Generation of enterprise-wide licenses in a customer environment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8229858
  • Patent Number
    8,229,858
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 4, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 24, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
An enterprise licensing system is provided that includes a licensing agent 172 operable to (a) provide a customer with a first set of enterprise licensable features and/or capacities and a second set of non-enterprise licensable features and/or capacities, with the enterprise licensable features and/or capacities, but not non-enterprise licensable features and/or capacities, being allocable freely by the customer among first and second computational components; (b) receive a first allocation of the members of the first set between the first and second computational components; and (c) generate first and second licenses reflecting the first allocation. The first license is for the first computational component and the second license is for the second computational component.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates generally to software and/or hardware and particularly to enterprise-wide licensing.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the licensing of software for an enterprise, there is a need to issue the customer a license for software that specifies the number of users or simultaneous instances of the software the enterprise is allowed to have. Once the customer has the license for the enterprise, there is a need for the customer to be able to use the enterprise license to activate users/software instances while keeping the users/software instances within the limits of the enterprise license. This needs to be performed in the customer's environment without communication with the software vendor so that the customer can operate autonomously within the bounds of the enterprise license. For example, if the enterprise license allows 100 copies of the software to run at a time, the customer needs to be allowed to activate 100 instances of the software while being blocked from activating the 101st instance of software. For many applications, constant network communication with the enterprise license server is not possible or practical. Therefore, the licenses generated for users/software instances need to be persistent and continue to operate even when contact with the enterprise license server is lost or otherwise not available. This is the case with telecommunications enterprise-wide licensing where the licensing of mission critical voice communication systems needs to continue unabated even if communication to the enterprise license server is lost.


One licensing method is described in copending U.S. patent applications entitled “Securing Feature Activation in a Telecommunication System”, Ser. No. 09/357,679, filed Jul. 20, 1999, to Serkowski; “Securing Feature Activation in a Telecommunication System”, Ser. No. 09/357,679, filed Jul. 20, 1999, to Serkowski; “License Modes in Call Processing”, Ser. No. 10/232,508, filed Aug. 30, 2002; “Remote Feature Activator Feature Extraction”, Ser. No. 10/232,906, filed Aug. 30, 2002; “Flexible License File Feature Controls”, Ser. No. 10/231,999; “License File Serial Number Tracking”, Ser. No. 10/232,507; “Licensing Duplicated Systems”, Ser. No. 10/231,957; “Software Licensing for Spare Processors”, Ser. No. 10/232,647; “Temporary Password Login”, Ser. No. 10/387,182; and “Ironclad Notification of License Errors”, Ser. No. 10/405,176; each of which is incorporated herein by this reference, and is currently being implemented commercially in Communication Manager™ by Avaya Inc.™ A valid license file is required to run a computational component. The license file contains a hardware serial number that must be present on the hardware that is to execute the licensed software for the license to be valid and the software to be executable. This hardware serial number confirms that a single license is used to enable a single instance of software. This licensing method requires the licensed application to be in continuous contact with the enterprise license server. The license server issues a license that must be updated or checked periodically (such as once every 10 minutes).


There are different solutions that may be employed when a license fails an update or check. If the license update or check is not possible (such as due to loss of network communications), the license server may release the license and make the user seat/software instance available for use by another user. On the application side, if the license update or check fails, the application either continues to run with an alarm or stops operation. If the application continues to run without a license update or check, then there is a potential for license abuse since the same license can be used multiple times. If the application ceases to operate due to a failed license update or check, the software user is denied service, even though a seat/software instance is available. Neither of these solutions is satisfactory in most situations.


In the licensing of software for an enterprise, there is a further need to track licensing information at both the enterprise and individual software element levels. For example, the total number of ports for a telecommunications system may be tracked at the enterprise level, whereas platform type, serial number, and individual software feature right-to-use settings may need to be tracked at the lower level of an individual software element. In addition to tracking licensing information at both the enterprise and software element levels, a method is needed for establishing a relationship between the individual software elements and the license record for the enterprise to which they belong. For maximum flexibility in the software licensing options that a software company may want to offer their customers, software licensing parameters (e.g., software release, individual features, and capacities) need to be controllable at either level. Ideally, a method would be provided to allow moving an individual licensing parameter on a specific licensed system from one level to the other.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

These and other needs are addressed by the various embodiments and configurations of the present invention. The present invention is directed generally to customer-configurable enterprise-wide licensing techniques and data structures used therewith.


In a first embodiment, the present invention provides a customer with a first set of enterprise licensable features and/or capacities and a second set of non-enterprise licensable features and/or capacities. The enterprise licensable features and/or capacities, but not non-enterprise licensable features and/or capacities, are allocable freely by the customer among the various computational components of the enterprise network. For example, a customer can distribute an enterprise feature and/or feature capacity among the computational components in the enterprise in a first manner and later redistribute them in a second different manner. By paying a higher fee than is paid for a non-enterprise or single system license, the customer can purchase the right to designate members for the enterprise licensable features and/or capacities and allocate them among the enterprise computational components in whatever manner he desires. After payment of appropriate charges, a feature becomes an enterprise feature, and the customer can move freely such features and/or capacities between the enterprise and non-enterprise licensable feature and/or capacity sets. For example, a customer can pay for the right to designate ten features and/or capacities as enterprise licensable features and can elect at different times to have different features and/or capacities as designated members of the ten features and/or capacities.


In another embodiment, persistent licenses are generated in the customer telecommunications environment to solve the problem of licensing operation during loss of communication with the master license server. An enterprise license for the customer's enterprise is generated by and delivered from a remote feature activation system of the manufacturer. The enterprise license is then installed on a customer master license server. The customer can allocate features and capacities to enterprise media servers, and the remote feature activation system or master license server generates licenses for the media servers that reflect the allocations. Once generated, these allocation licenses are installed on the media servers. The allocation licenses are persistent in that they do not require periodic updates from the master license server, and the media servers continue to operate even if communication is lost with the license server. The capacity allocated to a given media server is not returned for use by other media servers unless a new allocation license is installed on the media server with the capacity removed. Using this methodology, communication between the master license server and the licensed application is required only when license changes are needed. During a network outage, allocation license changes cannot be made but the allocation licenses persist through the outage. Moreover, allocation license generation in the customer enterprise is possible without contact with the software vendor/manufacturer, and enterprise license limits can be readily enforced.


This approach to enterprise licensing may be susceptible to license abuse unless proper security measures are in place. These security measures include two-way authentication between the remote feature activation system/master license server and media server using PKI certificates, node locking for the master license server to a specific instance of hardware, and node locking the allocation licenses to specific media server hardware.


