Laminated metals, and in particular nanolaminated metals, are of interest for structural and thermal applications because of their unique toughness, fatigue resistance and thermal stability. For corrosion protection, however, relatively little success has been reported in the formation of corrosion-resistant coatings that are laminated on the nanoscale.
Electrodeposition has been successfully used to deposit nanolaminated coatings on metal and alloy components for a variety of engineering applications. Electrodeposition is recognized as a low-cost method for forming a dense coating on any conductive substrate. Electrodeposition has been demonstrated as a viable means for producing nanolaminated coatings, in which the individual laminates may vary in the composition of the metal, ceramic or organic-metal composition or other microstructure feature. By time varying electrodeposition parameters such as current density, bath composition, pH, mixing rate, and/or temperature, multi-laminate materials can be produced in a single bath. Alternately by moving a mandrel or substrate from one bath to another, each of which represents a different combination of parameters that are held constant, multi-laminate materials or coatings can be realized.
The corrosion behavior of organic, ceramic, metal and metal-containing coatings depends primarily on their chemistry, microstructure, adhesion, thickness and galvanic interaction with the substrate to which they are applied. In the case of sacrificial metal or metal-containing coatings, such as zinc on an iron-based substrate, the coating is less electronegative than the substrate and so oxidation of the coating occurs preferentially, thus protecting the substrate. Because these coatings protect by providing an oxidation-preferred sacrificial layer, they will continue to work even when marred or scratched. The performance of sacrificial coatings depends heavily on the rate of oxidation of the coating layer and the thickness of the sacrificial layer. Corrosion protection of the substrate only lasts so long as the sacrificial coating is in place and may vary depending on the environment that the coating is subjected to and the resulting rate of coating oxidation.
Alternately, in the case of a barrier coating, such as nickel on an iron-based substrate, the coating is more electronegative than the substrate and thus works by creating a barrier to oxidative corrosion. In A-type metals, such as Fe, Ni, Cr and Zn, it is generally true that the higher the electronegativity, the greater the nobility (non reactivity). When the coating is more noble than the substrate, if that coating is marred or scratched in any way, or if coverage is not complete, these coatings will not work, and may accelerate the progress of substrate corrosion at the substrate: coating interface, resulting in preferential attack of the substrate. This is also true when ceramic coatings are used. For example, it has been reported in the prior art that while fully dense TiN coatings are more noble than steel and aluminum in resistance to various corrosive environments, pinholes and micropores that can occur during processing of these coating are detrimental to their corrosion resistance properties. In the case of barrier coatings, pinholes in the coating may accelerate corrosion in the underlying metal by pitting, crevice or galvanic corrosion mechanisms.
Many approaches have been utilized to improve the corrosion resistance of barrier coatings, such as reducing pinhole defects through the use of a metallic intermediate layer or multiple layering schemes. Such approaches are generally targeted at reducing the probability of defects or reducing the susceptibility to failure in the case of a defect, mar or scratch. One example of a multiple layering scheme is the practice commonly found in the deployment of industrial coatings, which involves the use of a primer, containing a sacrificial metal such as zinc, coupled with a highly-crosslinked, low surface energy topcoat (such as a fluorinated or polyurethane topcoat). In such case, the topcoat acts as a barrier to corrosion. In case the integrity of the topcoat is compromised for any reason, the metal contained in the primer acts as a sacrificial media, thus sacrificially protecting the substrate from corrosion.
Dezincification is a term is used to mean the corroding away of one constituent of any alloy leaving the others more or less in situ. This phenomenon is perhaps most common in brasses containing high percentages of zinc, but the same or parallel phenomena are familiar in the corrosion of aluminum bronzes and other alloys of metals of widely different chemical affinities. Dezincification usually becomes evident as an area with well-defined boundaries, and within which the more noble metal becomes concentrated as compared with the original alloy. In the case of brass the zinc is often almost completely removed and copper is present almost in a pure state, but in a very weak mechanical condition. Corrosion by dezincification usually depends on the galvanic differential between the dissimilar metals and the environmental conditions contributing to corrosion. Dezincification of alloys results in overall loss of the structural integrity of the alloy and is considered one of the most aggressive forms of corrosion.
Coatings that may represent the best of both the sacrificial coating and the barrier coating are those that are more noble than the substrate and creates a barrier to corrosion, but, in case that coating is compromised, is also less noble than the substrate and will sacrificially corrode, thus protecting the substrate from direct attack.
In one embodiment of the technology described herein, the phenomena observed in dezincification of alloys is leveraged to enable corrosion resistant coatings that are both more and less noble than the substrate, and which protect the substrate by acting both as a barrier and as a sacrificial coating. Other embodiments and advantages of this technology will become apparent upon consideration of the following description.
The technology described herein includes in one embodiment an electrodeposited, corrosion-resistant multilayer coating or cladding, which comprises multiple nanoscale layers that periodically vary in electrodeposited species or electrodeposited microstructures (electrodeposited species microstructures), wherein variations in said layers of said electrodeposited species or electrodeposited species microstructure result in galvanic interactions between the layers, said nanoscale layers having interfaces there between.
The technology described herein also provides an electrodeposition method for producing a corrosion resistant multilayer coating or cladding comprising the steps of:
a) placing a mandrel or a substrate to be coated in a first electrolyte containing one or more metal ions, ceramic particles, polymer particles, or a combination thereof; and
b) applying electric current and varying in time one or more of: the amplitude of the electrical current, electrolyte temperature, electrolyte additive concentration, or electrolyte agitation, in order to produce periodic layers of electrodeposited species or periodic layer of electrodeposited species microstructures; and
c) growing a multilayer coating under such conditions until the desired thickness of the multilayer coating is achieved.
Such a method may further comprising after step (c), step (d), which comprises removing the mandrel or the substrate from the bath and rinsing.
