A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The present invention generally relates to the field of electronic messaging. In particular, the present invention is directed to an electronic message recipient handling system and method with media component and header information separation.
Typically, an electronic message between two people is not private. It may travel along a public network, such as the Internet, and be susceptible to interception by unintended third parties. Messages are also logged and archived by the communication systems themselves. They may also be copied, cut, pasted, printed, forwarded, blind copied, or otherwise manipulated. This may give a message a “shelf-life” that is often uncontrollable by the sender or even the recipient. Surreptitious logging (e.g., by keystroke and message recording software) may occur by third parties that have gained unauthorized access to either the computer of the sender and/or the recipient. Electronic messages include the message content itself coupled to identifying information regarding the sender, the recipient, the location of the message, times and dates associated with the message, etc. This allows a third party that is logging messages, intercepting messages, or simply gaining access to the messaging system's logs or inbox archives to associate the potentially important identifying information (typically referred to as header information) with the message content. These are only some of the ways in which electronic messages can be misused. There is a demand for a system and method for reducing the traceability of electronic messages.
In one implementation, a computer-implemented method of handling an electronic message is provided. The method includes receiving at a recipient user device a header information corresponding to a message content that includes a media component; providing a first display via the recipient user device, the first display including the header information in a message list, the first display not displaying the media component; receiving at the recipient user device the message content including the media component, wherein the message content including the media component and the header information are correlated by a unique identifier; receiving a selection by the recipient user via the first display, the selection directed to a portion of the message list corresponding to the header information; and in response to the selection, providing a second display via the recipient user device, the second display displaying the message content including the media component.
In another implementation, a machine readable hardware storage medium containing machine executable instructions implementing a method of handling an electronic message is provided. The instructions include a set of instructions for receiving at a recipient user device a header information corresponding to a message content that includes a media component; a set of instructions for providing a first display via the recipient user device, the first display including the header information in a message list, the first display not displaying the media component; a set of instructions for receiving at the recipient user device the message content including the media component, wherein the message content including the media component and the header information are correlated by a unique identifier; a set of instructions for receiving a selection by the recipient user via the first display, the selection directed to a portion of the message list corresponding to the header information; and a set of instructions for providing, in response to the selection, a second display via the recipient user device, the second display displaying the message content including the media component.
In yet another implementation, a system for handling an electronic message is provided. The system includes a means for receiving at a recipient user device a header information corresponding to a message content that includes a media component; a means for providing a first display via the recipient user device, the first display including the header information in a message list, the first display not displaying the media component; a means for receiving at the recipient user device the message content including the media component, wherein the message content including the media component and the header information are correlated by a unique identifier; a means for receiving a selection by the recipient user via the first display, the selection directed to a portion of the message list corresponding to the header information; and a means for providing, in response to the selection, a second display via the recipient user device, the second display displaying the message content including the media component.
For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show aspects of one or more embodiments of the invention. However, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings, wherein:
The present disclosure provides a system and method reducing traceability of an electronic message. In one embodiment, header information and message content of an electronic message are displayed by a system and method of the present disclosure so that header information and message content are not displayed at the same time. As will be clear to one skilled in the art from the disclosure below, separation of header information from message content reduces the traceability of the electronic message. To further reduce traceability of an electronic message, header information may be automatically deleted at a first predetermined time and message content may be automatically deleted at a second predetermined time (e.g., after message content is viewed). In one example, the first and second predetermined times may occur sequentially (e.g., deleting header information upon displaying message content and deleting message content upon closing a display of message content), simultaneously (e.g., deleting message content and associated header information upon closing a display of message content), or out of order such that the second predetermined time occurs before the first predetermined time (e.g., displaying message content first, deleting message content, displaying header information, then deleting header information). These and other aspects of the present disclosure will be described in greater detail below with respect to various exemplary embodiments illustrated in
Although computers 110 and 115 are illustrated as workstation computers, any well known computer may be utilized in creating and/or viewing electronic messages. Example computers include, but are not limited to, a personal computer, a workstation computer, a server computer, a laptop computer, a handheld device, a mobile telephone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), another computing device capable of communicating an electronic message via network 120, and any combinations thereof. System 100 may include one or more server computers. In one example, system 100 may reside substantially on a single server computer. In another example, system 100 may be distributed across two or more server computers. In yet another example, system 100 may be distributed across a plurality of user computers without a server computer, such as in a peer-to-peer environment. In one such example, components of a messaging system according to the present disclosure and/or their functionality (e.g., storage of header information and message content, display generation, reply generation, etc.) may occur at a recipient's user computer In still another example, system 100 may be distributed across one or more server computers and one or more user computers. One or more relay servers or other systems may be utilized between server computers and/or user computers.
A basic input/output system 230 (BIOS), including basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer 200, such as during start-up, may be stored in ROM 220. Computer 200 may also include a storage/memory device 235 for reading and/or writing information. Example storage devices include, but are not limited to, a hard disk drive for reading from and/or writing to a hard disk, a magnetic disk drive for reading from and/or writing to a removable magnetic disk, an optical disk drive for reading from and/or writing to an optical media (e.g., a compact disc), and any combinations thereof. Storage/memory device 235 may be connected to bus 215 by an interface. In one example, storage/memory device 235 and associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, and/or other data for computer 200. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of computer-readable media that can store data that is accessible by a computer in a volatile and/or non-volatile manner may also be used in an example operating environment. Examples of other types of computer-readable media include, but are not limited to, a magnetic cassette, a flash memory media (e.g., a card and a thumb-drive), a digital video disk, a Bernoulli cartridge, a random access memory (RAM), a read only memory (ROM), and any combinations thereof. A computer-readable medium, as used herein, is intended to include a single medium as well as a collection of physically separate media, such as, for example, a collection of compact disks or one or more hard disk drives in combination with a computer memory.
