Electrodeposited, nanolaminate coatings and claddings for corrosion protection

Abstract
Described herein are electrodeposited corrosion-resistant multilayer coating and claddings that comprises multiple nanoscale layers that periodically vary in electrodeposited species or electrodeposited microstructures. The coatings may comprise electrodeposited metals, ceramics, polymers or combinations thereof. Also described herein are methods for preparation of the coatings and claddings.
Description
BACKGROUND

Laminated metals, and in particular nanolaminated metals, are of interest for structural and thermal applications because of their unique toughness, fatigue resistance and thermal stability. For corrosion protection, however, relatively little success has been reported in the formation of corrosion-resistant coatings that are laminated on the nanoscale.


Electrodeposition has been successfully used to deposit nanolaminated coatings on metal and alloy components for a variety of engineering applications. Electrodeposition is recognized as a low-cost method for forming a dense coating on any conductive substrate. Electrodeposition has been demonstrated as a viable means for producing nanolaminated coatings, in which the individual laminates may vary in the composition of the metal, ceramic or organic-metal composition or other microstructure feature. By time varying electrodeposition parameters such as current density, bath composition, pH, mixing rate, and/or temperature, multi-laminate materials can be produced in a single bath. Alternately by moving a mandrel or substrate from one bath to another, each of which represents a different combination of parameters that are held constant, multi-laminate materials or coatings can be realized.


The corrosion behavior of organic, ceramic, metal and metal-containing coatings depends primarily on their chemistry, microstructure, adhesion, thickness and galvanic interaction with the substrate to which they are applied. In the case of sacrificial metal or metal-containing coatings, such as zinc on an iron-based substrate, the coating is less electronegative than the substrate and so oxidation of the coating occurs preferentially, thus protecting the substrate. Because these coatings protect by providing an oxidation-preferred sacrificial layer, they will continue to work even when marred or scratched. The performance of sacrificial coatings depends heavily on the rate of oxidation of the coating layer and the thickness of the sacrificial layer. Corrosion protection of the substrate only lasts so long as the sacrificial coating is in place and may vary depending on the environment that the coating is subjected to and the resulting rate of coating oxidation.


Alternately, in the case of a barrier coating, such as nickel on an iron-based substrate, the coating is more electronegative than the substrate and thus works by creating a barrier to oxidative corrosion. In A-type metals, such as Fe, Ni, Cr and Zn, it is generally true that the higher the electronegativity, the greater the nobility (non reactivity). When the coating is more noble than the substrate, if that coating is marred or scratched in any way, or if coverage is not complete, these coatings will not work, and may accelerate the progress of substrate corrosion at the substrate: coating interface, resulting in preferential attack of the substrate. This is also true when ceramic coatings are used. For example, it has been reported in the prior art that while fully dense TiN coatings are more noble than steel and aluminum in resistance to various corrosive environments, pinholes and micropores that can occur during processing of these coating are detrimental to their corrosion resistance properties. In the case of barrier coatings, pinholes in the coating may accelerate corrosion in the underlying metal by pitting, crevice or galvanic corrosion mechanisms.


Many approaches have been utilized to improve the corrosion resistance of barrier coatings, such as reducing pinhole defects through the use of a metallic intermediate layer or multiple layering schemes. Such approaches are generally targeted at reducing the probability of defects or reducing the susceptibility to failure in the case of a defect, mar or scratch. One example of a multiple layering scheme is the practice commonly found in the deployment of industrial coatings, which involves the use of a primer, containing a sacrificial metal such as zinc, coupled with a highly-crosslinked, low surface energy topcoat (such as a fluorinated or polyurethane topcoat). In such case, the topcoat acts as a barrier to corrosion. In case the integrity of the topcoat is compromised for any reason, the metal contained in the primer acts as a sacrificial media, thus sacrificially protecting the substrate from corrosion.


Dezincification is a term is used to mean the corroding away of one constituent of any alloy leaving the others more or less in situ. This phenomenon is perhaps most common in brasses containing high percentages of zinc, but the same or parallel phenomena are familiar in the corrosion of aluminum bronzes and other alloys of metals of widely different chemical affinities. Dezincification usually becomes evident as an area with well-defined boundaries, and within which the more noble metal becomes concentrated as compared with the original alloy. In the case of brass the zinc is often almost completely removed and copper is present almost in a pure state, but in a very weak mechanical condition. Corrosion by dezincification usually depends on the galvanic differential between the dissimilar metals and the environmental conditions contributing to corrosion. Dezincification of alloys results in overall loss of the structural integrity of the alloy and is considered one of the most aggressive forms of corrosion.


Coatings that may represent the best of both the sacrificial coating and the barrier coating are those that are more noble than the substrate and creates a barrier to corrosion, but, in case that coating is compromised, is also less noble than the substrate and will sacrificially corrode, thus protecting the substrate from direct attack.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one embodiment of the technology described herein, the phenomena observed in dezincification of alloys is leveraged to enable corrosion resistant coatings that are both more and less noble than the substrate, and which protect the substrate by acting both as a barrier and as a sacrificial coating. Other embodiments and advantages of this technology will become apparent upon consideration of the following description.


The technology described herein includes in one embodiment an electrodeposited, corrosion-resistant multilayer coating or cladding, which comprises multiple nanoscale layers that periodically vary in electrodeposited species or electrodeposited microstructures (electrodeposited species microstructures), wherein variations in said layers of said electrodeposited species or electrodeposited species microstructure result in galvanic interactions between the layers, said nanoscale layers having interfaces there between.


The technology described herein also provides an electrodeposition method for producing a corrosion resistant multilayer coating or cladding comprising the steps of:


a) placing a mandrel or a substrate to be coated in a first electrolyte containing one or more metal ions, ceramic particles, polymer particles, or a combination thereof; and


b) applying electric current and varying in time one or more of: the amplitude of the electrical current, electrolyte temperature, electrolyte additive concentration, or electrolyte agitation, in order to produce periodic layers of electrodeposited species or periodic layer of electrodeposited species microstructures; and


c) growing a multilayer coating under such conditions until the desired thickness of the multilayer coating is achieved.


Such a method may further comprising after step (c), step (d), which comprises removing the mandrel or the substrate from the bath and rinsing.


The technology described herein further provides an electrodeposition method for producing a corrosion resistant multilayer coating or cladding comprising the steps of:


a) placing a mandrel or substrate to be coated in a first electrolyte containing one or more metal ions, ceramic particles, polymer particles, or a combination thereof; and


b) applying electric current and varying in time one or more of: the electrical current, electrolyte temperature, electrolyte additive concentration, or electrolyte agitation, in order to produce periodic layers of electrodeposited species or periodic layer of electrodeposited species microstructures; and


c) growing a nanometer-thickness layer under such conditions; and


d) placing said mandrel or substrate to be coated in a second electrolyte containing one or more metal ions that is different from said first electrolyte, said second electrolyte containing metal ions, ceramic particles, polymer particles, or a combination thereof; and


e) repeating steps (a) through (d) until the desired thickness of the multilayer coating is achieved;


wherein steps (a) through (d) are repeated at least two times. Such a method may further comprising after step (e), step (f) which comprises removing the mandrel or the coated substrate from the bath and rinsing.


Also described herein is an electrodeposited, corrosion-resistant multilayer coating or cladding, which comprises multiple nanoscale layers that vary in electrodeposited species microstructure, which layer variations result in galvanic interactions occurring between the layers. Also described is a corrosion-resistant multilayer coating or cladding, which comprises multiple nanoscale layers that vary in electrodeposited species, which layer variations result in galvanic interactions occurring between the layers.


