1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a device for accelerating, and thereby imparting velocity and momentum to a fluid, especially to air, through the use of ions and electrical fields.
2. Description of the Related Art
A number of patents (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,210,847 and 4,231,766) have recognized the fact that ions may be generated by an electrode (termed the “corona electrode”), attracted (and, therefore, accelerated) toward another electrode (termed the “attracting electrode”), and impart momentum, directed toward the attracting electrode, to surrounding air molecules through collisions with such molecules.
The corona electrode must either have a sharp edge or be small in size, such as a thin wire, in order to create a corona discharge and thereby produce in the surrounding air ions of the air molecules. Such ions have the same electrical polarity as does the corona electrode.
Any other configuration of corona electrodes and other electrodes where the potential differences between the electrodes are such that ion-generating corona discharge occurs at the corona electrodes may be used for ion generation and consequent fluid acceleration.
When the ions collide with other air molecules, not only do such ions impart momentum to such air molecules, but the ions also transfer some of their excess electric charge to these other air molecules, thereby creating additional molecules that are attracted toward the attracting electrode. These combined effects cause the so-called electric wind.
However, because a small number of ions are generated by the corona electrode in comparison to the number of air molecules which are in the vicinity of the corona electrode, the ions in the present electric wind generators must be given initial high velocities in order to move the surrounding air. To date, even these high initial ionic velocities have not produced significant speeds of air movement. And, even worse, such high ionic velocities cause such excitation of surrounding air molecules that substantial quantities of ozone and nitrogen oxides, all of which have well-known detrimental environmental effects, are produced.
Presently, no invention has even attained significant speeds of air movement, let alone doing so without generating undesirable quantities of ozone and nitrogen oxides.
Three patents, viz., U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,638,058; 4,380,720; and 5,077,500, have, however, employed on a rudimentary level some of the techniques which have enabled the present inventors to achieve significant speeds of air movement and to do so without generating undesirable quantities of ozone and nitrogen oxides.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,077,500, in order to ensure that all corona electrodes “work under mutually the same conditions and will thus all engender mutually the same corona discharge,” uses other electrodes to shield the corona electrodes from the walls of the duct (in which the device of that patent is to be installed) and from other corona electrodes. These other electrodes, according to lines 59 through 60 in column 3 of the patent, “ . . . will not take up any corona current . . . . ”
Also, U.S. Pat. No. 4,380,720 employs multiple stages, each consisting of pairs of a corona electrode and an attracting electrode, so that the air molecules which have been accelerated to a given speed by one stage will be further accelerated to an even greater speed by the subsequent stage. U.S. Pat. No. 4,380,720 does not, however, recognize the need to neutralize substantially all ions and other electrically charged particles, such as dust, prior to their approaching the corona electrode of the subsequent stage in order to avoid having such ions and particles repelled by that corona electrode in an upstream direction, i.e., the direction opposite to the velocity produced by the attracting electrode of the previous stage.
And U.S. Pat. No. 5,077,500, on lines 25 through 29 of column 1, states, “The air ions migrate rapidly from the corona electrode to the target electrode, under the influence of the electric field, and relinquish their electric charge to the target electrode and return to electrically neutral air molecules.” The fact that the target electrode is not, however, so effective as to neutralize substantially all of the air ions is apparent from the discussion of ion current between the corona electrode K and the surfaces 4, which discussion is located on lines 15 through 27 in column 4.
Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 3,638,058 provides, on line 66 of column 1 through line 13 of column 2, “ . . . it can be seen that with a high DC voltage impressed between cathode point 12 and ring anode 18, an electrostatic field will result causing a corona discharge region surrounding point 14. This corona discharge region will ionize the air molecules in proximity to point 14 which, being charged particles of the same polarity as the cathode, will, in turn, be attracted toward ring anode 18 which will also act as a focusing anode. The accelerated ions will impart kinetic energy to neutral air molecules by repeated collisions and attachment. Neutral air molecules thus accelerated, constitute the useful mechanical output of the ion wind generator. The majority of ions, however, will end their usefulness upon reaching the ring 18 where they fan out radially and collide with the ring producing anode current. A small portion of the ions will possess sufficient kinetic energy to continue on through the ring along with the neutral particles. These result in a slight loss of efficiency because they tend to be drawn back to the anode. The same theory will apply for cathode 13 and anode 17. Since opposite polarities are impressed on each cathode-anode pair, their exiting airstreams will contain oppositely charged ions which will merge and neutralize; i.e., being of opposite polarity, the ions will attract each other and be neutralized by recombination. “It is, however, not clear that substantially all ions which escape the electrodes will merge because many ions emerging from the anode on the left are likely to have such momentum toward the left that the electrical attraction for ions emerging from the anode on the right with momentum toward the right is insufficent to overcome such opposite momenta. Furthermore, the distance required for such recombination as does occur is very probably so great that it would be a detriment to using multiple stages to provide increased speed to the air.
The present Electrostatic Fluid Accelerator employs two fundamental techniques to achieve significant speeds in the fluid flow, which can be virtually any fluid but is most often air, and which will not produce substantial undesired ozone and nitrogen oxides when the fluid is air.
First, to accelerate the fluid molecules significantly without having to impart high velocities to the ions, many ions are created within a given area so that there is a high density, or pressure, of ions. This is achieved by placing a multiplicity of corona electrodes close to one another. The corona electrodes can be placed near one another because they are electrically shielded from one another by exciting electrodes which have a potential difference, compared to the corona electrodes, adequate to generate a corona discharge. An exciting electrode is placed between adjacent corona electrodes and, thus, across the intended direction of flow for the fluid molecules.
In order to cause ions to create fluid flow, either the exciting electrode must be asymmetrically located between the adjacent corona electrodes (in order to create an asymmetrically shaped electric field that, unlike a symmetrical field, will force ions in a preferred direction) or there must be an accelerating electrode.
Preferably, in the case of an accelerating electrode, such accelerating electrode is an attracting electrode placed downstream from the corona electrodes in order to cause the ions to move in the intended direction. The electric polarity of the attracting electrode is opposite to that of the corona electrode.
It has, however, been experimentally determined that, when the corona electrodes are close to one another, if the electric potential of the exciting electrode is between that of the of the corona electrode and that of the attracting electrode, as in the case with respect to U.S. Pat. No. 5,077,500, the rate of fluid flow decreases. Indeed, when the electric potential of the exciting electrodes is the same as that of the corona electrode, no fluid flow occurs. This effect results from the fact that the electric field strength between the exciting electrode and the corona electrodes is not adequate to cause a corona discharge and produce ions; the corona discharge between the corona electrode and then attracting electrode is suppressed; and the consequent lower density of ions is inadequate to produce the desired flow of fluid, or, as explained above, any flow at all when the electric potential of the exciting electrodes is the same as that of the corona electrode. Furthermore, when the corona electrodes are placed close together in order to increase the density of ions, as described above, the electric field between the corona electrodes and the exciting electrodes influences the electric field between the corona electrodes and the attracting electrode. Thus, to achieve desirable flow rates, it is preferable to maintain the electric field strength between the exciting electrodes and the corona electrodes at a level that will produce a corona discharge and, consequently, a current flow from the corona electrodes to the exciting electrodes.
Yet, since the rate of fluid flow can be controlled by varying the electric field strength between the exciting electrode and the corona electrodes and since such electric field strength can be adjusted by varying the electric potential of the exciting electrode, the electric potential of the exciting electrodes can be varied in order to control the flow rate of the fluid with less expenditure of energy than when this is accomplished by controlling the potential of the attracting electrode.
Optionally, as suggested above, rather than using an attracting electrode as the accelerating electrode, a repelling electrode can be placed upstream from the corona electrode. The electrical polarity of the repelling electrode is the same as that of the corona electrode. From a repelling electrode, however, there is no corona discharge.
