Patent Application
20240350868
This disclosure generally relates to a golf ball, and is more particularly related to a rubber composition for a golf ball core having a natural rubber component.
Various rubber compositions are well known for golf ball cores. Synthetic rubber blends are typically used in golf ball core constructions. Synthetic rubber production can require resource intensive techniques and processes due to the requisite manufacturing steps.
There are various known natural rubbers, one of the most common being the Amazonzian rubber tree (i.e., Hevea brasiliensis). Natural rubber, such as Hevea brasiliensis, can require significant resources for cultivation.
It would be desirable to provide a natural rubber composition for a golf ball core that is ecologically friendly.
In some embodiments, the present disclosure is directed to a golf ball and a method of forming a golf ball that includes a natural rubber, such as dandelion root rubber. The natural rubber can consist entirely of dandelion root rubber, in one example.
The golf ball can comprise a core including at least one first layer comprised of a first rubber composition comprising a mixture including both synthetic rubber and natural rubber. The natural rubber can be dandelion root rubber. A cover can be disposed about the core. The cover can be formed from an ionomer, thermoplastic polyurethane, or other type of polymer, in some examples.
The at least one first layer can be formed as an inner core portion, and the core can further comprise at least one second layer formed as an outer core portion and having a second rubber composition.
The second rubber composition can comprise the synthetic rubber and at least one of styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) or ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM).
The at least one first layer can be formed as an outer core portion, and the core can further comprise at least one second layer formed as an inner core portion and having a second rubber composition.
The second rubber composition can be comprised of the synthetic rubber. The first rubber composition can further be comprised of at least one of SBR or EPDM.
The at least one first layer can be formed as an outer core portion, and the core can further comprise at least one second layer formed as an inner core portion and having a second rubber composition. The second rubber composition can further comprise a mixture of the synthetic rubber and the natural rubber.
The first rubber composition and the second rubber composition can have different concentrations of the synthetic rubber and the natural rubber, in one aspect.
The synthetic rubber can be comprised of polybutadiene, in one example.
The first rubber composition can further comprise a concentration of 1-20 parts per hundred (phr) of the natural rubber, and a concentration of 80-99 phr of the synthetic rubber. In one example, the first rubber composition can have a base rubber composition formed by the synthetic rubber and an additive component formed from the natural rubber. In another example, the first rubber composition can primarily be comprised of the natural rubber, and the synthetic rubber accounts for less than 50% of the first rubber composition.
The first rubber composition can further comprise a concentration of at least 5 phr of the natural rubber. The first rubber composition can further comprise a concentration of no greater than 10 phr of the natural rubber.
In another aspect, a golf ball is disclosed herein that includes a core comprising: at least one first layer comprised of a first rubber composition. The first rubber composition can include a synthetic rubber formed from butadiene rubber and a natural rubber formed from dandelion root rubber. The first rubber composition can comprise a concentration of 1-20 phr of the natural rubber, and a concentration of 80-99 phr of the synthetic rubber. A cover can be disposed about the core.
In another aspect, a method of forming a golf ball core is disclosed herein. The method can comprise forming at least one first layer of the golf ball core from a first rubber composition comprising both synthetic rubber and natural rubber. The natural rubber can be dandelion root rubber.
The present disclosure provides various configurations and compositions for a golf ball core that incorporates a natural rubber feature. Based on the inclusion of the dandelion root rubber, the present disclosure can provide a golf ball layer or core that has improved durability as compared to golf balls that lack any dandelion root rubber. Further, dandelion root rubber is a naturally occurring substance and therefore provides an ecologically friendly golf ball component. Various other aspects of a golf ball construction are described herein.
Further features and advantages of the present disclosure can be ascertained from the following detailed description that is provided in connection with the drawings described below:
According to the disclosed embodiments, a rubber composition for a golf ball component, such as a golf ball core, is disclosed herein. The rubber composition incorporates natural rubber. As disclosed herein, various configurations, formulations, and compositions are disclosed for a golf ball that generally include natural rubber. In one aspect, the natural rubber is dandelion root rubber. One of ordinary skill in the art would also understand that dandelion root rubber is also known as Russian dandelions. One of ordinary skill in the art would also understand that the dandelion root rubber is from the family asteraceae, genus Taraxacum, species kok-saghyz. The dandelion root rubber can also be known as Kazakh dandelion and generically referred to as rubber root.
Concentrations of components are in parts per hundred (phr) unless otherwise indicated. As used herein, the term, “parts per hundred,” also known as “phr” or “pph” is defined as the number of parts by weight of a particular component present in a mixture, relative to 100 parts by weight of the polymer component. Mathematically, this can be expressed as the weight of an ingredient divided by the total weight of the polymer, multiplied by a factor of 100.
The present disclosure provides, in some examples, a golf ball core that is comprised of a mixture of synthetic rubber and natural rubber. In one example, the natural rubber in the rubber formulation can be included in an amount of about 0.1 phr to about 50.0 phr, or about 1.0 phr to about 10.0 phr, or about 2.5 phr to about 7.5 phr, or about 4.0 phr to about 6.0 phr, or about 5.0 phr of the total rubber. The natural rubber can be dandelion root rubber. In one example, the golf ball core can be formed entirely from dandelion root rubber. In another example, the golf ball core can be formed primarily (i.e., more than 50%) from dandelion root rubber.
The core rubber formulations of the present disclosure can include a base rubber. In some embodiments, the base rubber may include natural and synthetic rubbers and combinations of two or more thereof. Examples of natural and synthetic rubbers suitable for use as the base rubber include, but are not limited to, polybutadiene, polyisoprene, ethylene propylene rubber (EPR), ethylene-propylene-diene (EPDM) rubber, grafted EPDM rubber, styrene-butadiene rubber, styrenic block copolymer rubbers (such as “SI”, “SIS”, “SB”, “SBS”, “SIBS”, and the like, where “S” is styrene, “I” is isobutylene, and “B” is butadiene), polyalkenamers such as, for example, polyoctenamer, butyl rubber, halobutyl rubber, polystyrene elastomers, polyethylene elastomers, polyurethane elastomers, polyurea elastomers, metallocene-catalyzed elastomers and plastomers, copolymers of isobutylene and p-alkylstyrene, halogenated copolymers of isobutylene and p-alkylstyrene, copolymers of butadiene with acrylonitrile, polychloroprene, alkyl acrylate rubber, chlorinated isoprene rubber, acrylonitrile chlorinated isoprene rubber, and combinations of two or more thereof.
For example, the core may be formed from a rubber formulation that includes polybutadiene as the base rubber. Polybutadiene is a homopolymer of 1,3-butadiene. The double bonds in the 1,3-butadiene monomer are attacked by catalysts to grow the polymer chain and form a polybutadiene polymer having a desired molecular weight. Any suitable catalyst may be used to synthesize the polybutadiene rubber depending upon the desired properties. In one embodiment, a transition metal complex (for example, neodymium, nickel, or cobalt) or an alkyl metal such as alkyl lithium is used as a catalyst. Other catalysts include, but are not limited to, aluminum, boron, lithium, titanium, and combinations thereof. The catalysts produce polybutadiene rubbers having different chemical structures. In a cis-bond configuration, the main internal polymer chain of the polybutadiene appears on the same side of the carbon-carbon double bond contained in the polybutadiene. In a trans-bond configuration, the main internal polymer chain is on opposite sides of the internal carbon-carbon double bond in the polybutadiene. The polybutadiene rubber can have various combinations of cis- and trans-bond structures. For example, the polybutadiene rubber may have a 1,4 cis-bond content of at least 40 percent. In another embodiment, the polybutadiene rubber has a 1,4 cis-bond content of greater than 80 percent. In still another embodiment, the polybutadiene rubber has a 1,4 cis-bond content of greater than 90 percent. In general, polybutadiene rubbers having a high 1,4 cis-bond content have high tensile strength and rebound.
