Patent Grant
8440961
1. Field of the Invention
The invention disclosed herein relates to exploration for oil and gas and, in particular, to a pulsed neutron generator.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the exploration for oil and gas, it is necessary to drill a borehole into the earth. While drilling of the borehole permits individuals and companies to evaluate sub-surface materials and to extract desired hydrocarbons, many problems are encountered.
For example, use of nuclear instrumentation presents significant safety issues for personnel. That is, aside from the burden of complying with regulation governing the handling of sources of ionizing radiation, workers tasked with performing well logging issues are often asked to handle radioactive sources that can cause detrimental health effects if great care is not taken.
One example is that of a logging instrument that uses a cesium-137 (Cs-137) source. Typically, the Cs-137 source is of a considerable strength. Accordingly, the cost of maintaining the source, the safety issues, and the additional tooling required to support use of the Cs-137 source can make such implementations expensive.
Therefore, what are needed are methods and apparatus that provide for reduced health and safety issues and cost when performing well logging with nuclear instrumentation. Preferably, the methods and apparatus provide for reductions in source terms associated with such instrumentation.
In one embodiment, the invention includes an instrument for performing measurements downhole, the instrument including: an irradiator oriented to irradiate sub-surface materials surrounding the instrument, the irradiator including at least one neutron source disposed proximate to a moderator for providing a source of inelastic gamma photons and also disposed proximate to a material for providing a source of capture gamma photons; and a first detector and a second detector, each detector for detecting gamma rays and oriented in a relationship to the irradiator for receiving gamma photons from at least one of the irradiator and the formation.
In another embodiment, the invention includes a method for irradiating sub-surface materials, the method including: using an instrument downhole, the instrument including an irradiator oriented to irradiate sub-surface materials surrounding the instrument, the irradiator including a pulsed neutron source disposed proximate to a moderator for providing a source of inelastic gamma photons and also disposed proximate to a material for providing a source of capture gamma photons; energizing the pulsed neutron source to provide a neutron flux; and directing at least one of the neutron flux, the inelastic gamma photons and the capture gamma photons into the sub-surface materials.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Disclosed are methods and apparatus for making use of an unused neutron population for generation of gamma photons, and using those photons for density measurements. Advantageously, the techniques provide for elimination of a separate source of gamma photons traditionally included in a logging instrument, thereby reducing cost and enhancing radiological safety.
Other improvements resulting from elimination of the gamma source (also referred to in the art as a “chemical source”) include reductions in shielding and results in a more compact tool. The more compact and simplified tool also results in simplification of maintenance requirements. In short, the teachings herein provide significant added value to a pulse neutron generator based tool deployed for other purposes.
Referring now to
In typical embodiments, the borehole 2 includes materials such as would be found in oil exploration, including a mixture of liquids such as water, drilling fluid, mud, oil, gases, and formation fluids as may be indigenous to the surroundings. One skilled in the art will recognize that the various geologic features as may be encountered in a subsurface environment may be referred to as “formations,” and that the array of materials down the borehole (i.e., downhole) may be referred to as “sub-surface materials.” That is, the formations are formed of sub-surface materials. Accordingly, as used herein, it should be considered that while the term “formation” generally refers to geologic formations of interest, and “sub-surface material,” includes any materials of interest such as fluids, gases, liquids, and the like, and may include other materials such as drilling mud. A layer of materials between an outer surface of the instrument 10 and a wall of the borehole 2 is referred to as a “standoff layer” 5, and includes a thickness of standoff.
The teachings herein provide for making accurate measurements of properties of the sub-surface materials. Before the logging instrument and techniques are discussed in detail, certain additional definitions are provided.
As used herein, the term “gamma radiation detector” relates to instruments that measure the gamma radiation entering the instrument. For example, the gamma radiation detector may use a scintillator material that interacts with gamma radiation and produces light photons which are in turn detected by a photomultiplier tube coupled to electronics. Exemplary gamma radiation detectors include, without limitation, sodium iodide (NaI), cesium iodide (CsI), bismuth germinate (BGO), thallium iodide (TlI), and other organic crystals, inorganic crystals, plastics, solid state detectors, and combinations thereof.
