This invention relates to processes and systems for coating substrates.
Various methods for applying coatings to a substrate are known in the art. One method of coating a substrate includes extrusion coating a substrate with a thermoplastic coating material. Such extrusion coated articles can be useful in a wide variety of applications, including, for example, as interior and exterior construction materials for homes, buildings, and furniture. According to this coating method, a substrate comprising wood, plastic, metal, or other desirable material, is passed through an extruder and a coating material is applied to at least a portion of the surface of the substrate. Once coated, the article is allowed to cool and the final coated substrate preferably exhibits enhanced aesthetic (e.g., gloss and surface smoothness) characteristics.
As the coated substrate exits the coating die and enters the cooling zone, water and other volatile material within the substrate may vaporize, thereby causing undesirable bubbles or blisters in the coating along the surface of the finished product. While at least partially submerging the coated substrate in a quench liquid has been found to help minimize this type of bubbling, quench cooling has also been observed to create a certain surface roughness that degrades the visual acceptability of the final product. Even substrates that show little or no blistering without a quench bath tend to exhibit undesirable surface texture when exposed to a quench liquid cooling bath.
Thus, a need exists for an extrusion coating process and system capable of producing coated substrates that exhibit an acceptable surface texture and appearance. It is also desirable that such a process and system could be economically implemented to existing extrusion coating systems, while minimizing process time and maximizing production rate.
One embodiment of the present invention concerns a process for coating a substrate. The process comprises the steps of (a) introducing an elongated substrate and a coating material into a die; (b) contacting said substrate with said coating material in said die to thereby provide a coated substrate; (c) removing said coated substrate from said die via a die outlet defined by a die outlet wall of said die; (d) passing said coated substrate removed from said die outlet through a shaped passageway formed in an insulating member affixed to said die outlet wall and having a thermal conductivity less than the thermal conductivity of said die outlet wall; and (e) cooling said coated substrate withdrawn from said insulating member via contact with a quench fluid to thereby provide a cooled coated substrate.
Another embodiment of the present invention concerns a system for applying coating material to a substrate. The system comprises a die for contacting the elongated substrate with the coating material to thereby produce a coated substrate. The die comprises an inlet wall, an outlet wall, and a coating chamber disposed at least partially therebetween. The inlet wall defines a die inlet for receiving said elongated substrate into said die and the outlet wall defines a die outlet for discharging said coated substrate from said die. The system further comprises an insulating member affixed to said outlet wall. The insulating member has a thermal conductivity less than the thermal conductivity of said outlet wall and defines a shaped passageway configured to at least partially surround said die outlet thereby allowing said coated substrate exiting said die outlet to pass through said insulating member. The system also comprises a quench zone located adjacent said insulating member for cooling said coated substrate discharged from said shaped passageway of said insulating member.
Yet another embodiment of the present invention concerns a process for coating an elongated substrate. The process comprises the steps of (a) pushing an elongated substrate into an inlet of an extrusion coating die; (b) passing said elongated substrate through said die along a substantially horizontal die axis; (c) introducing a coating material into said die; (d) during at least a portion of said passing, contacting said substrate with said coating material introduced into said die to thereby provide a coated substrate; (e) removing said coated substrate from said die via a die outlet defined within an outlet wall of the die; and (f) cooling said coated substrate removed from said die outlet via contact with a quench liquid to thereby provide a cooled, coated substrate, wherein said cooled coated substrate has an average Rmax surface roughness of not more than 30.
Still another embodiment of the present invention concerns a coated article comprising an elongated substrate; and a thermoplastic resin coating extrusion coated onto said substrate. The coated article is a water-quenched article that has not been subjected to a post-quench treatment step and has an average Rmax surface roughness of not more than 30.
Various embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein:
Processes and systems configured according to embodiments of the present invention may be useful for applying a coating material to at least a portion of a substrate. In some embodiments, processes and systems described herein may be useful for extrusion coating a polymeric material onto an elongated substrate to thereby provide an extrusion-coated substrate having an acceptable visual appearance. In particular, the coated substrate may exhibit a substantially bubble-free and non-textured surface, a combination which has heretofore been difficult to achieve using conventional coating methods. Coated substrates produced according to various embodiments of the present invention can be utilized for a variety of applications. In one embodiment, coated substrates or articles may be selected from the group consisting of interior and exterior construction materials, including, but not limited to, door jambs, window jambs, other door or window parts, flat panel shelving, pultrusion articles, exterior molding, exterior trim, and interior or exterior siding. Additional details regarding embodiments of the present invention will now be discussed in detail, with reference to the drawing figures.
Referring initially to
Coating system 12 can be configured to process any substrate capable of being extrusion coated. In some embodiments, the substrates employed in coating system 12 may be rigid or substantially rigid substrates, and, in the same or other embodiments, may not be a wire, a tube, or a co-extruded substrate. The substrates coated in coating system 12 may also be elongated substrates having any suitable dimensions. According to one embodiment, the substrate may have a length, or largest dimension, of at least about 5 feet, at least about 6 feet, at least about 8 feet, at least about 10 feet, at least about 12 feet and/or not more than about 25 feet, not more than about 20 feet, or not more than about 15 feet. In the same or another embodiment, the substrate can have a length in the range of from about 5 feet to about 25 feet, about 8 feet to about 20 feet, or about 10 feet to about 15 feet. The substrate can also have a width, or second largest dimension, of at least about 1 inch, at least about 2 inches, or at least about 4 inches and/or not more than about 10 inches, not more than about 8 inches, or not more than about 6 inches, or in the range of from about 1 to about 10 inches, about 2 to about 8 inches, or about 4 to about 6 inches. The thickness, or shortest dimension, of the substrate being coated in coating system 12 can be at least about 0.10 inches, at least about 0.25 inches, at least about 0.5 inches and/or not more than about 4 inches, not more than about 2 inches, or not more than about 1 inch, or in the range of from about 0.10 to about 4 inches, about 0.25 to about 2 inches, or about 0.5 to about 1 inch.
