Functionalized Carbon Particle CMP Slurry

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20250223467
  • Publication Number
    20250223467
  • Date Filed
    January 10, 2024
    a year ago
  • Date Published
    July 10, 2025
    9 days ago
Abstract
The invention provides a chemical mechanical polishing solution for metal and metal nitride substrates. The polishing solution includes a solvent and functionalized carbon-based particles having oxygen-containing functional groups. The functionalized carbon-based particles having oxygen-containing functional groups react with a peroxy moiety to increase oxygen to carbon atomic ratio on the functionalized carbon-based particles. The functionalized carbon-based particles contain at least 10 weight percent of an sp3-containing structure, the functionalized carbon-based particles include at least 0.01 atomic percent oxygen and a surface of the functionalized carbon-based particles has an atomic oxygen to carbon ratio of at least 0.01.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of chemical mechanical polishing. In particular, the present invention is directed to chemical mechanical polishing compositions for metal polishing.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the fabrication of integrated circuits and other electronic devices, multiple layers of conducting, semiconducting and dielectric materials are deposited onto and removed from a surface of a semiconductor wafer. Thin layers of conducting, semiconducting and dielectric materials may be deposited using a number of deposition techniques. Common deposition techniques in modern wafer processing include physical vapor deposition (PVD), also known as sputtering, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) and electrochemical plating, among others.


As layers of materials are sequentially deposited and removed, the uppermost surface of the wafer becomes non-planar. Because subsequent semiconductor processing (e.g., metallization) requires the wafer to have a flat surface, the wafer needs to be planarized. Planarization is useful for removing undesired surface topography and surface defects, such as rough surfaces, agglomerated materials, crystal lattice damage, scratches and contaminated layers or materials. Planarization is particularly critical in polishing metal layers adjacent non-metal layers in advanced semiconductor applications. Furthermore, control of metal dishing and dielectric erosion are increasingly important.


Chemical mechanical planarization, or chemical mechanical polishing (CMP), is a common technique used to planarize or polish work pieces such as semiconductor wafers. In conventional CMP, a wafer carrier, or polishing head, is mounted on a carrier assembly. The polishing head holds the wafer and positions the wafer in contact with a polishing layer of a polishing pad that is mounted on a table or platen within a CMP apparatus. The polishing slurry provides the correct balance of removal rate, selectivity, dishing and erosion to connect features of modern semiconductors.


Metals and metal nitrides, such as cobalt, copper, molybdenum, tungsten, titanium nitride and tantalum nitride are used in semiconductor manufacturing for the formation of metal lines and contact vias connecting inter layers of metal lines in integrated circuits. Most semiconductors use copper metal lines to connect semiconductor features, such as transistors. Titanium nitride and tantalum nitride can serve as barrier films that protect dielectric from copper diffusion. In the formation of via holes are etched through an interlevel dielectric (ILD) to interconnection lines or to a semiconductor substrate. A thin adhesion layer of, for example, titanium nitride or titanium may then be formed over the ILD and into the etched via hole. A cobalt, molybdenum or tungsten film is then blanket deposited over the adhesion layer and into the via. Excess cobalt, molybdenum or tungsten is then removed by chemical mechanical polishing to form the tungsten vias.


The chemical mechanical polishing composition used in the via polishing is an important variable in determining the success of the process. Depending on the choice of the abrasive and other additives, the chemical mechanical polishing composition can be tailored to provide effective polishing of various layers present at desired polishing rates while minimizing surface imperfections, defects, corrosion, and erosion of the interlevel dielectric adjacent to the tungsten vias. Furthermore, the chemical mechanical polishing composition may be used to provide controlled polishing selectivity to other materials present at the surface of the substrate being polished such as, for example, silicon oxide, titanium, titanium nitride, silicon nitride and the like.


Typically, tungsten polishing is accomplished using a chemical mechanical polishing composition that includes abrasive particles and a chemical reagent. Conventional polishing compositions for tungsten polishing use alumina (Al2O3) or silica (SiO2) fine particles as an abrasive material with a Fenton's catalyst or reagent. Fenton's regents operate in a harsh oxidizing environment usually at an acidic pH well below 3.5. In many cases, however, the resulting compositions etch tungsten in a manner that chemically etches tungsten from the surface instead of converting the tungsten to a soft oxidized film that is more easily removed from the surface by mechanical abrasion. Due to this enhanced chemical action, such compositions tend to cause recessing of the tungsten plug. Recessed tungsten vias, where the surface of the tungsten in the via is below that of the surrounding interlayer dielectric material can cause electrical contact problems to other areas of the device. Moreover, the recessing in the center of the tungsten vias can lead to increased nonplanarity of the device on subsequent levels of the device. Etching of the tungsten from the center of the vias can also cause undesirable “keyholing”.


Notwithstanding, there is a continuing need for new chemical mechanical polishing compositions for metal and metal nitride polishing for polishing and planarizing semiconductor wafers.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An aspect of the invention provides a chemical mechanical polishing solution for metal and metal nitride substrates comprising: a solvent; and functionalized carbon-based particles having oxygen-containing functional groups, the functionalized carbon-based particles having oxygen-containing functional groups react with a peroxy moiety to increase oxygen to carbon atomic ratio on the functionalized carbon-based particles, the functionalized carbon-based particles containing at least 10 weight percent of an sp3-containing structure, wherein the functionalized carbon-based particles include at least 0.01 atomic percent oxygen and wherein a surface of the functionalized carbon-based particles has an atomic oxygen to carbon ratio of at least 0.01.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 provides the crystal structure of functionalized carbon-based particles 2-1 measured by x-ray diffraction.



FIG. 2 provides Raman spectroscopy data for functionalized carbon-based particles 2-1.



FIG. 3 provides the FTIR spectra for the surface of multiple functionalized carbon-based particles.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The polishing slurries of invention are useful for polishing and planarizing metal and metal nitride-containing semiconductor substrates. In particular, the solutions are useful for cobalt, copper, molybdenum, tungsten, titanium nitride and tantalum nitride layers. The polishing formulation of the invention provides effective removal rates of soft metals, such as cobalt, copper and titanium, hard metals such as molybdenum and tungsten and metal nitrides, such as titanium nitride and tantalum nitride. Furthermore, it can provide effective selectivity with respect to dielectric layers, such as TEOS and silicon nitride layers.


The slurry operates with functionalized carbon-based particles having oxygen-containing functional groups. Advantageously, the oxygen-containing functional group is a COOH and its salts, COOOH and its salts, OH—, ketone, oxirane or a combination thereof. Most advantageously, the functional group is COOH and its salts or COOOH and its salts. The functionalized carbon-based particles having oxygen-containing functional groups react with a peroxy moiety to increase oxygen on the carbon-based particles. For example, the COOH and its salts groups can react with peroxy moieties to form COOOH— groups. Optionally, the carbon-based particles may also include an amine (NH2) group, hydroxyl (OH) group, sulfonate (SO3) group or hydrocarbon (C—H) groups.


