The present invention pertains to exoskeletons that assist people in carrying heavy loads through the use of flexible structures, this being uniquely possible because of the parallel nature of exoskeletons. Although it is not obvious that a flexible structure can bear weight, it is possible in the case of exoskeleton design because an exoskeleton acts in parallel with a person, similar to the way scaffolding works in parallel with a building.
There exists a body of exoskeleton design having different theories regarding load carriage and related problems. These theories are divided into several categories as discussed below.
Energy Transfer
Energy transferring exoskeletons seek to reduce metabolic cost by transferring power from an exoskeleton to a person. To do so, the exoskeleton creates a force in the direction of the person's motion, and the person must accommodate the addition of that force to his/her gait cycle, for example. This does not require that the force is identical to one that the person would generate during walking (i.e., it need not be correspond to clinical gait analysis data) or that the force be applied across a single degree of freedom. Examples of such devices include most military systems. While these devices can help reduce metabolic cost, they do not provide any support to the load, thereby requiring that the person bear any load through his/her body and increasing the possibility of load-related injuries.
Table 1, which is reproduced from Friedl et al., Military Quantitative Physiology: Problems and Concepts in Military Operational Medicine, Fort Detrick, Office of the Surgeon General, 2012, lists sources of injury among soldiers during a road march. The original study listed a 46 kg load, and the major causes of injury during marching were: blisters, back pain, metatarsalgia, leg strain, sprains, knee pain and foot contusions. Friedl et al. notes that “[i]njuries associated with load carriage, although generally minor, can adversely affect an individual's mobility and thus reduce the effectiveness of an entire unit”. Exoskeleton designs that seek to minimize metabolic cost without assisting in reducing the load borne by a person will not address such injuries.
Parallel Load Path
An exoskeleton using a parallel load path employs a rigid frame that transfers the weight of a load attached to the exoskeleton directly to the ground. By careful selection of the geometry, it is possible to transfer nearly the entire load to the ground during the stance phase. For example, Walsh, “A Quasi-Passive Leg Exoskeleton for Load-Carrying Augmentation”, International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, Vol. 4.3, 2007, pp. 487-506 includes experimental data showing that approximately 80% of the load is transferred to the ground in single stance. In some designs, limited actuation such as clutched springs and dampers are used to control motion at the hip or, more commonly, the knee. The principle difficulty is that flexion resistance at the knee must cease before the person attempts to move a leg to the swing cycle. Furthermore, the rigid elements may be difficult to size and have a deleterious impact on metabolic cost. While these devices can help bear the weight of a load, they often incur a high metabolic cost due to the rigid, high inertia structural elements. Attaching significant distal mass to the legs of a person is well known to impart a significant metabolic cost. Furthermore, the designs are complex, requiring numerous bearings and rotations to accommodate normal human motion.
Full Frame, Full Power Exoskeletons
In a full frame, full power exoskeleton, a rigid frame is outfitted with n degrees of freedom and n corresponding actuators, with each actuator being sized according to the torque requirements of the exoskeleton and payload weights. In some embodiments, there may be unactuated degrees of freedom (i.e., n degrees of freedom and in actuators where in <n), but the number of actuated degrees of freedom is high: at least six and often a dozen or more. A control scheme that seeks to minimize human-exoskeleton forces, either through direct measurement or estimation, ensures that all of the load attached to the exoskeleton is borne by the exoskeleton. The limitation of this type of device is the incredible power budget required, typically in the kilowatts range, which inescapably results in liquid-fueled power supplies. Examples include the UC Berkeley BLEEX and SARCO Raytheon XOS2. Although such devices have the potential to bear loads while not incurring large metabolic costs, they have proven impractical in implementation. In particular, the power and complexity required to drive the rigid frame elements make the devices essentially unusable.
Current State of the Art
As shown above, the prior art is not well suited to assist in load carriage. Devices that purely seek to address metabolic cost will not significantly reduce joint pain or injuries and may not decrease completion time. Load bearing devices that seek to reduce joint pain or injuries are too heavy to assist with metabolic cost. Full frame exoskeletons are too complex and heavy to be fieldable even if they could address these other issues.
