The advent of soft robotics stemmed from the need of robotic systems that closely interact with human beings with increased safety and friendliness. Naturally the materials and methods used in soft robots differ greatly from those used in traditional robots that are typically made of rigid structures and materials. One of the most important elements in soft robotics, and also in robotics in general, is performance of sensors as well as actuator technologies. Soft sensors that have been developed so far have utilized a range of polymer materials, such as Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and silicone rubbers.
However, since most polymers are nonconductive and require any type of conductive media that can transmit electric signals through the material without significantly changing the mechanical the materials' “soft” properties (i.e. flexibility and stretchability). For this reason, conductive liquids have been one of the most preferred and commonly used mediums due to their continuous property. They can be easily transformed to completely soft electrical wires in a highly deformable structure when encapsulated and sealed by a closed channel embedded in a soft structure. The conductive liquid channels can also work as a sensing element by changing their electrical resistance when the host material deforms. Many soft sensors have been developed using liquid metals embedded microchannels, such as a multi-modal sensor for strain and pressure, a multi-axis shear force sensor, a capacitive force sensor, and a curvature sensor. In addition to liquid metals, ionic liquids have been also used for soft microfluidic sensors for increased biocompatibility and high electrical resistance.
In spite of many advantages of liquid conductors, they have several limitations when coupled with soft materials. Encapsulation is one of the major limitations. Liquid metals are usually injected to microchannels in a soft structure using a thin syringe needle. Due to the hydrophobic nature of the soft material used, the injection requires a relatively high pressure. Also, the captured air in the microchannel needs to be removed simultaneously with injection, which makes it difficult to control the injection pressure. This also makes the manufacturing process time-consuming and complicated, requiring complete sealing of injection ports. Another limitation is biocompatibility. Although liquid metals are not considered as highly toxic, they could be dangerous if they come into contact with skin or ingested. Although ionic liquids are safer to use with the human body for both internally and externally, there still exist leaking and sealing problems.
This invention is an optical soft sensor for detecting various deformation modes. In its preferred implementation, the sensor is nontoxic and biocompatible. Because there is no liquid embedded in the sensor, the issues that confound microfluidic sensing are addressed. The idea behind this novel sensor is to detect light transmission through a reflective waveguide made in a transparent soft material. Any mechanical perturbation made to the waveguide structure causes a change in the light detected. The novelty in this invention is introduction of hyperelastic materials and a stretchable waveguide in optical sensing, which is simple to manufacture. Another reason of selecting optical transmission as a sensing mechanism is immunity to electromagnetic interference, as discussed in various applications. A curvature sensing mechanism for a flexible biopsy needle has been proposed by detecting the loss of optical power through pre-cut slits of an embedded optical fiber when the needle was bent. However, conventional optical fibers pose a limitation in our application due to their non-stretchability. Therefore, the nascent field of soft robotics shines light on the possibility to replace traditionally stiff materials with highly deformable ones. Other applications that require flexible components will benefit as well.
There have been some efforts to provide stretchability to optical sensors using PDMS, one of the most commonly used soft materials in optics due to its transparency, low absorption loss, and almost negligible birefringence. Pressure-sensitive skin for stretchable electronics has been proposed by making waveguides in a PDMS layer. However, the proposed mechanism cannot be used for large deformations due to the limited stretchability of PDMS.
The soft sensor proposed in this patent application introduces a hyperelastic sensor capable of detecting various modes of deformation: pressure, strain, and curvature. Another achievement of this invention is the simplicity and cleanness in fabrication.
The invention uses the notion of transmitting light from one end of the device through a transparent waveguide and detecting the change in light intensity at the other end of the device as the sensor undergoes deformation in the form of compression, stretching or curvature. The change in light intensity at the other end is due to microcracks which form in a reflective layer covering the waveguide as the device is deformed, allowing light to escape the waveguide and be absorbed by the housing of the device.
However, as the device 100 is deformed, microcracks 118 will form within reflective layer 106. A microscopic photo of this effect is shown in
The method of operation for this invention works by modulating the light intensity at photodiode 110 when the structure of the sensor is deformed by an external force. The measures of those deformations are defined as specifically pressure, strain, and curvature.
In one implementation, the elements used for the optical sensing method are a red surface mount LED 108, for example, an XLamp XBD, manufactured by CREE, and a photodiode 110 sensitive to red light, for example, an CLS15, manufactured by Everlight. Surface mount elements were used in this particular implementation to minimize the form factor, however, any form factor will work. Both the photodiode 110 and red LED 108 have, in the preferred embodiment, dimensions smaller than 3.2 mm. Red LED 108 has a peak wavelength of 625 nm and photodiode 110 has peak sensitivity for 620 nm. In alternative embodiments of the invention light sources of different wavelengths may be used, depending on the application. In such cases, a photodetector capable of detecting the appropriate frequencies will need to be paired with the light source.