The technology described herein further provides an electrodeposition method for producing a corrosion resistant multilayer coating or cladding comprising the steps of:
a) placing a mandrel or substrate to be coated in a first electrolyte containing one or more metal ions, ceramic particles, polymer particles, or a combination thereof; and
b) applying electric current and varying in time one or more of: the electrical current, electrolyte temperature, electrolyte additive concentration, or electrolyte agitation, in order to produce periodic layers of electrodeposited species or periodic layer of electrodeposited species microstructures; and
c) growing a nanometer-thickness layer under such conditions; and
d) placing said mandrel or substrate to be coated in a second electrolyte containing one or more metal ions that is different from said first electrolyte, said second electrolyte containing metal ions, ceramic particles, polymer particles, or a combination thereof; and
e) repeating steps (a) through (d) until the desired thickness of the multilayer coating is achieved;
wherein steps (a) through (d) are repeated at least two times. Such a method may further comprising after step (e), step (f) which comprises removing the mandrel or the coated substrate from the bath and rinsing.
Also described herein is an electrodeposited, corrosion-resistant multilayer coating or cladding, which comprises multiple nanoscale layers that vary in electrodeposited species microstructure, which layer variations result in galvanic interactions occurring between the layers. Also described is a corrosion-resistant multilayer coating or cladding, which comprises multiple nanoscale layers that vary in electrodeposited species, which layer variations result in galvanic interactions occurring between the layers.
The coating and claddings described herein are resistant to corrosion due to oxidation, reduction, stress, dissolution, dezincification, acid, base, or sulfidation and the like.
In one embodiment an electrodeposited corrosion-resistant multilayer coating comprised of individual layers with thicknesses on the nanometer scale is provided. In such an embodiment the individual layers can differ in electronegativity from adjacent layers.
In other embodiments, the present technology provides corrosion-resistant multilayer coatings or claddings (together herein referred to as a “coating”) that comprise multiple nanoscale layers having variations in the composition of metal, alloy, polymer, or ceramic components, or combination thereof (together herein referred to as “electrodeposited species”).
In such embodiments the variations in the compositions between layers results in galvanic interactions occurring between the layers.
In another embodiment, the present technology provides a corrosion-resistant multilayer coating that comprises multiple nanoscale layers having layer variations in grain size, crystal orientation, grain boundary geometry, or combination thereof (together herein referred to as “electrodeposited species microstructure(s)”), which layer variations result in galvanic interactions occurring between the layers.
In another embodiment multilayer coating or cladding is provided for, in which the layers vary in electronegativity or in nobility, and in which the rate of corrosion can be controlled by controlling the difference in electronegativity or in the reactivity (or “nobility”) of adjacent layers.
One embodiment of the present technology provides a multilayer coating or cladding in which one of the periodic layers is less noble than the other layer and is less noble than the substrate, thus establishing a periodic sacrificial layer in the multilayer coating.
As used herein “layers that periodically vary” means a series of two or more non-identical layers (non identical “periodic layers”) that are repeatedly applied over an underlying surface or mandrel. The series of non-identical layers can include a simple alternating pattern of two or more non-identical layers (e.g., layer 1, layer 2, layer 1, layer 2, etc.) or in another embodiment may include three or more non-identical layers (e.g., layer 1, layer 2, layer 3, layer 1, layer 2, layer 3, etc.). More complex alternating patterns can involve two, three, four, five or more layers arranged in constant or varying sequences (e.g., layer 1, layer 2, layer 3, layer 2, layer 1, layer 2, layer 3, layer 2, layer 1, etc.). In one embodiment, a series of two layers is alternately applied 100 times to provide a total of 200 layers having 100 periodic layers of a first type alternated with 100 periodic layers of a second type, wherein the first and second type of periodic layer are not identical. In other embodiments, “layers that periodically vary” include 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, or 5 or more layers that are repeatedly applied about 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,250, 1,500, 1,750, 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, 5,000, 7,500, 10,000, 15,000, 20,000 or more times.
As used herein, a “periodic layer” is an individual layer within “layers that periodically vary”.
In another embodiment, the present technology provides a multilayer coating or cladding in which one of the periodic layers is more noble than the other layer and is more noble than the substrate, thus establishing a periodic corrosion barrier layer in the multilayer coating.
In another embodiment, the present technology provides a multilayer coating in which one of the periodic layers is less noble than the adjacent layers and all layers are less noble than the substrate.
In still another embodiment, the present technology provides a multilayer coating or cladding in which one of the periodic layers is more noble than the adjacent layers and all layers are more noble than the substrate.
One embodiment of the present technology provides for a corrosion-resistant multilayer coating or cladding compositions that comprise individual layers, where the layers are not discrete, but rather exhibit diffuse interfaces with adjacent layers. In some embodiments the diffuse region between layers may be 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50 75, 100, 200, 400, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000, 6,000, 8,000 or 10,000 nanometers. In other embodiments the diffuse region between layers may be 1 to 5, or 5 to 25, or 25 to 100, or 100 to 500, or 500 to 1,000, or 1,000 to 2,000, or 2,000 to 5,000, or 4,000 to 10,000 nanometers. The thickness of the diffuse interface may be controlled in a variety of ways, including the rate at which the electrodeposition conditions are change.
Another embodiment of the technology described herein provides a method for producing a multilayered corrosion-resistant coating that comprises multiple nanoscale layers (“nanolaminates”) that vary in electrodeposited species or electrodeposited species microstructure or a combination thereof, which layers are produced by an electrodeposition process.
Where variations in electrodeposited species or combinations thereof are employed, in some embodiments, the electrodeposited species may comprise one or more of Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Au, Ag, Pd, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg and Cr, Al2O3, SiO2, TiN, BoN, Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2, epoxy, polyurethane, polyaniline, polyethylene, poly ether ether ketone, polypropylene.
In other embodiments the electrodeposited species may comprise one or more metals selected from Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Au, Ag, Pd, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg and Cr. Alternatively, the metals may be selected from: Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg and Cr; or from Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Sn, Mn, Co, Ti, Mg and Cr; or from Ni, Zn, Fe, Sn, and Cr. The metal may be present in any percentage. In such embodiments the percentage of each metal may independently selected about 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, 99, 99.9, 99.99, 99.999 or 100 percent of the electrodeposited species. Unless otherwise indicated, the percentages provided herein refer to weight percentages.