The coating and claddings described herein are resistant to corrosion due to oxidation, reduction, stress, dissolution, dezincification, acid, base, or sulfidation and the like.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a schematic of a substrate having the “Multilayered Coating” of a preferred embodiment (on the left of FIG. 1) and a schematic of a substrate having a “Homogeneous Coating” as is known in the art (on the right of FIG. 1). Both the left and right side schematics represent how a pinhole, a micropore or damage to a coating changes over time (in sequence from the top to the bottom of FIG. 1) relative to the substrate shown on the bottom of each of the sequences. The schematic illustrates a few representative layers that are not to scale with the substrate. In typical embodiments coating layers are on the nanoscale and present in a greater number than shown in FIG. 1.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In one embodiment an electrodeposited corrosion-resistant multilayer coating comprised of individual layers with thicknesses on the nanometer scale is provided. In such an embodiment the individual layers can differ in electronegativity from adjacent layers.


In other embodiments, the present technology provides corrosion-resistant multilayer coatings or claddings (together herein referred to as a “coating”) that comprise multiple nanoscale layers having variations in the composition of metal, alloy, polymer, or ceramic components, or combination thereof (together herein referred to as “electrodeposited species”).


In such embodiments the variations in the compositions between layers results in galvanic interactions occurring between the layers.


In another embodiment, the present technology provides a corrosion-resistant multilayer coating that comprises multiple nanoscale layers having layer variations in grain size, crystal orientation, grain boundary geometry, or combination thereof (together herein referred to as “electrodeposited species microstructure(s)”), which layer variations result in galvanic interactions occurring between the layers.


In another embodiment multilayer coating or cladding is provided for, in which the layers vary in electronegativity or in nobility, and in which the rate of corrosion can be controlled by controlling the difference in electronegativity or in the reactivity (or “nobility”) of adjacent layers.


One embodiment of the present technology provides a multilayer coating or cladding in which one of the periodic layers is less noble than the other layer and is less noble than the substrate, thus establishing a periodic sacrificial layer in the multilayer coating.


As used herein “layers that periodically vary” means a series of two or more non-identical layers (non identical “periodic layers”) that are repeatedly applied over an underlying surface or mandrel. The series of non-identical layers can include a simple alternating pattern of two or more non-identical layers (e.g., layer 1, layer 2, layer 1, layer 2, etc.) or in another embodiment may include three or more non-identical layers (e.g., layer 1, layer 2, layer 3, layer 1, layer 2, layer 3, etc.). More complex alternating patterns can involve two, three, four, five or more layers arranged in constant or varying sequences (e.g., layer 1, layer 2, layer 3, layer 2, layer 1, layer 2, layer 3, layer 2, layer 1, etc.). In one embodiment, a series of two layers is alternately applied 100 times to provide a total of 200 layers having 100 periodic layers of a first type alternated with 100 periodic layers of a second type, wherein the first and second type of periodic layer are not identical. In other embodiments, “layers that periodically vary” include 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, or 5 or more layers that are repeatedly applied about 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,250, 1,500, 1,750, 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, 5,000, 7,500, 10,000, 15,000, 20,000 or more times.


As used herein, a “periodic layer” is an individual layer within “layers that periodically vary”.


In another embodiment, the present technology provides a multilayer coating or cladding in which one of the periodic layers is more noble than the other layer and is more noble than the substrate, thus establishing a periodic corrosion barrier layer in the multilayer coating.


In another embodiment, the present technology provides a multilayer coating in which one of the periodic layers is less noble than the adjacent layers and all layers are less noble than the substrate.


In still another embodiment, the present technology provides a multilayer coating or cladding in which one of the periodic layers is more noble than the adjacent layers and all layers are more noble than the substrate.


One embodiment of the present technology provides for a corrosion-resistant multilayer coating or cladding compositions that comprise individual layers, where the layers are not discrete, but rather exhibit diffuse interfaces with adjacent layers. In some embodiments the diffuse region between layers may be 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50 75, 100, 200, 400, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000, 6,000, 8,000 or 10,000 nanometers. In other embodiments the diffuse region between layers may be 1 to 5, or 5 to 25, or 25 to 100, or 100 to 500, or 500 to 1,000, or 1,000 to 2,000, or 2,000 to 5,000, or 4,000 to 10,000 nanometers. The thickness of the diffuse interface may be controlled in a variety of ways, including the rate at which the electrodeposition conditions are change.


Another embodiment of the technology described herein provides a method for producing a multilayered corrosion-resistant coating that comprises multiple nanoscale layers (“nanolaminates”) that vary in electrodeposited species or electrodeposited species microstructure or a combination thereof, which layers are produced by an electrodeposition process.


Where variations in electrodeposited species or combinations thereof are employed, in some embodiments, the electrodeposited species may comprise one or more of Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Au, Ag, Pd, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg and Cr, Al2O3, SiO2, TiN, BoN, Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2, epoxy, polyurethane, polyaniline, polyethylene, poly ether ether ketone, polypropylene.


In other embodiments the electrodeposited species may comprise one or more metals selected from Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Au, Ag, Pd, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg and Cr. Alternatively, the metals may be selected from: Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg and Cr; or from Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Sn, Mn, Co, Ti, Mg and Cr; or from Ni, Zn, Fe, Sn, and Cr. The metal may be present in any percentage. In such embodiments the percentage of each metal may independently selected about 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, 99, 99.9, 99.99, 99.999 or 100 percent of the electrodeposited species. Unless otherwise indicated, the percentages provided herein refer to weight percentages.


In other embodiments the electrodeposited species may comprise one or more ceramics (e.g., metals oxides or metal nitrides) selected from Al2O3, SiO2, TiN, BoN, Fe2O3, MgO, SiC, ZrC, CrC, diamond particulates, and TiO2. In such embodiments the percentage of each ceramic may independently selected about 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, 99, 99.9, 99.99, 99.999 or 100 percent of the electrodeposited species.


In still other embodiments the electrodeposited species may comprise one or more polymers selected from epoxy, polyurethane, polyaniline, polyethylene, poly ether ether ketone, polypropylene, and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate). In such embodiments the percentage of each polymer may independently selected about 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, 99, 99.9, 99.99, 99.999 or 100 percent of the electrodeposited species.


Another embodiment of the present technology provides a electrodeposition method for producing a nanolaminated, corrosion resistant coating which reduces through-hole defects in the overall corrosion resistant coating. Such methods include those wherein multi-layered coatings or claddings are applied to a substrate or mandrel as illustrated in FIG. 1.


As shown on the left of FIG. 1, the multilayer coating of a preferred embodiment is disposed to have two alternating (light and dark) layers covering a substrate. In the embodiment of the left side of FIG. 1, the light layer is a protective layer and the dark layer is a sacrificial layer. As the sequence shows, over time the hole in the light layer expands slightly in a direction parallel to the surface of the substrate, and the sacrificial dark layer under the damaged light layer is consumed in a direction parallel with the surface of the substrate. It is also noted that the hole in the outermost (exposed) layer of the multilayer coating does not expand to breach the second light layer disposed between the hole and the substrate, thereby protecting the substrate from corrosion. In a preferred embodiment, corrosion is confined to the less-noble layers (the dark layers), with the layers being protected cathodically and the corrosion proceeding laterally rather than towards the substrate.


