This disclosure relates generally to nanotechnology, nanofabrication and nanoelectronics, and more particularly to systems, devices, and processes for electronic sensing and analyzing of individual biomolecules, including DNA and proteins.
Since the discovery of DNA, there has been a concerted effort to develop ways to actually experimentally determine the sequences of the constitutive chemical bases. The first method for systematically sequencing DNA was introduced by Sanger in 1978.
This basic method was automated in a commercial instrument platform in the late 1980's, enabling the sequencing of the first human genome. The success of this effort motivated the development of a number of “massively parallel” sequencing platforms, with the goal of dramatically reducing the cost and time required to sequence a human genome. These automated methods generally rely on processing millions to billions of sequencing reactions at the same time, in highly miniaturized microfluidic formats.
Although a variety of other related techniques and commercial platforms followed, further improvements in quality and accuracy of sequencing, as well as reductions in cost and time, remain highly desirable. This is especially true to make genome sequencing practical for widespread use in precision medicine, where it is desirable to sequence the genomes of millions of individuals with a clinical grade of quality. Further, many DNA sequencing techniques utilize optical means with fluorescence reporters. Such methods can be cumbersome, slow in detection speed, and difficult to mass produce or make affordable. Label-free DNA or genome sequencing approaches would have the advantages of not having to use fluorescent type labeling processes and associated optical systems, and are thus particularly needed.
This invention discloses new, manufacturable and highly-scalable techniques of sub-10 nm nano-electrode design and fabrication, which comprise parts of label-free DNA or genome sequencing methods, apparatus, and applications.
This invention provides unique structures, compositions and means of manufacturing the same, for extremely small and high-density nano-electrode arrays for use in electronic DNA sequencing systems. Such nano-electrode systems may also be used in analyzing other types of biomolecules, such as proteins, depending on how the nano-electrodes are functionalized to interact with biomolecule sensing targets. In general, the nano-electrode systems disclosed herein may comprise part of a system for such biomolecule analysis, wherein the nano-electrode system is coupled to biomolecules to constitute a molecular electronics sensor with specific application to sensing and characterizing a biomolecule target, in particular applications to sequencing of a DNA molecule, or a collection of such molecules constituting an entire genome.
In various aspects of the present disclosure, a method of manufacturing a device for DNA or genome sequencing is disclosed. The method includes: disposing a pair of electrodes on a substrate with the electrodes separated by a nanogap; depositing a resist layer over the pair of electrodes; patterning the resist layer to create an exposed region on each electrode at or near the nanogap; exposing the electrodes to plasma etching or gold (Au) ion beam implantation to roughen the surface within each exposed region; and exposing the exposed regions to a biomolecule, wherein the biomolecule has at least first and second ends, with each end including a functionalization for bonding to the pair of electrodes, wherein the biomolecule bridges the nanogap, with the first and second ends of the biomolecule being bound to the exposed regions.
In certain aspects, the resist layer may be an electrically insulating polymer or an oxide coating measuring from about 3 nm to about 20 nm in thickness, and the electrodes may be gold (Au) electrodes. In some examples, the patterning used is e-beam or nano-lithography.
In various embodiments, plasma etching includes RF plasma, DC plasma or sputter etching processes. The plasma etching or the Au ion beam implantation step results in an increase in the surface area of the electrode within each exposed region by at least 50% from the surface area of the exposed region prior to plasma etching or Au ion beam implantation.
In various embodiments of the present invention, a method of manufacturing a device for DNA or genome sequencing is disclosed. The method includes: disposing a pair of electrodes on a substrate, with the electrodes separated by a nanogap; depositing a resist layer over the pair of electrodes; patterning the resist layer to create an exposed region on each electrode at or near the nanogap; exposing the electrodes to Au nanoparticles, wherein the Au nanoparticles attach to the electrode surfaces within each exposed region; annealing the array at from about 200° to about 500° C. to bond the Au nanoparticles to the electrode surface; and exposing the exposed regions to a biomolecule, wherein the biomolecule has at least first and second ends, with each end including a functionalization for bonding to the pair of electrodes, wherein each biomolecule bridges the nanogap, with the first and second ends of the biomolecule being bound to the exposed regions. In certain examples, the resist layer is an electrically insulating ceramic layer such as Al2O3 or SiO2 and the electrodes are gold (Au). The patterning step may include e-beam or nano-lithography.
In various embodiments of the present disclosure, a method of manufacturing a device for DNA or genome sequencing is disclosed. The method includes: disposing a pair of Au metal alloy electrodes on a substrate with the electrodes separated by a nanogap; depositing a resist layer over the electrode pair; patterning the resist layer to create an exposed region on each electrode at or near the nanogap; exposing the electrodes to an etchant solution to selectively remove the non-Au metal from the alloy within each exposed region; and exposing the exposed regions to a biomolecule, wherein the biomolecule has at least first and second ends, with each end including a functionalization for bonding to the pair of electrodes, wherein each biomolecule bridges the nanogap, with the first and second ends of the biomolecule being bound to the exposed regions. The Au metal alloy may be selected from the group consisting of Au—Si, Au—Ge, Au—Bi, Au—Co, Au—Mo, Au—Rh, Au—Ru, and Au—W. In certain aspects, the resist layer is an electrically insulating ceramic layer such as Al2O3 or SiO2.
In certain examples, the method may further include a step of annealing at from about 200° to about 600° C. for about 10 minutes to about 12 hours to promote phase separation between the Au and non-Au metal.
In various embodiments of the present disclosure, a method of manufacturing a device for DNA or genome sequencing is disclosed. The method includes: disposing a pair of electrodes on a substrate, the electrodes separated by a nanogap; depositing a resist layer over the electrode pair; patterning the resist layer to create an exposed region on each electrode at or near the nanogap; depositing Au—Ag or Au—Cu alloy onto the electrode surface within each exposed region; exposing the electrodes to an etchant solution to selectively remove the non-Au metal from the alloy deposited within each exposed region; and exposing the exposed regions to a biomolecule, wherein the biomolecule has at least first and second ends, with each end including a functionalization for bonding to the pair of electrodes, wherein each biomolecule bridges the nanogap, with the first and second ends of the biomolecule being bound to the exposed regions. In certain examples, the resist layer is an electrically insulating ceramic layer such as Al2O3 or SiO2. Also, the electrodes can be gold (Au) electrodes. In various examples, the patterning process includes e-beam or nano-lithography.
In various embodiments of the present disclosure, a method of manufacturing a device for DNA or genome sequencing is disclosed. The method includes: disposing a pair of electrodes on a substrate, the electrodes separated by a nanogap; depositing a latchable magnetic layer over the electrodes; depositing a resist layer over the latchable magnetic layer; patterning the resist layer to create an exposed region at or near the nanogap in which the latchable magnetic layer is exposed; exposing the electrodes to an external magnetic field or to an applied voltage to magnetize the latchable magnetic layer; and exposing the exposed regions to a biomolecule, wherein the biomolecule has at least first and second ends with each end tagged with a magnetic nanoparticle for attraction to the magnetized latchable magnetic layer, wherein the biomolecule bridges the nanogap, with each magnetic nanoparticle held to each electrode at the exposed regions. In certain examples, the latchable magnetic layer is a FeCrCo or FeCuNi spinodal alloy with Hc higher than 10 Oe. This method may further include a step of depositing a layer of Au over the latchable magnetic layer prior to the step of patterning the resist layer. Further, the magnetic layer can be magnetized or demagnetized to enable magnetically attracted attachment of magnetic nanoparticle-tagged biomolecules or removal and cleaning-out of attached magnetic nanoparticle-tagged biomolecules with a permanent magnet sweep, allowing multiple repeat operations of the device.