In other embodiments the electrodeposited species may comprise one or more ceramics (e.g., metals oxides or metal nitrides) selected from Al2O3, SiO2, TiN, BoN, Fe2O3, MgO, SiC, ZrC, CrC, diamond particulates, and TiO2. In such embodiments the percentage of each ceramic may independently selected about 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, 99, 99.9, 99.99, 99.999 or 100 percent of the electrodeposited species.
In still other embodiments the electrodeposited species may comprise one or more polymers selected from epoxy, polyurethane, polyaniline, polyethylene, poly ether ether ketone, polypropylene, and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate). In such embodiments the percentage of each polymer may independently selected about 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, 99, 99.9, 99.99, 99.999 or 100 percent of the electrodeposited species.
Another embodiment of the present technology provides a electrodeposition method for producing a nanolaminated, corrosion resistant coating which reduces through-hole defects in the overall corrosion resistant coating. Such methods include those wherein multi-layered coatings or claddings are applied to a substrate or mandrel as illustrated in
As shown on the left of
As shown on the right of
In one embodiment, the technology described herein describes a method for producing a multilayer, nanolaminated coating by an electrodeposition process carried out in a single bath, comprising the steps of:
a) placing a mandrel or a substrate to be coated in a first electrolyte containing one or more metal ions, ceramic particles, polymer particles, or a combination thereof; and
b) applying electric current and varying in time one or more of: the amplitude of the electrical current, electrolyte temperature, electrolyte additive concentration, or electrolyte agitation, in order to produce periodic layers of electrodeposited species or periodic layer of electrodeposited species microstructures; and
c) growing a multilayer coating under such conditions until the desired thickness of the multilayer coating is achieved.
Such a method may further comprise after step (c), step (d) removing the mandrel or the substrate from the bath and rinsing.
The technology described herein also sets forth a method for producing a multilayer, nanolaminated coating or cladding using serial electrodeposition in two or more baths comprising the steps of:
Such a method may further comprise after step (e), step (f) removing the mandrel or the coated substrate from the bath and rinsing.
Corrosion-resistant multilayer coatings can be produced on a mandrel, instead of directly on a substrate to make a free-standing material or cladding. Cladding produced in this manner may be attached to the substrate by other means, including welding, gluing or through the use of other adhesive materials.
The multilayer coatings can comprise layers of metals that are electrolytically deposited from aqueous solution, such as Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Au, Ag, Pd, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb and Cr. The multilayer coating can also comprise alloys of these metals, including, but not limited to: ZnFe, ZnCu, ZnCo, NiZn, NiMn, NiFe, NiCo, NiFeCo, CoFe, CoMn. The multilayer can also comprise metals that are electrolytically deposited from a molten salt or ionic liquid solution. These include those metals previously listed, and others, including, but not limited to Al, Mg, Ti and Na. In other embodiments multilayer coatings can comprise one or more metals selected from Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Au, Ag, Pd, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg and Cr. Alternatively, one or more metals to be electrolytically deposited may be selected from: Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg and Cr; or from Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Sn, Mn, Co, Ti, Mg and Cr; or from Ni, Zn, Fe, Sn, and Cr.
The multilayer coating can comprise ceramics and polymers that are electrophoretically deposited for aqueous or ionic liquid solutions, including, but not limited to Al2O3, SiO2, TiN, BoN, Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2. Suitable polymers include, but are not limited to, epoxy, polyurethane, polyaniline, polyethylene, poly ether ether ketone, polypropylene.
The multilayer coating can also comprise combinations of metals and ceramics, metals and polymers, such as the above-mentioned metals, ceramics and polymers.
The thickness of the individual layers (nanoscale layers) can vary greatly as for example between 0.5 and 10,000 nanometers, and in some embodiments is about 200 nanometers per layer. The thickness of the individual layers (nanoscale layers) may also be about 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50 75, 100, 200, 400, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000, 6,000, 8,000 or 10,000 nanometers. In other embodiments the layers may be about 0.5 to 1, or 1 to 5, or 5 to 25, or 25 to 100, or 100 to 300, or 100 to 400, or 500 to 1,000, or 1,000 to 2,000, or 2,000 to 5,000, or 4,000 to 10,000 nanometers.
Individual layers may be of the same thickness or different thickness. Layers that vary periodically may also vary in thickness.
The overall thickness of the coating or cladding can vary greatly as, for example, between 2 micron and 6.5 millimeters or more. In some embodiments the overall thickness of the coating or cladding can also be between 2 nanometers and 10,000 nanometers, 4 nanometers and 400 nanometers, 50 nanometers and 500 nanometers, 100 nanometers and 1,000 nanometers, 1 micron to 10 microns, 5 microns to 50 microns, 20 microns to 200 microns, 200 microns to 2 millimeters (mm), 400 microns to 4 mm, 200 microns to 5 mm, 1 mm to 6.5 mm, 5 mm to 12.5 mm, 10 mm to 20 mm, 15 mm to 30 mm.
Layer thickness can be controlled by, among other things, the application of current in the electrodeposition process. This technique involves the application of current to the substrate or mandrel to cause the formation of the coating or cladding on the substrate or mandrel. The current can be applied continuously or, more preferably, according to a predetermined pattern such as a waveform. In particular, the waveform (e.g., sine waves, square waves, sawtooth waves, or triangle waves). can be applied intermittently to promote the electrodeposition process, to intermittently reverse the electrodeposition process, to increase or decrease the rate of deposition, to alter the composition of the material being deposited, or to provide for a combination of such techniques to achieve a specific layer thickness or a specific pattern of differing layers. The current density and the period of the wave forms may be varied independently. In some embodiments current density may be continuously or discretely varied with the range between 0.5 and 2000 mA/cm2. Other ranges for current densities are also possible, for example, a current density may be varied within the range between: about 1 and 20 mA/cm2; about 5 and 50 mA/cm2; about 30 and 70 mA/cm2; 0.5 and 500 mA/cm2; 100 and 2000 mA/cm2; greater than about 500 mA/cm2; and about 15 and 40 mA/cm2 base on the surface area of the substrate or mandrel to be coated. In some embodiments the frequency of the wave forms may be from about 0.01 Hz to about 50 Hz. In other embodiments the frequency can be from: about 0.5 to about 10 Hz; 0.02 to about 1 Hz or from about 2 to 20 Hz; or from about 1 to about 5 Hz.
