Patent Grant
6971375
This application is based on Japanese Patent Applications No. 2004-89033 filed on Mar. 25, 2004, No. 2004-326562 filed on Nov. 10, 2004, and No. 2004-377452 filed on Dec. 27, 2004, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a fuel vapor treatment system for an internal combustion engine.
The fuel vapor treatment system restricts the dissipation of fuel vapor produced in a fuel tank to the atmosphere. A fuel vapor introduced into the system from the fuel tank through an inlet passage is once adsorbed into an adsorbing material disposed within a canister and, when an internal combustion engine operates, the adsorbed fuel vapor is purged to an intake pipe in the internal combustion engine through a purging passage by utilizing a negative pressure developed within the intake pipe. The adsorption capacity of the adsorbing material is recovered by purging of the fuel vapor. Purging of the fuel vapor is performed by metering the flow rate of purged gas (the flow rate of purged air and that of purged fuel vapor) which metering is performed by a purge control valve disposed in the purging passage.
The purged fuel vapor burns together with fuel which is fed from an injector, therefore, in order to attain an appropriate air/fuel ratio, it is important to measure an actual amount of purged fuel vapor with a high accuracy. As a method for measuring the purge quantity, a method wherein a hot wire type mass flow meter is installed in a purging passage is disclosed in JP-5-18326A.
However, the flow meter is generally designed and calibrated on the premise of 100% air gas or a gas of a single component. Therefore, it has been difficult to measure with a high accuracy the flow rate of an air-fuel vapor mixture of which concentration is not constant like the purged gas. In JP-5-33733A (USP-5216995), another hot wire type mass flow meter is installed in an atmosphere passage which branches from the purging passage and the volume flow rate of the purged gas and the concentration of fuel vapor in the purged gas are detected from output values provided from the two mass flow meters.
In JP-5-18326A and JP-5-33733A (USP-5216995), since the flow meter(s) is installed in the purging passage, the concentration of fuel vapor cannot be detected unless purging of fuel vapor is performed with flow of purged gas. Therefore, for reflecting a measured concentration of fuel vapor in the control of air-fuel ratio, it is necessary to measure the concentration of fuel vapor before the purged fuel vapor reaches the injector position, and to correct a command value for the amount of fuel to be injected from the injector based on the measured concentration of fuel vapor.
However, in the case of an engine having a small intake pipe volume or in an operation region of a high flow velocity of intake air, the time required for purged fuel vapor to reach the injection position is shorter than the time required for completing the measurement of a fuel vapor concentration and thus it is hard to reflect a properly measured fuel vapor concentration in the control of air-fuel ratio. Alternatively, the engine structure including the layout of pipes, and the purge starting operation region are restricted. At present, throttling the purge flow rate up to the extent that the fuel vapor does not exert a bad influence on the control of air-fuel ratio is the only way to avoid the influence of variation in the concentration of fuel vapor. Without purge restriction, it is difficult to control the air-fuel ratio properly. Particularly, when a fuel vapor treatment system is to be applied to a hybrid vehicle which has recently been spotlighted, it is absolutely necessary to carry out a large quantity purge for the recovery of adsorption capacity because of the opportunity of purging is limited. It is expected to develop a technique which can measure an actual purge quantity of fuel vapor with a high accuracy and increase the purge flow rate.
The present invention has been accomplished in view of the above-mentioned problems and it is an object of the invention to provide a fuel vapor treatment system for an internal combustion engine which can measure the concentration of fuel vapor promptly and accurately and which thereby can purge fuel vapor efficiently and control the air-fuel ratio properly.
According to the present invention, a fuel vapor treatment system for an internal combustion engine includes a canister containing an adsorbing material for temporarily adsorbing fuel vapor conducted thereto from the interior of a fuel tank through an inlet passage; a purging passage for conducting an air-fuel mixture containing fuel vapor desorbed from the adsorbing material into an intake pipe of the internal combustion engine and purging the fuel vapor; and a purge control valve disposed in the purging passage to adjust the purge flow rate based on the result of measurement of a fuel vapor concentration in the air-fuel mixture.
The system further includes a measurement passage having an orifice; gas flow producing means for producing a gas flow within and along the measurement passage; measurement passage switching means for switching the measurement passage between a first concentration measurement state in which the measurement passage is opened to the atmosphere at both ends thereof, allowing air to flow as gas through the measurement passage and a second concentration measurement state in which the measurement passage is brought in communication at both ends thereof with the canister, allowing the air-fuel mixture fed from the canister to flow as gas through the measurement passage.
The system further includes a differential pressure detecting means for detecting a pressure difference at both ends of the orifice; and fuel vapor concentration calculating means for calculating a fuel vapor concentration based on a pressure difference detected in the first concentration measurement state and a pressure difference detected in the second concentration measurement state.
When the capacity of the gas flow producing means is constant, then in accordance with the law of energy conservation, the flow velocity of the passing through the measurement passage and that of gas different in composition from the air also passing through the measurement passage are different from each other because of different densities. Since there is a correlation between density and the concentration of fuel vapor, the flow velocity varies depending on the concentration of fuel vapor. Since the flow velocity defines a pressure loss in the orifice, the concentration of fuel vapor is detected based on a pressure difference detected in the first concentration measurement state and a pressure difference detected in the second concentration measurement state.
Since the measurement passage is provided, the concentration of fuel vapor is detected without flowing gas through the purging passage. Therefore, it is not necessary to determine the concentration of fuel vapor during purge, and the air-fuel ratio can be controlled properly while purging fuel vapor efficiently.
