The present disclosure relates to antenna systems for munitions, and more specifically, to side mounted or wrapped antenna systems for munitions.
Extensive efforts have been directed toward guiding, steering, or configuring military grade projectiles for proximity sensing or seeking operations. Such projectiles greatly enhance target engagement and operational efficiencies compared to traditional projectiles. For example, in certain applications the ability to perform guided maneuvers and/or for proximity sensing may be necessary to provide a reasonable probability of engaging a target as delivery errors, environmental factors, or other issues are known to significantly degrade the effectiveness of traditional projectiles. This is particularly true when engaging moving targets, small targets, or targets that can take evasive action. In addition, capabilities can reduce collateral damage, conserve ammunition, reduces costs, minimize personnel time in engaging targets, among other benefits.
Such projectiles have included barrel-fired and non-barrel-fired projectiles, boosted, and non-boosted projectiles, and spin-stabilized and fin-stabilized projectiles. In addition, such projectiles have included, low-caliber (50 caliber or less), medium-caliber (greater than 50 caliber to 75 mm), and large caliber projectiles (greater than 75 mm and generally used as artillery, rockets, and missiles).
For example, large-caliber artillery and other projectiles, have been successfully guided—utilizing systems such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,981,672, owned by the owner of the instant application. Artillery shells utilizing this type of design have been well received by the military. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 7,412,930. These patents are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
Guided missiles have long been utilized for targeting aircraft and may be self-guided or remotely guided. See, for example U.S. Pat. No. 3,111,080, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. Such missiles are typically fin-stabilized rather than spin-stabilized, having internal propulsion systems and relying upon fins and radially-extending flaps or propulsion-directing members for altering flight path. In addition, guided missiles typically need to be launched or fired from launch tubes or brackets that are designed specific to the missile. Due to their internal propulsion systems, missiles are substantially more expensive than non-propelled projectiles.
With respect to medium and small caliber projectiles, several solutions have been proposed utilizing movable aerodynamic surfaces for steering. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,422,507, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes, discloses a greater than 50 caliber projectile that may be fired from a conventional barreled gun. This projectile utilizes a spoiler that extends and retracts from a rearwardly positioned despun portion out into the air stream. The despun portion is despun by a motor and batteries provide power to the bullet.
Several solutions to guiding small-caliber projectiles, that is 50 caliber or less, have been proposed. These include firing the projectile without spinning the projectile and utilizing axially extending control fins for altering the flight. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,781,709, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. A notable disadvantage to such projectiles is that they cannot be fired from existing rifled barrels for conventional non-steerable projectiles and require internal batteries for operating the control circuitry and control fins which may affect the useful life of the projectile and provide a failure path. U.S. Pat. No. 5,788,178, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes, also discloses a small-caliber bullet that is designed to be fired from a non-rifled barrel. Deployable flaps are utilized to control the flight path in the '178 device and the device requires a battery.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,716,639 discloses small to medium caliber projectiles fired through a rifled barrel that use beveled surfaces or canards on a despun nose portion operated by a motor and battery for flight control. U.S. Pat. No. 4,537,371 discloses a projectile fired through a barreled projectile that distributes air from the air stream through the projectile with valves to discharge the air laterally to change the flight path. These references are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Additional prior guidance systems utilizing fins, wing-like projections, or canards have been proposed. See for example the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,373,688; 4,438,893; 4,512,537; 4,568,039; 5,425,514; 6,314,886; 6,502,786; 7,849,800; 8,319,164. These patents are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
It is generally understood in the art that fuzing, sensing, communications, proximity, and other functions are generally required for such projectiles. For example, GPS, height-of-burst (HOB), sensing, seeking, proximity detection, and other functions add capabilities for control or to enhance projectile performance to engage a target. Further improvements are always welcome for these projectiles that enhance accuracy, allow miniaturization, increase range, provide cost savings, or improve reliability.
