Electro-optic apparatus and process for multi-frequency variable refraction with minimized dispersion

BACKGROUND—FIELD OF INVENTION

This invention relates to electro-optic lenses, such as are used for variably bending light. Such lenses have broad applications including directing and switching light within fiber optics applications, focusing light as with optical lenses, and coherent imaging as with windows that are mounted in a building or on a vehicle, or a television or computer monitor screen. Specifically this invention couples electro-optic components (such as liquid crystals) in series such that a first liquid crystal comprising a first apex angle and a second liquid crystal comprising a second apex angle refract light of at least two frequencies simultaneously with minimal spectral dispersion. Moreover, said first and second liquid crystals so configured produce a first net refractive exiting beam angle with minimal dispersion when in a first state and a second net refractive exiting beam angle with minimal dispersion when in a second state. The invention enables switching between at least two net refractive states each with minimal spectral dispersion upon at least two exiting beam frequencies.

BACKGROUND—DESCRIPTION OF PRIOR ART

The optical properties of liquid crystals have been studied since at least 1888. Particularly since the late 1970's scientific investigation and applications of them has resulted in prolific, widely accepted and profoundly significant uses for their multi-state optical properties.

The dual refractive states associated with liquid crystals referred to as no and ne have been widely studied and applied to provide significant objects and advantages. U.S. Pat. No. 4,037,929 for example utilizes the no and ne states to operate a liquid crystal variable lens to provide a range of focal points. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 4,958,914 utilizes the no and ne refractive states to operate an array of liquid crystal variable prisms. U.S. Pat. No. 5,648,859 discloses liquid crystal variable prisms in series to achieve the object of fiber optic communications optical switching. It too relies upon the no and ne refractive states and the resulting range of refractive indices possible in one material.

The prior art contains a large body of information and applications which utilize the no and ne states of liquid crystals. But, it has not anticipated nor addressed the minimization of dispersion caused by different refractive indices for different frequencies of electromagnetic radiation passing through the variable liquid crystal. Particularly as it relates to the challenges posed by dispersion in multiple states (and concomitant multiple refractive indices for any given electromagnetic frequency).

It is well known that any given optical medium (including liquid crystals in the full range between the no and ne states) commonly has differing refractive indices for each frequency of electromagnetic radiation passing therethrough resulting in dispersion of exiting beams that had entered parallel to one another. For over a hundred years, in lens making, this resultant dispersion and symptomatic chromatic distortion have been addressed using crown an flint glasses with complementary spectral dispersion curves. This combination of glasses produces net refraction with minimal dispersion and chromatic distortion. Such glasses nearly always operate only in one state and have only one refractive index for each frequency at any given temperature. By contrast, the problem resolved in the present invention relates to a more complex medium that operates within at least two refractive states for each frequency of electromagnetic radiation.

The complexity of minimizing dispersion in multi-state refractive materials may not have been addressed heretofore because dispersion has not been an issue in the vast majority of applications. Nearly all applications to date have used single frequency electromagnetic radiation or very close frequencies whereby dispersion is not an issue. This is true in most laser and communications applications to date. Also, many of the applications to date are interfacing with photo cells that can retain the information in divergent rays just as efficiently as in parallel rays. Of course, as anyone who has tried to look at the world through a prism knows, the human eye can not efficiently use divergent rays. Such rays, when the eye is close to the dispersing optic, appear as blue and red shading on either side of an object, and as the eye moves away from the dispersing optical element, divergent rays from the same object quickly become an unintelligible blur at just a short distance away. Close-up is where the vast majority of liquid crystal multi-frequency multi-state refraction is utilized (such as with laptop computers). This is another reason why multi-frequency multi-state dispersion has not previously been addressed. The vast majority of applications heretofore involve close up use of exiting divergent rays by either the human eye such as with a laptop or the next in a series of optical components such as in fiber optic switching. Short distances keep dispersion from causing problems. For the previous reasons, multi-frequency multi-state dispersion has not been previously resolved. Solving this problem requires much effort in determining precise prism angles that are required for a minimum of eight refractive indices to cause beams to exit at precise trajectories. Computer software required to establish the precise refractive angles in multi-state materials and to match complementary refractive indices across multiple frequencies is disclosed herein. Also disclosed is software to operate the two materials.

The problem of minimizing the dispersion of at least two parallel beams of differing electromagnetic frequencies caused by liquid crystals operated between at least two states is addressed and resolved herein. It has been heretofore unrecognized that the refractive variability of liquid crystals could be used for additional significant applications if the associated dispersion is eliminated. The present invention retains the refractive variability of liquid crystals while simultaneously providing a reliable and cost effective means to minimize dispersion over an operating range of two materials each have a controllable range of refractive properties and between at least two frequencies of electromagnetic radiation.

SUMMARY

The preferred embodiment of the invention described herein incorporates a series of two variable electro-optic components such as liquid crystal prisms (referred to herein as a couplet) with at least two frequencies of electromagnetic radiation in beams entering parallel to one another and then passing therethrough. The first prism with a first apex angle operating between a first refractive state no and second refractive state ne and the second prism with a second apex angle operating between a first refractive state no and second refractive state ne. In said first state, the couplet producing a first net refracted angle in the beams with minimal dispersion and in said second state, the couplet producing a second net refracted angle in the beams with minimal dispersion. This novel construction has broad applications including directing and switching multi-frequency light within fiber optics applications, producing variable focal length multi-frequency light focus as with optical lenses, and coherent multi-frequency imaging as with windows that are mounted in a building or on a vehicle through which a user can view multiple views with minimal chromatic distortion, or a television or computer monitor screen.

OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES

Accordingly, several objects and advantages of my invention are apparent. The invention enables multiple frequencies of electromagnetic radiation traveling parallel to be accurately and reliably refracted and exit traveling parallel (within a controllable tolerance). Moreover, utilizing a first prism with a first apex angle operating in a range between a first refractive state no and second refractive state ne and the second prism with a second apex angle operating in a range between a first refractive state no and second refractive state Ne, enables the system to reliably refract multi-frequency beams in multiple directions with minimal dispersion.

Refracting multi-frequency beams with minimum dispersion has many advantages as have been historically made clear. Beams can travel greater distances between optical components or before entering the human eye. This is because the beams are not diverging after refraction as they would be under prior art systems not employing the present invention. Also the lack of beam divergence enables the use of smaller components since the multi-frequency beam stays closer together much longer.

Solving the more complex problem (as herein described) of creating a system for minimizing dispersion in a range between the no and ne states offers the advantage of variable focal length lenses with minimal chromatic distortion throughout the range of focal lengths. Electro-optic variable focal length lenses have been know in the prior art but they had heretofore not addressed the multi-frequency dispersion problem as solved herein.

Computer monitors and television screens employing minimized dispersion are to be used to variably refract images to users over much greater distances without chromatic distortion. Liquid crystal image direction devices heretofore disclosed did not adequately recognize or address the need to minimize dispersion when variably refracting views over distances. The present invention resolves this issue.

Windows in buildings and automobiles utilizing variable refraction with minimized dispersion will be used to change the viewing perspective for users while maintaining chromatic integrity. Heretofore the use of windows as a means to redirect views for the human eye through refraction while minimizing dispersion have been absent from the art. The present invention provides a reliable, light weight, compact means to redirect a user's view through a window and thereby complements the vast work (patent applications now pending referenced at the opening of this document) done in this area by the present inventor.

This novel construction has broad applications including directing and switching multi-frequency light within fiber optics applications, focusing multi-frequency light as with optical lenses, and coherent multi-frequency imaging as with windows that are mounted in a building or on a vehicle, or a television or computer monitor screen.

Many other areas including communications, entertainment, science, optics, telescopy, astronomy, automobile manufacturing, building architecture, and security will benefit from the present invention.

Further objects and advantages will become apparent from a consideration of the drawings and ensuing description.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following description of the invention and the related drawings portray a single cell of a electro-optic or liquid crystal couplet designed to produce a range of net refractive states each with minimal dispersion of at least two frequencies of electromagnetic radiation traveling therethrough. They also portray a lens with variable focal length and minimized dispersion. It will be understood, that the concept of the invention may be employed in any substantially light-transmissive component, broadly described as a prism or lens.

