Technical Field
The present invention generally relates to fluidic devices, such as microfluidic devices, and methods for manufacture and use of the same.
Description of the Related Art
Fluidic microcircuits are known in the art, and include mechanical systems such as piston driven devices, electrohydraulic systems such as electrokinetic pump and valve devices, and pneumohydraulic systems. Of these, those systems with pneumatic actuators and control surfaces have proven most practical in controlling microscale fluid flows.
One class of fluidic devices having a pneumatic interface is manufactured by Micronics, Inc. (Redmond, Wash.). Control of fluid flow in microfluidic channels is achieved with a MICROFLOW® system pneumatic controller, which operates millimeter-sized valves in a plastic cartridge according to programmable valve logic. Miniature diaphragms separate the pneumatic side and the hydraulic side of the cartridges; i.e., the valve diaphragms are interface elements for converting pneumatic control pulses into starting and stopping fluid flow. Cartridges are formed by building up laminations, layer by layer, with channels and chambers sealed between capping overlayers. All the diaphragms are formed of a single layer. In this way, complex fluidic circuits are formed. Pneumatic and hydraulic channels and chambers are formed such that the pneumatic workings and the hydraulic workings of the cartridge are separated by an elastomeric diaphragm layer. Diaphragms formed of polyurethane and PDMS have been favorites for this method. An unsolved problem is the ability to manufacture circuits in which the diaphragm material can be varied (e.g., breathable, chemically resistant, rupturable, elastomeric, inelastic, and so forth) according to the type or subtype of circuit element.
A second unsolved problem relates to the manufacturability of microcircuits having millimeter and sub-millimeter footprints. Miniaturization has proven a benefit, favoring development of devices having a higher density of circuit components per unit area, but valves and diaphragms at a millimeter or sub-millimeter scale have been difficult to realize by current production methods.
Micropumps
Miniature diaphragm pump elements, for example, are needed to achieve fullest benefit of fluidic microcircuitry technologies, which find numerous applications such as in diagnostics and in life sciences more generally. Diaphragm-driven pumps are advantageous because of their sanitary features, including the absence of mechanical seals and lubricant.
Although miniature pumps were generically disclosed by Wilding (for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,304,487 and 5,498,392), the disclosures themselves were not sufficient to fully enable fluidic microcircuitry pumps and valves. Cited by Wilding was Van Lintel [1988, “A Piezoelectric Micropump Based on Micromachining of Silicon,” Sensors and Actuators, 15:153-167], which relates to pumps microfabricated from silicon. Silicon-based microelectromechanical (MEMS) structures are not generally compatible with modern plastic devices.
There has been greater interest in elastomeric diaphragm materials because of the higher compression ratio and larger displacement volume, which offers the advantage of self-priming in fluidic operations. For example, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and silicones generally readily form thin sheets or articulated blocks and are used as diaphragm materials. Latex rubber and amorphous polyurethanes have also been used. Elastomeric materials that obey Hooke's law have the advantage that the diaphragm returns to its original shape in the relaxed state, but this is advantageous only for some applications, and can be associated with lack of chemical resistance.
Microvalves
Representative art related to valves includes U.S. Pat. No. 4,304,257 (the '257 valve), in which a soft, resilient, polyurethane sheet is clamped over flow channels formed in a hard acrylic body. A fluid path between two discontinuous fluid channels is opened and closed by actuating pistons which mechanically flex a part of the sheet. A tenting action on the sheet is associated with valve opening; valve closing is associated with spring return of the resilient sheet to a closed position. The sheet is flexed mechanically between the two positions by a solenoid-operated rod having an embedded attachment to the sheet over the valve seat, such that the sheet contacts the seat when closed and the sheet is pulled into an aperture overlying the valve seat to open the valve.
According to the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 4,848,722, the '257 valve has several disadvantages. In addition to delicacy of mechanical solenoid operation and need for fine adjustment, the membrane is subjected to great stresses with the risk of permanent stretch (i.e., permanent deformation or pinching past its yield point). By virtue of the concave contact surface for the membrane, the sealing area is maximized, but disadvantageously, a non-zero and significant volume of the valve cavity must be filled before fluid begins to flow.
In expired U.S. Pat. No. 4,848,722 (the '722 valve), a pressure or vacuum source is used to urge a flexible sheet such as biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate (boPET) into a stop-flow position in which apertures formed by the channels (3,4) in the valve seat are closed and an open position in which the apertures are fluidly confluent. The step land (FIG. 9: 62) of the valve seat is contacted by sheet (8) when the valve is closed. The sheet is glued to the pneumatic side of the valve.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,869,282 describes a micromachined valve having a diaphragm layer sandwiched between two rigid layers forming the valve cavity. The diaphragm layer is formed of polyimide, which is deflected by an applied pneumatic pressure in a control circuit to close the valve. Diaphragm motion is limited to avoid overstressing the polyimide layer.
Expired U.S. Pat. No. 5,660,370 (the '370 valve) describes a valve (FIG. 1: 1) having flexible diaphragm (2) and flat valve seat formed of a rigid layer in which two holes are formed, each hole defining an opening to a fluidic channel (3,4) in an underlying layer, where the holes are separated by a valve sill. The diaphragm is made of polyurethane or silicone. The valve (5) is opened by pneumatically exercising the diaphragm. To avoid the tendency of the sheet to become stressed beyond its yield point, a flat valve seat is used to minimize the required range of diaphragm motion. This also reduces the deadspace volume of the valve.
A similar structure is seen in U.S. Pat. No. 5,932,799 to YSI Inc., which teaches a fluidic microcircuitry analyzer having a plurality of polyimide layers, preferably KAPTON® film, directly bonded together without adhesives and a flexible pneumatically actuated diaphragm member for controlling fluid flow.
WO Publ. No. 2002/081934 to Micronics, Inc., published Oct. 17, 2002, describes a laminated valve having an elastomeric diaphragm. These valves, which were termed “peanut valves”, admit fluid across the valve sill under negative pressure, and are closed when positively pressurized. Advantageously, the valve cavity is formed with a contoured waist to minimize deadspace volume.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,445,926 to Mathies describes a laminate with a flexible diaphragm layer sandwiched between hard substrates. Pneumatic channels and fluid channels are formed on opposite sides of the diaphragm layer (cf., FIG. 1 of the reference), so that the diaphragm is the active valve member. The diaphragm material disclosed is a 254 micrometer PDMS membrane. The valve body is typically a solid such as glass.
US Pat. Appl. Nos. 2006/0275852 and 2011/0207621 to Montagu describe a fluidic cartridge for biological assays. The cartridge includes a molded body defining flow passages. A latex diaphragm and a canned diaphragm pump are shown (cf., FIG. 5 of the reference). The “rolling elastic diaphragm pump” member (3) is inserted into the cartridge as a preformed subassembly and is commercially available (Thomas Pumps, Model 1101 miniature compressor, Sheboygan, Wis. 53081). Valves are mechanically actuated using a stepper motor. Thus the valves have the disadvantage of requiring sensitive and meticulous adjustment for proper operation.
Other elastomeric valve and pump constructs are known. Examples of silicone valve construction include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,443,890, 6,793,753, 6,951,632 and 8,104,514, all of which illustrate soft lithographic processes (cf., U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,695,683 and 8,104,497) for forming valves and pumps. PDMS may be used to form diaphragms and pump bodies. Latex rubber and amorphous polyurethanes have also been used as diaphragm materials, but chemical resistance may not be sufficient for some applications.
While not limiting, examples of diaphragm materials having properties that have not been exploited for pneumohydraulic circuits include members that are gas permeable and liquid impermeable after wetting. Diaphragm members that are elastic and breathable are not known in the field of fluidic microcircuitry technology. Diaphragm members having solvent resistance and capable of being shaped into form-in-place diaphragms are not known. Other potential diaphragm materials have not been considered because means for independently selecting a diaphragm material for each class of fluidic element (such as valve, pump, reservoir, and so forth) are not known.
Advantageously, a gas-permeable diaphragm that retains its breathability after wetting would permit use of diaphragms in dead-ended fluidic circuits. Advantageously, a solvent-resistant diaphragm that yields to form a pre-shaped diaphragm member has application in valves used for pumping suspensions of particulates, and for replacing polyurethane diaphragms which leak when exposed to caustics, chaeotropes, or solvents, thus permitting use of solvents such as ethanol, formamide and dimethylsulfoxide for reducing temperature requirements during PCR, while not limited thereto.
Materials suited for one such application may be unsuited for another. As a first example, valve diaphragms may not be workable if fabricated from a microporous gas-permeable film, whereas vents require microporosity. Similarly, diaphragms requiring elasticity may not be readily substituted by diaphragms having a low yield point. Optimization of materials for particular classes of fluidic elements offers an advantage only if each class of fluidic elements can be optimized independently. Selected embodiments of the inventions cannot be realized without methods of manufacture which selectably incorporate an assortment or mixed palette of advanced diaphragm materials into the pump, valve, filter, vent and cuvette membranes of individual cartridges, where each class of fluidic elements is represented by a distinct and dissimilar diaphragm material. The various diaphragm materials are generally made of thin films.
The engineering of both valve and pump diaphragms can benefit from a manufacturing method that permits assembly of fluidic devices using thin films selectable from a list of materials. Conventional glue in place methods are not well suited to mass production and have raised technical barriers to further miniaturization and increased density of circuit elements. Given the unique advantages of the combinations disclosed herein, a process is needed to manufacture a fluidic circuit in which each diaphragm member of the fluidic circuit is independently selected from a plurality of available materials according the functional requirements of each individual circuit element. Currently available methods do not permit mass production of devices comprised of multiple diaphragm materials on a single cartridge at the manufacturing scale needed to satisfy the expected market growth in use of fluidic devices, such as for diagnostic assays.