The multilayer coatings and claddings described herein are suitable for coating or cladding a variety of substrates that are susceptible to corrosion. In one embodiment the substrates are particularly suited for coating substrates made of materials that can corrode such as iron, steel, aluminum, nickel, cobalt, iron, manganese, copper, titanium, alloys thereof, reinforced composites and the like.
The coatings and claddings described herein may be employed to protect against numerous types of corrosion, including, but not limited to corrosion caused by oxidation, reduction. stress (stress corrosion), dissolution, dezincification, acid, base, sulfidation and the like.
Preparation of a multilayer coating comprising nanoscale layers of zinc-iron alloy, in which the concentration of iron varies in adjacent layers.
A zinc-iron bath is produced using a commercial plating bath formula supplied by MacDermid Inc. (Waterbury, Conn.). The composition of the bath is described in Table 1.
A steel panel is immersed into the bath and connected to a power supply. The power supply was combined with a computer generated waveform supply that provided a square waveform which alternates between 25 mA/cm2 (for 17.14 seconds) and 15 mA/cm2 (for 9.52 seconds). The total plating time for a M90 coating (0.9 oz of coating per square foot) is about 1.2 hrs. In this time approximately 325 layers were deposited to achieve a total thickness of 19 μm. The individual layer thickness was between 50 and 100 nm.
The coating is tested in a corrosive environment, in accordance with ASTM B117 (Standard Practice for Operating Salt Spray), and shows no evidence of red rust after 300 hours of exposure.
Nickel Cobalt alloys have been used extensively in recent history because of its great wear and corrosion resistance. A nanolaminated Ni—Co alloy was created which contains codeposited diamond particles. The Ni—Co alloy by itself is a corrosion and wear resistant alloy. By modulating the electrode potential in the cell, it was possible to laminate the composition of the alloy. By doing this, a galvanic potential difference was established between the layers and thus created a more favorable situation for corrosion and fatigue wear. Also, two unique phases in the crystal structure of the matrix were established. The deposition rate of the diamonds has also been shown to vary with the current density of the cell.
Preparation of a multilayer coating comprising nanoscale layers of a Nickel-Cobalt alloy with diamond codeposition, in which the concentration of the metals vary in adjacent layers.
A traditional Nickel watts bath is used as the basis for the bath. The following table describes all of the components of the bath.
For creating samples, a steel panel is immersed into the bath and is connected to a power supply. The current density modulation was carried out between 10 mA/cm2 and 35 mA/cm2 with computer controlled software to form nanoscale layers. The current is applied and varied until a 20 μm thick coating had been formed on the substrate surface.
Testing for this coating has been carried out in a salf fog chamber in accordance with the ASTM B117 standers as well as taber wear tests which show the abrasion resistance to be significantly better than homogeneous coatings of Nickel-Cobalt and of stainless steel 316.
Preparation of a Ni—Zr—Cr alloy system containing particulate precursors.
Bath Make-Up Procedure:
In a first SEM image of the plated substrates shows a high density particle incorporation of zirconium and chromium carbide particles on a steel substrate. Particle spacing is between <1 and 5 microns and the deposit is fully dense. Particles show relatively even distribution throughout the deposit. A second SEM image shows low particle density inclusions on a steel substrate. Particle spacing is between 1 and 15 microns, with some deposit cleaving at particle/matrix interface. Even particle distribution is less pronounced in the second SEM image. Minor surface roughness is seen in both deposits.
Optional Heat Treatment:
In the event the coating requires greater corrosion resistance, a heat treatment can be applied to diffuse included zirconium throughout the deposit, creating, in this case, corrosion-resistant intermetallic phases of the Ni Cr and Zr. Heat treatment may be performed by:
The above descriptions of exemplary embodiments of methods for forming nanolaminate structures are illustrative of the present invention. Because of variations which will be apparent to those skilled in the art, however, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments described above. The scope of the invention is defined in the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/729,020, filed Jun. 2, 2015, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/314,948, filed Dec. 8, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,253,419, issued Apr. 9, 2019, which is a continuation of PCT/US2010/037856, filed Jun. 8, 2010, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/185,020, filed Jun. 8, 2009, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2428033 | Nachtman | Sep 1947 | A |
2436316 | Lum et al. | Feb 1948 | A |
2470775 | Jemstedt et al. | May 1949 | A |
2558090 | Jemstedt | Jun 1951 | A |
2642654 | Ahrens | Jun 1953 | A |
2678909 | Jemstedt et al. | May 1954 | A |
2694743 | Ruskin et al. | Nov 1954 | A |
2706170 | Marchese | Apr 1955 | A |
2891309 | Fenster | Jun 1959 | A |
3090733 | Brown | May 1963 | A |
3255781 | Gillespie, Jr. | Jun 1966 | A |
3282810 | Odekerken | Nov 1966 | A |
3359469 | Levy et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
3362851 | Dunster | Jan 1968 | A |
3483113 | Carter | Dec 1969 | A |
3549505 | Hanusa | Dec 1970 | A |
3616286 | Aylward et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3633520 | Stiglich, Jr. | Jan 1972 | A |
3716464 | Kovac et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3753664 | Klingenmaier et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3759799 | Reinke | Sep 1973 | A |
3787244 | Schulmeister et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3866289 | Brown et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3941674 | Vanmunster | May 1976 | A |
3994694 | Clauss et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
3996114 | Ehrsam | Dec 1976 | A |
4053371 | Towsley | Oct 1977 | A |
4105526 | Lewellen, Jr. et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4107003 | Anselrode | Aug 1978 | A |
4191617 | Hurley et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4204918 | McIntyre et al. | May 1980 | A |
4216272 | Clauss | Aug 1980 | A |
4246057 | Janowski et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4284688 | Stücheli et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4314893 | Clauss | Feb 1982 | A |
4405427 | Byrd | Sep 1983 | A |
4422907 | Birkmaier et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4461680 | Lashmore | Jul 1984 | A |
4464232 | Wakano et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4510209 | Hada et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4519878 | Hara et al. | May 1985 | A |
4540472 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4543300 | Hara et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4543803 | Keyasko | Oct 1985 | A |
4591418 | Snyder | May 1986 | A |
4592808 | Doubt | Jun 1986 | A |
4597836 | Schaer et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4613388 | Walter et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4620661 | Slatterly | Nov 1986 | A |
4652348 | Yahalom et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4666567 | Loch | May 1987 | A |
4670356 | Sato et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4678552 | Chen | Jul 1987 | A |
4678721 | den Broeder et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4702802 | Umino et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
H543 | Chen et al. | Nov 1988 | H |
4795735 | Uiu et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4834845 | Muko et al. | May 1989 | A |
