1. Technical Field
This invention relates in general to nonvolatile memory devices for use as memory storage in an electronic device and in particular to nonvolatile memory arrays that use electromechanical elements as the individual memory cells.
2. Discussion of Related Art
Important characteristics for a memory cell in electronic device are low cost, nonvolatility, high density, low power, and high speed. Conventional memory solutions include Read Only Memory (ROM), Programmable Read only Memory (PROM), Electrically Programmable Memory (EPROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) and Static Random Access Memory (SRAM).
ROM is relatively low cost but cannot be rewritten. PROM can be electrically programmed but with only a single write cycle. EPROM has read cycles that are fast relative to ROM and PROM read cycles, but has relatively long erase times and reliability only over a few iterative read/write cycles. EEPROM (or “Flash”) is inexpensive, and has low power consumption but has long write cycles (ms) and low relative speed in comparison to DRAM or SRAM. Flash also has a finite number of read/write cycles leading to low long-term reliability. ROM, PROM, EPROM and EEPROM are all non-volatile, meaning that if power to the memory is interrupted the memory will retain the information stored in the memory cells.
DRAM stores charge on transistor gates that act as capacitors but must be electrically refreshed every few milliseconds complicating system design by requiring separate circuitry to “refresh” the memory contents before the capacitors discharge. SRAM does not need to be refreshed and is fast relative to DRAM, but has lower density and is more expensive relative to DRAM. Both SRAM and DRAM are volatile, meaning that if power to the memory is interrupted the memory will lose the information stored in the memory cells.
Consequently, existing technologies are either non-volatile but are not randomly accessible and have low density, high cost, and limited ability to allow multiples writes with high reliability of the circuit's function, or they are volatile and complicate system design or have low density. Some emerging technologies have attempted to address these shortcomings.
For example, magnetic RAM (MRAM) or ferromagnetic RAM (FRAM) utilizes the orientation of magnetization or a ferromagnetic region to generate a nonvolatile memory cell. MRAM utilizes a magnetoresistive memory element involving the anisotropic magnetoresistance or giant magnetoresistance of ferromagnetic materials yielding nonvolatility. Both of these types of memory cells have relatively high resistance and low-density. A different memory cell based upon magnetic tunnel junctions has also been examined but has not led to large-scale commercialized MRAM devices. FRAM uses a circuit architecture similar to DRAM but which uses a thin film ferroelectric capacitor. This capacitor is purported to retain its electrical polarization after an externally applied electric field is removed yielding a nonvolatile memory. FRAM suffers from a large memory cell size, and it is difficult to manufacture as a large-scale integrated component. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,853,893; 4,888,630; 5,198,994.
Another technology having non-volatile memory is phase change memory. This technology stores information via a structural phase change in thin-film alloys incorporating elements such as selenium or tellurium. These alloys are purported to remain stable in both crystalline and amorphous states allowing the formation of a bi-stable switch. While the nonvolatility condition is met, this technology appears to suffer from slow operations, difficulty of manufacture and reliability and has not reached a state of commercialization. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,448,302; 4,845,533; 4,876,667; 6,044,008.
Wire crossbar memory (MWCM) has also been proposed. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,128,214; 6,159,620; 6,198,655. These memory proposals envision molecules as bi-stable switches. Two wires (either a metal or semiconducting type) have a layer of molecules or molecule compounds sandwiched in between. Chemical assembly and electrochemical oxidation or reduction are used to generate an “on” or “off” state. This form of memory requires highly specialized wire junctions and may not retain non-volatility owing to the inherent instability found in redox processes.
Recently, memory devices have been proposed which use nanoscopic wires, such as single-walled carbon nanotubes, to form crossbar junctions to serve as memory cells. See WO 01/03208, Nanoscopic Wire-Based Devices, Arrays, and Methods of Their Manufacture; and Thomas Rueckes et al., “Carbon Nanotube-Based Nonvolatile Random Access Memory for Molecular Computing,” Science, vol. 289, pp. 94-97, 7 Jul., 2000. Hereinafter these devices are called nanotube wire crossbar memories (NTWCMs). Under these proposals, individual single-walled nanotube wires suspended over other wires define memory cells. Electrical signals are written to one or both wires to cause them to physically attract or repel relative to one another. Each physical state (i.e., attracted or repelled wires) corresponds to an electrical state. Repelled wires are an open circuit junction. Attracted wires are a closed state forming a rectified junction. When electrical power is removed from the junction, the wires retain their physical (and thus electrical) state thereby forming a non-volatile memory cell.
