Minimally invasive medical devices that navigate natural body lumens need to be small enough to fit within the lumens. Lung catheters, for example, which may be used to perform minimally invasive lung biopsies or other medical procedures, may need to follow airways that decrease in size as the catheter navigates branching passages. To reach a target location in a lung, a catheter may follow passages having diameters as small as 3 mm or less. Manufacturing a catheter that is sufficiently small and includes the mechanical structures and sensors for remote or robotic operation can be challenging.
Electromagnetic sensors (EM) sensors can measure the position and orientation of a portion of a medical instrument. EM sensors are particularly suitable for minimally invasive medical instruments because EM sensors can combine high global accuracy with a small diameter package size. During EM sensor operation, a generator external to a patient can produce a well-controlled, time-varying magnetic field, and in response, one or more coils of an EM sensor in or on a portion of the medical instrument produce induced electrical signals. In particular, time variations in the magnetic field induce currents in the coils of the EM sensor, and the pose of each coil can be partially determined from knowledge of the generated magnetic field and the geometry of the coil. A single coil can be used, for example, to measure a position and a pointing direction, e.g., pitch and yaw angles, but a cylindrically symmetrical coil is unable to distinguish roll angles about the symmetry axis of the coil. Accordingly, EM sensors employing a single cylindrical coil have been used as 5-Degree-of-Freedom (5-DoF) sensors. To additionally measure the roll angle, a 6-DoF EM sensor generally requires two coils having symmetry axes that are not parallel, e.g., perpendicular symmetry axes.
The long, thin shape typical of 5-DoF EM sensors fits well with minimally invasive medical instruments or tools, which often have long and thin extensions. However, with the central axis of a single coil sensor aligned with the roll axis of an instrument, such 5-DoF EM sensors cannot measure the roll angle of the instrument. While some symmetric instruments such as needles may not require roll angle measurements, many instruments require knowledge of the roll angle of the instrument, particularly for robotic control. Measurement of the roll angle may require a 6-DoF sensor that includes two coils. For example, to create a 6-DoF EM sensor, two 5-DoF EM sensors may need to be placed perpendicular or at a non-zero angle to each other, which creates a much larger sensor package. If each 5-DoF sensor has a cylindrical shape about 1 mm in diameter and about 10 mm long, the 6-Dof sensor containing two 5-DoF sensors may be up to 10×10×1 mm. While the 1 mm diameter of a 5-DoF EM sensor may fit within a small, e.g., 3 mm diameter, instrument, a 10-mm wide 6-DoF EM sensor may not fit in a small instrument.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a small diameter EM sensor can include a coil with windings that define areas with a normal direction at a significant angle to the symmetry or long axis of the coil. As a result, the magnetic axis of an EM sensor that extends along a length of an instrument may be at an angle to the roll axis of the instrument to enable the sensor to measure a roll angle of the instrument, while still providing a narrow diameter package.
In one specific embodiment, a sensing system uses a coil including wire that is wound in loops around an axis, and each of the loops defines an area that has a normal direction at a non-zero, angle relative to the axis of the coil.
In another embodiment, a sensing system includes a coil and sensor logic. The coil includes wire that is wound in loops about an axis, and the loops define respective areas that have a normal direction at a non-zero angle relative to the axis of the coil. The sensor logic is coupled to the coil and configured to use an electrical signal induced in the coil in determining a measurement of a roll angle about the axis of the coil.
In yet another embodiment, a medical system includes a probe and optionally a guide instrument (e.g., catheter, bronchoscope, or endoscope) with a lumen sized for guiding the probe. A probe coil is in the probe and includes wire that is wound in loops collectively defining a first core that extends in a lengthwise direction of the probe. However, each of the loops in the probe coil defines an area that has a normal direction at a non-zero angle relative to the length of the probe. A secondary sensor (e.g., an electromagnetic sensor, shape sensor, gravity sensor, visualization sensor, and/or angular sensor(s), among others) included in the medical system can provide supplemental orientation information to be used with the probe coil signals to determine a roll angle of the probe. For example, a secondary sensor such as a coil could be positioned in a wall of a guide instrument for the probe, such that each of the loops of the guide instrument coil defines an area that has a second normal direction. Sensor logic that is coupled to receive induced signals from the probe coil and the guide instrument coil can then determine a roll angle of the probe from the induced signals.
Use of the same reference symbols in different figures indicates similar or identical items.
An EM sensor can employ an off-axis coil, which is a coil wound so that areas respectively defined by individual loops have a normal direction that is off-axis from the length of the coil. As a result, an effective area for magnetic flux in the off-axis coil has a normal direction that is also off-axis from the length of the coil. A magnetic field applied to an off-axis coil can be varied to induce an electrical signal that depends on the normal direction instead of about the long axis of the coil. Such a coil can thus be used in a small-diameter medical instrument to measure a roll angle about the long axis of the coil.
Medical device 110, in the illustrated embodiment, may be a flexible device such as a catheter, bronchoscope, endoscope, or cannula that includes a main shaft 112 with one or more lumens. For example, main shaft 112 may include a main lumen sized to accommodate interchangeable probes. Such probes can include a variety of a camera or vision systems, biopsy tools, cutting tools, clamping tools, sealing tools, suturing tools, stapling tools, cautery tools, therapeutic or diagnostic material delivery tools, or any other surgical instruments. The probes used in device 110 may be robotically operated, for example, using actuating tendons (not shown) that run the length of the probe. Additionally, main shaft 112 may incorporate one or more steerable sections 114 that are similarly operable using actuating tendons that attach to steerable section 114 and run from steerable section at the distal end of main shaft 112, through main shaft 112, to the proximal end of main shaft 112.
An exemplary embodiment of device 110 may be a lung catheter, bronchoscope or endoscope, where device 110 would typically be about 60 to 80 cm or longer. During a medical procedure, at least a portion of main shaft 112 and all of steerable section 114 may be inserted along a natural lumen such as an airway of a patient, and drive interface 120 may operate steerable section 114 by pulling on actuating tendons, e.g., to steer device 110 during insertion or to position steerable section 114 for a procedure.
Steerable section 114 is remotely controllable and particularly has a pitch and a yaw that can be controlled using actuating tendons, e.g., pull wires or cables, and may be implemented as a multi-lumen tube of flexible material such as Pebax. In general, steerable section 114 may be more flexible than the remainder of main tube 112, which assists in isolating actuation or bending to steerable section 114 when drive interface 120 pulls on the actuating tendons. Device 110 can also employ additional features or structures such as use of Bowden cables for actuating tendons to prevent actuation from bending the more proximal portion of main tube 112. In general, the actuating tendons are located at different angles about a roll axis 170 of steerable section 114. For example,
Actuating tendons 230 extend back through main tube 112 to drive interface 120 and may be coated or uncoated, single filament or multi strand wires, cables, Bowden cables, hypotubes, or any other structures that are able to transfer force from drive interface 120 to distal tip 215. (Push rods could conceivably be used in device 110 instead of tendons 230 but may not provide a desirable level of flexibility needed in some medical instruments.) Tendons 230 can be made of any material of sufficient strength including but not limited to a metal such as steel or a polymer such as Kevlar.
