Flat panel array antenna

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8558746
  • Patent Number
    8,558,746
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, November 16, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 15, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A panel array antenna has a waveguide network coupling an input feed to a plurality of primary coupling cavities. Each of the primary coupling cavities is provided with four output ports, each of the output ports coupled to a horn radiator. The waveguide network is provided on a second side of an input layer and a first side of a first intermediate layer. The primary coupling cavities are provided on a second side of the first intermediate layer and the output ports provided on a first side of an output layer, each of the output ports in communication with one of the horn radiators. The horn radiators are provided as an array of horn radiators on a second side of the output layer. Additional layers, such as a second intermediate layer and/or slot layer, may also be applied, for example to further simplify the waveguide network and/or rotate the polarization.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates to a microwave antenna. More particularly, the invention provides a flat panel array antenna utilizing cavity coupling to simplify corporate feed network requirements.


2. Description of Related Art


Flat panel array antenna technology has not been extensively applied within the licensed commercial microwave point to point or point to multipoint market, where more stringent electromagnetic radiation envelope characteristics consistent with efficient spectrum management are common. Antenna solutions derived from traditional reflector antenna configurations such as prime focus fed axi-symmetric geometries provide high levels of antenna directivity and gain at relatively low cost. However, the extensive structure of a reflector dish and associated feed may require significantly enhanced support structure to withstand wind loads, which may increase overall costs. Further, the increased size of reflector antenna assemblies and the support structure required may be viewed as a visual blight.


Array antennas typically utilize either printed circuit technology or waveguide technology. The components of the array which interface with free-space, known as the elements, typically utilize microstrip geometries, such as patches, dipoles or slots, or waveguide components such as horns, or slots respectively. The various elements are interconnected by a feed network, so that the resulting electromagnetic radiation characteristics of the antenna conform to desired characteristics, such as the antenna beam pointing direction, directivity, and sidelobe distribution.


Flat panel arrays may be formed, for example, using waveguide or printed slot arrays in either resonant or travelling wave configurations. Resonant configurations typically cannot achieve the requisite electromagnetic characteristics over the bandwidths utilized in the terrestrial point-to-point market sector, whilst travelling wave arrays typically provide a mainbeam radiation pattern which moves in angular position with frequency. Because terrestrial point to point communications generally operate with Go/Return channels spaced over different parts of the frequency band being utilized, movement of the mainbeam with respect to frequency may prevent simultaneous efficient alignment of the link for both channels.


Corporate fed waveguide or slot elements may enable fixed beam antennas exhibiting suitable characteristics. However, it may be necessary to select an element spacing which is generally less than one wavelength, in order to avoid the generation of secondary beams known as grating lobes, which do not respect regulatory requirements, and detract from the antenna efficiency. This close element spacing may conflict with the feed network dimensions. For example, in order to accommodate impedance matching and/or phase equalisation, a larger element spacing is required to provide sufficient volume to accommodate not only the feed network, but also sufficient material for electrical and mechanical wall contact between adjacent transmission lines (thereby isolating adjacent lines and preventing un-wanted interline coupling/cross-talk).


The elements of antenna arrays may be characterized by the array dimensions, such as a 2N×2M element array where N and M are integers. In a typical N×M corporate fed array, (N×M)1 T-type power dividers may be required, along with N×M feed bends and multiple N×M stepped transitions in order to provide acceptable VSWR performance. Thereby, the feed network requirements may be a limiting factor of space efficient corporate fed flat panel arrays.


Therefore it is the object of the invention to provide an apparatus that overcomes limitations in the prior art, and in so doing present a solution that allows such a flat panel antenna to provide electrical performance approaching that of much larger traditional reflector antennas which meet the most stringent electrical specifications over the operating band used for a typical microwave communication link.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention, where like reference numbers in the drawing figures refer to the same feature or element and may not be described in detail for every drawing figure in which they appear and, together with a general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention.



FIG. 1 is a schematic isometric angled front view of an exemplary flat panel antenna.



FIG. 2 is a schematic isometric angled back view of the flat panel antenna of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a schematic isometric exploded view of FIG. 1.



FIG. 4 is a schematic isometric exploded view of FIG. 2.



FIG. 5 is a close-up view of the second side of the intermediate layer of FIG. 3.



FIG. 6 is a close-up view of the first side of the intermediate layer of FIG. 3.