The carbon-based particles contain sp3-containing structure for effective removal rate of metal and metal nitrides. Non-sp3 carbon structures, such as pure graphite, graphene and amorphous carbon do not provide effective removal rate of metal and metal nitrides. For example, the carbon particles contain at least 10 weight percent of an sp3-containing structure. Advantageously, the carbon particles contain at least 30 weight percent of an sp3-containing structure. Most advantageously, the carbon particles contain at least 50 or even 60 weight percent of an sp3-containing structure. In the functionalized carbon-based particle includes at least 0.01 atomic percent oxygen. Advantageously, the functionalized carbon-based particle includes at least 0.02 atomic percent oxygen. Most advantageously, the functionalized carbon-based particle includes at least 0.025 atomic percent oxygen. In addition, the surface of the carbon-based particles has an atomic oxygen to carbon ratio of at least 0.01. Most advantageously, the surface of the carbon-based particles has an atomic oxygen to carbon ratio of at least 0.02. The oxygen associated with the carbon-based particles increases removal rate of the metal and metal nitride substrates. Similar oxygen compounds, in solution, such as peracetic acid provide no improvement to removal rate when without the use of the sp3-containing carbon particles. These polishing slurries can provide the advantage of operating without Fenton's catalyst or reagent. Thus, for some formulations, it is advantageous to operate with an iron-free formulation. These formulations can operate at higher pH levels with less hydrogen peroxide that can result in lower static etch rates.


Optionally, the polishing slurry contains a Fenton's catalyst or reagent. Examples of Fenton's catalysts or reagent include at least one transition metal catalyst selected from the group consisting of metal salts of Ag, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mo, Mn, Nb, Ni, Os, Pd, Ru, Sn, Ti, and V, and mixtures thereof. Most advantageously, the Fenton's reagent is iron and examples of suitable iron-based catalysts include iron(III) sulfate, iron(III) nitrate, iron(III) chloride, iron(III) oxalate, potassium tris(oxalato)ferrate (III), ammonium hexacyanoferrate(III), potassium hexacyanoferrate(III), iron(III) citrate, ammonium iron(III) citrate. Typical amounts of Fenton's reagent are 1 to 5000 ppm and advantageously, 5 to 1000 ppm. When using Fenton's reagent, it is advantageous to use a stabilizer for the hydroxy free radical. Examples of stabilizers include the following: citric acid, lactic acid, malic acid, maleic acid, malonic acid, oxalic acid, tartaric acid, phytic acid, gluconic acid. Most advantageously, the stabilizer is malonic acid. Typical amounts for the stabilizer is 0.001 to 1 wt. %. Advantageously, the stabilizer is in an amount of 0.005 to 0.5 wt. %. For purposes of this patent application, all concentrations are express in weight percent, unless noted otherwise.


The carbon-based particles can have a cubic phase or sp3 core and a non-cubic carbon exterior surface. The cubic phase carbon core provides hard particles that contribute to polishing removal rate. In addition, the non-cubic carbon exterior surface, can reduce scratching that can originate from the diamond interior. For example, the surface of the carbon-based particles can include a graphene, graphite, amorphous carbon or a mixture thereof.


The carbon-based hybrid particles typically have an average diameter of 0.2 to 200 nm. Advantageously, the carbon-based hybrid particles have an average diameter of 0.5 to 100 nm. Most advantageously, the carbon-based hybrid particles have an average diameter of 0.1 to 50 nm. Unlike conventional colloidal silica particles, carbon-based hybrid particles can be effective with average diameters of 1 to 10 nm or even 0.5 to 5 nm as measured with scanning electron microscopy. In addition, the carbon-based hybrid particles are effective with concentrations of 1 ppm to 10 wt %. Advantageously, the carbon-based hybrid particles are present in an amount of 1 ppm to 500 ppm. Most advantageously, the carbon-based hybrid particles are present in an amount of 2 ppm to 200 ppm.


The functionalized carbon-based abrasive operates with peroxy moieties. These peroxy moieties can be inorganic or organic per-compound. For purposes of this application, peroxy moieties is a compound including one or more peroxy groups (—O—O—). As the examples of the compound including one or more peroxy groups, although not limited hereto, hydrogen peroxide and adducts thereof, for example, urea hydrogen peroxide, percarbonate, benzyl peroxide, peracetic acid, di-t-butyl peroxide, monopersulfate (SO52−)-based compounds, disulfate (S2O82−)-based compounds, sodium peroxide, peroxyformic acid, propaneperoxoic acid; substituted or unsubstituted butaneperoxoic acid; hydroperoxy-acetaldehyde and mixtures thereof. Most advantageously, the oxidizer is hydrogen peroxide. With hydrogen peroxide, the end user can typically add the hydrogen peroxide at point of use by mixing it into a holding tank prior to usage.


Optionally, the slurry includes an inhibitor for the metal or the metal nitride. Inhibitors are especially important when polishing cobalt, copper, molybdenum and tungsten. Examples of cobalt inhibitors include heterocyclic nitrogen compound that is selected from the group consisting of benzotriazole, adenine, 1,2,4-triazole, imidazole, polyimidazole and mixtures thereof. Examples of copper inhibitors include an azole inhibitor, wherein the azole inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of benzotriazole, mercaptobenzotriazole, tolytriazole, imidazole and combinations thereof. Examples of molybdenum inhibitors include amino acids, nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds such as pyridine, pyrazine, piperidine, pyridazine, pyrimidine, benzotriazole, benzothiazole, triazole, indole, or zwitterionic surfactants. Inhibitors are typically present in an amount of 0.005 to 2 wt. %. Most advantageously, inhibitors are typically present in an amount of 0.01 to 1 wt. %.


When polishing tungsten, cationic inhibitors operate best for controlling static etch. Typical inhibitors include amines, such as primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary amines. Examples of these amines include amino acids such as arginine, histidine, proline, lysine, glycine, tryptophan, alanine, cysteine. Advantageously, the tungsten inhibitor is a cationic nitrogen-containing polymer or copolymer containing primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary amines, a cationic polyvinyl alcohol, a cationic cellulose, and combinations thereof. Examples of cationic nitrogen-containing polymers or copolymers include polyallylamine, poly(4-aminostyrene) polyethylenimine, poly(N-methylvinylamine), chitosan, poly(vinyl-1-methylpyridinium) halides, polylysine, poly(vinylimidazolium), poly(methacryloyloxyethyltrimethylammonium) halides, poly(methacryloyloxyethyl-trimethylammonium) halides, poly(diallyldimethylammonium) halides and polyquaternium compounds. Nitrogen-containing polymeric inhibitors are typically present in an amount of 0.0001 to 1 wt. %. Most advantageously, nitrogen-containing polymeric inhibitors are typically present in an amount of 0.001 to 0.5 wt. %.