According to embodiments of the present disclosure, a flexible projectile circuitry assembly is disclosed for implementing a side-mounted or wrapped projectile antenna. In one or more embodiments, the flexible projectile circuitry assembly comprises a plurality of circuit boards and a wrap antenna, the plurality of circuit boards and wrap antenna interconnected via an integrated flex-line to define a single unitary device without the use of a connector, the wrap antenna comprising one or more antenna elements that are defined on a flexible antenna substrate layer. In various embodiments, the projectile circuitry assembly is configured for use with a projectile. In such embodiments, the projectile can comprise a nose portion with a forward tip, a body portion, a tail portion, and a chassis. In various embodiments the chassis extends from the tail portion to the nose portion and defines a generally cylindrical wall and an interior cavity within the projectile for containing one or more projectile components and further defining an antenna aperture through the cylindrical wall of the body portion exposing the interior cavity. In one or more embodiments, the plurality of circuit boards are positioned in the interior cavity and the wrap antenna is threaded through the antenna aperture and wrapped circumferentially about an exterior of the cylindrical wall of the body portion. In addition, in certain embodiments a sealing material, such as an epoxy, seals the antenna aperture.
A significant difficulty in the design of guided or smart projectiles is the implementation of side mounted or wrapped antennas onto projectiles. Such designs offer various advantages and compatibility with numerous types of projectile designs, however, with increasing environmental stresses such as high temperatures, g-force stresses, rough handling, and the like, it is difficult to successfully mount an antenna on the side of a projectile and keep the antenna in operation after firing.
As such, embodiments of the present disclosure provide an advantageous solution as compared to other implementations of side-mounted projectile antennas. For example, referring to
Furthermore, during assembly of the projectile 100, some of these solder joints or cable connections must be performed while the boards are located within the projectile 100. This requires precise manual soldering which is very difficult and expensive. In addition, the higher the frequency of the antenna, the more expensive this solution gets. For example, at higher frequencies, the connectors can get extremely expensive, as well as it is difficult to find connectors that are small enough to fit within a 20 mm or 30 mm projectile. In particular, anything beyond 6 GHz becomes very difficult to produce and solder. Along with this of course, you can have mating problems between connectors, repeatability issues, problems with the connectors or cables themselves, too much strain on the cables so that they get damaged, and the extra space it all takes up. Finally, these problems are compounded where the projectile includes more than one externally wrapped antenna.
As such, embodiments of the disclosure provide for an improved design for antenna control circuitry and antenna subsystems that eliminate the need for complicated soldering and is scalable for use in 20 mm or smaller projectiles. Also, this invention can also easily be adapted to much higher frequencies (up to and beyond 40 GHz without difficulty) with the precision of etching tolerances on circuit boards/flex-lines. The above summary is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the present disclosure.
The drawings included in the present application are incorporated into, and form part of, the specification. They illustrate embodiments of the present disclosure and, along with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure. The drawings are only illustrative of certain embodiments and do not limit the disclosure.
While the embodiments of the disclosure are amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the disclosure to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
Referring to
Described further below, the projectile 200 additionally includes a projectile circuitry assembly 216. In various embodiments the projectile circuitry assembly 216 is a collection of components configured to perform one or more various functions for the projectile 200 including, but not limited to, communication, sensing, proximity detection, and fuzing. Described further below, in various embodiments the projectile circuitry assembly 216 includes an antenna circuitry portion 218 and a wrap antenna portion 220. In one or more embodiments the antenna circuitry portion 218 includes various antenna circuitry, such as one or more transmitters and receivers, that can be used to transmit/receive signals at respective frequencies for the projectile circuitry assembly 216. While the antenna circuitry portion 218 includes various circuitry for functionality of communication and antenna operation, in various embodiments, the antenna circuitry portion 218 can additionally or optionally include various other kinds of projectile control circuitry, such as sensing components, processing components, fuzing, or other electronic components.