Second, in order to achieve the greatest flow of fluid, multiple stages of corona discharge devices are used with a collecting electrode between each stage. The collecting electrode has opposite electrical polarity to that of the corona electrodes. The collecting electrode is designed to preclude substantially all ions and other electrically charged particles from passing to the next stage and, therefore, being repelled by the corona electrodes of the next stage, which repulsion would retard the rate of fluid flow. The corona discharge device can be any such device that is known in the art but is preferably one utilizing the construction discussed above for increasing the density of ions.
A further optional technique for maximizing the density of ions is having a high-voltage power supply with a variable maximum voltage that depends on the corona current, which is defined as the total current from the corona electrode to any other electrode. The output voltage of the high-voltage power supply is inversely proportional to the corona current. Therefore, the voltage applied to the corona electrodes is reduced sufficiently, when the corona current indicates that a breakdown is imminent, that such breakdown is precluded. Without this option, the voltage between the corona electrodes and the other electrodes (except, of course, repelling electrodes, where no corona discharge is desired) must be manually maintained between the corona inception voltage and the breakdown voltage to have a sufficient electric field strength to create a corona discharge between the corona electrodes and the other electrodes without causing a spark-producing breakdown that would preclude the creation of the desired ions. The closer the voltage between such electrodes approaches, without actually attaining, the breakdown voltage, however, the greater will be the density of the ions that are generated.
The voltage applied to any electrode other than the corona electrode can, furthermore, also be used to control the direction of movement of the ions and, therefore, of the fluid. If desired, electrodes may be introduced for this purpose alone.
In order to successfully create the desired rate of fluid flow, the high-voltage power supply should generate an output voltage that is higher than the corona onset voltage but, no matter what the surrounding environmental conditions, below the breakdown voltage.
To prevent a breakdown between electrodes, the high-voltage power supply should be sensitive to conditions that affect the breakdown voltage, such as humidity, temperature, etc. and reduce the output voltage to a level below the breakdown point.
Achieving this goal could require a rather costly high-voltage power supply with voltage and other sensors as well as a feedback loop control.
However, it was experimentally determined by the inventors that the corona current depends on the same conditions which affect the breakdown voltage. Thus, as indicated above, the voltage between the corona electrode and other electrodes (except the repelling electrodes, for which a corona discharge is not desired) should be maintained between the corona onset voltage and the breakdown voltage; and a preferred technique for maximizing the density of ions without having a breakdown, no matter what the surrounding environmental conditions are, is to utilize a high-voltage power supply with a variable maximum voltage that is inversely proportional to the corona current.
Such a high-voltage power supply is termed a “flexible top” high-voltage power supply.
The “flexible top” high-voltage power supply preferably consists of two power supply units connected in series. The first unit, which is termed the “base unit,” generates an output voltage, termed the “base voltage,” which is close to (above or below) the corona onset voltage and below the breakdown voltage and which, because of a low internal impedance in the unit, is only slightly sensitive to the output current. The second unit, which is termed the “flexible top,” generates an output voltage that is much more sensitive to the output current than is the voltage of the base unit, i.e., the base voltage, because of a large internal impedance. If output current increases, the base voltage will remain almost constant whereas the output voltage from the flexible top decreases. It is a matter of ordinary skill in the art to select the values of circuit components which will assure that, for any foreseeable environmental conditions, the combined resultant output voltage from the base unit and the flexible top will be greater than the corona onset voltage but less than the breakdown voltage.
Moreover, once the need for the flexible top has been recognized, ordinary skill in the art can supply various methods of achieving such a power supply.