Besides, since an orifice is not installed in the purging passage, there is no fear that the flow of gas in the purging passage may be obstructed by an orifice.
The purge valve is an electromagnetic valve, of which opening degree is adjusted by, for example, duty control with use of an electronic control unit (ECU) 41 which controls various portions of the engine 1. In accordance with the opening degree, fuel vapor desorbed from the adsorbing material 14 is purged into the intake pipe 2 by virtue of a negative pressure in the intake pipe 2 and burns together with fuel injected from an injector 5. The air-fuel mixture containing purged fuel vapor will hereinafter be referred to as “purged gas”.
A purged air passage 17 which is opened to the atmosphere at a front end thereof is connected to the canister 13. A closing valve 18 is disposed in the purged air passage 17.
The purging passage 15 and the purged air passage 17 can be connected with each other through a fuel vapor passage 21 as a measurement passage. On the canister 13 side rather than the purge valve 16, the fuel vapor passage 21 connects to the purging passage 15 through a branch passage 25 which branches from the purging passage 15. On the canister 13 side rather than the closing valve 18, the fuel vapor passage 21 connects to the purged air passage 17 through a branch passage 26 which branches from the purged air passage 17. In the fuel vapor passage 21, there are disposed a first switching valve 31, an orifice 22, a pump 23 and a second switching valve 32 in this order from the purging passage 15 side.
The first switching valve 31 is an electromagnetic valve of a three-way valve structure which makes switching between a first concentration measurement state in which the fuel vapor passage 21 is open to the atmosphere at one end thereof and a second concentration measurement state in which the fuel vapor passage 21 comes into communication with the canister 13 at the one end thereof. The ECU 41 controls the first switching valve in these two switching states selectively. The ECU 41 is preset such that when the first switching valve 31 is OFF, the state of switching is the first concentration measurement state in which the fuel vapor passage 21 is opened to the atmosphere.
The pump 23 as gas flow producing means is an electric pump. When operating, its first switching valve 31 side serves as a suction side to let gas flow along and into the fuel vapor passage 21. The ECU 41 controls Its ON/OFF operation and number of revolutions. The number of revolutions is controlled so as to become constant upon reaching a preset value.
The second switching valve 32 is an electromagnetic valve of a three-way valve structure which switches between a first concentration measurement state in which the fuel vapor passage 21 opens to the atmosphere at the other end thereof and a second concentration measurement state in which the other end of the fuel vapor passage 21 comes into communication with the purged air passage 17. The ECU 41 controls the second switching valve 32 to these two switching states selectively. The ECU 41 is preset such that when the second switching valve 32 is OFF, the state of switching is the first concentration measurement state in which the fuel vapor passage 21 is open to the atmosphere.
At both ends of the orifice 22 the fuel vapor passage 21 is connected to a differential pressure sensor 45 as differential pressure detecting means through pressure conduits 241 and 242, and a pressure difference at both ends of the orifice 22 is detected by the differential pressure sensor 45. A detected differential pressure signal is outputted to the ECU 41.
The ECU 41 has a structure and functions for the ordinary type of engines. With the ECU 41, various portions, including a throttle 4 disposed in the intake pipe 2 to adjust the amount of intake air and an injector 5 for the injection of fuel, are controlled in accordance with the amount of intake air detected by an air flow sensor 42 disposed in the intake pipe 2, an intake pressure detected by an intake pressure sensor 43, an air-fuel ratio detected by an air-fuel ratio sensor 44 disposed in an exhaust pipe 3, as well as an ignition signal, engine speed, engine cooling water temperature and an accelerator position. This control is performed so as to afford proper fuel injection quantity and throttle angle.
For example, the purge execution condition is established when the engine cooling water temperature becomes a predetermined value T1 or higher and it is determined that warming—up of the engine is completed. The concentration detecting condition is established during warming-up of the engine, but for example it is established when the cooling water temperature corresponds to a predetermined value T2 or higher which value T2 is set lower than the above predetermined value T1. The concentration detecting condition is established also during the period (mainly during deceleration) in which the engine is operating and the purging of fuel vapor is stopped. In the case where this fuel vapor treatment system is applied to a hybrid vehicle, the concentration detecting condition is established even when the engine is stopped and the vehicle is running by means of a motor.
When the answer in Step S101 is affirmative, the processing flow advances to Step S102, in which a concentration detecting routine to be described later is executed. When the answer in Step S101 is negative, the processing flow shifts to Step S106, in which it is determined whether the ignition key is OFF or not. When the answer in Step S106 is negative, the processing flow returns to Step S101. When the ignition key is OFF, the processing flow is ended.
In Step S205, a differential pressure ΔP1 in the orifice 22 is detected in this state.
Subsequent Steps S206 and S207 are processes performed by fuel vapor concentration calculating means. In Step S206, a differential pressure ratio P is calculated based on the two detected differential pressures ΔP0 and ΔP1 and in accordance with Equation (1). In Step S207, the fuel vapor concentration C is calculated based on the differential pressure ratio P and in accordance with Equation (2). In Equation (2), k1 is a constant and is stored beforehand in ROM of ECU 41 together with control programs.
