FLUIDIZED BED EXTRACTORS FOR CAPTURE OF CO2 FROM AMBIENT AIR

BACKGROUND

The disclosed methods and apparatus relate to the field of carbon capture technology, and in particular, to the field of carbon dioxide (CO₂) capture from ambient air (“direct air capture”) using packed bed and/or fluidized bed extractors comprising an anion exchange material.

A variety of direct air capture technologies for reducing the global atmospheric CO₂concentration and its impact on global climate change have been described in the technical and patent literature (see Sanz-Pérez, et al. (2016), “Direct capture of CO₂from ambient air”, Chem. Rev. 116:11840-11876, and Psarras, et al. (2017), “Slicing the pie: how big could carbon dioxide removal be?”, WIREs Energy Environ, e253 for recent reviews). Some of these technologies have been derived from conventional approaches to post-combustion CO₂capture from flue gas generated by large, stationary sources such as fossil fuel-based power plants, oil refineries, etc. For example, packed bed and fluidized bed extractors comprising activated carbon, zeolites, solid NaOH, Ca(OH)₂, or CaO, and supported amine type sorbents for capturing carbon dioxide from flue gases (and in some cases, from ambient air) have been described in the literature (see, for example, Arena, et al. (2012), “Carbon Dioxide Adsorption in a Sound-Assisted Fluidized Bed of Fine Powders”, XXXIV Meeting of the Italian Section of the Combustion Institute; Choi, et al. (2011), “Application of Amine-Tethered Solid Sorbents for Direct CO₂Capture from the Ambient Air”, Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:2420-2427; Schöny, et al. (2016), “A Multi-Stage Fluidized Bed System for Continuous CO₂Capture by Means of Temperature Swing Adsorption—First Results From Bench Scale Experiments”, in “Fluidization XV”, J. Chaouki, F. Berruti, X. Bi, R. Cocco, Editors, ECI Symposium Series; and Veneman, et al. (2012), “Continuous CO₂Capture in a Circulating Fluidized Bed Using Supported Amine Sorbents”, Chem. Eng. Journal 207-208:18-26). To date, these technologies have met with limited success in terms of practical application for the capture of CO₂from ambient air. Common drawbacks for application of these technologies to direct air capture have included: (1) the low binding affinities and poor carbon dioxide capture efficiencies of many sorbents at the low CO₂concentrations present in ambient air (approximately 400 ppm, or approximately 350 times lower than that found in a typical coal-based flue gas (Sanz-Pérez, et al. (2016))), thereby requiring the processing of large volumes of air; (2) the need to perform carbon capture reactions (e.g., carbonation reactions) and carbon release reactions (e.g., calcination reactions) at high temperatures for some approaches; and (3) the large energy penalties associated with: (i) forcing large volumes of air through a sorbent structure having a high resistance to flow, (ii) drying precipitates in approaches that utilize, e.g., aqueous NaOH or Ca(OH)₂solutions to absorb CO₂and form carbonates, (iii) performing carbonation reactions using, e.g., solid Ca(OH)₂or CaO at high temperatures, (iv) performing calcination of carbonates at high temperature, and (v) using a temperature jump to release bound CO₂from, e.g., some amine-based sorbents, etc., thus making it difficult to implement these technologies in a cost-effective, “carbon-negative” manner (i.e., in a manner that provides an overall net reduction in the amount of CO₂-based carbon in the atmosphere after the atmospheric CO₂contributions associated with all required energy sources are accounted for). Furthermore, because of the low capture efficiencies and/or large energy penalties associated with many of these technologies; it is difficult to implement them as a source of commercially useful CO₂at a commercially-feasible cost.

Thus there remains a need for efficient, cost-effect, and carbon-negative methods for the capture of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (i.e., from ambient air) and its subsequent storage or utilization.

SUMMARY

Disclosed herein are methods for capturing carbon dioxide from a first gas stream and releasing it into a second gas stream, the method comprising: a) contacting a packed bed or fluidized bed with a stream of the first gas, wherein the packed bed or fluidized bed comprises a humidity-sensitive sorbent material that adsorbs carbon dioxide from the first gas stream, and wherein the water vapor pressure in the first gas is less than the equilibrium water vapor pressure for a gas in contact with the sorbent; b) contacting the packed bed or fluidized bed with a stream of the second gas, wherein the water vapor pressure in the second gas is greater than that of the first gas, thereby releasing the adsorbed carbon dioxide and resulting in a net transfer of carbon dioxide from the first gas stream to the second gas stream; and c) optionally, repeating steps (a) and (b). In some embodiments, the methods further comprise separating and concentrating the released carbon dioxide from water vapor, and delivering it to an enclosed environment, to a storage container, or for use in a secondary process. In some embodiments, the adsorption step in (a) is performed at ambient temperature. In some embodiments, there is no heating required for the releasing step in step (b). In some embodiments, the first gas stream comprises ambient air, and the second gas stream comprises air drawn from within an enclosed environment. In some embodiments, the enclosed environment comprises a greenhouse or bioreactor. In some embodiments, the first gas stream comprises air drawn from within an enclosed environment, and the second gas stream comprises ambient air. In some embodiments, the enclosed environment comprises an apartment, house, residential building, school building, office building, commercial building, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the first gas stream comprises air drawn from within a first enclosed environment, and the second gas stream comprises air drawn from within a second enclosed environment. In some embodiments, the methods further comprise conditioning the first gas stream or the second gas stream by heating, humidification, de-humidification, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the humidity-sensitive sorbent is a strong base, type II anion exchange material. In some embodiments, steps (a) and (b) are repeated at least twelve times per day.

Also disclosed herein are methods for capturing carbon dioxide from ambient air and delivering said carbon dioxide to an enclosed environment, the methods comprising: a) contacting a packed bed or fluidized bed extractor with a stream of ambient air, wherein the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor comprises a humidity-sensitive sorbent material that adsorbs carbon dioxide from the ambient air; b) contacting the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor with a stream of humid air, wherein the humid air has a relative humidity that is higher than that of the ambient air of step (a), and wherein the sorbent material in the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor releases the adsorbed carbon dioxide upon contact with the humid air; c) delivering the released carbon dioxide to an enclosed environment; and d) optionally, repeating steps (a) through (c). In some embodiments, the sorbent comprises an amine functional group. In some embodiments, the sorbent comprises a strong base, type 2 anion exchange resin. In some embodiments, the contacting in step (a) is performed at ambient temperature. In some embodiments, there is no heating required for the releasing step in step (b). In some embodiments, the methods further comprise a sorbent drying or regeneration step following the contacting in step (b). In some embodiments, steps (a) through (c) are repeated at least 10 times per day. In some embodiments, the only external energy input required is the energy used to contact the sorbent material with ambient air or humid air in steps (a) and (b). In some embodiments, the energy required for adsorption and release of the adsorbed carbon dioxide is derived from the latent heats of evaporation and condensation of water. In some embodiments, the released carbon dioxide is delivered to the enclosed environment at a rate of at least 10 kg CO₂per day. In some embodiments, the ambient air has a carbon dioxide concentrate of less than 500 ppm. In some embodiments, the enclosed environment has a carbon dioxide concentration of greater than 500 ppm. In some embodiments, the released carbon dioxide is delivered to the enclosed environment at a net cost of less than $200 per ton.

Disclosed herein are methods for capturing carbon dioxide from indoor air, the method comprising: a) contacting a packed bed or fluidized bed extractor with a stream of indoor air drawn from within a first enclosed environment, wherein the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor comprises a humidity-sensitive sorbent material that adsorbs carbon dioxide from the indoor air, and wherein the water vapor pressure in the indoor air is less than the equilibrium water vapor pressure for air in contact with the sorbent; b) contacting the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor with a stream of ambient air or conditioned air, wherein the ambient air or conditioned air has a relative humidity that is higher than that of the indoor air of step (a), and wherein the sorbent material in the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor releases the adsorbed carbon dioxide upon contact with the ambient air or conditioned air; c) optionally, separating and concentrating the released carbon dioxide from water vapor, and delivering the released carbon dioxide to a second enclosed environment, to a storage container, or for use in a secondary process; and d) optionally, repeating steps (a) through (c). In some embodiments, the first enclosed environment and the second enclosed environment are the same. In some embodiments, the adsorption step in (a) is performed at ambient room temperature. In some embodiments, there is no heating required for the releasing step in step (b). In some embodiments, the methods further comprise release of carbon dioxide from the storage container to a third enclosed environment. In some embodiments, the third enclosed environment and the first enclosed environment are the same. In some embodiments, the third enclosed environment comprises a greenhouse or bioreactor. In some embodiments, the first enclosed environment comprises an apartment, house, residential building, school building, office building, commercial building, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the second enclosed environment comprises an apartment, house, residential building, school building, office building, commercial building, greenhouse, or bioreactor, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the methods further comprise conditioning the stream of indoor air in step (a) or the stream of ambient air or conditioned air of step (b) by heating, humidification, de-humidification, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the humidity-sensitive sorbent is a strong base, type II anion exchange material. In some embodiments, steps (a) through (c) are repeated at least twelve times per day. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises use of the released carbon dioxide to promote plant or algae growth in a greenhouse or a bioreactor.

Also disclosed herein are apparatus for capturing carbon dioxide from indoor air, the apparatus comprising: a) an extractor comprising a first packed bed or fluidized bed, wherein the packed bed or fluidized bed comprises a humidity-sensitive sorbent that is capable of adsorbing carbon dioxide from a stream of indoor air, and wherein the water vapor pressure in the indoor air is less than the equilibrium water vapor pressure for air in contact with the sorbent; b) a first air flow mechanism configured to contact the first packed bed or fluidized bed with the stream of indoor air; c) a second air flow mechanism configured to contact the first packed bed or fluidized bed with a stream of conditioned air, wherein the conditioned air has a relative humidity that is higher than that of the indoor air of step (a), and wherein the sorbent material in the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor releases the adsorbed carbon dioxide upon contact with the conditioned air; d) optionally, a separation station configured to separate and concentrate the released carbon dioxide from water vapor and deliver it to a storage container; e) a controller configured to turn the first air flow mechanism and the second air flow mechanism on and off in an alternating fashion. In some embodiments, the first air flow mechanism and the second air flow mechanism are the same. In some embodiments, the storage container is configured to release carbon dioxide back into the stream of indoor air on an as-needed basis. In some embodiments, the storage container is configured to release carbon dioxide for use in a secondary process. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises use of the released carbon dioxide to promote plant or algae growth in a greenhouse or a bioreactor. In some embodiments, the humidity-sensitive sorbent is capable of adsorbing carbon dioxide at ambient room temperature. In some embodiments, there is no heating required for the release of carbon dioxide in step (c). In some embodiments, the stream of indoor air comprises air from an apartment, house, residential building, school building, office building, commercial building, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the apparatus further comprises a conditioning unit for conditioning the stream of indoor air in step (b) or the stream of conditioned air of step (c) by heating, humidification, de-humidification, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the humidity-sensitive sorbent is a strong base, type II anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the controller is configured to turn the first air flow mechanism and the second air flow mechanism on and off at least twelve times per day.

Disclosed herein are systems for capturing carbon dioxide from a gas or air, the system comprising: a) a first fluidized bed, wherein the circulating fluidized bed comprises a humidity-sensitive sorbent that is contacted with an stream of dry gas or air, and wherein the sorbent is capable of adsorbing carbon dioxide from the stream of dry gas or air; b) a second fluidized bed in fluid communication with the first fluidized bed, wherein the humidity-sensitive sorbent is contacted with a stream of humid gas or air such that adsorbed carbon dioxide is released from the sorbent; wherein the humidity-sensitive sorbent is returned from the second fluidized bed to the first fluidized bed via a loop seal, and wherein the released carbon dioxide is delivered to a concentrator, a storage tank, or a greenhouse. In some embodiments, the systems further comprise a condenser for condensing moisture in the humid gas or air used to release the carbon dioxide from the sorbent. In some embodiments, the humidity sensitive sorbent is a strong base, type II anion exchange resin. In some embodiments, the stream of humid gas or air is delivered to the system from a greenhouse, and wherein the released carbon dioxide is delivered to the greenhouse. In some embodiments, released carbon dioxide is delivered to a Lemna growing system. In some embodiments, the Lemna growing system comprises a greenhouse that further comprises one or more vertical racks, each of which further comprises one or more growth chambers. In some embodiments, the vertical racks comprise plumbing for delivering carbon dioxide laden air or nutrients to each of the one or more growth chambers. In some embodiments, the Lemna growing system further comprises an integrated aquaponics system for raising fish.

Disclosed herein are methods for removing carbon dioxide from a gas and utilizing said carbon dioxide in a secondary process, the method comprising: a) contacting a sorbent material with the gas to capture carbon dioxide; b) releasing carbon dioxide from the sorbent material in a concentrated form; and c) utilizing the concentrated carbon dioxide in a secondary process. In some embodiments, the sorbent material is a solid sorbent comprising an amine. In some embodiments, the sorbent material is a strong base, type II anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the gas is contacted with the sorbent material in a fluidized bed reactor. In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide is released from the sorbent material by subjecting the sorbent material to a change in temperature, pressure, humidity, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to cure cement or concrete. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to form calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, or sodium bicarbonate. In some embodiments, the calcium carbonate or magnesium carbonate is further processed to form an aggregate product for the construction industry. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to enhance plant growth within a greenhouse environment. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to enhance the growth of aquatic plants or algae. In some embodiments, the aquatic plants comprise plants of the Lemna, Azolla, or Oryza genera. In some embodiments, the aquatic plants or algae are further utilized as feedstock for production of protein, starch or starch derivatives, animal feed, biofuel, bioplastic, biochar, syngas, graphene, energy, heat, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to produce methanol, formic acid, or syngas. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to produce carbon fiber, carbon nanotubes, fullerene, graphene, a polymer, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to produce a polymer, and the polymer comprises a polyurethane foam, a polycarbonate, or an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery or enhanced coal bed methane recovery. In some embodiments, the gas is ambient air, outdoor air, indoor air, an exhaust gas, or a flue gas.

Disclosed herein are apparatus for removing carbon dioxide from a gas and utilizing said carbon dioxide in a secondary process, the apparatus comprising: a) an extractor comprising a sorbent material capable of capturing carbon dioxide from the gas; b) a gas flow mechanism configured to contact the sorbent material within the extractor with a stream of the gas; c) a carbon dioxide release mechanism configured to release and concentrate carbon dioxide captured by the sorbent; and d) a carbon dioxide delivery mechanism to deliver concentrated carbon dioxide to a secondary process. In some embodiments, the sorbent material is a solid sorbent comprising an amine. In some embodiments, the sorbent material is a strong base, type II anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the extractor comprises a fluidized bed reactor. In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide release mechanism comprises a mechanism for subjecting the sorbent material to a change in temperature, pressure, humidity, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide delivery mechanism comprises a pipe in fluid communication with the extractor or an intermediate storage tank. In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide delivery mechanism comprises an intermediate storage tank. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to cure cement or concrete. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to form calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, or sodium bicarbonate. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to enhance plant growth within a greenhouse environment. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to enhance the growth of aquatic plants or algae. In some embodiments, the aquatic plants comprise plants of the Lemna, Azolla, or Oryza genera. In some embodiments, the aquatic plants or algae are further utilized as feedstock for production of protein, starch or starch derivatives, animal feed, biofuel, bioplastic, biochar, syngas, graphene, energy, heat, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to produce methanol, formic acid, or syngas. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to produce carbon fiber, carbon nanotubes, fullerene, graphene, a polymer, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to produce a polymer, and the polymer comprises a polyurethane foam, a polycarbonate, or an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery or enhanced coal bed methane recovery. In some embodiments, the gas is ambient air, outdoor air, indoor air, an exhaust gas, or a flue gas.

Disclosed herein are methods for capturing carbon dioxide from a first gas stream and releasing it into a second gas stream, the method comprising: a) contacting a packed bed or fluidized bed with a stream of the first gas, wherein the packed bed or fluidized bed comprises a humidity-sensitive sorbent material that adsorbs carbon dioxide from the first gas stream, and wherein the water vapor pressure in the first gas is less than the equilibrium water vapor pressure for a gas in contact with the sorbent; b) contacting the packed bed or fluidized bed with a stream of the second gas, wherein the water vapor pressure in the second gas is greater than that of the first gas, thereby releasing the adsorbed carbon dioxide and resulting in a net transfer of carbon dioxide from the first gas stream to the second gas stream; and c) optionally, repeating steps (a) and (b). In some embodiments, the methods may further comprise separating and concentrating the released carbon dioxide from water vapor, and delivering it to an enclosed environment, to a storage container, or for use in a secondary process. In some embodiments, the adsorption step in (a) is performed at ambient temperature. In some embodiments, there is no heating required for the releasing step in step (b). In some embodiments, the first gas stream comprises ambient air, and the second gas stream comprises air drawn from within an enclosed environment. In some embodiments, the enclosed environment comprises a greenhouse or bioreactor. In some embodiments, the first gas stream comprises air drawn from within an enclosed environment, and the second gas stream comprises ambient air. In some embodiments, the enclosed environment comprises an apartment, house, residential building, school building, office building, commercial building, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the first gas stream comprises air drawn from within a first enclosed environment, and the second gas stream comprises air drawn from within a second enclosed environment. In some embodiments, the first enclosed environment or the second enclosed environment comprises an apartment, house, residential building, school building, office building, commercial building, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the methods may further comprise conditioning the first gas stream or the second gas stream by heating, humidification, de-humidification, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the humidity-sensitive sorbent is an anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the anion-exchange material is a strong base, type II anion exchange material. In some embodiments, steps (a) and (b) are repeated at least once per day. In some embodiments, steps (a) and (b) are repeated at least twelve times per day. In some embodiments, steps (a) and (b) are repeated at least twenty four times per day.

Also disclosed herein are methods for capturing carbon dioxide from ambient air and delivering said carbon dioxide to an enclosed environment, the method comprising: a) contacting a packed bed or fluidized bed extractor with a stream of ambient air, wherein the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor comprises a humidity-sensitive sorbent material that adsorbs carbon dioxide from the ambient air; b) contacting the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor with a stream of humid air, wherein the humid air has a relative humidity that is higher than that of the ambient air of step (a), and wherein the sorbent material in the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor releases the adsorbed carbon dioxide upon contact with the humid air; c) delivering the released carbon dioxide to an enclosed environment; and d) optionally, repeating steps (a) through (c). In some embodiments, the sorbent comprises an amine functional group. In some embodiments, the sorbent comprises a strong base, type 2 anion exchange resin. In some embodiments, the humid air of step (b) has a relative humidity that is at least that of the ambient air of step (a) plus 10%. In some embodiments, the humid air of step (b) has a relative humidity that is at least that of the ambient air of step (a) plus 25%. In some embodiments, the humid air of step (b) has a relative humidity that is at least that of the ambient air of step (a) plus 50%. In some embodiments, the contacting in step (a) is performed at ambient temperature. In some embodiments, there is no heating required for the releasing step in step (b). In some embodiments, the methods may further comprise a sorbent drying or regeneration step following the contacting in step (b). In some embodiments, steps (a) through (c) are repeated at least once per day. In some embodiments, steps (a) through (c) are repeated at least 10 times per day. In some embodiments, steps (a) through (c) are repeated at least 100 times per day. In some embodiments, the enclosed environment is a greenhouse or a bioreactor. In some embodiments, the only external energy input required is the energy used to contact the sorbent material with ambient air or humid air in steps (a) and (b). In some embodiments, the energy required for adsorption and release of the adsorbed carbon dioxide is derived from the latent heats of evaporation and condensation of water. In some embodiments, the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor has a cross-sectional area of between 0.05 m²and 25 m². In some embodiments, the packed bed extractor comprises a sorbent bed having a packed bed height of between 0.05 m and 2.5 m. In some embodiments, the fluidized bed extractor comprises a sorbent bed having a static bed height of between 0.05 m and 0.75 m. In some embodiments, the stream of ambient air used for the contacting in step (a) is passed through the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor at a volumetric flow rate of between 10 m³/hr/kg-resin and 100 m³/hr/kg-resin. In some embodiments, the released carbon dioxide is delivered to the enclosed environment at a rate of at least 1 kg CO₂per day. In some embodiments, the ambient air has a carbon dioxide concentrate of less than 500 ppm. In some embodiments, the enclosed environment has a carbon dioxide concentration of greater than 500 ppm. In some embodiments, the released carbon dioxide is delivered to the enclosed environment at a net cost of less than $500 per ton. In some embodiments, the released carbon dioxide is delivered to the enclosed environment at a net cost of less than $100 per ton.

