The invention relates generally to software and/or hardware and particularly to enterprise-wide licensing.
In the licensing of software for an enterprise, there is a need to issue the customer a license for software that specifies the number of users or simultaneous instances of the software the enterprise is allowed to have. Once the customer has the license for the enterprise, there is a need for the customer to be able to use the enterprise license to activate users/software instances while keeping the users/software instances within the limits of the enterprise license. This needs to be performed in the customer's environment without communication with the software vendor so that the customer can operate autonomously within the bounds of the enterprise license. For example, if the enterprise license allows 100 copies of the software to run at a time, the customer needs to be allowed to activate 100 instances of the software while being blocked from activating the 101st instance of software. For many applications, constant network communication with the enterprise license server is not possible or practical. Therefore, the licenses generated for users/software instances need to be persistent and continue to operate even when contact with the enterprise license server is lost or otherwise not available. This is the case with telecommunications enterprise-wide licensing where the licensing of mission critical voice communication systems needs to continue unabated even if communication to the enterprise license server is lost.
One licensing method is described in copending U.S. patent applications entitled “Securing Feature Activation in a Telecommunication System”, Ser. No. 09/357,679, filed Jul. 20, 1999, to Serkowski; “Securing Feature Activation in a Telecommunication System”, Ser. No. 09/357,679, filed Jul. 20, 1999, to Serkowski; “License Modes in Call Processing”, Ser. No. 10/232,508, filed Aug. 30, 2002; “Remote Feature Activator Feature Extraction”, Ser. No. 10/232,906, filed Aug. 30, 2002; “Flexible License File Feature Controls”, Ser. No. 10/231,999; “License File Serial Number Tracking”, Ser. No. 10/232,507; “Licensing Duplicated Systems”, Ser. No. 10/231,957; “Software Licensing for Spare Processors”, Ser. No. 10/232,647; “Temporary Password Login”, Ser. No. 10/387,182; and “Ironclad Notification of License Errors”, Ser. No. 10/405,176; each of which is incorporated herein by this reference, and is currently being implemented commercially in Communication Manager™ by Avaya Inc.™ A valid license file is required to run a computational component. The license file contains a hardware serial number that must be present on the hardware that is to execute the licensed software for the license to be valid and the software to be executable. This hardware serial number confirms that a single license is used to enable a single instance of software. This licensing method requires the licensed application to be in continuous contact with the enterprise license server. The license server issues a license that must be updated or checked periodically (such as once every 10 minutes).
There are different solutions that may be employed when a license fails an update or check. If the license update or check is not possible (such as due to loss of network communications), the license server may release the license and make the user seat/software instance available for use by another user. On the application side, if the license update or check fails, the application either continues to run with an alarm or stops operation. If the application continues to run without a license update or check, then there is a potential for license abuse since the same license can be used multiple times. If the application ceases to operate due to a failed license update or check, the software user is denied service, even though a seat/software instance is available. Neither of these solutions is satisfactory in most situations.
In the licensing of software for an enterprise, there is a further need to track licensing information at both the enterprise and individual software element levels. For example, the total number of ports for a telecommunications system may be tracked at the enterprise level, whereas platform type, serial number, and individual software feature right-to-use settings may need to be tracked at the lower level of an individual software element. In addition to tracking licensing information at both the enterprise and software element levels, a method is needed for establishing a relationship between the individual software elements and the license record for the enterprise to which they belong. For maximum flexibility in the software licensing options that a software company may want to offer their customers, software licensing parameters (e.g., software release, individual features, and capacities) need to be controllable at either level. Ideally, a method would be provided to allow moving an individual licensing parameter on a specific licensed system from one level to the other.
These and other needs are addressed by the various embodiments and configurations of the present invention. The present invention is directed generally to customer-configurable enterprise-wide licensing techniques and data structures used therewith.
In a first embodiment, the present invention provides a customer with a first set of enterprise licensable features and/or capacities and a second set of non-enterprise licensable features and/or capacities. The enterprise licensable features and/or capacities, but not non-enterprise licensable features and/or capacities, are allocable freely by the customer among the various computational components of the enterprise network. For example, a customer can distribute an enterprise feature and/or feature capacity among the computational components in the enterprise in a first manner and later redistribute them in a second different manner. By paying a higher fee than is paid for a non-enterprise or single system license, the customer can purchase the right to designate members for the enterprise licensable features and/or capacities and allocate them among the enterprise computational components in whatever manner he desires. After payment of appropriate charges, a feature becomes an enterprise feature, and the customer can move freely such features and/or capacities between the enterprise and non-enterprise licensable feature and/or capacity sets. For example, a customer can pay for the right to designate ten features and/or capacities as enterprise licensable features and can elect at different times to have different features and/or capacities as designated members of the ten features and/or capacities.