A number of program modules can be stored on storage/memory device 235, including, but not limited to, an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, program data, computer implemented instructions for carrying out the system and methodologies of the present disclosure, and any combinations thereof. A user may enter commands and information into computer 200 through one or more input devices, such as a keyboard 240 and/or a pointing device 245. Other examples of an input device include, but are not limited to a microphone, a joystick, a game pad, a satellite dish, a scanner, and any combinations thereof. These and other input devices may be connected to processing unit 205 through an interface 250 that is coupled to bus 215. Example interfaces for connecting an input device include, but are not limited to, a serial interface, a parallel interface, a game port, a universal serial bus (USB), an IEEE 1394 (Firewire) interface, a direct interface to system bus 215, and any combinations thereof.
A display device 255 may be connected to system bus 215 via an interface, such as a display generator/video adaptor 260. Example display devices include, but are not limited to, a cathode-ray tube (CRT) monitor, a plasma display, an LCD display, and any combinations thereof. In addition to a display device, a computer may include one or more other peripheral output devices, such as a speaker and a printer. A pen digitizer and an accompanying pen/stylus may be included in order to digitally capture freehand input. A pen digitizer may be separately configured or coextensive with a display area 265 of display device 255. Accordingly, a pen digitizer may be integrated with display device 255, or may exist as a separate device overlaying or otherwise appended to display device 255.
Computer 200 may include a network connection 270 for connecting to one or more of a variety of networks, such as network 120 of
Referring to
Electronic message 105 as communicated to system 100 in the example of
An electronic message may be any electronic file, data, and/or other information transmitted between one or more user computers. An electronic message may include (e.g., as part of a message content) any of a wide variety of information including, but not limited to, text, an image, video (e.g., single play video utilizing an application, such as MACROMEDIA FLASH), binary, tabular data (e.g., a spreadsheet), rich text including variable font color, tables, etc.), audio (e.g., single play audio utilizing an application, such as MACROMEDIA FLASH), other types of data, and any combinations thereof. In one example, a message content of an electronic message may include embedded information. In another example, a message content of an electronic message may include an attached and/or linked file. In such an example with an attached and/or linked file, the attached and/or linked file may be automatically deleted from the messaging system after being viewed by a recipient. Typically, a message content, such as message content 140 does not include information that in itself identifies the message sender, recipient, location of the electronic message, or time/date associated with the electronic message.
System 100 may optionally include a message ID generator 150. As described in further detail below, message ID generator 150 may generate a message ID for each electronic message received by system 100. The message ID is associated with the corresponding message. A message ID is used to associate a container (i.e., header) information with a corresponding separately-stored message content. In one example, a message ID may be created using a unique 128 bit, randomly generated number. System 100 may include a correlation between header information and message content in a variety of ways including, but not limited to, a database, a lookup table, an entry in a file system, and any combinations thereof. Utilizing a message ID associated with an electronic message, such as electronic message 105, system 100 may handle (e.g., store, deliver, display, etc.) a header information and a message content of a particular electronic message separately with the ability to correlate the two at a later time. Thus, a message content may be handled without any of the identifying header information. A message ID may contain unique and/or non-unique information. For example, a message ID may include a sequence number (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.) identifying a number of a message amongst a group of messages. A sequence number may be re-used. For example, when an electronic message with a sequence number of “1” is viewed and subsequently deleted, sequence numbers for remaining electronic messages may be adjusted so that the electronic message having sequence number “2” is renumbered to number “1” and so forth. In another example, a message ID may include a sequence number and a unique user identifier (e.g., a user ID, a login ID, etc.).
System 100 may optionally include a reply ID generator 155. As described further below, reply ID generator 155 generates a reply ID for each electronic message received by system 100. The reply ID associates an electronic message, such as electronic message 105, with the sender of the electronic message. In one example, a reply ID may include no information that in itself would identify a sender of an electronic message to a third party that does not have access to the correlation maintained by the messaging system. System 100 may include a correlation between a reply ID and a corresponding message sender in a variety of ways, including, but not limited to, a database, a lookup table, an entry in a file system, and any combinations thereof. In one aspect, a reply ID associated with an electronic message allows the header information and/or the message content of the electronic message to include no information about the sender of the message that itself provides a traceable identity of the sender. As described in more detail below, a recipient may still send a reply electronic message to the original sender. Additionally, a third-party that may intercept, log, or otherwise come in possession of the header information and/or the message content will not be able to trace the electronic message to the sender without also gaining access to the correlation maintained by system 100. A reply ID may include a variety of different identifiers that allow a messaging system, such as system 100, to direct a reply electronic message back to a sender of the original electronic message. In one example, a reply ID may be created using a randomly generated number (e.g., a 128 bit, randomly generated number).
System 100 includes a display generator 160 in communication with electronic message storage module 130. Display generator 160 is configured to provide information representing a display image for display on a user computer, such as user computers 110, 115. Example display images include, but are not limited to, a user login display, a display listing information representing available electronic messages for viewing, a display for entering an electronic message, a display of a message content of an electronic message, a display for entering a reply electronic message, and any combinations thereof. In one example, display generator 160 may be configured to utilize a message ID in generating a first information 165 representing a first display image including at least some of the header information for electronic message 105. Display generator 160 may also be configured to generate a second information 170 representing a second display image including message content 140 of electronic message 105.
Display generator 160 may utilize any of a variety of well known display generation methodologies and/or protocols for creating information representing a displayable image. Example methodologies/protocols include, but are not limited to, hypertext markup language (HTML), extensible markup language (XML), direct graphic generation, and any combinations thereof. In one example, system 100 resides on one or more server computers and display generator 160 includes and/or utilizes a web server application to generate information representing web-browser-displayable images that may be viewed by a user computer including a web browser. In another example, display generator 160 may be configured to instruct a browser or other application of a user computer displaying a display image according to the present invention to not cache any of the information related to the display image.
