The present invention generally relates to vehicle coolers, and in particular to the design of fluid conveying tubes included in such coolers.
One type of vehicle cooler, which is, for instance, disclosed in EP-A1-0 590 945, comprises a heat exchanger assembly which is made up of, on the one hand, flat fluid conveying tubes, which are juxtaposed to be passed by a first fluid, for instance, liquid circulating through an engine block and, on the other, surface-enlarging means arranged between the tubes and adapted to be passed by a second fluid, e.g. cooling air. Each tube has opposite large faces, to which the surface-enlarging means are applied and which form the primary heat exchanging surfaces of the tube.
In this type of coolers, it is already known to provide the primary surfaces on the inside of the tubes with projections with a view to increasing the heat exchange between the fluids. These projections break up the insulating, laminar boundary layer which otherwise tends to form inside the tube along its primary surfaces, at least at low fluid flow rates. The projections can be elongate, as known from e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 4,470,452, or cylindrical, as known from e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,730,213. However, these constructions are not capable of combining a sufficiently high heat exchanging capacity with a sufficiently low pressure drop in the longitudinal direction of the tubes.
An alternative embodiment of fluid conveying tubes is disclosed in a doctor's thesis published in 1997 by Chalmers Institute of Technology entitled “Thermal and hydraulic performance of enhanced rectangular tubes for compact heat exchangers”. Such a tube is schematically shown in a plan view in FIG. 1. The opposite primary surfaces of the tube have transverse ribs 1 in zigzag, i.e. surface structures which each consist of a number of elongate rib elements 2 which are connected to each other in intermediate pointed areas 3. The transverse ribs 1 are alternatingly arranged in the longitudinal direction L of the tube on the opposite primary surfaces of the tube, the ribs 1 (full lines in
Vehicle coolers with this type of “spiral-flow tubes” have been found to have a high heat exchanging capacity also at relatively small flows through the tubes, which is often desirable, for instance, in vehicle coolers for truck engines with air charging or boosting, since these vehicles can generate large quantities of heat also at low speeds of the engine.
The above construction is, however, in its infancy, and needs to be further developed to optimise its capacity.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved fluid conveying tube, i.e. a tube which for a given size has a higher capacity of heat exchange and/or a lower pressure drop than ordinary constructions, in particular when relatively small fluid flows are passing through the same.
It is also an object to provide a fluid conveying tube with a small risk of clogging.
Yet another object is to provide a fluid conveying tube which is simple to manufacture.
These and other objects, which will appear from the description below, have now completely or partially been achieved by means of a fluid conveying tube and a vehicle cooler according to the appended claims. Preferred embodiments are defined in the dependent claims.
The inventive construction divides an input fluid flow into a number of partial flows and a swirling motion about a respective axis extending in the longitudinal direction of the tube is imparted to each partial flow. Thanks to the fact that the elongate directing elements in the surface structures are placed in rows which extend laterally over the tube and that the directing elements included in the respective rows are mutually parallel, the directing elements can be packed closer to each other than in previous constructions. As a result, more partial flows can be obtained in the tube for a given width of the primary surfaces of the tube. This has been found to result in a higher heat exchanging capacity than in previous constructions, in particular at small fluid flows through the tube. The inventive tube can easily be provided with suitable directing elements, for instance, by embossing a blank to form elongate recesses or pits in the large faces of the tube.
Below, the invention and its advantages will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings, which by way of example, show presently preferred embodiments of the invention.
The dimples 15 are elongate and inclined relative to the longitudinal direction L of the tube 10. In addition, the dimples 15 are arranged in a number of surface structures or groups 16 on the respective primary surfaces 11′, 12′.