In yet another embodiment, hierarchical relationships between system records (for individual hardware and/or software elements) and enterprise records (for the entire customer enterprise or a collection of hardware and/or software elements) are established via linking/unlinking system records to/from enterprise records. When a new software element is added (linked) to an enterprise, for example, all of the features/capacities present on the system record of the newly linked element are added to the licensing record for the enterprise. By way of illustration, if a system record with 100 ports is linked to an enterprise that currently has 1,000 ports, the enterprise record is updated automatically to reflect a total of 1,100 ports available across the enterprise. This automated ability to promote features to the enterprise level when system records are linked to enterprise records can ensure that the customer is given all of the features/capacities to which they are entitled. Such entitlements can be due to purchases at either the software element or enterprise level. The removal (unlinking) of a software element from an enterprise is a reverse of the process described (i.e., the features and capacities in the unlinked system record are subtracted from the enterprise record). The linking/unlinking of records allows customers to freely move individual software elements in and out of enterprises or even between enterprises. It provides the flexibility to control individual license parameters at either the system record or the enterprise record level. For a license parameter to be controlled at the enterprise level, it need only appear in the enterprise record. License parameters that appear only at the system record level are controlled at the level of the associated software element. If a license parameter should appear at both levels, it is handled as noted above with regard to linking and unlinking of records. The ability to support an individual licensing parameter as both a system record parameter and an enterprise record parameter allows features to be offered to customers at either the enterprise or software elements levels. Additionally, with the capability of moving an individual feature for an individual customer between levels, customers have maximum flexibility in software licensing. For example, a customer with an enterprise license can add a new software feature or capacity to the enterprise record and automatically promote this feature, as it appears in the linked system records, to an enterprise feature.


These and other advantages will be apparent from the disclosure of the invention(s) contained herein.


The above-described embodiments and configurations are neither complete nor exhaustive. As will be appreciated, other embodiments of the invention are possible utilizing, alone or in combination, one or more of the features set forth above or described in detail below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 depicts an architecture according to an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 depicts a set of data structures according to an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 depicts a standard license file according to an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a flowchart according to an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a flowchart according to an embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 6 is a flowchart according to an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Overview of the Remote Feature Activation System

Referring to FIG. 1, the remote feature activation or RFA system 100 comprises a remote feature activator 104 to supervise creation, encryption and delivery of master enterprise license files to enterprise master license servers, a license generation agent 108 that generates digitally signed standard and master license files (and in one implementation allocation license files) in response to requests from the RFA system 104, and a plurality of data structures 112, each of which corresponds to a licensed customer enterprise network. A cryptographic agent (not shown) generates public/private key pairs that are included in the master and/or standard license files.


The RFA system 100 is in communication, via network 120 and business application programming interface 124, with an enterprise resource manager 128, serial number database 132, and an order database 136. The operation of the ERM 104 is discussed in detail in copending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/232,507 entitled “License File Serial Number Tracking”. The ERM 104 is configured to cause the addition, update, modification, and validation of entries in the databases 132 and 136 based on predetermined rules or policies. The ERM 104 can be any suitable enterprise resource planning software, such as ERP or Enterprise Resource Planning™ software sold by SAP. The serial number database 132 comprises a plurality of records corresponding to hardware (e.g., processors or IP services interface cards) sold to customers. In particular, the database typically includes a serial number, serial number status or licensing state, client or purchaser, material code(s) (e.g., a material code in SAP that defines the hardware having the serial number), an Enterprise System ID or ESID that identifies uniquely the enterprise that is the subject of the record, a System (record) ID or SID that identifies a system defined by one or media servers, and a Module ID or MID that identifies a media server in a system. The combination of the SID and MID identify uniquely a media server in a network. The order database comprises a plurality of records associated with hardware and software corresponding to each customer order. Each order entry typically includes an order number, customer name, address, and contact information, and a series of quantity, material code, and description fields identifying the contents of each order. The databases and their associated data structures are further described in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/232,906, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “Remote Feature Activator Feature Extraction”.


The data structures 112 include a plurality of enterprise records 188a-n, each of which corresponds to a different enterprise network. Each of the enterprise records 188a-n is linked to a plurality of corresponding system records 192a-i, and defines the customer's enterprise licensing information including the enterprise feature capacities. A system record is a database record that defines the licensing information for a customer media server. The system record is identified by the SID with which the media server corresponding to the system record is identified. Material code mapping tables are used to convert customer orders into licensing records and provide controls to define, for each licensing parameter, whether it applies to system records, enterprise records, or both.


The enterprise record typically includes the following information: the ESID corresponding to the associated enterprise, customer and general information, and enterprise information (e.g., enterprise description, location of the master license server 154, unique hardware identification number for the master enterprise license file (e.g., the host identifier or Media Access Control or MAC address of the master license server 154), the licensed applications, the enterprise features and capacities for each licensed application, the expiration date(s) of the license(s)), the master enterprise license file delivery history, and the SIDs (e.g., the pointers to the various system records for the media servers included in the enterprise).


Each system record commonly includes the following information: the ESID for the corresponding enterprise (which acts as a pointer to the corresponding enterprise record for that enterprise), a unique hardware identifier of (Media Access Control address of and/or serial number of the processor associated with) the corresponding media server, the SID assigned to the media server corresponding to the system record, and the media server identifier (MID) within the system identified by the SID, the licensed enterprise and non-enterprise applications, the enterprise and non-enterprise features and settings for each of the licensed applications, and the expiration date(s) of the license(s).


Type I, II, and III features are eligible for enterprise wide licensing. As discussed in copending U.S. application entitled “Flexible License File Feature Controls”, the three types of features are: Type I features (which are activatable), Type II features (which have a value feature range defined numerically by V1 and V2 and a value setting in the range of V1 to V2), Type III features (which have a product value (e.g., corresponding to a product name or type), a release number (e.g., referring to a product release identifier), and numeric value(s) defined by V1 and V2, and a value setting in the range of V1 and V2). A Type III feature allows other applications to be executed. Examples of Type I features include abbreviated dialing enhanced list, audible message waiting, vectoring, answer supervision by call classifier, ATM trunking, agent states, dial by name, DCS call coverage, echo cancellation, multifrequency signaling, wideband switching, Digital Communication System or DCS call coverage, audible message waiting, vectoring, attendant vectoring, Asynchronous Transfer Mode or ATM WAN spare processor, ATM, dial by name, echo cancellation, multimedia call handling, multiple call handling, caller identification, multifrequency signaling, Integrated Services Digital Network or ISDN network call redirection, centralized attendant, remote office, enhanced Direct Inward Dialing or DID routing, survivable remote processor, time of day routing, tenant partitioning, hospitality announcements, Vector Directory Number or VDN of origin announcement, wideband switching, and wireless. Examples of Type II features include logged-in agents, offer category, maximum numbers of concurrently registered IP stations, administered IP trunks, ports, and concurrently administered remote office stations/trunks, call center release, logged-in automated call distribution or ACD agents, maximum currently registered IP stations, maximum administered IP trunks, offer category, maximum number of ports, maximum number of administered remote office trunks, and maximum number of mobile stations. Examples of Type III features include IP softphone registration.


