Gettering technique for wafers made using a controlled cleaving process

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6548382
  • Patent Number
    6,548,382
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 4, 2000
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 15, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A technique for forming a gettering layer in a wafer made using a controlled cleaving process. The gettering layer can be made by implanting using beam line or plasma immersion ion implantation, or made by forming a film of material such as polysilicon by way of chemical vapor deposition. A controlled cleaving process is used to form the wafer, which is a multilayered silicon on insulator substrate. The gettering layer removes and/or attracts impurities in the wafer, which can be detrimental to the functionality and reliability of an integrated circuit device made on the wafer.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to the manufacture of integrated circuits. More particularly, the present invention provides a technique for forming a gettering layer in a silicon-on-insulator wafer made using a controlled cleaving process, for example.




Integrated circuits are fabricated on chips of semiconductor material. These integrated circuits often contain thousands, or even millions, of transistors and other devices. In particular, it is desirable to put as many transistors as possible within a given area of semiconductor because more transistors typically provide greater functionality, and a smaller chip means more chips per wafer and lower costs.




Some integrated circuits are fabricated on a slice or wafer, of single-crystal (monocrystalline) silicon, commonly termed a “bulk” silicon wafer. Devices on such “bulk” silicon wafer typically are isolated from each other. A variety of techniques have been proposed or used to isolate these devices from each other on the bulk silicon wafer, such as a local oxidation of silicon (“LOCOS”) process and others. These techniques, however, are not free from limitations. For example, conventional isolation techniques consume a considerable amount of valuable wafer surface area on the chip, and often generate a non-planar surface as an artifact of the isolation process. Either or both of these considerations generally limit the degree of integration achievable in a given chip.




An approach to achieving very-large scale integration (VLSI) or ultra-large scale integration (ULSI) is by using a semiconductor-on-insulator (SOI) wafer. An SOI wafer typically has a layer of silicon on top of a layer of an insulator material. A variety of techniques have been proposed or used for fabricating the SOI wafer. These techniques include, among others, growing a thin layer of silicon on a sapphire substrate, bonding a layer of silicon to an insulating substrate, and forming an insulating layer beneath a silicon layer in a bulk silicon wafer. In an SOI integrated circuit, essentially complete device isolation is often achieved using conventional device processing methods by surrounding each device, including the bottom of the device, with an insulator. An advantage SOI wafers have over bulk silicon wafers is that the area required for isolation between devices on an SOI wafer is less than the area typically required for isolation on a bulk silicon wafer.




SOI offers other advantages over bulk silicon technologies as well. For example, SOI offers a simpler fabrication sequence compared to a bulk silicon wafer. Devices fabricated on an SOI wafer may also have better radiation resistance, less photo-induced current, and less cross-talk than devices fabricated on bulk silicon wafers. However, many problems that have already been solved regarding fabricating devices on bulk silicon wafers remain to be solved for fabricating devices on SOI wafers.




Numerous limitations, however, still exist with the fabrication of SOI wafers. For example, devices within integrated circuits in SOI wafers are very sensitive to the presence of even minute concentrations of some impurities. For example, metals, such as copper, nickel, silver, gold, or iron, within the active region of a device typically degrade several device characteristics, including leakage current and breakdown voltage. These and other metals rapidly diffuse through silicon at temperatures typical of semiconductor device fabrication processes. These impurities often become trapped in the active region of the SOI wafer. That is, the SOI wafer includes a dielectric layer or insulating layer underlying the active region that tends to keep impurities in the active layer, rather than diffusing down into the bulk silicon. Accordingly, SOI wafers are prone to device and reliability problems caused by the presence of impurities that cannot diffuse out of the active region.




From the above, it is seen that a technique for removing impurities from active regions of an integrated circuit made on an SOI wafer is highly desirable.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




According to the present invention, a technique including a method and device for removing impurities from an SOI wafer made using a controlled cleaving process is provided. In an exemplary embodiment, the present invention provides an SOI wafer with a gettering layer for removing impurities from an active region. This gettering layer removes impurities from the device, thereby preventing a possibility of quality and reliability problems, e.g., lowered breakdown voltage, increased leakage current, and the like. Additionally, the gettering layer provides for “lifetime” engineering of the device made on the SOI wafer.




In a specific embodiment, the present invention provides an SOI wafer made by way of a “cleaving” process with an implanted gettering layer. The process includes a step of providing an SOI wafer, where the thin layer of material (e.g., silicon) was bonded onto an insulating layer. Gas-forming particles, such as hydrogen or helium ions, are implanted or introduced into the thin layer of material or other region of the SOI wafer. The SOl wafer is thermally processed so that the implanted particles create, for example, microbubbles or implanted precipitates in the wafer. These microbubbles act as gettering sites for impurities in the thin layer of material. Alternatively, the particles act as gettering sites for the impurities. The thin layer of material has been separated from, for example, a bulk donor silicon wafer by a controlled cleaving process, such as the one described in U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/046,276 in the name of Henley et al. (“Henley”), which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.




In an alternative embodiment, the present invention provides an SOI wafer made by way of a cleaving process with a deposited gettering layer. The gettering layer is, for example, a layer of polysilicon, which can be patterned, formed on a bulk monocrystalline silicon donor or receptor wafer. The thin layer of material, including the gettering layer, has been separated from, for example, a bulk donor silicon wafer by a controlled cleaving process. A gettering layer, such as a layer of polysilicon, on the thin layer, such as a layer of monocrystalline silicon, can provide effective gettering after a different time-temperature product, i.e. thermal budget, than microbubbles. Thus, a gettering layer on the thin layer can be used in addition to or alternatively to microbubble or particle gettering sites.




Numerous benefits are achieved by way of the present invention over pre-existing techniques. These benefits include, among others, gettering of impurities from active regions of an integrated circuit device made on an SOI wafer. Additionally, the present invention occurs by way of improved processing techniques using PIII, for example. PIII is relatively cost effective, easy to use and in some instances produces less impurity metal contamination than other ion implantation techniques. Furthermore, the present technique provides “lifetime” engineering of the device, which is likely to have improved reliability from the present gettering layer(s). These and other benefits are described throughout the specification and more particularly below.




