Enforcement of semiconductor structure regularity for localized transistors and interconnect

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9202779
  • Patent Number
    9,202,779
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 17, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 1, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A global placement grating (GPG) is defined for a chip level to include a set of parallel and evenly spaced virtual lines. At least one virtual line of the GPG is positioned to intersect each contact that interfaces with the chip level. A number of subgratings are defined. Each subgrating is a set of equally spaced virtual lines of the GPG that supports a common layout shape run length thereon. The layout for the chip level is partitioned into subgrating regions. Each subgrating region has any one of the defined subgratings allocated thereto. Layout shapes placed within a given subgrating region in the chip level are placed in accordance with the subgrating allocated to the given subgrating region. Non-standard layout shape spacings at subgrating region boundaries can be mitigated by layout shape stretching, layout shape insertion, and/or subresolution shape insertion, or can be allowed to exist in the final layout.
Description
BACKGROUND


FIG. 1 shows a typical CMOS transistor configuration, in accordance with the prior art. In the example of FIG. 1, a preferred direction for an interconnect level (metal-1) is parallel to that for gate electrode (gate) wires, as seen for metal-1 wire 105 and gate wire 103. Gate wire 103 overlaps a diffusion shape 101, forming a transistor with a source or drain (S/D) node that is connected to metal-1 wire 105 by a contact 106. Wire 105 requires a non-rectangular shape, i.e., a shape with a bend, to allow it to overlap a contact 102 which connects to a gate wire 107. FIG. 1 also shows a gate electrode wire 104 that requires a bend to overlap a gate contact 108, which connects to a metal-1 wire 109.


The typical CMOS transistor configuration of FIG. 1 illustrates a number of features that may increase manufacturing difficulty. For example, contacts for S/D and gate connections are not aligned, gate and metal wire widths are variable, spacing between wire shapes is variable, wire center lines are variably spaced apart, and a ratio of filled to non-filled space for gate and metal-1 levels is variable. These features may cause parametric and defect yield loss in advanced semiconductor processes due to associated lithographic effects, CMP (chemical mechanical planarization) dishing, and/or other manufacturing imperfections. Therefore, it is of interest to define a semiconductor device layout methodology that accounts for layout characteristics which adversely affect manufacturability.


SUMMARY

In one embodiment, a method is disclosed for defining a layout for a portion of a given semiconductor chip level. The method includes an operation for defining a preferred routing direction for a given chip level. The method also includes an operation for identifying each contact level related to the given chip level, wherein each contact level includes at least one interfacing contact defined to physically connect with a structure corresponding to a layout shape to be placed in the given chip level. An operation is then performed to define a global placement grating (GPG) for the given chip level to include a set of parallel and evenly spaced virtual lines. At least one virtual line of the GPG is positioned to intersect each interfacing contact within each contact level related to the given chip level. A determination is then made as to whether a perpendicular spacing between adjacent virtual lines of the GPG provides for enforcement of layout shape pattern regularity within the given chip level as necessary to ensure manufacturability of layout shapes within the given chip level. If it is determined that the perpendicular spacing between adjacent virtual lines of the GPG is acceptable, the method proceeds with placement of layout shapes in alignment with the GPG for the given chip level. However, if it is determined that the perpendicular spacing between adjacent virtual lines of the GPG is not acceptable, the method proceeds with an operation for adjusting placement of one or more interfacing contacts within one or more contact levels related to the given chip level. The method then reverts back to the operation for defining the GPG for the given chip level.


In another embodiment, a method is disclosed for defining a layout for a portion of a given semiconductor chip level. In the method, a GPG is defined for a given chip level. The GPG is defined by a set of parallel and evenly spaced virtual lines. The method includes identifying all connection lines within the GPG. A connection line is a virtual line of the GPG that is spatially coincident with a virtual line of a related contact level. A subgrating is defined for the given chip level as a set of evenly spaced connection lines, such that a spacing between adjacent connection lines in the subgrating is at least as large as a minimum spacing required to support a common run length of layout shapes on the adjacent connection lines in the subgrating. Definition of subgratings is repeated until each connection line within the GPG is associated with at least one subgrating. The method further includes placement of layout shapes in alignment with the defined subgratings, such that each layout shape is associated with any one subgrating.


In another embodiment, a method is disclosed for defining a layout for a portion of a given semiconductor chip level. The method includes an operation for defining a GPG for a given chip level. The GPG is defined by a set of parallel and evenly spaced virtual lines. All connection lines within the GPG are identified. A connection line is a virtual line of the GPG that is spatially coincident with a virtual line of a related contact level. The method also includes an operation for defining a subgrating for the given chip level as a set of evenly spaced connection lines, such that a spacing between adjacent connection lines in the subgrating is at least as large as a minimum spacing required to support a common run length of layout shapes on the adjacent connection lines in the subgrating. The operation for defining the subgrating is repeated until each connection line within the GPG is associated with at least one subgrating. The layout for the given chip level is then partitioned into a number of subgrating regions. Each subgrating region is defined as a contiguous area within the layout for the given chip level. Subgratings are allocated to the number of subgrating regions such that only one subgrating is allocated to any one subgrating region. The method further includes an operation for placing functional layout shapes for the given chip level in alignment to the subgratings allocated to the subgrating regions. Following placement of the functional layout shapes, a non-standard spacing is identified within the layout of the given chip level. The method includes an operation for resolving the non-standard spacing so as to ensure manufacturability of structures corresponding to the functional layout shapes.


Other aspects and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the present invention.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a typical CMOS transistor configuration, in accordance with the prior art;



FIG. 2 shows a portion of a layout for a given chip level in which a GPG is defined and in which linear layout shapes are placed in alignment with the GPG, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3A shows an example in which a subgrating pitch results in a ratio of side-to-side spacing to layout shape width that is too large to maintain sufficient shape density for proper manufacturing;



FIG. 3B shows a modification of the layout of FIG. 3A in which a subresolution shape is used to mitigate the unacceptably large side-to-side spacing to width ratio, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 shows an example layout in which a GPG is used to place layout shapes for gate electrode wires, interconnect wires, diffusion contacts, and gate contacts, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5 shows an extension of the exemplary layout of FIG. 4 in which a number of subgrating regions are defined in various chip levels, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6 shows an example layout that illustrates subgrating use among different vertically stacked chip levels, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 7 shows an example layout in which a multi-level orthogonally routed connection is used to connect wires in a same chip level that cannot have a common run length, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 8 shows another example layout in which a multi-level orthogonally routed connection is used to connect wires in a same chip level that cannot have a common run length, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 9A shows an example layout that illustrates the occurrence of a non-standard spacing at an interface between adjacent subgrating regions, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 9B shows a layout shape stretching technique for mitigating a non-standard spacing introduced at subgrating region borders that lie parallel to the routing direction, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 10A shows an example layout that illustrates the occurrence of a non-standard spacing at an interface between adjacent subgrating regions, when the layout shape stretching technique of FIG. 9B is blocked, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 10B illustrates use of a subresolution shape to mitigate a non-standard spacing at an interface between adjacent subgrating regions, when the layout shape stretching technique of FIG. 9B is blocked, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 11 shows an exemplary layout in which a layout shape is stretched to overlap multiple contacts and/or vias, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 12 shows another example in which layout shapes are stretched to overlap multiple contacts and/or vias, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 13 shows an example in which layout shapes are extended relative to a contact and/or via so as to accommodate design requirements, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 14 shows a flowchart of a method for defining a layout for a portion of a given semiconductor chip level, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 15A shows a flowchart of a method for defining a layout for a portion of a given semiconductor chip level, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 15B shows an expanded view of operation 1509 of FIG. 15A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 15C shows an extension of the method of FIGS. 15A-15B, in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention; and



FIG. 16 shows a flowchart of a method for defining a layout for a portion of a given semiconductor chip level, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.


Within the context of the present invention, a global placement grating (GPG) is defined by a set of parallel and evenly spaced virtual lines extending across a semiconductor chip (“chip” hereafter) level. The even, i.e., equal, perpendicular spacing between adjacent virtual lines of a GPG is referred to at the GPG pitch (GPGP). Layout shapes within a portion of a given chip level can be placed in accordance with the GPG of the given chip level. For example, layout shapes within a portion of a given chip level may be centered upon or in some way indexed to virtual lines of the GPG of the given chip level. Also, the virtual lines of the GPG of a given chip level are oriented to extend in a preferred routing direction of the given chip level, wherein the preferred routing direction corresponds to a direction in which layout shapes are defined to extend.


In one embodiment, the layout shapes placed in accordance with the GPG are defined as linear layout shapes. Each linear layout shape has a substantially rectangular cross-section when viewed in an as-drawn state. In one embodiment, the linear layout shape does allow for small deviations from the rectangular cross-section. For example, a linear layout shape may include one or more expanded regions along its rectangular cross-section length so as to accommodate contact placements and connections thereto. In another embodiment, strict adherence to a substantially rectangular cross-section may be specified for the linear layout shapes. It should be understood that a degree of rectangularity of the linear layout shapes can vary between embodiments, depending on the requirements for design and layout of a particular embodiment. In one embodiment, each linear layout shape placed in a portion of a given chip level is placed such that a length of its substantially rectangular cross-section is parallel with the GPG of the given chip level. Therefore, in this embodiment, the linear layout shapes extend in the preferred routing direction of the given chip level which is parallel to the virtual lines of the GPG.


Also, in one embodiment, each linear layout shape is initially placed in a centered manner such that its centerline extending in the preferred routing direction is substantially centered upon a virtual line of the GPG. It should be understood, however, that following initial placement of a given layout shape in the centered manner, a width of the given layout shape may be adjusted, or the given layout shape may be stretched in its width direction, such that a final version of the given layout shape is no longer centered upon a virtual line of the GPG.



FIG. 2 shows a portion of a layout for a given chip level in which a GPG is defined and in which linear layout shapes are placed in alignment with the GPG, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The GPG of FIG. 2 is defined by virtual lines 200-209, with adjacent virtual lines evenly spaced at the GPG pitch (GPGP). The virtual lines 200-209 of the GPG extend in the preferred routing direction of the given chip level. FIG. 2 depicts layout shapes as shaded rectangular shapes. The layout shapes within the portion of the given chip level are defined as linear layout shapes and are placed so as to be substantially centered upon a virtual line of the GPG.



FIG. 2 further illustrates concepts of the present invention referred to as subgrating and subgrating regions. A subgrating is defined as a set of evenly spaced GPG lines having a subgrating pitch that is an integer multiple of the GPG pitch. A subgrating region is defined as a layout area of a portion of a given chip level within which layout shapes are placed according to a single subgrating. In one embodiment, a subgrating is defined to accommodate a common run length of layout shapes having a specified uniform width, wherein the common run length refers to side-by-side existence of layout shapes on adjacent subgrating virtual lines.



FIG. 2 shows by way of example five separate subgrating regions 220-224, where a periphery of each subgrating region 220-224 is delineated by bold solid lines. Each of subgrating regions 220-224 is associated with a particular subgrating. The subgrating within each subgrating region 220-224 is delineated by bold dashed lines. The subgratings for each of subgrating regions 220 and 224 include each virtual line of the GPG (GPG virtual lines 200-206 for subgrating region 220, and GPG virtual lines 207-209 for subgrating region 224). The subgrating for subgrating region 221 includes every other even numbered virtual line of the GPG (GPG virtual lines 200, 202, 204, 206), such that the corresponding subgrating pitch is 2*GPGP. The subgrating for subgrating region 222 includes every other odd numbered virtual line of the GPG (GPG virtual lines 201, 203, 205, 207, 209), such that the corresponding subgrating pitch is 2*GPGP. The subgrating for subgrating region 223 includes every third virtual line of the GPG, (GPG virtual lines 201 and 204), such that the corresponding subgrating pitch is 3*GPGP.


As shown in FIG. 2, linear layout shapes are initially placed in a centered manner on the subgrating of the subgrating region in which the linear layout shape is placed. Also, it should be appreciated from the example of FIG. 2 that layout shapes of uniform width placed in accordance with the same subgrating can have a common run length. Also, layout shapes that are placed on the same virtual line of the GPG in adjacent subgrating regions may, if necessary, be extended through the interface between the adjacent subgrating regions so as to combine and form single contiguous layout shape that spans the interface between the adjacent subgrating regions. For example, FIG. 2 shows layout shapes 250A and 250B extending through the interface between adjacent subgrating regions 222 and 224 so as to form a single layout shape 250.


It should be understood that a subgrating region is defined as a contiguous area within a layout of a portion of a given chip level in which layout shapes are aligned to a common subgrating. It should also be understood that a subgrating region can be defined to have an arbitrary shape. However, in one embodiment, an effort is made to define subgrating regions such that a minimal number of boundary segments are used to define a periphery of each subgrating region. Also, in one embodiment, when possible, layout shapes having related functions are grouped together within a subgrating region so as to maximize subgrating region area and minimize the number of boundary segments between adjacent subgrating regions. Moreover, it is likely that connection points utilizing the same subgrating will have related or identical functions. Also, in one embodiment, fill shapes neighboring a given subgrating region are placed in accordance with the given subgrating region so as to further maximize the area of the given subgrating region.


When layout shapes are placed according to a subgrating, a situation may arise in which the subgrating pitch and the layout shape width result in a side-to-side spacing between adjacently placed layout shapes that is too large to ensure proper manufacturability of the layout shapes. FIG. 3A shows an example in which a subgrating pitch (SGP) results in a ratio of side-to-side spacing (S1) to layout shape width (W) that is too large to maintain sufficient shape density for proper manufacturing.



FIG. 3B shows a modification of the layout of FIG. 3A in which a subresolution shape 301 is used to mitigate the unacceptably large ratio (S1/W), in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The subresolution shape 301 is defined to have a width (SRW) that is small enough to ensure that subresolution shape 301 will not be manufactured. Also, the subresolution shape 301 is placed such that a side-to-side spacing (S2) with its neighboring layout shapes is optimized for manufacturability of the neighboring layout shapes. Also, in some embodiments, because the width (SRW) of the subresolution shape 301 primarily governs whether or not the subresolution shape 301 will actually resolve, i.e., be manufactured, a length (SL) of the subresolution shape 301 can be made as large as necessary without increasing a likelihood that the subresolution shape 301 is inadvertently manufactured. The presence of the subresolution shape 301 will serve to enhance manufacturability of its neighboring layout shapes during a lithographic manufacturing process. It should be understood, however, that subresolution shapes are not intended to be manufactured and should not be placed or sized to cause their manufacture. Moreover, the likelihood of subresolution shape being manufactured can be dependent upon a layout shape density in its surrounding neighborhood. Therefore, the placement and sizing of a given subresolution shape should consider the layout shape density around the given subresolution shape.


In one embodiment, a subresolution shape can be placed within a subgrating region without regard to the corresponding subgrating for the purpose of enhancing manufacturability of layout shapes within the subgrating region. In another embodiment, a subresolution shape can be placed within a subgrating region in accordance with the corresponding subgrating for the purpose of enhancing manufacturability of layout shapes within the subgrating region.