The polybutadiene rubber may have a relatively high or low Mooney viscosity. Generally, polybutadiene rubbers of higher molecular weight and higher Mooney viscosity have better resiliency than polybutadiene rubbers of lower molecular weight and lower Mooney viscosity. However, as the Mooney viscosity increases, the milling and processing of the polybutadiene rubber generally becomes more difficult. Blends of high and low Mooney viscosity polybutadiene rubbers may be prepared as is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,982,301 and 6,774,187, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference, and used in accordance with the present disclosure. In general, the lower limit of Mooney viscosity may be about 30 or 35 or 40 or 45 or 50 or 55 or 60 or 70 or 75 and the upper limit may be about 80 or 85 or 90 or 95 or 100 or 105 or 110 or 115 or 120 or 125 or 130. For example, the polybutadiene used in the rubber formulation may have a Mooney viscosity of about 30 to about 80 or about 40 to about 60.
Examples of commercially available polybutadiene rubbers that can be used in rubber formulations in accordance with the present disclosure, include, but are not limited to, BR 01 and BR 1220, available from BST Elastomers of Bangkok, Thailand; SE BR 1220LA and SE BR1203, available from DOW Chemical Co of Midland, Mich.; BUDENE 1207, 1207s, 1208, and 1280 available from Goodyear, Inc of Akron, Ohio; BR 01, 51 and 730, available from Japan Synthetic Rubber (JSR) of Tokyo, Japan; BUNA CB 21, CB 22, CB 23, CB 24, CB 25, CB 29 MES, CB 60, CB Nd 60, CB 55 NF, CB 70 B, CB KA 8967, and CB 1221, available from Lanxess Corp. of Pittsburgh. Pa.; BR1208, available from LG Chemical of Seoul, South Korea; UBEPOL BR130B, BR150, BR150B, BR150L, BR230, BR360L, BR710, and VCR617, available from UBE Industries, Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan; EUROPRENE NEOCIS BR 60, INTENE 60 AF and P30AF, and EUROPRENE BR HV80, available from Polimeri Europa of Rome, Italy; KBR 01, NdBr 40, NdBR-45, NdBr 60, KBR 710S, KBR 710H, and KBR 750, available from Kumho Petrochemical Co., Ltd. Of Seoul, South Korea; DIENE 55NF, 70AC, and 320 AC, available from Firestone Polymers of Akron, Ohio; and PBR—Nd Group II and Group III, available from Nizhnekamskneftekhim, Inc. of Nizhnekamsk, Tartarstan Republic.
In another embodiment, the core is formed from a rubber formulation including butyl rubber. Butyl rubber is an elastomeric copolymer of isobutylene and isoprene. Butyl rubber is an amorphous, non-polar polymer with good oxidative and thermal stability, good permanent flexibility, and high moisture and gas resistance. Generally, butyl rubber includes copolymers of about 70 percent to about 99.5 percent by weight of an isoolefin, which has about 4 to 7 carbon atoms, for example, isobutylene, and about 0.5 percent to about 30 percent by weight of a conjugated multiolefin, which has about 4 to 14 carbon atoms, for example, isoprene. The resulting copolymer contains about 85 percent to about 99.8 percent by weight of combined isoolefin and about 0.2 percent to about 15 percent of combined multiolefin. A commercially available butyl rubber suitable for use in rubber formulations in accordance with the present disclosure includes Bayer Butyl 301 manufactured by Bayer AG.
The rubber formulations may include a combination of two or more of the above-described rubbers as the base rubber. In some embodiments, the rubber formulation of the present disclosure includes a blend of different polybutadiene rubbers. In this embodiment, the rubber formulation may include a blend of a first polybutadiene rubber and a second polybutadiene rubber in a ratio of about 5:95 to about 95:5. For example, the rubber formulation may include a first polybutadiene rubber and a second polybutadiene rubber in a ratio of about 10:90 to about 90:10 or about 15:85 to about 85:15 or about 20:80 to about 80:20 or about 30:70 to about 70:30 or about 40:60 to about 60:40. In other embodiments, the rubber formulation may include a blend of more than two polybutadiene rubbers or a blend of polybutadiene rubber(s) with any of the other elastomers discussed above. Any of these rubber formulations can be further blended or combined with a natural rubber, such as dandelion root rubber. In these formulations, the rubber formulation can be modified to include the first polybutadiene rubber, the second polybutadiene rubber, and the natural rubber additive such that a combination of the first and second polybutadiene rubbers (in equal parts or any combination or ratio of first polybutadiene rubber to second polybutadiene rubber ranging from 99:1 to 1:99) to the natural rubber is in a ratio of about 80:20 to about 90:10, or about 85:15 to about 95:5, or about 75:25 to about 99:1.
In other embodiments, the rubber formulation used to form the core can include a blend of polybutadiene and butyl rubber, plus a further addition of natural root rubber. In this embodiment, the rubber formulation may include a blend of polybutadiene and butyl rubber in a ratio of about 10:90 to about 90:10. For example, the rubber formulation may include a blend of polybutadiene and butyl rubber in a ratio of about 10:90 to about 90:10 or about 20:80 to about 80:20 or about 30:70 to about 70:30 or about 40:60 to about 60:40. In other embodiments, the rubber formulation may include polybutadiene and/or butyl rubber in a blend with any of the other elastomers discussed above. Any of these rubber formulations can be further blended or combined with a natural rubber, such as dandelion root rubber. In these formulations, the rubber formulation can be modified to include a blend of polybutadiene, butyl rubber, and the natural rubber such that a combination of the blend of polybutadiene and butyl rubber (in equal parts or any combination or ratio of the blend of polybutadiene to butyl rubber ranging from 99:1 to 1:99) to the natural rubber is in a ratio of about 80:20 to about 90:10, or about 85:15 to about 95:5, or about 75:25 to about 99:1.
In further embodiments, the rubber formulation used to form the core can include a blend of polybutadiene and EPDM rubber or grafted EPDM rubber as the base rubber. In still further embodiments, the rubber formulations may include a combination of polybutadiene rubber and EPDM rubber as the base rubber. In this embodiment, the EPDM may be included in the rubber formulation in an amount of about 0.1 to about 20 or about 1 to about 15 or about 3 to about 10 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. For example, EPDM may be included in the rubber formulation in an amount of about 5 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In still further embodiments, the core formulations may combine EPDM rubber and two or more different types of polybutadiene rubber, such as two or more different types of high cis-1,4 polybutadiene, as the base rubber.
The rubber formulations include the base rubber in an amount of 100 phr. That is, when more than one rubber component is used in the rubber formulation as the base rubber, the sum of the amounts of each rubber component should total 100 phr. In some embodiments, the rubber formulations include polybutadiene rubber as the base rubber in an amount of 100 phr. In other embodiments, the rubber formulations include polybutadiene rubber and a second rubber component. In this embodiment, the polybutadiene rubber may be used in an amount of about 80 to about 99.9 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber and the second rubber component may be used in an amount of about 0.1 to about 20 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. The second rubber component can be a natural root rubber or dandelion root rubber.
In further embodiments, the polybutadiene rubber may be used in an amount of about 85 to about 99 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber and the second rubber component may be used in an amount of about 1 to about 15 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber.
In yet other embodiments, the polybutadiene rubber may be used in an amount of about 90 to about 97 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber and the second rubber component may be used in an amount of about 3 to about 10 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber.
In still further embodiments, the polybutadiene rubber may be used in an amount of about 94 to about 96 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber and the second rubber component may be used in an amount of about 4 to about 6 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In some embodiments, the second rubber component is natural rubber, such as dandelion root rubber.
The base rubber may be used in the rubber formulation in an amount of at least about 5 percent by weight based on total weight of the rubber formulation. In some embodiments, the base rubber is included in the rubber formulation in an amount within a range having a lower limit of about 10 percent or 20 percent or 30 percent or 40 percent or 50 percent or 55 percent and an upper limit of about 60 percent or 70 percent or 80 percent or 90 percent or 95 percent or 100 percent. For example, the base rubber may be present in the rubber formulation in an amount of about 30 percent to about 80 percent by weight based on the total weight of the rubber formulation. In another example, the rubber formulation includes about 40 percent to about 70 percent base rubber based on the total weight of the rubber formulation. In one example, a remainder of the rubber formulation can consist of natural rubber, such as dandelion root rubber.