FIG. 7 is a close-up view of the second side of the output layer of FIG. 3.



FIG. 8 is a close-up view of the first side of the output layer of FIG. 3.



FIG. 9 is a schematic isometric angled front view of an alternative waveguide network embodiment of a flat panel antenna.



FIG. 10 is a schematic isometric angled back view of the flat panel antenna of FIG. 9.



FIG. 11 is a schematic isometric angled front view of an exemplary rotated polarization embodiment of a flat panel antenna.



FIG. 12 is a schematic isometric angled back view of the flat panel antenna of FIG. 11.



FIG. 13 is a schematic isometric exploded view of FIG. 11.



FIG. 14 is a schematic isometric exploded view of FIG. 12.



FIG. 15 is a close-up view of the slot layer of FIG. 13.



FIG. 16 is a close-up view of the second side of the intermediate layer of FIG. 13.



FIG. 17 is a close-up partial cut away front view of FIG. 11.



FIG. 18 is a schematic isometric angled front view of an exemplary second intermediate layer embodiment of a flat panel antenna.



FIG. 19 is a schematic isometric angled back view of the flat panel antenna of FIG. 18.



FIG. 20 is a schematic isometric exploded view of FIG. 18.



FIG. 21 is a schematic isometric exploded view of FIG. 19.



FIG. 22 is a close-up partial cut away front view of FIG. 18.



FIG. 23 is a close-up view of FIG. 22, with dimensional references for a coupling cavity.



FIG. 24 is a schematic isometric close-up view of the second side of an alternative second intermediate layer.



FIG. 25 is a schematic isometric close-up view of the first side of an alternative second intermediate layer.



FIG. 26 is a schematic isometric view of an input layer and first intermediate layer demonstrating an E-plane waveguide network with an input feed at a layer sidewall.



FIG. 27 is a close-up view of FIG. 26.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The inventors have developed a flat panel antenna utilizing a corporate waveguide network and cavity couplers provided in stacked layers. The low loss 4-way coupling of each cavity coupler significantly simplifies the requirements of the corporate waveguide network, enabling higher feed horn density for improved electrical performance. The layered configuration enables cost efficient precision mass production.


As shown in FIGS. 1-8, a first embodiment of a flat panel array antenna 1 is formed from several layers each with surface contours and apertures combining to form a feed horn array 4 and RF path comprising a series of enclosed coupling cavities and interconnecting waveguides when the layers are stacked upon one another.


The RF path comprises a waveguide network 5 coupling an input feed 10 to a plurality of primary coupling cavities 15. Each of the primary coupling cavities 15 is provided with four output ports 20, each of the output ports 20 coupled to a horn radiator 25.


The input feed 10 is demonstrated positioned generally central on a first side 30 of an input layer 35, for example to allow compact mounting of a microwave transceiver thereto, using antenna mounting features (not shown) interchangeable with those used with traditional reflector antennas. Alternatively, the input feed 10 may be positioned at a layer sidewall 40, as shown for example on FIG. 25, between the input layer 35 and a first intermediate layer 45 enabling, for example, an antenna side by side with the transceiver configuration where the depth of the resulting flat panel antenna assembly is minimized.


As best shown on FIGS. 3, 4 and 6, the waveguide network 5 is demonstrated provided on a second side 50 of the input layer 35 and a first side 30 of the first intermediate layer 45. The waveguide network 5 distributes the RF signals to and from the input feed 10 to a plurality of primary coupling cavities 15 provided on a second side 50 of the first intermediate layer 45. The waveguide network 5 may be dimensioned to provide an equivalent length electrical path to each primary coupling cavity 55 to ensure common phase and amplitude. T-type power dividers 55 may be applied to repeatedly divide the input feed 10 for routing to each of the primary coupling cavities 15. The waveguide sidewalls 60 of the waveguide network may also be provided with surface features 65 for impedance matching, filters and/or attenuation.


