Patent Grant
9741181
The present invention relates generally to imaging. More particularly, example embodiments of the present invention relate to evaluating image data.
Generally speaking, logistical processes increase efficiency and reduce cost of commerce in relation to storing inventory and transporting cargo. For example, storage space is finite and transport media, such as trailers, have specified capacities. Logistic processing apportions cargoes and inventories efficiently over the available spaces, which can facilitate storage and expedite transport.
To apportion a cargo or inventory, dimensions of each of the constituent packages, boxes, crates and other items (“items”) are measured. The measured dimensions are processed in relation to the available storage or transport space. Based on the processing, a position within the storage/transport space is computed that optimizes placement of each inventory/cargo item relative to each of the other items.
The measuring of the dimensions of the cargo/inventory items may be automated by a dimensioning apparatus (“dimensioner”), which may be operable optically. Optically based dimensioners are typically operable for capturing image data using photographic and/or videographic techniques. Image data captured in relation to surfaces of the cargo/inventory items are used for computing the measurements.
Dimensioners capture the image data over two or more measurably sufficient (“good”) surfaces of the cargo/inventory items to produce measurements with levels of accuracy sufficient for commercial application. Use of three good surfaces may improve measurement accuracy for commerce. In some situations however, dimensioners may sometimes capture substantially inaccurate (“false”) image data.
Computations based on the false captured image data produce inaccurate measurements of the dimensions of the items, which can cause faulty cargo/inventory apportioning. Excessive false image value production levels are thus unacceptable with dimensioners certified for commercial use, e.g., under the National Type Evaluation Program (NTEP) of the (U.S.) National Council on Weights and Measures.
On the contrary, NTEP certified dimensioners rely on consistently reliable measurement accuracy and thus, in the image values on which the measurements are based. Dimensioners may be deployed in industrial settings, e.g., in which they capture the image data from cargo/inventory items as the items are moved on high speed conveyors. Such usage however may sometimes degrade the accuracy of image based measurements.
For example, images captured by the dimensioner from an item that is beyond an optical range limit may lack sufficient structured light information for accurate measurement. Even with sufficient structured light information, accuracy may be affected by an orientation of an item relative to the dimensioner. For example, a dimensioner oriented straight-on to one face of an item may measure its depth inaccurately.
Therefore, a need exists for evaluating image data, captured from items examined by dimensioners, in relation to suitability of the data for computing accurate dimension measurements therewith. A need also exists for recognizing false values in the image data captured by the dimensioners and rejecting use of the false values in computing dimension measurements. Further, a need exists for recommending and/or implementing corrections in relation to the false image data, in order to produce accurate dimension measurements.
Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention embraces evaluating image data, captured from items examined by dimensioners, in relation to suitability of the data for computing accurate dimension measurements therewith. In an example embodiment, dimensioners are thus operable for recognizing false values in the image data captured therewith dimensioners and rejecting the false values for dimension measurement computations. Further, the dimensioners are operable for correcting the captured image data and computing accurate dimension measurements based on the corrected values.
Images of items are evaluated. A first image of the item, having a view of two or more (e.g., three) of its surfaces, is captured at a first time. A measurement of at least one dimension of one or more of the surfaces is computed and stored. A second image of the item, having a view of at least one of the two or more surfaces, is captured at a second time, subsequent to the first time. A measurement of the dimension is then computed and compared to the stored first measurement and evaluated based on the comparison.
An example embodiment of the present invention relates to a method for evaluating images of items. A first image of the item, having a view of two or more of its surfaces, is captured at a first time. A measurement of at least one dimension of one or more of the two or more surfaces is computed based on the first captured image and stored. A second image of the item, having a view of at least one of the two or more surfaces, is captured at a second time, which is subsequent to the first time. A measurement of the at least one dimension of the at least one of the two or more surfaces is computed. The computed measurement of the at least one dimension of the at least one of the two or more surfaces is compared to the stored first measurement. The computed measurement of the at least one dimension of the at least one of the two or more surfaces is evaluated based on the comparison.
The evaluating step comprises, selectively, accepting or rejecting the computed measurement of the at least one dimension of the at least one of the two or more surfaces. The captured first image and/or the captured second image each comprise information based on data relating to a characteristic of the item, and/or data relating to a wireframe model constructed of the imaged item. The information relates to one or more features of one or more surfaces of the item. The one or more surface features relate to a corresponding color or other chromatic or similar characteristic. Alternatively or additionally, the one or more surface features comprise a logo, a bar code pattern (“barcode”), or a text based, alphanumeric, ideographic, or pictographic symbol. The symbol may comprise handwritten or preprinted writing.
In an example embodiment, the comparing step comprises computing a duration of an interval between the second time and the first time. The evaluating step may comprise establishing an identity between a representation of the item in the second image with a representation of the item in the first image.
The evaluation of the image may also comprise delineating a boundary about a periphery of the one or more surface features in the first captured image. The delineated boundary is mapped to corresponding locations in a coordinate system. Data corresponding to the mapped boundary is stored.
The surface feature is then recognized in the captured second image. Data corresponding to the boundary is surveyed in relation to the recognized surface feature. The surveyed boundary data is compared to the stored boundary data. The evaluating step is then based, at least partially, on the comparison of the surveyed boundary data to the stored boundary data.
The evaluation of the images may also comprise capturing at least a third image of the item at a corresponding (e.g., third) time, which occurs between the first time and the second time. The at least third image comprises a view of the at least one of the two or more surfaces. A measurement of the at least one dimension of the at least one of the two or more surfaces is computed based on the captured at least third image. The measurement computed based on the captured at least third image is compared to the stored first measurement. The measurement computed based on the captured at least third image may be approved based on the comparison to the stored first measurement and stored.
A mean value is computed based on the stored first measurement and the stored approved measurement (from the captured at least third image). In an example embodiment, the evaluated measurement (from the second captured image) may be corrected based on the computed mean value.
An example embodiment may be implemented in which the capturing of the first image step comprises recording the view of the two or more surfaces of the item from a perspective associated with a first position of the item. The capturing of the second image step comprises recording the view of the at least one of the two or more surfaces from a perspective associated with a second position of the item. The second position is displaced (e.g., laterally, longitudinally, axially, etc.) relative to the first position.
The evaluation of the image may comprise certifying, based on the evaluating step, a charge for a commercial transaction relating to one or more of storing or transporting the item. Alternatively or additionally, the evaluation of the image may comprise certifying, based on the evaluating step, a dimensioner for a commercial use.
In another aspect, the present invention embraces a non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising instructions, which are operable when executing on a computer processor for causing and/or controlling a process for evaluating images (e.g., as summarized above).
In yet another aspect, the present invention embraces a computer system comprising a bus component and a processor component coupled to the bus. The computer system also comprises a non-transitory storage medium component coupled to the bus component. The storage component comprises instructions, which are operable when executing on the processor component for causing and/or controlling a process for evaluating images (e.g., as summarized above).
The foregoing illustrative summary, as well as other example features, functions and/or aspects of embodiments of the invention, and the manner in which the same are accomplished, are further explained within the following detailed description of example embodiments and each figure (FIG.) of the accompanying drawings.
Example embodiments of the present invention are described in relation to evaluating image data, captured from items examined by dimensioners. Suitability of the data is thus evaluated for computing accurate dimension measurements therewith. In an example embodiment, dimensioners are thus operable for recognizing false values in the image data captured therewith dimensioners and rejecting the false values for dimension measurement computations. Further, the dimensioners are operable for correcting the captured image data and computing accurate dimension measurements based on the corrected values.
Overview.
Example embodiments are described in relation to evaluating images of items. A first image of the item, having a view of two or more of its surfaces, is captured at a first time. A measurement of at least one dimension of one or more of the surfaces is computed and stored. A second image of the item, having a view of at least one of the two or more surfaces, is captured at a second time, subsequent to the first time. A measurement of the dimension is then computed and compared to the stored first measurement and evaluated based on the comparison.
An example embodiment of the present invention uses information accessed by a dimensioner from previous images to evaluate a present image. The present image is evaluated whether a user of the dimensioner is triggering the dimensioner to make a measurement related to an item in the present image, or not. The information accessed by the dimensioner can be wireframe-based and/or image based. The wireframe based information may be economical in relation to computational resources. The image based information may give a higher confidence in decisions relating to rejecting an image or a measurement made therewith.
Example Dimensioner and Image Views.
An item with which an example embodiment may be operable may comprise a box, a crate, or another a package associated with an inventory to be stored or a cargo to be shipped or transported.
The first view 10 shows an image 15 of an item 12, which comprises a box, rendered on a display screen of an example dimensioner 11. While depicted herein as a tablet computer, the dimensioner 11 may comprise another mobile device or a computer apparatus (or component thereof) disposed or deployed in a fixed location. Three (3) sides of the item 12 are visible as well as a “floor” 13, which is representative of any surface or structure supporting the weight of the item 12. The dimensioner 11 is shown in the foreground of the image 15, which shows the box item 12 on the floor 13, which in the view 10 comprises a table surface. The image 15 shows a good wireframe 16, which is delineated about a periphery of the item 12 conforming to its three visible sides. The dimensions of the box item 12, as shown in the image 15, are accurate and thus suitable for commercial use.
The position of the item 12 shown in the second view 20 is displaced axially, relative to its position as shown in the first view 10. Wireframe dimensions may be compared from images of the item 12 taken (“captured”) over each of multiple positions, which helps confirm that the dimensioner 11 is, in fact, imaging the same box in each of the views. Thus, an example embodiment may be implemented in which an identity is established between an item 12 shown in a present image and the item, as shown in previous images.