The NTWCM proposals to date rely on directed growth or chemical self-assembly techniques to grow the individual nanotubes needed for the memory cells. These techniques are now believed to be difficult to employ at commercial scales using modern technology. Moreover, they may contain inherent limitations such as the length of the nanotubes that may be grown reliably using these techniques, and it may difficult to control the statistical variance of geometries of nanotube wires so grown.
The invention provides electromechanical circuits, such as memory cells, and methods for making same. The circuits include a structure having electrically conductive traces and supports extending from a surface of the substrate, and nanotube ribbons suspended by the supports that cross the electrically conductive traces, wherein each ribbon comprises one or more nanotubes.
According to one aspect of the invention, the electro-mechanical circuit elements are made by providing a structure having electrically conductive traces and supports, in which the supports extend from a surface of the substrate. A layer of nanotubes is provided over the supports, and portions of the layer of nanotubes are selectively removed to form ribbons of nanotubes that cross the electrically conductive traces. Each ribbon includes one or more nanotubes.
In the Drawing,
Preferred embodiments of the invention provide new electromechanical memory arrays and methods for making same. In particular, electromechanical memory cells are created that operate anaologously to the NTWCM devices disclosed in WO 01/03208, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. However, unlike the NTWCM devices disclosed in WO 01/03208, preferred embodiments of the invention replace the suspended nanoscopic wires used in the NTWCM devices with new ribbons made from a matted layer of nanotubes or a non-woven fabric of nanotubes. These new devices are referred to herein as nanotube ribbon crossbar memories (NTRCMs). The new nanotube belt structures are believed to be easier to build at the desired levels of integration and scale (in number of devices made) and the geometries are more easily controlled.
Because the new nanotube belt crossbar memory devices operate analogously to NTWCM, the description of their architecture and principles of operation is brief. Reference may be made to WO 01/03208 for fuller description and background.
Each memory cell 103 includes a nanotube ribbon 101 suspended by one or more supports 102 over electrical traces or wires, e.g., 104.
Each crossing of a ribbon 101 and a wire, e.g., 104 forms a crossbar junction and defines a memory cell. Under certain embodiments, each cell may be read or written by applying currents and or voltages to electrodes 112 which are in electrical communication with ribbons 101 or through electrodes (not shown) in communication with traces or wires 104. The supports 102 are made from a layer 108 of silicon nitride (Si3N4). Below layer 108 is a gate oxide layer 109 separating the n-doped silicon traces 104 from an underlying silicon wafer 110.
Referring conjointly to
Under certain embodiments, the nanotube ribbon 101 may be held in position at the supports by friction. In other embodiments the ribbon may be held by other means, such as by anchoring the ribbons to the supports using any of a variety of techniques. This friction can be increased through the use of chemical interactions including covalent bonding through the use of carbon compounds such as pyrenes or other chemically reactive species. Evaporated or spin-coated material such as metals, semiconductors or insulators especially silicon, titanium, silicon oxide or polyimide could also be added to increase the pinning strength. The nanotube ribbons or individual nanotubes can also be pinned through the use wafer bonding to the surface. See R. J. Chen et al., “Noncovalent Sidewall Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Protein Immobiliation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 2001, 3838-39 and Dai et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., 77, 2000, 3015-17 for exemplary techniques for pinning and coating nanotubes by metals. See also WO01/03208 for techniques.