FIG. 4 shows an example layout in which a GPG is used to place layout shapes for gate electrode wires (“gates” hereafter), interconnect wires, diffusion contacts, and gate contacts, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The GPG is defined by virtual lines 401-406 evenly spaced at GPG pitch (GPGP). Gate wires 410 are placed according to a subgrating SG-A within the gate chip level that includes every other even numbered virtual line of the GPG (GPG virtual lines 402, 404, 406), such that the corresponding subgrating pitch is 2*GPGP. Interconnect wires 420 are also placed according to the subgrating SG-A within a given interconnect chip level that includes every other even numbered virtual line of the GPG (GPG virtual lines 402, 404, 406). Interconnect wires 430 are placed according to a subgrating SG-B within the given interconnect chip level that includes every other odd numbered virtual line of the GPG (GPG virtual lines 401, 403, 405), such that the corresponding subgrating pitch is 2*GPGP. Diffusion contacts 440, i.e., source/drain contacts, are also placed according to the subgrating SG-B within the diffusion contact chip level that includes every other odd numbered virtual line of the GPG (GPG virtual lines 401, 403, 405). Gate contacts 450 are placed according to the subgrating SG-A within the gate contact chip level that includes every other even numbered virtual line of the GPG (GPG virtual lines 402, 404, 406).


In one embodiment, layout shapes and subgratings within a portion of a given chip level are defined to enable use of substantially uniform layout shapes widths, substantially uniform layout shape side-to-side spacings, and substantially uniform layout shape end-to-end spacings. For example, the embodiment of FIG. 4 shows use of a substantially uniform interconnect wire layout shape width (M1W) within the illustrated portion of the interconnect chip level. Also, FIG. 4 shows use of a substantially uniform interconnect layout shape side-to-side spacing (M1S) within the illustrated portion of the interconnect chip level. Also, FIG. 4 shows use of a substantially uniform interconnect layout shape end-to-end spacing (M1LES) within the illustrated portion of the interconnect chip level.


Additionally, FIG. 4 shows use of a substantially uniform gate wire layout shape width (GW) within the illustrated portion of the gate chip level. Also, FIG. 4 shows use of a substantially uniform gate layout shape side-to-side spacing (GS) within the illustrated portion of the gate chip level. Also, FIG. 4 shows use of a substantially uniform gate layout shape end-to-end spacing (GLES) within the illustrated portion of the gate chip level. In various embodiments, extension of a layout shape size through stretching of one or more of the layout shape's edges can be used to achieve the substantially constant layout shape widths, side-to-side spacings, and end-to-end spacings. Moreover, although manufacturing benefits (such as in lithography processes) may be achieved by using substantially constant layout shape widths, side-to-side spacings, and end-to-end spacings, it should be understood that use of GPGs, subgratings, and subgrating regions does not require use of substantially constant layout shape widths, side-to-side spacings, and end-to-end spacings.



FIG. 5 shows an extension of the exemplary layout of FIG. 4 in which a number of subgrating regions are defined in various chip levels, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. A diffusion level of the exemplary layout includes diffusion regions 502 and 504. A gate level of the exemplary layout includes the gate wire layout shapes 410. A single subgrating region 507 is defined for the gate level, with the subgrating SG-A allocated thereto. Three subgrating regions 501, 503, 505 are defined for each of the diffusion contact level, gate contact level, and interconnect level with the subgratings SG-B, SG-A, SG-B allocated thereto, respectively. Therefore, each of the chip levels of the exemplary layout of FIG. 5 is partitioned into a number of subgrating regions, wherein each of these subgrating regions is defined as a contiguous area within the layout.



FIG. 5 also illustrates how layout shapes of related function can be placed together within a common subgrating region. For example, diffusion contacts 440 and their associated interconnect wires 430 are placed together in each of subgrating regions 501 and 505 in accordance with subgrating SG-B. Also, gate contacts 450 and their associated interconnect wires 420 are placed together in subgrating region 503 in accordance with subgrating SG-A. The gate wires 410 are placed in subgrating region 507 in accordance with subgrating SG-A. Based on the example of FIG. 5, it should be appreciated that allocation of a properly defined subgrating to a given subgrating region provides for placement of layout shapes having a common run length within the given subgrating region.


A layout shape in one subgrating region of a given chip level can connect with another layout shape in an adjacent subgrating region of the given level when the two layout shapes are placed along the same virtual line of the GPG, thereby forming a larger shape that traverses across the interface between the adjacent subgrating regions. This is illustrated above with regard to layout shapes 250A and 250B of FIG. 2 combining to form layout shape 250. Therefore, a layout shape can be defined to cross from one subgrating region to an adjacent subgrating region in a given level when the different subgratings in the adjacent subgrating regions align to a common GPG virtual line.


The techniques described herein may be generalized to enable pattern regularity for any number of chip levels that are partitioned into subgrating regions. FIG. 6 shows an example layout that illustrates subgrating use among different vertically stacked chip levels, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 6, a metal-3 subgrating region 620 includes vias 630 that connect to metal-2 wires 631 centered on horizontal GPG virtual line 650. The vias 630 and metal-3 wires 632 that overlap them are centered on odd numbered vertical GPG virtual lines 611, 613, 615, respectively, and have a horizontal pitch M3P2 that is twice the vertical GPG pitch GPG2. In another metal-3 subgrating region 621, vias 633 that connect to metal-2 wires 634 are centered on horizontal GPG virtual line 651, and the metal-3 wires 635 that overlap them are centered on even numbered vertical GPG virtual lines 610, 612, 614, respectively, and have a horizontal pitch M3P1 that is twice the vertical GPG pitch GPG2.



FIG. 7 shows an example layout in which a multi-level orthogonally routed connection is used to connect wires in a same chip level that cannot have a common run length, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Parallel metal-1 layout shapes 702, 701, 700 are centered on adjacent GPG virtual lines 740, 741, 742, respectively, and have insufficient clearance to run side-by-side, i.e., to have a common run length. Therefore, the metal-1 layout shapes 700, 701, 702 cannot traverse the boundary between the adjacent subgrating regions 760 and 761, and therefore cannot make a physical connection to each other within their chip level.


One solution is to use multiple chip levels with orthogonal routing directions to make the required connections. For example, as shown in FIG. 7, a diffusion shape 704 is connected to gate wire 720 by connecting through each of diffusion contact 710, metal-1 wire 701, via 730, metal-2 wire 740, via 750, metal-3 wire 770, via 751, metal-2 wire 741, via 731, metal-1 wire 702, and contact 711. This multiple chip level orthogonal routing connection solution can be generalized to form connections when layout shapes on a given level cannot traverse a subgrating region boundary that crosses their routing direction, i.e., when layout shapes on a given level cannot have a common run length.



FIG. 8 shows another example layout in which a multi-level orthogonally routed connection is used to connect wires in a same chip level that cannot have a common run length, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Parallel metal-3 wires 800-803 centered on adjacent GPG lines 870-873 cannot traverse the boundary 880 between metal-3 subgrating regions 820 and 821. Therefore, due to the boundary 880, a direct connection cannot be made between metal-3 wires 801 and 802. However, a connection can be made between metal-3 wires 801 and 802 by connecting through each of the following elements: via 830, metal-2 wire 840, via 850, metal-1 wire 860, via 851, metal-2 wire 841, and via 831. FIG. 8 also shows that wires on different levels with identical routing directions such as metal-1 wires 860-862 and metal-3 wires 800-803 may be centered on different GPGs such as the GPG with pitch GRM3 for metal-3 and the GPG with pitch GRM1 for metal-1.


In one embodiment, the GPG and subgrating region techniques described above can be used to enforce the following layout shape pattern regularity conventions that are beneficial to manufacturing: 1) layout shapes are rectangular, i.e., linear-shaped, 2) wire layout shape pitch is substantially constant in the direction orthogonal to routing, 3) contact layout shape pitch is substantially constant in the direction orthogonal to routing, 4) wire layout shape width is substantially constant, 5) wire layout shape side-to-side spacing is substantially constant, 6) wire layout shape end-to-end spacing is substantially constant, and 7) overall layout shape density is as uniform as possible.



FIG. 9A shows an example layout that illustrates the occurrence of a non-standard spacing at an interface between adjacent subgrating regions, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. In the example of FIG. 9A, a metal-1 subgrating region 900 that includes gate contacts 940 centered on even numbered GPG lines 924, 926, and a metal-1 subgrating region 901 that includes diffusion contacts 950 centered on odd GPG lines 921, 923. The metal-1 subgrating region 901 borders the metal-1 subgrating region 900 both vertically and horizontally. This introduces a non-standard spacing, M1S2, straddling the horizontal subgrating regional border located between the metal-1 wires 910 and 912.



FIG. 9B shows a layout shape stretching technique for mitigating a non-standard spacing introduced at subgrating region borders that lie parallel to the routing direction, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The layout of FIG. 9B is a modified version of the metal-1 layout of FIG. 9A. In FIG. 9B, the edge of metal-1 wire 910 that faces the large gap is stretched until it is co-linear with the edge of a metal-1 wire 911, which faces the same gap but is centered on an alternate grating line 923. By stretching the metal-1 wire 910, wire spaces M1S are made constant, but the metal-1 wire 910 has non-standard width and is no longer centered on a GPG line. However, the stretching of the metal-1 wire 910 in favor of constant spacing provides an overall improvement in manufacturability.



FIG. 10A shows an example layout that illustrates the occurrence of a non-standard spacing at an interface between adjacent subgrating regions, when the layout shape stretching technique of FIG. 9B is blocked, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 10A, layout shape 1010 in subgrating region 1000 runs parallel to a layout shape 1012 in subgrating region 1001, wherein layout shapes 1010 and 1012 are aligned to different subgratings. The non-standard gap M1S2 extends along the common run length CRL of layout shapes 1010 and 1012. The layout shape 1010 cannot be stretched toward the layout shape 1012 to reduce M1S2 because it is blocked by another layout shape 1013 in the same subgrating region 1000.


Due to the application of a GPG and fixed layout shape widths, M1S2 is most likely limited to a fixed value. In the example of FIG. 10A, M1S2=3*GPGP−M1W. More specifically, the fixed value for M1S2 applies to regions of the chip that share the same GPGP and M1W values. Thus, it should be appreciated that even when non-standard gaps, e.g., M1S2, cannot be mitigated through layout shape modification (such as layout shape stretching), specification of a constant GPGP value and of a limited number of layout shape widths, e.g., M1W, will serve to limit the corresponding number of non-standard gap values that may occur in the layout. For instance, in the example of FIG. 10A, use of the constant GPGP value and the single layout shape width M1W serves to limit the number of non-standard gap values to one, i.e., to the M1S2 value. Therefore, through specification of a constant GPGP value and of a limited number of layout shape widths it is possible to optimize manufacturing processes to account for a controlled number of non-standard spacings that may occur in the layout. In contrast, it should be appreciated that such manufacturing process optimization is not feasible when an uncontrolled number of non-standard layout shape spacings may occur in a given layout.



FIG. 10B illustrates use of a subresolution shape to mitigate a non-standard spacing at an interface between adjacent subgrating regions, as an alternative to the layout shape stretching technique of FIG. 9B is blocked, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The layout of FIG. 10B is a modified version of the layout of FIG. 10A. In FIG. 10B, a subresolution layout shape 1014 is placed within the area corresponding to the non-standard spacing. As with the previous subresolution layout shape description of FIG. 3B, a width (SRW) of the subresolution layout shape 1014 should be small enough to ensure that the subresolution layout shape 1014 is not manufactured. It should be appreciated that overall layout shape density and layout shape side-to-side spacing M1S can be made substantially uniform through use of this subresolution layout shape insertion technique. It should be understood, however, that in some embodiments the presence of a non-standard spacing at subgrating region boundaries is acceptable and does not require mitigation.



FIG. 11 shows an exemplary layout in which a layout shape is stretched to overlap multiple contacts and/or vias, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. In one embodiment, a linear layout shape of a wire can be stretched orthogonally to its preferred routing direction so that it overlaps multiple contacts and/or vias. For example, FIG. 11 shows a metal-1 wire 1110 having a preferred horizontal routing direction, i.e., preferred x-direction of routing. The metal-1 wire 1110 is placed in a subgrating region 1100 that is defined adjacent to a subgrating region 1103. The metal-1 wire 1110 needs to connect to each of contacts 1120 and 1121. While the metal-1 wire 1110 may have been initially placed in a centered manner on a GPG virtual line, the metal-1 wire 1110 is stretched orthogonal to its preferred routing direction, i.e., is stretched in the y-direction, so as to cover both of contacts 1120 and 1121. It should be understood that the linear layout shape stretching technique, exemplified by the metal-1 wire 1110 of FIG. 11, can be generalized to facilitate connection of layout shapes within different chip levels, within different subgrating regions of a given chip level, or within a same subgrating region of a given chip level.



FIG. 12 shows another example in which layout shapes are stretched to overlap multiple contacts and/or vias, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 12, a metal-2 wire layout shape 1231 is stretched in the x-direction, i.e., widened, such that both of its edges maintain a standard spacing M2S to adjacent wire layout shapes 1232 and 1233, and such that it overlaps and connects with a via 1240 and a via 1241. In this manner, the metal-2 wire 1231 serves to connect a metal-3 wire 1261 in a metal-3 subgrating region 1270 to a metal-3 wire 1262 in a metal-3 subgrating region 1271. Also, a metal-2 wire layout shape 1230 is similarly widened to overlap and connect with a via 1250 and a via 1242, which are respectively connected to a metal-1 wire 1220 and a metal-3 wire 1260.



FIG. 13 shows an example in which layout shapes are extended relative to a contact and/or via so as to accommodate design requirements, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Two adjacent subgrating regions 1300 and 1301 are defined for a metal-1 chip level. A diffusion contact 1311 is defined to connect a diffusion region 1323 to a metal-1 wire 1321. The diffusion contact 1311 is covered by the metal-1 wire 1321 layout shape. Given a lack of metal-1 wire 1321 overlap of the contact 1311 in the y-direction, a horizontal extension M1OL of the metal-1 wire 1321 layout shape in the x-direction is provided to enable compliance with design rules. Also, a gate contact 1310 is defined to connect a gate wire 1322 to a metal-1 wire 1320. The metal-1 wire 1320 layout shape can be defined to minimally overlap the gate contact 1310 in the x-direction due to the significant overlap of the gate contact 1310 by the metal-1 wire 1320 layout shape in the y-direction.


It should be understood that the manufacturability benefits of layout techniques described herein are preserved if dimensions referred to as substantially constant are allowed to vary slightly, so long as general layout pattern regularity is preserved. In one embodiment, the following layout method can be used for chip levels that are to be routed according to a GPG that is defined by a pitch too small to allow for common run lengths of shapes placed on adjacent GPG virtual lines. First, subgratings are defined. In one embodiment, alternate GPG lines are used for alternate functions when defining the subgratings. Then, layout shapes are organized according to subgrating regions. In one embodiment, layout shapes that use the same set of GPG virtual lines are grouped together in subgrating regions. Multiple chip levels can be utilized to make connections between layout shapes of a given chip level when required due to fragmentation of those layout shapes at subgrating region boundaries within the given chip level.