Perhaps, the simplest example of the flexible top high-voltage power supply is the following: A traditional high-voltage power supply is used for the base unit, and a step-up transformer with larger leakage inductance is employed in the flexible top. The alternating current flows through the leakage inductance, thereby creating a voltage drop across such inductance. The more current that is drawn, the more voltage drops across the leakage inductance; and the more voltage that is dropped across the leakage inductor, the less is the output voltage of the flexible top.
A second example of a flexible top high-voltage power supply utilizies a combination of capacitors of a voltage multiplier as depicted in FIG. 6. The first set of capacitors have a much greater capactitance and, therefore, much lower impedance than the second set. Therefore, the voltage across the first set of capacitors (the base unit) is relatively insensitive to the current whereas the voltage across the second set of capacitors (the flexible top) is inversely proportional to the current.
It will be appreciated that a flexible top high-voltage power supply is any combination of bases units and flexible tops connected in series that do not depart from the spirit of the invention. Therefore, the flexible top high-voltage power supply may consist of any number of base units and flexible tops connected in series in any desired order so that the resultant output voltage is within the desired range.
The Electrostatic Fluid Accelerator of the present invention, thus, comprises a multiplicity of closely spaced corona electrodes with an exciting electrode asymmetrically located between the corona electrodes. A flexible top high-voltage power supply preferably controls the voltage between the corona electrodes and the exciting electrodes so that such voltage is maintained between the corona onset voltage and the breakdown voltage.
Optionally, however, the voltage between the corona electrodes and the exciting electrodes can be varied even outside the preceding range in order to vary the flow of the fluid which it is desired to move.
And in lieu of locating the exciting electrode asymmetrically between the corona electrodes, the Electrostatic Fluid Accelerator may further comprise an accelerating electrode.
The accelerating electrode may, as discussed above, either be an attracting electrode, a repelling electrode, or a combination of attracting and repelling electrodes.
An attracting electrode has electric polarity opposite to that of the corona electrode and is located, with respect to the desired direction of fluid flow, downstream from the corona electrode. The repelling electrode has the same electrical polarity as the corona electrode and is situated, with respect to the desired direction of fluid flow, upstream from the corona electrode.
To assure that more ions and, consequently, more fluid particles, flow downstream, the exciting electrode can be constructed in the form of a plate that extends downstream with respect to the desired direction of fluid flow.
Finally, as discussed above, in order to achieve the greatest flow of fluid, multiple stages of corona discharge devices, and preferably the Electrostatic Fluid Accelerator of the present invention, are used with a collecting electrode placed between each stage. The collecting electrode has opposite electrical polarity to that of the corona electrodes and is designed to preclude substantially all ions and other electrically charged particles from passing to the next stage, where they would tend to be repelled and thereby impair the movement of the fluid. Preferably, the collecting electrode is a wire mesh that extends substantially across the intended path for the fluid particles.
If electric field strength in the area between the corona electrodes 41 and the exciting electrodes 34 is approximately equal to the electric field strength in the area between the corona electrodes 41 and the attracting electrodes 35 the electric current's magnitude that flows from the corona electrodes 41 to the exciting electrodes 34 is approximately equal to the electric current's magnitude that flows from the corona electrodes 41 to the attracting electrodes 35. It is experimentally determined that approximately equal electric field strength is most favorable for the corona discharge for the described electrodes geometry and mutual location. It was further determined that when the electric field strength in the area between the corona electrodes 41 and the exciting electrodes 34 is less than that of the electric field strength in the area between the corona electrodes 41 and the attracting electrodes 35 the corona discharge is suppressed and fewer ions are emitted from the corona discharge. When electric field strength in the area between the corona electrodes 41 and the exciting electrodes 34 is approximately half of the electric field strength in the area between the corona electrodes 41 and the attracting electrodes 35 the corona discharge is almost totally suppressed and almost no or fewer ions are emitted from the corona discharge and no fluid movement is detected.
It will be understood that because of nature of a corona discharge a flexible top power supply may be successfully used with any combination of electrodes for corona discharge initiating and maintenance.