Other efforts to produce a device include the recent DARPA Warrior Web program (http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/BTO/Programs/Warrior_Web.aspx), which notes that:
It is therefore seen that there exists an unmet need in the art for an exoskeleton that can help bear the weight of a load without having great complexity or mass. Accordingly, the present invention seeks to transfer a load to the ground without rigid elements and use those same structural elements to provide assistive power, thereby providing both metabolic assistance and a parallel load path.
The present invention is directed to an exoskeleton comprising at least one load-bearing element. The load-bearing element includes a flexible hose, sleeve or cable having a first end portion and a second end portion opposite the first end portion. The first end portion is engageable with a load and is configured to transfer a weight of the load to the hose, sleeve or cable. The hose, sleeve or cable is configured to transfer the weight of the load from the first end portion to the second end portion, and the second end portion is configured to transfer the weight of the load to a support surface upon which the exoskeleton is supported.
In one embodiment, the load-bearing element is a mechanical control cable or a push-pull cable. In another embodiment, the load-bearing element includes a first hydraulic cylinder located at the first end portion and a second hydraulic cylinder located at the second end portion. In this embodiment, the hose, sleeve or cable is a hydraulic hose containing hydraulic fluid. Furthermore, the first hydraulic cylinder, the second hydraulic cylinder and the hydraulic hose form a portion of a hydraulic circuit. The hydraulic circuit includes a pump, which selectively increases an amount of hydraulic fluid in the hydraulic hose to provide power to the load-bearing element. In one embodiment, the load-bearing element constitutes a first load-bearing element, and the exoskeleton further comprises a second load-bearing element. In this embodiment, the hydraulic circuit also comprises a valve having a first state and a second state. In the first state, the pump is configured to increase an amount of hydraulic fluid in the first load-bearing element and, in the second state, the pump is configured to increase an amount of hydraulic fluid in the second load-bearing element. In another embodiment, the hydraulic circuit further comprises a reservoir and an accumulator.
In a preferred embodiment, the load-bearing element is configured to follow at least one line of non-extension of a wearer of the exoskeleton. Preferably, the load-bearing element follows the at least one line of non-extension over at least a majority of a length of the load-bearing element. In one embodiment, the first end portion is configured to be located adjacent to a torso of the wearer, and the second end portion is configured to be located adjacent a foot of the wearer. In certain embodiments, the first end portion is configured to directly contact the load, and the second end portion is configured to directly contact the support surface.
The exoskeleton further comprises a textile configured to be worn by the wearer. The hose, sleeve or cable is coupled to the textile. Preferably, the textile is form-fitting with respect to the wearer. Also, a mass of the load-bearing element is preferably less than or equal to 1 kilogram per meter of the load-bearing element.
Additional objects, features and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts in the several views.
Detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein. However, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale, and some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to employ the present invention.
The structure used to achieve a parallel load path in exoskeletons of the prior art is the primary contributor to their metabolic cost and is necessary only to prevent buckling of the structure, not to support the underlying load. Typical loads carried by a soldier (e.g., 75 lb) do not require large amounts of material for support due to pure tensile or compressive loads. The additional material is required to prevent what would otherwise be a thin structure from buckling. For example, a 75 lb load could be borne by a ⅛ inch diameter fiberglass rod, including a generous factor of safety, if buckling was not a problem. The additional material needed to prevent the exoskeleton structure from buckling does not help a wearer (i.e., a user) of the exoskeleton in any way, yet it adds most of the mass of the exoskeleton. It is possible to avoid this if a thin, light structure is tightly coupled to the wearer in the way that scaffolding is coupled to a building. The wearer can prevent buckling of the structure while the structure bears the load.
Tightly coupling the structure to the wearer, however, is complicated by both the bending and linear motion of the person such that the structure must not be rigid. In the prior art, as documented above, exoskeletons have used rigid, outboard structure that crudely approximates the bending and stretching of the underlying person. Such structures are unwieldy, contribute significantly to metabolic cost and are unnatural to use. However, scientists, faced with the problem of keeping a flexible pressure suit from bulging off a person in a vacuum, have determined that there exist lines of non-extension over the human body along which the skin does not appreciably stretch during motion. See, e.g., Iberall, A. S., “The Experimental Design of a Mobile Pressure Suit”, Journal of Basic Engineering, Vol. 92.2, (1970), pp. 251-264.