Additionally, after initial layout shape placement, layout shapes can be stretched, i.e., widened, so as to maintain substantially constant side-to-side spacing where necessary, such as at subgrating region boundaries that run parallel to the preferred routing direction. In some instances, non-standard spaces between layout shapes at subgrating region boundaries can be accepted when those non-standard spaces are predictable and fixed. Also, in some instances, non-standard spaces between layout shapes at subgrating region boundaries can be partially filled using subresolution layout shapes. Moreover, in some instances, layout shapes neighboring non-standard spaces at subgrating region boundaries can be stretched so as to mitigate the non-standard spaces. Furthermore, a layout shape can be stretched, i.e., widened, in the direction orthogonal to its preferred routing direction so as to allow for connection of multiple overlapping contacts and/or vias to the layout shape. Also, a layout shape can be stretched, i.e., widened, in the direction orthogonal to its preferred routing direction so as to allow for reduction of contact and/or via overlap/extension by the layout shape in the direction parallel to its preferred routing direction.



FIG. 14 shows a flowchart of a method for defining a layout for a portion of a given semiconductor chip level, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The method includes an operation 1401 for defining a preferred routing direction for a given chip level. The method also includes an operation 1403 for identifying each contact level related to the given chip level, wherein such a related contact level includes at least one interfacing contact defined to physically connect with a structure corresponding to a layout shape to be placed in the given chip level. In various embodiments, contact levels related to the given chip level can include a gate contact level, a diffusion contact level, a via level, or a combination thereof.


The method further includes an operation 1405 for defining a global placement grating (GPG) for the given chip level to include a set of parallel and evenly spaced virtual lines. The GPG is defined such that at least one virtual line of the GPG is positioned to intersect each interfacing contact within each contact level that is related to the given chip level, as identified in operation 1403. An operation 1407 is then performed to determine whether a perpendicular spacing between adjacent virtual lines of the GPG, i.e., GPG pitch, provides for enforcement of layout shape pattern regularity within the given chip level as necessary to ensure manufacturability of layout shapes within the given chip level.


It should be understood that what constitutes sufficient layout shape pattern regularity can be dependent upon many factors, such as a critical dimension of structures to be defined in the chip, a spacing between structures to be defined in the chip, and/or a function of structures to be defined in the chip, among others. Thus, it should be understood that what constitutes sufficient layout shape pattern regularity can vary from one design to another. In one particular embodiment, enforcement of layout shape pattern regularity within a given chip level includes one or more of 1) a substantially constant layout shape width as measured perpendicular to the preferred routing direction, 2) a substantially constant spacing between adjacently placed layout shapes as measured perpendicular to the preferred routing direction, and 3) a substantially constant spacing between ends of adjacently placed layout shapes as measured parallel to the preferred routing direction. An example of this embodiment is illustrated in FIG. 4, as previously described.


If operation 1407 determines that the perpendicular spacing between adjacent virtual lines of the global placement grating is not acceptable, the method proceeds with an operation 1411 for adjustment of the placement(s) of one or more contacts that interface with the given chip level. Then, the method reverts back to operation 1405 and proceeds as described above.


If operation 1407 determines that the perpendicular spacing between adjacent virtual lines of the global placement grating is acceptable, the method proceeds with an operation 1409 in which layout shapes are placed in alignment with the GPG for the given chip level. In one embodiment, the layout shapes placed in alignment with the GPG are defined as linear layout shapes having a substantially rectangular cross-section when viewed in an as-drawn state. Also, in one embodiment, each linear layout shape is placed such that a length of its substantially rectangular cross-section is parallel with the preferred routing direction. Additionally, in one embodiment, each linear layout shape is initially placed such that its centerline extending in the preferred routing direction is substantially centered upon a virtual line of the GPG. It stood be understood, however, that after initial placement, some of the linear layout shapes may be stretched or otherwise modified to mitigate non-standard spacings within the layout so as to provide for sufficient layout shape pattern regularity as necessary to ensure manufacturability of layout shapes within the given chip level.



FIG. 15A shows a flowchart of a method for defining a layout for a portion of a given semiconductor chip level, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The method includes an operation 1501 for defining a global placement grating (GPG) for a given chip level. The GPG is defined by a set of parallel and evenly spaced virtual lines. The method also includes an operation 1503 for identifying all connection lines within the GPG. A connection line is a virtual line of the GPG that is spatially coincident with a virtual line of a related contact level. A related contact level includes at least one contact that is defined to physically connect with a structure corresponding to a layout shape placed within the given chip level. The virtual lines of any given related contact level are defined as a set of parallel and equally spaced virtual lines to which contact layout shapes are aligned.


The method further includes an operation 1505 for defining a subgrating for the given chip level. A subgrating is defined as a set of evenly spaced connection lines, such that a spacing between adjacent connection lines in the subgrating is at least as large as a minimum spacing required to support a common run length of layout shapes on the adjacent connection lines in the subgrating. A common run length of two layout shapes occurs where the two layout shapes are placed in a side-by-side manner on adjacent connection lines in the subgrating. In one embodiment, defining a subgrating for a chip level includes associating the subgrating with a particular function to be performed by structures corresponding to layout shapes to be placed in accordance with the given subgrating. Also, in this embodiment, a perpendicular spacing between adjacent lines of the given subgrating is defined to accommodate placement of the layout shapes corresponding to the particular function.


Following operation 1505, the method proceeds with a decision operation 1507 for determining whether each connection line within the global placement grating is associated with at least one subgrating. If each connection line is not associated with at least one subgrating the method reverts back to proceed again with operation 1505. However, if each connection line is associated with at least one subgrating, the method proceeds with operation 1509 for placing layout shapes in alignment with the defined subgratings, such that each layout shape is associated with any one subgrating.


In one embodiment, each layout shape of the given chip level is placed in alignment with at least one subgrating for the given chip level and is defined as a linear layout shape having a substantially rectangular cross-section when viewed in an as-drawn state. Each linear layout shape is placed such that its lengthwise centerline extends parallel to the virtual lines of the GPG. Also, each linear layout shape is initially placed such that its lengthwise centerline is substantially centered upon a line of its subgrating.



FIG. 15B shows an expanded view of operation 1509, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. In an operation 1511, the layout for the given chip level is partitioned into a number of subgrating regions. Each subgrating region is defined as a contiguous area within the layout for the given chip level. An operation 1513 is performed to allocate subgratings to the number of subgrating regions, such that only one subgrating is allocated to any one subgrating region. It should be understood, however, that different subgrating regions can have different subgratings respectively allocated thereto. In one embodiment, each of the number of subgrating regions within the given chip level is defined such that a layout area of each subgrating region is made as large as possible while accommodating layout area requirements of every other subgrating region within the given chip level. Also in this embodiment, the subgrating regions within the given chip level are defined such that a minimal number of boundary segments are used to define a periphery of each subgrating region.


Once the subgrating regions are defined and have subgratings allocated thereto, the method proceeds with an operation 1515 for placing a first set of layout shapes for the given chip level. Each layout shape of the first set is aligned to the subgrating for the subgrating region in which the layout shape is placed. In one embodiment, each layout shape of the given chip level is placed according to the following specifications: 1) the layout shape is placed in alignment with at least one subgrating for the given chip level and is defined as a linear layout shape having a substantially rectangular cross-section when viewed in an as-drawn state, 2) the layout shape is placed such that its lengthwise centerline extends parallel to the virtual lines of the GPG, 3) the layout shape is initially placed such that its lengthwise centerline is substantially centered upon a line of its subgrating.


In one augmentation of the above-described embodiment, a particular linear layout shape of the given chip level is stretched in its widthwise direction extending perpendicular to the virtual lines of the GPG, after the initial placement of the particular linear layout shape, such that a structure corresponding to the particular linear layout shape will physically connect with multiple contacts (i.e., contacts and/or vias) within one or more related contact levels. An example of this is illustrated in FIG. 11 by the stretching of layout shape 1110 to cover and physically connect with contacts 1120 and 1121. In another augmentation of the above-described embodiment, a particular linear layout shape of the given chip level is stretched in its widthwise direction extending perpendicular to the virtual lines of the GPG, after the initial placement of the particular linear layout shape, such that a structure corresponding to the particular linear layout shape will sufficiently overlap one or more contacts (i.e., contacts and/or vias) within one or more related contact levels. An example of this is illustrated in FIG. 13 by the stretching of layout shape 1320 to sufficiently overlap contact 1310.


Additionally, in one embodiment, some layout shapes in adjacent subgrating regions that are placed on a common virtual line of the GPG are extended through a boundary between the adjacent subgrating regions so as to form a single contiguous layout shape. In yet another embodiment, two or more layout shapes respectively placed in adjacent subgrating regions of the given chip level and on different virtual lines of the GPG are electrically connected together by orthogonally routed structures that extend through multiple chip levels. In this embodiment, the subgratings of the adjacent subgrating regions may not accommodate a common run length of the two or more layout shapes.



FIG. 15C shows an extension of the method of FIGS. 15A-15B, in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention. In one embodiment, the method proceeds from operation 1515 with an operation 1517 for identifying a blank space within the layout of the given chip level. The blank space in this embodiment is identified as a spatial area within the layout of the given chip level at which a non-standard spacing exists between layout shapes of the first set as placed in operation 1515. The method then proceeds with an operation 1519 for identifying a subgrating associated with a neighboring layout shape of the first set relative to the blank space and proximate to the blank space. An operation 1521 is then performed to define a second set of layout shapes for the given chip level within the blank space. The second set of layout shapes are placed in alignment with the subgrating identified in operation 1519. The second set of layout shapes are defined within the blank space so as to optimize manufacturability of the first set of layout shapes. In one embodiment, operations 1517 through 1521 are repeated until each blank space within the given chip level has been considered for placement of one or more layout shapes of the second set therein.


In another embodiment, the method proceeds from operation 1515 with an operation 1525 for identifying a non-standard spacing within the layout of the given chip level at an interface between adjacent subgrating regions. The method then proceeds with an operation 1527 for identifying a layout shape adjacent to the non-standard spacing that can be stretched toward the interface between the adjacent subgrating regions. An operation 1529 is then performed to stretch the layout shape identified in operation 1527 toward the interface between the adjacent subgrating regions so as to mitigate the non-standard spacing. In one embodiment, the layout shape identified in operation 1527 is stretched within its subgrating region so as to align with another layout shape present in the adjacent subgrating region. In one embodiment the layout shape identified in operation 1527 is a linear layout shape and is stretched in its widthwise direction that extends perpendicular to the virtual lines of the GPG.


In yet another embodiment, the method proceeds from operation 1515 with an operation 1531 for identifying a non-standard spacing within the layout of the given chip level at an interface between adjacent subgrating regions. The method then proceeds with an operation 1533 for identifying an inability to stretch a layout shape adjacent to the non-standard spacing toward the interface between the adjacent subgrating regions. An operation 1535 is then performed to define a subresolution layout shape within a layout area of the given chip level corresponding to the non-standard spacing. The subresolution shape is defined to reinforce manufacturability of the first set of layout shapes near the non-standard spacing, and so as to ensure that the subresolution layout shape is not manufactured.


In yet another embodiment, following operation 1515, one or more non-standard spacings are identified within the layout of the given chip level. In this embodiment, a decision is made to not mitigate the identified non-standard spacings. For example, the identified non-standard spacings may be dealt with through optimization of one or more manufacturing processes without requiring modification of the layout of the given chip level.



FIG. 16 shows a flowchart of a method for defining a layout for a portion of a given semiconductor chip level, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The method includes an operation 1601 for defining a global placement grating (GPG) for a given chip level, wherein the global placement grating is defined by a set of parallel and evenly spaced virtual lines. The method also includes an operation 1603 for identifying all connection lines within the GPG. A connection line is a virtual line of the GPG that is spatially coincident with a virtual line of a related contact level. The method further includes an operation 1605 for defining a subgrating for the given chip level as a set of evenly spaced connection lines, such that a spacing between adjacent connection lines in the subgrating is at least as large as a minimum spacing required to support a common run length of layout shapes on the adjacent connection lines in the subgrating.


A decision operation 1607 is provided to determine whether or not each connection line within the GPG is associated with at least one subgrating. If each connection line within the GPG is not associated with at least one subgrating, the method reverts back to operation 1605. If each connection line within the GPG is associated with at least one subgrating, the method continues with an operation 1609 for partitioning the layout for the given chip level into a number of subgrating regions. Each subgrating region is defined as a contiguous area within the layout for the given chip level. An operation 1611 is then performed to allocate subgratings to the number of subgrating regions such that only one subgrating is allocated to any one subgrating region. It should be understood that different subgratings can be allocated to different subgrating regions, so long as no more than one subgrating is allocated to a given subgrating region in a given chip level.


The method continues with an operation 1613 for placing functional layout shapes for the given chip level in alignment to the subgratings allocated to the subgrating regions. Following placement of the functional layout shapes in operation 1613, the method proceeds with an operation 1615 for identifying a non-standard spacing within the layout of the given chip level. In one embodiment, identifying the non-standard spacing in operation 1615 includes comparing a side-to-side spacing of functional layout shapes located adjacent to each subgrating region interface extending parallel to the virtual lines of the GPG with a standard side-to-side spacing between (or specified for) adjacent functional layout shapes within the given chip level.


In one embodiment, an operation 1617 is then performed to resolve the non-standard spacing so as to optimize manufacturability of structures corresponding to the functional layout shapes. In various embodiments, resolving the non-standard spacing in operation 1617 can include either stretching a functional layout shape to reduce the non-standard spacing, or inserting a non-functional layout shape within the non-standard spacing, or inserting a subresolution shape within the non-standard spacing, or a combination thereof.


In an alternative embodiment, operation 1617 includes making a decision to not mitigate the identified non-standard spacing. For example, the identified non-standard spacing may be dealt with through adjustment of one or more manufacturing processes without requiring modification of the layout of the given chip level.


In one embodiment, each functional layout shape of the given chip level is placed in alignment with at least one subgrating for the given chip level and is defined as a linear layout shape having a substantially rectangular cross-section when viewed in an as-drawn state. Also in this embodiment, each functional layout shape is placed such that its lengthwise centerline extends parallel to the virtual lines of the GPG. Also in this embodiment, each functional layout shape is initially placed (prior to operation 1617) such that its lengthwise centerline is substantially centered upon a line of its subgrating.


It should be understood that the chip layouts generated by the methods disclosed herein can be stored in a tangible form, such as in a digital format on a computer readable medium. Also, the invention described herein can be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium is any data storage device that can store data which can thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computer readable medium include hard drives, network attached storage (NAS), read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, CD-Rs, CD-RWs, magnetic tapes, and other optical and non-optical data storage devices. The computer readable medium can also be distributed over a network of coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.