In addition to the carbon-based hybrid particles, the polishing composition described herein may contain a second abrasive. The abrasive is typically a metal oxide abrasive preferably selected from the group consisting of silica, alumina, titania, zirconia, germania, ceria and mixtures thereof. Advantageously, the secondary abrasive is silica. Adding a mixture of silica abrasive, Fenton's catalyst or reagent in combination with a corrosion inhibitor can further increase metal removal rates. The silica can be a fumed silica or a colloidal silica. When adding silica, typically it has a concentration of 0.01 wt % to 5 wt %. Most advantageously, the silica has a concentration of 0.1 to 2 wt. %. Typical average diameters of silica is 10 to 200 nm and 20 to 100 nm for colloidal silica. Alternatively, the carbon-based hybrid particles can be added in amounts from 1 to 1000 ppm to further increase metal removal rates of Fenton's reagent-containing slurries. Most advantageously, these particles are added in an amount of 1 to 100 ppm.


For Fenton-free solutions, the solutions typically contain less than 0.01 μM hydroxyl radical as measured with the 1 wt % hydrogen peroxide conditions of Example 17. Advantageously, Fenton-free solutions contain less than 0.005 μM hydroxyl radical when measured with the 1 wt % hydrogen peroxide conditions of Example. Most advantageously, the test does not detect the presence of hydroxyl radical when measured with the 1 wt % hydrogen peroxide conditions of Example. Similarly, for the solutions containing molybdic acid, they typically contain less than 0.1 μM hydroxyl radical as measured with the 1 wt % hydrogen peroxide conditions of Example 17. Advantageously, molybdic acid-containing solutions advantageously include less than 0.05 μM hydroxyl radical. When the solution contains Fenton catalyst-containing ions, it contains at least 0.5 μM hydroxyl radical when measured with the 1 wt % hydrogen peroxide conditions of Example 17. Advantageously, the Fenton-containing solution contains at least 1 μM hydroxyl radical when measured with the 1 wt % hydrogen peroxide conditions of Example 17.


Optionally, the slurry includes at least one soluble metal oxide anion wherein the metal is selected from vanadium, niobium, tantalum, chromium, molybdenum and tungsten. The metal oxide anions are soluble in the solvent of the CMP slurry, such as aqueous solvents. Advantageously, the metal oxide anions are soluble in deionized water. Examples of suitable metal oxide anions include molybdic acid, silicomolybdic acid and phosphomolybdic acid. Most advantageously, the metal oxide anion is molybdic acid. The structure of these metal oxide anions is advantageously [MxOy]−n. where x and y are 1 or greater than 1 and n is at least 1. The metal oxide anions are typically present in an amount from 100 ppm to 1 wt %. In addition to the carbon-based hybrid particles, these formulation will operate with any particles having a hardness of at least 8. For example, alumina, diamond, silicon carbide and boron nitride particles will work. Most advantageously, the slurry uses the carbon-based hybrid particles. Typically, these slurries include 50 ppm to 1000 ppm abrasive particles having a hardness of at least 8. The hardness of at least 8 is important for providing mechanical abrasion against tungsten metal-tungsten metal also has a similar Mohs hardness.


One potential disadvantage of the functional carbon-based particles is that they are not stable in acidic solutions with a pH of about 4 or less. Furthermore, functional carbon-based particles are only stable at a pH from 4 to 4.5 in the presence of molybdic acid. It has been discovered that an oligomer or polymer having at least 50 mol % R1—C(O)—N[—R2, —R3]units wherein R1, R2, —R3 are selected from at least one of H, saturated or unsaturated aromatic or aliphatic groups, aryl, cycloaliphatic hydrocarbon or a mixture thereof can stabilize the carbon-based hybrid particles. In particular, these oligomers or polymers stabilize the carbon-based particles at all acidic pH levels. Furthermore, these oligomers or polymers can stabilize carbon-based particles in the presence of molybdic acid at all acidic pH levels. In addition to stabilizing the carbon-based hybrid particles, these oligomers or polymer coordinate with tungsten and when coupled with a cationic species provide effective inhibition of tungsten static etch. Specific examples of the oligomer or polymers for stabilizing the slurry are as follows: salicylhydroxamic acid, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), polyacrylamide, poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline), polyvinylpyrrolidone. Alternatively, these polymers can be copolymers or block copolymers. Examples of suitable copolymers are as follows: polyquaternium-16 and polyquaternium-44 compounds, poly(acrylamide-co-diallyldimethylammonium chloride), poly(acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) wherein R1—C(O)—N[—R2, —R3]unit is greater than 50 mol %. Advantageously, these represent polymers having a number average molecular weight of 200 to 2,000,000. Most advantageously, these represent polymers having a number average molecular weight of 500 to 1,000,000. Typically, the oligomer or polymer is present in an amount of 1 ppm to 10,000 ppm. Advantageously, the oligomer or polymer is present in an amount of 10 ppm to 1,000 ppm.


The polishing slurry works in a solvent, such as an aqueous or organic solvent or a mixture of aqueous and organic solvents. Typically, the solvent is an aqueous solvent. Advantageously, the aqueous solvent is deionized water. The polishing solution advantageously includes a balance of deionized water. For some applications, however, it is advantageous to include up to 10 wt. % alcohol solvent in the formulation. Furthermore, the solvent optionally includes a polar protic solvent or a combination of polar protic solvents such as methanol and ethanol (in any desirable ratio) such as 100%, 90%:10%, 80%:20%, 70%:30% and 60%:40%.


Optionally, the slurry includes a metal chelating/complexing agent that may prevent the undesired redeposition of insoluble metal oxide species, or accelerate the metal removal, wherein the complexing agent is selected from the group consisting of citric acid, lactic acid, malic acid, maleic acid, malonic acid, oxalic acid, tartaric acid, phytic acid, gluconic acid, L-aspartic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, nitrilotri(methylphosphonic acid), ethylenediamine-N,N′-disuccinic acid trisodium salt, and ethylene glycol-bis (2aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid.