Drive interface 120 of
A dock 126 in drive interface 120 of
Control system 140 controls actuators 122 in drive interface 120 to selectively pull on the actuating tendons as needed to actuate or steer steerable section 114. In general, control system 140 operates in response to commands from a user, e.g., a surgeon or other medical personnel using operator interface 150, and in response to measurement signals such as from EM sensors 116. Control system 140 may in particular include or execute sensor logic that analyzes signals (or digitized versions signals) from EM sensors 116 to determine measurement of the position and orientation of the distal end of device 110. Control system 140 may be implemented using a general purpose computer with suitable software, firmware, and/or interface hardware to interpret signals from operator interface 150 and EM sensors 116 and to generate control signals for drive interface 120.
Operator interface 150 may include standard input/output hardware such as a display, a keyboard, a mouse, a joystick, or other pointing device or similar I/O hardware that may be customized or optimized for a surgical environment. In general, operator interface 150 provides information to the user and receives instructions from the user. For example, operator interface 150 may indicate the status of system 100 and provide the user with data including images and measurements made by system 100. One type of instruction that the user may provide through operator interface 150, e.g., using a joystick or similar controller, indicates the desired movement or position of steerable section 114, and using such input, control system 140 can generate control signals for actuators in drive interface 120.
Field generator 160 and one or more EM sensors 116 can be used to measure a pose of a distal portion of main tube 112 or of steerable section 114. EM sensors 116 may particularly include an off-axis coil that field generator 160 may subject to a magnetic field that varies over space or time. The magnetic field produces magnetic flux through EM sensors 116, and variation in time of that magnetic flux induces a voltage or electric current in EM sensors 116.
The induced signals can be used to measure the pose of EM sensor 116. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,197,354, entitled “System for Determining the Position and Orientation of a Catheter”; U.S. Pat. No. 6,833,814, entitled “Intrabody Navigation System for Medical Applications”; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,188,355, entitled “Wireless Six-Degree-of-Freedom Locator” describe the operation of some EM sensor systems and are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. U.S. Pat. No. 7,398,116, entitled “Methods, Apparatuses, and Systems useful in Conducting Image Guided Interventions,” U.S. Pat. No. 7,920,909, entitled “Apparatus and Method for Automatic Image Guided Accuracy Verification,” U.S. Pat. No. 7,853,307, entitled “Methods, Apparatuses, and Systems Useful in Conducting Image Guided Interventions,” and U.S. Pat. No. 7,962,193, entitled “Apparatus and Method for Image Guided Accuracy Verification” further describe systems and methods that can use electromagnetic sensing coils in guiding medical procedures and are also incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Coils 320 and 330 of
EM sensors coils such as coil 310 may employ helical coils that are wound so that the normal to the magnetic flux areas are along the lengthwise axis of the coil. In particular, such coils may be helically wound with a constant, slight angle, i.e., the helix angle. For example, the sine of a wrap angle for coil 310 may be about equal to the ratio of the wire thickness to the diameter of coil 310. However, the effects of the wire being at the helix angle around a full loop cancel, and the normal for each loop of coil 310 is along the lengthwise axis. In contrast, the magnitude of the wrap angle (90°−α) in coil 410 can be much greater than the ratio of the diameter of wire 410. Further, for coil 410, the sign of the wrap angle reverses at some point in each loop. As a result, each loop of coil 410 has a part in which the wire angles down core 420 and a part in which the wire angles up core 420.
A magnetic field B applied to off-axis coil 400 can be varied to induce an electrical signal that depends on the normal direction A to the areas of the loops forming coil 400. In particular, according to Faradays law, an induced voltage in coil 400 is proportional to the time derivative of the dot product of magnetic field B and an effective area vector |A|Â.
Off-axis coils can be employed in small diameter 6-DoF sensors that are well adapted for use in minimally invasive medical instruments, e.g., as EM sensor 116 of
EM sensing using a single coil can generally only measure a set of five degrees of freedom because a single-coil EM sensor cannot distinguish rotations about the normal direction associated with the effective area of its coil. Two coils 611 and 612 with different normal directions Â1 and Â2 are used in sensor system 600A, so that each of coils 611 and 612 measures a different set of five degrees of freedom. In particular, a field generator 620 can produce a variable magnetic field that passes through coils 611 and 612. Coils 611 and 612 then produce respective induced voltages V1 and V2, and sensor logic 630 can process signal V1 to determine measurements of one set of five degrees of freedom and process signal V2 to determine measurements of a different set of five degrees of freedom. Sensor logic 630, which may include software for analyzing digitized versions of signals V1 and V2, can account for the difference in position of coils 611 and 612 and generate measurements of six degrees of freedom, e.g., position coordinates X, Y, and Z and pitch, yaw, and roll angles.
Coils 611 and 612 in the specific configuration illustrated in
Coil 725 is an off-axis coil, which can measure five degrees of freedom and when combined with a measurement of a pointing direction of the roll axis can be used to determine a roll angle as described above. Accordingly, the combination of sensing element 715 in instrument 710 and off-axis coil 725 in probe 720 can provide a 6-DoF measurement of probe 720 including measurement of a roll angle of probe 720. An advantage of system 700 is that the use of a single sensing element 715 in instrument 710 may provide additional space in instrument 710 and probe 720 for other structures, which is particularly important for small diameter devices such as lung catheters. Additionally, in system 700, coil 725, which is in probe 720, may be closer to the center of the distal tip than is sensing element 715, which is in the wall of instrument 710. As a result, the roll axis of coil 725 may closely correspond to the roll axis of system 700 and probe 720. Sensing element 715 in instrument 710 may as indicated above be a conventional helical coil so that a measurement of the direction of the area normal of sensing element 715 indicates the direction of the roll axis, and a measurement of the area normal direction of coil 725 can then give the roll angle of probe 720. Alternatively, sensing element 715 could be an off-axis coil, and if the normal direction of the areas defined by the loops in sensing element 715 differs from the normal direction of the areas defined by the loops in coil 725.
System 700 may be used by inserting probe 720 through instrument 710 until the distal ends of instrument 710 and probe 720 are aligned. Probe 720 may, for example, be a camera or vision system that is inserted in instrument 710 for navigation of natural lumens such as lung airways. Instrument 710 with the vision probe may then be steered to a worksite where measurements determined using sensing element 715 and coil 725 are used when orienting the distal tip of instrument 700 for a medical function such as biopsying tissue. The vision probe can then be removed and a probe such as a biopsy needle may be inserted in instrument 710 in place of the vision probe. The biopsy probe may similarly contain a coil or EM sensor, but the EM sensor used then may or may not need to be an off-axis coil or a coil intended for use with sensing element 715. For example, a biopsy needle may be inserted past the distal tip of instrument 710, and the position of the tip of the biopsy needle may be important to measure while the roll angle of a symmetric needle does not need to be measured.