As shown on the right of FIG. 1, the homogeneous coating of the prior art is disposed to have a single layer covering a substrate. As the sequence shows, over time the hole in the single layer expands in a direction normal to the surface of the substrate until ultimately reaching the substrate, which thereafter is affected by corrosion or other forms of degradation.


In one embodiment, the technology described herein describes a method for producing a multilayer, nanolaminated coating by an electrodeposition process carried out in a single bath, comprising the steps of:


a) placing a mandrel or a substrate to be coated in a first electrolyte containing one or more metal ions, ceramic particles, polymer particles, or a combination thereof; and


b) applying electric current and varying in time one or more of: the amplitude of the electrical current, electrolyte temperature, electrolyte additive concentration, or electrolyte agitation, in order to produce periodic layers of electrodeposited species or periodic layer of electrodeposited species microstructures; and


c) growing a multilayer coating under such conditions until the desired thickness of the multilayer coating is achieved.


Such a method may further comprise after step (c), step (d) removing the mandrel or the substrate from the bath and rinsing.


The technology described herein also sets forth a method for producing a multilayer, nanolaminated coating or cladding using serial electrodeposition in two or more baths comprising the steps of:

    • a) placing a mandrel or substrate to be coated in a first electrolyte containing one or more metal ions, ceramic particles, polymer particles, or a combination thereof; and
    • b) applying electric current and varying in time one or more of: the electrical current, electrolyte temperature, electrolyte additive concentration, or electrolyte agitation, in order to produce periodic layers of electrodeposited species or periodic layer of electrodeposited species microstructures; and
    • c) growing a nanometer-thickness layer under such conditions; and
    • d) placing said mandrel or substrate to be coated in a second electrolyte containing one or more metal ions that is different from said first electrolyte, said second electrolyte containing metal ions, ceramic particles, polymer particles, or a combination thereof; and
    • e) repeating steps (a) through (d) until the desired thickness of the multilayer coating is achieved; wherein steps (a) through (d) are repeated at least two times.


Such a method may further comprise after step (e), step (f) removing the mandrel or the coated substrate from the bath and rinsing.


Corrosion-resistant multilayer coatings can be produced on a mandrel, instead of directly on a substrate to make a free-standing material or cladding. Cladding produced in this manner may be attached to the substrate by other means, including welding, gluing or through the use of other adhesive materials.


The multilayer coatings can comprise layers of metals that are electrolytically deposited from aqueous solution, such as Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Au, Ag, Pd, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb and Cr. The multilayer coating can also comprise alloys of these metals, including, but not limited to: ZnFe, ZnCu, ZnCo, NiZn, NiMn, NiFe, NiCo, NiFeCo, CoFe, CoMn. The multilayer can also comprise metals that are electrolytically deposited from a molten salt or ionic liquid solution. These include those metals previously listed, and others, including, but not limited to Al, Mg, Ti and Na. In other embodiments multilayer coatings can comprise one or more metals selected from Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Au, Ag, Pd, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg and Cr. Alternatively, one or more metals to be electrolytically deposited may be selected from: Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg and Cr; or from Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Sn, Mn, Co, Ti, Mg and Cr; or from Ni, Zn, Fe, Sn, and Cr.


The multilayer coating can comprise ceramics and polymers that are electrophoretically deposited for aqueous or ionic liquid solutions, including, but not limited to Al2O3, SiO2, TiN, BoN, Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2. Suitable polymers include, but are not limited to, epoxy, polyurethane, polyaniline, polyethylene, poly ether ether ketone, polypropylene.


The multilayer coating can also comprise combinations of metals and ceramics, metals and polymers, such as the above-mentioned metals, ceramics and polymers.


The thickness of the individual layers (nanoscale layers) can vary greatly as for example between 0.5 and 10,000 nanometers, and in some embodiments is about 200 nanometers per layer. The thickness of the individual layers (nanoscale layers) may also be about 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50 75, 100, 200, 400, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000, 6,000, 8,000 or 10,000 nanometers. In other embodiments the layers may be about 0.5 to 1, or 1 to 5, or 5 to 25, or 25 to 100, or 100 to 300, or 100 to 400, or 500 to 1,000, or 1,000 to 2,000, or 2,000 to 5,000, or 4,000 to 10,000 nanometers.


Individual layers may be of the same thickness or different thickness. Layers that vary periodically may also vary in thickness.


The overall thickness of the coating or cladding can vary greatly as, for example, between 2 micron and 6.5 millimeters or more. In some embodiments the overall thickness of the coating or cladding can also be between 2 nanometers and 10,000 nanometers, 4 nanometers and 400 nanometers, 50 nanometers and 500 nanometers, 100 nanometers and 1,000 nanometers, 1 micron to 10 microns, 5 microns to 50 microns, 20 microns to 200 microns, 200 microns to 2 millimeters (mm), 400 microns to 4 mm, 200 microns to 5 mm, 1 mm to 6.5 mm, 5 mm to 12.5 mm, 10 mm to 20 mm, 15 mm to 30 mm.


Layer thickness can be controlled by, among other things, the application of current in the electrodeposition process. This technique involves the application of current to the substrate or mandrel to cause the formation of the coating or cladding on the substrate or mandrel. The current can be applied continuously or, more preferably, according to a predetermined pattern such as a waveform. In particular, the waveform (e.g., sine waves, square waves, sawtooth waves, or triangle waves). can be applied intermittently to promote the electrodeposition process, to intermittently reverse the electrodeposition process, to increase or decrease the rate of deposition, to alter the composition of the material being deposited, or to provide for a combination of such techniques to achieve a specific layer thickness or a specific pattern of differing layers. The current density and the period of the wave forms may be varied independently. In some embodiments current density may be continuously or discretely varied with the range between 0.5 and 2000 mA/cm2. Other ranges for current densities are also possible, for example, a current density may be varied within the range between: about 1 and 20 mA/cm2; about 5 and 50 mA/cm2; about 30 and 70 mA/cm2; 0.5 and 500 mA/cm2; 100 and 2000 mA/cm2; greater than about 500 mA/cm2; and about 15 and 40 mA/cm2 base on the surface area of the substrate or mandrel to be coated. In some embodiments the frequency of the wave forms may be from about 0.01 Hz to about 50 Hz. In other embodiments the frequency can be from: about 0.5 to about 10 Hz; 0.02 to about 1 Hz or from about 2 to 20 Hz; or from about 1 to about 5 Hz.


The multilayer coatings and claddings described herein are suitable for coating or cladding a variety of substrates that are susceptible to corrosion. In one embodiment the substrates are particularly suited for coating substrates made of materials that can corrode such as iron, steel, aluminum, nickel, cobalt, iron, manganese, copper, titanium, alloys thereof, reinforced composites and the like.


The coatings and claddings described herein may be employed to protect against numerous types of corrosion, including, but not limited to corrosion caused by oxidation, reduction. stress (stress corrosion), dissolution, dezincification, acid, base, sulfidation and the like.


Example #1

Preparation of a multilayer coating comprising nanoscale layers of zinc-iron alloy, in which the concentration of iron varies in adjacent layers.


A zinc-iron bath is produced using a commercial plating bath formula supplied by MacDermid Inc. (Waterbury, Conn.). The composition of the bath is described in Table 1.