The rubber formulations can further include a reactive cross-linking co-agent. Suitable co-agents include, but are not limited to, metal salts of unsaturated carboxylic acids having from 3 to 8 carbon atoms; unsaturated vinyl compounds and polyfunctional monomers (e.g., trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate); phenylene bismaleimide; and combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the co-agent is one or more metal salts of acrylates, diacrylates, methacrylates, and dimethacrylates, wherein the metal is selected from magnesium, calcium, zinc, aluminum, lithium, and nickel. In another embodiment, the co-agent includes one or more zinc salts of acrylates, diacrylates, methacrylates, and dimethacrylates. For example, the co-agent may be zinc diacrylate (ZDA). In another embodiment, the co-agent may be zinc dimethacrylate (ZDMA). An example of a commercially available zinc diacrylate includes Dymalink® 526 manufactured by Cray Valley.
The co-agent may be included in the rubber formulation in varying amounts depending on the desired characteristics of the golf ball core. For example, the co-agent may be used in an amount of about 5 to about 50 or about 10 to about 45 or about 15 to about 40 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In one embodiment, the rubber formulation of the core includes about 35 to about 48 parts by weight co-agent per 100 parts of the total rubber. In another embodiment, the rubber formulation includes about 38 to about 45 or about 39 to about 42 parts by weight co-agent per 100 parts of total rubber. In another embodiment, the co-agent is included in the rubber formulation of the core in an amount of about 29 to about 37 or about 31 to about 35 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In still another embodiment, the rubber formulation includes about 25 to about 33 or about 27 to about 31 parts by weight co-agent per 100 parts of the total rubber. In yet another example, the co-agent may be used in an amount of about 20-40 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In one example, the co-agent is used in an amount of about 30-35 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In one example, the co-agent is used in an amount of about 32-33 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber.
The core formulations may include a free radical initiator selected from an organic peroxide, a high energy radiation source capable of generating free radicals, or a combination thereof. Suitable organic peroxides include, but are not limited to, dicumyl peroxide; n-butyl-4,4-di(t-butylperoxy) valerate; 1,1-di(t-butylperoxy) 3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane; 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy) hexane; di-t-butyl peroxide; di-t-amyl peroxide; t-butyl peroxide; t-butyl cumyl peroxide; 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy) hexyne-3; di(2-t-butyl-peroxyisopropyl)benzene; dilauroyl peroxide; dibenzoyl peroxide; t-butyl hydroperoxide; and combinations thereof. In a particular embodiment, the free radical initiator is dicumyl peroxide, including, but not limited to Perkadox® BD-FF, commercially available from Akzo Nobel. In other embodiments, the free radical initiator is dimethyl terbutyl peroxide, including, but not limited to Trigonox® 101-50D-PD, commercially available from Nouryon.
Free radical initiators may be present in the rubber formulation in an amount of at least 0.05 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber, or an amount within the range having a lower limit of 0.05 parts or 0.1 parts or 1 part or 1.25 parts or 1.5 parts or 2.5 parts or 5 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber, and an upper limit of 2.5 parts or 3 parts or 5 parts or 6 parts or 10 parts or 15 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. For example, the rubber formulation may include peroxide free radical initiators in an amount of about 0.1 to about 10 or about 0.5 to about 6 or about 1 to about 5 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In another example, the rubber formulation may include peroxide free radical initiators in an amount of about 0.5 to about 2 or about 0.7 to about 1.8 or about 0.8 to about 1.2 or about 1.3 to about 1.7 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In yet another example, the rubber formulation may include peroxide free radical initiators in an amount of about 1.5 to about 3 or about 1.7 to about 2.8 or about 1.8 to about 2.2 or about 2.3 to about 2.7 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber.
Radical scavengers such as a halogenated organosulfur, organic disulfide, or inorganic disulfide compounds may also be added to the rubber formulation. In one embodiment, a halogenated organosulfur compound included in the rubber formulation includes, but is not limited to, pentachlorothiophenol (PCTP) and salts of PCTP such as zinc pentachlorothiophenol (ZnPCTP). In another embodiment, ditolyl disulfide, diphenyl disulfide, dixylyl disulfide, 2-nitroresorcinol, and combinations thereof are added to the rubber formulation. An example of a commercially available radical scavenger includes Rhenogran® Zn-PTCP-72 manufactured by Rheine Chemie. The radical scavenger may be included in the rubber formulation in an amount of about 0.3 to about 1.0 part by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In one embodiment, the rubber formulation may include about 0.4 to about 0.9 parts by weight radical scavenger per 100 parts of the total rubber. In another embodiment, the rubber formulation may include about 0.5 to about 0.8 parts by weight radical scavenger per 100 parts of the total rubber. In another embodiment, the rubber formulation may include about 0.3 parts to about 0.4 parts by weight radical scavenger per 100 parts of the total rubber. In yet another embodiment, the rubber formulation may include about 0.1 parts to about 0.3 parts by weight radical scavenger per 100 parts of the total rubber.
Suitable non-limiting examples of fillers include carbon black, clay and nanoclay particles, talc, glass (e.g., glass flake, milled glass, and microglass), mica and mica-based pigments (e.g., Iriodin® pearl luster pigments from The Merck Group), and combinations thereof. Metal oxide and metal sulfate fillers are also contemplated for inclusion in the rubber formulation. Suitable metal fillers include, for example, particulate, powders, flakes, and fibers of copper, steel, brass, tungsten, titanium, aluminum, magnesium, molybdenum, cobalt, nickel, iron, lead, tin, zinc, barium, bismuth, bronze, silver, gold, and platinum, and alloys and combinations thereof. Suitable metal oxide fillers include, for example, zinc oxide, iron oxide, aluminum oxide, titanium oxide, magnesium oxide, and zirconium oxide. Suitable metal sulfate fillers can include, for example, barium sulfate and/or strontium sulfate. An example of a commercially available barium sulfate filler includes PolyWate® 325 manufactured by Cimbar Performance Minerals.
When included, the fillers may be in an amount of about 1 to about 25 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In one embodiment, the rubber formulation includes at least one filler in an amount of about 5 to about 20 or about 8 to about 15 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In another embodiment, the rubber formulation includes at least one filler in an amount of about 8 to about 14 or about 10 to about 12 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In yet another embodiment, the rubber formulation includes at least one filler in an amount of about 10 to about 17 or about 12 to about 15 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In yet another embodiment, the rubber formulation includes at least one filler in an amount of about 10 to about 16 or about 12 to about 15 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In a further embodiment, the rubber formulation includes at least one filler in an amount of about 12 to about 18 or about 14 to about 16 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In a further embodiment, the rubber formulation includes at least one filler in an amount of about 1 part to about 30 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In one example, the filler is added to weight for a specific gravity, and the exact values can vary depending on the specific gravity of a specific rubber batch.
In some aspects, the amount of filler in the rubber formulation may be altered based on the compound, and the particular isomer of the compound, used as the hardening agent. For example, when the rubber formulation includes 2-nitrophenol, at least one filler may be included in the rubber formulation in amount from about 9 to about 13 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In another example, when the rubber formulation includes 3-nitrophenol, the filler may be included in the rubber formulation in amount from about 11 to about 16 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. In yet another example, when the rubber formulation includes 4-nitrophenol, the filler may be included in the rubber formulation in amount from about 13 to about 17 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber.
