Enhanced haptic feedback system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11109930
  • Patent Number
    11,109,930
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 16, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 7, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
An enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics includes a laparoscope configured to be inserted into a body cavity to view tissue and obtain an image of the viewed tissue. An imaging device is configured to acquire physiological data about tissue, process the acquired physiological data, and output the processed data to a graphical user haptic interface (GUHI) capable of generating tangible sensations utilizing one or more haptic interfaces. The GUHI is configured to combine the image received from the laparoscope and the processed physiological data received from the imaging device to provide tangible sensations on both a front screen of the GUHI and a rear screen of the GUHI allowing a surgeon the sensation of feeling for abnormal tissue conditions between the surgeon's hands.
Description
BACKGROUND
Technical Field

The present disclosure relates to monitoring instruments for minimally invasive surgical procedures and, more particularly, to an enhanced haptic feedback system for use with various laparoscopic surgical procedures.


Description of Related Art

In minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and various percutaneous procedures, limited visibility and limited anatomical feedback can often supersede the advantages of the procedure and put the surgeon at a relative disadvantage compared to open procedures. Moreover, many MIS procedures require additional incisions to accommodate an endoscope to improve visibility. These additional instruments typically do not provide any tactile feedback which may be advantageous during particular types of procedures, e.g., tactile feedback allows a surgeon to appreciate relevant physiological information about biological tissues and allows an interactive experience through a haptic interface while operating.


Rudimentary haptic interfaces have been used in gaming, e.g., gaming controllers, however, in the medical field, haptic technology has mostly been limited to simulators for various medical procedures in a virtual environment, for example, for teaching purposes.


Medical companies have also implemented haptic feedback systems that provide notification signals and/or vibro-tactile sensations as an alert when too much force is applied or to direct user controlled systems or robotic/tele-surgical operating systems. However, these systems do not provide the operator with tangible sensations that are physiologically relevant or reliable, nor do they provide a corresponding visual user interface that conveys the tactile information along with visual images of the body tissue.


SUMMARY

As used herein, the term “distal” refers to the portion that is being described which is further from a user, while the term “proximal” refers to the portion that is being described which is closer to a user.


In accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure, an enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics includes a laparoscope configured to be inserted into a body cavity of a patient to view internal tissue and tissue structures, the laparoscope is electrically coupled to a graphical user interface (GUI) configured to display an image of the tissue thereon or obtain an image of the tissue. An imaging device is included and is configured to acquire physiological data about tissue, process the acquired physiological data, and output the processed data to a graphical user haptic interface (GUHI) capable of generating tangible sensations utilizing one or more haptic interfaces. The GUHI is configured to combine the image received from the laparoscope and the processed physiological data received from the imaging device to provide tangible sensations on both a front screen of the GUHI and a rear screen of the GUHI allowing a surgeon the sensation of feeling for abnormal tissue conditions between the surgeon's hands. Normal tissue properties may be assessed in this fashion as well.


In aspects according to the present disclosure, the imaging device is selected from the group consisting of an ultrasound device, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) device, a computerized axial tomography (CT) scanner, and a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) device. In other aspects, the imaging device is a portable ultrasound probe. In still other aspects, the GUHI is portable and is configured to be held between the surgeon's fingers and thumb.


In yet other aspects, the imaging device is configured to acquire and process physiological data about tissue in real time and combine the processed physiological data about tissue with the image received from the laparoscope in real time. In still other aspects, the imaging device is configured to acquire and process physiological data about tissue prior to combining the processed physiological data with the image from the laparoscope.


In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, an enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics includes an imaging device configured to acquire physiological data about tissue, process the acquired physiological data, and output the processed data to a graphical user haptic interface (GUHI) capable of generating tangible sensations utilizing one or more haptic interfaces. The GUHI is configured to combine an image received from a laparoscope and the processed physiological data received from the imaging device to provide tangible sensations on both a front screen of the GUHI and a rear screen of the GUHI allowing a surgeon the sensation of feeling for abnormal tissue conditions between the surgeon's hands.


