Embodiments of the invention relate generally to flexible cable assemblies and more particularly to a reduced-tolerance electrical connection pad feature for a flexible cable assembly.
A hard disk drive (HDD) is a non-volatile storage device that is housed in a protective enclosure and stores digitally encoded data on one or more circular disks having magnetic surfaces. When an HDD is in operation, each magnetic-recording disk is rapidly rotated by a spindle system. Data is read from and written to a magnetic-recording disk using a read/write head that is positioned over a specific location of a disk by an actuator.
A read/write head uses a magnetic field to read data from and write data to the surface of a magnetic-recording disk. Write heads make use of the electricity flowing through a coil, which produces a magnetic field. Electrical pulses are sent to the write head, with different patterns of positive and negative currents. The current in the coil of the write head induces a magnetic field across the gap between the head and the magnetic disk, which in turn magnetizes a small area on the recording medium.
Hard disk drives are highly complex technological devices having many interacting components and sub-components. Increasing areal density (a measure of the quantity of information bits that can be stored on a given area of disk surface) is one of the ever-present holy grails of hard disk drive design evolution. However, the market demands increased areal density while maintaining the overall HDD form factor and, generally, without increasing cost. Thus, in view of such competing demands, maintaining and/or reducing physical tolerances within an HDD is an important design goal and an ongoing challenge.
Embodiments are directed towards a flexible printed circuit (FPC) having reduced-tolerance electrical connection pads, to a flexible cable assembly having such an FPC, and to a hard disk drive comprising such an FPC. The reduced-tolerance electrical connection pads constituent to the FPC comprise a connection portion and a window portion, where the position of the component that is electrically connected to the FPC is limited by the geometry of the connection portion of the respective electrical connection pads, thereby reducing the dimensional tolerance associated with the attached component.
According to an embodiment, the window and connection portions of the electrical connection pads are adjacent each other in the particular direction in which the tolerance reduction is desired. According to an embodiment, the electrical connection pads are formed of copper and the window portion of the respective electrical connection pads includes an area void of copper and bounded by the connection portion on one side and peripheral portions on the other sides, e.g., like a window, where the peripheral portions are significantly narrower than the connection portion. According to an embodiment, a portion of the peripheral portions extending from the connection portion are tucked under a portion of the FPC cover layer, near a cover layer cutout, to prevent peeling of the peripheral portions due to shear or other forces.
Embodiments discussed in the Summary of Embodiments section are not meant to suggest, describe, or teach all the embodiments discussed herein. Thus, embodiments of the invention may contain additional or different features than those discussed in this section.
Embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
Approaches to a flexible printed circuit (FPC) having reduced-tolerance electrical connection pads, for use in a hard disk drive for example, are described. In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments of the invention described herein. It will be apparent, however, that the embodiments of the invention described herein may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the embodiments of the invention described herein.
Embodiments of the invention may be used in the context of a flexible cable assembly (FCA) for a hard-disk drive (HDD). In accordance with an embodiment, a plan view illustrating an HDD 100 is shown in
The HDD 100 further includes an arm 132 attached to the HGA 110, a carriage 134, a voice-coil motor (VCM) that includes an armature 136 including a voice coil 140 attached to the carriage 134; and a stator 144 including a voice-coil magnet. The armature 136 of the VCM is attached to the carriage 134 and is configured to move the arm 132 and the HGA 110 to access portions of the media 120 being mounted on a pivot-shaft 148 with an interposed pivot-bearing assembly 152. In the case of an HDD having multiple disks, or platters as disks are sometimes referred to in the art, the carriage 134 is called an “E-block,” or comb, because the carriage is arranged to carry a ganged array of arms that gives it the appearance of a comb.
With further reference to
With further reference to
The electrical signal provided to the voice coil 140 of the VCM enables the head 110a of the HGA 110 to access a track 176 on which information is recorded. Thus, the armature 136 of the VCM swings through an arc 180 which enables the HGA 110 attached to the armature 136 by the arm 132 to access various tracks on the media 120. Information is stored on the media 120 in a plurality of stacked tracks arranged in sectors on the media 120, for example, sector 184. Correspondingly, each track is composed of a plurality of sectored track portions, for example, sectored track portion 188. Each sectored track portion 188 is composed of recorded data and a header containing a servo-burst-signal pattern, for example, an ABCD-servo-burst-signal pattern, information that identifies the track 176, and error correction code information. In accessing the track 176, the read element of the head 110a of the HGA 110 reads the servo-burst-signal pattern which provides a position-error-signal (PES) to the servo electronics, which controls the electrical signal provided to the voice coil 140 of the VCM, enabling the head 110a to follow the track 176. Upon finding the track 176 and identifying a particular sectored track portion 188, the head 110a either reads data from the track 176 or writes data to the track 176 depending on instructions received by the disk controller from an external agent, for example, a microprocessor of a computer system.
