The prior art does not describe antenna systems that perform well within shallow metal cavities or adjacent to conductive surfaces, generally because the metal is too close and produces a transmission line effect. The metal or conductive surface commonly produces an out of phase RF component that produces phase cancellation with the antenna signal. This transmission line effect typically severely degrades radiative performance of the antennas, especially in the far field.
Antenna systems according to the present disclosure provide means of mitigating the undesirable transmission line effect(s) by using fractal metamaterials in close proximity to an antenna, with both the antenna and fractal metamaterials being positioned a conductive surface, which may be inside or adjacent to a cavity. The fractal metamaterial can include an array of close spaced (e.g., less than 1/10 wavelength separation) resonant structures of a fractal shape, resonant at or near the intended frequency of use of the antenna. The fractal metamaterial can reverse the phase of the reflected wave so that the metal cavity no longer produces an out of phase current induced by the antenna. Without the cavity being out of phase to the antenna, the transmission line effect is mitigated substantially and the antenna performance can accordingly be enhanced. Further embodiments omit a cavity and locate a fractal metamaterial and antenna(s) adjacent to an underlying conductive surface.
These, as well as other components, steps, features, objects, benefits, and advantages, will now become clear from a review of the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments, the accompanying drawings, and the claims.
The drawings are of illustrative embodiments. They do not illustrate all embodiments. Other embodiments may be used in addition or instead. Details that may be apparent or unnecessary may be omitted to save space or for more effective illustration. Some embodiments may be practiced with additional components or steps and/or without all of the components or steps that are illustrated. When the same numeral appears in different drawings, it refers to the same or like components or steps.
Illustrative embodiments are now described. Other embodiments may be used in addition or instead. Details that may be apparent or unnecessary may be omitted to save space or for a more effective presentation. Some embodiments may be practiced with additional components or steps and/or without all of the components or steps that are described.
Systems according to the present disclosure can provide a means/way of mitigating the adverse transmission line issues, described above for the prior art, by using fractal metamaterials in close proximity to the antenna. As used herein, the term “close proximity,” can mean, e.g., less than about ⅛ of a wavelength of electromagnetic energy received or transmitted by the antenna. The fractal metamaterial can include an array of close spaced (e.g., less than about 1/10 wavelength separation) resonant structures of a fractal or fractal-like shape, resonant at or near the intended frequency of use of the antenna. The fractal metamaterial reverses the phase of the reflected wave so that the conductive surface (e.g., metal of a cavity) no longer produces an out of phase current induced by the antenna. Without the conductive surface being out of phase to the antenna, the transmission line effect is mitigated substantially and the antenna performance is enhanced.
A fractal resonator can be either a conductive trace or a slot having a fractal or fractal-like perimeter. A fractal resonator includes a minimum of at least two fractal iterations, which form at least a portion of the resonator. The array can be stacked or positioned adjacent to the antenna itself, preferably with a dielectric separator. The array (fractal metamaterial) is itself separated from the bottom of the cavity or underlying surface by a dielectric. Any suitable dielectric (including air or other gas) can be used for this purpose. The stack may be ‘sandwiched’ together and incorporated as a single component, including the antenna. An exemplary embodiment has the separation of the antenna in a layered and stacked structure, which can be inserted to some extent in the cavity; preferably, but not necessarily, the antenna itself is the only portion of the stacked structure that is not inserted into the cavity but instead is coplanar or parallel to the surface in which the cavity is located.
Embodiments of the present disclosure provide for a decrease in the transmission line effect noted for the prior art—for which the metal or conductive surface adjacent the antenna produces an out of phase RF component that produces phase cancellation with the antenna signal—by utilizing an intervening layer or layers having an array of close-spaced or close-packed fractal resonators. Those resonators may be disposed on or in a substrate. Due to the presence of the array, although the antenna is still very close to the metal or conductive surface (of a surface, structure, or a cavity), the intervening fractal array layer is mitigates the out-of-phase effect. An example of how this may be accomplished is in the context of a two- or multiple-layer circuit board where the fractal-array layer or layers are included in lower layers between the antenna and the metal or conductive surface (of a surface, structure, or a cavity).
The fractal layer can include an array (regular or irregular) of closely-spaced fractal cells on a substrate. At least a portion of each fractal cell can be defined by or includes a self-similar structure, where aspect to it such that portions of the structure are similar to each other at different size-resolutions. The fractal cells are placed so that their separation in wavelengths at the lowest operational frequency of use is small relative to the wavelength, e.g., far less than a 10th ( 1/10) of a wavelength. For multiband antennas and or wideband antennas the desired enhancement of performance can be accomplished or facilitated by multiple layers of these arrays having fractal-based cells.
As shown in
As shown in
The components, steps, features, objects, benefits, and advantages that have been discussed are merely illustrative. None of them, nor the discussions relating to them, are intended to limit the scope of protection in any way. Numerous other embodiments are also contemplated. These include embodiments that have fewer, additional, and/or different components, steps, features, objects, benefits, and/or advantages. These also include embodiments in which the components and/or steps are arranged and/or ordered differently.