4839214 | Oda et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4869971 | Nee et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4885215 | Yoshioka et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4904542 | Mroczkowski | Feb 1990 | A |
4904543 | Sakakima et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4923574 | Cohen | May 1990 | A |
4975337 | Hyner et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5043230 | Jagannathan et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5045356 | Uemura et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5056936 | Mahrus et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059493 | Takahata | Oct 1991 | A |
5073237 | Bacher et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5079039 | Heraud et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5156729 | Mahrus et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156899 | Kistrup et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158653 | Lashmore et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5190637 | Guckel | Mar 1993 | A |
5228967 | Crites et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5268235 | Lashmore et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5300165 | Sugikawa | Apr 1994 | A |
5320719 | Lasbmore et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5326454 | Engelhaupt | Jul 1994 | A |
5352266 | Erb et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5378583 | Guckel et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5413874 | Moysan, III et al. | May 1995 | A |
5431800 | Kirchhoff et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5461769 | McGregor | Oct 1995 | A |
5472795 | Atita | Dec 1995 | A |
5489488 | Asai et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5500600 | Moyes | Mar 1996 | A |
5547096 | Kleyn | Apr 1996 | A |
5527445 | Palumbo | Jun 1996 | A |
5545435 | Steffier | Aug 1996 | A |
5620800 | De Leeuw et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5660704 | Murase | Aug 1997 | A |
5679232 | Fedor et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5738951 | Goujard et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742471 | Barbee, Jr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5775402 | Sachs et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5783259 | McDonald | Jul 1998 | A |
5798033 | Uemiya et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800930 | Chen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828526 | Kagawa et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5912069 | Yializis et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930085 | Kitade et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942096 | Ruzicka et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5952111 | Sugg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958604 | Riabkov et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6036832 | Knol et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6036833 | Tang et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6071398 | Martin et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6143424 | Jonte et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6143430 | Miyasaka et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6193858 | Hradil et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200452 | Angelini | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203936 | Cisar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212078 | Hunt et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214473 | Hunt et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6284357 | Lackey et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312579 | Bank et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6344123 | Bhatnagar | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355153 | Uzoh et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6398937 | Menini et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409907 | Braun et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415942 | Fenton et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6461678 | Chen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466417 | Gill | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468672 | Donovan, III et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482298 | Bhatnagar | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6537683 | Staschko et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547944 | Schreiber et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6592739 | Sonoda et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6725916 | Gray et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6739028 | Sievenpiper et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6777831 | Gutiérrez, Jr. et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6800121 | Shahin | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6884499 | Penich et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6902827 | Kelly et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908667 | Christ et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6923898 | Yoshimura et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6979490 | Steffier | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7581933 | Bruce et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7632590 | Punsalan et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7736753 | Deligianni et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8084564 | Kano et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8152985 | Macary | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8177945 | Arvin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8192608 | Matthews | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8253035 | Matsumoto | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8585875 | Cummings et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8814437 | Braun | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8916001 | Pryce Lewis et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9005420 | Tomantschger et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9056405 | Sato et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9080692 | Tomomori et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9108506 | Whitaker et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9115439 | Whitaker | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9234294 | Whitaker et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9273932 | Whitaker et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9732433 | Caldwell et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9758891 | Bao | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9783907 | Cai et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9938629 | Whitaker et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10041185 | Sukenari | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10253419 | Lomasney | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10266957 | Sugawara et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10472727 | Lomasney | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10513791 | Lomasney et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10544510 | Lomasney | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10662542 | Caldwell et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10689773 | Whitaker et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10781524 | Whitaker et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10808322 | Whitaker et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10844504 | Sklar | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10851464 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
10961635 | Whitaker | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11118280 | Lomasney et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