In some embodiments, more than one type of filler may be included in the rubber formulation. For example, the rubber formulation may include a first filler in an amount from about 5 to about 20 or about 8 to about 17 parts by weight per 100 parts total rubber and a second filler in an amount from about 1 to about 10 or about 3 to about 7 parts by weight per 100 parts total rubber. In another example, the rubber formulation may include a first filler in an amount from about 7 to about 13 or about 9 to about 12 parts by weight per 100 parts total rubber and a second filler in an amount from about 2 to about 8 or about 4 to about 6 parts by weight per 100 parts total rubber. In yet another example, the rubber formulation may include a first filler in an amount from about 10 to about 15 or about 13 to about 14 parts by weight per 100 parts total rubber and a second filler in an amount from about 2 to about 9 or about 3 to about 7 parts by weight per 100 parts total rubber. In a further example, the rubber formulation may include a first filler in an amount from about 10 to about 15 or about 13 to about 14 parts by weight per 100 parts total rubber and a second filler in an amount from about 13 to about 18 or about 14 to about 16 parts by weight per 100 parts total rubber.
Antioxidants, processing aids, accelerators (for example, tetra methylthiuram), dyes and pigments, wetting agents, surfactants, plasticizers, coloring agents, fluorescent agents, chemical blowing and foaming agents, defoaming agents, stabilizers, softening agents, impact modifiers, antiozonants, as well as other additives known in the art, may also be added to the rubber formulation. Examples of suitable processing aids include, but are not limited to, high molecular weight organic acids and salts thereof. Suitable organic acids are aliphatic organic acids, aromatic organic acids, saturated mono-functional organic acids, unsaturated monofunctional organic acids, multi-unsaturated mono-functional organic acids, and dimerized derivatives thereof. In one embodiment, the organic acids include, but are not limited to, caproic acid, caprylic acid, capric acid, lauric acid, stearic acid, behenic acid, erucic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, myristic acid, benzoic acid, palmitic acid, phenylacetic acid, naphthalenoic acid, and dimerized derivatives thereof. The salts of organic acids include the salts of barium, lithium, sodium, zinc, bismuth, chromium, cobalt, copper, potassium, strontium, titanium, tungsten, magnesium, cesium, iron, nickel, silver, aluminum, tin, or calcium, salts of fatty acids, particularly stearic, behenic, erucic, oleic, linoelic or dimerized derivatives thereof.
The rubber, hardening agent, cross-linking agent, free radical initiator, fillers, and any other materials used in forming the core, in accordance with the present disclosure, may be combined to form a mixture by any type of mixing known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Suitable types of mixing include single pass and multi-pass mixing, and the like. A single pass mixing process where ingredients are added sequentially can be used because this type of mixing tends to increase efficiency and reduce costs for the process. In embodiments where a free-radical initiator is used, it may be desirable to combine the hardening agent into the rubber formulation prior to adding the free-radical initiator.
The rubber formulation may be cured using conventional curing processes. Non-limiting examples of curing processes suitable for use in accordance with the present disclosure include peroxide-curing, sulfur-curing, high-energy radiation, and combinations thereof.
The golf balls of the present disclosure may be formed using a variety of application techniques. For example, the golf ball, golf ball core, or any layer of the golf ball may be formed using compression molding, flip molding, injection molding, retractable pin injection molding, reaction injection molding (RIM), liquid injection molding (LIM), casting, vacuum forming, powder coating, flow coating, spin coating, dipping, spraying, and the like. Conventionally, compression molding and injection molding are applied to thermoplastic materials, whereas RIM, liquid injection molding, and casting are employed on thermoset materials. In this aspect, cover layers may be formed over the core using any suitable technique that is associated with the material used to form the layer. Preferably, each cover layer is separately formed over the core. For example, an ethylene acid copolymer ionomer composition may be injection-molded to produce half-shells over the core. Alternatively, the ionomer composition can be placed into a compression mold and molded under sufficient pressure, temperature, and time to produce the hemispherical shells, which may then be placed around the core in a compression mold. An outer cover layer including a polyurethane or polyurea composition over the ball sub-assembly may be formed by using a casting process.
The rubber formulations discussed above are suitable for use in the core or one or more of the core layers if multiple core layers are present. It is also contemplated that the rubber formulations disclosed herein may be used to form one or more of the layers of any of the one, two, three, four, or five, or more-piece (layered) balls described above. That is, any of the core layers, intermediate layers, and/or cover layers may comprise the rubber formulation of this disclosure. The rubber formulations of different layers may be the same or different. In one example, each of the layers can include natural rubber, such as dandelion root rubber. In one example, only one of the layers can include natural rubber, such as dandelion root rubber. In one example, only an inner layer of the core includes dandelion root rubber. In one example, only an outer layer of the core includes dandelion root rubber. The diameter and thickness of the different layers along with properties such as hardness and compression may vary depending upon the construction and desired playing performance properties of the golf ball.
In one aspect, different materials may be used in the construction of the intermediate and cover layers of golf balls according to the present disclosure. For example, a variety of materials may be used for forming the outer cover including, for example, polyurethanes; polyureas; copolymers, blends and hybrids of polyurethane and polyurea; olefin-based copolymer ionomer resins; polyethylene, including, for example, low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, and high density polyethylene; polypropylene; rubber-toughened olefin polymers; acid copolymers, for example, poly(meth)acrylic acid, which do not become part of an ionomeric copolymer; plastomers; flexomers; styrene/butadiene/styrene block copolymers; styrene/ethylene-butylene/styrene block copolymers; dynamically vulcanized elastomers; copolymers of ethylene and vinyl acetates; copolymers of ethylene and methyl acrylates; polyvinyl chloride resins; polyamides, poly(amide-ester) elastomers, and graft copolymers of ionomer; cross-linked trans-polyisoprene and blends thereof; polyester-based thermoplastic elastomers; polyurethane-based thermoplastic elastomers; synthetic or natural vulcanized rubber; and combinations thereof.
In one embodiment, the cover is formed from a polyurethane, polyurea, or hybrid of polyurethane-polyurea. When used as cover layer materials, polyurethanes and polyureas can be thermoset or thermoplastic. Thermoset materials can be formed into golf ball layers by conventional casting or reaction injection molding techniques. Thermoplastic materials can be formed into golf ball layers by conventional compression or injection molding techniques.
Conventional and non-conventional materials may be used for forming intermediate layers of the ball including, for instance, ionomer resins, highly neutralized polymers, polybutadiene, butyl rubber, and other rubber-based core formulations, and the like. In one embodiment, the inner cover layer, i.e., the layer disposed between the core and the outer cover, includes an ionomer. In this aspect, ionomers suitable for use in accordance with the present disclosure may include partially neutralized ionomers and highly neutralized ionomers (HNPs), including ionomers formed from blends of two or more partially-neutralized ionomers, blends of two or more highly-neutralized ionomers, and blends of one or more partially-neutralized ionomers with one or more highly-neutralized ionomers. For purposes of the present disclosure, “HNP” refers to an acid copolymer after at least 70 percent of all acid groups present in the composition are neutralized.
Preferred ionomers are salts of O/X- and O/X/Y-type acid copolymers, wherein O is an α-olefin, X is a C3-C8 α, β-ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid, and Y is a softening monomer. O is preferably selected from ethylene and propylene. X is preferably selected from methacrylic acid, acrylic acid, ethacrylic acid, crotonic acid, and itaconic acid. Methacrylic acid and acrylic acid are particularly preferred. Y is preferably selected from (meth) acrylate and alkyl (meth) acrylates wherein the alkyl groups have from 1 to 8 carbon atoms, including, but not limited to, n-butyl (meth) acrylate, isobutyl (meth) acrylate, methyl (meth) acrylate, and ethyl (meth) acrylate.
