The present invention generally relates to gas turbine engine flow paths, and more particularly, but not exclusively, to gas turbine engine flow path geometry.
Providing flow paths through a gas turbine engine that have acceptable performance characteristics remains an area of interest. Some existing systems have various shortcomings relative to certain applications. Accordingly, there remains a need for further contributions in this area of technology.
One embodiment of the present invention is a unique gas turbine engine flow path surface. Other embodiments include apparatuses, systems, devices, hardware, methods, and combinations for directing the flow through a turbomachinery component in the vicinity of a blade. Further embodiments, forms, features, aspects, benefits, and advantages of the present application shall become apparent from the description and figures provided herewith.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications in the described embodiments, and any further applications of the principles of the invention as described herein are contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
With reference to
The turbomachinery component 52 depicted in
The gas turbine engine 50 can be used to provide power to an aircraft (not illustrated). As used herein, the term “aircraft” includes, but is not limited to, helicopters, airplanes, unmanned space vehicles, fixed wing vehicles, variable wing vehicles, rotary wing vehicles, unmanned combat aerial vehicles, tailless aircraft, hover crafts, and other airborne and/or extraterrestrial (spacecraft) vehicles. Further, the present inventions are contemplated for utilization in other applications that may not be coupled with an aircraft such as, for example, industrial applications, power generation, pumping sets, naval propulsion, weapon systems, security systems, perimeter defense/security systems, and the like known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
Turning now to
The outer wall 60 generally includes a cylindrical upstream portion 64, a transition 66, and a conical downstream portion 68. The union of these two geometric shapes across the axial tip of the blade 58 provides at transonic flow conditions an increase in total blade area within the blade passage before the passage shock relative to a purely cone-shaped casing. This configuration provides two approximate design options: either actual flow within the blade passage is increased relative to a conventional configuration, or optionally the blade baseline airflow can be maintained via blade closure, leading to a reduction in specific flow due to the increase in blade passage area before the passage shock for the same actual flow. If, in conjunction with the casing, the baseline blade flow is maintained as per the second design approach, then due to the reduction in effective specific-flow the blade typically exhibits an improvement in efficiency at operating points such as cruise and take-off. The baseline flow rate can be maintained by increasing the stagger-angle parameter of either all or a subset of the blade airfoil sections or by reducing the camber of either all or a subset of the blade airfoil sections. In one embodiment, a baseline blade flow rate is maintained by increasing the blade tip stagger-angle and linearly blending the change in stagger-angle to zero at the blade hub.
The cylindrical upstream portion 64 can start at any axial location forward of a leading edge 70 of the blade 58 and generally extends aft to the transition 66 which is located between the leading edge 70 and a trailing edge 72 of the blade 58. In the illustrated embodiment the cylindrical upstream portion 64 starts at location 74 which is forward of location 76 associated with the leading edge 70 of the blade 58. In other embodiments the cylindrical upstream portion 64 starts at the axial location of the leading edge 70, thus location 74 and location 76 are axially coincident. In one alternative and/or additional embodiment, the axial extent of the cylindrical upstream portion 64, shown as distance B in
As used herein the term “cylindrical” includes surfaces that have a constant radius relative to a reference axis along the entirety of the circumference and the entirety of the axial reach of the cylindrical surface. The term also includes surfaces that are substantially cylindrical, either partially or in whole, around the circumference and axial reach of the cylinder. Non-limiting examples of substantially cylindrical include surfaces that have some amount of variation introduced through design, manufacturing, wear, etc.
The outer wall 60 changes from the cylindrical upstream portion 64 to the conical downstream portion 68 through the transition 66 which is denoted for convenience as location 79. The transition 66 can be formed as the result of a manufacturing operation such as, for example, milling, casting, molding, etc. The transition 66 could also represent a joint between separately constructed components fastened to reside next to one another to form the cylindrical upstream portion 64 and conical downstream portion 68. Thus, the outer wall 60 can be one integral structure or can be an integrated assembly.
The transition 66 between the cylindrical upstream portion 64 and the conical portion can have any shape and can be as abrupt as desired which may take into account manufacturing considerations/tolerances, flow phenomena considerations, etc. Setting forth just a few non-limiting forms, the transition can be a sharp corner in some applications, it can include a smoothed corner, such as a rounded or filleted corner, in other applications, etc. A rounded transition can, but need not, be at a constant radius and/or be centered about a point at which the cylindrical surface meets the conical surface. Other arrangements are also contemplated, such as, but not limited to, a rounded transition that extends further in either the forward or aft direction relative to the other direction.
As the flow path changes from cylindrical to conical it transitions from a surface having very little, if any, contraction, to a surface having a constant contraction once established on the conical surface. Throughout the transition 66, however, the contraction rate can be variable. As will therefore be appreciated, the flow path surface of the outer wall 60 experiences a rate of contraction that varies and will increase or stay the same over the entire axial length of the structure. In the particular form of a rounded corner at the transition 66, the initial contraction rate is relatively low and once a transition to the conical surface is complete the contraction rate is at its highest.
The blade 58 in the illustrated embodiment includes a tip shape that follows the contour of the outer wall 60. Thus, the blade 58 includes a forward portion 78 and an aft portion 80 that mimic the slopes of the cutaway view of the outer wall 60. Not all embodiments need include forward portions 78 and/or aft portions 80 that precisely mimic the slopes of the outer wall 60. An offset of the blade 58 from the outer wall 60 over the forward portion 78 can be constant, as can be an offset of the blade 58 from the outer wall 60 over the aft portion 80. Furthermore, the offset over the forward portion 78 can, but need not, be the same as the offset over the aft portion 80.