TABLE 1







Example Plating Bath












MacDermid Material

Composition
Product #
















Zinc Metal
10-12
g/l
118326



NaOH
125-135
g/l











Enviralloy Carrier
0.5-0.6%
174384



Enviralloy Brightener
  0-0.1%
174383



Enviralloy Fe
0.2-0.4%
174385



Enviralloy C
  4-6%
174386



Enviralloy B
0.4-0.6%
174399



Enviralloy Stabilizer
0.1-0.2%
174387



Envirowetter
0.05-0.2% 
174371










A steel panel is immersed into the bath and connected to a power supply. The power supply was combined with a computer generated waveform supply that provided a square waveform which alternates between 25 mA/cm2 (for 17.14 seconds) and 15 mA/cm2 (for 9.52 seconds). The total plating time for a M90 coating (0.9 oz of coating per square foot) is about 1.2 hrs. In this time approximately 325 layers were deposited to achieve a total thickness of 19 μm. The individual layer thickness was between 50 and 100 nm.


The coating is tested in a corrosive environment, in accordance with ASTM B117 (Standard Practice for Operating Salt Spray), and shows no evidence of red rust after 300 hours of exposure.


Example #2

Nickel Cobalt alloys have been used extensively in recent history because of its great wear and corrosion resistance. A nanolaminated Ni—Co alloy was created which contains codeposited diamond particles. The Ni—Co alloy by itself is a corrosion and wear resistant alloy. By modulating the electrode potential in the cell, it was possible to laminate the composition of the alloy. By doing this, a galvanic potential difference was established between the layers and thus created a more favorable situation for corrosion and fatigue wear. Also, two unique phases in the crystal structure of the matrix were established. The deposition rate of the diamonds has also been shown to vary with the current density of the cell.


Preparation of a multilayer coating comprising nanoscale layers of a Nickel-Cobalt alloy with diamond codeposition, in which the concentration of the metals vary in adjacent layers.


A traditional Nickel watts bath is used as the basis for the bath. The following table describes all of the components of the bath.









TABLE 2







Example Plating Bath










Component
Concentration















Nickel Sulfate
250
g/l



Nickel Chloride
30
g/l



Boric Acid
40
g/l



Cobalt Chloride
10
g/l



SDS
.01
g/l



Diamond (<1 micron size)
5
g/l










For creating samples, a steel panel is immersed into the bath and is connected to a power supply. The current density modulation was carried out between 10 mA/cm2 and 35 mA/cm2 with computer controlled software to form nanoscale layers. The current is applied and varied until a 20 μm thick coating had been formed on the substrate surface.


Testing for this coating has been carried out in a salf fog chamber in accordance with the ASTM B117 standers as well as taber wear tests which show the abrasion resistance to be significantly better than homogeneous coatings of Nickel-Cobalt and of stainless steel 316.


Example #3

Preparation of a Ni—Zr—Cr alloy system containing particulate precursors.









TABLE 3







Bath Make-up










Chemical
Conc. (g/L)














Nickel Sulfate
312



Nickel Chloride
45



Boric Acid
38



Surfactant (C-TAB ®)
0.1

















TABLE 4







Particle Additions










Particle
Conc. (g/L)







Zirconium (1-3 microns)
40



CrC (1-5 microns)
15











Bath Make-Up Procedure:
    • 1. Mix metal salts, boric acid and C-Tab at 100° F.
    • 2. Allow full dissolution, then shift pH to between 5 and 6 with ammonium hydroxide
    • 3. Add particles and allow full mixing
    • 4. Particles should be allowed to mix for one day before plating to allow full surfactant coverage


      Plating Procedure:
    • 1. Substrates should be prepared in accordance with ASTM standards
    • 2. Electrolyte should be held between 100° F. and 120° F.
    • 3. Solution should have sufficient agitation to prevent particle settling, and fluid flow should be even across the substrate
    • 4. A 50% duty cycle pulse waveform at 75 mA/cm2 effective current density is applied; the average current density of the pulse waveform can be varied and will vary particle inclusion allowing for a laminated structure with controllable deposit composition.


In a first SEM image of the plated substrates shows a high density particle incorporation of zirconium and chromium carbide particles on a steel substrate. Particle spacing is between <1 and 5 microns and the deposit is fully dense. Particles show relatively even distribution throughout the deposit. A second SEM image shows low particle density inclusions on a steel substrate. Particle spacing is between 1 and 15 microns, with some deposit cleaving at particle/matrix interface. Even particle distribution is less pronounced in the second SEM image. Minor surface roughness is seen in both deposits.


Optional Heat Treatment:


In the event the coating requires greater corrosion resistance, a heat treatment can be applied to diffuse included zirconium throughout the deposit, creating, in this case, corrosion-resistant intermetallic phases of the Ni Cr and Zr. Heat treatment may be performed by:

    • 1. Clean the part and dry;
    • 2. Using a furnace of any atmosphere, heat the deposit at no more than 10° C./min up to 927° C.
    • 3. Hold at 927° C. for 2 hours and
    • 4. Air cooling the part.