It will be further understood that any set of multiple electrodes may be located and/or secured on the separate frame. This frame must have an opening through which fluid freely flows. It may be a rectangular frame or u-shape frame or any other. Two or more frames on which the multiple set of the electrodes is located are then secured in the manner that ensures sufficient distance along the surface to prevent so called creeping discharge along this surface.
The above arrangements were successfully tested. The distance between exciting electrodes was 2 to 5 mm., the diameter of the corona electrodes was 0.1 mm and the exciting electrodes' width was about 12 mm. The attracting electrodes' diameter was 0.75 mm. The corona electrodes were made of tungsten wire while the exciting electrodes were made of aluminum foil, and the exciting electrodes were made of brass and steel rods. At a voltage for the corona electrodes (the exciting and attracting electrodes being grounded) in the magnitude of 2,000 volts to 7,500 volts, air flow was measured at a maximum rate of 950 feet per minute. In terms of the voltage applied to the exciting electrodes, air flow was at a maximum value when the exciting electrodes' potential was close to voltage of the attracting electrodes. When the potential at the exciting electrodes approached the potential of the corona electrodes, the air flow decreased and eventually dropped to an undetectable level.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/419,720 filed on Oct. 14, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,504,308, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/104,573, filed Oct. 16, 1998, now abandoned.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1888606 | Nesbit | Nov 1932 | A |
2765975 | Lindenblad | Oct 1956 | A |
2949550 | Brown | Aug 1960 | A |
3026964 | Penney | Mar 1962 | A |
3071705 | Coleman et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3108394 | Ellman et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
3198726 | Trikilis | Aug 1965 | A |
3267860 | Brown | Aug 1966 | A |
3374941 | Okress | Mar 1968 | A |
3518462 | Brown | Jun 1970 | A |
3582694 | Gourdine | Jun 1971 | A |
3638058 | Fritzius | Jan 1972 | A |
3675096 | Kiess | Jul 1972 | A |
3699387 | Edwards | Oct 1972 | A |
3740927 | Vincent | Jun 1973 | A |
3751715 | Edwards | Aug 1973 | A |
3896347 | Gelfand | Jul 1975 | A |
3907520 | Huang et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3918939 | Hardt | Nov 1975 | A |
3936635 | Clark | Feb 1976 | A |
3981695 | Fuchs | Sep 1976 | A |
3983393 | Thettu et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
3984215 | Zucker | Oct 1976 | A |
4008057 | Gelfand et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4011719 | Banks | Mar 1977 | A |
4061961 | Baker | Dec 1977 | A |
4086152 | Rich et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4086650 | Davis et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4124003 | Abe et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4156885 | Baker et al. | May 1979 | A |
4162144 | Cheney | Jul 1979 | A |
4210847 | Shannon et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4216000 | Kofoid | Aug 1980 | A |
4231766 | Spurgin | Nov 1980 | A |
4240809 | Elsbernd et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
RE30480 | Gelfand | Jan 1981 | E |
4246010 | Honacker | Jan 1981 | A |
4266948 | Teague et al. | May 1981 | A |
4267502 | Reese et al. | May 1981 | A |
4292493 | Selander et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4313741 | Masuda et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4315837 | Rourke et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4335414 | Weber | Jun 1982 | A |
4351648 | Penney | Sep 1982 | A |
4376637 | Yang | Mar 1983 | A |
4379129 | Abe | Apr 1983 | A |
4380720 | Fleck | Apr 1983 | A |
4388274 | Rourke et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4390831 | Byrd et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4401385 | Katayama et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4481017 | Furlong | Nov 1984 | A |
4567541 | Terai | Jan 1986 | A |
4600411 | Santamaria | Jul 1986 | A |
4604112 | Ciliberti et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4643745 | Sakakibara et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4646196 | Reale | Feb 1987 | A |
4649703 | Dettling et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4673416 | Sakakibara et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4689056 | Noguchi et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4719535 | Zhenjun et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4740826 | Halleck | Apr 1988 | A |
4741746 | Chao et al. | May 1988 | A |
4775915 | Walgrove, III | Oct 1988 | A |
4783595 | Seidl | Nov 1988 | A |
4789801 | Lee | Dec 1988 | A |
4790861 | Watai et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4812711 | Torok et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4837658 | Reale | Jun 1989 | A |
4838021 | Beattie | Jun 1989 | A |
4841425 | Maeba et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4853719 | Reale | Aug 1989 | A |