Preferred O/X and O/X/Y-type copolymers include, without limitation, ethylene acid copolymers, such as ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/maleic anhydride, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/maleic acid mono-ester, ethylene/maleic acid, ethylene/maleic acid mono-ester, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/n-butyl (meth)acrylate, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/iso-butyl (meth)acrylate, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/methyl (meth)acrylate, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/ethyl (meth)acrylate terpolymers, and the like. The term, “copolymer,” as used herein, includes polymers having two types of monomers, those having three types of monomers, and those having more than three types of monomers. Preferred a, B-ethylenically unsaturated mono- or dicarboxylic acids are (meth) acrylic acid, ethacrylic acid, maleic acid, crotonic acid, fumaric acid, itaconic acid. (Meth) acrylic acid is most preferred. As used herein, “(meth) acrylic acid” means methacrylic acid and/or acrylic acid. Likewise, “(meth) acrylate” means methacrylate and/or acrylate.
In a particularly preferred version, highly neutralized E/X- and E/X/Y-type acid copolymers, wherein E is ethylene, X is a C3-C8 α, β-ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid, and Y is a softening monomer are used. X is preferably selected from methacrylic acid, acrylic acid, ethacrylic acid, crotonic acid, and itaconic acid. Methacrylic acid and acrylic acid are particularly preferred. Y is preferably an acrylate selected from alkyl acrylates and aryl acrylates and preferably selected from (meth) acrylate and alkyl (meth) acrylates wherein the alkyl groups have from 1 to 8 carbon atoms, including, but not limited to, n-butyl (meth) acrylate, isobutyl (meth) acrylate, methyl (meth) acrylate, and ethyl (meth) acrylate. Preferred E/X/Y-type copolymers are those wherein X is (meth) acrylic acid and/or Y is selected from (meth) acrylate, n-butyl (meth) acrylate, isobutyl (meth) acrylate, methyl (meth) acrylate, and ethyl (meth) acrylate. More preferred E/X/Y-type copolymers are ethylene/(meth) acrylic acid/n-butyl acrylate, ethylene/(meth) acrylic acid/methyl acrylate, and ethylene/(meth) acrylic acid/ethyl acrylate.
The amount of ethylene in the acid copolymer may be at least about 15 weight percent, at least about 25 weight percent, at least about 40 weight percent, or at least about 60 weight percent, based on total weight of the copolymer. The amount of C3 to C8 α, β-ethylenically unsaturated mono- or dicarboxylic acid in the acid copolymer is typically from 1 weight percent to 35 weight percent, from 5 weight percent to 30 weight percent, from 5 weight percent to 25 weight percent, or from 10 weight percent to 20 weight percent, based on total weight of the copolymer. The amount of optional softening comonomer in the acid copolymer may be from 0 weight percent to 50 weight percent, from 5 weight percent to 40 weight percent, from 10 weight percent to 35 weight percent, or from 20 weight percent to 30 weight percent, based on total weight of the copolymer.
The various O/X, E/X, O/X/Y, and E/X/Y-type copolymers are at least partially neutralized with a cation source, optionally in the presence of a high molecular weight organic acid, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,756,436, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. The acid copolymer can be reacted with the optional high molecular weight organic acid and the cation source simultaneously, or prior to the addition of the cation source. Suitable cation sources include, but are not limited to, metal ion sources, such as compounds of alkali metals, alkaline earth metals, transition metals, and rare earth elements; ammonium salts and monoamine salts; and combinations thereof. Preferred cation sources are compounds of magnesium, sodium, potassium, cesium, calcium, barium, manganese, copper, zinc, lead, tin, aluminum, nickel, chromium, lithium, and rare earth metals. The amount of cation used in the composition is readily determined based on desired level of neutralization. As discussed above, for HNP compositions, the acid groups are neutralized to 70 percent or greater, 70 to 100 percent, or 90 to 100 percent. In one embodiment, an excess amount of neutralizing agent, that is, an amount greater than the stoichiometric amount needed to neutralize the acid groups, may be used. That is, the acid groups may be neutralized to 100 percent or greater, for example 110 percent or 120 percent or greater. In other embodiments, partially neutralized compositions are prepared, wherein 10 percent or greater, normally 30 percent or greater of the acid groups are neutralized. When aluminum is used as the cation source, it is preferably used at low levels with another cation such as zinc, sodium, or lithium, since aluminum has a dramatic effect on melt flow reduction and cannot be used alone at high levels. For example, aluminum is used to neutralize about 10 percent of the acid groups and sodium is added to neutralize an additional 90 percent of the acid groups.
“Low acid” and “high acid” ionomeric polymers, as well as blends of such ionomers, may be used. In general, low acid ionomers are considered to be those containing 16 weight percent or less of acid moieties, whereas high acid ionomers are considered to be those containing greater than 16 weight percent of acid moieties. In one embodiment, the inner cover layer is formed from a composition comprising a high acid ionomer. A suitable high acid ionomer is Surlyn® 8150. (Dow), which is a copolymer of ethylene and methacrylic acid, having an acid content of 19 weight percent, 45 percent neutralized with sodium. In another embodiment, the inner cover layer is formed from a composition comprising a high acid ionomer and a maleic anhydride-grafted non-ionomeric polymer. An example of a suitable maleic anhydride-grafted polymer is Fusabond® 525D (Dow), which is a maleic anhydride-grafted, metallocene-catalyzed ethylene-butene copolymer having about 0.9 weight percent maleic anhydride grafted onto the copolymer. Blends of high acid ionomers with maleic anhydride-grafted polymers are further disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,992,135 and 6,677,401, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
When used to form an inner cover layer, the base polymer may include a composition comprising a 50/45/5 blend of Surlyn® 8940/Surlyn® 9650/Nucrel® 960. In this aspect, the composition may have a material hardness of from 80 to 85 Shore C. In another embodiment, the inner cover layer is formed from a composition comprising a 50/25/25 blend of Surlyn® 8940/Surlyn® 9650/Surlyn® 9910, having a material hardness of about 85 to 95 Shore C. In yet another embodiment, the inner cover layer is formed from a composition comprising a 50/50 blend of Surlyn® 8940/Surlyn® 9650, having a material hardness of about 82 to 90 Shore C. A composition comprising a 50/50 blend of Surlyn® 8940 and Surlyn® 7940 also may be used.
The compositions used to make the layers outside of the core, e.g., the outer cover layer and, when present, the inner cover layer, may contain a variety of fillers and additives to impart specific properties to the ball. For example, relatively heavy-weight and light-weight metal fillers such as, particulate; powders; flakes; and fibers of copper, steel, brass, tungsten, titanium, aluminum, magnesium, molybdenum, cobalt, nickel, iron, lead, tin, zinc, barium, bismuth, bronze, silver, gold, and platinum, and alloys and combinations thereof may be used to adjust the specific gravity of the ball. Other additives and fillers include, but are not limited to, optical brighteners, coloring agents, fluorescent agents, whitening agents, UV absorbers, light stabilizers, surfactants, processing aids, antioxidants, stabilizers, softening agents, fragrance components, plasticizers, impact modifiers, titanium dioxide, clay, mica, talc, glass flakes, milled glass, and mixtures thereof.
Golf balls made in accordance with the present disclosure may be subjected to finishing steps such as flash-trimming, surface-treatment, marking, coating, and the like using techniques known in the art. In one embodiment, a white-pigmented cover may be surface-treated using a suitable method such as, for example, corona, plasma, or ultraviolet (UV) light-treatment. Indicia such as trademarks, symbols, logos, letters, and the like may be printed on the cover using pad-printing, ink-jet printing, dye-sublimation, or other suitable printing methods. Clear surface coatings (for example, primer and topcoats), which may contain a fluorescent whitening agent, may be applied to the cover. Golf balls may also be painted with one or more paint coatings in a variety of colors. In one embodiment, white primer paint is applied first to the surface of the ball and then a white top-coat of paint may be applied over the primer.
Golf balls having various constructions may be made in accordance with the present disclosure. For example, golf balls having one-piece, two-piece, three-piece, four-piece, and five or more piece constructions with the term “piece” referring to any core, cover, or intermediate layer of a golf ball construction. Representative illustrations of such golf ball constructions are provided and discussed further below. The term, “layer” as used herein means generally any spherical portion of the golf ball.