Under certain preferred embodiments as shown in
The nanotube ribbon 101 of certain embodiments is formed from a non-woven fabric of entangled or matted nanotubes (more below). The switching parameters of the ribbon resemble those of individual nanotubes. Thus, the predicted switching times and voltages of the ribbon should approximate the same times and voltages of nanotubes. Unlike the prior art which relies on directed growth or chemical self-assembly of individual nanotubes, preferred embodiments of the present invention utilize fabrication techniques involving thin films and lithography. This method of fabrication lends itself to generation over large surfaces especially wafers of at least six inches. (In contrast, growing individual nanotubes over a distance beyond sub millimeter distances is currently unfeasible.) The ribbons should exhibit improved fault tolerances over individual nanotubes, by providing redundancy of conduction pathways contained with the ribbons. (If an individual nanotube breaks other tubes within the rib provide conductive paths, whereas if a sole nanotube were used the cell would be faulty.) Moreover, the resistances of the ribbons should be significantly lower than that for an individual nanotubes, thus, decreasing its impedance, since the ribbons may be made to have larger cross-sectional areas than individual nanotubes.
Once such a structure 302 is created or provided, the upper surface 306 receives a catalyst 308. For example, under certain embodiments, a catalyst metal 308, containing iron (Fe), molybdenum (Mo), cobalt or other metals, is applied by spin-coating or other application techniques to create a second intermediate structure 310.
A matted layer 312 of nanotubes is then grown into a non-woven fabric of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) to form a third intermediate structure 314. For example, the second intermediate structure 310 may be placed into an oven and heated to a high temperature (for example, about 800-1200° C.) while gases containing a carbon source, hydrogen and inert gas, such as argon or nitrogen, are flowed over the upper surface. This environment facilitates the generation or growth of the material layer or film 312 of single-walled carbon nanotubes. The layer 312 is primarily one nanotube thick and the various tubes adhere to one another via Van der Waals forces. Occasionally, one nanotube grows over the top of another, though this growth is relatively infrequent due to the growth tendencies of the material. Under some embodiments (not shown), the catalyst 308 may be patterned to assist in growing the nanotubes with specific densities either more or less dense as is desired. When conditions of catalyst composition and density, growth environment, and time are properly controlled, nanotubes can be made to evenly distribute over a given field that is primarily a monolayer of nanotubes. Proper growth requires control of parameters including but not limited to catalyst composition and concentration, functionialization of the underlying surface, spin coating parameters (length and RPM), growth time, temperature and gas concentrations.
A photoresist may then be applied to the layer 312 and patterned to define ribbons in the matted layer of nanotubes 312. The ribbon patterns cross (for example, perpendicularly) the underlying traces 104. The photoresist is removed to leave ribbons 101 of non-woven nanotube fabric lying on planar surface 306 to form fourth intermediate structure 318.
The fourth intermediate structure 318 has portions 320 of its underlying sacrificial layer 304 exposed as shown. The structure 318 is then treated with an acid, such as HF, to remove the sacrificial layer 304, including the portion under the ribbons 101, thus forming an array 322 of ribbons 101 suspended over traces 104 and supported by supports 102.
Subsequent metalization may be used to form addressing electrodes, e.g., 112 shown in FIG. 1.
One aspect of the above technique is that the various growth, patterning, and etching operations may use conventional techniques, such as lithographic patterning. Currently, this may entail feature sizes (e.g., width of ribbon 101) of about 180 nm to as low as 130 nm, but the physical characteristics of the components are amenable to even smaller feature sizes if manufacturing capabilities permit.
As will be explained below, there are many possible ways of creating the intermediate structures or analogous structures described above.
A silicon wafer 400 is provided with an oxide layer 402. The oxide layer is preferably a few nanometers in thickness but could be as much 1 μm. A silicon nitride (Si3N4) layer 404 is deposited on top of the oxide surface 402. The silicon nitride layer is preferably at least 30 nm thick.
The silicon nitride layer 404 is then patterned and etched to generate cavities 406 to form support structure 407. With modern techniques the cavity width may be about 180 nm wide or perhaps smaller. The remaining silicon nitride material defines the supports 102 (e.g., as row, or perhaps columns).
A covering 408 of n-doped silicon is then deposited to fill the cavities 406. The covering 408 for exemplary embodiments may be about 1 μm thick but may be as thin as 30 nm.