Thus, while the view 20 shows the same box item 12 from a perspective that offers a slightly less optimal angle than the perspective shown in the view 10, the dimensions of the item 12 may be computed to be the same as the dimensions computed from the view 10 (
In an example embodiment, stronger confirmation as to the identity of the item 12 over multiple images captured at different corresponding times is implemented by comparing features of the surface of the item 12 over each of the images. A boundary may thus be delineated around the surface features. For example, bounding lines may be created around surface features based on a color or another chromatic (or other) characteristic associated with each feature. Thus, the boundaries are delineated about each feature distinguished by, e.g., the different colors. The boundaries of the surface features are then mapped to a coordinate system based on the wireframe and stored.
Bounding boxes delineated around printed text or other surface features are used for comparing sequential images to build confidence that in the identity of the box item 12 is the same, whether or not a user of the dimensioner 11 executes a “make measurement” command therewith.
Images captured from some perspectives may lack sufficient information for computing accurate measurements of a dimension of the item 12. For example, a user may continue around the item to a point at which the dimensioner 11 faces only a single end of a box item. A measurement of a depth dimension made from such a perspective may comprise erroneous information.
Erroneous measurements computed during a certification process of the dimensioner typically cause its failure. Erroneous measurements computed during commercial transactions, e.g., in relation to assessing charges for storage and/or transport of the item, cause inaccuracies such as insufficient revenue capture or overcharging.
In example embodiments, this incorrect depth measurement is rejected and deleted from display. Sequential wireframes computed from images captured at various corresponding times, and/or comparing markings on the box or other surface features of the item 12, are used to reject the depth measurement.
An example embodiment of the present invention relates to a method for evaluating the image data for accepting or rejecting dimension measurements therewith. The example process, and non-transitory computer readable storage media comprising instructions, e.g., software associated with the dimensioner 11, are operable for making related judgments appropriately. Moreover, an example embodiment is implemented in which the instructions are configured to correct the depth measurement. For example, an average of related depth measurements computed from preceding images may be used to provide the correct measurement of the depth dimension.
Example Processes.
An example embodiment of the present invention relates to a computer implemented method for evaluating image data, captured from items examined by dimensioners, in relation to suitability of the data for computing accurate dimension measurements therewith. The method may relate to a process executing on a computer system, which is configured operably as a dimensioner.
An example embodiment is implemented, in which a dimensioner is thus operable for recognizing false values in the image data captured therewith dimensioners and rejecting the false values for dimension measurement computations. Further, the dimensioners are operable for correcting the captured image data and computing accurate dimension measurements based on the corrected values.
In step 501, a first image of the item, having a view of two or more (e.g., three) of its surfaces, is captured at a first point in time.
In step 502, a measurement of at least one dimension of one or more of the surfaces is computed and stored.
In step 503, a second image of the item, which has a view of at least one of the two or more surfaces, is captured at a second point in time. The second point in time is subsequent to the first point in time.
In step 504, a measurement of the at least one dimension of the at least one of the two or more surfaces is computed from the captured second image.
In step 505, the computed measurement of the at least one dimension of the at least one of the two or more surfaces is compared to the stored first measurement.
In step 506, the computed measurement of the at least one dimension of the at least one of the two or more surfaces is evaluated based on the comparison.
In step 507, the evaluating step 506 relates to a selective acceptance or rejection of the computed measurement of the at least one dimension of the at least one of the two or more surfaces. If the computed measurement is accepted, then the process 500 may be complete.
Example embodiments may be implemented in which the captured first image and/or the captured second image each comprise information based on data relating to a characteristic of the item. Alternatively of additionally, the captured first image and/or the captured second image each comprise information based on data relating to a wireframe model of the item constructed in relation to the captured images.
The information may relate to one or more features of one or more surfaces of the item. The one or more surface features may relate to a corresponding chromatic (color related) characteristic visible on the surface. Alternatively or additionally, the one or more surface features comprise a logo, a barcode pattern, or a text based, alphanumeric, ideographic, or pictographic symbol. The symbol may comprise handwritten or preprinted writing, an emblem, icon, or the like.
In an example embodiment, the comparing step comprises computing a duration of an interval between the second time and the first time. The evaluating step may comprise establishing an identity between a representation of the item in the second image with a representation of the item in the first image using the computed interval duration. For example, the identity of the item may thus be confirmed as not having changed from the first image, captured at the first time, to the second image, captured at the subsequent second time.
The evaluation of the image at step 501 may be based, at least in part, on analysis related to one or more visible features that appear on the surface of the item. The analysis of the surface features may be implemented as described, for example below, in relation to a process 60 (
In step 61, a boundary about a periphery of the one or more surface features of the item is delineated in the first captured image. For example, boundary lines may be created about (e.g., around, surrounding, proximate to a periphery of, etc.) the surface feature(s).
In step 62, the delineated boundary is mapped to corresponding locations in a coordinate system.
In step 63, data corresponding to the mapped boundary is stored. For example, the mapped boundary data may be stored in a non-transitory computer readable storage medium such as a memory and/or a drive or flash related storage unit or the like.
In step 64, the surface feature is recognized in the captured second image.
In step 65, data corresponding to the boundary is surveyed in relation to the recognized surface feature. Upon the recognition of the surface feature in the captured second image for example, a survey feature of dimensioner software may be operable for scanning the recognized surface feature in relation to the boundary about its periphery, as it may appear in a perspective shown in a view corresponding to the captured second image.
In step 66, the surveyed boundary data is compared to the stored boundary data.
In step 67, the evaluating step is based, at least in part, on the comparison of the surveyed boundary data to the stored boundary data.
Referring again to
In step 511 for example, at least a third image of the item is captured at a corresponding (e.g., third) point in time. The third (or other corresponding) point in time is subsequent to the first point in time, but occurs prior to the second point in time. Thus, the third (or other corresponding) point in time occurs between the first point in time and the second point in time. The captured at least third image comprises a view of the at least one of the two or more surfaces.
In step 512, a measurement of the at least one dimension of the at least one of the two or more surfaces is computed based on the captured at least third image.
In step 513, the measurement computed based on the captured at least third image is compared to the stored first measurement.
In step 514, the measurement computed based on the captured at least third image is approved based on the comparison to the stored first measurement and stored (e.g., based on an independent evaluation thereof, which occurs prior to the evaluation step 506).
In step 515, a mean value is computed based on an average of the stored first measurement and the stored approved measurement from the captured at least third image.
In step 521, the evaluated measurement (which was rejected in step 507) is corrected based on the computed mean value. Upon the correction of the measurement, the process 500 may then be complete.
An example embodiment may be implemented in which the capturing of the first image step comprises recording the view of the two or more surfaces of the item from a perspective associated with a first position of the item.
The capturing of the second image step comprises recording the view of the at least one of the two or more surfaces from a perspective associated with a second position of the item. The second position is displaced (e.g., laterally, longitudinally, axially, etc.) relative to the first position.
The evaluation of the image may comprise certifying, based on the evaluating step, a charge for a commercial transaction relating to one or more of storing or transporting the item. Alternatively or additionally, the evaluation of the image may comprise certifying, based on the evaluating step, a dimensioner for a commercial use.
An example embodiment may be implemented in which the process 500 and the process 60 (
Example Computer System and Network.
The first computer system 705 is configured operably (e.g., by software code with which it is programmed) as a dimensioner. The first computer system (“dimensioner”) 705 may comprise a mobile device such as a tablet computer, portable data terminal (PDT), smartphone, portable (or personal) digital assistant (PDA) and/or another mobile or portable computing apparatus. The dimensioner 705 may also comprise a fixed or substantially stationary computer system or component thereof. The dimensioner 705 may thus be deployed, disposed, and operated in a fixed location. The fixed location may be disposed in proximity to a site associated with a storage or transport related portal. The storage or transport portal may be associated with a logistic, commercial, industrial, agricultural, military, laboratory (e.g., certification) setting or another facility.
The dimensioner 705 is operable for communicating with other devices, such as the at least one computer 798. The dimensioner 705 is coupled communicatively via the network 728 with the computer 798. The network 728 may comprise a packet-switched data network operable based on transfer control and internetworking protocols (e.g., TCP/IP).
The data network 728 may comprise a portion of one or more other networks and/or two or more sub-network (“subnet”) components. For example, the data network 728 may comprise a portion of the internet and/or a particular wide area network (WAN). The network 728 may also comprise one or more WAN and/or local area network (LAN) subnet components. Portions of the data network 728 may be operable wirelessly and/or with wireline related means. The data network 728 may also comprise, at least in part, a digital telephone network.
The at least second computer (“computer”) 798 may comprise a mobile device. The computer 798 may also be located at a particular location, where it may be disposed in a more or less fixed, or at least stationary position or configuration. In relation to the dimensioner 705, the computer 798 may also be operable as a server and/or for performing one or more functions relating to control or centralized pooling, processing or storage of information gathered or accessed therewith, e.g., with a database 777.
For example, embodiments of the present invention may be implemented in which the dimensioner 705 is operable for sending reports 745 relating to data corresponding to the evaluation of the captured images to the computer 798 over the network 728. The computer 798 may then store the image evaluation related data in the database 777, from which it may be retrieved at a later time. The data retrieved from the database 777 may be used in evaluating other (e.g., subsequent) images.
The dimensioner 705 may also be operable for capturing images photographically (including recording video) and/or scanning and reading barcode patterns and other data presented by graphic media. The dimensioner 705 may also comprise a component 746, which is operable for scanning radio frequency identification (RFID) tags and processing data associated therewith.
The images and data associated with the barcode and/or RFID tags may be sent to the computer 798. In addition to capturing and evaluating images, the dimensioner 705 may also use scanned barcodes (and RFIDs) for reading data (e.g., inventory information, price, etc.) therefrom in relation to associated items (e.g., packages, stock, products, commodities, parts, components, etc.).