In aspects according to the present disclosure, the imaging device is selected from the group consisting of an ultrasound device, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) device, a computerized axial tomography (CT) scanner, and a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) device. In other aspects, the imaging device is a portable ultrasound probe. In still other aspects, the GUHI is portable and is configured to be held between the surgeon's fingers and thumb.


In yet other aspects, the imaging device is configured to acquire and process physiological data about tissue in real time and combine the processed physiological data about tissue with the image received from the laparoscope in real time. In still other aspects, the imaging device is configured to acquire and process physiological data about tissue prior to combining the processed physiological data with the image from the laparoscope.


The present disclosure also relates to a method for assessing tissue maladies ad includes positioning a laparoscopic or camera enabled device into a body cavity of a patient to visualize tissue and display a tissue image on a graphical user interface (GUI). The method also includes: acquiring physiological tissue data from an imaging source, combining both the acquired physiological data and the tissue image on a graphical user haptic interface (GUHI), and generating tangible sensations via one or more haptic interfaces on both a front screen of the GUHI and a rear screen of the GUHI allowing a surgeon to feel and diagnose various tissue maladies. Normal tissue properties may be assessed in this fashion as well.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various aspects of the present disclosure are described herein with reference to the drawings wherein like reference numerals identify similar or identical elements:



FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a surgical system including an enhanced haptic feedback system including a laparoscope, a display and a graphical user haptic interface (GUHI) according to the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of the GUHI of FIG. 1; and



FIG. 3 is an enlarged, schematic view of the GUHI of FIG. 1 shown in use.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Throughout the description, any particular feature(s) of a particular exemplary embodiment may be equally applied to any other exemplary embodiment(s) of this specification as suitable. In other words, features between the various exemplary embodiments described herein are interchangeable as suitable, and not exclusive.


Various embodiments of the presently disclosed system enable surgeons to acquire, read, modify, store, write, and download acquired sensor data in real time and display the information on one or more haptic displays. A haptic display is a device that portrays a visual representation of an object (such as a computer monitor, television, or cell phone display) and combines surface haptics overlayed on the image, producing variable forces on a user's finger as it interacts with the surface haptics. This can give the illusion of feeling textures and three dimensional shapes as the user touches the image on the screen.


CT scans, MRIs, fMRIs and ultrasound probes can detect, among other things, density of tissue. This acquired sensor data can be combined with images of actual tissue in real time. For example, if a laparoscope is used to view the surgical site, the location and orientation of the camera can be tracked so that the focal point has a known location within the patient. Using this known location, density data from a previous scan, e.g., a CT scan or MRI, and even real-time data from a live ultrasound probe (portable or standalone) can be used to overlay haptic data on a screen that the surgeon can then feel with his or her own hands.


Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 2, an enhanced haptic display system is shown and is generally identified as haptic system 10. Haptic system 10 includes an endoscope or laparoscope 20 operatively coupled via a cable 21 to a graphical user interface (GUI) 50 for displaying images “T1” of tissue “T” disposed within a body cavity “BC” of a patient. An imaging device 70 is included and includes a probe 60 electrically coupled via cable 65 to the imaging device 70. Imaging device 70 may be an ultrasound probe 60 that is configured to render images of tissue “T” in real time or imaging device 70 may be CT scan, MRI, FMRI or any other type of imaging device capable of acquiring sensor data relating to tissue or organs either in real time or prior to using the haptic system 10. Imaging device 70 is configured to measure various tissue properties, e.g., tissue density, blood flow, etc., and convert the acquired sensed data to haptic signal data readable and displayable by a graphical user haptic interface (GUHI) 100.