In various embodiments, the circuitry is distributed among one or more interconnected circuit boards 222. Described further below, in various embodiments the one or more boards 222 are interconnected via an integrated flex-line 224. As used herein, flex-line 224 refers to a signal conducting portion of the assembly that is configured to connect the various portions of the assembly and is flexibly bendable to allow for folding or positioning of the various elements of the assembly into a compact shape for insertion into a projectile chassis. In such embodiments, the boards 222 and flex-line 224 are formed from a single piece of material, including various layers that are selectively etched or removed to define the board portions of the circuitry portion 218 and the flex-line interconnects. Similarly, and described further below, the wrap antenna portion 220 is comprised of one or more antenna elements that are defined on an antenna substrate layer. In some embodiments, the antenna can be deposited by 3D printing or other metal deposition methods
In various embodiments, the main body portion 204 has a cylindrical shape or a generally cylindrical shape defined by the chassis 214 and has an exterior surface 232, a forward portion 236 and a rearward portion 240. In some embodiments, chassis 214 defines one or more tapered portions that converge in a direction along a central axis 244. For example, in some embodiments a first portion, such as the forward portion 236 converges in a forward direction, along central axis 244, towards the nose portion 212. In some embodiments, a second portion, such as the rearward portion 240 could converge in a rearward direction towards the tail portion 108. The chassis 214 is, in some embodiments, machined or formed from a single block of metal. However, in certain embodiments the chassis 214 can include a plurality of pieces that are fastened, screwed, or otherwise assembled together.
In various embodiments the chassis 214 defines an antenna recess 250 in the main body portion 204. Described further below, in one or more embodiments the wrap antenna portion 220 of the projectile circuitry assembly 216 is placed or mounted within the antenna recess 250. Depicted at least in
In one or more embodiments the chassis 214 defines a cavity 256 within the projectile 200 for supporting/containing one or more projectile components. As an example, antenna circuitry portion 218 is positioned is depicted in
In one or more embodiments, the chassis 214 defines an antenna aperture 260 or opening that exposes the interior cavity 256 of the projectile 200 from the antenna recess 250. Described further below, the antenna aperture 260 allows for projectile circuitry assembly 216 to extend between the interior and exterior of the projectile 200, with the wrap antenna portion 220 of the projectile circuitry assembly 216 circumferentially wrapped about the projectile 200 exterior in the antenna recess 250 while also extending through the aperture 260 to connect with the interior antenna circuitry portion 218. Described further below, in one or more embodiments, a sealing material, such as an epoxy filler 262 and/or solder is used to seal the aperture 260 in assembly of the antenna 218 with the projectile chassis 214.
The nose portion 212 is a forward-facing structure and has a tapered or a converging shape. As such, the nose portion 212 extends from the forward portion 236 of the main body portion 204, forwardly, in a first direction, along central axis 244 to a forward tip portion 268. In various embodiments, nose portion 212 has an exterior surface 270 and may be conical or have a curved taper from the forward portion 236 of the main body portion 204 to the forward tip portion 268. In various embodiments, the nose portion 212 is removable from the chassis 214 to reveal or expose an opening 272 into the interior cavity 256 of the projectile 200. Described further below, the opening 272 allows for initial insertion of the projectile circuitry assembly 218, such as during projectile assembly.
In one or more embodiments, the projectile 200 can include one or more flight control portions for directing or otherwise altering the trajectory of the projectile during flight. For example, in certain embodiments, the chassis could define a control support that supports a rotatable collar with one or more aerodynamic features for despinning and/or flight control. In such embodiments, alternator components or other power generation components could additionally be implemented to utilize the spinning collar for power generation/power supply for various electronic projectile components. Examples of power supply and projectile control mechanisms can be found in the various patent applications and/or publications incorporated by reference below.
Referring to
As described above, in various embodiments, the projectile circuitry assembly 300 includes an antenna circuitry portion 304 and a wrap antenna portion 308. In one or more embodiments the antenna circuitry portion 304 includes various antenna circuitry, such as one or more transmitters and receivers, processors, memory, fuzing or other components for executing various projectile functions. In various embodiments, the circuitry is distributed among one or more of a plurality of interconnected circuit boards 312 that are interconnected via an integrated flex-line 316. In such embodiments, the boards 312 and flex-line 316 are formed from a single piece of material, including various layers that are selectively etched or removed to define the boards 312 and the flex-line interconnects 316. Similarly, the wrap antenna portion 308 is comprised of one or more antenna elements that are defined on an antenna substrate layer.