Although the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, the description is only an example of the invention's application and should not be taken as a limitation. Various adaptations and combinations of features of the embodiments disclosed are within the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/802,199, filed Jul. 17, 2015, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/889,984, filed May 8, 2013, which claims priority to and the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/646,619, filed May 14, 2012, and is a continuation-in-part and claims the benefit of the earlier filing date of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/274,237, filed Oct. 14, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,387,048, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3096962 | Meijs | Jul 1963 | A |
3546961 | Marton | Dec 1970 | A |
4437114 | Larussa | Mar 1984 | A |
4644237 | Frushour et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4748969 | Wardle | Jun 1988 | A |
4792715 | Barsky et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4809191 | Domeier et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4905082 | Nishigaki et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4949927 | Madocks et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5114403 | Clarke et al. | May 1992 | A |
5174276 | Crockard | Dec 1992 | A |
5201757 | Heyn et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5251611 | Zehel et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5280781 | Oku | Jan 1994 | A |
5285796 | Hughes | Feb 1994 | A |
5297536 | Wilk | Mar 1994 | A |
5307437 | Facq et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5351693 | Taimisto et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5408263 | Kikuchi et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417210 | Funda et al. | May 1995 | A |
5429604 | Hammersmark et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5487757 | Truckai et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5492131 | Galel | Feb 1996 | A |
5588949 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5613946 | McKeever | Mar 1997 | A |
5617515 | MacLaren et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624380 | Takayama et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5631973 | Green | May 1997 | A |
5643175 | Adair | Jul 1997 | A |
5672877 | Liebig et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5729129 | Acker | Mar 1998 | A |
5752112 | Paddock et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755713 | Bilof et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759151 | Sturges | Jun 1998 | A |
5792135 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797900 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5817084 | Jensen et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5855569 | Komi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868760 | McGuckin, Jr. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876325 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892860 | Maron et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899425 | Corey Jr et al. | May 1999 | A |
5899851 | Koninckx | May 1999 | A |
5976071 | Sekiya | Nov 1999 | A |
5982791 | Sorin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6004016 | Spector | Dec 1999 | A |
6013024 | Mitsuda et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6030130 | Paddock et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6066090 | Yoon | May 2000 | A |
6120433 | Mizuno et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6161032 | Acker | Dec 2000 | A |
6171277 | Ponzi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188355 | Gilboa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191414 | Ogle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198974 | Webster, Jr. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200274 | McNeirney | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203493 | Ben-Haim | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6246200 | Blumenkranz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253770 | Acker | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275628 | Jones et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6331181 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332089 | Acker et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335617 | Osadchy et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347892 | Paddock et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352503 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366722 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6366799 | Acker et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371952 | Madhani et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380732 | Gilboa | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389187 | Greenaway et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396574 | Lee et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6432041 | Taniguchi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441577 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6451027 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453190 | Acker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459926 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470205 | Bosselmann et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6471710 | Bucholtz | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478028 | Paolitto et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484118 | Govari | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487352 | Sobiski et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490467 | Bucholz et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6554793 | Pauker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571639 | May et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6572629 | Kalloo et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6574355 | Green | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6575644 | Paddock et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6578967 | Paddock et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6618612 | Acker et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645196 | Nixon et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648816 | Irion et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6671055 | Wavering et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671581 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6695871 | Maki et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6720988 | Gere et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6743239 | Kuehn et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758843 | Jensen et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6783491 | Saadat et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790173 | Saadat et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6817974 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6833814 | Gilboa et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837846 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6837847 | Ewers et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6866671 | Tierney et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6899672 | Chin et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902560 | Morley et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6936042 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942613 | Ewers et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6960162 | Saadat et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6960163 | Ewers et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6984203 | Tartaglia et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991602 | Nakazawa et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994703 | Wang et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6997870 | Couvillon, Jr. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007699 | Martinelli et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7041052 | Saadat et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7042573 | Froggatt | May 2006 | B2 |
7090637 | Danitz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090683 | Brock et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7128708 | Saadat et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139601 | Bucholz et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7197354 | Sobe | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7233820 | Gilboa | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7252660 | Kunz | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7277120 | Gere et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7320700 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7371028 | Gordon et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7398116 | Edwards | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7500947 | Kucklick et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7594912 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7607440 | Coste-Maniere et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7715105 | Forkey et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720322 | Prisco et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725214 | Diolaiti | May 2010 | B2 |
7772541 | Froggatt et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7853307 | Edwards | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7920909 | Lyon et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7922650 | McWeeney et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930065 | Larkin et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7947000 | Vargas et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962193 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8016749 | Clerc et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8335557 | Maschke | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8376934 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8396595 | Dariush | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8442618 | Strommer et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8506555 | Ruiz Morales | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8554368 | Fielding et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8672837 | Roelle et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8720448 | Reis et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8738181 | Greer et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8784303 | Laby et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8784435 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8827948 | Romo et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8858424 | Hasegawa et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8929631 | Pfister et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8945095 | Blumenkranz et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9014851 | Wong et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9060678 | Larkin et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9125639 | Mathis et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9129417 | Zheng et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9199372 | Henderson et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9226796 | Bowling et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9256940 | Carelsen et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9289578 | Walker et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9314306 | Yu | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9345456 | Tsonton et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9358682 | Ruiz Morales | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9387048 | Donhowe et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9452276 | Duindam et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9504604 | Alvarez | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9522034 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9561083 | Yu et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9622827 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9629595 | Walker et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9636184 | Lee et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9675422 | Hourtash et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9713509 | Schuh et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9727963 | Mintz et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737371 | Romo et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737373 | Schuh | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744335 | Jiang | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9763741 | Alvarez et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9788910 | Schuh | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9789608 | Itkowitz et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9818681 | Machida | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9844353 | Walker et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9844412 | Bogusky et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9867635 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9931025 | Graetzel et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9949749 | Noonan et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9955986 | Shah | May 2018 | B2 |
