Patent Grant
6855032
The present invention relates to a method for maintaining fine force control between a polishing pad and a wafer that is being polished by the pad. The present invention also relates to an apparatus that utilizes actuators to perform fine force control without the need of gap measurement.
Chemical mechanical polishing apparatuses (CMP apparatuses) are commonly used for the planarization of silicon wafers. In one type of CMP apparatus, a rotating pad is placed in contact with a rotating wafer and the pad is moved back and forth laterally relative to the rotating wafer. Additionally, a polishing slurry is forced into a gap between the wafer and the pad. The slurry is typically an aqueous solution that carries a high concentration of nanoscale abrasive particles. The slurry can play a number of critical roles in the polishing of the wafer. For example, the chemical composition of the slurry can after the surface properties of the wafer, soften the wafer surface and make it amenable to material removal. Further, the abrasive particles in the slurry remove material from the wafer surface by cutting nanoscale grooves in the wafer surface.
Some in the industry believe that most of the material removal occurs when pad asperities on the pad are in contact with the wafer, trapping slurry particles between them. The asperities push the particles into the wafer surface and drag them along so the abrasive particles act as nanoscale cutting tools.
Designers are constantly trying to improve the accuracy and efficiency of CMP apparatuses. For example, if the force applied by the pad against the wafer is not uniform, the material removal rate will not be uniform. Additionally, if the force applied by the pad against the wafer is not precisely controlled, the planarity of the wafer and accuracy of the CMP apparatus will be diminished.
The present invention is directed to an actuator assembly including a first attraction only actuator and a control system. In one embodiment, the first actuator includes a first core, a conductor secured to the first core, and a second core spaced apart a component gap from the first core. Further, the control system directs current to the conductor to attract the second core to the first core. In one embodiment, the amount of current directed to the conductor is calculated without measuring the component gap.
In one embodiment, the control system utilizes the simplified formula of I=√{square root over (F)} to calculate the amount of current directed to the conductor. In this embodiment, I is the current and F is the force generated by the first actuator.
In another embodiment, the control system calculates the component gap from at least one previous sample. The calculated component gap is used for calculating the amount of current directed to the conductor at a subsequent time. In another embodiment, the control system uses calculated component gap information from a plurality of previous samples to determine the amount of current to direct to the conductor at a subsequent time.
The present is also directed to a system and method for accurately controlling the force applied by a pad against a wafer. In some embodiments, the present invention provides a system and method for controlling actuators without directly measuring the component gap between components of the actuators and an actuator assembly that can be controlled without measuring the component gap.
The present invention is also directed to a CMP apparatus, a method for controlling an actuator assembly, and a method for making a CMP apparatus. Additionally, the present invention is directed to an object or wafer that has been polished by the methods or apparatuses provided herein.
The novel features of this invention, as well as the invention itself, both as to its structure and its operation, will be best understood from the accompanying drawings, taken in conjunction with the accompanying description, in which similar reference characters refer to similar parts, and in which:
In
The loading station 16 provides a holding area for storing a number of substrates 12 that have not yet been prepared for their intended purpose. For example, the substrates 12 can be unplanarized and unpolished. The substrates 12 are transferred from the loading station 16 to the receiving station 22. The substrate 12 is then transferred to the polishing station 20 where the substrate 12 is planarized and polished to meet the desired specifications. After the substrate 12 has been planarized and polished, the substrate 12 is then transferred through the receiving station 22 to the cleaning station 18. The cleaning station 18 can include a rotating brush (not shown) that gently cleans a surface of the substrate 12. After the cleaning procedure, the substrate 12 is transferred to the loading station 16 from where it can be removed from the apparatus 10 and further processed.
In the embodiment illustrated in
The polishing base 26 is substantially disk shaped and is designed to be rotated in either a clockwise or counterclockwise direction about a centrally located axis. As shown in
In
The substrate rotator 42 can be designed to rotate the substrate 12 in the clockwise direction or the counter clockwise direction. In one embodiment, the substrate rotator 42 includes a motor that selectively rotates the substrate 12 between approximately negative 400 and 400 revolutions per minute.