In one embodiment, a golf ball of the present disclosure is a one-piece ball where the core and cover form a single integral layer. In another version, shown in
As shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Any one or more of the layers shown in
The hardness of the geometric center of the core may be obtained according to the following: the core is first gently pressed into a hemispherical holder having an internal diameter approximately slightly smaller than the diameter of the core, such that the core is held in place in the hemispherical portion of the holder while concurrently leaving the geometric central plane of the center exposed. The core is secured in the holder by friction, such that it will not move during the cutting and grinding steps, but the friction is not so excessive that distortion of the natural shape of the core would result. The core is secured such that the parting line of the center is roughly parallel to the top of the holder. The diameter of the center is measured 90 degrees to this orientation prior to securing. A measurement is also made from the bottom of the holder to the top of the core to provide a reference point for future calculations. A rough cut is made slightly above the exposed geometric center of the core using a band saw or other appropriate cutting tool, making sure that the core does not move in the holder during this step. The remainder of the core, still in the holder, is secured to the base plate of a surface grinding machine. The exposed ‘rough’ surface is ground to a smooth, flat surface, revealing the geometric center of the core, which can be verified by measuring the height from the bottom of the holder to the exposed surface of the core, making sure that exactly half of the original height of the core, as measured above, has been removed to within 0.004 inches. Leaving the core in the holder, the geometric center of the core is confirmed with a center square and carefully marked, and the hardness is measured at the center mark according to ASTM D-2240.
Additional hardness measurements at any distance from the geometric center of the core can then be made by drawing a line radially outward from the geometric center mark and measuring the hardness at any given distance along the line, typically in 2 mm increments from the center of the core. The hardness at a particular distance from the geometric center should be measured along at least two, preferably four, radial arms located 180° apart, or 90° apart, respectively, and then averaged. All hardness measurements performed on a plane passing through the geometric center are performed while the core is still in the holder and without having disturbed its orientation, such that the test surface is constantly parallel to the bottom of the holder, and thus also parallel to the properly aligned foot of the durometer.
The outer surface hardness of the core (or any golf ball layer) is measured on the actual outer surface of the layer and is obtained from the average of a number of measurements taken from opposing hemispheres, taking care to avoid making measurements on the parting line of the core or on surface defects, such as holes or protrusions and preferably making the measurements prior to surrounding the layer of interest with an additional layer. Hardness measurements are made pursuant to ASTM D-2240 “Indentation Hardness of Rubber and Plastic by Means of a Durometer.” Because of the curved surface, care must be taken to ensure that the golf ball or golf ball sub-assembly is centered under the durometer indenter before a surface hardness reading is obtained. A calibrated, digital durometer, capable of reading to 0.1 hardness units is used for the hardness measurements. The digital durometer must be attached to, and its foot made parallel to, the base of an automatic stand. The weight on the durometer and attack rate conforms to ASTM D-2240. It is worthwhile to note that, once an additional layer surrounds a layer of interest, the hardness of the layer of interest can be difficult to determine. Therefore, for purposes of the present disclosure, when the hardness of a layer is needed after the inner layer has been surrounded with another layer, the test procedure for measuring a point located 1 mm from an interface is used.
It should also be noted that there is a fundamental difference between “material hardness” and “hardness as measured directly on a golf ball” (or, as used herein, “surface hardness”). For purposes of the present disclosure, material hardness is measured according to ASTM D2240 and generally involves measuring the hardness of a flat “slab” or “button” formed of the material. Surface hardness as measured directly on a golf ball (or other spherical surface) typically results in a different hardness value. The difference in “surface hardness” and “material hardness” values is due to several factors including, but not limited to, ball construction (that is, core type, number of layers, and the like); ball (or ball sub-assembly) diameter; and the material composition of adjacent layers. It also should be understood that the two measurement techniques are not linearly related and, therefore, one hardness value cannot easily be correlated to the other. Shore hardness (for example, Shore C or Shore D hardness) was measured according to the test method ASTM D-2240.
A golf ball core made from the rubber formulation of the present disclosure may have a hardness at the geometric center of the core, referred to herein as HC, that ranges from about 40 to about 90 Shore C. In one embodiment, the core has a hardness at its geometric center of about 45 to about 65 Shore C or about 48 to about 58 Shore C or about 49 to about 52 Shore C. In another embodiment, the core has a hardness at its geometric center of about 55 to about 75 Shore C or about 60 to about 66 Shore C or about 68 to about 74 Shore C. In yet another embodiment, the core has a hardness at its geometric center of about 65 to about 85 Shore C or about 66 to about 74 Shore C or about 77 to about 84 Shore C.
The hardness at the surface of the core, referred to herein as HS, may range from about 60 to about 95 Shore C. In one embodiment, the hardness at the surface of the core is about 70 to about 95 Shore C or about 72 to about 82 Shore C or about 85 to about 95 Shore C or about 87 to about 93 Shore C. In another embodiment, the hardness at the surface of the core is about 65 to about 95 Shore C or about 73 to about 93 Shore C or about 74 to about 84 Shore C. In yet another embodiment, the hardness at the surface of the core is about 72 to about 95 Shore C or about 77 to about 85 Shore C or about 88 to about 94 Shore C. In yet another embodiment, the hardness at the surface of the core is about 60 Shore C to about 120 Shore C.
The direction of the hardness gradient is defined by the difference in hardness measurements taken at the geometric center and outer surfaces of the core. The geometric center hardness is readily determined according to the test procedures provided above. For example, the hardness of the outer surface of the core is also readily determined according to the procedures given herein for measuring the outer surface hardness of a golf ball layer, if the measurement is made prior to surrounding the core with additional layers.
While the hardness gradient across the core will vary based on several factors including, but not limited to, the dimensions and formulations of the components, the core of the present disclosure has a “positive” hardness gradient (that is, the geometric center is softer than the outer surface of the core). More particularly, the term, “positive hardness gradient” as used herein means a hardness gradient of positive about 2 Shore C or greater, about 4 Shore C or greater, about 6 Shore C or greater, about 8 Shore C or greater, or about 10 Shore C or greater. In general, the hardness gradient may be determined by subtracting the hardness value of one component being measured (for example, the geometric center of the core, HC) from the hardness value of another component being measured (for example, the outer surface of the core, HS).
The core of the present disclosure has a positive hardness gradient. In one embodiment, the core has a positive hardness gradient from the geometric center to the surface of the core of about 2 Shore C to 42 Shore C. In this aspect, the positive hardness gradient of the core is about 5 Shore C to about 40 Shore C. The rubber formulation of the core may be tailored to produce a desired hardness gradient in the core. In some embodiments, the positive hardness gradient of the core is about 30 to about 42 Shore C or about 34 Shore C to 41 Shore C or about 37 Shore C to about 40 Shore C. In other embodiments, the positive hardness gradient of the core is about 3 Shore C to about 25 Shore C or about 10 Shore C to about 23 Shore C, or about 11 Shore C to about 17 Shore C. In further embodiments, the positive hardness gradient of the core may be about 2 Shore C to about 40 Shore C or about 7 Shore C to about 12 Shore C or about 8 Shore C to 11 Shore C. In yet further embodiments, the positive hardness gradient of the core may be about 1 Shore C to about 40 Shore C.
The hardness of the core may not increase linearly from the center of the core to the outer surface of the core. For example, one or more regions within the core may have a “zero” hardness gradient, i.e., the hardness values across the region are substantially the same. The term, “zero hardness gradient” as used herein means a hardness gradient of −2 Shore C to 2 Shore C, preferably between about −1 Shore C and about 1 Shore C and may have a value of zero. In some embodiments, one or more regions of the core may also have a “negative” hardness gradient, i.e., the hardness values across the region may decrease from the inner edge of the region to the outer edge of the region.
