Emergency stop method and system for autonomous mobile robots

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8937410
  • Patent Number
    8,937,410
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 17, 2012
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 20, 2015
    10 years ago
Abstract
An emergency stop system for an autonomous mobile robot includes a base unit connected to the robot and an element engageable by a user extending from the base unit. The element is movably held by the base unit in an operation mode position. The base unit includes a mechanism for detecting the presence of the element in the operation mode position and triggering an emergency stop of the robot when the element is moved out of the operation mode position by the user.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present application relates generally to autonomous mobile robots and, more particularly, to an emergency stop system for such robots.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

In accordance with one or more embodiments, an emergency stop system is provided for an autonomous mobile robot. The system includes a base unit connected to the robot and an element engageable by a user extending from the base unit. The element is movably held by the base unit in an operation mode position. The base unit includes a mechanism for detecting the presence of the element in the operation mode position and triggering an emergency stop of the robot when the element is moved out of the operation mode position by the user.


In accordance with one or more further embodiments, a method of causing an autonomous mobile robot to stop operating is provided. The robot includes a base unit and an element engageable by a user extending from the base unit. The element is movably held by the base unit in an operation mode position. The base unit includes a mechanism for detecting the presence of the element in the operation mode position and triggering an emergency stop of the robot when the element is moved by the user out of the operation mode position. The method comprises engaging the element to move it out of the operation mode position to trigger an emergency stop.


In accordance with one or more further embodiments, a method of causing an autonomous mobile robot to stop operating is provided. The robot includes a base unit and an element engageable by a user extending from the base unit. The element is movably held by the base unit in an operation mode position. The method includes the steps of: detecting movement of the element from the operation mode position; and triggering an emergency stop of the robot when the element is moved by the user out of the operation mode position.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a simplified perspective view of an exemplary autonomous mobile robot having an emergency stop system in accordance with one or more embodiments.



FIG. 2 is a simplified perspective view of an exemplary emergency stop system in accordance with one or more embodiments.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating connectivity of an exemplary emergency stop system in a robot in accordance with one or more embodiments.



FIG. 4 is an exemplary system logic chart illustrating operation of an exemplary emergency stop system in accordance with one or more embodiments.



FIG. 5 illustrates an alternative exemplary emergency stop system in accordance with one or more embodiments.



FIG. 6 illustrates an alternative exemplary emergency stop system in accordance with one or more embodiments.



FIG. 7 illustrates an alternative exemplary emergency stop system in accordance with one or more embodiments.





Like or identical reference numbers are used to identify common or similar elements.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Autonomous mobile robots are used in a variety of industries, including in the agricultural industry. For example, one particular use of autonomous robots is for performing automated potted plant processing operations. Specifically, robots can be used to identify, pick up, transport, and deposit container-holding plants as disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/378,612 filed on Feb. 18, 2009 and entitled ADAPTABLE CONTAINER HANDLING SYSTEM and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/100,763 filed on May 4, 2011 and entitled ADAPTABLE CONTAINER HANDLING ROBOT WITH BOUNDARY SENSING SUBSYSTEM.


As a safety feature, autonomous mobile robots can include an emergency stop system to instantly stop operation of a robot if, e.g., the robot malfunctions or otherwise operates in a way that creates a potentially hazardous condition. An emergency stop feature can be implemented as a latched push button. When this button is pressed by a human user, power is removed from any robot systems (e.g., motors used to drive the robot wheels or other mechanisms). Once the stop button has been pressed, the button must be physically reset before the robot can resume normal operation.


This type of emergency stop system works well for fixed equipment. However, using a push button stop feature may be problematic for computer-controlled, mobile equipment. A software fault or other fault can produce an arbitrary response in such equipment. For example, if a certain sort of fault occurs on a differential-drive mobile robot, the robot could enter a state where one drive wheel is halted while the other turns at maximum velocity. This and other conditions can make it difficult for a user to reach the stop button without being struck by the robot.


Various embodiments disclosed herein are directed to an emergency stop system for autonomous mobile robots that can be quickly and easily actuated by users. The emergency stop system can be implemented in virtually any type of autonomous mobile robots, including robots used in the agricultural industry.



FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary autonomous mobile robot 10 having an emergency stop system 12 in accordance with one or more embodiments. In this example, the robot 10 is configured to transport a container-grown plant 14. The emergency stop system 12 includes a base unit 16 connected to the robot 10 and a flag or other element 18 engageable by a human user extending from and held by the base unit 16. During normal robot operation, the flag 18 rests in a receptacle 30 (shown in FIG. 2) in the base unit 16 in an operation mode position. However, if the robot 10 malfunctions or otherwise needs to be stopped quickly, the human user simply grabs and pulls the flag 18 or knocks it out of the operation mode position in the base unit 16. A sensor mechanism 28 (shown in FIG. 3) in the base unit 16 detects movement of the flag 18 from the operation mode position and responsively triggers an emergency stop of the robot 10. It is considerably easier and safer for a user to grasp or knock down the flag 18 than to locate and press a button on the robot 10.


As shown in FIG. 2, the flag 18 includes a mast 20 and a pennant 22, which allows motion of the robot 10 to be easily observed from a distance. Autonomous mobile robots are typically supervised by a human worker who may oversee a number of robots operating on different fields. As the robots carry out their duties, their motion will cause the pennant 22 to sway back and forth. This motion makes it easy for the human worker to determine from a distance whether and how each robot is working.


The flag 18 further includes a knob 24 to eliminate the sharp point at the top of the mast 20 to prevent injury to users.


A variety of different sensor mechanisms 28 can be used in the base unit 16 to detect the presence of the flag 18 in the operating mode position. By way of example, the tip of the flag 18 held by the base unit 16 includes a magnet 26 at the lower tip of the mast 20 (as shown in FIG. 2), and mechanism 28 includes a Hall-effect sensor for detecting the presence of the magnet 26.


Alternately, the sensor mechanism 28 can include an optical break beam sensor for detecting the presence of the flag 18 in the operation mode position.


The sensor mechanism 28 may also comprise an electrical circuit, in which the tip of the flag 18 acts as a switch in the circuit such that movement of the flag 18 from the operation mode position breaks a connection in the circuit.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating connectivity of the emergency stop system 12 in a robot 10. The robot 10 includes a power source (e.g., a battery system) 32 that supplies power to one or more motors 34 through a power relay 36. The base unit sensor mechanism 28 and the start button 38 are connected to and transmit control signals to the relay 36. The power relay 36 is preferably implemented in solid-state electronics. Alternatively, the power relay can comprise a mechanical device.



FIG. 4 illustrates exemplary emergency stop system logic in accordance with one or more embodiments. If the flag 18 is removed from the base unit 16 during normal operation of the robot 10, power to the robot motors is interrupted. Power cannot be restored until (1) the flag 18 is first returned to the base unit 16 and (2) the start button 38 is then pressed.


In accordance with one or more embodiments, the exemplary stop system functionality is implemented generally entirely in hardware.


The flag 18 should be easily removable from the base unit 16 by a user. In accordance with one or more embodiments, if the flag mast is rigid, the receptacle 30 of the base unit 16 is configured to provide compliance to make it easy for a user to remove the flag 18. Without compliance in the base unit 16, the flag mast may bind if the pull-direction (i.e., the direction the flag is pulled by a user) is not vertical. As shown in FIG. 5, compliance can be provided by attaching the base unit receptacle 30 to a spring 42. If the flag 18 is pulled a direction other than completely vertical, the receptacle will become oriented in the direction of the sideward force, allowing the flag 18 to be removed easily.


Alternately, in accordance with one or more further embodiments, if the flag mast is compliant, rather than rigid, the base unit receptacle 30 can be configured to have a radiused cross-section as shown in FIG. 6. The radiused cross-section geometry transforms sideward-pull forces into axial forces to facilitate easy removal of the flag 18.