Also as used herein, the term “characterization data” generally makes reference to a radiological profile (e.g., a gamma emission profile) of the instrument. More specifically, the instrument will exhibit certain radiological characteristics. In various embodiments, these characteristics are a result of irradiation with neutrons, and activation of components of the instrument which may ultimately result in emission of gamma rays from the components. Non-limiting embodiments for the generation of characterization data are provided herein.
The term “detector geometry” relates to a configuration of the gamma radiation detector(s). The detector geometry may include a size and a shape of the scintillator material and photomultiplier or other type of detector. The term “placement geometry” relates to relative placement of a gamma radiation detector within the logging instrument or in relation to the surrounding volume. The term “logging while drilling” (LWD) relates to measuring parameters from the borehole 2 while drilling is taking place. The term “sonde” relates to a section of the well logging tool that contains measurement sensors as opposed to the section that contains electronics and power supplies.
The terms “neutron capture” or “capture” make reference to a kind of nuclear interaction in which a neutron collides with an atomic nucleus and is merged into the nucleus, thus forming a heavier nucleus. As a result, the heavier nucleus enters into a higher energy state. At least some of the energy of the neutron capture interaction is usually lost by emission of gamma rays.
The terms “inelastic collision,” “neutron inelastic scattering” or “inelastic” make reference to a collision in which an incoming neutron interacts with a target nucleus and causes the nucleus to become excited, thereby releasing a gamma ray before returning to the ground state. In inelastic collisions, the incoming neutron is not merged into the target nucleus, but transfers some of its energy to the target nucleus before that energy is released in the form of a gamma ray.
Various types of interactions involve either absorption or emission of gamma radiation. Predominant types (as a function of increasing energy) include photoelectric effect, Compton scattering and pair production. As a matter of convention, “photoelectric effect” relates to interactions where electrons are emitted from matter after the absorption of a gamma ray. The emitted electrons may be referred to as “photoelectrons.” The photoelectric effect may occur with photons having energy of about a few eV or higher. If a photon has sufficiently high energy, Compton scattering or pair production may occur. Generally, Compton scattering relates to a decrease in energy (increase in wavelength) of a gamma ray photon when the photon interacts with matter. In pair production, higher energy photons may interact with a target and cause an electron and a positron pair to be formed.
Further, it should be noted that a variety of neutron emitting sources are known. Examples include americium-beryllium (AmBe) sources, plutonium-beryllium (PuBe) sources, californium sources (e.g., Cf-242) and others. Therefore, while the teachings herein are generally directed to a pulsed neutron source, it should be recognized that the term “neutron emitting,” “neutron generator,” and the like may be considered with reference to the variety of sources now available or subsequently devised for providing neutrons downhole.
Density tools use gamma ray radiation to determine the density of the formation, which in turn leads to determination of the lithology and porosity of the well environment. Typical density tools utilize a Cs-137 radioactive source to generate gamma rays. One example is provided in
Referring now to
The tool 10 is placed into service by loading it with the sealed chemical source 12 (typically cesium 137) and lowering it into the formation 4. Gamma-rays are continuously emitted by the source 12 and these propagate out into the formation 4.
Two physical processes dominate the scattering and absorption of gamma rays at the energies used in density tools. They are Compton scattering and photoelectric absorption. A cross section for Compton scattering, σcs, (i.e., probability of scattering while passing through a set thickness of material) is proportional to the electron density in the formation and is weakly dependent on the energy of the incident gamma ray (on a graph, this falls fairly slowly with increasing energy). Since the electron density is, for most formations, approximately proportional to the bulk density, the Compton cross section, σcs, is proportional to the density of the formation. The photoelectric absorption cross section, σpe, is also proportional to the electron density. Unlike the Compton cross section, σcs, photoelectric absorption cross section, σpe, is strongly dependent on the energy of the incident gamma rays and on the materials in the formation (the lithology).
Formation density is determined by measuring the attenuation of gamma rays through the formation. In this prior art tool, shielding is included in the tool to reduce a flux of gamma rays traveling straight through the tool. This flux can be viewed as background noise for the formation signal. The windows (in the detector hatch cover and fluid displacement sleeve 134) let gamma rays go into the formation and from the formation to the detectors. The layer of mud between the tool and the formation may be reduced by the use of an “in gauge” sleeve 134. After the standoff 5 (i.e., the mud layer) is minimized, density measurements made by using the two detectors 14, 16 are combined to form a compensated measurement.
