The present application relates to an improved electrostatic discharge protection device.
It is well known that some integrated circuit technologies are susceptible to damage by electrostatic discharge (ESD). CMOS transistors which are frequently used in logic circuits are an example of such devices. Protection schemes are known, such as providing diodes connecting an input pin to the device supply rails. However these measures are crude and can switch into a conducting state during normal operating conditions.
More sophisticated ESD protection circuits have been implemented using transistors within an integrated circuit. However, the transistor parameters and fabrication processes used in these integrated ESD protection circuits have not typically been optimized for their ESD function. Instead, the performance characteristics of these ESD transistors have largely been dependent upon fabrication parameters chosen to optimize other transistors that carry out the primary function of the circuit to be protected. Therefore, it has mainly been a matter of luck whether the fabrication parameters chosen to optimize majority devices are suitable for use in the accompanying ESD protection circuit. While it is possible to separately optimize an ESD protection circuit using additional processing steps, those additional processing steps carry increased costs. Instead, a reliable method of tailoring ESD protection device performance without using additional processing steps is required.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided an apparatus including an electrostatic discharge protection device comprising a semiconductor having first, second and third regions arranged to form a transistor, wherein the first region is doped with a first impurity of a first dopant type and is separated from the second region which is doped with a second impurity of a second dopant type, and wherein the electrostatic discharge protection device is adapted such that at least one of the following applies:
It is thus possible to provide an electrostatic protection device where the trigger is determined by the distance between the first and second regions, both of which are regions at the surface of the semiconductor, either in the finished device or during one of the processing steps in its fabrication, and hence their separation is well controlled during the masking and doping processes, as known to the person skilled in the art. It is feasible that other structures might be formed over the surface of the electrostatic protection device. In these circumstances the relevant separation would still have been defined at a surface of the semiconductor whilst the surface was exposed during fabrication. In any event the device properties may still be controlled by structures or dimensions defined on a surface in a horizontal plane, whether or not that surface is buried.
In some embodiments, a holding voltage can be controlled by controlling a width, area, or volume of the second region. It is thus possible to control the holding voltage by varying a spatial parameter that is easily modified during the masking and doping steps.
Thus, both the breakdown voltage and the holding voltage may be defined by dimensions at the surface of the device (or at least in a horizontal plane), and which are controllable during device fabrication.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of manufacturing an electronic apparatus including an electrostatic protection device. The method includes forming a horizontal bipolar transistor in a semiconductor substrate. The method also includes either: (1) selecting a first distance between a collector region and a base region to define a trigger voltage for the device; or (2) selecting a width of a base region to define a holding voltage.
According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided an integrated circuit including an electrostatic discharge protection device according to the first aspect of the present invention.
The present invention will now be described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Terms such as above, below, over, and so on as used herein refer to a semiconductor device orientated as shown in the figures and should be construed accordingly. It should also be appreciated that, because regions within a semiconductor device are defined by doping different parts of a semiconductor with differing impurities or differing concentrations of impurities, discrete physical boundaries between different regions may not actually exist in the completed device but instead regions may transition form one to another. Some boundaries as shown in the accompanying figures are of this type and are illustrated as abrupt structures merely for the assistance of the reader. The skilled artisan can readily determine with such gradients where to set boundaries for discrete functional diffusion regions in a semiconductor device.
As noted before, transistors have sometimes been used to provide electrostatic protection devices. However an integrated circuit may contain millions of transistors. The circuit designer wants to use as few process steps as possible in the fabrication of the integrated circuit since each additional masking and implanting step adds further cost. Also each step brings an increased error rate which reduces the yield of working devices formed on a wafer. Thus additional steps are preferably avoided. Given that the majority of transistors on a device will have a specific task, such as forming logic elements, then the transistor parameters are chosen so as to be appropriate for the majority task. Consequently the transistors that are formed are generally not suited for use in electrostatic discharge protection circuits, or give severely compromised performance.
In order to protect the transistor 10 from damage, an electrostatic protection device (or circuit) 20 is provided so as to limit the voltage excursions at the gate 16 of the transistor.
