NOT APPLICABLE
NOT APPLICABLE
NOT APPLICABLE
Automated test equipment utilizes its channels to drive signals to or receive signals from a device under test (DUT). Each device under test is typically comprised of address PINs, control PINs, and data PINs. In the past, the automated test equipment has used dedicated PIN electronics channels for the data PINS. As a result, there was a one-to-one relationship between the channels and the data PINs on a device under test. In other words, the PIN electronics channels for the data lines were not shared by multiple devices under test. As a result, the time needed to test multiple devices—for example on a wafer—was long due to the fact that data for each device under test had to be read serially.
While attempts have been made to utilize the same PIN electronics channel to read data from multiple devices under test, they have required that the data be read serially from these devices under test. Thus, a first data read has to be performed from the first device under test, followed by a data read on the second device under test, followed by a third data read from the third device under test, etc. Thus, the time to perform data reads from multiple devices in this serial fashion has increased the testing time by a factor of the number of devices being tested. For example, to read from four devices under test utilizing the same test channel requires four times as long as it would be required to read data from a single device under test. As a result, the test time overhead (TTO) has typically been unacceptable. Thus, testing has typically been performed by dedicating a single PIN IO channel of a testing device to an individual data PIN on a device under test.
Another drawback in the past to testing multiple devices has been the lack of electrical isolation between devices in performing data reads from the devices. Thus, when two devices, for example, are read in a serial manner using a single data line, a bad device under test can unnecessarily cause the other device under test to appear damaged or of low quality. For example, if a first device under test has an electrical short, the lack of electrical isolation when reading from the second device under test can cause a second device under test to perform poorly. As a result, the second device under test might be categorized as substandard.
According to one embodiment of the invention, an apparatus is provided for obtaining test data from multiple devices. The test apparatus can be comprised of a test signal generator configured to output from the testing device a first test signal for input in parallel to at least two devices in the test. The testing device can also include a response signal receiver configured to input in parallel to the testing device at least two response signals, each response signal produced by one of the devices in the test in response to the first test signal. Furthermore, the testing device can include a storage device such as a memory configured to store the response signals received in parallel. A serial output circuit can be configured to serially output the response signals from the storage device.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a method of obtaining test data from multiple devices can be implemented by outputting from a testing device a first test signal and inputting the test signal in parallel to at least two devices under test; inputting in parallel to the testing device at least two response signals, each response signal produced by one of the two devices under test in response to the first test signal; storing the response signal received in parallel in a storage device; and serially outputting the response signals from the storage device for use in testing analysis.
Further embodiments of the invention will be appreciated by reviewing the specification and drawings described herein.
Automated test equipment can be utilized to test multiple devices in serial fashion; however, such testing introduces a substantial time factor to the testing procedure. As a result, most testing equipment is configured with dedicated PIN electronics channels for the data PINs on devices under test. Thus, a channel is dedicated to a PIN of a single device in such testing schemes. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, multiple devices under test can now be tested in parallel fashion.
Referring to
System 200 has extensive flexibility and configurability. Thus, for example, a single architecture might be utilized to implement one or more servers that can be further configured in accordance with currently desirable protocols, protocol variations, extensions, etc. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that embodiments may well be utilized in accordance with more specific application requirements. For example, one or more system elements might be implemented as sub-elements within a system 200 component (e.g. within communications system 206). Customized hardware might also be utilized and/or particular elements might be implemented in hardware, software (including so-called “portable software,” such as applets) or both. Further, while connection to other computing devices such as network input/output devices (not shown) may be employed, it is to be understood that wired, wireless, optical, modem and/or other connection or connections to other computing devices might also be utilized.
Referring now to
The circuit shown in block 308 can be utilized in accordance with one embodiment of the invention to fan out a single PIN electronics channel 305 to multiple devices under test. In the past, a single PIN electronics channel would be dedicated to a data PIN of a device under test or would require serial electrical coupling to multiple devices under test. However, the circuit shown in block 308 allows the PIN electronics channel 305 to drive and receive signals from multiple devices while reading data from the devices in a parallel manner. This introduces no test time overhead. In the past, serial reads produced significant test time overhead and thus discouraged such serial testing.
Block 308 shows that PIN electronics channel 305 can fan out a signal driven by automated test circuit 304 by utilizing buffer 347 to fan out the signal to buffers 354, 355, and 356. These buffers drive the signal to devices 312, 316, and 320, respectively.