Any of the operations described herein that form part of the invention are useful machine operations. The invention also relates to a device or an apparatus for performing these operations. The apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purpose, such as a special purpose computer. When defined as a special purpose computer, the computer can also perform other processing, program execution or routines that are not part of the special purpose, while still being capable of operating for the special purpose. Alternatively, the operations may be processed by a general purpose computer selectively activated or configured by one or more computer programs stored in the computer memory, cache, or obtained over a network. When data is obtained over a network the data maybe processed by other computers on the network, e.g., a cloud of computing resources.


The embodiments of the present invention can also be defined as a machine that transforms data from one state to another state. The data may represent an article, that can be represented as an electronic signal and electronically manipulate data. The transformed data can, in some cases, be visually depicted on a display, representing the physical object that results from the transformation of data. The transformed data can be saved to storage generally, or in particular formats that enable the construction or depiction of a physical and tangible object. In some embodiments, the manipulation can be performed by a processor. In such an example, the processor thus transforms the data from one thing to another. Still further, the methods can be processed by one or more machines or processors that can be connected over a network. Each machine can transform data from one state or thing to another, and can also process data, save data to storage, transmit data over a network, display the result, or communicate the result to another machine.


While this invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art upon reading the preceding specifications and studying the drawings will realize various alterations, additions, permutations and equivalents thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention includes all such alterations, additions, permutations, and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A semiconductor device, comprising: a first linear-shaped conductive structure defined in a given chip level of the semiconductor device, the first linear-shaped conductive structure having a lengthwise centerline oriented in a first direction, the first linear-shaped conductive structure having a width measured in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction;a second linear-shaped conductive structure defined in the given chip level of the semiconductor device, the second linear-shaped conductive structure having a lengthwise centerline oriented in the first direction, the second linear-shaped conductive structure having a width measured in the second direction; anda third linear-shaped conductive structure defined in the given chip level of the semiconductor device, the third linear-shaped conductive structure having a lengthwise centerline oriented in the first direction, the third linear-shaped conductive structure having a width measured in the second direction,the width of the first linear-shaped conductive structure substantially equal to the width of the third linear-shaped conductive structure,the width of the second linear-shaped conductive structure greater than the width of the first linear-shaped conductive structure,at least a portion of the second linear-shaped conductive structure positioned in a side-by-side manner with at least a portion of the first linear-shaped conductive structure, the side-by-side positioned portions of the first and second linear-shaped conductive structure separated from each other by a first distance as measured in the second direction, andat least a portion of the second linear-shaped conductive structure positioned in a side-by-side manner with at least a portion of the third linear-shaped conductive structure, the side-by-side positioned portions of the second and third linear-shaped conductive structures separated from each other by the first distance as measured in the second direction.
  • 2. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 1, wherein the width of the second linear-shaped conductive structure is an integer multiple of the width of the first linear-shaped conductive structure.
  • 3. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 2, wherein the width of the second linear-shaped conductive structure is substantially equal to two times the width of the first linear-shaped conductive structure.
  • 4. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 1, wherein the width of the first linear-shaped conductive structure is greater than the first distance.
  • 5. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 1, wherein the first linear-shaped conductive structure has a first end and a second end and extends in the first direction from its first end to its second end, wherein the second linear-shaped conductive structure has a first end and a second end and extends in the first direction from its first end to its second end,wherein the third linear-shaped conductive structure has a first end and a second end and extends in the first direction from its first end to its second end, andwherein the first ends of the first, second, and third linear-shaped conductive structures are substantially positioned on a first line oriented in the second direction.
  • 6. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 5, wherein the second ends of the first and second linear-shaped conductive structures are substantially positioned on a second line oriented in the second direction.
  • 7. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 6, wherein a total length of the third linear-shaped conductive structure as measured in the first direction is greater than a total length of the first linear-shaped conductive structure as measured in the first direction.
  • 8. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 7, wherein a total length of the third linear-shaped conductive structure as measured in the first direction is greater than a total length of the second linear-shaped conductive structure as measured in the first direction.
  • 9. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 6, further comprising: a fourth linear-shaped conductive structure defined in the given chip level of the semiconductor device, the fourth linear-shaped conductive structure having a lengthwise centerline oriented in the first direction, the fourth linear-shaped conductive structure having a width measured in the second direction, the fourth linear-shaped conductive structure positioned in the second direction between the first and second linear-shaped conductive structures.
  • 10. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 9, wherein the lengthwise centerline of the fourth linear-shaped conductive structure is positioned at a midpoint of the first distance as measured in the second direction between the side-by-side positioned portions of the first and second linear-shaped conductive structure.
  • 11. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 10, wherein the width of the fourth linear-shaped conductive structure is substantially equal to the width of the first linear-shaped conductive structure.
  • 12. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 10, further comprising: a fifth linear-shaped conductive structure defined in the given chip level of the semiconductor device, the fifth linear-shaped conductive structure having a lengthwise centerline oriented in the first direction, the fifth linear-shaped conductive structure having a width measured in the second direction, the fifth linear-shaped conductive structure positioned in the second direction between the fourth and third linear-shaped conductive structures.
  • 13. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 12, wherein at least a portion of the fifth linear-shaped conductive structure is positioned in a side-by-side manner with at least a portion of the fourth linear-shaped conductive structure, the side-by-side positioned portions of the fourth and fifth linear-shaped conductive structures separated from each other by the first distance as measured in the second direction.
  • 14. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 13, wherein at least a portion of the fifth linear-shaped conductive structure is positioned in a side-by-side manner with at least a portion of the third linear-shaped conductive structure, the side-by-side positioned portions of the third and fifth linear-shaped conductive structures separated from each other by the first distance as measured in the second direction.
  • 15. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 14, wherein the width of the fourth linear-shaped conductive structure is substantially equal to the width of the first linear-shaped conductive structure, and wherein the width of the fifth linear-shaped conductive structure is substantially equal to the width of the first linear-shaped conductive structure.
  • 16. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 14, wherein the first linear-shaped conductive structure has a first end and a second end and extends in the first direction from its first end to its second end, wherein the second linear-shaped conductive structure has a first end and a second end and extends in the first direction from its first end to its second end,wherein the third linear-shaped conductive structure has a first end and a second end and extends in the first direction from its first end to its second end,wherein the fourth linear-shaped conductive structure has a first end and a second end and extends in the first direction from its first end to its second end,wherein the fifth linear-shaped conductive structure has a first end and a second end and extends in the first direction from its first end to its second end,wherein the first ends of the first, second, and third linear-shaped conductive structures are substantially positioned on a first line oriented in the second direction,wherein the second ends of the first and second linear-shaped conductive structures are substantially positioned on a second line oriented in the second direction,wherein the first ends of the fourth and fifth linear-shaped conductive structures are substantially positioned on a third line oriented in the second direction, andwherein a region of the given chip level located between the first and third linear-shaped conductive structures and located between the second and third lines oriented in the second direction does not include any conductive structure.
  • 17. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 1, wherein the given chip level is a gate electrode level of the semiconductor device.
  • 18. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 1, further comprising: a substrate, wherein the given chip level is a first interconnect level of the semiconductor device in a direction extending upward from the substrate.
  • 19. The semiconductor device as recited in claim 1, further comprising: a substrate, wherein the given chip level is a second interconnect level of the semiconductor device in a direction extending upward from the substrate.
  • 20. A method for fabricating semiconductor device, comprising: defining a first linear-shaped conductive structure in a given chip level of the semiconductor device, the first linear-shaped conductive structure having a lengthwise centerline oriented in a first direction, the first linear-shaped conductive structure having a width measured in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction;defining a second linear-shaped conductive structure in the given chip level of the semiconductor device, the second linear-shaped conductive structure having a lengthwise centerline oriented in the first direction, the second linear-shaped conductive structure having a width measured in the second direction; anddefining a third linear-shaped conductive structure in the given chip level of the semiconductor device, the third linear-shaped conductive structure having a lengthwise centerline oriented in the first direction, the third linear-shaped conductive structure having a width measured in the second direction,the width of the first linear-shaped conductive structure substantially equal to the width of the third linear-shaped conductive structure,the width of the second linear-shaped conductive structure greater than the width of the first linear-shaped conductive structure,at least a portion of the second linear-shaped conductive structure positioned in a side-by-side manner with at least a portion of the first linear-shaped conductive structure, the side-by-side positioned portions of the first and second linear-shaped conductive structure separated from each other by a first distance as measured in the second direction, andat least a portion of the second linear-shaped conductive structure positioned in a side-by-side manner with at least a portion of the third linear-shaped conductive structure, the side-by-side positioned portions of the second and third linear-shaped conductive structures separated from each other by the first distance as measured in the second direction.
  • 21. A non-transitory data storage device having program instructions stored thereon for generating a layout of a semiconductor device, comprising: program instructions for defining a layout of a first linear-shaped conductive structure defined in a given chip level of the semiconductor device, the first linear-shaped conductive structure having a lengthwise centerline oriented in a first direction, the first linear-shaped conductive structure having a width measured in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction;program instructions for defining a layout of a second linear-shaped conductive structure defined in the given chip level of the semiconductor device, the second linear-shaped conductive structure having a lengthwise centerline oriented in the first direction, the second linear-shaped conductive structure having a width measured in the second direction; andprogram instructions for defining a layout of a third linear-shaped conductive structure defined in the given chip level of the semiconductor device, the third linear-shaped conductive structure having a lengthwise centerline oriented in the first direction, the third linear-shaped conductive structure having a width measured in the second direction,the width of the first linear-shaped conductive structure substantially equal to the width of the third linear-shaped conductive structure,the width of the second linear-shaped conductive structure greater than the width of the first linear-shaped conductive structure,at least a portion of the second linear-shaped conductive structure positioned in a side-by-side manner with at least a portion of the first linear-shaped conductive structure, the side-by-side positioned portions of the first and second linear-shaped conductive structure separated from each other by a first distance as measured in the second direction, andat least a portion of the second linear-shaped conductive structure positioned in a side-by-side manner with at least a portion of the third linear-shaped conductive structure, the side-by-side positioned portions of the second and third linear-shaped conductive structures separated from each other by the first distance as measured in the second direction.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 13/897,307, filed May 17, 2013, which is a divisional application under 35 U.S.C. 121 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 12/363,705, filed Jan. 30, 2009, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,453,094, on May 28, 2013, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/024,980, filed Jan. 31, 2008. The disclosure of each above-identified patent application is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (810)
Number Name Date Kind
4197555 Uehara et al. Apr 1980 A
4417161 Uya Nov 1983 A
4424460 Best Jan 1984 A
4602270 Finegold et al. Jul 1986 A
4613940 Shenton et al. Sep 1986 A
4657628 Holloway et al. Apr 1987 A
