The present invention relates to magnetic head fabrication, and more particularly, this invention relates to a method for reducing blade distortion during slicing of a wafer.
Die separation, or dicing, by sawing is the process of cutting a thin film microelectronic substrate into its individual read/write recording devices with a rotating circular abrasive saw blade. This process has proven to be the most efficient and economical method in use today. It provides versatility in selection of depth and width (kerf) of cut, as well as selection of surface finish, and can be used to saw either partially or completely through a wafer or substrate.
Wafer dicing technology has progressed rapidly, and dicing is now a mandatory procedure in most front-end thin film packaging operations. It is used extensively for separation of die on thin film integrated circuit wafers.
Dicing thin film wafers by sawing is an abrasive machining process similar to grinding and cutoff operations that have been in use for decades. However, the size of the dicing blades used for die separation makes the process unique. Typically, the blade thickness ranges from 0.6 mils to 500 mils, and diamond particles (the hardest known material) are used as the abrasive material ingredient. Because of the diamond dicing blade's extreme fineness, compliance with a strict set of parameters is imperative, and even the slightest deviation from the norm could result in complete failure.
The diamond blade is a cutting tool in which each exposed diamond particle comprises a small cutting edge. Three basic types of dicing blades are available commercially:
Sintered Diamond Blade, in which diamond particles are fused into a soft metal such as brass or copper, or incorporated by means of a powdered metallurgical process.
Plated Diamond Blade, in which diamond particles are held in a nickel bond produced by an electroplating process.
Resinoid Diamond Blade, in which diamond particles are held in a resin bond to create a homogeneous matrix.
Thin film wafer dicing is dominated by the plated diamond blade, which has proved most successful for this application.
Increasing use of more expensive and exotic materials, coupled with the fact that they are often combined to produce multiple layers of dissimilar materials, adds further to the dicing problems. The high cost of these substrates, together with the value of the circuits fabricated on them, makes it difficult to accept anything less than high yield at the die-separation phase.
Thin film wafers are of a standardized size, and thus, the number of die that can be cut from each wafer is limited. To maximize the amount of wafer space that can be used for circuitry, and thus the die yield per wafer, the area cut away during slicing must be minimized. This can be accomplished only by using thinner blades and by elimination of yield loss due to deviation of the blade from the desired cut path.
One category of component created by thin film processing is the tape head. Many heads (such as hard disk recording heads and some tape heads) do not use closures, so they are relatively easy to slice. However, most conventional tape heads use closures.
For those heads that use closures, a problem arises during slicing by state of the art methods. To maximize yield, the cut is made through the wafer 202 such that it shaves off one edge of the closure 104. See
Cutting the wafer along side the closure rather than through the edge of the closure is not desirable for cutting rows from the wafer because of the typically high margin of error during sawing. By moving the saw path closer to the circuitry, the blade is more likely cut into the read/write circuitry, rendering the die unusable. The only remedy under this traditional method of cutting would be to increase the size of each row on the wafer to compensate for blade deviation or to accommodate a thicker blade. Either way, the end result would be an undesirable decrease in yield.
It would be desirable to achieve the aforementioned benefits using conventional, and therefore, less expensive blades. It would also be desirable to use a thinner blade to allow a higher yield per wafer. It would also be desirable to decrease the error rate caused by deviation of the blade during sawing
An electronic component, comprising: a portion of a row cut from a wafer; and a closure coupled to the portion of the row of the wafer towards a first edge of the portion of the row of the wafer; the portion of the row of the wafer having a bonding area positioned adjacent a second edge of the portion of the row of the wafer, the second edge of the portion of the row of the wafer being positioned opposite the first edge of the portion of the row of the wafer and along a same side thereof, wherein the bonding area includes a layer of adhesive thereon.
For a fuller understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention, as well as the preferred mode of use, reference should be made to the following detailed description read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The following description is the best embodiment presently contemplated for carrying out the present invention. This description is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the present invention and is not meant to limit the inventive concepts claimed herein.
The present invention provides a method and mechanism for slicing a thin film wafer to form such things as tape head components. A thin film wafer can be any type of composite or composition capable of containing circuitry therein, and includes semiconductor wafers.
According to the preferred method, the thin film wafer is cut into rectangular sections, sometimes called quads.
A top portion 504 of the array 500 of closures 502 may be removed prior to slicing the section 400 into rows 402. See
As shown in
One way to ensure that blade 900 engages equal surface areas of the closure 502 is to increase the size of the closure 502 such that the closure 502 overlaps the kerf completely. For example, if sawing is performed with a 120 micron blade 900, the closure 502 should cover about a 125 micron kerf (120 micron cutting width plus 5 microns to allow for deviation). The excess amount of closure can be removed later, as discussed below.
Another way is to use a very thin blade 900 that fully engages the closure 502. The cutting width of the blade is less than the width of the closure, where the width of the closure is defined opposite sides of the closure that are oriented generally parallel to the rotational plane of the blade. Preferably, the cutting width of the blade is less than three quarters (75%), and ideally less than one half (50%), the width of the closure. The cutting width of the blade 900 is preferably less than 150 microns, more preferably less than 100 microns, and ideally less than 75 microns. The closure 502 actually aids the blade 900 in keeping its shape because the amount of material on each side of the blade 900 is the same.
The sliver 1002 can be removed mechanically, i.e., by some physical mechanism, without removing material from the row. One example would be by using human labor and an implement such as tweezers. Optionally, the row 402 can be thermally treated for at least temporarily affecting properties of an adhesive bonding the sliver 1002 onto the row 402 for assisting removal of the sliver 1002. For example, depending on the type of adhesive used to bond the closure 502 to the wafer, the temperature of the row 402 can be reduced to make the adhesive become temporarily brittle, and thereby make the sliver 1002 easier to remove. For example, if adhesive becomes brittle at temperatures below −60° C., the temperature of the row 402 can be reduced to below −60° C. prior to removing the sliver 1002.
In use, the thin film elements created by the process and instruments described herein can be used in magnetic recording heads for any type of magnetic media, including but not limited to disk media, magnetic tape, etc.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. For example, the structures and methodologies presented herein are generic in their application to all types of thin film devices. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/036,148, filed Jan. 14, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,446,974, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/346,033, filed Jan. 15, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,863,061.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5029418 | Bull | Jul 1991 | A |
5718615 | Boucher et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5883770 | Biskeborn et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6122147 | Fahimi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6276355 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6295978 | Wark et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6354909 | Boucher et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6404587 | Chaug et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6611398 | Rumpler et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6646830 | Biskeborn et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6691697 | Leu | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6744594 | Denison et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6781792 | Biskeborn | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6885518 | Chaug | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6943987 | Raymond et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7161764 | Biskeborn et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7446974 | Deshpande et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20030039070 | Biskeborn et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
60197372 | Oct 1985 | JP |
4162647 | Jun 1992 | JP |
4254352 | Sep 1992 | JP |
6328433 | Nov 1994 | JP |
2001250800 | Sep 2001 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080218904 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10346033 | Jan 2003 | US |
Child | 11036148 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11036148 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 12106983 | US |