Coated substrates produced using coating system 12 may have a wide variety of shapes and/or sizes and may be made of a variety of materials. In one embodiment, the substrates coated in coating system 12 can comprise a material selected from the group consisting of natural wood, wood composites, plastics including cellularized PVC and other foams, metal, fiberglass, ceramics, cement, and combinations thereof. In the same or other embodiments, the substrate material comprises medium-density fiber board (MDF), particle board, oriented strand board (OSB), and combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the substrate can have an average initial moisture content, measured just prior to its introduction into die 20 of coating system 12 of at least about 2 weight percent, at least about 5 weight percent, at least about 8 weight percent and/or not more than about 15 weight percent, not more than about 12 weight percent, or not more than about 10 weight percent, or in the range of from about 2 weight percent to about 15 weight percent, from about 5 weight percent to about 12 weight percent, or about 8 weight percent to about 10 weight percent, based on the total weight of the substrate. In other embodiments, the initial moisture content of the substrate can be less than about 5 percent, less than about 3 percent, or less than about 2 percent, based on the total weight of the substrate.
Any coating material exhibiting sufficient processability and adhesion to the selected substrate may be employed by coating system 12. In one embodiment, the coating material may comprise one or more polymers or resins, such as thermoplastic polymers or resins capable of being applied to the substrate in a molten or melted form under the operating conditions of die 20. In one embodiment, the glass transition temperature of the polymers utilized in the coating material can be at least about 50° C., at least about 60° C., at least about 65° C., at least about 70° C., at least about 75° C. and/or not more than about 170° C., not more than about 160° C., not more than about 150° C., not more than about 140° C. Examples of polymers or polymer resins suitable for use in coating materials employed with embodiments of the coating system described herein include, but are not limited to, polyesters and copolyesters, such as polyethylene terephthalate or glycol modified polyethylene terephthalate; acid modified polyethylene terephthalate; polycarbonates; acrylics such as poly(methylmethacrylate); poly(acrylonitrile-styrene-acrylate); poly(acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene); poly(styrene-acrylonitrile); cellulose esters; polyolefins such as polypropylenes and polyethylene; nylons; and polyvinylchloride (PVC).
The coating material can also comprise one or more additives selected from the group consisting of color pigment, UV stabilizers, compatibilizers, rubbers, gloss modifiers (e.g., calcium carbonate), opacity modifiers (e.g., titanium dioxide), impact modifiers (e.g., styrene-butadiene-styrene polymers, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene polymers, or methacrylate-butadiene-styrene polymers), and other types of stabilizers typically employed to ensure a durable and appealing finish to the coating applied to the substrate. Several suitable coating compositions are described in detail in co-pending U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0015456, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference to the extent not inconsistent with the present disclosure.
Referring back to
Turning back to
Following pretreatment, the substrate can then be introduced into drying zone 16. Drying zone 16 can be configured to heat at least a portion of the surface of the substrate to thereby facilitate removal of at least some of the volatile materials within the substrate. Drying zone 16 can also be operable to remove surface moisture from the substrate, thereby facilitating a more precise control of the substrate size by minimizing the effects of moisture swelling. In one embodiment, the substrate can be dried in the drying zone 16 for at least about 5 seconds, at least about 10 seconds, at least about 20 seconds and/or not more than about 15 minutes, not more than about 10 minutes, not more than about 5 minutes, or in the range of from about 5 seconds to about 15 minutes, about 10 seconds to about 10 minutes, or about 20 seconds to about 5 minutes. Drying zone 16 can be maintained at a temperature of at least about 10° C., at least about 20° C., at least about 30° C., at least about 35° C. and/or not more than 80° C., not more than about 70° C., not more than about 60° C., not more than about 50° C., or in the range of from about 10° C. to about 80° C., about 20° C. to about 70° C., or about 30° C. to about 60° C.
Once removed from drying zone 16, the substrate can pass through optional staging area 18 before being introduced into die 20 via a feed system 28. Feed system 28 can comprise any suitable device or apparatus for pushing the substrate into and at least partially through die 20. In some embodiments, feed system 28 can also be operable to properly align the substrate with an inlet of die 20 (not shown in
As the substrate is introduced into die 20, at least a portion of the surface of the substrate can be contacted with a coating material introduced into die 20 from coating source 30. Coating source 30 can be any suitable system or apparatus for providing a coating, and, in one embodiment, may be an extruder. The temperature in the die 20 during the coating process can be any temperature sufficient to maintain the incoming coating material in a liquid or substantially liquid state. In some embodiments, the temperature in die 20 during coating can be at least about 50° C., at least about 100° C., at least about 200° C. and/or not more than about 500° C., not more than about 400° C., not more than about 300° C., or in the range of from about 50° C. to about 500° C., about 200° C. to about 400° C., or about 200° C. to about 300° C. The pressure in die 20 during the coating step can be at least about 25 pounds per square inch (psi), at least about 50 psi, at least about 75 psi and/or not more than about 5,000 psi, not more than about 3,500 psi, not more than about 2,000 psi, not more than about 1,500 psi, not more than 1,000 psi, or in the range of from about 25 to about 5,000 psi, from about 50 to about 3,500 psi, or from about 100 to about 2,000 psi.