GUHI 100 is operatively coupled via cable 75 to the GUI 50 and is configured to display images of the tissue “T3” overlapped with acquired sensor data (haptic data) obtained from imaging device 70. In various embodiments, the haptic system 10 communicates with the operator (e.g., surgeon) using a symbolic language descriptive of biological tissues physical properties and the characteristics of motors and actuators that constitute the interactive components of one or more haptic interfaces. Typically the haptic system 10 includes a touch screen interface, e.g., front screen 110 or rear panel or rear screen 120 (FIG. 2), which can provide haptic signals to the user and is thus an active display with touch and/or feedback that programs the one or more haptic interfaces. The haptic system 10 may include haptic signals that confirm programmable or system features (e.g., a palpable click) and provide additional sensor feedback that is descriptive of the events occurring in the haptic interfaces (e.g., vibro-tactile feedback, haptic rendering of physiologic events, audible and visual cues).


In embodiments, modification of the haptic experience of a user may be accomplished in real time (e.g. during procedures). Visual icons and secondary notations (not shown) may be included to provide a simplified graphical format and to augment the haptic feedback to further reflect relevant physiological information. The various haptic interfaces provide a way to display acquired sensor data from one or more imaging sources 70, and control the corresponding actions of one or more corresponding actuators or haptic elements within the screen, e.g., screen 110 and/or screen 120.


The symbolic language communicated by the imaging device 70 provides the acquired sensor data in both frequency and time and enables a user-friendly means for understanding, interacting with and controlling hardware, firmware and programming software in real time. The presently disclosed haptic system 10 provides an open, universally compatible platform capable of sensing or acquiring physiological signals/data (referred to as acquired sensor data) in any format; processing of the acquired sensor data within an operating system; and outputting the processed signals to the GUHI 100 which generates tangible sensations via one or more haptic interfaces. Tangible sensations are able to be felt or modified by the surgeon in real time on the GUHI 100 which allows a surgeon to feel and diagnose various tissue types and tissue maladies, e.g., tumors. Normal tissue properties may be assessed in this fashion as well.


The GUHI 100 utilizes various haptic interfaces including motors, actuators, and haptic elements to provide tactile feedback to the surgeon concerning the tissue. For example, the imaging device 70 may provide acquired sensor data to the GUHI 100 concerning tissue density of a liver. During a liver resection, a surgeon may need to feel for lumps in the liver in order to identify the appropriate plane of dissection that will excise an appropriate margin of healthy tissue on the patient side. This is to ensure that all of the cancer is removed, and only healthy tissue is left within the patient. As such, using the haptic system 10, the surgeon can feel the varying densities of the liver and quickly ascertain lumps or abnormal tissue masses to define an acceptable dissection plane.



FIG. 2 shows an enlarged view of the GUHI 100 and includes a front screen 110 and a rear panel or rear screen 120. The acquired sensor data from the imaging device 70 (and image “T2” if available) along with the image of the tissue “T1” from the laparoscope 20 are combined and displayed on the front screen 110 as tissue image “T3”. More particularly, the image “T1” from the laparoscope is displayed on the front screen 110 and the surface haptics from the acquired sensor data is overlaid on the image “T2” to produce an image “T3” that provides variable forces on a user's fingers or hand as the user interacts with the surface of the front screen 110. As a result, the user is given the illusion of feeling textures as the user touches the image “T3” on the front screen 110.


The acquired haptic data can also be combined with images of the actual tissue in real time. For example, the location and orientation of the laparoscope can be tracked so that the focal point has a known location within the patient. Using this known location, density data from a previous CT scan or MRI or even real time data from a live ultrasound probe may be used to overlay surface haptics from the acquired sensor data on the front screen 110.


The surface haptics from the acquired sensor data may also be overlaid on the rear screen 120. This would give the surgeon the ability to feel three dimensional objects such as a lump more effectively. For example, the surgeon can put his or her hand around the GUHI 100 (around both the front and rear screens 110, 120, respectively) and feel objects between his/her thumb and fingers (FIG. 3). It is contemplated that utilizing both the front screen 110 and the rear screen 120 as haptic surfaces will enhance medical diagnostics, e.g., for more effectively analyzing mammograms.


