Electromagnetic sensor with probe and guide sensing elements

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11918340
  • Patent Number
    11,918,340
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 15, 2020
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 5, 2024
    a month ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • Intuitive Surgical Opeartions, Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA, US)
  • Examiners
    • Park; Patricia J
    Agents
    • Haynes & Boone, LLP
Abstract
A medical system comprises a probe comprising a coil and a terminal distal end. The medical system further comprises a guide instrument comprising a terminal distal end, a sensor, and a lumen sized to receive the probe. The probe is configured to be inserted through the lumen to reach a worksite. At the worksite, the terminal distal end of the probe is configured to reach at least the terminal distal end of the guide instrument. The medical system further comprises processing hardware configured to receive a first signal from the coil and to receive a second signal from the sensor.
Description
BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive medical devices that navigate natural body lumens need to be small enough to fit within the lumens. Lung catheters, for example, which may be used to perform minimally invasive lung biopsies or other medical procedures, may need to follow airways that decrease in size as the catheter navigates branching passages. To reach a target location in a lung, a catheter may follow passages having diameters as small as 3 mm or less. Manufacturing a catheter that is sufficiently small and includes the mechanical structures and sensors for remote or robotic operation can be challenging.


Electromagnetic sensors (EM) sensors can measure the position and orientation of a portion of a medical instrument. EM sensors are particularly suitable for minimally invasive medical instruments because EM sensors can combine high global accuracy with a small diameter package size. During EM sensor operation, a generator external to a patient can produce a well-controlled, time-varying magnetic field, and in response, one or more coils of an EM sensor in or on a portion of the medical instrument produce induced electrical signals. In particular, time variations in the magnetic field induce currents in the coils of the EM sensor, and the pose of each coil can be partially determined from knowledge of the generated magnetic field and the geometry of the coil. A single coil can be used, for example, to measure a position and a pointing direction, e.g., pitch and yaw angles, but a cylindrically symmetrical coil is unable to distinguish roll angles about the symmetry axis of the coil. Accordingly, EM sensors employing a single cylindrical coil have been used as 5-Degree-of-Freedom (5-DoF) sensors. To additionally measure the roll angle, a 6-DoF EM sensor generally requires two coils having symmetry axes that are not parallel, e.g., perpendicular symmetry axes.


The long, thin shape typical of 5-DoF EM sensors fits well with minimally invasive medical instruments or tools, which often have long and thin extensions. However, with the central axis of a single coil sensor aligned with the roll axis of an instrument, such 5-DoF EM sensors cannot measure the roll angle of the instrument. While some symmetric instruments such as needles may not require roll angle measurements, many instruments require knowledge of the roll angle of the instrument, particularly for robotic control. Measurement of the roll angle may require a 6-DoF sensor that includes two coils. For example, to create a 6-DoF EM sensor, two 5-DoF EM sensors may need to be placed perpendicular or at a non-zero angle to each other, which creates a much larger sensor package. If each 5-DoF sensor has a cylindrical shape about 1 mm in diameter and about 10 mm long, the 6-Dof sensor containing two 5-DoF sensors may be up to 10×10×1 mm. While the 1 mm diameter of a 5-DoF EM sensor may fit within a small, e.g., 3 mm diameter, instrument, a 10-mm wide 6-DoF EM sensor may not fit in a small instrument.


SUMMARY

In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a small diameter EM sensor can include a coil with windings that define areas with a normal direction at a significant angle to the symmetry or long axis of the coil. As a result, the magnetic axis of an EM sensor that extends along a length of an instrument may be at an angle to the roll axis of the instrument to enable the sensor to measure a roll angle of the instrument, while still providing a narrow diameter package.


In one specific embodiment, a sensing system uses a coil including wire that is wound in loops around an axis, and each of the loops defines an area that has a normal direction at a non-zero, angle relative to the axis of the coil.


In another embodiment, a sensing system includes a coil and sensor logic. The coil includes wire that is wound in loops about an axis, and the loops define respective areas that have a normal direction at a non-zero angle relative to the axis of the coil. The sensor logic is coupled to the coil and configured to use an electrical signal induced in the coil in determining a measurement of a roll angle about the axis of the coil.


In yet another embodiment, a medical system includes a probe and optionally a guide instrument (e.g., catheter, bronchoscope, or endoscope) with a lumen sized for guiding the probe. A probe coil is in the probe and includes wire that is wound in loops collectively defining a first core that extends in a lengthwise direction of the probe. However, each of the loops in the probe coil defines an area that has a normal direction at a non-zero angle relative to the length of the probe. A secondary sensor (e.g., an electromagnetic sensor, shape sensor, gravity sensor, visualization sensor, and/or angular sensor(s), among others) included in the medical system can provide supplemental orientation information to be used with the probe coil signals to determine a roll angle of the probe. For example, a secondary sensor such as a coil could be positioned in a wall of a guide instrument for the probe, such that each of the loops of the guide instrument coil defines an area that has a second normal direction. Sensor logic that is coupled to receive induced signals from the probe coil and the guide instrument coil can then determine a roll angle of the probe from the induced signals.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a minimally invasive medical instrument that uses an electromagnetic sensor that includes an off-axis coil.



FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of a steerable segment that can be employed in the system of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 shows sensing coils that can be employed in electromagnetic sensors in medical systems in some embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 4 shows a cross-section of an off-axis coil that can be used in an electromagnetic sensor.



FIG. 5 illustrates the geometry of one embodiment of an electromagnetic sensing system that uses an off-axis coil in a magnetic field for measurements of five degrees of freedom.



FIGS. 6A and 6B show alternative configurations of electromagnetic sensor systems using at least one off-axis coil for measurement of six degrees of freedom.



FIG. 7 shows a medical system capable of using a coil in a probe and a secondary sensor to measure six degrees of freedom including a roll angle of the probe.





Use of the same reference symbols in different figures indicates similar or identical items.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An EM sensor can employ an off-axis coil, which is a coil wound so that areas respectively defined by individual loops have a normal direction that is off-axis from the length of the coil. As a result, an effective area for magnetic flux in the off-axis coil has a normal direction that is also off-axis from the length of the coil. A magnetic field applied to an off-axis coil can be varied to induce an electrical signal that depends on the normal direction instead of about the long axis of the coil. Such a coil can thus be used in a small-diameter medical instrument to measure a roll angle about the long axis of the coil.



FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a medical system 100 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. In the illustrated embodiment, medical system 100 includes a medical device 110, a drive interface 120, a control system 140, an operator interface 150, and a field generator 160 for a sensing system.


Medical device 110, in the illustrated embodiment, may be a flexible device such as a catheter, bronchoscope, endoscope, or cannula that includes a main shaft 112 with one or more lumens. For example, main shaft 112 may include a main lumen sized to accommodate interchangeable probes. Such probes can include a variety of a camera or vision systems, biopsy tools, cutting tools, clamping tools, sealing tools, suturing tools, stapling tools, cautery tools, therapeutic or diagnostic material delivery tools, or any other surgical instruments. The probes used in device 110 may be robotically operated, for example, using actuating tendons (not shown) that run the length of the probe. Additionally, main shaft 112 may incorporate one or more steerable sections 114 that are similarly operable using actuating tendons that attach to steerable section 114 and run from steerable section at the distal end of main shaft 112, through main shaft 112, to the proximal end of main shaft 112.


An exemplary embodiment of device 110 may be a lung catheter, bronchoscope or endoscope, where device 110 would typically be about 60 to 80 cm or longer. During a medical procedure, at least a portion of main shaft 112 and all of steerable section 114 may be inserted along a natural lumen such as an airway of a patient, and drive interface 120 may operate steerable section 114 by pulling on actuating tendons, e.g., to steer device 110 during insertion or to position steerable section 114 for a procedure.


Steerable section 114 is remotely controllable and particularly has a pitch and a yaw that can be controlled using actuating tendons, e.g., pull wires or cables, and may be implemented as a multi-lumen tube of flexible material such as Pebax. In general, steerable section 114 may be more flexible than the remainder of main tube 112, which assists in isolating actuation or bending to steerable section 114 when drive interface 120 pulls on the actuating tendons. Device 110 can also employ additional features or structures such as use of Bowden cables for actuating tendons to prevent actuation from bending the more proximal portion of main tube 112. In general, the actuating tendons are located at different angles about a roll axis 170 of steerable section 114. For example, FIG. 2 shows one specific embodiment in which steerable section 114 is made from a tube 210 that may be cut to create flexures 220. Tube 210 in the illustrated embodiment defines a main lumen for a probe system and smaller lumens for actuating tendons 230. In the illustrated embodiment, four actuating tendons 230 attach to a distal tip 215 of steerable section 114 at locations that are 90° apart around a roll axis 170 of steerable section 114. In operation, pulling harder on any one of tendons 230 tends to cause steerable section 114 to bend in the direction of that tendon 230. To accommodate repeated bending, tube 210 may be made of a material such as Nitinol, which is a metal alloy that can be repeatedly bent with little or no damage.


Actuating tendons 230 extend back through main tube 112 to drive interface 120 and may be coated or uncoated, single filament or multi strand wires, cables, Bowden cables, hypotubes, or any other structures that are able to transfer force from drive interface 120 to distal tip 215. (Push rods could conceivably be used in device 110 instead of tendons 230 but may not provide a desirable level of flexibility needed in some medical instruments.) Tendons 230 can be made of any material of sufficient strength including but not limited to a metal such as steel or a polymer such as Kevlar.


Drive interface 120 of FIG. 1, which pulls on actuating tendons 230 to operate steerable section 114, includes a mechanical system or transmission 124 that converts the movement of actuators 122, e.g., electric motors, into movements of (or tensions in) actuating tendons 230. The movement and pose of steerable section 114 can thus be controlled through selection of drive signals for actuators 122 in drive interface 120. In addition to manipulating the actuating tendons, drive interface 120 may also be able to control other movement of device 110 such as a range of motion in an insertion direction and rotation or roll of the proximal end of device 110, which may also be powered through actuators 122 and transmission 124. Backend mechanisms or transmissions that are known for flexible-shaft instruments could in general be used or modified for drive interface 120.


