The present invention relates to techniques for reducing electronic leakage from appliances and modified electrical outlets.
A wide variety of electrically-powered appliances are known to draw electrical current, using electrical power, even when “switched off,” meaning that the appliance is placed in a relatively inactive and unused state by the user, usually by pushing a “power” button or switching a power switch to an “off” position. (These buttons are often labeled with the symbol: , or a similar symbol.) The power consumed by appliances that are “switched off,” known as power “leakage,” is a matter of growing public concern because the associated unnecessary use of power is tremendously wasteful of economic resources, especially in the aggregate, and contributes to the creation of atmospheric pollution associated with the production of the wasted power at plants that expel pollution, including greenhouse gasses. See generally California Energy Commission, report available at http://www.consumerenergycenter.org/homeandwork/homes/inside/appliances/small.html.; see also http://www.energyrating.gov.au/library/pubs/cop5-leaking.pdf.
Prior art has addressed the problem of leakage through “Smart Switches” built into, or retrofitted to, individual appliances, such that an appliance draws little or no current upon pressing a power button, or flipping a power switch. See generally http://www.energyrating.gov.au/library/pubs/cop5-leaking.pdf. Similarly, one may simply unplug an appliance, or switch off a “hard switch” which totally breaks an electric circuit, preventing further leakage. Another invention addresses the problem of leakage by enabling the electrical utility company to control outlets at each and all homes of the individual consumer, to reduce their “draw” at critical times of power shortage. See U.S. Pat. No. 6,828,695, “System, Apparatus and Method for Energy Distribution Monitoring and Control and Information Transmission.” Yet another invention addresses leakage through a “smart” power strip, with one or more outlets designated as “control,” “master” or “hot,” which is constantly powered, but also monitored for current usage, and other “slave” outlets on the strip that are switched off when an appliance attached to the “control” outlet is “turned off.” That invention is intended for systems, such as a computer, computer screen, computer-associated printer, etc, where the consumer may wish for all associated devices to be switched off at once, when the computer, for example, is switched off.
Some Disadvantages of the Prior Art
The latter invention discussed above does not address the problem of leakage from the “control,”/“master”/“hot” appliance, which will still draw power while the associated peripheral appliances are switched off. Similarly, that invention does not apply to devices that are individually turned on and off because the consumer does not wish to necessarily associate their use and disuse with some other “master” or “control” appliance. In addition, such Smart Switches integrated in newer appliances address the problem of leakage on an ongoing basis, but do not address the problem of leakage in the vast majority of existing appliances. Although a consumer may always unplug or otherwise manually break the circuit, as with a finger-actuated power strip switch, that solution requires perpetual consideration and perseverance on the part of the individual consumer. In practice, the vast majority of individual consumers leave their appliances plugged in, and leaking power, even when aware of the problem of leakage.
Electronic leakage reduction techniques are provided. In one aspect of the invention, an electrical power outlet with a programmable computing unit and means for reducing power to appliances detects whether said appliance is in “the off position,” and reduces voltage to the appliance, and then monitors the level of power drawn by the appliance to determine when the appliance is in the “on position,” and restores the “original operational voltage” to the appliance. More specifically, the electrical power outlet including a programmable computing unit delivers a “selected voltage below the original operational voltage” to the appliance while the appliance is in the off position, while testing the level or pattern of power, current or resistance, and restoring the original operational voltage to the appliance when said levels or patterns match the state of the appliance in the on position. Alternatively, the electrical power outlet including a programmable computing unit may deliver a particular voltage for particular durations at particular intervals to the appliance while the appliance is in the “off position,” while testing the level or pattern of power, current or resistance, and restoring the original operational voltage to the appliance when said levels or patterns match the state of the appliance in the on position.
The following definitions apply to the remainder of this application:
“The off position” means that action with respect to an electrical appliance, such as switching a main power switch on the appliance to the “off” position, prescribed by the manufacturer or user for reducing power consumption by the appliance, has taken place without subsequent action prescribed by the manufacturer or user for returning the appliance to the “on” position.
“The on position” means that action with respect to an electrical appliance, such as switching a main power switch on the appliance to the “on” position, prescribed by the manufacturer or user for increasing power consumption by the appliance, has taken place, without subsequent action prescribed by the manufacturer or user for returning the appliance to “the off position.”
“Original operational voltage” means the voltage or range of voltages applied to an appliance at which the appliance is operated, according to manufacturer's specifications or customary usage by consumers.
“Selected voltage below the original operational voltage” means a voltage below the original operational voltage and at which a level of power, resistance or current of the appliance can be identified as relating to the appliance in the on position.
“Pattern of current drawn by an electrical appliance” means a set of more than one level of current in an appliance occurring at particular timed intervals.
“Pattern of resistance of an electrical appliance” means a set of more than one level of resistance in an appliance occurring at particular timed intervals.