The dimensioner 705 may then send the image evaluation report 745, data relating thereto, and/or the scan related data to the computer 798 over the network 728 wirelessly, via the network 728, to the computer 798.
Upon receipt thereof, the computer 798 may be operable for processing the data related to the image evaluations and the scan related data. The scan data may relate to the image evaluation. For example, the scan data may relate to the captured images, measurements associated therewith, and/or surveys of boundaries or other information related to surface features of an item.
The scan data may relate to commercial transactions relating to the transport and/or storage of an item. The scan data may also relate to a sale, transfer or other disposition of the item and associated with the barcode or RFID tag. The processing of the data may thus allow, for example, updating the database 777 in relation to inventory, tracking shipments, etc.) based on the image evaluation and other aspects of the item associated with the scanned surface features and the barcodes (or RFID tags).
The dimensioner 705 comprises a plurality of electronic components, each of which is coupled to a data bus 702. The data bus 702 is operable for allowing each of the multiple, various electronic components of the dimensioner 705 to exchange data signals conductively with each of the other electronic components thereof.
The electronic components of the dimensioner 705 may comprise integrated circuit (IC) devices, including one or more microprocessors. The electronic components of the dimensioner 705 may also comprise other IC devices, such as a microcontroller, field-programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device (PLD) or application-specific IC (ASIC).
The microprocessors include a central processing unit (CPU) 704. The CPU 704 is operable for performing general data processing functions related to operations of the dimensioner 705. The electronic components of the dimensioner 705 may also comprise one or more other processors 744. The other microprocessors may also include a graphic processing unit (GPU) and/or digital signal processor (DSP) 704, which are each operable for performing data processing functions that may be somewhat more specialized than the general processing functions, as well as sometimes sharing some of the general processing functions with the CPU 704.
One of the processors 744 may also be operable as a “math” (mathematics) coprocessor. The math co-processor, DSP and/or GPU (“DSP/GPU”) 744 are operable for performing computationally intense data processing. The computationally intense processing relates to imaging, image evaluation, graphics, dimension measurements, wireframe manipulations, coordinate system management, logistics, and other (e.g., mathematical, financial) information.
The data processing operations comprise computations performed electronically by the CPU 704 and the DSP/GPU 744. For example, the microprocessors may comprise components operable as an arithmetic logic unit (ALU), a floating point logic unit (FPU), and associated memory cells. The memory cells comprise non-transitory data storage media, which may be configured as caches (e.g., “L1,” “L2”), registers, latches and/or buffers. The memory cells are operable for storing data electronically in relation to various functions of the processor. For example, a translational look-aside buffer (TLB) may be operable for optimizing efficiency of use of content-addressable memory (CAM) by the CPU 704 and/or the DSP/GPU 744.
The dimensioner 705 also comprises non-transitory computer readable storage media operable for storing data, e.g., electronically. For example, the dimensioner 705 comprises a main memory 706, such as a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device 706. The main memory 706 is coupled to data bus 702 for storing information and instructions, which are to be executed by the CPU 704. The main memory 706 also may be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions by the CPU 704. Other memories (represented in the present description with reference to the RAM 706) may be installed for similar uses by the DSP/GPU 744.
The dimensioner 705 further comprises a read-only memory (ROM) 708 or other static storage device coupled to the data bus 702. The ROM 708 is operable for storing static information and instructions for use by the CPU 704. In addition to the RAM 706 and the ROM 708, the non-transitory storage media of the dimensioner 705 may comprise at least one data storage device 710. The data storage device 710 is operable for storing information and instructions and allowing access thereto.
The data storage device 710 may comprise a magnetic disk drive, flash drive, or optical disk drive. The data storage device 710 comprises non-transitory media coupled to data bus 702, and may be operable for providing a “virtual memory” function. The virtual memory operations of the storage device 710 may supplement, at least temporarily, storage capacity of other non-transitory media, such as the RAM 706.
The non-transitory storage media of the dimensioner 705 also comprises instructions (“dimensioner instructions”) 755, which is stored (e.g., electronically, magnetically, optically, physically, etc.) in relation to software for programming, controlling, and/or configuring its operations relating to evaluating images and computing measurements of items featured therein. The non-transitory dimensioner instructions 755 may also (or alternatively) be stored in association with the storage 710 and other storage components of the dimensioner 705.
Non-transitory programming instructions, software, settings and configurations related to the evaluation of images are stored (e.g., magnetically, electronically, optically, physically, etc.) by a memory, flash, or drive related non-transitory storage medium 755 and/or with the non-transitory storage medium 710. The non-transitory storage medium 710 may also store a suite 788 of instructions, which relate to a suite of other functional features with which the dimensioner 705 may also be also operable, e.g., for performing other functional features.
An example embodiment may be implemented in which the suite 788 of features relates to applications, tools and tool sets, menus (and sub-menus) and macros associated with functions of dimensioner 705 related to capturing and evaluating images. The suite 788 may also relate to scanning and reading barcode patterns and RFID tags, taking photographs, recording video and/or audio information, telephonic operations, and capturing other data related to images and presentations of graphic media and other information sources.
The dimensioner 705 comprises a user-interactive touchscreen 725, which is operable as a combined graphical user interface (GUI) and display component 725. The touchscreen 725 may comprise a liquid crystal display (LCD), which is operable for rendering images by modulating variable polarization states of an array of liquid crystal transistor components. The touchscreen 725 also comprises an interface operable for receiving haptic inputs from a user.
The haptic interface of the GUI touchscreen 725 may comprise, e.g., at least two arrays of microscopic (or transparent) conductors, each of which is insulated electrically from the other and disposed beneath a surface of the display 725 in a perpendicular orientation relative to the other. The haptic inputs comprise pressure applied to the surface of the touchscreen GUI 725, which cause corresponding local changes in electrical capacitance values proximate to the pressure application that are sensed by the conductor grids to effectuate a signal corresponding to the input.
In an example embodiment, the touchscreen GUI and display component 725 is operable for rendering graphical reports 745 in relation to dimension related image evaluations. The image evaluation reports 745 are rendered by the display 725 upon receipt of data related to the dimensioning and image evaluations from the CPU 704 and/or the GPU/DSP 744.
The touchscreen GUI component 725 may be implemented operably for rendering images over a heightened (e.g., high) dynamic range (HDR), the rendering of the images may also be based on modulating a back-light unit (BLU). For example, the BLU may comprise an array of light emitting diodes (LEDs). The LCDs may be modulated according to a first signal and the LEDs of the BLU may be modulated according to a second signal. The touchscreen 725 may render an HDR image by coordinating the second modulation signal in real time, relative to the first modulation signal.
A plurality of inputs 714 may comprise one or more electromechanical switches, which may be implemented as buttons, escutcheons, or cursor controls. The inputs 714 may also comprise a keyboard. The keyboard may comprise an array of alphanumeric (and/or ideographic, syllabary based) keys operable for typing letters, number, and other symbols. The keyboard may also comprise an array of directional (e.g., “up/down,” “left/right”) keys, operable for communicating commands and data selections to the CPU 704 and for controlling movement of a cursor rendering over the touchscreen GUI display 725.
The directional keys may be operable for presenting two (2) degrees of freedom of a cursor, over at least two (2) perpendicularly disposed axes presented on the display component of the touchscreen GUI 725. A first ‘x’ axis is disposed horizontally. A second ‘y’ axis, complimentary to the first axis, is disposed vertically. Thus, the dimensioner 705 is thus operable for specifying positions over a representation of a geometric plane and/or other coordinate systems.
Audio transducers (“Xducers”) 727 have a microphone function and a speaker function. The microphone function is operable for transducing speech and other sound into corresponding electrical signals, which may be accessed via an interface 718 and processed by one or more of the electronic components of the dimensioner 705. The speaker function is operable for transducing audibly signals accessed via the interface 718, which were generated by the electronic components. The audio transducers and associated interface 714 thus allow the dimensioner 705 to function telephonically and in response to audio user commands.
The dimensioner 705 may be operable for scanning visual data such as barcode patterns and/or other images presented on printed graphic media and/or self-lit electronic displays. Example embodiments of the present invention also relate to the use of the dimensioner 705 for taking photographs and recording video. A camera component 748 is coupled to the data bus 702. The camera component 748 is operable for receiving data related to the scanned barcode patterns.
The camera component 748 is also operable for receiving static and dynamic image data related, respectively, to the photographs and the video. The camera component 748 may receive the data captured from an image sensor 749. The image sensor 749 may comprise an array of charge-coupled devices (CCDs), photodiodes (PDs), or active complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) based imaging devices. The image sensor 749 may be operable with a system of optical components (“optics”) 747. The dimensioner and image evaluation instructions 755 and the barcode scanning (and other) feature(s) of the mobile device 700 are operable with one or more of the camera component 748, the image sensor component 749, and/or the optics 747.
The electronic components of the dimensioner 705 may also comprise an RFID scanner 746 coupled to the data bus 702. The RFID scanner 746 is operable for scanning RFID tags.
Execution of instruction sequences contained in the main memory 706 causes the CPU 704 to perform process steps associated with operations of the dimensioner 705. One or more microprocessors are operable for executing instructions contained in main memory 706. Additionally and/or alternatively, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of, or in combination with the software instructions. Thus, the dimensioner 705 is not limited to any specific combination of circuitry, hardware, firmware, and/or software.
The term “computer readable storage medium,” as used herein, may refer to any non-transitory storage medium that participates in providing instructions to the CPU 704 (and the DSP/GPU 744) for execution. Such a medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media, and transmission media. Non-volatile media comprises, for example, configured/programmed active elements of the CPU 704, the DSP/GPU 744, the non-transitory stored dimensioner instructions 755 and other optical, electronic, or magnetic disks, such as storage device 710. Volatile media comprises dynamic memory associated, e.g., with the RAM 706.