It is useful to consider the operation of an electrostatic discharge, ESD, protection device. Ideally, an electrostatic protection device should exhibit a controllable and selectable trigger voltage T. For input voltages having a magnitude less than the trigger voltage T, the device should be in a high-impedance (non-conducting) state. Once the trigger voltage magnitude has been exceeded the device should enter a low impedance state and start conducting.
The protection device may also offer “fold back” or “snap back” such that once it starts conducting, the voltage across the device reduces to a lower value. In this case, the device remains conducting, provided that the input voltage remains above a threshold magnitude, which may be called a “holding voltage”.
The inventors realized that for a given transistor fabrication process, it would be desirable for the trigger voltage and the holding voltage to be well controlled, and better still, adjustable. Doping concentrations and thermal budgets are already constrained by the function of the majority devices when those devices are simultaneously fabricated with ESD protection device(s). Therefore, those control parameters are not accessible to independently tailor ESD protection device performance. Fabrication steps to tailor doping just for ESD protection devices are costly, and it is not feasible to separate thermal budgets for different devices on the same substrate. Thus, it may be useful to control other device parameters and internal transistor processes.
Consider, for example, the structure of a vertically formed NPN bipolar transistor. During device fabrication the semiconductor wafer exists as a slab whose width and length is much greater than its depth. A surface of the wafer is exposed to impurities for doping. The surface is regarded as an upper horizontal surface in a frame of reference that is adopted for the purposes of description. An exemplary prior-art transistor 60 is illustrated in
A further region of less heavily doped N type semiconductor 110 is provided above the collector 100, and bounded by the vertical regions 102. It contains a well of P+ doped semiconductor which forms the base region 120 of the transistor. Finally, an emitter region 130 of N+ doped semiconductor is provided along with metallic emitter contact 132. It can be seen that the transistor structure NPN exists vertically along the line A-A′.
However it can also be seen that a horizontal or lateral NPN transistor structure also exists at the surface of the device. This horizontal transistor may be considered to be undesirable as it constitutes a structure that can give rise to breakdown, i.e. unwanted and often uncontrolled current conduction by transistor 60.
In the finished device an oxide layer 150 is provided over the surface of the transistor.
Although the device structures, such as the base and the collector have been shown as being well defined, it should be appreciated that during fabrication, the doping (e.g., ion implantation) process occurs from above the surface of the device (when viewed in the frame of reference adopted herein) so dopant concentrations are greater near the surface and naturally decrease with increasing depth into the wafer. Following implantation, a diffusion step is performed where the wafer is heated. This allows dopants to spread helping smear out local discontinuities in dopant concentration. However diffusion occurs in all directions so the theoretically sharp delineation between the base region 120 and the layer 110 becomes a smoother change in concentration and hence the transistor does not have a sharp boundary between these regions.
It should also be noted that higher dopant concentrations near a junction between dissimilarly doped materials means that the depletion region is smaller and hence any voltage difference between the dissimilar regions is dropped across a smaller distance, and hence the electrostatic field gradient is higher.
Given that implantation occurs from above, it follows that the highest field gradient tends to be near the surface of the transistor, even after the thermal diffusion step has occurred. Thus the depletion region of a junction is narrower near the upper surface of the transistor.
Additionally, it is known from electrostatic theory that the field gradient increases around a curved surface. The formation of the base layer gives rise to a structure having a nominally flat lower surface (which can be regarded as part of a cylinder of infinite radius) with curved edges (which can be regarded as a cylinder having a radius similar to the diffusion distance). Thus, the curvature at the edge of the base region gives rise to a field strength enhancement.
The simulation of electric field gradients shown in
The high field gradient provokes impact ionization in region 200, with carriers (in this case electrons), being swept towards and injected into the base region. Here they may cause the device to turn on, and if the current flow in the device is not limited by an external factor the collector current will increase until the device becomes damaged.
However, the inventors realized that the impact ionization driven breakdown process in this vertical transistor is highly controllable for a given fabrication process. In fact, experimentation has shown that the trigger voltage can be directly set by controlling the separation between the edge of the base and the edge of the collector region. This distance can be defined by masks during the doping stages of device fabrication.