In contrast with the previously utilized implementation of a side-mounted projectile antenna described above with respect to
Referring to
In various embodiments, the flex-line portion 408 can be defined by at least a pair of flex-line substrate layers 420, a flex-line signal layer 422, and the first transition layer 418 and a second transition layer 424. In such embodiments, the flex-line substrate layers 420 function as top and bottom substrates for the flex-line while the signal layer 422 transmits signal lines along the flex-line portion 408. As described above, the first transition layer 418 functions as a ground layer for the bottom of the flex-line portion 408. Similarly, the second transition layer 424 is positioned between the antenna portion 412 and flex-line portion 408. In various embodiments, the second transition layer 424 functions as both an antenna ground layer for the antenna portion 412 or as a flex-line ground layer for the top-side of the flex-line portion 408. In various embodiments, the antenna portion 412 is defined by at least an antenna layer 430, an antenna substrate 432, and the second transition layer 424. In various embodiments, the antenna layer 430 is configured as an antenna, such as a patch antenna, and is configured to transmit/receive an antenna signal. In one or more embodiments, the antenna substrate layer 432 functions as the antenna substrate, and as described above, the second transition layer 424 would function as well as the ground of the antenna portion 412.
Depicted in
Referring to
In one or more embodiments, the board 500A includes a plurality of layers of various types of material. Depicted in
In one or more embodiments, the board ground layer 514 functions as a ground for various attached components and may, in various embodiments, include components attached to the layer 514. In one or more embodiments, the board substrate layer 516 functions as a substrate for board components. In various embodiments, the first transition layer 518 is positioned between the board portion 504 and signal portion 508 and functions both as a board signal layer and as a ground layer for the bottom of the flex-line portion 508. In such embodiments, the first transition layer 518 can connect various components for signal transfer.
In various embodiments, the signal portion 508 can be defined by a pair of substrate layers including a first substrate layer 520, a second substrate layer 522, a signal layer 524, a ground layer 526 and the first transition layer 518. In such embodiments, the signal portion 508, at least based on the etching or machining performed on the flex-line board 500A is configurable to function as either a flex-line 530 or antenna 534. For example, depicted in
Depicted in
Referring briefly to
Referring to
Referring specifically to
Referring specifically to
Referring to
In a first stage of assembly the opening 272 allows for initial insertion of the folded projectile circuitry assembly 300 into the interior of the projectile 200. As described above, in one or more embodiments, the chassis 714 defines an antenna aperture 760 or opening that exposes the interior cavity 256 of the projectile 200 from the antenna recess 256. Depicted in
The result of assembly is depicted in
In addition to the above disclosure, the disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 6,981,672, which is owned by the owner of this application, is fully incorporated by reference herein for all purposes. Also incorporated herein for all purposes, in their entireties are: U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,422,507; 7,412,930; 7,431,237; 6,345,785; 8,916,810; 6,653,972; 7,631,833; 7,947,936; 8,063,347; 9,709,372; 9,683,814; 8,552,349; 8,757,064; 8,508,404; 7,849,797; 7,548,202; 7,098,841; 6,834,591; 6,389,974; 6,204,8015,734,389; 5,696,347; 9,709,372; 9,683,814; 9,031,725; 8,552,349; 8,757,064; 8,508,404; 7,849,797; 7,548,202; 7,098,841; 6,834,591; 6,389,974; 6,204,801; 5,734,389; 5,696,347; 6,502,786; 6,666,402; 6,693,592; 7,681,504; 8,319,163; 8,324,542; 8,674,277; 8,950,335; 9,303,964; 9,360,286; 9,557,405; 9,587,923; 10,054,404; 2006/0061949; 2018/0245895; and 2019/0041527.