In various embodiments of the present disclosure, a method of manufacturing a device for DNA or genome sequencing is disclosed. The method includes: disposing a pair of platinum (Pt) or rhenium (Rh) electrodes on a substrate, the electrodes separated by a nanogap; depositing a gold (Au) film measuring from about 1 nm to about 10 nm in thickness over the electrode pair; patterning the resist layer to create an exposed region on each electrode at or near the nanogap; annealing the electrodes to induce spheroidization of the Au film into Au spheres, with one sphere disposed within each exposed region; etching the spheres to reduce the height of the spheres; repeating the annealing and etching steps at least two more times; and exposing the Au spheres to a biomolecule, wherein the biomolecule has at least first and second ends, with each end including a functionalization for bonding to the Au spheres, wherein the biomolecule bridges the nanogap, with the first and second ends of the biomolecule being bound to the Au spheres. In this method, the annealing can be from about 200° to about 400° C. for about 10 minutes to about 12 hours, or the time/temperature sufficient to cause spheroidization. The etching step may include at least one of ion milling, sputter etching, and masking and chemical dissolution.
The subject matter of the present disclosure is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. A more complete understanding of the present disclosure, however, may best be obtained by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in connection with the drawing figures.
It is to be understood that the drawings are for purposes of illustrating the concepts of the invention and are not to scale.
The detailed description of embodiments herein makes reference to the accompanying drawings, which show particular embodiments by way of illustration. While these embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, it should be understood that other embodiments may be realized and that logical, chemical, and mechanical changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the inventions. Thus, the detailed description herein is presented for purposes of illustration and not as a source of limitation. For example, unless otherwise noted, the steps recited in any of the method or process descriptions may be executed in any order and are not necessarily limited to the order presented. Furthermore, any reference to singular includes plural embodiments, and any reference to more than one component or step may include a singular embodiment or step. Also, any reference to attached, fixed, connected or the like may include permanent, removable, temporary, partial, full and/or any other possible attachment option. Additionally, any reference to without contact (or similar phrases) may also include reduced contact or minimal contact.
Any term not expressly defined should be given the common meaning known to a person skilled in the art.
As used herein, the term “sub-10 nm” refers to the size of devices and components therein, and the scale at which methods can be executed. In particular, the term refers to physical structures measuring less than about 10 nm in size, and the ability to manipulate steps in various processes on a scale of less than about 10 nm.
As used herein, the term “nanogap” refers to a space, or “gap,” between elements, such as between two electrodes or two conductive islands, measuring in the nanometer range. Similarly, the term “nanogapped” refers to two elements having a gap between them on a nanometer scale.
As used herein, the term “label-free” refers to a process that does not require fluorescence labeling, or is in other words, is “fluorescence-free.”
As used herein, symbols for atomic elements and the associated names of the elements may be used interchangeably, or together. For example, the element gold may be denoted herein “Au,” “gold,” or “gold (Au).”
As used herein, the term “latchable magnetic stripe” (or “latchable magnetic layer”) refers to a thin film or layer of magnetizable material having a capability to change magnetization direction in response to an external magnetic field, such as a layer having magnetic properties that are programmable and reconfigurable as an applied field or an applied voltage is altered.
DNA or genome sequencing by electronic conductance measurements often entails using devices comprising a pair of electrically separated, conductive islands onto which a biomolecule is bridged, and through which electronic current or voltage signals are detected. Referring to the drawings,
Nanoscale particles, such as, for example, ˜5 nm diameter gold nanoparticles, are difficult to accurately position and place directly on an electrode surface, such as on to a Pt electrode. In certain instances, Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) or Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM) methods may be used to pick-up, move, and release an individual Au nanoparticle onto an electrode surface, whereby van der Walls forces assist in holding the nanoparticle at its intended location, such as illustrated in
Therefore, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, the Au nanoparticle is more strongly bonded onto the electrode surface such that the contact area of the Au particle used in the bonding with the electrode surface comprises at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90%, and even more preferably up to 100% of the Au particle diameter, as illustrated in the top example in
Another embodiment according to the disclosure avoids fabricating Au islands on Pt electrodes entirely, relying instead on exposed portions of Au electrodes for biomolecule bonding and bridging. As illustrated in the third example in
In alternative embodiments, Al2O3, SiO2 or Si3N4, or other oxide or nitride layers, may be deposited on the Au electrodes and used as an insulating layer instead of using a polymer resist layer. In this case, a very thin adhesion layer, such as a 1-3 nm thick Ti layer, may be deposited on the Au electrode surface before the oxide or nitride coating is applied. This protective coating, whether polymeric or ceramic, serves as an electrical insulator and also as a coating that prevents or minimizes the adhesion of biomolecules at unwanted locations.
Referring to
The process depicted sequentially in
For molecular electronics devices, including those for protein analysis or DNA/genome sequencing, parallel electronic sensing using an array of many electrode pair devices is desirable. In order to package more electrical measurement devices and circuits within a given space, the electrode dimensions must be reduced to micro- or nano-dimensions. An array of nano-electrodes having the geometry such as shown in
In DNA and genome sequencing comprising label-free electronic detection, as well as molecular electronics devices in general, a strong and reliable biomolecule-to-electrode (or biomolecule-to-conductive island) attachment is essential, so as to obtain reproducibly strong, noise-reduced signals during electronic interrogation of nucleotide interaction with the biomolecule. Attachment of a biomolecule to a surface can be enhanced if the surface is “roughened,” meaning that the surface is modified in a way that increases the surface area onto which the biomolecule is to attach. Ordinarily it is difficult to make branched or porous structures on what are already nano-dimensioned (e.g., 5-10 nm area) structures. However, in accordance with the present disclosure, this difficulty has been overcome, whereby further subdivided nanostructures for enhanced adhesion of biomolecules onto the electrode surface has been accomplished. An embodiment comprising subdivided nanostructures on an electrode surface is where an Au pillar, deposited on an electrode surface, is surface damaged in a way to make at least the top surface rough or porous.
Au surfaces allow for the opportunity to use thiol (—SH) groups on a biomolecule for adhesion (immobilization) of the biomolecule to the Au surface, through Au-sulfur bonding. Nonetheless, if biomolecule adhesion can be enhanced beyond the basic Au-sulfur bonding afforded by thiol groups, the reliability and signal-to-noise ratio in electronic, label-free sequencing can be significantly improved. According to the present disclosure, increasing the surface area of a nano-island of Au increases biomolecule binding to the Au. Herein, further surface nano-structuring of a sub-10 nm island of Au is disclosed.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Once the resist layer 48 is patterned, the exposed regions 44 are processed to increase the surface area within the exposed region 44.
A rough surface having an increased surface area can also be created by ion implantation, e.g., by using an Au ion beam. An example of a rough surface formed by ion beam implantation is illustrated as surface 441 in
Another embodiment used to increase the surface area of an Au island comprises attaching Au nanoparticles 421 to the exposed Au region, as shown in
Shown in
In various embodiments, the volume of porosity within an Au island region, characterized as branched or porous, is at least 10%, preferably at least 30%, and even more preferably at least 50%, so as to increase the surface area of the Au island at or near its top surface by at least by 20%, preferably by at least 40%, and even more preferably by at least 60% over a flat and smooth Au island structure.