4853735 | Kodama et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4878149 | Stiehl et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4924937 | Beal et al. | May 1990 | A |
4938786 | Tonomoto | Jul 1990 | A |
4941353 | Fukatsu et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4980611 | Orenstein | Dec 1990 | A |
4996473 | Markson et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5012159 | Torok et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5024685 | Torok et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5055118 | Nagoshi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059219 | Plaks et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5077500 | Torok et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5087943 | Creveling | Feb 1992 | A |
5136461 | Zellweger | Aug 1992 | A |
5138513 | Weinstein | Aug 1992 | A |
5155531 | Kurotori et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163983 | Lee | Nov 1992 | A |
5199257 | Colletta et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5245692 | Kawai | Sep 1993 | A |
5257073 | Gross et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5269131 | Brophy | Dec 1993 | A |
5330559 | Cheney et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5369953 | Brophy | Dec 1994 | A |
5423902 | Strutz et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5469242 | Yu et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474599 | Cheney et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5508880 | Beyer | Apr 1996 | A |
5542967 | Ponizovsky et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5556448 | Cheney et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5578112 | Krause | Nov 1996 | A |
5661299 | Purser | Aug 1997 | A |
5667564 | Weinberg | Sep 1997 | A |
5707428 | Fedlman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5769155 | Ohadi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5814135 | Weinberg | Sep 1998 | A |
5827407 | Wang et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5847917 | Suzuki | Dec 1998 | A |
5892363 | Roman | Apr 1999 | A |
5899666 | Chung et al. | May 1999 | A |
D411001 | Pinchuk | Jun 1999 | S |
5920474 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5951957 | Simpson | Sep 1999 | A |
5973905 | Shaw | Oct 1999 | A |
5982102 | Andzej | Nov 1999 | A |
5993521 | Loreth et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007682 | Hancock et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
D420438 | Pinchuk | Feb 2000 | S |
6042637 | Weinberg | Mar 2000 | A |
6056808 | Krause | May 2000 | A |
6394086 | Barnes et al. | May 2000 | B1 |
D427300 | Pinchuk | Jun 2000 | S |
6084350 | Ezaki et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108504 | Dickhoff | Aug 2000 | A |
D433494 | Pinchuk et al. | Nov 2000 | S |
D434483 | Pinchuk | Nov 2000 | S |
6145298 | Burton | Nov 2000 | A |
6152146 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6167196 | Huggins et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176977 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182671 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
D438513 | Pinchuk | Mar 2001 | S |
6195827 | Dumitriu | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200539 | Sherman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203600 | Loreth | Mar 2001 | B1 |
D440290 | Pinchuk | Apr 2001 | S |
6210642 | Lee et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228330 | Herrmann et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245126 | Feldman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245132 | Feldman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6313064 | Miyafuji et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6504308 | Krichtafovitch et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6574123 | Wiser et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
20020122751 | Sinaiko et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020122752 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020127156 | Taylor | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020155041 | McKinney, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030033176 | Hancock | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030147785 | Joannou | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165410 | Taylor | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030170150 | Lau et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030206837 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030206839 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030206840 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030209420 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040025497 | Truce | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040033340 | Lau et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047775 | Lau et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052700 | Kotlyar et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040057882 | Lau et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079233 | Lau et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030090209 A1 | May 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60104573 | Oct 1998 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09419720 | Oct 1999 | US |
Child | 10295869 | US |