The covering 408 is then processed, for example by self-flattening of thick silicon layers or by annealing, to produce a planar surface 306, discussed above, to form structure 411. In the case of self-flattening, reactive ion-etching (RIE) with end-point detection (EPD) may be utilized until the upper surface 410 of the etched silicon nitride is reached.
The structure 411 is then oxidized to form and define sacrificial layers 304 of SiO2 about 10-20 nm deep into planar surface 306.
The unconverted, remaining portions of silicon form traces 104.
After the layer 514 is added, an annealing step is performed to yield a planarized surface 306 to form a structure 411 like that described above. The annealing step causes the silicon of layer 514 to flow into the cavities 406.
Like that described in connection with
The silicon nitride layer 602 is then patterned and etched to generate spacings 606 and to defined supports 102. The etching process exposes a portion 608 of the surface of silicon substrate 600.
The exposed silicon surface 608 is oxidized to generate a silicon dioxide (SiO2) layers 610 having a thickness of a few nm. These layers 610 eventually insulate traces 104 analogously to the way insulating layer 109 did for the above described structures 302.
Once the insulating layers 610 have been created, the traces 104 may be created in any of a variety of manner.
Reactive ion etching (RIE) or the like may then be used to etch the Si3N4 layer 704 to form cavities 708 and to define supports 102.
Afterwards, n-doped silicon 710 may be deposited in the cavities 708. Under certain embodiments silicon is deposited to a height about equal to the height 712 of the Si3N4 supports 102.
The photoresist 706 and silicon 710 on top of the photoresist 706 are then stripped away to form an intermediate structure 411 like that described above.
The structure 411 is then oxidized to generate the sacrificial SiO2 layers 304.
The top silicon dioxide (SiO2) layer 808 is patterned by photolithography to create an RIE mask 810. The mask is used to etch the exposed portions 812 of second silicon layer 806 down to the first silicon dioxide layer 804. This etching creates cavities 814 and defines traces 104.
The cavities 814 are filled and covered with silicon nitride (Si3N4) 816.
The Si3N4 covering 816 is backetched with RIE to the same height 818 as the remaining portions of the SiO2 layer 806 covering the n-doped silicon electrodes 104 (which form the sacrificial layer 304).
The exposed metal electrodes 902 may then be removed by wet chemical methods or dry chemical methods. This forms an intermediate structure 411′ like the structure 411 described above, but with a buried electrode 903, as an artifact of the silicon growing process.
The structure 411′ is then oxidized to form sacrificial layers 304 at the exposed portions of silicon, as described above. For example, the layers 304 may be grown to a thickness of about 10 nm.
Using nitridization techniques, exposed portions 1010 of n-doped silicon layer 1006 are chemically converted to Si3N4 supports 102. The unconverted portions of layer 1006 form traces 104.
The mask 1008 is removed forming a structure 411 like that described above.
The exposed portions 1012 of silicon surface are then oxidized to form the SiO2 sacrificial layers 304.
The surface of traces 104 are oxidized to form the SiO2 layer 1106 which acts as an alternative form of sacrificial layer 304′.
The structure is overgrown with Si3N4 1108 and back etched to form a planar surface 306 and to form alternative first intermediate structure 302′″. As will be evident to those skilled in the art, under this approach, when the sacrificial layer is subsequently removed, traces 104 will be separated from supports 102. Other variations of this technique may be employed to create alternative transverse cross-sections of trace 104. For example, the traces 104 may be created to have a rounded top, or to have a triangular or trapezoidal cross section. In addition, the cross section may have other forms, such as a triangle with tapered sides.
As was explained above, once a first intermediate structure is formed, e.g., 302, a matted nanotube layer 312 is provided over the planar surface 306 of the structure 302. In preferred embodiments, the non-woven fabric layer 312 is grown over the structure through the use of a catalyst 308 and through the control of a growth environment. Other embodiments may provide the matted nanotube layer 312 separately and apply it directly over the structure 302. Though structure 302 under this approach preferably includes the sacrificial layer to provide a planar surface to receive the independently grown fabric, the sacrificial layer may not be necessary under such an approach.