The polishing composition can also optionally include buffering agents such as various organic and inorganic bases or their salts with a pKa in the pH range of greater than 1 to 6. The polishing composition can further optionally include defoaming agents, such as non-ionic surfactants including esters, ethylene oxides, alcohols, ethoxylate, silicon compounds, fluorine compounds, ethers, glycosides and their derivatives, and the like. The defoaming agent can also be an amphoteric surfactant. The polishing composition may optionally contain biocides, such as Kordex™ MLX (9.5-9.9% methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, 89.1-89.5% water and 1.0% related reaction product) or Kathan™ 1CP III containing active ingredients of 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, each manufactured by The Dow Chemical Company, (Kathan and Kordex are trademarks of The Dow Chemical Company).


Preferably, the slurry polishes a semiconductor substrate by applying the slurry to a semiconductor substrate by placing 27.6 kPa or less downward force on a polishing pad. The downward force represents the force of the polishing pad against the semiconductor substrate. The polishing pad may have a circular shape, a belt shape or a web configuration. This low downward force is particularly useful for planarizing the semiconductor substrate to remove a barrier material from the semiconductor substrate. Most preferably, the polishing occurs with a downward force of less than or equal to 13.8 kPa.


EXAMPLES
Example 1

Polishing conditions: UMT Tribolab polisher, 9 in. (22.9 cm) diameter IC1010 concentric circular grooves polyurethane polishing pad manufactured by DuPont, Slurry flow rate: 40 ml/min, 3 psi (20.7 kPa), 211 rpm platen speed, 207 rpm carrier speed, 2.6×2.6 cm squares tungsten blanket wafer with a 4.25 inch diameter Saesol AK-45 diamond conditioner (170 μm diamonds with a 315 μm spacing).


















TABLE 1







Amorphous
Hybrid
Hybrid
Hybrid
Hybrid







carbon
structured
structured
structured
structured



Graphite
nanoparticle
C particle
C particle
C particle
C particle



A-1
B-1
1-1
2-1
3-1
4-1
H2O2

pH


Slurry
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
pH
Titrant







Comparative
0.02





2
2.5
HNO3


Example A


Comparative

0.01




1
2.5
HNO3


Example B


Example 1


0.01



1
2.5
HNO3


Example 2



0.01


1
2.5
HNO3


Example 3




0.01

1
2.5
HNO3


Example 4





0.01
1
2.5
HNO3





Note:


Particle 2-1 had an average particle diameter of 125 μm.




















TABLE 1-1








Carbon
Graphite
Amorphous
O/C
Estimated sp2




W
cubic phase
phase
phase
atomic
(Graphite)/




Removal
(111) from
from
from
ratio
sp3 (Cubic)




Rate
XRD
XRD
XRD
from
weight ratio


Slurry
Particle
(Å/min)
(Wt %)
(Wt %)
(Wt %)
XPS
from Raman






















Comparative
Graphite A-
104
0
85
8
0.02
No sp3 peak


Example A
1


Comparative
Amorphous
94
0
13
87
0.06
No sp3 peak


Example B
carbon B-1


Example 1
Hybrid 1-1
1195
94.0
0
2
0.075
~0.1


Example 2
Hybrid 2-1
1341
63.0
5
16
0.100
~0.1


Example 3
Hybrid 3-1
1011
99.0
0
1
0.095
<0.01


Example 4
Hybrid 4-1
1058
99.0
0
1
0.087
<0.01









The pure graphite and amorphous C nano particles examples did not provide significant tungsten polishing removal rates. The hybrid cubic carbon nanoparticles with oxygen-containing surfaces (O/C ratio >0.06 per XPS) increased tungsten removal rates.



FIG. 1 provides XRD peaks for hybrid particle of particle 2-1 measured with conditions as follows:

    • Instrument: Panalytical Empyrean Powder Diffractometer
    • Mode: reflection
    • Radiation: Cu K-alpha 1.54 Å
    • Optic: BBHD with ⅛° divergence slit, 20 mm mask
    • Detector: Pixcel 1D line detector, with ⅛° slit, PHD 35/75, 0.04° soller slits, 3.3470 window of measurement, Ni filter
    • Sample Prep: Powders were transferred to a low-back, round stainless steel deep well holders and immediately placed in the instrument for measurements. Quantitative phase ID was performed by measuring corundum standard (external K-factor)
    • Scan time: 2 hr
    • Scan start, stop, and step size: 10°, 90°, 0.1°
    • Data analysis: Rietveld refinements were performed in Panalytical HighScore Plus 4.5 using corundum standard as an intensity reference. Crystallite size for cubic carbon phase was determined using line profile analysis with silicon powder as a line broadening standard.


The FIG. 1 data indicate that the particles include cubic, tetragonal, and graphite phases.


The Raman measurements of FIG. 2 were measured using the following conditions:


Horiba LabRam HR Raman microscope using 785 nm excitation. A 10x objective (Olympus NA 0.4) was used in the measurements. The Duoscan rastering option available in this instrument was used to sample each spectrum over a 50×50 um region. The spectra reported here are the result of averaging the response from at least 3 separate areas. Power was kept very low (ca. 200-400 mW) to avoid changing the sample during the measurements.

    • Model: LabRam HR Raman microscope
    • Spot size: 50×50 um
    • Excitation wavelength: 785 nm
    • Power: ca. 300 mW
    • Integration time: 20 sec


Referring to FIG. 2, the Raman peak at 1313 cm-1 was consistent with cubic phase carbon. In addition, the Raman peak at 1598 cm-1 was consistent with a graphite peak.


The FIG. 3 data were measured using a Diamond ATR-IR (DATR) with an integrated diamond crystal FTIR accessory that is part of a Thermo iS-50 FTIR spectrometer. Spectra were scaled to absolute intensity to provide the ability to compare response at least on a semi-quantitative basis. These FTIR spectra illustrates that the hybrid carbon particle surfaces were functionalized with both —COOH. Furthermore, the polishing data of Table 1-1 show that the functionalized carbon particles with cubic cores provided the highest tungsten polishing rates.


Example 2

A series of wafers were compared using 2.6 cm×2.6 cm square molybdenum wafers and the polishing conditions of Example 1. Table 2 below provides formulations at both acidic and alkaline pH levels.

















TABLE 2










Hybrid










structured







C particle



Colloidal



2-1


Slurry
silica
Ceria
Alumina
SiC
(wt. %)
H2O2
pH
pH Titrant























Comparative
0.5




1
3.5
HNO3


Example C


Comparative

0.5



1
3.5
HNO3


Example D


Comparative


0.5


1
3.5
HNO3


Example E


Comparative



0.5

1
3.5
HNO3


Example F


Comparative


0.5


1
10.7
KOH


Example G


Comparative



0.5

1
10.7
KOH


Example H


Example 5




0.0225
1
3.5
HNO3


Example 6




0.0225
1
10.7
KOH









Table 2.1 below provides the molybdenum removal rates for the polishing slurries of Table 2.