System 100 may further include a deletion module 175 in communication with electronic message storage module 130. Deletion module 175 is configured to delete header information and/or message content from system 100 after a predetermined amount of time. In one example, deletion module 175 is configured to automatically delete header information and corresponding message content immediately after the message content is displayed. In another example, a deletion module (e.g., deletion module 175) is configured to automatically delete header information upon display of a corresponding message content. In yet another example, a deletion module (e.g., deletion module 175) is configured to automatically delete message content upon a display of the message content being closed. In still another example, a deletion module is configured to automatically delete header information and/or message content, whether or not they have been viewed, after a predetermined time (e.g., twenty-four hours after being received). In still yet another example, a deletion module is configured to automatically delete header information and/or message content a predetermined time (e.g., twenty-four hours) after first being displayed. In a further example, a predetermined amount of time may include a predetermined number of viewings (other than a single viewing) of a particular electronic message (e.g., an electronic message is deleted after 20 views). In still a further example, a deletion module (e.g., deletion module 175) is configured to automatically delete header information upon display of a corresponding message content and to automatically delete message content upon a display of the message content being closed. Combinations of deletion protocols, such as these examples, are also contemplated.
In an alternate embodiment, system 100 may include a display-based keyboard generator 180. Display-based keyboard generator 180 is configured to generate a display-based keyboard that may be included with a display image generated by display generator 160. A display-based keyboard can be utilized by a user (e.g., through mouse click or touch screen depression) to input information (e.g., username, password, recipient address, message content) without the use of the standard keyboard associated with the user computer. In this way interception by keyboard (keystroke) logging hardware and/or software resident on the user computer, such as computers 110, 115, can be avoided. In one example, a display-based keyboard generator may utilize FLASH technology commercially available from Macromedia Inc. In another example, a display-based keyboard generator may utilize Java technology commercially available from Sun Microsystems. In one aspect a FLASH-based keyboard may randomly place spaces between characters in the on-screen keyboard to further prevent interception of the message. Although this is a relatively slow data entry method, a user can be more assured that their information is not being logged and/or intercepted.
System 100 may also optionally include a reply message receiver 185. Reply message receiver 185 is configured to receive a reply message to one or more original electronic messages viewed by a recipient. In one aspect, a sender of an original electronic message may be determined from an identifying characteristic included, or associated, with the electronic message. Example identifying characteristics include, but are not limited to, a reply ID, an email address, a username, a display name, login ID, and any combination thereof. In one example, a reply ID of the original electronic message may be utilized in generating a reply message. In one example, a reply message as communicated by computer 115 to system 100 need only include a message content 190. System 100 may include a reply generator 195. Reply generator 195 may be configured to utilize the original reply ID to associate message content 190 and any corresponding header information with the original electronic message sending user. Message ID generator 150 may be configured to generate a message ID for the reply electronic message (i.e., message content 190 and corresponding header information). Reply ID generator 155 may be configured to generate a new reply ID for the reply message and electronic message storage module 130 may store message content 190 and corresponding header information separately for later display to the user (original sender).
Referring to
In one aspect, while a user is logged into system 300, a session may be established including the establishment of a session ID. A session and a corresponding memory may be utilized by system 300 to maintain certain information regarding the session and the user (e.g., user's identification information, a reply ID).
Upon proper login, the user may be presented with a session starting display image. One of skill in the art will appreciate that a variety of starting display images (i.e., pages) may be available for display to a user upon initial login to system 300. In one example, a display image for inputting an electronic message may be displayed.
Upon entering a recipient address (step 510 of
In an alternative embodiment, a display-based keyboard (as discussed above) may be included in an electronic message input displays, such as display images 700, 800, and 900. A user may use a mouse or other pointing device (e.g., a touchscreen display) to select characters being entered.
In an alternate embodiment, upon server 310 receiving electronic message 330, instructions associated with system 300 (e.g., instruction stored at server 310) generates a reply ID and associates the reply ID with electronic message 330 (step 525 of
In another alternate embodiment, at step 530, system 300 generates a message ID for associating the separated message content and header information of electronic message 330. Server 310 maintains a correspondence between the message content and header information.
At step 535, header information associated with electronic message 330 is identified for separation from message content 930. In one aspect, separation of information that identifies the sending user, recipient user, location of the electronic message, timing of electronic message from the message content may be implemented by associating such information with a container or header information component of the electronic message. In one example, utilization of a reply ID and a message ID can further facilitate the removal of information that itself identifies a sending user or recipient. A display name for the sending user may be generated and associated with the header information. The display name for the user need not be unique, thus maintaining the anonymity of the user when electronic message 330 is ultimately communicated to computer 320 or otherwise viewed by the recipient. In one example, system 300 replaces all information associated with electronic message 330 that could itself identify the sending user. In one embodiment, a predetermined display name for the sending user that does not provide unique identification of the sending user may be generated and associated with corresponding header information. In another example, system 300 may utilize a display name that includes information that uniquely identifies the sending user (e.g., login name, email address, etc.).
In one example, header information for a particular electronic message, such as header information, may include, but is not limited to, a reply ID, a message ID, a date/time associated with the electronic message (e.g., date/time of creation, date/time of delivery, etc.), a display name representing a sender of the electronic message, and any combinations thereof.
At step 540, an electronic message 330 is associated with a recipient represented by the recipient address. In one example, a location of the recipient is determined. As used herein, a location may include a message mailbox, a message server associated with the recipient, a computer associated with the recipient, an electronic address of the recipient, a display name for the recipient in system 300, or the like. For example, system 300 may identify a user by a variety of identities (e.g., display name, login ID, associated email address, text messaging address, instant messaging address, SMS address, mobile number, BLACKBERRY PIN, or the like) to determine a routing for electronic message 330. As discussed above, if the recipient is not a registered user of system 300, a notification may be sent to a third-party system of the existence of electronic message 330. For example, if the recipient is identified by a third-party email address, a notification may go to the email recipient over the third-party email network. Similarly, if the recipient is identified by a Blackberry PIN, a notification may go to the recipient over the Blackberry network.
