The claimed invention generally relates to a device for measuring electrostatic charge, and more particularly to a device that measures an electrostatic charge and allows for the measurement range to be changed during the measurement process.
An electrometer is an electronic circuit designed to measure very small currents (10−16 to 10−3 Ampere). Electrometers are commonly used to measure electrostatic charge on objects using a shielded sensing electrode such as a Faraday cup.
QX=−VOUT·Cint
Unfortunately, one difficulty with the measurement illustrated in
Since the measurement range of an electrometer being used to measure electrostatic charge is determined by the integrating capacitor that must be selected prior to a measurement, the range cannot be changed during the measurement because the charge on the integrating capacitor would have to transfer to the newly selected integrating capacitor without loss of charge. If the range selected is too sensitive, that is, the integrating capacitor selected is too small, the output of the high gain differential amplifier 40 will saturate and information on the charge being measured will be lost. If the measurement range selected is too big, that is, the integrating capacitor selected is too big, the instrument will lack the sensitivity to provide a useful reading. For example, assume that an operator selects a very big measurement range, 10−3 Coulombs/volt, utilizing a very large 1 mF capacitor. If the charge to be measured is 1 nC, the resulting output voltage will be only 0.000001 V. The high gain differential amplifier 40 would have to be very sensitive and the factor used to scale the voltage to determine the charge would have to be accurate to 6 significant figures. Calibration of sensitive equipment is, at best, 0.1% or 4 significant digits, which is a factor of 100× less than required.
Furthermore, electrometers used to measure charge need to be reset prior to making a measurement to insure that the charge stored on the integrating capacitor is zero. The time needed to discharge the integrating capacitor often exceeds 100 mS which is too long for many applications. Faster discharge times are desirable.
Furthermore, the components used in electrometers, such as the high gain differential amplifiers, may be susceptible to damage from electrostatic discharge (ESD) events or sparks. It would also be desirable to have an electrometer which was less susceptible to ESD damage.
Therefore, there is an need for a more versatile and efficient electrometer. In particular, it would be desirable to have an electrometer for use in electrostatic charge measurement which is capable of range adjustment during measurement, is simple and relatively inexpensive to manufacture, and which preferably has a shortened zero reset time and protection against electrostatic discharge.
An electrometer is disclosed. The electrometer has a high gain differential amplifier having a first input, a second input, and an output. The electrometer also has feedback switching circuitry. The electrometer further has a plurality of feedback elements configured to be selectively and cumulatively added in any parallel combination between the output and the first input of the high gain differential amplifier via the feedback switching circuitry.
A method of adjusting a measurement range of an electrometer while the electrometer is being used to measure an electrostatic charge is also disclosed. One or more additional feedback elements are selectively added in parallel with one or more existing feedback elements which are coupled between an output and an input of a high gain differential amplifier of the electrometer.
Another electrometer is also disclosed. The electrometer has a) a high gain differential amplifier having a first input, a second input, and an output. The electrometer also has b) a sensing electrode coupled to the first input of the high gain differential amplifier. The electrometer further has c) a level detector circuit configured to monitor the output of the high gain differential amplifier. The electrometer also has d) a plurality of integrating capacitors; and e) one or more feedback switches. The plurality of integrating capacitors are coupled in parallel circuit paths between the first input and the output of the high gain differential amplifier. Each of the one or more feedback switches is coupled in series with at least one of the plurality of integrating capacitors. The electrometer also has f) control circuitry coupled to the level detector circuit and the one or more feedback switches, such that the control circuitry adds one or more of the plurality of integrating capacitors in parallel combination between the output and the first input of the high gain differential amplifier by completing one or more of the parallel circuit paths via the one or more feedback switches depending on an output of the level detector circuit. A charge measured by the electrometer is proportional to a voltage of the high gain differential amplifier output multiplied by a total feedback capacitance from the plurality of integrating capacitors which have been selectively and cumulatively added in parallel combination between the output and the first input of the high gain differential amplifier via control circuitry and the one or more feedback switches.
It will be appreciated that for purposes of clarity and where deemed appropriate, reference numerals have been repeated in the figures to indicate corresponding features, and that the various elements in the drawings have not necessarily been drawn to scale in order to better show the features.