P=ΔP1/ΔP0 (1)
C=k1×(P−1)(=k1×(ΔP1−ΔP0)/ΔP0) (2)
When fuel vapor is contained in the purged gas, the density becomes high because the fuel vapor is heavier than air. Under the same number of revolutions of the pump 23 and the same flow velocity (flow rate) in the fuel vapor passage 21, the differential pressure in the orifice 22 becomes large in accordance with the law of energy conservation. The higher the fuel vapor concentration C, the larger the differential pressure ratio P. As shown in
A differential pressure ΔP—flow rate Q characteristic (“orifice characteristic”) in the orifice 22 is also shown in the same figure. The pressure P is equal to the differential pressure ΔP because the pressure loss in the other portions than the orifice 22 is small. The orifice characteristic can be expressed by Equation (3), assuming that the density of fluid flowing through the orifice 22 is ρ. In Equation (3), K is a constant and K=α×π×d2/4×21/2 in which d is a hole diameter of the orifice 22 and α is a flow coefficient of the orifice 22.
Q=K(ΔP/ρ)1/2 (3)
Thus, Equations (3-1) and (3-2) are valid respectively when the fluid flowing through the orifice 22 is air (Air in the figure, also in the following) and when the said fluid is air (HC in the figure, also in the following) containing fuel vapor. As to the subscripts in the equations, Air indicates that the fluid is air and HC indicates that the fluid is air containing fuel vapor.
QAir=K(ΔPAir/ρAir)1/2 (3-1)
QHC=K(ΔPHC/ρHC)1/2 (3-2)
As described above, since the pump 23 is controlled so that its number of revolutions becomes constant, QAir=QHC and Equation (4) exists:
ρHC/ρAir=ΔPHC/ΔPAir (4)
Since density depends on the fuel vapor concentration, the fuel vapor concentration is known with the differential pressure ratio ΔPHC/ΔPAir as parameter. Learning of the pump characteristic is not necessary. ΔPHC and ΔPAir are ΔP1 and ΔP0, respectively.
The following effect is further obtained by controlling the number of revolutions of the pump 23 to a constant value.
When the number of revolutions of the pump 23 is small, the differential pressure ΔP becomes small and the fuel vapor concentration measuring accuracy becomes low, while when the number of revolutions of the pump 23 is too large, the differential pressure ΔP becomes large, affecting the operation of the switching valves 31 and 32. Therefore, it is preferable to set the number of revolutions of the pump 23 while taking such a point into account.
In Step 208, the fuel vapor concentration C obtained is stored temporarily.
In Step S209, the first and second switching valves 31, 32 are turned OFF, and in Step S210, the pump 23 is turned OFF. This state is the same as A in
After execution of the concentration detecting routine (Step S102), it is determined in Step S103 whether the purge execution condition exists or not. As in the ordinary type of fuel vapor treatment systems, the purge execution condition is determined based on such operating conditions as engine water temperature, oil temperature, and engine speed.
When the answer in Step S103 for determining whether the purge execution condition exists or not is affirmative, a purge execution routine is carried out in Step S104. When the purge execution condition does not exist, that is, when the answer in Step S103 is negative, it is determined in Step S105 whether a predetermined time has elapsed or not after execution of the concentration detecting routine. When the answer in Step S105 is negative, the processing of Step S104 is repeated. When the answer in Step S105 for determining whether the predetermined time has elapsed or not after execution of the concentration detecting routine is affirmative, the processing flow returns to Step S101, in which the processing for obtaining the fuel vapor concentration C is again executed and the fuel vapor concentration C is updated to the latest value (Steps S101, S102). The aforesaid predetermined time is set based on the accuracy of a concentration value which is required taking changes with time of the fuel vapor concentration C into account.
In Step S303, the present intake pipe pressure P0 is detected, while in Step S304, a reference flow rate Q100 is calculated based on the intake pipe pressure P0. The reference flow rate Q100 represents the flow rate of gas flowing through the purging passage 15 when the flowing fluid is air 100% and when the degree of opening of the purge valve 16 (“purge valve opening” hereinafter) is 100%. It is calculated in accordance with a reference flow map.
In Step S305, an estimated flow rate Qc of purged air-fuel mixture is calculated based on the fuel vapor concentration C detected in the concentration detecting routine and in accordance with Equation (5). The estimated flow rate Qc is an estimated value of purged gas flow rate when the purged valve opening is set at 100% and when purged gas of the present fuel vapor concentration C is allowed to flow through the purging passage 15.
Qc=Q100×(1−A×C) (5)
In Step S306, based on the fuel vapor concentration C and estimated flow rate Qc and in accordance with Equation (6), there is calculated an estimated flow rate (“estimated purged fuel vapor flow rate” hereinafter) Fc of purged fuel vapor at a purged valve opening of 100% and with purged gas of the present fuel vapor concentration C flowing through the purging passage 15.
Fc=Qc×C (6)
The process of Steps S307 to S309 are performed by degree-of-opening setting means. In Step S307, the estimated purged fuel vapor flow rate Fc is compared with the allowable-purged-fuel-vapor-flow-rate value Fm and it is determined whether Fc≦Fm or not. When the answer is affirmative, the processing flow advances to Step S308, in which the opening degree “x” of the purge valve is set at 100%. This is because there is a margin up to the allowable-purged-fuel-vapor-flow-rate value even when the opening degree “x” of the purged value is set at 100%.