In
The transfer device 29 transfers the substrate 12 to be polished from the receiving station 22 to the substrate holder 40 positioned in the load/unload area 34. Subsequently, the transfer device 28 transfers a polished substrate 12 from the substrate holder 40 positioned in the load/unload area 34 through the receiving station 22 to the cleaning station 18. The transfer devices 28 and 29 can include a robotic arm that is controlled by the control system 24.
The polishing station 20 illustrated in
The design of each polishing system 30 can be varied. In
The pad conditioner 46 conditions and/or roughens the polishing surface of the polishing pad 48 so that the polishing surface has a plurality of asperities and to ensure that the polishing surface of the polishing pad 48 is uniform.
The pad rotator 52 rotates the polishing pad 48. The rotation rate can vary. In one embodiment, the pad rotator 52 includes a rotator motor (not shown) that selectively rotates the polishing pad 48 at between approximately negative 800 and 800 revolutions per minute.
In one embodiment, the difference in relative rotational movement of the pad rotator 52 and the substrate rotator 42 is designed to be relatively high, approximately between negative 800 and 400 revolutions per minute. In this embodiment, the high speed relative rotation, in combination with relatively low pressure between the polishing pad 48 and the substrate 12 helps to enable greater precision in planarizing and polishing the substrate 12. Further, the polishing pad 48 and the substrate 12 can be rotated in the same or opposite direction.
The pad lateral mover 54 selectively moves and sweeps the pad 48 back and forth laterally, in an oscillating motion relative to the substrate 12. This allows for uniform polishing across the entire surface of the substrate 12. In one embodiment, the pad lateral mover 54 moves the polishing pad 48 laterally a distance of between approximately 30 mm and 80 mm and at a rate of between approximately 1 mm/sec and 200 mm/sec. However, other rates are possible.
The pad vertical mover assembly 58 moves the polishing pad 48 vertically and at least partly controls the force that the polishing pad 48 applies against the substrate 12. In one embodiment, the pad vertical mover assembly 58 applies between approximately 0 and 10 psi between the polishing pad 48 and the substrate 12. The pad vertical mover assembly 58 further provides forces to help maintain the force between the polishing pad 48 and the substrate 12 at a substantially equal level across the cross-section of the polishing pad 48. In one embodiment, the pad vertical mover assembly 58 maintains the force at a substantially equal level across the cross-section of the polishing pad 48 above the substrate 12 regardless of whether the polishing pad 48 is positioned entirely above the surface of the substrate 12 or whether the polishing pad 48 extends beyond the outer edge of the substrate 12. The pad vertical mover assembly 58 is described in greater detail below.
The fluid source 32 provides a pressurized polishing fluid 60 (illustrated as circles) into a gap 64 (illustrated in
In another embodiment, the slurry can include non-abrasive particles and/or abrasive-free particles.
In one embodiment, the chemical solution in the slurry can create a chemical reaction at the surface of the substrate 12 which makes the surface of the substrate 12 susceptible to mechanical abrasion by the particles suspended in the slurry. For example, when polishing metals, the slurry may include an oxidizer to oxidize the metal because metal oxides polish faster compared to the pure metal. Additionally, the fluid 60 can also include a suspension agent that is made up of mostly water plus fats, oils or alcohols that serve to keep the abrasive particles in suspension throughout the slurry.
The rate of fluid flow and the pressure of the fluid 60 directed into the gap 64 can also vary. In one embodiment, the fluid 60 is directed into the gap 64 at a flow rate of between approximately 50 ml/sec and 300 ml/sec and at a pressure of between approximately 0 and 10 psi.
The control system 24 controls the operation of the components of the apparatus 10 to accurately and quickly polish the substrates 12. For example, the control system 24 can control (i) each substrate rotator 42 to control the rotation rate of each substrate 12, (ii) each pad rotator 52 to control the rotation rate of each polishing pad 48, (iii) each pad lateral mover 54 to control the lateral movement of each polishing pad 48, (iv) each pad vertical mover assembly 58 to control the force applied by each polishing pad 48, and (v) the fluid source 32 to control the fluid flow in the gap 64.
The control system 24 can include one or more conventional CPU's and data storage systems. In one embodiment, the control system 24 is capable of high volume data processing.
In this embodiment, the polishing pad 48 is relatively small in diameter compared to the substrate 12. This can facilitate high speed rotation of the polishing pad 48. Additionally, the relatively small size of the polishing pad 48 results in a polishing pad 48 that is lightweight, with less pad deformity, which in turn allows for improved planarity. Alternatively, for example, the polishing pad 48 can have an outer diameter that is greater than the outer diameter of the substrate 12.