Disclosed herein are apparatus for capturing carbon dioxide from ambient air and delivering said carbon dioxide to an enclosed environment, the apparatus comprising: a) a first packed bed or fluidized bed extractor, wherein the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor comprises a humidity-sensitive sorbent that is capable of adsorbing carbon dioxide from a stream of ambient air; b) a first air flow mechanism configured to contact the first packed bed or fluidized bed extractor with a stream of ambient air; c) a second air flow mechanism configured to contact the first packed bed or fluidized bed extractor with a stream of humid air; and d) a controller configured to turn the first air flow mechanism and the second air flow mechanism on and off in an alternating fashion; wherein, after contacting the first packed bed or fluidized bed extractor in step (c), the stream of humid air delivers carbon dioxide released from the sorbent to the enclosed environment. In some embodiments, the apparatus may further comprise at least a second packed bed or fluidized bed extractor connected in series to the first packed bed or fluidized bed extractor. In some embodiments, the apparatus may further comprise at least a second packed bed or fluidized bed extractor connected in parallel to the first packed bed or fluidized bed extractor. In some embodiments, the sorbent comprises an amine functional group. In some embodiments, the sorbent comprises a strong base, type 2 anion exchange resin. In some embodiments, the humid air of step (c) has a relative humidity that is at least that of the ambient air of step (b) plus 10%. In some embodiments, the humid air of step (c) has a relative humidity that is at least that of the ambient air of step (b) plus 25%. In some embodiments, the humid air of step (c) has a relative humidity that is at least that of the ambient air of step (b) plus 50%. In some embodiments, the contacting in step (b) is performed at ambient temperature. In some embodiments, there is no heating required for the carbon dioxide release step. In some embodiments, the apparatus may further comprise a sorbent drying or regeneration step following the contacting in step (c). In some embodiments, the controller is configured to turn the first air flow mechanism and the second air flow mechanism on and off in an alternating fashion at least once per day. In some embodiments, the controller is configured to turn the first air flow mechanism and the second air flow mechanism on and off in an alternating fashion at least 10 times per day. In some embodiments, the controller is configured to turn the first air flow mechanism and the second air flow mechanism on and off in an alternating fashion at least 100 times per day. In some embodiments, the enclosed environment is a greenhouse or a bioreactor. In some embodiments, the only external energy input required is the energy used by the controller and the first and second air flow mechanisms to contact the sorbent material with ambient air or humid air in steps (b) and (c). In some embodiments, the energy required for adsorption and release of the adsorbed carbon is derived from the latent heats of evaporation and condensation of water. In some embodiments, the first packed bed or fluidized bed extractor has a cross-sectional area of between 0.05 m²and 25 m². In some embodiments, the first packed bed extractor comprises a sorbent bed having a packed bed height of between 0.05 m and 2.5 m. In some embodiments, the first fluidized bed extractor comprises a sorbent bed having a static bed height of between 0.05 m and 0.75 m. In some embodiments, the stream of ambient air used for the contacting in step (b) is passed through the first packed bed or fluidized bed extractor at a volumetric flow rate of between 10 m³/hr/kg-resin and 100 m³/hr/kg-resin. In some embodiments, the released carbon dioxide is delivered to the enclosed environment at a rate of at least 1 kg CO₂per day. In some embodiments, the ambient air has a carbon dioxide concentrate of less than 500 ppm. In some embodiments, the enclosed environment has a carbon dioxide concentration of greater than 500 ppm. In some embodiments, the released carbon dioxide is delivered to the enclosed environment at a net cost of less than $500 per ton. In some embodiments, the released carbon dioxide is delivered to the enclosed environment at a net cost of less than $100 per ton.

Disclosed herein are methods for capturing carbon dioxide from indoor air, the method comprising: a) contacting a packed bed or fluidized bed extractor with a stream of indoor air drawn from within a first enclosed environment, wherein the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor comprises a humidity-sensitive sorbent material that adsorbs carbon dioxide from the indoor air, and wherein the water vapor pressure in the indoor air is less than the equilibrium water vapor pressure for air in contact with the sorbent; b) contacting the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor with a stream of ambient air or conditioned air, wherein the ambient air or conditioned air has a relative humidity that is higher than that of the indoor air of step (a), and wherein the sorbent material in the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor releases the adsorbed carbon dioxide upon contact with the ambient air or conditioned air; c) optionally, separating and concentrating the released carbon dioxide from water vapor, and delivering the released carbon dioxide to a second enclosed environment, to a storage container, or for use in a secondary process; and d) optionally, repeating steps (a) through (c). In some embodiments, the first enclosed environment and the second enclosed environment are the same. In some embodiments, the adsorption step in (a) is performed at ambient room temperature. In some embodiments, there is no heating required for the releasing step in step (b). In some embodiments, the method may further comprise release of carbon dioxide from the storage container to a third enclosed environment. In some embodiments, the third enclosed environment and the first enclosed environment are the same. In some embodiments, the third enclosed environment comprises a greenhouse or bioreactor. In some embodiments, the first enclosed environment comprises an apartment, house, residential building, school building, office building, commercial building, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the second enclosed environment comprises an apartment, house, residential building, school building, office building, commercial building, greenhouse, or bioreactor, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the method may further comprising conditioning the stream of indoor air in step (a) or the stream of ambient air or conditioned air of step (b) by heating, humidification, de-humidification, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the humidity-sensitive sorbent is an anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the anion-exchange material is a strong base, type II anion exchange material. In some embodiments, steps (a) through (c) are repeated at least once per day. In some embodiments, (a) through (c) are repeated at least twelve times per day. In some embodiments, steps (a) through (c) are repeated at least twenty four times per day. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises use of the released carbon dioxide to promote plant or algae growth in a greenhouse or a bioreactor.

Disclosed herein are apparatus for capturing carbon dioxide from indoor air, the apparatus comprising: a) an extractor comprising a first packed bed or fluidized bed, wherein the packed bed or fluidized bed comprises a humidity-sensitive sorbent that is capable of adsorbing carbon dioxide from a stream of indoor air, and wherein the water vapor pressure in the indoor air is less than the equilibrium water vapor pressure for air in contact with the sorbent; b) a first air flow mechanism configured to contact the first packed bed or fluidized bed with the stream of indoor air; c) a second air flow mechanism configured to contact the first packed bed or fluidized bed with a stream of conditioned air, wherein the conditioned air has a relative humidity that is higher than that of the indoor air of step (a), and wherein the sorbent material in the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor releases the adsorbed carbon dioxide upon contact with the conditioned air; d) optionally, a separation station configured to separate and concentrate the released carbon dioxide from water vapor and deliver it to a storage container; e) a controller configured to turn the first air flow mechanism and the second air flow mechanism on and off in an alternating fashion. In some embodiments, the first air flow mechanism and the second air flow mechanism are the same. In some embodiments, the storage container is configured to release carbon dioxide back into the stream of indoor air on an as-needed basis. In some embodiments, the storage container is configured to release carbon dioxide for use in a secondary process. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises use of the released carbon dioxide to promote plant or algae growth in a greenhouse or a bioreactor. In some embodiments, the humidity-sensitive sorbent is capable of adsorbing carbon dioxide at ambient room temperature. In some embodiments, there is no heating required for the release of carbon dioxide in step (c). In some embodiments, the stream of indoor air comprises air from an apartment, house, residential building, school building, office building, commercial building, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the apparatus may further comprise a conditioning unit for conditioning the stream of indoor air in step (b) or the stream of conditioned air of step (c) by heating, humidification, de-humidification, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the humidity-sensitive sorbent is an anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the anion-exchange material is a strong base, type II anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the controller is configured to turn the first air flow mechanism and the second air flow mechanism on and off at least once per day. In some embodiments, the controller is configured to turn the first air flow mechanism and the second air flow mechanism on and off at least twelve times per day. In some embodiments, the controller is configured to turn the first air flow mechanism and the second air flow mechanism on and off at least twenty four times per day.

Disclosed herein are methods for removing carbon dioxide from a gas and utilizing said carbon dioxide in a secondary process, the methods comprising: a) contacting a sorbent material with the gas to capture carbon dioxide; b) releasing carbon dioxide from the sorbent material in a concentrated form; and c) utilizing the concentrated carbon dioxide in a secondary process. In some embodiments, the sorbent material is a solid sorbent comprising an amine. In some embodiments, the sorbent material is an anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the sorbent material is a strong base, Type II anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the gas is contacted with the sorbent material in a fluidized bed reactor. In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide is released from the sorbent material by subjecting the sorbent material to a change in temperature, pressure, humidity, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to cure cement or concrete. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to form calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, or sodium bicarbonate. In some embodiments, the calcium carbonate or magnesium carbonate is further processed to form an aggregate product for the construction industry. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to enhance plant growth within a greenhouse environment. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to enhance the growth of aquatic plants or algae. In some embodiments, the aquatic plants comprise plants of the Lemna, Azolla, or Oryza genera. In some embodiments, the aquatic plants or algae are further utilized as feedstock for production of protein, starch or starch derivatives, animal feed, biofuel, bioplastic, biochar, syngas, graphene, energy, heat, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to produce methanol, formic acid, or syngas. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to produce carbon fiber, carbon nanotubes, fullerene, graphene, a polymer, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the polymer comprises a polyurethane foam, a polycarbonate, or an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery or enhanced coal bed methane recovery. In some embodiments, the gas is ambient air, outdoor air, indoor air, an exhaust gas, or a flue gas.

Also disclosed herein are apparatuses for removing carbon dioxide from a gas and utilizing said carbon dioxide in a secondary process, the apparatuses comprising: a) an extractor comprising a sorbent material capable of capturing carbon dioxide from the gas; b) a gas flow mechanism configured to contact the sorbent material within the extractor with a stream of the gas; c) a carbon dioxide release mechanism configured to release and concentrate carbon dioxide captured by the sorbent; and d) a carbon dioxide delivery mechanism to deliver concentrated carbon dioxide to a secondary process. In some embodiments, the sorbent material is a solid sorbent comprising an amine. In some embodiments, the sorbent material is an anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the sorbent material is a strong base, Type II anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the extractor comprises a fluidized bed reactor. In some embodiments, the gas flow mechanism comprises a fan, an impeller, a rotor, or an exhaust vent. In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide release mechanism comprises a mechanism for subjecting the sorbent material to a change in temperature, pressure, humidity, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide delivery mechanism comprises a pipe in fluid communication with the extractor or an intermediate storage tank. In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide delivery mechanism comprises an intermediate storage tank. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to cure cement or concrete. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to form calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, or sodium bicarbonate. In some embodiments, the calcium carbonate or magnesium carbonate is further processed to form an aggregate product for the construction industry. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to enhance plant growth within a greenhouse environment. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to enhance the growth of aquatic plants or algae. In some embodiments, the aquatic plants comprise plants of the Lemna, Azolla, or Oryza genera. In some embodiments, the aquatic plants or algae are further utilized as feedstock for production of protein, starch or starch derivatives, animal feed, biofuel, bioplastic, biochar, syngas, graphene, energy, heat, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to produce methanol, formic acid, or syngas. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide to produce carbon fiber, carbon nanotubes, fullerene, graphene, a polymer, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the polymer comprises a polyurethane foam, a polycarbonate, or an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery or enhanced coal bed methane recovery. In some embodiments, the gas is ambient air, outdoor air, indoor air, an exhaust gas, or a flue gas.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference in its entirety. In the event of a conflict between a term herein and a term in an incorporated reference, the term herein controls.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:

FIG. 1 provides a schematic illustration of a packed bed extractor for removal of carbon dioxide from a gas stream, e.g., ambient air.

FIG. 2 provides a schematic illustration of a fluidized bed extractor for removal of carbon dioxide from a gas stream, e.g., ambient air. For a given pressure drop, the bed depth remains constant with scale-up of the extractor design. The carbon dioxide capture capacity of the bed and the volumetric air flow rate increase proportionally with the cross-sectional area of the bed.

FIG. 7 provides one non-limiting example of simulation data for a fluidized bed extractor which illustrates the predicted relationships between bed height, pressure drop across the bed, and the carbon dioxide transfer capacity of the bed (in units of grams CO₂per humidity swing cycle) under a defined set of operating conditions.

FIG. 8 provides one non-limiting example of performance data for carbon dioxide capture and release using a fluidized bed extractor, wherein CO₂is released from an anion exchange resin using a humidity swing. Tests were performed in an open-loop (once through), laboratory-scale environmental chamber.

FIG. 9 provides one non-limiting example of CO₂adsorption isotherm data for a typical “moisture swing” cycle using a humidity-sensitive sorbent at 25 C.

FIG. 10 provides a schematic illustration of the mechanism underlying a “moisture swing” release mechanism (from Wang, T., et al. (2011), “A Moisture Swing Sorbent for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Ambient Air”, Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 6670-6675).

FIG. 11 shows a non-limiting schematic illustration of a two-stage fluidized bed system for capture of CO₂from ambient air or indoor air and delivery to a condenser/concentrator, wherein the condenser/concentrator is configured to concentrate the CO₂released from a sorbent, and to condense and recycle the water present in the humid air used to release CO₂from the sorbent in the fluidized bed.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The disclosed invention provides novel methods and apparatus for the capture of carbon dioxide from gas streams in general, and from ambient air in particular, using a series of one or more packed bed and/or fluidized bed extractors comprising a sorbent material. In some embodiments, a plurality of packed bed and/or fluidized bed extractors operated in parallel may be used. In some embodiments, the sorbent material may comprise an anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide thus removed from the gas or ambient air stream may be subsequently released from the sorbent material using, for example, an increase in humidity, a wetting process, a change in pH, and/or an increase in temperature. In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide thus released from the sorbent material may be further concentrated, stored, sequestered, delivered to an enclosed environment, and/or used in a secondary process.

In one preferred embodiment, disclosed herein are methods and apparatus for removing carbon dioxide from ambient air (i.e., from outdoor or atmospheric air) using a series of one or more packed bed and/or fluidized bed reactors comprising an anion exchange material, wherein the captured CO₂is released from the anion exchange material and delivered to the interior of a greenhouse where elevated concentrations of CO₂may be beneficial for stimulating plant growth. In these embodiments, the release of CO₂from the anion exchange material may be implemented by a difference in relative humidity and/or temperature between the exterior environment and the greenhouse interior, i.e., without requiring the input of additional energy. In these embodiments, the apparatus may also be further configured to simultaneously modulate the humidity of the greenhouse interior.

In another preferred embodiment, disclosed herein are methods and apparatus for capturing carbon dioxide from indoor air (e.g., from within a residential, a commercial building, or other enclosed environment) using a series of one or more packed bed and/or fluidized bed reactors comprising an anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide thus removed from the indoor air stream may be subsequently released from the sorbent material using, for example, an increase in humidity, a wetting process, a change in pH, and/or an increase in temperature. In some embodiments, the captured CO₂may be released into the atmosphere or otherwise disposed of In some embodiments, the captured CO₂may be concentrated and/or stored for subsequent use, e.g., for release back into the same or a different enclosed environment on an as-needed basis to maintain a specified concentration of CO₂in the enclosed environment. In some embodiments, the captured CO₂may be stored for subsequent use, e.g., for delivery to a greenhouse or bioreactor, or for use in a secondary process.

Various aspects of the invention described herein may be applied to any of the particular applications set forth below, or to any other type of carbon dioxide capture application or carbon dioxide-dependent chemical process. It shall be understood that different aspects of the invention can be appreciated individually, collectively, or in combination with each other.

Unless otherwise defined, all technical terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art in the field to which this disclosure belongs. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Any reference to “or” herein is intended to encompass “and/or” unless otherwise stated.

As used herein, the phrase “ambient air” means outdoor air or atmospheric air, i.e., air from the atmosphere that is external to buildings and other enclosed environments.

Packed and fluidized bed extractors for removal of CO₂from a gas stream: Disclosed herein are novel methods and apparatus for extracting carbon dioxide (or other trace gases) from a gas stream, e.g., a stream of ambient air, by passing the gas or air stream through a series of one or more packed bed and/or fluidized bed extractors (e.g., packed bed and/or fluidized bed chromatography columns) comprising a sorbent material (e.g., an anion exchange resin) that selectively binds CO₂(or other trace gases), and from which the bound CO₂or trace gas may subsequently be released or eluted. In some embodiments, the gas stream from which CO₂or other trace gases are captured may comprise ambient air (i.e., outdoor air or atmospheric air), indoor air (e.g., air from within a residential building, office building, commercial building, or other enclosed structure that has optionally been processed or conditioned (e.g., heated, cooled, humidified, or de-humidified)), a process gas mixture, an exhaust gas mixture (e.g. a flue gas), or any combination thereof. As noted above, the carbon dioxide or other trace gas released from the sorbent may be further concentrated, stored, sequestered, delivered to an enclosed environment, and/or used in a secondary chemical process. In some embodiments, the disclosed methods and apparatus or extracting carbon dioxide (or other trace gases) from a gas stream may be used to remove carbon dioxide from the air within a residential building, office building, commercial building, or other enclosed structure, and the carbon dioxide or other trace gas released from the sorbent may then be subsequently concentrated, stored, sequestered, delivered to the external environment (e.g., the atmosphere), and/or used in a secondary chemical process.

In some embodiments, the disclosed methods and apparatus may comprise the use of a packed bed extractor design. For packed bed extractors (also known as “fixed bed” extractors), the sorbent material is confined within a housing through which the gas or air stream is passed (see FIG. 1) so that the gas or air stream flows through and makes contact with the bed of sorbent material. The sorbent is typically a particulate material, and is confined within the housing by packing it between support screens or other porous barriers (e.g., glass frits) at the inlet and outlet ends of the housing. In operation, the gas or air stream from which carbon dioxide is to be extracted is passed through the packed bed of sorbent material for a specified period of time to capture CO₂(typically for times shorter than that required to reach saturation of the available CO₂binding sites), followed by subsequent release of the captured CO₂upon switching the inlet to, for example, a humid air stream (in the case that the sorbent comprises a strong base, Type I anion exchange resin). In some configurations, a series of two or more packed bed extraction devices may be operated in parallel so that the inlet gas or air stream is switched back and forth between individual packed beds in an alternating fashion with, for example, a humid air stream so that some subset of the packed bed extraction devices are engaged in the CO₂capture step, while a different subset are engaged in the CO₂release step, and continuous or partially-continuous operation is achieved. In some configurations, sub-sections of a single packed bed extractor of suitable aspect ratio may be exposed to the inlet gas or air stream, while other sub-sections of the packed bed are exposed to, for example, a humid air stream so that, again, the CO₂capture and release steps are performed in parallel and in a continuous or partially-continuous manner. The latter may be accomplished, for example, by rotating the packed bed around an axis along which gas or air flow is directed, and/or by switching between inlet gas or air streams and inlet humid air streams using valves and/or duct work. The maximal CO₂binding capacity of the packed bed will vary depending on several design parameters, e.g., the number of CO₂binding sites per unit volume of the sorbent material, the porosity of the sorbent material (which may impact the accessibility of CO₂binding sites within the sorbent material to the gas or air stream), the porosity or packing density of the sorbent particles within the bed itself (which may also impact the accessibility of the CO₂binding sites to the gas or air stream), and the dimensions of the housing containing the packed bed, which determines the amount of sorbent contained within the extractor. The experimentally observed CO₂binding capacity of the packed bed extractor, and the overall efficiency of the CO₂capture process, may further depend on a number of operational parameters, as will be described in more detail below.

In some embodiments, the disclosed methods and apparatus may comprise the use of a fluidized bed extractor design. For fluidized bed extractors, the sorbent material is partially confined within a housing through which the inlet gas or air stream is passed (see FIG. 2). The bed of sorbent material rests on a support screen, or other porous barrier at the inlet end of the housing, and the flow rate of the gas or air stream passing upwards through the bed is adjusted so that the static, solid-like state of the particulate sorbent material is converted to a dynamic fluid-like state. In some embodiments, the fluidized bed extractor may further comprise a support screen, or other porous barrier, at the outlet end of the housing to prevent loss of sorbent particles as the gas or air stream passes through the bed chamber. One potential advantage of the fluidized bed design is the decrease in flow resistance and consequent pressure drop across the sorbent bed as compared to that of a packed bed design, and hence a corresponding reduction in the force needed (and energy required) to push the inlet gas or air stream through the sorbent bed. Another potential advantage of the fluidized bed design is improved efficiency of CO₂capture through more efficient contact between the inlet gas or air stream and the fluidized sorbent particles. As with the packed bed approach, a variety of single and multiple fluidized bed device configurations are possible, and again, the maximal CO₂binding capacity, the experimentally observed CO₂binding capacity, and the overall efficiency of the CO₂capture process will vary depending on a number of design parameters (e.g., the number of CO₂binding sites per unit volume of the sorbent material, the porosity of the sorbent material, and the static dimensions of the fluidized bed) and operational parameters (e.g., the flow rate of the inlet gas or air stream, which may impact the flow characteristics of the fluidized sorbent particles), as will be described in more detail below.

In some embodiments, the disclosed methods and apparatus may comprise the use of a circulating fluidized bed extractor design. In a circulating fluidized bed extractor design, the sorbent particles circulate (at gas velocities somewhat higher than those typically used for standard fluidized beds) between an adsorber column and a desorber column for implementing a continuous-flow or partially-continuous flow extraction operation. Both the adsorber and desorber columns are “fluidized beds”, wherein the sorbent particles in the fluidized bed comprising the inlet gas or air stream are transferred by means of the gas flow from the adsorber column through a riser pipe to, for example, a cyclone. The CO₂-depleted inlet gas or air stream exits the cyclone, while the sorbent particles are separated from the gas or air stream and fall into the desorber column via a connecting stand pipe. A desorber gas (e.g., a stream of humid air or humidified CO₂in the case that a humidity increase is used to strip the bound CO₂from the sorbent) is flowed through the desorber column and exits the desorber column as a product gas stream. Finally, the CO₂-depleted sorbent particles travel back to the adsorber column by means of a connecting loop seal, e.g., a two-chambered housing comprising another fluidized bed, wherein the same gas or a different gas as that used for the desorber gas is flowed through the housing to fluidize the bed, and wherein one chamber is connected to the desorber column and the other is connected to the adsorber column via, for example, a weir structure and discharge pipe. The loop seal prevents mixing of the inlet gas or air stream with the desorber gas.