The description of the invention relates to and is best understood with relation to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG.

1

(

a

). Prior Art, U.S. Pat. No. 4,958,914 (Owechko et al., 1990), illustrates a simple schematic for varying the refractive index of a liquid crystal cell through varying a voltage applied thereto. FIG.

1

(

b

) of the same patent shows such cells in array.

FIG.

2

. Prior Art, U.S. Pat. No. 5,648,859 (Hirabayashi et al., 1997), illustrates a voltage variable liquid crystal array with variable refractivity and a second prism angle in series.

FIG.

3

. Prior Art, U.S. Pat. No. 5,648,859 (Hirabayashi et al., 1997), illustrates a voltage variable liquid crystal array in series with a second array with variable refractivity.

FIG.

4

. Prior Art, U.S. Pat. No. 5,648,859 (Hirabayashi et al., 1997), illustrates the deflection (refraction) angle curve possible using liquid crystals at each of three different prism angles when a range of voltages is applied to each.

FIG.

5

. illustrates the liquid crystal couplet of the present invention.

FIG. 6

a.

is a ray trace diagram illustrating the present invention in State 1 including variables utilized in a computer model to determine how to minimize dispersion as each of two electro-optic materials transition through a range of refractive states.

FIG. 6

b.

is a ray trace diagram illustrating the present invention in State 2 including variables utilized in a computer model to determine how to minimize dispersion as each of two electro-optic materials transition through a range of refractive states.

FIG.

7

. is a graphical user interface (GUI) for manually inputting data into a software application named Loslo II which is designed to minimize dispersion.

FIG.

8

. is a flowchart describing the process by which the net refractive angle of a couplet is varied while dispersion in minimized.

FIG.

9

. an example net refraction curve from State 1 through State 2 of the present invention.

FIG.

10

. Prior Art, U.S. Pat. No. 4,037,929 (Bricot et al., 1977), illustrates a voltage variable liquid crystal lens wherein the focal length is variable as a function of voltage.

FIG.

11

. illustrating a dispersion minimized variable focal length lens embodiment of the present invention.

FIG.

12

. is a cutaway view of the lens of

FIG. 11

with ray tracing included.

DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION OF THE FIRST PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

For nearly 30 years, in a multitude of embodiments, the prior art has disclosed changing a refractive index over a range between no and ne as a function of a variable voltage applied to a liquid crystal.

FIG. 1

a,

prior art, U.S. Pat. No. 4,958,914 (Owechko et al., 1990), illustrates a simple circuit schematic for varying the refractive index of an electro-optic material such as a liquid crystal cell with an apex angle of “A” through varying the intensity of an electric field applied thereto. An array of such cells is depicted in

FIG. 1

b

from the same patent. While this and other similar prior art has been used to variably refract light for 30 years, the problem of dispersion has neither been anticipated nor addressed. The complexity of minimizing dispersion in multi-state refractive materials may not have been addressed heretofore because dispersion has not been an issue in the vast majority of applications.

Many applications to date have used single frequency electromagnetic radiation or very close frequencies whereby dispersion is not an issue. This is true in most laser and telecommunications applications to date. Also, many of the applications to date are interfacing with photoelectric cells that can retain the information in divergent rays just as efficiently as in parallel rays. Of course, as anyone who has tried to look at the world through a prism knows, the human eye can not efficiently use divergent rays and such rays when the dispersing optic is close-up to the eye appear as blue and red shading on either side on an object. As the dispersing optic moves away from the eye, the dispersing rays quickly become an unintelligible blur to the human eye. Close-up is where the vast majority of liquid crystal multi-frequency multi-state refraction has been utilized heretofore. This is another reason why multi-frequency multi-state dispersion has not previously been addressed.

The vast majority of applications heretofore involve close up use by either the human eye such as with a laptop or the next in a series of optical components such as fiber optic switching. Short distances keep dispersion from causing problems. For the previous reasons, multi-frequency multi-state dispersion has not been addressed nor resolved in the prior art. Solving this problem requires much effort in determining precise prism angles that are required for a minimum of eight refractive indices to cause beams to exit at precise trajectories. Computer software required to determine the precise apex angles required and the precise matching of complementary refractive indices to achieve a desired net refractive index and minimize dispersion is disclosed herein.

For 30 years, prior art has used voltage variable prism arrays in series with other prisms or with other prism arrays to variably refract electromagnetic radiation.

FIG. 2

, and FIG.

3

. Prior Art, prior art, U.S. Pat. No. 5,648,859 (Hirabayashi et al., 1997), illustrates a voltage variable liquid crystal array with variable refractivity and a second prism angle. This arrangement is useful for fiber-optic switching because the distance between optical components is minimal, the refractive indices of frequencies involved are relatively close, and no human vision is required to interpret the signal. This prior art does not disclose a solution for resolving the complexity of minimizing dispersion of multi-frequency beams through at least two refractive states. Disclosed herein is a means to minimize dispersion in materials that retain a constant shape but produce a range of net refractive angles. My invention utilizes the refractive curves of two materials represented by a minimum of eight refractive indices to determine precise apex angles and then to achieve desired net refractive angles while simultaneously minimizing dispersion.

For decades, prior art has utilized the refraction curves of electro-optic materials to achieve variable refraction optical components. FIG.

4

. prior art, U.S. Pat. No. 5,648,859 (Hirabayashi et al., 1997), illustrates the deflection angle curve possible using liquid crystals at each of three different prism angles when a range of voltages is applied to each. No attempt has been made to minimize dispersion. This fact can easily be observed in analyzing the angles which have been selected for use. None of these angles including 20 degrees, 30 degrees, and 40 degrees can be used to reliably provide the maximum refraction range for this material with the minimum dispersion. The present invention can use two points on each of two such curves to establish the required prism angles at which dispersion can be minimized across the range of possible net refraction angles between no and ne.

The present invention utilizes the values from curves similar to

FIG. 4

, to calculate the voltages to be applied to a first material and to a second material such that the desired refraction angle is achieved with minimized spectral dispersion. The database/memory can incorporate refractive indices of one or more materials incorporating the effects of temperature, voltage, frequency, apex angle, incident angles, refraction angle desired and a controllable dispersion tolerance. Multiple incident angles can be considered simultaneously in the present invention such that the human eye can in effect look through a prism at a three dimensional world with minimized perceived chromatic distortion in multiple directions simultaneously.

FIG.

5

. illustrates the liquid crystal couplet of the present invention. A first rigid transparent member

31

includes a first surface onto which a first transparent electrode

33

is connected. Together, they form a first side which communicates with a first electro-optic material

35

such as a MBBA (Schiff base) liquid crystal (see Table I below for reference). Forming a second side which communicates with the first electro-optic material is a second transparent electrode

37

which is attached to a first side of a second rigid transparent member

39

. A first variable power source

49

is electrically in contact with the first and second transparent electrodes. A second side of the second rigid transparent member is sealable connected to a third transparent electrode

41

. Said electrode and rigid member communicating with a first side of a second electro-optic material

43

such as RO-TN-601 liquid crystal (see Table I below for reference). Communicating with a second side of the second electro-optic material is a fourth transparent electrode

45

. Said electrode connected to a third rigid transparent member. A second variable power source

51

is electrically in contact with the third and fourth transparent electrodes.

Each rigid member/electrode assembly are permanently positioned at precise angles relative to one another such that each of the electro-optic materials forms a precisely chosen prism apex angle. The first material forming a prism with a first apex angle and the second material forming a prism with a second apex angle. (Determination of the precise angular positioning of these members will be discussed in a later section.).

Some properties of the two electro-optic materials used to illustrate the present invention are presented in Table I. It should be noted that the software of the present invention can utilize any combination of one or more such electro-optic materials. Indeed under the present invention, the first and second electro-optic materials can be made of the same material.