At step 545, header information and message content are stored. In one example, header information and message content are stored separately from each other (e.g., in separate files, in separate databases, in separate tables, etc.). A message ID may be used to maintain a correspondence between the separated components of electronic message 330. Storage may occur in a variety of ways including, but not limited to, storage at a location of the recipient and storage at server 310. In one example, the header information and message content of electronic message 330 are stored in a storage medium of server 310 in separate tables.
In another example, each user of system 310 is assigned a storage directory (e.g., on a server, on a user computer such as in a peer-to-peer arrangement, etc.). Upon association of a user with the recipient address, the message content and header information for any electronic messages to that user may be stored in that user's storage directory. The following XML file definition illustrates an example of header information for two electronic messages stored in a user storage directory.
The above file definition includes a message ID (“streamsummary id”), a display name (“from”), date received, and reply ID for each message in the recipients storage directory. Note that as an implementation variation, the sending user of the second message has associated therewith a display name, “user four”, which includes a reference to an email address, mike.smith@onlinemail.com. This email address may or may not be associated with an actual email account of a third-party system, and may or may not provide actual identifying information related to the sending user. The following message content XML file is stored separately in the storage directory from the above header information.
The following second message content XML file is stored separately in the storage directory from the header information.
Each of the message content XML files includes the corresponding message ID for correlation back to the corresponding header information. Each message content XML file also includes the message content. One skilled in the art would recognize other storage methodologies for separating header information from message content that are consistent with the present disclosure.
Referring again generally to
In an alternate embodiment, the header information communicated to computer 320 may include a sequence number (ex: 1, 2, 3, etc.) assigned to each electronic message associated with a particular user and/or sent to a particular computer. In such an embodiment, each sequence number may be associated in system 300 with the corresponding message ID. The message ID may be removed from the corresponding header information and/or message content. In this manner, system 300 may avoid sending a message ID to a user computer and instead may send the sequence number, which may be reused when a message is deleted and is, therefore, less traceable from the user computer.
At step 560, a user may select one of the electronic messages indicated by header information 1015, 1020, 1025 (e.g., by selecting a corresponding “read” indicator in message listing 1010). At the time of selection, the message content for each electronic message may not have been communicated to computer 320. In one example, message content may be communicated to computer 320 along with corresponding header information (but, not displayed). In another example, message content may be retained at server 310 until a second request from a user is sent to server 310 to view a message content of a particular electronic message. In such an example, computer 320 requests a message content for a selected electronic message (e.g., electronic message 330 via header information 1015) from server 310. In response to this action, server 310 may associate a message ID from the selected header information and communicate the message content having the corresponding message ID to computer 320. Alternatively, where a sequence number is utilized for each electronic message, server 310 associates the sequence number of the selected electronic message with a corresponding message content and communicates the message content to computer 320.
At step 565, a display image including the message content, but none of the header information, is provided at computer 320.
In one alternate embodiment, display image 1100 may employ FLASH technology to display the message content. For example, display image 1100 may require the user to “park” the on-screen cursor in an area in display image 1100 to see the message content, which may be displayed as a Flash movie. Should the cursor be moved, the displayed message content will be hidden from view on the screen to allow the user to quickly prevent the message content from being seen by onlookers. Also, this technology may also be utilized to prevent the message content from being printed using the web browser or application print because the message content will be hidden as soon as the user moves the mouse in attempt to print. In another example, the use of Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) may allow the portion of the display image including the message content to be not shown or hidden during printing.
Referring to
As discussed above, other examples of deletion times for deletion from a system, such as system 300, include, but are not limited to, automatic deletion of header information and corresponding message content immediately after the message content is displayed, automatic deletion of header information upon display of a corresponding message content, automatic deletion of message content upon a display of the message content being closed, automatic deletion of header information and/or message content (whether or not they have been viewed) after a predetermined time (e.g., twenty-four hours after being received), automatic deletion of header information and/or message content a predetermined time (e.g., twenty-four hours) after first being displayed, and any combinations thereof. In one example, system 300 is configured to require a given deletion scheme (e.g., automatic permanent deletion of an electronic message upon displaying the electronic message and/or one or more of its components) regardless of a desire of a sending and/or recipient user.
One example of a deletion algorithm appropriate for deletion of electronic messages from system 300 include, but is not limited to, US Department of Defense (DoD) clearing and sanitizing standard DoD 5220.22-M. In an alternative embodiment, server computer 310 may delete an electronic message, such as electronic message 330 and the corresponding reply ID from its own memory if the recipient fails to retrieve the electronic message within a predetermined amount of time.
In one example, after viewing the message content, the user may select a link 1130 on display image 1100 to return to the message listing (e.g., message listing 1010 of
In an alternative embodiment, electronic messages may be sent, stored, and/or retrieved using encryption technology. Various encryption technologies are known to those skilled in the art. For example, a combination of public and private encryption keys may be utilized by users and the system to further ensure security and reduce traceability of electronic messages until deletion.
Referring to
In one example, upon receipt of the reply message content, server 310 determines the reply ID for the original message (e.g., from the current session ID), and uses the reply ID to associate the electronic message with the user that sent the original message 330 (step 610 of
Next at step 620, the server 310 may generate another reply ID and associate the reply ID with reply message 340 in a similar fashion as discussed above for electronic message 330. Server 310 may also generate another message ID, which establishes a correlation between the message content of reply message 340 and header information for reply message 340. Header information and message content for reply message 340 are handled and stored similarly as described above with respect to electronic message 330. Reply message 340 may be viewed by its recipient in the same manner as original electronic message 330 was viewed.