In some embodiments, other types of fluidized bed extractor designs known to those of skill in the art may be used in the disclosed methods and apparatus. Examples include, but are not limited to, bubbling fluidized beds (where the air or gas to be passed through the sorbent bed is introduced from the bottom), vibratory fluidized beds (similar to standard fluidized beds, but with the addition of mechanical vibration to further agitate the particles), sound-assisted fluidized beds (similar to standard fluidized beds, but with the addition of sonication to further agitate the particles), transport or flash reactor beds (using gas velocities higher than those used in circulating fluidized beds; the particles approach the velocity of the gas), annular fluidized beds (a large nozzle at the center of fluidized bed introduces gas at a high velocity thereby achieving rapid mixing in a zone above the surrounding bed), or a mechanically-fluidized reactor (a mechanical stirrer is used to mobilize particles and achieve properties similar to that of a well-mixed fluidized bed without the need for a fluidization gas).

The housing geometry, dimensions, and materials used for the packed or fluidized beds of the disclosed methods and apparatus may be varied (independently and/or in combination with other design parameters such as choice of sorbent) to optimize a variety of performance parameters, e.g., total volume of air processed per unit time, overall capacity for CO₂capture, rates of CO₂capture and release (or net transfer rate), the concentration of CO₂in the product stream, etc. In some embodiments, the housing geometry may comprise a cylindrical (i.e., tubular or columnar) geometry, a triangular prism geometry, a cubic or rectangular prism (e.g., slab-like) geometry, a hexagonal prism geometry, a conical geometry, a polyhedral geometry, or any combination thereof.

In some embodiments, e.g., for cylindrical geometries, the diameter of the housing (i.e., the inner diameter or the diameter of the sorbent bed contained therein) may range from about 0.25 m to about 10 m. In some embodiments, the diameter of the housing may be at least 0.25 m, at least 0.5 m, at least 1 m, at least 2 m, at least 3 m, at least 4 m, at least 5 m, or at least 10 m. In some embodiments, the diameter of the housing may be at most 10 m, at most 5 m, at most 4 m, at most 3 m, at most 2 m, at most 1 m, at most 0.5 m, or at most 0.25 m. In preferred embodiments, the diameter of the housing may range from about 0.5 m to about 3 m. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the diameter of the housing may range from about 0.5 m to about 2 m. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the diameter of the housing may have any value within this range, e.g., about 1.25 m. These dimensions should not be taken as limiting, as the disclosed system designs may be scaled as necessary to achieve a desired carbon dioxide capture capacity.

In some embodiments, e.g., for cylindrical geometries, the height of the housing (i.e., the interior height, or the bed height for packed sorbent beds) may range from about 0.15 m to about 40 m. In some embodiments, the height of the housing (or sorbent bed height) may be at least 0.15 m, at least 0.2 m, at least 0.3 m, at least 0.4 m, at least 0.5 m, at least 1 m, at least 2 m, at least 3 m, at least 4 m, at least 5 m, at least 10 m, at least 20 m, at least 30 m, or at least 40. In some embodiments, the height of the housing (or sorbent bed height) may be at most 40 m, at most 30 m, at most 20 m, at most 10 m, at most 5 m, at most 4 m, at most 3 m, at most 2 m, at most 1 m, at most 0.5 m, at most 0.4 m, at most 0.3 m, at most 0.2 m, or at most 0.15 m. In preferred embodiments, the height of the housing (or sorbent bed height) may range from about 0.45 m to about 3.0 m. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the height of the housing (or sorbent bed height) may range from about 0.3 m to about 3 m. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the height of the housing (or sorbent bed height) may have any value within this range, e.g., about 2.25 m. These dimensions should not be taken as limiting, as the disclosed system designs may be scaled as necessary to achieve a desired carbon dioxide capture capacity.

Similarly, in some embodiments, e.g., for cubic or rectangular prism geometries, the width, length, and height of the housing (i.e., the interior dimensions) may each independently range from about 0.25 m to about 40 m. Smaller housings may have a square cross-sectional footprint, while for housings larger than a certain size, the width may be held constant and the length increased to increase the cross-sectional area of the bed while providing proper mechanical support for the screen or component that supports the sorbent material that constitutes the bed. In some embodiments, the width of the housing may range from about 0.25 m to about 40.0 m. In some embodiments, the width of the housing may be at least 0.25 m, at least 0.5 m, at least 1.0 m, at least 2.0 m, at least 3.0 m, at least 4.0 m, at least 5.0 m, at least 10.0 m, at least 20.0 m, at least 30.0 m, or at least 40.0 m. In some embodiments, the width of the housing may be at most 40.0 m, at most 30.0 m, at most 20.0 m, at most 10.0 m, at most 5.0 m, at most 4.0 m, at most 3.0 m, at most 2.0 m, at most 1.0 m, at most 0.5 m, or at most 0.25 m. In preferred embodiments, the width of the housing may range from about 0.5 m to about 2.0 m. In some embodiments, the length of the housing may range from about 0.25 m to about 40.0 m. In some embodiments, the length of the housing may be at least 0.25 m, at least 0.5 m, at least 1.0 m, at least 2.0 m, at least 3.0 m, at least 4.0 m, at least 5.0 m, at least 6.0 m, at least 7.0 m, at least 8.0 m, at least 9.0 m, at least 10.0 m, at least 20.0 m, at least 30.0 m, or at least 40.0 m. In some embodiments, the length of the housing may be at most 40.0 m, at most 30.0 m, at most 20.0 m, at most 10.0 m, at most 9.0 m, at most 8.0 m, at most 7.0 m, at most 6.0 m, at most 5.0 m, at most 4.0 m, at most 3.0 m, at most 2.0 m, at most 1.0 m, at most 0.5 m, or at most 0.25 m. In preferred embodiments, the length of the housing may range from about 1.0 m to about 3.0 m. In some embodiments, the height of the housing may range from about 0.15 m to about 40 m. In some embodiments, the height of the housing may be at least 0.15 m, at least 0.25 m, at least 0.5 m, at least 1.0 m, at least 2.0 m, at least 3.0 m, at least 4.0 m, at least 5 m, at least 10 m, at least 20 m, at least 30 m, or at least 40 m. In some embodiments, the height of the housing may be at most 40 m, at most 30 m, at most 20 m, at most 10m, at most 5 m, at most 4.0 m, at most 3.0 m, at most 2.0 m, at most 1.0 m, at most 0.5 m, at most 0.25 m, or at most 0.15 m. In preferred embodiments, the height of the housing may range from about 0.45 m to about 3.0 m. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the width, length, or height of the housing may each individually range from about 0.5 m to about 2.5 m. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the width, length, or height of the housing may each independently have any value within this range, e.g., about 0.75 m. These dimensions should not be taken as limiting, as the disclosed system designs may be scaled as necessary to achieve a desired carbon dioxide capture capacity.

For other housing geometries, the dimensions of the housing (e.g., average cross-sectional diameter, average width, average depth, or average height) may be similar to those described above, and may each independently range from about 0.05 m to about 40 m.

In general, the cross-sectional area of an individual packed or fluidized sorbent bed, as defined by the housing geometry, may range from about 0.05 m²to about 50 m², or larger. In some embodiments, the cross-sectional area of an individual packed or fluidized sorbent bed may be at least 0.05 m², at least 0.1 m², at least 0.25 m², at least 0.5 m², at least 0.75 m², at least 1 m², at least 2.5 m², at least 5 m², at least 7.5 m², at least 10 m², at least 15 m², at least 20 m², at least 25 m², at least 30 m², at least 40 m², or at least 50 m². In some embodiments, the cross-sectional area of an individual packed or fluidized sorbent bed may be at most 50 m², at most 40 m², at most 30 m², at most 25 m², at most 20 m², at most 15 m², at most 10 m², at most 7.5 m², at most 5 m², at most 2.5 m², at most 1 m², at most 0.75 m², at most 0.5 m², at most 0.25 m², at most 0.1 m², or at most 0.05 m². Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the cross-sectional area of an individual packed or fluidized sorbent bed may range from about 0.5 m²to about 15 m². Those of skill in the art will recognize that the cross-sectional area of an individual packed or fluidized sorbent bed may have any value within this range, e.g., about 0.85 m². These dimensions should not be taken as limiting, as the disclosed system designs may be scaled as necessary to achieve a desired carbon dioxide capture capacity.

The internal dimensions of the housing define the maximal volume of sorbent enclosed therein. In some embodiments, e.g., for packed bed extractors, the inner cross-sectional area of the housing defines the cross-sectional area of the sorbent bed contained therein, and the internal height defines the height (or thickness) of the sorbent bed, i.e., the sorbent bed occupies 100% of the internal volume of the housing. In some embodiments, e.g., for fluidized bed reactors, the inner cross-sectional area of the housing again defines the cross-sectional area of the sorbent bed contained therein, but the height of the sorbent bed will generally be less than the internal height of the housing.

In some embodiments, the height of the sorbent bed in a fluidized bed extractor design (i.e., the “settled” or “static” thickness of the sorbent bed when gas or air flow is turned off) may range from about 10% to about 40% of the internal height of the housing. In some embodiments, the “settled” thickness of the sorbent bed may be at least 10%, at least 20%, at least 30%, or at least 40% of the internal height of the housing. In some embodiments, the “settled” thickness of the sorbent bed may be at most 40%, at most 30%, at most 20%, or at most 10% of the internal height of the housing. In preferred embodiments, the “settled” thickness of the sorbent bed may range from about 15% to about 30% of the internal height of the housing. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the “settled” thickness of the sorbent bed may range from about 20% to about 40% of the internal height of the housing. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the “settled” thickness of the sorbent bed may have any value within this range, e.g., about 28% of the internal height of the housing.

In some embodiments, the height of the sorbent bed in a fluidized bed extractor design (i.e., the “settled” or “static” thickness of the sorbent bed when gas or air flow is turned off) may range from about 0.05 m to about 20 m. In some embodiments, the “settled” thickness of the sorbent bed may be at least 0.05 m, at least 0.1 m, at least 0.2 m, at least 0.3 m, at least 0.4 m, at least 0.5 m, at least 0.6 m, at least 0.7 m, at least 0.8 m, at least 0.9 m, at least 1.0 m, at least 5 m, at least 10 m, at least 15 m, or at least 20 m. In some embodiments, the “settled” thickness of the sorbent bed may be at most 20 m, at most 15 m, at most 10 m, at most 5 m, at most 1 m, at most 0.9 m, at most 0.8 m, at most 0.7 m, at most 0.6 m, at most 0.5 m, at most 0.4 m, at most 0.3 m, at most 0.2 m, at most 0.1m, or at most 0.05 m. In preferred embodiments, the “settled” thickness of the sorbent bed may range from about 0.15 m to about 0.5 m, or thicker. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the “settled” thickness of the sorbent bed may range from about 0.1 m to about 0.5 m. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the “settled” thickness of the sorbent bed may have any value within this range, e.g., about 0.12 m. These dimensions should not be taken as limiting, as the disclosed system designs may be scaled as necessary to achieve a desired carbon dioxide capture capacity.

The housings employed to create packed bed or fluidized bed extractors of the present disclosure may be fabricated from any of a variety of materials known to those of skill in the art. Examples include, but are not limited to, glass, ceramic, polymer, aluminum, steel, stainless steel, or any combination thereof. In general, the primary drivers for choice of material(s) are manufacturability and cost. Corrosion resistance may be an additional consideration in the case that caustic solutions are required for desorption, regeneration, and/or in situ cleaning steps. In some embodiments, the housing may include either single-walled, double-walled, or multi-walled designs, and may incorporate, for example, liquid or thermoelectric heating and cooling mechanisms, as well as fittings for making connections to tubing, piping, duct work, or attaching sensors (e.g., flow rate sensors, temperature sensors, pressure sensors, optical sensors, and/or infrared gas analyzers for monitoring the concentration of CO₂or other gases).

Sorbents for direct air capture: As indicated above, the choice of sorbent used in the disclosed methods and apparatus for capture of carbon dioxide (or other trace gases) from gas mixtures or ambient air streams is a key component in the successful implementation of the technology from both a performance and commercial viability perspective. The choice of particulate sorbent material used may determine the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent bed under a given set of operating conditions, and hence may impact the design of the packed bed and/or fluidized bed extractor in terms of the volumes of gas or air that must be processed, and the size of the housing and volume of sorbent required, in order to achieve the target CO₂capture rates. In addition, the choice of sorbent may also impact the choice of release mechanism used to subsequently strip bound CO₂from the sorbent and regenerate the starting sorbent material, and thus may further impact the design of the process cycle and the extractor apparatus used to implement it.

Examples of sorbents that may be used in the disclosed methods and apparatus include, but are not limited to, sorbents comprising amines physically adsorbed on porous oxide or polymer particles, sorbents comprising amines covalently bonded to porous oxide or polymer particles, sorbents comprising amine-containing porous particles created by in situ polymerization of amine monomers within porous oxide or polymer particles, sorbents comprising porous amine-containing polymer particles created by direct polymerization of amine monomers, or any combination thereof. The use of solid-supported amine materials as candidate sorbents for direct air capture of carbon dioxide derives from the long-standing industrial practice of using aqueous amine solutions for separation of CO₂from gas streams. The chemical reaction that takes place between CO₂and the amine groups of the sorbent material create strong bonds that enable significant uptake even at relatively low CO₂partial pressures (Sanz-Pérez, et al. (2016)). The mechanism of CO₂-amine reaction under anhydrous conditions is thought to require one molecule of CO₂and two primary or secondary amine moieties (reactions 1 and 2, respectively):

CO₂+2R—NH₂↔R—NH₃⁺+R—NHCO⁻ (1)

CO₂+2R₁R₂NH↔R₁R₂NH₂⁺+R₁R₂NHCOO⁻ (2)

In the presence of moisture, a reaction of CO₂with secondary (reaction 3) or tertiary amines (reaction 4) to yield ammonium carbonate or bicarbonate (depending on pH) has been reported (Sanz-Pérez, et al. (2016)):

CO₂+R₁R₂NH+H₂O↔R₁R₂NH₂+HCO₃⁻(bicarbonate)↔R₁R₂NH₂+CO₃²⁻(carbonate) (3)

CO₂+R₁R₂R₃N+H₂O↔R₁R₂R₃NH+HCO₃⁻(bicarbonate)↔R₁R₂R₃NH+CO₃²⁻(carbonate) (4)

Quaternary ammonium hydroxide or carbonate groups are the preferred CO₂adsorption groups for sorbents used in the humidity swing adsorption cycle developed by Lackner and co-workers (Wang, et al. (2011), “Moisture-swing sorption for carbon dioxide capture from ambient air: a thermodynamic analysis”, Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:6670-6675). The use of these types of sorbents will be described in more detail below.

In some embodiments, the packed bed and/or fluidized bed extraction methods and apparatus of the present disclosure may utilize a sorbent comprising amine-containing compounds physically adsorbed on oxide or polymer particles. Examples include, but are not limited to, silica, mesoporous alumina (aluminum oxide), or polymer particles (e.g., poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA), polycarbonate (PC), or polystyrene (PS) particles, etc.) impregnated with different amounts of, for example, low molecular weight, branched poly(ethylenimine) (PEI), tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA), pentaethylenehexamine (PEHA), poly(allylamine) (PAA), poly(vinylamine), or other amine-containing compounds of relatively low volatility. In some embodiments, the CO₂binding capacity of the resulting sorbent may be tuned by adjusting the amine loading level and/or pore size of the impregnated sorbent particles. In some embodiments, the use of secondary amine-containing compounds may be advantageous over primary amine-containing compounds, as it has been reported that they may provide the best compromise between reactivity with CO₂and the energy requirements for regeneration of the sorbent (see Sanz-Pérez, et al. (2016), and references cited therein).

In some embodiments, the packed bed and/or fluidized bed extraction methods and apparatus of the present disclosure may utilize a sorbent comprising amines covalently bonded to porous oxide or polymer particles. Examples include, but are not limited to, the use of aminopropyl (APS) and diethylenetriamine (DT) silanes for covalent modification of porous silicon dioxide or other porous oxide particles. Studies of CO₂binding to organosilane-modified porous oxide supports, where the organosilanes chosen had the same number of amines per molecule but differed with respect to primary or secondary amine structure, have suggested that primary amines may be more effective for promoting CO₂adsorption than secondary amines in the presence of moisture, possibly due to differences in the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the sorbent particles obtained (see Sanz-Pérez, et al. (2016), and references cited therein). However, CO₂partial pressure also appears to play a key role in determining the CO₂binding efficiencies for different types of amines.

In some embodiments, the packed bed and/or fluidized bed extraction methods and apparatus of the present disclosure may utilize a sorbent comprising amine-containing porous particles created by in situ polymerization of amine monomers within porous oxide or polymer particles. Examples include, but are not limited to, hyper-branched aminosilica materials produced by in situ polymerization of aziridine monomers in porous oxide particles, the polymerization of Z-(L-lysine) in the presence of aminopropyl-grafted porous silica, or grafting of a mesoporous silica foam support with an alkyliodine, followed by a cationic polymerization of 2-methyl-2-oxazoline and subsequent acid hydrolysis to produce a grafted linear PEI-like polymer composed of secondary amines with terminal primary amines (Sanz-Pérez, et al. (2016)).

In some embodiments, the packed bed and/or fluidized bed extraction methods and apparatus of the present disclosure may utilize a sorbent comprising a polymer backbone that has been functionalized with amine groups through covalent modification. In some embodiments, the disclosed methods and apparatus may utilize a sorbent comprising an amine-containing polymer obtained by direct polymerization of one or more types of amine-containing monomer, or combinations of one or more types of amine-containing monomers and one or more types of non-amine-containing monomers.

In some embodiments, the packed bed and/or fluidized bed extraction methods and apparatus of the present disclosure may utilize a sorbent comprising an anion exchange material, e.g., a strong base, type 1 or type 2 anion exchange resin. Strong base, type 1 anion exchange resins contain a quaternary amine functional group that is strongly basic. Strong base, type 2 anion exchange resins, obtained by the reaction of a styrene-DVB copolymer with dimethylethanolamine, contain a quaternary amine having lower basicity than that of type 1 resins, but that exhibit much greater regeneration efficiencies than do type 1 resins.

In a preferred embodiment, the sorbent may comprise a strong base, type 2 anion exchange resin. In some embodiments, the sorbent may further comprise a strong base, type 2 anion exchange resin that has been powdered and coated onto, or embedded within, mesoporous or macroporous particles of another material. The quaternary ammonium groups of strong base, type 2 anion exchange resins enable the use of a “humidity swing” release mechanism whereby CO₂captured from a gas or air stream by the “dry” resin is released through an increase in humidity or by wetting of the sorbent (Wang, et al. (2011)), as will be described in more detail below. In some cases, the strong base, type 2 anion exchange material may be provided in a form comprising chloride ions as the exchangeable anions. In these cases, the chloride ions must be replaced by hydroxide or carbonate ions to provide CO₂uptake capability. Type 2 resins in either the hydroxide or carbonate form can both absorb CO₂from ambient air. Since the type 2 resins in the carbonate form already contains one CO₂per two positive charges, the initial CO₂binding capacity of the carbonate form is half of that for the hydroxide form, however, measurement of adsorption isotherms as a function of CO₂concentration indicate that the two materials reach nearly identical saturation states (Wang, et al. (2011)). At the ambient CO₂concentration level of 400 ppm and water vapor concentration of 0.5% (5 parts per thousand), the hydroxide and carbonate type 2 sorbents have both been reported to exhibit a very high CO₂saturation level of over 99%. Even at very low CO₂concentrations, such as 100 ppm, the sorbents are reported to exhibit a CO₂saturation level of more than 95%.

The particulate sorbents used in the disclosed methods and apparatus may have any of a variety of sizes, shapes, and porosities. For example, in some embodiments, the shape of the sorbent particle may be nearly spherical, cylindrical, discoidal, ellipsoidal, tabular, equant, irregular, or any combination thereof (i.e., within the distribution of particles used). The shape of the particle may impact its surface area-to volume ratio, packing density, flow properties and/or the operating parameters, e.g., gas or air stream flow rates, required to fluidize the bed in fluidized bed extractor designs, etc. In some embodiments, the sorbent may comprise amine-containing compounds deposited on or incorporated into fibers.

The particulate sorbents used in the disclosed methods and apparatus may be monodisperse or polydisperse in size, and may comprise nanoparticles (i.e., having average diameters ranging from about 1 to about 100 nm), fine particles (i.e., having average diameters ranging from about 100 nm to about 2.5 micrometers), coarse particles (i.e., having average diameters ranging from about 2.5 micrometers to about 100 micrometers), or any combination thereof. As with particle shape, the size of the sorbent particle may impact its surface area-to volume ratio (i.e., for porous particles), packing density, flow properties and/or the operating parameters, e.g., gas or air stream flow rates, required to fluidize the bed in fluidized bed extractor designs, etc. In some embodiments, the average diameter of the sorbent particles may be at least 10 nm, at least 100 nm, at least 1 at least 5μm, at least 10 μm, at least 20 μm, at least 30 μm, at least 40 μm, at least 50 μm, at least 60 μm, at least 70 μm, at least 80 μm, at least 90 μm, at least 100 μm, at least 200 μm, at least 300 μm, at least 400 μm, at least 500 μm, at least 1 mm, or at least 2 mm. In some embodiments, the average diameter of the sorbent particles may be at most 2 mm, at most 1 mm, at most 750 μm, at most 500 μm, at most 400 μm, at most 300 μm, at most 200 μm, at most 100 μm, at most 90 μm, at most 80 μm, at most 70 μm, at most 60 μm, at most 50 μm, at most 40 μm, at most 30 μm, at most 20 μm, at most 10 μm, at most 1 μm, at most 100 nm, or at most 10 nm. In some embodiments, the average diameter of the sorbent particles may range from about 700 μm to about 1,200 μm. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the average diameter of the sorbent particles may range from about 100 μm to about 1,000 μm. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the average diameter of the sorbent particles may have any value within this range, e.g., about 728 μm.