In a further alternate embodiment, easy flag removal can be accomplished using a flag mast having a broad flat flag base 44 as shown in FIG. 7. The flag base 44 is retained in a recessed area 46 in the base unit 16 that is shallow and allows easy removal of the flag. The recessed area 46 in the base unit 16 is sized to receive the flag base 44. The flag base 44 includes a magnet 48. A layer of ferrous material 50, to which the magnet 48 in the flag base 44 is attracted, is provided at the bottom of the recessed area 46. A Hall-effect or other magnetic field sensor 52 is provided under the recessed area 46. In this position, the sensor 52 can determine when the flag 18 is present.


Having thus described several illustrative embodiments, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to form a part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. While some examples presented herein involve specific combinations of functions or structural elements, it should be understood that those functions and elements may be combined in other ways according to the present disclosure to accomplish the same or different objectives. In particular, acts, elements, and features discussed in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from similar or other roles in other embodiments. Additionally, elements and components described herein may be further divided into additional components or joined together to form fewer components for performing the same functions.


Accordingly, the foregoing description and attached drawings are by way of example only, and are not intended to be limiting.

Claims
  • 1. A computer-controlled autonomous mobile robot, comprising: a chassis;a drive subsystem for maneuvering the chassis including one or more motors;a power source;a power relay for relaying power from the power source to the one or more motors; andan emergency stop system to trigger an emergency stop of the autonomous mobile robot by causing the power relay to interrupt power flow to the one or more motors, said emergency stop system comprising: a base unit connected to the robot; andan element engageable by a user extending from the base unit, the element being movably held by the base unit in an operation mode position,wherein the base unit includes a mechanism for detecting the presence of the element in the operation mode position and triggering an emergency stop of the robot when the element is moved out of the operation mode position by the user.
  • 2. The computer-controlled autonomous mobile robot of claim 1, wherein the element comprises an elongated member extending from a portion of the robot.
  • 3. The computer-controlled autonomous mobile robot of claim 2, further comprising a pennant at an end of the elongated member distal to the base unit.
  • 4. The computer-controlled autonomous mobile robot of claim 2, further comprising a rounded knob at an end of the elongated member distal to the base unit.
  • 5. The computer-controlled autonomous mobile robot of claim 1, wherein the element includes a magnet in a portion thereof held by the base unit, and wherein the mechanism includes a Hall-effect sensor for detecting the presence of the element in the operation mode position.
  • 6. The computer-controlled autonomous mobile robot of claim 1, wherein the mechanism comprises an optical break beam sensor for detecting the presence of the element in the operation mode position.
  • 7. The computer-controlled autonomous mobile robot of claim 1, wherein the mechanism includes an electrical circuit, and the element includes electrical contacts comprising a portion of the circuit such that movement of the element from the operation mode position breaks a connection in the circuit to trigger an emergency stop.
  • 8. The computer-controlled autonomous mobile robot of claim 1, wherein the mechanism includes a mechanical switch, and movement of the element from the operation mode position activates the mechanical switch.
  • 9. The computer-controlled autonomous mobile robot of claim 1, wherein the robot further comprises a start switch engageable by a user to continue robot operation once an element moved out of the operation mode position has been returned to the operation mode position.
  • 10. The computer-controlled autonomous mobile robot of claim 1, wherein a portion of the base unit holding the element is compliant to facilitate easy removal of the element from the base unit by the user.
  • 11. The computer-controlled autonomous mobile robot of claim 10, wherein the portion of the base unit comprises a spring.
  • 12. The computer-controlled autonomous mobile robot of claim 1, wherein the portion of the base unit holding the element includes a radiused opening to facilitate easy removal of the element from the base unit by the user.