Transmission media comprises coaxial cables, copper wire and other electrical conductors and fiber optics, including the wires (and/or other conductors or optics) that comprise the data bus 702.
Transmission media can also take the form of electromagnetic radiation (e.g., light waves), such as may be generated at radio frequencies (RF), and infrared (IR) and other optical frequencies. Data communications may also be effectuated using other means, including acoustic (e.g., sound related) or other mechanical, vibrational, or phonon related media.
Non-transitory computer-readable storage media may comprise, for example, flash drives such as may be accessible via universal serial bus (USB) or any medium from which a computer can read data.
Various forms of non-transitory computer readable storage media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to CPU 704 for execution. For example, the instructions may initially be carried on a magnetic or other disk of a remote computer (e.g., computer 798). The remote computer can load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over networks 728.
The dimensioner 705 can receive the data over the network 728 and use an IR, RF or other transmitter means to convert the data to corresponding signals. An IR, RF or other signal detector or receiver (“receiver”) coupled to the data bus 702 can receive the data carried in the corresponding signals and place the data on data bus 702. The operations associated with the transmitter and the receiver may be combined in a transmitter/receiver (transceiver) means. The transmitter, receiver, and/or transceiver means may be associated with the interfaces 718.
The data bus 702 carries the data to main memory 706, from which CPU 704 and the DSP/GPU 744 retrieve and execute the instructions. The instructions received by main memory 706 may optionally be stored on storage device 710 either before or after execution by CPU 704.
The interfaces 718 may comprise a communication interface coupled to the data bus 702. In addition to interfacing audio signals between the data bus 702 and the audio transducers 727, the communication interface is also operable for providing a two-way (or more) data communication coupling to a network link 720, which may connect wirelessly at radio frequencies (RF) to the network 728. Wireless communication may also be implemented optically, e.g., at IR frequencies.
In any implementation, the communication interface 718 sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic, or optical signals that carry digital data streams representing various types of information. The network link 720 provides data communication through the network 728 to other data devices. The communication interfaces 718 may also provide audio signals to the speaker 727.
The network 728 may use one or more of electrical, electromagnetic, and/or optical signals carrying digital data streams. The signals sent over the network 728 and through the network link 720 and communication interface 718 carry the digital data to and from the dimensioner 705. The dimensioner 705 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network 728, network link 720, and communication interface 718.
To supplement the present disclosure, this application incorporates entirely by reference the following commonly assigned patents, patent application publications, and patent applications:
Example embodiments of the present invention have thus been described. An example embodiment of the present invention relates to a computer implemented method for evaluating images of items. A first image of the item, having a view of two or more of its surfaces, is captured at a first time. A measurement of at least one dimension of one or more of the two or more surfaces is computed based on the first captured image and stored. A second image of the item, having a view of at least one of the two or more surfaces, is captured at a second time, which is subsequent to the first time. A measurement of the at least one dimension of the at least one of the two or more surfaces is computed. The computed measurement of the at least one dimension of the at least one of the two or more surfaces is compared to the stored first measurement. The computed measurement of the at least one dimension of the at least one of the two or more surfaces is evaluated based on the comparison. The example method may be implemented by a processor component of a computer system, based on instructions stored physically in a non-transitory computer readable storage medium component.
For clarity and brevity, as well as to avoid unnecessary or unhelpful obfuscating, obscuring, obstructing, or occluding features of an example embodiment, certain intricacies and details, which are known generally to artisans of ordinary skill in related technologies, may have been omitted or discussed in less than exhaustive detail. Any such omissions or discussions are unnecessary for describing example embodiments of the invention, and not particularly relevant to understanding of significant features, functions and aspects of the example embodiments described herein.
In the specification and/or figures, typical embodiments of the invention have been disclosed. The present invention is not limited to such example embodiments. The use of the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. The figures are schematic representations and so are not necessarily drawn to scale. Unless otherwise noted, specific terms have been used in a generic and descriptive sense and not for purposes of limitation.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3971065 | Bayer | Jul 1976 | A |
| 4279328 | Ahlbom | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4398811 | Nishioka et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4495559 | Gelatt, Jr. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4730190 | Win et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4803639 | Steele | Feb 1989 | A |
| 5220536 | Stringer et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5331118 | Jensen | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5359185 | Hanson | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5384901 | Glassner | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5548707 | LoNegro et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5555090 | Schmutz | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5590060 | Granville et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5606534 | Stringer et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5619245 | Kessler et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5655095 | LoNegro et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5661561 | Wurz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5699161 | Woodworth | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5729750 | Ishida | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5730252 | Herbinet | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5732147 | Tao | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734476 | Dlugos | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5737074 | Haga et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5767962 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5831737 | Stringer et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5850370 | Stringer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850490 | Johnson | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5869827 | Rando | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5870220 | Migdal et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5900611 | Hecht | May 1999 | A |
| 5923428 | Woodworth | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5929856 | LoNegro et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5938710 | Lanza et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5959568 | Woolley | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960098 | Tao | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5969823 | Wurz et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978512 | Kim et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5979760 | Freyman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5988862 | Kacyra | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991041 | Woodworth | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6009189 | Schaack | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6025847 | Marks | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6049386 | Stringer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6053409 | Brobst et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6064759 | Buckley et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6067110 | Nonaka et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6069696 | McQueen et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6137577 | Woodworth | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6177999 | Wurz et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6232597 | Kley | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236403 | Chaki | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246468 | Dimsdale | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6333749 | Reinhardt et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6336587 | He et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6369401 | Lee | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6373579 | Ober et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6429803 | Kumar | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6457642 | Good et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6507406 | Yagi et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6517004 | Good et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6519550 | D'Hooge et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6674904 | McQueen | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6705526 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6781621 | Gobush et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6824058 | Patel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6832725 | Gardiner et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6858857 | Pease et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6971580 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6995762 | Pavlidis et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7057632 | Yamawaki et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7085409 | Sawhney et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7086162 | Tyroler | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7104453 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7128266 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7137556 | Bonner et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7159783 | Walczyk et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7161688 | Bonner et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7214954 | Schopp | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7277187 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7307653 | Dutta | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7310431 | Gokturk et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7413127 | Ehrhart et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7527205 | Zhu | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7586049 | Wurz | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7602404 | Reinhardt et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
| 7639722 | Paxton et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7726575 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7780084 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7788883 | Buckley et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7974025 | Topliss | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8027096 | Feng et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8028501 | Buckley et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8050461 | Shpunt et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8055061 | Katano | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8102395 | Kondo et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8132728 | Dwinell et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8134717 | Pangrazio et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8149224 | Kuo et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8194097 | Xiao et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8212889 | Chanas et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8228510 | Pangrazio et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8230367 | Bell et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8294969 | Plesko | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8305458 | Hara | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8310656 | Zalewski | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8313380 | Zalewski et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8317105 | Kotlarsky et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8322622 | Liu | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8339462 | Stec et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8350959 | Topliss et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8351670 | Ijiri et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8366005 | Kotlarsky et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8371507 | Haggerty et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8376233 | Van Horn et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8381976 | Mohideen et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8381979 | Franz | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8390909 | Plesko | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8408464 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8408468 | Horn et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8408469 | Good | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8424768 | Rueblinger et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8437539 | Komatsu et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8441749 | Brown et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8448863 | Xian et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8457013 | Essinger et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8459557 | Havens et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8463079 | Ackley et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8469272 | Kearney | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8474712 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8479992 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8490877 | Kearney | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8517271 | Kotlarsky et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8523076 | Good | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8528818 | Ehrhart et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8544737 | Gomez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8548420 | Grunow et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8550335 | Samek et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8550354 | Gannon et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8550357 | Kearney | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8556174 | Kosecki et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8556176 | Van Horn et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8556177 | Hussey et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8559767 | Barber et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8561895 | Gomez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8561903 | Sauerwein | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8561905 | Edmonds et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8565107 | Pease et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8570343 | Halstead | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8571307 | Li et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8576390 | Nunnink | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8579200 | Samek et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8583924 | Caballero et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8584945 | Wang et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8587595 | Wang | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8587697 | Hussey et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8588869 | Sauerwein et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8590789 | Nahill et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8596539 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8596542 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8596543 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8599271 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8599957 | Peake et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8600158 | Li et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8600167 | Showering | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8602309 | Longacre et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8608053 | Meier et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8608071 | Liu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8611309 | Wang et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8615487 | Gomez et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8621123 | Caballero | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8622303 | Meier et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8628013 | Ding | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8628015 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8628016 | Winegar | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8629926 | Wang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8630491 | Longacre et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8635309 | Berthiaume et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8636200 | Kearney | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8636212 | Nahill et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8636215 | Ding et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8636224 | Wang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8638806 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8640958 | Lu et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8640960 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8643717 | Li et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8646692 | Meier et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8646694 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8657200 | Ren et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8659397 | Vargo et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8668149 | Good | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8678285 | Kearney | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8678286 | Smith et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8682077 | Longacre | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| D702237 | Oberpriller et al. | Apr 2014 | S |