For example, the core, or a layer of the core if the core has multiple layers, may be characterized by three regions: an inner region, an intermediate region, and an outer region. Each of the inner region, intermediate region, and outer region may have its own hardness gradient. For a single-layer core, the inner region is the region of the core surrounding the center of the core and is characterized by positive hardness gradient of about 2 Shore C to about 25 Shore C. In some embodiments, the positive hardness gradient of the inner region of the core is about 6 Shore C to about 25 Shore C or about 16 Shore C to about 23 Shore C. In other embodiments, the positive hardness gradient of the inner region of the core is about 1 Shore C to about 13 Shore C or about 6 Shore C to about 11 Shore C. In further embodiments, the positive hardness gradient of the inner region of the core is about 5 Shore C to about 9 Shore C or about 6 Shore C to about 8 Shore C.
The outer region of the core is the region of the core adjacent the surface of the core and may be characterized by a zero or positive hardness gradient from about −2 Shore C to about 28 Shore C. In some embodiments, the outer region may have a positive hardness gradient from 2 Shore C to about 27 Shore C or about 16 Shore C to about 27 Shore C or about 17 Shore C to about 22 Shore C. In other embodiments, the outer region may have a zero or positive hardness gradient from −2 Shore C to about 16 Shore C or about 2 Shore C to about 6 Shore C or about 10 Shore C to about 15 Shore C. In further embodiments, the outer region may have a zero or positive hardness gradient from −2 Shore C to about 14 Shore C or about 1 Shore C to about 8 Shore C or about 2 Shore C to about 6 Shore C.
The intermediate region of the core is the region of the core between the inner region and the outer region and may be characterized by a negative, zero, or positive hardness gradient from about −10 to 8 Shore C. In some embodiments, the intermediate region may have a negative, zero, or positive hardness gradient from −7 to about 6 Shore C or about −6 to about 1 Shore C. In other embodiments, the intermediate region may have a positive hardness gradient from −7 to about 4 Shore C or about −2 to about 4 Shore C. In further embodiments, the intermediate region may have a negative or zero hardness gradient from −10 to about 0 Shore C or about −4 Shore C to about 0 Shore C.
In some embodiments, a point or plurality of points measured along a “positive” gradient may be above or below a line fit through the gradient and its outermost and innermost hardness values. In an alternative embodiment, the hardest point along a particular steep “positive” gradient may be higher than the value at the innermost portion of the center (the geometric center) or outer surface of the core—as long as the outermost point (i.e., the outer surface of the core) is greater than the innermost point (i.e., the geometric center of the core), such that the “positive” gradients remain intact.
Several different methods can be used to measure compression, including Atti compression, Riehle compression, load/deflection measurements at a variety of fixed loads and offsets, and effective modulus (see, e.g., Compression by Any Other Name, Science and Golf IV, Proceedings of the World Scientific Congress of Golf (Eric Thain ed., Routledge, 2002) (J. Dalton)). For purposes of the present disclosure, compression values are provided as measured by the Dynamic Compression Machine (“DCM”) as well as the Soft Center Deflection Index (“SCDI”). The DCM applies a load to a ball component or a ball and measures the number of inches the core or ball is deflected at measured loads. A crude load/deflection curve is generated that is fit to the Atti compression scale that results in a number being generated that represents an Atti compression. The DCM does this via a load cell attached to the bottom of a hydraulic cylinder that is triggered pneumatically at a fixed rate (typically about 1.0 ft/s) towards a stationary core. Attached to the cylinder is an LVDT that measures the distance the cylinder travels during the testing timeframe. A software-based logarithmic algorithm ensures that measurements are not taken until at least five successive increases in load are detected during the initial phase of the test.
The SCDI is a slight variation of the DCM set up that allows determination of the pounds required to deflect a component or ball 10 percent of its diameter. With the SCDI, the goal is to obtain the pounds of force required to deflect a component or ball a certain number of inches. That amount of deflection is 10 percent of the component or ball diameter. The DCM is triggered, the cylinder deflects the component or ball by 10 percent of its diameter, and the DCM reports back the pounds of force required (as measured from the attached load cell) to deflect the component or ball by that amount. The SCDI value obtained is a single number in units of pounds.
The compression of a core made from the rubber formulation of the present disclosure may range from about 20 to about 120 DCM or more preferably about 50 to about 120 DCM. For example, the core compression may be about 50 to about 85 DCM or about 60 to 80 DCM or about 65 to about 75 DCM. In another example, the core compression may range from about 50 to about 100 DCM or about 55 to about 65 DCM or about 80 to 100 DCM. In another example, the core compression may range from about 50 DCM to about 95 DCM. In yet another example, the core compression is about 60 to about 120 DCM or about 110 to about 120 DCM or about 60 to about 80 DCM or about 71 to about 79 DCM. In some embodiments, it may be desirable for a core comprising the rubber formulation of the present disclosure to have a compression from about 68 to about 75 DCM or from about 70 to about 74 DCM regardless of the hardening agent used.
The diameter of the core may vary. In some embodiments, the core diameter may range from about 1.50 to about 1.58 inches. For example, the core may have a diameter of 1.53 to 1.56 inches. In some embodiments, the core diameter may range from about 1.20 to about 1.60 inches. In some embodiments, the core diameter may range from about 1.45 to about 1.62 inches. In some embodiments, the core diameter may range from about 1.50 to about 1.60 inches. In embodiments where the core comprises two or more layers, the diameter of the inner layer of the core may range from about 1.0 to about 1.4 inches or from about 1.0 to about 1.2 inches. In further embodiments where the core comprises two or more layers, the diameter of the inner layer of the core may range from about 1.0 to about 1.5 inches, or from about 1.1 to about 1.4 inches, or from about 1.30 to about 1.55 inches.
The golf ball cores of the present disclosure can be tailored to have a desired or targeted coefficient of restitution (CoR) value. In one example, it may be desirable to have a golf ball core with a relatively high CoR value. In one example, the CoR of the golf ball cores formed according to the present disclosure at 125 ft/s is about 0.740 or greater. In another example, the CoR of the golf ball core according to the present disclosure at 125 ft/s is about 0.860 or greater. In another example, the CoR of the golf ball core according to the present disclosure at 125 ft/s is about 0.820 or greater. One of ordinary skill in the art would understand based on the present disclosure that these CoR values can vary.
Compositions for various golf balls or golf ball cores are disclosed herein. Some of the compositions can include a base rubber, which can include a synthetic rubber and a natural rubber, such as dandelion root rubber. Additionally, a co-agent, at least one filler, a radical scavenger, and/or an initiator can be included. One of ordinary skill in the art would understand that other additives can also be used.
In one aspect, a golf ball comprising a core and a cover disposed about the core is disclosed herein. The core comprises at least one first layer comprised of a first rubber composition comprising a mixture of synthetic rubber and natural rubber. The first rubber composition can be a blend of various types of synthetic and/or natural rubbers. The natural rubber can be dandelion root rubber.
In one aspect, the at least one first layer is formed as an inner core portion, and the core further comprises at least one second layer formed as an outer core portion surrounding the inner core portion and having a second rubber composition. One of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the core can be comprised of a single or solid layer, or a plurality of layers.
The second rubber composition can be formed from a synthetic rubber and at least one of styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) or ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) rubber.
The at least one first layer can be formed as an outer core portion, and the core can further comprise at least one second layer formed as an inner core portion that is surrounded by the outer core portion and has a second rubber composition. The second rubber composition can comprise the synthetic rubber. The first rubber composition can further comprise at least one of SBR or EPDM.
The at least one first layer can be formed as an outer core portion, and the core can further comprise at least one second layer formed as an inner core portion and having a second rubber composition. The second rubber composition can be comprised of the synthetic rubber and the natural rubber.
The first rubber composition and the second rubber composition can have different concentrations of the synthetic rubber and the natural rubber.
The synthetic rubber can be comprised of polybutadiene. In one example, the synthetic rubber is comprised of a high-cis polybutadiene.