In a fluid conveying tube according to
In the embodiment according to
It has been found that the dimensioning and positioning of the dimples 15 on the primary surfaces 11′, 12′ of the tube 10 influence the capacity of the tube 10 as concerns the heat exchanging capacity and pressure drop. Parameters which have been investigated are the angles of inclination α and β of the dimples 10 (see FIG. 4), the distance B between succeeding dimples 10 in the longitudinal direction L (see FIG. 4), the distance C between succeeding dimples 15 on the respective primary surfaces 11′, 12′ in the longitudinal direction L (see FIG. 4), the height F of the dimples 15 from the primary surfaces 11′, 12′ (see
It has then been found that the angles α and β are preferably equal. Furthermore, the angles α and β should be in the range of about 40-80°, and preferably in the range of about 45-75°. Currently, the most preferred value of α and β is about 45°, which means that succeeding dimples are substantially mutually perpendicular.
Furthermore, it has been found that suitably the distance C is twice the distance B, i.e. that all dimples 15 succeeding in the longitudinal direction L of the tube 10 have a constant mutual centre-to-centre distance.
When the tube 10 is to be passed by a fluid in the form of a liquid, e.g. water, the following preferred dimensions have been found. For a liquid flowing through the tube at a mean rate of about 0.8-2.2 m/s, the relation between the distance B and the height F of the dimples 15 should be in the range of about 10-40, and preferably about 15-30. At the minimum limit value, the pressure drop along the tube will be undesirably high, and at the maximum limit value the heat exchanging capacity through the primary surfaces will be unsatisfactorily low. In a tube 10 having a distance G between the primary surfaces 11′, 12′ of 0.8-2.8 mm, the relation between the length A of the dimples 15 and height F of the dimples 15 should be in the range of about 4-14. At the minimum limit value, the pressure drop along the tube 10 will be undesirably high, and at the upper limit value the heat exchanging capacity through the primary surfaces 11′, 12′ will be unsatisfactorily low. Furthermore, the relation between the mutual distance G of the primary surfaces 11′, 12′ and the height F of the dimples 15 should be at least about 2.5. This is preferred in tubes having a mutual distance between the primary surfaces 11′, 12′ of 0.8-2.8 mm in order to avoid clogging when a liquid flows through the tube at a mean rate of about 0.8-2.2 m/s.
When the tube is to be passed by a fluid in the form of a gas, e.g. air, it has been found that the relation between the distance B and the height F of the dimples 15 should be in the range of about 25-65, and preferably about 35-55. At the minimum limit value, the pressure drop along the tube will be undesirably high, and at the maximum limit value the heat exchanging capacity through the primary surfaces will be unsatisfactorily low.
It should be noted that the inventive tube is applicable to all types of vehicle coolers having tubes arranged in parallel for cooling fluids, i.e. liquids or gases, such as liquid coolers, charge-air coolers, condensers and oil coolers.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9902326 | Jun 1999 | SE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1840318 | Horvath | Jan 1932 | A |
2017201 | Bossart et al. | Oct 1935 | A |
4262659 | Brzezinski | Apr 1981 | A |
4470452 | Rhodes | Sep 1984 | A |
5125453 | Bertrand et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5186251 | Joshi | Feb 1993 | A |
5441106 | Yukitake | Aug 1995 | A |
5579837 | Yu et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5689881 | Kato | Nov 1997 | A |
5730213 | Kiser et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5768782 | Kato | Jun 1998 | A |
5890288 | Rhodes et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5934128 | Takiura et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6067712 | Randlett et al. | May 2000 | A |
6209202 | Rhodes et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6510870 | Valaszkai et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6513586 | Haussmann | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6550533 | Nakado et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19548495 | Jun 1997 | DE |
19819248 | Apr 1999 | DE |
0159685 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0590945 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0774637 | May 1997 | EP |
0907062 | Jul 1999 | EP |
489717 | Mar 1919 | FR |
2085226 | Dec 1971 | FR |
2757258 | Jun 1998 | FR |
521285 | May 1940 | GB |
2090651 | Jul 1982 | GB |
2159265 | Nov 1985 | GB |
58-140597 | Aug 1983 | JP |
1-142393 | Jun 1989 | JP |
01-184399 | Jul 1989 | JP |
10193014 | Jul 1998 | JP |