With continued reference to the drawings,
A second embodiment (2) uses an all Au electrode configuration, with the Au electrode disposed in a rectangular shape but with much of the surface masked by insulator coating 58, except for an island-like region at the end of the electrode. The insulator coating may comprise polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), polyethylene glycol (PEG), polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), or their combinations, hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ), or various oxide coatings such as Al2O3, SiO2 or nitride coatings such as Si3N4 coating.
A third embodiment (3) comprises the fabrication of the Au electrodes in tapered shapes having sharp tip geometry, and then masking the majority of the surface of the electrode by insulator layer 580 at all other regions except for the sharp tips of the electrodes. PEG and PDMS have remarkably non-adhesive characteristics toward proteins and cells, which can be an additional advantage for electronic sequencing devices where protein adhesion at places other than on the Au island is undesirable.
As the adhesion of biomolecules is dependent on the size of an Au island, controlling the size of Au island is critical for securing the biomolecule in sequencing devices. In various embodiments, an optimal Au island size is from about 5 to about 9 nm in diameter. Too large a diameter or too small a diameter Au island does not enable reproducible and strong adhesion of biomolecules. Thus, in various aspects of the present disclosure, techniques are shown that are used to conveniently control the Au island diameter.
With continuing reference to the drawings,
Referring to the drawings,
Once the electronic sequencing device is in place, the magnetic layer is magnetized by an externally applied magnetic field, e.g., using a ferrite magnet or an electromagnet, at a field of e.g., 100-1,000 Oe. Then, using a surrounding microfluidic chamber, a liquid medium comprising biomolecules 72 already tagged with magnetic nanoparticles 71 is introduced. Biomolecules with magnetic nanoparticles bonded thereto may comprise antibody-antigen binding, streptavidin-biotin binding, peptide bonding, or electrical charge attraction, or other binding approach. A magnetic particle 71 with biomolecule 72 attached will then be attracted onto the exposed area of the magnetic stripe 791 where it will be magnetically and electrically anchored as illustrated in the lower drawing in
The magnetic nanoparticles to be tagged onto the biomolecules can be selected from Fe2O3, Fe3O4, or surface-protected or surface-functionalized metallic magnetic particles having higher magnetic moment than iron oxide, including Fe, Co, Ni and their alloys. The oxide-based magnetic nanoparticles are chemically stable, but the metal-based magnetic nanoparticles, while having 2-4 times higher magnetic moment, may lack the chemical stability in a liquid environment of genome sequencing. A slight surface oxidation as a protective coat against oxidation is desirable. Alternatively, the surface of magnetic nanoparticles can be Au-coated to provide chemical stability, as well as enhanced electrical conductivity and more affinity to biomolecules.
Once the desired magnetic attraction and biomolecule attachment has occurred, the liquid medium in the microfluidic chamber is washed away to remove unbonded biomolecules, and then the sequencing electronic measurements can be conducted and completed. A feature of such magnetic attachment technique is the reversibility of biomolecule attachment, i.e., easy detaching of biomolecules if needed. As the magnetic stripe (the portion of the magnetic layer on an electrode) can easily be demagnetized (e.g., by using gradually diminishing magnetic field of from 200 Oe to near zero field using a 60 Hz AC field in a few seconds), all the magnetically attached biomolecules can be thoroughly removed once the desired sequencing measurement is completed, e.g., by employing a sweeping permanent magnet to detach and collect all the magnetic particles and associated biomolecules and discarding them. In this way, the sequencing device is reusable, for example, the device can be reused at least 10 times, at least 100 times, or even at least 1,000 times.
A modified method, utilizing Pt, Pd, or Rh base electrode pairs separated by nanogap 700 instead of Au base electrodes, is illustrated in
Shown in
Illustrated in
An alternative embodiment of electronic signal interrogation is possible using the array configuration illustrated in
Shown in
Even larger data can be obtained if the
The genome or DNA sequencing structures and systems according to the disclosure is described in the flowchart of
In various embodiments, a DNA or genome sequencing structure comprises an array of electrode pairs, each electrode in a pair separated by a nanogap and comprising a strongly adherent and highly conductive island with reduced contact resistance, and a biomolecule securely attached with each of its ends on one conductive island to bridge the nanogap, wherein the conductive islands comprise nano-pattern defined Au on a Au electrode, with the Au island dimension being sub-10 nm, and further comprising electronic means of DNA or genome sequencing using DC, RF or pulse signal on nucleotide attachment, but without using fluorescent element.
In various embodiments, a non-Au electrode based DNA or genome sequencing structure comprises an array of electrodes and strongly adherent and highly conductive Au or other conductive islands having reduced contact resistance, with a biomolecule securely attached on a pair of conductive islands, with the Au island dimension being sub-10 nm, and the electrode base material selected from Pt, Pd, Rh, and Ag, with electronic means of DNA or genome sequencing using DC, RF or pulse signal on nucleotide attachment, but without using fluorescent element.
In various embodiments, the adherent conductor is made of Au, having a contact area to the electrode surface of at least 50%, and preferably %100 of the Au island diameter.
In various embodiments, the adherent gold nano-island is branched or porous with a porosity of at least 10%, preferably at least 30%, and even more preferably at least 50%, so as to increase the surface area of gold island top surface by at least by 20%, preferably by at least 40%, and even more preferably by at least 60%, over a flat and smooth Au nano-island structure.
In various embodiments, an increase in the surface area of the Au islands is obtained by one or more of the methods selected from a list of: i) plasma etching; ii) ion implantation and optional annealing heat treatment; iii) gold (Au) nanoparticles attaching and bonding; iv) selective dissolving non-Au component from a nanocomposite structure; or v) de-alloying process.
In various embodiments, the structure comprises parallel devices with at least 1,000, preferably at least 10,000, even more preferably at least 1 million devices, fabricated by one or more methods selected from nano-patterning approaches such as nano-imprinting lithography, shadow mask patterning, electron beam lithography, extreme UV lithography, or X-ray lithography.
In various embodiments, the structure comprises multilayers of devices with at least 10,000, preferably at least 1 million, even more preferably at least 100 million devices, in combination with microfluidic systems.
In various embodiments, a sequential interrogation of electrodes is enabled by a connected structure wherein one side of the device array lead wires are ganged into a common lead wire.
In various embodiments, a biomolecule is attached to an Au island using antibody-antigen coupling, streptavidin-biotin coupling, peptide bonding, thiol-gold binding, gold binding proteins, or other coupling configurations.
In various embodiments, a genome or DNA sequencing system comprises a chamber containing a multitude of biomolecule sensing devices described herein, and a microfluidic subsystem that supplies or maintains biomolecules, nucleotides, PBS or water solution, and other needed materials.
In various embodiments, the Au island diameter is progressively reduced by repeated spheroidization annealing and top-etching, with the process repeated by at least 2 cycles of spheroidization and part of the top etching to reduce the height and diameter.
In various embodiments, the height reducing etching comprises chemical etching or plasma etching.