A blade transition 82 between the forward portion 78 and aft portion 80 can be placed at location 77 such that it is located axially forward, axially aft, or with any portion of the transition 66. In the illustrated embodiment the location 77 of the blade transition 82 is located forward of the location 79 of transition 66. In one non-limiting embodiment, the axis of the first torsion mode of the blade 58 is located with the transition 66.
The conical downstream portion 68 begins after the transition 66 and generally extends aft past the trailing edge 72 of the blade 58 to location 83 in the illustrated embodiment. In one form the conical downstream portion 68 extends a fraction of the axial chord-length of the blade 58 past the location 73. As used herein the term “conical” includes frustoconical surfaces that have a linear sloping surface around the entirety of the circumference and the entirety of the axial reach of the frustoconical surface. The term also includes surfaces that are substantially linearly sloping, either partially or in whole, around the circumference and axial reach of the surface. Non-limiting examples of substantially frustoconical include surfaces that have some amount of variation in the sloping surface introduced through design, manufacturing, wear, etc. In one non-limiting embodiment, the slope of the linear sloping surface is about nine degrees as measured relative to a reference line, such as the centerline of the engine.
Turning now to
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only the preferred embodiments have been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the inventions are desired to be protected. It should be understood that while the use of words such as preferable, preferably, preferred or more preferred utilized in the description above indicate that the feature so described may be more desirable, it nonetheless may not be necessary and embodiments lacking the same may be contemplated as within the scope of the invention, the scope being defined by the claims that follow. In reading the claims, it is intended that when words such as “a,” “an,” “at least one,” or “at least one portion” are used there is no intention to limit the claim to only one item unless specifically stated to the contrary in the claim. When the language “at least a portion” and/or “a portion” is used the item can include a portion and/or the entire item unless specifically stated to the contrary.
Unless specified or limited otherwise, the terms “mounted,” “connected,” “supported,” and “coupled” and variations thereof are used broadly and encompass both direct and indirect mountings, connections, supports, and couplings. Further, “connected” and “coupled” are not restricted to physical or mechanical connections or couplings.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/776,752, filed 11 Mar. 2013, the disclosure of which is now expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2788172 | Stalker | Apr 1957 | A |
2830753 | Stalker | Apr 1958 | A |
3173605 | Harris | Mar 1965 | A |
3295824 | Woodwell et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3825364 | Halila et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3851994 | Seippel | Dec 1974 | A |
3869222 | Rahnke et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
4008978 | Smale | Feb 1977 | A |
4213736 | Gongwer | Jul 1980 | A |
4358246 | Hanson et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4398866 | Hartel et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4439981 | Weiler et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4522557 | Bouiller et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4639194 | Bell, III et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4643638 | Laurello | Feb 1987 | A |
4679981 | Guibert et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4684320 | Kunz | Aug 1987 | A |
4726737 | Weingold et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4759687 | Miraucourt et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4971520 | Van Houten | Nov 1990 | A |
5080557 | Berger | Jan 1992 | A |
5167487 | Rock | Dec 1992 | A |
5167489 | Wadia et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5169287 | Proctor et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5169288 | Gliebe et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5181826 | Rock | Jan 1993 | A |
5273400 | Amr | Dec 1993 | A |
5333992 | Kane et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5368095 | Kadambi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5385447 | Geister | Jan 1995 | A |
5439348 | Hughes et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5478199 | Gliebe | Dec 1995 | A |
5486090 | Thompson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5513952 | Mizuta | May 1996 | A |
5562408 | Proctor et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5584660 | Carter et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5642985 | Spear et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5735673 | Matheny et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769607 | Neely et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5810555 | Savage et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5906179 | Capdevila | May 1999 | A |
6048174 | Samit et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059532 | Chen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071077 | Rowlands | Jun 2000 | A |
6139257 | Proctor et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6250883 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6315521 | Hunt | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328533 | Decker et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338609 | Decker et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338611 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340285 | Gonyou et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6354795 | White et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368054 | Lucas | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368061 | Capdevila | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386830 | Slipper et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6471474 | Mielke et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6499940 | Adams | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6508630 | Liu et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6524070 | Carter | Feb 2003 | B1 |
RE38040 | Spear et al. | Mar 2003 | E |
6561760 | Wadia et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6561761 | Decker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6562227 | Lamphere et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6659716 | Laurello et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6733233 | Jasklowski et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6942445 | Morris et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6991428 | Crane | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7004722 | Teramura | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004922 | Shesol | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7008183 | Sayegh et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033138 | Tomita et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7134842 | Tam et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7195456 | Aggarwala et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7217096 | Lee | May 2007 | B2 |
7220100 | Lee et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7249933 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7290982 | Girard et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7351039 | Bachofner et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7374403 | Decker et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7476086 | Wadia et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487819 | Wang et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7624787 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7690890 | Aotsuka et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7811053 | Balamucki et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7938168 | Lee et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7972109 | Crall et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7997872 | Wilson | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8061980 | Praisner et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8092160 | Shi et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8157518 | Decker et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8337154 | Decker et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8393872 | Kirtley | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8413709 | Lee et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8647054 | Aulich et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20010021343 | Kuwabara et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20050232752 | Meisels | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20110189020 | Aulich et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110255985 | Diamond et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110293430 | Jan | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120027604 | McDonald et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130156559 | Perrot | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
492865 | Jul 1992 | EP |
801230 | Oct 1997 | EP |
1245791 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1516322 | Mar 2005 | EP |
2407344 | Apr 2005 | GB |
2431697 | May 2007 | GB |
2011157927 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012025357 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2013141935 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion completed by the ISA/EP on Sep. 30, 2014 and issued in connection with PCT/US2013/072315. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150128604 A1 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61776752 | Mar 2013 | US |