As mentioned, compensation for the mud and/or standoff is usually accomplished through the use of the short space detector 14 and the long space detector 16. Since gamma rays travel through more of the formation 4 to reach the long space detector 16 than they do to reach the short space detector 14, the long space detector 16 shows a significantly larger count rate change for a given change in formation density. This allows for the compensation by using the two detector responses and a “rib” algorithm. The rib function, provides for the calculation of compensation (which should be equal to the difference between the true and the measured long space density), as a function of the difference between the short and long space densities. These aspects and other aspects are known in the prior art, and generally not discussed in greater depth herein. However, one reference that includes these aspects is U.S. Pat. No. 5,397,893, entitled “Method for analyzing formation data from a formation evaluation measurement-while-drilling logging tool.” This patent issued on May 14, 1995 and is assigned to Baker Hughes Incorporated. Accordingly, such relevant aspects disclosed therein are incorporated herein by reference. Having thus provided some context, an introduction to the invention is provided.
Disclosed herein are methods and apparatus for performing gamma-gamma density measurements using a neutron based instrument. The neutron based instrument does not include a chemical source, and therefore provides users with equipment that offers improved radiological safety as well as reduced cost. The teachings provided herein are particularly beneficial for making use of pulsed neutron generator based instruments deployed for other purposes, such as lithology and porosity measurements.
Embodiments of downhole tools using a pulsed neutron generator usually provide a burst of about 10E4-10E5 fast neutrons. When the neutron flux is averaged over time, this is equivalent to a steady state emission of about 10E8 neutrons/second. For these embodiments, an energy spectrum of the neutrons shows that the neutrons are very close to monoenergetic, and exhibit an initial energy of about 14.2 MeV, while an angular distribution of the neutrons is very close to isotropic. Therefore, neutrons provided by a pulsed neutron generator generally radiate in all directions, and penetrate not only into the formation direction but also into the tool itself. Accordingly, most tools making use of neutron sources include significant shielding for protection of other components.
The present invention takes advantage of the excess neutron population that is hazardous to other components on board the tool. As an overview, a sourceless gamma density tool includes a moderator close to the neutron generator. This is provided for thermalizing the high energy neutrons traveling into the tool and acting as a source for photons born out of inelastic scattering interactions of neutrons. Included is a surrogate material provided for capturing the thermalized neutrons. As a consequence of the surrogate material capturing thermalized neutrons, prompt gamma emissions result.
Example of a hydrogen rich moderator include various forms of high temperature plastics. Such plastics offer further advantages as these may be molded, machined or otherwise fabricated for incorporation into the downhole tool with relative ease. Another example can be a graphite moderator that can both slow down the neutrons and emit photons from neutron inelastic scattering event. Examples of surrogate material include cadmium, and other materials with high capture cross sections for thermal neutrons.
Cadmium has been selected as one material suited for use as the surrogate material as cadmium has a relatively high thermal neutron capture cross section, σ0.025, of 2,520 barns (natural cadmium), 20,615 barns (Cd-113, percent abundance of about 12). Accordingly, use of the surrogate material is discussed in terms of cadmium and the properties thereof. However, it should be noted that a number of other materials may be suited for practice of the teachings herein. For example, isotopes of cadmium, hafnium, and/or gadolinium may be used. In general, desirable properties of the surrogate material include prompt gamma emission resulting from neutron capture, short half life as an activation product, at least one gamma emission of high abundance and at least one gamma emission of high energy.
Notably, the capture gamma ray spectrum of Cd-113 contains two significant lines. One is a 558.46 keV line with 100 percent relative yield and the other is a 651.26 keV one with 18.94 percent relative yield. Although there are many other lines, they are mostly less than one percent abundant. Therefore, it may be assumed that Cd-113 provides users with a source having essentially two lines. The energy levels of those lines put this into a range where the current gamma-gamma density tools operate with 662 keV Cs-137 photon lines.
Accordingly, use of a thermalizing material in conjunction with an appropriate surrogate material provides for emission of gamma rays from the tool in a manner quite similar to the existing tools using chemical sources.