A dock 126 in drive interface 120 of FIG. 1 can provide a mechanical coupling between drive interface 120 and device 110 and link the actuating tendons 230 to transmission 124. Dock 126 may additionally contain an electronic or optical system for receiving, converting, and/or relaying sensor signals from one or more EM sensors 116 and contain an electronic or mechanical system for identifying the specific probe or the type of probe deployed in device 110.


Control system 140 controls actuators 122 in drive interface 120 to selectively pull on the actuating tendons as needed to actuate or steer steerable section 114. In general, control system 140 operates in response to commands from a user, e.g., a surgeon or other medical personnel using operator interface 150, and in response to measurement signals such as from EM sensors 116. Control system 140 may in particular include or execute sensor logic that analyzes signals (or digitized versions signals) from EM sensors 116 to determine measurement of the position and orientation of the distal end of device 110. Control system 140 may be implemented using a general purpose computer with suitable software, firmware, and/or interface hardware to interpret signals from operator interface 150 and EM sensors 116 and to generate control signals for drive interface 120.


Operator interface 150 may include standard input/output hardware such as a display, a keyboard, a mouse, a joystick, or other pointing device or similar I/O hardware that may be customized or optimized for a surgical environment. In general, operator interface 150 provides information to the user and receives instructions from the user. For example, operator interface 150 may indicate the status of system 100 and provide the user with data including images and measurements made by system 100. One type of instruction that the user may provide through operator interface 150, e.g., using a joystick or similar controller, indicates the desired movement or position of steerable section 114, and using such input, control system 140 can generate control signals for actuators in drive interface 120.


Field generator 160 and one or more EM sensors 116 can be used to measure a pose of a distal portion of main tube 112 or of steerable section 114. EM sensors 116 may particularly include an off-axis coil that field generator 160 may subject to a magnetic field that varies over space or time. The magnetic field produces magnetic flux through EM sensors 116, and variation in time of that magnetic flux induces a voltage or electric current in EM sensors 116.


The induced signals can be used to measure the pose of EM sensor 116. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,197,354, entitled “System for Determining the Position and Orientation of a Catheter”; U.S. Pat. No. 6,833,814, entitled “Intrabody Navigation System for Medical Applications”; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,188,355, entitled “Wireless Six-Degree-of-Freedom Locator” describe the operation of some EM sensor systems and are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. U.S. Pat. No. 7,398,116, entitled “Methods, Apparatuses, and Systems useful in Conducting Image Guided Interventions,” U.S. Pat. No. 7,920,909, entitled “Apparatus and Method for Automatic Image Guided Accuracy Verification,” U.S. Pat. No. 7,853,307, entitled “Methods, Apparatuses, and Systems Useful in Conducting Image Guided Interventions,” and U.S. Pat. No. 7,962,193, entitled “Apparatus and Method for Image Guided Accuracy Verification” further describe systems and methods that can use electromagnetic sensing coils in guiding medical procedures and are also incorporated by reference in their entirety.



FIG. 3 illustrates three different types of sensing coils 310, 320, and 330 that could be used in an EM sensor. Coil 310 is a helical coil containing individual loops defining areas that are substantially perpendicular to a lengthwise axis 312 of coil 310. A field generator can vary the direction and magnitude of the magnetic field in a systematic manner that enables at least partial determination of the pose of coil 310 from the induced electric signal. In particular, up to five degrees of freedom can be measured using sensing coil 310. However, sensing coil 310 is cylindrically symmetric, so that a roll angle, i.e., an angle indicating orientation about axis 312 of coil 310, cannot be determined from an electric signal induced in coil 310. However, the position and the pointing direction of coil 310 can be determined from the induced electrical signal and knowledge of the generated magnetic field. Accordingly, coil 310 can be used for a 5-DoF sensor that measures position X, Y, and Z and pointing angles θ and φ, but a 5-DoF sensor using coil 310 alone cannot measure a roll angle ψ.


Coils 320 and 330 of FIG. 3 are off-axis coils. In particular, coil 320 (or 330) includes wire loops with a normal direction 322 (or 332) that is at a non-zero angle to lengthwise axis 312 passing through the loops of coil 320 (or 330). As a result, even when the lengths of coils 310, 320, and 330 are parallel or aligned, coils 320 and 330 are capable of measuring five degrees of freedom that differ from the five degrees of freedom that coil 310 can measure. EM sensor 116 of system 100 can include one or more off-axis coils such as coil 320 or 330 oriented along the length of device 110 to enable measurement of a roll angle of the distal tip of device 110.



FIG. 4 shows a cross-sectional view of an off-axis coil 400 that may be used in measuring a roll angle. Coil 400 is a winding of wire 410 that may be considered to form multiple loops that define respective areas with a normal direction Â. Coil 400 is wound so that normal direction  is off-axis by an angle α from the length (i.e., from an axis 470) of coil 400. Coil 400 may be formed, for example, by wrapping insulated conductive wire around a core 420 at an angle (90°−α) to axis 470 of core 420 and coil 400 for about one half of each loop and at an angle −(90°−α) for the other half of each loop. As a result, an effective area |A| for magnetic flux in off-axis coil 400 has normal direction A that is at angle α relative to lengthwise axis 470 of coil 400 and has a magnitude |A| that is equal to the product of the area of a single loop and the number of loops in coil 400. In general, each loop may define an area having any desired shape and may have a shape that depends on angle α and the shape of core 420. For example, each loop area can be elliptical when core 420 is circular cylindrical and angle α is non-zero. For an EM sensor in a medical device, coil 400 may have a diameter of about 1 mm and a length of about 10 mm. The off-axis angle α can be any angle greater than zero and less than 180°, but for roll angle measurement as described further below, angle α may be between about 5° and about 175°. A range for angle α between about 45° to 70° or 110° to 135° for an EM sensor could provide accurate data and avoid difficulties in wrapping a coil when angle α is near 90°.


EM sensors coils such as coil 310 may employ helical coils that are wound so that the normal to the magnetic flux areas are along the lengthwise axis of the coil. In particular, such coils may be helically wound with a constant, slight angle, i.e., the helix angle. For example, the sine of a wrap angle for coil 310 may be about equal to the ratio of the wire thickness to the diameter of coil 310. However, the effects of the wire being at the helix angle around a full loop cancel, and the normal for each loop of coil 310 is along the lengthwise axis. In contrast, the magnitude of the wrap angle (90°−α) in coil 410 can be much greater than the ratio of the diameter of wire 410. Further, for coil 410, the sign of the wrap angle reverses at some point in each loop. As a result, each loop of coil 410 has a part in which the wire angles down core 420 and a part in which the wire angles up core 420.


A magnetic field B applied to off-axis coil 400 can be varied to induce an electrical signal that depends on the normal direction A to the areas of the loops forming coil 400. In particular, according to Faradays law, an induced voltage in coil 400 is proportional to the time derivative of the dot product of magnetic field B and an effective area vector |A|Â. FIG. 5 shows one specific geometry for magnetic field B and effective normal vector Â. In FIG. 5, magnetic field B is along the x axis of a Cartesian coordinate system that may be defined relative to a field generator that generates magnetic field B. With this configuration, if only the magnitude |B| of magnetic field B varies with time, the induced signal in coil 400 will have a voltage V given by Equation 1, wherein C is a constant that depends on the magnetic permeability inside coil 400. Since the induced voltage V for coil 400 depends on the direction Â, i.e., angles θ and φ, the direction  can be determined or measured, by varying the magnitude and direction of magnetic field B and analyzing the change in the induced voltage V. For example, Cartesian coordinates Bx, By, and Bz of the magnetic field B applied to coil 400 can be varied with different frequencies, and the different frequency components of the resulting induced voltage in coil 400 can be analyzed to determine measurements of up to five degrees of freedom of coil 400, including direction angles θ and φ. (Determining a roll angle ψ may further require knowledge the direction of a roll axis, which may, for example, be measured using a second coil.)









V
=

C



A





d



B




d





t




sin


(
θ
)




cos


(
φ
)







Equation





1







Off-axis coils can be employed in small diameter 6-DoF sensors that are well adapted for use in minimally invasive medical instruments, e.g., as EM sensor 116 of FIG. 1. FIG. 6A, for example, shows a sensing system 600A employing coils 611 and 612 having lengths aligned along the same axis 170. Each coil 611 and 612 may have a diameter of about 1 mm or less, so that 6-DoF sensor 610A may similarly have a diameter of about 1 mm or less. One or both of coils 611 and 612 can be an off-axis coil such as coil 410, which is described above with reference to FIG. 4. For coil 611, a normal direction Â1 of the effective area for magnetic flux is at an angle α to axis 170. For coil 612, a normal direction Â2 of the effective area for magnetic flux is at an angle β to axis 170. At least one of coils 611 and 612 are off-axis coils, i.e., α≠0 or β≠0, which enables measurement of a roll angle about axis 170.


EM sensing using a single coil can generally only measure a set of five degrees of freedom because a single-coil EM sensor cannot distinguish rotations about the normal direction associated with the effective area of its coil. Two coils 611 and 612 with different normal directions Â1 and Â2 are used in sensor system 600A, so that each of coils 611 and 612 measures a different set of five degrees of freedom. In particular, a field generator 620 can produce a variable magnetic field that passes through coils 611 and 612. Coils 611 and 612 then produce respective induced voltages V1 and V2, and sensor logic 630 can process signal V1 to determine measurements of one set of five degrees of freedom and process signal V2 to determine measurements of a different set of five degrees of freedom. Sensor logic 630, which may include software for analyzing digitized versions of signals V1 and V2, can account for the difference in position of coils 611 and 612 and generate measurements of six degrees of freedom, e.g., position coordinates X, Y, and Z and pitch, yaw, and roll angles.


