The present invention relates to a fluid bearing slide assembly for workpiece polishing. The exemplary embodiments relate to the manufacture of semiconductor wafers, and more particularly to a system and method for a polishing member transport in a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,103,628, assigned to the assignee of the present invention, describes a reverse linear chemical mechanical polisher, also referred to as bi-directional linear chemical mechanical polisher that operates to use a bi-directional linear motion to perform chemical mechanical polishing. In use, a rotating wafer carrier within a polishing region holds the wafer being polished. U.S. Pat. No. 6,103,628 is incorporated herein by reference.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,464,571 and 6,468,139, assigned to the assignee of the present invention and related to the '628 patent, describe various features of a reverse linear chemical mechanical polisher, including incrementally moving the polishing pad that is disposed between supply and receive spools. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,464,571 and 6,468,139 are incorporated herein by reference.
While the mechanisms shown and described in these patents typically use roller bearings for supporting the polishing pad, roller bearings may have certain characteristics that affect polishing action, for example, in a reciprocating polishing apparatus, rotational momentum must be reversed whenever the belt direction is reversed. The act of overcoming roller bearing momentum may cause temporary or permanent belt stretching or other unwanted distortion, which can affect the polishing action. Additionally, while the inventions described in the patents are advantageous, further novel refinements are described herein which provide for a more efficient drive system for reverse linear, e.g. bi-directional linear, motion.
The invention is a fluid bearing assembly for supporting a polishing member while polishing a workpiece. The polishing member may be, for example, a polishing pad, a polishing belt, or another type of polishing member. The fluid bearing assembly of the invention overcomes potential disadvantages of the conventional ball bearing rollers in which the polishing member mechanically contacts the roller surface.
An exemplary apparatus for polishing a workpiece comprises a polishing member configured to polish the workpiece. A support structure is coupled to the polishing member and configured to move the polishing member to polish the workpiece. The support structure includes at least one curved fluid bearing coupled to the polishing member and configured to support the polishing member while it is moved to polish the workpiece.
In one aspect of the invention, the fluid bearing supports the polishing member over a region where the polishing pad plane of travel changes from a first plane to a second plane.
In another one aspect of the invention, the apparatus further comprising a pressure regulator configured to control pressure of a fluid exhausted from the fluid bearing.
In another one aspect of the invention, the apparatus further comprising a temperature regulator configured to control temperature of a fluid exhausted from the fluid bearing.
In another one aspect of the invention, the support structure includes at least two curved fluid bearings coupled to the polishing member and configured to support the polishing member while it is moved to polish the workpiece.
In another one aspect of the invention, the fluid bearing is a substantially hollow structure with a curved portion constructed from perforated sheet metal.
In another one aspect of the invention, the support structure includes a supply spool configured to supply the polishing member and a receive spool configured to receive the polishing member; and a slide member coupled to the supply spool and the receive spool and configured to move the polishing pad in a bi-linear manner.
The invention offers many advantages, including the ability to efficiently produce reverse linear motion for a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus. Another advantage of the invention is to provide for the ability to efficiently produce bi-directional linear motion in a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus that also allows for the incremental movement of the polishing member. Yet another advantage is that angular momentum on the prior art rollers and polishing member is reduced. These advantages create smooth belt motion in all desired directions of movement.
The invention is described with reference to the following figures wherein:
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,103,628 and 6,589,105, which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference, describe a reverse linear polisher for use in polishing a workpiece (e.g. a semiconductor wafer). The embodiments described herein are for purposes of satisfying the best mode of the invention and may be modified while remaining within the scope of the claims.
Below the polishing member 30 is a platen support 50. During operation, due to a combination of tensioning of the polishing member 30 and the emission of a fluid, such as air, water, or a combination of different fluids from openings 54 disposed in the top surface 52 of the platen support 50, the bi-linearly moving portion of the polishing member 30 is supported above the platen support 50 in the processing area, such that a frontside 32 of the polishing member 30 contacts the front surface 12 of the wafer 10, and a backside 34 of the polishing member 30 levitates over the top surface 52 of the platen support 50.
