Embodiments of the present invention relate generally to flow meters for use in fuel dispensers. More specifically, embodiments of the present invention relate to a mechanical arrangement for correction of vapor pressure error that can occur in some situations.
In a retail service station environment, customers use a fuel dispenser to pump fuel from an underground storage tank (UST) into their vehicle's fuel tank. Fuel flow meters are used by the fuel dispenser to measure the amount of fuel being dispensed. As fuel is dispensed, it flows through the flow meter, which generates an output signal proportional to the flow rate or volume of the fuel. The output signal, generally in the form of a pulse train, is received by the fuel dispenser control system, which calculates and displays the volume and price of fuel dispensed.
Fuel flow meters must be very accurate in order to ensure that customers are properly charged for the fuel that has been dispensed. Seasonal variations in fuel temperature can cause errors in flow meter output, thus requiring frequent meter testing and recalibration to ensure accuracy. Fuel flow meters must comply with regulatory requirements regarding measurement accuracy which are enforced by Weights & Measures (or an equivalent regulatory authority). Failure to comply with these regulatory requirements can result in an entire fueling station being temporarily shut down until the issues with the flow meters are rectified.
Example embodiments of the present invention recognize and address considerations of prior art constructions and methods.
According to one aspect, an example embodiment of the present invention provides a meter for measuring the flow rate of fuel in a fuel dispenser, comprising a housing with an axial bore extending therethrough and defining an inlet and an outlet. A flow indicating mechanism comprising one or more rotatable components are mounted in the axial bore of the housing and configured to rotate as fuel flows from the inlet to the outlet, wherein each rotation indicates fuel flow. A pulse generating device senses rotation of the rotatable components and generates an output signal indicative of the fuel flow. Finally, a vapor generating device is configured to generate vapor bubbles that flow through the flow indicating mechanism.
Another aspect of the present invention provides for a flow indicating mechanism comprising two interlocking helically-shaped spindles. The vapor generating device may be a mesh-like arrangement with multiple sharp-edge orifices, a spring-loaded check valve with sharp vapor-generating edges, or a cavitation machine.
A still further aspect of the present invention provides a flow meter that comprises a bypass passage that routes fuel around a vapor generating mechanism when the fuel is above a certain temperature. The bypass passage may be opened and closed by a valve actuated by a bimetallic temperature-responsive device.
Another example embodiment of the present invention provides a vapor generating device for generating vapor bubbles in fuel flowing through a flow meter. The vapor generating device comprises a support structure configured to be positioned in the fuel flow path upstream of the flow meter's flow indicating mechanism and a permeable structure spanning an opening in the support structure. Vapor bubbles are generated when fuel flows through the permeable structure. The permeable structure may be, for example, a wire mesh screen and may be configured to cover the entire flow meter inlet.
In some example embodiments, the support structure of the vapor generating device is an integrated portion of the flow meter housing. The vapor generating device may also comprise a bypass valve which is configured to divert a portion of the flowing fuel around the permeable structure and into the flow meter when a certain temperature is reached. The bypass valve may be opened and closed, for example, by a bimetallic control device. The bypass valve may comprise a temperature-dependent variable orifice which becomes larger as the fuel temperature increases.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the present invention and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of example embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended drawings, in which:
Repeat use of reference characters in the present specification and drawings is intended to represent same or analogous features or elements of the invention.
Reference will now be made in detail to certain preferred embodiments of the present invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit thereof. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment may be used on another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations.
Some embodiments of the present invention are particularly suitable for use in a fuel dispensing environment, and the below discussion will describe example embodiments in that context. However, those of skill in the art will understand that the present invention is not so limited. In fact, it is contemplated that embodiments of the present invention may be used in other situations where the flow rate of liquid or gas products needs to be measured. In this regard, “flow rate” is used in the description below as a generic term for the rate of fluid dispensing.
Fuel dispenser 14 includes a housing with at least one flexible fuel hose 18 extending therefrom. Fuel hose 18 terminates in a manually-operated fuel dispensing nozzle 20 adapted to be inserted into a fill neck of a vehicle's fuel tank. When a customer places the spout of the fuel dispensing nozzle 20 into the vehicle's fuel tank and pulls the lever, a submersible turbine pump (STP) 22 pumps fuel through the underground fuel piping conduit 16 to the fuel dispenser 14. As will be discussed in more detail below in reference to
The fuel dispenser 14 has a customer interface 24 which may include a display 26 that shows the amount and price of fuel dispensed. The customer interface 24 may also include additional displays to, for example, provide instructions for basic transaction functions, such as initiating dispensing of fuel. The dispenser also preferably includes a credit card reader and a PIN pad to allow the customer to pay for the fuel at the dispenser using credit or debit cards.