“Pattern of power drawn by an electrical appliance” means a set of more than on level of power in an appliance occurring at particular timed intervals.
It is within the scope of this invention that solid-state circuitry may also be utilized to accomplish some of the objectives of this invention. For example, a variably-set (by the user) reverse-oriented circuit breaker could cause an outlet to cease delivering power below certain pre-determined power levels, which may be set by the user as corresponding to the level of power consumption by the appliance in the off position. Magnets may be interposed for the circuit to test the level of resistance and potential current of the appliance at that point to determine whether the appliance is being returned to the on position, at which time the circuit breaker may re-close according to other aspects of this invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/888,410, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,999,415, filed Sep. 22, 2010 the entire disclosure and references of which are incorporated herein by reference; U.S. Pat. No. 7,999,415 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/806,083, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,821,161, filed May 29, 2007, the entire disclosure and references of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,821,161 also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional application No. 60/808,814, filed May 27, 2006, the entire disclosure and references of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1859492 | Balestra | May 1932 | A |
2577114 | Eames | Dec 1951 | A |
3019548 | Nadler | Feb 1962 | A |
3104490 | Cornell | Sep 1963 | A |
3343774 | Pryor | Sep 1967 | A |
4391427 | Foresman | Jul 1983 | A |
4418333 | Schwarzbach et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4611295 | Fowler | Sep 1986 | A |
4775124 | Hicks | Oct 1988 | A |
4782420 | Holdgaard-Jensen | Nov 1988 | A |
4993546 | Southard | Feb 1991 | A |
5020753 | Green | Jun 1991 | A |
5029802 | Ali | Jul 1991 | A |
5181606 | Martell | Jan 1993 | A |
5368268 | Jodwischat | Nov 1994 | A |
5417397 | Harnett | May 1995 | A |
5642871 | Repert | Jul 1997 | A |
5680929 | Von Seidel | Oct 1997 | A |
6152294 | Weinberg | Nov 2000 | A |
6340864 | Wacyk | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6396166 | Kim | May 2002 | B1 |
6552888 | Weinberger | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6828695 | Hansen | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6956593 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6957233 | Beezer et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6966445 | Johanna | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6992687 | Baird et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7020663 | Hay et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7181679 | Taylor | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7234104 | Chang et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7257774 | Denoue et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7388735 | Chen | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7411317 | Liu | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418656 | Petersen | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7447771 | Taylor | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7505237 | Baxter | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7506246 | Hollander et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7594187 | Baird et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7800251 | Hodges et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7821161 | Beckman | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7859539 | Beckman | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7889464 | Chen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7999415 | Beckman | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000074 | Jones et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8004123 | Hodges et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8006387 | Watts et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20030050927 | Hussam | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050055405 | Kaminsky et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066069 | Kaji | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050182973 | Funahashi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193188 | Huang | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060107062 | Fauthoux | May 2006 | A1 |
20060163344 | Nwosu | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173819 | Watson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060176146 | Krishah et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060273663 | Emalfarb | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070006322 | Karimzadeh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016941 | Gonzalez et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070045417 | Tsai et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080086680 | Beckman | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080092219 | Beckman | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Internet Archive Wayback Machine, disclosing site retrieval for http://lexisnexis.com in 2005, 1 page. |
Lexis Nexis, “LexisNexis Citation Tools 2001”, copyright 2002, LexisNexis, p. 1-8. (discloses checking citations for positive and negative treatments). |
LexisNexis, “Shepard's Citations Review”, Apr. 30, 2004, p. 1-2. |
LexisNexis, “Shepard's Citations Service”, copyright 2003, p. 1-2. |
Calhoun et al., “Standby Voltage Scaling for Reduced Power”; Dec. 19, 2002. |
Stolowitz Ford Cowger LLP, Listing of Related Cases, Jan. 12, 2012. |
SVT Technologies, “SVT Lighting Control Products”, May 4, 2006; http://www.svt-tech.com/lightingcontrol.html. |
California Energy Commission, “Small Appliances”, Mar. 6, 2001; http://www.consumerenergycenter.org/homeandwork/homes/inside/appliances/small.html. |
Energyrating.gov.au, “The Leaking Electricity Initiative: an International Action to Reduce Standby Power Waste of Electrical Equipment”, Jul. 9, 2005; http://www.energyrating.gov.au/library/pubs/cop5-leaking.pdf. |
Bits Limited, “The Leg3”, Jan. 1, 2007; http://catalog.bitsltd.us/catalog/SMART/LEG3.html. |
Stolowitz Ford Cowger LLP List of Related Cases. Prepared Jan. 12, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110298303 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60808814 | May 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12888410 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 13210366 | US | |
Parent | 11806083 | May 2007 | US |
Child | 12888410 | US |