When the answer in Step S307 for determining whether Fc≦Fm or not is negative, it is determined that at a purge valve opening “x” of 100% it is impossible to carry out the air-fuel ratio control properly due to surplus fuel vapor, and the processing flow advances to Step S309, in which the purged valve opening “x” is set at (Fm/Fc)×100%. This is because under the relation of Fc>Fm the maximum purge flow rate at which the proper air-fuel ration control is guaranteed corresponds to allowable-purged-fuel-vapor-flow-rate value Fm.
After the execution of Steps S308 and S309, the purged valve 16 is opened in Step S310. The degree of opening at this time corresponds to the degree of opening (D in
In Step S311 it is determined whether a purge stop condition exists or not. A shift to the next Step S312 is not made until the answer in Step S311 becomes affirmative. When the purge stop condition is established, the purge valve 16 is closed in Step S312.
After execution of the purge execution routine (Step S104), the processing flow advances to Step S105.
Although in this embodiment the pump 23 is controlled to a constant number of revolutions, this does not always constitute a limitation. In this case, learning (measurement) of characteristics of the pump 23 is necessary, but the contents thereof differ depending on the structure of the pump 23. An explanation will now be given about this point.
A description will now be given about the case where pump characteristics are not influenced by the fuel vapor concentration (
Q=K1×P+K2 (7)
Therefore, Equations (7-1) and (7-2) are valid respectively when the fluid passing through the orifice 22 is air and when it is air containing fuel vapor.
QAir=K1×ΔPAir+K2=K1(ΔPAir−Pt) (7-1)
QHC=K1×ΔPHC+K2=K1(ΔPHC−Pt) (7-2)
As to orifice characteristics, the foregoing Equations (3), (3-1) and (3-2) are valid.
Since the Equation (3-1) is equal to the Equation (7-1) in the first concentration measurement state, Equation (8) is obtained.
K(ΔPAir/ρAir)1/2=K1(ΔPAir−Pt) (8)
Transformation of Equation (8) gives Equation (9).
ρAir=(K2×ΔPAir)/{K12×(ΔPAir−Pt)2} (9)
Likewise, since (3-2)=(7-2) in the second concentration measurement state, Equation (10) is obtained.
ρHC=(K2×ΔPHC)/{K12×(ΔPHC−Pt)2} (10)
Equation (11) is obtained from Equations (9) and (10).
ρHC/ρAir=(ΔPHC/ΔPAir)×{(ΔPAir−Pt)/(ΔPHC−Pt)}2 (11)
Thus, for obtaining the fuel vapor concentration, the no-discharge pressure Pt is measured as a pump characteristic in addition to ΔPAir and ΔPHC.
The following description is now provided about the case where pump characteristics are influenced by the fuel vapor concentration (
QAir=K1×ΔPAir+K2=Q0×(1−ΔPAir/PAt) (7-1′)
QHC=K1′×ΔPHC+K2′=Q0×(1×ΔPHC/PHt) (7-2′)
As described earlier, since the Equation (3-1) is equal to the Equation (7-1′) in the first concentration measurement state, Equation (12) is established.
ρAir=(K2×ΔPAir)/{Q02×(1−ΔPAir/PAt)2} (12)
Likewise, in the second concentration measurement state, Equation (13) is established since the Equation (3-2) is equal to the Equation (7-2′).
ρHC=(K2×ΔPHC)/{Q02×(1−ΔPHC/PHt)2} (13)
Equation (14) is obtained from Equations (12) and (13).
ρHC/ρAir=(ΔPHC/ΔPAir)×{(1−ΔPAir/PAt)/(1−ΔPHC/PHt)}2 (14)
Therefore, for obtaining the fuel vapor concentration, the no-discharge pressures PAt and PHt are measured in addition of ΔPAir and ΔPHC.
In this embodiment, the differential pressure in the orifice 22 is detected by the differential pressure sensor 45. However, there may be adopted such a construction as shown in
A bypass 27 is provided for connecting the fuel vapor passage 21 and the purged air passage 17 directly with each other without interposition of the pump 23 and the second switching valve 32. One end of the bypass 27 is in communication with the fuel vapor passage 21 at a position between the orifice 22 and the pump 23, while an opposite end thereof is in communication with the purging passage 17 on the canister 13 side rather than the branch passage 26. A bypass opening/closing valve 28 is disposed in the bypass 27. The bypass opening/closing valve 28 is a normally closed electromagnetic valve, which is opened or closed by control of the ECU 41B to cut off or provide communication between the fuel vapor passage 21 and the purged air passage 17 through the bypass 27.
The ECU 41B is basically the same as the ECU used in the first embodiment.
In Step S350 which follows, the purge valve 16 is opened at the purge valve opening “x”, thus set and the first switching valve 31 and the bypass opening/closing valve 28 are turned ON (E in
In Step S351, a differential pressure ΔP in the orifice 22 is detected, then in Step S352, an actual flow rate (“actual purge flow rate” hereinafter as the case may be) Qr of purged gas fed to the intake pipe 2 is calculated based on the detected differential pressure ΔP. As purged air, as described above, there are two types, one passing through the canister 13 and the other passing through the aforesaid purging bypass. The flow rate ratio is constant in proportion to the sectional areas of the respective passages. The differential pressure ΔP in the orifice 22 is proportional to the square of the flow rate of purged air passing through the orifice 22. Therefore, the actual flow rate Qr can be calculated based on the differential pressure ΔP.
In Steps S353 and S354, like Steps S303 and 304 in the first embodiment, the intake pipe pressure P0 is detected (Step S353) and the reference flow rate Q100 is calculated based on the detected intake pipe pressure P0 (Step S354).