Coils 611 and 612 in the specific configuration illustrated in FIG. 6A are identical off-axis coils, but are oriented so coil 612 is rotated by 180°, e.g., about a yaw axis of sensor 610A, relative to coil 611. As a result, angle β of a normal direction Â2 to axis 170 is the supplement to angle α, i.e., β=180°−α. Sensing system 600A may be able to achieve highest accuracy measurements if normal directions Â1 and Â2 are perpendicular to each other, and in one particular configuration of sensor 610A, angle α is 45° to make normal directions Â1 and Â2 perpendicular. If coils 611 and 612 are not identical, a wide range of combinations of angles α and β are possible that make normal directions Â1 and Â2 perpendicular, e.g., configurations where |β−α|−90°.



FIG. 6B shows another sensing system 600B using a 6-DoF sensor 610B containing two identical off-axis coils 611 and 612. Coils 611 and 612 in FIG. 6B have respective normal directions Â1 and Â2, both of which are at angle α with roll axis 170. However, coil 612 is rotated by an angle θr about roll axis 170 relative to coil 611. In this configuration, normal directions Â1 and Â2 are at an angle to each other that depends on angles α and θr. If angle α is greater than or equal to 45°, at least one value for angle θr exists that will make normal directions Â1 and Â2 perpendicular. For example, in one configuration, angle α is 45°, angle θr is 180°, and normal directions Â1 and Â2 are perpendicular.



FIG. 7 shows a medical system 700 capable of measuring six degrees of freedom using a sensing element 715 in an instrument 710 and a coil 725 in a probe 720 that fits within instrument 710. Instrument 710 may be or may include a catheter, a cannula, bronchoscope, endoscope, cannula, or similar instrument through which a probe-like object with unknown roll angle may fit. Sensing element 715 is a device suitable for measurement of at least a pointing direction of the distal tip of instrument 710. As described above, a conventional helical coil can be used to measure five degrees of freedom including a pointing direction of a distal tip of system 700 when such a coil is oriented along a lengthwise axis of system 700, and sensing element 715 could be a coil. Alternatively, sensing element 715 could be another type of sensing device such as a shape sensor, a gravity sensor, a joint angle sensor (for jointed rigid-link instruments), or a vision-based sensor. Note that although described as a system including both a guide instrument 710 and a corresponding probe 720 for exemplary purposes, in various other embodiments, both sensing element 715 and coil 725 can be incorporated into a single instrument.


Coil 725 is an off-axis coil, which can measure five degrees of freedom and when combined with a measurement of a pointing direction of the roll axis can be used to determine a roll angle as described above. Accordingly, the combination of sensing element 715 in instrument 710 and off-axis coil 725 in probe 720 can provide a 6-DoF measurement of probe 720 including measurement of a roll angle of probe 720. An advantage of system 700 is that the use of a single sensing element 715 in instrument 710 may provide additional space in instrument 710 and probe 720 for other structures, which is particularly important for small diameter devices such as lung catheters. Additionally, in system 700, coil 725, which is in probe 720, may be closer to the center of the distal tip than is sensing element 715, which is in the wall of instrument 710. As a result, the roll axis of coil 725 may closely correspond to the roll axis of system 700 and probe 720. Sensing element 715 in instrument 710 may as indicated above be a conventional helical coil so that a measurement of the direction of the area normal of sensing element 715 indicates the direction of the roll axis, and a measurement of the area normal direction of coil 725 can then give the roll angle of probe 720. Alternatively, sensing element 715 could be an off-axis coil, and if the normal direction of the areas defined by the loops in sensing element 715 differs from the normal direction of the areas defined by the loops in coil 725.


System 700 may be used by inserting probe 720 through instrument 710 until the distal ends of instrument 710 and probe 720 are aligned. Probe 720 may, for example, be a camera or vision system that is inserted in instrument 710 for navigation of natural lumens such as lung airways. Instrument 710 with the vision probe may then be steered to a worksite where measurements determined using sensing element 715 and coil 725 are used when orienting the distal tip of instrument 700 for a medical function such as biopsying tissue. The vision probe can then be removed and a probe such as a biopsy needle may be inserted in instrument 710 in place of the vision probe. The biopsy probe may similarly contain a coil or EM sensor, but the EM sensor used then may or may not need to be an off-axis coil or a coil intended for use with sensing element 715. For example, a biopsy needle may be inserted past the distal tip of instrument 710, and the position of the tip of the biopsy needle may be important to measure while the roll angle of a symmetric needle does not need to be measured.