Because the growth process causes the underside of such nanotubes to be in contact with planar surface 306 of intermediate structure 302, they exhibit a “self-assembly” trait as is suggested by FIG. 12. In particular, individual nanotubes tend to adhere to the surface on which they are grown whenever energetically favorable, such that they form substantially as a “monolayer.” Some nanotubes may grow over another so the monolayer is not expected to be perfect. The individual nanotubes do not “weave” with one another but do adhere with one another as a consequence of Van der Waals forces.
In certain embodiments, nanotubes grow substantially unrestrained in the x- and y-axis directions, but are substantially restricted in the z-axis (perpendicular to page of
A plan view of the matted nanotube layer 312 with underlying silicon traces 104 is shown in FIG. 13.
As explained above, once the matted nanotube layer 312 is provided over the surface 306, the layer 312 is patterned and etched to define ribbons 101 of nanotube fabric that cross the supports 102. The sacrificial layer is then removed (e.g., with acid) forming the array 322 described above in connection with FIG. 3. Because the matted layer of nanotubes 312 form a non-woven fabric that is not a contiguous film, etchants or other chemicals may diffuse between the individual nanotube “fibers” and more easily reach the underlying components, such as the sacrificial layer.
Subsequent metalization may be used to form addressing electrodes, e.g., 112 shown in
More specifically, under certain embodiments described above, nanotubes are used to form NTRCM arrays. Certain embodiments use nanotube technology, whether in individual wire or belt form, to implement addressing logic to select the memory cell(s) for reading or writing operations. This approach furthers the integration of nanotube technology into system design and may provide beneficial functionality to higher-level system design. For example, under this approach the memory architecture will not only store memory contents in non-volatile manner but will inherently store the last memory address.
The nanotube-based memory cells have bistability characterized by a high ratio of resistance between “0” and “1” states. Switching between these states is accomplished by the application of specific voltages across the nanotube belt or wire and the underlying trace, in which at least one of the memory cell elements is a nanotube or a nanotube ribbon. In one approach, a “readout current” is applied and the voltage across this junction is determined with a “sense amplifier.” Reads are non-destructive, meaning that the cell retains its state, and no write-back operations are needed as is done with DRAM.
A perpendicular intersection of two lines 1404 and 1406 depicted as a dot 1402 indicates a junction of two nanotubes or nanotube ribbons. In this regard, the interaction is analogous to a “pass transistor” found in CMOS and other technology, in which the intersection may be opened or closed.
Locations such as 1420 where one nanotube or nanotube ribbon may cross another but which are not intended to create a crossbar junction may be insulated from one another with a lithographically patterned insulator between the components.
For the sake of clarity, the decoder illustrated is for a 3-bit binary address carried on addressing lines 1408. Depending on the value of the encoding the intersections (dots) will be switched to create only one path through which sensing current I may pass to select lines 1418.
To use this technique, a “dual rail” representation 1408 of each bit of the binary address is fashioned externally so that each of the address bits 1410 is presented in true and complementary form. Thus, line 1406 may be the logical true version of address line 1408a and line 1407 may be the logical complement of address line 1408a. The voltage values of the representation 1408 are consistent with that needed to switch a crossbar junction to the “1” or “0” state as described above.
In this fashion an address 1408 may be used to supply a sense current I to a bit or row of bits in an array, e.g., to nanotubes or nanotube ribbons. Likewise, the same approach may be used to sense a given trace, for example, selecting specific array column(s) to read sense from in conjunction with selecting a row. Thus this approach may be used for X and/or Y decoding both for reading and for writing operations.
Certain embodiments of the invention provide a hybrid technology circuit 1500, shown in
In other embodiments, the X and Y address decoders 1504 and 1506 may be substituted with the nanotube wire or belt addressing technique discussed above. In these embodiments the core would include memory cells and addressing logic.