20010037944 | Sanada et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020011419 | Arao et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020070118 | Schreiber et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020100858 | Weber | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020179449 | Domeier et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030134142 | Ivey et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030234181 | Palumbo | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236163 | Chaturvedi et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040027715 | Hixson-Goldsmith et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031691 | Kelly et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040067314 | Joshi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040154925 | Podlaha et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040178076 | Stonas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040211672 | Ishigami et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040232005 | Hubel | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234683 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239836 | Chase | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002228 | Dieny et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050109433 | Danger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050205425 | Palumbo et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050221100 | Kirihara et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050279640 | Shimoyama et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060065533 | Inoue et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060135281 | Palumbo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135282 | Palumbo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060201817 | Guggemos et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060243597 | Matefi-Tempfli et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269770 | Cox et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272949 | Detor et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286348 | Sauer | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070158204 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070269648 | Schuh et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278105 | Ettel | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080063866 | Allen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080093221 | Basol | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080102360 | Stimits et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080226976 | Stimits | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080245669 | Yoshioka et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271995 | Savastiouk et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283236 | Akers et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090004465 | Kano et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090101511 | Lochtman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090114530 | Noda et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090130424 | Tholen et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090130425 | Whitaker | May 2009 | A1 |
20090155617 | Kim et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090283410 | Sklar et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100078330 | Hyodo | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100116675 | Sklar et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100187117 | Lingenfelter et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100304063 | McCrea et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304179 | Facchini et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319757 | Oetting | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110111296 | Berdichevsky et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110162970 | Sato | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110180413 | Whitaker et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110186582 | Whitaker et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110256356 | Tomantschger et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110277313 | Soracco et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120118745 | Bao | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135270 | Wilbuer et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120231574 | Wang | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120282417 | Garcia et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130052343 | Dieny et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130071755 | Oguro | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130075264 | Cummings et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130130057 | Caldwell et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130186852 | Dietrich et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130220831 | Vidaurre Heiremans et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130224008 | Cheung et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130323473 | Dietsch et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140163717 | Das et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140178637 | Rajagopalan et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140231266 | Sherrer et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150315716 | Whitaker | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150322588 | Lomasney et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160002790 | Whitaker et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160002803 | Sklar | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160002806 | Lomasney | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160002813 | Lomasney | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160024663 | Lomasney | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160047980 | Page et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160145850 | Cook et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160159488 | Roach et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160160863 | Roach et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160214283 | Schick et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170191177 | Whitaker et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170191179 | Sklar | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170275775 | Guadarrama Calderon et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180016694 | Bao | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180066375 | Morgan et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180071980 | Lomasney et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180245229 | Whitaker et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190309430 | Sklar | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190360116 | Collinson et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200115998 | Lomasney | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200131658 | Lomasney et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200173032 | Lomasney | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200277706 | Lomasney et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200283923 | Lomasney | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200318245 | Lomasney | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200354846 | Whitaker et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200392642 | Lomasney | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210054522 | Lomasney et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210071303 | Whitaker et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210147995 | Sklar | May 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1236024 | Nov 1999 | CN |
1380446 | Nov 2002 | CN |
1924110 | Mar 2007 | CN |
101113527 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101195924 | Jun 2008 | CN |
102148339 | Aug 2011 | CN |
105442011 | Mar 2016 | CN |
39 02 057 | Jul 1990 | DE |
10 2004 006 441 | Dec 2005 | DE |
1 688 518 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2 189 554 | May 2010 | EP |