TABLE 2.1





Slurry
Mo Removal Rate (Å/min) - Type 2-1
















Comparative Example C
159


Comparative Example D
1203


Comparative Example E
2328


Comparative Example F
863


Comparative Example G
1121


Comparative Example H
729


Example 5
3134


Example 6
1621









Tables 2 and 2.1 combine to show that hybrid structured C particle 2-1 with less than one tenth of the particle concentration outperformed silica, ceria, alumina and silicon carbide abrasive particles at acidic pH levels. At alkaline pH levels, the Mo RR is overall lower, but Hybrid structured C particle 2-1 still exhibited much better polishing efficiency than the alumina and silicon carbide abrasive particles.


Example 3

A series of wafers were compared using 2.6 cm×2.6 cm square molybdenum and TEOS wafers and the polishing conditions of Example 1. Table 3 below provides formulations at multiple abrasive concentrations, hydrogen peroxide concentrations and acidic pH levels.

















TABLE 3










Hybrid










structured



Colloidal
Iron(III)


C particle



silica
Nitrate
Titania
Zirconia
2-1
H2O2

pH


Slurry
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
pH
Titrant























Comparative
0.5
0.02



3
2.5
HNO3


Example I


Comparative


0.5


1
3.5
HNO3


Example J


Comparative



0.5

1
3.5
HNO3


Example K


Example 7




0.0225
1
2.5
HNO3


Example 8




0.0225
1
3.5
HNO3


Example 9




0.0225
1
4.5
HNO3


Example 10

0.005


0.0225
1
2.5
HNO3


Example 11

0.02


0.0225
1
2.5
HNO3


Example 12




0.01
1
2.5
HNO3


Example 13




0.045
1
2.5
HNO3


Example 14




0.0225
2
2.5
HNO3









Table 3.1 below provides the molybdenum and TEOS removal rates along with coefficients of friction for the polishing slurries of Table 3.













TABLE 3.1






Mo RR
TEOS RR
Mo
TEOS


Slurry
(Å/min) - Type 2
(Å/min)
CoF
CoF



















Comparative Example I
1060
66
0.34
0.21


Comparative Example J
554
21
0.21
0.10


Comparative Example K
698
262
0.40
0.11


Example 7
1508
30
0.18
0.18


Example 8
1437
22
0.21
0.14


Example 9
1413
17
0.18
0.12


Example 10
2127
47
0.23
0.18


Example 11
2203
40
0.27
0.15


Example 12
1379
30
0.16
0.15


Example 13
1629
54
0.21
0.19


Example 14
1704
39
0.15
0.18





CoF = Coefficient of Friction;


RR = Removal Rate;


TEOS = the oxidized product of tetraethyl orthosilicate






In comparison to titania and zirconia, hybrid structured C particle 2-1 exhibited much higher molybdenum removal rates while maintaining lower TEOS removal rates. Thus, the slurry provides an increased enhanced Mo/TEOS removal selectivity. Furthermore, despite a higher molybdenum removal rate, the hybrid structured hybrid particle 2-1 also showed a lower coefficient of friction. The molybdenum removal rates achieved with hybrid structured hybrid particle 2-1 were higher at a pH range of 2.5 to 4.5 and abrasive wt % effect without using Fenton chemistry in comparison to a silica particle formulation using an iron-containing Fenton reagent chemistry.


Example 4

A series of wafers were compared using 2.6 cm×2.6 cm square molybdenum wafers and the polishing conditions of Example 1. Table 4 below provides multiple hybrid particle formulations at an acidic 2.5 pH level.

















TABLE 4







Hybrid
Hybrid
Hybrid
Hybrid






Graphite
structured
structured
structured
structured



A-1
C particle
C particle
C particle
C particle


pH


Slurry
(wt. %)
1-1 (wt. %)
2-1 (wt. %)
3-1 (wt. %)
4-1 (wt. %)
H2O2
pH
Titrant







Comparative
0.02




2
2.5
HNO3


Example L


Example 15



0.01

1
2.5
HNO3


Example 16




0.01
1
2.5
HNO3


Example 17

0.01



1
2.5
HNO3


Example 18


0.01


1
2.5
HNO3









Table 4.1 below provides the molybdenum removal rates along with coefficients of friction for the polishing slurries of Table 4.












TABLE 4.1








Cubic (111)


Slurry
Mo RR (Å/min)
Mo CoF
Percentage (wt. %)


















Comparative
359
0.10
<0.1


Example L


Example 15
1694
0.24
99


Example 16
1353
0.14
99


Example 17
1844
0.24
94


Example 18
1558
0.15
63





CoF = Coefficient of Friction;


RR = Removal Rate






Among the types of hybrid carbon nanoparticles, the slurries with percentage of cubic structure (111) from XRD ranging from 63 to 99 provided significant molybdenum removal rate enhancement. Examples 16 and 18 provided excellent removal rates with low coefficient of friction values.


Example 5

A series of wafers were compared using 2.6 cm×2.6 cm square cobalt and TEOS (silicon dioxide) wafers and the polishing conditions of Example 1. Table 5 below provides formulations at 2.75.
















TABLE 5






Hybrid









structured C
Peracetic
Graphite
Colloidal



particle 2-2
acid
A-1
Silica
H2O2

pH


Slurry
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
pH
Titrant







Comparative

0.01


3
2.75
HNO3


Example M


Example 19
0.01



3
2.75
HNO3


Comparative

0.01
0.02


2.75
HNO3


Example N


Comparative

0.01
0.02

3
2.75
HNO3


Example O


Example 20
0.01

0.02

3
2.75
HNO3


Comparative

0.01

0.2

2.75
HNO3


Example P


Comparative

0.01

0.2
3
2.75
HNO3


Example Q


Example 21
0.01


0.2
3
2.75
HNO3





Note:


Particle 2-2 had an average diameter of 50 nm.















TABLE 5-1





Slurry
W RR (Å/min)
TEOS RR (Å/min)

















Comparative Example M
72
2


Example 19
1281
29


Comparative Example N
9
6


Comparative Example O
97
7


Example 20
1126
30


Comparative Example P
65
131


Comparative Example Q
165
144


Example 21
1018
19





RR = Removal Rate;


TEOS = the oxidized product of tetraethyl orthosilicate






Table 5-1 illustrates that the peracetic acid-containing polishing solutions do not increase in tungsten removal rate. The hybrid carbon particles, however, containing COOH functional groups provide a significant increase in tungsten removal rate. Since the peracetic acid in solution includes a peroxy moiety, this illustrates that COOH functional groups must be attached to hybrid carbon particles and be activated by hydrogen peroxide for effective tungsten removal.




embedded image


Example 6

In this Example, 100 ppm hybrid C particles 2.2 were mixed with increasing amounts of hydrogen peroxide. Table 6 below provides the hydrogen peroxide concentration and the resulting O/C atomic ratio as measured with EDS (energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy) from a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM).