The linkage of system records to enterprise records permits licensing records to be maintained at two different levels, namely the enterprise and computational component or media server levels. Stated another way, a hierarchical relationship is established between the enterprise record 188 and its corresponding system records 192a-i. The relationship permits enterprise administrators or customers to promote/demote features and/or capacities between the enterprise and non-enterprise levels. In other words, a selected feature and/or capacity for a first customer can be an enterprise level feature and/or capacity, and for a second customer can be a non-enterprise level feature and/or capacity.


The logical relationships or links are established pursuant to a number of rules including: a given system record shall be linked to no more than a single enterprise record, a given enterprise record can have any number of system records linked to it, a system record is linked to an enterprise record only if the system record is eligible for enterprise-wide licensing, and a system record can only be linked to an enterprise record if one or more of the applications in the enterprise record are present in the system record.


Because of the logical relationships established between enterprise and system records when a new system element, such as a media server, is added to an enterprise and its associated system record linked to the enterprise record, all of the features/capacities present on the system record of the newly linked element are added to the licensing record for the enterprise. This concept is illustrated in FIG. 2. When the enterprise record 200 was originally created the enterprise feature FEAT_ON_OFF 202, which is an activatable enterprise feature, had a value of 1 and the capacity enterprise feature VALUE_CAPACITY 203 a value of 1000. It is later linked to three system records 204, 208, and 212 and, as a result, the originally assigned values are adjusted in the modified enterprise record 216. The value for the feature 202 is the value in the original enterprise record 200 incremented by 1 for each linked system record that has the same feature activated. The feature is activated in system records 204 and 208, but the feature is absent from system record 212. Accordingly, the new value 218 for the feature is 3. The value for the capacity enterprise feature 203 in the modified enterprise record 216 is the value from the original enterprise record 200 plus the values from each system record in the enterprise that has the capacity feature. As can be seen in FIG. 2, each of the linked system records 204, 208, and 212 has the same enterprise capacity feature, with the value in record 204 being 200, the value in record 208 being 30 and the value in record 212 being 4. The mathematical sum of these values is 1234 as shown in the modified enterprise record 216. It is important to note that FEAT_XYZ is a non-enterprise feature and therefore is absent from the enterprise record 200 and 216. Its presence in the linked system record 212 thus has no impact on the enterprise record, even if FEAT_XYZ is an enterprise feature in other enterprise records. Features are added to the enterprise record only via a customer order.


The Enterprise Network

The RFA system 100 is further in communication, via network 146, with an enterprise network 150. The enterprise network 150 includes a master license server 154 and a plurality of media servers 158, respectively, a network 162, and a terminal 168.


The media servers 158 can be any converged architecture for directing circuit-switched and/or packet-switched contacts to one or more communication devices. Typically, the media server is a stored-program-controlled system that conventionally includes interfaces to external communication links, a communications switching fabric, service circuits (e.g., tone detectors and generators, announcement circuits, etc.), memory for storing control programs and data, and a processor (i.e., a computer) for executing the stored control programs to control the interfaces and the fabric and to provide automatic contact-distribution functionality. Illustratively, the media server can be a modified form of Avaya Inc.'s Definity™ Private-Branch Exchange (PBX)-based ACD system; Avaya Inc.'s IP600™ LAN-based ACD system, or an S8100™, S8300™, S8500™, S8700™, or S8710™ media server running a modified version of Avaya, Inc.'s Communication Manager™ voice-application software with call processing capabilities and contact center functions. Other types of known switches and servers are well known in the art and therefore not described in detail herein. The media servers 158 can server a variety of functions, including acting as a main server, local spare processors, remote spare processor, WAN spare processor, primary port network or PPN, and enterprise survivable server or ESS.


The master license server 154 can be any system operable to install and distribute licenses. Typically, the master license server 154 is a media server having network connectivity to the remote feature activation provisioning system 100.


The terminal 168 is a computer, such as a laptop or PC, that is connected to the media servers for user administration of the various system elements in the enterprise network. Administration includes the creation and distribution of allocation licenses as discussed more fully below.


The networks 120, 146, and 162 can be packet-switched and/or circuit-switched. Typically, networks 120 and 162 are local area networks while network 146 is a wide area network, such as the Internet.


The media servers 158 include a license installation agent 174 to receive and install standard and enterprise allocation license files, and the master license server 154 includes a license installation and configuration agent 172 that receives from the remote feature activation system 100 and installs on the server 154 standard and master enterprise license files 184 and 176 and forwards standard license files 184 and generates and forwards enterprise allocation license files 180 to media servers 158. In the configuration of FIG. 1, for example the remote feature activation system 100 could provide four licenses files to the master license server 154, namely the master enterprise license file 176 and three standard license files 184, one for each of the license server 154 and media servers 158. As will be appreciated, the standard licenses may be distributed by enterprise administration/the remote feature activation system 100 manually and/or independently of the master license server 154.


The master enterprise license file 176 defines the total enterprise feature capacities for the enterprise. The master enterprise license file 176 includes the following information: the ESID for the enterprise network 150, unique hardware identifier of (Media Access Control address of and/or serial number of the processor associated with) the master license server 154 in the corresponding enterprise network 150, the SIDs and MIDs of the various media servers in the enterprise network 150, the licensed enterprise applications, the enterprise features and settings for each of the licensed enterprise applications, and the expiration date(s) of the licenses. The master enterprise license file and standard license files include the features and maximum feature capacities that can be allocated to primary and media servers in the licensed enterprise. Because the enterprise licensable features are not associated with a single media server, the enterprise has portability of the capacities between all the media servers in the enterprise. The license files include a numerical value setting corresponding to the number of media servers in the enterprise on which the customer is allowed to have each of the Type I features activated and a numerical value corresponding to the total enterprise capacity that the customer is allowed to have for each Type II and III capacity features. As will be appreciated, the standard license file can be merged into the master enterprise license file so that only a single license file is installed on the master license server.