For example, while some of the above-description and drawings have indicated preferred use of dipole antenna elements, a person of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that other suitable antenna elements may be used. For example, monopoles, arrays of monopoles and/or dipoles, and slots, helix, meanders, fractals, patch, Vivaldi, inverted F, or space filling curves can be used. Further, any suitable conductive and/or dielectric materials can be used within the scope of the present disclosure examples including, but not limited to, phenolics, FR4, ceramics, RT Duroid 6002, PTFE, RO4730, Rogers RO 3200, and the like. Conductive materials can include, but are not limited to, copper, silver, gold, aluminum, suitable semi-conductor materials, printable inks, etc.
Exemplary clauses: the following clauses described certain exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.
An antenna system including:
An antenna system including:
A laminated assembly of layers of the antenna system of claim 1.
A laminated assembly of layers of the antenna system of claim 2.
The system of claim 1, wherein the antenna is positioned within a range of between about 1/10 and ⅛ of the longest operational wavelength of the antenna to the one or more array layers.
The system of claim 2, wherein the antenna is positioned within a range of between about 1/10 and ⅛ of the longest operational wavelength of the antenna to the one or more array layers.
Unless otherwise stated, all measurements, values, ratings, positions, magnitudes, sizes, and other specifications that are set forth in this specification, including in the claims that follow, are approximate, not exact. They are intended to have a reasonable range that is consistent with the functions to which they relate and with what is customary in the art to which they pertain.
All articles, patents, patent applications, and other publications that have been cited in this disclosure are incorporated herein by reference.
The phrase “means for” when used in a claim is intended to and should be interpreted to embrace the corresponding structures and materials that have been described and their equivalents. Similarly, the phrase “step for” when used in a claim is intended to and should be interpreted to embrace the corresponding acts that have been described and their equivalents. The absence of these phrases from a claim means that the claim is not intended to and should not be interpreted to be limited to these corresponding structures, materials, or acts, or to their equivalents.
The scope of protection is limited solely by the claims that now follow. That scope is intended and should be interpreted to be as broad as is consistent with the ordinary meaning of the language that is used in the claims when interpreted in light of this specification and the prosecution history that follows, except where specific meanings have been set forth, and to encompass all structural and functional equivalents.
Relational terms such as “first” and “second” and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another, without necessarily requiring or implying any actual relationship or order between them. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” and any other variation thereof when used in connection with a list of elements in the specification or claims are intended to indicate that the list is not exclusive and that other elements may be included. Similarly, an element proceeded by an “a” or an “an” does not, without further constraints, preclude the existence of additional elements of the identical type.
None of the claims are intended to embrace subject matter that fails to satisfy the requirement of Sections 101, 102, or 103 of the Patent Act, nor should they be interpreted in such a way. Any unintended coverage of such subject matter is hereby disclaimed. Except as just stated in this paragraph, nothing that has been stated or illustrated is intended or should be interpreted to cause a dedication of any component, step, feature, object, benefit, advantage, or equivalent to the public, regardless of whether it is or is not recited in the claims.
The abstract is provided to help the reader quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, various features in the foregoing detailed description are grouped together in various embodiments to streamline the disclosure. This method of disclosure should not be interpreted as requiring claimed embodiments to require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the detailed description, with each claim standing on its own as separately claimed subject matter.
This application is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2017/055367, filed on Oct. 5, 2017, which claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application 62/404,273, entitled “Enhanced In-Cavity Antenna System,” filed 5 Oct. 2016. The entire contents of the above-referenced applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2017/055367 | 10/5/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/067835 | 4/12/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5450053 | Wood | Sep 1995 | A |
6127977 | Cohen | Oct 2000 | A |
6445352 | Cohen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451553 | Olsen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
10103445 | Gregoire | Oct 2018 | B1 |
20020149519 | Varadan | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20050151697 | Cohen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050237238 | Rahola | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070126637 | Habib | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20150314526 | Cohen | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20170365931 | Martel | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Apr. 12, 2018 for international application PCT/US2017/055367 filed Oct. 5, 2017, 11 pages. |
Zhong, Yong-Wei et al., “Gain enhancement of bow-tie antenna using fractal wideband artificial magnetic conductor ground” Electronics LET, IEE Stevenage, GB, vol. 51, No. 4, Feb. 19, 2015, pp. 315-317. |
Li Hongmei et al, “Design of EBG with fractal structure of PIFA” 2015 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC), IEEE, vol. 3, Dec. 6, 2015, pp. 1-3. |
Shengying Liu, et al. “A broadband fractal AMC ground plane for low-profile antennas” Millimeter Waves (GSMM), 2012 5th Global Symposium on, IEEE, May 27, 2012, pp. 70-73. |
Zhou L. et al., “Multiband Subwavelength Magnetic Reflectors based on Fractals” Applied Physics Letters, A I P Publishing LLC, US, vol. 83, No. 16, Oct. 20, 2003, pp. 3257-3259. |
Martinis M. et al., “Wideband antenna in Cavity Based on Metasurfaces” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 15, Oct. 15, 2015, pp. 1053-1056. |
Joubert J. et al., “CPW-Fed Cavity—Backed Slot Radiator Loaded With an AMC Reflector” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, vol. 60, No. 2, Oct. 21, 2011, pp. 735-742. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200044352 A1 | Feb 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62404273 | Oct 2016 | US |