In another embodiment, persistent licenses are generated in the customer telecommunications environment to solve the problem of licensing operation during loss of communication with the master license server. An enterprise license for the customer's enterprise is generated by and delivered from a remote feature activation system of the manufacturer. The enterprise license is then installed on a customer master license server. The customer can allocate features and capacities to enterprise media servers, and the remote feature activation system or master license server generates licenses for the media servers that reflect the allocations. Once generated, these allocation licenses are installed on the media servers. The allocation licenses are persistent in that they do not require periodic updates from the master license server, and the media servers continue to operate even if communication is lost with the license server. The capacity allocated to a given media server is not returned for use by other media servers unless a new allocation license is installed on the media server with the capacity removed. Using this methodology, communication between the master license server and the licensed application is required only when license changes are needed. During a network outage, allocation license changes cannot be made but the allocation licenses persist through the outage. Moreover, allocation license generation in the customer enterprise is possible without contact with the software vendor/manufacturer, and enterprise license limits can be readily enforced.
This approach to enterprise licensing may be susceptible to license abuse unless proper security measures are in place. These security measures include two-way authentication between the remote feature activation system/master license server and media server using PKI certificates, node locking for the master license server to a specific instance of hardware, and node locking the allocation licenses to specific media server hardware.
In yet another embodiment, hierarchical relationships between system records (for individual hardware and/or software elements) and enterprise records (for the entire customer enterprise or a collection of hardware and/or software elements) are established via linking/unlinking system records to/from enterprise records. When a new software element is added (linked) to an enterprise, for example, all of the features/capacities present on the system record of the newly linked element are added to the licensing record for the enterprise. By way of illustration, if a system record with 100 ports is linked to an enterprise that currently has 1,000 ports, the enterprise record is updated automatically to reflect a total of 1,100 ports available across the enterprise. This automated ability to promote features to the enterprise level when system records are linked to enterprise records can ensure that the customer is given all of the features/capacities to which they are entitled. Such entitlements can be due to purchases at either the software element or enterprise level. The removal (unlinking) of a software element from an enterprise is a reverse of the process described (i.e., the features and capacities in the unlinked system record are subtracted from the enterprise record). The linking/unlinking of records allows customers to freely move individual software elements in and out of enterprises or even between enterprises. It provides the flexibility to control individual license parameters at either the system record or the enterprise record level. For a license parameter to be controlled at the enterprise level, it need only appear in the enterprise record. License parameters that appear only at the system record level are controlled at the level of the associated software element. If a license parameter should appear at both levels, it is handled as noted above with regard to linking and unlinking of records. The ability to support an individual licensing parameter as both a system record parameter and an enterprise record parameter allows features to be offered to customers at either the enterprise or software elements levels. Additionally, with the capability of moving an individual feature for an individual customer between levels, customers have maximum flexibility in software licensing. For example, a customer with an enterprise license can add a new software feature or capacity to the enterprise record and automatically promote this feature, as it appears in the linked system records, to an enterprise feature.
These and other advantages will be apparent from the disclosure of the invention(s) contained herein.
The above-described embodiments and configurations are neither complete nor exhaustive. As will be appreciated, other embodiments of the invention are possible utilizing, alone or in combination, one or more of the features set forth above or described in detail below.
Referring to
The RFA system 100 is in communication, via network 120 and business application programming interface 124, with an enterprise resource manager 128, serial number database 132, and an order database 136. The operation of the ERM 104 is discussed in detail in copending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/232,507 entitled “License File Serial Number Tracking”. The ERM 104 is configured to cause the addition, update, modification, and validation of entries in the databases 132 and 136 based on predetermined rules or policies. The ERM 104 can be any suitable enterprise resource planning software, such as ERP or Enterprise Resource Planning™ software sold by SAP. The serial number database 132 comprises a plurality of records corresponding to hardware (e.g., processors or IP services interface cards) sold to customers. In particular, the database typically includes a serial number, serial number status or licensing state, client or purchaser, material code(s) (e.g., a material code in SAP that defines the hardware having the serial number), an Enterprise System ID or ESID that identifies uniquely the enterprise that is the subject of the record, a System (record) ID or SID that identifies a system defined by one or media servers, and a Module ID or MID that identifies a media server in a system. The combination of the SID and MID identify uniquely a media server in a network. The order database comprises a plurality of records associated with hardware and software corresponding to each customer order. Each order entry typically includes an order number, customer name, address, and contact information, and a series of quantity, material code, and description fields identifying the contents of each order. The databases and their associated data structures are further described in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/232,906, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “Remote Feature Activator Feature Extraction”.