Although the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, the description is only an example of the invention's application and should not be taken as a limitation. Various adaptations and combinations of features of the embodiments disclosed are within the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A medical system comprising: a probe comprising: a first coil; anda terminal distal end;a guide instrument comprising a terminal distal end, a sensor embedded in a wall of the guide instrument, and a lumen sized to receive the probe, wherein the sensor comprises a second coil, wherein a normal direction of the first coil is different from a normal direction of the second coil, wherein the second coil is non-concentric with respect to the first coil, wherein an axis of the first coil and an axis of the second coil are each aligned with a longitudinal axis of the guide instrument, wherein the probe is configured to be inserted through the lumen to reach a worksite, and wherein at the worksite, the terminal distal end of the probe is configured to reach at least the terminal distal end of the guide instrument; andprocessing hardware configured to receive a first signal from the first coil and to receive a second signal from the sensor.
  • 2. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the second signal received from the sensor indicates a pointing direction of the guide instrument.
  • 3. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the processing hardware is configured to use the first signal and the second signal to determine six degrees of freedom of the probe.
  • 4. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the processing hardware is further configured to use the first signal and the second signal to determine a roll angle of the probe.
  • 5. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the processing hardware is configured to receive the first signal and the second signal when the probe is at the worksite.
  • 6. The medical system of claim 5, wherein after the processing hardware receives the first signal and the second signal, the probe is configured to be removed from the lumen of the guide instrument.
  • 7. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the normal direction of the first coil is perpendicular to the normal direction of the second coil.
  • 8. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the probe comprises a surgical tool, a camera, or a vision system, and wherein the guide instrument comprises a catheter, an endoscope, a bronchoscope, or a cannula.
  • 9. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the first coil comprises wire that is wound in a plurality of loops collectively defining a first core extending along a lengthwise direction of the probe, wherein each of the loops defines a first normal direction that is at a non-zero angle relative to the lengthwise direction.
  • 10. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the guide instrument further comprises: a proximal section;a steerable distal section; anda plurality of actuation cables extending from the proximal section into the steerable distal section,wherein each actuation cable of the plurality of actuation cables is configured to actuate the steerable distal section.
  • 11. The medical system of claim 10, further comprising an actuator, wherein each actuation cable of the plurality of actuation cables is coupled to the actuator, and wherein the actuator is configured to actuate the steerable distal section of the guide instrument by actuating at least one actuation cable of the plurality of actuation cables.
  • 12. The medical system of claim 1, wherein: the sensor comprises a shape sensor; andthe processing hardware is configured to receive the second signal from the shape sensor and employ the second signal as an indication of a pointing direction of the guide instrument.
  • 13. The medical system of claim 1, wherein a roll axis of the probe extends in a direction normal to the sensor.
  • 14. The medical system of claim 1, further comprising a medical tool sized to extend within the lumen of the guide instrument, wherein a terminal distal end of the medical tool is configured to reach at least the terminal distal end of the guide instrument.
  • 15. The medical system of claim 14, wherein the medical tool includes a third coil, and wherein the processing hardware is configured to receive a third signal from the third coil and to use both the third signal from the third coil and the second signal from the sensor to determine a roll angle of the medical tool.
  • 16. A medical system comprising: a probe comprising: a first coil; anda terminal distal end;a guide instrument comprising a terminal distal end, a sensor embedded in a wall of the guide instrument, and a lumen sized to receive the probe, wherein the sensor comprises a second coil, wherein the second coil is non-concentric with respect to the first coil, wherein an axis of the first coil and an axis of the second coil are each aligned with a longitudinal axis of the guide instrument, wherein the probe is configured to be inserted through the lumen to reach a worksite, and wherein at the worksite, the terminal distal end of the probe is configured to reach at least the terminal distal end of the guide instrument; andprocessing hardware configured to: receive a first signal from the first coil and to receive a second signal from the sensor; anduse the first signal and the second signal to determine a roll angle of the probe.
  • 17. The medical system of claim 16, wherein the probe comprises a surgical tool, a camera, or a vision system.
  • 18. A medical system comprising: a probe comprising: a first coil embedded in the probe; anda terminal distal end;a guide instrument comprising a terminal distal end, a sensor embedded in a wall of the guide instrument, and a lumen sized to receive the probe, wherein the sensor comprises a second coil, wherein a normal direction of the first coil is different from a normal direction of the second coil, wherein an axis of the first coil and an axis of the second coil are each aligned with a longitudinal axis of the guide instrument, wherein the probe is configured to be inserted through the lumen to reach a worksite, and wherein at the worksite, the terminal distal end of the probe is configured to reach at least the terminal distal end of the guide instrument; andprocessing hardware configured to receive a first signal from the first coil and to receive a second signal from the sensor.
  • 19. The medical system of claim 18, wherein the second signal received from the sensor indicates a pointing direction of the guide instrument.
  • 20. The medical system of claim 18, wherein the processing hardware is further configured to use the first signal and the second signal to determine a roll angle of the probe.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/802,199, filed Jul. 17, 2015, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/889,984, filed May 8, 2013, which claims priority to and the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/646,619, filed May 14, 2012, and is a continuation-in-part and claims the benefit of the earlier filing date of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/274,237, filed Oct. 14, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,387,048, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (542)
Number Name Date Kind
3096962 Meijs Jul 1963 A
3546961 Marton Dec 1970 A
4437114 Larussa Mar 1984 A
4644237 Frushour et al. Feb 1987 A
4748969 Wardle Jun 1988 A
4792715 Barsky et al. Dec 1988 A
4809191 Domeier et al. Feb 1989 A
4905082 Nishigaki et al. Feb 1990 A
4949927 Madocks et al. Aug 1990 A
5114403 Clarke et al. May 1992 A
5174276 Crockard Dec 1992 A
5201757 Heyn et al. Apr 1993 A
5251611 Zehel et al. Oct 1993 A
5280781 Oku Jan 1994 A
5285796 Hughes Feb 1994 A
5297536 Wilk Mar 1994 A
5307437 Facq et al. Apr 1994 A
5351693 Taimisto et al. Oct 1994 A
5408263 Kikuchi et al. Apr 1995 A
5417210 Funda et al. May 1995 A
5429604 Hammersmark et al. Jul 1995 A
5487757 Truckai et al. Jan 1996 A
5492131 Galel Feb 1996 A
5588949 Taylor et al. Dec 1996 A
5613946 McKeever Mar 1997 A
5617515 MacLaren et al. Apr 1997 A
5624380 Takayama et al. Apr 1997 A
5631973 Green May 1997 A
5643175 Adair Jul 1997 A
5672877 Liebig et al. Sep 1997 A
5729129 Acker Mar 1998 A
5752112 Paddock et al. May 1998 A
5755713 Bilof et al. May 1998 A
5759151 Sturges Jun 1998 A
5792135 Madhani et al. Aug 1998 A
5797900 Madhani et al. Aug 1998 A
5817084 Jensen et al. Oct 1998 A
5855569 Komi et al. Jan 1999 A
5868760 McGuckin, Jr. Feb 1999 A
5876325 Mizuno et al. Mar 1999 A
5892860 Maron et al. Apr 1999 A
5899425 Corey Jr et al. May 1999 A
5899851 Koninckx May 1999 A
5976071 Sekiya Nov 1999 A
5982791 Sorin et al. Nov 1999 A
6004016 Spector Dec 1999 A
6013024 Mitsuda et al. Jan 2000 A
6030130 Paddock et al. Feb 2000 A
6066090 Yoon May 2000 A
6120433 Mizuno et al. Sep 2000 A
6132368 Cooper Oct 2000 A
6161032 Acker Dec 2000 A
6171277 Ponzi Jan 2001 B1
6188355 Gilboa Feb 2001 B1
6191414 Ogle et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198974 Webster, Jr. Mar 2001 B1
6200274 McNeirney Mar 2001 B1
6203493 Ben-Haim Mar 2001 B1
6246200 Blumenkranz et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253770 Acker Jul 2001 B1
6275628 Jones et al. Aug 2001 B1
6331181 Tierney et al. Dec 2001 B1
6332089 Acker et al. Dec 2001 B1
6335617 Osadchy et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347892 Paddock et al. Feb 2002 B1
6352503 Matsui et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366722 Murphy et al. Apr 2002 B1
6366799 Acker et al. Apr 2002 B1
6371952 Madhani et al. Apr 2002 B1
6380732 Gilboa Apr 2002 B1
6389187 Greenaway et al. May 2002 B1
6396574 Lee et al. May 2002 B1
6432041 Taniguchi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6441577 Blumenkranz et al. Aug 2002 B2
6451027 Cooper et al. Sep 2002 B1
6453190 Acker et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459926 Nowlin et al. Oct 2002 B1
6470205 Bosselmann et al. Oct 2002 B2
6471710 Bucholtz Oct 2002 B1
6478028 Paolitto et al. Nov 2002 B1
6484118 Govari Nov 2002 B1
6487352 Sobiski et al. Nov 2002 B1
6490467 Bucholz et al. Dec 2002 B1
6554793 Pauker et al. Apr 2003 B1
6571639 May et al. Jun 2003 B1
6572629 Kalloo et al. Jun 2003 B2
6574355 Green Jun 2003 B2
6575644 Paddock et al. Jun 2003 B2
6578967 Paddock et al. Jun 2003 B1
6618612 Acker et al. Sep 2003 B1
6645196 Nixon et al. Nov 2003 B1
6648816 Irion et al. Nov 2003 B2
6671055 Wavering et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671581 Niemeyer et al. Dec 2003 B2
6695871 Maki et al. Feb 2004 B1
6720988 Gere et al. Apr 2004 B1
6743239 Kuehn et al. Jun 2004 B1
6758843 Jensen et al. Jul 2004 B2
6783491 Saadat et al. Aug 2004 B2
6790173 Saadat et al. Sep 2004 B2
6817974 Cooper et al. Nov 2004 B2
6833814 Gilboa et al. Dec 2004 B2
6837846 Jaffe et al. Jan 2005 B2
6837847 Ewers et al. Jan 2005 B2
6866671 Tierney et al. Mar 2005 B2
6899672 Chin et al. May 2005 B2
6902560 Morley et al. Jun 2005 B1
6936042 Wallace et al. Aug 2005 B2
6942613 Ewers et al. Sep 2005 B2
6960162 Saadat et al. Nov 2005 B2
6960163 Ewers et al. Nov 2005 B2
6984203 Tartaglia et al. Jan 2006 B2
6991602 Nakazawa et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994703 Wang et al. Feb 2006 B2
6997870 Couvillon, Jr. Feb 2006 B2
7007699 Martinelli et al. Mar 2006 B2
7041052 Saadat et al. May 2006 B2
7042573 Froggatt May 2006 B2
7090637 Danitz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7090683 Brock et al. Aug 2006 B2
7128708 Saadat et al. Oct 2006 B2
7139601 Bucholz et al. Nov 2006 B2
7197354 Sobe Mar 2007 B2
7233820 Gilboa Jun 2007 B2
7252660 Kunz Aug 2007 B2
7277120 Gere et al. Oct 2007 B2
7320700 Cooper et al. Jan 2008 B2
7371028 Gordon et al. May 2008 B2
7398116 Edwards Jul 2008 B2
7500947 Kucklick et al. Mar 2009 B2
7594912 Cooper et al. Sep 2009 B2
7607440 Coste-Maniere et al. Oct 2009 B2
7715105 Forkey et al. May 2010 B2
7720322 Prisco et al. May 2010 B2
7725214 Diolaiti May 2010 B2
7772541 Froggatt et al. Aug 2010 B2
7853307 Edwards Dec 2010 B2
7920909 Lyon et al. Apr 2011 B2
7922650 McWeeney et al. Apr 2011 B2
7930065 Larkin et al. Apr 2011 B2
7947000 Vargas et al. May 2011 B2
7962193 Edwards et al. Jun 2011 B2
8016749 Clerc et al. Sep 2011 B2
8335557 Maschke Dec 2012 B2
8376934 Takahashi et al. Feb 2013 B2
8396595 Dariush Mar 2013 B2
8442618 Strommer et al. May 2013 B2
8506555 Ruiz Morales Aug 2013 B2
8554368 Fielding et al. Oct 2013 B2
8672837 Roelle et al. Mar 2014 B2
8720448 Reis et al. May 2014 B2
8738181 Greer et al. May 2014 B2
8784303 Laby et al. Jul 2014 B2
8784435 Cooper et al. Jul 2014 B2
8827948 Romo et al. Sep 2014 B2
8858424 Hasegawa et al. Oct 2014 B2
8929631 Pfister et al. Jan 2015 B2
8945095 Blumenkranz et al. Feb 2015 B2
9014851 Wong et al. Apr 2015 B2
9060678 Larkin et al. Jun 2015 B2
9125639 Mathis et al. Sep 2015 B2
9129417 Zheng et al. Sep 2015 B2
9199372 Henderson et al. Dec 2015 B2
9226796 Bowling et al. Jan 2016 B2
9256940 Carelsen et al. Feb 2016 B2
9289578 Walker et al. Mar 2016 B2
9314306 Yu Apr 2016 B2
9345456 Tsonton et al. May 2016 B2
9358682 Ruiz Morales Jun 2016 B2
9387048 Donhowe et al. Jul 2016 B2
9452276 Duindam et al. Sep 2016 B2
9504604 Alvarez Nov 2016 B2
9522034 Johnson et al. Dec 2016 B2
9561083 Yu et al. Feb 2017 B2
9622827 Yu et al. Apr 2017 B2
9629595 Walker et al. Apr 2017 B2
9636184 Lee et al. May 2017 B2
9675422 Hourtash et al. Jun 2017 B2
9713509 Schuh et al. Jul 2017 B2
9727963 Mintz et al. Aug 2017 B2
9737371 Romo et al. Aug 2017 B2
9737373 Schuh Aug 2017 B2
9744335 Jiang Aug 2017 B2
9763741 Alvarez et al. Sep 2017 B2
9788910 Schuh Oct 2017 B2
9789608 Itkowitz et al. Oct 2017 B2
9818681 Machida Nov 2017 B2
9844353 Walker et al. Dec 2017 B2
9844412 Bogusky et al. Dec 2017 B2
9867635 Alvarez et al. Jan 2018 B2
9931025 Graetzel et al. Apr 2018 B1
9949749 Noonan et al. Apr 2018 B2
9955986 Shah May 2018 B2
9962228 Schuh et al. May 2018 B2
9980785 Schuh May 2018 B2
9993313 Schuh et al. Jun 2018 B2
10016900 Meyer et al. Jul 2018 B1
10022192 Ummalaneni Jul 2018 B1
10080576 Romo et al. Sep 2018 B2
10238837 Duindam et al. Mar 2019 B2