TABLE I

Describes the refractive indices of two liquid crystals in their ηo and ηe

states at a common temperature and at two frequencies. These data are

described by Yeh, P., and Claire, G., Optics of Liquid Crystal Displays,

Wiley Interscience Publication, NY, 1999, Page 61.

Material

Temp.

Wavelength (nm)

ηe

ηo

MBBA (Schiff base)

25 Celsius

508.6

1.802

1.563

MBBA (Schiff base)

25 Celsius

467.8

1.837

1.575

RO-TN-601

25 Celsius

508.6

1.7041

1.5098

RO-TN-601

25 Celsius

467.8

1.718

1.515

A first frequency incident beam

53

at a first frequency is caused to enter the assembly. It is refracted by both

35

and

43

. The refraction of the first material causes dispersion and the refraction of the second material undoes the dispersion. When a first voltage is applied at

49

and a first voltage is applied at

51

,

35

is in a first refractive state and

43

is in a first refractive state, the electromagnetic energy of

53

exits the system on a new trajectory of first beam

57

. When a second voltage is applied at

49

and a second voltage is applied at

51

,

35

is in a second refractive state and

43

is in a second refractive state, the electromagnetic energy of

53

exits the system on a second new trajectory of first beam

59

. A second frequency incident beam

55

at a second frequency is caused to enter the assembly. It is refracted by both

35

and

43

. The refraction of the first material causes dispersion and the refraction of the second material undoes the dispersion. When a first voltage is applied at

49

and a first voltage is applied at

51

,

35

is in a first refractive state and

43

is in a first refractive state, the electromagnetic energy of

55

exits the system on a new trajectory of second beam

61

. When a second voltage is applied at

49

and a second voltage is applied at

51

,

35

is in a second refractive state and

43

is in a second refractive state, the electromagnetic energy of

55

exits the system on a second new trajectory of second beam

63

. It is very important to note that if

53

is parallel to

55

, then

57

is parallel (within a controllable tolerance) to

61

, and that

59

is parallel (within a controllable tolerance) to

63

.

In Nematic crystals, the process of rubbing to achieve a first state of alignment with a first refractive index and of applying voltage to achieve additional alignments with additional corresponding refractive indices is well known in the prior art and is not discussed in detail herein to avoid redundancy. The advantages of polarizing light versus not polarizing light when working with nematic crystals too is well known and is likewise not discussed herein.

FIG. 6

a.

is a ray trace diagram illustrating the present invention in a first net refractive state including variables utilized in the LosloII computer software to determine how to minimize dispersion in a first set of refractive states and the corresponding refractive effects. The symbols generally correspond to the computer software which is employed and disclosed herein. Depicted is a couplet of complementary prism surfaces designed to achieve angular refraction without significant spectral dispersion.

Inc—is the incident angle at which a multi-frequency ray meets a first refractive material. In practice, the system can use one or more incident angles simultaneously to determine voltage required.

Mat

1

—is air for the purpose of discussion its refractive index is assumed to be 1.

Mat

2

—is a first transparent electro-optic material with a refractive index through which light passes. It can transition through multiple refractive indices as a function of applied voltage.

VM

1

—is the variable voltage supply applied to Mat

1

to vary refractive indices.

Mat

3

—is a second transparent electro-optic material with a refractive index through which light passes. It can transition through multiple refractive indices as a function of applied voltage.

VM

2

—is the variable voltage supply applied to Mat

2

to vary refractive indices.

Ref

1

L—is the refracted trajectory in radians of the first wavelength caused by Mat

2

when incident angle is Inc.

Ref

1

H—is the refracted trajectory in radians of the second wavelength caused by Mat

2

when incident angle is Inc

Ref

2

L—is the refracted trajectory in radians of the first wavelength caused by Mat

3

when prism angle apex is Off

2

.

Ref

2

H—is the refracted trajectory in radians of the second wavelength caused by Mat

3

when prism angle apex is Off

2

.

Ref

3

L—is the refracted trajectory in radians of the first wavelength upon exiting Mat

3

when prism angle apex is Off

3

. The relative trajectory (Rel in the software) when comparing

Ref

3

L to Ref

3

H is to approach zero. When Rel equals zero, Ref

3

L and Ref

3

H are parallel.

Ref

3

H—is the refracted trajectory in radians of the second wavelength upon exiting Mat

3

when prism angle apex is Off

3

. The relative trajectory (Rel in the software) when comparing

Ref

3

L to Ref

3

H is to approach zero. When Rel equals zero, Ref

3

L and Ref

3

H are parallel.

Off

2

—is the prism angle apex formed by Mat

2

, Off

2

is a fixed angle that has been engineered by the computer software disclosed herein to optimally maximize refraction for a range of states and net refractive results while minimizing dispersion when operated in collaboration with Off

3

by the computer software herein.

Off

3

—is the prism angle apex formed by Mat

3

, Off

3

is a fixed angle that has been engineered by the computer software disclosed herein to optimally maximize refraction for a range of states and net refractive results while minimizing dispersion when operated in collaboration with Off

2

by the computer software herein.

State1—shows the net relative refracted trajectories of the above set of angles and materials in the first state.

FIG. 6

b.

is a ray trace diagram illustrating the present invention in a second net refractive state including variables utilized in a computer model to determine how to minimize dispersion in a second set of refractive states and the corresponding refractive effects. The figure is identical to

FIG. 6

a

except that the refractive values of Mat

2

and Mat

3

are assumed to be different such that the resultant refraction is different but the exiting rays are still parallel within a controllable tolerance.

State2—shows the net relative refracted trajectories of the above set of angles and materials when Mat

2

and Mat

3

are each respectively electronically switched a second state.

FIG.

7

. is the graphical user interface (GUI) that enables manual user input into the LosloII software incorporated herein. (All angles are in Radians.) Up to three incident angles at which multi-frequency rays meet a first refractive material can be input. The current setting indicates that all rays are incident from one direction (zero) which is perpendicular to Mat

2

. The Material

2

offset is used to input Off

2

manually. Note that the current setting is a range between 0.01 and 0.99 with increments of 0.001. In this mode, the software will check for minimum dispersion across a range of Off

2

's. Similarly Material

3

Offset can be set at 1 angle or a range of angles. In the current setting, it will check dispersion across a range of Of angles from −0.99 through −0.01 with 0.001 increments. The n material

2

State 1 and State 2 represents the refractive indices of MBBA (Schiff base) at the frequencies listed in Table I above. The n Material

3

State 1 and State 2 represents the refractive indices of RO-TN601 at the frequencies listed in Table I above. The Relative Tolerance enables the user to choose what level of dispersion between the two frequencies is acceptable. Using a higher Relative Tolerance, enables greater refraction angles but also produces greater associated dispersion. At the current setting, only angles that will produce a dispersion angle between the low and high frequencies of 0.00031 radians or less will be reported. The Loslo II software included herewith will report a series of Off

2

and Off

3

angles that satisfy the specifications that were manually input. Knowing the Off

2

and Off

3

angles which in combination are optimal for a material enables the user to design a couplet cell that can produce a maximum refraction range with minimal dispersion across the range. Once the system is built with these fixed Off

2

and Off

3

angles, their fixed values will be input into the LosloII software which can then optimally operate the couplet across the possible refractive range always with minimized dispersion. This is done by using by connecting LosloII to other components as described in FIG.

8

.

Any electro-optic material can be used with the present invention. Table II represents a tiny fraction that can be investigated using the manual LosloII GuI and the descriptions described herein and operated using the components in FIG.

8

.

TABLE II is an index of refraction for some known electro-optic materials

at specified wavelengths, temperatures and for ηo and ηe states. These

data are described by Yeh, P., and Claire, G., Optics of Liquid Crystal

Displays, Wiley Interscience Publication, NY, 1999, Page 61.

Wavelength

Material

Temp.