The standard license file enables the telecommunications application to run on each of the computational components in the enterprise network 150. The standard license file enables the host computational component software to run and enables enterprise wide licensing on a given media server. The standard license file is required by computational components whether or not they participate in enterprise-wide licensing.



FIG. 3 represents, at a high level, both the master enterprise license 176 and the standard license 184. The enterprise license 176 typically includes, in the license file 300: the ESID of the enterprise network 150, the unique hardware identifier of the master license server 154, the SIDs, MIDs, and hardware identifiers of the various media servers in the enterprise network 150, the licensed enterprise applications, the enterprise features and settings for each licensed enterprise application, and the expiration date(s) of the license. As will be appreciated, the master license server may be co-resident on a media server. The standard license 184 typically includes, in the license file 300, the ESID, the SID, and MID of the licensed media server, the licensed enterprise and non-enterprise applications, features, and settings, and the license expiration date. Both types of licenses further include the digital certificates 304 for each of the identified computational components containing the public key, and the private key 308 corresponding to each of the public keys in the certificates 304. As will be further appreciated, when the standard license files are delivered to each of the media servers 158, the standard licenses are generally different. The standard license file delivered to each of the media servers 158 includes only the corresponding media server's SID, MID, and hardware identifier, digital certificate, and associated private key for that media server.


The enterprise allocation license file 180 defines the enterprise features and feature capacity allocations for the host media server. The allocation license file typically includes the following information: the ESID for the enterprise network 150, the unique hardware identifier of the master license server 154, the SID and MID of the corresponding media server 158, the licensed enterprise applications for the corresponding media server 158, the allocated enterprise features and settings for each of the licensed enterprise applications in the corresponding media server 158, the expiration date of the allocation license. Allocation license files are given an expiration date, such as thirty days after generation, to prevent use of the software in violation of the license terms. Periodically, the master license server and/or remote feature activation system must generate and install a new allocation license good for thirty more days.


Although the master enterprise and enterprise allocation license files on the one hand and the standard license files on the other include the enterprise features and feature capacity allocations, the feature and feature capacity allocations in the master enterprise and enterprise allocation license files take precedence in the event of conflict with or supersede the information for the enterprise features and feature capacity allocations in the standard license files. This rule permits a customer to move freely features and feature capacity allocations to and from the enterprise and non-enterprise levels.


To facilitate user configuration of the allocation licenses, the agent 172 provides a Graphical User Interface or GUI to the user. The GUI permits the user to view information in the master enterprise license file, such as the ESID, SIDs, MIDs, expiration date of the master enterprise license file, applications covered by the master enterprise license file, enterprise feature states (whether the feature is enabled or disabled), values, and capacities, and allocation license duration. The user can further view the number of media servers in the enterprise with each Type I on/off (or activatable) enterprise feature currently activated, the available quantity remaining for each activatable enterprise feature, the total allocated capacity for each enterprise capacity feature, the available capacity remaining for each enterprise capacity feature, and the percent utilization for each enterprise feature. For the displayed usage level for each enterprise capacity feature, the GUI provides the date/time that the usage data was collected. The GUI enables the user to allocate enterprise features and capacities to any of the media servers in the licensed enterprise network subject to a number of selected rules. The rules include: the total number of media servers with a given activatable enterprise feature activated cannot exceed the value defined in the master enterprise license file, the total allocated capacity for each enterprise capacity feature cannot exceed the total capacity for that feature as defined in the master enterprise license file, allocated enterprise feature capacity cannot be less than current usage for that feature on a media server, enterprise feature capacity can only be allocated to a system whose SID appears in the master enterprise license file, the allocation of enterprise features and capacities to spare media servers in a system shall be identical to the allocation to the corresponding main media server, and the calculation of the total allocation for a given feature shall be based only on the allocations to main servers (or the allocation to spare media servers shall not be counted against the total allocation for the enterprise).


Other aspects of the architecture are described in the copending applications referenced above and incorporated herein by this reference.


Process for Generating and Installing Standard and Master Enterprise License Files on Master License Server

The process for generating and installing standard and master enterprise license files on the master license server 154 will now be described with reference to FIGS. 4-5.


In step 400, the remote feature activation system 100 creates system records for all servers 154 and 158 in the enterprise network 150 using orders (one order per system record). A unique hardware ID, such as a processor serial number, is added to each system record.


In step 404, the system 100 creates an enterprise record for the enterprise using an order and adds to the record the unique hardware identifier associated with each master license server.


In step 408 the system records are linked to the corresponding enterprise record. After the records are linked, the standard and master enterprise license files are generated by the license generation agent 108.


In step 412, the application software (e.g., Avaya Inc.'s Communication Manager™ or Multi-Vantage™ software) is installed on the master license server 154. As part of this step and where the master license server is co-resident on a media server, the remote feature activator 104 delivers the standard license file 184 to the license installation and configuration agent 172 in the master license server 154 and the agent 172 unpackages and installs the standard license file 184 so that the master license server can run the application software. The master license server 154 is selected to have network access to all of the media servers in the enterprise network.


In step 416, the activator 104 delivers the master enterprise license file 176 to the license installation and configuration agent 172 in the master license server 154.


In step 420, the agent 172 unpackages and installs the master enterprise license file 176. The installation process is discussed below with reference to FIG. 5.


In step 424, after the master license server 154 is enabled by the installed master enterprise license file the application software is installed on the media servers 158.


In step 428, an appropriate standard license file 184 is delivered to the license installation agent 174 in each of the media servers 158. The agent 172 unpackages and installs the standard license file 184 so that the application software can run. To generate an allocation license file, the agent 172, after receiving input from the customer, generates in one configuration an allocation license request and forwards the request to the remote feature activation system 100, where an allocation license is generated by the license generation agent 108. Allocation license requests include the ESID for the enterprise 150, the SID and MID associated with the media server that will be the subject of the allocation license, the expiration date of the allocation license, and the enterprise feature allocations and settings, including those requested by the customer. The request includes all of the active features contained in the master enterprise license file. In the feature mask of the allocation license file, Type I feature settings are locked and Type II and III feature settings have V1 equal to V2. In another configuration, the agent 172 generates allocation license files without involvement of the remote feature activation system 100.


In step 432, enterprise network connectivity is configured for the media servers using techniques known to those of ordinary skill in the art.