10299870 Connolly et al. May 2019 B2
10307205 Ludwin Jun 2019 B2
10568700 Donhowe et al. Feb 2020 B2
10653866 Duindam et al. May 2020 B2
10682070 Duindam Jun 2020 B2
10744303 Duindam et al. Aug 2020 B2
20010049509 Sekine et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020077550 Rabiner et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087169 Brock et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020120252 Brock et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020143319 Brock Oct 2002 A1
20020151967 Mikus et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156345 Eppler et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161280 Chatenever et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020173786 Kortenbach et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030045778 Ohline et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030050649 Brock et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030182091 Kukuk Sep 2003 A1
20030236455 Swanson et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236505 Bonadio et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040024311 Quaid et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040054355 Gerbi et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040083808 Rambow et al. May 2004 A1
20040116803 Jascob et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040138525 Saadat et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138529 Wiltshire et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040147837 Macaulay et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153191 Grimm et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040202400 Kochergin et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040249367 Saadat et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040257021 Chang et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004431 Kogasaka et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050043718 Madhani et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049486 Urquhart et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050059960 Simaan et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065397 Saadat et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065398 Adams Mar 2005 A1
20050065400 Banik et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050096502 Khalili May 2005 A1
20050102062 Green May 2005 A1
20050131343 Abrams et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050192532 Kucklick et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197536 Banik et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197557 Strommer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050215983 Brock Sep 2005 A1
20050222554 Wallace et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251176 Swanstrom et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256398 Hastings et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261551 Couvillon Nov 2005 A1
20050272977 Saadat et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050284221 Danisch et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004286 Chang Jan 2006 A1
20060013523 Childlers et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015096 Hauck et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060025652 Vargas Feb 2006 A1
20060041293 Mehdizadeh et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060095022 Moll et al. May 2006 A1
20060149418 Anvari Jul 2006 A1
20060161045 Merril et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161136 Anderson et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060184016 Glossop et al. Aug 2006 A1
20070013336 Nowlin et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016070 Grunwald et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021738 Hasser et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070043455 Viswanathan et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070049908 Boese et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055128 Glossop et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055291 Birkmeyer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070065077 Childers et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083217 Eversull et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070089557 Solomon et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070106116 Sugimoto May 2007 A1
20070135803 Belson Jun 2007 A1
20070135886 Maschke Jun 2007 A1
20070137371 Devengenzo et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150155 Kawai et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070151391 Larkin et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070156020 Foley et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173694 Tsuji et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070197896 Moll et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070225554 Maseda et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070232898 Huynh Oct 2007 A1
20070249911 Simon Oct 2007 A1
20070253599 White et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070265503 Schlesinger et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270642 Bayer et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070283970 Mohr et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070287884 Schena Dec 2007 A1
20070287889 Mohr Dec 2007 A1
20070287992 Diolaiti et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070293721 Gilboa Dec 2007 A1
20070299353 Harlev et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080046122 Manzo et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080051704 Patel et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080058861 Cooper et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080064921 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080064927 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080064931 Schena et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065097 Duval et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065098 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065099 Cooper et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065100 Larkin Mar 2008 A1
20080065101 Larkin Mar 2008 A1
20080065102 Cooper Mar 2008 A1
20080065103 Cooper et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065104 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065106 Larkin Mar 2008 A1
20080065107 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065109 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065110 Duval et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071288 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071289 Cooper et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071290 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071291 Duval et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080097155 Gattani et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103362 Couvillon May 2008 A1
20080108870 Wiita et al. May 2008 A1
20080123921 Gielen et al. May 2008 A1
20080140087 Barbagli Jun 2008 A1
20080147089 Loh et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080151041 Shafer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080156971 Ogisu et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080159653 Dunki-Jacobs et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080172049 Bredno et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080212082 Froggatt et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080231221 Ogawa Sep 2008 A1
20080249640 Vittor et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080255505 Carlson et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080287963 Rogers et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080312771 Sugiura Dec 2008 A1
20080319376 Wilcox et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090030307 Govari et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090076534 Shelton, IV et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090085807 Anderson Apr 2009 A1
20090088756 Anderson Apr 2009 A1
20090088774 Swarup et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090096443 Anderson Apr 2009 A1
20090105799 Hekmat et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090118620 Tgavalekos May 2009 A1
20090123111 Udd May 2009 A1
20090137952 Ramamurthy May 2009 A1
20090184825 Anderson Jul 2009 A1
20090198298 Kaiser et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090231419 Bayer Sep 2009 A1
20090245600 Hoffman et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248040 Cooper et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090275799 Saadat et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090281566 Edwards et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090287354 Choi Nov 2009 A1
20090314131 Bailey Dec 2009 A1
20090322001 Luke et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326322 Diolaiti et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326552 Diolaiti Dec 2009 A1
20090326553 Mustufa et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100030115 Fujimoto et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100041949 Tolkowsky Feb 2010 A1
20100076263 Tanaka et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076303 McKinley Mar 2010 A1
20100082041 Prisco Apr 2010 A1
20100121138 Goldenberg et al. May 2010 A1
20100121139 Ouyang et al. May 2010 A1
20100125284 Tanner et al. May 2010 A1
20100170519 Romo et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100210939 Hartmann et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100222647 Hashimshony et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100234856 Stoianovici et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100256812 Tsusaka et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274087 Diolaiti et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100292535 Paskar Nov 2010 A1
20100298642 Trusty et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100331820 Prisco et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100332033 Diolaiti et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110021903 Strommer et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110028991 Ikeda et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040305 Gomez et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040404 Diolaiti et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110054309 Edwards Mar 2011 A1
20110063428 Sonnenschein et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110082365 McGrogan et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110082462 Suarez et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110092808 Shachar et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110125032 McIntyre et al. May 2011 A1
20110130750 Ormsby Jun 2011 A1
20110137122 Kawai Jun 2011 A1
20110152879 Williams et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110153252 Govari et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110160570 Kariv et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110172680 Younge et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110172687 Woodruff et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110184241 Zubiate et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110184276 Lyon et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110196199 Donhowe et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110196419 Cooper Aug 2011 A1
20110201883 Cooper et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110201922 Hezemans et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110202068 Diolaiti et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110224684 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110224685 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110224686 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110224687 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110224688 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110224689 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110224825 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110237889 Tanaka Sep 2011 A1
20110257480 Takahashi et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110277576 Cooper Nov 2011 A1
20110277579 Anderson et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110277580 Cooper et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110277775 Holop et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110277776 McGrogan et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282356 Solomon et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282357 Rogers et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282358 Gomez et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282359 Duval Nov 2011 A1
20110282491 Prisco et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110319910 Roelle et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120000427 Nilsson Jan 2012 A1
20120010628 Cooper et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120046522 Naito Feb 2012 A1
20120059249 Verard et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071752 Sewell et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071822 Romo et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120116393 Jimenez et al. May 2012 A1
20120123441 Au et al. May 2012 A1
20120150075 Ludwin et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120165608 Banik et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120182409 Moriyama et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120209293 Carlson et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120215094 Rahimian et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120253276 Govari et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120289815 Keast et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120296166 Kim Nov 2012 A1
20120328077 Bouvier Dec 2012 A1
20130085330 Ramamurthy et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130090530 Ramamurthy et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130096385 Fenech et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130102846 Sjostrom et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130131503 Schneider et al. May 2013 A1