While the portion of the polishing member 30 within the processing area moves in a bi-linear manner, the two ends of the polishing member 30 are preferably connected to supply and receive spools 102 and 104 illustrated in
Further, during operation, various polishing agents without abrasive particles or slurries with abrasive particles can be introduced, depending upon the type of polishing member 30 and the desired type of polishing, using nozzles 80. For example, the polishing member 30 can contain abrasives embedded in the frontside 32, and can also be used with polishing agents if desired. Or a polishing member 30 can be used that does not contain such embedded abrasives but instead uses a slurry. Alternatively, some other combination of polishing member, slurry and/or polishing agents can be used. The polishing agent or slurry may include a chemical that oxidizes the material that is subsequently mechanically removed from the wafer. A polishing agent or slurry that contains colloidal silica, fumed silica, alumina particles etc., is generally used with an abrasive or non-abrasive polishing member. As a result, high profiles on the wafer surface are removed until an extremely flat surface is achieved.
While the polishing member can have differences in terms of whether or not it contains abrasives, any polishing member 30 according to the invention should be sufficiently flexible and light so that a variable fluid flow from the openings on the platen support can affect the polishing profile at various locations on the wafer. Further, it is preferable that the polishing member be made from a single body material, which may or may not have abrasives impregnated therein. In this context, a single body material means a single layer of material, or, if more than one layer is used, flexibility is maintained by use of a thin polymeric material as described herein.
An example of a polishing member that contains these characteristics is the fixed abrasive pad MWR66 marketed by 3M company. The MWR66 is 6.7 mils (0.0067 inches) thick and has a density of 1.18 g/cm3. As stated above, polishing members are preferably made of a flexible material, such as a polymer. Additionally, the polishing members preferably have a thickness in the range of 4-15 mils. Given such polishing member properties, variation of the pressure of the fluid that is exhausted from the openings on the platen support by less than 1 psi can significantly affect the degree of polishing that occurs on the front face of the wafer, as explained further hereinafter.
The manner in which the polishing member is used, i.e. whether the movement of the polishing member is linear, bi-linear, or non-constant, may affect the type of polishing members that can be used. However, use of polishing members other than the preferred types of polishing members described above with reference to
Another consideration with respect to the polishing member is its width relative to the diameter of the wafer being polished. The width of the polishing member may substantially correspond to the width of the wafer, or be greater or less than the width of the wafer.
The polishing member 30 may be substantially optically transparent at some wavelength, so that a continuous polishing member, without any cutout windows, can allow for detection of the removal of a material layer (endpoint detection) from the front surface 12 of the wafer 10. Additionally, a feedback loop may be implemented based upon signals related to endpoint detection to ensure uniform polishing of the wafer and/or polishing of all of the various regions of the wafer to the desired extent.
The platen support 50 may be made of a hard and machineable material, such as titanium, stainless steel or hard polymeric material. The machineable material allows formation of the openings 54, as well as channels that allow the fluid to be transmitted through the platen support to the openings. The polishing member levitates above the platen support due to the fluid that is exhausted from the openings. The exhausted fluid may be any fluid medium, such as air, water or some other fluid. By levitating the polishing member, the exhausted fluid causes the polishing member to press against the wafer surface during chemical mechanical polishing. The temperature and/or pressure of the fluid that is exhausted from the openings 54 may be controlled for optimum polishing conditions.
In one aspect of the invention, the fluid bearings use a fluid cushion created by exhausting a fluid (e.g., air, water, or other gases or liquids or gels) from holes in the surface of the fluid bearings. As opposed to conventional barrel rollers that employ an internal bearing over a fixed axle, the fluid bearing design allows for reduced resistance and/or friction against the movement of the polishing member.
A polishing member drive system 100 that is preferably used to cause bi-linear reciprocating movement of a portion of the polishing member within the processing area will now be described.
As previously mentioned, the bi-linearly moving portion of the polishing member 30 is supported above the platen support 50 in the processing area, such that a frontside 32 of the polishing member 30 contacts the front surface 12 of the wafer 10, and the backside 34 of the polishing member 30 levitates over the top surface 52 of the platen support 50. The movement mechanism of the polishing member 30 and the details of the drive system are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,589,105 and U.S. Prov. No. 60/400,542, incorporated herein by reference.