These and other embodiments of the present invention, as well as its advantages and features are described in more detail in conjunction with the text below and attached figures.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a simplified cross-sectional view diagram of an SOI wafer having a gettering layer according to the present invention; and





FIGS. 2-12

are simplified cross-sectional view diagrams of the above SOI wafer made using the controlled cleaving process according to the present invention.











DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS




The present invention provides an SOI wafer with a gettering layer for removing impurities from an active region of an integrated circuit to be formed on the wafer. In a specific embodiment, a gettering layer is formed in an SOI wafer made using a controlled cleaving process. The gettering layer is generally beneath an active region of the devices that will be formed on the SOI wafer. The SOI wafer is made using a controlled cleaving process, which is described in Henley, noted above.




1. Silicon On Insulator Substrate





FIG. 1

is a simplified cross section of an SOI wafer


10


according to an embodiment of the present invention. The Fig. is not to scale and is merely an illustration, which should not limit the scope of the claims herein. The SOI wafer


10


includes numerous features including a lower substrate


12


, an insulating layer(s)


14


, and a film of material


16


, which will include active devices in later processing steps. The film of material, which can be a silicon material, is defined on the insulating material using a controlled cleaving process, which will be described in more detail below. A gettering layer can be formed in a region


17


below the insulating layer


14


, or be formed in a region


19


in the insulating layer


14


, or be formed in a region


21


underlying the active region in the film


16


of silicon material. A variety of techniques can be used to introduce the gettering layer into region


17


,


19


, or


21


. These techniques include, among other, implantation of particles using ion beam implanting or plasma immersion implanting, and film deposition such as chemical vapor deposition and physical vapor deposition. The techniques for forming the gettering layer will be described throughout the present specification, and more particularly below.




2. Controlled Cleaving Process




A process for fabricating a silicon-on-insulator substrate having a gettering layer using the controlled cleaving process may be briefly outlined as follows:




(1) Provide a donor silicon wafer (which may be coated with a dielectric material);




(2) Introduce particles into the silicon wafer to a selected depth to define a thickness of silicon film to be detached;




(3) Introduce particles into the silicon wafer to a selected depth to define a gettering layer (option


1


);




(4) Provide a receptor substrate material (which may be coated with a dielectric material and may also have a gettering layer (option


2


));




(5) Bond the donor silicon wafer to the receptor substrate material by joining the implanted face to the receptor substrate material;




(6) Increase global stress (or energy) of implanted region at selected depth without initiating a cleaving action (optional);




(7) Provide stress (or energy) to a selected region of the bonded substrates to initiate a controlled cleaving action at the selected depth;




(8) Provide additional energy to the bonded substrates to sustain the controlled cleaving action to free the thickness of silicon film from the silicon wafer (optional);




(9) Complete bonding of donor silicon wafer to the receptor substrate;




(10) Introduce particles into the silicon wafer to a selected depth to define a gettering layer (option


3


);




(11) Polish a surface of the thickness of silicon film; and




(12) Perform any remaining steps, if necessary.




The above sequence of steps provides a method of forming an SOI wafer having a gettering layer using a controlled cleaving process. This process begins cleaving in a controlled manner by limiting the amount of energy applied to the substrate. Further propagation of the cleaving action can occur by providing additional energy to selected regions of the substrate to sustain the cleaving action, or using the energy from the initiation step to provide for further propagation of the cleaving action. A gettering layer according to this present invention can be applied to either the receptor or donor wafer using, for example, option


1


,


2


, or


3


(or any combination of these) to complete the SOI wafer structure, which is shown above. Further details with regard to the above sequence of steps are described below in references to the Figs.





FIGS. 2-12

are simplified cross-sectional view diagrams of substrates undergoing a fabrication process for a silicon-on-insulator wafer according to the present invention. The process begins by providing a semiconductor substrate


200


similar to the silicon wafer, as shown by FIG.


2


. Substrate or donor substrate


200


includes a material region


16


to be removed, which is a thin relatively uniform film derived from the substrate material


207


. The silicon wafer


200


includes a top surface


201


, a bottom surface


202


, and a thickness


204


. Material region also includes a thickness (z


0


), within the thickness of the silicon wafer. Optionally, a dielectric layer


208


(e.g., silicon nitride, silicon oxide, silicon oxynitride) overlies the top surface of the substrate.




Selected energetic particles


203


implant through the top surface of the silicon wafer to a selected depth, which defines the thickness of the material region, termed the thin film of material. As shown, the particles have a desired concentration


205


at the selected depth (z


0


). A variety of techniques can be used to implant the energetic particles into the silicon wafer. These techniques include ion implantation using, for example, beam line ion implantation equipment manufactured from companies such as Applied Materials, Eaton Corporation, Varian, and others. Alternatively, implantation occurs using a plasma immersion ion implantation (“PIII”) technique. Of course, techniques used depend upon the application, such as an ion shower technique.




Depending upon the application, smaller mass particles are generally selected to reduce a possibility of damage to the material region. That is, smaller mass particles easily travel through the substrate material to the selected depth without substantially damaging the material region that the particles traversed through. For example, the smaller mass particles (or energetic particles) can be almost any charged (e.g., positive or negative) and/or neutral atoms or molecules, or electrons, or the like. In a specific embodiment, the particles can be neutral and/or charged particles including ions such as H+ ions, rare gas ions such as helium and its isotopes, and neon, and deuterium. The particles can also be derived from compounds such as gases, e.g., hydrogen gas, water vapor, methane, hydrides, and hydrogen compounds, and other light atomic mass particles. Alternatively, the particles can be any combination of the above particles, and/or ions and/or molecular species and/or atomic species.




A gettering layer can be defined in the donor substrate using a variety of techniques.

FIG. 3

is a simplified diagram of an implantation technique used to define the gettering layer


305


in the donor wafer. As shown, particles are introduced into a region directly underlying the insulating layer


208


to define the gettering layer


305


in the substrate


300


. These particles can include a variety of materials, which form either gas bubbles or implanted precipitates. Gas-forming particles may not significantly react with the substrate that they are implanted into, but rather form gas pockets, or microbubbles, within the substrate and are suitable for subsequent thermal treatment. Examples of gas-forming particles include ions formed from the noble gases, including helium, neon, argon, krypton, and xenon. These pockets or microbubbles provide trapping sites for impurities. It is believed that the internal surfaces of these microbubbles provide a lower energy state for impurities, and also that the formation of the bubbles may create localized crystalline defects, providing further trapping sites. It has been estimated that the interior surface of a microbubble may trap a copper impurity ion by providing a site that is about 2.2 eV lower in energy than the bulk solution site for copper ions. Alternatively, the implanted particles can form precipitates, which may react with the substrate, but are not sensitive to subsequent thermal treatment of the wafer. The precipitates form sites which are believed to trap impurities therein or thereon.