20130144124 Prisco et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130165854 Sandhu et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130165945 Roelle et al. Jun 2013 A9
20130169272 Eichler et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130172906 Olson et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130218005 Desai et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130223702 Holsing et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130303944 Duindam Nov 2013 A1
20130325030 Hourtash et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140114180 Jain Apr 2014 A1
20140135985 Coste-Maniere et al. May 2014 A1
20140142591 Alvarez et al. May 2014 A1
20140163664 Goldsmith Jun 2014 A1
20140222207 Bowling et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140296870 Stern et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140296872 Cooper et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140309649 Alvarez et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140316420 Ballard et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140357984 Wallace et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140364870 Alvarez et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150051592 Kintz Feb 2015 A1
20150088161 Hata et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150101442 Romo Apr 2015 A1
20150104284 Riedel Apr 2015 A1
20150119628 Bharat et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150119638 Yu et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150164594 Romo et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150164596 Romo et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150202015 Elhawary et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150223902 Walker et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150265359 Camarillo Sep 2015 A1
20150265807 Park et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150297864 Kokish et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150335480 Alvarez et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150342695 He et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150359597 Gombert et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150374956 Bogusky Dec 2015 A1
20160001038 Romo et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160005168 Merlet Jan 2016 A1
20160005220 Weingarten et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160005576 Tsukamoto Jan 2016 A1
20160007880 Duindam Jan 2016 A1
20160016319 Remirez et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160029998 Brister et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160045269 Elhawary et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160051221 Dickhans et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160066794 Klinder et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160073928 Soper et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160081568 Kolberg et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160100772 Ikuma et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160228032 Walker et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160270865 Landey et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160278865 Capote et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160287111 Jacobsen Oct 2016 A1
20160287279 Bovay et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160296294 Moll et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160331469 Hall et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160338787 Popovic et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160346924 Hasegawa et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160354057 Hansen et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160360947 Iida et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160360949 Hyodo et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160374541 Agrawal et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170007337 Dan Jan 2017 A1
20170056215 Nagesh et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170068796 Passerini et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170100199 Yu et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170119413 Romo May 2017 A1
20170119481 Romo et al. May 2017 A1
20170151027 Walker et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170165011 Bovay et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170165503 Hautvast et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170172673 Yu et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170202627 Sramek et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170209073 Sramek et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170251988 Weber et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170280978 Yamamoto et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170281049 Yamamoto et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170290631 Lee et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170304015 Tavallaei et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170325715 Mehendale et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170333679 Jiang Nov 2017 A1
20170340396 Romo et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170365055 Mintz et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170367782 Schuh et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180025666 Ho et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180177383 Noonan et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180177556 Noonan Jun 2018 A1
20180177561 Mintz et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180214011 Graetzel et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180221038 Noonan et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180221039 Shah Aug 2018 A1
20180250083 Schuh et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180250085 Simi et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180271616 Schuh et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180279852 Rafii-Tari et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180280660 Landey et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180289243 Landey et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180289431 Draper et al. Oct 2018 A1
20190192819 Duindam et al. Jun 2019 A1
20200023201 Overweg Jan 2020 A1
20200146757 Fenech et al. May 2020 A1
20200254223 Duindam et al. Aug 2020 A1
20210016061 Duindam et al. Jan 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (52)
Number Date Country
1658789 Aug 2005 CN
101088451 Dec 2007 CN
101247847 Aug 2008 CN
101252870 Aug 2008 CN
101404921 Apr 2009 CN
101918073 Dec 2010 CN
102013100605 Jul 2014 DE
1566150 Aug 2005 EP
1800593 Jun 2007 EP
2158834 Mar 2010 EP
2392435 Dec 2011 EP
3025630 Jun 2016 EP
S57190549 Nov 1982 JP
H06285009 Oct 1994 JP
H07504363 May 1995 JP
H07505790 Jun 1995 JP
H1020214 Jan 1998 JP
2000093522 Apr 2000 JP
2000166936 Jun 2000 JP
2001046529 Feb 2001 JP
2003275223 Sep 2003 JP
2008018007 Jan 2008 JP
2008508987 Mar 2008 JP
2009530069 Aug 2009 JP
19990087101 Dec 1999 KR
WO-9313916 Jul 1993 WO
WO-9605768 Feb 1996 WO
WO-9729690 Aug 1997 WO
WO-9744089 Nov 1997 WO
WO-0051486 Sep 2000 WO
WO-0156457 Aug 2001 WO
WO-0207809 Jan 2002 WO
WO-2004016155 Feb 2004 WO
WO-2005087128 Sep 2005 WO
WO-2006039092 Apr 2006 WO
WO-2006122061 Nov 2006 WO
WO-2007109418 Sep 2007 WO
WO-2007109778 Sep 2007 WO
WO-2007146987 Dec 2007 WO
WO-2008028149 Mar 2008 WO
WO-2008111070 Sep 2008 WO
WO-2008147961 Dec 2008 WO
WO-2009002701 Dec 2008 WO
WO-2009120940 Oct 2009 WO
WO-2009148317 Dec 2009 WO
WO-2010039394 Apr 2010 WO
WO-2011001300 Jan 2011 WO
WO-2011008922 Jan 2011 WO
WO-2011085166 Jul 2011 WO
WO-2011100110 Aug 2011 WO
WO-2011132409 Oct 2011 WO
WO-2017048194 Mar 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (229)
Entry
Exhibit 1, Before Ulrike W. Jenks, Tina E. Hulse, and James A. Worth, Administrative Patent Judges, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc v. Patent Owner. Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., IPR2019-01173, Document 215-1, Entered: Dec. 16, 2019, 197 pages.
Exhibit 1, Redacted in its Entirety, Demand for Jury Trial, Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s First set of Requests for production to Plaintiffs, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 233-1, 2019, 1-70 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/039604 dated Sep. 14, 2018, 6 pages.
Kukuk M., et al., “TBNA-protocols: Guiding TransBronchial Needle Aspirations Without a Computer in the Operating Room”, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Oct. 5, 2001, LNCS 2208, pp. 997-1006.
Petitioner's Request for Rehearing of the Institution Decision of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Mar. 16, 2020, 9 pages.
Shaw Keller LLP, Responsive Letter to Honorable Maryellen Noreika from David M. Fry, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. vs Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Redacted—Public Version, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 236, Apr. 1, 2020, 1-117 pages.
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from David M. Fry, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Defendant: Auris Health, Inc., held on Mar. 31, 2020, pp. 1-77.
Stipulation Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Mar. 20, 2020, 2 pages.
Verdaasdonk R., et al., “Effect of Microsecond Pulse Length and Tip Shape On Explosive Bubble Formation of 2.78 μm Er,Cr;YSGG and 2.94 μm Er:YAG Laser”, Proceedings of SPIE, Jan. 23, 2012, vol. 8221 (12), 1 page.
Exhibit I, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s vs Defendant Auris Health, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Claim Construction, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), Nov. 20, 2019, 59 pages.
Exhibit J, Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. § 314, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, IPR2019-01496 U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276 B2, Before Ulrike W. Jenks, Tina E. Hulse, and James A. Worth, Administrative Patent Judges, Feb. 13, 2020, 21 pages.
Exhibit K, Declaration of William Cimino Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Sep. 27, 2016, in the United States Patent and Trademark, inventors: Vincent Duindam et al., 126 pages.
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Filed: Oct. 14, 2011, 113 pages.
[Proposed] Amended Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 61, 2019, 14 pages.
[Proposed] Order Regarding Access to Source Code, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 46, Mar. 21, 2019, 3 pages.
[Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 45, Mar. 21, 2019, 31 pages.
Abbott, Daniel J. et al., “Design of an Endoluminal NOTES Robotic System,” Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007, pp. 410-416.
Al-Ahmad A., et al., “Early Experience with a Computerized Obotically Controlled Catheter System,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, Apr. 2005, vol. 12(3), pp. 199-202.
Amended Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 123-1, Nov. 13, 2019, 31 pages.
Amended Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 81, Aug. 29, 2019, 29 pages.
Amending Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 62, 2019, 14 pages.
Anisfield, Nancy; “Ascension Technology Puts Spotlight on DC Field Magnetic Motion Tracking,” HP Chronicle, Aug. 2000, vol. 17, No. 9, 3 Pages.
Ascari, Luca et al., “A New Active Microendoscope for Exploring the Sub-Arachnoid Space in the Spinal Cord,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2003, pp. 2657-2662, vol. 2, IEEE.
Auris Health, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Jury Trial Demanded, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 52, Mar. 29, 2019, 8 pages.
Barnes Industries, Inc., “How a Ball Screw Works,” 4 pages, Copyright 2007; Internet: http://www.barnesballscrew.com/ball.htm.
Berthold III, John W., “Historical Review of Microbend Fiber-Optic Sensors,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 1995, pp. 1193-1199.
Blue Road Research, “Overview of Fiber Optic Sensors,” 40 pages, first posted Dec. 8, 2004. Internet< www.bluerr.com/papers/Overview_of_FOS2.pdf>.
Cao, Caroline G.L., “Designing Spatial Orientation in Endoscopic Environments,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, 2001, pp. 1259-1263.
Cao, Caroline G.L., “Disorientation in Minimal Access Surgery: A Case Study,” Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, pp. 4-169-4-172.
Childers, Brooks A., et al., “Use of 3000 Bragg grating strain sensors distributed on four eight-meter optical fibers during static load tests of a composite structure,” SPIE 8th International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Mar. 4-8, 2001, Newport Beach, California, 10 Pages.
Choi, Dong-Geol et al., “Design of a Spring Backbone Micro Endoscope,” Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007, pp. 1815-1821.
Compendium of Inventor Declarations in Support of Plaintiffs Intutive Surgical, Inc. And Intutive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 29, Dec. 11, 2018, 2 pages.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand For Jury Trial, Aug. 31, 2018, 14 pages.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/762,185, filed Jun. 13, 2007.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,028, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,029, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,030, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,075, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,125, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,126, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,129, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,131, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,172, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,198, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,207, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,328, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 61/334,978, filed May 14, 2010.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,173, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Cowie, Barbara M., et al., “Distributive Tactile Sensing Using Fibre Bragg Grating Sensors for Biomedical Applications,” 1st IEEE / RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob 2006), Feb. 2006, pp. 312-317.