The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present disclosure have been presented for purposes of illustration but are not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the described embodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to explain the principles of the embodiments, the practical application or technical improvement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodiments disclosed herein.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 69/973,919, filed Nov. 1, 2019, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2270314 | Kraus | Jan 1942 | A |
2939130 | Robinson, Jr. | May 1960 | A |
3111080 | French et al. | Nov 1963 | A |
3127609 | Wentworth | Mar 1964 | A |
3713162 | Munson | Jan 1973 | A |
3745583 | Herbert | Jul 1973 | A |
3972050 | Kaloi | Jul 1976 | A |
4373688 | Topliffe | Feb 1983 | A |
4438893 | Sands et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4512537 | Sebestyen et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4537371 | Lawhorn et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4568039 | Smith et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4951901 | Dunne | Aug 1990 | A |
5425514 | Grosso | Jun 1995 | A |
5489909 | Dittmann et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5696347 | Sebeny, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5708446 | Laramie | Jan 1998 | A |
5731538 | O'Brien et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734389 | Bruce et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5788178 | Barrett, Jr. | Aug 1998 | A |
6098547 | West | Aug 2000 | A |
6133879 | Grangeat et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138517 | Laursen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6204801 | Sharka et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220168 | Woodall | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6314886 | Kuhnle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345785 | Harkins et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6389974 | Foster | May 2002 | B1 |
6389975 | Haddon et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6404065 | Choi | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422507 | Lipeles | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6473041 | Koch et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6476481 | Woodworth et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6502786 | Rupert et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6597316 | Rao et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6615734 | Koch et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6634298 | Denney | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6653972 | Krikorian et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6666402 | Rupert et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6693592 | Dowdle et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6834591 | Rawcliffe et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6966261 | Keil | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981672 | Clancy et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7020501 | Elliott et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7098841 | Hager et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7199461 | Son et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7236345 | Roesler et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7305467 | Kaiser et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7355553 | Ryken, Jr. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7412930 | Smith et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7431237 | Mock et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7548202 | Jennings | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7631833 | Ghaleb et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7681504 | Machina et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7781709 | Jones et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7849797 | Geswender et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7849800 | Hinsdale et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7947936 | Bobinchak et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8063347 | Urbano et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8077099 | Wesh et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8091477 | Brooks et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8138982 | West et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8319164 | Martinez | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8324542 | Frey, Jr. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8432310 | Pogemiller et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8508404 | Wilmhoff | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8542153 | Owens | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8552349 | Alexander | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8674277 | Axford et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8716639 | Mallon | May 2014 | B2 |
8757064 | Jennings et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8812654 | Gelvin et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8832244 | Gelvin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8836503 | Gelvin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8916810 | Geswender et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8931415 | Volkmann | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8950335 | Stroemberg et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9013154 | O'Sullivan | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9031725 | DiEsposti | May 2015 | B1 |