The disclosure also relates to a method for operating a haptic system 10 including positioning a laparoscopic or camera-enabled device 20 into a body cavity “BC” to visualize tissue “T” and displaying a tissue image “T1” on a GUI 50. The method also includes obtaining imaging information “T2” or physiological tissue data (acquired sensor data) from an imaging source (CT scan, MRI, fMRI, ultrasound, etc.), displaying a tissue image “T3” on a GUHI 100, overlaying the acquired sensor data on the tissue image “T3”, and generating tangible sensations via one or more haptic interfaces on both the front screen 110 of the GUHI 100 and the rear screen 120 of the GUHI 100 relating to one or more tissue properties, e.g., tissue density. Tangible sensations may be felt by the surgeon in real time on the GUHI 100 which allows a surgeon to feel and diagnose various tissue types and tissue maladies, e.g., tumors.


The various embodiments disclosed herein may also be configured to work with robotic surgical systems and what is commonly referred to as “Telesurgery.” Such systems employ various robotic elements to assist the clinician and allow remote operation (or partial remote operation) of surgical instrumentation. Various robotic arms, gears, cams, pulleys, electric and mechanical motors, etc. may be employed for this purpose and may be designed with a robotic surgical system to assist the clinician during the course of an operation or treatment. Such robotic systems may include remotely steerable systems, automatically flexible surgical systems, remotely flexible surgical systems, remotely articulating surgical systems, wireless surgical systems, modular or selectively configurable remotely operated surgical systems, etc.


The robotic surgical systems may be employed with one or more consoles that are next to the operating theater or located in a remote location. In this instance, one team of clinicians may prep the patient for surgery and configure the robotic surgical system with one or more of the instruments disclosed herein while another clinician (or group of clinicians) remotely controls the instruments via the robotic surgical system. As can be appreciated, a highly skilled clinician may perform multiple operations in multiple locations without leaving his/her remote console which can be both economically advantageous and a benefit to the patient or a series of patients.


For a detailed description of exemplary medical work stations and/or components thereof, reference may be made to U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0116416, and PCT Application Publication No. WO2016/025132, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein.


Persons skilled in the art will understand that the structures and methods specifically described herein and shown in the accompanying figures are non-limiting exemplary embodiments, and that the description, disclosure, and figures should be construed merely as exemplary of particular embodiments. It is to be understood, therefore, that the present disclosure is not limited to the precise embodiments described, and that various other changes and modifications may be effected by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure. Additionally, the elements and features shown or described in connection with certain embodiments may be combined with the elements and features of certain other embodiments without departing from the scope of the present disclosure, and that such modifications and variations are also included within the scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the subject matter of the present disclosure is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described.