In various embodiments, the structure comprises an added magnetic layer to enhance the attachment of magnetic-particle-tagged biomolecules, with the magnetic particles based on oxide material having natural chemical stability or metallic alloy material with surface coated with thin oxide or gold for anti-corrosion protection by a factor of at least 50% reduced corrosion rate, and/or enhanced affinity to biomolecules with at least 50% increased probability of biomolecule attachment.
In various embodiments, magnetic particles are selected from Fe2O3, Fe3O4, surface-protected or surface-functionalized metallic magnetic particles having higher magnetic moment than iron oxide including Fe, Co, Ni and their alloys.
In various embodiments, the magnetic layer is magnetized or demagnetized to enable magnetically attracted attachment of biomolecules or removal and cleaning-out of attached biomolecules with a permanent magnet sweep, allowing multiple repeat operations of the sequencing devices by at least 10 times, preferably at least 1,000 times.
In various embodiments, methods of assembly, methods of operation associated with
In various embodiments, these device structures for DNA sequencing can be used for cancer detection and other medical uses.
In various embodiments, these devices are usable for human genome sequencing.
The embodiments described above are only to exemplify the present invention but not to limit the scope of the present invention. Any equivalent modification or variation according to the spirit of the present invention is to be also included within the scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/076,673 filed on Aug. 8, 2018 entitled “ELECTRONIC LABEL-FREE DNA AND GENOME SEQUENCING,” which is a U.S. national phase filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/US2017/017231 filed on Feb. 9, 2017, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/293,239 filed on Feb. 9, 2016, entitled “ELECTRONIC, LABEL-FREE DNA AND GENOME SEQUENCING APPARATUS, METHOD OF FABRICATION, AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF,” the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4923586 | Katayama et al. | May 1990 | A |
5082627 | Stanbro | Jan 1992 | A |
5194133 | Clark et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5366140 | Koskenmaki et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5414588 | Barbee, Jr. | May 1995 | A |
5486449 | Honso et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5532128 | Eggers et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5583359 | Ng et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5639507 | Galvagni et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646420 | Yamashita | Jul 1997 | A |
5767687 | Geist | Jun 1998 | A |
5871918 | Thorp et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881184 | Guidash | Mar 1999 | A |
5965452 | Kovacs | Oct 1999 | A |
5982018 | Wark | Nov 1999 | A |
6051380 | Sosnowski et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060023 | Maracas | May 2000 | A |
6094335 | Early | Jul 2000 | A |
6110354 | Saban | Aug 2000 | A |
6123819 | Peeters | Sep 2000 | A |
6144023 | Clerc | Nov 2000 | A |
6238927 | Abrams et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6440662 | Gerwen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6464889 | Lee et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6506564 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6537747 | Mills, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6670131 | Hashimoto | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673533 | Wohlstadter et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6716620 | Bashir et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6749731 | Kobori | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762050 | Fukushima et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764745 | Karasawa et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6790341 | Saban | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6824974 | Pisharody et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6861224 | Fujita et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6916614 | Takenaka et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6958216 | Kelley | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7015046 | Wohlstadter et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7075428 | Oleynik | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7169272 | Fritsch et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7183055 | Van Der Weide | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7189435 | Tuominen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202480 | Yokoi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208077 | Albers et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7276206 | Augustine et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7399585 | Gau | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7432120 | Mascolo et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7470533 | Xu et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7507320 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7531120 | Van Rijn et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7579823 | Ayliffe | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7691433 | Kronholz et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7785785 | Pourmand et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7834344 | Mascolo et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7851045 | Gandon et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7886601 | Merassi et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901629 | Calatzis et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7943394 | Flandre et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8241508 | D'Urso | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8313633 | Li et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8351181 | Ahn | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8591816 | Calatzis et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8652768 | Huber et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8753893 | Liu et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8927464 | Aizenberg et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8940663 | Iqbal et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9070733 | Rajagopal et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9108880 | Jin et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9139614 | Medintz | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9306164 | Chang et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9829456 | Merriman et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9956743 | Jin et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10036064 | Merriman et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10125420 | Jin et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10151722 | Jin et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10508296 | Merriman et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10526696 | Jin et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10584410 | Jin et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10597767 | Merriman et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10648941 | Merriman et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10712334 | Choi et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20020022223 | Connolly | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020090649 | Chan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020137083 | Kobori et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138049 | Allen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020142150 | Baumann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020142477 | Lewis et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172963 | Kelley et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184939 | Yadav | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030025133 | Brousseau | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040000 | Connolly et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040173 | Fonash | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030064390 | Schülein et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030087296 | Fujita et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109031 | Chafin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030141189 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141276 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030186263 | Frey et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030224387 | Kunwar et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040014106 | Patno et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023253 | Kunwar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038090 | Faris | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040048241 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040063100 | Wang | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040086929 | Weide et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040096866 | Hoffman et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040012161 | Chiu | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040146863 | Pisharody et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040209355 | Edman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040209435 | Patridge et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040229247 | DeBoer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235016 | Hamers | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040248282 | Sobha | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050029227 | Chapman | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050067086 | Ito et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074911 | Kornilovich et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050151541 | Brinz et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156157 | Parsons et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164371 | Arinaga | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172199 | Miller et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181195 | Dubrow | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050221473 | Dubin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050227373 | Flandre et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050247573 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050285275 | Son | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287548 | Bao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287589 | Connolly | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003482 | Chinthakindi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060019273 | Connolly et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024504 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024508 | D'Urso et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029808 | Zhai et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060051919 | Mascolo et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060051946 | Mascolo et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060105449 | Larmer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105467 | Niksa et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060128239 | Nun et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060147983 | O'uchi | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060154489 | Tornow | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060275853 | Matthew et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070026193 | Luzinov et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070048748 | Williams et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070140902 | Calatzis et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070148815 | Chao et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070186628 | Curry et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070184247 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070207487 | Emig et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070231542 | Deng | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080012007 | Li et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080098815 | Merassi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080149479 | Olofsson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080199657 | Capron et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080199659 | Zhao | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090006284 | Liu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090011222 | Xin et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090017571 | Nuckolls | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020428 | Levitan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027036 | Nuckolls | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090062684 | Gregersen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090152109 | Whitehead et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162927 | Naaman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090170716 | Su et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090178935 | Reymond et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090295372 | Krstic et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090297913 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306578 | Sivan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324308 | Law et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100038342 | Lim et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100044212 | Kim et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100055397 | Kurihara et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100132771 | Lu | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142259 | Drndic et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149530 | Tomaru | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100167938 | Su et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100184062 | Steinmueller-Nethl et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188109 | Edel et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194409 | Gao et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100201381 | Iqbal et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100206367 | Jeong et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100227416 | Koh et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100280397 | Feldman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100285275 | Baca et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100285601 | Kong et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100288543 | Hung et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300899 | Levine et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110056845 | Stellacci | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110065588 | Su et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110076783 | Liu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110091787 | McGrath et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110160077 | Chaisson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166034 | Kwong et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110217763 | Rasooly et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110227558 | Mannion et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110229667 | Jin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110233075 | Soleymani et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110248315 | Nam et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110287956 | Iqbal et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291673 | Shibata et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311853 | Fratti | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110312529 | He et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120060905 | Fogel et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120122715 | Gao et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120220046 | Chao | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120258870 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120286332 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120309106 | Eichen et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130049158 | Hong et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130071289 | Knoll | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130108956 | Lu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130109577 | Korlach et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130162276 | Lee et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130183492 | Lee et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130214875 | Duncan et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130239349 | Knights et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245416 | Yarmush et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130273340 | Neretina et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130281325 | Elibol et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130331299 | Reda et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140001055 | Elibol et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140011013 | Jin | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140018262 | Reda et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140048776 | Huang et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140054788 | Majima et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140057283 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140061049 | Lo et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140079592 | Chang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140027775 | Quick et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140170567 | Sakamoto et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140174927 | Bashir et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140197459 | Kis et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140218637 | Gao et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140235493 | Zang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253827 | Gao et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140284667 | Basker et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140320849 | Chou et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140367749 | Bai et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140377900 | Astier | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150005188 | Levner et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150017655 | Huang et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150049332 | Sun et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057182 | Merriman et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150065353 | Turner et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150068892 | Ueno et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150077183 | Ciubotaru | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150148264 | Esfandyarpour et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150177150 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150191709 | Heron et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150263203 | Lewis et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150293025 | Ninomiya et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150294875 | Khondaker et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150344945 | Mandell et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160017416 | Boyanov et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160045378 | Geloen | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160155971 | Strachan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187282 | Gardner et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160265047 | van Rooyen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160284811 | Yu et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160290957 | Ram | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160319342 | Kawai et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160377564 | Carmignani et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170023512 | Cummins et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170037462 | Turner et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170038333 | Turner et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170043355 | Fischer | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170044605 | Merriman | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170131237 | Ikeda | May 2017 | A1 |
20170184542 | Chatelier et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170234825 | Elibol et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170240962 | Merriman | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170288017 | Majima et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170332918 | Keane | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180014786 | Keane | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180031508 | Jin | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180031509 | Jin | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180045665 | Jin | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180259474 | Jin | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180297321 | Jin et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180305727 | Merriman | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180340220 | Merriman | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190004003 | Merriman | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190033244 | Jin | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190039065 | Choi | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190041355 | Merriman | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190041378 | Choi | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190094175 | Merriman | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190194801 | Jin et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190355442 | Merriman et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190376925 | Choi et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190383770 | Choi et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200157595 | Merriman et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200217813 | Merriman et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200242482 | Merriman et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200277645 | Merriman et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200385850 | Merriman et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200385855 | Jin et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200393440 | Jin et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1795376 | Jun 2006 | CN |
101231287 | Jul 2008 | CN |
102706940 | Oct 2012 | CN |
104685066 | Jun 2015 | CN |
104703700 | Jun 2015 | CN |
108027335 | May 2018 | CN |