The first input 54 may be configured to be coupled to a sensing electrode 64. In other embodiments, the sensing electrode 64 may be integral with the electrometer 50 and therefore already coupled to the electrometer 50. When an electrostatically charged object (not shown) is brought near the sensing electrode 64, it may induce an opposite charge on the sensing electrode 64. The induced charge on the sensing electrode 64 is drawn through the one or more feedback elements 62 which are added in parallel combination between the output 58 and the first input 54 of the high gain differential amplifier 52 by the feedback switching circuitry 60. Examples of this operation will be discussed in more detail in later embodiments.
The embodied electrometer of
Depending on the type of electrometer being used, the feedback elements may be integrating capacitors or feedback resistors. If the feedback elements are integrating capacitors 72, then a measured electrostatic charge may be determined 74 as being proportional to an output voltage of the high gain differential amplifier multiplied by a total integrating capacitance of the one or more existing feedback elements and the one or more additional feedback elements between the input and the output of the high gain differential amplifier. If the feedback elements are feedback resistors 76, then a measure electrostatic charge may be determined 78 as being a numerical integration of a scaled digital conversion of an output voltage from the high gain differential amplifier, wherein the output voltage is scaled by an adjustable scale factor inversely proportional to a total feedback resistance of the one or more existing feedback elements and the one or more additional feedback elements between the input and the output of the high gain differential amplifier.
A sensing electrode 84 is provided as part of a Faraday cup 86 and is coupled to the first input 54 of the high gain differential amplifier 52 by a shielded cable 88. The Faraday cup 86 provides an outer shielding electrode 90 to further isolate the sensing electrode 84.
Prior to making a measurement, switches 82, S2, S3, S4, and S5 are all closed for the zero reset. To initiate the measurement, all switches are opened. As the object with static charge QX is placed within the Faraday cup 86, the output voltage VOUT of the high gain differential amplifier 52 increases as charge accumulates on Cint,1. If the output voltage approaches the maximum output voltage of the amplifier, S2 is closed to add capacitance and lower the voltage. Switches S2, S3, S4, and S5 are closed in sequence to maintain the output voltage within the operating range of the high gain differential amplifier.
If QX exceeds 10 pC, the output voltage will exceed 10 V and the output voltage of the differential amplifier will saturate. When VOUT exceeds a threshold voltage, say 9V, switch S2 is closed adding capacitor Cint,2 to the circuit. Assume that Cint,2 is 9 pF. With S2 closed, the output voltage is now given by (2).
When switch S2 is closed, the output voltage VOUT of the high gain differential amplifier 52 decreases by 10× enabling the electrometer to accurately measure charges up to 100 pC. In fact, using the Cint values given in Table 1, the output voltage of the differential amplifier is given in (3).
The electrometer illustrated in
QX=−VOUT·Cint,total (4)
where Cint,total is the total capacitance which has been added in parallel between the input and the output of the high gain differential amplifier as indicated by Vscale.
The computed value of capacitor C1 is given in (5).
QMIN<QMEASURED<QMAX (6)
C2V−<QMEASURED<C2V+ (7)
(0.22 μF)(−9 V)<QMEASURED<(0.22 μF)(+9 V) (8)
−2.0 μC<QMEASURED<+2.0 μC (9)
The sequence for using the circuit in
Note that in Sequence Step 10, voltage V1 increases measurably from +10.0 volts to +10.092 volts. This increase in voltage is caused by a small off-set current in the input amplifier of the data acquisition system. This increase of 0.092 volts does not alter significantly the operation of the circuit.
The value of integrating capacitor C2 is determined by equating the measured charge QMEASURED to the charge stored on capacitor C1 as shown in (10)-(12):
CINTEGRATING=C2+C3=0.228 μF+1.5 μF=1.7 μF (13)
The range of charge that can be measured using this circuit is determined by the value of the integrating capacitance CINTEGRATING and the voltage range of the Op Amp as in (14) through (17).