(nm)

ηe

ηo

MBBA (Schiff base)

25 Celsius

467.8

1.837

1.575

MBBA (Schiff base)

25 Celsius

480

1.825

1.57

MBBA (Schiff base)

25 Celsius

508.6

1.802

1.563

MBBA (Schiff base)

25 Celsius

589

1.764

1.549

MBBA (Schiff base)

25 Celsius

643.8

1.749

1.544

RO-TN-601

25 Celsius

467.8

1.74

1.5098

RO-TN-601

25 Celsius

643.848

1.74

1.5098

RO-TN-601

25 Celsius

643.8508.6

1.74

1.5098

RO-TN-601

25 Celsius

488,546

1.718

1.515

K15 (5CB)(BDH, Ltd.)

25

509

1.7411

1.5443

K15 (5CB)(BDH, Ltd.)

25

577

1.7201

1.5353

K15 (5CB)(BDH, Ltd.)

25

644

1.7072

1.5292

K15 (5CB)(BDH, Ltd.)

30

436

1.7648

1.5624

K15 (5CB)(BDH, Ltd.)

30

509

1.725

1.5481

K15 (5CB)(BDH, Ltd.)

30

577

1.7044

1.539

K15 (5CB)(BDH, Ltd.)

30

644

1.6926

1.5323

E5 (BDH, Ltd)

20

436

1.8038

1.5447

E5 (BDH, Ltd)

20

509

1.7584

1.5303

E5 (BDH, Ltd)

20

577

1.736

1.5228

E5 (BDH, Ltd)

20

644

1.7222

1.5169

E5 (BDH, Ltd)

30

436

1.7856

1.5455

E5 (BDH, Ltd)

30

509

1.7417

1.5318

E5 (BDH, Ltd)

30

577

1.7208

1.5232

E5 (BDH, Ltd)

30

644

1.7071

1.5172

E7 (BDH, Ltd.)

20

436

1.8208

1.544

E7 (BDH, Ltd.)

20

509

1.7737

1.5311

E7 (BDH, Ltd.)

20

577

1.75

1.5231

E7 (BDH, Ltd.)

20

644

1.7354

1.5175

TABLE III

LOSLO II software code written in C+ + calculates the relative trajectories of two

frequencies of electromagnetic radiation parallel when incident such that exiting dispersion

can be minimized.

//--------------------------------------------------------------------------

#ifndef ThreadH

#define ThreadH

//--------------------------------------------------------------------------

#include <Classes.hpp>

//--------------------------------------------------------------------------

class TMain : public TThread

{

private:

protected:

void_fastcall Execute();

void_fastcall Progress(void);

void_fastcall OnTerminate();

public:

_fastcall TMain(bool CreateSuspended);

};

//--------------------------------------------------------------------------

#endif//--------------------------------------------------------------------------

#ifndef ImputH

#define ImputH

//--------------------------------------------------------------------------

#include <Classes.hpp>

#include <Controls.hpp>

#include <StdCtrls.hpp>

#include <Forms.hpp>

#include <Buttons.hpp>

#include <Mask.hpp>

#include <Dialogs.hpp>

#include “cspin.h”

//--------------------------------------------------------------------------

class TInputForm : public TForm

{

_published: //IDE-managed Components

TLabel *Label1;

TLabel *Label2;

TLabel *Label3;

TLabel *Label5;

TLabel *Label6;

TLabel *Label7;

TLabel *Label8;

TLabel *Label9;

TLabel *Label10;

TLabel *Label11;

TLabel *Label12;

TLabel *Label19;

TMaskEdit *TInc2;

TMaskEdit *TInc3;

TMaskEdit *TOff2B;

TMaskEdit *TOff2E,

TMaskEdit *TOff2I;

TMaskEdit *TOff3B;

TMaskEdit *TOff3E;

TMaskEdit *TOff3I;

TMaskEdit *TTol1;

TBitBtn *Done;

TMaskEdit *TInc1;

TBitBtn *Save;

TBitBtn *Reset;

TCheckBox *Inc1N;

TCheckBox *Off3EN;

TCheckBox *Off3BN;

TCheckBox *Inc2N;

TCheckBox *Inc3N;

TLabel *Label4;

TMaskEdit *TTol2;

TMaskEdit *TTol3;

TLabel *Label20;

TLabel *Label21;

TLabel *Label22;

TLabel *Label23;

TCSpinEdit *NumResults;

TGroupBox *GroupBox1;

TLabel *Label13;

TLabel *Label14;

TMaskEdit *TMat2LS1;

TMaskEdit *TMat2HS1;

TLabel *Label15;

TMaskEdit *TMat3B;

TMaskEdit *TMat3E;

TGroupBox *GroupBox2;

TLabel *Label24;

TLabel *Label32;

TLabel *Label25;

TLabel *Label26;

TLabel *Label27;

TMaskEdit *TMat2LS2;

TMaskEdit *TMat2HS2;

TMaskEdit *TMat3HS2;

TMaskEdit *TMat3LS2;

TLabel *Label28;

TLabel *Label29;

TLabel *Label16;

TLabel *Label17;

void_fastcall DoneClick(TObject *Sender);

void_fastcall SaveClick(TObject *Sender);

void_fastcall ResetClick(TObject *Sender);

private: // User declarations

TStrings *Params;

public:

_fastcall TInputForm(TComponent* Owner);

virtual_fastcall˜TInputForm(void);

};

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

extern PACKAGE TInputForm *InputForm;

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

#endif//--------------------------------------------------------------------------

#ifndef OutputTH

#define OutputTH

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

#include <Classes.hpp>

#include <Controls.hpp>

#include <StdCtrls.hpp>

#include <Forms.hpp>

#include <ComCtrls.hpp>

#include <Dialogs.hpp>

#include <Menus.hpp>

#include <Buttons.hpp>

#include “LED.h”

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

class TMainForm: public TForm

_published: // IDE-managed Components

TLabel *Label1;

TLabel *Label2;

TLabel *Label3;

TLabel *Label6;

TLabel *Label7;

TLabel *Label8;

TStatusBar *StatusBar1;

TMainMenu *MainMenu;

TMenuItem *File1;

TMenuItem *Open1;

TMenuItem * Save;

TMenuItem *N2;

TMenuItem *Print1;

TMenuItem *N1;

TMenuItem *Exit1;

TOpenDialog *OpenDialog;

TSaveDialog *SaveDialog;

TMenuItem *Parameters1;

TMenuItem *Set1;

TBitBtn *Start;

TMenuItem *SaveAs;

TLabel *Label12;

TMenuItem *Clear1;

TListBox *List;

TLabel *Label4;

TLabel *Label5;

TProgressBar *ProgressBar;

void_fastcall Open1Click(TObject *Sender);

void_fastcall SaveClick(TObject *Sender);

void_fastcall Exit1Click(TObject *Sender);

void_fastcall Set1Click(TObject *Sender);

void_fastcall SaveAsClick(TObject *Sender);

void_fastcall StartClick(TObject *Sender);

void_fastcall Clear1Click(TObject *Sender);

void_fastcall StartStop(void);

void_fastcall Print1Click(TObject *Sender);

private:

// User declarations

public:

// User declarations

_fastcall TMainForm(TComponent* Owner);

virtual_fastcall˜TMainForm(void);

double Results[999];

;

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

extern PACKAGE TMainForm *MainForm;

//--------------------------------------------------------------------------

#endif#include <vcl.h>

#pragma hdrstop

USERES(“Loslo.res”);

USEFORM(“OutputT.cpp”, MainForm);

USEFORM(“Imput.cpp”, InputForm);

USEUNIT(“Convert.cpp”);

USEUNIT(“Thread.cpp”);

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

WINAPI WinMain(HINSTANCE, HINSTANCE, LPSTR, int)

{

try

{

Application->Initialize();

Application->Title = “Loslo II”;

Application->CreateForm(_classid(TMainForm), &MainForm);

Application->CreateForm(_classid(TInputForm), &InputForm);

Application->Run();

}

catch (Exception &exception)

{

Application->ShowException(&exception);

}

return ();

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

#include <vcl.h>

#include <Printers.hpp>

#pragma hdrstop

#include “Convert.h”