| 8687282 | Feng et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8692927 | Pease et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8695880 | Bremer et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8698949 | Grunow et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8702000 | Barber et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8717494 | Gannon | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8720783 | Biss et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8723804 | Fletcher et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8723904 | Marty et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8727223 | Wang | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8740082 | Wilz | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8740085 | Furlong et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8746563 | Hennick et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8750445 | Peake et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8752766 | Xian et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8756059 | Braho et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8757495 | Qu et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8760563 | Koziol et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8763909 | Reed et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8777108 | Coyle | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8777109 | Oberpriller et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8779898 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8781520 | Payne et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8783573 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8789757 | Barten | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8789758 | Hawley et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8789759 | Xian et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8792688 | Unsworth | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8794520 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8794522 | Ehrhart | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8794525 | Amundsen et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8794526 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8798367 | Ellis | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8807431 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8807432 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8810779 | Hilde | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8820630 | Qu et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8822848 | Meagher | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8824692 | Sheerin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8824696 | Braho | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8842849 | Wahl et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8844822 | Kotlarsky et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8844823 | Fritz et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8849019 | Li et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| D716285 | Chaney et al. | Oct 2014 | S |
| 8851383 | Yeakley et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8854633 | Laffargue | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8866963 | Grunow et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8868421 | Braho et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8868519 | Maloy et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8868802 | Barten | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8868803 | Caballero | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8870074 | Gannon | Oct 2014 | B1 |
| 8879639 | Sauerwein | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8880426 | Smith | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8881983 | Havens et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8881987 | Wang | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8897596 | Passmore | Nov 2014 | B1 |
| 8903172 | Smith | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8908995 | Benos et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8910870 | Li et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8910875 | Ren et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8914290 | Hendrickson et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8914788 | Pettinelli et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8915439 | Feng et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8915444 | Havens et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8916789 | Woodburn | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8918250 | Hollifield | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8918564 | Caballero | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8925818 | Kosecki et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8939374 | Jovanovski et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8942480 | Ellis | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8944313 | Williams et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8944327 | Meier et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8944332 | Harding et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8950678 | Germaine et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| D723560 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2015 | S |
| 8967468 | Gomez et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8971346 | Sevier | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8976030 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8976368 | Akel et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8978981 | Guan | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8978983 | Bremer et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8978984 | Hennick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8985456 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8985457 | Soule et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8985459 | Kearney et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8985461 | Gelay et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8988578 | Showering | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8988590 | Gillet et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8991704 | Hopper et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8996194 | Davis et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8996384 | Funyak et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8998091 | Edmonds et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9002641 | Showering | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9007368 | Laffargue et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9010641 | Qu et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9014441 | Truyen et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9015513 | Murawski et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9016576 | Brady et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| D730357 | Fitch et al. | May 2015 | S |
| 9022288 | Nahill et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9030964 | Essinger et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9033240 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9033242 | Gillet et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9036054 | Koziol et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9037344 | Chamberlin | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9038911 | Xian et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9038915 | Smith | May 2015 | B2 |
| D730901 | Oberpriller et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
| D730902 | Fitch et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
| D733112 | Chaney et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
| 9047098 | Barten | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9047359 | Caballero et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9047420 | Caballero | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9047525 | Barber | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9047531 | Showering et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9049640 | Wang et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9053055 | Caballero | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9053378 | Hou et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9053380 | Xian et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9057641 | Amundsen et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9058526 | Powilleit | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9064165 | Havens et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9064167 | Xian et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9064168 | Todeschini et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9064254 | Todeschini et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9066032 | Wang | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9070032 | Corcoran | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| D734339 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2015 | S |
| D734751 | Oberpriller et al. | Jul 2015 | S |
| 9082023 | Feng et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9082195 | Holeva et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9142035 | Rotman | Sep 2015 | B1 |
| 9233470 | Bradski | Jan 2016 | B1 |
| 9299013 | Curlander | Mar 2016 | B1 |
| 9424749 | Reed et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
| 9486921 | Straszheim et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
| 20010027995 | Patel et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010032879 | He et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020054289 | Thibault et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020067855 | Chiu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020109835 | Goetz | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020118874 | Chung et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020158873 | Williamson | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020167677 | Okada et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020179708 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020196534 | Lizotte et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030038179 | Tsikos et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030053513 | Vatan et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030063086 | Baumberg | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030091227 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030156756 | Gokturk et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030197138 | Pease et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225712 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030235331 | Kawaike et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040008259 | Gokturk et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040019274 | Galloway et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024754 | Mane et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040066329 | Zeitfuss et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073359 | Ichijo et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040083025 | Yamanouchi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040089482 | Ramsden et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098146 | Katae et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040105580 | Hager et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040118928 | Patel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122779 | Stickler et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040155975 | Hart et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040165090 | Ning | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040184041 | Schopp | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040211836 | Patel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040214623 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040233461 | Armstrong et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040258353 | Gluckstad et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050006477 | Patel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050117215 | Lange | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050128196 | Popescu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050168488 | Montague | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050211782 | Martin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050264867 | Cho et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060047704 | Gopalakrishnan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078226 | Zhou | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060108266 | Bowers et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060112023 | Horhann | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060151604 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159307 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159344 | Shao et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060232681 | Okada | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060255150 | Longacre | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060269165 | Viswanathan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060291719 | Ikeda | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070003154 | Sun | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070025612 | Iwasaki et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070031064 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070063048 | Havens et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116357 | Dewaele | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127022 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070143082 | Degnan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070153293 | Gruhlke et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070171220 | Kriveshko | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070177011 | Lewin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070181685 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070237356 | Dwinell et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070291031 | Konev et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299338 | Stevick et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080013793 | Hillis et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080035390 | Wurz | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080056536 | Hildreth et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080062164 | Bassi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077265 | Boyden | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164074 | Wurz | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080204476 | Montague | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080212168 | Olmstead et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080247635 | Davis et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080273191 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080278790 | Boesser et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090059004 | Bochicchio | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090095047 | Patel | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090134221 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090195790 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090225333 | Bendall et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090237411 | Gossweiler et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090268023 | Hsieh | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090272724 | Gubler | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090273770 | Bauhahn et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313948 | Buckley et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090323084 | Dunn et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090323121 | Valkenburg | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100035637 | Varanasi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100060604 | Zwart | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100091104 | Sprigle | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100118200 | Gelman | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100128109 | Banks | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100161170 | Siris | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100171740 | Andersen | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100172567 | Prokoski | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177076 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177080 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177707 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177749 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100202702 | Benos et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100208039 | Stettner | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211355 | Horst et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217678 | Goncalves | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100220849 | Colbert et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100220894 | Ackley et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223276 | Al-Shameri | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100245850 | Lee et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100254611 | Arnz | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100303336 | Abraham | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100315413 | Izadi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110019155 | Daniel et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040192 | Brenner et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110043609 | Choi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110099474 | Grossman et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110169999 | Grunow et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110188054 | Petronius et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110188741 | Sones et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202554 | Powilleit et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110234389 | Mellin | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110235854 | Berger | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110249864 | Venkatesan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110254840 | Halstead | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110279916 | Brown et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110286007 | Pangrazio et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110286628 | Goncalves et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110288818 | Thierman | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301994 | Tieman | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110303748 | Lemma et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110310227 | Konertz | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120024952 | Chen | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120056982 | Katz et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120057345 | Kuchibhotla | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120067955 | Rowe | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120074227 | Ferren et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120081714 | Pangrazio et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120111946 | Golant | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120113223 | Hilliges et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120113250 | Farlotti et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120126000 | Kunzig et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120140300 | Freeman | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120168512 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179665 | Baarman et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185094 | Rosenstein et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120190386 | Anderson | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120193423 | Samek | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197464 | Wang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203647 | Smith | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120218436 | Rodriguez et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120223141 | Good et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120224026 | Bayer et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120236288 | Stanley | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120242852 | Hayward et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120256901 | Bendall | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120262558 | Boger et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120280908 | Rhoads et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120282905 | Owen | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120282911 | Davis et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284012 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284122 | Brandis | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284339 | Rodriguez | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284593 | Rodriguez | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120293610 | Doepke et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120294549 | Doepke | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120299961 | Ramkumar et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120300991 | Free | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120313848 | Galor et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120314030 | Datta | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120314058 | Bendall et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120316820 | Nakazato et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130038881 | Pesach et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130038941 | Pesach et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130043312 | Van Horn | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130050426 | Sarmast et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130075168 | Amundsen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130094069 | Lee et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130101158 | Lloyd et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130175341 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130175343 | Good | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200150 | Reynolds et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130201288 | Billerbeck et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130208164 | Cazier et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211790 | Loveland et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130223673 | Davis et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130257744 | Daghigh et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130257759 | Daghigh | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130270346 | Xian et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130287258 | Kearney | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130291998 | Konnerth | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130292475 | Kotlarsky et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130292477 | Hennick et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130293539 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130293540 | Laffargue et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130306728 | Thuries et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130306731 | Pedrao | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130307964 | Bremer et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130308013 | Li et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130308625 | Park et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130313324 | Koziol et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130313325 | Wilz et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130329012 | Bartos | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130329013 | Metois et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130342343 | Harring et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130342717 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140001267 | Giordano et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140002828 | Laffargue et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140008439 | Wang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140009586 | McNamer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140021259 | Moed et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140025584 | Liu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140031665 | Pinto et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140034731 | Gao et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140034734 | Sauerwein | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140036848 | Pease et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140039693 | Havens et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140042814 | Kather et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140049120 | Kohtz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140049635 | Laffargue et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140058612 | Wong et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140061306 | Wu et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140063289 | Hussey et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140066136 | Sauerwein et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140067104 | Osterhout | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140067692 | Ye et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140070005 | Nahill et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140071840 | Venancio | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140074746 | Wang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140076974 | Havens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140078341 | Havens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140078342 | Li et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140078345 | Showering | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140091147 | Evans et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140097238 | Ghazizadeh | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140098091 | Hori | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140098792 | Wang et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100774 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100813 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140103115 | Meier et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140104413 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140104414 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140104416 | Giordano et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140104451 | Todeschini et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140104664 | Lee | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140106594 | Skvoretz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140106725 | Sauerwein | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108010 | Maltseff et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108402 | Gomez et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108682 | Caballero | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140110485 | Toa et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140114530 | Fitch et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140124577 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140124579 | Ding | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140125842 | Winegar | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140125853 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140125999 | Longacre et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140129378 | Richardson | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140131438 | Kearney | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140131441 | Nahill et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140131443 | Smith | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140131444 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140131445 | Ding et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140131448 | Xian et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140133379 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140135984 | Hirata | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140136208 | Maltseff et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140139654 | Takahashi | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140140585 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140151453 | Meier et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140152882 | Samek et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140152975 | Ko | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140158468 | Adami | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140158770 | Sevier et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140159869 | Zumsteg et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140166755 | Liu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140166757 | Smith | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140166759 | Liu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140168380 | Heidemann et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140168787 | Wang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140175165 | Havens et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140175172 | Jovanovski et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140191644 | Chaney | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140191913 | Ge et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140192187 | Atwell et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140192551 | Masaki | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140197238 | Liu et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140197239 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140197304 | Feng et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140203087 | Smith et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140204268 | Grunow et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140205150 | Ogawa | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140214631 | Hansen | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140217166 | Berthiaume et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140217180 | Liu | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140225918 | Mittal et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140225985 | Klusza et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140231500 | Ehrhart et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140232930 | Anderson | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140240464 | Lee | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140247279 | Nicholas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140247280 | Nicholas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140247315 | Marty et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140263493 | Amurgis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140263645 | Smith et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140267609 | Laffargue | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140268093 | Tohme et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140270196 | Braho et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140270229 | Braho | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140270361 | Amma et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140278387 | DiGregorio | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140282210 | Bianconi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140284384 | Lu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140288933 | Braho et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140297058 | Barker et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140299665 | Barber et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140306833 | Ricci | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140307855 | Withagen et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140312121 | Lu et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140313527 | Askan | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140319219 | Liu et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140319220 | Coyle | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140319221 | Oberpriller et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140320408 | Zagorsek et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140326787 | Barten | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140332590 | Wang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140344943 | Todeschini et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140346233 | Liu et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140347553 | Ovsiannikov et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140350710 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140351317 | Smith et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140353373 | Van Horn et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140361073 | Qu et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140361082 | Xian et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140362184 | Jovanovski et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140363015 | Braho | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140369511 | Sheerin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140374483 | Lu | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140374485 | Xian et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140379613 | Nishitani et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150001301 | Ouyang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150001304 | Todeschini | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150003673 | Fletcher | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150009301 | Ribnick et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150009338 | Laffargue et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150009610 | London et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150014416 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150021397 | Rueblinger et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150028102 | Ren et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150028103 | Jiang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150028104 | Ma et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150029002 | Yeakley et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150032709 | Maloy et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150036876 | Marrion et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150039309 | Braho et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150040378 | Saber et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150048168 | Fritz et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150049347 | Laffargue et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150051992 | Smith | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150053766 | Havens et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150053768 | Wang et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150053769 | Thuries et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150062366 | Liu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150062369 | Gehring et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150063215 | Wang | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150063676 | Lloyd et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150069130 | Gannon | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150071819 | Todeschini | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150083800 | Li et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150086114 | Todeschini | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150088522 | Hendrickson et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150096872 | Woodburn | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150099557 | Pettinelli et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150100196 | Hollifield | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150102109 | Huck | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150115035 | Meier et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150116498 | Vartiainen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150127791 | Kosecki et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150128116 | Chen et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150129659 | Feng et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150133047 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150134470 | Hejl et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150136851 | Harding et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150136854 | Lu et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150142492 | Kumar | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150144692 | Hejl | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150144698 | Teng et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150144701 | Xian et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150149946 | Benos et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150161429 | Xian | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150163474 | You | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150169925 | Chen et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150169929 | Williams et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150186703 | Chen et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150193644 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150193645 | Colavito et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150199957 | Funyak et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150204662 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150204671 | Showering | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150213647 | Laffargue et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150229838 | Hakim et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150269403 | Lei et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150276379 | Ni et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150301181 | Herschbach | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150308816 | Laffargue et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150325036 | Lee | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150355470 | Herschbach | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160048725 | Holz et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160063429 | Varley et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160090283 | Svensson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160090284 | Svensson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160138247 | Conway et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160138248 | Conway et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160138249 | Conway et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160169665 | Deschenes et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160187186 | Coleman et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160187210 | Coleman et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160191801 | Sivan | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160202478 | Masson et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20170115490 | Hsieh et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2004212587 | Apr 2005 | AU |
| 3335760 | Apr 1985 | DE |
| 10210813 | Oct 2003 | DE |
| 102007037282 | Mar 2008 | DE |
| 1111435 | Jun 2001 | EP |
| 1443312 | Aug 2004 | EP |
| 2286932 | Feb 2011 | EP |
| 2381421 | Oct 2011 | EP |
| 2533009 | Dec 2012 | EP |
| 2722656 | Apr 2014 | EP |
| 2779027 | Sep 2014 | EP |
| 2833323 | Feb 2015 | EP |
| 2843590 | Mar 2015 | EP |
| 2845170 | Mar 2015 | EP |
| 2966595 | Jan 2016 | EP |
| 3006893 | Mar 2016 | EP |
| 3012601 | Mar 2016 | EP |
| 3007096 | Apr 2016 | EP |
| 2503978 | Jan 2014 | GB |
| 2531928 | May 2016 | GB |
| H04129902 | Apr 1992 | JP |
| 2008210276 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 2014210646 | Nov 2014 | JP |
| 20110013200 | Feb 2011 | KR |
| 20110117020 | Oct 2011 | KR |
| 20120028109 | Mar 2012 | KR |
| 9640452 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| 0077726 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| 0114836 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| 2006095110 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| 2007015059 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| 2011017241 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| 2012175731 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2013021157 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2013033442 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| 2013163789 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2013166368 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2013173985 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2013184340 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| 2014019130 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| 2014102341 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| 2014110495 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| 2014149702 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014151746 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2015006865 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| 2016020038 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| 2016061699 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,179 for Dimensioning System With Multipath Interference Mitigation, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Thuries et al.); 30 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/264,173 for Autofocus Lens System for Indicia Readers, filed Apr. 29, 2014, (Ackley et al.); 39 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/453,019 for Dimensioning System With Guided Alignment, filed Aug. 6, 2014 (Li et al.); 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,697 for Interactive Indicia Reader , filed Aug. 6, 2014, (Todeschini); 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/231,898 for Hand-Mounted Indicia-Reading Device with Finger Motion Triggering, filed Apr. 1, 2014 (Van Horn et al.); 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,916 for Evaluating Image Values, filed May 19, 2015 (Ackley); 60 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,808 for Identifying Inventory Items in a Storage Facility, filed Oct. 14, 2014 (Singel et al.); 51 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/458,405 for an Electronic Device, filed Jun. 19, 2013 (Fitch et al.); 22 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/459,620 for an Electronic Device Enclosure, filed Jul. 2, 2013 (London et al.); 21 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/483,056 for Variable Depth of Field Barcode Scanner, filed Sep. 10, 2014 (McCloskey et al.); 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/531,154 for Directing an Inspector Through an Inspection, filed Nov. 3, 2014 (Miller et al.); 53 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/525,068 for Tablet Computer With Removable Scanning Device, filed Apr. 27, 2015 (Schulte et al.); 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/468,118 for an Electronic Device Case, filed Sep. 26, 2013 (Oberpriller et al.); 44 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/340,627 for an Axially Reinforced Flexible Scan Element, filed Jul. 25, 2014 (Reublinger et al.); 41 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/676,327 for Device Management Proxy for Secure Devices, filed Apr. 1, 2015 (Yeakley et al.); 50 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,364 for Docking System and Method Using Near Field Communication, filed Apr. 21, 2014 (Showering); 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/327,827 for a Mobile-Phone Adapter for Electronic Transactions, filed Jul. 10, 2014 (Hejl); 25 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,934 for a System and Method for Indicia Verification, filed Jul. 18, 2014 (Hejl); 38 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/530,600 for Cyclone, filed Jun. 18, 2015 (Vargo et al); 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/707,123 for Application Independent DEX/UCS Interface, filed May 8, 2015 (Pape); 47 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,282 for Terminal Having Illumination and Focus Control, filed May 21, 2014 (Liu et al.); 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/619,093 for Methods for Training a Speech Recognition System, filed Feb. 11, 2015 (Pecorari); 35 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/524,186 for Scanner, filed Apr. 17, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,407 for Method and System to Protect Software-Based Network-Connected Devices From Advanced Persistent Threat, filed May 6, 2015 (Hussey et al.); 42 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,706 for Device for Supporting an Electronic Tool on a User's Hand, filed Feb. 5, 2015 (Oberpriller et al.); 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,708 for Device, System, and Method for Determining the Status of Checkout Lanes, filed Feb. 23, 2015 (Todeschini); 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/704,050 for Intermediate Linear Positioning, filed May 5, 2015 (Charpentier et al.); 60 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,563 for Adaptable Interface for a Mobile Computing Device, filed Oct. 31, 2014 (Schoon et al.); 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,012 for Hands-Free Human Machine Interface Responsive to a Driver of a Vehicle, filed May 6, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 44 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,672 for Augumented Reality Enabled Hazard Display, filed May 19, 2015 (Venkatesha et al.); 35 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,364 for Medication Management System, filed Apr. 24, 2015 (Sewell et al.); 44 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/664,063 for Method and Application for Scanning a Barcode With a Smart Device While Continuously Running and Displaying an Application on the Smart Device Display, filed Mar. 20, 2015 (Todeschini); 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/735,717 for Indicia-Reading Systems Having an Interface With a User's Nervous System, filed Jun. 10, 2015 (Todeschini); 39 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/527,191 for Method and System for Recognizing Speech Using Wildcards in an Expected Response, filed Oct. 29, 2014 (Braho et al.); 45 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,110 for System and Method for Regulating Barcode Data Injection Into a Running Application on a Smart Device, filed May 1, 2015 (Todeschini et al.); 38 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/535,764 for Concatenated Expected Responses for Speech Recognition, filed Nov. 7, 2014 (Braho et al.); 51 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/687,289 for System for Communication Via a Peripheral Hub, filed Apr. 15, 2015 (Kohtz et al.); 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,197 for Optical Pattern Projector, filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Thuries et al.); 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/674,329 for Aimer for Barcode Scanning, filed Mar. 31, 2015 (Bidwell); 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,979 for Tracking Battery Conditions, filed May 4, 2015 (Young et al.); 70 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/529,441 for Indicia Reading Device, filed Jun. 8, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 14 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,490 for Dual-Projector Three-Dimensional Scanner, filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Jovanovski et al.); 40 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,320 for Tactile Switch for a Mobile Electronic Device, filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Barndringa); 38 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,923 for Secure Unattended Network Authentication, filed Apr. 24, 2015 (Kubler et al.); 52 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,373 for Calibrating a Volume Dimensioner, filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Ackley et al.); 63 pages. |
| Lloyd, Ryan and Scott McCloskey, “Recognition of 3D Package Shapes for Singe Camera Metrology” IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of computer Visiona, IEEE, Mar. 24, 2014, pp. 99-106, {retrieved on Jun. 16, 2014}, Authors are employees of common Applicant. |
| Search Report and Opinion in related GB Application No. 1517112.7, Dated Feb. 19, 2016, 6 Pages. |
| European Search Report for Related EP Application No. 15189214.8, dated Mar. 3, 2016, 9 pages. |
| “A one-step intrinsic and extrinsic calibration method for laster line scanner operation in coordinate measuring machines”, dated Apr. 1, 2009, Measurement Science and Technology, IOP, Bristol, GB, vol. 20, No. 4; 12 pages. |
| Search Report and Opinion in Related EP Application 15176943.7, Dated Jan. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
| European Search Report for related EP Application No. 15188440.0, Dated Mar. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
| United Kingdom Search Report in related application GB1517842.9, dated Apr. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Great Britain Search Report for related Application On. GB1517843.7, Dated Feb. 23, 2016; 8 pages. |
| European Extended search report in related EP Application No. 15190306.9, Dated Sep. 9, 2016, 15 pages. |
| Collings et al., “The Applications and Technology of Phase-Only Liquid Crystal on Silicon Devices”, Journal of Display Technology, IEEE Service Center, New, York, NY, US, vol. 7, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2011 (Mar. 1, 2011), pp. 112-119. |
| Second Chinese Office Action in related CN Application No. 201520810685.6, Dated Mar. 22, 2016, 5 pages, no references. |
| European Search Report in related EP Application No. 15190315.0, Dated Apr. 1, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Second Chinese Office Action in related CN Application No. 2015220810562.2, Dated Mar. 22, 2016, 5 pages. English Translation provided [No references]. |
| European Search Report for related Application EP 15190249.1, Dated Mar. 22, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Second Chinese Office Action in related CN Application No. 201520810313.3, Dated Mar. 22, 2016, 5 pages. English Translation provided [No references]. |
| European Search Report for related EP Application No. 16152477.2, dated May 24, 2016, 8 pages. |