QMIN<QMEASURED<QMAX (14)
CINTEGRATINGV−<QMEASURED<CINTEGRATINGV+ (15)
(1.7 μF)(−9 V)<QMEASURED<(1.7 μF)(+9 V) (16)
−15 μC<QMEASURED<+15 μC (17)
Note that the measurement range of the circuit is extended from ±2.0 μC to ±15 μC. The sequence for using the circuit in
Note that in Sequence Step 10, voltage V1 increases measurably from +10.0 volts to +10.12 volts. This increase in voltage is caused by a small off-set current in the input amplifier of the data acquisition system. This increase of 0.12 volts does not alter significantly the operation of the circuit.
The value of integrating capacitor C2 is determined by equating the measured charge QMEASURED to the charge stored on capacitor C1 as in (10) through (12).
Note that in Sequence Step 10, voltage V1 increases measurably from +10.0 volts to +10.09 volts. This increase in voltage is caused by a small off-set current in the input amplifier of the data acquisition system. This increase of 0.09 volts does not alter significantly the operation of the circuit.
The measurement range of the circuit is extended during a charge measurement, which demonstrates the feasibility of the auto-ranging method. The charge stored on capacitor C1 is given in (21).
Q1=C1V1=(0.108 μF)(10.09 V)=1.090 μC (21)
The measured charge prior to closing switch S3 is given in (22).
QMEASURED=−C2VOUT=(0.228 μF)(−4.877 V)=1.112 μC (22)
The charge measurement prior to closing switch S3 is repeatable to within 2%. Results from prototype circuits are typical repeatable to with 5%, which is consistent with these results. Repeatability would be much better using a hard wired, dedicated circuit. The measured charge after closing switch S3 is given in (23).
QMEASURED=−(C2+C3)VOUT=(0.228 μF+1.564 μF)(−0.631 V)=1.131 μC (23)
The charge measurement after closing switch S3 is repeatable to within 4%, which is consistent with the repeatability of prototype circuits. The use of the PS710A-1A does not significantly degrade the performance of the charge measuring circuit. Measurement repeatability would be much better using a hard wired, dedicated circuit.
During operation, the Level Detector Circuit (LDC) 114 monitors the output voltage VOUT of the high gain differential amplifier 102. When VOUT exceeds a predetermined maximum voltage, the LDC 114 generates an output signal that is monitored by the SSR-CC 112. The SSR-CC 112 closes switches S2, S3, S4, and S5 in sequence to maintain VOUT below the maximum voltage. The SSR-CC 112 generates an output signal Sout to indicate which switches have been closed. The Range Scale Control Circuit (RSCC) 116 monitors this signal and selects the correct scale factor from a Look-Up Table (LUT). The RSCC 116 generates output Nout so that the correct multiplying factor is used to scale VOUT to determine IX.
The input impedance of the high gain differential amplifier 102 is very high (>10+15Ω) so this current flows through the one or more feedback resistors RFB,1-RFB,5, depending on which ones have been enabled. The output voltage VOUT of the high gain differential amplifier is given in (24).
VOUT=−IXRFB (24)
VOUT is digitized by the analog to digital (A/D) converter 106. The output of the A/D 106 is multiplied by a scale factor 108 as in (26) to determine current IX. As just one example, using the feedback resistor values given in Table 5, the output voltage of the Differential Amplifier 102 is given in (26).
1.11 × 10+9 Ω
1.11 × 10+8 Ω
In (26), the notation (R1∥R2) means that the value of resistance is to be computed for resistors R1 and R2 connected in parallel as defined in (25).
The current is then numerically integrated as in (27) to accomplish the measurement of QX.
QX=∫IXdt (27)
Logarithmic amplifiers have very wide dynamic range. For example, the Texas Instruments LOG114 has an operating voltage of ±5V and input current range of 8 decades (100 pA to 10 mA). No switching of feedback components is needed in the embodiment of
As just one example of how the filter 138 could be designed, consider the following example, where a passive, 2nd order, low-pass filter is designed to achieve 3 objectives:
1. The cut-off frequency is chosen to be half the Nyquist frequency. If the A/D converter in the numerically integrating electrometer is clocked at 100 KHz, the Nyquist frequency is 50 KHz and the filter will have a design cut-off frequency of 50 KHz.
2. Resistor R will be chosen to provide maximally flat (Butterworth) response.
3. The individual components must be chosen to be robust against energetic current pulses characteristic of ESD events (sparks) that commonly occur when measuring electrostatic charge.