4682202 Tanizawa Jul 1987 A
4745084 Rowson et al. May 1988 A
4780753 Miyashima et al. Oct 1988 A
4801986 Chang et al. Jan 1989 A
4804636 Groover, III Feb 1989 A
4812688 Chu et al. Mar 1989 A
4884115 Michel et al. Nov 1989 A
4928160 Crafts May 1990 A
4975756 Haken et al. Dec 1990 A
5068603 Mahoney Nov 1991 A
5079614 Khatakhotan Jan 1992 A
5097422 Corbin Mar 1992 A
5117277 Yuyama et al. May 1992 A
5121186 Wong et al. Jun 1992 A
5208765 Turnbull May 1993 A
5224057 Igarashi Jun 1993 A
5242770 Chen et al. Sep 1993 A
5268319 Harari Dec 1993 A
5298774 Ueda et al. Mar 1994 A
5313426 Sakuma et al. May 1994 A
5351197 Upton et al. Sep 1994 A
5359226 DeJong Oct 1994 A
5365454 Nakagawa et al. Nov 1994 A
5367187 Yuen Nov 1994 A
5378649 Huang Jan 1995 A
5396128 Dunning et al. Mar 1995 A
5420447 Waggoner May 1995 A
5461577 Shaw et al. Oct 1995 A
5471403 Fujimaga Nov 1995 A
5497334 Russell et al. Mar 1996 A
5497337 Ponnapalli et al. Mar 1996 A
5526307 Lin et al. Jun 1996 A
5536955 Ali Jul 1996 A
5545904 Orbach Aug 1996 A
5581098 Chang Dec 1996 A
5581202 Yano et al. Dec 1996 A
5612893 Hao et al. Mar 1997 A
5636002 Garofalo Jun 1997 A
5656861 Godinho et al. Aug 1997 A
5682323 Pasch et al. Oct 1997 A
5684311 Shaw Nov 1997 A
5684733 Wu et al. Nov 1997 A
5698873 Colwell et al. Dec 1997 A
5705301 Garza et al. Jan 1998 A
5723883 Gheewalla Mar 1998 A
5723908 Fuchida et al. Mar 1998 A
5740068 Liebmann et al. Apr 1998 A
5745374 Matsumoto Apr 1998 A
5764533 deDood Jun 1998 A
5774367 Reyes et al. Jun 1998 A
5780909 Hayashi Jul 1998 A
5789776 Lancaster et al. Aug 1998 A
5790417 Chao et al. Aug 1998 A
5796128 Tran et al. Aug 1998 A
5796624 Sridhar et al. Aug 1998 A
5798298 Yang et al. Aug 1998 A
5814844 Nagata et al. Sep 1998 A
5825203 Kusunoki et al. Oct 1998 A
5834851 Ikeda et al. Nov 1998 A
5838594 Kojima Nov 1998 A
5841663 Sharma et al. Nov 1998 A
5847421 Yamaguchi Dec 1998 A
5850362 Sakuma et al. Dec 1998 A
5852562 Shinomiya et al. Dec 1998 A
5858580 Wang et al. Jan 1999 A
5898194 Gheewala Apr 1999 A
5900340 Reich et al. May 1999 A
5905287 Hirata May 1999 A
5908827 Sirna Jun 1999 A
5915199 Hsu Jun 1999 A
5917207 Colwell et al. Jun 1999 A
5920486 Beahm et al. Jul 1999 A
5923059 Gheewala Jul 1999 A
5923060 Gheewala Jul 1999 A
5929469 Mimoto et al. Jul 1999 A
5930163 Hara et al. Jul 1999 A
5935763 Caterer et al. Aug 1999 A
5949101 Aritome Sep 1999 A
5973507 Yamazaki Oct 1999 A
5977305 Wigler et al. Nov 1999 A
5977574 Schmitt et al. Nov 1999 A
5998879 Iwaki et al. Dec 1999 A
6009251 Ho et al. Dec 1999 A
6026223 Scepanovic et al. Feb 2000 A
6037613 Mariyama Mar 2000 A
6037617 Kumagai Mar 2000 A
6044007 Capodieci Mar 2000 A
6054872 Fudanuki et al. Apr 2000 A
6063132 DeCamp et al. May 2000 A
6077310 Yamamoto et al. Jun 2000 A
6080206 Tadokoro et al. Jun 2000 A
6084255 Ueda Jul 2000 A
6084437 Sako Jul 2000 A
6091845 Pierrat et al. Jul 2000 A
6099584 Arnold et al. Aug 2000 A
6100025 Wigler et al. Aug 2000 A
6114071 Chen et al. Sep 2000 A
6144227 Sato Nov 2000 A
6159839 Jeng et al. Dec 2000 A
6166415 Sakemi et al. Dec 2000 A
6166560 Ogura et al. Dec 2000 A
6174742 Sudhindranath et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182272 Andreev et al. Jan 2001 B1
6194104 Hsu Feb 2001 B1
6194252 Yamaguchi Feb 2001 B1
6194912 Or-Bach Feb 2001 B1
6209123 Maziasz et al. Mar 2001 B1
6230299 McSherry et al. May 2001 B1
6232173 Hsu et al. May 2001 B1
6240542 Kapur May 2001 B1
6249902 Igusa et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255600 Schaper Jul 2001 B1
6255845 Wong et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262487 Igarashi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269472 Garza et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275973 Wein Aug 2001 B1
6282696 Garza et al. Aug 2001 B1
6291276 Gonzalez Sep 2001 B1
6297668 Schober Oct 2001 B1
6297674 Kono et al. Oct 2001 B1
6303252 Lin Oct 2001 B1
6331733 Or-Bach et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331791 Huang Dec 2001 B1
6335250 Egi Jan 2002 B1
6338972 Sudhindranath et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347062 Nii et al. Feb 2002 B2
6356112 Tran et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359804 Kuriyama et al. Mar 2002 B2
6370679 Chang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378110 Ho Apr 2002 B1
6380592 Tooher et al. Apr 2002 B2
6388296 Hsu May 2002 B1
6393601 Tanaka et al. May 2002 B1
6399972 Masuda et al. Jun 2002 B1
6400183 Yamashita et al. Jun 2002 B2
6408427 Cong et al. Jun 2002 B1
6415421 Anderson et al. Jul 2002 B2
6416907 Winder et al. Jul 2002 B1
6417549 Oh Jul 2002 B1
6421820 Mansfield et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425112 Bula et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425117 Pasch et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426269 Haffner et al. Jul 2002 B1
6436805 Trivedi Aug 2002 B1
6445049 Iranmanesh Sep 2002 B1
6445065 Gheewala et al. Sep 2002 B1
6467072 Yang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469328 Yanai et al. Oct 2002 B2
6470489 Chang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476493 Or-Bach et al. Nov 2002 B2
6477695 Gandhi Nov 2002 B1
6480032 Aksamit Nov 2002 B1
6480989 Chan et al. Nov 2002 B2
6492066 Capodieci et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496965 van Ginneken et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504186 Kanamoto et al. Jan 2003 B2
6505327 Lin Jan 2003 B2
6505328 van Ginneken et al. Jan 2003 B1
6507941 Leung et al. Jan 2003 B1
6509952 Govil et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514849 Hui et al. Feb 2003 B1
6516459 Sahouria Feb 2003 B1
6523156 Cirit Feb 2003 B2
6525350 Kinoshita et al. Feb 2003 B1
6536028 Katsioulas et al. Mar 2003 B1
6543039 Watanabe Apr 2003 B1
6553544 Tanaka et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553559 Liebmann et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553562 Capodieci et al. Apr 2003 B2
6566720 Aldrich May 2003 B2
6570234 Gardner May 2003 B1
6571140 Wewalaarachchi May 2003 B1
6571379 Takayama May 2003 B2
6574786 Pohlenz et al. Jun 2003 B1
6578190 Ferguson et al. Jun 2003 B2
6583041 Capodieci Jun 2003 B1
6588005 Kobayashi et al. Jul 2003 B1
6590289 Shively Jul 2003 B2
6591207 Naya et al. Jul 2003 B2
6609235 Ramaswamy et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610607 Armbrust et al. Aug 2003 B1
6617621 Gheewala et al. Sep 2003 B1
6620561 Winder et al. Sep 2003 B2
6621132 Onishi et al. Sep 2003 B2
6632741 Clevenger et al. Oct 2003 B1
6633182 Pileggi et al. Oct 2003 B2
6635935 Makino Oct 2003 B2
6642744 Or-Bach et al. Nov 2003 B2
6643831 Chang et al. Nov 2003 B2
6650014 Kariyazaki Nov 2003 B2
6661041 Keeth Dec 2003 B2
6662350 Fried et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664587 Guterman et al. Dec 2003 B2
6673638 Bendik et al. Jan 2004 B1
6677649 Minami et al. Jan 2004 B2
6687895 Zhang Feb 2004 B2
6690206 Rikino et al. Feb 2004 B2
6691297 Misaka et al. Feb 2004 B1
6700405 Hirairi Mar 2004 B1
6703170 Pindo Mar 2004 B1
6709880 Yamamoto et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714903 Chu et al. Mar 2004 B1
6732334 Nakatsuka May 2004 B2
6732338 Crouse et al. May 2004 B2
6732344 Sakamoto et al. May 2004 B2
6734506 Oyamatsu May 2004 B2
6737199 Hsieh May 2004 B1
6737318 Murata et al. May 2004 B2
6737347 Houston et al. May 2004 B1
6745372 Cote et al. Jun 2004 B2
6745380 Bodendorf et al. Jun 2004 B2
6749972 Yu Jun 2004 B2
6750555 Satomi et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760269 Nakase et al. Jul 2004 B2
6765245 Bansal Jul 2004 B2
6777138 Pierrat et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777146 Samuels Aug 2004 B1
6787823 Shibutani Sep 2004 B2
6789244 Dasasathyan et al. Sep 2004 B1
6789246 Mohan et al. Sep 2004 B1
6792591 Shi et al. Sep 2004 B2
6792593 Takashima et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794677 Tamaki et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794914 Sani et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795332 Yamaoka et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795358 Tanaka et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795952 Stine et al. Sep 2004 B1
6795953 Bakarian et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800883 Furuya et al. Oct 2004 B2
6807663 Cote et al. Oct 2004 B2
6809399 Ikeda et al. Oct 2004 B2
6812574 Tomita et al. Nov 2004 B2
6818389 Fritze et al. Nov 2004 B2
6818929 Tsutsumi et al. Nov 2004 B2
6819136 Or-Bach Nov 2004 B2
6820248 Gan, II Nov 2004 B1
6826738 Cadouri Nov 2004 B2
6834375 Stine et al. Dec 2004 B1
6841880 Matsumoto et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850854 Naya et al. Feb 2005 B2
6854096 Eaton et al. Feb 2005 B2
6854100 Chuang et al. Feb 2005 B1
6867073 Enquist Mar 2005 B1
6871338 Yamauchi Mar 2005 B2
6872990 Kang Mar 2005 B1
6877144 Rittman et al. Apr 2005 B1
6881523 Smith Apr 2005 B2
6884712 Yelehanka et al. Apr 2005 B2
6885045 Hidaka Apr 2005 B2
6889370 Kerzman et al. May 2005 B1
6897517 Houdt et al. May 2005 B2
6897536 Nomura et al. May 2005 B2
6898770 Boluki et al. May 2005 B2
6904582 Rittman et al. Jun 2005 B1
6918104 Pierrat et al. Jul 2005 B2
6920079 Shibayama Jul 2005 B2
6921982 Joshi et al. Jul 2005 B2
6922354 Ishikura et al. Jul 2005 B2
6924560 Wang et al. Aug 2005 B2
6928635 Pramanik et al. Aug 2005 B2
6931617 Sanie et al. Aug 2005 B2
6953956 Or-Bach et al. Oct 2005 B2
6954918 Houston Oct 2005 B2
6957402 Templeton et al. Oct 2005 B2
6968527 Pierrat Nov 2005 B2
6974978 Possley Dec 2005 B1
6977856 Tanaka et al. Dec 2005 B2
6978436 Cote et al. Dec 2005 B2
6978437 Rittman et al. Dec 2005 B1
6980211 Lin et al. Dec 2005 B2
6992394 Park Jan 2006 B2
6992925 Peng Jan 2006 B2
6993741 Liebmann et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994939 Ghandehari et al. Feb 2006 B1
6998722 Madurawe Feb 2006 B2
7003068 Kushner et al. Feb 2006 B2
7009862 Higeta et al. Mar 2006 B2
7016214 Kawamata Mar 2006 B2
7022559 Barnak et al. Apr 2006 B2
7028285 Cote et al. Apr 2006 B2
7041568 Goldbach et al. May 2006 B2
7052972 Sandhu et al. May 2006 B2
7053424 Ono May 2006 B2
7063920 Baba-Ali Jun 2006 B2
7064068 Chou et al. Jun 2006 B2
7065731 Jacques et al. Jun 2006 B2
7079413 Tsukamoto et al. Jul 2006 B2
7079989 Wimer Jul 2006 B2
7093208 Williams et al. Aug 2006 B2
7093228 Andreev et al. Aug 2006 B2
7103870 Misaka et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105871 Or-Bach et al. Sep 2006 B2
7107551 de Dood et al. Sep 2006 B1
7115343 Gordon et al. Oct 2006 B2
7115920 Bernstein et al. Oct 2006 B2
7120882 Kotani et al. Oct 2006 B2
7124386 Smith et al. Oct 2006 B2
7126837 Banachowicz et al. Oct 2006 B1
7132203 Pierrat Nov 2006 B2
7137092 Maeda Nov 2006 B2
7141853 Campbell et al. Nov 2006 B2
7143380 Anderson et al. Nov 2006 B1
7149999 Kahng et al. Dec 2006 B2
7152215 Smith et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155685 Mori et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155689 Pierrat et al. Dec 2006 B2
7159197 Falbo et al. Jan 2007 B2
7174520 White et al. Feb 2007 B2
7175940 Laidig et al. Feb 2007 B2
7176508 Joshi et al. Feb 2007 B2
7177215 Tanaka et al. Feb 2007 B2
7183611 Bhattacharyya Feb 2007 B2
7185294 Zhang Feb 2007 B2
7188322 Cohn et al. Mar 2007 B2
7194712 Wu Mar 2007 B2
7200835 Zhang et al. Apr 2007 B2
7202517 Dixit et al. Apr 2007 B2
7205191 Kobayashi Apr 2007 B2
7208794 Hofmann et al. Apr 2007 B2
7214579 Widdershoven et al. May 2007 B2
7219326 Reed et al. May 2007 B2
7221031 Ryoo et al. May 2007 B2
7225423 Bhattacharya et al. May 2007 B2
7227183 Donze et al. Jun 2007 B2
7228510 Ono Jun 2007 B2
7231628 Pack et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235424 Chen et al. Jun 2007 B2
7243316 White et al. Jul 2007 B2
7252909 Shin et al. Aug 2007 B2
7257017 Liaw Aug 2007 B2
7264990 Rueckes et al. Sep 2007 B2
7266787 Hughes et al. Sep 2007 B2
7269803 Khakzadi et al. Sep 2007 B2
7278118 Pileggi et al. Oct 2007 B2
7279727 Ikoma et al. Oct 2007 B2
7287320 Wang et al. Oct 2007 B2
7294534 Iwaki Nov 2007 B2
7302651 Allen et al. Nov 2007 B2
7308669 Buehler et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312003 Cote et al. Dec 2007 B2
7315994 Aller et al. Jan 2008 B2
7327591 Sadra et al. Feb 2008 B2
7329938 Kinoshita Feb 2008 B2
7335966 Ihme et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337421 Kamat Feb 2008 B2
7338896 Vanhaelemeersch et al. Mar 2008 B2
7345909 Chang et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346885 Semmler Mar 2008 B2
7350183 Cui et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353492 Gupta et al. Apr 2008 B2
7358131 Bhattacharyya Apr 2008 B2
7360179 Smith et al. Apr 2008 B2
7360198 Rana et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366997 Rahmat et al. Apr 2008 B1
7367008 White et al. Apr 2008 B2
7376931 Kokubun May 2008 B2
7383521 Smith et al. Jun 2008 B2
7397260 Chanda et al. Jul 2008 B2
7400627 Wu et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402848 Chang et al. Jul 2008 B2
7404154 Venkatraman et al. Jul 2008 B1
7404173 Wu et al. Jul 2008 B2
7411252 Anderson et al. Aug 2008 B2
7421678 Barnes et al. Sep 2008 B2
7423298 Mariyama et al. Sep 2008 B2
7424694 Ikeda Sep 2008 B2
7424695 Tamura et al. Sep 2008 B2
7424696 Vogel et al. Sep 2008 B2
7426710 Zhang et al. Sep 2008 B2
7432562 Bhattacharyya Oct 2008 B2
7434185 Dooling et al. Oct 2008 B2
7441211 Gupta et al. Oct 2008 B1
7442630 Kelberlau et al. Oct 2008 B2
7444609 Charlebois et al. Oct 2008 B2
7446352 Becker et al. Nov 2008 B2
7449371 Kemerling et al. Nov 2008 B2
7458045 Cote et al. Nov 2008 B2
7459792 Chen Dec 2008 B2
7465973 Chang et al. Dec 2008 B2
7466607 Hollis et al. Dec 2008 B2
7469396 Hayashi et al. Dec 2008 B2
7480880 Visweswariah et al. Jan 2009 B2
7480891 Sezginer Jan 2009 B2
7484197 Allen et al. Jan 2009 B2
7485934 Liaw Feb 2009 B2
7487475 Kriplani et al. Feb 2009 B1
7492013 Correale, Jr. Feb 2009 B2
7500211 Komaki Mar 2009 B2
7502275 Nii et al. Mar 2009 B2
7503026 Ichiryu et al. Mar 2009 B2
7504184 Hung et al. Mar 2009 B2
7506300 Sezginer et al. Mar 2009 B2
7508238 Yamagami Mar 2009 B2
7509621 Melvin, III Mar 2009 B2
7509622 Sinha et al. Mar 2009 B2
7512017 Chang Mar 2009 B2
7512921 Shibuya Mar 2009 B2
7514959 Or-Bach et al. Apr 2009 B2
7523429 Kroyan et al. Apr 2009 B2
7527900 Zhou et al. May 2009 B2
7538368 Yano May 2009 B2
7543262 Wang et al. Jun 2009 B2
7563701 Chang et al. Jul 2009 B2
7564134 Lee et al. Jul 2009 B2
7568174 Sezginer et al. Jul 2009 B2
7569309 Blatchford et al. Aug 2009 B2
7569310 Wallace et al. Aug 2009 B2
7569894 Suzuki Aug 2009 B2
7575973 Mokhlesi et al. Aug 2009 B2
7598541 Okamoto et al. Oct 2009 B2
7598558 Hashimoto et al. Oct 2009 B2
7614030 Hsu Nov 2009 B2
7625790 Yang Dec 2009 B2
7632610 Wallace et al. Dec 2009 B2
7640522 Gupta et al. Dec 2009 B2
7646651 Lee et al. Jan 2010 B2
7653884 Furnish et al. Jan 2010 B2
7665051 Ludwig et al. Feb 2010 B2
7700466 Booth et al. Apr 2010 B2
7712056 White et al. May 2010 B2
7739627 Chew et al. Jun 2010 B2
7749662 Matthew et al. Jul 2010 B2
7755110 Gliese et al. Jul 2010 B2
7770144 Dellinger Aug 2010 B2
7791109 Wann et al. Sep 2010 B2
7802219 Tomar et al. Sep 2010 B2
7825437 Pillarisetty et al. Nov 2010 B2
7842975 Becker et al. Nov 2010 B2
7873929 Kahng et al. Jan 2011 B2
7882456 Zach Feb 2011 B2
7888705 Becker et al. Feb 2011 B2
7898040 Nawaz Mar 2011 B2
7906801 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7908578 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7910958 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7910959 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7917877 Singh et al. Mar 2011 B2
7917879 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7923266 Thijs et al. Apr 2011 B2
7923337 Chang et al. Apr 2011 B2
7923757 Becker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7932544 Becker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7932545 Becker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7934184 Zhang Apr 2011 B2
7939443 Fox et al. May 2011 B2
7943966 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7943967 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7948012 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7948013 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7952119 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7956421 Becker Jun 2011 B2
7958465 Lu et al. Jun 2011 B2
7962867 White et al. Jun 2011 B2
7962879 Tang et al. Jun 2011 B2
7964267 Lyons et al. Jun 2011 B1
7971160 Osawa et al. Jun 2011 B2
7989847 Becker et al. Aug 2011 B2
