Active inceptors provide force feedback to an operator of a user input device through internally simulating a feel model, one example being a mass-spring-damper (MSD) system, and driving an actuated mechanism to mimic the dynamic performance of the feel model.
Active inceptor systems may be used to provide force feedback to a user input device. An active inceptor system may be used in control of flight surfaces of aircraft, such as helicopters or aeroplanes. However, they may also have applications in other vehicles or any other application where force feedback is useful.
An active inceptor system 100 is illustrated in
The user input device 110 may move about the pivot 120 in at least one axis. The user may grip the user input device 110 using grip portion 140, although they are not limited to gripping the user input device 110 at grip portion 140.
The user input device 110 may be a stick, an inceptor, or throttle. The user input device 110 may have any shape. The grip portion 140 may be the part of the user input device 110 that is designed for the user to hold. Grip portion 140 may also be merely a portion of user input device 110 that has a different mass or profile than the rest of the user input device 110.
Force sensor 130 is illustrated as being coupled to the user input device 110, however it may be positioned in any location that still enables the user input force to be determined. For example, it may be located on the grip portion 140, the user input device 110, pivot 120 or mechanism 150.
Force feedback may be provided to the user input device 110 with a force feedback control loop using force feedback circuitry 160. Force feedback system 160 may internally simulate a feel model, such as a second order mass-spring-damper (MSD) model, although other models may be used. The force feedback circuitry 160 may cause mechanism 150 to apply a force to the user input device 110, the force dependent upon predetermined settings and chosen feel model.
A user may also input an operator force on the user input device 110 to move the user input device 110. The user may feel a feedback force from mechanism 150 dependent upon the predetermined settings and chosen feel model.
Due in part to the inertia of the mass of the grip portion 140, when movement of the user input device 110 is initiated, either by user input force or the mechanism 150, a force is felt on the force sensor 130. The magnitude and direction of the force is dependent upon at least the location of the force sensor 130, the direction of the applied force, and whether the movement is initiated by the mechanism 150 or by the user (i.e. the relationship between the location of the force sensor 130 and the position of the user or mechanism applied force).
Two examples of the force felt on the force sensor 130 are illustrated in
In
In
The force induced due to the inertial effects is a physical property of the active inceptor system 100. However to improve the system bandwidth the forces induced due to the inertial effects should be mitigated. If the inertial forces are not mitigated, then they may limit the maximum bandwidth of the active input device system 100, deteriorating the tactile feel of the active input device, in some examples making it feel sluggish. This in turn may limit performance of the user and/or vehicle the active inceptor system 100 controls.
The user input device 110 may comprise a stick or an inceptor, or any other appropriate input device. The active inceptor system 100 may be used to control the flight surfaces of an aircraft. The active inceptor system 100 may be used to control vehicles, such as trains. The active inceptor system 100 may also be used for other applications, and is not limited to being applied to vehicles.
The force sensor 130 may comprise a strain gauge, such as a wheatstone bridge type arrangement, although it is not limited to this type of sensor.
The transfer function may be estimated by determining a total compensation force, which may be removed from the sensed force sensed by force sensor 130. The total compensation force is determined by determining a damping force and an inertial force. The damping force is dependent upon the velocity of the grip portion 140, and the inertial force is dependent upon the acceleration of the grip portion 140.
A method, 300, to determine the total compensation force information is illustrated in
At substantially the same time as the velocity information is obtained the acceleration information is obtained 330. The inertial force information may be obtained, 340, based on the acceleration information.
The damping force information and inertial force information are combined 350 by summing to produce total compensation force information 360. The total compensation force information may then be provided to the force feedback circuitry 160 which may use it to update the sensed force supplied to the model to provide compensated force information.
The velocity information may be obtained without using a velocity sensor, or may be obtained using a velocity sensor close to or on the grip portion 140.
In some examples obtaining, 310, velocity information of the user input device and/or grip portion may comprise obtaining position information of the user input device 110 from a position sensor located close or on the grip portion 140 and differentiating the position information to obtain the velocity information.
In some examples obtaining, 310, velocity information of the user input device and/or grip portion may comprise obtaining acceleration information of the user input device 110 from an acceleration sensor located close to or on the grip portion 140 and integrating the acceleration information.