Turning now to
As shown in
As particularly illustrated in
According to one embodiment, die 120 can further comprise a first insulating member 150 affixed to at least a portion of outlet wall 124 of die 120. In some embodiments, as depicted in
In an alternative embodiment, die 120 may comprise a device or system capable of creating a fluid insulator in place of, or in addition to, insulating member 150. According to this embodiment, a region or “curtain” of air, nitrogen, or other pressurized fluid may be configured proximate die outlet 134 and may perform a similar function as insulating member 150. Similarly to insulating member 150, the temperature of outlet wall 124 may be maintained within a similar temperature range as described in detail below.
Turning now to
According to one embodiment illustrated in
Shaped passageway 158 may be configured to have any suitable cross-sectional shape. Preferably, shaped passageway 158 can have a constant cross-sectional shape and/or size, such that the size and/or shape of shaped passageway 158 remains substantially constant throughout its entire length. In general, the cross-sectional shapes of die outlet 134 and substrate inlet 154 of shaped passageway 158 may be different from one another, while, in some embodiments, the cross-sectional shapes may be substantially the same. For example, in one embodiment, the cross-sectional shapes of die outlet 134 and shaped passageway 158 may be substantially geometrically similar, while, in other embodiments, shaped passageway 158 and die outlet 134 may have congruent cross-sectional shapes. As used herein, the term “geometrically similar” refers to two or more objects having substantially the same shape, while the term “congruent” refers to two objects having the same shape and size. Further, at least one of shaped passageway 158 and die outlet 134 may have a cross-sectional shape geometrically similar to the lateral cross-sectional shape of the coated substrate passing therethrough. Specific examples of lateral cross-sectional shapes of the coated substrate will be discussed in detail shortly.
Turning back to
Referring again to
Quench zone 22 can include any suitable means for contacting the coated substrate with a quench fluid. In one embodiment, quench zone 22 may include a quench bath for at least partially submerging the coated substrate into a quench liquid. In another embodiment, quench zone 22 can include a pressure box configured to maintain a pressurized environment for the coating material to cool on the substrate. When quench zone 22 utilizes a pressure box (not shown), the pressure box can be configured to cool the coated substrate under a pressure of at least about 20 psi, at least about 25 psi, at least about 30 psi and/or not more than about 100 psi, not more than about 80 psi, not more than about 60 psi, or in the range of from about 20 to about 100 psi, from about 25 psi to about 80 psi, or from about 30 psi to about 60 psi. In other embodiments, quench zone 22 may utilize any other suitable cooling system or method, including, for example, cooled rollers (not shown). In some embodiments, coated substrate 102 may simply be allowed to cool at ambient temperature and/or pressure.
Once the cooled, coated substrate is removed from quench zone 22, it can then be passed through an optional post treatment zone 24, if desired. Examples of suitable post-treatment processes can include, but are not limited to, abrasion via one or more types of media treatment, gloss enhancements, in-line primer treatments, painting, staining, and combinations thereof. In another embodiment shown in
According to one embodiment, the cooled, coated articles produced by systems and processes according to embodiments of the present invention may exhibit a highly desirable surface texture and visual appearance. For example, in one embodiment, the cooled, coated substrate withdrawn from coating system 12 may be substantially bubble-free. As used herein, the term “substantially bubble free” refers to a coated substrate exhibiting less than 10 bubbles per 100 square feet as measured by visual detection. In one embodiment, coated substrates according to embodiments of the present invention can exhibit less than about 10 bubbles per 100 square feet, less than about 5 bubbles per 100 square feet, less than about 2 bubbles per 100 square feet, or less than 1 bubble per 100 square feet.
In the same or other embodiments, the water-quenched, extrusion coated substrate exiting quench zone 22 may have a relatively smooth, untextured surface. For example, in one embodiment, at least a portion of the surface of the coated substrate can have an average Rmax surface roughness of no more than about 40, no more than about 30, no more than about 25, no more than about 20, no more than about 15, no more than about 12, or no more than about 10. As used herein, the term “average Rmax surface roughness” refers to the maximum roughness depth measured from the highest point to the lowest point along the measurement length, averaged over all measurements taken. The values for surface roughness parameters, including Rmax, provided herein were measured using a Mitutoyo Surftest SJ-201P roughness tester with a 5-micron stylus, as described in detail in Examples 34-42 below. In addition to Rmax, several other roughness parameters were measured via profilometry for several coated substrates and values and descriptions for each of these additional parameters are provided below in Examples 34-42. In some embodiments, coated substrates having a surface texture as described above may be obtained even in the absence of post-quench treatment, such as sanding, buffing, or the like. Unlike conventionally-prepared water-quenched articles, extrusion coated articles of the present invention exhibit unexpected surface smoothness while retaining an acceptable visual appearance, including a reduced occurrence of bubbles and surface blisters.