The fluid 60 supplied under pressure into the gap 64 by the fluid source 32 generates hydrostatic lift under the polishing pad 48 that reduces the load applied to the asperities of the polishing surface of the polishing pad 48.
In one embodiment, the polishing pad 48 is made of a relatively soft and wetted material such as blown polyurethane or similar substance. For example, the polishing pad 48 can be made of felt impregnated with polyurethane. The polishing surface of the polishing pad 48 is roughened to create a plurality of asperities on the polishing surface of the polishing pad 48.
In one embodiment, the polishing pad 48 is flat, annular shaped and has an outer diameter of between approximately 260 mm and 150 mm and an inner diameter of between approximately 80 mm and 40 mm. Polishing pads 48 within this range can be used to polish a wafer having a diameter of approximately 300 mm or 200 mm. Alternatively, the polishing pad 48 can be larger or smaller than the ranges provided above.
Additionally, in one embodiment, the polishing surface of the polishing pad 48 includes a plurality of grooves 300 positioned in a rectangular shaped grid pattern. Each of the grooves 300 has a groove depth and a groove width. The grooves 300 cooperate to form a plurality of spaced apart plateaus on the polishing surface of the polishing pad 48. The grooves 300 reduce pressure and hydrostatic lift in the gap 64. It should be noted that the groove shape and pattern can be changed to alter the polishing characteristics of the polishing pad 48. For example, each groove 300 can be a depth and a width on the order of between approximately 0.1 mm and 1.5 mm. Also, the grooves 300 may be in a different pattern and shape. For example, a set of radial grooves combined with a set of circular grooves also could be utilized.
Alternatively, a polishing pad 48 without grooves can be used in one or more of the polishing systems 30. Still alternatively, the polishing pad 48 could be another type of substrate.
As an overview, in one embodiment, the control system 24 (illustrated in
The pad rotator 52 includes a rotator shaft 402 that is coupled to and rotated about a central axis by the rotator motor (not shown). In
The fluid conduit 400 is used to transfer fluid between the fluid source 32 (illustrated in
The vertical mover assembly 58 couples and secures the pad holder 50 to the rotator shaft 402. Additionally, the vertical mover assembly 58 is used to control the force of the pad 48 against the substrate 12 (illustrated in
In
The mover drive ring 412 is generally disk shaped and is secured to the bottom of the side wall 418 of the mover housing 410. A bottom of the mover drive ring 412 is secured to the top of the pad holder 50. In one embodiment, the mover drive ring 412 is made of a magnetic material such as iron, silicon steal or Ni—Fe Steel. In this embodiment, the mover drive ring 412 transfers rotational force from the rotator shaft 402 to the pad holder 50. The mover housing 410 and the mover drive ring 412 cooperate to define a mover chamber 422.
The mover fluid source 414 directs a fluid 424 (illustrated as triangles) into the mover chamber 422 to adjust the position of the mover drive ring 412, and pad holder 50 relative to the rotator shaft 402. As the pressure of the pressurized fluid inside the mover chamber 422 increases, the mover drive ring 412 will move downward so as to slightly increase the volume inside the mover chamber 422. Conversely, as the pressure of the pressurized fluid inside the mover chamber 422 decreases, the mover drive ring 412 will deform and move upward so as to slightly decrease the volume inside the mover chamber 422. As the mover drive ring 412 moves so as to slightly increase or decrease the volume inside the mover chamber 422, the mover drive ring 412 transfers the pressure from inside the mover chamber 422 toward the polishing pad 48 to influence the force that the polishing pad 48 applies against the substrate 12.
The type of fluid 424 utilized can be varied. In one embodiment, the fluid 424 is air. Alternatively, for example, the fluid 424 can be another type of gas.
As a result of this structure, the rotational movement of the rotator shaft 402 results in rotational movement of the mover housing 410, the mover drive ring 412, the pad holder 50, and the polishing pad 48.
The design of the second pad mover 408 can be varied. In
The bearing assembly 428 secures the first section 434 of the first housing 426 to the rotator shaft 402 and allows the rotator shaft 402 to rotate relative to the first housing 426. In one embodiment, the bearing assembly 428 includes a rolling type bearing. Additionally, another structure or frame (not shown) can be used to secure the first housing.