TABLE 6







Sample
O/C Atomic Ratio









0.1 wt % H2O2
0.006 ± 0.002



0.25 wt % H2O2
0.009 ± 0.003



0.5 wt % H2O2
0.010 ± 0.006



1 wt % H2O2
0.015 ± 0.011



2 wt % H2O2
0.053 ± 0.037










These data illustrate that oxygen concentration on the surface of the hybrid C particles increases with concentration of hydrogen peroxide.


Example 7

A series of wafers were compared using 2.6 cm×2.6 cm square copper and tantalum nitride wafers and the polishing conditions of Example 1. Table 7 below provides formulations at pH 6.8 and 2.5.

















TABLE 7







Hybrid










structured




C particle


Molybdic



Silica
2-1
Iminodiacetic
BTA
acid
H2O2


Slurry
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
acid (wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
pH
pH Titrant























Commercial
1




1
6.8
HNO3/NH4OH


slurry R


Example 22

0.01
0.6


1
6.8
HNO3/NH4OH


Example 23

0.01
0.6
0.0025

1
6.8
HNO3/NH4OH


Example 24

0.01
0.6
0.01

1
6.8
HNO3/NH4OH


Example 25

0.005


0.2
2
2.5
HNO3/NH4OH


Example 26

0.005


0.2
2
2.2
HNO3/NH4OH









Table 7.1 below provides the copper and tantalum nitride removal rates for the polishing slurries of Table 7.













TABLE 7.1







Slurry
Cu RR (Å/min)
TaN RR (Å/min)




















Commercial slurry R*
3952
3



Example 22
8165
135



Example 23
4750
133



Example 24
2316
132



Example 25
10889



Example 26
15886







*Commercial Slurry R was a bulk copper slurry;



RR = Removal Rate






In comparison to commercial R, the examples showed that using hybrid structured carbon particle 2-1 abrasive with appropriate BTA level, achieved comparable or higher copper removal rates and much higher TaN removal rates.


Example 8

A series of wafers were compared using 200 mm wafers using Applied Materials' Mirra polishing tool with 93 rpm platen speed; 87 rpm carrier speed; 125 ml/minute slurry flow with a downforce of 3 psi (20.7 kPa) using an IK4250EH polishing pad. Table 8 below provides formulations at a pH of 2.5 with and without molybdic acid, iron nitrate or colloidal silica.
















TABLE 8






Hybrid









structured C
Colloidal
Molybdic



particle 2-1
silica
acid
Fe(NO3)3
H2O2

pH


Slurry
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
pH
Titrant






















Comparative

0.2

0.2
3
2.5
HNO3


Example S


Example 27
0.0025
0.2

0.2
3
2.5
HNO3


Example 28
0.01

0.3

3
2.5
HNO3


Example 29
0.01

0.3
0.2
3
2.5
HNO3









Table 8.1 below provides the tungsten, TEOS, silicon nitride, titanium nitride and titanium removal rates for the polishing slurries of Table 8.














TABLE 8.1






W RR
TEOS RR
SiN RR
TiN RR
Ti RR


Slurry
(Å/min)
(Å/min)
(Å/min)
(Å/min)
(Å/min)




















Comparative
2535
124
199
4326
1283


Example S


Example 27
3802
42
120
6007
1279


Example 28
1731
24
96
3201
1478


Example 29
3572
23
104
4280
1431





RR = Removal Rate;


TEOS = the oxidized product of tetraethyl orthosilicate






Table 8 and 8.1 combine to illustrate that the hybrid carbon particles operate in a cumulative manner with ferric nitrate and colloidal silica to increase removal rate. Furthermore molybdic acid operates with the hybrid particles to further increase removal rate of tungsten, titanium nitride and titanium. Molybdic acid had little impact upon silicon nitride and TEOS removal rates.


Example 9

A series of wafers were compared using 2.6 cm×2.6 cm square cobalt and TEOS (silicon dioxide) wafers and the polishing conditions of Example 1. Table 9 below provides formulations at 2.5 and 8.


















TABLE 9






Hybrid

Hybrid









structured C
Graphite
structured C

Aspartic
Molybdic



particle 2-1
A-1
particle 3-1
Silica
acid
acid
H2O2

pH


Slurry
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
pH
Titrant
























Comparative



1
0.25

0.4
8
KOH


Example T


Comparative

0.01


0.25

0.4
8
KOH


Example U


Example 30
0.01



0.25

0.4
8
KOH


Example 31


0.01

0.25

0.4
8
KOH


Example 32
0.01




0.3
3
2.5
HNO3









Table 9.1 below provides the cobalt and TEOS removal rates for the polishing slurries of Table 9.













TABLE 9.1







Slurry
Co RR (Å/min)
TEOS RR Å/min)




















Comparative Example T
1413
28



Comparative Example U
264
10



Example 30
5854
26



Example 31
6122
31



Example 32
6129
111







RR = Removal Rate;



TEOS = the oxidized product of tetraethyl orthosilicate






The Tables demonstrate that the functionalized carbon-based particles provide a large increase in cobalt removal rate without significant impact on TEOS removal rate.


Example 10

Polishing conditions: AMAT Reflexion polisher, 30 in. (76.2 cm) diameter IKONIC™ 4121H concentric circular grooves polyurethane polishing pad manufactured by DuPont, Slurry flow rate: 250 ml/min, 1 psi (6.9 kPa), 115 rpm platen speed, 125 rpm carrier speed, 12-inch tungsten and TEOS blanket wafer with a 4.25 inch diameter Kinik I-PDA 33A-3 disk. Table 10 below provides 3 distinct formulations with and without dispersants. Metrology: SP2, defect >0.08 um.
















TABLE 10







Poly(2-








Hybrid
acrylamido-2-



structured
methyl-1-



C particle
propanesulfonic
Luviquat
Molybdic



2-3
acid) solution
FC 370
acid
H2O2

pH


Slurry
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
pH
Titrant






















Comparative
0.005


0.3
3
3
HNO3


Example V


Example 33
0.005
0.02

0.3
3
3
HNO3


Example 34
0.005

0.01
0.3
3
3
HNO3





Note:


Particle 2-3 had an average diameter of 5 nm.






Note: Luviquat FC370 is a polymeric quaternary ammonium salt formed from methylvinylimidazolium chloride and vinylpyrrolidone (3:7 molar ratio).