In most of the embodiments, the distribution of these gettering sites depends upon the energies used to implant the gas-forming particles, among other factors. In this instance, the gettering layer is made up of several microbubbles distributed over a range of depth from the top surface of the wafer. The microbubbles formed after thermally treating the implanted gas-forming particles. The choice of ion dosage and energy to form the gettering layer depends upon many factors, including the depth of the insulator layer, the type of semiconductor material the gettering layer is to be formed in, the bubble-forming species, and the intended device type and active region, among other factors. As an example, 1×10


17


cm


−2


helium ions implanted into a {100} silicon wafer at 30 keV and annealed for one-half hour at 700° C. resulted in a layer of microbubbles in the silicon wafer about 0.3 μm below the top surface of the wafer. The bubbles can have an average diameter of about 8 μm. Annealing for longer periods of time or at a higher temperature resulted in larger bubbles being formed, resulting in a reduction of total microbubble surface area. High-temperature annealing also generally reduces the dislocations, stacking faults, and other crystal imperfections associated with microbubble gettering. The implantation of gas-forming particles, as well as the implantation of insulator-forming particles, may be performed by a variety of techniques, including ion beam implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII).




In an alternative embodiment, a gettering layer can be defined using a deposited layer


405


in the substrate


400


, as shown by FIG.


4


. The deposited layer can be a variety of materials including polysilicon or heavily doped N-type polysilicon, which is often doped using phosphorous or the like. The polycrystalline silicon layer may be formed by a variety of conventional techniques, and will eventually become a gettering layer in an SOI wafer. It is understood that a layer of amorphous silicon could be formed instead of the polysilicon layer, but polysilicon layers typically have small grains, which are advantageous for gettering impurities. Heavily doped polysilicon can also be used, for example. In some embodiments, the polysilicon is doped using phosphorous or the like. The polysilicon can be doped via diffusion or implantation or in-situ doped, depending upon the application.




Grain boundaries and high degree of lattice disorder in the polysilicon act as sinks for mobile impurities. The polysilicon layer provides gettering sites that differ from the sites provided by microbubbles. For example, the grain boundaries and lattice disorder associated with polysilicon do not anneal out at the same time-temperature product as some of the gettering sites provided by microbubbles. The polysilicon layer may further include impurities, such as oxygen or other precipitate-forming impurities, or lattice-strain-inducing impurities, such as phosphorous, to further improve the effectiveness of the gettering layer.




In yet an alternative specific embodiment, the present invention provides a gettering layer


501


, which is defined on the top surface of the substrate


500


, as illustrated by FIG.


5


. As shown, particles


503


are introduced into a region directly in the insulating layer to define the gettering layer


501


. These particles can include a variety of materials, which form either gas bubbles or implanted precipitates such as those described above, but can be others.




In a modification to any of the above embodiments, the gettering layer including those implanted or deposited can be patterned. For example, the pattern can be formed by a “shadow” mask, or masking and photolithography steps. Additionally, a variety of patterns can be used depending upon the applications. For instance, the patterns can be in the form of a plurality of strips, numerous concentric circles, a checkerboard, and others. Alternatively, the implanted region can be specifically placed in to be non-active regions of the device. These non-active regions include, among others, field isolation oxide regions, peripheral regions of the device, and “streets.” Of course, the type of pattern used depends highly upon the application.




The process uses a step of joining the implanted silicon wafer (e.g.,


300


,


400


, or


500


) to a workpiece or receptor wafer


600


, as illustrated in FIG.


6


. The workpiece may also be a variety of other types of substrates such as those made of a dielectric material (e.g., glass, silicon nitride, silicon dioxide), a conductive material (polysilicon, group III/V materials, metal), and plastics (e.g., polyimide-based materials). In the present example, however, the workpiece is a silicon wafer.




In a specific embodiment, a gettering layer can be defined on the receptor or target wafer


600


. For example, the gettering layer can be made of particles, which are implanted into an insulating layer


601


as shown by reference letter B. Alternatively, the gettering layer can be made of particles, which are implanted into a region underlying the insulating layer


601


as shown by reference letter A. Furthermore, deposition techniques such as chemical vapor deposition or physical vapor deposition is used to form a gettering layer in either region A or B. This gettering layer can be made of a variety of materials including polysilicon, amorphous silicon, heavily doped polysilicon, and others. The heavily doped polysilicon includes, among other materials, phosphorous doped polysilicon, which is implanted, diffused, or in-situ doped. The gettering layer in the receptor wafer can be combined with any of the other gettering layers defined throughout the present specification, as well as others.




In a modification to any of the above embodiments using the receptor substrate, the gettering layer including those implanted or deposited can be patterned. For example, the pattern can be formed by a “shadow” mask or masking and photolithography steps. Additionally, a variety of patterns can be used depending upon the applications. For instance, the patterns can be in the form of a plurality of strips, numerous concentric circles, a checkerboard, and others. Alternatively, the implanted region can be specifically placed in to be non-active regions of the device. These non-active regions include, among others, field isolation oxide regions, peripheral regions of the device, and “streets.” Of course, the type of pattern used depends highly upon the application.




In a specific embodiment, the silicon wafers are joined or fused together using a low temperature thermal step. The low temperature thermal process generally ensures that the implanted particles do not place excessive stress on the material region, which can produce an uncontrolled cleave action. In one aspect, the low temperature bonding process occurs by a self-bonding process. In particular, one wafer is stripped to remove oxidation therefrom (or one wafer is not oxidized). A cleaning solution treats the surface of the wafer to form O—H bonds on the wafer surface. An example of a solution used to clean the wafer is a mixture of H


2


O


2


—H


2


SO


4


. A dryer dries the wafer surfaces to remove any residual liquids or particles from the wafer surfaces. Self-bonding occurs by placing a face of the cleaned wafer against the face of an oxidized wafer.