In certain embodiments, the hybrid circuit 1500 may be formed by using a nanotube core (having either just memory cells or memory cells and addressing logic) and by implementing the surrounding circuitry using a field programmable gate array. The core and gate array circuitry may be contained in a single physical package if desired. Or, they may be packaged separately. For example, a hermitically packaged nanotube circuit (having memory or memory and addressing logic) may be combined with a PLD/FPGA/ASIC in which the I/O interfacing logic is contained. The resulting compact chipset provides access to the benefits of the NT memory for the user of the product, while maximizing the use of “off-the-shelf” technologies, which may be utilized on an as-needed basis by the manufacturer.
This particular embodiment is suggested to conform to the PCI bus standard, typical of today's personal computers. Other passive circuitry, such as capacitors, resistors, transformers, etc. (not pictured) would also be necessary to conform to the PCI standard. A front-side bus speed of 200 MHz-400 MHz is annotated, suggesting the kinds of external clock speeds such a chipset might run at. This speed is limited by the PCB interconnects and FPGA/PLD/ASIC speed, and also the chip packages, not the NT memory cell speed.
Besides carbon nanotubes other materials with electronic and mechanical properties suitable for electromechanical switching could be envisioned. These materials would have properties similar to carbon nanotubes but with different and likely reduced tensile strength. The tensile strain and adhesion energies of the material must fall within a range to allow bistability of the junction and electromechanical switching properties to exist within acceptable tolerances.
For the purpose of integrating CMOS logic for addressing two approaches can be envisioned. In the first embodiment the nanotube array will be integrated before metallization but after ion implantation and planarization of the CMOS logic devices. A second method involves growth of the nanotube arrays before fabrication of the CMOS devices involving ion implementation and high temperature annealing steps. Upon completion of these steps the final metallization of both the nanotube ribbons and the CMOS devices will proceed using standard and widely used protocols.
Electrodes consisting of n-doped silicon on top of some metal or semiconductor line can also be envisioned. This will still provide rectifying junctions in the ON state so that no multiple current pathways exist.
In addition to rectifying junctions, there are other widely accepted and used methods to prevent the occurrence of electrical crosstalk (i.e. multiple current pathways) in crossbar arrays. Tunnel barriers on top of the static, lithographically fabricated electrodes prevent the formation of ohmic ON states. No leakage currents at zero bias voltage will occur but a small bias voltage has to be applied for the charge carriers to overcome this barrier and tunnel between the crossing lines.
Methods to increase the adhesion energies through the use of ionic, covalent or other forces can be envisioned to alter the interactions with the electrode surfaces. These methods can be used to extend the range of bistability with these junctions.
Nanotubes can be functionalized with planar conjugated hydrocarbons such as pyrenes which may then aid in enhancing the internal adhesion between nanotubes within the ribbons.
Certain of the above aspects, such as the hybrid circuits and the nanotube technology for addressing, are applicable to individual nanotubes (e.g., using directed growth techniques, etc.) or to nanotube ribbons.
It will be further appreciated that the scope of the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments but rather is defined by the appended claims, and that these claims will encompass modifications of and improvements to what has been described.