Curriculum Vitae of Prof. Ron Alterovitz, Ph.D, Professor, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Jan. 14, 2019, 22 pages.
Danisch, Lee et al., “Spatially continuous six degree of freedom position and orientation sensor,” Sensor Review, 1999, vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 106-112.
Dario, Paolo et al., “A Miniature Device for Medical Intracavitary Intervention,” Micro Electro Mechanical Systems '91 Proc IEEE ‘An Investigation of Micro Structures, Sensors, Actuators, Machines and Robots’, 1991, pp. 171-175, IEEE.
Declaration of David Styka in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 18, 2018, 3 pages.
Declaration of Kelly E. Farnan in Support of Auris Health, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 53, 2019, 3 pages.
Declaration of Laura E. Miller in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Exihibit, Document 122, Nov. 13, 2019, 50 pages.
Declaration of Laura Miller in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 44, 2019, 1 page.
Declaration of Nathan B. Sabri in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 16, 2018, 7 pages.
Declaration of Shaelyn K. Dawson in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 119, 2019, 3 pages.
Declaration of Shaelyn K. Dawson in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 127, 2019, 2 pages.
Declaration of Taylor Patton in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Redacted—Public Version, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 30, Dec. 11, 2018, 15 pages.
Declaration of Vera Ranieri in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28, Demand For Jury Trial, 2018, 4 pages.
Declaration of Prof. Ron Alterovitz, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, 2019, 25 pages.
Declaration of Professor Mark E. Rentschler, Ph.D, Mar. 2018, 58 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Amended Notice of Deposition of Catherine J. Mohr, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 99, Oct. 9, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Amended Notice of Deposition of Vincent Duindam, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 100, Demand For Jury Trial, Oct. 9, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint for Patent Infringement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 12, Oct. 25, 2018, 12 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of 30(B)(6) Deposition of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 120, Nov. 12, 2019, 10 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Catherine J. Mohr, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 94, Oct. 2, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Mark E. Rentschler, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 103, Oct. 15, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Tim Soper, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 87, Sep. 13, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Vincent Duindam, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 93, Oct. 2, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief In Support of Its Motion to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 118, Oct. 30, 2019, 18 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 15, Oct. 29, 2018, 25 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Demand for Jury Trial, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, 2019, 38 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Demand for Jury Trial, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 126, Nov. 15, 2019, 13 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.s.c. § 1404(a), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 31, Nov. 18, 2018, 14 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement Per F.r.c.p. 7.1, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Jury Trial Demanded, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Apr. 17, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement per F.R.C.P. 7.1(a), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 13, Oct. 25, 2018, 1 page.
Duncan, Roger, “Sensing Shape: Fiber-Bragg-grating sensor arrays monitor shape at a high resolution,” 2005, pp. 18-21, SPIE.
Excerpts from the deposition of Mark Edwin Rentschler, Ph.D., Oct. 21, 2019, 35 pages.
Excerpts from Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 2003, 11th Edition, 3 pages.
Exhibit 1, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 119-1, Aug. 9, 2019, 5 pages.
Exhibit 1, [Proposed] Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 43-2, 2019, 14 pages.
Exhibit 1, Declaration, Annual Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(D) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form 10-K, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Document 28-1, 2018, 12 pages.
Exhibit 1, Fox Chase Cancer Center Among First in U.S. to Use Innovative Technology for Lung Cancer Diagnosis, Temple Health, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://www.foxchase.org/news/2018-08-15-Monarch-Robotic-Bronchoscopy), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-3, Aug. 15, 2018, 4 pages.
Exhibit 1, Morrison & Foerster, via Email, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Sep. 9, 2019, Document 127-1, 22 pages.
Exhibit 10, “Auris Health Lands $220M to Expand Sales of Lung Testing Medical Robot, ” exome, Frank Vinluan, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-10, 2018, 4 pages.
Exhibit 10, From: Dawson, Shaelyn K, Subject: Intuitive v. Auris: Summary of Sep. 26, 2019 meet-and-confer re: Intuitive's deficient production, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-10, 2019, 4 pages.
Exhibit 11, “Auris Health Lands $220M to Expand Sales of Lung Testing Medical Robot, ” Xcomony, Nov. 28, 2018, Auris, Auris Health, Inc , Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-11, 2018, 4 pages.
Exhibit 11, U.S Food and Drug Administration, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-11, Auris Surgical Robotics, Inc, Mar. 22, 2018, 12 pages.
Exhibit 12, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form D, Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-12, 2018, 7 pages.
Exhibit 13, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form D, Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-13, 2018, 7 pages.
Exhibit 14, “Auris Surgical Robotics Agrees to Acquire Hansen Medical, ” Market Wired, Source: Hansen Medical, Inc, The Global Leader in Intravascular Robotics, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-14, Apr. 20, 2016, 2018, 4 pages.
Exhibit 15, Declaration, Delaware, U.S. District Court , Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-15, 2018, 3 pages.
Exhibit 2, [proposed] Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 43-3, 2019, 19 pages.
Exhibit 2, Declaration, “Pairing Human Ingenuity with Technology,” Intuitive, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-2, 2018, 13 pages.
Exhibit 2, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, USPTO, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-2, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01173, Jun. 12, 2019, 85 Pages.
Exhibit 2, UPMC Hamot First in U.S. to Use Innovative Robotic Technology to Detect Lung Cancer Earlier, UPMC Life Changing Medicine, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-4, 2018, 3 pages.
Exhibit 3, Declaration, Contact Intuitive, Office locations and contact Information, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-3, 2018, 5 pages.
Exhibit 3, Letter, Careers Audacious goals. Audacious challenges, Auris Health Inc, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://www.aurishealth.com/jobs?gh_jid=1256912), 2018, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-5, 7 pages.
Exhibit 3, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,800,056, USPTO, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-3, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01189, Jun. 13, 2019, 73 Pages.
Exhibit 4, “da Vinci Robotic Surgery,” Christiana Care Health System, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-4, 2018, 3 pages.
Exhibit 4, Letter, Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions, ClinicalTrials.gov, Document 23-6, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03727425), Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-6, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03727425, 2018, 9 pages.
Exhibit 4, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,200, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01448, Document 119-4, Aug. 5, 2019, 86 pages.
Exhibit 5, “Auris Health, Ethicon's Neuwave Ink Robot-assisted Bronchoscope Ablation Dev Deal,” May 16, 2018, By Fink Densford, Retrieved from the Internet: (https:// https://www.massdevice.com/auris-health-ethicons-neuwave-ink-robot-assisted-bronchoscope-ablation-dev-deal/), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-7, 2018, Massdevice Medical Network, 12 pages.
Exhibit 5, Declaration, “Beebe Healthcare Introduces the da Vinci® Xi™ Robotic Surgical System,” Submitted by Rachel on Jun. 8, 2018, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-5, 4 Pages.
Exhibit 5, Petition For Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01496, Document 119-5, Aug. 15, 2019, 72 pages.
Exhibit 6, Declaration, “Fox Chase Cancer Center Among First in U.S. to Use Innovative Technology for Lung Cancer Diagnosis,” Philadelphia International Medicine® News Bureau, Fox Chase Cancer Center Temple Health, For Immediate Release, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-6, Aug. 23, 2018, 3 pages.
Exhibit 6, Letter, Nathan, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Intuitive Surgical, Inc et al v. Auris Health, Inc., C.A. No. 18-1359-LPS, Document 23-8, 2018, 4 pages.
Exhibit 6, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, Before The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01533, Document 119-6, Aug. 29, 2019, 84 pages.
Exhibit 7, “UPMC Hamot First in U.S. to Use Innovative Robotic Technology to Detect Lung Cancer Earlier,” UPMC Life Changing Medicine, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-7, 2018, 3 pages.
Exhibit 7, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,701, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01532, Document 119-7, Aug. 29, 2019, 79 Pages.
Exhibit 8, Careers Audacious goals. Audacious challenges, Auris, Retrieved from the Internet: (URL:http://https://www.aurishealth.com/jobs?gh_jid=1256912), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-8, 2018, 8 pages.
Exhibit 8, Petition For Inter Partes Review Of U.S. Pat. No. 6,522,906, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, IPR2019-01547, Document 119-8, Aug. 30, 2019, 82 pages.
Exhibit 9, “Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions,” ClinicalTrials.gov, U.S National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03727425, Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-9, 2018, 8 pages.
Exhibit 9, Trial Statistics, USPTO, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-9, 2019, 12 pages.
Exhibit A, “Johnson & Johnson Announces Agreement to Acquire Auris Health, Inc,” Auris Health's Robotic Platform Expands Johnson & Johnson's Digital Surgery Portfolio, New Brunswick, NJ—Feb. 13, 2019, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 36-1, 2019, 4 pages.
Exhibit A, Da Vinci by Intuitive, enabling Surgical care to get patients back to what matters, Aug. 29, 2019, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-1, Retrieved from the internet: URL: [https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-and-services/da-vinci], pp. 4 pages.
Exhibit A, Intuitive, Annual Report 2017, Intuitive Surgical, Inc, www.intuitivesurgical.com, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 16-1, 2018, 144 pages.
Exhibit A, Letter, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. v. Auris Health, Inc., Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Doc 53-1, 2019, 86 pages.
Exhibit A, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(B)(6) Directed to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Demand For Jury Trial, Document 23-1, Dec. 3, 2018, 7 pages.
Exhibit B, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Defendant Auris Health, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Document 23-2, Dec. 3, 2018, 9 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 12840613.9 dated Oct. 6, 2015, 9 pages (ISRG02860/EP).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP20070798487, dated Jan. 30, 2015, 8 pages (ISRG00990/EP).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP19174999.3 dated Nov. 26, 2019, 10 pages.
Gagarina, T. et al., “Modeling and experimental analysis of a new bellow type actuators for active catheter end-effector,” Proc. 10th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2001, pp. 612-617, IEEE.
Gander, M.J. et al., “Bend measurement using Bragg gratings in multicore fibre,” Electronics Letter, Jan. 20, 2000, vol. 36, No. 2, 2 Pages.
Hagn U., et al., “DLR MiroSurge: A Versatile System for Research in Endoscopic Telesurgery,” International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2010, vol. 5 (2), 11 pages.
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Sensei: Discover Your Sixth Sense”, Brochure, 2007, 10 pages.
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Bibliography”, Jun. 22, 2005, 1 page, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20060714042735if_/http://hansenmedical.com/bibliography.aspx].
Hansen Medical, Inc., “System Overview”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20060714043118if_/http://hansenmedical.com/system.aspx].
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Technology Advantages”, 2005, 1 page, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20060713011151if_/http://hansenmedical.com/advantages.aspx].
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Sensei-X:Robotic Catheter System”, Brochure, 2009, 5 pages.
Hill, Kenneth O., “Fiber Bragg grating technology fundamentals and overview,” IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 15, Issue 8, Aug. 1997, pp. 1263-1276.