#include “OutputT.h”

#include “Imput.h”

#include “Thread.h”

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

#pragma package(smart_init)

//#pragma link “CustomRichEdit1”

#pragma link “LED”

#pragma resource “*.dfm”

TMainForm *MainForm;

TMain *Equate;

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

_fastcall TMainForm::TMainForm(TComponent* Owner)

:TForm(Owner)

{

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

_fastcall TMainForm::˜TMainForm(void)

{

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

void_fastcall TMainForm::Open1Click(TObject *Sender)

{

OpenDialog->FileName =“”;

if(OpenDialog->Execute())

{

if(List->Items->Count >0)

List->Items->LoadFromFile(OpenDialog->FileName);

SaveDialog->FileName = OpenDialog->FileName;

}

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

void_fastcall TMainForm::SaveClick(TObject *Sender)

{

if(SaveDialog->FileName !=“”)

{

List->Items->SaveToFile(SaveDialog->FileName);

}

else SaveAsClick(Sender);

}

//--------------------------------------------------------------------------

void_fastcall TMainForm::Exit1Click(TObject *Sender)

{

Close();

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

void_fastcall TMainForm::Set1Click(TObject *Sender)

{

InputForm->ShowModal();

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

void_fastcall TMainForm::SaveAsClick(TObject *Sender)

{

SaveDialog->Title=“Save As”;

if (SaveDialog->Execute())

{

List->Items->SaveToFile(SaveDialog->FileName);

}

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

void_fastcall TMainForm::StartClick(TObject *Sender)

{

if(Start->Caption = = “Next”)

{

Start->Caption = “Stop”;

List->Clear();

Equate->Resume();

}

else

{

if(Start->Caption = = “Start”)

{

List->Clear();

Start->Caption=“Stop”;

Equate = new TMain(false);

}

else

{

StartStop();

Start->Enabled=false;

}

}

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

void_fastcall TMainForm::Clear1Click(TObject *Sender)

{

List->Clear();

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

void_fastcall TMainForm::StartStop()

{

if(Start->Caption = = “Start”) Start->Caption = “Stop”;

else Start->Caption = “Start”;

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

void_fastcall TMainForm::Print1Click(TObject *Sender)

{

MainForm->ActiveControl = List;

Print();

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

#include <vcl.h>

#pragma hdrstop

#include “Imput.h”

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

#pragma package(smart_init)

#pragma link “cspin”

#pragma resource “*.dfm”

TInputForm *InputForm;

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

_fastcall TInputForm::TInputForm(TComponent* Owner)

:TForm(Owner)

{

Params = new TStringList;

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

_fastcall TInputForm::˜TInputForm(void)

{

delete Params;

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

void_fastcall TInputForm::DoneClick(TObject *Sender)

{

InputForm->Close();

}

void_fastcall TInputForm::SaveClick(TObject *Sender)

{

// Params->Add(

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

void_fastcall TInputForm::ResetClick(TObject *Sender)

{

// Peram->Lines->LoadFromFile(“Loslo.ini”);

// Peram->Lines->Insert(Peram->Lines,TInc1->Text);

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------//-------------------------------------------

--------------------------------

#include <vcl.h>

#include <math.h>

#pragma hdrstop

#include “Thread.h”

#include “Convert.h”

#include “OutputT.h”

#include “Imput.h”

#pragma package(smart_init)

double convert(AnsiString);

int p;

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

void_fastcall TMain::Progress()

{

MainForm->ProgressBar->Position = p;

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

_fastcall TMain::TMain(bool CreateSuspended): TThread(CreateSuspended)

{

Priority = tpNormal;

FreeOnTerminate = true;

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

void_fastcall TMain::Execute()

{

double Inc1 = convert(InputForm->TInc1->Text);

if(InputForm->Inc1N->Checked = = true) Incl = Inc1 * −1;

double Inc2 = convert(InputForm->TInc2->Text);

if (InputForm->Inc2N->Checked = = true) Inc2 = Inc2 * −1;

double Inc3 = convert(InputForm->TInc3 ->Text);

if (InputForm->Inc3N->Checked = = true) Inc3 = Inc3 * −1;

double Mat2L = convert(InputForm->TMat2LS1->Text);

double Mat2H = convert(InputForm->TMat2HS1->Text);

double Off2B = convert(InputForm->TOff2B->Text);

double Off2 E = convert(InputForm->TOff2E->Text);

double Off2I = convert(InputForm->TOff2I->Text);

double Off3B = convert(InputForm->TOff3B->Text);

if(InputForm->Off3BN->Checked = = true) Off3B = Off3B * −1;

double Off3E = convert(InputForm->TOff3E->Text);

if(InputForm->Off3EN->Checked = = true) Off3E = Off3E * −1;

double Off3I = convert(InputForm->TOff3I->Text);

double Mat3B = convert(InputForm->TMat3B->Text);

double Mat3E = convert(InputForm->TMat3E->Text);

// double Mat3I = convert(InputForm->TMat3I->Text);

double Tol1 = convert(InputForm->TTol1->Text);

double Tol2 = convert(InputForm->TTol2->Text);

double Tol3 = convert(InputForm->TTol3->Text);

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

double Mat3L = Mat3B;

double Mat3H = Mat3B;

double Off2 = Off2B;

double Off3 = Off3B;

double Ref1L = 0;

double Ref1H = 0;

double Ref2L = 0;

double Ref2H = 0;

double Ref3L = 0;

double Ref3H = 0;

double x = 0;

double loop;

if(Off2E!=Off2B&&Off2I!=0)loop = 1/((Off2E-Off2B)/Off2I)*100;

double count = 0;

double Range;

Range = .2;

// Synchronize(Progress);

Mat3H = Mat3B;

Mat3L = Mat3E;

AnsiString Mat3La = AnsiString(Mat3L);

AnsiString Mat3Ha = Ansistring(Mat3H);

double Mat2LS2 = convert(InputForm->TMat2LS2->Text);

double Mat2HS2 = convert(InputForm->TMat2HS2->Text);

double Mat3LS2 = convert(InputForm->TMat3LS2->Text);

double Mat3HS2 = convert(InputForm->TMat3HS2->Text);

AnsiString Mat2LaS2 = AnsiString(Mat2LS2);

Ansistring Mat2HaS2 = AnsiString(Mat2HS2);

AnsiString Mat3LaS2 = AnsiString(Mat3LS2);

AnsiString Mat3HaS2 = AnsiString(Mat3HS2);

double Ref1LS2 = 0;

double Ref1HS2 = 0;

double Ref2LS2 = 0;

double Ref2HS2 = 0;

double Ref3LS2 = 0;

double Ref3HS2 = 0;

while (Off2 <= Off2E)

{

while(Off3 <= Off3E)

{

if(MainForm->Start->Enabled)

{

Ref3L = 0;

Ref3H = 0;

Ref1L = asin(sin(Inc1)/Mat2L);

Ref1H = asin(sin(Incl)/Mat2H);

Ref2L = asin(Mat2L *sin(Ref1L-Off2)/Mat3L);

Ref2H = asin(Mat2H *sin(Ref1H-Off2)/Mat3H);

x = Mat3L *sin(Ref2L-Off3);

if(fabs(x) < 1) Ref3L = asin(x)+Off2+Off3;

x = Mat3H * sin(Ref2H-Off3);

if(fabs(x) < 1) Ref3H = asin(x)+Off2+Off3;

double Rel1 = Ref3L - Ref3H;

if(fabs(Rel1) < Toll && (Ref3L != 0 && Ref3H != 0))

{

if(MainForm->List->Items->Count>20000)

{

MainForm->Start->Caption = “Next”,

Suspend();

}

Ref3LS2 = 0;

Ref3HS2 = 0;

Ref1LS2 = asin(sin(Inc1)/Mat2LS2);

Ref1HS2 = asin(sin(Inc1)/Mat2HS2);

Ref2LS2 = asin(Mat2LS2 * sin(Ref1LS2-Off2)/Mat3LS2);