In various embodiments of the sourceless gamma density tool, certain adaptations may be realized. For example, fluence of the neutrons generated, size and placement of the moderator, the surrogate material, collimation, detector size(s), and techniques for performing spectroscopy may all be adjusted as needed to enhance operation of the sourceless gamma density tool.
More specifically, and only by way of example, as brightness of the neutron driven gamma ray source will be lower than some embodiments of chemical sources, designers may compensate for reduced count rates by at least one of increasing a size of each detector and modifying collimation schemes. A variety of algorithms and fitting techniques (as are known in the art of gamma spectroscopy) may be used to provide for separation of photons associated with the surrogate material from photons originating in the formation from the inelastic and capture interactions. For example, when it comes to distinguishing photons, an energy based biasing can be implemented. That is, the capture and inelastic photons from the formation will exhibit higher energy levels compared to prompt gamma rays emitted from, for example, cadmium. In fact, photons from the surrogate material will have even lower energy levels after scattering inside the formation.
Of course, it should be recognized that geometry must be taken into consideration. For example, a relatively larger tool, such as one used in logging-while-drilling affords users with additional space for thermalizing the neutrons, and placing a surrogate material (like a Cd target) in suitable size to generate significant amount of gamma rays.
When the sourceless gamma density tool is in use, gamma rays emitted from the source pass into the formation. Depending on the density of the surrounding formation, some of the gamma rays will be absorbed in the surrounding sub-surface materials while others are reflected back to the tool. The ratio of returning gamma rays to absorbed gamma rays is useful in determining density of the surrounding formation 4.
Referring now to
While operating in the subsurface borehole environment, the electronically timed pulsed-neutron source emits neutrons having an energy of about 14 MeV. The neutrons are emitted into the ambient formation(s) 4 and the subsurface materials. In about 1-2 μsecs, these fast neutrons promptly interact with the nuclei of the surrounding sub-surface materials and scatter elastically as well as inelastically, ultimately losing their energy. Some of the nuclei of the atoms with which the neutrons interact become energetically excited during the inelastic scattering process, after which they return to the ground state by emitting one or more gamma rays with energies characteristic of the parent isotope. This process results in the measured inelastic spectrum of gamma ray energies, and can only take place if the energy of the incident neutron is sufficient to raise the nucleus of the parent isotope to one or more of its excited energy levels, or bound states.
The neutrons continue their slowing down process until they reach thermal equilibrium with the surrounding medium. Thermal neutrons typically possess energy of about 0.025 eV, and may remain in a diffusion process for up to about 800 μsec, or slightly more, before being absorbed by the nuclei of the surrounding atoms. This absorption results in new isotopes of the same elements. Upon absorption, the nuclei of these isotopes usually de-excite through emission of one or more gamma rays. As in the case of the inelastic spectrum, these energies carry the fingerprint of the parent isotope and allow each element (i.e., isotope) to be uniquely identified. This absorption process leads to the acquisition of the capture spectrum. The capture spectra and the inelastic spectra for each individual isotope are different.
In order to provide some detail, additional aspects are now discussed in greater detail.