Step S355 is a processing performed by another fuel vapor concentration calculating means, in which the fuel vapor concentration C is calculated based on the actual purge flow rate Qr and the reference flow rate Q100 and in accordance with Equation (14). In Equation (14), “A” is a constant of the same meaning as “A” in the Equation (5).
C=(1/A)×(1−Qr/Q100) (14)
In Step S356, the purged fuel vapor flow rate F is calculated in accordance with Equation (15).
F=Qr×C (15)
In Step S357, the purged fuel vapor flow rate F is compared with the allowable-purged-fuel-vapor-flow-rate value Fm and it is determined whether F≦Fm or not. When the answer is affirmative, the processing flow advances to Step S358, in which the purge valve opening “x” is made 100%. This is because there is a margin up to the allowable-purged-fuel-vapor-flow-rate value Fm even when the purge valve opening “x”, is made 100%. When the answer in Step S357 for determining whether F≦Fm or not is negative, it is determined that at the purge valve opening “x” of 100% it is impossible to properly control the air-fuel ratio due to surplus fuel vapor, and the processing flow shifts to Step S359, in which the purge valve opening “x” is set at (Fm/F)×100%. This is because under the condition of F>Fm the maximum purge flow rate which guarantees the proper air-fuel ratio control becomes the allowable-purged-fuel-vapor-flow-rate value Fm.
After the execution of Step S358 or S359, the purge valve opening “x” is controlled in Step S360 to the degree of opening set in Step S358 or S359.
In Step S361, like Step S311 in the first embodiment, it is determined whether the purge stop condition exists or not. When the answer in Step S361 is negative, the processing flow shifts to Step S351, in which the purged fuel vapor flow rate F and the allowable-purged-fuel-vapor-flow-rate value Fm are updated under new operating conditions and the degree of opening of the purge valve 16 is adjusted (Steps S351 to S360). When the answer in Step S361 for determining whether the purge stop condition exists or not is affirmative, the processing flow advances to Step S362, in which the purge valve 16 is closed, the first switching valve 31 is turned OFF, and the bypass opening/closing valve 28 is closed.
Thus, according to this embodiment, even when the fuel vapor concentration C varies during purge, the degree of opening of the purge valve 16 is adjusted accordingly, so that the air-fuel control can be performed in a more appropriate manner.
A fuel vapor passage opening/closing valve 29 is disposed in the fuel vapor passage 21 on the orifice 22 side rather than the connection with the pressure conduit 242. The fuel vapor passage opening/closing valve 29 is an electromagnetic valve, which is controlled so as to open or close the fuel vapor passage 21 by means of ECU 41C. In this embodiment, leakage in the evaporative system is detected by utilizing the orifice 22 and the differential pressure sensor 45. But the construction of this embodiment is substantially the same as that of the second embodiment, provided the fuel vapor passage opening/closing valve 29 is kept open. The air-fuel ratio can be controlled properly by executing the foregoing concentration detecting routine and purge execution routine.
When the answer in Step S402 for determining whether the key is OFF or not is affirmative, the processing flow advances to Step S403, in which it is determined whether a predetermined time has elapsed or not from the time when the key turned OFF. The process of Step S403 is for stopping the execution of leak check taking into account the point that, just after turning OFF of the key, the state of the evaporative system is unstable and not suitable for the execution of leak check, for example, the fuel present within the fuel tank 11 oscillates or the fuel temperature is unstable. The predetermined time is a reference time required until the state of the evaporative system becomes stable to such an extent as permits an accurate execution of leak check after the unstable state just after turning OFF of the key. When the answer in Step S403 for determining whether the predetermined time has elapsed or not after turning OFF of the key is negative, the processing of Step S403 is repeated, while when the predetermined time has elapsed, that is, when the answer in Step S403 is affirmative, leak check is carried out in Step S404 and this flow is ended.
In Step S501, the pump 23 is turned ON (B in
In Step S504, a change P(i−1)−P(i) from an immediately preceding measured pressure P(i−1) to this-time measured pressure P(i) is compared with a threshold value Pa to determine whether P(i−1)−P(i)<Pa or not. When the answer is negative, the variable i is incremented in Step S505 and the processing flow returns to Step S503. When the answer in Step S504 for determining whether P(i−1)−P(i)<Pa or not is affirmative, the processing flow advances to Step S506. That is, the measured pressure changes sharply upon activation of the pump 23 and thereafter converges gradually to a pressure value which is defined by for example the sectional area of the passage in the orifice 22. Since the measured pressure exhibits such a behavior, the processes of Step S506 and subsequent steps are executed after the measured pressure converges to a sufficient extent.
In Step S506, P(i) is substituted into the reference pressure P1. Then, in Step S507, the closing valve 18 is closed, the bypass opening/closing valve 28 is opened, and the fuel vapor passage opening/closing valve 29 is closed (F in
At this time, the gas present in the fuel tank 11, inlet passage 12, canister 13, purging passage 15 and purged air passage 17 is discharged to the atmosphere as indicated by arrow in
When the answer in Step S510 for determining whether P(i)<P1 is negative, the processing flow shifts to Step S511. The processes of Steps S511 and S512 are of the same contents as Steps S504 and S505. In Step S511, a change P(i−1)−P(i) from an immediately preceding measured pressure P(i−1) to this-time measured pressure P(i) is compared with the threshold value Pa to determine whether P(i−1)−P(i)<Pa or not. When the answer is negative, the variable i is incremented in Step S512 and the processing flow returns to Step S509. When the answer in Step S511 for determining whether P(i−1)−P(i)<Pa or not is affirmative, the processing flow advances to Step S514. Step S511, like Step S504, waits for convergence of the measured pressure P(i).