In step 436, enterprise features and capacities are allocated by the customer to each of the primary media servers in the enterprise network 436. In response to user input, the license installation and configuration agent 172 in the master license server 154 generates appropriate allocation license files 180 for each of the affected media servers. The process to install an allocation license file 180 on a media server is discussed below with reference to FIG. 6.


Installation of the Master Enterprise License File on the Master License Server


FIG. 5 depicts the steps performed by the license installation and configuration agent 172 to install the master enterprise license file.


When the file is received, the agent 172 unpackages the license file and, in decision diamond 500, determines whether the license file is valid, readable, and in the proper format.


When the license file is valid, readable, and properly formatted, the agent 172 in decision diamond 504 determines whether the hardware ID in the file matches the hardware ID of the license server 154.


When the hardware ID's match, the agent 172 in decision diamond 508 determines whether the feature and capacity limits in the master enterprise license file are less than the current allocations in the enterprise network 150.


When the feature and capacity limits are not less than the current allocations, the agent 172 in decision diamond 512 determines whether the master enterprise license has expired. This is done by comparing the expiration date in the license file with the system clock of the license server.


When the license is not expired, the agent 172 in decision diamond 516 determines if the license generation date is before (within some tolerance) the current date on the system clock of the license server 154.


If so and after all of the other checks are successful, the agent 172 finds in step 520 the installation of the master enterprise license file to be successful.


When any of the checks is not successful, the agent 172 finds in step 524 the installation of the master enterprise license file to be unsuccessful.


Distribution of Allocation License Files

The distribution of allocation license files will now be discussed with reference to FIG. 6. The figure assumes that the allocation license file has been received by an agent 174 in a media server 158. Although these steps are described as being performed by the agent 174, they could alternatively or additionally be performed by the agent 172 in the master license server before distribution to the media server identified in the license file.


In decision diamond 600, the agent 174 determines whether the corresponding media server already has installed a valid standard license file 184.


When a valid standard license file 184 exists, the agent 174 in decision diamond 604 determines whether enterprise licensing is activated in the standard license file 184.


When enterprise licensing is activated, the agent 174 in decision diamond 608 determines whether the digital signature on the allocation license file is valid. This is done by decrypting the digital signature using the public key in the public certificate of the digitally signing entity, which is commonly the remote feature activation system 100 and confirming that the decrypted hash value is correct.


When the digital signature is verified successfully, the agent 174 in decision diamond 612 determines whether the enterprise and system identification information (e.g., ESID, SID, and MID of the media server) in the allocation license match the enterprise and system identification information in the standard license 184.


When the enterprise and system identification information matches the same information in the standard license 184, the agent 174 in decision diamond 616 determines whether the system is currently in a license-error or no-license mode due to a hardware ID mismatch.


When the system is not currently in a license-error or no-license mode, the agent 174 determines in decision diamond 620 whether the allocation license is expired.


When the allocation license is not expired, the agent 174 in decision diamond 624 determines whether the generation date of the allocation license is past the current time on the media server by more than a specified limit.


When the generation date of the allocation license is not past the current time on the media server by more than a specified limit, the agent 174 in decision diamond 628 determines whether installation of the allocation license file will cause a license error on the system. For example, a license error can be caused by a feature limit being exceeded. When a feature and/or capacity limit will be exceeded, the customer must increase the feature and/or capacity limit in the allocation license file for the media server.


If so and after all of the other checks are successful, the agent 174 finds in step 632 the installation of the allocation license file to be successful.


When any of the checks is not successful, the agent 174 finds in step 636 the installation of the master enterprise license file to be unsuccessful.


A number of variations and modifications of the invention can be used. It would be possible to provide for some features of the invention without providing others.


For example in one alternative embodiment, the various modules referenced herein are implemented as software, hardware (e.g., a logic circuit), or a combination thereof.


In another alternative embodiment, the division of the various functions performed by the various modules in the enterprise licensing system is different.


In other embodiments, the present invention is used to license computational components, such as software and/or hardware, distributed in an enterprise network other than media servers. Examples of such components include personal computers, laptops, packet-switched and/or circuit-switched communication devices, such as IP hardphones, digital phones, and Personal Digital Assistants, gateways, voice messaging servers, instant messaging servers, email servers, adjunct processors, and peripherals (such as printers).


The present invention, in various embodiments, includes components, methods, processes, systems and/or apparatus substantially as depicted and described herein, including various embodiments, subcombinations, and subsets thereof. Those of skill in the art will understand how to make and use the present invention after understanding the present disclosure. The present invention, in various embodiments, includes providing devices and processes in the absence of items not depicted and/or described herein or in various embodiments hereof, including in the absence of such items as may have been used in previous devices or processes, e.g., for improving performance, achieving ease and\or reducing cost of implementation.


The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the invention to the form or forms disclosed herein. In the foregoing Detailed Description for example, various features of the invention are grouped together in one or more embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed invention requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate preferred embodiment of the invention.


Moreover, though the description of the invention has included description of one or more embodiments and certain variations and modifications, other variations and modifications are within the scope of the invention, e.g., as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.