Alternatively, a self-bonding process occurs by activating one of the wafer surfaces to be bonded by plasma cleaning. In particular, plasma cleaning activates the wafer surface using a plasma derived from gases such as argon, ammonia, neon, water vapor, and oxygen. The activated wafer surface is placed against a face of the other wafer, which has a coat of oxidation thereon. The wafers are in a sandwiched structure having exposed wafer faces. A selected amount of pressure is placed on each exposed face of the wafers to self-bond one wafer to the other.




Alternatively, an adhesive disposed on the wafer surfaces is used to bond one wafer onto the other. The adhesive includes an epoxy, polyimide-type materials, and the like. Spin-on-glass layers can be used to bond one wafer surface onto the face of another. These spin-on-glass (“SOG”) materials include, among others, siloxanes or silicates, which are often mixed with alcohol-based solvents or the like. SOG can be a desirable material because of the low temperatures (e.g., 150 to 250° C.) often needed to cure the SOG after it is applied to surfaces of the wafers.




Alternatively, a variety of other low temperature techniques can be used to join the donor wafer to the receptor wafer. For instance, an electrostatic bonding technique can be used to join the two wafers together. In particular, one or both wafer surface(s) is charged to attract to the other wafer surface. Additionally, the donor wafer can be fused to the receptor wafer using a variety of commonly known techniques. Of course, the technique used depends upon the application.




After bonding the wafers into a sandwiched structure


700


, as shown in

FIG. 7

, the method includes a controlled cleaving action to remove the substrate material to provide a thin film of substrate material overlying an insulator the receptor silicon wafer. The controlled-cleaving occurs by way of selective energy placement or positioning or targeting of energy sources onto the donor and/or receptor wafers. For instance, an energy impulse(s) can be used to initiate the cleaving action. The impulse (or impulses) is provided using an energy source which include, among others, a mechanical source, a chemical source, a thermal sink or source, and an electrical source.




The controlled cleaving action is also illustrated by way of FIG.


7


. For instance, a process for initiating the controlled cleaving action uses a step of providing energy


701


,


703


to a selected region of the substrate to initiate a controlled cleaving action at the selected depth (z


0


) in the substrate, whereupon the cleaving action is made using a propagating cleave front to free a portion of the substrate material to be removed from the substrate. In a specific embodiment, the method uses a single impulse to begin the cleaving action. Alternatively, the method uses an initiation impulse, which is followed by another impulse or successive impulses to selected regions of the substrate. Alternatively, the method provides an impulse to initiate a cleaving action which is sustained by a scanned energy along the substrate. Alternatively, energy can be scanned across selected regions of the substrate to initiate and/or sustain the controlled cleaving action.




Optionally, an energy or stress of the substrate material is increased toward an energy level necessary to initiate the cleaving action, but not enough to initiate the cleaving action before directing an impulse or multiple successive impulses to the substrate according to the present invention. The global energy state of the substrate can be raised or lowered using a variety of sources such as chemical, mechanical, thermal (sink or source), or electrical, alone or in combination. The chemical source can include particles, fluids, gases, or liquids. These sources can also include chemical reaction to increase stress in the material region. The chemical source is introduced as flood, time-varying, spatially varying, or continuous. In other embodiments, a mechanical source is derived from rotational, translational, compressional, expansional, or ultrasonic energies. The mechanical source can be introduced as flood, time-varying, spatially varying, or continuous. In further embodiments, the electrical source is selected from an applied voltage or an applied electromagnetic field, which is introduced as flood, time-varying, spatially varying, or continuous. In still further embodiments, the thermal source or sink is selected from radiation, convection, or conduction. This thermal source can be selected from, among others, a photon beam, a fluid jet, a liquid jet, a gas jet, an electro/magnetic field, a gas jet, an electron beam, a thermo-electric heating, and a furnace. The thermal sink can be selected from a fluid jet, a liquid jet, a gas jet, a cryogenic fluid, a super-cooled liquid, a thermo-electric cooling means, an electro/magnetic field, and others. Similar to the previous embodiments, the thermal source is applied as flood, time-varying, spatially varying, or continuous. Still further, any of the above embodiments can be combined or even separated, depending upon the application. Of course, the type of source used depends upon the application. As noted, the global source increases a level of energy or stress in the material region without initiating a cleaving action in the material region before providing energy to initiate the controlled cleaving action.




In a preferred embodiment, the method maintains a temperature which is below a temperature of introducing the particles into the substrate. In some embodiments, the substrate temperature is maintained between −200 and 450° C. during the step of introducing energy to initiate propagation of the cleaving action. Substrate temperature can also be maintained at a temperature below 400° C. or below 350° C. In preferred embodiments, the method uses a thermal sink to initiate and maintain the cleaving action, which occurs at conditions significantly below room temperature. Details of the controlled cleaving process is described in Henley, as previously noted.




A final bonding step occurs between the receptor wafer and thin film of material region according to some embodiments, as illustrated by FIG.


8


. In one embodiment, one silicon wafer has an overlying layer of silicon dioxide, which is thermally grown overlying the face before cleaning the thin film of material. The silicon dioxide can also be formed using a variety of other techniques, e.g., chemical vapor deposition. The silicon dioxide between the wafer surfaces fuses together thermally in this process.




In some embodiments, the oxidized silicon surface from either the receptor wafer or the thin film of material region (from the donor wafer) are further pressed together and are subjected to an oxidizing ambient


801


, as shown in

FIG. 8

, for example. The oxidizing ambient can be in a diffusion furnace for steam oxidation, hydrogen oxidation, or the like. A combination of the pressure and the oxidizing ambient fuses the two silicon wafers together at the oxide surface or interface. These embodiments often require high temperatures (e.g., 700° C.).




Alternatively, the two silicon surfaces are further pressed together and subjected to an applied voltage between the two wafers. The applied voltage raises temperature of the wafers to induce a bonding between the wafers. This technique limits the amount of crystal defects introduced into the silicon wafers during the bonding process, since substantially no mechanical force is needed to initiate the bonding action between the wafers. Of course, the technique used depends upon the application.