102012008375 | Oct 2012 | DE |
102013012145 | Jan 2015 | DE |
2053383 | Apr 2009 | EP |
3403079 | Nov 2018 | EP |
3408219 | Dec 2018 | EP |
3408220 | Dec 2018 | EP |
3414784 | Dec 2018 | EP |
3420580 | Jan 2019 | EP |
2485559 | May 2012 | GB |
H0233981 | Jul 1990 | JP |
2008-258594 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2018-522236 | Aug 2018 | JP |
20070059880 | Jun 2007 | KR |
20110104245 | Sep 2011 | KR |
2001044501 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2002049980 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2001044501 | Jul 2002 | WO |
2002074985 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2003042396 | May 2003 | WO |
2003096986 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004096986 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004099307 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005108612 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2007054649 | May 2007 | WO |
2007102960 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007126432 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007128965 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2009003208 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009035647 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2010022107 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2012083249 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012087352 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012152056 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013096851 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2014018630 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014182630 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2015167019 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015176990 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015188197 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016016635 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016100635 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016100637 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016196755 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2016210386 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2017027518 | Feb 2017 | WO |
2017041056 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017042038 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017061129 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2017123416 | Jul 2017 | WO |
2017132567 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017132586 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017139493 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017147187 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017151680 | Sep 2017 | WO |
2017184677 | Oct 2017 | WO |
2018022799 | Feb 2018 | WO |
2018026855 | Feb 2018 | WO |
2018098286 | May 2018 | WO |
2018132457 | Jul 2018 | WO |
2018136148 | Jul 2018 | WO |
2018200687 | Nov 2018 | WO |
2018208505 | Nov 2018 | WO |
2003091458 | Jan 2019 | WO |
2020210832 | Oct 2020 | WO |
2021195637 | Nov 2021 | WO |
2021226291 | Nov 2021 | WO |
2021237180 | Nov 2021 | WO |
2021237182 | Nov 2021 | WO |
2021257594 | Dec 2021 | WO |
2021262739 | Dec 2021 | WO |
2022051558 | Mar 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 24, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/477,106. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 7, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/878,484. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/684,338. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2021 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/070,133. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2021 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/479,257. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/831,722. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/652,672. |
EP; European Search Report dated Nov. 19, 2020 in Application No. 18739158.6. |
JP; Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2020 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-536737. |
EP; European Search Report dated Dec. 23, 2020 in Application No. 18790713.4. |
EP; European Search Report dated Dec. 14, 2020 in Application No. 18799263.1. |
Ali et al., “DNA hybridization detection using less than 10-nm gap silicon nanogap structure,” Sensors and Actuators A. vol. 199, pp. 304-309 (2013). |
Bornholt et al., “A DNA-Based Archival Storage System”, Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pp. 637-649 (2016). |
Chen et al., “Silicon nanowire field-effect transistor-based biosensors for biomedical diagnosis and cellular recording investigation”, Nano Today, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 131-154 (2011). |
Grass et al., “Robust Chemical Preservation of Digital Information on DNA in Silica with Error-Correcting Codes”, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 54, No. 8, pp. 2552-2555 (2015). |
Hatcher et al., “PNA versus DNA: Effects of Structural Fluctuations on Electronic Structure and Hole-Transport Mechanisms,” J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 130, pp. 11752-11761 (2008). |
Korlach et al., “Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules,” 11, Methods in Enzymology, Academy Press, vol. 472, pp. 431-455 (2010). |
Paul et al., “Charge transfer through Single-Stranded Peptide Nucleic Acid Composed of Thymine Nucleotides,” J. Phy. Chem. C 2008, 112, pp. 7233-7240 (2008). |
Shin et al., “Distance Dependence of Electron Transfer Across Peptides with Different Secondary Structures: The Role of Peptide Energetics and Electronic Coupling,” J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, pp. 3722-3732 (2003). |
Venkatramani et al., “Nucleic Acid Charge Transfer: Black, White and Gray,” Coard Chem Rev., 255(7-8): pp. 635-648 (2011). |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/639,716. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/073,693. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/731,749. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 9, 2020 in Application No. PCT/US2020/13218. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 6, 2020 in Application No. PCT/US2020/25068. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 4, 2020 in Application No. PCT/US2020/28004. |
EP; European Search Report dated Sep. 30, 2020 in Application No. 17893481.6. |
JP; Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2020 in Japanese Application No. 2017-566864. |
CN; Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2020 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201680083636.4. |
Yang et al., “Two-Dimensional Graphene Nanoribbons,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. vol. 130, Issue 13 (2008). |
USPTO; Requirement for Restriction dated Nov. 2, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/667,583. |
USPTO; Requirement for Restriction dated Jan. 17, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/336,557. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Mar. 14, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated May 16, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/336,557. |
USPTO; Final Office Action date Dec. 30, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/220,307. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 28, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/220,307. |
USPTO; Requirement for Restriction dated Dec. 1, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/996,477. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated May 5, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/996,477. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/996,477. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 3, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/996,477. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,400. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,412. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,080. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/336,557. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated May 25, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/336,557. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,412. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,080. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,400. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Sep. 4, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,080. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,135. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 12, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,412. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Sep. 26, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/667,583. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 11, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,080. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Oct. 12, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,400. |
USPTO; Requirement for Restriction dated Oct. 15, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,028. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Nov. 14, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,400. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,135. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 6, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,400. |
USPTO; Requirement for Restriction dated Dec. 17, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,049. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,028. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/152,190. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/667,583. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,135. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,049. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/944,356. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,028. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated May 22, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,135. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated May 29, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/250,929. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated May 30, 2019, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/152,190. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,049. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,135. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2019 in the U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,028. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2019 in the U.S. Appl. No. 16/011,065. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 19, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/073,706. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/667,583. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 23, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/250,929. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/073,706. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 8, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,028. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,049. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 11, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,135. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 6, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/076,673. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/011,065. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 20, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,049. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/070,133. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 8, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/479,257. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated May 11, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/073,706. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 1, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/076,673. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/684,338. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/878,484. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/479,257. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/477,106. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 29, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/001995. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 27, 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2017/015465. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 27, 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2017/015437. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 26, 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2017/017231. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 25, 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2017/018950. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 27, 2016 in Application No. PCT/US2016/039446. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 22, 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2017/044023. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 26, 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2017/044965. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 7, 2018 in Application No. PCT/US2017/063105. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 12, 2018 in Application No. PCT/US2017/063025. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 13, 2018 in Application No. PCT/US2018/013140. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 20, 2018 in Application No. PCT/US2018/029382. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 20, 2018 in Application No. PCT/US2018/029393. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion received Nov. 9, 2018 in Application No. PCT/US2018/048873. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 8, 2010 in Application No. PCT/US2009/054235. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 18, 2019 in Application No. PCT/US2018/055264. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 18, 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2016/068922. |
EP; European Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2019 in Application No. EP16815467.2. |
CN; Notice of the First Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2019 in Chinese Application No. 201680049272.8. |
EP; European Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2019 in Application No. EP16885434.7. |
EP; European Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2019 in Application No. EP17745026.9. |
CN; Notice of the First Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2019 in Chinese Application No. 201780020478.2. |
EP; European Search Report dated Oct. 24, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/757,146. |
PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 29, 2019 in Application No. PCT/US2018/029382. |
EP; European Search Report dated Jan. 29, 2020 in Application No. 17745013.7. |
EP; European Search Report dated Jan. 29, 2020 in Application No. 17750776.1. |
EP; European Search Report dated Feb. 7, 2020 in Application No. 17837566.3. |
EP; European Search Report dated Mar. 6, 2020 in Application No. 17835231.6. |
EP; European Search Report dated Jun. 18, 2020 in Application No. 16815467.2. |
CN; Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2020 in Chinese Patent Application No. 2017800204782. |
EP; European Search Report dated Jun. 26, 2020 in Application No. 17874229.2. |
Ahn et al., “Electrical Immunosensor Based on a Submicron-Gap Interdigitated Electrode and Gold Enhancement,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 26, pp. 4690-4696, (2011). |
Alayo et al., “Gold Interdigitated Nanoelectrodes as a Sensitive Analytical Tool for Selective Detection of Electroactive Species via Redox Cycling,” Microchim Acta, vol. 183, pp. 1633-1639, (2016). |
Antibody Structure Downloaded from https://absoluteantibody.com/antibody-resources/antibody-overview/antibody-structure/ (Mar. 1, 2019). |
Bai et al., “Review: Gas Sensors Based on Conducting Polymers,” Sensors, vol. 7, pp. 267-307, (2007). |
Bailey et al., “DNA-Encoded Antibody Libraries: A Unified Platform for Multiplexed Cell Sorting and Detection of Genes and Proteins,” Journal of American Chemical Society, vol. 129, pp. 1959-1967, (2007). |
Bechelany et al. “Synthesis Mechanisms of Organized Nanoparticles: Influence of Annealing Temperature and Atmosphere,” Crystal Growth and Design, vol. 10, pp. 587-596 (Oct. 21, 2010). |
Berdat et al., “Label-Free Detection of DNA with Interdigitated Micro-Electrodes in a Fluidic Cell,” Lab on a Chip, vol. 8, pp. 302-308, (2008). |
Bhura, “3D Interdigitated Electrode Array (IDEA) Biosensor for Detection of Serum Biomarker,” Master Thesis, Portland State University, 68 Pages, (2011). |
Blossey, R., “Self-Cleaning Surfaces-Virtual Realities,” Nature Materials, vol. 2(5), pp. 301-306, (May 2006). |
Bonilla et al., “Electrical Readout of Protein Microarrays on Regular Glass Slides,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 83, pp. 1726-1731, (2011). |
Botsialas et al., “A Miniaturized Chemocapacitor System for the Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds,” Sensors and Actuators B, Chemical, vol. 177, pp. 776-784, (2013). |
Branagan et al., “Enhanced Mass Transport of Electroactive Species to Annular Nanoband Electrodes Embedded in Nanocapillary Array Membranes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 134, pp. 8617-8624, (2012). |
Braun et al., “DNA-Templated Assembly and Electrode Attachment of a Conducting Silver Wire,” Letters to Nature, vol. 391(6669), pp. 775-778, (Feb. 1998). |
Briglin et al., “Exploitation of Spatiotemporal Information and Geometric Optimization of Signal/Noise Performance Using Arrays of Carbon Black-Polymer Composite Vapor Detectors,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 82, pp. 54-74, (2002). |
Cassie, A.B.D. et al., “Wettability of Porous Surfaces,” Transitions of the Faraday Society, vol. 40, pp. 546-551, (Jan. 1944) (Abstract Only). |
Cerofolini et al., “A Hybrid Approach to Nanoelectronics: A Hybrid Approach to Nanoelectrics,” Nanotechnology, Institute of Physics Publishing, GB, vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 1040-1047 (2005). |
Chen et al., “Electrochemical Approach for Fabricating Nanogap Electrodes with Well Controllable Separation,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, pp. 123105.1-123105.3, (2005). |
Chen, X. et al., “Electrical Nanogap Devices for Biosensing,” Materials Today, vol. 13, pp. 28-41, (Nov. 2010). |
Chen et al., “Fabrication of Submicron-Gap Electrodes by Silicon Volume Expansion for DNA-Detection,” Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 175, pp. 73-77, (2012). |
Choi Y.S. et al., “Hybridization by an Electroatomical Genome on Detection on Using an Indicator-Free DNA on a Microelectrode-Array DNA Chip,” Bulletin of the Korean Chemistry Society, vol. 26, pp. 379-383, (2005). |
Choi, J. E. et al., “Fabrication of Microchannel with 60 Electrodes and Resistance Measurement,” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 21, pp. 178-183, (Sep. 2010) (Abstract Only). |
Choi, C. et al., “Strongly Superhydrophobic Silicon Nanowires by Supercritical CO2 Drying,” Electronic Materials Letters, vol. 6 (2), pp. 59-64, (Jun. 2010). |
Church et al., “Next-Generation Digital Information Storage in DNA,” Science, vol. 337(6102), p. 6102, (Sep. 28, 2012). |
Cosofret et al., “Microfabricated Sensor Arrays Sensitive to pH and K+ for Ionic Distribution Measurements in the Beating Heart,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 67, pp. 1647-1653, (1995). |
Coulson S.R. et al., “Super-Repellent Composite Fluoropolymer Surfaces,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B., vol. 104(37), pp. 8836-8840, (Aug. 2000). |
Dickey et al., “Electrically Addressable Parallel Nanowires with 30 NM Spacing from Micromolding and Nanoskiving,” Nano Letters, vol. 8(12), pp. 4568-4573, (2008). |
Fan et al., “Detection of MicroRNAs Using Target-Guided Formation of Conducting Polymer Nanowires in Nanogaps,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, pp. 5437-5443, (2007). |
Fink et al. “Electrical Conduction Through DNA Molecules,” Nature, vol. 398, pp. 407-410 (Jan. 20, 1999). |
Fuller et al., “Real-Time Single-Molecule Electronic DNA Sequencing by Synthesis Using Polymer-Tagged Nucleotides on a Nanopore Array,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113(19), pp. 5233-5523, (May 10, 2016). |
Gapin, A.I. et al., “CoPt Patterned Media in Anodized Aluminum Oxide Templates,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 99(8), pp. 08G902 (1-3), (Apr. 2006). |
Ghindilis, A. et al., “Real Time Biosensor Platforms Fully Integrated Device for Impedimetric Assays,” ECS Transactions, vol. 33, pp. 59-68, (2010). |
Guo et al., “Conductivity of a single DNA duplex bridging a carbon nanotube gap,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 1-12 (2008). |
Han, “Energy Band Gap Engineering of Graphene Nanoribbons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 98, pp. 1-7, (May 16, 2007). |
Han et al., “Redox Cycling in Nanopore-Confined Recessed Dual-Ring Electrode Arrays,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 120, pp. 20634-20641, (2016). |
Hanief, Topic, Pineda-Vargas, “Solid State Dewetting of Continuous Thin Platinum Coatings,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, vol. 363, pp. 173-176, (2015). |
Hashioka et al., “Deoxyribonucleic Acid Sensing Device with 40-NM-Gap-Electrodes Fabricated by Low-Cost Conventional Techniques,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85(4), p. 687-688, (Jul. 2004). |
He et al., “Electromechanical Fabrication of Atomically Thin Metallic Wires and Electrodes Separated with Molecular-Scale Gaps,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 522, pp. 167-172, (Jan. 2002). |
Heerema et al., “Graphene Nanodevices for DNA Sequencing,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 11, pp. 127-136, (Feb. 3, 2016). |
Henry et al., “Microcavities Containing Individually Addressable Recessed Microdisk and Tubular Nanoband Electrodes,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 146(9), pp. 3367-3373, (1999). |
Hwang et al., “Electrical Transport Through 60 Base Pairs of Poly (dG)-Poly (dC) DNA Molecules,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 81(6), p. 1134-1136, (Aug. 2002). |
Ino et al., “Addressable Electrode Array Device with IDA Electrodes for High-Throughput Detection,” Lab on a Chip, vol. 11, p. 385-388, (2011). |
Ino et al., “Local Redox-Cycling-Based Electrochemical Chip Device with Seep Microwells for Evaluation of Embryoid Bodies,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 51, pp. 6648-6652, (2012). |
Iqbal et al., “Direct Current Electrical Characterization of ds-DNA in Nanogap Junctions,” Applied Physics Letter, vol. 86, p. 153901-1-153901-3, (Apr. 2005). |