Claims
  • 1. An enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics, comprising: a laparoscope configured to be inserted into a body cavity to view tissue, the laparoscope configured to obtain an image of the viewed tissue;an imaging device configured to acquire physiological data about tissue, process the acquired physiological data, and output the processed data to a graphical user haptic interface (GUHI) capable of generating tangible sensations utilizing one or more haptic interfaces, the GUHI configured to receive the image from the laparoscope, combine the image received from the laparoscope and the processed physiological data received from the imaging device, and provide tangible sensations on both a front screen of the GUHI and a rear screen of the GUHI allowing a surgeon the sensation of feeling for abnormal tissue conditions between the surgeon's hands.
  • 2. An enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics according to claim 1 wherein the imaging device is selected from the group consisting of an ultrasound device, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) device, a computerized axial tomography (CT) scanner, and a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) device.
  • 3. An enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics according to claim 1 wherein the imaging device is a portable ultrasound probe.
  • 4. An enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics according to claim 1 wherein the GUHI is portable and is configured to be held between the surgeon's fingers and thumb.
  • 5. An enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics according to claim 1 wherein the imaging device is configured to acquire and process physiological data about tissue in real time and combine the processed physiological data about tissue with the image received from the laparoscope in real time.
  • 6. An enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics according to claim 1 wherein the imaging device is configured to acquire and process physiological data about tissue prior to combining the processed physiological data with the image from the laparoscope.
  • 7. An enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics according to claim 1 wherein the imaging device is selected from the group consisting of an ultrasound device, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) device, a computerized axial tomography (CT) scanner, and a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) device.
  • 8. An enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics according to claim 1 wherein the imaging device is a portable ultrasound probe.
  • 9. An enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics according to claim 1 wherein the GUHI is portable and is configured to be held between the surgeon's fingers and thumb.
  • 10. An enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics according to claim 1 wherein the imaging device is configured to acquire and process physiological data about tissue in real time and combine the processed physiological data about tissue with the image received from the laparoscope in real time.
  • 11. An enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics according to claim 1 wherein the imaging device is configured to acquire and process physiological data about tissue prior to combining the processed physiological data with the image from the laparoscope.
  • 12. An enhanced haptic feedback system for medical diagnostics, comprising: an imaging device configured to acquire physiological data about tissue, process the acquired physiological data, and output the processed data to a graphical user haptic interface (GUHI) capable of generating tangible sensations utilizing one or more haptic interfaces, the GUHI configured to combine an image received from a laparoscope and the processed physiological data received from the imaging device to provide tangible sensations on both a front screen of the GUHI and a rear screen of the GUHI allowing a surgeon the sensation of feeling for abnormal tissue conditions between the surgeon's hands.
  • 13. A method for assessing tissue maladies, comprising: inserting a laparoscope into a body cavity of a patient to visualize tissue and obtain a tissue image;acquiring physiological tissue data from an imaging source; andcombining both the acquired physiological data and the tissue image on a graphical user haptic interface (GUHI) and generating tangible sensations via one or more haptic interfaces on both a front screen of the GUHI and a rear screen of the GUHI allowing a surgeon to feel and diagnose various tissue maladies.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/682,204, filed on Jun. 8, 2018 the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (99)
