The production of radioisotopes typically involves irradiating a target fluid (gas or liquid) maintained within a target assembly with an energetic charged particle beam. The energetic charged particle beam may be characterized by one or more parameters such as particles per second, beam current (typically measured in microamps (μA) or milliamps (mA)), particle velocity, beam energy (typically measured in kilo electron volts (KeV) or mega electron volts (MeV)), and beam power (typically measured in watts (W)). The interaction of one of the energetic particles from the particle beam with a target nucleus in the target fluid will, under the appropriate conditions, tend to produce a nuclear reaction that transforms the target nucleus into a different element.
These nuclear reactions may be written as a shorthand expression X(a,b)Y in which X represents the target nuclei, a is the incoming or beam particle, b is the particle emitted by the nuclei, and Y represents the resultant or product nuclei. An example of such an expression is 18O(p,n)18F, which indicates a nuclear reaction in which the oxygen isotope 18O is struck by a proton, which enters the nucleus and causes a neutron to be ejected, resulting in a change in the nuclear structure to the fluorine isotope 18F. Another example of such an expression is 14N(p,α)11C, which indicates that the nitrogen isotope 14N is struck by a proton, which enters the nucleus and causes an α particle to be emitted, resulting in a change in the nuclear structure to the carbon isotope 11C.
The probability of a nuclear reaction occurring is referred to as the cross-section and is a function of the incoming particle energy and differs for each combination of target nuclei, incoming particle, and leaving particle. For the production of a particular radioisotope, type of particle, the beam current, beam energy, target nuclei and target density may be selected to increase the likelihood of the preferred nuclear reaction and the yield of the desired product.
The systems used for generating the energetic charged particle beams, such as cyclotrons, electrostatic accelerators and radiofrequency quadrupoles, are typically expensive (usually more than US$1,000,000) to purchase, expensive to maintain and to operate and require highly skilled technical staff. In some cases, the preferred target material may also be expensive to purchase, such as enriched 18O gas (typically more than US$500 per liter) and enriched 18O water (typically more than US$100 per milliliter). These enriched 18O materials are, however, commonly used target materials for the production of the fluorine isotope 18F. The 18F is, in turn, frequently utilized in the production of radiolabeled materials, such as the radiopharmaceutical 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), that may be used in positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis of cancer and other conditions.
As noted above, the cross-section parameter reflects the probability that the desired nuclear reaction will occur. The yield of the desired product can, therefore, be enlarged by increasing the number of incoming energetic particles, i.e., the beam current. Increasing the number of incoming energetic particles, while maintaining the same beam energy, will tend to increase the number of product nuclei generated. The range, or distance travelled through a medium, of a charged particle is a function of the energy of the charged particle and the properties of the medium or media through which it will travel. The range values for a wide range of particles, energies and media are generally known or readily available to those of skill in the art.
There is a phenomenon in fluid targets, particularly gas targets, which tends to reduce the energy deposited in the target material even as the total power applied to the target assembly increases if the beam energy remains substantially constant. This phenomenon is referred to as a density reduction. This phenomenon has been attributed to the interaction between the charged particle beam and the target fluid during which most of the energy transfer results in ionization rather than nuclear reactions. This energy transfer heats the target fluid, causing it to rise and consequently move away from the region of the incoming particle beam.
This phenomenon was first noted in Bame S. J. Jr., Perry J. E. Jr., T(d,n)4He Reaction, Physical Review, Vol. 107, pp. 1616-20, 1957. Robertson et al.'s 1961 article, i.e., Robertson L. P., White B. L., Erdman K. L., Beam Heating Effects in Gas Targets, Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 32, p. 1405, 1961, provides a study of beam heating. And, in 1982, Heselius et al. published photographs of the beam interaction in a gas target in Heselius S. J., Lindbolm P., and Solin O., Optical Studies Of The Influence Of An Intense Ion Beam On High-Pressure Gas Targets, Int'l J. of Applied Radiation, Vol. 33, pp. 653-659, 1982, that depicted the extended beam travel as the beam current increased for a fixed energy. Each of the referenced articles is hereby incorporated by reference, in their entirety.
This movement of the target nuclei away from the beam region reduces the number of nuclei in the beam path (density) and hence increases the range of the beam, or in the case of a fixed distance, decreases the proportion of the beam power transferred to the target nuclei. This in turn decreases the number of the nuclear reactions that will occur and reduces the number of product nuclei that are produced.