In another embodiment, the fluid bearings may be used in various types of polishing apparatuses that use a static polishing member or linearly moving polishing member.
Referring to
In the aspect shown in
Advantages of the invention include reduced handling of the polishing member, which can extend the useful life of the polishing member and reduce defects introduced by fluctuations from surfaces rubbing against one another. The use of fluid bearings also reduces rolling resistance and angular momentum on the polishing member, as compared to conventional rollers. Further, the fluid bearing design may allow for better tension control of the polishing member than with conventional rollers.
Having disclosed exemplary embodiments and the best mode, modifications and variations may be made to the disclosed embodiments while remaining within the subject and spirit of the invention as defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation in part of U.S. Ser. No. 10/614,311 filed Jul. 7, 2003 (NT-251C1), which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 10/126,464 filed Apr. 18, 2002 (NT-251) now U.S. Pat. No. 6,589,105, and U.S. Ser. No. 10/126,469 filed Apr. 18, 2002 (NT-253), now U.S. Pat. No. 6,634,935 all incorporated herein by reference. This application claims priority to U.S. Prov. No. 60/400,542, filed Aug. 2, 2002 (NT-275P), incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
669923 | Grauert | Mar 1901 | A |
3888050 | Elm | Jun 1975 | A |
4412400 | Hammond | Nov 1983 | A |
4802309 | Heynacher | Feb 1989 | A |
4895486 | Baker et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5245796 | Miller et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5335453 | Baldy et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5377452 | Yamaguchi | Jan 1995 | A |
5377453 | Perneczky | Jan 1995 | A |
5429733 | Ishida | Jul 1995 | A |
5473433 | Miller | Dec 1995 | A |
5489235 | Gagliardi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5558568 | Talieh et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5593344 | Weldon et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5607341 | Leach | Mar 1997 | A |
5650039 | Talieh | Jul 1997 | A |
5679212 | Kato et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5707409 | Martin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5759918 | Hoshizak et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5762751 | Bleck et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770521 | Pollock | Jun 1998 | A |
5807165 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810964 | Shiraishi | Sep 1998 | A |
5851136 | Lee | Dec 1998 | A |
5866436 | Miller | Feb 1999 | A |
5893755 | Nakayoshi | Apr 1999 | A |
5899798 | Trojan et al. | May 1999 | A |
5899801 | Tolles et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908530 | Hoshizaki et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913716 | Mucci et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5951368 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951377 | Vaughn et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961372 | Shendon | Oct 1999 | A |
5975988 | Christianson | Nov 1999 | A |
6017831 | Beardsley et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6048789 | Vines et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6068542 | Hosokai | May 2000 | A |
6093086 | Easter et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6110025 | Williams et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113479 | Sinclair et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126518 | Jacquinot et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6126527 | Kao et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129540 | Hoopman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135859 | Tietz | Oct 2000 | A |
6136715 | Shendon et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146248 | Jairath et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6179690 | Talieh | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6224465 | Meyer | May 2001 | B1 |
6241583 | White | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6291350 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302767 | Tietz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312319 | Donohue et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6376361 | Chooi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379231 | Birang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380084 | Lim et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383933 | Shu et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413873 | Li et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419559 | Gurusamy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428394 | Mooring et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439978 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6464571 | Talieh et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468139 | Talieh et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475070 | White | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500056 | Krusel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6561870 | Saldana et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6589105 | Young et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6604988 | Talieh et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6634935 | Young et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6692947 | Walke et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6729945 | Xu et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736710 | Osawa et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6769970 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6790128 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
20010044210 | Nakabayashi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020014661 | Okamoto et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020123298 | Krussel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3113204 | Oct 1982 | DE |
0 517 594 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0 941 806 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1 025 955 | Aug 2000 | EP |
WO 9720660 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9845090 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9922908 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0032356 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0202272 | Jan 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040087259 A1 | May 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60400542 | Aug 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10126464 | Apr 2002 | US |
Child | 10614311 | US | |
Parent | 10126469 | Apr 2002 | US |
Child | 10126464 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10614311 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 10632481 | US |