The second housing 430 is generally annular tube shaped and includes a bottom end that is fixedly secured to the top of the pad holder 50. In this embodiment, the second housing 430 rotates concurrently with the pad holder 50, the rotator shaft 402 and the pad 48. Further, the second housing 430 rotates relative to the stationary first housing 426.
The actuator assembly 432 defines one or more actuators 438 that cooperate to move the second housing 430, the pad holder 50 and the pad 48 relative to the first housing 426, the rotator shaft 402, and the substrate 12. For example, in one embodiment, the actuator assembly 432 includes a plurality of attraction only type actuators 438. In
It should be noted that at any given time, the component gap 444 for each of the actuators 438 is different. Further, during operation of the apparatus 10, the component gap 444 for each of the actuators 438 usually increases as the polishing pad 48 (illustrated in
In this embodiment, each of the first actuator subassemblies 440 includes a sensor 500, a first core 502 and a pair of spaced apart conductors 504. Further, the second actuator subassembly 442 is generally flat annular ring shaped and defines a second core 506.
In this embodiment, the control system 524 directs current to the conductors 504 of each first actuator subassembly 440 to attract the second core 506 towards the first core 502.
The sensor 500 can be a load cell, e.g. a strain guage, or another type of sensor that measures the force that acts upon the sensor 500. Because the sensor 500 secures the first actuator subassembly 440 to the first housing 426 (illustrated in FIG. 4B), each sensor 500 measures the force generated by the attraction between the actuator subassemblies 440, 442.
Each first actuator subassembly 440 and the second actuator subassembly 442 cooperate to form an actuator 438. Each actuator 438, in this embodiment, is an electromagnetic, attraction only actuator. In one embodiment, the first core 502 is a C-shaped core (“C core”) and the second core 506 is a ring-shaped. The second core 506 is substantially ring-shaped and rotates with the pad holder 50 (illustrated in FIG. 4B). As the ring-shaped second core 506 rotates, a portion of the second core 506 will be positioned substantially directly beneath each of the first cores 502 at any point in time. The portion of the ring-shaped second core 506 that interacts with the first core 502 at any point in time is substantially I-shaped. As the second core 506 continues to rotate, the particular portion of the second core 506 that is positioned substantially directly beneath each of the first cores 502 will change, but at any point in time there will always be some portion of the second core 506 that will be positioned so as to interact with each of the first cores 502.
The first cores 502 and the second core 506 are each made of a magnetic material such as iron, silicon steel or Ni—Fe steel. The conductors 504 are made of an electrically conductive material.
For the first actuator 438F, a first current I1 (not shown) directed through the conductor(s) 504 generates an electromagnetic field that attracts the second core 506 towards the first core 502. This results in an attractive first force F1 across the first component gap g1. Similarly, for the second actuator 438S, a second current I2 directed through the conductor(s) 504 generates an electromagnetic field that attracts the second core 506 towards the first core 502. This results in an attractive second force F2 across the second gap 92. Furthermore, for the third actuator 438T, a third current I3 directed through the conductor(s) 504 generates an electromagnetic field that attracts the second core 506 towards the first core 502. This results in an attractive third force F3 across the gap g3. The amount of current determines the amount of attraction. With this design, the first actuator 438F urges the pad 48 with a controlled first force F1, the second actuator 438S urges the pad 48 with a controlled second force F2, and the third actuator 438T urges the pad 48 with a controlled third force F3.
The electromagnet actuators 438 illustrated in
The control system 524 (i) determines the amount of current that should be directed to the conductors 504 of the first actuator subassemblies 440 and the amount of pressure in mover chamber 422, (ii) controls the mover fluid source 414 to direct fluid 424 into the mover chamber 422, and (iii) directs current to the conductors 504 of the first actuator subassemblies 440 to achieve the desired force between the pad 48 (illustrated in
In one embodiment, the control system 524 independently directs current to each of the conductors 504 of the second pad mover 408 at a plurality of discrete time steps t, namely t1, t2, t3, t4 . . . tx. At each time step, the sensor 500 also measures the force that is generated by each of the actuators 438F, 438S, 438T. The time interval that separates each time step t can be varied. In alternative examples, the time interval between time steps t is approximately 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 or 3 milliseconds. However, the time interval can be larger or smaller than these values. The term time interval is also referred to herein as sampling rate.