As mentioned, dimensional tolerances are an important design criteria and constraint in the context of hard disk drive development, as well as with practically all other hardware devices and systems. Thus, reducing dimensional tolerances is an ongoing design challenge. Consider the following example in the context of a hard disk drive.
The placement and the positional tolerance of the connector 201 with respect to its attachment to the FPC 202 has a significant impact on, for example, the process of fitting the connector 201 through the opening 205 in base 206 as well as the ability to provide a sound electrical contact and connection between the pins of the connector 201 and the electrical connection pads on the PCB 208. Additionally, as more functionality is added to HDDs (e.g., dual-stage actuation, embedded contact sensing, energy-assisted magnetic recording, etc.), more and more pins are needed on a connector such as connector 201. Note that the assembly of connector 201 to FPC 202 has better tolerance in the X direction than in the Y direction. That is, when using a solder reflow process to attach connector 201 to FPC 202, the connector pins 305a-n of connector 201 may slip or “skate” on the layer of solder paste applied to the FPC 202 for the solder reflow process, thus manifesting as dimensional tolerance of the FPC 202 to base 206 assembly. Therefore, reducing Y direction tolerance is a challenge for the FPC 202 to base 206 assembly and the corresponding assembly procedure. However, machining the base with tighter tolerance for opening 205, or reducing the size tolerance of the connector 201 body would add cost and may even be outside the manufacturing process capabilities.
Flexible Cable Assembly with Reduced-Tolerance Connection Pad
According to an embodiment, FPC 402 includes multiple electrical connection pads, 404a-n, where n equals the total number of connection pads/connector pins, which may vary from implementation to implementation. The magnified view window of
As discussed, during the solder reflow process typically utilized for connecting a component such as connector 201 (
As depicted in
Flexible cable assemblies are typically formed of layers. Thus, FPC 402 is formed of multiple layers, including a copper layer 410 and a cover layer 412. According to an embodiment, the connection pad 402 is formed by etching copper. Therefore, the connection portion 408 and the portion of the window portion 406 that contains conductive material, such as peripheral portions 407, reside on the copper layer 410, which may reside for example on a base layer or an adhesive layer. The cover layer 412 is configured to cover a portion of the copper layer 410, and comprises one or more cutouts over portions of the copper layer 410. For example, cover layer 412 comprises a cutout 413 over a portion of each of the connection pads 404a-n, in order to provide the ability to solder a component to the FPC 402 via the connection pads 404a-n. According to an embodiment, and as depicted in
Thus, window portion 526 is configured on a copper layer 530, with an area void of conductive material (e.g., copper) bounded by the connection portion 528 on one side and by peripheral portions 527 on the other sides. Similarly as with connection pad 404 (
Connection portion 528 of connection pad 524 further comprises one or more cutouts 534 from the connection portion 528, along the “X” direction normal to the “Y” direction. As discussed, the connector pins 305a-n (
The foregoing embodiments provide for reduced-tolerance electrical connection pads for a flexible printed circuit, generally, without adding additional cost or fabrication process complication and without affecting the electrical performance of the flexible cable assembly. For a non-limiting example, experimentation has shown a tolerance reduction in the “Y” direction on the order of 50% reduction.
In the foregoing specification, embodiments of the invention have been described with reference to numerous specific details that may vary from implementation to implementation. Thus, the sole and exclusive indicator of what is the invention, and is intended by the applicants to be the invention, is the set of claims that issue from this application, in the specific form in which such claims issue, including any subsequent correction. Any definitions expressly set forth herein for terms contained in such claims shall govern the meaning of such terms as used in the claims. Hence, no limitation, element, property, feature, advantage or attribute that is not expressly recited in a claim should limit the scope of such claim in any way. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4526436 | Aso | Jul 1985 | A |
4695108 | Ichitsubo | Sep 1987 | A |
4871317 | Jones | Oct 1989 | A |
4900268 | Kunishi | Feb 1990 | A |
5495377 | Kim | Feb 1996 | A |
5498840 | Maggio et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5609496 | Kilmer et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5838519 | Takizawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5909338 | Butler et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6396665 | Asano | May 2002 | B1 |
6699395 | Svenkeson et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6812410 | Sakamoto et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6856490 | Rosner et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6934126 | Berding et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7372669 | Deguchi et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7446261 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7690923 | Horchler et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8213124 | Chang et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20030070834 | Tsuchiya et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050199680 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060034018 | Deguchi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060139809 | Matsumoto et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070075056 | Ho et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070102830 | Muto et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080156437 | Kawate et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090207529 | Yao | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20110090599 | Feng et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20130344717 | Ito | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150124352 A1 | May 2015 | US |