In embodiments described herein, impact ionization sets up a current in the base, which forward biases the base-emitter junction and turns the transistor on. This in turn causes an emitter current which itself gives rise to the creation of additional impact ionization, by virtue of a combination of current density and electric field gradient occurring within a region of the device.
Once the device has turned on, in order to perform its function, it should stay on while the voltage across the device exceeds a holding voltage and/or the current therein exceeds a holding value. The holding voltage is the voltage across the device that is required to sustain the impact ionization process. Normally, device designers go to considerable lengths to try and avoid impact ionization from occurring. However, in embodiments of the invention, not only is the device modified so as to allow the onset of impact ionization to be controlled so as to set the trigger voltage, but the device is also designed so as to sustain impact ionization provided the voltage across the device exceeds a holding voltage. Of course, the designer may also want to control the holding voltage.
Once impact ionization has started, the current flow in the semiconductor enhances the impact ionization effect. In broad terms, impact ionization can be achieved with large voltages and small current densities or, critically, larger current densities and reduced voltages.
The inventors realized that controlling the size of the base region controls the current gain of a transistor, and that this in turn would provide a mechanism for controlling the holding voltage of the protection device. It is of course desirable for the control mechanism to be reliable and predictable.
This gives rise to a protection device where both the trigger voltage and the holding voltage are definable by features at the surface of the device. Furthermore no additional processing steps are required compared to those required to form the “majority” transistors that aid in carrying out the primary function of the integrated circuit.
In another arrangement, the device can instead be fabricated in a region of material that, in combination with the semiconductor substrate, is arranged to form a reverse biased PN junction well for isolation. However, the fabrication inside a well of insulating material (as shown) may be advantageous for an ESD protection device as the magnitude and polarity of the ESD event may be unpredictable. Side walls 250 can be formed as dielectric-filled trenches, whereas the bottom of the well 252 can be provided as silicon dioxide in a SOI structure.
Compared with the standard transistor as shown in
The base-collector separation 300 controls the trigger voltage of the ESD protection device. The distance 310, defining the width of the base 120, controls the holding voltage. Thus the device parameters are controlled by spatial features defined at the surface of the device. This means device characteristics can be accurately defined during design of the masks used to define the doping regions.
Similarly, the area and volume of the base 120 may control the holding voltage. For example, the area may be defined at the surface by modifying the width and length of the base 120, depending upon the shape. The volume is defined by the area times depth of the doped region. Thus, generally, a horizontal dimension defined during doping steps can be modulated to affect that horizontal dimension as well as the area and volume of the doped region, such that each of these parameters can be said to control an operational threshold of an ESD device.
The device shown in
A similar test of holding voltage was performed for a base-to-collector spacing of 14 μm and varying the base width from 12 to 50 μm. The holding voltages are shown in
In both examples of modulation in
Because the ESD protection device 20 allows mask-defined horizontal dimensions to tailor operational thresholds (e.g., trigger voltage or holding voltage), special doping dosages need not be used for this purpose. Instead, a designer may select doping dosages in order to optimize the performance of other transistors to be simultaneously fabricated on the substrate for the same integrated circuit. In some embodiments, at least one ESD protection device 20 is fabricated, and particularly doped, on the substrate simultaneously with at least one “primary” device, by which is meant a non-protective transistor employed in the primary functions of the integrated circuit. During a doping step of the fabrication process, a single mask may be used to simultaneously define at least one doped region or active area of both an ESD device and a primary device. Thus, one or more doped regions of the primary device may share the same dopant dosage and thus about the same maximum dopant levels with one or more doped regions of ESD protection device.
In one embodiment, the primary device is a MOSFET transistor, such as the transistor 10 of
In each of the foregoing examples, one or more active regions of a primary transistor and the ESD protection transistor share a common dopant dosage and thus about the same maximum dopant level, which may be selected in order to optimize performance of the primary transistor. At the same time, performance of the ESD protection device may be adjusted by selecting a mask-defined horizontal dimension. The ability to tailor an ESD protection device's operational threshold voltages such as trigger voltage and holding voltage through selection of horizontal dimensions in the doping masks allows doping dosages to be optimized for other transistors that are simultaneously fabricated, while still minimizing masking steps by simultaneous doping of both types of transistors.