In some examples the acceleration information may be obtained from an acceleration sensor close to or on the grip portion 140. In some examples, obtaining, 330, acceleration information may comprise double differentiating a sensed position of the user input device or differentiating a velocity.
In some examples obtaining, 320, the damping force information may comprise multiplying the velocity information with a damping constant. The damping constant may depend on the physical properties of the active inceptor system 100, and may be predetermined.
In some examples obtaining, 340, the inertial force information may comprise multiplying the acceleration information with an inertia constant. The inertial constant may depend on the physical properties of the active inceptor system 100, and may be predetermined.
The accuracy of the total compensation force information may be improved by locating the sensors as close as possible to the grip portion 140, or on the grip portion 140. This is because structural flexure between the actual grip position and the location of the sensor may cause inaccuracies to build up in the sensed output.
A lag filter may be applied, 410, as the velocity and/or acceleration information may have high levels of noise, for example due to the use of differentiators. Using a lag filter reduces the noise of the signal. Although the lag filter is shown as occurring after the summation, is it to be understood that the lag filter could be used at any suitable positon in the method. Furthermore, other methods to reduce noise could be used instead or in addition to the application of the lag filter. There could also be more than one lag filter, for example a separate lag filters may be used at any point in the method.
Applying, 420, the saturation limit, limits the magnitude of the compensation force information to be below a predetermined value. The predetermined value may be equal to the available maximum grip force which is the maximum force a pilot is expected to apply. Limiting the compensation force information to be below a predetermined value allows for unexpectedly large forces to be identified and not summed with the sensed force. Summing an unexpectedly large force with the sensed force may reduce the performance of the active inceptor system 100. An unexpectedly large force might be result when double differentiating a position signal, which can lead to very large transient spikes in response.
The description refers to position information, velocity information, acceleration information, inertial force information, damping force information, and total compensation force information. This is because the method and systems may not require an absolute value of the variables to be calculated. In some examples the position information, velocity information, acceleration information, inertial force information, damping force information, and total compensation force information may comprise absolute values, in some examples they may be proportionate to the actual absolute value.
The methods described may be performed in any appropriate order and are not limited to the order as described in the description.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1909963 | Jul 2019 | GB | national |
19195273 | Sep 2019 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2020/051473 | 6/18/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/005328 | 1/14/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4236325 | Hall et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
5532476 | Mikan | Jul 1996 | A |
5734373 | Rosenberg | Mar 1998 | A |
6342880 | Rosenberg | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6580418 | Grome et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
7432908 | Rutledge et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7757579 | Bloch | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8345004 | Kass et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
9156546 | Irwin, III et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20060007181 | Jung et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20110050563 | Skutt | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20150130730 | Harley | May 2015 | A1 |
20160004270 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20170242444 | Eggold | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170367773 | Kottenstette et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20200103897 | Thornberg | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20220242554 | Bean et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1175017 | Mar 1998 | CN |
3023794 | May 2016 | EP |
2549272 | Oct 2017 | GB |
2587469 | Mar 2021 | GB |
2021005328 | Jan 2021 | WO |
2021005329 | Jan 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/GB2020/051473. dated Aug. 11, 2020. 9 pages. |
GB Search Report under Section 17(5) received for GB Application No. 1909963.9, dated Jan. 13, 2020. 3 pages. |
Extended European Search Report received for EP Application No. 19195273.8, dated Jan. 23, 2020. 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/GB2020/051477. dated Sep. 15, 2020. 17 pages. |
GB Search Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) received for GB Application No. 2009323.3, dated Dec. 11, 2020. 6 pages. |
GB Search Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) received for GB Application No. 2109820.7, dated Nov. 5, 2021. 5 pages. |
GB Search Report under Section 17(5) received for GB Application No. 1909962.1, dated Jan. 8, 2020. 4 pages. |
Extended European Search Report received for EP Application No. 19195209.2, dated Apr. 17, 2020. 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT/GB2020/051473, dated Jan. 20, 2022. 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT/GB2020/051477, dated Jan. 20, 2022. 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220244754 A1 | Aug 2022 | US |