In Step S513 the evaporative system is determined to be normal with respect to leakage, while in Step S514 it is determined that a trouble, i.e., leakage, is occurring in the evaporative system. Thus, the normal condition is determined when the measured pressure P(i) has reached the reference pressure P1, while when the measured pressure P(i) has not reached the reference pressure P1, the occurrence of a trouble is determined on condition that the measured pressure P(i) is converged. This determination is based on the sectional area of the passage in the orifice.
The orifice 22 is set taking into account the area of a leak hole leading to the determination indicating the occurrence of a trouble.
After the normal condition is determined in Step S513, the processing flow advances to Step S516. On the other hand, after the occurrence of a trouble is determined in Step S514, the processing flow advances to Step S515, in which warning means is operated, and then the flow advances to Step S516. For example, the warning means is an indicator installed in the vehicular instrument panel.
In Step S516, the pump 23 is turned OFF, the closing valve 18 is opened, the opening/closing valve 28 is closed, the fuel vapor passage opening/closing valve 29 is opened, and this flow is ended.
Thus, according to this embodiment, leak check for the evaporative system can be done by utilizing the orifice 22 for fuel vapor concentration measurement, the pump 23, and the differential pressure sensor 45. The fuel vapor treatment system can be provided at low cost because it is not necessary to provide new sensors.
The capacity of the pump 23 may be switched from one to the other between the time when the fuel vapor concentration is to be measured and the time when leakage in the evaporative system is to be checked. Switching of the pump capacity can be done by increasing or decreasing the number of revolutions of the pump 23.
As noted earlier, the detected differential pressure ΔP is obtained from a point of intersection between pump characteristic and orifice characteristic. In this connection, when the number of revolutions of the pump 23 is set high to increase the flow rate relatively, the difference in fuel vapor concentration is reflected largely in the detected differential pressure ΔP (
A differential pressure in the orifice 22 is calculated by ECU 41D from pressures detected by pressure sensors 451 and 452. The fuel vapor passage opening/closing valve 29 is not installed.
The ECU 41D is basically the same as ECU 41A (
In Step S607, the closing valve 18 is closed, the first switching valve 31 is turned ON, and the bypass opening/closing valve 28 is opened. Pressure which is converged in this state is measured by the pressure sensor 452. Although gas flows in this state as shown in
In Step S616, the pump 23 is turned OFF, the closing valve 18 is opened, the first switching valve 31 is closed, and the bypass valve 28 is closed.
Thus, the evaporative system and the orifice 22 are brought into communication with each other by turning ON the first switching valve 31. Therefore, by detecting the pressure of the to-be-inspected space with use of not a differential pressure sensor but a pressure sensor, it is not required to provide a valve for shutting off the fuel vapor passage 21 on the orifice 22 side rather than the connection with the pressure conduit 242. As a result, the construction can be further simplified.
The pressure sensor 451 need not be provided as in
The leak check for the evaporative system is carried out by measuring pressures in pressure reduction ranges in two leak measurement states. In this case, combinations of pressure reduction ranges in the two leak measurement states are as in the third and fourth embodiment wherein one pressure reduction range is only the fuel vapor passage having the orifice or as in the fourth embodiment wherein the orifice is integral with the evaporative system and is not open to the atmosphere on the side opposite to the pump.
Unlike these modes, there may be adopted a mode wherein not only the pressure of the evaporative system is reduced by the pump but also the pressure reduction is performed in an open condition to the atmosphere of the orifice-including fuel vapor passage on the side opposite to the pump. In this case, the detected pressure value depends on the total value of both the sectional area of the passage in the orifice and the sectional area of the passage in the leak hole of the evaporative system. Therefore, by comparing this pressure value with the pressure value in case of the pressure reduction range being the orifice alone or in case of the pressure reduction range being the evaporative system alone, it is possible to determine the size of the leak hole. Further, not the reduction of pressure by the pump, but the application of pressure may be adopted.