The data structures 112 include a plurality of enterprise records 188a-n, each of which corresponds to a different enterprise network. Each of the enterprise records 188a-n is linked to a plurality of corresponding system records 192a-i, and defines the customer's enterprise licensing information including the enterprise feature capacities. A system record is a database record that defines the licensing information for a customer media server. The system record is identified by the SID with which the media server corresponding to the system record is identified. Material code mapping tables are used to convert customer orders into licensing records and provide controls to define, for each licensing parameter, whether it applies to system records, enterprise records, or both.
The enterprise record typically includes the following information: the ESID corresponding to the associated enterprise, customer and general information, and enterprise information (e.g., enterprise description, location of the master license server 154, unique hardware identification number for the master enterprise license file (e.g., the host identifier or Media Access Control or MAC address of the master license server 154), the licensed applications, the enterprise features and capacities for each licensed application, the expiration date(s) of the license(s)), the master enterprise license file delivery history, and the SIDs (e.g., the pointers to the various system records for the media servers included in the enterprise).
Each system record commonly includes the following information: the ESID for the corresponding enterprise (which acts as a pointer to the corresponding enterprise record for that enterprise), a unique hardware identifier of (Media Access Control address of and/or serial number of the processor associated with) the corresponding media server, the SID assigned to the media server corresponding to the system record, and the media server identifier (MID) within the system identified by the SID, the licensed enterprise and non-enterprise applications, the enterprise and non-enterprise features and settings for each of the licensed applications, and the expiration date(s) of the license(s).
Type I, II, and III features are eligible for enterprise wide licensing. As discussed in copending U.S. application entitled “Flexible License File Feature Controls”, the three types of features are: Type I features (which are activatable), Type II features (which have a value feature range defined numerically by V1 and V2 and a value setting in the range of V1 to V2), Type III features (which have a product value (e.g., corresponding to a product name or type), a release number (e.g., referring to a product release identifier), and numeric value(s) defined by V1 and V2, and a value setting in the range of V1 and V2). A Type III feature allows other applications to be executed. Examples of Type I features include abbreviated dialing enhanced list, audible message waiting, vectoring, answer supervision by call classifier, ATM trunking, agent states, dial by name, DCS call coverage, echo cancellation, multifrequency signaling, wideband switching, Digital Communication System or DCS call coverage, audible message waiting, vectoring, attendant vectoring, Asynchronous Transfer Mode or ATM WAN spare processor, ATM, dial by name, echo cancellation, multimedia call handling, multiple call handling, caller identification, multifrequency signaling, Integrated Services Digital Network or ISDN network call redirection, centralized attendant, remote office, enhanced Direct Inward Dialing or DID routing, survivable remote processor, time of day routing, tenant partitioning, hospitality announcements, Vector Directory Number or VDN of origin announcement, wideband switching, and wireless. Examples of Type II features include logged-in agents, offer category, maximum numbers of concurrently registered IP stations, administered IP trunks, ports, and concurrently administered remote office stations/trunks, call center release, logged-in automated call distribution or ACD agents, maximum currently registered IP stations, maximum administered IP trunks, offer category, maximum number of ports, maximum number of administered remote office trunks, and maximum number of mobile stations. Examples of Type III features include IP softphone registration.
The linkage of system records to enterprise records permits licensing records to be maintained at two different levels, namely the enterprise and computational component or media server levels. Stated another way, a hierarchical relationship is established between the enterprise record 188 and its corresponding system records 192a-i. The relationship permits enterprise administrators or customers to promote/demote features and/or capacities between the enterprise and non-enterprise levels. In other words, a selected feature and/or capacity for a first customer can be an enterprise level feature and/or capacity, and for a second customer can be a non-enterprise level feature and/or capacity.
The logical relationships or links are established pursuant to a number of rules including: a given system record shall be linked to no more than a single enterprise record, a given enterprise record can have any number of system records linked to it, a system record is linked to an enterprise record only if the system record is eligible for enterprise-wide licensing, and a system record can only be linked to an enterprise record if one or more of the applications in the enterprise record are present in the system record.