Claims
  • 1. A method, comprising: creating, by a remote feature activation system including a processor, an enterprise record corresponding to an enterprise network and first, second, and third system records corresponding to first, second, and third computational components, respectively, in the enterprise network, the first, second, and third system records having first, second, and third system capacities, respectively, for an enterprise-level licensable feature and fifth, sixth, and seventh system capacities, respectively, for a non-enterprise-level licensable feature, wherein the first, second, and third capacities for the enterprise-level licensable feature are freely transferable, by a customer, to any of the first, second, and third computational components, and wherein the fifth, sixth, and seventh non-enterprise level licensable capacities are not freely transferable, by the customer, to another of the first, second, and third computational components;during a first time interval, associating, at a first request of the customer, with the enterprise record, and by the remote feature activation system, the first and second system records;during the first time interval, creating and delivering, by the remote feature activation system, a first master license to the enterprise network, the first master license governing and permitting a total capacity for the enterprise-level licensable feature in the enterprise network that is at least the sum of the first and second system capacities;during the first time interval, creating and delivering first and second standard licenses to the first and second computational components, respectively, the first and second standard licenses having respective ones of the first, second, fifth, and sixth system capacities, wherein the first and second standard licenses include feature and maximum feature capacity information;during a second time interval, associating, at a second request of the customer, with the enterprise record, and by the remote feature activation system, the first and third system records, but not the second system record;during the second time interval, creating and delivering, by the remote feature activation system, a second master license to the enterprise network, the second master license permitting a total capacity for the enterprise-level licensable feature in the enterprise network that is a sum of at least the first and third system capacities, the sum excluding the second system capacity, wherein at least one of the first and second master licenses replaces the other of the first and second master licenses; andduring the second time interval, creating and delivering a third standard license to the third computational component, the third standard license including the third and seventh system capacities.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein a customer has the ability, without contacting either a software vendor or manufacturer, to associate the enterprise record with either or both of the first and second system records, wherein the second master license replaces the first master license, wherein the enterprise record has an enterprise capacity, wherein the first master license permits a total capacity that is at least the sum of the enterprise and first and second system capacities; and wherein the second master license permits a total capacity that is at least the sum of the enterprise and first system capacities but that excludes the second system capacity.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the enterprise network comprises a second network segment, wherein the first and second system records have first and second system record identifiers, respectively, wherein the enterprise record has a corresponding enterprise identifier, wherein, during the first time interval, the first and second system record identifiers are linked to the enterprise identifier and wherein, during the second time interval, the first, but not the second system identifier, is linked to the enterprise identifier, wherein the second master license replaces the first master license, and further comprising: during the second time interval, associating, with a second enterprise record corresponding to the second network segment, the second system record; andduring the second time interval, generating and delivering a third master license for the second network segment, the third master license permitting a total capacity that includes at least the second system capacity but excludes the first system capacity.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second system records each comprise a pointer to a corresponding enterprise record, a hardware identifier, a respective system identifier, a listing of system-level licensed applications, a listing of features and capacities for each licensed application, and a license expiration date, wherein the first and second system records have first and second system record identifiers, respectively, wherein the enterprise record has a corresponding enterprise identifier, and wherein the enterprise record comprises an enterprise identifier, customer information, enterprise information, a listing of licensed applications, a listing of enterprise-level features and capacities for each licensed application, a license expiration date, and pointers to one or more associated system records and wherein the first and second computational components are media servers and the first and second system records each comprise a set of licensed enterprise features and/or capacities comprising a plurality of the following: abbreviated dialing enhanced list, audible message waiting, vectoring, answer supervision by call classifier, ATM trunking, agent states, dial by name, DCS call coverage, echo cancellation, multifrequency signaling, wideband switching, Digital Communication System or DCS call coverage, audible message waiting, vectoring, attendant vectoring, Asynchronous Transfer Mode or ATM WAN spare processor, ATM, dial by name, echo cancellation, multimedia call handling, multiple call handling, caller identification, multifrequency signaling, Integrated Services Digital Network or ISDN network call redirection, centralized attendant, remote office, enhanced Direct Inward Dialing or DID routing, survivable remote processor, time of day routing, tenant partitioning, hospitality announcements, Vector Directory Number or VDN of origin announcement, wideband switching, wireless, logged-in agents, offer category, maximum numbers of concurrently registered IP stations, administered IP trunks, ports, and concurrently administered remote office stations/trunks, call center release, logged-in automated call distribution or ACD agents, maximum currently registered IP stations, maximum administered IP trunks, offer category, maximum number of ports, maximum number of administered remote office trunks, and maximum number of mobile stations.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the enterprise record comprises enterprise-level features and capacities and not non-enterprise -level features and capacities, and wherein the system records comprise non-enterprise -level features and capacities and not enterprise-level features and capacities.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the enterprise record comprises enterprise-level features and capacities and not non-enterprise level features and capacities and wherein the system records comprise non-enterprise level features and capacities and not enterprise-level features and capacities.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second computational components are servers and wherein the following rules govern the generating steps: a total number of servers with a given activatable enterprise feature activated cannot exceed a value defined in a master license file;a total allocated capacity for each enterprise capacity feature cannot exceed a total capacity for that feature as defined in the master license file;an allocated enterprise feature capacity cannot be less than a current usage for that feature on a server;an enterprise feature capacity can only be allocated to a system having a system record identifier appearing in the master license file;an allocation of enterprise features and capacities to spare servers in a system is identical to an allocation to a corresponding main server;a calculation of a total allocation for a given feature is based only on the allocations to main servers; andan allocation to a spare server is not counted against a total allocation for the enterprise, wherein the enterprise is licensed to a maximum enterprise capacity and further comprising:determining whether the sum of the enterprise and first and second system capacities is less than the maximum enterprise capacity;when the sum is greater than the maximum capacity, determining that at least one of the first and second master licenses is invalid;providing a collection of non-enterprise-level features; andinstalling on the first and second computational components a standard license comprising the collection of non-enterprise-level features.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the customer controls the allocation of the first, second, and third capacities for the enterprise-level licensable feature among the first, second, and third computational components, and wherein the customer does not control the allocation of fifth, sixth, and seventh non-enterprise-level licensable capacities among the first, second, and third computational components.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein a selected application has both enterprise-level and non-enterprise-level features and settings.
  • 10. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising machine executable instructions that, when executed by a server, perform the steps: creating, by a remote feature activation system including a processor, an enterprise record corresponding to an enterprise network and first, second, and third system records corresponding to first, second, and third computational components, respectively, in the enterprise network, the first, second, and third system records having first, second, and third system capacities, respectively, for an enterprise-level licensable feature and fifth, sixth, and seventh system capacities, respectively, for a non-enterprise-level licensable feature, wherein the first, second, and third capacities for the enterprise-level licensable feature are freely transferable, by a customer, to any of the first, second, and third computational components, and wherein the fifth, sixth, and seventh non-enterprise-level licensable capacities are not freely transferable, by the customer, to another of the first, second, and third computational components;during a first time interval, associating, at a first request of the customer, with the enterprise record, and by the remote feature activation system, the first and second system records;during the first time interval, creating and delivering, by the remote feature activation system, a first master license to the enterprise network, the first master license governing and permitting a total capacity for the enterprise-level licensable feature in the enterprise network that is at least the sum of the first and second system capacities;during the first time interval, creating and delivering first and second standard licenses to the first and second computational components, respectively, the first and second standard licenses having respective ones of the first, second, fifth, and sixth system capacities, wherein the first and second standard licenses include feature and maximum feature capacity information;during a second time interval, associating, at a second request of the customer, with the enterprise record, and by the remote feature activation system, the first and third system records, but not the second system record;during the second time interval, creating and delivering, by the remote feature activation system, a second master license to the enterprise network, the second master license permitting a total capacity for the enterprise-level licensable feature in the enterprise network that is a sum of at least the first and third system capacities, the sum excluding the second system capacity, wherein at least one of the first and second master licenses replaces the other of the first and second master licenses; andduring the second time interval, creating and delivering a third standard license to the third computational component, the third standard license including the third and seventh system capacities.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefits under 35 U.S.C. §119 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/615,432, filed Sep. 30, 2004, of the same title and to the same inventors, which is incorporated herein by this reference. Cross reference is made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/231,957, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “Licensing Duplicated Systems”; Ser. No. 10/232,507, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “License File Serial Number Tracking”; Ser. No. 10/232,508, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “License Modes in Call Processing”; Ser. No. 10/231,999, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “Flexible License File Feature Controls”; Ser. No. 10/232,906, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “Remote Feature Activator Feature Extraction”; Ser. No. 10/232,647, filed Aug. 30, 2002, entitled “Software Licensing for Spare Processors”; Ser. No. 10/348,107, filed Jan. 20, 2003, entitled “Remote Feature Activation Authentication File System”; Ser. No. 10/387,182, filed Mar. 11, 2003, entitled “Temporary Password Login”; Ser. No. 10/811,412, filed Mar. 25, 2004, entitled “Global Positioning System Hardware Key for Software Licenses”; and Ser. No. 10/956,861, filed Sep. 30, 2004, entitled “Certificate Distribution Via License Files”, each of which is incorporated herein by this reference.