While progress has been made, there is a need in the art for improved fluidic devices, such as microfluidic devices, The present invention provides this and related advantages.
Fluidic devices having an assorted plurality of pneumohydraulic diaphragms are disclosed, such that the diaphragm members are not formed as a single sheet, but are instead each deposited individually so that the material of the diaphragm can be varied according to the kind of circuit element being formed. Each cartridge contains circuit elements (such as valve, pump, vent, filter) that are grouped as subsets and combinations having different diaphragm materials. Also disclosed is a method for manufacture of these systems by a diaphragm printing process that can be described as “edge-bonded decoupage”, with adaptations for high-throughput manufacture.
Diaphragms may further be subjected to a “form in place” process by stretching the diaphragm film past its yield point. After relaxation, these diaphragms retain the shape of the cavity in which they are stretched. This process occurs after initial assembly of the fluidic system and closure of the housing, and advantageously also serves as a quality control step for identifying product having continuity or leak defects. Overstretched diaphragms may also be formed mechanically, such as by a rolling or a pressing process. Pre-stretched diaphragms have improved response time, increased stroke volume consistency, decreased flow resistance, and valves made in this way have smaller internal volumes and a smaller footprint.
As an introduction, several embodiments are illustrated by way of examples. In each embodiment, a plurality of assorted diaphragm subtypes are assembled in a device, each diaphragm subtype having been formed of a particular material having a unique property (such as elasticity, inelasticity, breathability, impermeability, chemical resistance, rupture sensitivity, and so forth) of value in a fluidic circuit, where any one diaphragm subtype is not suited for all the desired fluidic circuit elements. These subcombinations are illustrative of the general concept of a fluidic circuit having an assortment of specialized diaphragms which are “printed in place”, and are not intended to be limiting, i.e., the illustrated subcombinations may be formed into larger combinations, and other subcombinations and combinations are readily achieved by practicing the principles behind these teachings.
Using the processes of the invention, subtypes of diaphragms having properties uniquely suited to particular fluidic or pneumatic functions are readily incorporated alongside other subsets of diaphragms having dissimilar properties. It will be readily apparent that the full list of possible subcombinations of circuit elements having individualized diaphragm materials would be extensive, and that the principles of the invention are apparent from the disclosure herein, while not limited thereby.
Fluidic Cartridges/Fluidic Circuits
In another embodiment, fluidic cartridges having 2, 3, 4, or more layers may be formed around fluidic circuits containing a plurality of assorted diaphragm materials that have been formed into functional units. Fluidic cartridges of the invention may be formed having two molded substrate layers and one or two capping layers for example, while not limited thereto. Unique three layer and four layer fluidic cartridges are formed by this process, dramatically simplifying manufacture. Fluidic cartridges having 4 layers are particularly preferred for reasons as will be described below.
Preferredly, the cartridges comprise a first molded piece which houses the pneumatic works and a second molded piece which houses the fluidic works. Diaphragm members are inserted between the two molded pieces in proper registration to separate the pneumatics from the fluidics where they intersect and to form valves, pumps, vents, waste receptacles, reagent reservoirs and cuvettes, for example. In this way, structures are formed such that action of a pneumatic pulse on a diaphragm results in motion or arrest of a fluid on the other side of the diaphragm. Diaphragms thus have a fluid side and a pneumatic side. Capping layers are used to seal additional pneumatic or fluidic features that would otherwise be on the exposed outer surfaces of the device.
Decoupage Process Description
In a production process of the invention, each diaphragm is cut from a film layer as an island on a substrate having a pneumatic cavity, the cutting process forming a weld between the film layer and the substrate at least so that excess material surrounding the diaphragm cutouts is removed. In a second step, a second substrate having a hydraulic cavity is fused or bonded to the first substrate so that an “apron” around each diaphragm member is compressed between the first and second substrates. The apron is a margin of the diaphragm member that is cut oversize to permit a compression or fusion seal around the edges of the diaphragm between the two substrate layers while allowing the internal web of the diaphragm to be unbonded. The resulting diaphragm has a range of motion defined by the size of the cavity in which it is encapsulated.
By placing diaphragms between pneumatic cavities in the first substrate and hydraulic cavities in the second substrate, operable pneumohydraulic microcircuits are constructed. The paired cavities may function as valves, pumps, vents, filters, extractors, waste receptacles, reagent reservoirs, and cuvettes.
Sheets of diaphragm materials may be welded or tacked to a polymeric substrate using laser decoupage or hot nip roller decoupage, although laser decoupage has the advantage that a laser can be guided over the workpiece to make welds according to a programmable design.
Advantageously, the cutting process is performed cooperatively with an air knife or electrostatic roller so as to remove excess and unbonded diaphragm material. This ensures that discrete diaphragms each having unique properties may be printed at high density.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, diaphragm materials are supplied as films from a roll or sheet and contacted with a first rigid or semi-rigid substrate so that a cutting laser may be used to tack or fuse in place individual diaphragm members cut from the film. Excess material is removed and a first subset of diaphragms is printed onto the substrate in this way in registration with underlying features (i.e., cavities) in the substrate. A second round of diaphragm printing results in a substrate having a plurality of diaphragms, a subset formed of a first material and a subset formed of a second material, where the materials are compositionally distinct. Additional diaphragms are printed in place if desired.
In some embodiments, dehydrated reagents may be prepositioned in the cartridge by printing spots on the fluidic face before the placement of the second substrate. The substrates may also be modified with surface treatments, textures, or optical coatings before assembly of the cartridge. A second substrate piece is then contacted on its fluidic face with the first so that the diaphragms are sandwiched between the two body parts and the conjoining faces are fused or bonded.
In a third step, capping layers are applied to the outside surfaces of the body parts if needed, sealing any channels or chambers formed in those outside surfaces. Any vents or sample inlet holes are generally precut into the capping layers, which are fed into the process for example from a roll of stamped or precut appliqués, often with an intermediate glue layer or ACA layer where solvent, thermal, molecular, laser or ultrasonic bonding between the pieces is not practical.
These and other features of the inventive products and processes will be more fully made apparent by the detailed description which follows, the claims and accompanying drawing figures herewith, the entirety of which, taken together, form the specification of the invention.
The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be more readily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example. It is to be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are for illustration and description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention. The various features of novelty that characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming part of this disclosure. The invention does not necessarily reside in any one of these features taken alone, but rather in the particular combination of all of its structures for the functions specified.
Certain terms throughout the following description are used to refer to particular features, steps or components, and are used as terms of description and not of limitation. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, different persons may refer to the same feature, step or component by different names. Components, steps or features that differ in name but not in function or action are considered equivalent and not distinguishable, and may be substituted herein without departure from the invention. Certain meanings are defined here as intended by the inventors, i.e. they are intrinsic meanings Other words and phrases used here take their meaning as consistent with usage as would be apparent to one skilled in the relevant arts.
Definitions:
“Substrate” refers to a body layer or member having a generally planar face upon which cavities forming chambers and channels are embossed or molded.
“Microfluidic”—by convention, refers to fluidic features having at least one critical dimension that is less than 500 micrometers. The narrowness of the critical dimension results in fundamental changes in the rules governing fluid flow. The fluidic microcircuitry flow regime is characterized by Poiseuille or “laminar” flow.
“Hydraulic works” of a device: includes the network or networks of intercommunicating channels and chambers that are intended to be wetted by sample or liquid reagents in the course of an assay. The hydraulic networks are configured with fluidic subcircuits for performing the steps of an assay.
“Pneumatic works” of a device: includes the network or networks of pneumatically actuated valves, pumps and diaphragms and interconnecting circuitry and manifolds that are useful for powering and controlling the hydraulics of the device. The pneumatic works of the cartridge device interface with positive and negative pressure sources on the host instrument and with valves, diaphragms, pumps and other pneumatically actuated elements that control and drive liquids in the hydraulic network.
While it may be said that the pneumatic works of the device are preferably operated with a gas such as air or nitrogen, it is also conceived that equivalent “pneumatic” circuits may be operated with a fluid more generally, where fluid is selected from a gas or a liquid, including liquids such as silicone oils, vegetable oils, fluorocarbon liquids, and the like. Thus in one variant of the invention, the pneumatic works are operated with a “fluid” having the characteristics of a liquid and the operation of the device is otherwise equivalent, as would readily be understood by one skilled in the art.
“Fluidic works” of a device: include the hydraulic works formed of a network or networks of internal channels and chambers wetted in the course of the assay and the pneumatic works formed of control and pump driving circuits powered by positive and negative pressure sources derived from a host instrument via a pneumatic interface.
The fluidic works may be divided into fluidic subcircuits, where each subcircuit comprises channels and chambers for performing a particular function on a liquid sample or reagent. The fluidic subcircuits may be organized into serial subcircuits (such as for extraction, amplification and detection of a nucleic acid target or targets) and parallel subcircuits and networks such as for simultaneous assay for multiple targets on a single sample by splitting the sample. “Microscale” and “fluidic” refer to devices having millimeter or submillimeter features.
“Stress” is the internal or restoring force per unit area associated with a strain and has units of Pascals or megaPascals.
“Strain” is a ratio ΔL/L0 of the change in length divided by the original length in response to an externally applied stress, and is unitless; it is often given in percent.
“Yield point” is the point on a stress-strain curve where the curve deflects or levels off and plastic deformation commences, and thus corresponds to the “elastic limit” of the material. Prior to the yield point, the material elastically return to its original shape when the applied stress is removed. Once the yield point is passed, some fraction of the deformation will be permanent and non-reversible.