Because of the logical relationships established between enterprise and system records when a new system element, such as a media server, is added to an enterprise and its associated system record linked to the enterprise record, all of the features/capacities present on the system record of the newly linked element are added to the licensing record for the enterprise. This concept is illustrated in
The RFA system 100 is further in communication, via network 146, with an enterprise network 150. The enterprise network 150 includes a master license server 154 and a plurality of media servers 158, respectively, a network 162, and a terminal 168.
The media servers 158 can be any converged architecture for directing circuit-switched and/or packet-switched contacts to one or more communication devices. Typically, the media server is a stored-program-controlled system that conventionally includes interfaces to external communication links, a communications switching fabric, service circuits (e.g., tone detectors and generators, announcement circuits, etc.), memory for storing control programs and data, and a processor (i.e., a computer) for executing the stored control programs to control the interfaces and the fabric and to provide automatic contact-distribution functionality. Illustratively, the media server can be a modified form of Avaya Inc.'s Definity™ Private-Branch Exchange (PBX)-based ACD system; Avaya Inc.'s IP600™ LAN-based ACD system, or an S8100™, S8300™, S8500™, S8700™, or S8710™ media server running a modified version of Avaya, Inc.'s Communication Manager™ voice-application software with call processing capabilities and contact center functions. Other types of known switches and servers are well known in the art and therefore not described in detail herein. The media servers 158 can server a variety of functions, including acting as a main server, local spare processors, remote spare processor, WAN spare processor, primary port network or PPN, and enterprise survivable server or ESS.
The master license server 154 can be any system operable to install and distribute licenses. Typically, the master license server 154 is a media server having network connectivity to the remote feature activation provisioning system 100.
The terminal 168 is a computer, such as a laptop or PC, that is connected to the media servers for user administration of the various system elements in the enterprise network. Administration includes the creation and distribution of allocation licenses as discussed more fully below.
The networks 120, 146, and 162 can be packet-switched and/or circuit-switched. Typically, networks 120 and 162 are local area networks while network 146 is a wide area network, such as the Internet.
The media servers 158 include a license installation agent 174 to receive and install standard and enterprise allocation license files, and the master license server 154 includes a license installation and configuration agent 172 that receives from the remote feature activation system 100 and installs on the server 154 standard and master enterprise license files 184 and 176 and forwards standard license files 184 and generates and forwards enterprise allocation license files 180 to media servers 158. In the configuration of
The master enterprise license file 176 defines the total enterprise feature capacities for the enterprise. The master enterprise license file 176 includes the following information: the ESID for the enterprise network 150, unique hardware identifier of (Media Access Control address of and/or serial number of the processor associated with) the master license server 154 in the corresponding enterprise network 150, the SIDs and MIDs of the various media servers in the enterprise network 150, the licensed enterprise applications, the enterprise features and settings for each of the licensed enterprise applications, and the expiration date(s) of the licenses. The master enterprise license file and standard license files include the features and maximum feature capacities that can be allocated to primary and media servers in the licensed enterprise. Because the enterprise licensable features are not associated with a single media server, the enterprise has portability of the capacities between all the media servers in the enterprise. The license files include a numerical value setting corresponding to the number of media servers in the enterprise on which the customer is allowed to have each of the Type I features activated and a numerical value corresponding to the total enterprise capacity that the customer is allowed to have for each Type II and III capacity features. As will be appreciated, the standard license file can be merged into the master enterprise license file so that only a single license file is installed on the master license server.
The standard license file enables the telecommunications application to run on each of the computational components in the enterprise network 150. The standard license file enables the host computational component software to run and enables enterprise wide licensing on a given media server. The standard license file is required by computational components whether or not they participate in enterprise-wide licensing.
The enterprise allocation license file 180 defines the enterprise features and feature capacity allocations for the host media server. The allocation license file typically includes the following information: the ESID for the enterprise network 150, the unique hardware identifier of the master license server 154, the SID and MID of the corresponding media server 158, the licensed enterprise applications for the corresponding media server 158, the allocated enterprise features and settings for each of the licensed enterprise applications in the corresponding media server 158, the expiration date of the allocation license. Allocation license files are given an expiration date, such as thirty days after generation, to prevent use of the software in violation of the license terms. Periodically, the master license server and/or remote feature activation system must generate and install a new allocation license good for thirty more days.