After bonding the wafers, silicon-on-insulator has a receptor substrate


807


with an overlying film of silicon material


809


and a sandwiched oxide layer


705


between the receptor substrate and the silicon film, as also illustrated in

FIG. 8

The detached surface of the film of silicon material is often rough


803


and needs finishing. Finishing occurs using a combination of grinding and/or polishing techniques. In some embodiments, the detached surface undergoes a step of grinding using, for example, techniques such as rotating an abrasive material overlying the detached surface to remove any imperfections or surface roughness therefrom. A machine such as a “back grinder” made by a company called Disco may provide this technique.




Alternatively, chemical mechanical polishing or planarization (“CMP”) techniques finish the detached surface of the film, as illustrated by FIG.


9


. In CMP, a slurry mixture is applied directly to a polishing surface


901


which is attached to a rotating platen


903


. This slurry mixture can be transferred to the polishing surface by way of an orifice, which is coupled to a slurry source. The slurry is often a solution containing an abrasive and an oxidizer, e.g., H


2


O


2


, KIO


3


, ferric nitrate. The abrasive is often a borosilicate glass, titanium dioxide, titanium nitride, aluminum oxide, aluminum trioxide, iron nitrate, cerium oxide, silicon dioxide (colloidal silica), silicon nitride, silicon carbide, graphite, diamond, and any mixtures thereof. This abrasive is mixed in a solution of deionized water and oxidizer or the like. Preferably, the solution is acidic.




This acid solution generally interacts with the silicon material from the wafer during the polishing process. The polishing process preferably uses a poly-urethane polishing pad. An example of this polishing pad is one made by Rodel and sold under the tradename of IC-1000. The polishing pad is rotated at a selected speed. A carrier head which picks up the receptor wafer having the film applies a selected amount of pressure on the backside of the receptor wafer such that a selected force is applied to the film. The polishing process removes about a selected amount of film material, which provides a relatively smooth film surface


1001


for subsequent processing, as illustrated by FIG.


10


.




In certain embodiments, a thin film of oxide overlies the film of material overlying the receptor wafer. The oxide layer forms during the thermal annealing step, which is described above for permanently bonding the film of material to the receptor wafer. In these embodiments, the finishing process is selectively adjusted to first remove oxide and the film is subsequently polished to complete the process. Of course, the sequence of steps depends upon the particular application.




In a further alternative embodiment, the gettering layer


1103


can be formed by way of implanting gas forming particles or precipitate forming particles


1101


after forming the SOI wafer using the controlled cleaving process, as illustrated by FIG.


11


.

FIG. 11

shows insulating layer


705


beneath the top surface


1001


of the wafer, which includes the substrate


807


, the insulating layer


705


, and the film


809


of material. These gas-forming particles, such as ions, are implanted into the wafer beneath the top surface of the wafer, but above the insulating layer to a selected depth of the getering layer


1103


. Gas-forming particles may not significantly react with the substrate that they are implanted into, but rather form gas pockets, or microbubbles, within the substrate after suitable thermal treatment. Examples of gas-forming particles include hydrogen ions and ions formed from the noble gases, including helium, neon, argon, krypton, and xenon. These pockets or microbubbles provide trapping sites for impurities. It is believed that the internal surfaces of these microbubbles provide a lower energy state for impurities, and also that the formation of the bubbles may create localized crystalline defects, providing further trapping sites. It has been estimated that the interior surface of a microbubble may trap a copper impurity ion by providing a site that is about 2.2 eV lower in energy than the bulk solution site for copper ions. Alternatively, the implanted particles can form precipitates, which may react with the substrate, but are not sensitive to subsequent thermal treatment of the wafer. The precipitates form sites which are believed to trap impurities therein or thereon.




In most of the embodiments, the distribution of these gettering sites depends upon the energies used to implant the gas-forming particles, among other factors. In this instance, the gettering layer is made up of several microbubbles distributed over a range of depth from the top surface of the wafer. The microbubbles formed after thermally treating the implanted gas-forming particles. The choice of ion dosage and energy to form the gettering layer depends upon many factors, including the depth of the insulator layer, the type of semiconductor material the gettering layer is to be formed in, the bubble-forming species, and the intended device type and active region, among other factors. As an example, 1×10


17


cm


−2


helium ions implanted into a {100} silicon wafer at 30 keV and annealed for one-half hour at 700° C. resulted in a layer of microbubbles in the silicon wafer about 0.3 μm below the top surface of the wafer. The bubbles can have an average diameter of about 8 nm. Annealing for longer periods of time or at a higher temperature resulted in larger bubbles being formed, resulting in a reduction of total microbubble surface area. High-temperature annealing also generally reduces the dislocations, stacking faults, and other crystal imperfections associated with microbubble gettering. The implantation of gas-forming particles, as well as the implantation of insulator-forming particles, may be performed by a variety of techniques, including ion beam implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII). Although the embodiment of

FIG. 11

shows introducing particles to a region to form gettering layer


1103


, the particles can also be introduced into the insulating layer


705


or beneath the insulating layer in substrate


807


.




In a specific embodiment, the silicon-on-insulator substrate undergoes a series of process steps for formation of integrated circuits thereon. These processing steps are described in S. Wolf, Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era (Volume 2), Lattice Press (1990), which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes. A portion of a completed wafer


1200


including integrated circuit devices is illustrated by

FIG. 12

, for example. As shown, the portion of the wafer includes active devices regions


1201


and isolation regions


1209


. The active devices


1201


are field effect transistors each having a source/drain region and a gate electrode as shown. A dielectric isolation layer


1207


is defined overlying the active devices to isolate the active devices from any overlying layers. Also shown are insulating layer


1203


and substrate


1205


. Gettering layers made using any of the above techniques can be defined by the locations shown by reference letters A, B, or C, or any combination thereof.




While the above is a complete description of specific embodiments of the present invention, various modifications, variations, and alternatives may be employed. For example, a silicon alloy may be substituted for the polysilicon gettering layer. Furthermore, the donor wafer does not have to be silicon, but could be another semiconductor material, such as germanium, silicon carbide, silicon-germanium alloy, or a heterostructure, among others. In such an instance, the gettering layer material would be chosen such that it is appropriate according to the principles discussed above. That is, the gettering layer would be chosen so that it provided an impurity sink in relation to the material used in the active region of devices. Other variations will be apparent to persons of skill in the art. These equivalents and alternatives are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention.