Number Name Date Kind
D249549 Pike Sep 1978 S
D263020 Rau, III Feb 1982 S
D295893 Sharkany et al. May 1988 S
D295894 Sharkany et al. May 1988 S
D298353 Manno Nov 1988 S
D299413 DeCarolis Jan 1989 S
D343453 Noda Jan 1994 S
D348930 Olson Jul 1994 S
D349341 Lichtman et al. Aug 1994 S
D354564 Medema Jan 1995 S
D358887 Feinberg May 1995 S
D384413 Zlock et al. Sep 1997 S
H1745 Paraschac Aug 1998 H
D402028 Grimm et al. Dec 1998 S
D408018 McNaughton Apr 1999 S
D416089 Barton et al. Nov 1999 S
D424694 Tetzlaff et al. May 2000 S
D425201 Tetzlaff et al. May 2000 S
H1904 Yates et al. Oct 2000 H
D449886 Tetzlaff et al. Oct 2001 S
D453923 Olson Feb 2002 S
D454951 Bon Mar 2002 S
D457958 Dycus et al. May 2002 S
D457959 Tetzlaff et al. May 2002 S
H2037 Yates et al. Jul 2002 H
D465281 Lang Nov 2002 S
D466209 Bon Nov 2002 S
D493888 Reschke Aug 2004 S
D496997 Dycus et al. Oct 2004 S
D499181 Dycus et al. Nov 2004 S
D502994 Blake, III Mar 2005 S
D509297 Wells Sep 2005 S
D525361 Hushka Jul 2006 S
D531311 Guerra et al. Oct 2006 S
D533274 Visconti et al. Dec 2006 S
D533942 Kerr et al. Dec 2006 S
D535027 James et al. Jan 2007 S
D538932 Malik Mar 2007 S
D541418 Schechter et al. Apr 2007 S
D541611 Aglassinger May 2007 S
D541938 Kerr et al. May 2007 S
D545432 Watanabe Jun 2007 S
D547154 Lee Jul 2007 S
D564662 Moses et al. Mar 2008 S
D567943 Moses et al. Apr 2008 S
D575395 Hushka Aug 2008 S
D575401 Hixson et al. Aug 2008 S
D582038 Swoyer et al. Dec 2008 S
D617900 Kingsley et al. Jun 2010 S
D617901 Unger et al. Jun 2010 S
D617902 Twomey et al. Jun 2010 S
D617903 Unger et al. Jun 2010 S
D618798 Olson et al. Jun 2010 S
D621503 Otten et al. Aug 2010 S
D627462 Kingsley Nov 2010 S
D628289 Romero Nov 2010 S
D628290 Romero Nov 2010 S
D630324 Reschke Jan 2011 S
D649249 Guerra Nov 2011 S
D649643 Allen, IV et al. Nov 2011 S
D661394 Romero et al. Jun 2012 S
D670808 Moua et al. Nov 2012 S
D680220 Rachlin Apr 2013 S
9084608 Larson et al. Jul 2015 B2
9211657 Ackley et al. Dec 2015 B2
20140221995 Guerra et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140221999 Cunningham et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140228842 Dycus et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140230243 Roy et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140236149 Kharin et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140243811 Reschke et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140243824 Gilbert Aug 2014 A1
20140249528 Hixson et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140250686 Hempstead et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140257274 Mccullough, Jr. et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140257283 Johnson et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140257284 Artale Sep 2014 A1
20140257285 Moua Sep 2014 A1
20140276803 Hart Sep 2014 A1
20140284313 Allen, IV et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140288549 Mckenna et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140288553 Johnson et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140330308 Hart et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140336635 Hart et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140353188 Reschke et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150018816 Latimer Jan 2015 A1
20150025528 Arts Jan 2015 A1
20150032106 Rachlin Jan 2015 A1
20150051598 Orszulak et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150051640 Twomey et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150066026 Hart et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150080880 Sartor et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150080889 Cunningham et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150082928 Kappus et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150088122 Jensen Mar 2015 A1
20150088126 Duffin et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150088128 Couture Mar 2015 A1
20150094714 Lee et al. Apr 2015 A1
20170042626 Egorov Feb 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (93)
Number Date Country
201299462 Sep 2009 CN
2415263 Oct 1975 DE
02514501 Oct 1976 DE
2627679 Jan 1977 DE
03423356 Jun 1986 DE
03612646 Apr 1987 DE
3627221 Feb 1988 DE
87712328 Mar 1988 DE
04303882 Feb 1995 DE
34303882 02 Feb 1995 DE
04403252 Aug 1995 DE
19515914 Jul 1996 DE
19506363 Aug 1996 DE
29616210 Nov 1996 DE
19608716 Apr 1997 DE
19751106 May 1998 DE
19751108 May 1999 DE