S47-2005 | Feb 1972 | JP |
S47-33925 | Nov 1972 | JP |
S52-109439 | Sep 1977 | JP |
58-197292 | Nov 1983 | JP |
S60-97774 | May 1985 | JP |
S61-99692 | May 1986 | JP |
H0I-132793 | May 1989 | JP |
2-214618 | Aug 1990 | JP |
H05-251849 | Sep 1993 | JP |
H06-196324 | Jul 1994 | JP |
07-065347 | Mar 1995 | JP |
H09-119000 | May 1997 | JP |
2000-239888 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001-152388 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001-181893 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002-53999 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2006-035176 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2009-215590 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2003-0092463 | Dec 2003 | KR |
10-2015-0132043 | Nov 2015 | KR |
36121 | Apr 1934 | SU |
8302784 | Aug 1983 | WO |
9514116 | May 1995 | WO |
2004001100 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2007045466 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007138619 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008057401 | May 2008 | WO |
2009045433 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2011033775 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011110346 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2012145750 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2013133762 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2017097300 | Jun 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 16/582,931, filed Sep. 25, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/671,104, filed Oct. 31, 2019. |
“Appendix 1: Literature review (Task 1): Literature review concerning the improvement of galvanneal (GA) coating adherence during shear test of adhesively bonded GA steel sheets,” 70 pages, no date. |
“Low-temperature iron plating,” web blog article found at http:blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_48ed0a9c0100024z.html, published Mar. 22, 2006, 3 pages. (with English translation). |
Adams et al., “Controlling strength and toughness of multilayer films: A new multiscalar approach,” J. Appl. Phys. 74(2):1015-1021, 1993. |
Aizenberg et al., “Skeleton of Euplectella sp.: Structural Hierarchy from the Nanoscale to the Macroscale,” Science 309:215-218, 2005. |
Alfantazi et al., “Synthesis of nanocrystalline Zn—Ni alloy coatings,” JMSLD5 15(15):1361-1363, 1996. |
Atanassov et al., “Electrodeposition and properties of nickel-manganese layers,” Surface and Coatings Technology 78:144-149, 1996. |
Bakonyi et al., “Electrodeposited multilayer films with giant magnetoresistance (GMR): Progress and problems,” Progress in Materials Science 55:107-245, 2010. |
Bartlett et al., “Electrochemical deposition of macroporous platinum, palladium and cobalt films using polystyrene latex sphere templates,” Chem. Commun., pp. 1671-1672, 2000. |
Beattie et al., “Comparison of Electrodeposited Copper-Zinc Alloys Prepared Individually and Combinatorially,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 150(11):C802-C806, 2003. |
Bird et al., “Giant Magnetoresistance in Electrodeposited Ni/Cu and Co/Cu Multilayers,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 142(4):L65-L66, 1995. |
Blum, “The Structure and Properties of Alternately Electrodeposited Metals,” presented at the Fortieth General Meeting of the American Electrochemical Society, Lake Placid, New York, Oct. 1, 1921, 14 pages. |
Cohen et al., “Electroplating of Cyclic Multilayered Alloy (CMA) Coatings,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 130(10):1987-1995, 1983. |
Cowles, “High cycle fatigue in aircraft gas turbines—an industry perspective,” International Journal of Fracture 80(2-3):147-163, 1996. |
“Designing with Metals: Dissimilar Metals and The Galvanic Series,” printed Oct. 5, 2017, 3 pages. |
Despic et al., “Electrochemical Formation of Laminar Deposits of Controlled Structure and Composition,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 136(6):1651-1657, 1989. |
Dini et al. “On the High Temperature Ductility Properties of Electrodeposited Sulfamate Nickel,” Plating and Surface Finishing 65(2):36-40. 1978. |
Etminanfar et al., “Corrosion resistance of multilayer coatings of nanolayered Cr/Ni electrodeposited from Cr(III)-Ni(II) bath,” Thin Solid Films 520:5322-5327, 2012. |
Gasser et al., “Materials Design for Acoustic Liners: an Example of Tailored Multifunctional Materials,” Advanced Engineering Materials 6(1-2):97-102, 2004. |
Georgescu et al., “Magnetic Behavior of [Ni/Co—Ni—Mg—N] x n Cylindrical Multilayers prepared by Magnetoelectrolysis,” Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 189(3):1051-1055, 2002. |
Ghanem et al., “A double templated electrodeposition method for the fabrication of arrays of metal nanodots,” Electrochemistry Communications 6:447-453, 2004. |
Grimmett et al., “Pulsed Electrodeposition of Iron-Nickel Alloys,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 137(11):3414-3418, 1990. |
Hariyanti, “Electroplating of Cu—Sn Alloys and Compositionally Modulated Multilayers of Cu—Sn—Zn—Ni Alloys on Mild Steel Substrate,” Master of Science Thesis, University of Science, Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia, 2007. |
Harris et al., “Improved Single Crystal Superalloys, CMSX-4® (SLS)[La+Y] and CMSX-486®,” TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society), Superalloys, p. 45-52, 2004. |
Huang et al., “Hardness variation and annealing behavior of a Cr—Ni multilayer electroplated in a trivalent chromium-based bath,” Surface and Coatings Technology 203:3320-3324, 2009. |
Huang et al., “Characterization of Cr—Ni multilayers electroplated from a chromium(III)-nickel(II) bath using pulse current,” Scripta Materialia, 57:61-64, 2007. |
Igawa et al., “Fabrication of SiC fiber reinforced SiC composite by chemical vapor infiltration for excellent mechanical properties,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 66:551-554. 2005. |
Ivanov et al., “Corrosion resistance of compositionally modulated multilayered Zn—Ni alloys deposited from a single bath,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 33:239-244, 2003. |
Jeong et al., “The Effect of Grain Size on the Wear Properties of Electrodeposited Nanocrystalline Nickel Coatings,” Scripta Mater. 44:493-499, 2001. |
Jia et al., “LIGA and Micromolding” Chapter 4, The MEMS Handbook, 2nd edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, Edited by Mohamed Gad-el-Hak, 2006. |
Kalu et al., “Cyclic voltammetric studies of the effects of time and temperature on the capacitance of electrochemically deposited nickel hydroxide,” Journal of Power Sources 92:163-167, 2001. |
Kaneko et al., “Vickers hardness and deformation of Ni/Cu nano-multilayers electrodeposited on copper substrates,” Eleventh International Conference on Intergranular and Interphase Boundaries 2004, Journal of Material Science 40:3231-3236, 2005. |
Karimpoor et al., “Tensile Properties of Bulk Nanocrystalline Hexagonal Cobalt Electrodeposits,” Materials Science Forum 386-388:415-420, 2002. |
Keckes et al., “Cell-wall recovery after irreversible deformation of wood,” Nature Materials 2:810-814, 2003. |
Kirilova et al., “Corrosion behaviour of Zn—Co compositionally modulated multilayers electrodeposited from single and dual baths,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 29:1133-1137, 1999. |
Kockar et al., “Effect of potantiostatic waveforms on properties of electrodeposited NiFe alloy films,” Eur. Phys. J. B(42):497-501, 2004. |
Kruth et al., “Progress in Additive Manufacturing and Rapid Prototyping” CIRP Annals 47(2):525-540, 1998. |
Lashmore et al., “Electrodeposited Cu—Ni Textured Superlattices,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 135(5):1218-1221, 1988. |
Lashmore et al., “Electrodeposited Multilayer Metallic Coatings,” Encyclopedia of Materials Science and Engineering, Supp. vol. 1:136-140, 1988. |
Leisner et al., “Methods for electrodepositing composition-modulated alloys,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 58:39-44, 1996. |