“Yield Strength” and “yield point” are measured by standard techniques for reproducibility, such as described in ASTM Standard Test Method D882-10 (the “882 test method”). For consistency, generally a 1 mil film is a preferred substrate. Yield strength is an indication of the maximum stress that can be developed in a material without causing irreversible deformation. Yield point is an indication of the maximum strain that can be developed in a material without causing irreversible deformation. For practical reasons, the measurements of yield strength, strain, elastic limit and elastic modulus are defined experimentally from a stress-strain diagram.
Offset yield strength is the stress read from the diagram at the intersection of an offset line (drawn parallel to the initial slope of the stress-strain curve through the elastic deformation range) and the stress-strain curve, where the offset line is offset by a selected value. Offsets for plastics are conventionally taken as 2%. Optionally, yield is sometimes shown as a range, for example in the case of co-laminated films.
“Elasticity” refers to the ability of a material to return to its original shape when load causing deformation is removed. Elasticity is the ability to store and release energy with a spring-like sample response generally as described by Hook's law of elasticity. If the strain increases linearly with increasing applied stress, the material is purely elastic, however in some materials, such as materials displaying visco-elastic properties, the stress-strain relation is not linear and the sample response is strongly dependent on time and rate of load application.
“Elastic modulus” (E), also termed “Elastic Modulus”, is a slope measured in the elastic deformation region of the stress-strain curve, where strain is fully reversible. “Elastic Modulus” is the initial slope measured in the stress-strain curve and is an indication of the stiffness of the material. Elastic Modulus is a constant within the range of stretch or deformation that is fully reversible, and is thus equivalent to the spring constant of Hooke's Law.
“Permanent Deformation” or “inelastic deformation”, is an increase in length dimension, expressed as a percentage of the original length dimension, by which material fails to return to its original length after being subjected to an elongation stress. When subjected to a stress greater than the yield strength or elastic limit of the film, permanent deformations of thin films may occur. For example, when a thin film diaphragm having a web span length from one side to another of a cavity or frame is stretched by a pressure and then collapsed back to a relaxed state, the web span length may be permanently elongated according to the amount of overstretch that the diaphragm was subjected to in excess of its yield point. “Overstretch” simply indicates that the material has been stretched past its yield point.
“Toughness” of a material is the ability of a material to absorb energy and plastically deform without fracturing or rupturing, and can be related to the total area under the stress-strain curve up to a break point according to the integral
K=∫0∈
where ϵ is strain, ϵf is the strain on failure, and σ is stress. The units of K are of energy per unit volume. For purposes of the invention, toughness is particularly indicative of the capacity of a material to undergo a strain of up to 50% by length and to be permanently deformed thereby. This property is desirable for the manufacture of pneumatic elements by a form-in-place process as described herein.
A comparison of the relative magnitudes of the yield strength, ultimate tensile strength and percent elongation of different material can also give a good indication of their relative toughness.
“Top”, “bottom”, “up”, “down”, “upper”, “lower”, “above”, “below”, “upward”, “downward”, “superior to”, “floor”, “roof”, “convex”, “concave”, and so forth, are indications of relative position and not absolute position or viewpoint: when reference is made to a specific frame of reference, such as the “ground plane” which is taken as orthogonal to an intersecting plumb line.
A “method” as disclosed herein refers one or more steps or actions for achieving the described end. Unless a specific order of steps or actions is required for proper operation of the embodiment, the order and/or use of specific steps and/or actions may be modified without departing from the scope of the present invention.
“Conventional”—refers to a term or method designating that which is known and commonly understood in the technology to which this invention relates.
The cartridge contains hydraulic works and pneumatic works, including microscale channels, cavities and chambers. Sample and reagent liquids are conveyed in a hydraulic network of the cartridge or card; fluid flow is controlled and driven by a pneumatic network that interfaces with the hydraulics at diaphragms spanning selected junctions, channels and chambers. Typically, the body of the cartridge or card is made of a flexible plastic and may be formed by lamination, molding or a combination thereof. Body plastics may include, but are not limited to, polycarbonate, polyethylene terephthalate, cyclic polyolefins, acrylates, methacrylates, polystyrene, polyimide, polysilicone, polypropylene, high density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, graft and block copolymers, and composites thereof. A preferred cartridge is made from rollstock and includes dry reagents printed thereon. Other such cartridges may include molded body elements.
A cartridge 100 is illustrated schematically in
In one embodiment, active pump diaphragms may be formed of a polymer having a yield point such that inelastic stretching occurs during assembly or use, whereas passive pump diaphragms, which are elastically stretched to store energy that can be used for fluid kinetics, may be formed of an elastomer. For example, first pump type 207 may be formed of an overstretched diaphragm and second pump type 208 may be formed of a microporous elastomer where first pump type is driven by a pneumatic actuation line and second pump type is operated passively, such that fluid driven actively from pump 207 to pump 208 is returned passively by elastic relaxation of diaphragm 208, as is useful in diagnostic applications such as PCR with two-zone thermocycling.
Diaphragms are generally formed of thin films, and while optionally being cast in place, a preferred method is to print them in place by edge-bonded decoupage as will be described with reference to
Diaphragm materials include, for example, a range of polyurethanes (including microporous polyurethanes sold under the tradename FABTEX®), a low density polyethylene/ethylene vinyl acetate/polyvinylidene chloride/ethylene vinyl acetate and low density polyethylene laminate (as sold under the tradename SARANEX®, a porous polytetrafluoroethylene film sold under the tradename MUPOR®, linear low density polyethylene, ethylene vinyl acetate, biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate, polyvinylidene chloride, polyimides, and polyolefins. One subtype is fully elastic over the required range of deformation; another subtype has a yield point that is exceeded in making form-in-place diaphragm elements. Certain members are not sufficiently elastic to be useful as elastomeric diaphragms, either because the yield point is too low or because the Young's Modulus is too high. Yet another subtype is microporous and breathable. Some diaphragms are hydrophilic, others are hydrophobic. For certain applications, rupture sensitive or rupture resistant thin films (such as those having a nylon reinforcement or co-laminate) are used. By selecting a diaphragm material optimized for each kind of fluidic element in a microcircuit, improved and surprising properties of the circuitry are realized.
Materials for forming body plate members or layers (101, 102, 103, 104) include polyethylene terephthalate (most preferredly biaxially stretched PET sold as MYLAR®), polycarbonate, polystyrene, polypropylene, polyimide, polyamide, and silicone rubber, while not limited thereto.
The diaphragm members are arrayed between the fluidic plate and the pneumatic plate in registration (using registration marks 210 or other fiducials as known in the art) with corresponding cavities on the opposing surfaces of the body members. The diaphragms may be assembled by contacting a sheet of film against the pneumatic layer and cutting each outline while welding the material onto the substrate, a process termed “cut-welding”. The shape of the diaphragm is generally determined by the outline of the cavity which it overlies. A bib or apron of extra material is cut around each shape so that the cavity is sealed. The excess material between the cutouts is then stripped away, for example using an electrostatic pickup roller or an air knife.
The first stage of assembly can be broken conceptually into steps. A pair of molded plates are manufactured, cavity and channel features defining a the hydraulic works of a fluidic circuit are embossed, molded or laminated into a first plate or housing, and cavity and channel features defining the pneumatic works of a pneumatic circuit are embossed, molded or laminated into a second manufactured plate or housing.
In a next step, the pneumatic plate 101 is fed into an automated process with pneumatic face up. As shown schematically in
In a fourth step, a sheet of a second diaphragm material (at Station B) contacted onto the pneumatic face and a robotic laser is used to cut out a second subset of diaphragms. These might include a second subtype of fluidic elements having elastic diaphragms, for example.
The laser decoupage step can be repeated with as many sheets or rolls of diaphragm materials as are needed for the fluidic circuit, where each sheet or roll is a distinct material that will be used for a particular class of diaphragm types.
Finally, the fluidics plate (having been spotted or printed with any dry reagents to be contained in the cartridge) is fitted face-to-face against the pneumatic plate, sandwiching the aprons of the diaphragm members between corresponding lip surfaces surrounding the various cavities in each plate, and a process of fusion or bonding is applied so that the two plates are sealed together.
Fusion of the two substrates is completed by ultrasonic welding, by solvent welding, by gluing, or by laser assisted thermal fusion, for example. Use of a double sided glue layer can be avoided by pressure treating the plates in combination with UV-activation of surface epoxide groups covalently bound to one of the substrates.
This step results in operational valve and pump diaphragm assemblies encapsulated within their valve and pump cavities. In the process of bonding or fusing the two plates together, the aprons of the diaphragm members are sealed in place bordering the outside walls of the valve and pump cavities so that the diaphragm physically separates the pneumatic and fluidic sides of the circuit.
Assembly may involve additional steps. Where circuit features are brought out onto the outside surfaces of the fused plates, a capping layer is applied on the contralateral faces of the cartridge body to enclose those features.
The device may be tested for continuity and leaks on the fluid side and the pneumatic side. By applying an overpressure on the fluid side, diaphragms can be stretched in place to comply with the shape of the overlying pneumatic cavity. These diaphragms when relaxed, will have a tented appearance like a bubble. This defines a “form-in-place” diaphragm process, as will be described in more detail below.
In a next operation, which is not shown in the figure, the pneumatic substrate plate is mated face-to-face with the hydraulic substrate plate and the two are fused or bonded together, thus encapsulating the diaphragms inside the finished product. The diaphragms separate the hydraulic cavity from the pneumatic cavity, or from an atmospheric vent.