19946527 Jul 2001 DE
20121161 Apr 2002 DE
10045375 02 Oct 2002 DE
10045375 Oct 2002 DE
202007009165 Aug 2007 DE
202007009317 Aug 2007 DE
202007009318 Aug 2007 DE
10031773 Nov 2007 DE
202007016233 Jan 2008 DE
19738457 Jan 2009 DE
102004026179 Jan 2009 DE
102008018406 Jul 2009 DE
1281878 Feb 2003 EP
1159926 Mar 2003 EP
61501068 Sep 1984 JP
1024051 Jan 1989 JP
1147150 Jun 1989 JP
6502328 Mar 1992 JP
55106 Jan 1993 JP
H0540112 Feb 1993 JP
6121797 May 1994 JP
6285078 Oct 1994 JP
6511401 Dec 1994 JP
H06343644 Dec 1994 JP
H07265328 Oct 1995 JP
08056955 Mar 1996 JP
08252263 Oct 1996 JP
8289895 Nov 1996 JP
8317934 Dec 1996 JP
8317936 Dec 1996 JP
09000538 Jan 1997 JP
H0910223 Jan 1997 JP
9122138 May 1997 JP
0010000195 Jan 1998 JP
10155798 Jun 1998 JP
1147149 Feb 1999 JP
11070124 Mar 1999 JP
11169381 Jun 1999 JP
11192238 Jul 1999 JP
H11244298 Sep 1999 JP
2000102545 Apr 2000 JP
2000135222 May 2000 JP
2000342599 Dec 2000 JP
2000350732 Dec 2000 JP
2001008944 Jan 2001 JP
2001029355 Feb 2001 JP
2001029356 Feb 2001 JP
2001003400 Apr 2001 JP
2001128990 May 2001 JP
2001190564 Jul 2001 JP
2002136525 May 2002 JP
2002528166 Sep 2002 JP
2003116871 Apr 2003 JP
2003175052 Jun 2003 JP
2003245285 Sep 2003 JP
2004517668 Jun 2004 JP
2004528869 Sep 2004 JP
2005152663 Jun 2005 JP
2005253789 Sep 2005 JP
2005312807 Nov 2005 JP
2006015078 Jan 2006 JP
2006501939 Jan 2006 JP
2006095316 Apr 2006 JP
2008054926 Mar 2008 JP
2011125195 Jun 2011 JP
H0630945 Nov 2016 JP
401367 Nov 1974 SU
0036986 Jun 2000 WO
0059392 Oct 2000 WO
0115614 Mar 2001 WO
0154604 Aug 2001 WO
0245589 Jun 2002 WO
2006021269 Mar 2006 WO
2005110264 Apr 2006 WO
2008040483 Apr 2008 WO
2011018154 Feb 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (51)
Entry
Michael Choti, “Abdominoperineal Resection with the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System and LigaSure Atlas 20 cm Open Instrument”; Innovations That Work, Jun. 2003.
Chung et al., “Clinical Experience of Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum vol. 46, No. 1 Jan. 2003.
Tinkcler L.F., “Combined Diathermy and Suction Forceps”, Feb. 6, 1967 (Feb. 6, 1967), British Medical Journal Feb. 6, 1976, vol. 1, nr. 5431 p. 361, ISSN: 0007-1447.
Carbonell et al., “Comparison of theGyrus PlasmaKinetic Sealer and the Valleylab LigaSure Device in the Hemostasis of Small, Medium, and Large-Sized Arteries” Carolinas Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgery Program, Carolinas Medical Center,Charlotte,NC; Date: Aug. 2003.
Peterson et al. “Comparison of Healing Process Following Ligation with Sutures and Bipolar Vessel Sealing” Surgical Technology International (2001).
“Electrosurgery: A Historical Overview” Innovations in Electrosurgery; Sales/Product Literature; Dec. 31, 2000. (6 pages).
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealing Device in Hemorrhoidectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004. (1 page).
E. David Crawford “Evaluation of a New Vessel Sealing Device in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 2000.
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hemorrhoidectormy” American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinicla Congress Poster (2000).
Muller et al., “Extended Left Hemicolectomy Using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System” Innovations That Work, Sep. 1999.
Kennedy et al. “High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing” Surgical Endoscopy (1998) 12: 876-878.
Burdette et al. “In Vivo Probe Measurement Technique For Determining Dielectric Properties At VHF Through Microwave Frequencies”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-28, No. 4, Apr. 1980 pp. 414-427.
Carus et al., “Initial Experience With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Abdominal Surgery” Innovations That Work, Jun. 2002.
Heniford et al. “Initial Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Surgical Endoscopy (2000) 15:799-801.(4 pages).
Herman et al., “Laparoscopic Intestinal Resection With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: A Case Report”; Innovations That Work, Feb. 2002.
Koyle et al., “Laparoscopic Palomo Varicocele Ligation in Children and Adolescents” Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques, vol. 6, No. 1, 2002.
W. Scott Helton, “LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: Revolutionary Hemostasis Product for General Surgery”; Sales/Product Literature 1999.
LigaSure Vessel Sealing System, the Seal of Confidence in General, Gynecologic, Urologic, and Laparaoscopic Surgery; Sales/Product Literature; Apr. 2002.