7989848 Becker et al. Aug 2011 B2
7992122 Burstein et al. Aug 2011 B1
7994583 Inaba Aug 2011 B2
8004042 Yang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8022441 Becker et al. Sep 2011 B2
8030689 Becker et al. Oct 2011 B2
8035133 Becker et al. Oct 2011 B2
8044437 Venkatraman et al. Oct 2011 B1
8058671 Becker et al. Nov 2011 B2
8058690 Chang Nov 2011 B2
8072003 Becker et al. Dec 2011 B2
8072053 Li Dec 2011 B2
8088679 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088680 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088681 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088682 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089098 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089099 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089100 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089101 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089102 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089103 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089104 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8101975 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8110854 Becker et al. Feb 2012 B2
8129750 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129751 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129752 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129754 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129755 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129756 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129757 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129819 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8130529 Tanaka Mar 2012 B2
8134183 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134184 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134185 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134186 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8138525 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8161427 Morgenshtein et al. Apr 2012 B2
8178905 Toubou May 2012 B2
8178909 Venkatraman et al. May 2012 B2
8198656 Becker et al. Jun 2012 B2
8207053 Becker et al. Jun 2012 B2
8214778 Quandt et al. Jul 2012 B2
8217428 Becker et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225239 Reed et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225261 Hong et al. Jul 2012 B2
8245180 Smayling et al. Aug 2012 B2
8247846 Becker Aug 2012 B2
8253172 Becker et al. Aug 2012 B2
8253173 Becker et al. Aug 2012 B2
8258547 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258548 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258549 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258550 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258551 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258552 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264007 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264008 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264009 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8283701 Becker et al. Oct 2012 B2
8294212 Wang et al. Oct 2012 B2
8316327 Herold Nov 2012 B2
8356268 Becker et al. Jan 2013 B2
8378407 Audzeyeu et al. Feb 2013 B2
8395224 Becker et al. Mar 2013 B2
8402397 Robles et al. Mar 2013 B2
8405163 Becker et al. Mar 2013 B2
8422274 Tomita et al. Apr 2013 B2
8436400 Becker et al. May 2013 B2
8453094 Kornachuk et al. May 2013 B2
8575706 Becker et al. Nov 2013 B2
8667443 Smayling et al. Mar 2014 B2
8701071 Kornachuk et al. Apr 2014 B2
8735995 Becker et al. May 2014 B2
8756551 Becker et al. Jun 2014 B2
8836045 Becker et al. Sep 2014 B2
8839162 Amundson et al. Sep 2014 B2
8839175 Smayling et al. Sep 2014 B2
8847329 Becker et al. Sep 2014 B2
8863063 Becker et al. Oct 2014 B2
20010049813 Chan et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020003270 Makino Jan 2002 A1
20020015899 Chen et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020030510 Kono et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020063582 Rikino May 2002 A1
20020068423 Park et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020079927 Katoh et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020149392 Cho Oct 2002 A1
20020166107 Capodieci et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020194575 Allen et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030042930 Pileggi et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030046653 Liu Mar 2003 A1
20030061592 Agrawal et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030088839 Watanabe May 2003 A1
20030088842 Cirit May 2003 A1
20030103176 Abe et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030106037 Moniwa et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030117168 Uneme et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030124847 Houston et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030125917 Rich et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030126569 Rich et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145288 Wang et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145299 Fried et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030177465 MacLean et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030185076 Worley Oct 2003 A1
20030203287 Miyagawa Oct 2003 A1
20030229868 White et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229875 Smith et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040029372 Jang et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040049754 Liao et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040063038 Shin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040115539 Broeke et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040139412 Ito et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040145028 Matsumoto et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153979 Chang Aug 2004 A1
20040161878 Or-Bach et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040164360 Nishida et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040169201 Hidaka Sep 2004 A1
20040194050 Hwang et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040196705 Ishikura et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040229135 Wang et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040232444 Shimizu Nov 2004 A1
20040243966 Dellinger Dec 2004 A1
20040262640 Suga Dec 2004 A1
20050009312 Butt et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050009344 Hwang et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050012157 Cho et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050044522 Maeda Feb 2005 A1
20050055828 Wang et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050076320 Maeda Apr 2005 A1
20050087806 Hokazono Apr 2005 A1
20050093147 Tu May 2005 A1
20050101112 Rueckes et al. May 2005 A1
20050110130 Kitabayashi et al. May 2005 A1
20050135134 Yen Jun 2005 A1
20050136340 Baselmans et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050138598 Kokubun Jun 2005 A1
20050156200 Kinoshita Jul 2005 A1
20050185325 Hur Aug 2005 A1
20050189604 Gupta et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050189614 Ihme et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050196685 Wang et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050205894 Sumikawa et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050212018 Schoellkopf et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050224982 Kemerling et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050229130 Wu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251771 Robles Nov 2005 A1
20050264320 Chan et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050264324 Nakazato Dec 2005 A1
20050266621 Kim Dec 2005 A1
20050268256 Tsai et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278673 Kawachi Dec 2005 A1
20050280031 Yano Dec 2005 A1
20060038234 Liaw Feb 2006 A1
20060063334 Donze et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060070018 Semmler Mar 2006 A1
20060084261 Iwaki Apr 2006 A1
20060091550 Shimazaki et al. May 2006 A1
20060095872 McElvain May 2006 A1
20060101370 Cui et al. May 2006 A1
20060112355 Pileggi et al. May 2006 A1
20060113533 Tamaki et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060113567 Ohmori et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060120143 Liaw Jun 2006 A1
20060121715 Chang et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060123376 Vogel et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060125024 Ishigaki Jun 2006 A1
20060131609 Kinoshita et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060136848 Ichiryu et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060146638 Chang et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060151810 Ohshige Jul 2006 A1
20060158270 Gibet et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060177744 Bodendorf et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060181310 Rhee Aug 2006 A1
20060195809 Cohn et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195810 Morton Aug 2006 A1
20060197557 Chung Sep 2006 A1
20060206854 Barnes et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060223302 Chang et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060248495 Sezginer Nov 2006 A1
20070001304 Liaw Jan 2007 A1
20070002617 Houston Jan 2007 A1
20070007574 Ohsawa Jan 2007 A1
20070038973 Li et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070074145 Tanaka Mar 2007 A1
20070094634 Seizginer et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070101305 Smith et al. May 2007 A1
20070105023 Zhou et al. May 2007 A1
20070106971 Lien et al. May 2007 A1
20070113216 Zhang May 2007 A1
20070172770 Witters et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070186196 Tanaka Aug 2007 A1
20070196958 Bhattacharya et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070209029 Ivonin et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070210391 Becker et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070234252 Visweswariah et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070234262 Uedi et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070241810 Onda Oct 2007 A1
20070256039 White Nov 2007 A1
20070257277 Takeda et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070274140 Joshi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070277129 Allen et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070288882 Kniffin et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070290361 Chen Dec 2007 A1
20070294652 Bowen Dec 2007 A1
20070297249 Chang et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080001176 Gopalakrishnan Jan 2008 A1
20080005712 Charlebois et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021689 Yamashita et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080022247 Kojima et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080046846 Chew et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080081472 Tanaka Apr 2008 A1
20080082952 O'Brien Apr 2008 A1
20080086712 Fujimoto Apr 2008 A1
20080097641 Miyashita et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080098334 Pileggi et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080098341 Kobayashi et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080099795 Bernstein et al. May 2008 A1
20080127000 Majumder et al. May 2008 A1
20080127029 Graur et al. May 2008 A1
20080134128 Blatchford et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080144361 Wong Jun 2008 A1
20080148216 Chan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080163141 Scheffer et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080168406 Rahmat et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080211028 Suzuki Sep 2008 A1
20080216207 Tsai Sep 2008 A1
20080244494 McCullen Oct 2008 A1
20080251779 Kakoschke et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080265290 Nielsen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080276105 Hoberman et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080283910 Dreeskornfeld et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080285331 Torok et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080308848 Inaba Dec 2008 A1
20080308880 Inaba Dec 2008 A1
20080315258 Masuda et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090014811 Becker et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024974 Yamada Jan 2009 A1
20090031261 Smith et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090032898 Becker et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090032967 Becker et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090037864 Becker et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090057780 Wong et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090075485 Ban et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090077524 Nagamura Mar 2009 A1
20090085067 Hayashi et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090087991 Yatsuda et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090101940 Barrows et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106714 Culp et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090155990 Yanagidaira et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090181314 Shyu et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187871 Cork Jul 2009 A1
20090206443 Juengling Aug 2009 A1
20090224408 Fox Sep 2009 A1
20090228853 Hong et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090228857 Kornachuk et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090273100 Aton et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090280582 Thijs et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090302372 Chang et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090319977 Saxena et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100001321 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006897 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006898 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006899 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006900 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006901 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006902 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006903 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006947 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006948 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006950 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006951 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006986 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011327 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011328 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011329 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011330 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011331 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011332 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011333 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012981 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012982 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012983 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012984 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012985 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012986 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017766 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017767 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017768 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017769 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017770 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017771 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017772 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019280 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019281 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019282 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019283 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019284 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019285 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019286 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019287 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019288 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019308 Chan et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023906 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023907 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023908 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023911 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100025731 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025732 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025733 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025734 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025735 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025736 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032722 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032723 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032724 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032726 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100037194 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100037195 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100096671 Becker et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100203689 Bernstein et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100224943 Kawasaki Sep 2010 A1