The first rubber composition can further comprise: a concentration of 1-20 phr of the natural rubber, and a concentration of 80-99 phr of the synthetic rubber. The first rubber composition can further comprise a concentration of at least 5 phr of the natural rubber. The first rubber composition can be comprised of a concentration of 1-10 phr EPDM, in one example. In another example, the concentration of EPDM is 5-15 phr for the first rubber composition. In one example, the first rubber composition is comprised of a concentration of 1-10 phr SBR. The first rubber composition can further comprise a concentration of no greater than 10 phr of the natural rubber.
In another aspect, a golf ball comprising a core and a cover disposed about the core is disclosed herein. The core further comprises at least one first layer comprised of a first rubber composition comprising: a synthetic rubber comprising butadiene rubber and a natural rubber comprising dandelion root rubber. The first rubber composition can comprise a concentration of 1-20 phr of the natural rubber, and a concentration of 80-99 phr of the synthetic rubber. The cover can be formed from ionomer, thermoplastic polyurethane, or any other polymer. The cover can be formed as a cast layer.
A method of forming a golf ball core is also disclosed herein. The method comprises forming at least one first layer of the golf ball core from a first rubber composition comprised of both a synthetic rubber and a natural rubber. The natural rubber can consist only of dandelion root rubber.
The first rubber composition can be comprised of a concentration of 1-20 phr of the natural rubber, and a concentration of 80-99 phr of the synthetic rubber. The at least one first layer can be formed as an inner core portion, and the method can further comprise: forming at least one second layer as an outer core portion and having a second rubber composition. The second rubber composition can comprise the synthetic rubber and at least one of SBR or EPDM.
The at least one first layer can be formed as an outer core portion, and the method can further comprise forming at least one second layer formed as an inner core portion and having a second rubber composition. The second rubber composition can comprise the synthetic rubber.
The first rubber composition can further comprise at least one of SBR or EPDM.
The at least one first layer can be formed as an outer core portion, and the method can further comprise forming at least one second layer formed as an inner core portion and having a second rubber composition. The second rubber composition can comprise a mixture of the synthetic rubber and the natural rubber.
The following examples describe compositions of golf ball cores having a single layer (solid sphere) or the inner core of a dual-layer core made from rubber formulations in accordance with the present disclosure. The rubber formulations below include a base rubber comprised of polybutadiene rubber and in some embodiments, EPDM; SBR; ZnO; ZnPCTP; barium sulfate; peroxide; and/or ZDA. The compositions of the cores are described in Table 1 below. The compositions listed below are listed in phr. Barium sulfate, or any other known filler, can be added to each of the compositions below based on a particular weight for specific gravity.
One of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the values for the components or materials listed above in Table 1 can vary depending on the desired characteristics of the golf ball core. Exemplary values for dandelion root rubber of 5 phr and 10 phr are provided in Table 1, however one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that these values can vary and can be 1 phr-50 phr in another example. In another example, the dandelion root rubber can comprise 0.1 phr-99.9 phr. In another example, the dandelion root rubber can comprise less than half of the rubber composition. In another example, the dandelion root rubber can comprise more than half of the rubber composition.
Polybutadiene rubber and EPDM are listed in Table 1, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand based on this disclosure that other rubbers could be used, including other synthetic and natural rubbers. For example, other suitable rubbers include, for example, polyisoprene, EPR, EPDM rubber, grafted EPDM rubber, styrene-butadiene rubber, styrenic block copolymer rubbers (such as “SI”, “SIS”, “SB”, “SBS”, “SIBS”, and the like, where “S” is styrene, “I” is isobutylene, and “B” is butadiene), polyalkenamers such as, for example, polyoctenamer, butyl rubber, halobutyl rubber, polystyrene elastomers, polyethylene elastomers, polyurethane elastomers, polyurea elastomers, metallocene-catalyzed elastomers and plastomers, copolymers of isobutylene and p-alkylstyrene, halogenated copolymers of isobutylene and p-alkylstyrene, copolymers of butadiene with acrylonitrile, polychloroprene, alkyl acrylate rubber, chlorinated isoprene rubber, acrylonitrile chlorinated isoprene rubber, and combinations of two or more thereof.
ZnO is listed in Table 1, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand based on the present disclosure that other types of fillers could also be used. Other suitable fillers include, for example, tungsten, barium sulfate, silica, calcium carbonate, zinc carbonate, metals, metal oxides and salts, regrind, high-Mooney-viscosity rubber regrind, trans-regrind core material, and the like.
Although ZDA is listed in Table 1, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand based on the present disclosure that other types of co-agents could also be used. Other exemplary co-agents can include metal salts of diacrylates, dimethacrylates, and monomethacrylates, wherein the metal is zinc, magnesium, calcium, barium, tin, aluminum, lithium, sodium, potassium, iron, zirconium, and/or bismuth.
ZnPCTP is listed in Table 1, but one of ordinary skill in the art would understand based on the present disclosure that various other radical scavengers, fast and soft agents, or additives could also be used. For example, other suitable fast and soft agents can include other forms of PCTP, ditolyl disulfide, diphenyl disulfide, dixylyl disulfide, 2-nitroresorcinol, and combinations thereof.
Exemplary golf ball formulations are further disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,205,308, 9,259,621, and 7,988,570, which are each commonly assigned to Acushnet Company and which are each incorporated in their entirety as if fully set forth herein.
One of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate from the present disclosure that various layers of the golf ball sub-assembly can be formed with a natural rubber component (i.e., dandelion root rubber) integrated into a base rubber. The natural rubber can be included in an innermost, medial, and/or outermost layer of a multi-layer core sub-assembly. The dandelion root rubber can be included in any other portion or layer of the golf ball.
Based on the present disclosure, a golf ball core or golf ball is provided that can exhibit improved moisture protection due to the incorporation of the dandelion root rubber. As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,147 and US Patent Pub. 2003/0069085, which are commonly assigned to Acushnet Company and are each incorporated in their entirety as if fully set forth herein, preferred standards of measuring the moisture vapor transmission rate include ASTM F1249-90 entitled “Standard Test Method for Water Vapor Transmission Rate Through Plastic Film and Sheeting Using a Modulated Infrared Sensor,” and ASTM F372-99 entitled “Standard Test Method for Water Vapor Transmission Rate of Flexible Barrier Materials Using an Infrared Detection Technique,” among others. In one aspect, the inclusion of dandelion root rubber results in a layer or portion of the golf ball having a lower moisture vapor transmission rate than other layers, such as the cover. The composition including dandelion root rubber can have a moisture vapor transmission rate that is less than 0.45 grams*mm/m2*day. In another aspect, the composition including dandelion root rubber can have a moisture vapor transmission rate that is less than 0.95 grams*mm/m2*day.
In another aspect, the present disclosure can also provide a solution for golf ball compositions such that the golf balls exhibit reduced distance due to the incorporation of the dandelion root rubber while performing similar to traditional high performance golf balls in other ways. The golf ball compositions disclosed herein can performed similarly to other traditional high performance golf balls, such as regarding flight trajectory, spin rate, and feel, except golf ball composition disclosed herein can provide a shorter distance than traditional high performance golf balls. In yet another aspect, the golf ball compositions disclosed herein that include dandelion root rubber can exhibit increased durability as compared to traditional high performance golf balls that lack any dandelion root rubber.
The terms “about” and “approximately” shall generally mean an acceptable degree of error or variation for the quantity measured given the nature or precision of the measurements. Numerical quantities given in this description are approximate unless stated otherwise, meaning that the term “about” or “approximately” can be inferred when not expressly stated.
The terms “first,” “second,” and the like are used to describe various features or elements, but these features or elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one feature or element from another feature or element. Thus, a first feature or element discussed below could be termed a second feature or element, and similarly, a second feature or element discussed below could be termed a first feature or element without departing from the teachings of the disclosure.
The golf balls described and claimed herein are not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments herein disclosed, since these embodiments are intended as illustrations of several aspects of the disclosure. Any equivalent embodiments are intended to be within the scope of this disclosure. Indeed, various modifications of the device in addition to those shown and described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims. All patents and patent applications cited in the foregoing text are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