9962228 | Schuh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9980785 | Schuh | May 2018 | B2 |
9993313 | Schuh et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10016900 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10022192 | Ummalaneni | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10080576 | Romo et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10238837 | Duindam et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10299870 | Connolly et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10307205 | Ludwin | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10568700 | Donhowe et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10653866 | Duindam et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10682070 | Duindam | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10744303 | Duindam et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
20010049509 | Sekine et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020077550 | Rabiner et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087169 | Brock et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120252 | Brock et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143319 | Brock | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151967 | Mikus et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156345 | Eppler et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161280 | Chatenever et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173786 | Kortenbach et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030045778 | Ohline et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050649 | Brock et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030182091 | Kukuk | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030236455 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236505 | Bonadio et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024311 | Quaid et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054355 | Gerbi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040083808 | Rambow et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040116803 | Jascob et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138525 | Saadat et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138529 | Wiltshire et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147837 | Macaulay et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153191 | Grimm et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040202400 | Kochergin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249367 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257021 | Chang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004431 | Kogasaka et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050043718 | Madhani et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049486 | Urquhart et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059960 | Simaan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065397 | Saadat et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065398 | Adams | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065400 | Banik et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096502 | Khalili | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102062 | Green | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131343 | Abrams et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050192532 | Kucklick et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197536 | Banik et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197557 | Strommer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215983 | Brock | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222554 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251176 | Swanstrom et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256398 | Hastings et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261551 | Couvillon | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050272977 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050284221 | Danisch et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004286 | Chang | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013523 | Childlers et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015096 | Hauck et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025652 | Vargas | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041293 | Mehdizadeh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060095022 | Moll et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060149418 | Anvari | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161045 | Merril et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161136 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184016 | Glossop et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070013336 | Nowlin et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016070 | Grunwald et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021738 | Hasser et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043455 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049908 | Boese et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055128 | Glossop et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055291 | Birkmeyer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070065077 | Childers et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083217 | Eversull et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070089557 | Solomon et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106116 | Sugimoto | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135803 | Belson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135886 | Maschke | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137371 | Devengenzo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150155 | Kawai et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070151391 | Larkin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156020 | Foley et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173694 | Tsuji et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070197896 | Moll et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070225554 | Maseda et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070232898 | Huynh | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249911 | Simon | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253599 | White et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265503 | Schlesinger et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270642 | Bayer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283970 | Mohr et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287884 | Schena | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287889 | Mohr | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287992 | Diolaiti et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293721 | Gilboa | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299353 | Harlev et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080046122 | Manzo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051704 | Patel et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058861 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064921 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064927 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064931 | Schena et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065097 | Duval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065098 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065099 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065100 | Larkin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065101 | Larkin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065102 | Cooper | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065103 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065104 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065106 | Larkin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065107 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065109 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065110 | Duval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071288 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071289 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071290 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071291 | Duval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097155 | Gattani et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103362 | Couvillon | May 2008 | A1 |
20080108870 | Wiita et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123921 | Gielen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140087 | Barbagli | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147089 | Loh et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151041 | Shafer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156971 | Ogisu et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080159653 | Dunki-Jacobs et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172049 | Bredno et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080212082 | Froggatt et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080231221 | Ogawa | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080249640 | Vittor et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255505 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080287963 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080312771 | Sugiura | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319376 | Wilcox et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030307 | Govari et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076534 | Shelton, IV et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085807 | Anderson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090088756 | Anderson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090088774 | Swarup et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096443 | Anderson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105799 | Hekmat et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118620 | Tgavalekos | May 2009 | A1 |
20090123111 | Udd | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137952 | Ramamurthy | May 2009 | A1 |
20090184825 | Anderson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198298 | Kaiser et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090231419 | Bayer | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245600 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248040 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275799 | Saadat et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281566 | Edwards et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287354 | Choi | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090314131 | Bailey | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322001 | Luke et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326322 | Diolaiti et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326552 | Diolaiti | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326553 | Mustufa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100030115 | Fujimoto et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100041949 | Tolkowsky | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076263 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076303 | McKinley | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082041 | Prisco | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121138 | Goldenberg et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121139 | Ouyang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125284 | Tanner et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100170519 | Romo et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100210939 | Hartmann et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222647 | Hashimshony et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234856 | Stoianovici et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256812 | Tsusaka et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274087 | Diolaiti et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100292535 | Paskar | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100298642 | Trusty et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100331820 | Prisco et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332033 | Diolaiti et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110021903 | Strommer et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028991 | Ikeda et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040305 | Gomez et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040404 | Diolaiti et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054309 | Edwards | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063428 | Sonnenschein et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082365 | McGrogan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110082462 | Suarez et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110092808 | Shachar et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110125032 | McIntyre et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130750 | Ormsby | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137122 | Kawai | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152879 | Williams et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153252 | Govari et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160570 | Kariv et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110172680 | Younge et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172687 | Woodruff et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184241 | Zubiate et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184276 | Lyon et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196199 | Donhowe et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110196419 | Cooper | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110201883 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110201922 | Hezemans et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202068 | Diolaiti et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110224684 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224685 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224686 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224687 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224688 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224689 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224825 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237889 | Tanaka | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110257480 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110277576 | Cooper | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277579 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277580 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277775 | Holop et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277776 | McGrogan et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282356 | Solomon et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282357 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282358 | Gomez et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282359 | Duval | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282491 | Prisco et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110319910 | Roelle et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000427 | Nilsson | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010628 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120046522 | Naito | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059249 | Verard et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071752 | Sewell et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071822 | Romo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120116393 | Jimenez et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123441 | Au et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150075 | Ludwin et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165608 | Banik et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120182409 | Moriyama et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209293 | Carlson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215094 | Rahimian et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120253276 | Govari et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120289815 | Keast et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296166 | Kim | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120328077 | Bouvier | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130085330 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130090530 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130096385 | Fenech et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130102846 | Sjostrom et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130131503 | Schneider et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144124 | Prisco et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165854 | Sandhu et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165945 | Roelle et al. | Jun 2013 | A9 |
20130169272 | Eichler et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130172906 | Olson et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130218005 | Desai et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223702 | Holsing et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130303944 | Duindam | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130325030 | Hourtash et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140114180 | Jain | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140135985 | Coste-Maniere et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142591 | Alvarez et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163664 | Goldsmith | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140222207 | Bowling et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140296870 | Stern et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140296872 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309649 | Alvarez et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140316420 | Ballard et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140357984 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140364870 | Alvarez et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150051592 | Kintz | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150088161 | Hata et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150101442 | Romo | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150104284 | Riedel | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119628 | Bharat et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119638 | Yu et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150164594 | Romo et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150164596 | Romo et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150202015 | Elhawary et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150223902 | Walker et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150265359 | Camarillo | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150265807 | Park et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150297864 | Kokish et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150335480 | Alvarez et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150342695 | He et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150359597 | Gombert et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150374956 | Bogusky | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160001038 | Romo et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160005168 | Merlet | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160005220 | Weingarten et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160005576 | Tsukamoto | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160007880 | Duindam | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160016319 | Remirez et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160029998 | Brister et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160045269 | Elhawary et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160051221 | Dickhans et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160066794 | Klinder et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160073928 | Soper et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160081568 | Kolberg et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160100772 | Ikuma et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160228032 | Walker et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160270865 | Landey et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160278865 | Capote et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160287111 | Jacobsen | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160287279 | Bovay et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160296294 | Moll et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160331469 | Hall et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160338787 | Popovic et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160346924 | Hasegawa et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160354057 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160360947 | Iida et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160360949 | Hyodo et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160374541 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170007337 | Dan | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170056215 | Nagesh et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170068796 | Passerini et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170100199 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170119413 | Romo | May 2017 | A1 |
20170119481 | Romo et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170151027 | Walker et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170165011 | Bovay et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170165503 | Hautvast et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172673 | Yu et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170202627 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170209073 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170251988 | Weber et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170280978 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170281049 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170290631 | Lee et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170304015 | Tavallaei et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170325715 | Mehendale et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170333679 | Jiang | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170340396 | Romo et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170365055 | Mintz et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170367782 | Schuh et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180025666 | Ho et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180177383 | Noonan et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180177556 | Noonan | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180177561 | Mintz et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180214011 | Graetzel et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180221038 | Noonan et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180221039 | Shah | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180250083 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180250085 | Simi et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180271616 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180279852 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180280660 | Landey et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180289243 | Landey et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180289431 | Draper et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190192819 | Duindam et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20200023201 | Overweg | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200146757 | Fenech et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200254223 | Duindam et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20210016061 | Duindam et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1658789 | Aug 2005 | CN |
101088451 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101247847 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101252870 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101404921 | Apr 2009 | CN |
101918073 | Dec 2010 | CN |
102013100605 | Jul 2014 | DE |
1566150 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1800593 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2158834 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2392435 | Dec 2011 | EP |