Due to their initial energy levels, photons from Cs-137 are not very penetrating, at least in comparison to most photons generated through neutron and matter interactions. Table I provides the mean free paths for 662 keV photons (Cs-137 characteristic photon energy) in various formation materials and some relevant fluids. As may be seen, there is a significant difference between the mean free paths for formation material and fluid. That basically indicates that if there is an uninterrupted fluid connection between source and detector, the density values would become inaccurate. This is one reason why density values reliant on data from the far detector should be corrected with the short space detector values. Reference may be had to
Consider now aspects of the short space detector 14, the long space detector 16, and gamma emissions from the tool 10 and from the formation 4. First, due at least in part to the larger size and distant placing of the long space detector 16, the long space detector 16 favors photons coming from deeper parts of formation 4. When there is a standoff 5, it may be seen that the flux profile outside the tool goes up to the levels of other profiles. Gamma rays travel comparatively easily through the water conduits along the tool body and this affects the measurements. The water between the tool 10 and the formation 4 acts like a conduit for photons. That is, according to data for the mean free path provided in Table I, 662 keV photons should go through at least five interactions in the formation 4 before they can reach the short spaced detector 14. This is a number dictated by the mean free path of the photons at 662 keV. For the long space detector 16, the same number is about 8 interactions. It should be noted that these numbers are lower limits (that is, such values are possible only if all scattering angles are 0 degrees), so the actual numbers would be larger. Compton scattering with nonzero scattering angles would further reduce the energy of the photons, and mean free paths get shorter with lower energy levels. Therefore, with loss of energy, the actual interaction numbers go up to higher values. As a result of those high numbers of interactions taking place in the formation, a very small portion of the photons can reach the detectors. This can be seen in
Referring again to the figures,
Further aspects of the physics underlying the invention are now discussed. As is widely known, pulsed neutron generators emit neutrons with about 14.2 MeV energy levels. This energy is high enough to induce a large variety of nuclear interactions. What we are basically interested in this application are inelastic and capture interactions. The oxygen and carbon usually emit inelastic photons at the 6.13 and 4.439 MeV levels. What makes those energy levels important is that those are energy levels that are high enough to induce pair production interactions inside the formation 4. As discussed above, conventional density logging is based on Compton scattering. However, in the present invention, high energy photons, such as would cause pair production interactions are used, to provide a good way of reading density values from deeper into the formation 4 then previously achievable with the conventional density logging. Table II gives the mean free paths oxygen inelastic photons inside various formations. Important entries in that table are Limestone, Dolomite and Sandstone values. As it is seen, typical mean free path is around 14-15 cm. This points out that any photon originating in the tool can penetrate into the formation around that distance before it goes through an interaction. The same values for carbon inelastic photons are around 11-12 cm. Both of those provide a good interrogation depth if such a technique is proven to be feasible. As may be seen in Table I, the same distance is around 4-5 cm for Cs-137 photons. When those two sets of mean free paths are compared, it can be seen that using inelastic photons can have significant advantage over Cs-137 photons due to the depth of investigation. Accordingly, the present invention provides gamma photons of sufficient energy such that quality of data is improved. That is, one weak point of currently employed techniques for density logging is the shallow depth of investigation that arises if a sampling volume equates to an invaded zone (a zone invaded with drilling mud).
Further consideration is given to pair production interactions. Every time a photon undergoes a pair production event, 1.02 MeV of the incident energy gives rise to an electron/positron pair with the pair sharing the remaining energy as kinetic energy. The pair production is usually a smaller portion of the interactions taking place inside the formation. This can be seen in
Since neutrons thermalized inside the tool and in the formation are to be captured and give way to capture photons, this provides another source of gamma radiation for interrogating the formation 4. Normally, there is no way to distinguish inelastic and capture photons. One aspect that is useful in this regard is to obtain the time dependent spectra of the photons. This is something that is routinely done for various types of measurements. More specifically, usually the neutrons slow down to thermal energy levels in about 1-10 microseconds, depending on the medium. After that there is usually a relatively longer time period where the capture takes place and capture photons are emitted. By incorporating temporal response into evaluations of spectra, users are afforded a capability to distinguish the thermal capture photons. As noted above, a principal concern issue with lower energy photons is determined by the mean free path, where a total distance traveled by those photons is significantly shorter than for photons from inelastic interactions.
Turning now to a discussion of associated apparatus, consider
While the sourceless gamma density tool 100 is generally used in logging-while-drilling, the tool 100 may be deployed using wireline systems as well. Accordingly, the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, the moderator and inelastic gamma source 92 acts as both a moderator and inelastic photon source while the pulse is on. In general, the moderator and inelastic gamma source 92 includes a low-Z material (i.e., a material having few protons), such as a generally hydrogenous material. A suitable material for use in the moderator and inelastic gamma source 92 is graphite. Although it is not as efficient as hydrogen, the graphite is a moderating material as well and it is used as moderator in some nuclear reactors. This provides users with a strong 4.439 MeV photon source inside the tool 100. In some instances, the actual strength of the source may be higher than the carbon inelastic photons coming from the formation. Carbon presence in the formation is a function of the fluids available in that part of the formation and porosity. Since the carbon inelastic photons have a mean free path of about 11-12 cm, the volume that will contribute to counting statistics may hold carbon that might be much lower than the carbon in the on board carbon (i.e., graphite) block. There will be significant amount of oxygen in the formation and this will provide a significant number of inelastic photons. All things considered, the beam of inelastic photons hitting the detector will contain a significant contribution of inelastic photons generated inside the tool.