This application is related to the following applications, all of which are filed on the same date that this application is filed, all of which are assigned to the assignee of this application, and all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety: Hybrid Circuit Having Nanotube Electromechanical Memory (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/915,095); now U.S. Pat. No. 6,574,130 andElectromechanical Memory Having Cell Selection Circuitry Constructed with Nanotube Technology (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/915,173).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3448302 | Shanefield | Jun 1969 | A |
3740494 | Dunand et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3892890 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
4324814 | Reichert | Apr 1982 | A |
4378629 | Bozlev et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4495511 | Yoder | Jan 1985 | A |
4510016 | Chi et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4524431 | Haken et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4673474 | Ogawa | Jun 1987 | A |
4694427 | Miyamoto et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4701842 | Olnowich | Oct 1987 | A |
4707197 | Hensel et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4758534 | Derkits, Jr. et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4819212 | Nakai et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4845533 | Pryor et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4853893 | Eaton, Jr. et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4876667 | Ross et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4888630 | Paterson | Dec 1989 | A |
4901121 | Gibson et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4903090 | Yokoyama | Feb 1990 | A |
4939556 | Eguchi et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4947226 | Huang et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4979149 | Popovic et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4985871 | Catlin | Jan 1991 | A |
5010037 | Lin et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5031145 | Lever | Jul 1991 | A |
5032538 | Bozler et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5051956 | Burns | Sep 1991 | A |
5057883 | Noda | Oct 1991 | A |
5089545 | Pol | Feb 1992 | A |
5155561 | Bozler et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5161218 | Catlin | Nov 1992 | A |
5168070 | Luth | Dec 1992 | A |
5175597 | Cachier et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5184320 | Dye | Feb 1993 | A |
5196396 | Lieber | Mar 1993 | A |
5198390 | MacDonald et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5198994 | Natori | Mar 1993 | A |
5252835 | Lieber et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5290715 | Pandya | Mar 1994 | A |
5316979 | MacDonald et al. | May 1994 | A |
5346683 | Green et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5412785 | Skruhak et al. | May 1995 | A |
5424054 | Bethune et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5426070 | Shaw et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5444421 | Carroll et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444651 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453970 | Rust et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5456986 | Majetich et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5475341 | Reed | Dec 1995 | A |
5479172 | Smith et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5482601 | Ohshima et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5517194 | Carroll et al. | May 1996 | A |
5521602 | Carroll et al. | May 1996 | A |
5533061 | Smith et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5538916 | Kuroi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5547748 | Ruoff et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553099 | Carroll et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563424 | Yang et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5586286 | Santeler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589692 | Reed | Dec 1996 | A |
5590078 | Chatter | Dec 1996 | A |
5592643 | Thomas | Jan 1997 | A |
5592644 | Thomas | Jan 1997 | A |
5608246 | Yeager et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5608888 | Purcell et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623638 | Andrade | Apr 1997 | A |
5626670 | Varshney et al. | May 1997 | A |
5626812 | Ebbesen et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640133 | MacDonald et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640343 | Gallagher et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5650958 | Gallagher et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5651126 | Bailey et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652856 | Santeler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5699317 | Sartore et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5716708 | Lagow | Feb 1998 | A |
5719073 | Shaw et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721862 | Sartore et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5739057 | Tiwari et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5747180 | Miller et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751156 | Muller et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753088 | Olk | May 1998 | A |
5780101 | Nolan et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781717 | Wu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5793697 | Scheuerlein | Aug 1998 | A |
5799209 | Chatter | Aug 1998 | A |
5802583 | Yeager et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5838165 | Chatter | Nov 1998 | A |
5840435 | Lieber et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841692 | Gallagher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5846849 | Shaw et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847454 | Shaw et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847565 | Narayanan | Dec 1998 | A |
5850089 | Varshney et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850231 | Orimoto et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858862 | Westwater et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5875451 | Joseph | Feb 1999 | A |
5878840 | Tessum et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887272 | Sartore et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897945 | Lieber et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903010 | Flory et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909624 | Yeager et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914553 | Adams et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5925465 | Ebbesen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928450 | Russell | Jul 1999 | A |
5930164 | Zhu | Jul 1999 | A |
5939785 | Klonis et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946228 | Abraham et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946930 | Anthony | Sep 1999 | A |
5973444 | Xu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5985446 | Lagow | Nov 1999 | A |
5993697 | Cohen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994733 | Nishioka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997832 | Lieber et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6025618 | Chen | Feb 2000 | A |
6031711 | Tennent et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031756 | Gimzewski et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036774 | Lieber et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038060 | Crowley | Mar 2000 | A |
6038637 | Berube et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044008 | Choi | Mar 2000 | A |
6048740 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049856 | Bolyn | Apr 2000 | A |
6051866 | Shaw et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052263 | Gill | Apr 2000 | A |
6052313 | Atsumi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060724 | Flory et al. | May 2000 | A |
6062931 | Chuang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063243 | Zettl et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064107 | Yeh et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069380 | Chou et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072718 | Abraham et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083624 | Hiura | Jul 2000 | A |
6087293 | Carnahan et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088760 | Walker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104633 | Abraham et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105381 | Ghoshal | Aug 2000 | A |
6108725 | Chatter | Aug 2000 | A |
6128214 | Kuekes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136160 | Hrkut et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138219 | Soman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146227 | Mancevski | Nov 2000 | A |
6156256 | Kennel | Dec 2000 | A |
6159620 | Heath et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159742 | Lieber et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165890 | Kohl et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166948 | Parkin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6177703 | Cunningham | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183714 | Smalley et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187823 | Haddon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190634 | Lieber et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198655 | Heath et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203814 | Fisher et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203864 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212597 | Conlin et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219212 | Gill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221330 | Moy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226722 | Shippy et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231744 | Ying et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231980 | Cohen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232706 | Dai et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233665 | Bolyn | May 2001 | B1 |