The waveguide network 5 may be provided with a rectangular waveguide cross section, a long axis of the rectangular cross section normal to a surface plane of the input layer 35 (see FIG. 6). Alternatively, the waveguide network 5 may be configured wherein a long axis of the rectangular cross section is parallel to a surface plane of the input layer 35 (see FIGS. 25-26). A seam 70 between the input layer 35 and the first intermediate layer 45 may be applied at a midpoint of the waveguide cross section, as shown for example in FIG. 6. Thereby, any leakage and/or dimensional imperfections appearing at the layer joint are at a region of the waveguide cross section where the signal intensity is minimized. Further, any sidewall draft requirements for manufacture of the layers by injection molding mold separation may be minimized, as the depth of features formed in either side of the layers is halved. Alternatively, the waveguide network 5 may be formed on the second side 50 of the input layer 35 or the first side 30 of the first intermediate layer 45 with the waveguide features at full waveguide cross-section depth in one side or the other, and the opposite side operating as the top or bottom sidewall, closing the waveguide network 5 as the layers are seated upon one another (see FIGS. 9 and 10).


The primary coupling cavities 15, each fed by a connection to the waveguide network 5, provide −6 dB coupling to four output ports 20. The primary coupling cavities 15 have a rectangular configuration with the waveguide network connection and the four output ports 20 on opposite sides. The output ports 20 are provided on a first side 30 of an output layer 75, each of the output ports 20 in communication with one of the horn radiators 25, the horn radiators 25 provided as an array of horn radiators 25 on a second side 50 of the output layer 75. The sidewalls 80 of the primary coupling cavities 15 and/or the first side 30 of the output layer 75 may be provided with tuning features 85 such as septums 90 projecting into the primary coupling cavities 15 or grooves 95 forming a depression to balance transfer between the waveguide network 5 and the output ports 20 of each primary coupling cavity 15. The tuning features 85 may be provided symmetrical with one another on opposing surfaces (see FIG. 23) and/or spaced equidistant between the output ports 20.


To balance coupling between each of the output ports 20, each of the output ports 20 may be configured as rectangular slots run parallel to a long dimension of the rectangular cavity, AB, and the input waveguide, AJ (see FIG. 22). Similarly, the short dimension of the output ports 20 may be aligned parallel to the short dimension of the cavity, AC, which is parallel to the short dimension of the input waveguide, AG.


When using array element spacing of between 0.75 and 0.95 wavelengths to provide acceptable array directivity, with sufficient defining structure between elements, a cavity aspect ratio, AB:AC may be, for example, 1.5:1.


An exemplary cavity may be dimensioned with:

    • a depth less than 0.2 wavelengths,
    • a width, AC, close to n×wavelengths, and
    • a length, AB, close to n×3/2 wavelengths.


The exemplary embodiment provides output signals with the same polarization orientation as delivered to the input feed 10. In further embodiments, for example as shown in FIGS. 11-17, the signal path may include polarization rotation, for example by inserting a slot layer 100 between the first intermediate layer 45 and the output layer 75. The slot layer 100 is provided with a plurality of dumbbell-shaped slots 105 (see FIG. 15), one of the slots 105 aligned with each of the output ports 20. A dumbbell-shaped slot 105 is a generally rectangular slot with end portions which extend away from the longitudinal axis of the slot 105, similar in appearance to the profile of the common weight training apparatus, a dumbbell. The slots 105 may be aligned at one half of a desired rotation angle, with respect to a longitudinal axis of the primary coupling cavities 15, and the output ports 20 further rotated one half the desired rotation angle with respect to a longitudinal axis of the slots 105. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the number of slot layers 100 may be increased, with the division of the desired rotation angle further distributed between the additional slot layers 100.


Where the desired rotation angle is 45 degrees with respect to the polarization at the input feed 10, the flat panel antenna 1 may be then mounted in a “diamond” orientation, rather than “square” orientation (with respect to the azimuth axis) and benefit from improved signal patterns, particularly with respect to horizontal or vertical polarization as the diamond orientation maximizes the number of horn radiators along each of these axes while using the advantages of the array factor.


To assist with signal routing to off axis dumbbell slots 105, tuning features 85 of the primary coupling cavity 15 may similarly be shifted into an asymmetrical alignment weighted toward ends of adjacent dumbbell slots 105, as shown for example in FIG. 16.


Further simplification of the waveguide network 5 may be obtained by applying additional layers of coupling cavities. For example, instead of being coupled directly to the output ports 20, each of the primary coupling cavities 15 may feed intermediate ports 110 coupled to secondary coupling cavities 115 again each with four output ports 20, each of the output ports 20 coupled to a horn radiator 25. Thereby, the horn radiator 25 concentration may be increased by a further factor of 4 and the paired primary and secondary coupling cavities 15, 115 result in −12 dB coupling (−6 dB/coupling cavity), comparable to an equivalent corporate waveguide network, but which significantly reduces the need for extensive high density waveguide layout gyrations required to provide equivalent electrical lengths between the input feed 10 and each output port 20.