With reference now to
Referring back to the embodiment of
It is also important to prevent pressure rupture of the hydraulic hoses (e.g., hoses 200 and 201 of
Turning to
There are many possible embodiments of the present invention, resulting in a continuum of systems. For some applications, such as helping a soldier at a checkpoint who is wearing armor, load-bearing with a passive system (such as shown in
A timing diagram for a powered embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Although there are a number of possible powered hydraulic embodiments of the present invention,
With reference to the present invention more generally, in some embodiments, there is no payload, and the upper ends of the flexible load-bearing elements push against the torso of the wearer or a harness that is connected to the wearer. In such embodiments, the present invention reduces the effective weight of the wearer, which can help reduce joint injuries. This effective weight reduction is also useful during rehabilitation from an injury.
In general then, the present invention is directed to an exoskeleton comprising at least one flexible load-bearing element. The load-bearing element includes a flexible hose, sleeve or cable having a first end (or end portion) and a second end (or end portion), the second end being opposite the first end. The first end is engageable with a load and transfers a weight of the load to the hose, sleeve or cable. The hose, sleeve or cable transfers the weight of the load from the first end to the second end, and the second end transfers the weight of the load to a support surface upon which the exoskeleton is supported. In other words, the hose, sleeve or cable transmits a compressive load from the exoskeleton to the support surface.
In one embodiment, the load-bearing element is a mechanical control cable or a push-pull cable. In another embodiment, the load-bearing element includes a first hydraulic cylinder located at the first end and a second hydraulic cylinder located at the second end. In this embodiment, the hose, sleeve or cable is a hydraulic hose containing hydraulic fluid. Furthermore, the first hydraulic cylinder, the second hydraulic cylinder and the hydraulic hose form a portion of a hydraulic circuit. The hydraulic circuit further includes a pump, which selectively increases the amount of hydraulic fluid in the hydraulic hose. As a result, power is provided to the load-bearing element in the form of propulsive assistance for the wearer of the exoskeleton. The hydraulic circuit also includes a valve having a first state and a second state. In the first state, the pump increases the amount of hydraulic fluid in a first load-bearing element, and, in the second state, the pump increases the amount of hydraulic fluid in a second load-bearing element.
Preferably, the load-bearing element follows one or more lines of non-extension of the wearer. Specifically, the load-bearing element follows the one or more lines of non-extension over at least a majority (i.e., greater than 50%) of the length of the load-bearing element. In one embodiment, the first end is located adjacent the torso of the wearer, and the second end is located adjacent a foot of the wearer. In such an embodiment, the load-bearing element preferably follows one or more lines of non-extension from the wearer's torso to the wearer's foot. In certain embodiments, the first end directly contacts the load, and the second end directly contacts the support surface. Alternatively, the first and second ends indirectly contact the load and support surface through load-transmitting structures such that the compressive load is still transferred from the exoskeleton to the support surface through the load-bearing element.
The exoskeleton further comprises a textile configured to be worn by the wearer. The hose, sleeve or cable is coupled to the textile. Preferably, the textile is form-fitting with respect to the wearer, i.e., the textile fits tightly against the wearer's body. This allows the load-bearing element to transmit the compressive load to the support surface without buckling of the load-bearing element, which is otherwise sufficiently flexible so as to buckle under the load.
Based on the above, it should be readily apparent that the present invention provides an exoskeleton that helps a wearer bear the weight of a load through the use of flexible structures that also provide propulsive assistance. Although described with reference to preferred embodiments, it should be readily understood that various changes or modifications could be made to the invention without departing from the spirit thereof. In general, the invention is only intended to be limited by the scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/097,978, which was filed on Dec. 30, 2014 and titled “Flexible Structures for Load Bearing Exoskeletons”. The entire content of this application is incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US15/68106 | 12/30/2015 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62097978 | Dec 2014 | US |