Referring now to
The coating layer 220a-d can be affixed to substrates 210a-d such that the coating material can be sufficiently adhered directly to at least a portion of the substrate. Unlike conventional “peel-and-stick” or other similar coatings, coated substrates according to embodiments of the present invention do not include a layer of glue or other adhesive disposed between the surface of the substrate and the coating material. In one embodiment, the coating can have an average adhesion peel force of at least 0.10 pounds (lb), at least about 0.25 lbs, at least about 0.35 lbs, or at least 0.40 lbs and/or not more than about 2 lbs, not more than about 1.5 lbs, not more than about 1 lb, not more than about 0.75 lbs, not more than about 0.65 lbs, or not more than 0.50 lbs, measured with a 90° T-Peel test described in ASTM Method D3330, Method F or in the range of from about 0.10 to about 2 lbs, about 0.35 to about 1.5 lbs, or about 0.40 to about 1 lb.
In some embodiments, the coating may be applied to only a portion of the surface of the substrate, as illustrated in
In addition, as particularly illustrated by the exemplary coated substrates 200a-d in
The various aspects of the present invention can be further illustrated and described by the following Examples. It should be understood, however, that these Examples are included merely for purposes of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention, unless otherwise specifically indicated.
Two samples of natural finger-jointed pine were prepared for coating in a lab scale extrusion coating system. The first sample had a rectangular lateral cross-section measuring approximately ⅝ inch (1.6 cm) by ⅞ inch (2.2 cm) and the second sample had a complex cross-sectional shape similar to the one depicted in
Each of the samples described above were preheated in an oven to a temperature of about 100° F. (38° C.) and the heated substrates were placed in a staging area before being individually passed through a die assembly connected to a 2½-inch extruder. A thermoplastic coating material that included glycol-modified poly(ethylene terephthalate), a calcium carbonate gloss modifier, a titanium dioxide opacity modifier, a UV stabilizer, and an impact modifier was extruded into the die assembly and applied to each substrate at a melt temperature of 500° F. (260° C.). The pressure in the die assembly was maintained between 300 and 500 psi (2070 and 3450 kPa) during coating and the target coating thickness was between 0.006 and 0.0012 inches (0.015 and 0.030 cm). The substrates passed through the die assembly at a line speed of 25 board feet per minute (7.6 meters per minute).
In this Example, no insulating member was employed on the die outlet wall and no water bath was employed. The coated samples exited the die assembly and were allowed to cool in under ambient temperature and pressure. Upon visual inspection of the cooled, coated substrates, it was noted that the samples had an unacceptably high concentration of surface bubbles and blisters.
Two wood samples having a rectangular and an E1 cross-section were prepared and coated as described above in Example 1, except the coated samples exiting the die assembly were immediately passed into a water bath to cool. The temperature of the water bath was maintained between 60° F. and 75° F. (16° C. and 24° C.). The outlet wall of the die assembly was not insulated and was directly contacted by the water bath. The temperature of the die outlet wall was approximately 100° F. to 150° F. less than the melt temperature. Upon visual inspection, it was noted that the cooled, coated substrates were substantially bubble-free, but exhibited an unacceptable surface texture.
Two wood samples having a rectangular and an E1 cross-section were prepared and coated as described above in Example 1. The coated samples exiting the die assembly were immediately passed into a water bath to cool, as described above in Example 2. In addition, a ⅛-inch (0.32 cm) thick mica insulating member with a rectangular opening was affixed to the outlet wall of the die and the coated substrate passed through the insulating member as it exited the die assembly. The rectangular opening was larger than the die opening, so that a portion of the outlet wall of the die was still exposed to quench water. Coated samples exiting the die outlet passed through the insulating member and were cooled in a water bath as described in Example 2. Upon visual inspection, it was noted that the cooled, coated substrates were substantially bubble-free, but exhibited an unacceptable surface texture.
A wood sample having a rectangular cross-section was prepared and coated as described above in Example 1. The coated sample exiting the die assembly was passed through an insulating member affixed to the outlet wall of the die as described in Example 3, except the opening of the insulating member was cut to have the same size and shape as the coated substrate. Upon visual inspection, it was noted that the cooled, coated substrate was not only substantially bubble-free, but also exhibited a smooth, non-textured surface.
A wood sample having an E1 cross-section was prepared and coated as described above in Example 1. The coated sample exiting the die assembly was passed through an insulating member affixed to the outlet wall of the die having the same size and shape as the coated substrate, similar to the procedure described in Example 4. Upon visual inspection, it was noted that the cooled, coated E1 substrate was not only substantially bubble-free, but also exhibited a smooth, non-textured surface.
Several samples of finger-jointed pine having an E1 cross-section were prepared and coated as described in Example 1. Similar to Example 5, each coated sample was passed through a ⅛-inch thick mica insulator affixed to the die outlet wall and cut to have an opening the same size and shape as the coated substrate. The melt temperature of the coating was maintained at 475° F. (246° C.), but the water bath temperature, the substrate preheat temperature, and the die outlet wall temperature were varied. Each of the cooled, coated substrates removed from the quench water bath was visually evaluated and the surface appearance was noted. The operating conditions and visual appearance results for each of Examples 6-18 are summarized in Table 1, below.