In this embodiment, as the vehicle fuel tank is filled, entering fuel displaces fuel vapor already in the tank. Fuel dispensers are often equipped with vapor recovery systems for capturing these escaping vapors and delivering them back to the ullage space 28 of the UST 12. Exemplary vapor recovery systems may use a vacuum source to draw escaping vapors along a vapor recovery path back into the ullage space 28. The vapor recovery path typically begins at the nozzle spout, where air and vapor are drawn in through a boot or a series of intake ports (not shown). The recovered vapors then flow through the nozzle to the outer vapor recovery conduit 18b of the fuel hose 18. Inside the fuel dispenser 14, a manifold (not shown) separates conduits 18a and 18b and connects them with piping conduit 16 and vapor return pipe 30, respectively. Specifically, conduit 18a is in fluid communication with underground piping conduit 16. Outer vapor recovery conduit 18b is in fluid communication with vapor return pipe 30, which returns the recovered vapors back into the ullage space 28 of the UST 12.
After fuel exits the outlet of the shear valve 31 and enters into the internal fuel piping 32, it may encounter an electromechanical valve 33 positioned upstream of a flow meter 34. However, in some fuel dispensers, valve 33 may be positioned downstream of the flow meter 34. Valve 33 may be, for example, a proportional solenoid controlled valve, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,954,080 to Leatherman, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Valve 33 is under control of a control system 35 via a control valve signal line 36. Control system 35 may comprise a microprocessor, microcontroller, or other suitable electronics with associated memory and software programs running thereon. Control system 35 controls the application of power from a power source to the valve coil. In this manner, control system 35 can control the degree of opening and closing of the proportional control valve 33 via the valve coil to allow fuel to flow or not flow through meter 34 and on to hose 18 and nozzle 20 at a desired flow rate, or not to flow at all.
A vapor barrier typically separates some of the mechanical or hydraulic components from the electrical components of the fuel dispenser 14. For example, proportional control valve 33 is typically located below a vapor barrier 38 delimiting a hydraulics compartment 40 of the fuel dispenser 14. Control system 35, on the other hand, is typically located in an electronics compartment 42 of fuel dispenser 14 above vapor barrier 38. In this embodiment, after fuel exits proportional control valve 33, it may flow through meter 34, which measures the volume and/or flow rate of the fuel.
Flow meter 34 may be a positive displacement or inferential flow meter having one or more rotors which rotate on one or more shafts. Some examples of positive displacement flow meter technology which may be used with embodiments of the present invention are provided in U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,151 to Tingleff et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,397,686 to Taivalkoski et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,447,062 to Köpl et al., each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes. Likewise, examples of inferential flow meter technology are provided in U.S. Pat. No. 7,111,520 to Payne et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,689,071 to Ruffner et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 8,096,446 to Carapelli, each of which is also incorporated by reference herein in their entireties for all purposes.
As shown in
In this embodiment, as fuel leaves flow meter 34, it enters a flow switch 48. Flow switch 48, which preferably includes a one-way check valve that prevents back flow through fuel dispenser 14, provides a flow switch communication signal to control system 35 via the flow switch signal line 50. The flow switch communication signal indicates to control system 35 that fuel is actually flowing in the fuel delivery path and that subsequent signals from sensor 44 are due to actual fuel flow.
After the fuel leaves flow switch 48, it exits through internal fuel piping 32 to be delivered through fuel hose 18 and nozzle 20 for delivery to the customer's vehicle. Nozzle 20 typically includes a manually-actuated valve as is well-known in the art. Further information on and examples of fuel dispensers and retail fueling environments are provided in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,435,204; 5,956,259; 5,734,851; 6,052,629; 5,689,071; 6,935,191; and 7,289,877, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
The spindles 70 each comprise one or more interlocking threads such that the spindles 70 rotate together as fuel flows axially through the inlet 66, across the spindles 70, and out of the outlet 68. During each rotation of the spindles 70, a specific volume of liquid is captured from the inlet 66 and the same amount is expelled from the output 68. The flowing fuel causes the spindles 70 to rotate at a speed proportional to the fuel flow rate. Therefore, by measuring the rotational speed of one of the shafts 72, the flow rate of the liquid fuel can be determined.
One method of measuring the rotational speed of the spindles, and thus the rate of fluid flow, is to detect the rotational speed of one of the spindle shafts using a series of magnets and a measuring transducer. In the example embodiment, the magnets 76 are mounted on an exciter disc 78 that is coaxially mounted on the downstream end of one of the spindle shafts 72 (see
In general, positive displacement meters can provide a measure of the volumetric flow of liquid through the flow meter. However, any vapor generated in the captured volume can cause undesired variation in the measurement. The size of the flow meter components and the captured volume of liquid are small. Therefore, the spindles must be able to rotate at very high speeds in order to meet expected system flow rates. This high speed rotation generates significant internal fluid friction between the rotating components and the housing. The edges of the rotating spindles cause high shear forces and generate localized pressure drops where the edges of the spindles move quickly through the fuel. Therefore, vapor generation is increased, and the presence of vapor bubbles in flow meters is a common occurrence. Typically, the liquid is vaporized in the meter itself, and the vaporized fuel condenses back to liquid form downstream after exiting the flow meter outlet. However, because the flow meter's accuracy depends on the displacement of fluid, the presence of vapor bubbles within the meter introduces error into the volumetric measurement.