By trial and error, selected materials have been found to weld or tack onto a plastic substrate in the process of cutting the shapes by laser. Cut welding is typically accomplished with a laser such as a CO2 laser, a Nd:YAG laser, a Holmium laser, and most preferably a laser having an output in the 1.7-10 micron range, and finds application in edge-bonded laser decoupage. CO2 lasers have an output at about 2 um. Fiber lasers having a 2 um output (such as those employing thulium (Tm) doped and holmium (Ho) doped double-clad fibres) are particularly preferred because the output can be finely focused and is in a band that interacts intensely with polymeric materials to a greater depth than a CO2 laser and without the need for absorption enhancers on the surfaces to be welded. Target output is generally less than 100 Watts.
Most plastics do not absorb laser radiation in the region extending from UV to near-IR. Laser welding (conversion of laser radiation into heat) can be performed at wavelengths below about 2 micrometers by polymer sensitization, such as by addition of dyes or an adjunct absorbing layer. But at around 1.7 micrometers, the intrinsic absorptivity of plastic increases due to vibronic excitation. We have found that the preferred laser output frequencies for laser edge-welded decoupage are in the range of 1.7 to 10 micrometers. The advantages of fiber lasers having a 2 micrometer output include higher power and beam quality; higher efficiency and smallest size; flexible fiber beam delivery for high-speed robotic workstations; and efficacy over a wide range of polymers. In some applications, cutting speeds approach several meters per second. If needed, different lasers may be used for cutting and edge-bonding different diaphragm materials.
Hot nip rollers are also found to be useful for edge-bonded decoupage, the sharp edges of the roller serving both to make the cut and weld the film onto the substrate. However, laser cutting is preferred because of the finer detail and quality of the cuts, which permits closer fluidic circuit element packing and increased miniaturization.
Smaller diaphragm elements permit closer spacing of valve and pump arrays, which are often formed into branching circuits operated in parallel for running multiple assay panels in parallel. Larger diaphragm elements are needed, for example, as covers over a common waste receptacle or over reagent packs having diaphragms for pneumatic dispensation of reagent. Specialized diaphragm elements are also used as vents and as optical cuvettes.
Attaching the diaphragm layers to the pneumatic substrate member 101 is mostly a matter of convenience, and is preferred because reagents are typically printed onto the hydraulic substrate. But this is a matter of individual choice and does not limit the practice of the invention.
In
The fluidic and pneumatic plate body members (generally including at least one pneumatic substrate having features intended for receiving pressurized gas and at least one hydraulic substrate having fluidic features intended for wetting during use) may be formed by a process of molding and are stamped or molded on at least one surface with cavities that serve as fluidic or pneumatic chambers and channels which when interfaced together form a fluidic circuit. The fluidic face of the fluidic plate member is designed to interface with the pneumatic face of the pneumatic plate member. An individual pump cavity may consist of paired cavities on the fluidic and pneumatic sides of the housing and is assembled in a clamshell process. Dried reagents and beads are spotted or printed into the fluidic cavities before the cavity is sealed under its diaphragm. When fully assembled, each diaphragm interfaces between a fluidic chamber or channel and a pneumatic chamber or channel and is used to move fluid through the fluidic circuit under control of pneumatic pulses supplied by a pneumatic interface which is generally under solenoid-actuated control of a microprocessor. The fluidic and pneumatic body members may also be formed by lamination, as will be illustrated in
Advantageously, fluidic and pneumatic features may also extend through the plate substrates so that additional circuit features may be located on the outside face of one or both plates; i.e., contralateral to the faces that will be fused or bonded together. These channels and chambers must also be sealed and this is generally done with a “capping layer”. Capping layers may be applied by gluing or by other bonding techniques, and are composed of polyethylene terephthalate or a cyclical polyolefin, for example. Bonding and fusing body layers is accomplished by applying an intermediate glue or ACA (adhesive-core-adhesive) layer between the pieces, but preferred methods include solvent, thermal, molecular, laser or ultrasonic bonding where possible. Recent advances in laser bonding result in essentially seamless fusion between adjoining pieces.
At this stage, manufacturing may be complete, or a pressure-driven “form-in-place” process may be used to shape selected diaphragms. Adding capping layers to any outside surface which bear circuit features in negative relief may be completed at any stage of the process.
In
The fluidic and pneumatic plate body members (generally including at least one pneumatic substrate having features intended for receiving pressurized gas and at least one hydraulic substrate having fluidic features intended for wetting during use) may be formed by a process of molding and are stamped or molded on at least one surface with cavities that serve as fluidic or pneumatic chambers and channels which when interfaced together form a fluidic circuit. The fluidic face of the fluidic plate member is designed to interface with the pneumatic face of the pneumatic plate member. An individual pump cavity may consist of paired cavities on the fluidic and pneumatic sides of the housing and is assembled in a clamshell process. Dried reagents and beads are spotted or printed into the fluidic cavities before the cavity is sealed under its diaphragm. When fully assembled, each diaphragm interfaces between a fluidic chamber or channel and a pneumatic chamber or channel and is used to move fluid through the fluidic circuit under control of pneumatic pulses supplied by a pneumatic interface which is generally under solenoid-actuated control of a microprocessor. The fluidic and pneumatic body members may also be formed by lamination.
Advantageously, fluidic and pneumatic features may also extend through the plate substrates so that additional circuit features may be located on the outside face of one or both plates; i.e., contralateral to the faces that will be fused or bonded together. These channels and chambers must also be sealed and this is generally done with a “capping layer”. Capping layers may be applied by gluing or by other bonding techniques, and are composed of polyethylene terephthalate or a cyclical polyolefin, for example. Bonding and fusing body layers is accomplished by applying an intermediate glue or ACA (adhesive-core-adhesive) layer between the pieces, but preferred methods include solvent, thermal, molecular, laser or ultrasonic bonding where possible. Recent advances in laser bonding result in essentially seamless fusion between adjoining pieces.
At this stage, manufacturing may be complete, or a pressure-driven “form-in-place” process may be used to shape selected diaphragms. Adding capping layers to any outside surface which bear circuit features in negative relief may be completed at any stage of the process.
Chambers of this kind can be used for reagent additions where a dried reagent is stored in the chamber, and for thermocycling, for example, where a pair of pumps are slaved so that one is actuated pneumatically, and the second is a dead end chamber that is filled under pressure (while venting gas through the diaphragm) and then passively returns the fluid upstream due to its spring force.
The device of
Other microporous polymers are also known and function analogously. Microporous forms of polyterefluoroethylene (PTFE) sold under the tradename MUPOR® (Porex, Fairburn Ga.) are readily yielded in place using hydraulic pressure. The resulting diaphragms have good permeability to gas and can be used as vents, and the hydrophobicity results in selective blockage of water leakage if desired. In an unexpected solution to a technical problem, microporous polyurethane films may thus be used to form diaphragm members in closed-end channels, where ingress of liquid into a terminal chamber is possible only by directly venting the resident air through a permeable diaphragm. In some applications, these diaphragms initially release air, but when wetted, permeability to air is substantially decreased, thus the diaphragm to a zero-air entrapment, self-priming pump for close-ended channels, where advantageously the pump becomes an active pneumatic micropump once all air in the line is vented and the film is wetted.
In this case, a simplified pneumatic substrate is shown with a circular diaphragm cutout applied thereon. The cutout includes a well-defined apron 901 that overlaps and extends outside the periphery of the cavity over which the diaphragm is applied. The outside edge of the apron is bonded to the underlying substrate so that the diaphragm may be pressurized through inlet 903.
When pressure is applied from within the cavity (here shown in cutaway view) the diaphragm film will stretch according to its Young's modulus. An elastic material will rebound when the pressure is removed, but for that class of materials having a yield point that is exceeded by the applied force, the material will be permanently stretched and deformed. This is the basis of the “form-in-place” diaphragm process, which may be applied to make “form-in-place” pumps and valves having improved latency times and are less likely to stick closed. In one process, the diaphragm material is stretched to take on and comply with the female shape of the cavity into which it is forced. Thus for a process that exceeds the yield point of the thin film material, the figures demonstrate how a diaphragm pump can be formed by a form-in-place process of yielding a plastic film. The difference in enclosed volume between the stretched (lower) and unstretched (upper) diaphragm is the ejection stroke volume of the pump. Thus the process of manufacturing mimics the process of pumping and ensures a consistent stroke volume. This was first noted with films that were not resilient elastomers, but had been chosen for chemical resistance. A particular film in this class was a co-laminate of a polyethylene terephthalate or vinylidene chloride sandwich disposed between layers of polyethylene, which is valued for its chemical resistance. This material is sold under the tradename SARANEX®. We discovered that first ejection stroke volume of a virgin film was significantly less than second or third ejection stroke volume of a formed-in-place stretched film under normal conditions of use.
Stroke volume maturation is shown in
As shown in
Similarly, as shown in
The valve body is formed of four layers which include two outside capping layers and a molded core formed by fusion of a pneumatic plate member and a fluidic plate member. The capping layers are shown as part of a subassembly, where the hydraulic body member and bottom capping layer form a first subassembly 1310 and the pneumatic body member and top capping layer form a second subassembly 1311. A diaphragm is sandwiched between the two plates and rests on the valve seat. Two fluidic channels are shown entering the valve cavity through dual ports in a valve seat; the ports are separated by a valve sill. In the closed position, the valve diaphragm seats on the valve sill and is pressurized (pneumatic actuation port 1305) to resist flow of fluid from one channel to another. In the open position (
The microvalve is formed in a plastic body shown here with 4 layers. The microvalve includes a valve cavity, where valve cavity is defined by a first surface and a second surface enclosing the valve cavity therebetween, the first surface defining a valve seat and the second surface apposing the first surface at a lip bounding the cavity; a diaphragm member with apron peripherally defined therearound, wherein the apron is sealedly inserted into the body under the lip so as to separate the first surface from the second surface; a first fluidic channel entering the valve cavity through the valve seat at a first port; a second fluidic channel entering the valve cavity through the valve seat at a second port; a valve sill defined on the first surface between the first port and the second port; and further wherein the diaphragm member is capable of being reversibly deflected against and retracted from the valve sill, thereby having an “ON” position and an “OFF” position for allowing or not allowing flow of a fluid between the first channel and the second channel.
The microvalve may be further characterized by the species of diaphragm member encapsulated therein. The diaphragm material may be, for example, a co-laminated plastic film having a yield strength such that first actuation of the valve permanently deforms the film to conform in place to the female contour of the cavity surface; a film having a vinylidene chloride polymer layer disposed between layers of polyethylene and sold under the tradename of SARANEX®; a film comprising a low density polyethylene/ethylene vinyl acetate/polyvinylidene chloride/ethylene vinyl acetate and low density polyethylene; a breathable plastic film such that gas is transmitted bidirectionally in response to a pneumatic pressure even when wetted; a film composed of a hydrophobic, microporous, gas permeable polyurethane; or, a film composed of FABTEX®, while not limited thereto. SARANEX®, polyvinylidene chloride ethylene vinyl acetate, for example, are chosen for their form-in-place properties; FABTEX® for their elasticity; grades of FABTEX® for their breathability in making hydrophobic liquid impermeable/gas permeable barrier films, vents and breathable diaphragms. Of interest for applications as diaphragm materials are linear low density polyethylene, ethylene vinyl acetate, biaxially oriented polypropylene, polyvinylidene chloride, microporous polyurethanes, polypropylenes, and polyolefins.
Plan and elevation views show a valve diaphragm with apron 1405 and a diaphragm web in an elastically recoverable or inelastically collapsible blister-shape 1410 having a generally “peanut” shape. The peanut shape can be seen more clearly in
As shown in
The valves may be constructed by lamination or by fusion of molded body parts as shown here. Shown here are top capping layer 1702, diaphragm 1701, pneumatic body layer 1703, hydraulic layers (1704a, 1704b), and bottom capping layer 1705. Also shown are valve seat 1707, pneumatic cavity 1708, hydraulic cavity 1709, first fluidic channel 1710, second fluidic channel 1711 and pneumatic actuation circuit 1712. The dark arrow indicates fluid flow when the valve is in the “OPEN” position (
Referencing
All of the U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, U.S. patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent applications and non-patent publications referred to in this specification and related application data sheets, including but not limited to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 61/745,335, are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Unless the context requires otherwise, throughout the specification and claims which follow, the word “comprise” and variations thereof, such as, “comprises” and “comprising” are to be construed in an open, inclusive sense, that is as “including, but not limited to”. The term “a” or “an” as used in the claims does not exclude a plurality.
The appended claims are not to be interpreted as including means-plus-function limitations, unless such a limitation is explicitly recited in a given claim using the phrase “means for.”
While there is provided herein a full and complete disclosure of the preferred embodiments of this invention, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction, dimensional relationships, and operational features shown and described. Various modifications, alternative constructions, changes and equivalents will readily occur to those skilled in the art and may be employed, as suitable, without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Such changes might involve alternative components, structural arrangements, sizes, shapes, forms, functions, operational features or the like.
In general, in the following claims, the terms used in the written description should not be construed to limit the claims to specific embodiments described herein for illustration, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments, both specific and generic, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/077252 | 12/20/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/100732 | 6/26/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3013467 | Minsky | Dec 1961 | A |
3799742 | Coleman | Mar 1974 | A |
3996345 | Ullman et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4104029 | Maier, Jr. | Aug 1978 | A |
4235960 | Sasse et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4304257 | Webster | Dec 1981 | A |
4366241 | Tom et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4373932 | Gribnau et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4610678 | Weisman et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4683195 | Mullis et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4683202 | Mullis | Jul 1987 | A |
4788729 | Walker | Dec 1988 | A |
4798703 | Minekane | Jan 1989 | A |
4800159 | Mullis et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4810630 | Craig et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4833332 | Robertson, Jr. et al. | May 1989 | A |
4837168 | de Jaeger et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4848722 | Webster | Jul 1989 | A |
4855240 | Rosenstein et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4869282 | Sittler et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4883750 | Whiteley et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4943522 | Eisinger et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4956302 | Gordon et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4965188 | Mullis et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5038852 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5075078 | Osikowicz et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5100626 | Levin | Mar 1992 | A |
5120643 | Ching et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5130238 | Malek et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5141850 | Cole et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5160701 | Brown, III et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5192980 | Dixon et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5225163 | Andrews | Jul 1993 | A |
5234809 | Boom et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5252459 | Tarcha et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5270183 | Corbett et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5275785 | May et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5296703 | Tsien | Mar 1994 | A |
5304487 | Wilding et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5354668 | Auerbach | Oct 1994 | A |
5415994 | Imrich et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420016 | Boguslaski et al. | May 1995 | A |
5427930 | Birkenmeyer et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5443890 | Öhman | Aug 1995 | A |
5455166 | Walker | Oct 1995 | A |
5486335 | Wilding et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5498392 | Wilding et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504013 | Senior | Apr 1996 | A |
5543026 | Hoff et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5578818 | Kain et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582989 | Caskey et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587128 | Wilding et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591645 | Rosenstein | Jan 1997 | A |
5602040 | May et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5622871 | May et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5631734 | Stern et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635358 | Wilding et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5635602 | Cantor et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5639428 | Cottingham | Jun 1997 | A |
5656503 | May et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658723 | Oberhardt | Aug 1997 | A |
5660370 | Webster | Aug 1997 | A |
5660990 | Rao et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5670381 | Jou et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5707807 | Kato | Jan 1998 | A |
5716842 | Baier et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716852 | Yager et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718567 | Rapp et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724404 | Garcia et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5726026 | Wilding et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5726404 | Brody | Mar 1998 | A |
5726751 | Altendorf et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5730850 | Kambara et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5747349 | van den Engh et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748827 | Holl et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759014 | Van Lintel | Jun 1998 | A |
5770460 | Pawlak et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5798273 | Shuler et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5856174 | Lipshutz et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863502 | Southgate et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863801 | Southgate et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5872710 | Kameyama | Feb 1999 | A |
5906602 | Weber et al. | May 1999 | A |
5922210 | Brody et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922591 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5932100 | Yager et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5932799 | Moles | Aug 1999 | A |
5948684 | Weigl et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955029 | Wilding et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965410 | Chow et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971158 | Yager et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971355 | Biegelsen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972710 | Weigl et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972721 | Bruno et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974867 | Forster et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989813 | Gerdes | Nov 1999 | A |
6001307 | Naka et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007309 | Hartley | Dec 1999 | A |
6007775 | Yager | Dec 1999 | A |
6018616 | Schaper | Jan 2000 | A |
6020187 | Tam | Feb 2000 | A |
6037168 | Brown | Mar 2000 | A |
6057167 | Shieh et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068752 | Dubrow et al. | May 2000 | A |
6086740 | Kennedy | Jul 2000 | A |
6158712 | Craig | Dec 2000 | A |
6168948 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171865 | Weigl et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184029 | Wilding et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210514 | Cheung et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6210882 | Landers et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6272939 | Frye et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287850 | Besemer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303389 | Levin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309875 | Gordon | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325975 | Naka et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6326211 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6368876 | Huang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387290 | Brody et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390791 | Maillefer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6399398 | Cunningham et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418968 | Pezzuto et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431212 | Hayenga et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439036 | Mansky | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6468807 | Svensson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488896 | Weigl et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6506346 | Monro | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6541213 | Weigl et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6541274 | Nagle et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562209 | Sullivan et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569674 | McGarry et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6576459 | Miles et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6581899 | Williams | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6614030 | Maher et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6620273 | Dai et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632655 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635487 | Lee et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6637463 | Lei et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6664104 | Pourahmadi et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6720411 | Mirkin et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729352 | O'Connor et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6731178 | Gailhard et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6731781 | Shams et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6743399 | Weigl et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748975 | Hartshorne et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758107 | Cabuz | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767194 | Jeon et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6787338 | Wittwer et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793753 | Unger et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6815160 | Chien et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6843263 | Kuo et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6872566 | Vischer et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6901949 | Cox et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916113 | Van de Goor et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6951632 | Unger et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6953675 | Leung et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6953676 | Wilding et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6955738 | Derand et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6974119 | Brendle et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974669 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7010391 | Handique et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7052594 | Pelrine et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7087414 | Gerdes et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7141416 | Krutzik | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7153673 | Stern | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7223363 | McNeely et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7223371 | Hayenga et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226562 | Holl et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235400 | Adey | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7318913 | Loeffler et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7416892 | Battrell et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7445926 | Mathies et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7514212 | Prudent et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7517651 | Marshall et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7541147 | Marshall et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7544506 | Breidford et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7607641 | Yuan | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7615370 | Streit et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7648835 | Breidford et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7695683 | Quan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7749444 | Yamada et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763453 | Clemmens et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7785776 | Wittwer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7832429 | Young et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7906317 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7955836 | Clemmens et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8104497 | Unger et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8104514 | Fernandes et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8110392 | Battrell et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8222023 | Battrell et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8329453 | Battrell et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8431389 | Battrell et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8716007 | Battrell et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8747779 | Sprague et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8772017 | Battrell et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9056291 | Battrell et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9132423 | Battrell et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20010046701 | Schulte et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020081934 | Murao et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086443 | Bamdad | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020137196 | Miles et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020160518 | Hayenga et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020192676 | Madonna et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020195152 | Fernandes et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030008308 | Enzelberger et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030013184 | Streit et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032028 | Dace et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030073229 | Greenstein et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030124619 | Weigl et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030129756 | Thorne et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030136178 | Cabuz | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152927 | Jakobsen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030175990 | Hayenga et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030215825 | Tong | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224434 | Wittwer et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040005718 | Fukushima | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018611 | Ward et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024051 | Holton | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037739 | McNeely et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040081997 | Stern | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040115094 | Gumbrecht et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040121364 | Chee et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124384 | Biegelsen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040189311 | Glezer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040209354 | Mathies et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224339 | Numajiri et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226348 | Bruce, III et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040248167 | Quake et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050013732 | Battrell et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050019792 | McBride et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050019898 | Adey et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050037397 | Mirkin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050106066 | Saltsman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050106742 | Wahl et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050129582 | Breidford et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136552 | Buechler | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142582 | Doyle et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050157301 | Chediak et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050161669 | Jovanovich et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164373 | Oldham et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050186585 | Juncosa et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050205816 | Hayenga et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050217741 | Bohm | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050221281 | Ho | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050284817 | Fernandez et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003440 | Streit et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060073484 | Mathies et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060076068 | Young et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060127886 | Kaylor et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060166375 | Hawkins et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178568 | Danna et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060246575 | Lancaster et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263816 | Laikhter et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264782 | Holmes et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275852 | Montagu et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060275893 | Ishii et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060292588 | Chou et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060292630 | Fukumoto | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008536 | Mitani et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070009383 | Bedingham et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014695 | Yue et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070042427 | Gerdes et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070125947 | Sprinzak et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154895 | Spaid et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183935 | Clemmens et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070190525 | Gu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219366 | Gumbrecht et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234785 | Beerling et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070243603 | Einsle et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070280856 | Ulmanella et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070292858 | Chen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080050283 | Chou et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080081341 | Maher et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080226500 | Shikida et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080260586 | Boamfa | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080274511 | Tan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080297792 | Kim et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090000678 | Therriault et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090017483 | Yamaoka et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090047713 | Handique | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090061450 | Hunter | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090148847 | Kokoris et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148933 | Battrell et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090181411 | Battrell et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090298059 | Gumbrecht et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325203 | Jenny et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325276 | Battrell et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100041049 | Smith et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100112723 | Battrell et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100120129 | Amshey | May 2010 | A1 |
20100291588 | McDevitt et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303687 | Blaga | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110151479 | Stevens et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110207621 | Montagu et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120028342 | Ismagilov et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120064597 | Clemmens et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071342 | Lochhead et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120115214 | Battrell et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135511 | Battrell et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120156750 | Battrell et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164383 | Sollmann | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164627 | Battrell et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120177543 | Battrell et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120329142 | Battrell et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130011912 | Battrell et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130032235 | Johnstone | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130130262 | Battrell | May 2013 | A1 |
20140349381 | Battrell et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150158026 | Battrell et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150321193 | Sprague et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150346097 | Battrell et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160090588 | Lofquist et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160102340 | Bouzek | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20170113221 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1146017 | Mar 1997 | CN |
1253625 | May 2000 | CN |
102602087 | Jul 2012 | CN |
20 2004 012 163 | Nov 2004 | DE |
0 320 308 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0 329 822 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0 399 859 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0 517 631 | Dec 1992 | EP |
1 180 135 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1 659 405 | May 2006 | EP |
1 707 965 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1 726 940 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1 792 654 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2 202 328 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2 202 328 | Sep 1988 | GB |
52-55679 | May 1977 | JP |
61-137066 | Jun 1986 | JP |
7-151101 | Jun 1995 | JP |
2520468 | Sep 1996 | JP |
10-82773 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10-504916 | May 1998 | JP |
11-508347 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-314719 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2003-166910 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-207454 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004-028589 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-333452 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-512071 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-527303 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-531006 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2005-345378 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-73371 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-84459 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-90774 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006-512092 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006-122743 | May 2006 | JP |
2006-517029 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006-227301 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006-246777 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006-520190 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007-514142 | May 2007 | JP |
2007-532918 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008-503722 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008-89597 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008-96375 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008-537063 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2009-14529 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-019962 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-510337 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009-513966 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009-529883 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009-255083 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2010-78508 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010-519463 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2010-535346 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2012-516455 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2013-518289 | May 2013 | JP |
2015-510111 | Apr 2015 | JP |
2016-508197 | Mar 2016 | JP |
8606488 | Nov 1986 | WO |
8808534 | Nov 1988 | WO |
8810315 | Dec 1988 | WO |
8906700 | Jul 1989 | WO |
8909284 | Oct 1989 | WO |
9112336 | Aug 1991 | WO |
9633399 | Oct 1996 | WO |
9701055 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9849543 | Nov 1998 | WO |
0063670 | Oct 2000 | WO |
01070381 | Sep 2001 | WO |
02001184 | Jan 2002 | WO |
02012896 | Feb 2002 | WO |
02041994 | May 2002 | WO |
02072262 | Sep 2002 | WO |
02081934 | Oct 2002 | WO |
03015923 | Feb 2003 | WO |
03031977 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03049860 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03054523 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03097831 | Nov 2003 | WO |
03099355 | Dec 2003 | WO |
03101887 | Dec 2003 | WO |
03102546 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004055198 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004061085 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004065010 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2004065930 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2005016529 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005022154 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005066638 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005069015 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005088280 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005106024 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006018811 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006035830 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006052652 | May 2006 | WO |
2006076567 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006083833 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2006125767 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007049009 | May 2007 | WO |
2007064635 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007106579 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007106580 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007109584 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008002462 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008070198 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008101732 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008147382 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009018473 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009037361 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009105711 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2010025302 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010088514 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2011094577 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2011094577 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2012071069 | May 2012 | WO |
2013052318 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2014100732 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2014182847 | Nov 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Al Zahrani et al., “Accuracy and Utility of Commercially Available Amplification and Serologic Tests for the Diagnosis of Minimal Pulmonary Tuberculosis,” Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:1323-1329, 2000. |
Aoki et al., “Serine Repeat Antigen (SERA5) Is Predominantly Expressed among the SERA Multigene Family of Plasmodium falciparum, and the Acquired Antibody Titers Correlate with Serum Inhibition of the Parasite Growth,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry 277(49):47533-47540, Dec. 2002. |
Arar et al., “Synthesis and Antiviral Activity of Peptide-Oligonucleotide Conjugates Prepared by Using Na-(Bromoacetyl)peptides,” Bioconjugate Chem. 6(5):573-577, 1995. |
Arikan et al., “Anti-Kp 90 IgA Antibodies in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis,” CHEST 114(5):1253-1257, Nov. 1998. |
Birkelund, “The molecular biology and diagnostics of Chlamydia trachomatis,” Danish Medical Bulletin 39(4):304-320, Aug. 1992. |
Bongartz et al., “Improved biological activity of antisense oligonucleotides conjugated to a fusogenic peptide,” Nucleic Acids Research 22(22):4681-4688, 1994. |
Bowden et al., “Using Self-Administered Tampons to Diagnose STDs,” AIDS Patient Care and STDs 12(1):29-32, 1998. |
C. Fredrick Battrell et al., “Sample-To-Answer Microfluidic Cartridge,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,182, filed Aug. 5, 2015, 78 pages. |
Carmona et al., “The use of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) peptides for measurement of clinically important proteolytic enzymes,” An Acad Bras Cienc 81(3):381-392. |
Chan et al., “Polymer surface modification by plasmas and photons,” Surface Science Reports 24:1-54, 1996. |
Chernesky et al., “Clinical Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of a Commercially Available Enzyme Immunoassay for Detection of Rubella Virus-Specific Immunoglobulin M,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 20(3):400-404, Sep. 1984. |
Chernesky et al., “Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis Antigens by Enzyme Immunoassay and Immunofluorescence in Genital Specimens from Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Men and Women,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases 154(1):141-148, Jul. 1986. |
Chou et al., “Prevention of pre-PCR mis-priming and primer dimerization improves low-copy-number amplifications,” Nucleic Acids Research 20(7):1717-1723, 1992. |
Crotchfelt et al., “Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in Genitourinary Specimens from Men and Women by a Coamplification PCR Assay,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 35(6):1536-1540, Jun. 1997. |
Cuzzubbo et al., “Use of Recombinant Envelope Proteins for Serological Diagnosis of Dengue Virus Infection in an Immunochromatographic Assay,” Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 8(6):1150-1155, 2001. |
D'Aquila et al., “Maximizing sensitivity and specificity of PCR by pre-amplification heating,” Nucleic Acids Research 19(13):3749, 1991. |
Dean et al., “Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification,” PNAS 99(8):5261-5266, Apr. 2002. |
Detter et al., “Isothermal Strand-Displacement Amplification Applications for High-Throughput Genomics,” Genomics 80(6):691-698, Dec. 2002. |
Edelstein et al., “The BARC biosensor applied to the detection of biological warfare agents,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics 14:805-813, 2000. |
Eritja et al., “Synthesis of Defined Peptide-Oligonucleotide Hybrids Containing a Nuclear Transport Signal Sequence,” Tetrahedron 47(24):4113-4120, 1991. |
Fontana et al., “Performance of Strand Displacement Amplification Assay in the Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae,”Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 58:283-288, 2005. |
Frame et al., “Identification and Typing of Herpes Simplex Virus by Enzyme Immunoassay with Monoclonal Antibodies,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 20(2):162-166, Aug. 1984. |
Gallo et al., “Study of viral integration of HPV-16 in young patients with LSIL,” J Clin Pathol 56:532-536, 2003. |
Garbassi et al., Polymer Surfaces—From Physics to Technology, John Wiley and Sons, Baltimore, Md., 1998, pp. 238-241. |
Ghai et al., “Identification, expression, and functional characterization of MAEBL, a sporozoite and asexual blood stage chimeric erythrocyte-binding protein of Plasmodium falciparum,” Molecular & Biochemical Parasitology 123:35-45, 2002. |
Gijs, “Magnetic bead handling on-chip: new opportunities for analytical applications,” Microfluid Nanofluid 1:22-40, 2004. |
Gomes et al., “Immunoreactivity and differential developmental expression of known and putative Chlamydia trachomatis membrane proteins for biologically variant serovars representing distinct disease groups,” Microbes and Infection 7:410-420, 2005. |
Graham et al., “Magnetoresistive-based biosensors and biochips,” TRENDS in Biotechnology 22(9):455-462, Sep. 2004. |
Graves et al., “Development of Antibody to Measles Virus Polypeptides During Complicated and Uncomplicated Measles Virus Infections,” Journal of Virology 49(2):409-412, Feb. 1984. |
Grover et al., “Monolithic membrane valves and diaphragm pumps for practical large-scale integration into glass microfluidic devices,” Sensors and Actuators B 89:315-323, 2003. |
Hardt et al., “Passive micromixers for applications in the microreactor and mTAS fields,” Microfluid Nanofluid 1:108-118, 2005. |
Harris et al., “Typing of Dengue Viruses in Clinical Specimens and Mosquitoes by Single-Tube Multiplex Reverse Transcriptase PCR,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 36(9):2634-2639, Sep. 1998. |
Harrison et al., “Synthesis and hybridization analysis of a small library of peptide—oligonucleotide conjugates,” Nucleic Acids Research 26(13):3136-3145, 1998. |
Hummel et al., “Development of quantitative gene-specific real-time RT-PCR assays for the detection of measles virus in clinical specimens,” Journal of Virological Methods 132:166-173, 2006. |
Hung et al., “A specificity enhancer for polymerase chain reaction,” Nucleic Acids Research 18(16):4953, Jun. 1990. |
Innis et al., (eds.), PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California, 1990, 480 pages. |
Jacobs et al., “Detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae Antigen in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Samples by a Rapid Immunochromatographic Membrane Assay,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 43(8):4037-4040, 2005. |
Joung et al., “Micropumps Based on Alternating High-Gradient Magnetic Fields,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 36(4):2012-2014, Jul. 2000. |
Kanehisa, “Use of statistical criteria for screening potential homologies in nucleic acid sequences,” Nucleic Acids Research 12(1):203-213, Jan. 1984. |
Kellogg et al., “TaqStart Antibody: “Hot Start” PCR Facilitated by a Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody Directed Against Taq DNA Polymerase,” BioTechniques 16(6):1134-1137, Jun. 1994. |
Kennedy et al., “Protein-Protein Coupling Reactions and the Applications of Protein Conjugates,” Clinica Chimica Acta 70(1):1-31, Jul. 1976. |
Khan et al., “Antibiotic Resistance, Virulence Gene, and Molecular Profiles of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Isolates from Diverse Sources in Calcutta, India,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 40(6):2009-2015, Jun. 2002. |
Khan et al., “Prevalence and Genetic Profiling of Virulence Determinants of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from Cattle, Beef, and Humans, Calcutta, India,” Emerging Infectious Diseases 8(1):54-62, Jan. 2002. |
Kittigul et al., “Use of a Rapid Immunochromatographic Test for Early Diagnosis of Dengue Virus Infection,” Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21(3):224-226, Mar. 2002. |
Knox et al., “Evaluation of Self-Collected Samples in Contrast to Practitioner-Collected Samples for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis by Polymerase Chain Reaction Among Women Living in Remote Areas,” Sexually Transmitted Diseases 29(11):647-654, Nov. 2002. |
Kremer et al., “Measles Virus Genotyping by Nucleotide-Specific Multiplex PCR,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 42(7):3017-3022, Jul. 2004. |
Kuipers et al., “Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in peripheral blood leukocytes of reactive arthritis patients by polymerase chain reaction,” Arthritis & Rheumatism 41(10):1894-1895, Oct. 1998. |
Kuipers et al., “Sensitivities of PCR, MicroTrak, ChlamydiaEIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2 for Purified Chlamydia trachomatis Elementary Bodies in Urine, Peripheral Blood, Peripheral Blood Leukocytes, and Synovial Fluid,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 33(12):3186-3190, Dec. 1995. |
Kuno, “Universal diagnostic RT-PCR protocol for arboviruses,” Journal of Virological Methods 72:27-41, 1998. |
Kwoh et al., “Transcription-based amplification system and detection of amplified human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with a bead-based sandwich hybridization format,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86:1173-1177, Feb. 1989. |
Lage et al., “Whole Genome Analysis of Genetic Alterations in Small DNA Samples Using Hyperbranched Strand Displacement Amplification and Array-CGH,” Genome Research 13:294-307, 2003. |
Lanciotti et al., “Rapid Detection and Typing of Dengue Viruses from Clinical Samples by Using Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 30(3):545-551, Mar. 1992. |
Leclerc et al., “Meager genetic variability of the human malaria agent Plasmodium vivax,” PNAS 101(40):14455-14460, Oct. 5, 2004. |
Lee et al., “Implementation of Force Differentiation in the Immunoassay,” Analytical Biochemistry 287:261-271, 2000. |
Leung et al., “Rapid antigen detection testing in diagnosing group A b-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis,” Expert. Rev. Mol. Diagn. 6(5):761-766, 2006. |
Lindegren et al., “Optimized Diagnosis of Acute Dengue Fever in Swedish Travelers by a Combination of Reverse Transcription-PCR and Immunoglobulin M Detection,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 43(6):2850-2855, Jun. 2005. |
Ling et al., “The Plasmodium falciparum clag9 gene encodes a rhoptry protein that is transferred to the host erythrocyte upon invasion,” Molecular Microbiology 52(1):107-118, 2004. |
Lundquist et al., “Human Recombinant Antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum Merozoite Surface Protein 3 Cloned from Peripheral Blood Leukocytes of Individuals with Immunity to Malaria Demonstrate Antiparasitic Properties,” Infect. Immun. 74(6):3222-3231, Jun. 2006. |
Luxton et al., “Use of External Magnetic Fields to Reduce Reaction Times in an Immunoassay Using Micrometer-Sized Paramagnetic Particles as Labels (Magnetoimmunoassay),” Anal. Chem. 76(6):1715-1719, Mar. 2004. |
Mahony et al., “Chlamydia trachomatis confirmatory testing of PCR-positive genitourinary specimens using a second set of plasmid primers,” Molecular and Cellular Probes 6:381-388, 1992. |
Mahony et al., “Comparison of Plasmid- and Chromosome-Based Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis Nucleic Acids,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 31(7):1753-1758, Jul. 1993. |
Mahony et al., “Detection of Antichlamydial Immunoglobulin G and M Antibodies by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 18(2):270-275, Aug. 1983. |
Mahony et al., “Multiplex PCR for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Genitourinary Specimens,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 33(11):3049-3053, Nov. 1995. |
Mahony, “Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases,” Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 16(1):61-71, Mar. 1996. |
Mayta et al., “Use of a reliable PCR assay for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Peruvian patients,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection 12(8):809-812, Aug. 2006. |
Michon et al., “Naturally Acquired and Vaccine-Elicited Antibodies Block Erythrocyte Cytoadherence of the Plasmodium vivax Duffy Binding Protein,” Infect. Immun. 68(6):3164-3171, Jun. 2000. |
Migot-Nabias et al., “Immune Responses Against Plasmodium Falciparum Asexual Blood-Stage Antigens and Disease Susceptibility in Gabonese and Cameroonian Children,” Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 61(3):488-494, 1999. |
Mitrani-Rosenbaum et al., “Simultaneous detection of three common sexually transmitted agents by polymerase chain reaction,” Am J Obstet Gynecol 171(3):784-790, Sep. 1994. |
Mohmmed et al., “Identification of karyopherin b as an immunogenic antigen of the malaria parasite using immune mice and human sera,” Parasite Immunology 27:197-203, 2005. |
Monis et al., “Nucleic acid amplification-based techniques for pathogen detection and identification,” Infection, Genetics and Evolution 6:2-12, 2006. |
Morré et al., “RNA Amplification by Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification with an Internal Standard Enables Reliable Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Cervical Scrapings and Urine Samples,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 34(12):3108-3114, Dec. 1996. |
Narum et al., “A novel Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte binding protein-2 (EBP2/BAEBL) involved in erythrocyte receptor binding,” Molecular & Biochemical Parasitology 119:159-168, 2002. |
NCBI Database, GenBank Accession No. ACOL01000910, Jun. 9, 2009. |
NCBI Database, GenBank Accession No. ACOL01004315, Jun. 9, 2009. |
NCBI Database, GenBank Accession No. ACOL01004318, Jun. 9, 2009. |
NCBI Database, GenBank Accession No. ACOL01004329, Jun. 9, 2009. |
NCBI Database, GenBank Accession No. ACOL01004331, Jun. 9, 2009. |
NCBI Database, GenBank Accession No. NP_473155, Jan. 3, 2007. |
Nielsen et al., “Detection of Immunoglobulin G Antibodies to Cytomegalovirus Antigens by Antibody Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 24(6):998-1003, Dec. 1986. |
Notomi et al., “Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA,” Nucleic Acids Research 28(12):2-7, 2000. |
Oeuvray et al., “Merozoite Surface Protein-3: A Malaria Protein Inducing Antibodies that Promote Plasmodium falciparum Killing by Cooperation With Blood Monocytes,” Blood 84(5):1594-1602, Sep. 1994. |
Ohara et al., “One-sided polymerase chain reaction: The amplification of cDNA,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86:5673-5677, Aug. 1989. |
Ohta et al., “Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay of Influenza Specific IgA Antibody in Nasal Mucus,” Acta Paediatr Jpn. 33(5):617-622, Oct. 1991. |
Østergaard et al., “A novel approach to the automation of clinical chemistry by controlled manipulation of magnetic particles,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 194:156-162, 1999. |
Ozoemena et al., “Comparative Evaluation of Measles Virus Specific TaqMan PCR and Conventional PCR Using Synthetic and Natural RNA Templates,” Journal of Medical Virology 73:79-84, 2004. |
Park et al., “Polymorphisms of p53, p21 and IRF-1 and cervical cancer susceptibility in Korean women,” Proceedings of the American Association of Cancer Research 44, Second Edition, p. 1081, Jul. 2003. |
Pfyffer et al., “Diagnostic Performance of Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test with Cerebrospinal Fluid, Other Nonrespiratory, and Respiratory Specimens,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34(4):834-841, Apr. 1996. |
Pinder et al., “Immunoglobulin G Antibodies to Merozoite Surface Antigens Are Associated with Recovery from Choroquine-Resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Gambian Children,” Infect. Immun. 74(5):2887-2893, May 2006. |
Pingle et al., “Multiplexed Identification of Blood-Borne Bacterial Pathogens by Use of a Novel 16S rRNA Gene PCR-Ligase Detection Reaction-Capillary Electrophoresis Assay,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 45(6):1927-1935, Jun. 2007. |
Polley et al., “Vaccination for vivax malaria: targeting the invaders,” TRENDS in Parasitology 20(3):99-102, Mar. 2004. |
Porstmann et al., “Comparison of Chromogens for the Determination of Horseradish Peroxidase as a Marker in Enzyme Immunoassay,” J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 19(7):435-439, 1981. |
Ranjan et al., “Mapping regions containing binding residues within functional domains of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium knowlesi erythrocyte-binding proteins,” PNAS 96(24):14067-14072, Nov. 1999. |
Rida et al., “Long-range transport of magnetic microbeads using simple planar coils placed in a uniform magnetostatic field,” Applied Physics Letters 83(12):2396-2398, Sep. 2003. |
Roosendaal et al., “Comparison of different primer sets for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction,” J. Med. Microbiol. 38:426-433, 1993. |
Schachter et al., “Ligase Chain Reaction to Detect Chlamydia trachomatis Infection of the Cervix,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 32(10):2540-2543, Oct. 1994. |
Shi et al., “Fabrication and optimization of the multiplex PCR-based oligonucleotide microarray for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum,” Journal of Microbiological Methods 62:245-256, 2005. |
Shi et al., “Natural Immune Response to the C-Terminal 19-Kilodalton Domain of Plasmodium falciparum Merozoite Surface Protein 1,” Infect. Immun. 64(7):2716-2723, Jul. 1996. |
Shu et al., “Development of Group- and Serotype-Specific One-Step SYBR Green I-Based Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay for Dengue Virus,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 41(6):2408-2416, Jun. 2003. |
Snounou et al., “High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 61:315-320, 1993. |
Soukchareun et al., “Use of Na-Fmoc-cysteine(S-thiobutyl) Derivatized Oligodeoxynucleotides for the Preparation of Oligodeoxynucleotide-Peptide Hybrid Molecules,” Bioconjugate Chem. 9:466-475, 1998. |
Staben et al., “Particle transport in Poiseuille flow in narrow channels,” International Journal of Multiphase Flow 31:529-547, 2005. |
Stetsenko et al., “Efficient Conjugation of Peptides to Oligonucleotides by ‘Native Ligation’,” J. Org. Chem. 65:4900-4908, 2000. |
Sturm et al., “Vaginal tampons as specimen collection device for the molecular diagnosis of non-ulcerative sexually transmitted infections in antenatal clinic attendees,” International Journal of STD & AIDS 15:94-98, Feb. 2004. |
Tai et al., “Artificial Receptors in Serologic Tests for the Early Diagnosis of Dengue Virus Infection,” Clinical Chemistry 52(8):1486-1491, 2006. |
Tamim et al., “Cervicovaginal coinfections with human papillomavirus and chlamydia trachomatis,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 43:277-281, 2002. |
TechNote 303, “Lateral Flow Tests,” Bangs Laboratories, Inc., Rev. #002, Apr. 11, 2008, pp. 1-7. |
Tongren et al., “Target Antigen, Age, and Duration of Antigen Exposure Independently Regulate Immunoglobulin G Subclass Switching in Malaria,” Infect. Immun. 74(1):257-264, Jan. 2006. |
Trenholme et al., “Antibody Reactivity to Linear Epitopes of Plasmodium Falciparum Cytoadherence-linked asexual gene 9 in asymptomatic children and adults from Papua New Guinea,” Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 72(6):708-713, 2005. |
Tung et al., “Preparation and Applications of Peptide-Oligonucleotide Conjugates,” Bioconjugate Chem. 11(5):605-618, Sep./Oct. 2000. |
Tung et al., “Preparation of Oligonucleotide-Peptide Conjugates,” Bioconjugate Chem. 2:464-465, 1991. |
Unger et al., “Monolithic Microfabricated Valves and Pumps by Multilayer Soft Lithography,” Science 288:113-116, Apr. 2000. |
van Gemen et al., “Quantification of HIV-1 RNA in plasma using NASBAä during HIV-1 primary infection,” Journal of Virological Methods 43:177-188, 1993. |
Vinayagamoorthy et al., “Nucleotide Sequence-Based Multitarget Identification,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 41(7):3284-3292, Jul. 2003. |
Vivès et al., “Selective Coupling of a Highly Basic Peptide to an Oligonucleotide,” Tetrahedron Letters 38(7):1183-1186, 1997. |
Walker et al., “Strand displacement amplification—an isothermal, in vitro DNA amplification technique,” Nucleic Acids Research 20(7):1691-1696, 1992. |
Walker, “Empirical Aspects of Strand Displacement Amplification,” PCR Methods and Applications 3:1-6, 1993. |
Wang et al., “Molecular engineering of DNA:molecular beacons,” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48(5):856-870, 2009. |
Watson et al., Molecular Biology of the Gene, 4th Ed., Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park, California, Jan. 1987. |
Weinstock et al., “Sexually Transmitted Diseases Among American Youth: Incidence and Prevalence Estimates, 2000,” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Heath 36(1):6-10, Jan./Feb. 2004. |
Whiley et al., “Comparison of three in-house multiplex PCR assays for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis using real-time and conventional detection methodologies,” Pathology 37(5):364-370, Oct. 2005. |
Witkin et al., “Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction in the cervices of women with acute salpingitis,” Am J Obstet Gynecol 168(5):1438-1442, May 1993. |
Woehlbier et al., “Analysis of Antibodies Directed against Merozoite Surface Protein 1 of the Human Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum,” Infect. Immun. 74(2):1313-1322, Feb. 2006. |
Wu et al., “The Ligation Amplification Reaction (LAR)—Amplification of Specific DNA Sequences Using Sequential Rounds of Template-Dependent Ligation,” Genomics 4:560-569, 1989. |
Yogi et al., “Clinical Evaluation of the Bladder Tumor Marker “TU-MARK-BTA”,” Hinyokika Kiyo 37(4):335-339, Apr. 1991. |
Cady, “Quantum dot Molecular Beacons for DNA Detection,” in Micro and Nano Technologies in Bioanalysis, Lee et al., (eds.), Humana Press, 2009, pp. 367-379. |
Cissell et al., “Resonance energy transfer methods of RNA detection,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 393(1):125-135, 2009. |
Freund et al., (eds.), “Film buckling, bulging, and peeling,” in Thin Film Materials: Stress, Defect Formation and Surface Evolution, Cambridge, UK, The University of Cambridge, 2003, pp. 312-386. |
Frohman, “Race: Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends,” in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Innis et al., (eds.), New York , Academic Press, Inc., 1990, pp. 28-38. |
Krasnoperov et al., “Luminescent Probes for Ultrasensitive Detection of Nucleic Acids,” Bioconjug. Chem. 21(2):319-327, Feb. 2010. |
Li et al., “Molecular Beacons: an optimal multifunctional biological probe,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 373:457-461, 2008. |
Lofquist et al., “Device for Preparation and Analysis of Nucleic Acids,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/889,374, filed Nov. 5, 2015, 51 pages. |
Van Lintel, “A Piezoelectric Micropump Based on Micromachining of Silicon,” Sensors and Actuators 15:153-167, 1988. |
Khanna et al., “Transformation of Bacillus subtilis by DNA Bound on Montmorillonite and Effect of DNase on the Transforming Ability of Bound DNA,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58(6):1930-1939, Jun. 1992. |
Huft et al., “Fabrication of High-Quality Microfluidic Solid-Phase Chromatography Columns,” Anal. Chem. 85:1797-1802, 2013. |
Zhang et al., “Synthesis of clay minerals,” Applied Clay Science 50:1-11, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150352549 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61745335 | Dec 2012 | US |