The field of the invention is apparatus and methods for agitating liquid electrolyte in an electroplating apparatus.
In many plating processes, a diffusion layer forms in the liquid electrolyte at the surface of the wafer. The diffusion layer reduces the mass transfer rate of electrolyte components and reactants to the surface of the wafer, which degrades the quality and efficiency of the plating process. One technique for increasing the mass transfer rate is to increase the relative velocity between the liquid electrolyte and the surface of the workpiece. In the past, some processing apparatus have used a paddle which oscillates horizontally or vertically in the electrolyte. The paddle has spaced apart ribs or blades. As the paddle moves, a liquid vortex is formed in the spaces between adjacent ribs. The liquid vortex creates a high speed agitated flow at or against the lower (down-facing) surface of the workpiece, increasing the mass transfer rate.
These types of paddle plating apparatus also often have an electric field shield provided to shield the edges of the wafer from the full electric field in the electrolyte, to achieve more uniform plating at the edges of the wafer. The shield is usually an annular ring of di-electric material.
Both the paddle and the shield are most effective when positioned very close to the wafer, for example, within 5 mm. If the shield is positioned below the paddle, the shield is less effective. If the shield is positioned above the paddle, then the paddle is less effective, as the gap between the paddle and the wafer is larger. Accordingly, engineering challenges remain in designing electro-plating apparatus.
Experimental and computation results disclose a relationship between the dimension of the gap between the paddle and the wafer, and the vortex size for achieving improved mass transfer. Specifically, the inventors have discovered that in processor designs having a larger gap, using a paddle which creates larger vortices provides improved results. Consequently, in designs having a shield is at a vertical position above the paddle, making the gap larger, a paddle having ribs spaced farther apart provides better mass transfer by creating larger vortices. The vortices may also be made more consistently across the wafer providing more uniform mass-transfer.
In one aspect, an electroplating apparatus agitates electrolyte to provide high velocity fluid flow at the surface of a wafer that results in results in high, uniform mass transfer providing more uniform plating at high plating rates. The apparatus includes a paddle which can provide uniform high mass transfer over the entire wafer, even with a relatively large gap between the paddle and the wafer. Consequently, the processor may have an electric field shield positioned between the paddle and the wafer, where the shield is more effective. In this design, with the paddle below the shield, the paddle is also less likely to adversely influence the electric field across the wafer. This advantage is particularly significant in processing where the wafer does not rotate, where such disturbances cannot be averaged out with wafer rotation.
In the drawings, the same reference number indicates the same element in each of the views.
As shown in
A contact ring 26 on the head 14 holds the wafer 30 and has a plurality of contact fingers for making electrical contact with a conductive layer, such as a metal seed layer, on the wafer 30. The contact ring 26 may optionally have a seal 38 to seal the contact fingers from the electrolyte. The head 14 may include a rotor 36 for rotating the wafer 30 during processing, with the contact ring 26 on the rotor. Typically the contact ring has a seal and a backing plate, with the contact ring and the backing plate forming a wafer holder. The head 14 is movable to position the wafer holder into a processing position in the vessel, where the seed layer is in contact with electrolyte in the vessel.
Referring now also to
As shown in
With a seal 38 height of 2-3 mm (2.7 mm nominal), and allowing for a 1 mm gap SG between the seal 38 and the weir shield 34, a weir shield 34 thickness of 1 mm, and a gap BG of 1 mm between the top of the ribs and the weir shield 34, the minimum gap GG is about 5-6 mm (5.7 mm nominal).
To achieve a smaller gap GG over most of the wafer 30, a raised rib paddle 15 as shown in
Referring once again to
All of the ribs 60 may have the same cross section shape, dimensions and spacing, with the length of the ribs varying with rib position, as shown in
The inventors have discovered that there is a mathematical relationship between the gap GG and the pitch spacing PP (or alternatively the width of the space 68 formed between adjacent ribs).
1. PP=2.72×GG+3.45 mm.
2. Space aspect ratio=(HH−BB)/PP=0.3 to 0.5 (0.44 nominal).
Consequently, in processor design, the gap GG may be first determined based on the shield requirements and other factors. Then the paddle 18 may be designed with the pitch and height of the ribs selected to have an aspect ratio of 0.3 or 0.35 to 0.5, and PP is greater than 16, 17 or 18 mm, and up to 22 or 24 mm. Using these equations, the thickness BB of the base 66 is added to obtain the total rib height HH. Although the gap GG varies depending on dimensions of other elements and the design of the electroplating processor, the ratio of PP/GG may typically range from about 2.5 to 3.
Thus, a novel electroplating processor has been shown and described. Various changes and substitutions may of course be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The invention, therefore, should not be limited, except by the following claims, and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/806,255, filed Jul. 22, 2015, now pending, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6602383 | Batz, Jr. et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
7160421 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7351315 | Klocke et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7390382 | McHugh et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390383 | McHugh et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7931786 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8920616 | Chen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
10227706 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
20020020621 | Uzho et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029961 | Dordi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040245094 | McHugh et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070144912 | Woodruff | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070151844 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080110751 | Oberlitner et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20130334051 | Chen et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140251814 | Kao et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150075976 | Harris et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1960799 | May 2007 | CN |
I415968 | Nov 2013 | TW |
M542660 | Jun 2017 | TW |
Entry |
---|
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office, Office Action for Taiwan Application No. 105123028; dated Jul. 24, 2019; 17 pages. |
Applied Materials, Figure 2, 10mm Pitch, Uniform Height Paddle Blades 2.44mm Gap (Jan. 2012). |
Applied Materials, Figure 4, “Raise Rib” Raider-S Paddle 16mm Pitch Cavity (Jan. 2012). |
The State Intellectual Property Office, First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201610586002.2; dated Oct. 31, 2018; 14 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office, Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201610586002.2; dated Jul. 1, 2019; 6 pages. |
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office, Examination Notice in Taiwan Application No. 105123028, English translation only; dated May 27, 2019; 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190153611 A1 | May 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14806255 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 16261157 | US |