Leith et al., “Characterization of Flow-Induced Compositional Structure in Electrodeposited NiFe Composition-Modulated Alloys” J. Electrochem. Soc. 145(8):2821-2833, 1998. |
Lekka et al., “Corrosion and wear resistant electrodeposited composite coatings,” Electrochimica Acta 50:4551-4556, 2005. |
Lewis et al., “Stability in thin film multilayers and microlaminates: the role of free energy, structure, and orientation at interfaces and grain boundaries,” Scripta Materialia 48:1079-1085, 2003. |
Low et al., “Electrodeposition of composite coatings containing nanoparticles in a metal deposit,” Surface & Coating Technology 201:371-383, 2006. |
Malone, “New Developments in Electroformed Nickel-Based Structural Alloys,” Plating and Surface Finishing 74(1):50-56, 1987. |
Marchese, “Stress Reduction of Electrodeposited Nickel,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society 99(2):39-43, 1952. |
Meng et al., “Fractography, elastic modulus, and oxidation resistance of Novel metal-intermetallic Ni/Ni3Al multilayer films,” J. Mater. Res. 17(4):790-796, 2002. |
Naslain et al., “Synthesis of highly tailored ceramic matrix composites by pressure-pulsed CVI,” Solid State Ionics 141-142:541-548, 2001. |
Naslain, “The design of the fibre-matrix interfacial zone in ceramic matrix composites,” Composites Part A 29A: 1145-1155, 1998. |
Nicholls, “Advances in Coating Design for High-Performance Gas Turbines,” MRS Bulletin, p. 659-670, 2003. |
Onoda et al., “Preparation of amorphous/crystalloid soft magnetic multilayer Ni—Co—B alloy films by electrodeposition,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 126(1-3):595-598, 1993. |
Parkin et al., “Oscillations in Exchange Coupling and Magnetoresistance in Metallic Superlattice Structures: Co/Ru, Co/Cr, and Fe/Cr,” Physical Review Letters 64(19):2304-2307, 1990. |
Pilone et al., “Model of Multiple Metal Electrodeposition in Porous Electrodes,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society 153(5):D85-D90, 2006. |
Podlaha et al. “Induced Codeposition: I. An Experimental Investigation of Ni—Mo Alloys,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 143(3):885-892, 1996. |
Ross, “Electrodeposited Multilayer Thin Films,” Annual Review of Materials Science 24:159-188, 1994. |
Rousseau et al., “Single-bath Electrodeposition of Chromium-Nickel Compositionally Modulated Multilayers (CMM) From a Trivalent Chromium Bath,” Plating and Surface Finishing, p. 106-110, 1999. |
Saleh et al., “Effects of electroplating on the mechanical properties of stereolithography and laser sintered parts,” Rapid Prototyping Journal 10(5)305-315, 2004. |
Sanders et al., “Mechanics of hollow sphere foams,” Materials Science and Engineering A347:70-85, 2003. |
Sartwell et al., “Replacement of Chromium Electroplating on Gas Turbine Engine Components Using Thermal Spray Coatings,” Report No. NRL/MR/6170-05-8890, Naval Research Laboratory, 2005, (207 pages). |
Schwartz, “Multiple-Layer Alloy Plating,” ASM Handbook 5: Surface Engineering, p. 274-276, 1994. |
Sherik, “Synthesis, Structure and Properties of Electrodeposited Bulk Nanocrystalline Nickel,” Master's Thesis, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada, 1993. |
Shishkovski, “Laser synthesis of functionally graded meso structures and bulk products,” FIZMATLIT, Moscow, Russia, pp. 30-38, 2009, (with English Abstract). |
Simunovich et al., “Electrochemically Layered Copper-Nickel Nanocomposites with Enhanced Hardness,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 141(1):L10-L11, 1994. |
Sperling et al., “Correlation of stress state and nanohardness via heat treatment of nickel-aluminide multilayer thin films,” J. Mater. Res. 19(11):3374-3381, 2004. |
Srivastava et al., “Corrosion resistance and microstructure of electrodeposited nickel-cobalt alloy coatings,” Surface & Coatings Technology 201:3051-3060, 2006. |
Stephenson, Jr., “Development and Utilization of a High Strength Alloy for Electroforming,” Plating 53(2): 183-192, 1966. |
Suresh, “Graded Materials for Resistance to Contact Deformation and Damage,” Science 292:2447-2451, 2001. |
Switzer et al., “Electrodeposited Ceramic Superlattices,” Science 247(4941)444-446, 1990. |
Tench et al., “Considerations in Electrodeposition of Compositionally Modulated Alloys,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 737(10):3061-3066, 1990. |
Tench et al., “Enhanced Tensile Strength for Electrodeposited Nickel-Copper Multilayer Composites,” Metallurgical Transactions A (15A):2039-2040, 1984. |
Thangaraj et al., “Corrosion behavior of composition modulated multilayer Zn—Co electrodeposits produced using a single-bath technique,” J. of Appl. Electrochem. 39:339-345, 2009. |
Thangaraj et al., “Surface Modification by Compositionally Modulated Multilayered Zn—Fe Coatings,” Chinese Journal of Chemistry 26:2285-2291, 2008. |
Tokarz et al., “Preparation, structural and mechanical properties of electrodeposited Co/Cu multilayers.” phys. stat. sol. (c) 5(11):3526-3529, 2008. |
Touchstone Research Laboratory, Ltd., Material Safety Data Sheet, CFOAM Carbon Foams, 2008. (4 pages). |
Vill et al., “Mechanical Properties of Tough Multiscalar Microlaminates,” Acta metall. mater. 43(2):427-437, 1995. |
Voevodin et al., “Superhard, functionally gradient, nanolayered and nanocomposite diamond-like carbon coatings for wear protection,” Diamond and Related Materials 7:463-467, 1998. |
Wearmouth et al., “Electroforming with Heat-Resistant, Sulfur-Hardened Nickel,” Plating and Surface Finishing 66(10):53-57, 1979. |
Weil et al., “Pulsed Electrodeposition of Layered Brass Structures,” Metallurgical Transactions A 19A:1569-1573, 1988. |
Weil et al., “Properties of Composite Electrodeposits,” U.S. Army Research Office, Final Report, Contract No. DAALO3-87-K-0047, 21 pages, 1990. |
Wikipedia, “Gold,” URL= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold, version modified Nov. 3, 12 pages, 2008. |
Wikipedia, “Silver,” URL= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver, version modified Nov. 3, 12 pages, 2008. |
Wilcox, “Surface Modification With Compositionally Modulated Multilayer Coatings,” The Journal of Corrosion Science and Engineering 6(Paper 52): 2004 (5 pages). |
Wu et al., “Preparation and characterization of superhard CNx/ZrN multilayers,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15(3):946-950, 1997. |
Yahalom et al., “Formation of composition-modulated alloys by electrodeposition,” Journal of Materials Science 22:499-503, 1987. |
Yang et al., “Effects of SiC sub-layer on mechanical properties of Tyranno-SA/SiC composites with multiple interlayers,” Ceramics International 31:525-531, 2005. |
Yang et al., “Enhanced elastic modulus in composition-modulated gold-nickel and copper-palladium foils,” Journal of Applied Physics 48(3):876-879, 1977. |
Yogesha et al., “Optimization of deposition conditions for development of high corrosion resistant Zn—Fe multilayer coatings,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 211:1409-1415, 2011. |
Zabludovsky et al., “The Obtaining of Cobalt Multilayers by Programme-controlled Pulse Current,” Transactions of the Institute of Metal Finishing 75(5):203-204, 1997. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/179,351, filed Feb. 18, 2021. |
Paz et al., “Nano-Laminated Alloys for Improved Return on Oilfield Assets,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2016 (14 pages). |
U.S. Pat. No. 11,118,280, dated Sep. 14, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/409,688, dated Aug. 23, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200318245 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61185020 | Jun 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14729020 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 16726079 | US | |
Parent | 13314948 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14729020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2010/037856 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 13314948 | US |