Therefore, the scope of this invention should not be limited to the embodiments described, and should instead be defined by the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for producing a semiconductor wafer comprising:providing a donor substrate; implanting first particles into the substrate to a first depth to produce a stressed layer, thereby dividing the donor substrate into a semiconductor layer and a remaining portion of the donor substrate; and disposing a gettering layer within a region of at least one of the semiconductor layer, the stressed layer, and the remaining portion of the donor substrate, the gettering layer being patterned; wherein the gettering layer provides trapping sites for mobile impurity species.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the semiconductor layer comprises monocrystalline silicon and the gettering layer comprises polycrystalline silicon.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the gettering layer is selected from an implanted layer or a deposited layer.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the semiconductor layer comprises germanium.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the substrate is a silicon substrate having <100> crystal orientation.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the gettering layer comprises microbubbles or implanted precipitates within the semiconductor layer.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the microbubbles are formed by implanting gas-forming particles into the semiconductor layer.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the gas-forming particles comprise hydrogen ions.
  • 9. the method of claim 7 wherein the gas-forming particles are implanted into the semiconductor layer using a plasma immersion ion implantation technique.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the implanted first particles are hydrogen ions.
  • 11. A method of producing a semiconductor wafer comprising:providing a donor substrate; implanting first particles into the substrate to a first depth to produce a stressed layer, thereby dividing the donor substrate into a semiconductor layer and a remaining portion of the donor substrate; disposing a gettering layer within a region of at least one of the semiconductor layer, the stressed layer, and the remaining portion of the donor substrate, the gettering layer being patterned; and applying energy to a region of the donor substrate to produce a controlled cleaving action within the stressed layer to separate the semiconductor layer from the remaining portion of the donor substrate; wherein the gettering layer provides trapping sites for mobile impurity species.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 further including, prior to the applying step, increasing a global energy of the stress layer without initiating the cleaving action.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the patterned deposited layer is a polysilicon layer.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the patterned deposited layer includes an impurity.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the impurity is oxygen.
  • 16. The method of claim 11, wherein the implanted first particles are hydrogen ions.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, wherein the donor substrate is a silicon substrate having <100> crystal orientation.
  • 18. A method for producing a semiconductor wafer comprising:providing a donor substrate having <100> crystal orientation; implanting hydrogen ions into the substrate to a first depth to produce a stressed layer, thereby dividing the donor substrate into a semiconductor layer and a remaining portion of the donor substrate; and providing a gettering layer within a region of at least one of the semiconductor layer, the stressed layer, and the remaining portion of the donor substrate, the gettering layer being a patterned, deposited polysilicon layer; wherein the gettering layer provides trapping sites for mobile impurity species.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the gettering layer includes an impurity.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the impurity is oxygen.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation Ser. No. 09/025,958 filed Feb. 19, 1998 now abandoned claims priority from No. 60/059,980 filed Jul. 18, 1997.