Moderation of the neutrons will start immediately while the pulser is on. Since there is an onboard region that is purely moderator, one might expect to see moderation to take place faster than in the formation. Therefore, the early phase of capture photons may be heavily effected by the capture photons originating in the onboard capture photon source. That is, depending on the borehole fluid versus formation material properties, the early phases in the capture time spectrum will have a different slope and that will be used to distinguish a borehole signal versus a formation signal. The same approach may turn out to be valid for this case as well. Since the neutrons will be thermalized faster in the onboard moderator region, the capture target may emit capture photon in the earlier phase of the time spectrum.
Even though different techniques may be employed to strip the onboard photon source gammas from the overall total, the results would not equate to a signal free from the formation photons. However, data from the long-spaced detector 16 may be used to support this task. That is, a signal from the long space detector 16 may be considered representative of formation photons, as this detector 16 is placed far enough from the onboard photon sources so that there is negligible interference from the source. The positioning of the detector 16 is to be determined and adjusted to perform this task efficiently. Among other things, factoring temporal response permits users to refine estimates of formation contributions. Therefore, the signal from the long space detector 16 can be used as a background signal that is being subtracted from the short spaced detector 14. In one embodiment, the distance from the short spaced detector 14 to the neutron source 91 is approximately the same as the distance from the long spaced detector 16 to the neutron source 91. However, because the thermalizer and inelastic gamma source 92 and the capture gamma source 94 are placed to one side of the neutron generator 91 closer to the short spaced detector 14 as shown in
For convenience, the neutron source 91, the moderator and inelastic gamma source 92, and the gamma capture source 94 may be referred to herein, either in part or collectively as an “irradiator.” That is, the irradiator of the sourceless gamma density tool 100 may include any one or more of the neutron source 91, the moderator and inelastic gamma source 92, and the gamma capture source 94.
Evaluation of the sourceless gamma density tool 100 has included generation of base models and computation of performance characteristics. Aspects of the base models for computations are given in
In order to anticipate aspects of counting statistics as may be associated with the detectors 14, 16, initial computations were performed. First, in this exemplary computation, it was assumed that the tool 100 had a diameter of 17.15 cm (6¾ inches). The thermalizer and inelastic gamma source 92 (i.e., the moderator) had a diameter of 10 cm and its height is 15.0 cm. Therefore, the thermalizer and inelastic gamma source 92, in the form of a carbon block, was included with an offset to leave room for the mud channel 96. In this example, the borehole 2 is filled with a liquid that was substantially water. The borehole had a radius of 10.16 cm (8 inch diameter). The formation 4 around the tool was a spherical formation, having two layers. The inner layer had a radius of 25 cm. This radius has been chosen because any photos born outside this will have very small chances of making it to the detector. Accordingly, the inner layer effectively correlates to the measurement volume 110. Although the neutron flux will still be quite significant outside the measurement volume 110, the contribution of those neutrons to the measurements is likely to be insignificant.
The simulations were mainly interested in or directed to inelastic reactions in thermalizer and inelastic gamma source 92 (i.e., the carbon block moderator) in the tool 100 and the inelastic reactions in the measurement volume 110. Note that, as shown in
For evaluating lithology and the fluids in the formation, calculations were repeated for sandstone and limestone formations with no porosity, 20% porosity and 40% porosity saturated with oil.
It is desirable to provide users with embodiments where the measurement volume 110 is at least as big, if not bigger, than realized with use of a chemical source. This should be viable for all formations. However, since oil saturated formations will include some carbon, these formations might be of a concern. Accordingly, further evaluations were performed.