Ikuta, Koji et al., “Development of remote microsurgery robot and new surgical procedure for deep and narrow space,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, 2003, pp. 1103-1108, vol. 1, IEEE.
Ikuta, Koji et al., “Shape memory alloy servo actuator system with electric resistance feedback and application for active endoscope,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1988, pp. 427-430, vol. 1, IEEE.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/059889, dated Mar. 29, 2013, 14 pages.
International Search Report for application No. PCT/US07/71085, dated Sep. 17, 2008, 2 pages.
Ion by Intuitive, A New Robotic Endoluminal Platform for Minimally Invasive Peripheral Lung Biopsy, Aug. 29, 2019, Retrived from the internet: [https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-andservices/ion], 5 pages.
Jin, Long et al., “Two-dimensional bend sensing with a cantilever-mounted FBG [Fiber Bragg Grating],” Meas. Sci. Technol., 2006, pp. 168-172, vol. 17, Institute of Physics Publishing.
Joint Claim Construction Brief, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 113, Oct. 29, 2019, 103 pages.
Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 76, Aug. 2, 2019, 31 pages.
Kenneth Salisbury Jr., “The heart of microsurgery,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers , 1998, 12 pages.
Kreger, Stephen et al., “Optical Frequency Domain Reflectometry for High Density Multiplexing of Multi-Axis Fiber Bragg Gratings,” 16th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors (OFS-16), Oct. 2003, Nara, Japan, pp. 526-529.
Le Roux, P.D., et al., “Robot-assisted Microsurgery: A Feasibility Study in the Rat,” Neurosurgery, Mar. 2001, vol. 48 (3), pp. 584-589.
Lertpiriyasuwat, Vatchara et al., “Extended Kalman Filtering Applied to a Two-Axis Robotic Arm with Flexible Links,” International Journal of Robotics Research, 2000, vol. 19., No. 3, pp. 254-270.
Letter Response, Kelly E. Farnan, By CM/ECF, Richards Layton & Finger, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 24, RLF1 20392700v.1, Document 24, Dec. 4, 2018, 3 pages.
Letter, Shaw Keller LLP, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Oct. 29, 2019, Document 112, 1 page.
Lunwei Z., et al., “FBG Sensor Devices for Spatial Shape Detection of Intelligent Colonoscope,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 2004, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 835-840.
Markman Hearing, Before: The Honorable Maryellen Noreika, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Defendant: Auris Health, Inc., held on Nov. 20, 2019, pp. 1-162.
Marrouche N.F., et al., “AB32-1: Preliminary Human Experience Using a Novel Robotic Catheter Remote Control”, May 6, 2005, 1 page.
Martinez, A. et al., “Vector Bending Sensors Based on Fibre Bragg Gratings Inscribed by Infrared Femtosecond Laser,” Electronics Letters, 2005, pp. 472-474, vol. 41—Issue 8.
Measurand, “ShapeTape Overview,” Measurand ShapeTape Advantage, pp. 1-3, first posted Nov. 3, 2004. Internet<www.measurand.com/products/ShapeTape_overview.html>.
Meltz, Gerald, “Overview of Fiber Grating-Based Sensors,” Proceedings of SPIE Distributed Multiplexed Fiber Optic Sensors VI, Nov. 27, 1996, Eds. Kersey et al.,vol. 2838, pp. 2-22.
Memorandum Opinion, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), May 31, 2019, 13 pages.
Memorandum Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), 2019, 16 pages.
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Maryellen Noreika, Telephone Conference held on Aug. 21, 2019, 1 page.
Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 117, Oct. 30, 2019, 2 pages.
Nambi M., et al., “A Compact Telemanipulated Retinal-Surgery System that Uses Commercially Available Instruments with a Quick-Change Adapter,” Journal of Medical Robotics Research, 2016, vol. 1 (2), 14 pages.
Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2014 for Japanese Application No. 20130179563 filed Aug. 30, 2013, 7 pages (ISRG00990D12/JP).
Oh S., et al., “P5-75: Novel Robotic Catheter Remote Control System: Safety and Accuracy in Delivering RF Lesions in All 4 Cardiac Chambers”, 2005, pp. S277-S278.
Olympus , Your Vision, Our Future, “Endoscope Overview 2008,” Evis Exera II, HDTV 1080, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-1, 6 pages.
Olympus Medical Systems, “Olympus ScopeGuide Receives FDA Clearance,” Press Release dated May 24, 2011, 2 pages.
Oral Order, Intuitive Surgical, Inc et al v. Auris Health, Inc, 1-18-cv-01359 (DED), docket entry 25, 2018, 1 Page.
Oral Order, re 37 Proposed Scheduling Order, Intuitive Surgical, Inc et al v. Auris Health, Inc, 1-18-cv-01359 (DED), 2019, 1 page.
Order Conduct of the Proceeding, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2019-01173, Case IPR2019-01189, Case IPR2019-01496, Case IPR2019-01547, Dated Dec. 9, 2019, 04 pages.
Order Regarding Access to Source Code, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Mar. 21, 2019, 3 pages.
Order Scheduling Adr Teleconference, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 142, 2019, 4 pages.
Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), Document 70, 2019, 1 page.
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP19174999.3 dated Aug. 21, 2019, 11 pages (ISRG02860D1/EP).
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP20120840613, dated Jun. 5, 2015, 5 pages (ISRG02860/EP).
Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Before The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, IPR2019-01496, Sep. 3, 2019, 6 pages.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Nov. 22, 2019, 33 pages.
Patent Owner's Response to Supplemental Paper Regarding Claim Construction Arguments and Rulings in a Related District Court Action of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 20, 2019, 4 pages.
PCT/US07/71085 Written Opinion, dated Sep. 17, 2008, 5 pages.
PCT/US09/46446 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 14, 2009, 21 pages.
PCT/US09/46446 Partial International Search Report and Invitation to Pay Additional Fees, dated Sep. 18, 2009, 9 pages.
PCT/US2011/035113 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 4, 2011, 13 pages.
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 9, 2019, pp. 1-4.
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 5, 2019, pp. 1-4.
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Oct. 15, 2019, 04 pages.
Plaintiffs' First Notice of Rule 30(B)(6) Deposition of Defendant Auris Health, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Document 129, Case No. 18-1359-MN, 2019, 14 Pages.
Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Corporate Disclosure Statement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Aug. 31, 2018, 1 page.
Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Notice of Subpoenas to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 82, 2019, 20 pages.
Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 26, Dec. 11, 2018, 23 pages.
Plaintiffs' Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 43, Mar. 15, 2019, 8 pages.
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 121, Nov. 13, 2019, 21 pages.
Proposed Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 43-1, 2019, 1 page.
Proposed Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 37, 2019, 17 pages.
Proposed Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case 18-1359-MN, Document 41, 2019, 17 pages.
PTAB Teleconference for review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 6, 2019, Petitioner Auris Health, Inc, pp. 1-33.
Rassweiler J., et al., “The Role of Imaging and Navigation for Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery,” Journal of Endourology, May 2009, vol. 23 (5), pp. 793-802.
Reddy V.Y., et al., “P1-53: Porcine Pulmonary Vein Ablation Using a Novel Robotic Catheter Control System and Real-time Integration of CT Imaging with Electroanatomical Mapping”, 2005, p. S121.
Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark, To: Mail Stop 8, Director of USPTO, Alexandria, VA, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 3, 2018, 2 pages.
Rosenberg J.M., Artificial Intelligence & Robotics, 1986, 3 pages.
RULE 7.1.1 CERTIFICATE, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-01359-MN, Document 117-2, Oct. 30, 2019, 2 pages.
Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 42, 2019, 17 pages.
Shang, J. et al., “An Articulated Universal Joint Based Flexible Access Robot for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” 2011 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 9-13, 2011, London, UK, pp. 1147-1152.
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter Proposed Scheduling Order, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 39, Feb. 28, 2019, 1 page.
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter to Request Scheduling of a Discovery Teleconference, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 20, Nov. 8, 2018, 1 page.
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, Karen E. Keller, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., et al. v. Auris Health, Inc., Document 23, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Dec. 3, 2018, 4 pages.
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, Written to Advise the Court that Auris has “Entered into a Definitive Agreement”, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 36, Feb. 20, 2019, 1 page.
Sheila Weller, He Helped Pioneer Robotic Surgery. Now He Wants to Reinvent Lung Cancer Care, JNJ.com, Apr. 2019, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-2, Retrived from the internet : [https://www.jnj.com/personal-stories/why-robotic-surgery-pioneer-frederic-moll-is-now-tackling-lung-cancer-care], 6 pages.
Slepian M.J., “Robotic Catheter Intervention: The Hansen Medical Sensei™ Robotic Catheter System,” 2010, 28 pages.
Stieber, Michael E. et al., “Vision-Based Sensing and Control for Space Robotics Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Aug. 1999, vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 807-812.
Sturges R.H. Jr., et al., “A Voice-Actuated, Tendon-Controlled Device for Endoscopy”, 1996, pp. 603-617.
Sturges, Robert H. et al., “A Flexible, Tendon-Controlled Device for Endoscopy,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1993, vol. 12(2), pp. 121-131.
Super Dimension, “How it Works”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070510094239/http://www.superdimension.com/new_resources.html].
Super Dimension,“Overview”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070510094239/http://www.superdimension.com/new_resources.html].
Super Dimension, “System Elements”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070510094239/http://www.superdimension.com/new_resources.html].
Supplemental Briefing Regarding Claim Construction Arguments and Rulings in Parallel District Court Action of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 13, 2019, 5 pages.
Szewczyk, Jerome et al., “An active tubular polyarticulated micro-system for flexible endoscope,” Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 271, Experimental Robotics VII, 2000, pp. 179-188, Springer-Verlag.
TAB 1, “Declaration of Stephen J. Blumenkranz in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand For Jury Trial, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-1, 2018, 3 pages.
TAB 2, “Declaration of Thomas G. Cooper in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand For Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-2, 2018, 3 pages.
TAB 3, “Declaration of Nicola Diolaiti in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-3, 2018, 3 pages.
TAB 4, “Declaration of Vincent Duindam in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” Demand For Jury Trial, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-4, Demand For Jury Trial, 2018, 3 pages.
TAB 5,“Declaration of Carolyn M. Fenech in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand For Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-5, 2018, 3 pages.
TAB 6, “Declaration of Gary S. Guthart in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-6, 2018, 3 pages.
TAB 7, “Declaration of Catherine J. Mohr in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” Demand for Jury Trial, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-7, 2018, 3 pages.
TAB 8, “Declaration of Robert Matthew Ohline in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ”United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-8, 2018, 3 pages.
TAB 9, “Declaration of David J. Rosa in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-9, 2018, 3 pages.
The Da Vinci Surgical system, Retrieved from the internet: [http://web.archive.org/web/20080724022504/http:/www.intuitivesurgical.com/products/davinci_surgicalsystem/], 2 pages.
Transcript Teleconference, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Document 58, 2019, 11 pages.
Transcript, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18- 1359-(MN), Document 83, 9 pages.
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages.
Waldman H., Dictionary of Robotics, 1985, 4 pages.
Wang, Yi-Ping et al., “A novel long period fiber grating sensor measuring curvature and determining bend-direction simultaneously,” IEEE Sensors Journal, 2005, pp. 839-843, vol. 5-Issue: 5, IEEE.
Webster, Robert J. III et al., “Toward Active Cannulas: Miniature Snake-Like Surgical Robots,” 2006, 7 pages.
Wong, Allan C. L .et al., “Multiplexed fibre Fizeau interferometer and fibre Bragg grating sensor system for simultaneous measurement of quasi-static strain and temperature using discrete wavelet transform,” Measurement Science and Technology, 2006, pp. 384-392, vol. 17—Issue 2, Institute of Physics Publishing.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200275860 A1 Sep 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61646619 May 2012 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13889984 May 2013 US
Child 14802199 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14802199 Jul 2015 US
Child 16875747 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13274237 Oct 2011 US
Child 13889984 US