| European Partial Search Report for related EP Application No. 15190306.9, dated May 6, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Mike Stensvold, “Get the Most Out of Variable Aperture Lenses”, published on www.OutdoorPhotogrpaher.com; dated Dec. 7, 2010; 4 pages, [As noted on search report retrieved from URL: http;//www.outdoorphotographer.com/gear/lenses/get-the-most-out-ofvariable-aperture-lenses.html on Feb. 9, 2016]. |
| M.Zahid Gurbuz, Selim Akyokus, Ibrahim Emiroglu, Aysun Guran, An Efficient Algorithm for 3D Rectangular Box Packing, 2009, Applied Automatic Systems: Proceedings of Selected AAS 2009 Papers, pp. 131-134. |
| Office Action in counterpart European Application No. 13186043.9 dated Sep. 30, 2015, pp. 1-7. |
| Lloyd et al., “System for Monitoring the Condition of Packages Throughout Transit”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/865,575, filed Sep. 25, 2015, 59 pages, not yet published. |
| James Chamberlin, “System and Method for Picking Validation”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/865,797, filed Sep. 25, 2015, 44 pages, not yet published. |
| Jovanovski et al., “Image-Stitching for Dimensioning”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/870,488, filed Sep. 30, 2015, 45 pages, not yet published. |
| Todeschini et al.; “Depth Sensor Based Auto-Focus System for an Indicia Scanner,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/872,176, filed Oct. 1, 2015, 44 pages, not yet published. |
| Wikipedia, “3D projection” Downloaded on Nov. 25, 2015 from www.wikipedia.com, 4 pages. |
| McCloskey et al., “Methods for Improving the Accuracy of Dimensioning-System Measurements,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/873,613, filed Sep. 2, 2015, 47 pages, not yet published. |
| Search Report in counterpart European Application No. 15182675.7, Dated Dec. 4, 2015, 10 pages. |
| McCloskey et al., “Image Transformation for Indicia Reading,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/982,032, filed Oct. 30, 2015, 48 pages, not yet published. |
| Great Britain Combined Search and Examination Report in related Application GB1517842.9, Dated Apr. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Peter Clarke, Actuator Developer Claims Anti-Shake Breakthrough for Smartphone Cams, Electronic Engineering Times, p. 24, May 16, 2011. |
| Spiller, Jonathan; Object Localization Using Deformable Templates, Master's Dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2007; 74 pages. |
| Leotta, Matthew J.; Joseph L. Mundy; Predicting High Resolution Image Edges with a Generic, Adaptive, 3-D Vehicle Model; IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009; 8 pages. |
| European Search Report for application No. EP13186043 dated Feb. 26, 2014 (now EP2722656 (Apr. 23, 2014)); Total pp. 7. |
| International Search Report for PCT/US2013/039438 (WO2013166368), Oct. 1, 2013, 7 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/453,019, not yet published, filed Aug. 6, 2014, Hand Held Products Inc., Dimensioning System With Guided Alignment: 31 pages. |
| European Office Action for application EP 13186043, dated Jun. 12, 2014(now EP2722656 (Apr. 23, 2014)), Total of 6 pages. |
| Zhang, Zhaoxiang; Tieniu Tan, Kaiqi Huang, Yunhong Wang; Three-Dimensional Deformable-Model-based Localization and Recognition of Road Vehicles; IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 21, No. 1, Jan. 2012, 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/801,023, Tyler Doomenbal et al., filed Jul. 16, 2015, not published yet, Adjusting Dimensioning Results Using Augmented Reality, 39 pages. |
| Wikipedia, YUV description and definition, downloaded from http://www.wikipeida.org/wiki/YUV on Jun. 29, 2012, 10 pages. |
| YUV Pixel Format, downloaded from http://www.fource.org/yuv.php on Jun. 29, 2012; 13 pages. |
| YUV to RGB Conversion, downloaded from http://www.fource.org/fccyvrgb.php on Jun. 29, 2012; 5 pages. |
| Benos et al., “Semi-Automatic Dimensioning with Imager of a Portable Device,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/149,912, filed Feb. 4, 2009 (now expired), 56 pages. |
| Dimensional Weight—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional—weight, download date Aug. 1, 2008, 2 pages. |
| Dimensioning—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensioning, download date Aug. 1, 2008, 1 page. |
| European Patent Office Action for Application No. 14157971.4-1906, Dated Jul. 16, 2014, 5 pages. |
| European Patent Search Report for Application No. 14157971.4-1906, Dated Jun. 30, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Caulier, Yannick et al., “A New Type of Color-Coded Light Structures for an Adapted and Rapid Determination of Point Correspondences for 3D Reconstruction.” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 8082 808232-3; 2011; 8 pages. |
| Kazantsev, Aleksei et al. “Robust Pseudo-Random Coded Colored STructured Light Techniques for 3D Object Model Recovery”; ROSE 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Robotic and Sensors Environments (Oct. 17-18, 2008) , 6 pages. |
| Mouaddib E. et al. “Recent Progress in Structured Light in order to Solve the Correspondence Problem in Stereo Vision” Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 1997; 7 pages. |
| Proesmans, Marc et al. “Active Acquisition of 3D Shape for Moving Objects” 0-7803-3258-X/96 1996 IEEE; 4 pages. |
| Salvi, Joaquim et al. “Pattern Codification Strategies in Structured Light Systems” published in Pattern Recognition; The Journal of the Pattern Recognition Society, Received Mar. 6, 2003; Accepted Oct. 2, 2003; 23 pages. |
| EP Search and Written Opinion Report in related matter EP Application No. 14181437.6, Dated Mar. 26, 2015, 7 pages. |
| Hetzel, Gunter et al.; “3D Object Recognition from Range Images using Local Feature Histograms,”, Proceedings 2001 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001. Kauai, Hawaii, Dec. 8-14, 2001; pp. 394-399, XP010584149, ISBN: 978-0-7695-1272-3. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,179, Serge Thuries et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, not published yet. Dimensioning System With Multipath Interference Mitigation; 40 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,249, H. Sprague Ackley et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, not published yet. Handheld Dimensioning System With Measurement-Conformance Feedback; 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,233, Franck Laffargue et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, not published yet. Handheld Dimensioner With Data-Quality Indication; 34 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,211, H. Sprague Ackley et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, System and Method for Dimensioning; not published yet. 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,195, Franck Laffargue et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, not published yet. Handheld Dimensioning System With Feedback; 35 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,757 , Eric Todeschini, filed Jul. 16, 2015, not published yet, Dimensioning and Imaging Items, 80 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,197, Serge Thuries et al., filed Jun. 23, 2015, not published yet, Optical Pattern Projector; 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,490, Brian L. Jovanovski et al., filed Jun. 23, 2015, not published yet, Dual-Projector Three-Dimensional Scanner; 40 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,916, H. Sprague Ackley, filed May 19, 2015, not published yet, Evaluating Image Values; 54 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/793,149, H. Sprague Ackley, filed Jul. 7, 2015, not published yet, Mobile Dimensioner Apparatus for Use in Commerce; 57 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,373, H. Sprague Ackley et al., filed Jun. 16, 2015, not published yet, Calibrating a Volume Dimensioner; 63 pages. |
| Intention to Grant in counterpart European Application No. 14157971.4 dated Apr. 14, 2015, pp. 1-8. |
| Decision to Grant in counterpart European Application No. 14157971.4 dated Aug. 6, 2015, pp. 1-2. |
| Leotta, Matthew, Generic, Deformable Models for 3-D Vehicle Surveillance, May 2010, Doctoral Dissertation, Brown University, Providence RI, 248 pages. |
| Ward, Benjamin, Interactive 3D Reconstruction from Video, Aug. 2012, Doctoral Thesis, Univesity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 157 pages. |
| Hood, Frederick W.; William A. Hoff, Robert King, Evaluation of an Interactive Technique for Creating Site Models from Range Data, Apr. 27-May 1, 1997 Proceedings of the ANS 7th Topical Meeting on Robotics & Remote Systems, Augusta GA, 9 pages. |
| Gupta, Alok; Range Image Segmentation for 3-D Objects Recognition, May 1988, Technical Reports (CIS), Paper 736, University of Pennsylvania Department of Computer and Information Science, retrieved from Http://repository.upenn.edu/cis—reports/736, Accessed May 31, 2015, 157 pages. |
| Reisner-Kollmann,Irene; Anton L. Fuhrmann, Werner Purgathofer, Interactive Reconstruction of Industrial Sites Using Parametric Models, May 2010, Proceedings of the 26th Spring Conference of Computer Graphics SCCG ″10, 8 pages. |
| Drummond, Tom; Roberto Cipolla, Real-Time Visual Tracking of Complex Structures, Jul. 2002, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 24, No. 7; 15 pages. |
| European extended Search report in related EP Application 13785171.3, dated Sep. 19, 2016, 8 pages. |
| El-Hakim et al., “Multicamera vision-based approach to flexible feature measurement for inspection and reverse engineering”, published in Optical Engineering, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, vol. 32, No. 9, Sep. 1, 1993, 15 pages. |
| El-Hakim et al., “A Knowledge-based Edge/Object Measurement Technique”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sabry—E1 -Hakim/publication/44075058—A—Knowledge—Based—EdgeObject—Measurement—Technique/links/00b4953b5faa7d3304000000.pdf [retrieved on Jul. 15, 2016] dated Jan. 1, 1993, 9 pages. |
| European Search Report from related EP Application No. 16168216.6, Dated Oct. 20, 2016, 8 pages. |
| European Extended Search Report in Related EP Application No. 16172995.9, Dated Aug. 22, 2016, 11 pages. |
| United Kingdom combined Search and Examination Report in related GB Application No. 1607394.2, Dated Oct. 19, 2016, 7 pages. |
| European Extended Search Report in related EP Application No. 16173429.8, dated Dec. 1, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report in related EP Application No. 16175410.0, dated Dec. 13, 2016, 5 pages. |
| Padzensky, Ron; “Augmera; Gesture Control”, Dated Apr. 18, 2015, 15 pages. |
| Grabowski, Ralph; “New Commands in AutoCADS 2010: Part 11 Smoothing 3D Mesh Objects” Dated 2011, 6 pages. |
| Theodoropoulos, Gabriel; “Using Gesture Recognizers to Handle Pinch, Rotate, Pan, Swipe, and Tap Gestures” dated Aug. 25, 2014, 34 pages. |
| European Extended Search Report in related EP Application No. 16190017.0, dated Jan. 4, 2017, 6 pages. |
| European Examination report in related EP Application No. 14181437.6, dated Feb. 8, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Wikipedia, “Microlens”, Downloaded from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microlens, pp. 3. {Feb. 9, 2017 Final Office Action in related matter}. |
| Fukaya et al., “Characteristics of Speckle Random Pattern and Its Applications”, pp. 317-327, Nouv. Rev. Optique, t.6, n.6. (1975) {Feb. 9, 2017 Final Office Action in related matter: downloaded Mar. 2, 2017 from http://iopscience.iop.org}. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,978, filed Feb. 7, 2012, (Feng et al.); now abandoned. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,801 for Mobile Computing Device With Data Cognition Software, filed Aug. 19, 2014 (Todeschini et al.); 38 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/596,757 for System and Method for Detecting Barcode Printing Errors, filed Jan. 14, 2015 (Ackley); 41 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/277,337 for Multipurpose Optical Reader, filed May 14, 2014 (Jovanovski et al.); 59 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,405 for Indicia Reader for Size-Limited Applications, filed Mar. 7, 2014 (Feng et al.); 42 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/662,922 for Multifunction Point of Sale System, filed Mar. 19, 2015 (Van Horn et al.); 41 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/446,391 for Multifunction Point of Sale Apparatus With Optical Signature Capture, filed Jul. 30, 2014 (Good et al.); 37 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,165 for In-Counter Barcode Scanner, filed May 27, 2015 (Oberpriller et al.); 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,890 for Mobile Computer Housing, filed Jun. 2, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 61 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,796 for Cargo Apportionment Techniques, filed Feb. 5, 2015 (Morton et al.); 56 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/516,892 for Table Computer, filed Feb. 6, 2015 (Bidwell et al.); 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/523,098 for Handle for a Tablet Computer, filed Apr. 7, 2015 (Bidwell et al.); 17 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/578,627 for Safety System and Method, filed Dec. 22, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,022 for Dynamic Diagnostic Indicator Generation, filed Dec. 17, 2014 (Goldsmith); 43 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,857 for Barcode Reader With Security Features, filed Oct. 31, 2014 (Todeschini et al.); 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,195 for Handheld Dimensioning System With Feedback, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Laffargue et al.); 39 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,211 for System and Method for Dimensioning, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,233 for Handheld Dimensioner With Data-Quality Indication, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Laffargue et al.); 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/533,319 for Barcode Scanning System Using Wearable Device With Embedded Camera, filed Nov. 5, 2014 (Todeschini); 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/748,446 for Cordless Indicia Reader With a Multifunction Coil for Wireless Charging and EAS Deactivation, filed Jun. 24, 2015 (Xie et al.); 34 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,590 for Electronic Device, filed May 29, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,249 for Handheld Dimensioning System With Measurement-Conformance Feedback, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 36 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/519,017 for Scanner, filed Mar. 2, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 11 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/398,542 for Portable Electronic Devices Having a Separate Location Trigger Unit for Use in Controlling an Application Unit, filed Nov. 3, 2014 (Bian et al.); 22 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/405,278 for Design Pattern for Secure Store, filed Mar. 9, 2015 (Zhu et al.); 23 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/590,024 for Shelving and Package Locating Systems for Delivery Vehicles, filed Jan. 6, 2015 (Payne); 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/568,305 for Auto-Contrast Viewfinder for an Indicia Reader, filed Dec. 12, 2014 (Todeschini); 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/526,918 for Charging Base, filed May 14, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/580,262 for Media Gate for Thermal Transfer Printers, filed Dec. 23, 2014 (Bowles); 36 pages. |
| European extended search report in related EP Application 16190833.0, dated Mar. 9, 2017, 8 pages. |
| United Kingdom Combined Search and Examination Report in related Application No. GB1620676.5, dated Mar. 8, 2017, 6 pages. |
| European Exam Report in related, EP Application No. 16168216.6, dated Feb. 27, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Thorlabs, Examiner Cited NPL in Advisory Action dated Apr. 12, 2017 in related commonly owned application, downloaded from https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup—id=6430, 4 pages. |
| Eksma Optics, Examiner Cited NPL in Advisory Action dated Apr. 12, 2017 in related commonly owned application, downloaded from http://eksmaoptics.com/optical-systems/f-theta-lenses/f-theta-lens-for-1064-nm/, 2 pages. |
| Sill Optics, Examiner Cited NPL in Advisory Action dated Apr. 12, 2017 in related commonly owned application, http://www.silloptics.de/1/products/sill-encyclopedia/laser-optics/f-theta-lenses/, 4 pages. |
| European Exam Report in related EP Application No. 15176943.7, dated Apr. 12, 2017, 6 pages. |
| European Exam Report in related EP Application No. 15188440.0, dated Apr. 21, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Ralph Grabowski, “Smothing 3D Mesh Objects,” New Commands in AutoCAD 2010: Part 11, Examiner Cited art in related matter Non Final Office Action dated May 19, 2017; 6 pages. |
| Chinese Notice of Reexamination in related Chinese Application 201520810313.3, dated Mar. 14, 2017, English Computer Translation provided, 7 pages. |
| Extended European search report in related EP Application 16199707.7, dated Apr. 10, 2017, 15 pages. |
| Ulusoy et al., One-Shot Scanning using De Bruijn Spaced Grids, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops, 7 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160343176 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