6237130 | Soman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239547 | Uemura et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6250984 | Jin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256767 | Kuekes et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259277 | Tour et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262469 | Le et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277318 | Bower et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6300205 | Fulford et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314019 | Kuekes et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320428 | Atsumi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322713 | Choi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325909 | Li et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331209 | Jang et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346413 | Fodor et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348295 | Griffith et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348700 | Ellenbogen et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350488 | Lee et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358756 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361861 | Gao et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6362073 | Kim | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6380434 | Chiang | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6400088 | Livingston et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6400091 | Deguchi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406776 | D'Evelyn | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407443 | Chen et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6413487 | Resasco et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417606 | Nakamoto et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420726 | Choi et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6421271 | Gogl et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422450 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423583 | Avouris et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426134 | Lavin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432740 | Chen | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443901 | Fraser | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6495116 | Herman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6515339 | Shin et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6518156 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6566983 | Shin | May 2003 | B2 |
6574130 | Segal et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
20010004979 | Han et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010023123 | Kim | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010023986 | Mancevski | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020055010 | Gao et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020061441 | Ogura et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068170 | Smalley et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020081380 | Dillon et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020081787 | Kohl et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088938 | Colbert et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090331 | Smalley et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092983 | Colbert et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092984 | Colbert et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020096634 | Colbert et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098135 | Smalley et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020102193 | Smalley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020102194 | Smalley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020102196 | Smalley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020102353 | Mauthner et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112814 | Hafner et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020125805 | Hsu | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130353 | Lieber et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020160111 | Sun et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172639 | Horiuchi | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173083 | Avouris et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175323 | Guillom et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175390 | Goldstein et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020179434 | Dai et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004058 | Li et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021968 | Segal et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 217 023 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0 269 225 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0 269 225 | Jun 1988 | EP |
441409 | Jul 1988 | EP |
441409 | Jul 1988 | EP |
0 269 716 | Dec 1988 | EP |
0 296 716 | Dec 1988 | EP |
0 315 392 | May 1989 | EP |
0 315 392 | May 1989 | EP |
426282 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 613 130 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0 688 618 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 665 187 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 688 618 | Aug 1995 | EP |
758028 | Jul 1996 | EP |
1209123 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0 665 187 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0 947 466 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0 989 579 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0 945 402 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 046 613 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1225613 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1 052 520 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1 054 249 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1 059 266 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 061 040 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 061 043 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 061 044 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 061 544 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 061 555 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 069 206 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 072 693 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1132920 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1 100 106 | May 2001 | EP |
1 100 297 | May 2001 | EP |
1205436 | Nov 2001 | EP |
2364933 | Jul 2001 | GB |
11-011917 | Jan 1999 | JP |
WO 9502709 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9638410 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9641043 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9722971 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9709272 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9731139 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9743473 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9826871 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9839250 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9839251 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9842620 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9848456 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9906618 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 0009443 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 0008650 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9947570 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9948810 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9958748 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 9965821 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0009443 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0017101 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0019494 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0063115 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0073204 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0103208 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0044094 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0048195 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0118246 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0123303 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0063115 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0073204 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0103208 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0237500 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0144796 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0219420 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0238496 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0242204 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0248701 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0248822 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 02054505 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 02059898 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02060812 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02060813 | Jan 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030021966 A1 | Jan 2003 | US |