In general, the amount of vapor generated in a fluid is directly related to the fluid's equilibrium vapor pressure. When the localized pressure of a fluid is below the fluid's equilibrium vapor pressure, portions of the fluid convert from liquid to vapor bubbles. This is commonly referred to as cavitation. Thus, lower equilibrium vapor pressure results in the generation of less vapor, while more vapor is generated as the fluid's equilibrium vapor pressure increases.
The equilibrium vapor pressure of fuel—and thus its tendency to vaporize—is directly related to the fuel temperature. For example,
As a result, during the summer when fuel temperatures are elevated, the equilibrium vapor pressure of the fuel is higher, and the generation of vapor bubbles in the flow meter spindles increases. The increased vapor in the meter causes less liquid fuel to be displaced during each rotation of the spindles. By contrast, as the fuel temperature decreases in the winter, the generation of vapor in the flow meter spindles is decreased. Therefore, fuel flow meters can exhibit seasonal variations and require frequent testing and calibration to ensure accurate measurement.
The pulse train generated by the Hall-effect sensor 80 represents the raw or uncorrected flow rate independent of mechanical wear or other factors that require compensation. In order to determine the actual or corrected flow rate, the pulse train may be received by a signal processor, where it may be processed, compensated, corrected, or otherwise analyzed. For example, the signal processor may count the number of pulses and apply a compensation or calibration factor to calculate the corrected flow rate. The control system 35 can then use the corrected flow rate to determine the volume and price of the fuel dispensed, and present this information to the customer via display 26. The signal processor may be packaged with the flow meter, may be a separate stand-alone unit, or may be incorporated into the control system 35. In any event, the compensation applied is based on the most recent calibration of the meter.
Occasional calibration can be effectively used to compensate for relatively static errors. However, due to the temperature-dependent nature of vapor bubble generation, and the resulting seasonal variation in the presence of vapor bubbles, flow meters must be recalibrated multiple times throughout the year to remain accurate. Thus, the amount of vapor generated—and thus the calibration—varies seasonally. If the calibration was conducted during a prior season, it will not likely compensate for the vapor effects discussed above. Thus, failure to properly maintain the calibration of the flow meter may result in a fuel dispenser falling outside regulatory limits regarding the accuracy of the flow meters.
In an example embodiment of the present invention, a mechanical device, referred to herein as a vapor generator 92 is use to minimize the seasonal impact of fuel temperature on flow meter calibration. As shown in
It should be appreciated that although the vapor generator 92 of
One skilled in the art will appreciate that a conical mesh vapor generator 92 as discussed above with respect to
Alternatively, as shown in
While one or more example embodiments of the invention have been described above, it should be understood that any and all equivalent realizations of the present invention are included within the scope and spirit thereof. In addition, the embodiments depicted are presented by way of example only and are not intended as limitations upon the present invention. Thus, it should be understood by those of ordinary skill in this art that the present invention is not limited to these embodiments since modifications can be made. Therefore, it is contemplated that any and all such embodiments are included in the present invention as may fall within the scope and spirit thereof.
This application is based upon and claims priority to provisional application Ser. No. 62/073,450, filed Oct. 31, 2014. The foregoing application is incorporated fully herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4324145 | Werkmann | Apr 1982 | A |
4522237 | Endo et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4768384 | Flecken et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5447062 | Kopl | Sep 1995 | A |
5557084 | Myers et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5689071 | Ruffner | Nov 1997 | A |
5734851 | Leatherman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5954080 | Leatherman | Sep 1999 | A |
5956259 | Hartsell, Jr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6052629 | Leatherman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6067917 | Nimberger et al. | May 2000 | A |
6199434 | Cornil | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6250151 | Tingleff | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6397686 | Taivalkoski et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6435204 | White et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6935191 | Olivier et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7111520 | Payne | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7168464 | Diggins | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7289877 | Wilson | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7946309 | Reid et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8096446 | Carapelli | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8285506 | Oldham et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
9383241 | Weinstein | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20050028610 | Olivier | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060027100 | Kozyuk | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20080178687 | Amante | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090032548 | Larsson et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20120031195 | Skirda | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120285259 | Boulanger et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130126553 | Williams | May 2013 | A1 |
20140110429 | Tronik et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150153210 | Bartlett et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160122174 | Liebal et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160122175 | Liebal et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2012076666 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 5, 2016 in corresponding international application No. PCT/US2015/058628, all enclosed pages cited. |
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Cavitation—Heaters, last updated Jun. 14, 2016, all enclosed pages cited. |
Corrected Notice of Allowance and Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 3, 2017 and Jul. 11, 2017, respectively, in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/929,908, all enclosed pages cited. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2016 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/929,908, all enclosed pages cited. |
Amendment filed in response to Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2016 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/929,908, all enclosed pages cited. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160122175 A1 | May 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62073450 | Oct 2014 | US |