Javey et al., “Layer-By-Layer Assembly of Nanowires for Three-Dimensional, Multifunctional Electronics,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, pp. 773-777, (2007). |
Khawli et al., “Charge Variants in IgG1-Isolation, Characterization, in Vitro Binding Properties and Pharmacokinetics in Rats,” Landes Bioscience, vol. 2(6), pp. 613-623, (2010). |
Kim et al., “Rapid Fabrication of Uniformly Sized Nanopores and Nanopore Arrays for Parallel DNA Analysis,” Advances Materials, vol. 18, pp. 3149-3153, (Dec. 4, 2006). |
Kim, J. Y. et al., “Optically Transparent Glass with Vertically Aligned Surface AI203 Nanowires Having Syperhydrophobic Characteristics,” NANA: Brief Reports and Reviews, vol. 5(2), pp. 89-95, (Apr. 2010) (Abstract Only). |
Kitsara et al., “Single Chip Interdigitated Electrode Capacitive Chemical Sensor Arrays,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 127, pp. 186-192, (2007). |
Kitsara et al., “Small-Volume Multiparametric Electrochemical Detection at Low Cost Polymeric Devices Featuring Nanoelectrodes,” SPIE, vol. 9518, 9 Pages, (2015). |
Kraft, “Doped Diamond: A Compact Review on a New, Versatile Electrode Material,” International Journal of Electrochemistry, vol. 2, pp. 355-385, (May 2007). |
Kumar et al., “Terminal Phosphate Labeled Nucleotides: Synthesis, Applications and Linker Effect on Incorporation by DNA Polymerases,” Nucleosides, Nucleotides and Nucleic Acids, Taylor and Francis, vol. 24, No. 5-7, pp. 401-408 (2005). |
Lee, K. H. et al., “One-Chip Electronic Detection of DNA Hybridization using Precision Impedance-Based CMOS Array Sensor,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 26, pp. 1373-1379, (Dec. 15, 2010). |
Li et al., “Graphene Channel Liquid Container Field Effect Transistor as pH Sensor,” Hindawi Publishing Corp., Journal of Nanomaterials 2014. |
Lin et al., “An Addressable Microelectrode Array for Electrichemical Detection,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 80, pp. 6830-6833, (2008). |
Liu et al., “Controllable Nanogap Fabrication on Microchip by Chronopotentiometry,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 50, pp. 3041-3047, (2005). |
Liu et al., “Atomically Thin Molybdenum Disulfide Nanopores with High Sensitivity for DNA Translocation,” ACS Nano, vol. 8, pp. 2504-2511, (Feb. 18, 2014). |
Liu et al., “An Enzyme-Based E-DNA Sensor for Sequence-Specific Detection of Femtomolar DNA Targets,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 130(21), pp. 6820-6825, (2008). |
MacNaughton et al., “High-Throughput Heterogeneous Integration of Diverse Nanomaterials on a Single Chip for Sensing Applications,” PLOS One, vol. 9(10), el 11377, 7 Pages, (2014). |
Mastrototaro et al., “Thin-Film Flexible Multielectrode Arrays for Voltage Measurements in the Heart,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society 11th Annual International Conference, 1 Page, (1989). |
Mastrototaro et al., “Rigid and Flexible Thin-Film Multielectrode Arrays for Transmural Cardiac Recording,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 39, pp. 217-279, (1992). |
Mirando-Castro et al., “Hairpin-DNA Probe for Enzyme-Amplified Electrochemical Detection of Legionella pnuemophila,” Anal. Chem., vol. 79, pp. 4050-4055, (Jun. 1, 2007). |
Nishida, et al. “Self-Oriented Immobilization of DNA Polymerase Tagged by Titanium-Binding Peptide Motif,” Langmuir, vol. 31, pp. 732-740 (Dec. 17, 2014). |
Niwa, O. et al., “Fabrication and Characteristics of Vertically Separated Interdigitated Array Electrodes,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, vol. 267 pp. 291-297, (Aug. 10, 1989) (Abstract Only). |
Okinaka et al., “”Polymer“ Inclusions in Cobalt-Hardened Electroplated Gold,” Journal the of Electrochemical Society, vol. 125, p. 1745, (1978). (Abstract Only). |
Park, S.J. et al., “Array-Based Electrical Detection of DNA with Nanoparticle Probes,” Science, vol. 295, pp. 1503-1506, (Feb. 22, 2002). |
Park, C.W. et al., “Fabrication of Poly-Si/ AU Nano-Gaps Using Atomic-Layer-Deposited AI2O3 as a Sacrificial Layer,” Nanotechnology, vol. 16, pp. 361-364, (Feb. 1, 2005)(Abstract Only). |
Parkin, I. P. et al., “Self-Cleaning Coatings,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 15(17), pp. 1689-1695, (Dec. 2004). |
Prins et al., “Room-Temperature Gating of Molecular Junctions Using Few-Layer Graphene Nanogap Electrodes,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, pp. 4607-4611, (Oct. 21, 2011). |
Pugliese et al., “Processive Inforporation of Deoxynucleoside Triphosphate Analogs by SingleMolecule DNA Polymerase I (Klenow Fragment) Nanocircuits,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 137, No. 30, pp. 9587-9594 (2015). |
Qing et al., “Finely Tuning Metallic Nanogap Size with Electrodeposition by Utilizing High-Frequency Impedance in Feedback,” Angewandte Chemie Int ed, vol. 44, pp. 7771-7775, (2005). |
Reed et al., “Conductance of a Molecular Junction Reports,” Science, vol. 278, pp. 252-254, (Oct. 1997). |
Roy, S. et al., “Mass-Produced Nanogap Sensor Arrays for Ultra-Sensitive Detection of DNA,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 131, pp. 12211-12217, (Aug. 5, 2009) (Abstract Only). |
Reichert et al., “Driving Current Through Single Organic Molecules,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88(17), pp. 176804-1-176804-4, (Apr. 2002). |
Roppert et al., “A New Approach for an Interdigitated Electrodes DNA-Sensor,” XVIIIth International Symposium on Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, Bioelectrochemistry, p. 143, (2005). |
Ruttkowski, E. et al., “CMOS based Arrays of Nanogaps Devices for Molecular Devices,” Proceedings of 2005 5th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology, vol. 1, pp. 438-441, (Jul. 2005) (Abstract Only). |
Sanguino et al., “Interdigitated Capacitive Immunosensors with PVDF Immobilization Layers,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 14(4), pp. 1260-1265, (Apr. 2014). |
Santschi et al., “Interdigitated 50nm Ti Electrode Arrays Fabricated using XeF2 Enhanced Focused Ion Beam Etching,” Nanotechnology, vol. 17, pp. 2722-2729, (2006). |
Schaefer et al., “Stability and Dewetting Kinetics of Thin Gold Films on Ti, TiOx, and ZnO Adhesion Layers,” Acta Materialia, vol. 61, pp. 7841-7848, (2013). |
Schrott, W. et al., “Metal Electrodes in Plastic Microfluidic Systems,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 86, pp. 1340-1342, (Jun. 2009). |
Shimanovsky et al., “Hiding Data in DNA,” International Workshop on Information Hiding, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 373-386, (Dec. 18, 2012). |
Shimoda, T. et al., “Solution-Processed Silicon Films and Transistors,” Nature, vol. 440(7085), pp. 783-786, (Apr. 2006). |
Sholders et al., “Distinct Conformations of a Putative Translocation Element in Poliovirus Polymerase,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 426(7), pp. 1407-1419, (Apr. 3, 2014). |
Singh et al., “3D Nanogap Interdigitated Electrode Array Biosensors,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 397, pp. 1493-1502, (2010). |
Singh et al., “Evaluation of Nanomaterials-Biomolecule Hybrids for Signals Enchancement of Impedimetric Biosensors,” 11th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology, pp. 707-710, (2011). |
Singh et al., “Nanoparticle-Enhanced Sensitivity of a Nanogap-Interdigitated Electrode Array Impedimetric Biosensor,” Langmuir, vol. 27, pp. 13931-13939, (2011). |
Stagni, C. et al., “CMOS DNA Sensor Array with Integrated A/D Conversation Based on Label-Free Capacitance Measurement,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 41, pp. 2956-2964, (Nov. 20, 2006). |
Stenning, “The Investigation of Grain Boundary Development and Crystal Synthesis of Thin Gold Films on Silicon Wafers,” http://www.ucl.ac.uk/˜ucapikr/projects, (Mar. 31, 2009). |
Su, Y., “Modeling and Characteristic Study of Thin Film Based Biosensor Based on COMSOL,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Article 581063 (6 Pages), (Apr. 7, 2014). |
Thompson, “Solid-State Dewetting of Thin Films,” Department of Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 42, pp. 399-434, (2012). |
Urban, M. et al., “A Paralleled Readout System for an Electrical DNA-Hybridization Assay Based on a Microstructured Electrode Array,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 74, pp. 1077-1081, (Jan. 2003) (Abstract Only). |
Van Gerwin et al., “Nanoscaled Interdigitated Electrode Arrays for Biochemical Sensors,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 49, pp. 73-80, (1998). |
Van Megan et al., “Submicron Electrode Gaps Fabricated by Gold Electrodeposition at Interdigitated Electrodes,” Key Engineering Materials, vol. 605, pp. 107-110, (2014). |
Wang et al., “Electronics and Optoelectronics of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 7, pp. 699-712, (Nov. 6, 2012). |
Xu et al., “Fabrication of Complex Metallic Nanostructures by Nanoskiving,” American Chemical Society Nano, vol. 1(3), pp. 215-227, (2007). |
Zafarani et al., “Electrochemical Redox Cycling in a New Nanogap Sensor: Design and Simulation,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 760, pp. 42-47, (2015). |
Church, et al. Next-Generation Digital Information Storage in DNA Science, vol. 337, p. 1628 and supplementary information, 2012. |
European Search Report dated Dec. 23, 2020 in Application No. 18739158.6. |
European Search Report dated Jun. 18, 2020 in Application No. 16815467.2. |
European Search Report dated Jun. 26, 2020 in Application No. 17874229.2. |
European Search Report dated Sep. 30, 2020 in Application No. 17893481.6. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/070,133. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 6, 2020 for PCT/US2020/025068. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 18, 2019 in Application No. PCT/US2018/055264. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 9, 2020 for PCT/US2020/013218. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 4, 2020 for PCT/US2020/028004. |
Long, et al. “Peptide Electron Transfer: More Questions than Answers,” Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, pp. 5186-5194 (2005). |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 1, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/076,673. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 11, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/073,706. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 7, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/878,484. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 24, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/477,106. |
Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2020 in JP Application No. 2017-566864. |
Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2020 in CN App. No. 201680083636.4. |
Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2020 in CN Application No. 2017800204782. |
Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/878,484. |
Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/684,338. |
Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/477,106. |
Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/479,257. |
Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/731,749. |
Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/073,693. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210077998 A1 | Mar 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62293239 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16076673 | US | |
Child | 16912580 | US |