The above descriptions of exemplary embodiments of methods for forming nanolaminate structures are illustrative of the present invention. Because of variations which will be apparent to those skilled in the art, however, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments described above. The scope of the invention is defined in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: forming a coating on a substrate or mandrel, the coating having a thickness from 5 microns to 50 microns and comprising a series of layers arranged in a repeating pattern, each layer of the series of layers having a thickness from about 5 nanometers to about 1,000 nanometers, the series of layers comprising: A) a first layer of a first alloy that is less noble than the substrate or the mandrel, the first alloy comprising: i) a first metal in a first concentration that is at least about 1 wt. %, the first metal selected from Co, Fe, Ni, and Zn; andii) a second metal in a second concentration that is at least about 1 wt. %; andB) a second layer of a second alloy that is less noble than the first alloy and less noble than the substrate or the mandrel, the second alloy comprising: i) the first metal in a third concentration that is at least about 1 wt. %; andii) the second metal in a fourth concentration that is at least about 1 wt. %.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first metal is Ni or Zn.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein each layer of the series of layers is discrete.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising a diffuse interface between each layer of the series of layers.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the second metal is selected from Co, Fe, Ni, and Zn, the second metal being different than the first metal.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the series of layers further comprises a third layer.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising forming a cladding by removing the coating from the mandrel.
  • 8. A method comprising: forming a coating on a substrate or mandrel, the coating having a thickness from 5 microns to 50 microns and comprising a series of layers arranged in a repeating pattern, each layer of the series of layers having a thickness from about 5 nanometers to about 1,000 nanometers, the series of layers comprising: A) a first layer of a first alloy that is more noble than the substrate or the mandrel, the first alloy comprising: i) Co in a first concentration that is at least about 1 wt. %; andii) Ni in a second concentration that is at least about 1 wt. %; andB) a second layer of a second alloy that is more noble than the first alloy and more noble than the substrate or the mandrel, the second alloy comprising: i) Co in a third concentration that is at least about 1 wt. %; andii) Ni in a fourth concentration that is at least about 1 wt. %; andC) a third metal layer of a third alloy that is more noble than the substrate or the mandrel, the third alloy comprising: i) Co in a fifth concentration that is at least about 1 wt. %; andii) Ni in a sixth concentration that is at least about 1 wt. %; the first, second, and third alloys being different.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein each layer of the series of layers is discrete.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, further comprising a diffuse interface between each layer of the series of layers.
  • 11. The method of claim 8, further comprising forming a cladding by removing the coating from the mandrel.
  • 12. A method comprising: forming a coating on a substrate or mandrel, the coating having a thickness from 5 microns to 50 microns and comprising a series of layers arranged in a repeating pattern, each layer of the series of layers having a thickness from about 5 nanometers to about 1,000 nanometers, the series of layers comprising: A) a first layer of a first alloy that is more noble than the substrate or the mandrel, the first alloy comprising: i) a first metal in a first concentration that is at least about 1 wt. %, the first metal selected from Co, Fe, Ni, and Zn; andii) a second metal; andB) a second layer of a second alloy that is less noble than the first alloy and less noble than the substrate or the mandrel, the second alloy comprising: i) the first metal in a second concentration that is at least about 1 wt. %; andii) the second metal.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the first metal is Ni or Zn.
  • 14. The method of claim 12, wherein each layer of the series of layers is discrete.
  • 15. The method of claim 12, wherein second metal is selected from Co, Fe, Ni, and Zn, the second metal being different than the first metal.
  • 16. The method of claim 12, wherein the series of layers further comprises a third layer.
  • 17. The method of claim 12, further comprising forming a cladding by removing the coating from the mandrel.
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/729,020, filed Jun. 2, 2015, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/314,948, filed Dec. 8, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,253,419, issued Apr. 9, 2019, which is a continuation of PCT/US2010/037856, filed Jun. 8, 2010, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/185,020, filed Jun. 8, 2009, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (281)
Number Name Date Kind
2428033 Nachtman Sep 1947 A
2436316 Lum et al. Feb 1948 A
2470775 Jemstedt et al. May 1949 A
2558090 Jemstedt Jun 1951 A
2642654 Ahrens Jun 1953 A
2678909 Jemstedt et al. May 1954 A
2694743 Ruskin et al. Nov 1954 A
2706170 Marchese Apr 1955 A
2891309 Fenster Jun 1959 A
3090733 Brown May 1963 A
3255781 Gillespie, Jr. Jun 1966 A
3282810 Odekerken Nov 1966 A
3359469 Levy et al. Dec 1967 A
3362851 Dunster Jan 1968 A
3483113 Carter Dec 1969 A
3549505 Hanusa Dec 1970 A
3616286 Aylward et al. Oct 1971 A
3633520 Stiglich, Jr. Jan 1972 A
3716464 Kovac et al. Feb 1973 A
3753664 Klingenmaier et al. Aug 1973 A
3759799 Reinke Sep 1973 A
3787244 Schulmeister et al. Jan 1974 A
3866289 Brown et al. Feb 1975 A
3941674 Vanmunster May 1976 A
3994694 Clauss et al. Nov 1976 A
3996114 Ehrsam Dec 1976 A
4053371 Towsley Oct 1977 A
4105526 Lewellen, Jr. et al. Aug 1978 A
4107003 Anselrode Aug 1978 A
4191617 Hurley et al. Mar 1980 A
4204918 McIntyre et al. May 1980 A
4216272 Clauss Aug 1980 A
4246057 Janowski et al. Jan 1981 A
4284688 Stücheli et al. Aug 1981 A
4314893 Clauss Feb 1982 A
4405427 Byrd Sep 1983 A
4422907 Birkmaier et al. Dec 1983 A
4461680 Lashmore Jul 1984 A
4464232 Wakano et al. Aug 1984 A
4510209 Hada et al. Apr 1985 A
4519878 Hara et al. May 1985 A
4540472 Johnson et al. Sep 1985 A
4543300 Hara et al. Sep 1985 A
4543803 Keyasko Oct 1985 A
4591418 Snyder May 1986 A
4592808 Doubt Jun 1986 A
4597836 Schaer et al. Jul 1986 A
4613388 Walter et al. Sep 1986 A
4620661 Slatterly Nov 1986 A
4652348 Yahalom et al. Mar 1987 A
4666567 Loch May 1987 A
4670356 Sato et al. Jun 1987 A
4678552 Chen Jul 1987 A
4678721 den Broeder et al. Jul 1987 A
4702802 Umino et al. Oct 1987 A
H543 Chen et al. Nov 1988 H
4795735 Uiu et al. Jan 1989 A
4834845 Muko et al. May 1989 A
4839214 Oda et al. Jun 1989 A
4869971 Nee et al. Sep 1989 A
4885215 Yoshioka et al. Dec 1989 A
4904542 Mroczkowski Feb 1990 A
4904543 Sakakima et al. Feb 1990 A
4923574 Cohen May 1990 A
4975337 Hyner et al. Dec 1990 A
5043230 Jagannathan et al. Aug 1991 A
5045356 Uemura et al. Sep 1991 A
5056936 Mahrus et al. Oct 1991 A
5059493 Takahata Oct 1991 A
5073237 Bacher et al. Dec 1991 A
5079039 Heraud et al. Jan 1992 A
5156729 Mahrus et al. Oct 1992 A
5156899 Kistrup et al. Oct 1992 A
5158653 Lashmore et al. Oct 1992 A
5190637 Guckel Mar 1993 A
5228967 Crites et al. Jul 1993 A
5268235 Lashmore et al. Dec 1993 A
5300165 Sugikawa Apr 1994 A
5320719 Lasbmore et al. Jun 1994 A
5326454 Engelhaupt Jul 1994 A
5352266 Erb et al. Oct 1994 A
5378583 Guckel et al. Jan 1995 A
5413874 Moysan, III et al. May 1995 A
5431800 Kirchhoff et al. Jul 1995 A
5461769 McGregor Oct 1995 A
5472795 Atita Dec 1995 A
5489488 Asai et al. Feb 1996 A
5500600 Moyes Mar 1996 A
5547096 Kleyn Apr 1996 A
5527445 Palumbo Jun 1996 A