A pump 231 is an electric pump capable of rotating forward and reverse. The measurement of the fuel vapor concentration is performed in the same way as in the second embodiment while setting the rotational direction of the pump 231 in a direction (the rotation in this direction will hereinafter be referred to as “forward rotation”) in which gas flows from the first switching valve 31 to the second switching valve 32. Leak check for the evaporative system is performed in the same manner as in the third embodiment except that the rotational direction of the pump 231 is set in the opposite direction (the rotation in this direction will hereinafter be referred to as “reverse rotation”). In this way it is possible to apply pressure in the pressure application range instead of pressure reduction. That is, when the pump 231 is turned ON with the first and second switching valves 31, 32 OFF and the opening/closing valve 28 closed, air is introduced into the fuel vapor passage 21 and the outflow of gas is restricted by the orifice 22, so that the internal pressure of the fuel vapor passage 21 rises (first leak measurement state). Next, when the first switching valve 31 is turned ON and the opening/closing valve 28 is opened, an air is introduced along the path indicated by a dotted line in
In the pressure application type leak check, however, “internal pressure relief” is needed to restore the internal pressure of the tank to the atmospheric pressure after the end of leak check. At the time of internal pressure relief, when the canister 13 is in a state of adsorption close to breakthrough, HC adsorbed in the canister is desorbed by the internal pressure relief, with consequent fear of entry of HC into the pump. Particularly, in case of using a pump (e.g., vane pump) of a structure involving internal leak, as a result of entry of breakthrough HC into the pump from a pressure application line, the P-Q characteristic of the pump varies and there is a fear that an erroneous concentration may be detected at the time of detecting concentration just after the leak check (e.g., detecting concentration after start-up of the engine). As a countermeasure, according to the construction shown in
Thus, by disposing the opening/closing valve 28 in the bypass 27 it is possible to cut off communication between the canister 13 and the pump 231. Therefore, even when there is used a pump involving internal leak and the detection of concentration is performed just after the pressure application type leak check, it is possible to suppress variations in pump characteristic and detect an accurate concentration. When purging is performed during vehicular running and after the leak check, there does not occur any variation in characteristic because the pump portion is also scavenged with fresh gas. In the construction of
Although in the above embodiments the bypass 27 which connects the purged air passage 17 and the fuel vapor passage 21 with each other while bypassing the canister 13 is used as a pressure reducing passage or a pressure application passage at the time of leak check, this does not always constitute a limitation. For example, there may be adopted a construction free of the by pass 27 wherein the pump 23 is rotated forward to pressurize the evaporative system from the branch passage 26 through the purged air passage 17. Also in this case it is possible to prevent breakthrough of HC to the pump 23 by closing the second switching valve 32 which serves as an opening/closing valve during internal pressure relief. Thus, in the present invention, both leak check and concentration detection can be effected easily by utilizing or modifying the existing construction.
In each of the above embodiments, the differential pressure may be determined not by use of a differential pressure sensor or pressure sensors but based on operating conditions the pump 23 such as, for example, drive voltage, drive current, and the number of revolutions. This is because these conditions vary in accordance with the load on the pump. In this case, a voltmeter, an ammeter, and a revolution sensor are provided as means for detecting operating conditions of the pump.
Although atmosphere-side ports of the first and second switching valves 31, 32 are not shown in the construction diagrams of the above embodiments, those ports are connected to air filters through predetermined pipes. In this connection, there may be adopted such a construction as shown in
A fuel vapor passage 61 can communicate on one end side thereof with the branch passage 25 branching from the purging passage 15 through a switching valve 33 which serves as measurement passage switching means, and is in communication on an opposite end side thereof with the purged air passage 17. The switching valve 33 is an electromagnetic valve of a three-way valve structure adapted to switch between the side where the fuel vapor passage 61 is opened to the atmosphere and the branch passage 25 is closed and the side where the branch passage 25 and the fuel vapor passage 61 are brought into communication with each other.
An orifice 63 and a pump 62 are provided in the fuel vapor passage 61. Pressure conduits 241 and 242 are connected to the fuel vapor passage 61 at both ends of the orifice 63 and a pressure difference before and behind the orifice 63 is detected by the differential pressure sensor 45.
A switching valve 34 is disposed in the pressure conduit 242 located on the purged air passage 17 side to switch the differential pressure sensor 45 from one side to the other between the fuel vapor passage 61 side and the atmosphere opening side. The switching valve 34 is an electromagnetic valve of a three-way valve structure. The switching valves 33 and 34 are controlled by ECU 41E. When the switching valve 34 is switched to the fuel vapor passage 61 side, a detected signal provided from the differential pressure sensor 45 indicates an internal pressure of the fuel vapor passage 61. The pump 62 is an electric pump capable of rotating forward and reverse, whose ON-OFF and switching of rotational direction are controlled by ECU 41E.
A passage 64 bypasses the orifice 63 and an opening/closing valve 65 is disposed in the passage 64. The opening/clo sing valve is an electromagnetic valve of a two-way valve structure. Also in this embodiment, as in the previous embodiments, the closing valve 18 is provided for opening and closing the purged air passage 17. Four valves are used exclusive of the purge valve 16. Although this number is smaller by one than in the third embodiment, it is possible to effect operations (fuel vapor concentration measurement and leak check for the evaporator system) equal to those in the previous embodiments.
(Measurement of Fuel Vapor Concentration)
First, the opening/closing valve 65 is closed and the closing valve 18 is opened. Then, the switching valve 33 is switched to the atmosphere open side and the switching valve 34 is switched to the fuel vapor passage 61 side. The rotational direction of the pump 62 is switched to the direction in which the discharged gas from the pump 62 flows to the orifice 63 (the rotation in this direction will hereinafter be referred to as “forward rotation”). As a result, air which has entered the fuel vapor passage 61 from one end of the same passage passes through the purged air passage 17 and is again discharged to the atmosphere side. This state corresponds to the first concentration measurement state in each of the previous embodiments shown in
Next, the switching valve 33 is switched to the branch passage 25 side and the closing valve 18 is closed. As a result, there is formed a closed annular path along which the fuel vapor-containing air present within the canister 13 passes through the fuel vapor passage 61 from the purging passage 15 and again returns to the canister 13. This state corresponds to the second concentration measurement state in each of the previous embodiments shown in
In the ECU 41E, the fuel vapor concentration is calculated in the same way as in the previous embodiments (see Steps S206 to S208 in
(Leak Check in Evaporative System)
Also in case of leak check for the evaporative system, the opening/closing valve 65 is closed beforehand and the closing valve 18 is opened. Then, the switching valve 33 is switched to the atmosphere open side and the switching valve 34 is switched to the atmosphere open side. The pump 62 is rotated in a direction opposite (“reverse rotation” hereinafter as the case may be) to the rotational direction in the fuel vapor concentration measurement. As a result, the air present within the fuel vapor passage 61 is discharged in a state in which the entry of air is restricted by the orifice 63. This state corresponds to the first leak measurement state in the third embodiment and the pressure detected by the differential pressure sensor 45 is inputted until convergence thereof (see Steps S502 to S506 in
Next, the closing valve 18 is closed and the opening/closing valve 65 is opened. The pump 62 is reverse-rotated as above. As a result, a closed space from the canister 13 to the purge valve 16 and the switching valve 33 and from the canister 13 to the pump 62 is formed as a to-be-inspected space and an air is discharged by the pump 62. This state corresponds to the second leak measurement state in the third embodiment and the pressure detected by the differential pressure sensor 45 is inputted until convergence thereof.