TABLE 10.1






W RR
TEOS RR
Total Defect
Total


Slurry
(Å/min)
(Å/min)
Counts
chattermarks



















Comparative
869
3
19434
17988


Example V


Example 33
421
31
3631
2214


Example 34
684
2
6625
5352





RR = Removal Rate;


TEOS = the oxidized product of tetraethyl orthosilicate






These data illustrate polymer dispersants decreasing chattermark defects for the hybrid carbon particles.


Example 11

A series of wafers were compared using 2.6 cm×2.6 cm square W, Mo and TEOS (silicon dioxide) wafers and the polishing conditions of Example 1. Table 11 below provides formulations at 2.5.












TABLE 11







Material
Mohs' Hardness









Silica
6-7



Tungsten
7.5-9  



Silicon Carbide
 9-10



Diamond
10
























TABLE 11.1







Hybrid structured
Molybdic







Silica
C particle 2-1
acid
Fe(NO3)
H2O2

pH


Slurry
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
pH
Titrant






















Comparative
0.2


0.02
3
2.5
HNO3


Example W


Comparative
0.2

0.2

3
2.5
HNO3


Example X


Comparative
0.2

0.1
0.02
3
2.5
HNO3


Example Y


Comparative

0.0225


1
2.5
HNO3


Example Z


Example 35

0.0225
0.1

1
2.5
HNO3


Example 36

0.0225
0.2

1
2.5
HNO3





















TABLE 11.2








W RR
Mo RR
TEOS RR



Slurry
(Å/min)
(Å/min)
(Å/min)





















Comparative Example W
1690
1136
71



Comparative Example X
272
497
49



Comparative Example Y
1450
1022
62



Comparative Example Z
971
1193
43



Example 35
1522
1406
40



Example 36
1959
2713
45







RR = Removal Rate;



TEOS = the oxidized product of tetraethyl orthosilicate






These data combine to show that molybdic acid in combination with silica abrasive particles does not increase tungsten removal rate. But molybdic acid was effective for increasing removal rate in combination with the hybrid carbon particles.


Example 12

A series of wafers were compared using 2.6 cm×2.6 cm square W, Mo and TEOS (silicon dioxide) wafers and the polishing conditions of Example 1. Table 12 below provides formulations at 2.5.

















TABLE 12






Hybrid



Sodium






structured C

Molybdic
Tungstic
orthovana



particle 2-1
SiC
acid
acid
date
H2O2

pH


Slurry
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
pH
Titrant























Comparative
0.01




3
2.5
HNO3


Example AA


Comparative

0.25



3
2.5
HNO3


Example AB


Example 37
0.01

0.3


3
2.5
HNO3


Example 38
0.01


0.3

3
2.5
HNO3


Example 39
0.01



0.3
3
2.5
HNO3


Example 40

0.05
0.3


3
2.5
HNO3





















TABLE 12.1








W RR
Mo RR
TEOS RR



Slurry
(Å/min)
(Å/min)
(Å/min)





















Comparative Example AA
854
1508
30



Comparative Example AB
209
363
264



Example 37
3003
3720
37



Example 38
1940
3606
37



Example 39
2209
2555
67



Example 40
726
911
94







RR = Removal Rate;



TEOS = the oxidized product of tetraethyl orthosilicate






These data illustrate that molybdic acid, tungstic acid and vanadate all increase tungsten and molybdenum removal rates with both hybrid carbon particles and SiC particles.


Example 13

A series of wafers were compared using 2.6 cm×2.6 cm square W, Mo and TEOS (silicon dioxide) wafers and the polishing conditions of Example 1. Table 13 below provides formulations at pH 2.5.
















TABLE 13






Hybrid









structured C
Molybdic
Silicomolybdic
Phosphomolybdic



particle 2-1
acid
acid solution
acid hydrate
H2O2

pH


Slurry
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
(wt. %)
pH
Titrant






















Comparative
0.01



3
2.5
HNO3


Example AC


Example 41
0.01
0.3


3
2.5
HNO3


Example 42
0.01

0.3

3
2.5
HNO3


Example 43
0.01

0.5

3
2.5
HNO3


Example 44
0.01


0.3
3
2.5
HNO3


Example 45
0.01


0.5
3
2.5
HNO3




















TABLE 13.1








W RR
TEOS RR



Slurry
(Å/min)
(Å/min)




















Comparative Example AC
877
18



Example 41
2046
16



Example 42
1763
22



Example 43
2340
19



Example 44
1165
12



Example 45
1412
15







RR = Removal Rate;



TEOS = the oxidized product of tetraethyl orthosilicate






These data illustrate that molybdic acid and its derivatives all increase tungsten removal rate without increasing TEOS removal rate.


Example 14

This Example provides dispersant examples for hybrid carbon particles at pH 3 using nitric acid as the titrant.

















TABLE 14









Poly(acrylamide-










co-






diallyldimethyl-



C
Molybdic
Luviquat
ammonium chloride),
Poly(acrylamide-
Polyvinyl-


Slurry
2-2
acid
FC 370
acrylamide ~55%
co-acrylic acid)
pyrrolidone
Polyacrylamide
H2O2























AC
0.01









AD
0.01
0.3


AE
0.01
0.3





3


46
0.01

0.001


47
0.01


0.001


48
0.01



0.001


49
0.01




0.001


50
0.01





0.001





Note:


Luviquat FC370 is a polymeric quaternary ammonium salt formed from methylvinylimidazolium chloride and vinylpyrrolidone (3:7 molar ratio).















TABLE 14.1







Normalized



Settling Rate
Settling Rate


Slurry
LUMiSizer (%/s)
LUMiSizer

















AC
0.0056
1.0


AD
0.0059
1.1


AE
0.0839
15.0


46
0.0014
0.3


47
0.0034
0.6


48
0.0027
0.5


49
0.0032
0.6


50
0.0032
0.6





Note:


Normalizing was in comparison to comparative slurry AC and LUMiSizer was a dispersion analyzer from LUM GmbH to measure sedimentation, flotation or consolidation and the calculation of the velocity distribution in the centrifugal field.






These data illustrate that polymeric dispersants containing —C(═O)—NH— moiety are capable of reducing particle settling rates.


Example 15

Table 15 below provides formulations in weight percent for particle stability using 0.01 wt % hybrid structured carbon particle abrasive 2-2 containing 0.3 wt. % molybdic acid using nitric acid titrant.

