5545435 Steffier Aug 1996 A
5620800 De Leeuw et al. Apr 1997 A
5660704 Murase Aug 1997 A
5679232 Fedor et al. Oct 1997 A
5738951 Goujard et al. Apr 1998 A
5742471 Barbee, Jr. et al. Apr 1998 A
5775402 Sachs et al. Jul 1998 A
5783259 McDonald Jul 1998 A
5798033 Uemiya et al. Aug 1998 A
5800930 Chen et al. Sep 1998 A
5828526 Kagawa et al. Oct 1998 A
5912069 Yializis et al. Jun 1999 A
5930085 Kitade et al. Jul 1999 A
5942096 Ruzicka et al. Aug 1999 A
5952111 Sugg et al. Sep 1999 A
5958604 Riabkov et al. Sep 1999 A
6036832 Knol et al. Mar 2000 A
6036833 Tang et al. Mar 2000 A
6071398 Martin et al. Jun 2000 A
6143424 Jonte et al. Nov 2000 A
6143430 Miyasaka et al. Nov 2000 A
6193858 Hradil et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200452 Angelini Mar 2001 B1
6203936 Cisar et al. Mar 2001 B1
6212078 Hunt et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214473 Hunt et al. Apr 2001 B1
6284357 Lackey et al. Sep 2001 B1
6312579 Bank et al. Nov 2001 B1
6344123 Bhatnagar Feb 2002 B1
6355153 Uzoh et al. Mar 2002 B1
6398937 Menini et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409907 Braun et al. Jun 2002 B1
6415942 Fenton et al. Jul 2002 B1
6461678 Chen et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466417 Gill Oct 2002 B1
6468672 Donovan, III et al. Oct 2002 B1
6482298 Bhatnagar Nov 2002 B1
6537683 Staschko et al. Mar 2003 B1
6547944 Schreiber et al. Apr 2003 B2
6592739 Sonoda et al. Jul 2003 B1
6725916 Gray et al. Apr 2004 B2
6739028 Sievenpiper et al. May 2004 B2
6777831 Gutiérrez, Jr. et al. Aug 2004 B2
6800121 Shahin Oct 2004 B2
6884499 Penich et al. Apr 2005 B2
6902827 Kelly et al. Jun 2005 B2
6908667 Christ et al. Jun 2005 B2
6923898 Yoshimura et al. Aug 2005 B2
6979490 Steffier Dec 2005 B2
7581933 Bruce et al. Sep 2009 B2
7632590 Punsalan et al. Dec 2009 B2
7736753 Deligianni et al. Jun 2010 B2
8084564 Kano et al. Dec 2011 B2
8152985 Macary Apr 2012 B2
8177945 Arvin et al. May 2012 B2
8192608 Matthews Jun 2012 B2
8253035 Matsumoto Aug 2012 B2
8585875 Cummings et al. Nov 2013 B2
8814437 Braun Aug 2014 B2
8916001 Pryce Lewis et al. Dec 2014 B2
9005420 Tomantschger et al. Apr 2015 B2
9056405 Sato et al. Jun 2015 B2
9080692 Tomomori et al. Jul 2015 B2
9108506 Whitaker et al. Aug 2015 B2
9115439 Whitaker Aug 2015 B2
9234294 Whitaker et al. Jan 2016 B2
9273932 Whitaker et al. Mar 2016 B2
9732433 Caldwell et al. Aug 2017 B2
9758891 Bao Sep 2017 B2
9783907 Cai et al. Oct 2017 B2
9938629 Whitaker et al. Apr 2018 B2
10041185 Sukenari Aug 2018 B2
10253419 Lomasney Apr 2019 B2
10266957 Sugawara et al. Apr 2019 B2
10472727 Lomasney Nov 2019 B2
10513791 Lomasney et al. Dec 2019 B2
10544510 Lomasney Jan 2020 B2
10662542 Caldwell et al. May 2020 B2
10689773 Whitaker et al. Jun 2020 B2
10781524 Whitaker et al. Sep 2020 B2
10808322 Whitaker et al. Oct 2020 B2
10844504 Sklar Nov 2020 B2
10851464 Kobayashi et al. Dec 2020 B1
10961635 Whitaker Mar 2021 B2
11118280 Lomasney et al. Sep 2021 B2
20010037944 Sanada et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020011419 Arao et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020070118 Schreiber et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020100858 Weber Aug 2002 A1
20020179449 Domeier et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030134142 Ivey et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030234181 Palumbo Dec 2003 A1
20030236163 Chaturvedi et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040027715 Hixson-Goldsmith et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040031691 Kelly et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040067314 Joshi et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040154925 Podlaha et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040178076 Stonas et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040211672 Ishigami et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040232005 Hubel Nov 2004 A1
20040234683 Tanaka et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040239836 Chase Dec 2004 A1
20050002228 Dieny et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050109433 Danger et al. May 2005 A1
20050205425 Palumbo et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050221100 Kirihara et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050279640 Shimoyama et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060065533 Inoue et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060135281 Palumbo et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060135282 Palumbo et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060201817 Guggemos et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060243597 Matefi-Tempfli et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060269770 Cox et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060272949 Detor et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060286348 Sauer Dec 2006 A1
20070158204 Taylor et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070269648 Schuh et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070278105 Ettel Dec 2007 A1
20080063866 Allen et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080093221 Basol Apr 2008 A1
20080102360 Stimits et al. May 2008 A1
20080226976 Stimits Sep 2008 A1
20080245669 Yoshioka et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080271995 Savastiouk et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080283236 Akers et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090004465 Kano et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090101511 Lochtman et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090114530 Noda et al. May 2009 A1
20090130424 Tholen et al. May 2009 A1
20090130425 Whitaker May 2009 A1
20090155617 Kim et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090283410 Sklar et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100078330 Hyodo Apr 2010 A1
20100116675 Sklar et al. May 2010 A1
20100187117 Lingenfelter et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100304063 McCrea et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100304179 Facchini et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100319757 Oetting Dec 2010 A1
20110111296 Berdichevsky et al. May 2011 A1
20110162970 Sato Jul 2011 A1
20110180413 Whitaker et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110186582 Whitaker et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110256356 Tomantschger et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110277313 Soracco et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120118745 Bao May 2012 A1
20120135270 Wilbuer et al. May 2012 A1
20120231574 Wang Sep 2012 A1
20120282417 Garcia et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130052343 Dieny et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130071755 Oguro Mar 2013 A1
20130075264 Cummings et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130130057 Caldwell et al. May 2013 A1
20130186852 Dietrich et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130220831 Vidaurre Heiremans et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130224008 Cheung et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130323473 Dietsch et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140163717 Das et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140178637 Rajagopalan et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140231266 Sherrer et al. Aug 2014 A1
20150315716 Whitaker Nov 2015 A1
20150322588 Lomasney et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160002790 Whitaker et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160002803 Sklar Jan 2016 A1
20160002806 Lomasney Jan 2016 A1
20160002813 Lomasney Jan 2016 A1
20160024663 Lomasney Jan 2016 A1
20160047980 Page et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160145850 Cook et al. May 2016 A1
20160159488 Roach et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160160863 Roach et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160214283 Schick et al. Jul 2016 A1
20170191177 Whitaker et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170191179 Sklar Jul 2017 A1
20170275775 Guadarrama Calderon et al. Sep 2017 A1