Ref2HS2 = asin(Mat2HS2 * sin(Ref1HS2-Off2)/Mat3HS2);

x = Mat3LS2 * sin(Ref2LS2-Off3);

if(fabs(x) < 1) Ref3LS2 = asin(x)+Off2+Off3;

x = Mat3HS2 * sin(Ref2HS2-Off3);

if(fabs(x) < 1) Ref3HS2 = asin(x)+Off2+Off3;

double Rel1S2 = Ref3LS2 - Ref3HS2;

if(fabs(Rel1S2) < Tol1 && (Ref3LS2 != 0 && Ref3HS2 != 0))

{

AnsiString Inc1a = Inc1;

AnsiString Off2a = Off2;

AnsiString Off3a = Off3;

AnsiString Ref3L1 = AnsiString(Ref3L);

AnsiString Ref3H1 = AnsiString(Ref3H);

AnsiString Rel1a = AnsiString(Rel1);

AnsiString Ref3L1S2 = AnsiString(Ref3LS2);

AnsiString Ref3H1S2 = AnsiString(Ref3HS2);

AnsiString Rel1aS2 = AnsiString(Rel1S2);

if(Inc2 = = Inc1)

{

MainForm->List->Items->Add(“1 ” + Inc1a + “ ” + Off2a + “ ” + Off3a + “ ” + Mat3La

+ “ ” + Mat3Ha + “ ” + Ref3L1 + “ ” + Ref3H1 + “ ” + Rel1);

MainForm->List->Items->Add(“2 ” + Inc1a + “ ” + Off2a + “ ” +“ ” + Off3a + “ ” +

Mat3LaS2 + “ ” + Mat3HaS2 + “ ” + Ref3L1S2 + “ ” + Ref3H1S2 + “ ” + Rel1S2);

}

else

{

Ref3L=0;

Ref3H=0;

Ref1L = asin(sin(Inc2)/Mat2L);

Ref1H = asin(sin(Inc2)/Mat2H);

Ref2L = asin(Mat2L * sin(Ref1L-Off2)/Mat3L);

Ref2H = asin(Mat2H * sin(Ref1H-Off2)/Mat3H);

x = Mat3L * sin(Ref2L-Off3);

if(fabs(x) < 1) Ref3L = asin(x)+Off2+Off3;

x = Mat3H * sin(Ref2H-Off3);

if(fabs(x) < 1) Ref3H = asin(x)+Off2+Off3;

double Rel2 = Ref3L - Ref3H;

if(fabs(Rel2) < Tol2 && (Ref3L != 0 && Ref3H != 0))

{

Ref3LS2=0;

Ref3HS2=0;

Ref1LS2 = asin(sin(Inc3)/Mat2LS2);

Ref1HS2 = asin(sin(Inc3)/Mat2HS2);

Ref2LS2 = asin(Mat2LS2 * sin(Ref1LS2-Off2)/Mat3LS2);

Ref2HS2 = asin(Mat2HS2 * sin(Ref1HS2-Off2)/Mat3HS2);

x = Mat3LS2 * sin(Ref2LS2-Off3);

if(fabs(x) < 1) Ref3LS2 = asin(x)+Off2+Off3;

x = Mat3HS2 * sin(Ref2HS2-Off3);

if(fabs(x) < 1) Ref3HS2 = asin(x)+Off2+Off3;

double Rel2S2 = (Ref3LS2 - Ref3HS2);

if(fabs(Rel2S2) < Tol3 && (Ref3LS2 != 0 && Ref3HS2 != 0))

{

AnsiString Inc2a = Inc2;

AnsiString Ref3L2 = AnsiString(Ref3L);

AnsiString Ref3H2 = AnsiString(Ref3H);

AnsiString Rel2a = AnsiString(Rel2);

AnsiString Ref3L2S2 = AnsiString(Ref3LS2);

AnsiString Ref3H2S2 = AnsiString(Ref3HS2);

AnsiString Rel2aS2 = AnsiString(Rel2S2);

if(Inc3 = = Inc2)

{

MainForm->List->Items->Add(“1 ” + Incla + “ ” + Off2a + “ ” + Off3a + “ ” +

Mat3La + “ ” + Mat3Ha + “ ” + Ref3L1 + “ ” + Ref3H1 + “ ” + Rel1);

MainForm->List->Items->Add (“1 ” + Inc2a + “ ” + Off2a + “ ” + Off3a + “ ” +

Mat3La + “ ” + Mat3Ha + “ ” + Ref3L2 + “ ” + Ref3H2 + “ ” + Rel2);

MainForm->List->Items->Add(“2 ” + Incla + “ ” + Off2a + “ ” + Off3a + “ ” +

Mat3LaS2 + “ ” + Mat3HaS2 + “ ” + Ref3L1S2 + “ ” + Ref3H1S2 + “ ” + Rel1S2);

MainForm->List->Items->Add (“2 ” + Inc2a + “ ” + Off2a + “ ” + Off3a + “ ” +

Mat3LaS2 + “ ” + Mat3HaS2 + “ ” + Ref3L2S2 + “ ” + Ref3H2S2 + “ ” + Rel2S2);

}

else

{

Ref3L=0;

Ref3H=0;

Ref1L = asin(sin(Inc3)/Mat2L);

Ref1H = asin(sin(Inc3)/Mat2H);

Ref2L = asin(Mat2L * sin(Ref1L-Off2)/Mat3L);

Ref2H = asin(Mat2H * sin(Ref1H-Off2)/Mat3H);

x = Mat3L * sin(Ref2L-Off3);

if(fabs(x) < 1) Ref3L = asin(x)+Off2+Off3;

x = Mat3H * sin(Ref2H-Off3);

if(fabs(x) < 1) Ref3H = asin(x)+Off2+Off3;

double Rel3 = (Ref3L - Ref3H);

if(fabs(Rel3) < Tol3 && (Ref3L != 0 && Ref3H != 0))

{

Ref3LS2=0;

Ref3HS2=0;

Ref1LS2 = asin(sin(Inc3)/Mat2LS2);

Ref1HS2 = asin(sin(Inc3)/Mat2HS2);

Ref2LS2 = asin(Mat2LS2 * sin(Ref1LS2-Off2)/Mat3LS2);

Ref2HS2 = asin(Mat2HS2 * sin(Ref1HS2-Off2)/Mat3HS2);

x = Mat3LS2 * sin(Ref2LS2-Off3);

if(fabs(x) < 1) Ref3LS2 = asin(x)+Off2+Off3;

x = Mat3HS2 * sin(Ref2HS2-Off3);

if(fabs(x) < 1) Ref3HS2 = asin(x)+Off2+Off3;

double Rel3S2 = (Ref3LS2 - Ref3HS2);

if(fabs(Rel3S2) < Tol3 && (Ref3LS2 != 0 && Ref3HS2 != 0))

{

AnsiString Inc3a = Inc3;

AnsiString Ref3L3 = AnsiString(Ref3L);

AnsiString Ref3H3 = AnsiString(Ref3H);

AnsiString Rel3a = AnsiString(Rel3);

AnsiString Ref3L3S2 = AnsiString(Ref3LS2);

AnsiString Ref3H3S2 = AnsiString(Ref3HS2);

AnsiString Rel3aS2 = AnsiString(Rel3S2);

MainForm->List->Items->Add(“1 ” + Inc1a + “ ” + Off2a + “ ” + Off3a + “ ” +

Mat3La + “ ” + Mat3Ha + “ ” + Ref3L1 + “ ” + Ref3H1 + “ ” + Rel1);

MainForm->List->Items->Add (“1 ” + Inc2a + “ ” + Off2a + “ ” + Off3a + “ ” +

Mat3La + “ ” + Mat3Ha + “ ” + Ref3L2 + “ ” + Ref3H2 + “ ” + Rel2);

MainForm->List->Items->Add (“1 ” + Inc3a + “ ” + Off2a + “ ” + Off3a + “ ” +

Mat3La + “ ” + Mat3Ha + “ ” + Ref3L3 + “ ” + Ref3H3 + “ ” + Rel3);