Although the master enterprise and enterprise allocation license files on the one hand and the standard license files on the other include the enterprise features and feature capacity allocations, the feature and feature capacity allocations in the master enterprise and enterprise allocation license files take precedence in the event of conflict with or supersede the information for the enterprise features and feature capacity allocations in the standard license files. This rule permits a customer to move freely features and feature capacity allocations to and from the enterprise and non-enterprise levels.
To facilitate user configuration of the allocation licenses, the agent 172 provides a Graphical User Interface or GUI to the user. The GUI permits the user to view information in the master enterprise license file, such as the ESID, SIDs, MIDs, expiration date of the master enterprise license file, applications covered by the master enterprise license file, enterprise feature states (whether the feature is enabled or disabled), values, and capacities, and allocation license duration. The user can further view the number of media servers in the enterprise with each Type I on/off (or activatable) enterprise feature currently activated, the available quantity remaining for each activatable enterprise feature, the total allocated capacity for each enterprise capacity feature, the available capacity remaining for each enterprise capacity feature, and the percent utilization for each enterprise feature. For the displayed usage level for each enterprise capacity feature, the GUI provides the date/time that the usage data was collected. The GUI enables the user to allocate enterprise features and capacities to any of the media servers in the licensed enterprise network subject to a number of selected rules. The rules include: the total number of media servers with a given activatable enterprise feature activated cannot exceed the value defined in the master enterprise license file, the total allocated capacity for each enterprise capacity feature cannot exceed the total capacity for that feature as defined in the master enterprise license file, allocated enterprise feature capacity cannot be less than current usage for that feature on a media server, enterprise feature capacity can only be allocated to a system whose SID appears in the master enterprise license file, the allocation of enterprise features and capacities to spare media servers in a system shall be identical to the allocation to the corresponding main media server, and the calculation of the total allocation for a given feature shall be based only on the allocations to main servers (or the allocation to spare media servers shall not be counted against the total allocation for the enterprise).
Other aspects of the architecture are described in the copending applications referenced above and incorporated herein by this reference.
The process for generating and installing standard and master enterprise license files on the master license server 154 will now be described with reference to
In step 400, the remote feature activation system 100 creates system records for all servers 154 and 158 in the enterprise network 150 using orders (one order per system record). A unique hardware ID, such as a processor serial number, is added to each system record.
In step 404, the system 100 creates an enterprise record for the enterprise using an order and adds to the record the unique hardware identifier associated with each master license server.
In step 408 the system records are linked to the corresponding enterprise record. After the records are linked, the standard and master enterprise license files are generated by the license generation agent 108.
In step 412, the application software (e.g., Avaya Inc.'s Communication Manager™ or Multi-Vantage™ software) is installed on the master license server 154. As part of this step and where the master license server is co-resident on a media server, the remote feature activator 104 delivers the standard license file 184 to the license installation and configuration agent 172 in the master license server 154 and the agent 172 unpackages and installs the standard license file 184 so that the master license server can run the application software. The master license server 154 is selected to have network access to all of the media servers in the enterprise network.
In step 416, the activator 104 delivers the master enterprise license file 176 to the license installation and configuration agent 172 in the master license server 154.
In step 420, the agent 172 unpackages and installs the master enterprise license file 176. The installation process is discussed below with reference to
In step 424, after the master license server 154 is enabled by the installed master enterprise license file the application software is installed on the media servers 158.
In step 428, an appropriate standard license file 184 is delivered to the license installation agent 174 in each of the media servers 158. The agent 172 unpackages and installs the standard license file 184 so that the application software can run. To generate an allocation license file, the agent 172, after receiving input from the customer, generates in one configuration an allocation license request and forwards the request to the remote feature activation system 100, where an allocation license is generated by the license generation agent 108. Allocation license requests include the ESID for the enterprise 150, the SID and MID associated with the media server that will be the subject of the allocation license, the expiration date of the allocation license, and the enterprise feature allocations and settings, including those requested by the customer. The request includes all of the active features contained in the master enterprise license file. In the feature mask of the allocation license file, Type I feature settings are locked and Type II and III feature settings have V1 equal to V2. In another configuration, the agent 172 generates allocation license files without involvement of the remote feature activation system 100.
In step 432, enterprise network connectivity is configured for the media servers using techniques known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
In step 436, enterprise features and capacities are allocated by the customer to each of the primary media servers in the enterprise network 436. In response to user input, the license installation and configuration agent 172 in the master license server 154 generates appropriate allocation license files 180 for each of the affected media servers. The process to install an allocation license file 180 on a media server is discussed below with reference to
When the file is received, the agent 172 unpackages the license file and, in decision diamond 500, determines whether the license file is valid, readable, and in the proper format.