20180016694 Bao Jan 2018 A1
20180066375 Morgan et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180071980 Lomasney et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180245229 Whitaker et al. Aug 2018 A1
20190309430 Sklar Oct 2019 A1
20190360116 Collinson et al. Nov 2019 A1
20200115998 Lomasney Apr 2020 A1
20200131658 Lomasney et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200173032 Lomasney Jun 2020 A1
20200277706 Lomasney et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200283923 Lomasney Sep 2020 A1
20200318245 Lomasney Oct 2020 A1
20200354846 Whitaker et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200392642 Lomasney Dec 2020 A1
20210054522 Lomasney et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210071303 Whitaker et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210147995 Sklar May 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (44)
Number Date Country
1236024 Nov 1999 CN
1380446 Nov 2002 CN
1924110 Mar 2007 CN
101113527 Jan 2008 CN
101195924 Jun 2008 CN
102148339 Aug 2011 CN
105442011 Mar 2016 CN
39 02 057 Jul 1990 DE
10 2004 006 441 Dec 2005 DE
1 688 518 Aug 2006 EP
2 189 554 May 2010 EP
S47-2005 Feb 1972 JP
S47-33925 Nov 1972 JP
S52-109439 Sep 1977 JP
58-197292 Nov 1983 JP
S60-97774 May 1985 JP
S61-99692 May 1986 JP
H0I-132793 May 1989 JP
2-214618 Aug 1990 JP
H05-251849 Sep 1993 JP
H06-196324 Jul 1994 JP
07-065347 Mar 1995 JP
H09-119000 May 1997 JP
2000-239888 Sep 2000 JP
2001-152388 Jun 2001 JP
2001-181893 Jul 2001 JP
2002-53999 Feb 2002 JP
2006-035176 Feb 2006 JP
2009-215590 Sep 2009 JP
2003-0092463 Dec 2003 KR
10-2015-0132043 Nov 2015 KR
36121 Apr 1934 SU
8302784 Aug 1983 WO
9514116 May 1995 WO
2004001100 Dec 2003 WO
2007045466 Apr 2007 WO
2007138619 Dec 2007 WO
2008057401 May 2008 WO
2009045433 Apr 2009 WO
2011033775 Mar 2011 WO
2011110346 Sep 2011 WO
2012145750 Oct 2012 WO
2013133762 Sep 2013 WO
2017097300 Jun 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (93)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 16/582,931, filed Sep. 25, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/671,104, filed Oct. 31, 2019.
“Appendix 1: Literature review (Task 1): Literature review concerning the improvement of galvanneal (GA) coating adherence during shear test of adhesively bonded GA steel sheets,” 70 pages, no date.
“Low-temperature iron plating,” web blog article found at http:blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_48ed0a9c0100024z.html, published Mar. 22, 2006, 3 pages. (with English translation).
Adams et al., “Controlling strength and toughness of multilayer films: A new multiscalar approach,” J. Appl. Phys. 74(2):1015-1021, 1993.
Aizenberg et al., “Skeleton of Euplectella sp.: Structural Hierarchy from the Nanoscale to the Macroscale,” Science 309:215-218, 2005.
Alfantazi et al., “Synthesis of nanocrystalline Zn—Ni alloy coatings,” JMSLD5 15(15):1361-1363, 1996.
Atanassov et al., “Electrodeposition and properties of nickel-manganese layers,” Surface and Coatings Technology 78:144-149, 1996.
Bakonyi et al., “Electrodeposited multilayer films with giant magnetoresistance (GMR): Progress and problems,” Progress in Materials Science 55:107-245, 2010.
Bartlett et al., “Electrochemical deposition of macroporous platinum, palladium and cobalt films using polystyrene latex sphere templates,” Chem. Commun., pp. 1671-1672, 2000.
Beattie et al., “Comparison of Electrodeposited Copper-Zinc Alloys Prepared Individually and Combinatorially,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 150(11):C802-C806, 2003.
Bird et al., “Giant Magnetoresistance in Electrodeposited Ni/Cu and Co/Cu Multilayers,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 142(4):L65-L66, 1995.
Blum, “The Structure and Properties of Alternately Electrodeposited Metals,” presented at the Fortieth General Meeting of the American Electrochemical Society, Lake Placid, New York, Oct. 1, 1921, 14 pages.
Cohen et al., “Electroplating of Cyclic Multilayered Alloy (CMA) Coatings,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 130(10):1987-1995, 1983.
Cowles, “High cycle fatigue in aircraft gas turbines—an industry perspective,” International Journal of Fracture 80(2-3):147-163, 1996.
“Designing with Metals: Dissimilar Metals and The Galvanic Series,” printed Oct. 5, 2017, 3 pages.
Despic et al., “Electrochemical Formation of Laminar Deposits of Controlled Structure and Composition,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 136(6):1651-1657, 1989.
Dini et al. “On the High Temperature Ductility Properties of Electrodeposited Sulfamate Nickel,” Plating and Surface Finishing 65(2):36-40. 1978.
Etminanfar et al., “Corrosion resistance of multilayer coatings of nanolayered Cr/Ni electrodeposited from Cr(III)-Ni(II) bath,” Thin Solid Films 520:5322-5327, 2012.
Gasser et al., “Materials Design for Acoustic Liners: an Example of Tailored Multifunctional Materials,” Advanced Engineering Materials 6(1-2):97-102, 2004.
Georgescu et al., “Magnetic Behavior of [Ni/Co—Ni—Mg—N] x n Cylindrical Multilayers prepared by Magnetoelectrolysis,” Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 189(3):1051-1055, 2002.
Ghanem et al., “A double templated electrodeposition method for the fabrication of arrays of metal nanodots,” Electrochemistry Communications 6:447-453, 2004.
Grimmett et al., “Pulsed Electrodeposition of Iron-Nickel Alloys,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 137(11):3414-3418, 1990.
Hariyanti, “Electroplating of Cu—Sn Alloys and Compositionally Modulated Multilayers of Cu—Sn—Zn—Ni Alloys on Mild Steel Substrate,” Master of Science Thesis, University of Science, Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia, 2007.
Harris et al., “Improved Single Crystal Superalloys, CMSX-4® (SLS)[La+Y] and CMSX-486®,” TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society), Superalloys, p. 45-52, 2004.
Huang et al., “Hardness variation and annealing behavior of a Cr—Ni multilayer electroplated in a trivalent chromium-based bath,” Surface and Coatings Technology 203:3320-3324, 2009.
Huang et al., “Characterization of Cr—Ni multilayers electroplated from a chromium(III)-nickel(II) bath using pulse current,” Scripta Materialia, 57:61-64, 2007.
Igawa et al., “Fabrication of SiC fiber reinforced SiC composite by chemical vapor infiltration for excellent mechanical properties,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 66:551-554. 2005.
Ivanov et al., “Corrosion resistance of compositionally modulated multilayered Zn—Ni alloys deposited from a single bath,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 33:239-244, 2003.
Jeong et al., “The Effect of Grain Size on the Wear Properties of Electrodeposited Nanocrystalline Nickel Coatings,” Scripta Mater. 44:493-499, 2001.
Jia et al., “LIGA and Micromolding” Chapter 4, The MEMS Handbook, 2nd edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, Edited by Mohamed Gad-el-Hak, 2006.
Kalu et al., “Cyclic voltammetric studies of the effects of time and temperature on the capacitance of electrochemically deposited nickel hydroxide,” Journal of Power Sources 92:163-167, 2001.
Kaneko et al., “Vickers hardness and deformation of Ni/Cu nano-multilayers electrodeposited on copper substrates,” Eleventh International Conference on Intergranular and Interphase Boundaries 2004, Journal of Material Science 40:3231-3236, 2005.
Karimpoor et al., “Tensile Properties of Bulk Nanocrystalline Hexagonal Cobalt Electrodeposits,” Materials Science Forum 386-388:415-420, 2002.
Keckes et al., “Cell-wall recovery after irreversible deformation of wood,” Nature Materials 2:810-814, 2003.
Kirilova et al., “Corrosion behaviour of Zn—Co compositionally modulated multilayers electrodeposited from single and dual baths,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 29:1133-1137, 1999.
Kockar et al., “Effect of potantiostatic waveforms on properties of electrodeposited NiFe alloy films,” Eur. Phys. J. B(42):497-501, 2004.
Kruth et al., “Progress in Additive Manufacturing and Rapid Prototyping” CIRP Annals 47(2):525-540, 1998.
Lashmore et al., “Electrodeposited Cu—Ni Textured Superlattices,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 135(5):1218-1221, 1988.