TABLE 15-A











Poly (acrylamide-










co-diallyldimethyl-
Poly(2-




Poly(4-styrene-
Poly (Propylene
Luviquat FC 370
Luviquat ® FC 550
ammonium chloride),
ethyl-2-



Polyethyl-
sulfonic acid)
Glycol)
(Mw ~100,000),
(Mw ~80,000)
acrylamide ~55%
oxazoline)


Slurry
enimine
(Mw ~75000)
(Mw ~100,000)
VP ~70%
VP ~50%
(Mw ~25,000)
(Mw ~50000)
pH























AF
0.001






3


AG

0.001





3


AH


0.001




3


51



0.001



3


52



0.005



2.5


AI




0.001


3


53





0.001

3


54






0.001
3























TABLE 15-B






Poly(acrylamide-co-



Poly(diallyldi-





acrylic acid)



methylammonium
Polyvinyl



Mw ~520,000,

Polyvinylpyrrolidone
Polyacrylamide
chloride)
alcohol


Slurry
acrylamide ~55%
Lidocaine
(Mw ~10,000)
(Mw ~10,000)
(Mw ~8500)
(Mw ~9k-10k)
pH







55
0.001





3


56

0.001




3


57


0.001



3


58



0.001


3


AJ




0.001

3


AK





0.001
3






















TABLE 15-1







Slurry
3 Hours
1 day
1 Week
1 month









AF
Settled






AG

Settled



AH


Settled



51



Stable



52



Stable



AI

Settled



53



Stable



54



Stable



55



Stable



56



Stable



57



Stable



58



Stable



AJ

Settled



AK


Settled










These data illustrate that polymeric dispersants containing —C(═O)—NH— moiety are capable of reducing particle settling rates.


Example 16

Table 16 below provides formulations for static etch control using 0.01 wt % hybrid structured carbonparticle abrasive 2-2 and 0.3 wt % molybdic acid (except AL) at pH 3 using nitric acid titrant.


Experimentally, a series of 2.6 cm×2.6 cm square tungsten wafers were submerged into slurries for 3 minutes under 55° C. Static etching rates (Å/min) were calculated by (post-etching wafer thickness—pre-etching wafer thickness)/3.



















TABLE 16










Poly(di-









Poly(4-


allyldi-
Poly(acrylamide-co-
Poly(acrylamide-




styrene-
Poly

methyl-
diallyldimethyl-
co-acrylicacid),
Poly(N-



Polyethyl-
sulfonic
(Propylene
Luviquat
ammonium
ammonium chloride),
partial sodium
isopropyl-

Polyly-


Slurry
enimine
acid)
Glycol)
FC 370
chloride)
acrylamide ~55%
salt
acrylamide
PAS-5
sine

























AL












AM


59
0.005


AN

0.005







3


AO


0.005


60



0.005


61




0.005


62





0.005


AP






0.005


AQ







0.005


63








0.005


64









0.005





Note:


PAS-5 was Diallylamine hydrochloride acrylamide copolymer from Nitto Boseki Co. Ltd.
















TABLE 16.1







Slurry
Static Etching Rate (Å/min)



















AL
438.4



AM
307.9



59
3.6



AN
244.7



AO
252.7



60
15.8



61
0.4



62
90.1



AP
217.6



AQ
338.8



63
5.6



64
101.7










These data indicated that when molybdic acid is present, anionic and nonionic polymers did not function as a corrosion inhibitor for controlling tungsten static etch rates. However, cationic nitrogen-containing polymers can reduce the tungsten static etching rate to low levels. In particular, these polymers can achieve greater than fifty percent reductions in static etch rates.


Example 17

All samples contained 1 μM terephthalic acid and the samples were injected into ultra performance liquid chromatography right after mixing with the designated amount of hydrogen peroxide. The expected end-product, hydroxy terephthalic acid (“HPA”) was used to reflect the amount of hydroxyl radical formation. The HPA was identified (effluent peaks were measured at an initial interval of 5.1 minutes and subsequent intervals of 4.5 minutes.) These peaks were then quantified by the Mass Spec Extracted ion chromatograms.


The reaction of the hydroxyl radical with HPA is as follows:




embedded image











TABLE 17






HPA Intensity by



Sample
UPLC/Mass
HPA concentration

















1% H2O2
0
0


100 ppm C 2 − 2 + 1 wt % H2O2
0
0


100 ppm C 2 − 2 + 0.012 μM Molybdic
1.7
~0.01 μM


acid + 1 wt % H2O2


100 ppm C 2 − 2 + 0.02 wt % Fe(NO3)2 +
129.5
  ~1 μM


1 wt % H2O2


0.1 μM HPA
10.27


1 μM HPA
100.09









The Fenton-containing sample promoted the formation of hydroxy radical. Unlike the Fenton-containing example, the Fenton-free functionalized carbon-based particles did not promote the formation of hydroxyl radical. Specifically, the Fenton-free sample did not detect the presence of hydroxyl radical. Similarly, the molybdic acid-containing sample did not promote the significant formation of hydroxy radical.

Claims
  • 1. A chemical mechanical polishing solution for metal and metal nitride substrates comprising: a solvent; andfunctionalized carbon-based particles having oxygen-containing functional groups, the functionalized carbon-based particles having oxygen-containing functional groups react with a peroxy moiety to increase oxygen to carbon atomic ratio on the functionalized carbon-based particles, the functionalized carbon-based particles containing at least 10 weight percent of an sp3-containing structure, wherein the functionalized carbon-based particles include at least 0.01 atomic percent oxygen and wherein a surface of the functionalized carbon-based particles has an atomic oxygen to carbon ratio of at least 0.01.
  • 2. The polishing solution of claim 1 wherein the polishing solution includes a corrosion inhibitor for the metal or the metal nitride.
  • 3. The polishing solution of claim 1 wherein the surface of the functionalized carbon-based particles includes a graphene, graphite, amorphous carbon or a mixture thereof.
  • 4. The polishing solution of claim 1 wherein the oxygen-containing functional group is a COOH and its salts, COOOH and its salts, OH—, ketone, oxirane or a combination thereof.
  • 5. The polishing solution of claim 4 wherein the functionalized carbon-based particles also include an amine (NH2) group, sulfonate (SO3) group or hydrocarbon (C—H) groups.
  • 6. The polishing solution of claim 1 wherein the metal and metal nitride is selected from the group consisting of cobalt, copper, molybdenum, tungsten, titanium nitride and tantalum nitride.
  • 7. The polishing solution of claim 1 wherein the polishing solution includes hydrogen peroxide as the peroxy moiety.
  • 8. The polishing solution of claim 1 wherein the polishing solution includes a Fenton's catalyst or reagent.
  • 9. The polishing solution of claim 1 wherein the polishing solution is iron free and contains less than contained less than 0.01 μM hydroxyl radical.
  • 10. The polishing solution of claim 1 wherein the functionalized carbon-based particles contain at least 30 weight percent sp3-containing structure.