As shown for example in FIGS. 19 and 20, the waveguide network 5 may be similarly formed on a second side 50 of an input layer 35 and a first side 30 of a first intermediate layer 45. The primary coupling cavities 15 are again provided on a second side 50 of the first intermediate layer 45. Intermediate ports 110 are provided on a first side 30 of a second intermediate layer 120, aligned with the primary coupling cavities 15. The secondary coupling cavities 115 are provided on a second side 50 of the second intermediate layer 120, aligned with the output ports 20 provided on the first side 30 of the output layer 75, the horn radiators 25 provided as an array of horn radiators 25 on a second side 50 of the output layer 75. Tuning features 85 may also be applied to the secondary coupling cavities 115, as described with respect to the primary coupling cavities 15, herein above.


Alternatives described herein above with respect to the split of the waveguide network 5 features between adjacent layer sides may be similarly applied to the primary and/or secondary coupling cavities 15,115. For example, the midwall of the coupling cavities may be applied at the layer joint, a portion of the coupling cavities provided in each side of the adjacent layers.


In an embodiment having primary and secondary coupling cavities 15,115, the dimensions of the primary coupling cavity 15 may be, for example, approximately 3×2×0.18 wavelengths, while the dimensions of the secondary coupling 115 may be 1.5×1×0.18 wavelengths.


The array of horn radiators 25 on the second side 50 of the output layer 75 improves directivity (gain), with gain increasing with element aperture until element aperture increases past one wavelength and grating lobes begin to be introduced. One skilled in the art will appreciate that because each of the horn radiators 20 is individually coupled in phase to the input feed 10, the prior low density ½ wavelength output slot spacing typically applied to follow propagation peaks within a common feed waveguide slot configuration has been eliminated, allowing closer horn radiator 20 spacing and thus higher overall antenna gain.


Because an array of small horn radiators 20 with common phase and amplitude are provided, the amplitude and phase tapers observed in a conventional single large horn configuration that may otherwise require adoption of an excessively deep horn or reflector antenna configuration have been eliminated.


One skilled in the art will appreciate that the simplified geometry of the coupling cavities and corresponding reduction of the waveguide network requirements enables significant simplification of the required layer surface features which reduces overall manufacturing complexity. For example, the input, first intermediate, second intermediate (if present), slot (if present) and output layers 35,45,120,100,75 may be formed cost effectively with high precision in high volumes via injection molding and/or die-casting technology. Where injection molding with a polymer material is used to form the layers, a conductive surface may be applied.


Although the coupling cavities and waveguides are described as rectangular, for ease of machining and/or mold separation, corners may be radiused and/or rounded in a trade-off between electrical performance and manufacturing efficiency.


As frequency increases, wavelengths decrease. Therefore, as the desired operating frequency increases, the physical features within a corporate waveguide network, such as steps, tapers and T-type power dividers, become smaller and harder to fabricate. As use of the coupling cavities simplifies the waveguide network requirements, one skilled in the art will appreciate that higher operating frequencies are enabled by the present flat panel antenna, for example up to 26 GHz, above which the required dimension resolution/feature precision may begin to make fabrication with acceptable tolerances cost prohibitive.


From the foregoing, it will be apparent that the present invention brings to the art a high performance flat panel antenna with reduced cross section that is strong, lightweight and may be repeatedly cost efficiently manufactured with a very high level of precision.












Table of Parts
















1
flat panel array antenna


5
waveguide network


10
input feed


15
primary coupling cavity


20
output port


25
horn radiator


30
first side


35
input layer


40
layer sidewall


45
first intermediate layer


50
second side


55
T-type power divider


60
waveguide sidewalls


65
surface features


70
seam


75
output layer


80
sidewall


85
tuning feature


90
septum


95
groove


100
slot layer


105
slot


110
intermediate port


115
secondary coupling cavity


120
second intermediate layer









Where in the foregoing description reference has been made to materials, ratios, integers or components having known equivalents then such equivalents are herein incorporated as if individually set forth.