Lashmore et al., “Electrodeposited Multilayer Metallic Coatings,” Encyclopedia of Materials Science and Engineering, Supp. vol. 1:136-140, 1988.
Leisner et al., “Methods for electrodepositing composition-modulated alloys,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 58:39-44, 1996.
Leith et al., “Characterization of Flow-Induced Compositional Structure in Electrodeposited NiFe Composition-Modulated Alloys” J. Electrochem. Soc. 145(8):2821-2833, 1998.
Lekka et al., “Corrosion and wear resistant electrodeposited composite coatings,” Electrochimica Acta 50:4551-4556, 2005.
Lewis et al., “Stability in thin film multilayers and microlaminates: the role of free energy, structure, and orientation at interfaces and grain boundaries,” Scripta Materialia 48:1079-1085, 2003.
Low et al., “Electrodeposition of composite coatings containing nanoparticles in a metal deposit,” Surface & Coating Technology 201:371-383, 2006.
Malone, “New Developments in Electroformed Nickel-Based Structural Alloys,” Plating and Surface Finishing 74(1):50-56, 1987.
Marchese, “Stress Reduction of Electrodeposited Nickel,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society 99(2):39-43, 1952.
Meng et al., “Fractography, elastic modulus, and oxidation resistance of Novel metal-intermetallic Ni/Ni3Al multilayer films,” J. Mater. Res. 17(4):790-796, 2002.
Naslain et al., “Synthesis of highly tailored ceramic matrix composites by pressure-pulsed CVI,” Solid State Ionics 141-142:541-548, 2001.
Naslain, “The design of the fibre-matrix interfacial zone in ceramic matrix composites,” Composites Part A 29A: 1145-1155, 1998.
Nicholls, “Advances in Coating Design for High-Performance Gas Turbines,” MRS Bulletin, p. 659-670, 2003.
Onoda et al., “Preparation of amorphous/crystalloid soft magnetic multilayer Ni—Co—B alloy films by electrodeposition,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 126(1-3):595-598, 1993.
Parkin et al., “Oscillations in Exchange Coupling and Magnetoresistance in Metallic Superlattice Structures: Co/Ru, Co/Cr, and Fe/Cr,” Physical Review Letters 64(19):2304-2307, 1990.
Pilone et al., “Model of Multiple Metal Electrodeposition in Porous Electrodes,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society 153(5):D85-D90, 2006.
Podlaha et al. “Induced Codeposition: I. An Experimental Investigation of Ni—Mo Alloys,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 143(3):885-892, 1996.
Ross, “Electrodeposited Multilayer Thin Films,” Annual Review of Materials Science 24:159-188, 1994.
Rousseau et al., “Single-bath Electrodeposition of Chromium-Nickel Compositionally Modulated Multilayers (CMM) From a Trivalent Chromium Bath,” Plating and Surface Finishing, p. 106-110, 1999.
Saleh et al., “Effects of electroplating on the mechanical properties of stereolithography and laser sintered parts,” Rapid Prototyping Journal 10(5)305-315, 2004.
Sanders et al., “Mechanics of hollow sphere foams,” Materials Science and Engineering A347:70-85, 2003.
Sartwell et al., “Replacement of Chromium Electroplating on Gas Turbine Engine Components Using Thermal Spray Coatings,” Report No. NRL/MR/6170-05-8890, Naval Research Laboratory, 2005, (207 pages).
Schwartz, “Multiple-Layer Alloy Plating,” ASM Handbook 5: Surface Engineering, p. 274-276, 1994.
Sherik, “Synthesis, Structure and Properties of Electrodeposited Bulk Nanocrystalline Nickel,” Master's Thesis, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada, 1993.
Shishkovski, “Laser synthesis of functionally graded meso structures and bulk products,” FIZMATLIT, Moscow, Russia, pp. 30-38, 2009, (with English Abstract).
Simunovich et al., “Electrochemically Layered Copper-Nickel Nanocomposites with Enhanced Hardness,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 141(1):L10-L11, 1994.
Sperling et al., “Correlation of stress state and nanohardness via heat treatment of nickel-aluminide multilayer thin films,” J. Mater. Res. 19(11):3374-3381, 2004.
Srivastava et al., “Corrosion resistance and microstructure of electrodeposited nickel-cobalt alloy coatings,” Surface & Coatings Technology 201:3051-3060, 2006.
Stephenson, Jr., “Development and Utilization of a High Strength Alloy for Electroforming,” Plating 53(2): 183-192, 1966.
Suresh, “Graded Materials for Resistance to Contact Deformation and Damage,” Science 292:2447-2451, 2001.
Switzer et al., “Electrodeposited Ceramic Superlattices,” Science 247(4941)444-446, 1990.
Tench et al., “Considerations in Electrodeposition of Compositionally Modulated Alloys,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 737(10):3061-3066, 1990.
Tench et al., “Enhanced Tensile Strength for Electrodeposited Nickel-Copper Multilayer Composites,” Metallurgical Transactions A (15A):2039-2040, 1984.
Thangaraj et al., “Corrosion behavior of composition modulated multilayer Zn—Co electrodeposits produced using a single-bath technique,” J. of Appl. Electrochem. 39:339-345, 2009.
Thangaraj et al., “Surface Modification by Compositionally Modulated Multilayered Zn—Fe Coatings,” Chinese Journal of Chemistry 26:2285-2291, 2008.
Tokarz et al., “Preparation, structural and mechanical properties of electrodeposited Co/Cu multilayers.” phys. stat. sol. (c) 5(11):3526-3529, 2008.
Touchstone Research Laboratory, Ltd., Material Safety Data Sheet, CFOAM Carbon Foams, 2008. (4 pages).
Vill et al., “Mechanical Properties of Tough Multiscalar Microlaminates,” Acta metall. mater. 43(2):427-437, 1995.
Voevodin et al., “Superhard, functionally gradient, nanolayered and nanocomposite diamond-like carbon coatings for wear protection,” Diamond and Related Materials 7:463-467, 1998.
Wearmouth et al., “Electroforming with Heat-Resistant, Sulfur-Hardened Nickel,” Plating and Surface Finishing 66(10):53-57, 1979.
Weil et al., “Pulsed Electrodeposition of Layered Brass Structures,” Metallurgical Transactions A 19A:1569-1573, 1988.
Weil et al., “Properties of Composite Electrodeposits,” U.S. Army Research Office, Final Report, Contract No. DAALO3-87-K-0047, 21 pages, 1990.
Wikipedia, “Gold,” URL= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold, version modified Nov. 3, 12 pages, 2008.
Wikipedia, “Silver,” URL= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver, version modified Nov. 3, 12 pages, 2008.
Wilcox, “Surface Modification With Compositionally Modulated Multilayer Coatings,” The Journal of Corrosion Science and Engineering 6(Paper 52): 2004 (5 pages).
Wu et al., “Preparation and characterization of superhard CNx/ZrN multilayers,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15(3):946-950, 1997.
Yahalom et al., “Formation of composition-modulated alloys by electrodeposition,” Journal of Materials Science 22:499-503, 1987.
Yang et al., “Effects of SiC sub-layer on mechanical properties of Tyranno-SA/SiC composites with multiple interlayers,” Ceramics International 31:525-531, 2005.
Yang et al., “Enhanced elastic modulus in composition-modulated gold-nickel and copper-palladium foils,” Journal of Applied Physics 48(3):876-879, 1977.
Yogesha et al., “Optimization of deposition conditions for development of high corrosion resistant Zn—Fe multilayer coatings,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 211:1409-1415, 2011.
Zabludovsky et al., “The Obtaining of Cobalt Multilayers by Programme-controlled Pulse Current,” Transactions of the Institute of Metal Finishing 75(5):203-204, 1997.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/179,351, filed Feb. 18, 2021.
Paz et al., “Nano-Laminated Alloys for Improved Return on Oilfield Assets,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2016 (14 pages).
U.S. Pat. No. 11,118,280, dated Sep. 14, 2021.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/409,688, dated Aug. 23, 2021.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200318245 A1 Oct 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61185020 Jun 2009 US
Divisions (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14729020 Jun 2015 US
Child 16726079 US
Parent 13314948 Dec 2011 US
Child 14729020 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent PCT/US2010/037856 Jun 2010 US
Child 13314948 US