When the license file is valid, readable, and properly formatted, the agent 172 in decision diamond 504 determines whether the hardware ID in the file matches the hardware ID of the license server 154.
When the hardware ID's match, the agent 172 in decision diamond 508 determines whether the feature and capacity limits in the master enterprise license file are less than the current allocations in the enterprise network 150.
When the feature and capacity limits are not less than the current allocations, the agent 172 in decision diamond 512 determines whether the master enterprise license has expired. This is done by comparing the expiration date in the license file with the system clock of the license server.
When the license is not expired, the agent 172 in decision diamond 516 determines if the license generation date is before (within some tolerance) the current date on the system clock of the license server 154.
If so and after all of the other checks are successful, the agent 172 finds in step 520 the installation of the master enterprise license file to be successful.
When any of the checks is not successful, the agent 172 finds in step 524 the installation of the master enterprise license file to be unsuccessful.
The distribution of allocation license files will now be discussed with reference to
In decision diamond 600, the agent 174 determines whether the corresponding media server already has installed a valid standard license file 184.
When a valid standard license file 184 exists, the agent 174 in decision diamond 604 determines whether enterprise licensing is activated in the standard license file 184.
When enterprise licensing is activated, the agent 174 in decision diamond 608 determines whether the digital signature on the allocation license file is valid. This is done by decrypting the digital signature using the public key in the public certificate of the digitally signing entity, which is commonly the remote feature activation system 100 and confirming that the decrypted hash value is correct.
When the digital signature is verified successfully, the agent 174 in decision diamond 612 determines whether the enterprise and system identification information (e.g., ESID, SID, and MID of the media server) in the allocation license match the enterprise and system identification information in the standard license 184.
When the enterprise and system identification information matches the same information in the standard license 184, the agent 174 in decision diamond 616 determines whether the system is currently in a license-error or no-license mode due to a hardware ID mismatch.
When the system is not currently in a license-error or no-license mode, the agent 174 determines in decision diamond 620 whether the allocation license is expired.
When the allocation license is not expired, the agent 174 in decision diamond 624 determines whether the generation date of the allocation license is past the current time on the media server by more than a specified limit.
When the generation date of the allocation license is not past the current time on the media server by more than a specified limit, the agent 174 in decision diamond 628 determines whether installation of the allocation license file will cause a license error on the system. For example, a license error can be caused by a feature limit being exceeded. When a feature and/or capacity limit will be exceeded, the customer must increase the feature and/or capacity limit in the allocation license file for the media server.
If so and after all of the other checks are successful, the agent 174 finds in step 632 the installation of the allocation license file to be successful.
When any of the checks is not successful, the agent 174 finds in step 636 the installation of the master enterprise license file to be unsuccessful.
A number of variations and modifications of the invention can be used. It would be possible to provide for some features of the invention without providing others.
For example in one alternative embodiment, the various modules referenced herein are implemented as software, hardware (e.g., a logic circuit), or a combination thereof.
In another alternative embodiment, the division of the various functions performed by the various modules in the enterprise licensing system is different.
In other embodiments, the present invention is used to license computational components, such as software and/or hardware, distributed in an enterprise network other than media servers. Examples of such components include personal computers, laptops, packet-switched and/or circuit-switched communication devices, such as IP hardphones, digital phones, and Personal Digital Assistants, gateways, voice messaging servers, instant messaging servers, email servers, adjunct processors, and peripherals (such as printers).
The present invention, in various embodiments, includes components, methods, processes, systems and/or apparatus substantially as depicted and described herein, including various embodiments, subcombinations, and subsets thereof. Those of skill in the art will understand how to make and use the present invention after understanding the present disclosure. The present invention, in various embodiments, includes providing devices and processes in the absence of items not depicted and/or described herein or in various embodiments hereof, including in the absence of such items as may have been used in previous devices or processes, e.g., for improving performance, achieving ease and\or reducing cost of implementation.
The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the invention to the form or forms disclosed herein. In the foregoing Detailed Description for example, various features of the invention are grouped together in one or more embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed invention requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate preferred embodiment of the invention.
Moreover, though the description of the invention has included description of one or more embodiments and certain variations and modifications, other variations and modifications are within the scope of the invention, e.g., as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.