While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of the embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus, methods, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departure from the spirit or scope of applicant's general inventive concept. Further, it is to be appreciated that improvements and/or modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention as defined by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A panel array antenna, comprising: a waveguide network coupling an input feed to a plurality of primary coupling cavities;each of the primary coupling cavities provided with four output ports, each of the output ports coupled to a horn radiator;the waveguide network provided on a second side of an input layer and a first side of a first intermediate layer;the primary coupling cavities provided on a second side of the first intermediate layer;the output ports provided on a first side of an output layer, each of the output ports in communication with one of the horn radiators; andthe horn radiators provided as an array of horn radiators on a second side of the output layer.
  • 2. The panel array antenna of claim 1, wherein the input feed is provided on a first side of the input layer.
  • 3. The panel array antenna of claim 1, wherein the input feed is provided on a layer sidewall between the input layer and the first intermediate layer.
  • 4. The antenna of claim 1, further including a plurality tuning features provided on the first side of the output layer; the tuning features provided for each of the primary coupling cavities.
  • 5. The antenna of claim 1, further including at least one tuning feature located on at least one sidewall of each primary coupling cavity.
  • 6. The antenna of claim 1, wherein the primary cavities are rectangular.
  • 7. The antenna of claim 1, wherein the waveguide network has a rectangular cross section, a long axis of the rectangular cross section normal to a surface plane of the input layer.
  • 8. The antenna of claim 1, wherein the waveguide network has a rectangular cross section, a long axis of the rectangular cross section parallel to a surface plane of the input layer.
  • 9. The antenna of claim 1, further including a slot layer between the first intermediate layer and the output layer; the slot layer provided with a plurality of dumbbell-shaped slots, one of the slots aligned with each of the output ports;the slots rotated one half a desired rotation angle with respect to a longitudinal axis of the primary coupling cavities; andthe output ports rotated one half the desired rotation angle with respect to a longitudinal axis of the slots.
  • 10. A panel array antenna, comprising: a waveguide network coupling an input feed to a plurality of primary coupling cavities;each of the primary coupling cavities provided with four intermediate ports, each of the intermediate ports coupled to a secondary coupling cavity with four output ports, each of the output ports coupled to a horn radiator;the waveguide network formed on a second side of an input layer and a first side of a first intermediate layer;the primary coupling cavities provided on a second side of the first intermediate layer;the intermediate ports provided on a first side of a second intermediate layer;the secondary coupling cavities provided on a second side of the second intermediate layer;the output ports provided on a first side of an output layer; andthe horn radiators provided as an array of horn radiators on a second side of the output layer.
  • 11. The panel array antenna of claim 10, wherein the input feed is provided on a first side of the input layer.
  • 12. The panel array antenna of claim 10, wherein the input feed is provided on a layer sidewall between the input layer and the first intermediate layer.
  • 13. The antenna of claim 10, further including a plurality of tuning features provided on the first side of the second intermediate layer and a first side of the output layer; the tuning features provided on the first side of the second intermediate layer aligned with each of the primary coupling cavities and the tuning features of the first side of the output layer aligned with each of the secondary coupling cavities.
  • 14. The antenna of claim 10, wherein the primary cavities are rectangular.
  • 15. The antenna of claim 10, further including at least one side wall tuning feature located on at least one sidewall of each of the primary coupling cavity and at least one sidewall of each of the secondary coupling cavity.