The same has been repeated for sandstone formation as well. In contrast with limestone formation, sandstone formation does not have carbon. Accordingly, the relative inelastic signal strength should be similar for sandstone formation as well. In this case, the inelastic scattering rates in the sandstone formation are given in
In summary, the teachings herein provide a unique approach to provide an interrogating beam of gamma radiation. The interrogating beam includes photons from inelastic neutron interactions and capture neutron interactions emitted from an onboard target. The impact of the lithology variations, presence of clay, shale and gas on the neutron interactions in the formation is well known. As with neutron interaction variations, there is to be a change in the photon emission density inside the formation as well. This practically negates use of photons originating in the formation to be used as interrogating beam in density logging. The placement of a gamma generating target inside the tool will overcome this problem and a stable photon source will be obtained. Using an onboard photon generating target does not ensure a neutron generator based density log by itself. There are issues such as count rates, removal of formation born photons from counts, impact of the pair production on the density measurements and those are to be investigated for feasibility of the idea.
In support of the teachings herein, various analysis components may be used, including a digital system and/or an analog system. The system(s) may have components such as a processor, storage media, memory, input, output, communications link (wired, wireless, pulsed mud, optical or other), user interfaces, software programs, signal processors (digital or analog) and other such components (such as resistors, capacitors, inductors and others) to provide for operation and analyses of the apparatus and methods disclosed herein in any of several manners well-appreciated in the art. It is considered that these teachings may be, but need not be, implemented in conjunction with a set of computer executable instructions stored on a computer readable medium, including memory (ROMs, RAMs), optical (CD-ROMs), or magnetic (disks, hard drives), or any other type that when executed causes a computer to implement the method of the present invention. These instructions may provide for equipment operation, control, data collection and analysis and other functions deemed relevant by a system designer, owner, user or other such personnel, in addition to the functions described in this disclosure.
The term “carrier” as used herein means any device, device component, combination of devices, media and/or member that may be used to convey, house, support or otherwise facilitate the use of another device, device component, combination of devices, media and/or member. Other exemplary non-limiting carriers include drill strings of the coiled tube type, of the jointed pipe type and any combination or portion thereof. Other carrier examples include casing pipes, wirelines, wireline sondes, slickline sondes, drop shots, bottom-hole-assemblies, drill string inserts, modules, internal housings and substrate portions thereof.
Elements of the embodiments have been introduced with either the articles “a” or “an.” The articles are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “including” and “having” are intended to be inclusive such that there may be additional elements other than the elements listed. The conjunction “or” when used with a list of at least two terms is intended to mean any term or combination of terms. The terms “first” and “second” are used to distinguish elements and are not used to denote a particular order.
One skilled in the art will recognize that the various components or technologies may provide certain necessary or beneficial functionality or features. Accordingly, these functions and features as may be needed in support of the appended claims and variations thereof, are recognized as being inherently included as a part of the teachings herein and a part of the invention disclosed.
While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications will be appreciated by those skilled in the art to adapt a particular instrument, situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3842265 | Pitts, Jr. | Oct 1974 | A |
| 4008392 | Lock et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4297575 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
| 5397893 | Minette | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5591967 | Moake | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5608215 | Evans | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5767510 | Evans | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5804820 | Evans et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5900627 | Odom et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 7334465 | Smits et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 20050067160 | Jacobson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20060093087 | Procter | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060192096 | Radtke et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20090026359 | Stephenson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2009023437 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Notification of Transmittal of the International Search report and the Written Opinion of the Internatinoal searching Authority, or the Declaration, PCT/US2010/030216; Mailed Nov. 30, 2010. |
| Notification of Transmittal of the International Search report and the Written Opinion of the Internatinoal searching Authority, or the Declaration, PCT/US2010/030217; Mailed Oct. 20, 2010. |
| Neuman, C.H., M.J. Sullivan and D.L. Belanger, “An Investigation of Density Derived from Pulsed Neutron Capture Measurements” (Abstract Only), SPE 56647 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 3-6, 1999. |
| B.W. and Archer, M.P. “Applications and Derivation of a New Cased-Hole Density Porosity in Shaly Sands” (Abstract Only), SPE 38699 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 5-8, 1997. |
| Rennie, Allan. “LWD System Provides Real-Time, Memory-Recorded Bulk Density, Density Porosity, Ultrasonic Caliper Measurements” (Abstract Only), Drilling Contractor Magazine Sep./Oct. 2006 Ed., pp. 14-16. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100252726 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61167328 | Apr 2009 | US |