MainForm->List->Items->Add(“2 ” + Incla + “ ” + Off2a + “ ” + Off3a + “ ” +

Mat3LaS2 + “ ” + Mat3HaS2 + “ ” + Ref3L1S2 + “ ” + Ref3H1S2 + “ ” + Rel1S2);

MainForm->List->Items->Add (“2 ” + Inc2a + “ ” + Off2a + “ ” + Off3a + “ ” +

Mat3LaS2 + “ ” + Mat3HaS2 + “ ” + Ref3L2S2 + “ ” + Ref3H2S2 + “ ” + Rel2S2);

MainForm->List->Items->Add (“2 ” + Inc3a + “ ” + Off2a + “ ” + Off3a + “ ” +

Mat3LaS2 + “ ” + Mat3HaS2 + “ ” + Ref3L3S2 + “ ” + Ref3H3S2 + “ ” + Rel3S2);

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

else

{

Mat3L = 2;

Mat3H = 2;

Off2 = 2;

Off3 = 2;

Off2B = 2;

Off3B = 2;

MainForm->Start->Enabled = true;

}

Off3 =0 Off3 + Off3I;

}

Off2 = Off2 + Off2I;

Off3 = Off3B;

count = count + loop;

p = int(count);

Synchronize(Progress);

}

p = 0;

Synchronize(Progress);

if(MainForm->Start->Caption = = “Stop”) MainForm->Start->Caption = “Start”;

MainForm->Start->Enabled=true;

}

//-------------------------------------------------------------------------

FIG. 8

is a flowchart that describes the automatic operation of the present invention. The process is initiated by a net refraction angle request NRAR

81

. A user or automatic process requests a desired net angle of refraction. This information is received by a CPU

83

which utilizes logic to select the voltage to generate the refractive states in Mat

2

and Mat

3

at which the Ref

3

angles equal the NRAR with minimal dispersion. These mathematical values are generated using LosloII logic and a memory

85

. To achieve this, the CPU calls to the memory

85

from which to select values. The memory contains arrays of information similar to that in Table I except over a much larger range of operation. The refractive indices from 1 or more materials over a range of many temperatures, voltages, incident angles, and frequencies may be contained in the memory. The CPU also receives temperature information

87

from an optical window

91

to ensure that it selects refractive indices corresponding to the current operating temperature. Once the CPU has selected the proper voltages to be applied to each material, it sends corresponding signals to voltage regulators

91

which in turn apply the correct voltage to the optical window. In the case of the couplet described in

FIG. 5

, each circuit,

49

and

51

, would receive a respective selected voltage. In the case of a cell couplets in array, a series of many differing voltages may be applied to each couplet half of each array cell. This is the case in

FIG. 12

where a variable focal length is achieved and a focal point is approximated by applying a number of differing voltages to each concentric couplet half. The refraction required varies moving from the center outward, a multitude of voltages provides this gradient. In this way, the desired refraction is achieved with minimum dispersion. The optical window can continually be adjusted across its range of refractive indices always with minimized dispersion. An additional fie tuning may be provided in the form of optical feedback

93

. Optical feedback checks the actual refraction and dispersion achieved and reports back to the CPU. The CPU compares the actual to the expected and fme-tunes the applied voltages accordingly.

Calculations used by CPU

Using Snell's Law to describe the two wavelengths' trajectories through each material in the refractive states incorporates the following mathematical logic.

Ref

1

L=Inv

sin(Mat

1

*Sin(Inc)/Mat

2

L

)

Ref

1

H=Inv

sin(Mat

1

*Sin(Inc)/Mat

2

H

)

Ref

2

L=Inv

sin(Mat

2

L

*Sin(Ref

1

L−

Off

2

)/Mat

3

L

)

Ref

2

H=Inv

sin(Mat

2

H

*Sin(Ref

1

H−

Off

2

)/Mat

3

H

)

Ref

3

L=Inv

sin(Mat

3

L

*Sin(Ref

2

L−

Off

3

)/Mat

1

)

Ref

3

H=Inv

sin(Mat

3

H

*Sin(Ref

2

H−

Off

3

)/Mat

1

)

Rel=absolute value (Ref

3

L−

Ref

3

H

)

Minimizing Rel

When Ref

3

L=Ref

3

H, Rel=0. This minimizes Rel.

It follows that voltage applied to Mat

2

and voltage applied to Mat

3

must achieve the desired net refraction (Ref

3

's) whereby at the same time Rel is minimized.

The program calculates the relative trajectory of two light wavelengths that have started (parallel) as parts of one ray. These two wavelengths subsequently have passed through Mat

2

(with a prism angle of Off

2

) and Mat

3

(with a prism angle of Off

3

). The two wavelengths' relative resultant trajectories are set equal to Rel. If allowed to change voltage of Mat

2

independent of, a corresponding change in voltage applied to Mat

3

, will cause dispersion between the various wavelengths of light to also increase. Without remediation from voltage applied to Mat

3

, the human eye detects this dispersion as chromatic distortion. The objective of the computer programming instructions is to eliminate this chromatic distortion by minimizing net relative dispersion. (The goal is to cause the two light wavelengths that entered the system parallel to one another also to exit the system parallel to one another.) Using the refractive indices of Mat

2

and Mat

3

at different wavelengths, the software when interfacing with a database/memory, and voltage regulating hardware, will vary voltage to achieve desired refractive angles with minimized dispersion (Rel is minimized). When Rel is minimized, the wavelengths passing through both Mat

2

at Off

2

and Mat

3

at Off

3

are nearly parallel and as such chromatic distortion can not be detected by the human eye. (Particularly when the distance that the wavelengths travel through the refractive fluids is minimized.)

Table IV describes the refractive angles that can be achieved by a couplet with a first apex angle of 0.302 and a second apex angle of −0.735. (To reiterate, Off

2

and Off

3

are apex angles.) In the first state a refraction angle of 0.324 is achievable while maintaining a relative tolerance of 0.000308. In the second state a refraction angle of 0.234 is achievable while maintaining a relative tolerance of 0.000307.

Table IV describes the refractive angles achievable in the no and ne states of the materials in Table 1 at one set of angles with a relative tolerance of .000308. The same angles can be used to generate different refractive angles when voltage is altered to a range between the no and ne states.

State

Inc

Off2

Off3

nMat 2 I&h

nMat3 E&h

Ref 3H

Ref3L

Rel

1

0

0.302

−0.735

1.837 1.802

1.718 1.7041

0.32425

0.32456

3.08

E-4

2

0

0.302

−0.735

1.575 1.563

1.515 1.5098

0.23401

0.2337

3.07

E-4

It is noteworthy that if Mat

2

in State 1 (operating at a suitable Off

2

) alone were used to achieve the refraction of 0.324 radians, the corresponding dispersion would be 0.016 radians. This is 52 times greater than the dispersion resulting from the present mention in the present illustration. Stated another way, the present invention (in this example) can achieve the same refraction as the prior art but with 2% of the dispersion. Further exploration of all available materials in all possible combinations using the computer applications of the present invention will enable even further lowering of dispersion and greater net refraction.

FIG. 9

uses the data in Table IV to illustrate an example net refraction curve describing the operating range of the present invention from the State 1 through the State 2 range of possibilities. Any net refraction angle between 0.2337 radians and 0.3243 radians can be achieved with minimized dispersion utilizing the present invention with the illustrated materials at the selected apex angles.

Description and Operation of the Second Preferred Embodiments

FIG.

10

. Prior Art, U.S. Pat. No. 4,037,929 (Bricot et al., 1977), illustrates a voltage variable liquid crystal lens wherein the focal length is variable as a function of voltage. The prior art has been using liquid crystals to produce variable focal lengths for at least 23 years. No attempt has been made to minimize dispersion across the operating range of an electro-optic lens. The present invention solves the problem of dispersion in a lens that operates across a range of refractive indices.

FIG.