Several samples of finger-joint pine having an E1 cross-section were prepared and coated as described in Example 1. Each substrate was coated in a die assembly with a melt temperature of 475° F. (246° C.) and a die outlet wall temperature of 500° F. (260° C.), but the thickness of the mica insulating insulator affixed to the outer wall of the die was varied. The opening in the insulating member was cut to match the size and shape of the E1 profile. The water bath temperature was maintained between 65° F. and 80° F. (18° C. and 27° C.). Each of the cooled, coated substrates removed from the quench water bath were visually evaluated and the surface appearance was noted. The insulator thickness and visual appearance results for each of Examples 19-21 are summarized in Table 2, below.
Several samples of medium-density fiber board (MDF) and finger-joint pine (FJP) each having an E1 cross-sectional shape were prepared and coated as described in Example 1, above. The melt temperature of the coating was 500° F. and the samples were passed through the die at a board speed of 15 feet per minute. The sample coated in Example 22 was allowed to cool under ambient conditions, while the samples coated in Examples 24-30 were cooled in a water quench bath maintained at a temperature of about 70° F. No insulating member was used in Examples 22-24. For Examples 25-30, a ⅛-inch thick mica insulator having an inlet of E1 shape, but varying size were used in order to vary the clearance between the inner edge of the insulator inlet and the outer edge of the die outlet. The surface appearance and texture of the cooled, coated substrates for each run were observed. The minimum insulator clearance and the visual appearance results for the samples tested in each of Examples 22-30 are summarized in Table 3, below.
Several samples of medium density fiberboard having an E1 cross-section were prepared and coated as described in Example 1. Each substrate was coated in a die assembly with a melt temperature of 500° F. and was passed through a mica insulator having a thickness of ⅛ inch and a clearance of 100 mils, measured from the outer edge of the die outlet to the inner edge of the insulator inlet. The speed at which the substrate passed through the die was varied. The coated substrates were cooled in a water bath having a temperature of 70° F. Each of the cooled, coated substrates removed from the quench water bath were visually evaluated and the surface appearance was noted. The line speed and visual appearance results for each of Examples 31-33 are summarized in Table 4, below.
Several 8-foot long samples of medium-density fiber board (MDF) and finger-joint Radiata pine (FJP) each having an E1 cross-sectional shape were prepared and coated as described in Example 1, above. The samples were passed through the die at a board speed of 15 feet per minute. The sample coated in Example 34 was allowed to cool under ambient conditions, while the samples coated in Examples 35-42 were cooled in a water quench bath maintained at a temperature of about 60° F. No insulating member was used in Examples 34-36. For Examples 37-42, various ¼-inch thick mica insulators, each having an E1-shaped inlet of but a different opening size, were used in order to vary the clearance between the inner edge of the insulator inlet and the outer edge of the die outlet. The surface appearance and texture of the cooled, coated substrates were observed for each run. The minimum insulator clearance and the visual appearance results for the samples tested in each of Examples 34-42 are summarized in Table 5a, below.
After cooling, the samples were cut into 3-foot segments and surface roughness measurements were taken at two randomly-selected locations on the back (flat) side of the sample. The surface roughness of each sample was measured using a Mitutoyo SJ-210 having a 2 micron stylus with a 60 degree radius. The measurements were taken in accordance with the procedure described in the roughness tester manual over a sample length of 1 inch. The results of the surface roughness measurements for each of the samples in Examples 34-42 are summarized in Table 5b, below.
In addition to Rmax, which as discussed above, is the maximum roughness depth measured from the highest point to the lowest point along the measurement length, the following surface roughness parameters were also measured for each sample in Examples 34-42: Ra, Rq, Rz, Rv, Rp, and Rpm. Ra is the arithmetic average surface roughness, calculated over the entire measured array, while Rq is the root-mean-square average between the height deviations and the mean line or surface calculated over the entire measured array. Rz is an average of the ten greatest peak-to-valley separations in the sample, while Rmax is the maximum roughness depth measured from the highest peak to the lowest value along a measurement length. Rv is the maximum profile valley depth or the height difference between the mean (average) height line and the lowest point over the entire measurement length, while Rp is the maximum profile peak height or the height difference between the mean height line and the highest point over the entire measurement length. Rpm is the average maximum profile peak height, measured as the average of successive Rp values over the measurement length. Values for each of these roughness parameters, taken for each coated substrate in Examples 34-42 are provided in Table 5b, below.
Additionally, several scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were taken of each of the coated substrates in Examples 34-42 at an SEM HV of 5.0 kV (Examples 34 and 35) or 3.0 kV (Examples 36-42) and a magnification of 250×. The resulting images for coated MDF substrates are presented as
Several samples of medium density fiberboard having an E1 cross-section were prepared and coated as described in Example 1. Upon exiting the die outlet, each substrate was passed through a mica insulator having a thickness of ¼ inch and a clearance of 100 mils, measured from the outer edge of the die outlet to the inner edge of the insulator inlet. The speed at which the substrate passed through the die and insulator was varied. The coated substrates were cooled in a water bath having a temperature of 60° F. Each of the cooled, coated substrates removed from the quench water bath were visually evaluated and the surface appearance was noted. Additionally, the surface roughness of each of the cooled substrates was measured using a Mitutoyo SJ-210 having a 2 micron stylus with a 60 degree radius, as described in Examples 34-42 above. The line speed and visual appearance results for each of Examples 43-45 are summarized in Table 6a, below, while the surface roughness measurements are provided in Table 6b. Additionally, several scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were taken of each of the coated substrates in Examples 43-45 at an SEM HV of 3.0 kV and a magnification of 250×. The resulting images are provided in
The preferred forms of the invention described above are to be used as illustration only, and should not be used in a limiting sense to interpret the scope of the present invention. Obvious modifications to the exemplary embodiments, set forth above, could be readily made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention.