US Referenced Citations (275)
Number Name Date Kind
4288659 Atalla Sep 1981 A
4405829 Rivest et al. Sep 1983 A
4780821 Crossley Oct 1988 A
4811393 Hazard Mar 1989 A
4888800 Marshall et al. Dec 1989 A
4937863 Robert et al. Jun 1990 A
5005122 Griffin et al. Apr 1991 A
5023907 Johnson et al. Jun 1991 A
5157663 Major et al. Oct 1992 A
5179591 Hardy et al. Jan 1993 A
5204897 Wyman Apr 1993 A
5206903 Kohler et al. Apr 1993 A
5230020 Hardy et al. Jul 1993 A
5260999 Wyman Nov 1993 A
5307481 Shimazaki et al. Apr 1994 A
5329570 Glassmacher et al. Jul 1994 A
5341427 Hardy et al. Aug 1994 A
5347580 Molva et al. Sep 1994 A
5386369 Christiano Jan 1995 A
5390297 Barber et al. Feb 1995 A
5408649 Beshears et al. Apr 1995 A
5448639 Arazi Sep 1995 A
5553143 Ross et al. Sep 1996 A
5563946 Cooper et al. Oct 1996 A
5579222 Bains et al. Nov 1996 A
5629980 Stefik et al. May 1997 A
5646992 Subler et al. Jul 1997 A
5671412 Christiano Sep 1997 A
5673315 Wolf Sep 1997 A
5699431 Van Oorschot et al. Dec 1997 A
5708709 Rose Jan 1998 A
5717604 Wiggins Feb 1998 A
5724428 Rivest Mar 1998 A
5742757 Hamadani et al. Apr 1998 A
5745569 Moskowitz et al. Apr 1998 A
5745576 Abraham et al. Apr 1998 A
5745879 Wyman Apr 1998 A
5754761 Willsey May 1998 A
5758068 Brandt et al. May 1998 A
5758069 Olsen May 1998 A
5790074 Rangedahl et al. Aug 1998 A
5790664 Coley et al. Aug 1998 A
5796941 Lita Aug 1998 A
5828747 Fisher et al. Oct 1998 A
5835600 Rivest Nov 1998 A
5864620 Pettitt Jan 1999 A
5905793 Flockhart et al. May 1999 A
5905860 Olsen et al. May 1999 A
5935243 Hasebe et al. Aug 1999 A
5940504 Griswold Aug 1999 A
5956505 Manduley Sep 1999 A
5956716 Kenner et al. Sep 1999 A
5960085 de la Huerga Sep 1999 A
5978565 Ohran et al. Nov 1999 A
5982873 Flockhart et al. Nov 1999 A
5995625 Sudia et al. Nov 1999 A
6006016 Faigon et al. Dec 1999 A
6009401 Horstmann Dec 1999 A
6011973 Valentine et al. Jan 2000 A
6023763 Grumstrup et al. Feb 2000 A
6023766 Yamamura Feb 2000 A
6047242 Benson Apr 2000 A
6067621 Yu et al. May 2000 A
6108703 Leighton et al. Aug 2000 A
6128389 Chan et al. Oct 2000 A
6134660 Boneh et al. Oct 2000 A
6148415 Kobayashi et al. Nov 2000 A
6163607 Bogart et al. Dec 2000 A
6173053 Bogart et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178511 Cohen et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189146 Misra et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192122 Flockhart et al. Feb 2001 B1
6212635 Reardon Apr 2001 B1
6219652 Carter et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223291 Puhl et al. Apr 2001 B1
6246871 Ala-Laurila Jun 2001 B1
6314565 Kenner et al. Nov 2001 B1
6343280 Clark Jan 2002 B2
6360320 Ishiguro et al. Mar 2002 B1
6381747 Wonfor et al. Apr 2002 B1
6414595 Scrandis et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421726 Kenner et al. Jul 2002 B1
6442708 Dierauer et al. Aug 2002 B1
6463534 Geiger et al. Oct 2002 B1
6502079 Ball et al. Dec 2002 B1
6513117 Tarpenning et al. Jan 2003 B2
6513121 Serkowski Jan 2003 B1
6539481 Takahashi et al. Mar 2003 B1
6557105 Tardo et al. Apr 2003 B1
6574612 Baratti et al. Jun 2003 B1
6584454 Hummel et al. Jun 2003 B1
6615347 de Silva et al. Sep 2003 B1
6640305 Kocher et al. Oct 2003 B2
6654888 Cooper et al. Nov 2003 B1
6675208 Rai et al. Jan 2004 B1
6697945 Ishiguro et al. Feb 2004 B2
6704885 Salas-Meza et al. Mar 2004 B1
6760324 Scott et al. Jul 2004 B1
6765492 Harris Jul 2004 B2
6769063 Kanda et al. Jul 2004 B1
6772133 Kambayashi et al. Aug 2004 B1
6775782 Buros et al. Aug 2004 B1
6778820 Tendler Aug 2004 B2
6785726 Freeman et al. Aug 2004 B1
6795941 Nickels Sep 2004 B2
6816842 Singh et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826606 Freeman et al. Nov 2004 B2
6842896 Redding et al. Jan 2005 B1
6850958 Wakabayashi Feb 2005 B2
6854010 Christian et al. Feb 2005 B1
6868403 Wiser et al. Mar 2005 B1
6876984 Tadayon et al. Apr 2005 B2
6883095 Sandhu et al. Apr 2005 B2
6889212 Wang et al. May 2005 B1
6901386 Dedrick et al. May 2005 B1
6904523 Bialick et al. Jun 2005 B2
6920567 Doherty et al. Jul 2005 B1
6928166 Yoshizawa Aug 2005 B2
6928558 Allahwerdi et al. Aug 2005 B1
6934463 Ishiguro et al. Aug 2005 B2
6934848 King et al. Aug 2005 B1
6941283 Kambayashi et al. Sep 2005 B2
6957344 Goldshlag et al. Oct 2005 B1
6959291 Armstrong et al. Oct 2005 B1
6961858 Fransdonk Nov 2005 B2
6968384 Redding et al. Nov 2005 B1
6973444 Blinn et al. Dec 2005 B1
6976164 King et al. Dec 2005 B1
6981222 Rush et al. Dec 2005 B2
7032113 Pendlebury Apr 2006 B2
7035918 Redding et al. Apr 2006 B1
7065214 Ishiguro et al. Jun 2006 B2
7069468 Olson et al. Jun 2006 B1
7073063 Peinado Jul 2006 B2
7085382 Terao et al. Aug 2006 B2
7096469 Kubala et al. Aug 2006 B1
7100044 Watanabe et al. Aug 2006 B2
7100200 Pope et al. Aug 2006 B2
7124304 Bel et al. Oct 2006 B2
7146340 Musson Dec 2006 B1
7149806 Perkins et al. Dec 2006 B2
7152245 Dublish et al. Dec 2006 B2
7171662 Misra et al. Jan 2007 B1
7185195 Hug et al. Feb 2007 B2
7206936 Aull et al. Apr 2007 B2
7225333 Peinado et al. May 2007 B2
7228426 Sinha et al. Jun 2007 B2
7260557 Chavez Aug 2007 B2
7302703 Burns Nov 2007 B2
7308717 Koved et al. Dec 2007 B2
7313828 Holopainen Dec 2007 B2
7318236 DeMello et al. Jan 2008 B2
7336791 Ishiguro Feb 2008 B2
7356692 Bialick et al. Apr 2008 B2
7382881 Uusitalo et al. Jun 2008 B2
7383205 Peinado et al. Jun 2008 B1
7415729 Ukeda et al. Aug 2008 B2
7545931 Dillaway Jun 2009 B2
7552166 Chack Jun 2009 B2
7565325 Lenard et al. Jul 2009 B2
7702903 Roy et al. Apr 2010 B1
7716348 Redding et al. May 2010 B1
7725721 Yellai et al. May 2010 B2
20010001268 Menon et al. May 2001 A1
20010011254 Clark Aug 2001 A1
20010013024 Takahashi et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010034846 Beery Oct 2001 A1
20020001302 Pickett Jan 2002 A1
20020010681 Hillegass et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013722 Kanaga Jan 2002 A1
20020017977 Wall Feb 2002 A1
20020038422 Suwamoto et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020052939 Lee May 2002 A1
