The present embodiments relate generally to an electrical connector and, more particularly, to protecting pins in an electrical connector from incorrectly having injection potential applied.
An electrical connector is a device which allows circuits to be joined. When used in commercial airplanes, an electrical connector joins the circuitry in a controller to an aircraft wiring harness. Circuitry in the controller can include, for example, discrete inputs and outputs, microprocessor boards, analog interface boards, and communications devices. The aircraft wiring harness connects the circuitry in the controller to other devices such as linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) based sensors, resolver based sensors, status lights, and communication buses. Some of the circuitry in the controller interfaces with sensors that are exposed to the outside world, such as sensors on the wings.
Because some of the circuitry in the controller interfaces with devices exposed to the outside world, it is required that such controller circuitry be tested to ensure it is able to withstand a lightning strike. Therefore, pin injection testing is used to simulate a lightning strike by applying high potential only to those pins in the electrical connector coupled to circuitry which interfaces with devices that could experience a lightning strike. This pin injection testing verifies whether the controller can withstand the requisite high potential applied. However, an electrical connector has many pins within it which couple to various circuitry, and only some of those pins couple to circuitry which interfaces with devices exposed to the outside world. Thus, during pin injection testing only some of the pins in the electrical connector are to have the high potential applied to them, whereas other pins are not to have potential applied to them. If potential is applied to an incorrect pin during pin injection testing, the controller may be damaged, possibly resulting in tens of thousands of dollars in damage and the inability to use the controller in further testing.
When electrical connectors are shipped, a plate may be installed over each block of the electrical connector to prevent damage. Such a plate may also be installed to cover an entire block of pins in an electrical connector to prevent potential from being applied to an incorrect pin. Installing the plate prevents injection potential from being applied to an incorrect pin within that block; however, this type of plate also prevents pins which are to be tested from being accessible. Therefore, to test an identified pin within the block, the plate must be removed, once again exposing pins that are not to be tested. Furthermore, when the plate is removed, there is no way to distinguish pins which are to have potential applied from those that are not to have potential applied without manually counting the pins to identify the pin number. This introduces the possibility of human error if the pins are not counted correctly.
One embodiment includes a method of performing a pin injection test through a multipin electrical connector. Pins are identified which are not to have potential applied during the pin injection test. An electrical insulating sleeve is fitted around each identified pin to prevent potential from being applied to the identified pin. A pin injection test is performed at pins of the multipin electrical connector that are not fitted with one of the electrical insulating sleeves.
Another embodiment includes a method of identifying pins of a multipin electrical connector which are not to have potential applied during testing. Pins which are not to have potential applied are fitted with electrical insulating sleeves. A test is performed at pins which are not fitted with electrical insulating sleeves.
Generally, within a multipin electrical connector are numerous pins, some or all of which may be male and some or all of which may be female, and each of which may be coupled to different circuitry. Depending on the circuitry to which the pin is coupled, a high potential may need to be applied to the pin during testing to simulate a lightning strike. To distinguish those pins which are not to have potential applied, an electrical insulating sleeve is fitted around each of these pins.
As can be seen in both block 12 and block 14 of electrical connector 10, there can be a plurality of pins in a single block. In some circumstances, only certain pins are identified to have potential applied during pin injection testing, whereas other pins are not to have potential applied. For example, during pin injection testing only those pins which couple to circuitry which interfaces with a device exposed to the outside world are to have potential applied. However, when there is a multipin electrical connector where pins are numerous as in block 12 and block 14, it can be difficult to distinguish pins which are to have potential applied from those which are not. Although a pin number can be provided to help identify a pin which is to have potential applied, this requires manual counting of the pins to arrive at the identified pin, introducing the possibility of human error.
Pin 20 is a pin identified which is not to have potential applied. A pin can be identified to not have potential applied, for example, because the pin couples to circuitry which interfaces with a device that is not exposed to the outside world. Another reason a pin can be identified to not have potential applied to it is that the circuitry to which the pin is coupled could not survive the level of potential that is to be applied. Additionally, if potential is being applied as part of pin injection testing, there may be at least one circuit, and therefore pin, which is exempt from testing under the test specification because, for example, it has not been altered and was previously tested. Therefore, the pin to which such a circuit is coupled would be identified to not be tested.
Sleeve 30 can be made of any electrical insulating material which is sized to fit around pin 20. For example, sleeve 30 can be made of material including rubber, silicone or heat shrink sleeving. However, the electrical insulating material used for sleeve 30 must be capable of being easily removed from the pin without leaving residue that could affect the pin's ability to mate with a connecting pin when sleeve 30 is removed. Sleeve 30 in
Depending on the material of sleeve 30, it can then be secured onto pin 20. Sleeve 30 can be secured, for example, by use of a band clamp. Securing sleeve 30 around pin 20 with a band clamp obviates the need to apply adhesive material to pin 20, which may leave residue preventing pin 20 from mating with a connecting pin while in place within the electrical connector. However, sleeve 30 must be of a material thin enough to fit tightly onto pin 20 when secured such that pin 20 and sleeve 30 fit into the electrical connector.
Pins in electrical connector 10 that are fitted with sleeves (pins 20s and 22s) were fitted while in place within electrical connector 10. Sleeve 30 on each identified pin is heat shrink sleeving which was fitted on and around the pin while in place within electrical connector 10 by applying heat from a heat gun to shrink the heat shrink sleeving onto the contour of the pin. Heat from the heat gun was applied for approximately 1 to 2 minutes, or until the sleeve 30 was tightly shrunk onto the contour of the pin. Each sleeve 30 on an identified pin 20s, 22s in electrical connector 10 is fitted onto that portion of the pin that protrudes outward from its location within a block of electrical connector 10.
By fitting sleeves onto pins which are not to have potential applied, accidental application of potential to pins 20s, 22s is prevented. For example, it is clear when applying potential to pins in electrical connector 10 of
Electrical connector 10 of
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment(s), it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment(s) disclosed, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4245189 | Wahl | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4497533 | Genova | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4678250 | Romine | Jul 1987 | A |
| 5097213 | Hunting | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5098319 | McGaffigan | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5163856 | McGaffigan | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5203723 | Ritter | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5406031 | Mathieu | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5536183 | Brandolf | Jul 1996 | A |
| 6124716 | Kanamori | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6960102 | Styles | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 8574000 | Smith | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8851939 | Bazenas | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 20100092588 | Tabassi | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100323542 | Boucher | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110163471 | Lee | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20130115788 | Broughton | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130161093 | Broughton | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20150130486 | Kleindienst | May 2015 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Auderer, Conducted Impulse Injection Method (CIIM), Universidad Politecnica de Catalunya, 2006. |
| Keithley, Solutions for Production Testing of Connectors, Keithley: A Tektronix Company, No. 2208, Rev Mar. 25, 2014. |
| Auderer, Conducted Impulse Injection Method (CUM), Universidad Politecnica de Catalunya, 2006. |
| Walko, A Test Technique for Measuring Lightning-Induced Voltages on Aircraft Electrical Circuits, NASA, Feb. 1974. |
| Feudi et al., Fundamentals of DO-160F, Section 22: Lightning Induced Transient Susceptibility, In Compliance News, Jan. 2010. |
| Watanabe et al., LSI Immunity Test Method by Direct GND Pin Injection, NEC Corporation, 2003 IEEE. |
| Teseq, NSG 439 ESD Simulator, www.teseq.com/products/NSG-439.php, Aug 2013. (See Wayback Date). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150130486 A1 | May 2015 | US |