US Referenced Citations (176)
Number Name Date Kind
2614055 Senarelens Oct 1952 A
3117022 Bronson et al. Jan 1964 A
3225820 Riordan Dec 1965 A
3390033 Brown Jun 1968 A
3551213 Boyle Dec 1970 A
3770499 Crowe et al. Nov 1973 A
3786359 King Jan 1974 A
3806380 Kitada et al. Apr 1974 A
3832219 Nelson et al. Aug 1974 A
3900636 Curry et al. Aug 1975 A
3901423 Hillberry et al. Aug 1975 A
3915757 Engel Oct 1975 A
3946334 Yonezu Mar 1976 A
3957107 Alotz et al. May 1976 A
3993909 Drews et al. Nov 1976 A
4006340 Gornais Feb 1977 A
4039416 White Aug 1977 A
4053335 Hu Oct 1977 A
4074139 Pankove Feb 1978 A
4107350 Berg et al. Aug 1978 A
4108751 King Aug 1978 A
4116751 Zaromb Sep 1978 A
4121334 Wallis Oct 1978 A
4170662 Weiss et al. Oct 1979 A
4216906 Olsen et al. Aug 1980 A
4237601 Woolhouse et al. Dec 1980 A
4244348 Wilkes Jan 1981 A
4252837 Auton Feb 1981 A
4255208 Deutscher et al. Mar 1981 A
4274004 Kanai Jun 1981 A
4342631 White et al. Aug 1982 A
4346123 Kaufmann Aug 1982 A
4361600 Brown Nov 1982 A
4368083 Bruel et al. Jan 1983 A
4375125 Byatt Mar 1983 A
4412868 Brown et al. Nov 1983 A
4452644 Bruel et al. Jun 1984 A
4468309 White Aug 1984 A
4471003 Cann Sep 1984 A
4486247 Ecer et al. Dec 1984 A
4490190 Speri Dec 1984 A
4500563 Ellenberger et al. Feb 1985 A
4508056 Bruel et al. Apr 1985 A
4536657 Bruel Aug 1985 A
4539050 Kramler et al. Sep 1985 A
4566403 Fournier Jan 1986 A
4567505 Pease et al. Jan 1986 A
4568563 Jackson et al. Feb 1986 A
4585945 Bruel et al. Apr 1986 A
4645546 Matsushita Feb 1987 A
4684535 Heinecke et al. Aug 1987 A
4704302 Bruel et al. Nov 1987 A
4706377 Shuskus Nov 1987 A
4717683 Parillo et al. Jan 1988 A
4727047 Bozler et al. Feb 1988 A
4764394 Conrad Aug 1988 A
4766086 Ohshima et al. Aug 1988 A
4837172 Mizuno et al. Jun 1989 A
4846928 Dolins et al. Jul 1989 A
4847792 Barna et al. Jul 1989 A
4853250 Boulos et al. Aug 1989 A
4883561 Gmitter et al. Nov 1989 A
4887005 Rough et al. Dec 1989 A
4891329 Reisman et al. Jan 1990 A
4894709 Phillips et al. Jan 1990 A
4931405 Kamijo et al. Jun 1990 A
4948458 Ogle Aug 1990 A
4952273 Popov Aug 1990 A
4956693 Sawahata et al. Sep 1990 A
4960073 Suzuki et al. Oct 1990 A
4982090 Wittmaack Jan 1991 A
4983251 Haisma et al. Jan 1991 A
4996077 Moslehi Feb 1991 A
5015353 Hubler et al. May 1991 A
5034343 Rouse et al. Jul 1991 A
5070040 Pankove Dec 1991 A
5082793 Li Jan 1992 A
5102821 Moslehi Apr 1992 A
5110748 Sarma May 1992 A
5133826 Dandl Jul 1992 A
5162241 Mori et al. Nov 1992 A
5196355 Wittkower Mar 1993 A
5198371 Li Mar 1993 A
5202095 Houchin et al. Apr 1993 A
5203960 Dandl Apr 1993 A
5206749 Zavracky et al. Apr 1993 A
5213451 Frank May 1993 A
5234529 Johnson Aug 1993 A
5234535 Beyer et al. Aug 1993 A
5242861 Inaba Sep 1993 A
5250328 Otto Oct 1993 A
5252178 Moslehi Oct 1993 A
5256562 Vu et al. Oct 1993 A
5258320 Zavracky et al. Nov 1993 A
5258325 Spitzer et al. Nov 1993 A
5269880 Jolly et al. Dec 1993 A
5273610 Thomas, III et al. Dec 1993 A
5277748 Sakaguchi et al. Jan 1994 A
5303574 Matossian et al. Apr 1994 A
5304509 Sopori Apr 1994 A
5308776 Gotou May 1994 A
5317236 Zavracky et al. May 1994 A
5342472 Imahashi et al. Aug 1994 A
5344524 Sharma et al. Sep 1994 A
5354381 Sheng Oct 1994 A
5362671 Zavracky et al. Nov 1994 A
5363603 Miller et al. Nov 1994 A
5368710 Chen et al. Nov 1994 A
5370765 Dandl Dec 1994 A
5374564 Bruel Dec 1994 A
5376560 Aronowitz et al. Dec 1994 A
5377031 Vu et al. Dec 1994 A
5404079 Ohkuni et al. Apr 1995 A
5405480 Benzing et al. Apr 1995 A
5411592 Ovshinsky et al. May 1995 A
5413679 Godbey May 1995 A
5435880 Minato et al. Jul 1995 A
5438241 Zavracky et al. Aug 1995 A
5443661 Oguro et al. Aug 1995 A
5444557 Spitzer et al. Aug 1995 A
5459016 Debe et al. Oct 1995 A
5475514 Salerno et al. Dec 1995 A
5476691 Komvopoulos et al. Dec 1995 A
5480842 Clifton et al. Jan 1996 A
5487785 Horiike Jan 1996 A
5494835 Bruel Feb 1996 A
5504328 Bonser Apr 1996 A
5528397 Zavracky et al. Jun 1996 A
5539245 Imura et al. Jul 1996 A
5558718 Leung Sep 1996 A
5559043 Bruel Sep 1996 A
5569620 Linn et al. Oct 1996 A
5581385 Spitzer et al. Dec 1996 A
5585304 Hayashi et al. Dec 1996 A
5611855 Wijaranakula Mar 1997 A
5643834 Harada et al. Jul 1997 A
5653811 Chan Aug 1997 A
5705421 Matsushita et al. Jan 1998 A
5710057 Kenny Jan 1998 A
5714395 Bruel Feb 1998 A
5744852 Linn et al. Apr 1998 A
5753560 Hong et al. May 1998 A
5755914 Yonehara May 1998 A
5763319 Ling et al. Jun 1998 A
5783022 Cha et al. Jul 1998 A
5804086 Bruel Sep 1998 A
5821158 Shishiguchi Oct 1998 A
5824595 Igel et al. Oct 1998 A
5827751 Nuyen Oct 1998 A
5840590 Myers, Jr. et al. Nov 1998 A
5854123 Sato et al. Dec 1998 A
5869387 Sato et al. Feb 1999 A
5877070 Goesele et al. Mar 1999 A
5882987 Srikrishnan Mar 1999 A
5909627 Egloff Jun 1999 A
5920764 Hanson et al. Jul 1999 A
5953622 Lee et al. Sep 1999 A
5966620 Sakaguchi et al. Oct 1999 A
5985742 Henley et al. Nov 1999 A
5993677 Biasse et al. Nov 1999 A
5994207 Henley et al. Nov 1999 A
6010579 Henley et al. Jan 2000 A
6013563 Henley et al. Jan 2000 A
6013567 Henley et al. Jan 2000 A
6020252 Aspar et al. Feb 2000 A
6033974 Henley et al. Mar 2000 A
6048411 Henley et al. Apr 2000 A
6077383 Laporte Jun 2000 A
6083324 Henley et al. Jul 2000 A
6120597 Levy et al. Sep 2000 A
6150239 Goesele et al. Nov 2000 A
6159824 Henley et al. Dec 2000 A
6171965 Kang et al. Jan 2001 B1
6184111 Henley et al. Feb 2001 B1
6214701 Matsushita et al. Apr 2001 B1
6225192 Aspar et al. May 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (72)
Number Date Country
834363 Mar 1952 DE
084 287 Jul 1983 EP
099 778 Feb 1984 EP
155 875 Feb 1984 EP
112 238 Jun 1984 EP
164 281 Dec 1985 EP
112 230 Apr 1987 EP
181 249 Jun 1989 EP
355 913 Feb 1990 EP
379 828 Aug 1990 EP
459 177 Dec 1991 EP
504 714 Sep 1992 EP
533 551 Mar 1993 EP
665 588 Feb 1995 EP
660 140 Jun 1995 EP
665 587 Aug 1995 EP
703 609 Mar 1996 EP
763 849 Mar 1997 EP
867 917 Sep 1998 EP
867 921 Sep 1998 EP
961 312 Dec 1999 EP