9041172 | Niu et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9115970 | DeVries | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9303964 | Wuzel et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9319163 | Yamaguchi et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9360286 | Pettersson et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9557405 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9587923 | Wurzel et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9683814 | Dryer | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9709372 | Edwards | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9824996 | Satou et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10054404 | Balk et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
11349201 | Parrow | May 2022 | B1 |
20060061949 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080036657 | Oomuro | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20100097275 | Parsche et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20180245895 | Malul et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190041527 | Gustafson | Feb 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2334323 | Aug 1999 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Aijaz, Zarreen et al., “Effect of the Different Shapes: Aperture Coupled Microstrip Slot Antenna”, International Journal of Electronics Engineering, 2(1), 2010, pp. 103-105. |
Bao, X.L. et al., “Compact Concentric Annular-Ring Patch Antenna for Triple Frequency Operation”, Electronics Letters, vol. 42, No. 20, Sep. 28, 2006, 2 pages. |
Carver, Keith R. et al., “Microstrip Antenna Technology”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. AP-29, No. 1, Jan. 1981, 23 pages. |
Dewan, R. et al, “Improved Design of Tapering and Through Element Series Antenna”, 2012 IEEE Symposium on Wireless Technology and Applications (ISWTA), Sep. 23-26, Bandung, Indonesia, pp. 202-205. |
Hertlein, Robert et al., “Extended Range Guided Munition (ERGM) Safe & Arm Device and Height-of-Burst Sensor”, NDIA Fuze Conference, Apr. 9, 2003, 21 pages. |
Ijaz, Bilal et al., “A Series-fed Microstrip Patch Array with Interconnecting CRLH Transmission Lines for WLAN Applications”, 2013 7th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), pp. 2023-2026. |
Jamaluddin, M.H. et al., “Microstrip Dipole Antenna for WLAN Application”, Wirele3ss Communication Center, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Technologi Malaysia, 2005, pp. 30-32. |
Jenn, Prof. David, “Radar Fundamentals”, Naval Postgraduate School, http://www.nps.navy.mil/faculty/jenn, date unknown, 51 pages. |
Jones, Bevan B. et al., “The Synthesis of Shaped Patterns with Series-Fed Microstrip Patch Arrays”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. AP-30, No. 6, Nov. 1982, pp. 1206-1212. |
Kaur, Rajvir et al., “Tri-Widebank Inverted U-Slot Patch Antenna for Wireless Communication Applications”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vo. 10(16), Apr. 2017, 5 pages. |
Keller, Steven D. et al., Quadirfilar Helix Antenna for Enhanced Air=to-Ground Communications, US Armey Research Laboratory, ARL-TR-79, May 2016, 34 pages. |
Kraus, John D., “The Square-Comer Reflector Beam Antenna for Ultra High Frequencies”, www.rfcafe.com/references/qst/square-comer-reflector-beam-antenna-qst-november-1940.htm., Nov. 1940, 4 pages. |
Lee, Kai Fong at al., “A Personal Overview of the Development of Patch Antennas”, The University of Mississippi, Oct. 28, 2015, 78 pages. |
Mehta, Surbhi et al., “An Overview: Various Slots Shapes of Micro-Strip Patch Antenna”, International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research & Practice, URSI, vol. I, Issue VII, date unknown, pp. 175-178. |
Mishra, Pushkar et al., “Modified Concentric Rings Based Square Shaped Fractal Antenna for Wi-Fi & WiMAX Application”, International Journal of Electronics Engineering Research, ISSN 0975-6450, vol. 9, No. 7, 2017, pp. 1005-1012. |
Niroo-Jazi, Mahmoud et al., “A New Triple-Band Circular Ring Patch Antenna with Monopole-like Radiation Pattern Using a Hybrid Technique”, IEEE Transactions, vol. 59, No. 10, Oct. 2011, pp. 3512-3517. |
Patil, Sharanu et al., “Design and Implementation of a Conformal Omnidirectional Microstrip Antenna Array on Cylindrical Surface”, International Journal of Advances in Electronics and Computer Science, ISSN 2393-2835, vol. 2, Issue 8, Aug. 2015, 4 pages. |
Perrin, Max, “Proximity Sensor Technologies Application to New Munitions”, NDIA 58th Annual Fuze Conference, Jul. 7-9, 2015, 19 pages. |
Product Information Sheet, “Selectable Effects Munition”, L-3 Mustang Technology, 2011, 2 pages. |
Shoukat Saad, et al., “Design of a Dual Band Frequency Reconfigurable Patch Antenna for GSM and Wi-Fi Applications”, IEEE, 2016, 5 pages. |
Slade, Bill, The Basics of Quadrifilar Helix Anetnnas, www.orbanmicrowave.com, 2015, pp. 1-20. |
Stephenson, B.T. et al., “Endfire Slot Antennas”, TRF, Transactions—Antennas and Propagation, Apr. 1955, pp. 81-86. |
Yang, Wanchen et al., “A Novel 24-GHz Series-fed Patch Antenna Array for Radar System”, 2016 IEEE International Workshop on Electromagnetics: Applications and Student Innovation Competition (IWEM), May 16, 2016, 3 pages. |
Yuan, Tao et al., “A Novel Series-Fed Taper Antenna Array Design”, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 7, 2008, pp. 362-365. |
Zhang, Zongtang et al., “A Circularly Polarized Multimode Patch Antenna for the Generation of Multiple Orbital Angular Momentum Modes”, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 16, 2017, pp. 521-524. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62973919 | Nov 2019 | US |