11

. illustrates a variable focal length lens embodiment of the present invention with minimized dispersion. An optical axis

109

is at the center of a transparent rigid structure employing a first series of concentric Fresnel zones such as

107

and

105

and a second series of concentric Fresnel zones on the backside of the lens

101

(couplet zones on the backside of the lens are not visible but look similar to the side currently in view).

FIG.

12

. illustrates a variable focal length lens of

FIG. 11

in a cutaway profile view. It contains the same components as

FIG. 5

except whereas

FIG. 5

consists of flat surfaces and prism like structures, the

FIG. 12

components are arranged in concentric circles. Otherwise, the description, operation, and software associated with

FIGS. 5

,

6

,

7

,

8

, and

9

all similarly apply to the concentric Fresnel prism structure of

FIGS. 11 and 12

.

A first multi-frequency beam enters a first electro-optic component similar to a first material

123

. The beam is refracted and dispersed, whereupon it enters a second electro-optic component similar to a second material

125

. Upon exit the second material the beam is a refracted beam

127

. As with the previous embodiment, if

121

consists of two parallel frequencies entering the optic, two refracted and parallel (within a controllable tolerance) beams exit at

127

. As previously discussed, the voltage applied to each half of concentric couplets must be controlled individually to produce a common focal length and an approximated variable focal point. A similar structure but with curved sides can be used to provide a variable focal length each length having a real focal point.

Additional Embodiments

Two frequencies within the visible spectrum are shown, it is understood that the present invention can apply to other frequencies within or outside of the visible range.

The first material and second material may be the same material.

The first offset angle and the second offset angle may be equal.

The first material and the second material need not be at the same temperature.

The term “frequency” as used herein can be interchanged with the word “wavelength”.

The phrase “electro-optic material” can be used in place of the phrase “liquid crystal” herein. Electro-optic is defined as any material whose refractive index varies with the intensity of an applied electric field. A nematic liquid crystal being one such a material.

“Net refraction” refers to the refraction that results from components in series.

The illustration herein has two materials transitioning through states in the same direction from ne to no. This is not always the optimal combination, they may transition from no to ne, or one may transition from no to ne while the other transitions from ne to no.

The present example best illustrates correction of dispersion in the no and ne states only, it is understood that the range of dispersion between these two states can also be corrected by the means disclosed herein. This can easily be accomplished using a memory and computer logic to control voltage to each half of a couplet to achieve the desired refraction while minimizing dispersion.

The two liquid crystal materials in couplet described herein were selected based upon easily documented refractive indices at common temperatures in two states at common frequencies. Many other pairs of liquid crystals in couplet are possible to achieve refraction with minimized dispersion as described herein.

Disclosed herein is one cell of the present invention to describe liquid crystal induced refraction with minimal dispersion. It is understood that many such cells can be used together in arrays or in sequence.

The structures described herein are very useful in the embodiment of the variable view window.

The computer software disclosed herein contains functionality beyond what is required to operate the disclosed liquid crystal couplet cell between two states of two materials. The logic and mathematical algorithms easily can interface with a database memory that describes the refractive state of multiple liquid crystal materials across a range of electromagnetic frequencies and temperatures. It solves the mathematical problem of how to move the net refraction of the couplet through a range with minimal dispersion.

Voltage is used herein as the method to vary the refractive index of a liquid crystal. It is understood that the invention described herein can be used to vary refractive index through other means including but not limited to temperature, pressure, and magnetic field.

The lens embodiment disclosed herein minimizes dispersion in a Fresnel type lens in a first and second state utilizing the same data and angles utilized in the prism couplet example. This is done for ease of illustration. It is understood that the invention herein can be used to minimize dispersion of a liquid crystal lens whereby two crystals in series each having at least one curved surface can be used to form a range of focal points with minimized dispersion.

The example disclosed herein uses a common incident angle of zero. The invention disclosed herein is fully capable of producing multiple net refraction results with minimal dispersion using any incident angle. Indeed, the invention disclosed herein can use incident angles that differ between the electromagnetic frequencies. In such case, the two frequencies would enter non-parallel and exit non-paralell.

The current disclosure describes minimized dispersion of two parallel beams only. The invention described herein and the computer software disclose has the capability of achieving variable refraction while minimizing dispersion across multiple incident angles simultaneously.

Each liquid prism couplet can also be used to change a window between a transparent and opaque state by increasing the refraction within either liquid crystal prism beyond the critical angle such that total internal reflection is achieved. This is a contrast to other opaque windows that use incoherence to produce the opacity.

Variable mirrors—The structures disclosed herein can be used to form variable view mirrors wherein one of the surfaces reflects light after the light is refracted by a prism. Alternately, a reflective fluid such as mercury can be contained in any of the prism voids described herein to form a mirror capable of a wide range of reflection angles while remaining in a relatively stationary position.

Computer Monitors and TV screens can be viewed from any angle using the variable structures disclosed herein.

A memory or database is described herein as a means for the CPU to retrieve refractive indices for Mat

2

and Mat

3

according to apex angle, voltage, frequency, and temperature. It is recognized that formulas describing refractive indices with regard to these variables could be used instead of the memory or database.

The preceding is not to be construed as any limitation on the claims and uses for the structures disclosed herein.

Previous Disclosures

Previous disclosures in the form of patent applications and provisional applications have been filed by the present inventor. They include the techniques for reducing the dispersion associated with refraction using a fluid with a refractive index to counteract the chromatic distortion effects of dispersion. Previous filings include the use of computer software and hardware to actuate surfaces, monitor temperature, control temperature, and reduce dispersion. Such techniques as previously disclosed by the present applicant can also be used with the present structures disclosed herein but have not be rediscussed to avoid redundancy.

Advantages

Many advantages of the preferred embodiment are present because the user can see many different views from any given vantage point which would otherwise not be possible. Firstly, high refraction is achievable. A range greater than 1.5 radians is possible for a normal ray. Secondly, dispersion can be reduced to a low tolerance level of below 0.0001 radians across the visible spectrum. Thirdly, in effect the structure has no moving parts. Fourthly, this structure is compatible with automobile window characteristics. Fifthly, for novelty, the window can be adjusted to maximize the color separation caused by dispersion. For example, the user can maximize color separation to provide a uniquely distorted view through the window.

Benefits of the Present Invention.

The invention disclosed herein is a new kind of lens, screen or window. Heretofore, viewing angles possible through a lens, screen or window were only adjustable by moving the viewer's viewing angle. If the viewer looked out these windows at a norm angle to the window, they would see an object at the norm angle to the window. The present invention enables a viewer to look through a prismatic window at a norm to the window yet to see objects located in any selected direction other than at the norm angle to the window. Such a window may be used to create a completely new view in a room that may otherwise have an undesirable view. Moreover, under the present invention, a viewer may view at an infinite number of angles while looking from the perspective of a single angle. Under the present invention, a user may stay in one position and look in different directions through a window as desired. This is desirable within buildings to view sights otherwise not possible or practicable and within automobiles to eliminate blind spots. The alternate views made possible by the present invention are also of interest to the retail industry. The retail industry can display merchandise in new ways. Through a variable view window, shoppers can see merchandise within a window display from greater angles than are otherwise possible. Retail display cases and refrigerated display cases can also use the art disclosed herein to enable consumers to view products within from angles not otherwise possible.

Conclusion, Ramifications, and Scope

Thus the reader will see that the variable view window of this invention provides a highly functional and reliable means to alter the refraction provided through a optical structure with minimized dispersion. This is useful from aesthetic and functional perspectives.

Many structures can be envisioned across many fields of endeavor which can utilize the invention disclosed herein.

Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiment(s) illustrated, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.

Number	Name	Date	Kind
4037929	Bricot et al.	Jul 1977	A
4190330	Berreman	Feb 1980	A
4958914	Owechko et al.	Sep 1990	A
5648859	Hirabayashi et al.	Jul 1997	A

Electro-optic apparatus and process for multi-frequency variable refraction with minimized dispersion

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Examiners

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Term Extension

Abstract

Description

Claims

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

US Referenced Citations (4)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)

Provisional Applications (1)