A factor affecting the density reduction in a gas target is the ability of the target assembly to maintain the gas at a uniform temperature. One approach aims to suppress the convective movement of the heated target gas away from the incident particle beam by configuring the target assembly to provide a target envelope that is closely matched to the configuration of the incoming charged particle beam, thereby forcing substantially all of the target nuclei to remain in the path of the beam. Other approaches include increasing the length of the target and/or increasing the loading pressure to increase the number of target nuclei that will be exposed to the incident particle beam substantially above those values required when little heat is generated in the target assembly. These approaches can compensate to some degree for the pressure differential that will be generated within the target fluid inside the target envelope and the resulting localized density reduction.
An additional factor affecting the process yield is that the incoming charged particle beam tends to lack spatial uniformity with respect to particle distribution. Indeed, a typical distribution of particles within the beam will exhibit a substantially gaussian radial distribution perpendicular to the beam direction. This means that the particle distribution within the beam is biased toward a central portion of the beam and the convective movement of the target gas will tend shift the target nuclei to areas within the target assembly that are exposed to fewer beam particles, thereby tending to decrease production of the desired product isotope(s).
As a result, even closely matching the configuration of the target chamber to the beam shape will generally not fully counteract the heating induced density reduction of the target gas in the higher beam density regions. Further, target assemblies in which the target chamber includes little or no volume that is not within the beam strike region tend to experience much greater pressure increases than targets that include substantial target chamber volume that is not within the beam strike region. In order to accommodate the greater pressure increases experienced within the reduced volume target chamber, the chamber beam windows and chamber walls must be made stronger which, in the case of the chamber beam window, can reduce the percentage of beam energy and/or beam current that can be applied to the target gas.
The invention provides a modified target assembly in which the target fluid is moved within the target assembly in a manner that increases the effective density of the target fluid within the beam path, thereby increasing beam yield. As detailed below, the invention utilizes forced convection, and optional structures arranged within the target envelope, to direct the target fluid within an inner sleeve in a direction opposite the direction of the beam current, i.e., produce a counter current flow of the target fluid, and optionally direct the flow of the target fluid toward a central region. This countercurrent flow of the target fluid suppresses, to some degree, the natural convective effects that tend to reduce the effective density of the target fluid within the beam path as a result of fluid heating and tend to increase the heat transfer from the target, allowing operation at lower temperatures and/or pressures.
The above and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by describing in detail exemplary embodiments thereof with reference to the attached drawings in which:
These drawings have been provided to assist in the understanding of the exemplary embodiments of the invention as described in more detail below and should not be construed as unduly limiting the invention. In particular, the relative spacing, sizing and dimensions of the various elements illustrated in the drawings are not drawn to scale and may have been exaggerated, reduced or otherwise modified for the purpose of improved clarity. Those of ordinary skill in the art will also appreciate that certain structures that may be commonly utilized in the construction of such couplers, such as tool alignment structures or fixtures, have been omitted simply to improve the clarity and reduce the number of drawings.
The particle beam must enter the target, preferably with as little energy loss as possible. The particle beam generation (in the accelerator) and transport to the target must occur in a vacuum to minimize the loss of particles. The high-pressure environment of the target must be isolated from this vacuum yet still allow the particle beam to enter the target chamber. One method of forming a beam window or port utilizes a pair of thin metal foils between which passes helium or another cooling gas to remove the heat produced in the foils by the passage of the particle beam. Another method of forming a beam window or port utilizes a single thin metal foil supported by a water cooled structure referred to as a grid as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,917,874, the contents of which are hereby incorporated in its entirety. This grid will, however, partially intercept the particle beam, thereby reducing the number of beam particles that will actually enter the target and reach the target nuclei. The advantages provided by thinner entrance foils, e.g., less beam energy lost in passing through the foil, is directly at odds with the advantages provided by thicker entrance foils, e.g., increased mechanical strength that will allow containment of higher pressure.
An improved target assembly as disclosed herein utilizes forced convection to increase the heat transfer from the target gas to the target body which is, in turn, cooled, to reduce the local heating to which the target gas will be subjected during irradiation and thereby reduce the corresponding density reduction. Fluid motion is generated by a fan or blower apparatus incorporated into the fluid chamber. Exemplary embodiments of the improved target assembly are illustrated in
These higher cooling rates result in reduced temperature variations within the target gas distributed throughout the target chamber and correspondingly increased target nuclei density within the beam path, a combination which tends to improve the yield of the desired isotope product(s) over a conventional target for a given beam current and target fluid loading and/or increased beam currents and target fluid loadings. Similarly, the advantages provided by forced convection also allow either an increase in beam current or a reduction in the volume of target fluid while maintaining or even increasing production of the desired isotope. The selection of the appropriate regime in which to operate targets according to the invention will depend upon which advantage is more desirable to the user.