The inventors hereby state their intent to rely on the Doctrine of Equivalents to determine and assess the reasonably fair scope of the present invention as pertains to any apparatus not materially departing from but outside the literal scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.
This application is a divisional of Ser. No. 13/706,408, filed Dec. 6, 2012, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2216519 | Quarnstrom | Oct 1940 | A |
2926729 | Zanini | Mar 1960 | A |
2991273 | Hechelhammer et al. | Jul 1961 | A |
2999835 | Goldberg | Sep 1961 | A |
2999846 | Schnell et al. | Sep 1961 | A |
3028365 | Schnell et al. | Apr 1962 | A |
3084662 | Badger et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
3148172 | Fox | Sep 1964 | A |
3153008 | Fox | Oct 1964 | A |
3169121 | Goldberg | Feb 1965 | A |
3207814 | Goldberg | Sep 1965 | A |
3271367 | Schnell et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3368740 | Rohde | Feb 1968 | A |
3402682 | Peden | Sep 1968 | A |
3410938 | Schippers | Nov 1968 | A |
3544669 | Schock | Dec 1970 | A |
3599286 | Karet | Aug 1971 | A |
3694538 | Okamoto et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3720027 | Christensen | Mar 1973 | A |
3741843 | Louis | Jun 1973 | A |
3772405 | Hamb | Nov 1973 | A |
3793128 | Chancellor, Jr. et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3852933 | Guzzo | Dec 1974 | A |
3853462 | Smith | Dec 1974 | A |
3941904 | Hoh et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3961118 | Michaelis et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3980005 | Buonaiuto | Sep 1976 | A |
4000219 | Smejkal | Dec 1976 | A |
4123436 | Holub et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4124574 | Preston et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4143187 | Pilgrim et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4156069 | Prevorsek et al. | May 1979 | A |
4181764 | Totten | Jan 1980 | A |
4190686 | Muis | Feb 1980 | A |
4194038 | Hipp et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4209475 | Herrington | Jun 1980 | A |
4222911 | Christenson | Sep 1980 | A |
4301053 | Wolfrey | Nov 1981 | A |
4397986 | Hornbaker | Aug 1983 | A |
4420920 | Hewitt | Dec 1983 | A |
4430484 | Quinn | Feb 1984 | A |
4433088 | Haaf et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4452933 | McCready | Jun 1984 | A |
4465820 | Miller et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4514449 | Budich | Apr 1985 | A |
4558096 | Boon et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4567142 | Lloyd | Jan 1986 | A |
4576846 | Noel | Mar 1986 | A |
4589456 | Traben | May 1986 | A |
4613653 | Kitchens et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4740556 | Abolins et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4757110 | Sato | Jul 1988 | A |
4760114 | Haaf et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4774794 | Grieb | Oct 1988 | A |
4775597 | Birkmeyer et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4790851 | Suire et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4872907 | Areaux | Oct 1989 | A |
4935306 | Ohtsuka et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4963435 | Hara et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4981898 | Bassett | Jan 1991 | A |
4982014 | Freitag et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4984406 | Friesen | Jan 1991 | A |
4987702 | Anschutz | Jan 1991 | A |
5010162 | Serini et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5084511 | Abe et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5095069 | Ambrose et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5162058 | Uenaka et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166237 | Abe et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5197319 | Beekel | Mar 1993 | A |
5286547 | Tyerman | Feb 1994 | A |
5288559 | Oka et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5312863 | Van Rheenen et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321056 | Carson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5344700 | McGath et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5382401 | Pickett et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5415943 | Gorger et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417904 | Razi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5484632 | Mercer, Jr. et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5625999 | Buzza et al. | May 1997 | A |
5654347 | Khemani et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665798 | Speaks et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672391 | Santarossa | Sep 1997 | A |
5674928 | Chisholm et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5696176 | Khemani et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5725944 | Jones et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5824373 | Biller et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5858522 | Turk | Jan 1999 | A |
5897708 | Hsu | Apr 1999 | A |
5898043 | Uemae et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907006 | Rennie et al. | May 1999 | A |
5914083 | Yada et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5925698 | Steckel | Jul 1999 | A |
5962573 | Berta | Oct 1999 | A |
5965075 | Pauley et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972471 | Jasenof et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976676 | Miki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5985397 | Witt et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997456 | Butters et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6020414 | Nelsen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6074727 | Miller et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083601 | Prince et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093773 | Evans et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6114021 | Pankratz | Sep 2000 | A |
6153264 | Schmid et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6168866 | Clark | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203915 | Prissok et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206965 | Rao et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6298626 | Rudden | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6306507 | Brunelle et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6336265 | Niedermair | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352657 | Veldhuis et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6352784 | Katagiri | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6353050 | Bastiaens et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6391461 | Ryntz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394784 | Gellert et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6448328 | Kappler et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455161 | Regnier et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461792 | Kawamura et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6500895 | Bastiaens et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6540624 | Isogawa | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551662 | Schmid et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6576309 | Dalgewicz, III et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6579611 | Iwashita et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583189 | King | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584743 | Paxton et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592668 | Rao et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596784 | King | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601357 | Tunis | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6616998 | Greer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6660086 | Prince et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6667367 | Berta | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673293 | Mistopoulos | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680104 | Boris et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6716522 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6780359 | Burch | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6841239 | Hasegawa | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6852765 | Decker et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6933043 | Son et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6991632 | Ritland | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994752 | Estrada et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7022257 | Ohkido et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7022768 | Lacroix