  • 16. A method for manufacturing a panel array antenna, comprising the steps of: providing a waveguide network coupling an input feed to a plurality of primary coupling cavities;each of the primary coupling cavities feeding four output ports, each of the output ports feeding a horn radiator;the input feed provided on a first side of an input layer;the waveguide network provided on a second side of the input layer and a first side of a first intermediate layer;the primary coupling cavities provided on a second side of the first intermediate layer;the output ports provided on a first side of an output layer, each of the output ports in communication with one of the horn radiators; andthe horn radiators provided as an array of horn radiators on a second side of the output layer.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the input, intermediate and output layers are formed by injection molding.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, further including the step of applying a conductive surface to the input, intermediate and output layers.
  • 19. The method of claim 16, wherein the input, intermediate and output layers are formed by die-casting.
  • 20. The method of claim 16, further including the step of inserting a slot layer between the first intermediate layer and the output layer; the slot layer provided with a plurality of dumbbell-shaped slots, one of the slots aligned with each of the output ports;the slots rotated one half a desired rotation angle with respect to a longitudinal axis of the primary cavities; andproviding the output ports rotated one half a desired rotation angle with respect to a longitudinal axis of the slots.
US Referenced Citations (72)
Number Name Date Kind
2573746 Watson et al. Nov 1951 A
2981948 Kurtz Apr 1961 A
3157847 Williams Nov 1964 A
3193830 Provencher Jul 1965 A
3243818 Holtzman Mar 1966 A
3281851 Goebels, Jr. Oct 1966 A
3340534 Fee Sep 1967 A
3570007 Whitehead Mar 1971 A
3599216 Paine et al. Aug 1971 A
3701162 Seaton Oct 1972 A
4121220 Scillieri et al. Oct 1978 A
4429313 Muhs, Jr. et al. Jan 1984 A
4527165 de Ronde Jul 1985 A
4716415 Kelly Dec 1987 A
4829309 Tsukamoto et al. May 1989 A
4857938 Tsukamoto et al. Aug 1989 A
4878060 Barbier et al. Oct 1989 A
4916458 Goto Apr 1990 A
4949092 Crail et al. Aug 1990 A
4959658 Collins Sep 1990 A
4985708 Kelly Jan 1991 A
5010351 Kelly Apr 1991 A
5019831 Yee et al. May 1991 A
5086304 Collins Feb 1992 A
5210543 Kurtz May 1993 A
5243354 Stern et al. Sep 1993 A
5270721 Tsukamoto et al. Dec 1993 A
5321411 Tsukamoto et al. Jun 1994 A
5327150 Cherrette Jul 1994 A
5512906 Speciale Apr 1996 A
5541612 Josefsson Jul 1996 A
5579019 Uematsu et al. Nov 1996 A
5589843 Meredith et al. Dec 1996 A
5619216 Park Apr 1997 A
5650793 Park Jul 1997 A
5831583 Lagerstedt et al. Nov 1998 A
5880695 Brown et al. Mar 1999 A
5926147 Sehm et al. Jul 1999 A
6023243 Frank Feb 2000 A
6101705 Wolfson et al. Aug 2000 A
6127985 Guler Oct 2000 A
6198456 Le Halle et al. Mar 2001 B1
6201508 Metzen et al. Mar 2001 B1
6225960 Collins May 2001 B1
6285335 Snygg et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304228 Smith et al. Oct 2001 B1
6476772 Smith et al. Nov 2002 B1
6480167 Matthews Nov 2002 B2
6535173 Ou Mar 2003 B2
6563398 Wu May 2003 B1
6624787 Puzella et al. Sep 2003 B2
6657599 Solbach Dec 2003 B2
6720931 Michisaka et al. Apr 2004 B1
6731241 Park et al. May 2004 B2
6796126 Hasegawa et al. Sep 2004 B2
6861996 Jeong Mar 2005 B2
6950066 Hendler et al. Sep 2005 B2
6977621 Kelly et al. Dec 2005 B2
7064725 Shtrikman et al. Jun 2006 B2
7205948 Krikorian et al. Apr 2007 B2
7227508 Wang et al. Jun 2007 B2
7391381 Wang et al. Jun 2008 B2
D576344 Conroy Sep 2008 S
7607942 Van Swearingen Oct 2009 B1
7663566 Engel Feb 2010 B2
7680516 Lovberg et al. Mar 2010 B2
7817097 Margomenos Oct 2010 B2
7872609 Ou et al. Jan 2011 B2
7948443 Bullock et al. May 2011 B2
8010042 Judd et al. Aug 2011 B2
8040286 Matsuo et al. Oct 2011 B2
20040233122 Espenscheid et al. Nov 2004 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
1885616 Dec 2006 CN
0154240 Sep 1985 EP
0205212 Dec 1986 EP
0213646 Mar 1987 EP
2083484 Jul 2009 EP
2669776 Mar 1987 FR
1019474 Feb 1966 GB
2076230 Nov 1981 GB
2142476 Jan 1985 GB
1264257 Oct 1986 SU
1587612 Aug 1990 SU
WO8909501 Oct 1989 WO
WO9639730 Dec 1996 WO
WO2009093779 Jul 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Miura et al, Double-Layer Full-Corporate-Feed Hollow-Waveguide Slot Array Antenna in the 60-GHz Band, Aug. 2011, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, No. 8, pp. 2844-2851.
Byeon Jong Gil, International Search Report of Counterpart International Application No. PCT/IB2013/052989, Jan. 20, 2013, Daejeon Metropolitan City, Korea.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130120205 A1 May 2013 US