3025630 | Jun 2016 | EP |
S57190549 | Nov 1982 | JP |
H06285009 | Oct 1994 | JP |
H07504363 | May 1995 | JP |
H07505790 | Jun 1995 | JP |
H1020214 | Jan 1998 | JP |
2000093522 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000166936 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001046529 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2003275223 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2008018007 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008508987 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2009530069 | Aug 2009 | JP |
19990087101 | Dec 1999 | KR |
WO-9313916 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO-9605768 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO-9729690 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-9744089 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-0051486 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-0156457 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0207809 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-2004016155 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO-2005087128 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO-2006039092 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2006122061 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2007109418 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2007109778 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2007146987 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2008028149 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO-2008111070 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO-2008147961 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2009002701 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2009120940 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO-2009148317 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2010039394 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-2011001300 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO-2011008922 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO-2011085166 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO-2011100110 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO-2011132409 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO-2017048194 | Mar 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Exhibit 1, Before Ulrike W. Jenks, Tina E. Hulse, and James A. Worth, Administrative Patent Judges, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc v. Patent Owner. Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., IPR2019-01173, Document 215-1, Entered: Dec. 16, 2019, 197 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Redacted in its Entirety, Demand for Jury Trial, Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s First set of Requests for production to Plaintiffs, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 233-1, 2019, 1-70 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/039604 dated Sep. 14, 2018, 6 pages. |
Kukuk M., et al., “TBNA-protocols: Guiding TransBronchial Needle Aspirations Without a Computer in the Operating Room”, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Oct. 5, 2001, LNCS 2208, pp. 997-1006. |
Petitioner's Request for Rehearing of the Institution Decision of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Mar. 16, 2020, 9 pages. |
Shaw Keller LLP, Responsive Letter to Honorable Maryellen Noreika from David M. Fry, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. vs Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Redacted—Public Version, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 236, Apr. 1, 2020, 1-117 pages. |
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from David M. Fry, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Defendant: Auris Health, Inc., held on Mar. 31, 2020, pp. 1-77. |
Stipulation Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Mar. 20, 2020, 2 pages. |
Verdaasdonk R., et al., “Effect of Microsecond Pulse Length and Tip Shape On Explosive Bubble Formation of 2.78 μm Er,Cr;YSGG and 2.94 μm Er:YAG Laser”, Proceedings of SPIE, Jan. 23, 2012, vol. 8221 (12), 1 page. |
Exhibit I, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s vs Defendant Auris Health, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Claim Construction, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), Nov. 20, 2019, 59 pages. |
Exhibit J, Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. § 314, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, IPR2019-01496 U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276 B2, Before Ulrike W. Jenks, Tina E. Hulse, and James A. Worth, Administrative Patent Judges, Feb. 13, 2020, 21 pages. |
Exhibit K, Declaration of William Cimino Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Sep. 27, 2016, in the United States Patent and Trademark, inventors: Vincent Duindam et al., 126 pages. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Filed: Oct. 14, 2011, 113 pages. |
[Proposed] Amended Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 61, 2019, 14 pages. |
[Proposed] Order Regarding Access to Source Code, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 46, Mar. 21, 2019, 3 pages. |
[Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 45, Mar. 21, 2019, 31 pages. |
Abbott, Daniel J. et al., “Design of an Endoluminal NOTES Robotic System,” Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007, pp. 410-416. |
Al-Ahmad A., et al., “Early Experience with a Computerized Obotically Controlled Catheter System,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, Apr. 2005, vol. 12(3), pp. 199-202. |
Amended Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 123-1, Nov. 13, 2019, 31 pages. |
Amended Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 81, Aug. 29, 2019, 29 pages. |
Amending Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 62, 2019, 14 pages. |
Anisfield, Nancy; “Ascension Technology Puts Spotlight on DC Field Magnetic Motion Tracking,” HP Chronicle, Aug. 2000, vol. 17, No. 9, 3 Pages. |
Ascari, Luca et al., “A New Active Microendoscope for Exploring the Sub-Arachnoid Space in the Spinal Cord,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2003, pp. 2657-2662, vol. 2, IEEE. |
Auris Health, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Jury Trial Demanded, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 52, Mar. 29, 2019, 8 pages. |
Barnes Industries, Inc., “How a Ball Screw Works,” 4 pages, Copyright 2007; Internet: http://www.barnesballscrew.com/ball.htm. |
Berthold III, John W., “Historical Review of Microbend Fiber-Optic Sensors,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 1995, pp. 1193-1199. |
Blue Road Research, “Overview of Fiber Optic Sensors,” 40 pages, first posted Dec. 8, 2004. Internet< www.bluerr.com/papers/Overview_of_FOS2.pdf>. |
Cao, Caroline G.L., “Designing Spatial Orientation in Endoscopic Environments,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, 2001, pp. 1259-1263. |
Cao, Caroline G.L., “Disorientation in Minimal Access Surgery: A Case Study,” Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, pp. 4-169-4-172. |
Childers, Brooks A., et al., “Use of 3000 Bragg grating strain sensors distributed on four eight-meter optical fibers during static load tests of a composite structure,” SPIE 8th International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Mar. 4-8, 2001, Newport Beach, California, 10 Pages. |
Choi, Dong-Geol et al., “Design of a Spring Backbone Micro Endoscope,” Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007, pp. 1815-1821. |
Compendium of Inventor Declarations in Support of Plaintiffs Intutive Surgical, Inc. And Intutive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 29, Dec. 11, 2018, 2 pages. |
Complaint for Patent Infringement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand For Jury Trial, Aug. 31, 2018, 14 pages. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/762,185, filed Jun. 13, 2007. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,028, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,029, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,030, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,075, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,125, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,126, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,129, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,131, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,172, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,198, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,207, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,328, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 61/334,978, filed May 14, 2010. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,173, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Cowie, Barbara M., et al., “Distributive Tactile Sensing Using Fibre Bragg Grating Sensors for Biomedical Applications,” 1st IEEE / RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob 2006), Feb. 2006, pp. 312-317. |
Curriculum Vitae of Prof. Ron Alterovitz, Ph.D, Professor, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Jan. 14, 2019, 22 pages. |
Danisch, Lee et al., “Spatially continuous six degree of freedom position and orientation sensor,” Sensor Review, 1999, vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 106-112. |
Dario, Paolo et al., “A Miniature Device for Medical Intracavitary Intervention,” Micro Electro Mechanical Systems '91 Proc IEEE ‘An Investigation of Micro Structures, Sensors, Actuators, Machines and Robots’, 1991, pp. 171-175, IEEE. |
Declaration of David Styka in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 18, 2018, 3 pages. |
Declaration of Kelly E. Farnan in Support of Auris Health, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 53, 2019, 3 pages. |
Declaration of Laura E. Miller in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Exihibit, Document 122, Nov. 13, 2019, 50 pages. |
Declaration of Laura Miller in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 44, 2019, 1 page. |
Declaration of Nathan B. Sabri in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 16, 2018, 7 pages. |
Declaration of Shaelyn K. Dawson in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 119, 2019, 3 pages. |
Declaration of Shaelyn K. Dawson in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 127, 2019, 2 pages. |
Declaration of Taylor Patton in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Redacted—Public Version, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 30, Dec. 11, 2018, 15 pages. |
Declaration of Vera Ranieri in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28, Demand For Jury Trial, 2018, 4 pages. |
Declaration of Prof. Ron Alterovitz, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, 2019, 25 pages. |
Declaration of Professor Mark E. Rentschler, Ph.D, Mar. 2018, 58 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Amended Notice of Deposition of Catherine J. Mohr, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 99, Oct. 9, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Amended Notice of Deposition of Vincent Duindam, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 100, Demand For Jury Trial, Oct. 9, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint for Patent Infringement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 12, Oct. 25, 2018, 12 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of 30(B)(6) Deposition of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 120, Nov. 12, 2019, 10 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Catherine J. Mohr, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 94, Oct. 2, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Mark E. Rentschler, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 103, Oct. 15, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Tim Soper, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 87, Sep. 13, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Vincent Duindam, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 93, Oct. 2, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief In Support of Its Motion to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 118, Oct. 30, 2019, 18 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 15, Oct. 29, 2018, 25 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Demand for Jury Trial, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, 2019, 38 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Demand for Jury Trial, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 126, Nov. 15, 2019, 13 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.s.c. § 1404(a), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 31, Nov. 18, 2018, 14 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement Per F.r.c.p. 7.1, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Jury Trial Demanded, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Apr. 17, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement per F.R.C.P. 7.1(a), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 13, Oct. 25, 2018, 1 page. |