This application claims the benefits under 35 U.S.C. §119 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/615,432, filed Sep. 30, 2004, of the same title and to the same inventors, which is incorporated herein by this reference. Cross reference is made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/231,957, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “Licensing Duplicated Systems”; Ser. No. 10/232,507, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “License File Serial Number Tracking”; Ser. No. 10/232,508, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “License Modes in Call Processing”; Ser. No. 10/231,999, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “Flexible License File Feature Controls”; Ser. No. 10/232,906, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “Remote Feature Activator Feature Extraction”; Ser. No. 10/232,647, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “Software Licensing for Spare Processors”; Ser. No. 10/348,107, filed Jan. 20, 2003, entitled “Remote Feature Activation Authentication File System”; Ser. No. 10/387,182, filed Mar. 11, 2003, entitled “Temporary Password Login”; Ser. No. 10/811,412, filed Mar. 25, 2004, entitled “Global Positioning System Hardware Key for Software Licenses”; and Ser. No. 10/956,861, filed Sep. 30, 2004, entitled “Certificate Distribution Via License Files”, each of which is incorporated herein by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4288659 | Atalla | Sep 1981 | A |
4405829 | Rivest et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4780821 | Crossley | Oct 1988 | A |
4811393 | Hazard | Mar 1989 | A |
4888800 | Marshall et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4937863 | Robert et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5005122 | Griffin et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5023907 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5157663 | Major et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5179591 | Hardy et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5204897 | Wyman | Apr 1993 | A |
5206903 | Kohler et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5230020 | Hardy et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5260999 | Wyman | Nov 1993 | A |
5307481 | Shimazaki et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5329570 | Glassmacher et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5341427 | Hardy et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347580 | Molva et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5386369 | Christiano | Jan 1995 | A |
5390297 | Barber et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5408649 | Beshears et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5448639 | Arazi | Sep 1995 | A |
5553143 | Ross et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563946 | Cooper et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5579222 | Bains et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5629980 | Stefik et al. | May 1997 | A |
5646992 | Subler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5671412 | Christiano | Sep 1997 | A |
5673315 | Wolf | Sep 1997 | A |
5699431 | Van Oorschot et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5708709 | Rose | Jan 1998 | A |
5717604 | Wiggins | Feb 1998 | A |
5724428 | Rivest | Mar 1998 | A |
5742757 | Hamadani et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745569 | Moskowitz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745576 | Abraham et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745879 | Wyman | Apr 1998 | A |
5754761 | Willsey | May 1998 | A |
5758068 | Brandt et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758069 | Olsen | May 1998 | A |
5790074 | Rangedahl et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790664 | Coley et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796941 | Lita | Aug 1998 | A |
5828747 | Fisher et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835600 | Rivest | Nov 1998 | A |
5864620 | Pettitt | Jan 1999 | A |
5905793 | Flockhart et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905860 | Olsen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5935243 | Hasebe et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940504 | Griswold | Aug 1999 | A |
5956505 | Manduley | Sep 1999 | A |
5956716 | Kenner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960085 | de la Huerga | Sep 1999 | A |
5978565 | Ohran et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982873 | Flockhart et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995625 | Sudia et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006016 | Faigon et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009401 | Horstmann | Dec 1999 | A |
6011973 | Valentine et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023763 | Grumstrup et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023766 | Yamamura | Feb 2000 | A |
6047242 | Benson | Apr 2000 | A |
6067621 | Yu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6108703 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128389 | Chan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134660 | Boneh et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148415 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163607 | Bogart et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173053 | Bogart et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178511 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189146 | Misra et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192122 | Flockhart et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212635 | Reardon | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219652 | Carter et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223291 | Puhl et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246871 | Ala-Laurila | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6314565 | Kenner et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6343280 | Clark | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6360320 | Ishiguro et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381747 | Wonfor et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6414595 | Scrandis et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421726 | Kenner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442708 | Dierauer et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6463534 | Geiger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6502079 | Ball et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6513117 | Tarpenning et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6513121 | Serkowski | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6539481 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6557105 | Tardo et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574612 | Baratti et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584454 | Hummel et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6615347 | de Silva et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640305 | Kocher et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6654888 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6675208 | Rai et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6697945 | Ishiguro et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6704885 | Salas-Meza et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6760324 | Scott et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6765492 | Harris | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769063 | Kanda et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772133 | Kambayashi et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775782 | Buros et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778820 | Tendler | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785726 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795941 | Nickels | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6816842 | Singh et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826606 | Freeman et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6842896 | Redding et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850958 | Wakabayashi | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6854010 | Christian et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6868403 | Wiser et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876984 | Tadayon et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883095 | Sandhu et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6889212 | Wang et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6901386 | Dedrick et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6904523 | Bialick et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920567 | Doherty et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6928166 | Yoshizawa | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6928558 | Allahwerdi et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934463 | Ishiguro et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934848 | King et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941283 | Kambayashi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957344 | Goldshlag et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6959291 | Armstrong et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6961858 | Fransdonk | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6968384 | Redding et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6973444 | Blinn et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976164 | King et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981222 | Rush et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7032113 | Pendlebury | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035918 | Redding et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7065214 | Ishiguro et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069468 | Olson et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7073063 | Peinado | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085382 | Terao et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096469 | Kubala et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7100044 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100200 | Pope et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7124304 | Bel et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7146340 | Musson | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7149806 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152245 | Dublish et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171662 | Misra et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7185195 | Hug et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7206936 | Aull et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225333 | Peinado et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228426 | Sinha et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7260557 | Chavez | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7302703 | Burns | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308717 | Koved et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313828 | Holopainen | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7318236 | DeMello et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7336791 | Ishiguro | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7356692 | Bialick et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7382881 | Uusitalo et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7383205 | Peinado et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7415729 | Ukeda et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7545931 | Dillaway | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552166 | Chack | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7565325 | Lenard et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7702903 | Roy et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7716348 | Redding et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7725721 | Yellai et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20010001268 | Menon et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010011254 | Clark | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010013024 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010034846 | Beery | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020001302 | Pickett | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010681 | Hillegass et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013722 | Kanaga | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020017977 | Wall | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020038422 | Suwamoto et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052939 | Lee | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083003 | Halliday | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087892 | Imazu | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020104006 | Boate et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107809 | Biddle et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112186 | Ford et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116340 | Hellberg et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020125886 | Bates et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138441 | Lopatic | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154777 | Candelore | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164025 | Raiz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169625 | Yang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169725 | Eng | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174356 | Padole et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176404 | Girard | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188656 | Patton et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188704 | Gold | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005427 | Herrero | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030013411 | Uchiyama | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018491 | Nakahara et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018582 | Yaacovi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023564 | Padhye et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055749 | Carmody et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084306 | Abburi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095542 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030144959 | Makita | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149670 | Cronce | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149874 | Balfanz et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156719 | Cronce | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159033 | Ishiguro | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159070 | Mayer et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163428 | Schneck et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172035 | Cronce et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177393 | Ishiguro | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191936 | Kawatsura et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208449 | Diao | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220880 | Lao et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233547 | Gaston et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003269 | Waxman et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010440 | Lenard et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010469 | Lenard et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010471 | Lenard et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039916 | Aldis et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044629 | Rhodes et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044630 | Walker et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044631 | Walker et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044901 | Serkowski et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040047354 | Slater et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054909 | Serkowski et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054930 | Walker et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073517 | Zunke et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078339 | Goringe et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088541 | Messerges et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103011 | Hatano et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103324 | Band | May 2004 | A1 |
20040127196 | Dabbish et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128395 | Miyazaki | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128551 | Walker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133794 | Kocher et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162998 | Tuomi et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166878 | Erskine et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167926 | Waxman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172367 | Chavez | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181695 | Walker | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181696 | Walker | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199760 | Mazza | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249763 | Vardi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260589 | Varadarajan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268120 | Mirtal et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005098 | Michaelis et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038753 | Yen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050076204 | Thornton et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086174 | Eng | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091507 | Lee et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050144437 | Ransom et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154877 | Trench | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050185792 | Tokutani et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198510 | Robert et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202830 | Sudit | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229004 | Callaghan | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246098 | Bergstrom et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289072 | Sabharwal | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021068 | Xu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026105 | Endoh | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036554 | Schrock et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036894 | Bauer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064582 | Teal et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089912 | Spagna et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060178953 | Aggarwal et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190409 | Hillegass et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060242083 | Chavez | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060294010 | Kim et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070033419 | Kocher et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070094710 | Walker et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070107067 | Fountian | May 2007 | A1 |
20070219917 | Liu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080052295 | Walker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082449 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080141242 | Shapiro | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080189131 | Chavez | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090119779 | Dean et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138975 | Richardson | May 2009 | A1 |
20100049725 | Walker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 071 253 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1562378 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2006085481 | Mar 2006 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60615432 | Sep 2004 | US |