et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7034072 | Milic | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7081488 | Bardman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7097879 | Bolton et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7160977 | Hale et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175905 | Curtis et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7226985 | Hale et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7318958 | Wang | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7335399 | Bolton et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7368511 | Hale et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7374795 | Prince et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7435483 | Lee et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7644553 | Knauseder | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7687768 | Hashizume et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7694468 | Prince et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7695498 | Ritland | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7766915 | Jackson | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7868090 | Juikar | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883597 | Blahut | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901435 | Slivka et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8065848 | Carlson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8071198 | Michalczyk et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8071695 | Strand et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8113143 | Prince et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8197733 | Sudano | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8394784 | Stroumpoulis et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8734909 | Iyer et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20010013211 | Rudden | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010055671 | Pickett et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020034629 | Jones | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020090471 | Burger et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020121064 | Erwin | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136911 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020139047 | Haddad | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020192451 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030093078 | Ritland | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108735 | Hoppe et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030211347 | Rabinovitch et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040003903 | Wenrick et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023052 | Ambroise | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040048055 | Branca | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040109946 | Prince et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040131871 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040236063 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050037176 | Domine | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050814 | Prince et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050102963 | Nien et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050106406 | Curtis et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137332 | Hale et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137356 | Hale et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050288401 | Pearson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060022376 | Prince et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060111519 | Strand et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060255496 | Wells | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258801 | Martin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267238 | Wang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270806 | Hale | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070000568 | Bohme et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070059463 | Melkonian | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070104930 | Grohman | May 2007 | A1 |
20070235705 | Burger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070292569 | Bohme et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080118741 | Michalczyk et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080145564 | Allam et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080145637 | Frank | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080153984 | Renken et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090011164 | Masuda et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090035581 | Sudano | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090036581 | Joshi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090064627 | Struthers et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100003410 | King et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100015456 | Lizotte et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100021677 | West et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036007 | Journee | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100211180 | Helmuth et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110223342 | Iyer et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245876 | Brumfield | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130005892 | Lizotte et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130011563 | Lizotte et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130060345 | Tepie | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2133696 | May 1995 | CA |
201626102 | Nov 2010 | CN |
9316759 | Feb 1994 | DE |
44 24 767 | Nov 1995 | DE |
198 57 045 | Jun 2000 | DE |
20 2011 003953 | May 2011 | DE |
10 2012 001910 | Aug 2013 | DE |
0 132 218 | Jan 1985 | EP |
0 210 297 | Feb 1987 | EP |
0210297 | Feb 1987 | EP |
0 488 711 | Jun 1992 | EP |
0 510 463 | Oct 1992 | EP |
653469 | May 1995 | EP |
2 861 738 | May 2005 | FR |
1 397 270 | Jun 1975 | GB |
2 024 658 | Jan 1980 | GB |
S52 103465 | Aug 1977 | JP |
58-118231 | Jul 1983 | JP |
S59 155024 | Sep 1984 | JP |
60-085921 | May 1985 | JP |
1-225647 | Sep 1989 | JP |
3-26752 | Feb 1991 | JP |
8-34866 | Feb 1996 | JP |
1996 034866 | Feb 1996 | JP |
08300590 | Nov 1996 | JP |
09-302078 | Nov 1997 | JP |
9324135 | Dec 1997 | JP |
11-90827 | Apr 1999 | JP |
1999245590 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2002-337291 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003-056168 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2004-211039 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2005-154731 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-264136 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-281544 | Oct 2006 | JP |
20110073672 | Jun 2011 | KR |
WO 9618685 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9746627 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9827159 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 0127200 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0158663 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 2006093916 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006102705 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2008040498 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English Translation EP0210297A1, Feb. 1987. |
December, Timothy S., et al.; “The Effects of TPO Composition on Adhesion and Proposed Chemical Mechanism”; Paint and Coatings Industry; Mar. 2008; www.pcimag.com; pp. 76-82. |
Berta, Dominic A.; “Formulating Plastics for Paint Adhesion”; Chapter 3 from Coatings of Polymers and Plastics, 2003, edited by Ryntz, Rose, A. and Yaneff, Phillip V.; pp. 85-119. |
ASTM D 2457 Mar. 2008. |
ASTM D 3359-02 Oct. 2002. |
ASTM D3330 Oct. 2004. |
ASTM D 523 Jun. 2008. |
ASTM E 1164 Jun. 2009. |
ASTM E 308 Jan. 2009. |
“Blendex BMAT Data Sheet Styrene Acrylonitrile”, http://www.ides.com/info/datasheet/E73798/BLENDEX-BMAT, Sep. 13, 2012. |
“Paraloid™ KM-377 Acrylic Impact Modifier”, Technical Data Sheet, The Dow Chemical Company. |
“Blendex BMAT Modifier Resin”; Chemtura; www.chemtura.com; Effective Jun. 4, 2008; (2007). |
“Butyl acrylate-methyl methacrylate polymers”; Chemical Book; www.chemicalbook.com; (2008). |
“Paraloid KM-377 Impact Modifier”; Material Safety Data Sheet, DOW; Revision Date: Feb. 7, 2004. |
Turner, S. R., et al.; “Polyesters Based on 1,4-Cyclohexanedimethanol”; Modern Polyesters: Chemistry and Technology of Polyesters and Copolyesters; (2003); pp. 280-282. |
“Chlorocarbons and Chlorohydrocarbons—C2 to Combustion Technology”; Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology; 4th Edition, vol. 6, (1993), pp. 620-623. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jan. 22, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/004107. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/721,080, filed Mar. 10, 2010, Subramanian Iyer et al. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,675, filed Jul. 15, 2009, Jeremy Richard Lizotte et al. |
Strasser, CFD Investigation of Gear Pump Mixing Using Deforming/Agglomerating Mesh, J. Fluids Eng.—Apr. 2007—vol. 129, Issue 4, 476 (9 pages). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Apr. 28, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/026942. |
USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,675. |
USPTO Office Action dated May 7, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/721,080. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,672, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Jeremy Richard Lizotte et al. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,681, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Jeremy Richard Lizotte et al. |
USPTO Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,675. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/706,408, filed Dec. 6, 2012, Tony Wayne Helton. |
USPTO Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/721,080. |
USPTO Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,672. |
USPTO Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,681. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/861,412, filed Apr. 12, 2013, Gordon L. King. |
UPSTO Offfice Action dated Jul. 16, 2013 in copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/706,408. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 18, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/037957. |
USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2013 in copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/721,080. |
USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2013 in copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,681. |
Fred W. Billmeyer, Jr., Textbook of Polymer Science, 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, p. 153 (1984). |
Carraher, Introduction to Polymer Chemistry 3rd Edition, CRC Press, Taylor & France Group, Boca Raton FL p. 240 (2013). |
USPTO Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2014 in copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,675. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration—International Application No. PCT/US2013/072546 dated Mar. 11, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance received in Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/721,080 dated Apr. 10, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance received in C0-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/706,408 dated May 12, 2014. |
USPTO Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2014 in copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,672. |
USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2014 in copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,675. |
ASTM D882; “Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting”; Published Sep. 2012. |
ASTM D1037; “Evaluating Properties of Wood-Based Fiber and Particle Panel Materials”; Published Jun. 2012. |
ASTM D4541; “Standard Test Method for Pull-Off Strength of Coatings Using Portable Adhesion Testers”; Published Apr. 2009. |
Chemical Abstract Services No. 25852-37-3. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration—International Application No. PCT/US2014/059839 dated Jan. 22, 2015. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration—International Application No. PCT/US2014/059824 dated Mar. 30, 2015. |
USPTO Office Action dated May 11, 2015 in copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,675. |
USPTO Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2014 in copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,672. |
Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2015 received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,672. |
USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2015 in copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,681. |
USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/721,080. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 20, 2014 in copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/706,408. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,549, filed Sep. 25, 2014, Jennifer Lynne Peavey; now U. S. Publication No. 2015/0110996. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,508, filed Sep. 25,2014, Jennifer Lynne Peavey; now U. S. Publication No. 2015/0110986. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,529, filed Sep. 25, 2014, Jennifer Lynne Peavey; now U. S. Publication No. 2015-0110988. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,483, filed Sep. 25, 2014, Jennifer Lynne Peavey; now U. S. Publication No. 2015/0110995. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,567, filed Sep. 25, 2014, Chad Alan Frazier; now U. S. Publication No. 2015/0107175. |
USPTO Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2015 in copending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,567. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 14/571,568, filed Dec. 16, 2014, Kevin Michael Cable. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated May 18, 2016 received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,672. |
Office Communication notification dated Jul. 12, 2016 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,508. |
Office Communication notification dated Sep. 7, 2016 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,529. |
Office Communication notification dated Apr. 27, 2016 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,483. |
Office Communication notification dated Aug. 18, 2016 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,567. |
Office Communication notification dated Apr. 11, 2016 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,675. |
Office Communication notification dated Apr. 7, 2016 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,529. |
Office Communication notification dated Sep. 14, 2015 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,681. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration—International Application No. PCT/US2015/065681 dated Mar. 8, 2016. |
Office Communication notification dated Oct. 27, 2015 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,675. |
Office Communication notification dated Nov. 18, 2015 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,567. |
Office Communication notification dated Mar. 2, 2016 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,567. |
Office Communication notification dated Sep. 23, 2016 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,675. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated Sep. 28, 2016 received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,672. |
Office Communication notification dated Oct. 14, 2016 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,681. |
Office Communication notification dated Sep. 28, 2016 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,549. |
Office Communication notification dated Jun. 15, 2017 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,675. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated Jan. 30, 2017 received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,672. |
Office Communication notification dated Feb. 21, 2017 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,681. |
Office Communication notification dated Dec. 12, 2016 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,508. |
Office Communication notification dated Mar. 9, 2017 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,529. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated Jun. 28, 2017 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,529. |
Office Communication notification dated Oct. 26, 2016 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,483. |
Office Communication notification dated Feb. 22, 2017 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,483. |
Office Communication notification dated Mar. 9, 2017 received in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,567. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150004349 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13706408 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 14487355 | US |