Duncan, Roger, “Sensing Shape: Fiber-Bragg-grating sensor arrays monitor shape at a high resolution,” 2005, pp. 18-21, SPIE. |
Excerpts from the deposition of Mark Edwin Rentschler, Ph.D., Oct. 21, 2019, 35 pages. |
Excerpts from Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 2003, 11th Edition, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 119-1, Aug. 9, 2019, 5 pages. |
Exhibit 1, [Proposed] Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 43-2, 2019, 14 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Declaration, Annual Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(D) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form 10-K, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Document 28-1, 2018, 12 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Fox Chase Cancer Center Among First in U.S. to Use Innovative Technology for Lung Cancer Diagnosis, Temple Health, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://www.foxchase.org/news/2018-08-15-Monarch-Robotic-Bronchoscopy), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-3, Aug. 15, 2018, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Morrison & Foerster, via Email, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Sep. 9, 2019, Document 127-1, 22 pages. |
Exhibit 10, “Auris Health Lands $220M to Expand Sales of Lung Testing Medical Robot, ” exome, Frank Vinluan, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-10, 2018, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 10, From: Dawson, Shaelyn K, Subject: Intuitive v. Auris: Summary of Sep. 26, 2019 meet-and-confer re: Intuitive's deficient production, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-10, 2019, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 11, “Auris Health Lands $220M to Expand Sales of Lung Testing Medical Robot, ” Xcomony, Nov. 28, 2018, Auris, Auris Health, Inc , Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-11, 2018, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 11, U.S Food and Drug Administration, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-11, Auris Surgical Robotics, Inc, Mar. 22, 2018, 12 pages. |
Exhibit 12, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form D, Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-12, 2018, 7 pages. |
Exhibit 13, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form D, Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-13, 2018, 7 pages. |
Exhibit 14, “Auris Surgical Robotics Agrees to Acquire Hansen Medical, ” Market Wired, Source: Hansen Medical, Inc, The Global Leader in Intravascular Robotics, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-14, Apr. 20, 2016, 2018, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 15, Declaration, Delaware, U.S. District Court , Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-15, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 2, [proposed] Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 43-3, 2019, 19 pages. |
Exhibit 2, Declaration, “Pairing Human Ingenuity with Technology,” Intuitive, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-2, 2018, 13 pages. |
Exhibit 2, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, USPTO, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-2, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01173, Jun. 12, 2019, 85 Pages. |
Exhibit 2, UPMC Hamot First in U.S. to Use Innovative Robotic Technology to Detect Lung Cancer Earlier, UPMC Life Changing Medicine, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-4, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 3, Declaration, Contact Intuitive, Office locations and contact Information, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-3, 2018, 5 pages. |
Exhibit 3, Letter, Careers Audacious goals. Audacious challenges, Auris Health Inc, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://www.aurishealth.com/jobs?gh_jid=1256912), 2018, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-5, 7 pages. |
Exhibit 3, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,800,056, USPTO, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-3, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01189, Jun. 13, 2019, 73 Pages. |
Exhibit 4, “da Vinci Robotic Surgery,” Christiana Care Health System, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-4, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 4, Letter, Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions, ClinicalTrials.gov, Document 23-6, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03727425), Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-6, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03727425, 2018, 9 pages. |
Exhibit 4, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,200, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01448, Document 119-4, Aug. 5, 2019, 86 pages. |
Exhibit 5, “Auris Health, Ethicon's Neuwave Ink Robot-assisted Bronchoscope Ablation Dev Deal,” May 16, 2018, By Fink Densford, Retrieved from the Internet: (https:// https://www.massdevice.com/auris-health-ethicons-neuwave-ink-robot-assisted-bronchoscope-ablation-dev-deal/), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-7, 2018, Massdevice Medical Network, 12 pages. |
Exhibit 5, Declaration, “Beebe Healthcare Introduces the da Vinci® Xi™ Robotic Surgical System,” Submitted by Rachel on Jun. 8, 2018, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-5, 4 Pages. |
Exhibit 5, Petition For Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01496, Document 119-5, Aug. 15, 2019, 72 pages. |
Exhibit 6, Declaration, “Fox Chase Cancer Center Among First in U.S. to Use Innovative Technology for Lung Cancer Diagnosis,” Philadelphia International Medicine® News Bureau, Fox Chase Cancer Center Temple Health, For Immediate Release, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-6, Aug. 23, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 6, Letter, Nathan, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Intuitive Surgical, Inc et al v. Auris Health, Inc., C.A. No. 18-1359-LPS, Document 23-8, 2018, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 6, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, Before The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01533, Document 119-6, Aug. 29, 2019, 84 pages. |
Exhibit 7, “UPMC Hamot First in U.S. to Use Innovative Robotic Technology to Detect Lung Cancer Earlier,” UPMC Life Changing Medicine, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-7, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 7, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,701, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01532, Document 119-7, Aug. 29, 2019, 79 Pages. |
Exhibit 8, Careers Audacious goals. Audacious challenges, Auris, Retrieved from the Internet: (URL:http://https://www.aurishealth.com/jobs?gh_jid=1256912), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-8, 2018, 8 pages. |
Exhibit 8, Petition For Inter Partes Review Of U.S. Pat. No. 6,522,906, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, IPR2019-01547, Document 119-8, Aug. 30, 2019, 82 pages. |
Exhibit 9, “Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions,” ClinicalTrials.gov, U.S National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03727425, Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-9, 2018, 8 pages. |
Exhibit 9, Trial Statistics, USPTO, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-9, 2019, 12 pages. |
Exhibit A, “Johnson & Johnson Announces Agreement to Acquire Auris Health, Inc,” Auris Health's Robotic Platform Expands Johnson & Johnson's Digital Surgery Portfolio, New Brunswick, NJ—Feb. 13, 2019, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 36-1, 2019, 4 pages. |
Exhibit A, Da Vinci by Intuitive, enabling Surgical care to get patients back to what matters, Aug. 29, 2019, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-1, Retrieved from the internet: URL: [https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-and-services/da-vinci], pp. 4 pages. |
Exhibit A, Intuitive, Annual Report 2017, Intuitive Surgical, Inc, www.intuitivesurgical.com, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 16-1, 2018, 144 pages. |
Exhibit A, Letter, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. v. Auris Health, Inc., Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Doc 53-1, 2019, 86 pages. |
Exhibit A, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(B)(6) Directed to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Demand For Jury Trial, Document 23-1, Dec. 3, 2018, 7 pages. |
Exhibit B, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Defendant Auris Health, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Document 23-2, Dec. 3, 2018, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 12840613.9 dated Oct. 6, 2015, 9 pages (ISRG02860/EP). |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP20070798487, dated Jan. 30, 2015, 8 pages (ISRG00990/EP). |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP19174999.3 dated Nov. 26, 2019, 10 pages. |
Gagarina, T. et al., “Modeling and experimental analysis of a new bellow type actuators for active catheter end-effector,” Proc. 10th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2001, pp. 612-617, IEEE. |
Gander, M.J. et al., “Bend measurement using Bragg gratings in multicore fibre,” Electronics Letter, Jan. 20, 2000, vol. 36, No. 2, 2 Pages. |
Hagn U., et al., “DLR MiroSurge: A Versatile System for Research in Endoscopic Telesurgery,” International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2010, vol. 5 (2), 11 pages. |
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Sensei: Discover Your Sixth Sense”, Brochure, 2007, 10 pages. |
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Bibliography”, Jun. 22, 2005, 1 page, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20060714042735if_/http://hansenmedical.com/bibliography.aspx]. |
Hansen Medical, Inc., “System Overview”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20060714043118if_/http://hansenmedical.com/system.aspx]. |
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Technology Advantages”, 2005, 1 page, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20060713011151if_/http://hansenmedical.com/advantages.aspx]. |
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Sensei-X:Robotic Catheter System”, Brochure, 2009, 5 pages. |
Hill, Kenneth O., “Fiber Bragg grating technology fundamentals and overview,” IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 15, Issue 8, Aug. 1997, pp. 1263-1276. |
Ikuta, Koji et al., “Development of remote microsurgery robot and new surgical procedure for deep and narrow space,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, 2003, pp. 1103-1108, vol. 1, IEEE. |
Ikuta, Koji et al., “Shape memory alloy servo actuator system with electric resistance feedback and application for active endoscope,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1988, pp. 427-430, vol. 1, IEEE. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/059889, dated Mar. 29, 2013, 14 pages. |
International Search Report for application No. PCT/US07/71085, dated Sep. 17, 2008, 2 pages. |
Ion by Intuitive, A New Robotic Endoluminal Platform for Minimally Invasive Peripheral Lung Biopsy, Aug. 29, 2019, Retrived from the internet: [https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-andservices/ion], 5 pages. |
Jin, Long et al., “Two-dimensional bend sensing with a cantilever-mounted FBG [Fiber Bragg Grating],” Meas. Sci. Technol., 2006, pp. 168-172, vol. 17, Institute of Physics Publishing. |
Joint Claim Construction Brief, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 113, Oct. 29, 2019, 103 pages. |
Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 76, Aug. 2, 2019, 31 pages. |
Kenneth Salisbury Jr., “The heart of microsurgery,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers , 1998, 12 pages. |
Kreger, Stephen et al., “Optical Frequency Domain Reflectometry for High Density Multiplexing of Multi-Axis Fiber Bragg Gratings,” 16th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors (OFS-16), Oct. 2003, Nara, Japan, pp. 526-529. |
Le Roux, P.D., et al., “Robot-assisted Microsurgery: A Feasibility Study in the Rat,” Neurosurgery, Mar. 2001, vol. 48 (3), pp. 584-589. |