Each actuator 438F, 438S, 438T requires some kind of commutation to globally compensate for the non linearity between the input current and component gap to the force output. The control system uses a commutation formula to determine the amount of current that is to be individually directed to each of the conductors 504 of the second pad mover to achieve the forces F1, F2, F3 at each actuator 438F, 438S, 438T at each time step t. Stated another way, the control system calculates a first current I1 needed at the first actuator 438F to achieve the desired F1 at the first actuator 438F, a second current I2 needed at the second actuator 428S to achieve the desired F2 at the second actuator 438S, and a third current I3 needed at the third actuator 428T to achieve the desired F3 at the third actuator 438T. The currents I1 I2 I3 are directed to the actuators 438F, 438S, 438T and the actuators 438F, 438S, 438T impart forces F1, F2, F3 on the pad at each time step t.
In one embodiment, the control system 524 independently directs current I1 I2 I3 to each of the conductors 504 of the second pad mover 408 at each time step t so that the forces F1, F2, F3 generated by each of the actuators 438F, 438S, 438T is approximately the same. In alternative embodiments, the control system 24 directs current to the conductors 504 so that the forces F1, F2, F3 generated by each of the actuators 438F, 438S, 438T is within at least approximately 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, or 100 Newtons. Stated another way, in alternative embodiments, the control system 24 directs current to the conductors 504 so that the forces F1, F2, F3 generated by each of the actuators 438F, 438S, 438T are within at least approximately 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 40, or 50 percent. Alternatively, the control system 24 can direct current to the conductors 504 so that the force of the pad 48 against the substrate 12 is substantially uniform across the pad 48 that is against the substrate 12. In alternative embodiments, for example, the control system 24 can direct current to the conductors 504 so that difference in force of the pad 48 against the substrate 12 at any and every two spaced apart locations is within at least approximately 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.5 or 1 newtons. Stated another way, in alternative embodiments, the control system 24 can direct current to the conductors 504 so that difference in force of the pad 48 against the substrate 12 at any and every two spaced apart locations is within at least approximately 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10 or 20 percent.
As provided herein, the actual output force F1, F2, F3 generated by one of the actuators 438F, 438S, 438T can be expressed as follows:
F=k(I2)/(g2) equation 1
where F is in Newtons; k is an electromagnetic constant which is dependent upon the geometries of the first core and the second core, and the number of coil turns in the conductor(s); I is current, measured in amperes that is directed to the conductor(s); and g is the gap distance, measured in meters.
The actual value of k is not exactly known because they depend upon the geometries, shape and alignment of the first core and the second core. In one embodiment, k=½N2μowd; where N=the number of coil turns in the conductor(s); μo=a physical constant of about 1.26×10−6 H/m; w=the half width of the center of the first core, in meters; and d=the depth of the center of the first core, in meters. In one embodiment, k is equal to 7.73×10−6 kg m3/s2A2;
Equation 1 can be rewritten as follows:
I=g×√{square root over ((F/k))} equation 2
g=I×√{square root over ((k/F))} equation 3
However, in some embodiments, it is very difficult to accurately measure the component gap g1 g2 g3 at each of the actuators 438F, 438S, 438T.
In one embodiment, when the measured value of the component gap is not available and when the component gap g1 g2 g3 does not deviate from an operational value g′, then a simplified commutation may be used. In one embodiment, the operational value g′ is within with a range of between approximately 0.5 mm and 1.5 mm. However, the range may be larger or smaller.
In this example, because g′ and k are constant, they can be merged to the control gain and then equation 2 can be simplified as follows:
I=√{square root over (F)} equation 4
In this embodiment, at each time step t, the control system (i) takes the square root of the F1 to determine the current I1 that should be directed to the first actuator 438F, (ii) takes the square root of the F2 to determine the current I2 that should be directed to the second actuator 438S, and (iii) takes the square root of the F3 to determine the current I3 that should be directed to the third actuator 438T.