Advantageously, the system 300 allows the users of the computers 315 and 320 to have a private conversation over network 325. After messages, such as electronic message 330 and reply message 340, are communicated the sender leaves no proof of the message on his or her computer. In one example, after the recipient views the message (or at another predetermined time), the message no longer exists on system 300, thus ensuring that the message cannot be forensically recreated and ensuring that there is no record of the message remaining on system 300. In another example, no copies of an electronic message are ever delivered to a user computer. In such an example, only non-caching display images of header information and message content are displayed separately. The header information and message content may be immediately, automatically, and permanently deleted from the system upon display. Once each display image is closed, the information is gone forever. Thus, in this example, there is never a copy on the user computer to be archived, forwarded, copied, pasted, etc. In another aspect, separate display of header information and message content prevents a single screen capture at a user computer from creating a complete record of the electronic message. In yet another aspect, a system and method according to the present disclosure may provide an end-to-end recordless electronic messaging system that upon the deletion of the electronic message leaves no trace of the message content, header information, or the fact that it was created, existed, delivered, viewed, etc.
server 410 acts as the “recipient location” and performs a portion of step 540 and steps 545 to 585 of
It is to be noted that the above described aspects and embodiments may be conveniently implemented using a conventional general purpose computer programmed according to the teachings of the present specification, as will be apparent to those skilled in the computer art. Appropriate software coding can readily be prepared by skilled programmers based on the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those skilled in the software art.
Such software can be a computer program product which employs a storage medium including stored computer code which is used to program a computer to perform the disclosed function and process of the present invention. The storage medium may include, but is not limited to, any type of conventional floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, or any other suitable media for storing electronic instructions.
Exemplary embodiments have been disclosed above and illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, omissions and additions may be made to that which is specifically disclosed herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/133,875, filed Dec. 19, 2013, and titled “Electronic Message Content and Header Restrictive Recipient Handling System and Method,” which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/651,909, filed Oct. 15, 2012, and titled “Disassociated Content Electronic Message System and Method,” which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/605,885, filed Oct. 26, 2009, and titled “Reduced Traceability Electronic Message System and Method For Sending Header Information Before Message Content,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,291,026, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/401,148, filed Apr. 10, 2006, and titled “Reduced Traceability Electronic System and Method,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,610,345, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. This application also claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/703,367, filed Jul. 28, 2005, and titled “Method and System for Reducing Traceability of Electronic Messages,” which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. This application is also related to the following commonly-owned applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/572,920, filed Dec. 17, 2014, and titled “Electronic Message Send Device Handling System and Method with Separation of Message Content and Header Information,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/572,932, filed Dec. 17, 2014, and titled “Electronic Message Send Device Handling System and Method with Separated Display and Transmission of Message Content and Header Information,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/572,942, filed Dec. 17, 2014, and titled “Electronic Message Send Device Handling System and Method with Media Component and Header Information Separation,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/572,952, filed Dec. 17, 2014, and titled “Electronic Message Recipient Handling System and Method with Separation of Message Content and Header Information,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/572,966, filed Dec. 17, 2014, and titled “Electronic Message Recipient Handling System and Method with Separated Display of Message Content and Header Information,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/447,932, filed Apr. 16, 2012, and titled “Reduced Traceability Electronic Message System and Method,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/133,897, filed Dec. 19, 2013, and titled “Electronic Message Content and Header Restrictive Send Device Handling System and Method,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,886,739, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4803703 | DeLuca et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5255356 | Michelman | Oct 1993 | A |
5457454 | Sugano | Oct 1995 | A |
5560033 | Doherty et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5598279 | Ishii et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5608786 | Gordon | Mar 1997 | A |
5675507 | Bobo, II | Oct 1997 | A |
5680551 | Martino, II | Oct 1997 | A |
5742905 | Pepe | Apr 1998 | A |
5754778 | Shoujima | May 1998 | A |
5768503 | Olkin | Jun 1998 | A |
5781741 | Imamura et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5848410 | Walls et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857201 | Wright, Jr. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870605 | Bracho | Feb 1999 | A |
5874960 | Mairs et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5889942 | Orenshteyn | Mar 1999 | A |
5896301 | Barrientos | Apr 1999 | A |
5903472 | Barrientos | May 1999 | A |
5930479 | Hall | Jul 1999 | A |
5949348 | Kapp et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951636 | Zerber | Sep 1999 | A |
5956521 | Wang | Sep 1999 | A |
5958005 | Thorne | Sep 1999 | A |
6006206 | Smith et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008807 | Bretschneider et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018801 | Palage et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038601 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044395 | Costales et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6071347 | Ogawa et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6073174 | Montgomerie | Jun 2000 | A |
6076101 | Kamakura et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6134432 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6161129 | Rochkind | Dec 2000 | A |
6178331 | Holmes et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6209100 | Robertson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6233318 | Picard et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6268855 | Mairs et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271839 | Mairs et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285363 | Mairs et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288704 | Flack et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289212 | Stein et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289450 | Pensak et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298446 | Schreiber et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324569 | Ogilvie et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6339825 | Pensak et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6353892 | Schreiber et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6357010 | Viets et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370656 | Olarig et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411684 | Cohn | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6434702 | Maddalozzo, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438594 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442592 | Alumbaugh | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449721 | Pensak et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6487586 | Ogilvie et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6516416 | Gregg et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6529500 | Pandharipande | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549194 | McIntyre et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556586 | Sipila | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563800 | Salo | May 2003 | B1 |
6591291 | Gabber et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601088 | Kelley et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606659 | Hegli et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609148 | Salo | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629138 | Lambert et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631398 | Klein | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6651185 | Sauvage | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6671732 | Weiner | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6697806 | Cook | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701346 | Klein | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6701347 | Ogilvie | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711608 | Ogilvie | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721784 | Leonard et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724370 | Dutta et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728714 | Doganata et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6730863 | Gerpheide et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732150 | Thrane | May 2004 | B1 |
6732368 | Michael | May 2004 | B1 |