20100229140 Strolenberg et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100232212 Anderson et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100252865 Van Der Zanden Oct 2010 A1
20100264468 Xu Oct 2010 A1
20100270681 Bird et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100287518 Becker Nov 2010 A1
20110016909 Mirza et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110108890 Becker et al. May 2011 A1
20110108891 Becker et al. May 2011 A1
20110154281 Zach Jun 2011 A1
20110207298 Anderson et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110260253 Inaba Oct 2011 A1
20110298025 Haensch et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110317477 Liaw Dec 2011 A1
20120012932 Perng et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120273841 Quandt et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130097574 Balabanov et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130200465 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130200469 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130207198 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130207199 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130254732 Kornachuk et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140197543 Kornachuk et al. Jul 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (70)
Number Date Country
0102644 Jul 1989 EP
0788166 Aug 1997 EP
1394858 Mar 2004 EP
1670062 Jun 2006 EP
1833091 Aug 2007 EP
1730777 Sep 2007 EP
2251901 Nov 2010 EP
2860920 Apr 2005 FR
58-182242 Oct 1983 JP
61-182244 Aug 1986 JP
S63-310136 Dec 1988 JP
H01284115 Nov 1989 JP
03-165061 Jul 1991 JP
H05152937 Jun 1993 JP
H05211437 Aug 1993 JP
H05218362 Aug 1993 JP
H07-153927 Jun 1995 JP
2684980 Jul 1995 JP
1995-302706 Nov 1995 JP
1997-09289251 Nov 1997 JP
10-116911 May 1998 JP
1999-045948 Feb 1999 JP
2001-068558 Mar 2001 JP
2001-168707 Jun 2001 JP
2002-026125 Jan 2002 JP
2002-026296 Jan 2002 JP
2002-184870 Jun 2002 JP
2001-056463 Sep 2002 JP
2002-258463 Sep 2002 JP
2002-289703 Oct 2002 JP
2001-272228 Mar 2003 JP
2003-100872 Apr 2003 JP
2003-264231 Sep 2003 JP
2004-013920 Jan 2004 JP
2004-200300 Jul 2004 JP
2004-241529 Aug 2004 JP
2004-342757 Dec 2004 JP
2005-020008 Jan 2005 JP
2003-359375 May 2005 JP
2005-135971 May 2005 JP
2005-149265 Jun 2005 JP
2005-183793 Jul 2005 JP
2005-203447 Jul 2005 JP
2005-268610 Sep 2005 JP
2005-114752 Oct 2006 JP
2006-303022 Nov 2006 JP
2007-012855 Jan 2007 JP
2007-013060 Jan 2007 JP
2007-043049 Feb 2007 JP
10-0417093 Jun 1997 KR
10-1998-087485 Dec 1998 KR
1998-0084215 Dec 1998 KR
10-1999-0057943 Jul 1999 KR
2000-0005660 Jan 2000 KR
10-2000-0028830 May 2000 KR
10-2002-0034313 May 2002 KR
10-2002-0070777 Sep 2002 KR
2003-0022006 Mar 2003 KR
10-2005-0030347 Mar 2005 KR
2005-0037965 Apr 2005 KR
2006-0108233 Oct 2006 KR
386288 Apr 2000 TW
200709309 Mar 2007 TW
200709565 Mar 2007 TW
200811704 Mar 2008 TW
WO 2005104356 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2006014849 Feb 2006 WO
WO 2006052738 May 2006 WO
WO 2007014053 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2007103587 Sep 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (204)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 60/625,342, filed May 25, 2006, Pileggi et al.
Acar, et al., “A Linear-Centric Simulation Framework for Parametric Fluctuations”, 2002, IEEE, Carnegie Mellon University USA, pp. 1-8, Jan. 28, 2002.
Amazawa, et al., “Fully Planarized Four-Level Interconnection with Stacked VLAS Using CMP of Selective CVD-A1 and Insulator and its Application to Quarter Micron Gate Array LSIs”, 1995, IEEE, Japan, pp. 473-476, Dec. 10, 1995.
Axelrad et al. “Efficient Full-Chip Yield Analysis Methodology for OPC-Corrected VLSI Design”, 2000, International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), Mar. 20, 2000.
Balasinski et al. “Impact of Subwavelength CD Tolerance on Device Performance”, 2002, SPIE vol. 4692, Jul. 11, 2002.
Burkhardt, et al., “Dark Field Double Dipole Lithography (DDL) for Back-End-Of-Line Processes”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Mar. 26, 2007.
Capetti, et al., “Sub k1=0.25 Lithography with Double Patterning Technique for 45nm Technology Node Flash Memory Devices at λ=193nm”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Mar. 27, 2007.
Capodieci, L., et al., “Toward a Methodology for Manufacturability-Driven Design Rule Exploration,” DAC 2004, Jun. 7, 2004, San Diego, CA.
Chandra, et al., “An Interconnect Channel Design Methodology for High Performance Integrated Circuits”, 2004, IEEE, Carnegie Mellon University, pp. 1-6, Feb. 16, 2004.
Cheng, et al., “Feasibility Study of Splitting Pitch Technology on 45nm Contact Patterning with 0.93 NA”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Chow, et al., “The Design of a SRAM-Based Field-Programmable Gate Array—Part II: Circuit Design and Layout”, 1999, IEEE, vol. 7 # 3 pp. 321-330, Sep. 1, 1999.
Clark et al. “Managing Standby and Active Mode Leakage Power in Deep Sub-Micron Design”, Aug. 9, 2004, ACM.
Cobb et al. “Using OPC to Optimize for Image Slope and Improve Process Window”, 2003, SPIE vol. 5130, Apr. 16, 2003.
Devgan “Leakage Issues in IC Design: Part 3”, 2003, ICCAD, Nov. 9, 2003.
DeVor, et al., “Statistical Quality Design and Control”, 1992, Macmillan Publishing Company, pp. 264-267, Jan. 3, 1992.
Dictionary.com, “channel,” in Collins English Dictionary—Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition. Source location: HarperCollins Publishers. Sep. 3, 2009.
Dusa, et al. “Pitch Doubling Through Dual Patterning Lithography Challenges in Integration and Litho Budgets”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
El-Gamal, “Fast, Cheap and Under Control: The Next Implementation Fabric”, Jun. 2, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 354-355.
Firedberg, et al., “Modeling Within-Field Gate Length Spatial Variation for Process-Design Co-Optimization,” 2005 Proc. of SPIE vol. 5756, pp. 178-188, Feb. 27, 2005.
Frankel, “Quantum State Control Interference Lithography and Trim Double Patterning for 32-16nm Lithography”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 27, 2007.
Garg, et al. “Lithography Driven Layout Design”, 2005, IEEE VLSI Design 2005, Jan. 3, 2005.
Grobman et al. “Reticle Enhancement Technology Trends: Resource and Manufacturability Implications for the Implementation of Physical Designs” Apr. 1, 2001, ACM.
Grobman et al. “Reticle Enhancement Technology: Implications and Challenges for Physical Design” Jun. 18, 2001, ACM.
Gupta et al. “Enhanced Resist and Etch CD Control by Design Perturbation”, Oct. 4, 2006, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Gupta et al. “A Practical Transistor-Level Dual Threshold Voltage Assignment Methodology”, 2005, Sixth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), Mar. 21, 2005.
Gupta et al. “Detailed Placement for Improved Depth of Focus and CD Control”, 2005, ACM, Jan. 18, 2005.
Gupta et al. “Joining the Design and Mask Flows for Better and Cheaper Masks”, Oct. 14, 2004, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Gupta et al. “Manufacturing-Aware Physical Design”, ICCAD 2003, Nov. 9, 2003.
Gupta et al. “Selective Gate-Length Biasing for Cost-Effective Runtime Leakage Control”, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM.
Gupta et al. “Wafer Topography-Aware Optical Proximity Correction for Better DOF Margin and CD Control”, Apr. 13, 2005, SPIE.
Gupta, Puneet, et al., “Manufacturing-aware Design Methodology for Assist Feature Correctness,” SPIE vol. 5756, May 13, 2005.
Ha et al., “Reduction in the Mask Error Factor by Optimizing the Diffraction Order of a Scattering Bar in Lithography,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 46, No. 5, May 5, 2005, pp. 1213-1217.
Hakko, et al., “Extension of the 2D-TCC Technique to Optimize Mask Pattern Layouts,” 2008 Proc. of SPIE vol. 7028, 11 pages, Apr. 16, 2008.
Halpin et al., “Detailed Placement with Net Length Constraints,” Publication Year 2003, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on System-on-Chip for Real-Time Applications, pp. 22-27, Jun. 30, 2003.
Hayashida, et al., “Manufacturable Local Interconnect technology Fully Compatible with Titanium Salicide Process”, Jun. 11, 1991, VMIC Conference.
Heng, et al., “A VLSI Artwork Legalization Technique Base on a New Criterion of Minimum Layout Perturbation”, Proceedings of 1997 International Symposium on Physical Design, pp. 116-121, Apr. 14, 1997.
Heng, et al., “Toward Through-Process Layout Quality Metrics”, Mar. 3, 2005, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Hu, et al., “Synthesis and Placement Flow for Gain-Based Programmable Regular Fabrics”, Apr. 6, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 197-203.
Hur et al., “Mongrel: Hybrid Techniques for Standard Cell Placement,” Publication Year 2000, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design, ICCAD-2000, pp. 165-170, Nov. 5, 2000.
Hutton, et al., “A Methodology for FPGA to Structured-ASIC Synthesis and Verification”, 2006, EDAA, pp. 64-69, Mar. 6, 2006.
Intel Core Microarchitecture White Paper “Introducing the 45 nm Next-Generation Intel Core Microarchitecture,” Intel Corporation, 2007 (best available publication date).
Jayakumar, et al., “A Metal and VIA Maskset Programmable VLSI Design Methodology using PLAs”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 590-594, Nov. 7, 2004.
Jhaveri, T. et al., Maximization of Layout Printability/Manufacturability by Extreme Layout Regularity, Proc. of the SPIE vol. 6156, Feb. 19, 2006.
Kang, S.M., Metal-Metal Matrix (M3) for High-Speed MOS VLSI Layout, IEEE Trans. on CAD, vol. CAD-6, No. 5, Sep. 1, 1987.
Kawashima, et al., “Mask Optimization for Arbitrary Patterns with 2D-TCC Resolution Enhancement Technique,” 2008 Proc. of SPIE vol. 6924, 12 pages, Feb. 24, 2008.
Kheterpal, et al., “Design Methodology for IC Manufacturahility Based on Regular Logic-Bricks”, DAC, Jun. 13, 2005, IEEE/AMC, vol. 6520.
Kheterpal, et al., “Routing Architecture Exploration for Regular Fabrics”, DAC, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 204-207.
Kim, et al., “Double Exposure Using 193nm Negative Tone Photoresist”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Kim, et al., “Issues and Challenges of Double Patterning Lithography in DRAM”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Koorapaty, et al., “Exploring Logic Block Granularity for Regular Fabrics”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 1-6, Feb. 16, 2004.
Koorapaty, et al., “Heterogeneous Logic Block Architectures for Via-Patterned Programmable Fabric”, 13th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL) 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Sep. 1, 2003, Springer-Verlag, vol. 2778, pp. 426-436.
Koorapaty, et al., “Modular, Fabric-Specific Synthesis for Programmable Architectures”, 12th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL—2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)), Sep. 2, 2002, Springer-Verlag, vol. 2438 pp. 132-141.
Kuh et al., “Recent Advances in VLSI Layout,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 78, Issue 2, pp. 237-263, Feb. 1, 1990.
Lavin et al. “Backend DAC Flows for “Restrictive Design Rules””, 2004, IEEE, Nov. 7, 2004.
Li, et al., “A Linear-Centric Modeling Approach to Harmonic Balance Analysis”, 2002, IEEE, pp. 1-6, Mar. 4, 2002.
Li, et al., “Nonlinear Distortion Analysis via Linear-Centric Models”, 2003, IEEE, pp. 897-903, Jan. 21, 2003.
Liebmann et al., “Integrating DfM Components into a Cohesive Design-to-Silicon Solution,” Proc. SPIE 5756, Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing III, Feb. 27, 2005.
Liebmann et al., “Optimizing Style Options for Sub-Resolution Assist Features,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4346, Feb. 25, 2001, pp. 141-152.
Liebmann, et al., “High-Performance Circuit Design for the RET-Enabled 65nm Technology Node”, Feb. 26, 2004, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 5379 pp. 20-29.
Liebmann, L. W., Layout Impact of Resolution Enhancement Techniques: Impediment or Opportunity?, International Symposium on Physical Design, Apr. 6, 2003.
Liu et al., “Double Patterning with Multilayer Hard Mask Shrinkage for Sub 0.25 k1 Lithography,” Proc. SPIE 6520, Optical Microlithography XX, Feb. 25, 2007.
Mansfield et al., “Lithographic Comparison of Assist Feature Design Strategies,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4000, Feb. 27, 2000, pp. 63-76.
Miller, “Manufacturing-Aware Design Helps Boost IC Yield”, Sep. 9, 2004, http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=47102054.
Mishra, P., et al., “FinFET Circuit Design,” Nanoelectronic Circuit Design, pp. 23-54, Dec. 21, 2010.
Mo, et al., “Checkerboard: A Regular Structure and its Synthesis, International Workshop on Logic and Synthesis”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, UC Berkeley, California, pp. 1-7, Jun. 1, 2003.
Mo, et al., “PLA-Based Regular Structures and Their Synthesis”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, IEEE, pp. 723-729, Jun. 1, 2003.
Mo, et al., “Regular Fabrics in Deep Sub-Micron Integrated-Circuit Design”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Entire Book, Jun. 1, 2002.
Moore, Samuel K., “Intel 45-nanometer Penryn Processors Arrive,” Nov. 13, 2007, IEEE Spectrum, http://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/design/intel-45nanometer-penryn-processors-arrive.
Mutoh et al. “1-V Power Supply High-Speed Digital Circuit Technology with Multithreshold-Voltage CMOS”, 1995, IEEE, Aug. 1, 1995.
Op de Beek, et al., “Manufacturability issues with Double Patterning for 50nm half pitch damascene applications, using RELACS® shrink and corresponding OPC”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Or-Bach, “Programmable Circuit Fabrics”, Sep. 18, 2001, e-ASIC, pp. 1-36.
Otten, et al., “Planning for Performance”, DAC 1998, ACM Inc., pp. 122-127, Jun. 15, 1998.
Pack et al. “Physical & Timing Verification of Subwavelength-Scale Designs-Part I: Lithography Impact on MOSFETs”, 2003, SPIE vol. 5042, Feb. 23, 2003.
Pandini, et al., “Congestion-Aware Logic Synthesis”, 2002, IEEE, pp. 1-8, Mar. 4, 2002.
Pandini, et al., “Understanding and Addressing the Impact of Wiring Congestion During Technology Mapping”, ISPD Apr. 7, 2002, ACM Press, pp. 131-136.
Patel, et al., “An Architectural Exploration of via Patterned Gate Arrays, ISPD 2003”, Apr. 6, 2003, pp. 184-189.
Pham, D., et al., “FINFET Device Junction Formation Challenges,” 2006 International Workshop on Junction Technology, pp. 73-77, Aug. 1, 2006.
Pileggi, et al., “Exploring Regular Fabrics to Optimize the Performance-Cost Trade-Offs, Proceedings of the 40th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2003”, Jun. 2, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 782-787.
Poonawala, et al., “ILT for Double Exposure Lithography with Conventional and Novel Materials”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Qian et al. “Advanced Physical Models for Mask Data Verification and Impacts on Physical Layout Synthesis” 2003 IEEE, Mar. 24, 2003.
Ran, et al., “An Integrated Design Flow for a Via-Configurable Gate Array”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 582-589, Nov. 7, 2004.