Lertpiriyasuwat, Vatchara et al., “Extended Kalman Filtering Applied to a Two-Axis Robotic Arm with Flexible Links,” International Journal of Robotics Research, 2000, vol. 19., No. 3, pp. 254-270. |
Letter Response, Kelly E. Farnan, By CM/ECF, Richards Layton & Finger, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 24, RLF1 20392700v.1, Document 24, Dec. 4, 2018, 3 pages. |
Letter, Shaw Keller LLP, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Oct. 29, 2019, Document 112, 1 page. |
Lunwei Z., et al., “FBG Sensor Devices for Spatial Shape Detection of Intelligent Colonoscope,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 2004, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 835-840. |
Markman Hearing, Before: The Honorable Maryellen Noreika, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Defendant: Auris Health, Inc., held on Nov. 20, 2019, pp. 1-162. |
Marrouche N.F., et al., “AB32-1: Preliminary Human Experience Using a Novel Robotic Catheter Remote Control”, May 6, 2005, 1 page. |
Martinez, A. et al., “Vector Bending Sensors Based on Fibre Bragg Gratings Inscribed by Infrared Femtosecond Laser,” Electronics Letters, 2005, pp. 472-474, vol. 41—Issue 8. |
Measurand, “ShapeTape Overview,” Measurand ShapeTape Advantage, pp. 1-3, first posted Nov. 3, 2004. Internet<www.measurand.com/products/ShapeTape_overview.html>. |
Meltz, Gerald, “Overview of Fiber Grating-Based Sensors,” Proceedings of SPIE Distributed Multiplexed Fiber Optic Sensors VI, Nov. 27, 1996, Eds. Kersey et al.,vol. 2838, pp. 2-22. |
Memorandum Opinion, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), May 31, 2019, 13 pages. |
Memorandum Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), 2019, 16 pages. |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Maryellen Noreika, Telephone Conference held on Aug. 21, 2019, 1 page. |
Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 117, Oct. 30, 2019, 2 pages. |
Nambi M., et al., “A Compact Telemanipulated Retinal-Surgery System that Uses Commercially Available Instruments with a Quick-Change Adapter,” Journal of Medical Robotics Research, 2016, vol. 1 (2), 14 pages. |
Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2014 for Japanese Application No. 20130179563 filed Aug. 30, 2013, 7 pages (ISRG00990D12/JP). |
Oh S., et al., “P5-75: Novel Robotic Catheter Remote Control System: Safety and Accuracy in Delivering RF Lesions in All 4 Cardiac Chambers”, 2005, pp. S277-S278. |
Olympus , Your Vision, Our Future, “Endoscope Overview 2008,” Evis Exera II, HDTV 1080, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-1, 6 pages. |
Olympus Medical Systems, “Olympus ScopeGuide Receives FDA Clearance,” Press Release dated May 24, 2011, 2 pages. |
Oral Order, Intuitive Surgical, Inc et al v. Auris Health, Inc, 1-18-cv-01359 (DED), docket entry 25, 2018, 1 Page. |
Oral Order, re 37 Proposed Scheduling Order, Intuitive Surgical, Inc et al v. Auris Health, Inc, 1-18-cv-01359 (DED), 2019, 1 page. |
Order Conduct of the Proceeding, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2019-01173, Case IPR2019-01189, Case IPR2019-01496, Case IPR2019-01547, Dated Dec. 9, 2019, 04 pages. |
Order Regarding Access to Source Code, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Mar. 21, 2019, 3 pages. |
Order Scheduling Adr Teleconference, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 142, 2019, 4 pages. |
Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), Document 70, 2019, 1 page. |
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP19174999.3 dated Aug. 21, 2019, 11 pages (ISRG02860D1/EP). |
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP20120840613, dated Jun. 5, 2015, 5 pages (ISRG02860/EP). |
Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Before The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, IPR2019-01496, Sep. 3, 2019, 6 pages. |
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Nov. 22, 2019, 33 pages. |
Patent Owner's Response to Supplemental Paper Regarding Claim Construction Arguments and Rulings in a Related District Court Action of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 20, 2019, 4 pages. |
PCT/US07/71085 Written Opinion, dated Sep. 17, 2008, 5 pages. |
PCT/US09/46446 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 14, 2009, 21 pages. |
PCT/US09/46446 Partial International Search Report and Invitation to Pay Additional Fees, dated Sep. 18, 2009, 9 pages. |
PCT/US2011/035113 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 4, 2011, 13 pages. |
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 9, 2019, pp. 1-4. |
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 5, 2019, pp. 1-4. |
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Oct. 15, 2019, 04 pages. |
Plaintiffs' First Notice of Rule 30(B)(6) Deposition of Defendant Auris Health, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Document 129, Case No. 18-1359-MN, 2019, 14 Pages. |
Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Corporate Disclosure Statement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Aug. 31, 2018, 1 page. |
Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Notice of Subpoenas to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 82, 2019, 20 pages. |
Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 26, Dec. 11, 2018, 23 pages. |
Plaintiffs' Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 43, Mar. 15, 2019, 8 pages. |
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 121, Nov. 13, 2019, 21 pages. |
Proposed Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 43-1, 2019, 1 page. |
Proposed Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 37, 2019, 17 pages. |
Proposed Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case 18-1359-MN, Document 41, 2019, 17 pages. |
PTAB Teleconference for review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 6, 2019, Petitioner Auris Health, Inc, pp. 1-33. |
Rassweiler J., et al., “The Role of Imaging and Navigation for Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery,” Journal of Endourology, May 2009, vol. 23 (5), pp. 793-802. |
Reddy V.Y., et al., “P1-53: Porcine Pulmonary Vein Ablation Using a Novel Robotic Catheter Control System and Real-time Integration of CT Imaging with Electroanatomical Mapping”, 2005, p. S121. |
Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark, To: Mail Stop 8, Director of USPTO, Alexandria, VA, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 3, 2018, 2 pages. |
Rosenberg J.M., Artificial Intelligence & Robotics, 1986, 3 pages. |
RULE 7.1.1 CERTIFICATE, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-01359-MN, Document 117-2, Oct. 30, 2019, 2 pages. |
Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 42, 2019, 17 pages. |
Shang, J. et al., “An Articulated Universal Joint Based Flexible Access Robot for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” 2011 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 9-13, 2011, London, UK, pp. 1147-1152. |
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter Proposed Scheduling Order, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 39, Feb. 28, 2019, 1 page. |
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter to Request Scheduling of a Discovery Teleconference, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 20, Nov. 8, 2018, 1 page. |
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, Karen E. Keller, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., et al. v. Auris Health, Inc., Document 23, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Dec. 3, 2018, 4 pages. |
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, Written to Advise the Court that Auris has “Entered into a Definitive Agreement”, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 36, Feb. 20, 2019, 1 page. |
Sheila Weller, He Helped Pioneer Robotic Surgery. Now He Wants to Reinvent Lung Cancer Care, JNJ.com, Apr. 2019, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-2, Retrived from the internet : [https://www.jnj.com/personal-stories/why-robotic-surgery-pioneer-frederic-moll-is-now-tackling-lung-cancer-care], 6 pages. |
Slepian M.J., “Robotic Catheter Intervention: The Hansen Medical Sensei™ Robotic Catheter System,” 2010, 28 pages. |
Stieber, Michael E. et al., “Vision-Based Sensing and Control for Space Robotics Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Aug. 1999, vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 807-812. |
Sturges R.H. Jr., et al., “A Voice-Actuated, Tendon-Controlled Device for Endoscopy”, 1996, pp. 603-617. |
Sturges, Robert H. et al., “A Flexible, Tendon-Controlled Device for Endoscopy,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1993, vol. 12(2), pp. 121-131. |
Super Dimension, “How it Works”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070510094239/http://www.superdimension.com/new_resources.html]. |
Super Dimension,“Overview”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070510094239/http://www.superdimension.com/new_resources.html]. |
Super Dimension, “System Elements”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070510094239/http://www.superdimension.com/new_resources.html]. |
Supplemental Briefing Regarding Claim Construction Arguments and Rulings in Parallel District Court Action of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 13, 2019, 5 pages. |
Szewczyk, Jerome et al., “An active tubular polyarticulated micro-system for flexible endoscope,” Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 271, Experimental Robotics VII, 2000, pp. 179-188, Springer-Verlag. |
TAB 1, “Declaration of Stephen J. Blumenkranz in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand For Jury Trial, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-1, 2018, 3 pages. |
TAB 2, “Declaration of Thomas G. Cooper in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand For Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-2, 2018, 3 pages. |
TAB 3, “Declaration of Nicola Diolaiti in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-3, 2018, 3 pages. |
TAB 4, “Declaration of Vincent Duindam in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” Demand For Jury Trial, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-4, Demand For Jury Trial, 2018, 3 pages. |
TAB 5,“Declaration of Carolyn M. Fenech in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand For Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-5, 2018, 3 pages. |
TAB 6, “Declaration of Gary S. Guthart in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-6, 2018, 3 pages. |
TAB 7, “Declaration of Catherine J. Mohr in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” Demand for Jury Trial, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-7, 2018, 3 pages. |
TAB 8, “Declaration of Robert Matthew Ohline in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ”United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-8, 2018, 3 pages. |
TAB 9, “Declaration of David J. Rosa in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, ” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-9, 2018, 3 pages. |
The Da Vinci Surgical system, Retrieved from the internet: [http://web.archive.org/web/20080724022504/http:/www.intuitivesurgical.com/products/davinci_surgicalsystem/], 2 pages. |
Transcript Teleconference, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Document 58, 2019, 11 pages. |
Transcript, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., V. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18- 1359-(MN), Document 83, 9 pages. |
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. |
Waldman H., Dictionary of Robotics, 1985, 4 pages. |
Wang, Yi-Ping et al., “A novel long period fiber grating sensor measuring curvature and determining bend-direction simultaneously,” IEEE Sensors Journal, 2005, pp. 839-843, vol. 5-Issue: 5, IEEE. |
Webster, Robert J. III et al., “Toward Active Cannulas: Miniature Snake-Like Surgical Robots,” 2006, 7 pages. |
Wong, Allan C. L .et al., “Multiplexed fibre Fizeau interferometer and fibre Bragg grating sensor system for simultaneous measurement of quasi-static strain and temperature using discrete wavelet transform,” Measurement Science and Technology, 2006, pp. 384-392, vol. 17—Issue 2, Institute of Physics Publishing. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200275860 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61646619 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13889984 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 14802199 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14802199 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 16875747 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13274237 | Oct 2011 | US |
Child | 13889984 | US |