The transfer function for the circuit shown in
The cut-off frequency is given in (29)
The resistor is chosen to provide maximally flat response.
Shown in Table 6 are the component values for one implementation of the filter shown illustrated in
It is desirable to use a filter with the highest possible cut-off frequency that satisfies the design criteria. The higher cut-off frequency enables the design to use smaller inductors with lower coupling capacitance resulting in higher self-resonant frequencies. This is desirable for effective ESD protection. A low-pass filter with a cut-off frequency of 100 KHz should provide effective ESD protection. Most of the electrical energy in ESD events (sparks) is at high frequency (greater than 1 MHz) since the sparks last for only a few nanoseconds (10−9 s).
Having thus described several embodiments of the claimed invention, it will be rather apparent to those skilled in the art that the foregoing detailed disclosure is intended to be presented by way of example only, and is not limiting. Various alterations, improvements, and modifications will occur and are intended to those skilled in the art, though not expressly stated herein. These alterations, improvements, and modifications are intended to be suggested hereby, and are within the spirit and the scope of the claimed invention. Additionally, the recited order of the processing elements or sequences, or the use of numbers, letters, or other designations therefore, is not intended to limit the claimed processes to any order except as may be specified in the claims. Accordingly, the claimed invention is limited only by the following claims and equivalents thereto.
This patent application claims priority to provisional U.S. Patent Application 60/956,004 filed on Aug. 15, 2007 and entitled, “AUTO-RANGING ELECTROMETER AND METHOD OF USE FOR MEASURING ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE.” Provisional U.S. Patent Application 60/954,004 is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4050019 | Nirschl | Sep 1977 | A |
4873489 | Melcher et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
5235385 | Rushing | Aug 1993 | A |
5719502 | Verbiest et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6462552 | Suzuki | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7098644 | Denison | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7230431 | Mirme | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7238936 | Okamura et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20050162173 | Mirme | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Robinson et al., “Spark Protection Circuit for Measuring Current in High-Voltage Circuits”, Journal of Electrostatics (63), 2005, pp. 285-296. |
Acharya et al., “A Low-Current Logarithmic LED Electrometer”, IEEE Transaction on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 49, No. 1, Feb. 2000, pp. 5-9. |
Denison et al., “A Self-Resonant MEMS-Based Electrometer”, IMTC 2007—IEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, May 1-3, 2007, pp. 1-5. |
Ericson et al., “A Wide-Range Logarithmic Electrometer with Improved Accuracy and Temperature Stability”, IEEE, 1992, pp. 454-459. |
Ericson et al., “A Wide-Range Logarithmic Electrometer with Improved Accuracy and Temperature Stability”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 41, No. 6, Dec. 1992, pp. 968-973. |
Kim et al., “Performance Evaluation of an Electrometer”, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual EMBS International Conference, Jul. 23-28, 2000, pp. 511-513. |
Morin II et al., “An Absolute Charge Sensor for Fluid Electrification Measurements”, IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation, vol. 26, No. 2, Apr. 1991, pp. 181-199. |
Nils-Gunnar et al., “An Electrometer Amplifier with Low Input Capacitance and Large Input Dynamic Range”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Mar. 1972, pp. 162-164. |
Park et al., “A Novel Ultrafine Particle Mesurement System with an Electrometer”, IEEE, 2005, pp. 227-230. |
Praglin et al., “High-Speed Electrometers for Rocket and Satellite Experiments”, 1960, pp. 771-779. |
Rietveld et al., “Vibration Reed Electrometer for Accurate Measurements of Electrical Currents Below 10pA”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 56, No. 2, Apr. 2007, pp. 559-563. |
Victoreen et al., “Electrometer Tubes for the Measurement of Small Currents”, Proceeding of the I.R.E. Waves and Electrons Section, Apr. 1949 pp. 432-441. |
Wickstrom et al., “A Simple, Inexpensive Electrometer Used to Measure Currents of Individual Silicon Vidicon Diodes in the 10^-16 to 10^-15 Ampere Range”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Aug. 1970, pp. 634-636. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090045816 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60956004 | Aug 2007 | US |