6741855 | Martin et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6742032 | Castellani et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6748422 | Morin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757713 | Ogilvie et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6779022 | Horstmann | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6804675 | Knight et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826688 | Westerman et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829599 | Chidlovskii | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6829631 | Forman et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6832354 | Kawano et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6834372 | Becker et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6851049 | Price, III | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6922693 | Rubin et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6978376 | Giroux et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6993662 | Rubin et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7010566 | Jones et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020783 | Vange et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7035912 | Arteaga | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043563 | Vange et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062454 | Giannini et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7062533 | Brown et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062563 | Lewis | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072934 | Helgeson | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076085 | Sah | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076469 | Schreiber et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080077 | Ramamurthy | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7111006 | Vange et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120615 | Sullivan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7120662 | Vange et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123609 | Glasser et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124189 | Summers | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127518 | Vange et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130831 | Howard et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143195 | Vange et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7155539 | Vange et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155743 | Goodman et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155744 | Schreiber et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162014 | Skladman | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162471 | Knight et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7162508 | Messina | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162649 | Ide | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7171620 | Castellani et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171693 | Tucker et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174453 | Lu | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185359 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185364 | Knouse et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7191219 | Udell et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194547 | Moreh | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194764 | Martherus et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200635 | Yashchin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7213249 | Tung Loo | May 2007 | B2 |
7219148 | Rounthwaite et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7222157 | Sutton, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7266779 | Baek | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281272 | Rubin et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7305069 | Day | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7340518 | Jenkins | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7356564 | Hartselle et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366760 | Warren et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7386590 | Warren et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7433949 | Xu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7451359 | Coekaerts | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7496631 | Austin-Lane et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7532913 | Doulton | May 2009 | B2 |
7539755 | Li et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7562118 | Fellenstein et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7590693 | Chan et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7610345 | Collins et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7620688 | Warren et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7657759 | Rubin et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664956 | Goodman | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676767 | Hofmeister | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7730150 | Warren et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760662 | Maeda | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765285 | Yoshida et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765483 | Schmieder | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774414 | Shah | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783715 | Muller | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7814158 | Malik | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7836301 | Harris | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7860932 | Fried | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7899872 | Warren et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7962654 | Vange et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966376 | Kelso et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7975066 | Vange et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8171286 | Harris | May 2012 | B2 |
8200971 | Edwards | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8255465 | Edwards | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8291026 | Collins et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8364764 | Hartselle et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8386641 | Vange et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8417770 | Vange et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8463935 | Vange et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8725809 | Hartselle et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8886739 | Collins et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8935351 | Collins et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9054870 | Gassi | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9076231 | Hill | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9147050 | Park | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9154926 | Steele | Oct 2015 | B1 |
20010000265 | Schreiber et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20010000359 | Schreiber et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20010000541 | Schreiber et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20010006551 | Masaki | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010034791 | Clubb et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037316 | Shiloh | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044831 | Yamazaki | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002602 | Vange et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002603 | Vange | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002611 | Vange | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002618 | Vange | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002622 | Vange et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002625 | Vange et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002636 | Vange et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002686 | Vange et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002688 | Gregg et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004796 | Vange et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004816 | Vange et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016918 | Tucker et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020019853 | Vange et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023159 | Vange et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024506 | Flack et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026487 | Ogilvie et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026495 | Arteaga | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029248 | Cook et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020029249 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032742 | Anderson | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049749 | Helgeson | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020054120 | Kawano et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020056006 | Vange et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059170 | Vange | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059381 | Cook et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065892 | Malik | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069365 | Howard et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078343 | Rubin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078361 | Giroux et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083016 | Dittrich et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087720 | Davis et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091745 | Ramamurthy | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091775 | Morehead et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095399 | Devine | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098831 | Castell et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099826 | Summers | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107950 | Lu | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112155 | Martherus et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120646 | Dutta et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129140 | Peled et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143865 | Tung Loo | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149569 | Dutta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194470 | Grupe | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009672 | Goodman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023580 | Braud et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028809 | Goodman et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050046 | Conneely et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030054810 | Chen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055897 | Brown et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061215 | Messina | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074248 | Braud | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074397 | Morin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074552 | Olkin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074580 | Knouse et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078890 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100292 | Kynast et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120948 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126215 | Udell et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126259 | Yoshida et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131055 | Yashchin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131060 | Hartselle et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147378 | Glasser et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149737 | Lambert et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154249 | Crockett et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154292 | Spriestersbach et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163538 | Yeh et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167350 | Davis et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030224810 | Enzmann et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002903 | Stolfo et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015729 | Elms et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019846 | Castellani et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024788 | Hill et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030918 | Karamchedu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049436 | Brand et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040051736 | Daniell | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040051897 | Kakiuchi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059790 | Austin-Lane | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068486 | Chidlovskii | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040121762 | Chou | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133599 | Warren et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133643 | Warren et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133644 | Warren et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040177110 | Rounthwaite et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188151 | Gerpheide et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040189616 | Gerpheide et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040189617 | Gerpheide et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193591 | Winter | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193695 | Salo | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210632 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210796 | Largman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040234046 | Skladman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243679 | Tyler | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249892 | Barriga | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010643 | Fellenstein et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027846 | Wolfe et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050064883 | Heck | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071178 | Beckstrom et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071282 | Lu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086186 | Sullivan et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091501 | Osthoff et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050120230 | Waterson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050130631 | Maguire | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132010 | Muller | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132013 | Karstens | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132372 | Vargas et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144246 | Malik | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050193068 | Brown et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198365 | Wei | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204005 | Purcell et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204008 | Shinbrood | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204130 | Harris | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209903 | Hunter et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229258 | Pigin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240666 | Xu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240759 | Rubin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251399 | Agarwal et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256929 | Bartol et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050266836 | Shan | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277431 | White | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283621 | Sato et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289601 | Park et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010215 | Clegg et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020714 | Girouard et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031483 | Lund et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041751 | Rogers et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046758 | Emami-Nouri | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060047748 | Kelso et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075473 | Moreh | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095502 | Lewis et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129697 | Vange et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129823 | McCarthy et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140347 | Kaji | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168058 | Midgley | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177007 | Vaghar | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060208871 | Hansen | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212561 | Feng | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217126 | Sohm et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060223554 | Fried | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229899 | Hyder et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060234680 | Doulton | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235824 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060236095 | Smith | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248599 | Sack | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259492 | Jun et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265453 | Kaminsky et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282426 | Spears | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060284852 | Hofmeister | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070013662 | Fauth | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038715 | Collins et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061399 | Schmieder | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070063999 | Park | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071222 | Flockhart et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074018 | Edwards | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077921 | Hayashi et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078675 | Kaplan | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083675 | Vemulapelli et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083929 | Sprosts et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070113287 | Blumenau | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113288 | Blumenau | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113289 | Blumenau | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113293 | Blumenau | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116001 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130329 | Shah | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133034 | Jindal et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136428 | Boutboul et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143423 | Kieselbach et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070177568 | Clontz et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070217393 | Lee et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233790 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250619 | Li et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080077704 | Shah et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080126496 | Warren et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080201440 | Shah et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208998 | Warren et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080281930 | Hartselle et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080313296 | Muller | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320092 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090116492 | Maeda | May 2009 | A1 |
20090254994 | Waterson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100064016 | Collins et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077360 | Nason et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082979 | Edwards | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131868 | Chawla | May 2010 | A1 |
20100157998 | Vange et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110030052 | Harris | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110061099 | Jiang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110161448 | Warren et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110238860 | Vange et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246665 | Vange et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110302321 | Vange et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120036452 | Coleman | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120054308 | Vange et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120059907 | Vange et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120203849 | Collins et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130159436 | Hartselle et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130290443 | Collins et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140074981 | Vange et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140181689 | Collins et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140201295 | Collins et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140207887 | Hartselle et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150100657 | Collins et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106459 | Collins et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106460 | Collins et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106461 | Collins et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106743 | Collins et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106744 | Collins et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150180905 | Ruppin | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150180938 | Ruppin | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150215359 | Bao | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150237021 | Sovio | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244664 | Kendal | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150248557 | Sallam | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006276974 | Feb 2012 | AU |
2006276974 | Aug 2012 | AU |
2616911 | Feb 2013 | CA |
2616911 | Aug 2013 | CA |
2006-80035550 | Jan 2010 | CN |
2006-80035550 | Dec 2011 | CN |
2006-80035550 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102004031677 | Jan 2006 | DE |
899918 | Mar 1999 | EP |
918420 | May 1999 | EP |
994608 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1113631 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1388986 | Feb 2004 | EP |
EU06750321.9 | Apr 2010 | EP |
EU06750321.9 | Jul 2010 | EP |
EU06750321.9 | Dec 2011 | EP |
EU06750321.9 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2430591 | Sep 2010 | GB |
382KOLNP2008 | May 2014 | IN |
H11-163923 | Jun 1999 | JP |
200010879 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2003114852 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2004038407 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004126973 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004341813 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2008-523868 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2008-523868 | Nov 2011 | JP |
70048412008 | Nov 2012 | KR |
095119990 | Oct 2012 | TW |
095119990 | May 2013 | TW |
9859456 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2004095814 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2006088915 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2006114135 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007018636 | Feb 2007 | WO |
PCTUS2006014254 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008036971 | Mar 2008 | WO |
PCTUS2007079299 | Mar 2008 | WO |
PCTUS2008054093 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008101165 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2010151873 | Dec 2010 | WO |