1558881 Jan 1969 FR
2261802 Feb 1974 FR
2235474 Apr 1974 FR
2298880 Jan 1975 FR
2266304 Apr 1975 FR
2519437 Jan 1982 FR
2529383 Jun 1982 FR
2560426 Feb 1984 FR
2563377 Apr 1984 FR
2537777 Dec 1984 FR
2575601 Dec 1984 FR
2681472 Sep 1991 FR
2537768 Aug 1992 FR
2714524 Dec 1993 FR
2715501 Jan 1994 FR
2715502 Jan 1994 FR
2715503 Jan 1994 FR
2720189 May 1994 FR
2725074 Sep 1994 FR
2 211 991 Jul 1989 GB
2 231 197 Nov 1990 GB
60-235434 Nov 1958 JP
53-104156 Sep 1978 JP
58-144475 Aug 1983 JP
60-083591 Oct 1983 JP
59-019394 Jan 1984 JP
59-046750 Mar 1984 JP
59-054217 Mar 1984 JP
59-114744 Jul 1984 JP
59-139539 Aug 1984 JP
59-193904 Nov 1984 JP
60-207237 Oct 1985 JP
4-076503 Jul 1990 JP
3-109731 May 1991 JP
3-132055 Jun 1991 JP
3-265156 Nov 1991 JP
4-246594 Sep 1992 JP
5-211128 Aug 1993 JP
7-215800 Aug 1995 JP
7-254690 Oct 1995 JP
7-263291 Oct 1995 JP
8-097389 Apr 1996 JP
10-200080 Jul 1998 JP
11-045840 Feb 1999 JP
2901031 Jun 1999 JP
2910001 Jun 1999 JP
2000-94317 Apr 2000 JP
9510718 Apr 1995 WO
9520824 Aug 1995 WO
9531825 Nov 1995 WO
9935674 Jul 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (37)
Entry
Aspar, B. et al., “Transfer of structured and patterned thin silicon films using the Smart-Cut process”, Electronics Letters, v.32, No. 21 (1996), pp. 1985-1986.*
Alles et al., “Thin Film Silicon on Insulator: An Enabling Technology,” Semiconductor International, pp. 67-72 (1997.
Burggraff, P., “Advanced Plasma Source: What's Working?” Semiconductor International, pp. 56-59 (May 1994).
Basta, N., “Ion-Beam Implantation,” High Technology, (1985).
Carter et al., “The Collection of Ions Implanted in Semiconductors II. Rnage distributions Derived from Collection and Sputter-Etch Curves,” Radiation Effects, 16:107-114 (1972).
Cassidy, Victor M., “Ion Implantation Process Toughens Metalworking Tools,” Modern Metals, pp. 65-67 (1984).
Cheung, N.W., “Plasma Immersion Ion Implanation for Semiconductor Processing,” Material Chemistry and Physics, 46(2-3): 132-139 (1996).
Choyke et al., “Mechanical Response of Single Crystal Si to Very High Fluence H+ Implantation,” Nuc. Instr. Meth., 209-210:407-412 (1983).
Choyke et al., “Implanted Hydrogen Effects at High Concentrations in Model Low Z Shielding Materials,” J. Nuc. Mtrls., 122-23:1585-86 (1984).
Choyke et al., “A Comparative Study of Near-Surface Effects Due to Very High Fluence H+ Implantation in Single Crystal FZ, CZ, and Web SI,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 27:359-364 (1984).
Chu et al. “Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation—A Fledgling Technique for Semiconductor Processing,” Materials Science and Engineering Reports: A Review Journal, R17(6-7): 207-280 (1996) cover page and table of contents only.
Chu et al., “Recent Applications of Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation,” Semiconductor International, pp. 165-172 (1996).
Chu, Paul K., “Synthesis of SOI Materials Using Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation,” 1997 Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 438:333-343 (1997).
Corbett et al., “Embrittlement of Materials: Si(H) as a Model System,” J. Nuc. Mtrls., 169: 179-184 (1989).
Grovenor, C.R.M., Microelectronic Materials, pp. 73-75 (1989).
Hulett, D.M. et al., “Ion Nitriding and Ion Implantation: A Comparison,” Metal Progress, pp. 18-21 (1985).
I.B.M. Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 29: No. 3, pp. 1416 (Aug. 1986).
Johnson et al., “Hydrogen-Induced Platelets in Silicon: Separation of Nucleation and Growth,” Mtrls. Sci. Forum, 83-87:33-38 (1992).
Lee et al., “A Novel Pattern Transfer Process for Bonded SOI Giga-bit DRAMS,” 1996 IEEE Int'l SOL Conference Proceedings, IEEE Electron Devices Society, (1996).
Li, J., “Novel Semiconductor Substrate Formed by Hydrogen Ion Implantation into Silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 55(21):2223-2224 (1989).
Lu et al., “SOI Material Technology Using Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation,” Proceedings 1996 IEEE International SOI Conference (Oct. 1996).
Mahajan et al., Principles of Growth and Processing of Semiconductors, WCB McGraw-Hill, chapter 6, pp. 262-269.
Matsuda et al., “Large Diameter Ion Beam Implantation System,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods, B21:314-316 (1987).
Milnes et al., “Peeled Film Technology for solar Cells,” pp. 338-341.
Moreau, Wayne M., Semiconductor Lithography, Principles, Practices, and Materials, Plenum Press (1988).
Oshima et al., “Defects in Si irradiated with D-T neutrons, D and He ions,” J. Nuc. Mtrls., 179-181:947-950 (1991).
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 7, No. 107 (E-174), (May 11, 1993) JP-58-030145 (Feb. 22, 1983).
Picraux et al., “Ion Implantation of Surfaces,” Scientific American, 252(3):102-113 (1985).
Reiner et al., “A New Low-Energy Ion Implanter for Bombardment of Cylindrical Surfaces,” Vacuum, 35(12):557-578 (1985).
Sioshansi, Piran, “Ion Beam Modification of Materials for Industry,” Thin Solid Film, 118:61-71 (1984).
Smith, D.L., Thin-Film Deposition, McGraw-Hill, Inc., pp. 185-196, 278-293.
Sze, S.M., VLSI Technology, 2nd Edition, pp. 9-10, (1988).
Tong et al., “A ‘smarter-cut’ approach to low temperature silicon layer transfer,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 72(1):49-51 (1998).
Tong et al., Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: Science and Technology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 152-171.
Wolf, Stanley Ph.D., Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era vol. 2, pp. 66-79, Lattice Press (1990).
U.S. Dept. of Energy, “The Fusion Connection: . . . ”, Plasma Coating, pp. 6-7 (1985).
Veldkamp et al., Binary Optics, Scientific American, pp. 50-55 (May 1992).
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/059980 Jul 1997 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/025958 Feb 1998 US
Child 09/631891 US