According to one embodiment, the ESD protection device is connected such that the collector 270 is connected to the terminal 18 of the integrated circuit 5 that is to be protected, and the emitter is connected to the ground supply rail. The base terminal can be left floating or can be connected to the emitter via a resistor. Where a resistor is provided, the voltage difference across the resistor that arises when current flow in the base region has been initiated by impact ionization can be used to further control the “snap back” characteristic of the ESD protection device. This is further discussed below.
The arrangement described hitherto is suitable for providing unidirectional ESD protection. However, ESD events may occur with either polarity, and hence the integrated circuit benefits from protection against input terminal voltages that are either excessively above its positive supply rail, or excessively below its negative supply rail. In order to achieve this bi-directional ESD protection, two devices can be provided in series.
Two devices similar to that shown in
The base regions 120a and 120b are now drawn as a ring surrounding the emitter regions 130a and 130b, which serve to delineate the edges of the regions in a slightly different way than was done in
However, intrinsic (high impedance) regions 360a and 360b have been fabricated just below the emitter regions 130a and 130b and above the P+ regions 260a and 260b. These regions represent additional measures to stop the formation of parasitic components, such as thyristors, that could cause the device to latch into a conducting state.
In this arrangement the collectors 270a and 270b are connected together, and the emitter 130a and base 120a of one of the ESD protection devices is connected to the terminal 18 that is to be protected. The emitter 130b and base 120b of the other device has a current flow path to a supply rail, and is preferably connected to ground. Thus, for any polarity one of the ESD devices acts as a forward biased diode while the other acts as a reverse biased transistor, and hence breaks down to give the ESD protection when it reaches its trigger voltage. If the polarity of the ESD threat reverses, then the roles of the ESD protection devices reverse, with the one that had previously been acting as a forward biased diode becoming the reverse biased transistor, and the one that had been acting as the reverse biased transistor becoming the forward biased diode. This enables laterally (horizontally) fabricated NPN transistors to provide ESD protection for discharge events of either polarity. The trigger and holding voltages are still defined by the separation between the collector and the base regions, and the size of the base region, respectively within each device. This means the trigger voltages can be set independently for each polarity of ESD threat if desired.
In other embodiments, other modifications may be made to the ESD protection devices. For example a metal plate 370b may be connected to the base or emitter junctions and arranged to extend over the edge of the collector region. This acts as a field plate 370b and helps prevent charge injection occurring in the oxide layer over the base-collector junction. Such a field plate 370b encircles the emitter when viewed in plan view.
As noted earlier, the inclusion of a resistor between the base and emitter terminals can modify the turn on characteristic of the device.
Embodiments have been described in the context of NPN devices. PNP structures can also be formed by reversing the dopant conductivity types in the examples provided above. However, carrier mobility is lower in PNP transistors, so they may provide a slower response.
So far, the structures controlling the breakdown and holding voltages have been described with respect to the devices where these structures are formed at the surface of the device. However, the principles and advantages described herein are not limited to such surface devices.
The arrangements shown in
It is thus possible to provide ESD protection devices where the characteristics are easily controlled by parameters at a surface (at least during device manufacture) of the device, or by control of horizontal dimensions of doped features. These features, and thus ESD protection device operational thresholds, are readily controlled by mask design.
Electrostatic protection devices as described herein can be implemented in various apparatuses. Examples of the electronic devices incorporating such ESD protection devices can include high speed signal processing chips, power regulators, memory chips, memory modules, circuits of optical networks or other communication networks, and disk driver circuits. Products in which such electronics can be incorporated include, but are not limited to, consumer electronic products, parts of the consumer electronic products, electronic test equipments, etc. The consumer electronic products can include, but are not limited to, a mobile phone, cellular base stations, a telephone, a television, a computer monitor, a computer, a hand-held computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a microwave, a refrigerator, a stereo system, a cassette recorder or player, a DVD player, a CD player, a VCR, an MP3 player, a radio, a camcorder, a camera, a digital camera, a portable memory chip, a washer, a dryer, a washer/dryer, a copier, a facsimile machine, a scanner, a multi functional peripheral device, a wrist watch, a clock, etc. Further, the electronic device can include unfinished products.