Joseph Ortenberg “LigaSure System Used in Laparoscopic 1st and 2nd Stage Orchiopexy” Innovations That Work, Nov. 2002.
Sigel et al. “The Mechanism of Blood Vessel Closure by High Frequency Electrocoagulation” Surgery Gynecology & Obstetrics, Oct. 1965 pp. 823-831.
Sampayan et al, “Multilayer Ultra-High Gradient Insulator Technology” Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, 1998. Netherlands Aug. 17-21, 1998; vol. 2, pp. 740-743.
Paul G. Horgan, “A Novel Technique for Parenchymal Division During Hepatectomy” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 181, No. 3, Apr. 2001 pp. 236-237.
Benaron et al., “Optical Time-Of-Flight and Absorbance Imaging of Biologic Media”, Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, vol. 259, Mar. 5, 1993, pp. 1463-1466.
Olsson et al. “Radical Cystectomy in Females” Current Surgical Techniques in Urology, vol. 14, Issue 3, 2001.
Palazzo et al. “Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy” British Journal of Surgery 2002, 89, 154-157.
Levy et al. “Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 102, No. 1, Jul. 2003.
“Reducing Needlestick Injuries in the Operating Room” Sales/Product Literature 2001. (1 page).
Bergdahl et al. “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator” J. Neurosurg, vol. 75, Jul. 1991, pp. 148-151.
Strasberg et al. “A Phase I Study of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hepatic Surgery” Section of HPB Surger, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, Presented at AHPBA, Feb. 2001.
Sayfan et al. “Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy: A New Technique” Annals of Surgery vol. 234 No. 1 Jul. 2001; pp. 21-24.
Levy et al., “Update on Hysterectomy—New Technologies and Techniques” OBG Management, Feb. 2003. (15 pages).
Dulemba et al. “Use of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealer in Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004.
Strasberg et al., “Use of a Bipolar Vessel-Sealing Device for Parenchymal Transection During Liver Surgery” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 6, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2002 pp. 569-574.
Sengupta et al., “Use of a Computer-Controlled Bipolar Diathermy System in Radical Prostatectomies and Other Open Urological Surgery” ANZ Journal of Surgery (2001) 71.9 pp. 538-540.
Rothenberg et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children” Int'l Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) 2000.
Crawford et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Urologic Cancer Surger” Grand Rounds in Urology 1999 vol. 1 Issue 4 pp. 10-17.
Craig Johnson, “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Bloodless Hemorrhoidectomy” Innovations That Work, Mar. 2000.
Levy et al. “Use of a New Energy-based Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) World Congress 1999.
Barbara Levy, “Use of a New Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” FIGO 2000, Washington, D.C.. (1 page).
E. David Crawford “Use of a Novel Vessel Sealing Technology in Management of the Dorsal Veinous Complex” Sales/Product Literature 2000.
Jarrett et al., “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System for Peri-Hilar Vessels in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy” Sales/Product Literature 2000.
Crouch et al. “A Velocity-Dependent Model for Needle Insertion in Soft Tissue” MICCAI 2005; LNCS 3750 pp. 624-632, Dated: 2005.
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Pelvic Surgery” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics FIGO World Congress 2000, Washington, D.C.
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Gynecologic Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 1999.
U.S. Appl. No. 08/926,869, filed Sep. 10, 1997; inventor: James G. Chandler, Abandoned.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/177,950, filed Oct. 23, 1998; inventor: Randel A. Frazier, abandoned.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/387,883, filed Sep. 1, 1999; inventor: Dale F. Schmaltz, abandoned.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/591,328, filed Jun. 9, 2000; inventor: Thomas P. Ryan, abandoned.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,970, filed Dec. 17, 2008; inventor: Paul R. Sremeich, abandoned.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,644, filed Oct. 29, 2013; inventor: Reschke, abandoned.
Heniford et al. “Initial Research and Clinical Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Oct. 1999.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190374298 A1 Dec 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62682204 Jun 2018 US