PCTUS2013036723 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013158603 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2013158764 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014047489 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/651,909, Jun. 8, 2015, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,932, May 21, 2015, Office Action. |
Henry, Paul and Luo, Hui. “Off the record Email System” (document and presentation). Presentation at IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (Infocom) Apr. 2001, Anchorage, Alaska, USA; last found at http://www.research.att.com:9000/˜macsbug/Other—Cool—Stuff/OTREM/otrem.html on Apr. 7, 2006. |
Bass, Steve. “50 fixes for the biggest PC annoyances: Windows gone wacky? Hardware gone haywire? Software gone screwy? Take a deep breath—help is here.” [online] Oct. 1, 2003. [retrieved on Mar. 8, 2009] PC-World. [Retrieved from http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary—0286-24479177—ITM] p. 3 Paragraph 5-7. |
Gulco, Ceki and Tsudik, Gene. “Mixing E-mail with Babel.” Proceedings of the Symposium on Network and Distributed System Security, XP-002086536, Jan. 1, 1996, pp. 2-16. |
Elkins, Michael. “The Mutt E-mail Client.” ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/mail/mutt/historic/mutt-1.Opre2.tar.gz, XP-002245042, Sep. 1, 1999. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,148, Mar. 13, 2009, First Office Action, U.S. Pat. No. 7,610,345. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,148, Jun. 10, 2009, Interview Summary, U.S. Pat. No. 7,610,345. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,148, Jun. 15, 2009, Response to Office Action, U.S. Pat. No. 7,610,345. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,148, Aug. 25, 2009, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Pat. No. 7,610,345. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,148, Aug. 25, 2009, Rule 312 Amendment, U.S. Pat. No. 7,610,345. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,148, Oct. 7, 2009, Issue Notification, U.S. Pat. No. 7,610,345. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,777, Aug. 19, 2009, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,845, Sep. 29, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,885, Jan. 25, 2011, Office Action, U.S. Pat. No. 8,291,026. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,885, May 25, 2011, Response to Office Action, U.S. Pat. No. 8,291,026. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,885, Jun. 14, 2011, Examiner Interview Summary, U.S. Pat. No. 8,291,026. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,885, Aug. 4, 2011, Final Office Action, U.S. Pat. No. 8,291,026. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,885, Nov. 23, 2011, Examiner Interview Summary, U.S. Pat. No. 8,291,026. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,885, Jan. 4, 2012, Response to Final Office Action and RCE, U.S. Pat. No. 8,291,026. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,885, Jun. 11, 2012, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Pat. No. 8,291,026. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,932, Jan. 9, 2014, Response to Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,932, Sep. 9, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,932, Mar. 19, 2015, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,875, May 21, 2014, Office Action, U.S. Pat. No. 8,935,351. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,875, May 28, 2014, Supplemental Office Action, U.S. Pat. No. 8,935,351. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,875, Jun. 9, 2014, Examiner Interview Summary, U.S. Pat. No. 8,935,351. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,875, Jun. 23, 2014, Examiner Interview Summary, U.S. Pat. No. 8,935,351. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,875, Jul. 14, 2014, Response to Office Action, U.S. Pat. No. 8,935,351. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,875, Jul. 23, 2014, Resubmission of Terminal Disclaimers, U.S. Pat. No. 8,935,351. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,875, Aug. 15, 2014, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Pat. No. 8,935,351. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,875, Dec. 23, 2014, Issue Notification, U.S. Pat. No. 8,935,351. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,897, May 28, 2014, Office Action, U.S. Pat. No. 8,886,739. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,897, Jun. 9, 2014, Examiner Interview Summary, U.S. Pat. No. 8,886,739. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,897, Jun. 23, 2014, Examiner Interview Summary, U.S. Pat. No. 8,886,739. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,897, Jul. 14, 2014, Response to Office Action, U.S. Pat. No. 8,886,739. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,897, Jul. 23, 2014, Resubmission of Terminal Disclaimers, U.S. Pat. No. 8,886,739. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,897, Aug. 5, 2014, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Pat. No. 8,886,739. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,897, Oct. 22, 2014, Issue Notification, U.S. Pat. No. 8,886,739. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,777, filed Sep. 23, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,845, filed Feb. 15, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,885, filed Oct. 26, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,932, filed Apr. 16, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/651,909, filed Oct. 15, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/864,930, filed Apr. 17, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/033,135, filed Sep. 20, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,875, filed Dec. 19, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,897, filed Dec. 19, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,920, filed Dec. 17, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,932, filed Dec. 17, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,942, filed Dec. 17, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,952, filed Dec. 17, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,966, filed Dec. 17, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,976, filed Dec. 17, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,932, Dec. 11, 2015, Response to Office Action with. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,932, Dec. 17, 2015, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,942, Dec. 17, 2015, Preliminary Amendment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,952, Dec. 17, 2015, Preliminary Amendment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/651,909, Dec. 21, 2015, Notice of Abandonment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,942, Dec. 22, 2015, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,952, Dec. 23, 2015, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,966, Dec. 23, 2015, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,932, Jan. 11, 2016, Examiner Interview Summary. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,920, Jan. 15, 2016, Response to Office Action with. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,932, Jan. 15, 2016, Response to Office Action with. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,942, Jan. 15, 2016, Response to Office Action with. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,952, Jan. 15, 2016, Response to Office Action with. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,966, Jan. 15, 2016, Response to Office Action with. |
Eide, Kristian. “The Next Generation of Mail Clients.” LWN.net. Feb. 25, 2004. Retrieved from https://lwn.net/Articles/72937/, last visited Dec. 11, 2015. |
Garrett, Jesse James. “Yahoo! Mail: Simplicity Holds Up Over Time.” BoxesandArrows.com. Mar. 11, 2002. Retrieved from http://boxesandarrows.com/yahoo-mail-simplicity-holds-up-over-time/, last visited Dec. 11, 2015. |
Garrett, Jesse James. “Yahoo! Mail.” Dec. 28, 2001. From BoxesandArrows.com. |
GSM Application Style Guide. Openwave Systems Inc. Feb. 2001. |
Jarrett, Caroline. “Designing Usable Forms: The Three Layer Model of the Form.” Effortmark. Excerpt from St. Francis Leprosy Guild Forms. 2000. |
Klensin, J. (ed.). Request for Comment 2821: “Simple Mail Transfer Protocol.” The Internet Society. Apr. 2001. Retrieved from https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt, last visited Dec. 11, 2015. |
Spolsky, Joel. “User Interface Design for Programmers.” Apress. 2001. |
Starling, Andrew. “Usability and HTML Forms.” ecommerce-guide.com. Dec. 11, 2001. Retrieved from http://www.ecommerce-guide.com/solutions/building/article.php/938071/Usability-and-HTML-Forms.htm, last visited Dec. 11, 2015. |
Wroblewski, Luke. “Web Application Form Design.” Jan. 22, 2005. Retrieved from http://www.lukew.com/ff/entry.asp?1502, last visited Dec. 11, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,932, Jun. 24, 2015, Applicant Initiated Interview Summary. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,932, Jul. 16, 2015, Office Action (Supplemental). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,932, Dec. 11, 2015, Applicant Initiated Interview Summary. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/864,930, Nov. 6, 2015, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,966, Dec. 3, 2015, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,920, Dec. 11, 2015, Preliminary Amendment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,932, Dec. 9, 2015, Preliminary Amendment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,976, Dec. 10, 2015, Preliminary Amendment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,932, filed Jan. 11, 2016, Examiner Initiated Interview Summary |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,932, filed Jan. 22, 2016, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,290, filed Feb. 18, 2016, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,932, filed Feb. 17, 2016, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,942, filed Feb. 17, 2016, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,952, filed Feb. 18, 2016, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,966, filed Feb. 18, 2016, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,932, filed Feb. 17, 2016, Issue Notification. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,920, filed Feb. 18, 2016, 1.312 Amendment after Notice of. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,932, filed Feb. 18, 2016, 1.312 Amendment after Notice of. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,942, filed Feb. 18, 2016, 1.312 Amendment after Notice of. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,952, filed Feb. 18, 2016, 1.312 Amendment after Notice of. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/572,966, filed Feb. 18, 2016, 1.312 Amendment after Notice of. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150106744 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60703367 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14133875 | Dec 2013 | US |
Child | 14572976 | US | |
Parent | 13651909 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 14133875 | US | |
Parent | 12605885 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 13651909 | US | |
Parent | 11401148 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 12605885 | US |