The improved target assembly includes a blower assembly that is mounted inside or adjacent the target envelope and rotated by an external motor through a direct or magnetic coupling. The blower assembly forces the gas from the central region to the walls of the target where the gas proceeds to the back of the target. The walls of the target envelope may be configured for improved heat transfer through, for example, modification of the surface finish, the addition of fins to increase the heat transfer surface area, or by the addition of metal foam bonded to the target wall to increase the surface area. Metal foam suitable for use in the invention is available commercially from suppliers such as ERG Materials and Aerospace Corporation (Oakland Calif., USA). Although such modifications to the configuration of the walls of the target envelope can improve the cooling performance of the target assembly, the benefits of the present invention are not dependent on such modifications.
A nozzle assembly may be provided toward the rear of the target envelope for directing target gas toward the forward portion of the target envelope where the particle beam is entering the target envelope. The nozzle may be arranged and configured so that the target gas is directed through the target envelope in a direction opposing and generally coaxial with the particle beam entering the target envelope. This flow of target gas has sufficient volume and velocity to at least partially suppress target gas density reduction associated with beam heating and maintain an increased average target gas density within the particle beam and at least partially compensate for the density loss associated with beam heating. Additionally, the heat transfer from the target gas to the surrounding target assembly structure will typically be improved by both the increased gas movement and the more turbulent flow and disruption of the boundary layer of gas at the target envelope surfaces, thereby further suppressing the target gas density reduction.
When activated, the fan or impeller 118 will tend to produce a flow of the target fluid through the target cavity in a flow direction F that is in a direction generally opposite that of the beam direction B. The target fluid will tend to flow through the target cavity in a counter current direction relative to the particle beam, thereby counteracting the natural convection resulting from heating of the target fluid by the particle beam and increasing the effective density of the target fluid. As the target fluid reaches the beam end of the target cavity, it will tend to assume a radial flow direction and flow into a space 108 defined between an outer surface of the inner sleeve 102 and a corresponding inner surface of the outer jacket 106. When the opposing surfaces of both the inner sleeve and the outer jacket are generally cylindrical, the space 108 will have a generally annular configuration.
In all the embodiments, the deposition of energy from the particle beam into the target fluid causes an increase in pressure in the target assembly. The mechanical strength of the target assembly structure thereby limits the total beam power which may be deposited in the target. The pressure rise observed in the target assembly for a given power deposition is a measure of the heat transfer properties of the target assembly with a lower pressure rise indicating better heat transfer. A heat transfer parameter can be determined for a give target assembly when a known power is deposited in the target from Equation 1. Such an apparatus has been built and heat transfer parameters measured for a target with or without a blower assembly that produces the above described forced convection fluid flow. The results of these tests are shown in Tables 1A (natural convection) and 1B (forced convection).
Table 1 shows clearly the improved performance of the target assembly to increase the heat transfer properties and reduce the pressure increase in the target fluid. At the same power levels this rather simple and non-optimized embodiment of a forced convection target assembly according to the invention produced a reduced pressure rise of approximately 45% (143 psig to 94 psig) and an increased heat transfer parameter of approximately 70% (180 watts/m2K versus 105 watts/m2K). Accordingly, the present invention will allow the isotope generation process to be run at higher beam currents, with lower target fluid charges, with a thinner target foil and/or with improved yield.
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to exemplary embodiments thereof, the invention should not be construed as being limited to the particular embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided to convey more fully the concept of the invention to those skilled in the art. In particular, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that various of the structures illustrated and described in connection with the various embodiments may be separately combined to form additional embodiments that also provide the advantages of the present invention. Thus, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/583,433, filed Jun. 29, 2004, the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5248613 | Roubicek | Sep 1993 | A |
5768329 | Berwald | Jun 1998 | A |
5917874 | Schlyer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6567492 | Kiselev et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6895064 | Ritter | May 2005 | B2 |
6907097 | Leung | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7127023 | Wieland | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7200198 | Wieland et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
20030152187 | Ritter | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040228433 | Magill et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2486604 | Dec 2003 | CA |
62-101415 | May 1987 | JP |
1224798 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000-82598 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2003139900 | May 2003 | JP |
WO 02101757 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2004053892 | Jun 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060050832 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60583433 | Jun 2004 | US |