  • 13. The computer-controlled autonomous mobile robot of claim 1, wherein the element includes a generally flat base, and wherein the base unit includes a shallow recessed area for holding the generally flat base to facilitate easy removal of the element from the base unit by the user.
  • 14. A method of supervising operation of a plurality of computer-controlled mobile robots autonomously performing operations in a given area, each of the robots including an emergency stop system comprising a base unit and an element engageable by a user extending from the base unit, the element being movably held by the base unit in an operation mode position, wherein the base unit includes a mechanism for detecting the presence of the element in the operation mode position and triggering an emergency stop of the robot when the element is moved by the user out of the operation mode position, the method comprising: observing the operation of the plurality of robots from a remote location;identifying a malfunctioning robot among said plurality of robots;approaching said malfunctioning robot from said remote location; andengaging the element of the emergency stop system of said malfunctioning robot to move it out of the operation mode position to trigger an emergency stop of the malfunctioning robot.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein engaging the element comprises grasping the element and pulling it out of the base.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein engaging the element comprises knocking the element out of the operation mode position.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, further comprising returning the element to the operation mode position and activating a start switch to restart the robot.
  • 18. The method of claim 14, wherein the element comprises an elongated member extending from a portion of the robot.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the elongated member includes a pennant at an end thereof distal to the robot.
  • 20. A method performed by an autonomous mobile robot, the robot including an emergency stop system comprising a base unit and an element engageable by a user extending from the base unit, the element being movably held by the base unit in an operation mode position, the method comprising the steps of: autonomously performing a given operation in a given area;detecting movement of the element from the operation mode position when the element is moved by the user; andtriggering an emergency stop of the robot when movement of the element out of the operation mode position is detected.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein triggering an emergency stop of the robot comprises causing a power relay to interrupt power flow to the one or more motors of the robot.
  • 22. The method of claim 20, wherein the element includes a magnet in a portion thereof held by the base unit, and wherein detecting movement of the element from the operation mode position comprises using a Hall-effect sensor for detecting the presence of the element in the operation mode position.
  • 23. The method of claim 20, wherein detecting movement of the element from the operation mode position comprises using an optical break beam sensor for detecting the presence of the element in the operation mode position.
  • 24. The method of claim 20, wherein the mechanism includes an electrical circuit, and the element includes electrical contacts comprising a portion of the circuit such that movement of the element from the operation mode position breaks a connection in the circuit to trigger an emergency stop.
  • 25. The method of claim 20, wherein the mechanism includes a mechanical switch, and movement of the element from the operation mode position activates the mechanical switch.
US Referenced Citations (126)
Number Name Date Kind
3821504 Schomaker et al. Jun 1974 A
3913758 Faircloth et al. Oct 1975 A
4155198 Kelley May 1979 A
4217073 Propst Aug 1980 A
4401236 Germaine Aug 1983 A
4476651 Drury Oct 1984 A
4522546 Ringer Jun 1985 A
4700301 Dyke Oct 1987 A
4749327 Roda Jun 1988 A
4793096 Todd, Sr. Dec 1988 A
4854802 deGroot Aug 1989 A
4869637 deGroot Sep 1989 A
4994970 Noji et al. Feb 1991 A
5016541 Feaster, Jr. May 1991 A
5020964 Hyatt et al. Jun 1991 A
5020965 Tanaka et al. Jun 1991 A
5046914 Holland et al. Sep 1991 A
5051906 Evans, Jr. et al. Sep 1991 A
5081941 Weeks Jan 1992 A
5085553 Bouwens et al. Feb 1992 A
5160235 Bikow Nov 1992 A
5181818 Tanaka et al. Jan 1993 A
5211523 Andrada Galan et al. May 1993 A
5315517 Kawase et al. May 1994 A
5332363 Tanaka et al. Jul 1994 A
5348063 Handleman Sep 1994 A
5348361 Ilchuk Sep 1994 A
5403142 Stewart Apr 1995 A
5427492 Tanaka et al. Jun 1995 A
5496143 Breyer Mar 1996 A
5688102 Vieselmeyer Nov 1997 A
5769589 Lubbers Jun 1998 A
5819863 Zollinger et al. Oct 1998 A
5842306 Onosaka et al. Dec 1998 A
5959423 Nakanishi et al. Sep 1999 A