The particulate sorbents used in the disclosed methods and apparatus may comprise microporous particles (i.e., having pore diameters of less than 2 nm), mesoporous particles (i.e., having pore diameters between 2 and 50 nm), macroporous particles (i.e., having pore diameters of more than 50 nm), or any combination thereof (i.e., within the distribution of particles used). The pore size, in combination with the size and shape of the sorbent particles, may impact the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent as well as the efficiency of CO₂uptake and release. In some embodiments, the sorbent particles may have pore diameters of at least 1 nm, at least 2 nm, at least 5 nm, at least 10 nm, at least 25 nm, at least 50 nm, at least 75 nm, at least 100 nm, at least 500 nm, at least 1 μm, at least 100 μm, or at least 500 μm. In some embodiments, the sorbent particles may have pore diameters of at most 500 μm, at most 100 μm, at most 1 μm, at most 500 nm, at most 100 nm, at most 75 nm, at most 50 nm, at most 25 nm, at most 10 nm, at most 5 nm, at most 2 nm, or at most 1 nm. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the sorbent particles may have pore diameters that range from about 100 nm to about 100 μm. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the sorbent particles may have pore diameters of any value within this range, e.g., about 950 nm.

CO₂uptake as a function of sorbent characteristics & environmental conditions: In general, CO₂uptake properties, e.g., maximal CO₂binding capacity and/or CO₂adsorption rate, will vary depending on the choice of sorbent used and/or the environmental conditions under which the disclosed methods and apparatus are operated. For example, as noted above, the CO₂binding capacity of sorbents comprising amine-containing compounds physically adsorbed on oxide or polymer particles may be tuned by adjusting the amine loading level and/or pore size of the impregnated sorbent particles. Furthermore, the nature of the amine groups on the sorbent (and of the support material thereof) may also impact the CO₂binding capacity, both in terms of binding affinity (and thus CO₂uptake as a function of the CO₂concentration in a gas or air stream), and in terms of adsorption rates and sensitivity to temperature, pressure, and/or humidity.

In some embodiments, the ambient temperature during the adsorption step may be a key parameter in determining uptake of CO₂, with many sorbents exhibiting lower CO₂binding at elevated temperatures. This observation forms the basis for the “temperature swing” release mechanism, which may be used for release of bound CO₂from the sorbent in some embodiments as will be discussed in more detail below.

In some embodiments, the dependence of CO₂binding on relative humidity or moisture may also be quite dependent on the choice of sorbent particles. For example, fumed silica particles impregnated with 33% polyethyleneimine (PEI) have been reported to exhibit an increase in the amount of CO₂bound in humid air relative to that bound in dry air, while fumed silica particles impregnated with 50% PEI have been reported to exhibit a decrease in the amount of CO₂bound in humid air relative to that in dry air (Sanz-Pérez, et al. (2016)). In preferred embodiments, the use of an anion exchange material may enable the use of a “humidity swing” release mechanism wherein the amount of CO₂bound in humid air is substantially less than that bound in dry air, as will be discussed in more detail below.

In some embodiments, the CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent may range from about 0.1 mmol CO₂per gram of sorbent to about 3.0 mmol CO₂per gram of sorbent, depending on the specific sorbent type and experimental conditions (e.g., CO₂concentration in the source gas, temperature, pressure, humidity, etc.) under which the measurements were made (Sanz-Pérez, et al. (2016)). In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent used in the disclosed methods and apparatus under optimal adsorption conditions may be at least 0.01, at least 0.05, at least 0.1, at least 0.2, at least 0.3, at least 0.4, at least 0.5, at least 0.6, at least 0.7, at least 0.8, at least 0.9, at least 1.0, at least 1.2, at least 1.4, at least 1.6, at least 1.8, at least 2.0, at least 2.2, at least 2.4, at least 2.6, at least 2.8, or at least 3.0 mmol CO₂per gram of sorbent. In some embodiments, the maximal CO₂binding capacity under optimal adsorption conditions may be at most 3.0, at most 2.8, at most 2.6, at most 2.4, at most 2.2, at most 2.0, at most 1.8, at most 1.6, at most 1.4, at most 1.2, at most 1.0, at most 0.9, at most 0.8, at most 0.7, at most 0.6, at most 0.5, at most 0.4, at most 0.3, at most 0.2, at most 0.1 mmol, at most 0.05, or at most 0.01 CO₂per gram of sorbent. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the maximal CO₂binding capacity under optimal adsorption conditions may range from about 0.8 to about 2.8 mmol CO₂per gram of sorbent. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the maximal CO₂binding capacity under optimal adsorption conditions may have any value within this range, e.g., about 1.5 mmol CO₂per gram of sorbent.

In some embodiments, the actual CO₂binding capacity observed may vary depending on a variety of experimental parameters, e.g., the CO₂concentration in the source gas, ambient temperature, pressure, humidity, etc., as well as on cycle number. For example, in some cases the CO₂binding capacity observed for the first adsorption/desorption cycle may differ from the mean value observed over a series of subsequent adsorption/desorption cycles. In some cases, the CO₂binding capacity observed for the first adsorption/desorption cycle may be higher than that observed for subsequent adsorption/desorption cycles and may range, for example, from about 1.4 to about 1.5 mmol CO₂per gram of sorbent, while that for subsequent adsorption/desorption cycles may range from about 0.02 to about 0.2 mmol CO₂per gram of sorbent. These values should be taken as non-limiting examples only, as the actual ranges will vary depending on the specific choice of sorbent and operating conditions.

In a preferred embodiment comprising the use of a strong base, type II anion exchange resin as sorbent, the mean value of CO₂binding capacity may range from about 0.02 to about 5.0 mmol CO₂per gram of sorbent. In some embodiments, the mean value of CO₂binding capacity may be at least 0.02, at least 0.04, at least 0.08, at least 0.1, at least 0.2, at least 0.4, at least 0.6, at least 0.8, at least 1.0, at least 1.2, at least 1.4, at least 1.6, at least 1.8, at least 2.0, at least 2.2, at least 2.4, at least 2.6, at least 2.8, at least 3.0, at least 3.2, at least 3.4, at least 3.6, at least 3.8, at least 4.0, at least 4.2, at least 4.4, at least 4.6, at least 4.8, or at least 5.0 mmol CO₂per gram of sorbent. In some embodiments, the mean value of CO₂binding capacity may be at most 5.0, at most 4.8, at most 4.6, at most 4.4, at most 4.2, at most 4.0, at most 3.8, at most 3.6, at most 3.4, at most 3.2, at most 3.0, at most 2.8, at most 2.6, at most 2.4, at most 2.2, at most 2.0, at most 1.8, at most 1.6, at most 1.4, at moat 1.2, at most 1.0, at most 0.8, at most 0.6, at most 0.4, at most 0.2, at most 0.1, at most 0.08, at most 0.06, at most 0.04, or at most 0.02 mmol CO₂per gram of sorbent. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the mean CO₂binding capacity may range from about 0.04 to about 0.12 mmol CO₂per gram of sorbent. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the mean CO₂binding capacity may have any value within this range, e.g., about 0.11 mmol CO₂per gram of sorbent.

In some embodiments, cyclic processes comprising carbon dioxide capture, carbon dioxide release, and/or sorbent regeneration steps may be implemented in order to meet the need for processing large volumes of ambient air in order to capture significant quantities of carbon dioxide without constructing an apparatus of immense size. The stability of the sorbent to repeated exposure to changes in temperature, pressure, humidity, or any combination thereof, may thus be of considerable importance for practical application. In preferred embodiments a moisture swing or humidity swing release mechanism is employed, as this approach makes use of existing differences in humidity levels to drive CO₂adsorption and release and avoids the high energy penalties and associated costs incurred when using temperature, vacuum, and/or steam as a release mechanism. In some embodiments, the steps of carbon dioxide capture, carbon dioxide release, and/or sorbent regeneration may be performed serially or sequentially. In some embodiments, the steps of carbon dioxide capture, carbon dioxide release, and/or sorbent regeneration may be performed simultaneously or concurrently (e.g., in a continuous, overlapping manner). In some embodiments, the steps of carbon dioxide capture, carbon dioxide release, and/or sorbent regeneration may be performed simultaneously or concurrently using apparatus comprising multiple sorbent beds. In some embodiments, modular apparatus comprising one or more sorbent beds may be assembled to implement large, multi-bed systems having greater CO₂capture and delivery capacity.

CO₂release mechanisms: In general, the mechanism used to release (or desorb) the bound CO₂(or other trace gases) from the sorbent (thereby regenerating the sorbent) will vary depending on the specific sorbent used. Any of a variety of release mechanisms known to those of skill in the art may be used, including but not limited to, temperature swing mechanisms (e.g., CO₂release as a result of a temperature change), vacuum swing mechanisms (e.g., CO₂release due to a change in pressure), humidity swing mechanisms (e.g., CO₂release due to a change in humidity), wetting mechanisms (e.g., CO₂release as a result of wetting the sorbent with a liquid or spray (e.g., water)), pH-based release and/or regeneration mechanisms (e.g., CO₂release as a result of wetting the sorbent with a liquid or spray that has a different pH that that to which the sorbent was previously exposed, or wherein the sorbent is regenerated between adsorption/desorption cycles by wetting with, for example, a basic solution to release all residual CO₂and/or other gaseous or particulate contaminants and then dried prior to the start of the next adsorption step), steam release mechanisms (e.g., CO₂release due to exposure of the sorbent to steam), or any combination thereof (provided that the release mechanism or combination thereof is appropriate for the particular sorbent selected, and that the sorbent is stable under that set of release conditions).

Temperature swing mechanisms: In some embodiments of the disclosed methods and apparatus, the release of bound carbon dioxide (or other gas) from the sorbent may be achieved by means of a temperature swing mechanism (also referred to as a thermal swing mechanism) in which the sorbent preferentially binds CO₂at lower temperatures and preferentially releases bound CO₂at higher temperatures. In general, the transition from CO₂(or other gas) adsorption to CO₂(or other gas) release may be triggered by changes (increases) of temperature ranging from about 10° C. to about 200° C., or more. In some embodiments, the change (increase) in temperature required to trigger the transition from gas adsorption to gas release (e.g., to transition from about 90% saturation of binding sites to about 10% saturation) may be at least 10° C., at least 20° C., at least 30° C., at least 40° C., at least 50° C., at least 60° C., at least 70° C., at least 80° C., at least 90° C., at least 100° C., at least 125° C., at least 150° C., at least 175° C., or at least 200° C. In some embodiments, the change in temperature required to trigger a transition may be at most 200° C., at most 175° C., at most 150° C., at most 125° C., at most 100° C., at most 90° C., at most 80° C., at most 70° C., at most 60° C., at most 50° C., at most 40° C., at most 30° C., at most 20° C., or at most 10° C. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the change in temperature required to trigger a transition may range from about 30° C. to about 175° C. Those of skill in the art will recognize that in specific embodiments, the change in temperature required to trigger a transition may have any value within this range, e.g., about 55° C. In some embodiments, the change in temperature required to trigger a transition from gas adsorption to gas release may depend on how the endpoints of the transition are defined, e.g., a transition from about 90% saturation of binding sites to about 10% saturation may require a different increase in temperature than a transition from about 80% saturation to about 20% saturation. In some embodiments, the change in temperature required to trigger a transition may further depend on the ambient pressure and/or relative humidity.

Vacuum swing mechanisms: In some embodiments of the disclosed methods and apparatus, the release of bound carbon dioxide (or other gas) from the sorbent may be achieved by means of a vacuum swing mechanism in which the sorbent preferentially binds CO₂at higher pressures (e.g., near ambient or atmospheric pressure) and preferentially releases bound CO₂at lower pressures (e.g., under partial or full vacuum). In general, the transition from CO₂(or other gas) adsorption to CO₂(or other gas) release may be triggered by changes (decreases) of pressure ranging from about 10 torr to about 700 torr, or more. In some embodiments, the change (decrease) in pressure required to trigger the transition from gas adsorption to gas release (e.g., to transition from about 90% saturation of binding sites to about 10% saturation) may be at least 10 torr, at least 20 torr, at least 40 torr, at least 60 torr, at least 80 torr, at least 100 torr, at least 200 torr, at least 300 torr, at least 400 torr, at least 500 torr, at least 600 torr, or at least 700 torr. In some embodiments, the change (decrease) in pressure required to trigger the transition may be at most 700 torr, at most 600 torr, at most 500 torr, at most 400 torr, at most 300 torr, at most 200 torr, at most 100 torr, at most 80 torr, at most 60 torr, at most 40 torr, at most 20 torr, or at most 10 torr. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the change (decrease) in pressure required to trigger the transition may range from about 40 torr to about 500 torr. Those of skill in the art will recognize that in specific embodiments, the change in pressure required to trigger a transition may have any value within this range, e.g., about 260 torr. Those of skill in the art will recognize that in specific embodiments, the change (decrease) in pressure required to trigger the transition from gas adsorption to gas release may depend on how the endpoints of the transition are defined, e.g., a transition from about 90% saturation of binding sites to about 10% saturation may require a different decrease in pressure than a transition from about 80% saturation to about 20% saturation. In some embodiments, the change in pressure required to trigger a transition may further depend on the ambient temperature and/or relative humidity.

Humidity swing & wetting mechanisms: In preferred embodiments of the disclosed methods and apparatus, the release of bound carbon dioxide (or other gas) from the sorbent may be achieved by means of a humidity swing mechanism (also referred to as a moisture swing mechanism) in which the sorbent (e.g., a strong base, type 2 anion exchange material) preferentially binds CO₂at low relative humidity and preferentially releases bound CO₂at high relative humidity (see, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,708,806 B2, 8,273,160 B2, and 8,337,589 B2). The humidity swing mechanism provides an approach to regenerating the CO₂sorbent that trades the input of heat required in a thermal swing approach, or the input of mechanical energy required in a vacuum swing approach, for the consumption of water, whose latent heats of condensation and evaporation provide the free energy that drives the humidity swing cycle (Wang, et al. (2011)). The humidity swing mechanism may thus enable a much more energy efficient and cost-effective means for capture of CO₂from ambient air or other gas streams. In some embodiments, the humidity swing mechanism may enable one to perform cyclic CO₂capture and release processes that require little or no input of external energy to drive the adsorption or desorption steps, thus avoiding the high energy penalties incurred when using thermal swing, vacuum swing, or steam stripping release mechanisms. The humidity swing mechanism is a general release mechanism that may be used in combination with a suitable sorbent material for CO₂capture in a variety of applications, e.g., CO₂capture from ambient (i.e., outdoor or atmospheric) air or from conditioned (i.e., indoor or enclosed) air, and that provides significant cost advantages for CO₂capture compared to other release mechanisms when no additional conditioning or processing (e.g., heating, humidification, or de-humidification) of the ambient or indoor air is required. One non-limiting example of a commercially-available strong base, type 2 anion exchange material suitable for use in the disclosed methods and apparatus is Purolite A500 (OH form) (Lenntech BV, Netherlands).

As noted above, there is a strong humidity effect on the CO₂adsorption equilibrium of, e.g., strong base, type 2 anion exchange resins, at room temperature such that the sorbent readily desorbs previously bound CO₂as the water vapor concentration increases. Wetting of the sorbent also causes rapid desorption of CO₂, and may provide advantages in terms of improving the CO₂desorption kinetics. The chemical reactions underlying the proposed mechanism for adsorption/desorption of CO₂by strong base, type 2 anion exchange materials are summarized in reactions 5 to 8 (Wang, et al. (2011)):

OH⁻R⁺+CO₂→HCO₃⁻R⁺ (5)

CO₃²⁻(R⁺)₂+H₂O+CO₂(gaseous)→2(HCO₃⁻R⁺) (6)

OH⁻R⁺+HCO₃⁻R⁺↔CO₃²⁻(R⁺)₂+H₂O (7)

2(HCO₃⁻R⁺)→CO₃²⁻(R⁺)₂+H₂O+CO₂(gaseous) (8)

where R⁺ represents the quaternary ammonium ion in the resin. In the dry state, CO₂reacts with hydroxide ions associated with the quaternary ammonium group to form bicarbonate ions according to reaction 5. CO₂may also react with carbonate ions to form bicarbonate according to reaction 6. Because the resin is never entirely dry under ambient conditions with vapor pressure present, the water consumed in reaction 6 is thought to be provided by the hygroscopic resin. Reaction 7 converts bicarbonate and hydroxide into carbonate and water. In the dry state, the equilibrium in reaction 7 is thought to allow for the coexistence of bicarbonate ions and hydroxide ions in far larger concentrations than in an aqueous environment. The resin absorbs CO₂until all hydroxide is consumed and reaches the bicarbonate state. The presence of moisture shifts the bicarbonate-carbonate equilibrium to what is expected in water, and CO₂is released via reaction 8. Note that type 2 sorbent resins may only convert from the bicarbonate state back to the carbonate state during the desorption process. As the resin dries following exposure to moisture, the equilibrium represented by reaction 7 may shift to the left. Although this shift in equilibrium is somewhat counterintuitive due to the presence of a water molecule on the product side of the reaction, it should be noted that reaction 7 ignores the number of water molecules associated with ion hydration clouds, which may also change as the system dries out and which may thereby give rise to a more complicated net balance of water in the reaction.

As noted above, the gas adsorption/desorption reactions involved in the capture and release of CO₂or other gases via a humidity swing mechanism can be fully reversible. In some embodiments, the adsorption of CO₂by the sorbent may fully saturate at ambient concentrations as low as 100 ppm of carbon dioxide. In some embodiments, the humidity swing may be implemented using low energy processes that are fueled by the evaporation of water. The only requirement is that there be a difference between the relative humidity of the ambient air (or other gas stream) from which CO₂is being removed and that of the greenhouse interior (or other enclosed environment) into which the CO₂is being released. For small differences in relative humidity between the adsorption and desorption process steps, the difference in sorbent CO₂binding capacity will be small and processing of larger volumes of air per unit time will be required to achieve a target CO₂transfer rate. For large differences in relative humidity between the adsorption and desorption steps, the difference in sorbent CO₂binding capacity will be correspondingly large, and the processing of smaller volumes of air may suffice. In some embodiments, the humidity swing (or increase in relative humidity) required to release an adsorbed gas such as CO₂from the sorbent may range from about a 5% increase in relative humidity to about an 80% increase in relative humidity. In some instances, the humidity swing (or increase in relative humidity) required to release an adsorbed gas from the sorbent (e.g., to transition from about 90% saturation of binding sites to about 10% saturation) may be an at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, or at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98%, or at least 99%. In some embodiments, the humidity swing (or increase in relative humidity) required to release an adsorbed gas such as CO₂from the sorbent (e.g., to transition from about 90% saturation of binding sites to about 10% saturation) may be at most 99%, at most 98%, at most 95%, at most 90%, at most 80%, at most 70%, at most 60%, at most 50%, at most 40%, at most 30%, at most 20%, at most 10%, or at most 5%. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the humidity swing (or increase in humidity) required to release an adsorbed gas such as CO₂from the sorbent may range from about 10% to about 60%. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the humidity swing (or increase in humidity) required to release an adsorbed gas from the sorbent may have any value within this range, e.g., an increase in relative humidity of about 36%. In some embodiments, the change in humidity required to release an adsorbed gas from the paper-based sorbent may depend on how the endpoints of the transition are defined, e.g., a transition from about 90% saturation of binding sites to about 10% saturation may require a different increase in humidity than a transition from about 80% saturation to about 20% saturation. In some embodiments, the change in humidity required to trigger the transition between adsorption of CO₂to release of CO₂may further depend on the ambient temperature and/or pressure. In general, high relative humidity during the desorption step tends to have a greater impact on the sorbent's CO₂binding and release capacity (per humidity swing), while low relative humidity during the adsorption step tends to have a stronger impact on sorbent drying rate (thus impacting the overall adsorption/desorption cycle time).

In some embodiments, a wetting mechanism may be used for release of CO₂from the sorbent, optionally followed by active drying of the sorbent. For example, when strong base, type 2 anion exchange resins or other amine-based sorbents are used, adsorbed CO₂may in some cases be released by partially or fully wetting the sorbent with a liquid, spray, or mist. In some embodiments, the liquid, spray, or mist may be water or an aqueous-based solution. In some embodiments, the liquid, spray, or mist may comprise a liquid sorbent solution. In some embodiments, the liquid sorbent solution may comprise a NaOH or Na₂CO₃solution. In some embodiments, the liquid, spray, or mist may comprise a solution that has a different pH that that to which the sorbent was previously exposed.

In some embodiments, release mechanisms based on a humidity swing or wetting may be further facilitated through the use of an elevated temperature and/or application of a partial vacuum. For example, in some instances the humidity swing or wetting desorption reaction may be performed at a temperature that is higher than the ambient and/or operating temperature of the system as a whole. In some instances, the humidity swing or wetting desorption reaction may be performed at a temperature ranging from about 20° C. to about 50° C. In some instances, the desorption reaction may be performed at a temperature of at least 20° C., at least 25° C., at least 30° C., at least 35° C., at least 40° C., at least 45° C., or at least 50° C. In some instances, the desorption reaction may be performed at a temperature of at most 50° C., at most 45° C., at most 40° C., at most 35° C., at most 30° C., at most 25° C., or at most 20° C. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, in some instances the desorption reaction may be performed at a temperature ranging from about 25° C. to about 45° C. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the temperature at which the desorption reaction is performed may have any value within this range, e.g., about 42° C.

In some instances the humidity swing or wetting desorption reaction may be performed at a temperature that is higher than the ambient and/or operating temperature of the system as a whole by a specified difference. For example, in some instances, the desorption reaction may be performed at a temperature of at least+5° C., +10° C., +20° C., at least +25° C., at least +30° C., at least +35° C., at least +40° C., at least +45° C., or at least +50° C. relative to the ambient or operating temperature of the system as a whole. In some instances, the desorption reaction may be performed at a temperature of at most +50° C., at most +45° C., at most +40° C., at most +35° C., at most +30° C., at most +25° C., at most +20° C., at most +10° C., or at most +5° C. relative to the ambient or operating temperature of the system as a whole. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, in some instances the desorption reaction may be performed at a temperature ranging from about +25° C. to about +45° C. relative to the ambient or operating temperature of the system as a whole. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the temperature at which the desorption reaction is performed may have any value within this range, e.g., about +17° C. relative to the ambient or operating temperature of the system as a whole.

In some instances the humidity swing or wetting desorption reaction may be performed under a partial vacuum to facilitate release of captured CO₂and/or to release the captured CO₂in a more pure or concentrated form. For example, in some instances the humidity swing or wetting desorption reaction may be performed under a residual pressure ranging from about 760 Torr (1 atmosphere) to about 1 Torr. In some instances, the humidity swing or wetting desorption reaction may be performed under a residual pressure that is at most 760 Torr, at most 740 Torr, at most 720 Torr, at most 700 Torr, at most 650 Torr, at most 600 Torr, at most 550 Torr, at most 500 Torr, at most 450 Torr, at most 400 Torr, at most 350 Torr, at most 300 Torr, at most 250 Torr, at most 200 Torr, at most 150 Torr, at most 100 Torr, at most 50 Torr, or at most 1 Torr.

Steam stripping mechanisms: In some embodiments of the disclosed methods and apparatus, the release of bound carbon dioxide (or other gas) from the sorbent may be achieved by means of a steam stripping mechanism in which a suitable sorbent preferentially binds CO₂at ambient temperature and relative humidity (e.g., near ambient or atmospheric pressure) and preferentially releases bound CO₂when exposed to steam. In some instances, steam stripping may be viewed as a combination of temperature swing and humidity swing mechanisms. In some embodiments, the transition from CO₂(or other gas) adsorption to CO₂(or other gas) release may be triggered by exposure of the sorbent to wet steam (i.e., steam comprising a mist or aerosol of water droplets). In some embodiments, the transition from CO₂(or other gas) adsorption to CO₂(or other gas) release may be triggered by exposure of the sorbent to dry steam (i.e., steam comprising only water in the gas phase).

Combination release mechanisms: In some embodiments of the disclosed methods and systems, the release of bound carbon dioxide (or other gas) from the sorbent may be achieved by means of any combination of temperature swing, pressure swing, wetting, steam, and/or humidity swing mechanisms (provided that the release mechanism or combination thereof is appropriate for the particular sorbent selected, and that the sorbent is stable under that set of release conditions). For example, in some embodiments, the release of bound carbon dioxide from the sorbent may be implemented by using a combination of temperature swing and vacuum swing. In some embodiments, the release of bound carbon dioxide from the sorbent may be implemented by using a combination of temperature swing and humidity swing. In some embodiments, the release of bound carbon dioxide from the sorbent may be implemented by using a combination of vacuum swing and humidity swing.

Sorbent regeneration: In some embodiments, it may be necessary to regenerate the sorbent between CO₂adsorption and desorption cycles. For example, in some cases where moisture-sensitive sorbents are employed, it may be advantageous to partially or fully wet the sorbent periodically to fully release any residual CO₂and/or other gaseous or particulate contaminants (e.g., other acidic gases) and then dry the sorbent prior to use in the next CO₂capture step. In some embodiments, the sorbent may be wetted with water, a basic solution, or secondary liquid sorbent, e.g., a NaOH or Na₂CO₃solution, and then dried prior to use in the next CO₂capture step. Regeneration allows one to restore the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent. When other types of sorbents are used, regeneration steps may alternatively comprise exposing the sorbent to high temperature, high vacuum, extended periods of steam treatment, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, regeneration steps may comprise exposing the sorbent to high temperature, high vacuum, extended periods of steam treatment, wetting, a humidity swing, or any combination thereof (provided that the specific sorbent used is suitably stable under the chosen set of regeneration conditions).

In some embodiments, a regeneration step may be performed as part of every cycle. In some embodiments, a regeneration step may be performed every few cycles. In some embodiments, a regeneration step may be performed at least every 1 cycle, at least every 5 cycles, at least every 10 cycles, at least every 100 cycles, at least every 1,000 cycles, or at least every 10,000 cycles. In some embodiments, a regeneration step may be performed at most every 10,000 cycles, at most every 1,000 cycles, at most every 100 cycles, at most every 10 cycles, at most every 5 cycles, or at most every 1 cycle. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, in some embodiments a regeneration step may be performed every 10 to 1,000 cycles. Those of skill in the art will recognize that a regeneration step may be performed at any periodicity within this range, e.g., every 560 cycles.

In some embodiments, the sorbent may need to be replaced after a certain number of regeneration steps are performed, for example, if the regeneration step comprises the use of a caustic wash that eventually degrades the sorbent material. In some embodiments, the sorbent may need to be replaced after performing at least 1 regeneration step, at least 10 regeneration steps, at least 25 regeneration steps, at least 50 regeneration steps, at least 75 regeneration steps, at least 100 regeneration steps, at least 200 regeneration steps, at least 300 regeneration steps, at least 400 regeneration steps, at least 500 regeneration steps, at least 750 regeneration steps, at least 1,000 regeneration steps, at least 5,000 regeneration steps, or at least 10,000 regeneration steps. In some embodiments, the sorbent may need to be replaced after performing at most 10,000 regeneration steps, at most 5,000 regeneration steps, at most 1,000 regeneration steps, at most 750 regeneration steps, at most 500 regeneration steps, at most 400 regeneration steps, at most 300 regeneration steps, at most 200 regeneration steps, at most 100 regeneration steps, at most 75 regeneration steps, at most 50 regeneration steps, at most 25 regenerations steps, at most 10 regeneration steps, or at most 1 regeneration step. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, in some embodiments the sorbent may need to be replaced after performing from 50 to 1,000 regeneration steps. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the sorbent may need to be replaced after performing any number of regeneration steps within this range of values, for example, the sorbent may need to be replaced after performing 1,250 regeneration steps.

Methods and apparatus for capture of CO₂from ambient air: Disclosed herein are methods and apparatus for capture of CO₂from a gas stream, e.g., a gas mixture or a stream of ambient air, using a cyclic process comprising: (i) adsorption of CO₂by a packed or fluidized bed extractor comprising a sorbent, (ii) release of the adsorbed CO₂, and/or (iii) regeneration of the sorbent material. In some embodiments, the steps of carbon dioxide adsorption, carbon dioxide release, and/or sorbent regeneration may be performed serially or sequentially. In some embodiments, the steps of carbon dioxide adsorption, carbon dioxide release, and/or sorbent regeneration may be performed simultaneously or concurrently (e.g., in a continuous, overlapping manner). Following its release from the sorbent, the CO₂may optionally be further concentrated, stored, sequestered, delivered to an enclosed environment, and/or used in a secondary process. In preferred embodiments, the disclosed methods and apparatus are used for removing carbon dioxide from ambient air (i.e., from outdoor or atmospheric air) using one or more packed bed and/or fluidized bed extractors comprising an anion exchange material, wherein the captured CO₂is released from the anion exchange material using a humidity swing mechanism and delivered to the interior of a greenhouse (or other enclosed structure) where elevated concentrations of CO₂may be beneficial for stimulating plant growth.

Methods and apparatus for capture of CO₂from indoor air: In some embodiments, the disclosed apparatus may be used to transfer CO₂from a high CO₂environment (e.g., an indoor environment such as a home, office, school, or manufacturing site, where CO₂concentrations may range from about 400 ppm to about 2,000 ppm, or higher) to a storage container or to the ambient environment (e.g., the outdoor environment or atmosphere). In this “indoor air purification” mode, apparatus that comprise the use of a moisture swing release mechanism will typically have higher per swing transfer capacity (mmol CO₂per gram of sorbent) than when operated in the “ambient air capture mode” used for greenhouse applications, etc.

For example, disclosed herein are methods for capturing carbon dioxide from indoor air, the methods comprising: a) contacting a packed bed or fluidized bed extractor with a stream of indoor air drawn from within a first enclosed environment, wherein the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor comprises, for example, a humidity-sensitive sorbent material that adsorbs carbon dioxide from the indoor air, and wherein the water vapor pressure in the indoor air is less than the equilibrium water vapor pressure for air in contact with the sorbent; b) contacting the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor with a stream of ambient air or conditioned air, wherein the ambient air or conditioned air has a relative humidity that is higher than that of the indoor air of step (a), and wherein the sorbent material in the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor releases the adsorbed carbon dioxide upon contact with the ambient air or conditioned air; c) optionally, separating and concentrating the released carbon dioxide from water vapor, and delivering the released carbon dioxide to a second enclosed environment, to a storage container, or for use in a secondary process; and d), optionally, repeating steps (a) through (c). In some embodiments, the adsorption of carbon dioxide by the sorbent is performed at ambient room temperature (i.e., at the ambient temperature of the enclosed environment from which the indoor air is drawn). In some embodiments, there is no heating required for the release of carbon dioxide from the sorbent. In some embodiments, the first enclosed environment and the second enclosed environment may be the same, e.g., wherein stored carbon dioxide is re-released into the indoor air on an as-needed basis to maintain a specified concentration of CO₂in the indoor environment. In some embodiments, stored carbon dioxide is released from a storage container into a third enclosed environment, e.g., a greenhouse or bioreactor. In general, the first enclosed environment, second enclosed environment, and/or third enclosed environment may comprise an apartment, house, residential building, school building, office building, commercial building, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the disclosed methods may further comprise conditioning the indoor air, ambient air, and/or conditioned air by heating, humidification, de-humidification, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the humidity-sensitive sorbent is an anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the anion-exchange material is a strong base, type II anion exchange material. In some embodiments, the steps of the method may be repeated at least once per day, at least twelve times per day, or at least twenty four times per day, at least 50 times per day, at least 75 times per day, at least 100 times per day, at least 125 times per day, at least 150 times per day, at least 175 times per day, at least 200 times per day, at least 225 times per day, at least 250 times per day, at least 275 times per day, or at least 300 times per day. Also disclosed are apparatus for performing these methods.

System design parameters: In some embodiments, the disclosed methods may be implemented using an apparatus comprising a single packed bed or fluidized bed extractor. In some embodiments, the disclosed methods may be implemented using an apparatus comprising two packed bed or fluidized bed extractors, three packed bed or fluidized bed extractors, four packed bed or fluidized bed extractors, five packed bed or fluidized bed extractors, six packed bed or fluidized bed extractors, seven packed bed or fluidized bed extractors, eight packed bed or fluidized bed extractors, nine packed bed or fluidized bed extractors, or ten or more packed bed or fluidized bed extractors. The methods or apparatus disclosed herein may comprise the use of any combination of packed bed and/or fluidized bed extractors. In some embodiments, two or more packed bed and/or fluidized bed extractors may be operated in series. In some embodiments, two or more packed bed and/or fluidized bed extractors may be operated in parallel.

Any of a variety of air flow mechanisms known to those of skill in the art may be used to provide and control the stream of gas, ambient air, indoor air, or humid air with which the sorbent of the packed or fluidized bed extractors are contacted. Examples include, but are not limited to, fans, blowers, ventilators, wind mills, etc. In some embodiments, one or more of these air flow mechanisms will be connected to the one or more packed bed or fluidized bed extractors by means of appropriate duct work or piping, and the apparatus may further comprise any of a variety of intake or inlet ports, valves, gates, vents, manifolds, flow dividers, outlet ports, etc. In general, a controller may be used to operate the one or more air flow mechanisms (or associated valves, gates, etc.) utilized by the disclosed methods and apparatus, and may provide for manual, semi-automated, or automated control of the volumetric flow rate and/or linear velocity of gas or air streams flowing through the one or more packed bed or fluidized bed extractors. In some embodiments, the controller may control the timing and synchronization of gas or air flow through two or more packed bed and/or fluidized bed extractors. In some embodiments, the duct work or piping may also connect the one or more air flow mechanisms and/or one or more packed bed or fluidized bed extractors to a storage structure or an enclosed environment.

In some embodiments, the disclosed apparatus may comprise the use of additional system components, including but not limited to, heaters, humidifiers, spray mechanisms, sensors, vacuum systems, concentrators, condensers, storage tanks, etc. For example, in some embodiments, a temperature swing release mechanism may be used, either alone or in combination with a humidity swing release mechanism, to release captured CO₂from the sorbent, and a heater may be used to raise the temperature of the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor, or that of a gas or air stream passing through the packed bed or fluidized bed extractor. As another example, in some embodiments, a spray mechanism may be used to wet an anion exchange sorbent and thereby release captured CO₂. In some embodiments of the disclosed apparatus, e.g., those designed for capture of CO₂from ambient air under non-optimal environmental conditions (e.g., where the average or transient climate conditions are too humid) or those designed for capture of CO₂from indoor air (e.g., air within a house, residential building, office building, commercial building, etc.), the inlet air may be suitably conditioned (e.g., heated, cooled, humidified, de-humidified, etc.) prior to exposure to the sorbent in order to optimize the efficiency of CO₂capture. In some embodiments, sensors (e.g., temperature sensors, pressure sensors, flow rate sensors, humidity sensors) may be used to monitor various process parameters, e.g., temperature, pressure, gas/air stream flow rate, and/or gas/air humidity, at different points in the apparatus, and may further be used to provide feedback to the controller in order to achieve and maintain optimal process parameter settings for maximizing CO₂capture efficiency and/or the rate of transfer of CO₂from, e.g., ambient air to an enclosed environment. In some embodiments, the disclosed apparatus may comprise optical sensors and/or infrared gas analyzers for monitoring the concentration of CO₂or other gases at the inlet, outlet, and/or at other points within the apparatus. In some embodiments, the disclosed apparatus may further comprise vacuum systems for evacuating the head space above packed or fluidized beds prior to release of the adsorbed CO₂, thereby providing for release of higher purity CO₂. In some embodiments, the disclosed apparatus may comprise CO₂storage capability so that the captured CO₂may subsequently be released as needed to, for example, maintain a specified CO₂concentration at the outlet of the apparatus or within an enclosed environment to which the apparatus is attached.

As noted above, in preferred embodiments, the only external energy input required to operate the disclosed apparatus is the energy used by the one or more air flow mechanisms used to contact the sorbent material within the packed bed or fluidized bed extractors with ambient air, a gas stream, and/or humid air (and the minimal amount of energy required to run the controller and/or sensors, if present). In preferred embodiments, there is no heating of ambient air prior to the extraction of CO₂(i.e., the adsorption step is performed at ambient temperature), and no heating of the air or extractor required for CO₂release (i.e., a humidity swing release mechanism is preferred). The preferred energy sources for these embodiments include solar power, wind power, hydraulic power, etc., which have little or no carbon footprint.

In general, the efficiency of CO₂capture and the rate of CO₂transfer may be dependent on a variety of design and operating parameters, e.g., the ambient concentration of CO₂at the inlet, the type of sorbent used, the dimensions (e.g., cross-sectional area and thickness) of the packed sorbent bed in a packed bed extractor, the dimensions (e.g., cross-sectional area and static thickness) of the sorbent bed in a fluidized bed extractor, and the fluid-like properties of the sorbent therein as a function of air or gas flow rate through the extractor, etc.

In some embodiments, the CO₂released from the sorbent may be concentrated (e.g., by removing water vapor using any of a variety of methods known to those of skill in the art in the case that a humidity swing release mechanism is used) and/or stored (e.g., in a storage tank or other storage structure). In some embodiments, the CO₂released from the sorbent may be permanently sequestered, e.g., by direct injection of CO₂into deep well or deep ocean storage. In some embodiments, the CO₂released from the sorbent may be delivered to an enclosed environment, e.g., a greenhouse (where increased levels of CO₂will improve conditions for growth), a bioreactor, or an enclosed algae or lemna (duckweed) culture. In some embodiments, the CO₂released from the sorbent may be delivered for use in a secondary process where the CO₂is transformed into a useful or benign product. The CO₂may be delivered in whatever form is required for the secondary process, which may be gaseous, solid, or liquid CO₂. The secondary process may be any manufacturing, food processing, or other industrial process that uses CO₂including, but not limited to, use as a machining coolant and lubricant, grit blasting for smoothing and paint removal, cryogenic cleaning, quick freeze processes, production and use of R744 refrigerant, CO₂-based dry cleaning solvents, perishable shipping container pre-cooling, perishable shipping inert environment maintenance, beverage carbonation, fire suppression, plant fertilization, horticulture or agriculture (e.g., through delivery of the released CO₂to the interior of a greenhouse to promote plant growth), silvaculture, aquatic plant or algae production (e.g., through delivery of the released CO₂to the interior of a bioreactor to promote duckweed (lemna) or algae growth), enhanced oil recovery, water softening, Solvay processes, as a propellant or pressurizing gas (e.g., for aerosol cans, inflation gas for life rafts), supercritical CO₂extraction processes, semiconductor manufacturing, as an organic solvent, perfume aromatics, decaffeinating beverages (e.g., coffee and tea), supramics, pharmaceutical manufacturing, chemical production processes for manufacturing urea, methanol, inorganic carbonates, organic carbonates, polyurethanes, paint pigments, foaming agents, carbon-based fuels (i.e., synthetic fuels), fumigation (e.g., of grain elevators), neutralization of alkaline water, as a gas shield (e.g., for welding), etc. In any of these embodiments, the disclosed devices and systems (or apparatus) used to implement the disclosed methods may be modular in design, so that linking two or more modules creates a system having a higher CO₂capture and/or delivery capacity. In some embodiments, the modular systems disclosed are not required to be co-located with large, stationary sources of CO₂emissions such as fossil fuel-based power plants, oil refineries, etc.

In some embodiments, e.g., those in which the disclosed methods and apparatus are used to capture CO₂from ambient air, the CO₂concentration in the ambient air may range from about 300 ppm to about 500 ppm. In some embodiments, the CO₂concentration in the ambient air may be at least 300 ppm, at least 350 ppm, at least 400 ppm, at least 450 ppm, or at least 500 ppm. In some embodiments, the CO₂concentration in the ambient air or gas stream may be at most 500 ppm, at most 450 ppm, at most 400 ppm, at most 350 ppm, or at most 300 ppm. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the CO₂concentration in the ambient air may range from about 350 ppm to about 450 ppm. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the CO₂concentration of the ambient air may have any value within this range, e.g., about 390 ppm.

In some embodiments, e.g., those in which the disclosed methods and apparatus are used to capture CO₂from a gas stream (e.g., a flue gas) or from air within an enclosed environment (e.g., the interior of a vehicle or building), the CO₂concentration in the gas stream or enclosed environment may range from about 500 ppm to about 5,000 ppm. In some embodiments, the concentration of CO₂in the gas stream or enclosed environment may be at least 500 ppm, at least 600 ppm, at least 700 ppm, at least 800 ppm, at least 900 ppm, at least 1,000 ppm, at least 1,100 ppm, at least 1,200 ppm, at least 1,300 ppm, at least 1,400 ppm, at least 1,500 ppm, at least 2,000 ppm, at least 2,500 ppm, at least 3,000 ppm, at least 4,000 ppm, or at least 5,000 ppm. In some embodiments, the concentration of CO₂in the gas stream or enclosed environment may be at most 5,000 ppm, at most 4,000 ppm, at most 3,000 ppm, at most 2,500 ppm, at most 2,000 ppm, at most 1,500 ppm, at most 1,400 ppm, at most 1,300 ppm, at most 1,200 ppm, at most 1,100 ppm, at most 1,000 ppm, at most 900 ppm, at most 800 ppm, at most 700 ppm, at most 600 ppm, or at most 500 ppm. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the CO₂concentration in the gas stream or enclosed environment may range from about 700 ppm to about 1,200 ppm. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the concentration of CO₂in the gas stream or enclosed environment may have any value within this range, e.g., about 1,050 ppm.

In some embodiments, e.g., those in which the disclosed methods and apparatus are used to capture CO₂from ambient air, the CO₂adsorption and/or release processes may be performed at an ambient temperature ranging from about −20° C. to about 40° C. For example, in some embodiments, the disclosed methods and apparatus may be suitable for direct air capture of CO₂in a cold and dry climate such as is found in northern Alaska or Canada. In some embodiments, the ambient temperature may be at least −20° C., at least −10° C., at least 0° C. at least 5° C., at least 10° C., at least 15° C., at least 20° C., at least 25° C., at least 30° C., at least 35° C., or at least 40° C. In some embodiments, the ambient temperature may be at most 40° C., at most 35° C., at most 30° C., at most 25° C., at most 20° C., at most 15° C., at most 10° C., at most 5° C., at most 0° C., at most −10° C., or at most −20° C. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the ambient temperature may range from about 15° C. to about 30° C. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the ambient temperature may have any value within this range, e.g., about 21° C.

In some embodiments, the amount of CO₂bound to the sorbent at the beginning and/or end of each capture (adsorption) and release (desorption) cycle may range from about 0% to about 100% of the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent. In some embodiments, the amount of CO₂bound to the sorbent at the beginning and/or end of each capture and release cycle may be at least 0%, at least 10%, at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% of the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent. In some embodiments, the amount of CO₂bound to the sorbent at the beginning and/or end of each capture and release cycle may be at most 100%, at most 90%, at most 80%, at most 70%, at most 60%, at most 50%, at most 40%, at most 30%, at most 20%, or at most 10% of the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the amount of CO₂bound to the sorbent at the beginning and/or end of each capture and release cycle may range from about 10% to about 80% of the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the amount of CO₂bound to the sorbent at the beginning and/or end of each capture and release cycle may have any value within this range, e.g., about 54% of the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent, and furthermore, that this value may vary with the specific choice of sorbent. In some embodiments, the amount of CO₂bound to the sorbent at the beginning and/or end of each capture and release cycle may vary depending not only on the type of sorbent used, but also on the CO₂concentration in the ambient air or gas mixture, the ambient temperature and humidity, the volumetric flow rates of the ambient air, gas mixture, and/or humid air through the packed bed or fluidized bed, etc.

In some embodiments, the maximal amount of CO₂bound to the sorbent at the end of the capture step may range from about 10% to about 100% of the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent. In some embodiments, the amount of CO₂bound to the sorbent at the end of the capture step may be at least 10%, at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% of the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent. In some embodiments, the amount of CO₂bound to the sorbent at the end of the capture process may be at most 100%, at most 90%, at most 80%, at most 70%, at most 60%, at most 50%, at most 40%, at most 30%, at most 20%, or at most 10% of the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the amount of CO₂bound to the sorbent at the end of the capture step may range from about 30% to about 80% of the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the amount of CO₂bound to the sorbent at the end of the capture step may have any value within this range, e.g., about 76% of the maximal CO₂binding capacity of the sorbent, and furthermore, that this value may vary with the specific choice of sorbent. In some embodiments, the amount of CO₂bound to the sorbent at the end of the capture step may vary depending not only on the type of sorbent used, but also on the CO₂concentration in the ambient air or gas mixture, the ambient temperature and humidity, the volumetric flow rates of the ambient air, gas mixture, and/or humid air through the packed bed or fluidized bed, etc.

As noted above, in order to meet the need for processing large volumes of ambient air (or other gases) in order to capture significant quantities of carbon dioxide without constructing an apparatus of immense size, in some embodiments the disclosed methods may comprise implementing cyclic processes further comprising carbon dioxide capture, carbon dioxide release, and/or sorbent regeneration steps. In general, the number of cycles performed is based on the time required to perform the adsorption, desorption, and/or the duration and frequency of any required sorbent regeneration steps. In some embodiments of the disclosed methods and apparatus, the number of cycles performed per day may range from about 1 to about 300. In some embodiments, the number of cycles performed may be at least 1, at least 2, at least 4, at least 6, at least 8, at least 10, at least 12, at least 14, at least 16, at least 18, at least 20, at least 22, at least 24 cycles per day, at least 25 cycles per day, at least 50 cycles per day, at least 75 cycles per day, at least 100 cycles per day, at least 125 cycles per day, at least 150 cycles per day, at least 175 cycles per day, at least 200 cycles per day, at least 225 cycles per day, at least 250 cycles per day, at least 275 cycles per day, or at least 300 cycles per day. In some embodiments, the number of cycles performed may be at most 300 cycles per day, at most 275 cycles per day, at most 250 cycles per day, at most 225 cycles per day, at most 200 cycles per day, at most 175 cycles per day, at most 150 cycles per day, at most 125 cycles per day, at most 100 cycles per day, at most 75 cycles per day, at most 50 cycles per day, at most 25 cycles per day, at most 24, at most 22, at most 20, at most 18, at most 16, at most 14, at most 12, at most 10, at most 8, or at most 6, at most 4, at most 2, or at most 1 cycles per day. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the number of cycles performed per day may range from about 8 to about 125. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the number of cycles performed per day may have any value within this range, e.g., about 12.5 cycles per day.

In general, the overall cycle time for the cyclic processes of the disclose methods and apparatus may range from about 30 minutes to about 4 hours. In some embodiments, the cycle time may be at least 30 minutes, at least 40 minutes, at least 50 minutes, at least 1 hour, at least 2 hours, at least 3 hours, or at least 4 hours. In some embodiments, the cycle time may be at most 4 hours, at most 3 hours, at most 2 hours, at most 1 hour, at most 50 minutes, at most 40 minutes, or at most 30 minutes. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, in some embodiments the cycle time may range from about 30 minutes to about 2 hours. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the cycle time may have any value within this range, e.g., about 1 hour, 12 minutes.

In general, the transfer rate at which captured and subsequently released carbon dioxide may be delivered to an enclosed environment (or released and concentrated, sequestered, or used in a secondary process) using the disclosed methods and apparatus may range from about 0.5 kg (˜11.4 mol) CO₂to about 500 kg (˜11,360 mol) CO₂per day per sorbent bed. In some embodiments, the rate at which carbon dioxide is transferred to an enclosed environment may be at least 0.5 kg, at least 1 kg CO₂, at least 10 kg CO₂, at least 25 kg CO₂, at least 50 kg CO₂, at least 75 kg CO₂, at least 100 kg CO₂, at least 125 kg CO₂, at least 150 kg CO₂, at least 175 kg CO₂, at least 200 kg CO₂, at least 225 kg CO₂, at least 250 kg CO₂, at least 275 kg CO₂, at least 300 kg CO₂, at least 325 kg CO₂, at least 350 kg CO₂, at least 375 kg CO₂, at least 400 kg CO₂, at least 425 kg CO₂, at least 450 kg CO₂, at least 475 kg CO₂, or at least 500 kg CO₂per day per sorbent bed. In some embodiments, the rate at which carbon dioxide is transferred to an enclosed environment may be at most 500 kg CO₂, at most 475 kg CO₂, at most 450 kg CO₂, at most 425 kg CO₂, at most 400 kg CO₂, at most 375 kg CO₂, at most 350 kg CO₂, at most 325 kg CO₂, at most 300 kg CO₂, at most 275 kg CO₂, at most 250 kg CO₂, at most 225 kg CO₂, at most 200 kg CO₂, at most 175 kg CO₂, at most 150 kg CO₂, at most 125 kg CO₂, at most 100 kg CO₂, at most 75 kg CO₂, at most 50 kg CO₂, at most 25 kg CO₂, at most 10 kg CO₂, at most 1 kg CO₂, or at most 0.5 kg CO₂per day per sorbent bed. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the rate at which carbon dioxide is transferred to an enclosed environment may range from about 10 kg CO₂to about 75 kg CO₂per day per sorbent bed. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the rate at which carbon dioxide is transferred to an enclosed environment may have any value within this range, e.g., about 2.5 kg CO₂per day per sorbent bed. Multi-bed installations may thus transfer CO₂in metric ton per day quantities.

In some embodiments, the volumetric flow rate of gas, ambient air, and/or humid air flowing through the one or more packed bed or fluidized bed extractors is dependent on the total cross-sectional area or total sorbent resin mass of the one or more beds. For example, the volumetric flow rate of gas, ambient air, and/or humid air flowing through the one or more packed bed or fluidized bed extractors may range from about 10 to about 100 m³/hr/kg. In some embodiments, the volumetric flow rate of gas, ambient air, and/or humid air may be at least 10 m³/hr/kg, at least 20 m³/hr/kg, at least 30 m³/hr/kg, at least 40 m³/hr/kg, at least 50 m³/hr/kg, at least 60 m³/hr/kg, at least 70 m³/hr/kg, at least 80 m³/hr/kg, at least 90 m³/hr/kg, or at least 100 m³/hr/kg. In some embodiments, the volumetric flow rate of gas, ambient air, and/or humid air may be at most 100 m³/hr/kg, at most 90 m³/hr/kg, at most 80 m³/hr/kg, at most 70 m³/hr/kg, at most 60 m³/hr/kg, at most 50 m³/hr/kg, at most 40 m³/hr/kg, at most 30 m³/hr/kg, at most 20 m³/hr/kg, or at most 10 m³/hr/kg. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the volumetric flow rate of gas, ambient air, and/or humid air may range from about 20 m³/hr/kg to about 80 m³/hr/kg. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the volumetric flow rate of gas, ambient air, and/or humid air may have any value within this range, e.g., about 20.6 m³/hr/kg.

In some embodiments, the purity of the CO₂released from the sorbent may range from about 0.1vol % pure to about 100 vol % pure without performing further purification. In some embodiments, the purity of the CO₂released from the sorbent may be at least 0.1 vol %, at least 1 vol %, at least 5 vol %, at least 10 vol %, at least 20 vol %, at least 30 vol %, at least 40 vol %, at least 50 vol %, at least 60 vol %, at least 70 vol %, at least 80 vol %, at least 90 vol %, or at least 95 vol %. In some embodiments, the purity of the CO₂released from the sorbent may be at most 95 vol %, at most 90 vol %, at most 80 vol %, at most 70 vol %, at most 60 vol %, at most 50 vol %, at most 40 vol %, at most 30 vol %, at most 20 vol %, at most 10 vol %, at most 5 vol %, or at most 1 vol %. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the purity of the CO₂released from the sorbent may range from about 5 vol % to about 80 vol %. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the purity of CO₂released from the sorbent may have any value within this range, e.g., about 0.14 vol %.

In some embodiments, e.g., those in which the CO₂released from the sorbent is delivered to an enclosed environment (e.g., a greenhouse or other structure), the resulting CO₂concentration of the air inside the greenhouse, i.e., the “indoor air”, may range from about 200 ppm to about 4,000 ppm, or higher. In some embodiments, the resulting CO₂concentration of the greenhouse air (or indoor air) may be at least 200 ppm, at least 300 ppm, at least 400 ppm, at least 500 ppm, at least 600 ppm, at least 700 ppm, at least 800 ppm, at least 900 ppm, at least 1,000 ppm, at least 1,100 ppm, at least 1,200 ppm, at least 1,300 ppm, at least 1,400 ppm, at least 1,500 ppm, at least 2,000 ppm, at least 2,500 ppm, at least 3,000 ppm, or at least 4,000 ppm. In some embodiments, the resulting CO₂concentration of the greenhouse air (or indoor air) may be at most 4,000 ppm, at most 3,000 ppm, at most 2,500 ppm, at most 2,000 ppm, at most 1,500 ppm, at most 1,400 ppm, at most 1,300 ppm, at most 1,200 ppm, at most 1,100 ppm, at most 1,000 ppm, at most 900 ppm, at most 800 ppm, at most 700 ppm, at most 600 ppm, at most 500 ppm, at most 400 ppm, at most 300 ppm, or at most 200 ppm. Any of the lower and upper values described in this paragraph may be combined to form a range included within the present disclosure, for example, the CO₂concentration of the greenhouse air (or indoor air) may range from about 800 ppm to about 1,400 ppm. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the CO₂concentration of the greenhouse air (or indoor air) may have any value within this range, e.g., about 1,050 ppm.

In some embodiments, e.g., those in which the CO₂released from the sorbent is delivered to an enclosed environment (e.g., a greenhouse or other structure) and a combination of CO₂sensors and/or humidity sensors and feedback circuitry are used to monitor and control the CO₂concentration and/or humidity of the air inside the greenhouse by varying, for example, the volumetric flow rate of ambient air or humid air flowing through the one or more packed bed or fluidized bed extractors, the CO₂content of the greenhouse air may be maintained within a specified range of a desired target level for all or a portion of the day/night cycle. For example, in some embodiments, the CO₂content of the greenhouse air may be maintained within a coefficient of variation of ±5%, ±10%, ±15%, or ±20% of the target CO₂level. In some embodiments, the relative humidity of the greenhouse air may also be maintained within a specified range of a desired target level for all or a portion of the day/night cycle. For example, in some embodiments, the relative humidity of the greenhouse air may be maintained within a coefficient of variation of ±5%, ±10%, ±15%, or ±20% of the target relative humidity level.

Because of the high CO₂capture and release efficiencies and low energy input requirements for the disclosed methods and apparatus (in particular, when using the preferred humidity swing release mechanism for release of captured CO₂from a suitable sorbent), the total cost per ton of CO₂that is captured and subsequently released for delivery to an enclosed environment (or released and concentrated, sequestered, converted to a useful product, or used in a secondary process) may be very low. For example, in some embodiments, the total cost for CO₂captured from ambient air and delivered to an enclosed environment may range from about $10 per ton to about $1,000 per ton. In some embodiments, the total cost for CO₂captured from ambient air and delivered to an enclosed environment may be at least $10 per ton, at least $50 per ton, at least $100 per ton, at least $200 per ton, at least $300 per ton, at least $400 per ton, at least $500 per ton, at least $600 per ton, at least $700 per ton, at least $800 per ton, at least $900 per ton, or at least $1,000 per ton. In some embodiments, the total cost for CO₂captured from ambient air and delivered to an enclosed environment may be at most $1,000, at most $900, at most $800, at most $700, at most $600, at most $500, at most $400, at most $300, at most $200, at most $100 per ton, at most $50 per ton, or at most $10 per ton. Any of the values within this paragraph may be combined to form a range included in the present disclosure. For example, the total cost for CO₂captured from ambient air and delivered to an enclosed environment may range from about $50 per ton to about $200 per ton. Those of skill in the art will recognize that in specific embodiments, the total cost of the CO₂captured and delivered to an enclosed environment may have any value within this range, for example, about $95 per ton.

The total cost for installing and operating carbon dioxide capture technologies may include contributions from: (i) capital investment, (ii) the cost of capture (i.e., the cost of energy required for operating the process), (iii) the cost of CO₂release and regeneration of the sorbent, and (iv) the cost of sorbent losses and maintenance of equipment (Sans-Perez, et al. (2016)). Depending on how the captured CO₂is subsequently utilized, there may be additional costs incurred for: (v) CO₂compression, (vi) CO₂transportation, (vii) geological sequestration or other forms of sequestration, (viii) leakage monitoring, and/or correcting or minimizing any unforeseen environmental impact. Past cost analyses have estimated that the total costs for direct capture of CO₂from ambient air may range from about $30 to about $1,000 per ton, with most estimates coming in at the several hundred dollars per ton level. In preferred embodiments of the methods, devices, and systems disclosed herein, the use of a moisture swing release mechanism may dramatically lower the total cost for direct capture of CO₂from ambient air (or indoor air), i.e., by circumventing the large energy penalties incurred through the use of thermal swing, vacuum swing, steam stripping, and other release mechanisms.

In preferred embodiments, the total cost of implementing the disclosed CO₂capture methods, devices, and systems may be offset by subsequently converting the captured CO₂to a useful product or by employing it in a secondary commercial process. Thus, in some embodiments, the net cost of for CO₂captured from ambient air and delivered to an enclosed environment (or released and concentrated for subsequent sale, converted to a useful product, or used in a secondary process) may range from about $10 per ton to about $1,000 per ton. In some embodiments, the net cost for CO₂captured from ambient air and delivered to an enclosed environment may be at least $10 per ton, at least $50 per ton, at least $100 per ton, at least $200 per ton, at least $300 per ton, at least $400 per ton, at least $500 per ton, at least $600 per ton, at least $700 per ton, at least $800 per ton, at least $900 per ton, or at least $1,000 per ton. In some embodiments, the net cost for CO₂captured from ambient air and delivered to an enclosed environment may be at most $1,000, at most $900, at most $800, at most $700, at most $600, at most $500, at most $400, at most $300, at most $200, at most $100 per ton, at most $50 per ton, or at most $10 per ton. Any of the values within this paragraph may be combined to form a range included in the present disclosure. For example, the net cost for CO₂captured from ambient air and delivered to an enclosed environment may range from about $50 per ton to about $200 per ton. Those of skill in the art will recognize that in specific embodiments, the net cost of the CO₂captured and delivered to an enclosed environment may have any value within this range, for example, about $55 per ton.

FIG. 3 provides a schematic illustration of one non-limiting example of an apparatus for capturing carbon dioxide from ambient air and transferring it to the interior of a greenhouse, wherein the apparatus comprises a single fluidized bed extractor and air flow is driven by a fan that runs continuously. The apparatus comprises two pairs of inlet and outlet ducts—one set that connects with the ambient air, and one set that connects with the interior of the greenhouse. The fan is located in the common flow path connecting the inlets to the outlets, and which includes the fluidized bed extractor comprising the sorbent material. In a preferred embodiment, the sorbent material comprises a strong base, type 2 anion exchange resin and a humidity swing release mechanism is employed. Two pairs of valves—one pair positioned within the ambient air inlet and outlet ducts, and one pair positioned within the greenhouse inlet and outlet ducts—are controlled by an air flow controller and are used to control which inlet air stream is contacted with the fluidized bed extractor at any given time. In operation, a flow of relatively dry ambient air is driven through the fluidized bed extractor by the fan for a first specified period of time while the greenhouse inlet and outlet valves are held shut, thereby enabling capture of CO₂from the ambient air by the sorbent. Following the first specified period of time, the ambient air inlet and outlet valves are shut and the fan drives a flow of humid greenhouse air through the fluidized bed reactor for a second specified period of time, thereby causing release of the adsorbed CO₂(in the case that the sorbent comprises a strong base, type 2 anion exchange material) and its delivery to the greenhouse interior. In some embodiments, the release of CO₂by a strong base, type 2 anion exchange material may be facilitated by using an aqueous spray or wetting mechanism in conjunction with the flow of greenhouse air through the fluidized bed. In some embodiments, e.g., when an alternative sorbent is used in the fluidized bed, the release of CO₂by the sorbent material may be facilitated, e.g., by using a heater to heat the inlet greenhouse air and/or the fluidized bed extractor in conjunction with the flow of greenhouse air through the fluidized bed. In some embodiments, the first specified period of time may be the same as or different from the second specified period of time. In some embodiments, a packed bed extractor may be used instead of a fluidized bed extractor. An air flow controller may be used to control the operation of the fan (e.g., on/off status, fan rotation speed, etc.) and/or the valves positioned in the ambient air and greenhouse inlets and outlets, and allows for manual, semi-automated, or automated control of the switching between ambient air and greenhouse air flow as well as other cyclic operational parameters.

FIG. 4 provides a schematic illustration of another non-limiting example of an apparatus for capturing carbon dioxide from ambient air and transferring it to the interior of a greenhouse, wherein the apparatus comprises a single fluidized bed extractor and air flow is driven by the operation of two fans that cycle between on and off states. Although illustrated in this figure as comprising a single fluidized bed, in some embodiments a modular system may be installed that comprises multiple fluidized beds, where the air flow through each bed is controlled by its own pair of fans, and the respective inlets and outlets for each bed are optionally connected through inlet and outlet manifolds to a single pair of ambient air and greenhouse inlets and outlets. The apparatus illustrated in FIG. 4 comprises two pairs of inlet and outlet ducts—one set that connects with the ambient air, and one set that connects with the interior of the greenhouse. There is a fan located in each of the ambient air and greenhouse air inlet ducts. The latter connect to the common flow path connecting the inlets to the outlets, and which also includes the fluidized bed extractor comprising the sorbent material. In a preferred embodiment, the sorbent material comprises a strong base, type 2 anion exchange resin and a humidity swing release mechanism is employed. Two pairs of valves—one pair positioned within the ambient air inlet and outlet ducts, and one pair positioned within the greenhouse inlet and outlet ducts—are controlled by an air flow controller which also controls the two inlet fans, and are used in conjunction with the fans to control which inlet air stream is contacted with the fluidized bed extractor at any given time. In operation, a flow of relatively dry ambient air is driven through the fluidized bed extractor by the ambient air inlet fan for a first specified period of time while the greenhouse air inlet fan is off, and the greenhouse inlet and outlet valves are held shut, thereby enabling capture of CO₂from the ambient air by the sorbent. Following the first specified period of time, the ambient air inlet fan is turned off and the ambient air inlet and outlet valves are shut, the greenhouse air inlet fan is turned on and the greenhouse inlet and outlet valves are opened, and the greenhouse inlet fan drives a flow of humid greenhouse air through the fluidized bed reactor for a second specified period of time, thereby causing release of the adsorbed CO₂(in the case that the sorbent comprises a strong base, type 2 anion exchange material) and its delivery to the greenhouse interior. In some embodiments, the release of CO₂by a strong base, type 2 anion exchange material may be facilitated by using an aqueous spray or wetting mechanism in conjunction with the flow of greenhouse air through the fluidized bed. In some embodiments, e.g., when an alternative sorbent is used in the fluidized bed, the release of CO₂by the sorbent material may be facilitated, e.g., by using a heater to heat the inlet greenhouse air and/or the fluidized bed extractor in conjunction with the flow of greenhouse air through the fluidized bed. In some embodiments, the first specified period of time may be the same as or different from the second specified period of time. In some embodiments, a packed bed extractor may be used instead of a fluidized bed extractor. An air flow controller may be used to control the operation of the two inlet fans (e.g., on/off status, fan rotation speed, etc.) and/or the valves positioned in the ambient air and greenhouse inlets and outlets, and allows for manual, semi-automated, or automated control of the switching between ambient air and greenhouse air flow as well as other cyclic operational parameters. As noted above, the apparatus illustrated in FIG. 4 may be used as an individual module for the installation of modular systems that allow for flexible expansion of CO₂capture and delivery capacity.

FIG. 5 provides a schematic illustration of another non-limiting example of an apparatus for capturing carbon dioxide from ambient air and transferring it to the interior of a greenhouse, wherein the apparatus comprises a single fluidized bed extractor and air flow is driven by fans that are located in the ductwork of the greenhouse (or other structure in some embodiments) rather than within the apparatus itself. Again, although illustrated in this figure as comprising a single fluidized bed, in some embodiments a multiple bed system may be installed, where the air flow through multiple beds is controlled a fan, or more than one fan, located in the ductwork of the greenhouse (or other structure). A multi-bed installation based on the design approach illustrated in FIG. 5 may prove to be more capital efficient than a multi-bed system based on the modular apparatus illustrated in FIG. 4.

FIG. 6 provides a schematic illustration of one non-limiting example of an apparatus for capturing carbon dioxide from ambient air and transferring it to the interior of a greenhouse, wherein the apparatus comprises a plurality of fluidized bed extractors operated in parallel. Ambient air inlet and return manifolds are connected to a plurality of fluidized bed extractors in parallel, which in turn are connected to greenhouse air inlet and return manifolds. As with the apparatus illustrated in FIGS. 3-5, an air flow controller may be used in combination with two or more fans (not shown) and valves (not shown) to control and alternate between flows of ambient air and greenhouse air through the two or more fluidized beds. In operation, a flow of relatively dry ambient air is driven through the two or more fluidized bed extractors for a first specified period of time by one or more fans located at the ambient air inlet and/or outlet, or within the duct work connected to the ambient air inlet and/or outlet, thereby enabling capture of CO₂from the ambient air by the sorbent. Optionally, a series of valves may be used to isolate the two or more fluidized beds from the greenhouse air inlet and return manifolds while ambient air is being contacted with the sorbent within the fluidized bed extractors. Following the first specified period of time, the ambient air inlet and/or outlet fan(s) are turned off and, optionally, a series of valves are used to isolate the two or more fluidized beds from the ambient air inlet and return manifolds. One or more fans connected to the greenhouse air inlet and/or outlet, or within the duct work connected to the greenhouse air inlet and/or outlet, are then turned on to drive a flow of humid greenhouse air through the two or more fluidized bed reactors for a second specified period of time, thereby causing release of the adsorbed CO₂(in the case that the sorbent comprises a strong base, type 2 anion exchange material) and its delivery to the greenhouse interior. In some embodiments, the release of CO₂by a strong base, type 2 anion exchange material may be facilitated by using an aqueous spray or wetting mechanism in conjunction with the flow of greenhouse air through the two or more fluidized beds. In some embodiments, e.g., when an alternative sorbent is used in the two or more fluidized beds, the release of CO₂by the sorbent material may be facilitated, e.g., by using heater(s) to heat the inlet greenhouse air and/or the two or more fluidized bed extractors in conjunction with the flow of greenhouse air through the two or more fluidized beds. In some embodiments, the first specified period of time may be the same as or different from the second specified period of time. In some embodiments, two or more packed bed extractors may be used instead of two or more fluidized bed extractors. In some embodiments, a combination of packed bed and fluidized bed extractors may be used. In some embodiments, different types of sorbent may be used in the two or more packed bed and/or fluidized bed extractors. An air flow controller may be used to control the operation of the two or more fans (e.g., on/off status, fan rotation speed, etc.) and/or the valves used to isolate the two or more fluidized bed extractors from the ambient air or greenhouse air inlet and return manifolds, and allows for manual, semi-automated, or automated control of the switching between ambient air and greenhouse air flow as well as other cyclic operational parameters.

EXAMPLES

These examples are provided for illustrative purposes only and not to limit the scope of the claims provided herein.

Example 1
Simulation of Fluidized Bed Extractor Performance

FIG. 7 provides one non-limiting example of simulation data for a fluidized bed extractor which illustrates the predicted relationships between bed height, pressure drop across the bed, and the carbon dioxide transfer capacity of the bed, i.e., the amount of carbon dioxide captured from ambient air and subsequently released by the bed (in units of grams CO₂per humidity swing cycle) under a defined set of bed design parameters and operating conditions.

Example 2
Experimental Performance Data for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Release Using a Humidity Swing

FIG. 8 provides one non-limiting example of experimental performance data for carbon dioxide capture and release using a fluidized bed extractor, wherein CO₂is released from an anion exchange resin using a humidity swing cycle of approximately 120 minutes in duration (approximately 60 minutes of adsorption and 60 minutes of desorption). Tests were performed in an open-loop, laboratory-scale environmental chamber utilizing a 2″ diameter tube (1.87″ inner diameter) as the housing for a fluidized bed consisting of 74 grams of a commercial anion exchange resin (Purolite A500 (OH form), Purolite, Bala Cynwyd, Pa.). The inlet gas flows for each swing segment was set to 25 standard liters per minute (slpm) and temperature was held between 22° C. and 23° C. The conditions of the ambient or adsorption flow were 8.5 ppt H₂O (32% RH) and ˜430 ppm CO₂. The desorption gas stream conditions were ˜23 ppt H₂O (˜85% RH) and 850 ppm CO₂(simulated greenhouse conditions). Inlet and outlet CO₂and H₂O concentrations were monitored using separate Li-Cor Li-840A CO_2/H₂O gas analyzers.

Without the resin in place, approximate step changes in CO₂and H₂O concentrations were measured as the inlet gas stream was cycled between adsorption and desorption flows. With the resin in place, the low H₂O level of the ambient gas stream drew water from the resin (desorbs water) and freed up reactive sites to adsorb CO₂. During the CO₂adsorption phase, the gas leaving the resin bed had higher H₂O and lower CO₂concentrations than that entering the bed. Conversely during the CO₂desorption phase, the gas leaving the bed had lower H₂O and higher CO₂concentrations than that entering the bed.

Example 3
Description of a “Typical” Humidity Swing Cycle for a Pilot CO₂Capture System

FIG. 9 provides one non-limiting example of CO₂adsorption isotherm data for a typical “moisture swing” cycle using a humidity-sensitive sorbent at 25 C. The proposed prototype CO₂capture system is designed to achieve a transfer capacity of approximately 1.4 kg CO_2/day over 18 hours (75 gm CO_2/hr). The system is designed to operate near the lower practical capacity limit for a commercial unit. As envisioned, the system will consist of two fluidized sorbent beds that are connected in parallel and that operate 180-degrees out of phase, e.g., one will undergo an adsorption cycle while the other is undergoing a desorption cycle.

The design specification assumes that the gas stream conditions (e.g., temperature, CO₂concentrations, H₂O concentrations, specific gas throughput, etc.) for the gases that cycle through the unit result in an effective transfer capacity equal to 1.25 gm CO_2/nominal kg resin/swing cycle (where the term “nominal kg resin” refers to the “as delivered” or “out of the box” condition of the sorbent resin). The swing cycle refers to a pair of sequential adsorption and desorption steps. For the given example, a 2 hour swing cycle was symmetric, i.e., consisting of a 1 hour adsorption step and a 1 hour desorption step.

As mentioned in the technical literature (Wong, et. al., 2013), CO₂and H₂O compete for binding sites on the active resin. The transfer of CO₂to and from the resin, as well as the inverse flow of moisture, is driven by the concentration gradient-based driving force between the gas streams and the resin as the system tends towards thermodynamic equilibrium. For a given system temperature and gas phase moisture level, there exists an equilibrium relationship between the gas phase CO₂concentration (partial pressure) and the number or fraction of resin sites occupied by CO₂. The resin's maximum effective transfer capacity can therefore be expressed as the difference in resin site occupancy under the different gas stream conditions, similar to the manner in which temperature swing adsorption capacity may be defined by the difference in site occupancy between points on different adsorption isotherms. FIG. 9 illustrates the relation between site occupancy and CO₂partial pressure based on a Langmuir model using data from Wong, et al. (2013) (Excellion I-200 resin sheet; binding isotherm data collected at 25 C). At low gas moisture levels (5 ppt H₂0; ˜16% Relative Humidity), the initial slope between site occupancy and gas phase CO₂level is steep and “levels off” as it approaches saturation (>90% capacity). In this example, a fractional capacity of ˜97% occupancy is reached at typical ambient CO₂levels (˜400 ppm). At higher moisture levels, the initial slope decreases and the “leveling off” occurs at lower occupancy level. At 20 ppt moisture level (˜64% Relative Humidity), an equivalent occupancy level is not reached until the CO₂level exceeds 3500 ppm.

FIG. 9 illustrates how the moisture swing capacity is defined by the operating conditions. Starting at point A1, the end of the adsorption cycle, the resin has been exposed to the ambient air stream (400 ppm CO₂and 5 ppt H₂0) long enough for the CO₂site occupancy to be approximately equal to the equilibrium level (˜97%). As the gas flow through the bed is switched from the “dry” ambient air source to a “wet” greenhouse air source having an elevated CO₂level (e.g., ˜800 ppm), the system shifts from the 5 ppt isotherm curve to the 20 ppt isotherm curve, i.e., from point A1 to point X1, and starts the desorption step process. The gas phase CO₂concentration immediately adjacent to the resin surface initially rises to near the equilibrium level (3500 ppm). As the CO₂is swept away and the resin site CO₂occupancy drops, the gas phase CO₂tends towards the ambient level, and the system moves from point X1 to point D1 (˜88% occupancy) along the 20 ppt isotherm curve. The net effect of movement along the isotherm is desorption of CO₂and corresponding adsorption of H₂O. When the gas flows are switched back to the ambient source, the system moves from point D1 to point X2. During the adsorption step, the system moves along the 5 ppt isotherm, from X1 to A1, adsorbing CO₂and releasing H₂O. At point A1, the moisture swing is complete, with the net effect being transfer of CO₂from the ambient to the greenhouse and transfer of H₂O in the reverse direction. The amount of CO₂transferred (transfer capacity) is defined by the difference in site occupancy at points A1 and D1, or ˜9% (97%-88%) of the overall sites available. The resin's capacity is determined by: (i) the relative positions of the respective isotherms (greater separation between the two curves corresponds to larger capacity) and (ii) the CO₂concentration of the respective gas streams (low desorption CO₂values correspond to larger transfer capacity).

Roughly 66 kg of “as delivered” resin are required to provide the target pilot scale capacity in this example. Initially the resin contains 50%-60% water, by weight. It loses most of the water during the first adsorption step and operates within a relatively narrow range of lower moisture loading during typical swing cycles. Normally, the resin bed's mass, and bulk density, is roughly half of the “as delivered” value. The resin bed depth is determined by the target bed pressure drop which, in turn, sets the resin bed's cross sectional area. For the pilot scale example, setting the operating pressure drop to 2.5 in. H₂O translates to a 7.3″ (0.185 m) resting bed height and a 5.65 ft²(0.525 m²) cross sectional area. Depending on whether one or two resin beds are employed, the diameter of cylindrical beds would be 32.2″ (0.818 m) or 22.8″ (0.578 m), respectively.

The operating conditions (temperature, humidity and CO₂levels) of the ambient and enclosed space air streams determine the effective resin bed capacity (gm CO_2/kg resin/swing cycle). The total resin volume is set by the target system capacity, the resin's per-swing capacity, and the cycle/swing duration. The resin bed depth is determined by the acceptable pressure drop (e.g., blower cost per unit CO₂captured). The overall resin bed area is determined by the resin capacity (volume) and bed depth. The required air flow through the resin bed is determined by swing cycle time and the average concentration difference realized during the swing cycle. Individual resin bed dimensions are limited by screen and support costs; beyond a certain size, multiple resin beds will be needed.

Example 4
Capture Systems Comprising a Two-Stage, Recirculating Fluidized Bed Extractor

Two of the main challenges in capturing CO₂from air in a carbon neutral or carbon negative fashion arise from the facts that the concentration of CO₂in the atmosphere is very low (e.g., about 410 ppm (or about 350 times lower than the concentration of CO₂found in coal-based flue gas)), and that many of the conventional technologies for capturing CO₂pre- or post-combustion in flue gas applications perform poorly at such low CO₂concentrations, with very low CO₂uptake and poor CO₂selectivity, thereby dictating that large volumes of air must be processed in order to capture significant quantities of carbon dioxide. For example, the density of air at sea level and 15° C. is approximately 1.225 kg/m³. At an atmospheric concentration of 410 ppm, the volume of air that must be processed to capture 1 kg of CO₂(at 100% efficiency) is therefore approximately 1/((410×1.225)/(10⁶))≅2,000 m³. The requirement for handling large volumes of air comes at the expense of the energy consumption required to move the air past or through the sorbent material, the cost for which will in general scale with the pressure drop across the extractor used to contact the air with the sorbent. Another significant cost for many extractor systems is the energy cost associated with the use of a thermal swing or pressure jump mechanism to release CO₂or other adsorbed species from the sorbent material.

Prototype systems have been built and tested that comprise the use of an immobilized quaternary ammonium cation-based solid sorbent for CO₂capture through a reversible chemical reaction. Using amine-functionalized solid sorbents presents multiple advantages when compared to conventional methods for capturing CO₂from flue gas based on, e.g., aqueous amine solutions. The latter deactivate rapidly when placed in contact with oxygen under the conditions required for regeneration. and suffer from significant solvent loss via evaporation as a consequence of being in contact with massive flows of air. Solid amine-based sorbents applied in a gas-solid process such as direct air capture (DAC) also exhibit much faster adsorption kinetics, higher CO₂capacity, higher stability, and higher resistance to contaminants compared to aqueous amine solutions.

One major advantage conferred by the use of specific amine-based solid sorbents, e.g., strong base, type II anion exchange materials, is the ability to implement a “moisture swing” (or “humidity swing”) release mechanism whereby the sorbent is capable of adsorbing CO₂when dry and releases the bound CO₂when wet. As shown in FIG. 10, in dry conditions in the presence of CO₂, bicarbonate species are formed and bound to the resin. When the material is wetted, CO₂is desorbed due to the formation of carbonate species. This approach uses the energy released during evaporation, thus avoiding the energy-consuming desorption step of temperature swing or vacuum swing release mechanisms. Although evaporation is spontaneous, it requires enthalpy, provided by the flow of air through the sorbent, and requires water losses estimated to be between 12 and 37 mol H₂O per mol of CO₂released. The moisture in this process may be applied in the form of a liquid, fine droplets (as in a spray or in a fog), or humidity.

Despite requiring little or no energy for release of CO₂from the sorbent, humidity swing-based direct air capture (HS-DAC) processes have comparable carbon dioxide capture efficiency to other direct CO₂capture methods. Preliminary results for a resin tested using an HS-DAC process yielded a CO₂uptake in dry air of 0.86 mmol/g resin. Improvements to the resin used for HS-DAC have improved upon the early results, and recent data have yielded CO₂uptakes of 2.26 mmol/g resin at 25° C., which is close to the highest level of CO₂loading reported in the literature to date under direct air capture conditions (2.50 mmol/g resin). The HS-DAC process is completely reversible and repeatable, and because the desorption step doesn't require exposure to vacuum or high temperature, the lifetime of the sorbent may be significantly enhanced without diminished performance or material degradation.

Fluidized beds have been widely used for a variety of industrial applications (e.g., catalytic cracking, coal/biomass combustion and gasification), and provide high mass and heat transfer rates while maintaining very high contact efficiency between the gas and a solid sorbent material and minimizing pressure drops across the sorbent bed. We have tested quaternary ammonium cation-based solid sorbents in two bubbling fluidized bed (BFB) reactors adapted for the humidity swing DAC method. The first system was designed to operate at small scale (i.e., using gram scale quantities of sorbent) and enabled testing and screening of multiple sorbents and adsorption/desorption conditions. The second system was designed to work as a pilot demonstration unit to evaluate the performance of the sorbent on a much larger scale (i.e., using kilogram quantities of sorbent). This later system has generated test data that demonstrates the feasibility of the HS-DAC approach for designing and operating large scale direct air capture systems.

Single-stage fluidized bed extractor: FIG. 3 provides a schematic illustration of the first system, e.g., a BFB chamber, wherein the sorbent was contacted with ambient air. Thermo-couples and pressure sensors, as well as a see-through window, were installed to monitor the fluidized bed behavior. At the bottom and at the top of the BFB two screens were installed to prevent loss of sorbent. At the bottom of the BFB, gas inlets for CO₂-containing dry inlet air and moist air were installed, with individual valves and mass flow controllers installed to control the gas feed for the adsorption and desorption steps. A separate, electrically-heated moisture saturator was used to generate the moist air for desorbing CO₂from the sorbent in system tests. CO₂concentrations at the inlet and outlet of the BFB were continuously monitored using calibrated CO₂analyzers

Two-stage fluidized bed extractor system: Currently we are completing the engineering design of a full-scale commercial HS-DAC system in which carbon dioxide present in the inlet air is extracted by passing large volumes of inlet air through a first fluidized bed comprising the sorbent (at relatively low energy costs), and the adsorbed CO₂is subsequently released at very low energy cost by using a humidity swing release mechanism, i.e., by contacting the sorbent with humid air. The design is related to one described by Zhang, et al. (2014), “Capturing CO₂from ambient air using a polyethyleneimine—silica adsorbent in fluidized beds”, Chem. Eng. Sci. 116:306-316, although the authors of that paper describe the use of a mesoporous silica-supported polyethyleneimine (PEI)—silica sorbent for CO₂capture, and the use of a thermal swing release mechanism with or without the inclusion of moisture in the stripping gas to prevent thermal degradation of the sorbent at the high temperatures used for desorption.

As illustrated in FIG. 11, one embodiment of the presently disclosed system 1100 comprises a first stage circulating fluidized bed (CFB) absorber 1104 to capture the CO₂from ambient air (which enters the system through inlet 1102), a cyclone separator 1106 to separate the CO₂-loaded sorbent particles from the CO₂-depleted air (which exits the system through outlet 1108), and a second stage BFB desorber 1110 to release the bound CO₂(which exits the system via condenser/concentrator 1112 and exits through outlet 1114) and regenerate the sorbent. A loop seal enables the regenerated sorbent to return to CFB adsorber. The decision to use separate chambers operating as CFB and BFB stages was based on the different kinetic requirements for adsorption and desorption. In one non-limiting example, the CFB adsorber 1104 is designed to have a cross-sectional area of approximately 113 m²(12 meter diameter) and a height of 40 meters, both of which are fairly typical dimensions for industrial-scale CFB-based facilities. The height was chosen to ensure sufficient gas—solid contact time with an air intake velocity of approximately 4 meters/sec. In this non-limiting example, a cylindrical BFB desorber 1110 with a smaller dimension of 4 meters in diameter and 5 meters in height was designed to act as the regenerator (desorber) for the sorbent. As the stripping gas (humid air) has a much smaller flow rate, the BFB desorber is operated in the bubbling fluidization regime. Condenser/concentrator 1112 is configured to concentrate the CO₂released from a sorbent (which exits the system via outlet 1114), and to condense and recycle the water present in the humid air used to release CO₂from the sorbent (which exits the system via outlet 1116). In some instances, the recycled water may be used to hydrate air to create or supplement the humid air introduced to the BFB desorber 1110 through inlet 1118. In some instances, the recycled water may be sprayed directly on the sorbent within the BFB desorber 1110 (dotted lines) through one or more spray nozzles connected to inlet 1118 or otherwise incorporated into the BFB desorber 1110 to facilitate the release of CO₂from the sorbent. In some instances, water from another source (or in combination with the recycled water) may be used to humidify air introduced through inlet 1118 or may be sprayed directly on the sorbent within the BFB desorber 1110.

In some embodiments, the sorbent used in the fluidized beds, e.g., an anion exchange material or resin, is contacted with a stream of the inlet air entering the first fluidized bed (i.e., the CFB reactor 1104) which may be ambient (i.e., atmospheric) air or indoor air. In some embodiments, the ambient air or indoor air may be pre-conditioned to maintain a temperature and/or humidity within a specified range. In some embodiments, the system may be operated in geographical locales where the humidity of ambient air or indoor air is typically very low such that no pre-conditioning is required.

In some embodiments, a pressure gradient (dotted triangle) may be applied across the cyclone separator 1106 (e.g., comprising a reduced pressure near the outlet of the separator) to facilitate separation of CO₂-loaded sorbent particles from the CO₂-depleted air. In some instances, the reduced pressure near the outlet of the separator may be about 750 Torr, about 725 Torr, about 700 Torr, about 675 torr, about 650 Torr, about 625 Torr, about 600 Torr, about 575 Torr, about 550 Torr, about 525 Torr, about 500 Torr, or lower. In some embodiments, the connection between the outlet of the cyclone separator 1106 and the inlet of the BFB desorber 1110 may be sealed, and a vacuum applied to the sorbent within the desorber (as described previously) to facilitate release of CO₂from the sorbent particles and provide a more concentrated stream of CO₂. In some embodiments, the temperature of the interior of the BFB desorber 1110 may be elevated (e.g., to about 40° C.) to facilitate release of CO₂from the sorbent particles. In some instances, elevating the temperature within the BFB desorber 1110 may offset an air temperature decrease (e.g., about 10-15° C.) incurred as the air passes through CFB adsorber 1104.

In some embodiments, the humid air used for releasing bound CO₂form the sorbent may be humid air delivered via inlet 1118 from a greenhouse (or other biomass growing system). In some embodiments, the air stream or concentrated gas stream comprising the released CO₂is passed from the second fluidized bed (i.e., the BFB reactor 1110) back to a greenhouse or other biomass growing system via outlet 1114.

In some embodiments, the system 1100 illustrated in FIG. 11 may be configured to deliver the captured CO₂to a storage tank and stored for later use. In some embodiments, the system may be configured to deliver the captured CO₂to a secondary process, e.g., for production of synthetic fuels or other products (or any of the other secondary processes outlined above). In yet other embodiments, the system may be configured to deliver the captured CO₂to a greenhouse or other biomass growing system, where enhanced levels of carbon dioxide may facilitate the rate of plant growth.

As illustrated in FIG. 11, in some embodiments the system may comprise a condenser 1112 for condensing and recycling the water present in the humid air after contacting it with the sorbent, thereby enabling its reuse, e.g., for irrigation purposes.

Conversion or sequestration of captured CO₂: In some embodiments, the system 1100 depicted in FIG. 11 may be used to capture CO₂from the atmosphere and deliver it for conversion to useful products, to stimulate growth of plants or other sources of biomass (e.g., algae), or to sequester it, e.g., by converting it to a form that may be safely mixed into the soil.

For example, in one preferred embodiment, a direct air capture system as depicted in FIG. 11 or as described elsewhere in this disclosure may be connected to, or integrated with, a controlled environment agriculture (CEA) system optimized for growing Lemna, a rapidly growing aquatic plant that has been widely used as a feedstock for raising domestic animals and may also be processed to produce starch and protein. Closed growing systems prevent water loss, and enable water and nutrient recycling. In chambers comprising high concentrations of CO₂, the growth rate of Lemna can be increased several fold over its rate in ambient concentrations. Under optimal conditions, Lemna may produce 64 grams of biomass per gram starting weight in a week. At carbon dioxide concentrations of 1500 ppm, we have achieved biomass growth rates of 8× every 24 to 48 hours.

In addition to providing a valuable feedstock, the growth of Lemna in environmentally-controlled systems supplied with CO₂by a direct air capture system also provides a means for sequestering excess CO₂. Plants draw down CO₂present in the atmosphere. About half is returned to the atmosphere by plant respiration, while the rest is converted into new biomass via photosynthesis. The remaining CO₂trapped in biomass is eventually released back in the atmosphere upon decomposition. Intercepting the carbon cycle and trapping the carbon fixed by plants in a stable form provides a means for creating an efficient carbon sink that helps to reduce atmospheric CO₂.

Pyrolysis is an example of a process for trapping the carbon captured by plants in a stable form. During pyrolysis, organic material is heated in the absence of oxygen and thermo-chemically converted into carbon-rich solid (biochar) and volatile matter (syngas and bio-oil). Through the use of pyrolysis, “labile” biomass carbon—carbon that is easily degraded and recycles continuously in the biosphere—can be converted into “recalcitrant” carbon which resists degradation and can be safely sequestered in soil. While biogenic organic materials provide only temporary carbon storage—with an estimated half-life of only weeks—carbon in the form of biochar can be stable in soil for tens of thousands of years. Estimates of the amount of land available to receive converted carbon in the form of biochar suggest that between 80 and 270 gigatons of carbon could be sequestered in the soil, a range that is similar to estimates of the current atmospheric imbalance of CO₂of about 220 gigatons. Sequestering carbon in the form of biochar returned to soil has the additional benefit of activating existing natural carbon sinks by enhancing soil quality and restoring the complex soil ecosystem. Addition of biochar to soil increases plant growth, improves the soil's physical properties, enhances soil moisture storage, increases pH in acidic soil, reduces nutrient-loss as well as methane-release in hydromorphic soil, enhances microbial and mycorrhizal growth, and accelerates nitrification with the net effect of promoting the accumulation of humic materials.

Lemna are extremely amenable to pyrolysis conversion, and the biochar obtained from Lemna is light and highly porous—ideal for soil priming. Analysis of Lemna pyrolysis products has shown that biochar is the most prevalent product, with an average yield of 48%, closely followed by bio-oil (38%) and syngas (13%). Syngas is highly valuable as it can be used to produce electricity or converted into biofuel(s). Bio-oil and syngas obtained from Lemna pyrolysis are highly valuable as they can be transformed into bio-diesel and bio-fuels using well established Fischer-Tropsch (FT) technology at a scale that could be economically competitive with petroleum based processes.

Lemna growing systems: As noted, in some embodiments, a direct air capture system of the present disclosure, such as the one illustrated in FIG. 11, may be connected to or integrated with a system designed and optimized for growing Lemna that is sustainable, environmentally sound, economically feasible, and optimized for productivity. In some embodiments, the system design may comprise the use of vertical closed-system greenhouses with minimal water and nutrient recycling and with minimal carbon emissions. The use of such a closed-system may also enable one to locate and operate these systems on marginal land, thereby minimizing or eliminating the impact on the use of valuable arable land.

State-of-the art controlled environment technologies may be integrated with the disclosed direct air capture systems to develop self-sustaining Lemna farms that have minimal impact on natural resources. In one embodiment, a Lemna farm may comprise one or more glass greenhouses each of which contain one or more high-density ventilated racks housing one or more tiers of Lemna growing chambers (e.g., 5 to 25 tiers per rack). In one embodiment, for example, each Lemna growing chamber may be about 2 meters long, 1 meter wide, and 0.2 meters tall. Each growing chamber may be filled to a level of about 5 cm with water and nutrients, with the remaining 15 cm of vertical space within the chamber dedicated to air circulation. In some embodiments, Lemna will be collected continuously, drained, and transported to external collecting containers where it will be dried. The ventilated racks will deliver water and nutrients to each Lemna chamber, as well as air enriched with CO₂. In some embodiments comprising integrated aquaponics systems for raising fish, as will be described below, the amount of additional nutrients required may be very low given the supply of nutrients provided by the fish. The racks may also contain the plumbing for collecting and harvesting the Lemna.

Overall this system design may enable one to dramatically reduce the gas exchange volume, the use of water, and the amount of nutrients required, while expanding the growing surface by factors of 5× to 25× compared to a ground-level pond. The system thus provides, for example, a growth capacity equivalent to that of a 1,000 ha surface in an actual footprint of 40 ha.

The system design may also include LED lights and infrared cameras to maximize and monitor growth, to reduce handling requirements, and importantly, to decouple Lemna growth from natural sunlight, thereby enabling growth of Lemna in some embodiments of the disclosed system in regular temperature-controlled buildings rather than in expensive glass greenhouses.

The Lemna growing system will require access to both water and energy. In some embodiments, energy may be supplied by a photovoltaic heliostat system, e.g., a 2,000 megawatt system. In some embodiments, water may be supplied by a desalination system.

The growth of Lemna year round under controlled conditions may enable one to double or more than double the yield compared to growth in open ponds (e.g., 30 to 150 tons/ha/year). The combined use of aquaponics and controlled environment agriculture will further optimize growth and increase it by a factor of at least 3-fold.

As noted above, in some embodiments the integration of the Lemna growing system with an aquaponics system for raising fish may reduce the nutrient requirements of the overall system. Fish tanks will be located in an adjacent area within the Lemna growth facility. Lemna and other duckweed family members have been grown for centuries as feeding stock for animals and fish. Their optimal amino acid balance and high protein content (as high as 35-45%) make them an ideal food. Lemna can be fed directly to fish such as tilapias and carp, or it can be dried and incorporated into a custom pelleted feed. The ability of Lemna to efficiently absorb ammonia, nitrate, phosphorous, and potassium, as well as other waste products of intensive fresh water fish cultures, such as magnesium, calcium, sodium, chlorine, boron, and iron make these plants ideal for integrated aquaponic systems. Lemna can remove up to 99% of nutrients and dissolved solids in wastewater. Tilapia and/or carps will be grown in containers connected to a water/nutrient recirculating system. The fish tanks will provide the vast majority of nutrients (80%) required for Lemna to grow. Lemna, on the other hand, will then remove and consume nearly all of the fish waste products and convert them into biomass that subsequently becomes a high protein food for the fish. As the water is fed directly to the roots of the plants and then re-circulated to the fish tanks, the system uses much less water than traditional agriculture. This low energy, low water-use system provides a natural, sustainable and economically valuable approach to intensive Lemna growth.

Use of captured carbon dioxide in secondary processes: In some embodiments, carbon dioxide captured from ambient air (i.e., outdoor air or atmospheric air) may be used in any of a variety of secondary processes known to those of skill in the art not only to sequester the captured CO₂and prevent its re-release to the atmosphere, but to produce useful and commercially-important products. Any of the sorbents, methods, and system configurations for direct air capture of carbon dioxide described herein, or in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,655,069 B2; 7,708,806 B2; 7,993,432 B2; 8,083,836 B2; 8,088,197 B2; 8,133,305 B2; 8,221,527 B1; 8,246, 723 B2; 8,262,774 B2; 8,273,160 B2; 8,337,589 B2; 8,715,393 B2; 8,999,279 B2; 9,205,372 B2; 9,266,051 B2; 9,266,052 B2; 9,527,747 B2; 9,616,375 B2; 9,861,933 B2; 10,010,829 B2 or related foreign applications, may be used to capture carbon dioxide from the outdoor environment or, in some instances, from other sources, e.g., indoor air, an exhaust gas, a flue gas, etc.

Thus the present disclosure includes general methods and apparatus for capturing CO₂from a gas and using it in a secondary process. The disclosed methods for removing carbon dioxide from a gas and utilizing said carbon dioxide in a secondary process will generally comprise: a) contacting a sorbent material with the gas to capture carbon dioxide; b) releasing carbon dioxide from the sorbent material in a concentrated form; and c) utilizing the concentrated carbon dioxide in a secondary process. In some embodiments, the sorbent material may comprise a solid sorbent that comprises an amine. In some embodiments, the sorbent material may comprise an anion exchange material. In some preferred embodiments, the sorbent material may comprise a strong base, Type II anion exchange material. In some preferred embodiments, the gas is contacted with the sorbent material in a fluidized bed reactor. In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide is released from the sorbent material by subjecting the sorbent material to a change in temperature, pressure, humidity, or any combination thereof. In some preferred embodiments, the carbon dioxide is released from the sorbent material by subjecting the sorbent material to a change in humidity, or by wetting the sorbent material with water, steam, or an aqueous solution.

Similarly, the disclosed apparatus for removing carbon dioxide from a gas and utilizing said carbon dioxide in a secondary process will generally comprise: a) an extractor comprising a sorbent material capable of capturing carbon dioxide from the gas; b) a gas flow mechanism configured to contact the sorbent material within the extractor with a stream of the gas; c) a carbon dioxide release mechanism configured to release and concentrate carbon dioxide captured by the sorbent; and d) a carbon dioxide delivery mechanism to deliver concentrated carbon dioxide to a secondary process. Again, in some embodiments, the sorbent material may comprise a solid sorbent that comprises an amine. In some embodiments, the sorbent material may comprise an anion exchange material. In some preferred embodiments, the sorbent material may comprise a strong base, Type II anion exchange material. In some preferred embodiments, the gas is contacted with the sorbent material in an extractor comprising a fluidized bed reactor design. In some embodiments, the carbon dioxide is released from the sorbent material using a release mechanism configured to subject the sorbent material to a change in temperature, pressure, humidity, or any combination thereof. In some preferred embodiments, the release mechanism is configured to release carbon dioxide from the sorbent material by subjecting the sorbent material to a change in humidity, or by wetting the sorbent material with water, steam, or an aqueous solution.

There are a wide variety of existing and emerging secondary processes that utilize carbon dioxide for commercial purposes in producing useful products. Examples include, but are not limited to, enhanced oil recovery (EOR), urea yield boosting, enhanced geothermal systems, polymer processing, algae cultivation, carbonate mineralization, CO₂concrete curing, bauxite residue carbonation, CO₂as a feedstock for liquid fuel production, and enhanced coal bed methane recovery.

A more detailed but still non-limiting list of existing and emerging secondary processes for utilizing carbon dioxide captured from ambient air or other sources is provided in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Existing and emerging processes that utilize carbon dioxide (adapted

from “Global CCS Institute - CO₂Reuse Technologies”)

Existing & Emerging Uses
Brief Description

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR)
CO₂is injected into depleted oil fields as a solvent that

reduces the viscosity of the oil, thus enabling it to flow

more easily to the production well. Once production is

complete, the CO₂can potentially be permanently stored

in the reservoir.

Urea yield boosting (non-
Additional CO₂obtained from an external source can be

captive use only)*
compressed and combined with surplus ammonia during

urea production from natural gas to produce additional

urea.

Other oil and gas industry
Liquid CO₂is used as a fluid for the stimulation/fracturing

Applications
of oil and gas wells.

Beverage carbonation
Carbonation of beverages with high-purity CO₂.

Wine making
CO₂is used as a seal gas to prevent oxidation of wine

during maturation. CO₂is also produced during the

fermentation process, and is often already captured on-site

for reuse for its inert gas properties.

Food processing, preservation
CO₂is used for various applications in the food industry,

and packaging
including cooling while grinding powders such as spices,

or as an inert atmosphere to prevent food spoilage. In

packaging applications, CO₂is used in modified

atmosphere packaging (MAP) of products such as cheese,

poultry, snacks, produce and red meat, or in controlled

atmosphere packaging (CAP) of food products to extend

shelf life.

Coffee
Supercritical CO₂is used as the solvent for decaffeinating

decaffeination
coffee.

Pharmaceutical processes
Use of CO₂in the pharmaceutical industry may overlap

with other uses identified, as it typically includes inerting,

chemical synthesis, supercritical fluid extraction, product

transportation at low temperature, and acidification of

wastewater.

Horticulture
CO₂is provided to greenhouses to maintain optimal CO₂

concentration and maximize plant growth rate.

Pulp and paper processing
CO₂is used to reduce pH during pulp washing operations.

Water treatment
CO₂is used for re-mineralization of water following

reverse osmosis and for pH control (reduction).

Inerting
CO₂is used in a wide range of applications where the

physical properties of an inert gas are desirable. This

includes applications covered under other use categories,

such as a welding shielding gas, and as a gas used in food

packaging and in wine production.

Steel manufacture
CO₂is used in a minority of basic oxygen furnaces as a

bottom stirring agent. It is also used for dust suppression.

Metal working
Used for varied purposes, including chilling parts for

shrink fitting, and hardening of sand cores and molds.

Supercritical CO₂as a solvent
CO₂is useful for high-pressure extraction and as a solvent

to isolate targeted compounds, such as fragrances and

flavors.

Electronics
Printed circuit board manufacture uses small quantities of

CO₂in niche applications, predominantly as a cleaning

fluid.

Pneumatics
Pneumatic applications for CO₂include use as a portable

power source (pressurized gas) for pneumatic hand tools

and equipment, as well as a power source for paintball

guns and other recreational equipment.

Welding
Used as a shrouding gas to prevent oxidation of the weld

metal.

Refrigerant gas
CO₂is used as the working fluid in refrigeration plant,

particularly for larger industrial air conditioning and

refrigeration systems.

Fire suppression technology
When applied to a fire, CO₂provides a heavy blanket of

gas that reduces the oxygen level to a point where

combustion cannot occur. CO₂is used in fire

extinguishers, as well as in industrial fire protection

systems.

Enhanced coal bed methane
In CO₂-ECBM, CO₂is injected into coal seams, where it

recovery (ECBM)
preferentially adsorbs onto the coal, displacing and

releasing adsorbed methane, which can then be recovered

at the surface.

Enhanced geothermal systems
There are two ways in which supercritical CO₂may be

(EGS) - CO₂as a working
utilized in EGS geothermal power generation. Firstly, it

fluid
may be used as the circulating heat exchange fluid. The

benefit here is that the significant density difference

between the cold CO₂flowing down the injection well(s)

and the hot CO₂flowing up the production well (s) would

eliminate the need for a circulation pump. Secondly, this

concept could be extended, and the circulating CO₂could

also be used directly as the working fluid in a supercritical

CO₂power cycle.

Power generation - CO₂as a
Supercritical CO₂power cycles need not be limited to

working fluid
geothermal power plants, as the benefits of high

efficiency and compact turbo machinery are not heat

source-specific. The nuclear power industry is

particularly interested in supercritical CO₂power cycles

for this reason.

Polymer processing
One example of CO₂as a feedstock for polymer

processing involves the transformation of carbon dioxide

into polycarbonates using proprietary zinc based catalyst

system. A variety of other process routes and end

products have been proposed.

Chemical synthesis (excludes
Carbon and oxygen are both key elements in organic

polymers and liquid
chemistry. Consequently, there are a wide range of

fuels/hydrocarbons)
chemicals that can at least theoretically utilize CO₂as a

feedstock for production, including organic acids,

alcohols, esters, and sugars. For example, acetic acid can

be produced by direct catalysis of CO₂and methane.

Algal bio-fixation
The productivity of algal cultivation systems can be

increased significantly (up to a saturation point) by the

injection/addition of CO₂to the growth

medium/solution.

Mineralization

Calcium carbonate and
Mildly concentrated CO₂is contacted with mineral-loaded

magnesium carbonate
alkaline brine. The CO₂present in the gas precipitates out

as mineral carbonates (limestone/dolomite equivalent

precipitates). The resulting product can be further

processed to form an aggregate equivalent product for the

construction industry, and can also potentially displace a

small portion of Portland Cement in concrete.

Baking soda (sodium
A variant of mineralization wherein CO₂is contacted with

bicarbonate)
sodium rich brine, resulting in the formation of sodium bi-

carbonate (NaHCO₃).

CO₂concrete curing
This technology is focused on precast concrete

production facilities, where CO₂is permanently stored as

un-reactive limestone within the concrete. This also limits

the need for heat and steam in the curing process. The

result is a reduction in emissions of CO₂equivalent to up

to 120 kg of CO₂per tonne (286 lbs. CO₂per US ton) of

precast concrete.

Bauxite residue treatment
The extraction of alumina from bauxite ore results in a

(‘red mud’)
highly alkaline bauxite residue slurry known as ‘red

mud’. Concentrated CO₂can be injected into the red

mud slurry to partially neutralize the product, improving

its manageability, reducing its disposal costs and

limiting its potential environmental impacts. In the

neutralization process, the CO₂is converted to mineral

form (typically carbonates). The resulting product

remains slightly alkaline, and has potential as a soil

amendment for acidic soils.

Liquid fuels

Renewable methanol
Electrolysis of water produces H₂. The H₂is combined

with captured CO₂, compressed and reacted over a catalyst

at moderate temperature and pressure (~5 MPa, ~225° C.) to

produce methanol and water.

Formic acid
Electro-reduction of CO₂to produce formic acid

(HCOOH) and O₂. Formic acid is used as a hydrogen

carrier, with hydrogen the primary fuel. Formic acid has

been classified as a liquid fuel as hydrogen is only

released from the liquid formic acid as required.

Genetically engineered micro-
Engineered product-specific photosynthetic organisms

organisms for direct fuel
circulate in a solution of micronutrients and brackish

secretion
water, producing hydrocarbon products as a by-product of

metabolism. Energy input is direct, un-concentrated solar

energy.

CO₂injection to conventional
The yield of methanol from conventional methanol

methanol synthesis
synthesis can be increased (some estimates suggest up to

a 20 percent yield increase) by the injection of additional

CO₂upstream of the methanol reformer.

*Unless otherwise stated, all references to urea production refer to the incremental additional production of urea from surplus ammonia and non-captive CO₂, e.g, the supply of CO₂from a source external to the process and not that generated and subsequently used within the process itself.

Thus, a variety of secondary processes may benefit from utilization of CO₂captured directly from the atmosphere or from other sources. For example, in some embodiments, the secondary process may comprise using the concentrated carbon dioxide to cure cement or concrete. In some embodiments, the secondary process may comprise using the concentrated carbon dioxide to form calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, or sodium bicarbonate. In some embodiments, the calcium carbonate or magnesium carbonate may be further processed to form an aggregate product for the construction industry. In some embodiments, as noted above, the secondary process may comprise using the concentrated carbon dioxide to enhance plant growth within a greenhouse environment. In some embodiments, the secondary process may comprise using the concentrated carbon dioxide to enhance the growth of aquatic plants or algae. In some embodiments, the aquatic plants may comprise plants of the Lemna, Azolla, or Oryza genera. In some embodiments, the aquatic plants or algae may be further utilized as feedstock for production of protein, starch or starch derivatives, animal feed, biofuel, bioplastic, biochar, syngas, graphene, energy, heat, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the secondary process may comprise using the concentrated carbon dioxide to produce methanol, formic acid, or syngas. In some embodiments, the secondary process may comprise using the concentrated carbon dioxide to produce carbon fiber, carbon nanotubes, fullerene, graphene, a polymer, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the polymer thus formed may comprise a polyurethane foam, a polycarbonate, or an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. In some embodiments, the secondary process comprises using the concentrated carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery or enhanced coal bed methane recovery. In some embodiments, the gas may be ambient air, outdoor air, indoor air, an exhaust gas, or a flue gas.

While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in any combination in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.

	Number	Date	Country
	62710445	Feb 2018	US
	62740261	Oct 2018	US

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	PCT/US2019/018086	Feb 2019	US
Child	16991316		US

FLUIDIZED BED EXTRACTORS FOR CAPTURE OF CO2 FROM AMBIENT AIR

Information

Publication Number

Date Filed

Date Published

Inventors

Original Assignees

CPC

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

CROSS-REFERENCE

Provisional Applications (2)

Continuations (1)