When data is read from the devices under test, the read can be accomplished in parallel fashion. Thus, the data lines of devices 312, 316, and 320 are shown as electrically coupled with comparators 351, 352, and 353 in
The serial stream of bits output by circuit 308 can then be manipulated by the test logic 332 to associate an individual bit with its corresponding device under test. The signal can be compared to an expected value so as to determine whether the device is operating correctly. If the device is not operating correctly, the error can be stored in the error catch RAM circuit 328. Logic tests can be performed on each bit of the serial stream so as to collect test data for each of the devices under test.
In this fashion, a single PIN electronics channel can be utilized not only to drive and receive information, but also to drive and receive information from multiple devices. This embodiment also allows the test equipment to perform parallel reads of data from these multiple devices while not introducing test time overhead. No test time overhead is introduced because the serial data stream can convey the entire amount of collected data before a subsequent read operation is performed and loaded into the latches.
The time slicing approach for sending data back to the testing device circuit 304 relies on the fact that a tester channel typically can operate much faster than a device under test at that time. For example, it is typical to be able to receive data in a PIN electronics channel at speeds of 600 or 800 Mbs, whereas a typical nonvolatile memory operates below 50 Mbs.
The serial transfer performed by sequencer 340 and serial shifter 336 can occur in the background between subsequent device under test goals. This is shown, for example, in the example timing diagram shown in
In the timing diagram shown in
The ECRDS signal shown in
The remaining three timing signals shown in
Referring now to
Thus, in accordance with various embodiments of the invention, different benefits can be achieved. For example, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, parallel reads are enabled from multiple devices under test with error catch RAM support. This significantly reduces the test time overhead in testing multiple devices using the fan out/fan in testing approach.
In addition, one embodiment of the invention enables the user to fully share not only address and control PIN electronics across multiple devices, but also to share tester channels being used as data I/O. This can increase the parallelism of an existing tester.
Furthermore, because the fan out/fan in is done using active components, when a device fails, it allows for isolation of the failing device. Thus, the failing device can be turned off while testing of other devices continues. This can be important especially in wafer sort due to the difficulty of wafer sort not being able to retest devices that were affected by a failing device.
In addition, one embodiment allows the sharing of a single line between a tester and the new circuit shown as circuit 308 in
Being able to capture individual errors in a memory device, for example, can be valuable for applications where one is interested in using that data to perform repair or analysis. This is typical testing of nonvolatile memory devices that allow for cell repair using redundant rows and/or columns that are built into the device. Without the ability to capture a device error map, one cannot perform such a repair.
While various embodiments of the invention have been described as methods or apparatus for implementing the invention, it should be understood that the invention can be implemented through code coupled to a computer, e.g., code resident on a computer or accessible by the computer. For example, software and databases could be utilized to implement many of the methods discussed above. Thus, in addition to embodiments where the invention is accomplished by hardware, it is also noted that these embodiments can be accomplished through the use of an article of manufacture comprised of a computer usable medium having a computer readable program code embodied therein, which causes the enablement of the functions disclosed in this description. Therefore, it is desired that embodiments of the invention also be considered protected by this patent in their program code means as well. Furthermore, the embodiments of the invention may be embodied as code stored in a computer-readable memory of virtually any kind including, without limitation, RAM, ROM, magnetic media, optical media, or magneto-optical media. Even more generally, the embodiments of the invention could be implemented in software, or in hardware, or any combination thereof including, but not limited to, software running on a general purpose processor, microcode, PLAs, or ASICs.
It is also envisioned that embodiments of the invention could be accomplished as computer signals embodied in a carrier wave, as well as signals (e.g., electrical and optical) propagated through a transmission medium. Thus, the various information discussed above could be formatted in a structure, such as a data structure, and transmitted as an electrical signal through a transmission medium or stored on a computer readable medium.
It is also noted that many of the structures, materials, and acts recited herein can be recited as means for performing a function or steps for performing a function. Therefore, it should be understood that such language is entitled to cover all such structures, materials, or acts disclosed within this specification and their equivalents.
It is thought that the apparatuses and methods of the embodiments of the present invention and its attendant advantages will be understood from this specification. While the above is a complete description of specific embodiments of the invention, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5471481 | Okumoto et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
6065144 | Knoch | May 2000 | A |
6275023 | Oosaki et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275962 | Fuller et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6349397 | Koga et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6392427 | Yang | May 2002 | B1 |
6483338 | Weng et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6499121 | Roy et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6577979 | Okitaka | Jun 2003 | B1 |
7091598 | Fujita et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7395476 | Cowell et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7421632 | Jordan et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
20040044936 | Rearick et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060170453 | Zerbe et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060290361 | Ellis et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070216432 | Kister | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070266288 | Volkerink et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283197 | Jordan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080031166 | Fukuda | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090055690 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |