This application claims priority to Japanese patent application serial numbers 2013-211855 and 2013-211858, both filed Oct. 9, 2013, the contents of each are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Embodiments disclosed herein relate to failure determination devices for fuel vapor processing systems. The failure determination systems may determine leakage of fuel vapor from fuel vapor processing systems based on a change in pressure of fuel vapor while the fuel vapor processing systems are kept in a hermetically sealed state.
Vehicles that run on fuel such as gasoline may have fuel vapor processing systems. The fuel vapor processing system may avoid damage to a fuel tank caused by an increase of an internal pressure of the fuel tank while inhibiting dissipation of fuel vapor to the atmosphere. However, if a failure (such as creation of cracks in parts of the system or improper sealing of connection portions of the system) occurs, it may be possible that fuel vapor leaks from the system. Even in the case that leakage of fuel vapor has occurred, it may not be possible for a vehicle driver to directly recognize such a failure. To this end, JP-A-2005-344540 and WO2005/001273 propose failure detection devices that can determine leakage of fuel vapor from a fuel vapor processing system.
JP-A-2005-344540 discloses a fuel vapor processing system including a fuel tank and a canister. A pressure sensor may detect a pressure within the fuel vapor processing system. A vent cut valve (also known as a canister closed valve) may be provided in an atmosphere passage through which the canister communicates with the atmosphere. The vent cut valve may serve as a closing device for defining a closed space in the system. During stopping of a vehicle engine, the vent cut valve may be closed for keeping the system in a closed state. The change in pressure and the change in fuel temperature of the system at that time may be used for determining whether or not leakage of fuel vapor is occurring.
However, in JP-A-2005-344540, a normally opening type electromagnetic valve is used as the vent cut valve serving as a closing device. Therefore, in order to keep a closed state for determining the leakage, it is necessary to continuously supply an electric power to the vent cut valve. This may result in an increase in power consumption. Therefore, it may be necessary to avoid repeated leakage determinations and long duration leakage determinations in order to reduce power consumption.
In WO2005/001273, in order to detect leakage of fuel vapor from a fuel vapor processing system, a target region of the system may be brought to a closed state during stopping of a vehicle engine. After that, a pressure may be applied to the target region by utilizing a fuel pump. Then, the leakage may be determined based on a driving time of the fuel pump and a change in pressure after stopping the fuel pump.
However, in the case of WO2005/001273, for determining the leakage of fuel vapor, the fuel pump is driven for applying a pressure to the target region. In other words, the fuel pump must be always driven during determination of the occurrence of leakage of fuel vapor. This may result an increase in power consumption. In addition, in the case of WO2005/001273, if a change in pressure of the target region before driving the fuel pump is large, determination of leakage may not be performed until an engine start key is switched off at the next time.
Therefore, there has been a need in the art for failure determination devices used for fuel vapor processing systems, which can operate for determining leakage with a reduced power consumption.
In one aspect according to the present teachings, a failure detecting device for a fuel vapor processing system may include a leakage determination device configured to determine leakage of fuel vapor from a target region of the fuel vapor processing system. The leakage determination device may include a canister closed valve provided in an atmospheric passage connecting between a canister and an atmosphere. The canister closed valve may switch between an open position and a closed upon receiving a supply of electric power, and may maintain the open position or the closed position when no electric power is supplied to the canister closed valve.
Each of the additional features and teachings disclosed above and below may be utilized separately or in conjunction with other features and teachings to provide improved failure determination devices for fuel vapor processing systems. Representative examples, which utilize many of these additional features and teachings both separately and in conjunction with one another, will now be described in detail with reference to the attached drawings. This detailed description is merely intended to teach a person of skill in the art further details for practicing preferred aspects of the present teachings and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Only the claims define the scope of the claimed invention. Therefore, combinations of features and steps disclosed in the following detailed description may not be necessary to practice the invention in the broadest sense, and are instead taught merely to particularly describe representative examples. Moreover, various features of the representative examples and the dependent claims may be combined in ways that are not specifically enumerated in order to provide additional useful examples of the present teachings.
In one embodiment, a failure detecting device may be used for a fuel vapor processing system including a fuel tank and a canister. The failure detecting device may include a pressure detecting device configured to detect a pressure within a target region of the fuel vapor processing system, a closing device configured to close the target region, and a leakage determination device configured to determine leakage of fuel vapor from the target region based on a change of pressure within the target region in a closed state of the target region. The closing device may include a canister closed valve (CCV) provided in an atmospheric passage connecting between the canister and an atmosphere. The canister closed valve may be configured to switch between an open position and a closed position upon receiving a supply of electric power, and to maintain the open position or the closed position when no electric power is supplied.
With this arrangement, in order to change between the open position and the closed position of the CCV, it is only necessary to supply an electric power to the CCV. The open position or the closed position may be kept after stopping the supply of the electric power. Therefore, it is possible to considerably reduce the electric power that is necessary for determining leakage of fuel vapor. Thus, it may be possible to perform the leakage determination process during a time longer than the known art with power consumption smaller than or similar to that required in the known art. Hence, it is possible to repeatedly perform the leakage determination process over a long period of time, whereby earlier detection of the occurrence of failure can be made.
The failure detecting device may further include a fuel temperature detecting device configured to detect a temperature of a fuel within the fuel tank. The leakage determination device may be configured to determine leakage of fuel vapor from the target region based on a change of temperature of the fuel in addition to the change of pressure within the target region. With this arrangement, it is possible to improve the accuracy in detection of occurrence of the failure.
The fuel vapor processing system may be used for a vehicle engine. The leakage determination device may include a controller configured to control the CCV and to execute a timer function that may perform a timed leakage determination process, in which a leakage determination operation may be periodically performed with a predetermined time even during stopping of the vehicle engine. In this way, it is possible to reduce the power consumption necessary for the failure detection.
The controller may be configured to execute a pre-determination function before executing the timer function. The pre-determination function may determine that no leakage is occurring if the change of pressure within the target region in the closed state within a predetermined time after closing the target region is out of a predetermined range. The pre-determination function may suspend the determination of leakage if the change of pressure within the target region in the closed state within the predetermined time after closing the target region is within the predetermined range. In general, immediately after stopping the vehicle, it may be possible that the pressure within the target region may increase due to the residual heat of the engine. Therefore, if the pressure within the target region does not increase even after stopping the vehicle, the determination of leakage may not be correctly made. The pre-determination function may avoid unnecessary power consumption. In this respect, it may be possible to further reduce the power consumption.
If the determination of leakage is suspended by the pre-determination function, the controller may open the CCV to reset the pressure within the target region to an atmospheric pressure, and thereafter close the CCV to bring the target region into the closed state. After that, the timed leakage determination process may be performed. Resetting the pressure within the target region to the atmospheric pressure may stabilize the pressure within the target region, so that the leakage can be properly determined. The CCV may be driven by a step motor.
The failure detecting device may further include a mechanical positive and negative pressure relief valve provided in the atmospheric passage and arranged parallel to the CCV. The mechanical positive and negative pressure relief valve may be opened when the pressure within the target region exceeds a predetermined positive pressure or falls blow a predetermined negative pressure. With this arrangement, when the pressure within the target region has become excessively high or excessively low, the mechanical positive and negative pressure relief valve device may automatically open to relieve the pressure. In this way, it may be possible to provide a fail-safe function for preventing an accidental damage to the fuel tank. Therefore, it is not necessary to always adjust the pressure by monitoring the same. In addition, because the relief valve device may mechanically operate to open without need of supply of an electric power, it is possible to save the power consumption.
The leakage determination device may terminate the determination of leakage when a fuel is refueled into the fuel tank. When the fuel is refueled into the fuel tank, it may be possible that the pressure within the target region abruptly increases. In such a case, the leakage determination may not be correctly made. Therefore, by stopping the leakage determination during refueling, it may be possible to further save the power consumption. In addition, because the leakage determination is made while the target region is closed, no damage to the fuel tank may occur.
The pressure detecting device may include a first detecting device configured to detect a pressure within the fuel tank and a second detecting device configured to detect a pressure within the canister. The failure detecting device may further include a shut-off device provided between the fuel tank and the canister and configured to switch between an open position for allowing communication between the fuel tank and the canister and a closed position for interrupting communication between the fuel tank and the canister. When the leakage is to be determined, the shut-off device may be switched to the closed position, so that the determination of leakage can be performed separately for each of a first part of the target region on the side of the fuel tank and for a second part of the target region on the side of the canister.
In another embodiment, the failure detecting device may be used for a fuel vapor processing system including a fuel tank, a canister and a fuel pump. The failure detecting device may include a pressure detecting device configured to detect a pressure within a target region of the fuel vapor processing system, a closing device configured to close the target region, a pressure applying device configured to apply a pressure to the target region and driven by the fuel pump, and a leakage determination device configured to determine leakage of fuel vapor from the target region based on a change of a pressure within the target region in a closed state of the target region. The leakage determination device may have a first failure detection function and a second failure detection function. The first failure detection function may determine whether or not leakage is occurring based on a change of the pressure within the target region without applying the pressure to the target region by the pressure applying device. The second failure detection function may determine whether or not leakage is occurring based on the change of the pressure within the target region after the pressure applying device applies the pressure to the target region. The leakage determination device may execute the second failure detection function only when the determination by the first failure detecting function is suspended.
For example, the first failure detecting function may be periodically performed by a predetermined time, and the second failure detecting function may be executed if a difference between an actual pressure detected by the pressure detecting device and a previously estimated pressure is smaller than a predetermined value. The previously estimated pressure may be that estimated based on the temperature detected by the fuel temperature detecting device during execution of the first failure detecting function that is previously performed.
The fuel vapor processing system may be used for a vehicle engine. The leakage determination device may determine leakage of fuel vapor during stopping of the vehicle engine. The first failure detecting function may be executed immediately after the vehicle engine is stopped.
In general, immediately after the engine start switch is switched off for stopping a vehicle (i.e., immediately after stopping the vehicle engine), the temperature of the fuel within the fuel tank may tend to increase due to the residual heat of the engine. This may cause increase in a pressure of fuel vapor that may be produced in the fuel tank. As a result, the pressure of the target region may also tend to increase. According to the above failure detection device, the controller may execute the first failure detection function without applying the pressure to the target region. In this way, the increase of pressure due to the residual heat may be effectively used for determination of leakage by the first failure detection function. Therefore, it is possible to save the power consumption resulting by the operation of the fuel pump.
In some cases, it may be possible that the increase of temperature of the fuel is not sufficient for increasing the pressure of fuel vapor to a value necessary for determining leakage. In such a case, the leakage determination by the first failure detecting function may be suspended. Then, the second failure detection function may determine whether or not leakage is occurring while the pressure applying device applies the pressure to the target region. Therefore, the determination of occurrence of leakage can be reliably performed. In addition, because the fuel pump is driven only when it is necessary to apply the pressure to the target region, the power consumption can be saved also in this respect.
The failure detecting device may further include a fuel temperature detecting device configured to detect a temperature of a fuel stored in the fuel tank. The first failure detecting function may suspend the determination of leakage if a change of the temperature of the fuel per unit time is smaller than a predetermined value.
If the change of the temperature of the fuel per unit time is larger than the predetermined value, this may mean that the pressure within the fuel tank is unstable. In such a case, the pressure of the target region may be unstable even if a pressure is applied by the pressure applying device. Therefore, it is difficult to distinguish whether the pressure is changed due to leakage of the fuel vapor or the pressure is changed due to change of the temperature of the fuel. For this reason, the determination of leakage may not be properly performed. By executing the second failure detecting function in the case that the change of the temperature of the fuel per unit time is smaller than the predetermined value, the determination of leakage may be properly performed by the second failure detection function.
The leakage determination device may terminate the determination of leakage when a fuel is refueled into the fuel tank during execution of the first failure detecting function or the second failure detecting function. When the fuel is refueled into the fuel tank, it may be possible that the pressure within the target region including the fuel tank abruptly increases. In such a case, the leakage determination may not be correctly made. Therefore, by stopping the leakage determination during refueling, it may be possible to further save the power consumption. In addition, because the leakage determination is made while the target region is closed, no damage to the fuel tank may occur.
Embodiments will now be described with reference to the drawings. It should be noted that the present invention may not be limited to the embodiments and may be applied to any other fuel vapor processing systems as long as they have a basic structure including a fuel tank and a canister. It may be possible to include various additional components, such as a heater for heating the canister, a separation membrane that can separate and refine fuel vapor, a suction device such as a vacuum pump that applies a negative pressure to the canister for positively desorbing fuel vapor from canister. In addition, the fuel vapor processing system may be suitably applied to vehicles such as automobiles that run on highly volatile fuel such as gasoline.
A first embodiment will be described in connection with a failure detection device that may be used for a fuel vapor processing system incorporating an evaporation purge system utilizing an intake air of an engine. Referring to
A pressure sensor 11 may be disposed at the fuel tank 1 for detecting an internal pressure of a target region of the fuel vapor processing system including the fuel tank 1. The internal pressure of the target region will be hereinafter also called a “system pressure.” The pressure sensor 11 may be located at any position as long as it can detect the system pressure. For example, the pressure sensor 11 may be disposed at the canister 3, the vapor passage 4, or the purge passage 5 other than at the fuel tank 1. A fuel temperature sensor 12 may be disposed at the fuel tank 1 for detecting the temperature of the fuel F. Detection signals outputted from the pressure sensor 11 and the fuel temperature sensor 12 may be inputted to an engine control unit (ECU) 35 that serves as a controller. The ECU 35 may include a central processing unit (CPU), a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), etc. As will be explained later, the ROM may store a predetermined control program and a timer function. According to the predetermined control program, the CPU may control various components of the system at predetermined timings and may perform various processing operations.
Adsorbent C may be filled within the canister 3. The adsorbent C may be activated carbon that can allow passage of air while it can adsorb and desorb fuel vapor. A canister closed valve (CCV) 15 may be provided in the atmospheric passage 10 and may be operable to open and close the atmospheric passage 10. A purge passage valve 13 may be provided in the purge passage 5 and may be operable to open and close the purge passage 5. The CCV 15 and the purge passage valve 13 may serve as a closing device that can operate to open the target region to the atmosphere and to close the target region for interrupting communication of the target region with the atmosphere. More specifically, the CCV 15 may serve as a first closing device, and the purge passage valve 13 may serve as a second closing device. Thus, the target region may be a series of communication spaces extending from within the fuel tank 1 to the purge passage valve 13 and to the CCV 15. In other words, the determination of failure may be made to components including the fuel tank 1, the canister 3, the vapor passage 4, the purge passage 5 and the atmospheric passage 10. A positive and negative pressure relief valve device 16 may be provided in the atmospheric passage 10 in parallel to the CCV 15.
The ECU 35 may control opening and closing timings of the CCV 15. In this embodiment, the CCV 15 may be a step motor valve to which an electric power is applied only when switching between an open position and a closed position, while the valve is held at the open position or the closed position when no electric power is applied to the valve. More specifically, as shown in
An actuation shaft 62 may have an upper portion that is provided with a male thread engaging a female thread of the nut member 58. The actuation shaft 62 may serve as an output shaft of the step motor 51. The lower portion of the actuation shaft 62 may be supported by the bearing support 60 such that the actuation shaft 62 is prevented from rotation about its axis relative to the bearing support 60 while the actuation shaft 62 can move vertically in the axial direction. Therefore, as the rotor 56 rotates in a normal direction and a reverse direction, the actuation shaft 62 moves upward and downward in the axial direction. The lower end portion of the actuation shaft 62 may extend through the wall portion of the atmospheric passage 10. The valve member 50 may be formed integrally with the lower end portion of the actuation shaft 62 and may have a circular disk-shape that is coaxial with the actuation shaft 62. A valve seat 10a may be formed within the atmospheric passage 10. As the valve member 50 moves downward, the atmospheric passage 10 may be brought to an open state (communicating state) as indicated by solid lines in
In order to change the closed state indicated by chain lines in
On the other hand, in order to switch the open state indicated by solid lines in
The purge passage valve 13 may be an electromagnetic valve of a normally closed type, the opening and closing timings of which may be controlled by the ECU 35. A step motor type electromagnetic valve similar to the CCV 15 may be used as the purge passage valve 13. The relief valve device 16 may serve as a check valve for adjusting the pressure within the target region. As shown in
The operation of the fuel vapor processing system configured as described above will be hereinafter described. During stopping of the vehicle (e.g. the state where an engine start key is switched off for stopping the engine), the CCV 15 may be opened, while the purge passage valve 13 may be closed. If the internal pressure of the fuel tank 1 has increased due to the residual heat of the engine after stopping the vehicle (e.g., parking of the vehicle) or due to refueling of fuel into the fuel tank 1, a gas (a mixture of air and fuel vapor produced within the fuel tank 1) may flow into the canister 3 via the vapor passage 4. Then, the fuel vapor may be selectively adsorbed and retained by the adsorbent C of the canister 3. The remaining part (air) of the gas passing through the adsorbent C may flow from the canister 3 to the atmospheric passage 10 so as to be dissipated to the atmosphere. In this way, the pressure within the fuel tank 1 can be relieved without causing atmosphere pollution. As a result, it is possible to prevent potential damage to the fuel tank 1.
On the other hand, during running of the vehicle, the ECU 35 may open the purge passage valve 13 while the CCV 15 is opened. Then, an intake negative pressure of the engine 30 may be applied to the canister 3 via the purge passage 5. Therefore, fuel vapor adsorbed by the adsorbent C of the canister 3 may be desorbed and may be thereafter purged into the intake passage 31 via the purge passage 5. At that time, the atmospheric air may be introduced from the atmospheric passage 10 into the canister 3 to promote desorption of fuel vapor.
A failure determining process (i.e., a leakage detection process) for the fuel vapor processing system will now be described with reference to
First, determination is made as to whether or not a failure detection condition for determining leakage is satisfied. More specifically, as indicated as Phase 1 (hereinafter also called a “failure detection condition determination phase P1”) in
If it is determined that the failure detection condition is satisfied in the failure detection condition determination phase P1, the process may proceed to Phase 2 (hereinafter also called a “pre-determination phase P2”) shown in
On the other hand, if the pressure within the target region is within the predetermined pressure range or does not exceed the predetermined reference pressure, the leakage determination may be temporarily suspended. In such a case, if the amount of heat from the engine is small, it may take much time to increase the pressure. However, if the pressure of the target region is still within the predetermined pressure range after a predetermined time has elapsed, the CCV 15 may be once opened to relieve the system pressure to the atmosphere, and thereafter, the CCV 15 may be closed to reset the system pressure to the atmospheric pressure. If the change in the system pressure caused by this operation exceeds a predetermined value that may be previously set to the ECU 35, it may be determined that no leakage is occurring. However, if the change does not exceed the predetermined value, the determination of leakage may be suspended.
If the determination of leakage is suspended in the pre-determination phase P2, the process proceeds to Phase 3 that is a full-fledged leakage determination phase and is indicated as P3 in
During the leakage determination phase P3, the system pressure may decrease as the temperature of the fuel F decreases as shown in
As described previously, it may be determined that no leakage is occurring if the pressure of the target region (system pressure) is out of the predetermined pressure range set to the ECU 35. In many cases, a value of the system pressure determined to be out of the predetermined pressure range may be lower than a minimum value of the predetermined pressure range or may be lower than the reference pressure, because the system pressure may tend to decrease during the leakage determination. However, in some cases, the system pressure may increase, for example, due to increase of the temperature of the atmosphere. In such a case, the pressure may become higher than a maximum value of the predetermined pressure range or the reference pressure. On the other hand, if the system pressure is within the predetermined pressure range, the detected pressure (actual pressure) may be compared with the estimated pressure of the closed target region calculated in the fuel temperature store process (T0). If a difference between the actual pressure and the estimated pressure exceeds a predetermined value, it may be determined that leakage is occurring. If it has been determined in the leakage determination phase P3 that leakage is occurring or no leakage is occurring, no further determination stem will follow. On the other hand, if the difference between the actual pressure and the estimated pressure does not exceed the predetermined value, the determination may be suspended, and the process may proceed to the next leakage determination routine. The leakage determination phase P3 may be periodically performed by the number of times set to the timer of the ECU 35.
Incidentally, if it is detected that the fuel is being refueled during the determination of the leakage including that performed in the pre-determination phase P2, the ECU 35 may stop the determination process. For this purpose, a suitable sensor may be disposed at the fuel tank 1 for detecting refueling and outputting a detection signal to the ECU 35.
The above embodiment described above may be modified in various ways. For example, in the above embodiment, a step motor type valve is used as the CCV 15 that may be switched between the open position and the closed poison upon receiving the supply of the electric power and may be kept in either the open position or the close position when receiving no electric power. However, it may be possible to use any other valves, such as an electromagnetic valve with a magnet, or a valve including a DC motor and a reduction gear, for the CCV 15. The electromagnetic valve with a magnet may be called an electromagnetic lock. Referring to
In the case of the electromagnetic valve 70 shown in
In order to move the valve portion 71a from the closed position to the open position, an electric power may be supplied to the upper electromagnet 72a to generate a magnetic field, so that the actuation portion 71b may be attracted to the electromagnet 72a against the urging force of the compression spring 74. In this way, the valve member 71 may be opened. After the valve member 71 is opened, the supply of electric power to the electromagnet 72a may be stopped. However, because the actuation portion 71b and the housing 73 are magnetized, the valve member 71 may be kept at the open position even after the supply of electric power to the electromagnet 72a is stopped.
In the case of the embodiment shown in
In the case of the above embodiments, the determination of leakage from the target system is made by using only one pressure sensor 11 both for the side of the fuel tank 1 and the side of the canister 3. However, it may be possible to perform determination of leakage separately on the side of the fuel tank 1 and on the side of the canister 3 as shown in
Another embodiment will now be described. Referring to
The fuel vapor processing system shown in
A fuel shut-off valve 14 may be provided in the branch passage 7 and may be opened for allowing introduction of the fuel F into the jet pump 8 and may be closed for preventing introduction of the fuel F into the jet pump 8. In another embodiment, the fuel shut-off valve 14 may be provided in the jet pump 8. For example, a needle valve (not shown) serving as a shut-off valve may be provided in a nozzle body 46 (see
As shown in
When the fuel shut-off valve 14 is opened, the fuel F injected from the fuel pump 2 may be introduced into the jet pump 8 via the fuel delivery passage 6, the branch passage 7 and the fuel introduction port 45p. Thereafter, the introduced fuel F may be injected from the nozzle body 46 to flow at a high speed in the axial direction through the throat 42 and the central region of the diffuser 44. Then, a negative pressure may be produced in the pressure reduction chamber 43 by a venturi effect. Therefore, a suction force may be produced in the suction port 41p and the suction passage 9, so that the atmospheric air may be drawn through the suction passage 9. The drawn air may be discharged from the diffuser portion 44 into the fuel tank 1 together with the fuel F injected from the nozzle body 46. As a result, a pressure may be applied to the target region of the system including the fuel tank 1. In this way, the jet pump 8 may serve to apply a positive pressure to the target region by utilizing the driving force of the fuel pump 2.
Similar to the purge passage valve 13, the fuel shut-off valve 14 may be an electromagnetic valve of a normally closed type, the opening and closing timings of which may be controlled by the ECU 35. Alternatively, a step motor valve similar to that of the CCV 15 may be used for the shut-off valve 14.
The operation of the fuel vapor processing system shown in
On the other hand, during running of the vehicle, the ECU 35 may open the purge passage valve 13 while the CCV 15 is opened and the fuel shut-off valve 14 is closed. Therefore, similar to the first embodiment, an intake negative pressure of the engine 30 may be applied to the canister 3 via the purge passage 5. Hence, fuel vapor adsorbed by the adsorbent C of the canister 3 may be desorbed and may be thereafter purged into the intake passage 31 via the purge passage 5.
A failure determining process (leakage detection process) for the fuel vapor processing system shown in
Initially, a first failure detection process may be performed based on a change in pressure that may be caused according to a change in temperature due to the residual heat of the engine without driving the fuel pump 2. After that, a second failure detection process may be performed while a pressure is applied to the target region by driving the fuel pump 2. In the first failure detection process, prior to the determination of leakage, determination is made as to whether or not a failure detection condition for determining leakage is satisfied as indicated as Phase 1-1 (hereinafter also called a “failure detection condition determination phase P1-1”) in
If it is determined that the failure detection condition is satisfied in the failure detection condition determination phase P1-1, the process may proceed to a leakage determination phase. However, also in this embodiment, as indicated as Phase 1-2 (hereinafter also called a “pre-determination phase P1-2”), a pre-determination phase similar to the pre-determination phase P2 shown in
On the other hand, if the pressure of the target region is still within the predetermined pressure range after a predetermined time has elapsed, the CCV 15 may be once opened to relieve the system pressure to the atmosphere, and thereafter, the CCV 15 may be closed to reset the system pressure to the atmospheric pressure. If the change in the system pressure caused by this operation exceeds a predetermined value that may be previously set to the ECU 35, it may be determined that no leakage is occurring. If the change does not exceed the predetermined value, the determination of leakage may be suspended.
If the determination of leakage is suspended in the pre-determination phase P1-2, the process proceeds to a full-fledged leakage determination phase that is Phase 1-3 indicated as P1-3 in
Also, the leakage determination phase P1-3 may be basically the same as the leakage determination phase P3. Thus, in the case that the leakage determination is suspended in the pre-determination phase P1-2, the leakage determination is made on the condition that the CCV 15 is closed and that the system pressure is in stable. If the system pressure is not in stable, the leakage determination may be suspended, and the process proceeds to the next leakage determination routine. If the CCV 15 is opened, the ECU 35 may close the CCV 15, and the process may then proceed to the fuel temperature store process (T0).
As described previously, it may be determined that no leakage is occurring if the pressure of the target region (system pressure) is out of the predetermined pressure range set to the ECU 35. On the other hand, if the system pressure is within the predetermined pressure range, a next fuel temperature store process (T1) may be performed. The leakage determination phase P1-3 is different from the leakage determination phase P3 shown in
As shown in
If the failure detection condition determination phase P2-1 determines that the detection condition is satisfied, the process proceeds to Phase 2-2 (hereinafter also called “execution condition determination phase P2-2) shown in
If the execution condition determination phase P2-2 determines that the execution condition is satisfied, the process proceeds to Phase 2-3 (hereinafter also called “leakage determination phase P2-3) shown in
Also in this embodiment, the leakage determination may be forcibly stopped if refueling of fuel into the fuel tank 1 is detected during the first failure detection process or the second failure detection process.
Also in this embodiment, the CCV 15 may not be limited to a step motor valve and may be an electromagnetic valve with a magnet, or a valve including a DC motor and a reduction gear. The electromagnetic valve with a magnet may be that described in the first embodiment and shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2013-211855 | Oct 2013 | JP | national |
2013-211858 | Oct 2013 | JP | national |