Although this invention has been described in terms of certain embodiments, other embodiments that are apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, including embodiments that do not provide all of the features and advantages set forth herein, are also within the scope of this invention. Moreover, the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. In addition, certain features shown in the context of one embodiment can be incorporated into other embodiments as well. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is defined only by reference to the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3660687 | Sahm et al. | May 1972 | A |
4520277 | Hahn | May 1985 | A |
4528461 | Shackle et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
5436486 | Fujishima et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440151 | Crevel et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5440162 | Worley et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5473169 | Ker et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5485023 | Sumida | Jan 1996 | A |
5594266 | Beigel et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602409 | Olney | Feb 1997 | A |
5610425 | Quigley et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5637892 | Leach | Jun 1997 | A |
5637901 | Beigel et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5663860 | Swonger | Sep 1997 | A |
5719432 | Kariyazono et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5736769 | Nishiura et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5818088 | Ellis | Oct 1998 | A |
5832376 | Henderson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5862301 | Gontowski | Jan 1999 | A |
5892264 | Davis et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6713816 | Wolf et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6927957 | Bakulin et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7471493 | Huang et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7859082 | Stecher | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8278684 | Walker et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
20010031521 | Pan et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020033520 | Kunikiyo | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020125931 | Yue et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020153564 | Shirai | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040048428 | Tanomura | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050057866 | Mergens et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050111150 | Jang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050280091 | Huang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060091497 | Sato | May 2006 | A1 |
20070138558 | Saitoh | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080218920 | Vanysacker et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090032837 | Tseng et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090122452 | Okushima | May 2009 | A1 |
20090231766 | Chang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100027174 | Galy et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100059028 | Ueno | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100109631 | Vinson | May 2010 | A1 |
20100148265 | Lin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171149 | Denison et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100301389 | Kushner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321092 | Momota et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110101444 | Coyne et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110133246 | Ueno | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120091503 | Su | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120133025 | Clarke et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120175673 | Lee | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120286325 | Coyne | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286327 | Coyne | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286396 | Coyne | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130099280 | Coyne | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 234 269 | Sep 1987 | EP |
2 246 885 | Nov 2010 | EP |
200733305 | Sep 2007 | TW |
WO 9522842 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9710615 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 2008135812 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2008135812 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2010011394 | Jan 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Partial International Search Report mailed Dec. 8, 2010 for International application PCT/US2010/051356. |
De Heyn et al “Design and Analysis of New Protection Structures for Smart Power Technology with Controlled Trigger and Holding Voltage” 2001 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings 39th Annual, Orlando Florida, Apr. 30-May 3, 2001, IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, New York, NY, IEEE Apr. 30, 2001, pp. 253-258. |
Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority for application PCT/US2010/051356 dated Jan. 25, 2012. |
Gendron et al., “Deep Trench NPN Transistor for Low-RON ESD Protection of High-Voltage I/Os in Advance Smart Power Technology,” BIPOLAR/BICMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting, IEEE, Oct. 1, 2006, pp. 1-4. |
Urresti et al., “Lateral Punch-Through TVS Devices for on-Chip Protection in Low-Voltage Applications,” Microelectronics Reliability, 2005, pp. 1181-1186, vol. 45. |
Walker et al., “Novel Robust High Voltage ESD Clamps for LDMOS Protection,” 45th Annual International Reliability Physics Symposium, 2007, IEEE International, Apr. 1, 2007, pp. 596-597. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of Mar. 1, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/051356 filed Oct. 4, 1010. 18 pages. |
EPO Communication and Response pursuant to Rules 161 (1) and 162 EPC of Jun. 13, 2012 for European Application No. 10766187.8. 2 pages. |
Chinese Office Action of Apr. 29, 2014 for Chinese Application No. 201080049940.X, filed on Oct. 4, 2010. 16 pages. |
Chinese Office Action of Oct. 30, 2014 for Chinese Application No. 201080049940.X, filed on Oct. 4, 2010. 6 pages. |
European office action dated May 13, 2015, in EP application No. 10766187.8 (6 pages). |
Taiwanese office action with Translation dated Mar. 10, 2015, in TW application No. 099136457 (21 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110101444 A1 | May 2011 | US |