Each element is placed at one end of the channel. Photodiode 110 was operated in reverse bias to provide a higher linear response than in forward bias. It was also connected to a current to voltage operational amplifier, for example, an LM358AP. The current generated by photodiode 110 is directly proportional to the optical power provided by LED 108. In an ideal condition the current generated by LED 108 is
where e is the charge of an electron, h is the energy of a photon, and P is the optical power with a unit of W/m. Ideally, the signal should be linear. Thus, any nonlinearity in the relationship between the signal output and the optical power input would be due to either absorption loss or optical loss through microcracks 118. A more accurate way to calculate the current is by including the dark current that is determined by the material of the photodiode itself. Electron volts (eV) for example is the valence band for a given element. In this case, the photodiode is made of silicon, which has a valence band of 1.12:
i=i
o*(eeV/kT−1)−is
Photodiode 110 can be also operated in forward bias (i.e. no-bias) in which a voltage output had a logarithmic relationship with light intensity as:
where V, q, k, T, i, and is are voltage output, charge, Boltzman's constant, temperature, current, and saturation current, respectively. We also know that current is linearly proportional to the light intensity. For modeling our system in strain, we can assume that the increase of cracks created within the waveguide is inversely proportional to the light intensity, and the current ratio can be simply replaced by the ratio of the original and stretched surface areas of the waveguide. Assuming the surface area change is dominated by the length change, the ratio further reduces to that of lengths, the original length (lo) divided by the stretched length (l). Also, we can replace q/kT with our known initial voltage V0 for simplification. Finally, the theoretical model can be expressed as:
There have been many studies on the optical properties of PDMS which have shown its compatibility with optical elements. PDMS however, lacks high stretchability. In various embodiments, this invention uses different materials to expand on the possible silicone rubbers that are optically compatible as well. The substrate material used in one embodiment of the invention is a hybrid between two silicone rubbers. The first one (Solaris, Smooth On) is optically transparent but not highly stretchable. The other (EcoFlex Gel, Smooth On) is much more stretchable with optical transparency but too soft and tacky. The hybrid was a 1:4 mix of Solaris and EcoFlex Gel. The two combined generated a transparent polymer with a relatively high elongation at break at around 300%. This custom silicone rubber obtained high stretchability while maintaining optical transparency.
While optical fibers achieve total internal reflection by having the refractive index of the waveguide higher than the outer cladding, this invention achieves total internal reflection by using a reflective coating 106 between the housing 102 and the waveguide 104. In one embodiment, 24 k gold leaf was used as reflective coating 106. The gold leaf sheets were 0.12 μm in thickness. Gold was chosen for various reasons, the first being that it is biocompatible and used in different medical instruments. Additionally, gold reflects 95% of wavelengths that are longer than 500 nm (i.e. infrared and visible red light). Finally, gold is ideal because it does not tarnish unlike aluminum and silver, which are alternative reflectors.
In this embodiment, to create a sensor that can be comparable to those using liquid conductors, the sensor geometry and size was designed to be as small as possible. Surface mount diodes were used because they are significantly smaller than LEDs with pins. Thus, the channel size was accommodated to have a close fit with these circuit elements. The cross sectional area of the channel is square because the diodes are square and would be a closer fit than a circular channel. In other embodiments of the invention, as shown in
The fabrication process of one embodiment of the invention is shown in
Three separate molds were made. Before curing at each stage, molds were placed in a vacuum to remove bubbles. The first mold 300, shown in
In this embodiment, the next step is embedding the optical elements. Surface mount diodes 308, which were utilized for their small form factor, were soldered to standard 30 AWG hook up wires 310. Epoxy was used to protect the unconventional connections between wires and surface mount elements. Before being embedded, LED 108 and photodiode 110 were covered by a thin plastic shield to prevent light from escaping through the gap between the electronics and the edge of gold layer 306. The shields were made from transparency and coated in white to prevent from interfering ambient light. Another benefit for having these shields was to prevent from the wires coming into contact with the gold interface.
Once the diodes were soldered and shielded, they were fixed into the ends of the channel, as shown in
The final product for this embodiment is shown in
This embodiment was tested for three modes of deformation, pressure, strain, and bending, as shown in
There is a three step process for creating the device as shown in
A prototype of the device is shown in
In yet another embodiment of the invention, shown in
In all embodiments of the invention, and representing yet another set of embodiments, the reflective material coating the optical waveguide may be sputtered on instead of being manually applied in leaf form to the outside surface of the waveguide. Thus, the soft waveguides can be made using two different manufacturing techniques: gold leafing and gold sputtering. While gold leafing is simple and cost effective, it involves a manual coating process that may cause some failures and uncontrolled quality. However, gold sputtering provides much more uniform and thin gold layer on a cylindrical waveguide in a much more controlled way. One negative is that the sputtering process is relatively expensive compared with gold leafing.
The base material can be soft rubber materials, such as silicone, Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), and polyurethane.
In repeated tests, the signal responses for pressure (compression), strain (stretching) and curvature (bending) show linearity, repeatability, and independence with strain rate. These results, plus the simplicity in fabrication, make the invention a novel replacement for microfluidic sensors.
Several examples of polymer compounds have been specified herein, however, the invention is not intended to be limited to these polymers, or, in fact, to polymers in general. Different applications may require that the body and waveguide of the device vary in elasticity. Additionally, different materials may be used, for example, polyethylene may be a suitable substitute for the silicone-based polymer compounds specified herein.
Although the invention is illustrated and described herein with reference to specific embodiments, the invention is not intended to be limiting to the details shown. Rather, various modifications may be made in the details without departing from the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/282,014, filed Jul. 22, 2015.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US16/43570 | 7/22/2016 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62282014 | Jul 2015 | US |