Ran, et al., “Designing a Via-Configurable Regular Fabric”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC). Proceedings of the IEEE, Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 423-426.
Ran, et al., “On Designing Via-Configurable Cell Blocks for Regular Fabrics” Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2004, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, s 198-203.
Ran, et al., “The Magic of a Via-Configurable Regular Fabric”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD) Oct. 11, 2004.
Ran, et al., “Via-Configurable Routing Architectures and Fast Design Mappability Estimation for Regular Fabrics”, 2005, IEEE, pp. 25-32, Sep. 1, 2006.
Reis, et al., “Physical Design Methodologies for Performance Predictability and Manufacturability”, Apr. 14, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 390-397.
Robertson, et al., “The Modeling of Double Patterning Lithographic Processes”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Rosenbluth, et al., “Optimum Mask and Source Patterns to Print a Given Shape,” 2001 Proc. of SPIE vol. 4346, pp. 486-502, Feb. 25, 2001.
Rovner, “Design for Manufacturability in Via Programmable Gate Arrays”, May 1, 2003, Graduate School of Carnegie Mellon University.
Sengupta, “An Integrated CAD Framework Linking VLSI Layout Editors and Process Simulators”, 1998, Thesis for Rice University, pp. 1-101, Nov. 1, 1998.
Sengupta, et al., “An Integrated CAD Framework Linking VLSI Layout Editors and Process Simulators”, 1996, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 2726; pp. 244-252, Mar. 10, 1996.
Sherlekar, “Design Considerations for Regular Fabrics”, Apr. 18, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 97-102.
Shi et al., “Understanding the Forbidden Pitch and Assist Feature Placement,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4562, pp. 968-979, Mar. 11, 2002.
Smayling et al., “APF Pitch Halving for 22 nm Logic Cells Using Gridded Design Rules,” Proceedings of SPIE, USA, vol. 6925, Jan. 1, 2008, pp. 69251E-1-69251E-7.
Socha, et al., “Simultaneous Source Mask Optimization (SMO),” 2005 Proc. of SPIE vol. 5853, pp. 180-193, Apr. 13, 2005.
Sreedhar et al. “Statistical Yield Modeling for Sub-Wavelength Lithography”, 2008 IEEE, Oct. 28, 2008.
Stapper, “Modeling of Defects in Integrated Circuit Photolithographic Patterns”, Jul. 1, 1984, IBM, vol. 28 # 4, pp. 461-475.
Taylor, et al., “Enabling Energy Efficiency in Via-Patterned Gate Array Devices”, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 874-877.
Tian et al. “Model-Based Dummy Feature Placement for Oxide Chemical—Mechanical Polishing Manufacturability” IEEE, vol. 20, Issue 7, Jul. 1, 2001.
Tong, et al., “Regular Logic Fabrics for a via Patterned Gate Array (VPGA), Custom Integrated Circuits Conference”, Sep. 21, 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 53-56.
Vanleenhove, et al., “A Litho-Only Approach to Double Patterning”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Wang, et al., “Performance Optimization for Gridded-Layout Standard Cells”, vol. 5567 SPIE, Sep. 13, 2004.
Wang, J. et al., Standard Cell Layout with Regular Contact Placement, IEEE Trans. on Semicon. Mfg., vol. 17, No. 3, Aug. 9, 2004.
Webb, Clair, “45nm Design for Manufacturing,” Intel Technology Journal, vol. 12, Issue 02, Jun. 17, 2008, ISSN 1535-864X, pp. 121-130.
Webb, Clair, “Layout Rule Trends and Affect upon CPU Design”, vol. 6156 SPIE, Feb. 19, 2006.
Wenren, et al., “The Improvement of Photolithographic Fidelity of Two-dimensional Structures Though Double Exposure Method”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Wilcox, et al., “Design for Manufacturability: A Key to Semiconductor Manufacturing Excellence”, 1998 IEEE, pp. 308-313, Sep. 23, 1998.
Wong, et al., “Resolution Enhancement Techniques and Design for Manufacturability: Containing and Accounting for Variabilities in Integrated Circuit Creation,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, Sep. 27, 2007, vol. 6(3), 2 pages.
Wu, et al., “A Study of Process Window Capabilities for Two-dimensional Structures under Double Exposure Condition”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Xiong, et al., “The Constrained Via Minimization Problem for PCB and VLSI Design”, 1988 ACM Press/IEEE, pp. 573-578, Jun. 12, 1998.
Yamamaoto, et al., “New Double Exposure Technique without Alternating Phase Shift Mask”, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Yamazoe, et al., “Resolution Enhancement by Aerial Image Approximation with 2D-TCC,” 2007 Proc. of SPIE vol. 6730, 12 pages, Sep. 17, 2007.
Yang, et al., “Interconnection Driven VLSI Module Placement Based on Quadratic Programming and Considering Congestion Using LFF Principles”, 2004 IEEE, pp. 1243-1247, Jun. 27, 2004.
Yao, et al., “Multilevel Routing With Redundant via Insertion”, Oct. 23, 2006, IEEE, pp. 1148-1152.
Yu, et al., “True Process Variation Aware Optical Proximity Correction with Variational Lithography Modeling and Model Calibration,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, Sep. 11, 2007, vol. 6(3), 16 pages.
Zheng, et al.“Modeling and Analysis of Regular Symmetrically Structured Power/Ground Distribution Networks”, DAC, Jun. 10, 2002, ACM Press, pp. 395-398.
Zhu, et al., “A Stochastic Integral Equation Method for Modeling the Rough Surface Effect on Interconnect Capacitance”, 2004 IEEE, Nov. 7, 2004.
Zhu, et al., “A Study of Double Exposure Process Design with Balanced Performance Parameters for Line/Space Applications”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Zuchowski, et al., “A Hybrid ASIC and FPGA Architecture”, 2003 IEEE, pp. 187-194, Nov. 10, 2002.
Alam, Syed M. et al., “A Comprehensive Layout Methodology and Layout-Specific Circuit Analyses for Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits,” Mar. 21, 2002.
Alam, Syed M. et al., “Layout-Specific Circuit Evaluation in 3-D Integrated Circuits,” May 1, 2003.
Aubusson, Russel, “Wafer-Scale Integration of Semiconductor Memory,” Apr. 1, 1979.
Bachtold, “Logic Circuits with Carbon,” Nov. 9, 2001.
Baker, R. Jacob, “CMOS: Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation (2nd Edition),” Nov. 1, 2004.
Baldi et al., “A Scalable Single Poly EEPROM Cell for Embedded Memory Applications,” pp. 1-4, Fig. 1, Sep. 1, 1997.
Cao, Ke, “Design for Manufacturing (DFM) in Submicron VLSI Design,” Aug. 1, 2007.
Capodieci, Luigi, “From Optical Proximity Correction to Lithography-Driven Physical Design (1996-2006): 10 years of Resolution Enhancement Technology and the roadmap enablers for the next decade,” Proc. SPIE 6154, Optical Microlithography XIX, 615401, Mar. 20, 2006.
Chang, Leland et al., “Stable SRAM Cell Design for the 32 nm Node and Beyond,” Jun. 16, 2005.
Cheung, Peter, “Layout Design,” Apr. 4, 2004.
Chinnery, David, “Closing the Gap Between ASIC & Custom: Tools and Techniques for High-Performance ASIC Design,” Jun. 30, 2002.
Chou, Dyiann et al., “Line End Optimization through Optical Proximity Correction (OPC): A Case Study,” Feb. 19, 2006.
Clein, Dan, “CMOS IC Layout: Concepts, Methodologies, and Tools,” Dec. 22, 1999.
Cowell, “Exploiting Non-Uniform Access Time,” Jul. 1, 2003.
Das, Shamik, “Design Automation and Analysis of Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits,” May 1, 2004.
Dehaene, W. et al., “Technology-Aware Design of SRAM Memory Circuits,” Mar. 1, 2007.
Deng, Liang et al., “Coupling-aware Dummy Metal Insertion for Lithography,” p. 1, col. 2, Jan. 23, 2007.
Devoivre et al., “Validated 90nm CMOS Technology Platform with Low-k Copper Interconnects for Advanced System-on-Chip (SoC),” Jul. 12, 2002.
Enbody, R. J., “Near-Optimal n-Layer Channel Routing,” Jun. 29, 1986.
Ferretti, Marcos et al., “High Performance Asynchronous ASIC Back-End Design Flow Using Single-Track Full-Buffer Standard Cells,” Apr. 23, 2004.
Garg, Manish et al., “Litho-driven Layouts for Reducing Performance Variability,” p. 2, Figs. 2b-2c, May 23, 2005.
Greenway, Robert et al., “32nm 1-D Regular Pitch SRAM Bitcell Design for Interference-Assisted Lithography,” Oct. 6, 2008.
Gupta et al., “Modeling Edge Placement Error Distribution in Standard Cell Library,” Feb. 23, 2006.
Grad, Johannes et al., “A standard cell library for student projects,” Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education, Jun. 2, 2003.
Hartono, Roy et al., “Active Device Generation for Automatic Analog Layout Retargeting Tool,” May 13, 2004.
Hartono, Roy et al., “IPRAIL—Intellectual Property Reuse-based Analog IC Layout Automation,” Mar. 17, 2003.
Hastings, Alan, “The Art of Analog Layout (2nd Edition),” Jul. 4, 2005.
Hurat et al., “A Genuine Design Manufacturability Check for Designers,” Feb. 19, 2006.
Institute of Microelectronic Systems, “Digital Subsystem Design,” Oct. 13, 2006.
Ishida, M. et al., “A Novel 6T-SRAM Cell Technology Designed with Rectangular Patterns Scalable beyond 0.18 pm Generation and Desirable for Ultra High Speed Operation,” IEDM 1998, Dec. 6, 1998.
Jakusovszky, “Linear IC Parasitic Element Simulation Methodology,” Oct. 1, 1993.
Jangkrajarng, Nuttorn et al., “Template-Based Parasitic-Aware Optimization and Retargeting of Analog and RF Integrated Circuit Layouts,” Nov. 5, 2006.
Kahng, Andrew B., “Design Optimizations DAC-2006 DFM Tutorial, part V),” Jul. 24, 2006.
Kang, Sung-Mo et al., “CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits Analysis & Design,” Oct. 29, 2002.
Kottoor, Mathew Francis, “Development of a Standard Cell Library based on Deep Sub-Micron SCMOS Design Rules using Open Source Software (MS Thesis),” Aug. 1, 2005.
Kubicki, “Intel 65nm and Beyond (or Below): IDF Day 2 Coverage (available at http://www.anandtech.com/show/1468/4),” Sep. 9, 2004.
Kuhn, Kelin J., “Reducing Variation in Advanced Logic Technologies: Approaches to Process and Design for Manufacturability of Nanoscale CMOS,” p. 27, Dec. 12, 2007.
Kurokawa, Atsushi et al., “Dummy Filling Methods for Reducing Interconnect Capacitance and Number of Fills, Proc. of ISQED,” pp. 586-591, Mar. 21, 2005.
Lavin, Mark, “Open Access Requirements from RDR Design Flows,” Nov. 11, 2004.
Liebmann, Lars et al., “Layout Methodology Impact of Resolution Enhancement Techniques,” pp. 5-6, Apr. 6, 2003.
Liebmann, Lars et al., “TCAD development for lithography resolution enhancement,” Sep. 1, 2001.
Lin, Chung-Wei et al., “Recent Research and Emerging Challenges in Physical Design for Manufacturability/Reliability,” Jan. 26, 2007.
McCullen, Kevin W., “Layout Techniques for Phase Correct and Gridded Wiring,” pp. 13, 17, Fig. 5, Dec. 1, 2006.
MOSIS, “Design Rules MOSIS Scalable CMOS (SCMOS) (Revision 8.00),” Oct. 4, 2004.
MOSIS, “MOSIS Scalable CMOS (SCMOS) Design Rules (Revision 7.2),” Jan. 1, 1995.
Muta et al., “Manufacturability-Aware Design of Standard Cells,” pp. 2686-2690, Figs. 3, 12, Dec. 1, 2007.
Na, Kee-Yeol et al., “A Novel Single Polysilicon EEPROM Cell With a Polyfinger Capacitor,” Nov. 30, 2007.
Pan et al., “Redundant Via Enhanced Maze Routing for Yield Improvement,” DAC 2005, Jan. 18, 2005.
Park, Tae Hong, “Characterization and Modeling of Pattern Dependencies in Copper Interconnects for Integrated Circuits,” Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, May 24, 2002.
Patel, Chetan, “An Architectural Exploration of via Patterned Gate Arrays (CMU Master's Project),” May 1, 2003.
Pease, R. Fabian et al., “Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future Electronics,” IEEE 2008, vol. 96, Issue 2, Jan. 16, 2008.
Serrano, Diego Emilio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Facultad De Ingenieria, Departamento De Electronica, “Diseño De Multiplicador 4 X 8 en VLSI, Introduccion al VLSI,” 2006 (best available publication date).
Pramanik, “Impact of layout on variability of devices for sub 90nm technologies,” 2004 (best available publication date).
Pramanik, Dipankar et al., “Lithography-driven layout of logic cells for 65-nm node (SPIE Proceedings vol. 5042),” Jul. 10, 2003.
Roy et al., “Extending Aggressive Low-K1 Design Rule Requirements for 90 and 65 Nm Nodes Via Simultaneous Optimization of Numerical Aperture, Illumination and Optical Proximity Correction,” J.Micro/Nanolith, MEMS MOEMS, 4(2), 023003, Apr. 26, 2005.
Saint, Christopher et al., “IC Layout Basics: A Practical Guide,” Chapter 3, Nov. 5, 2001.
Saint, Christopher et al., “IC Mask Design: Essential Layout Techniques,” May 24, 2002.
Scheffer, “Physical CAD Changes to Incorporate Design for Lithography and Manufacturability,” Feb. 4, 2004.
Smayling, Michael C., “Part 3: Test Structures, Test Chips, In-Line Metrology & Inspection,” Jul. 24, 2006.
Spence, Chris, “Full-Chip Lithography Simulation and Design Analysis: How OPC is changing IC Design, Emerging Lithographic Technologies IX,” May 6, 2005.
Subramaniam, Anupama R., “Design Rule Optimization of Regular layout for Leakage Reduction in Nanoscale Design,” pp. 474-478, Mar. 24, 2008.
Tang, C. W. et al., “A compact large signal model of LDMOS,” Solid-State Electronics 46(2002) 2111-2115, May 17, 2002.
Taylor, Brian et al., “Exact Combinatorial Optimization Methods for Physical Design of Regular Logic Bricks,” Jun. 8, 2007.
Tian, Ruiqi et al., “Dummy Feature Placement for Chemical-Mechanical Uniformity in a Shallow Trench Isolation Process,” IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 63-71, Jan. 1, 2002.
Tian, Ruiqi et al., “Proximity Dummy Feature Placement and Selective Via Sizing for Process Uniformity in a Trench-First-Via-Last Dual-Inlaid Metal Process,” Proc. of IITC, pp. 48-50, Jun. 6, 2001.
Torres, J. A. et al., “RET Compliant Cell Generation for sub-130nm Processes,” SPIE vol. 4692, Mar. 6, 2002.
Uyemura, John P., “Introduction to VLSI Circuits and Systems,” Chapters 2, 3, 5, and Part 3, Jul. 30, 2001.
Uyemura, John, “Chip Design for Submicron VLSI: CMOS Layout and Simulation,” Chapters 2-5, 7-9, Feb. 8, 2005.
Verhaegen et al., “Litho Enhancements for 45nm-nod MuGFETs,” Aug. 1, 2005.
Wong, Ban P., “Bridging the Gap between Dreams and Nano-Scale Reality (DAC-2006 DFM Tutorial),” Jul. 28, 2006.
Wang, Dunwei et al., “Complementary Symmetry Silicon Nanowire Logic: Power-Efficient Inverters with Gain,” Aug. 17, 2006.
Wang, Jun et al., “Effects of grid-placed contacts on circuit performance,” pp. 135-139, Figs. 2, 4-8, Feb. 28, 2003.
Wang, Jun et al., “Standard cell design with regularly placed contacts and gates (SPIE vol. 5379),” Feb. 22, 2004.
Wang, Jun et al., “Standard cell design with resolution-enhancement-technique-driven regularly placed contacts and gates,” J. Micro/Nanolith, MEMS MOEMS, 4(1), 013001, Mar. 16, 2005.
Watson, Bruce, “Challenges and Automata Applications in Chip-Design Software,” pp. 38-40, Jul. 16, 2007.
Weste, Neil et al., “CMOS VLSI Design: A Circuits and Systems Perspective, 3rd Edition,” May 21, 2004.
Wingerden, Johannes van, “Experimental verification of improved printability for litho-driven designs,” Mar. 14, 2005.
Wong, Alfred K., “Microlithography: Trends, Challenges, Solutions and Their Impact on Design,” Micro IEEE vol. 23, Issue 2, Apr. 29, 2003.
Xu, Gang, “Redundant-Via Enhanced Maze Routing for Yield Improvement,” Proceedings of ASP-DAC 2005, Jan. 18, 2005.
Yang, Jie, “Manufacturability Aware Design,” pp. 93, 102, Fig. 5.2, Jan. 16, 2008.
Yongshun, Wang et al., “Static Induction Devices with Planar Type Buried Gate,” Chinese Journal of Semiconductors, vol. 25, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2004.
Zobrist, George (editor), “Progress in Computer Aided VLSI Design: Implementations (Ch. 5),” Ablex Publishing Corporation, Feb. 1, 1990.
Petley, Graham, “VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Library Design,” from website www.vlsitechnology.org, Jan. 11, 2005.
Liebmann, Lars, et al., “Layout Optimization at the Pinnacle of Optical Lithography,” Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing II, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5042, Jul. 8, 2003.
Kawasaki, H., et al., “Challenges and Solutions of FinFET Integration in an SRAM Cell and a Logic Circuit for 22 nm node and beyond,” Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2009 IEEE International, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Dec. 7, 2009, pp. 1-4.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140197543 A1 Jul 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61024980 Jan 2008 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12363705 Jan 2009 US
Child 13897307 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13897307 May 2013 US
Child 14216891 US