5974348 Rocks Oct 1999 A
5988971 Fossey et al. Nov 1999 A
6164537 Mariani et al. Dec 2000 A
6186730 Place Feb 2001 B1
6212821 Adam et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216631 Wissner-Gross Apr 2001 B1
6243987 Hessel Jun 2001 B1
6255793 Peless et al. Jul 2001 B1
6336051 Pangels et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347920 Place Feb 2002 B1
6389329 Colens May 2002 B1
6417641 Peless et al. Jul 2002 B2
6431818 Place Aug 2002 B1
6481948 Spears Nov 2002 B2
6496755 Wallach et al. Dec 2002 B2
6508033 Hessel et al. Jan 2003 B2
6532404 Colens Mar 2003 B2
6543983 Felder et al. Apr 2003 B1
6611738 Ruffner Aug 2003 B2
6638004 Berger et al. Oct 2003 B2
6658324 Bancroft et al. Dec 2003 B2
6667592 Jacobs et al. Dec 2003 B2
6729836 Stingel, III et al. May 2004 B2
6850024 Peless et al. Feb 2005 B2
6854209 Van Horssen et al. Feb 2005 B2
6857493 Shupp et al. Feb 2005 B2
6915607 Tagawa et al. Jul 2005 B2
6950722 Mountz Sep 2005 B2
6984952 Peless et al. Jan 2006 B2
6988518 Rackers Jan 2006 B2
6997663 Siebenga Feb 2006 B2
7069111 Glenn et al. Jun 2006 B2
7086820 Blake Aug 2006 B1
7137770 Ueda Nov 2006 B2
7184855 Stingel, III et al. Feb 2007 B2
7198312 Blaho Apr 2007 B2
7200465 Stingel, III et al. Apr 2007 B2
7261511 Felder et al. Aug 2007 B2
7274167 Kim Sep 2007 B2
7343222 Solomon Mar 2008 B2
7400108 Minor et al. Jul 2008 B2
7506472 Leyns et al. Mar 2009 B2
7559736 Mohan Jul 2009 B1
7579803 Jones et al. Aug 2009 B2
7610122 Anderson Oct 2009 B2
7613544 Park et al. Nov 2009 B2
20010008112 Opitz Jul 2001 A1
20020120364 Colens Aug 2002 A1
20020146306 Morrell Oct 2002 A1
20020182046 Schempf et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030030398 Jacobs et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030118487 Pressman et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030165373 Felder et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030199944 Chapin et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040139692 Jacobsen et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050090961 Bonk et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050126144 Koselka et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050135912 Schempf et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050135913 Visser Jun 2005 A1
20050238465 Razumov Oct 2005 A1
20050246056 Marks et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050254924 Swetman et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050254927 Swetman et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050268987 Rackers Dec 2005 A1
20060045679 Ostendorff Mar 2006 A1
20060072988 Hariki et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095169 Minor et al. May 2006 A1
20060120834 Pressman et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060213167 Koselka et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060221769 Van Loenen et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060257236 Stingel et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060293810 Nakamoto Dec 2006 A1
20070017181 Jacobsen et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070042803 Anderson Feb 2007 A1
20070129849 Zini et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070140821 Garon et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070152619 Sugiyama et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070219720 Trepagnier et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080046130 Faivre et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080131254 Cope et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080279663 Alexander Nov 2008 A1
20090012667 Matsumoto et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090021351 Beniyama et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090054222 Zhang et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090148034 Higaki et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090175709 Okabe et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090214324 Grinnell et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090254217 Pack et al. Oct 2009 A1
20110025454 Pomerantz et al. Feb 2011 A1
20120114187 Duarte May 2012 A1
20130325159 Kilibarda et al. Dec 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
3828447 Mar 1990 DE
0195191 Sep 1986 EP
0774702 May 1997 EP
S61204714 Sep 1986 JP
03-285602 Dec 1991 JP
07-065908 Mar 1995 JP
11-077579 Mar 1999 JP
2006-346767 Dec 2006 JP
2007-508667 Apr 2007 JP
2009-511288 Mar 2009 JP
9422094 Sep 1994 WO
9959042 Nov 1999 WO
2007004551 Jan 2007 WO
2009024246 Feb 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/067939, dated Mar. 26, 2013.
SICK LMS 200 Technical Description, Jun. 2003 [online] [retrieved Sep. 11, 2014]. Retrieved from: http://www.sick-automation.ru/images/File/pdf/LMS%20Technicai%20Description.pdf.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130181544 A1 Jul 2013 US