In ECU 41E, based on the detected pressures in the first and second leak measurement states, the presence or absence of leak is determined as the area of a leak hole based on the sectional area of the passage in the orifice 63 which is a reference orifice as in the third embodiment (see Steps S506 to S515).
In the second concentration measurement state, a gas circulating annular path is formed between the fuel vapor passage 61 and the canister 13. When the second leak measurement state is to be obtained on the premise of the said path, it is necessary to not only shut off between the branch passage 25 and the fuel vapor passage 61 by the switching valve 33 but also provide a pipe for connecting the evaporative system to the pump 62, e.g., a pipe for connecting the purged air passage 17 to the fuel vapor passage 61 at a position between the pump 62 and the switching valve 33, and further provide a valve for opening and closing the said pipe [see the bypass 27 and bypass opening/closing valve 28 in the third embodiment (
These pipe and valve can be omitted by reversing the rotational direction of the pump 62 to reverse the gas flowing direction. Thus, according to this embodiment, despite a simple construction using a reduced number of valves, the measurement of fuel vapor concentration and leak check for the evaporative system substantially equivalent to those in the third embodiment can be effected.
In this embodiment, a switching valve 66 disposed in the fuel vapor passage 61 is constituted by an electromagnetic valve with orifice. In one switched state, the fuel vapor passage 61 becomes a passage having an orifice 661, while in the other switched state, the fuel vapor passage 61 becomes a simple passage free of orifice. The one switched state is equivalent to the closed state of the opening/closing valve 65 in the fifth embodiment, while the other switched state is substantially equivalent to the open condition of the valve 65, whereby the first and second concentration measurement states and the first and second leak measurement states can be realized. Since related passages can be omitted, the construction is further simplified and the layout of pies becomes neat.
ECU 41F controls not only the valves 18, 33 and 34 but also the electromagnetic valve 66 so that the first and second concentration measurement states and the first and second leak measurement states are realized.
In this embodiment, a check valve 35 is disposed in the pressure conduit 242 instead of the switching valve for switching the pressure conduit 242 for the differential pressure sensor 45 from one to the other between the fuel vapor passage 61 side and the atmosphere open side. The check valve 35 is mounted in such a manner that the direction from the fuel vapor passage 61 to the differential pressure sensor 45 is a forward direction. The check valve 35 becomes open when the orifice 63 is on the discharge side of the pump 62, and a differential pressure is known from a signal detected by the differential pressure sensor 45. When the orifice 63 is on the suction side of the pump 62 in a leak measurement state, the check valve 35 is closed and the internal pressure of the fuel vapor passage 61 is known from a signal detected the differential pressure signal 45. Thus, by only switching the rotational direction of the pump 62, the output of the differential pressure sensor 45 can be switched between differential pressure and pressure without control by ECU 41G. Consequently, it is possible to not only simplify the construction but also lighten the control burden on ECU 41G.
In this embodiment, like
Although in each of the above embodiments the pump is used only for the measurement of fuel vapor concentration and leak check in the evaporative system, the pump may be used in assisting the purge of fuel vapor as follows. During the execution of purge in the constructions of
Pre-purge of fuel vapor may be performed before the detection of a differential pressure in the first concentration measurement state and the detection of a differential pressure in the second concentration measurement state. By once purging the fuel vapor staying in the canister and in the purging passage it is possible to avoid mixing of fuel vapor into the gas flowing through the fuel vapor passage in the first concentration measurement state wherein the gas flowing through the fuel vapor passage is the air. There may be added a processing wherein in accordance with an ECU control program as pre-purge means the purge valve 18 is opened for a predetermined time prior to execution of the concentration detecting routine (Step S102). In this case, the predetermined time is set so that the purge quantity during that time corresponds to the volume from the front end of the purged air passage up to the closing valve. It is possible to prevent the pre-purge from being continued longer than necessary and make a prompt shift to the concentration detecting routine.
Concrete specifications of the present invention are not limited to those described above, but any other specifications may be adopted insofar as they are not contrary to the gist of the invention.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-089033 | Mar 2004 | JP | national |
| 2004-326562 | Nov 2004 | JP | national |
| 2004-377452 | Dec 2004 | JP | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5178117 | Fujimoto et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5216995 | Hosoda et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5390645 | Cook et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5447141 | Kitamoto et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 6016792 | Kawano et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6722348 | Nagasaki et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 20010049958 | Yamaguchi et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010054415 | Hanai et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20030051541 | Kano et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030226549 | Takagi et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040089062 | Matsubara et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 05018326 | Jul 1991 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050211228 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