20020083003 Halliday Jun 2002 A1
20020087892 Imazu Jul 2002 A1
20020104006 Boate et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107809 Biddle et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020112186 Ford et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116340 Hellberg et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020125886 Bates et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138441 Lopatic Sep 2002 A1
20020154777 Candelore Oct 2002 A1
20020164025 Raiz et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020169625 Yang et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020169725 Eng Nov 2002 A1
20020174356 Padole et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020176404 Girard Nov 2002 A1
20020188656 Patton et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020188704 Gold Dec 2002 A1
20030005427 Herrero Jan 2003 A1
20030013411 Uchiyama Jan 2003 A1
20030018491 Nakahara et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018582 Yaacovi Jan 2003 A1
20030023564 Padhye et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030055749 Carmody et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030084306 Abburi et al. May 2003 A1
20030095542 Chang et al. May 2003 A1
20030144959 Makita Jul 2003 A1
20030149670 Cronce Aug 2003 A1
20030149874 Balfanz et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030156719 Cronce Aug 2003 A1
20030159033 Ishiguro Aug 2003 A1
20030159070 Mayer et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030163428 Schneck et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030172035 Cronce et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177393 Ishiguro Sep 2003 A1
20030191936 Kawatsura et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030208449 Diao Nov 2003 A1
20030220880 Lao et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030233547 Gaston et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040003269 Waxman et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010440 Lenard et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010469 Lenard et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010471 Lenard et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040039916 Aldis et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044629 Rhodes et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044630 Walker et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044631 Walker et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044901 Serkowski et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040047354 Slater et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040054909 Serkowski et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040054930 Walker et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073517 Zunke et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078339 Goringe et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088541 Messerges et al. May 2004 A1
20040103011 Hatano et al. May 2004 A1
20040103324 Band May 2004 A1
20040127196 Dabbish et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040128395 Miyazaki Jul 2004 A1
20040128551 Walker et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133794 Kocher et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040162998 Tuomi et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040166878 Erskine et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167926 Waxman et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172367 Chavez Sep 2004 A1
20040181695 Walker Sep 2004 A1
20040181696 Walker Sep 2004 A1
20040199760 Mazza Oct 2004 A1
20040249763 Vardi Dec 2004 A1
20040260589 Varadarajan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040268120 Mirtal et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050005098 Michaelis et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038753 Yen et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050076204 Thornton et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050086174 Eng Apr 2005 A1
20050091507 Lee et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050144437 Ransom et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050154877 Trench Jul 2005 A1
20050185792 Tokutani et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050198510 Robert et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050202830 Sudit Sep 2005 A1
20050229004 Callaghan Oct 2005 A1
20050246098 Bergstrom et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050289072 Sabharwal Dec 2005 A1
20060021068 Xu et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026105 Endoh Feb 2006 A1
20060036554 Schrock et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036894 Bauer et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060064582 Teal et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060089912 Spagna et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060178953 Aggarwal et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190409 Hillegass et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060242083 Chavez Oct 2006 A1
20060294010 Kim et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070033419 Kocher et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070094710 Walker et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070107067 Fountian May 2007 A1
20070219917 Liu et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080052295 Walker et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080082449 Wilkinson et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080141242 Shapiro Jun 2008 A1
20080189131 Chavez Aug 2008 A1
20090119779 Dean et al. May 2009 A1
20090138975 Richardson May 2009 A1
20100049725 Walker et al. Feb 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
1 071 253 Jan 2001 EP
1562378 Aug 2005 EP
2006085481 Mar 2006 JP
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60615432 Sep 2004 US