In an alternative embodiment, for a system without component gap measurement but with large deviation of the component gap g1 g2 g3, a calculated component gap g1 g2 g3 can be calculated by the control system using information from one or more previous samples. For example, equation 3 from above can be rewritten as following:
g(t−1)=I(t−1)×√{square root over ((k/F(t−1)))} equation 5
In this embodiment, F is the actual force F1, F2, F3 applied by the particular actuator 438F, 438S, 438T at a previous time step t. The actual force F1, F2, F3 applied by the particular actuator 438F, 438S, 438T can be measured by the sensor 500 of each actuator 438F, 438S, 438T.
In one embodiment, if the control-sampling rate (length of time interval) is much faster than the rate at which the component gap g1 g2 g3 changes, then the component gap g1 g2 g3 can be estimated by using only one earlier sample data.
g″(t)=g(t−1)=I(t−1)×√{square root over ((k/F(t−1)))} equation 6
Referring to
As an example, in this embodiment, at time step t5, (i) the sensor 500 measures the F1 applied by the first actuator 438F, (ii) the sensor 500 measures the F2 applied by the second actuator 438S, and (iii) the sensor 500 measures the F3 applied by the third actuator 438T. Subsequently, during the time interval between time step t5 and t6, the control system (i) uses the value of F1 to determine the approximate gap g1 and the current I1 that should be directed to the first actuator 438F at time step t6, (ii) uses the value of F2 to determine to determine the approximate gap g2 and the current I2 that should be directed to the second actuator 438S at time step t6, and (iii) uses the value of F3 to determine the approximate gap g2 and the current I3 that should be directed to the third actuator 438T at time step t6. This same process can be used in subsequent time steps t to determine the appropriate for currents I1 I2 I3.
However, in an alternative embodiment, if the control-sampling rate (length of time interval) is much slower than the rate at which the component gap g1 g2 g3 changes, then the component gap g1 g2 g3 can be estimated by using data from at least two earlier samples.
The parameters αj(t) can be fixed numbers or updated online as follows:
αj(t+1)=αj(t)+Δαj(t) equation 8
Δαj(t)=αg(t−j)(g(t)−ĝ(t)) equation 9
The number of earlier samples utilized will vary according to the rate at which the component gap g1 g2 g3 changes. Generally speaking, more control samples are used if the component gap g1 g2 g3 rapidly changes than when the component gap g1 g2 g3 does not change as rapidly. In alternative examples, the control system can utilize 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, or 10 previous control samples.
For example, in one embodiment, the control system utilizes 4 previous control steps. Referring to
As an example, in this embodiment, at time step t8, (i) the sensor 500 measures the F1 applied by the first actuator 438F at t4-t7, (ii) the sensor 500 measures the F2 applied by the second actuator 438S at t4-t7, and (iii) the sensor 500 measures the F3 applied by the third actuator 438T at t4-t7. Subsequently, during the time interval between time step t7 and t8, the control system (i) uses the values of F1 at t4-t7 to determine the current I1 that should be directed to the first actuator 438F at time step t8, (ii) uses the values of F1 to determine the current I2 that should be directed to the second actuator 438S at time step t8, and (iii) uses the values of F3 at t4-t7 to determine the current 13 that should be directed to the third actuator 438T at time step t8. This same process can be used in subsequent time steps t to determine the appropriate for currents I1 I2 I3.
It should be noted that in this embodiment, the slope of measured forces F1 (solid line), F2 (solid line with triangles), and F3 (solid line with circles) can be taken into consideration when calculating the respective gap g1 g2 g3.
In one embodiment, as illustrated in
Additionally, as illustrated in
Damping other than the hardware setup may be provided by feedback control of the damping enhancement. In one embodiment, in order to do that, derivative of force output, (i.e. jerk) can be estimated using a filter.
Simple difference
D(z−1)=1/T(1−z−1)
Higher order estimation has smoother output with the tradeoff of longer time delays.
The graphs provided herein illustrate that with stiffness compensation and additional software damping, the system dynamics can be well re-shaped. Hence the resonance due to the mounting can be completely removed.
While the particular apparatus 10 and method as herein shown and disclosed in detail is fully capable of obtaining the objects and providing the advantages herein before stated, it is to be understood that it is merely illustrative of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention and that no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown other than as described in the appended claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4811522 | Gill, Jr. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 5882243 | Das et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5989103 | Birang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5989104 | Kim et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6059638 | Crevasse et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6213855 | Natalicio | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 20020033230 | Hayashi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
