Not Applicable
The present invention relates to golf balls. Particularly to golf balls with internal electronics.
Most patents that have been filed looking at communicating between a ball and a device involve only trying to find the golf ball using RFID type circuitry. Most of the designs will only be successful in getting a user close to the position of the golf ball.
In regards to the spin measurement, most spin measurement devices use Doppler technology to measure the ball as it spins, this method produces inconsistent results that have aliasing issues at times.
One aspect of the present invention is a golf ball comprising an epoxy sphere, a core layer and a cover layer. The epoxy sphere comprises a body and an electronic component. The electronic component comprises a plurality of stacked circuit boards and at least one battery disposed within the plurality of stacked circuit boards. The body is composed of an epoxy material. The body encompasses the electronic component. The core layer is disposed on the epoxy sphere. The cover layer is disposed over the core layer.
Another aspect of the present invention is a golf ball comprising an epoxy sphere, a core layer, a mantle layer and a cover. The epoxy sphere comprises a body and an electronic component. The electronic component comprises a plurality of stacked circuit boards and at least one battery disposed within the plurality of stacked circuit boards. The body is composed of an epoxy material and encompasses the electronic component. The core layer is disposed on the epoxy sphere, and comprises a polybutadiene and a graphene material in an amount ranging from 0.1 to 5.0 weight percent of the outer core. The outer core has a flexural modulus ranging from 80 MPa to 95 MPa.
This new design preferably uses a triangulation method to guide a player to a very close region around the golf ball.
By placing a magnetometer in the ball, the exact spin values are recorded (up to 5000 RPM).
The golf ball preferably creates a compact design due to the circuit board composed of a flexible material, such that the circuit board is wrapped around the batteries.
Another important aspect of the present invention is that the circuit board attaches directly to the battery using three contact points: one positive pad and two negative contacts, including the actual crystal cover.
Having briefly described the present invention, the above and further objects, features and advantages thereof will be recognized by those skilled in the pertinent art from the following detailed description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The two main advantages to the consumer will be a golf ball that records spin and a golf ball that can be easily found.
A magnetometer, preferably running at 85 Hz, inside a golf ball is able to measure spins of 5000 RPM. Measuring higher spin rates is also possible.
The entire circuitry is preferably inside a hard plastic molded sphere.
Data is transferred via BLE radio to a mobile device (in this case a phone).
The circuitry inside the ball preferably activates at impact using a shock switch for power savings. At rest, after the shot, the ball keeps sending the data and going back to sleep mode every second until the user finds it using the mobile device and acknowledges it in the application.
A golf ball is found using triangulation of the RSSI from the golf ball to the mobile device. The user will be instructed to move forward and to the side to generate enough space for the triangulation.
Internal circuitry is embedded within the golf ball. The internal circuitry comprises at least a BLUETOOTH Low Energy radio (5th generation), a processor, a magnetometer, an accelerometer, and a battery. The internal circuit may also have a memory. A KIONIX chip is preferred. The 5th generation BLUETOOTH Low Energy radio has a range of at least 700 meters. Triangulation is used to find a golf ball on course. The battery is preferably a 2032 coin cell. A NF52 Nordic processor is preferably utilized. A KIONIX 3-axis accelerometer is preferably utilized.
As shown in
One embodiment is a golf ball 10 comprising an epoxy sphere 112a, a core layer and a cover layer. The epoxy sphere 112a comprises a body and at least one electrical component 125. The electrical component preferably comprises a plurality of stacked circuit boards and at least one battery 130 disposed within the plurality of stacked circuit boards. The body is preferably composed of an epoxy material. The body encompasses the electrical component. The core layer is disposed on the epoxy sphere. The cover layer is disposed over the core layer.
The core layer preferably comprises polybutadiene material and a graphene material in an amount ranging from 0.1 to 5.0 weight percent of the outer core, wherein the outer core has a flexural modulus ranging from 80 MPa to 95 MPa.
The plurality of stacked circuit boards preferably comprises an integrated circuit, a gyroscope, a magnetometer, and an antenna.
The electrical component preferably has a width ranging from 5 to 20 mm, a height ranging from 5-20 mm and a length ranging from 5-20 mm.
The epoxy sphere preferably has a diameter ranging from 0.4 inch to 0.9 inch, and more preferably a diameter ranging from 0.45 inch to 0.6 inch.
The integrated circuit is preferably flexible and is wrapped around the at least one battery.
The integrated circuit is attached to the at least on battery at three contact points.
The electrical component is preferably centered within the epoxy sphere.
The integrated circuit comprises a BLUETOOTH antenna, a 1 GigaHertz antenna, a microcontroller and a radiofrequency transceiver.
The integrated circuit preferably comprises a plurality of capacitors and at least one inductor.
The electrical component is preferably detects a spin of the golf ball and transmits a signal to a mobile device.
The mantle component is preferably composed of the inner mantle layer and the outer mantle layer. The mantle component preferably has a thickness ranging from 0.05 inch to 0.15 inch, and more preferably from 0.06 inch to 0.08 inch. The outer mantle layer is preferably composed of a blend of ionomer materials. One preferred embodiment comprises SURLYN 9150 material, SURLYN 8940 material, a SURLYN AD1022 material, and a masterbatch. The SURLYN 9150 material is preferably present in an amount ranging from 20 to 45 weight percent of the cover, and more preferably 30 to 40 weight percent. The SURLYN 8945 is preferably present in an amount ranging from 15 to 35 weight percent of the cover, more preferably 20 to 30 weight percent, and most preferably 26 weight percent. The SURLYN 9945 is preferably present in an amount ranging from 30 to 50 weight percent of the cover, more preferably 35 to 45 weight percent, and most preferably 41 weight percent. The SURLYN 8940 is preferably present in an amount ranging from 5 to 15 weight percent of the cover, more preferably 7 to 12 weight percent, and most preferably 10 weight percent.
SURLYN 8320, from DuPont, is a very-low modulus ethylene/methacrylic acid copolymer with partial neutralization of the acid groups with sodium ions. SURLYN 8945, also from DuPont, is a high acid ethylene/methacrylic acid copolymer with partial neutralization of the acid groups with sodium ions. SURLYN 9945, also from DuPont, is a high acid ethylene/methacrylic acid copolymer with partial neutralization of the acid groups with zinc ions. SURLYN 8940, also from DuPont, is an ethylene/methacrylic acid copolymer with partial neutralization of the acid groups with sodium ions.
The inner mantle layer is preferably composed of a blend of ionomers, preferably comprising a terpolymer and at least two high acid (greater than 18 weight percent) ionomers neutralized with sodium, zinc, magnesium, or other metal ions. The material for the inner mantle layer preferably has a Shore D plaque hardness ranging preferably from 35 to 77, more preferably from 36 to 44, a most preferably approximately 40. The thickness of the outer mantle layer preferably ranges from 0.025 inch to 0.050 inch, and is more preferably approximately 0.037 inch. The mass of an insert including the dual core and the inner mantle layer preferably ranges from 32 grams to 40 grams, more preferably from 34 to 38 grams, and is most preferably approximately 36 grams. The inner mantle layer is alternatively composed of a HPF material available from DuPont. Alternatively, the inner mantle layer 14b is composed of a material such as disclosed in Kennedy, III et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,361,101 for a Golf Ball And Thermoplastic Material, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The outer mantle layer is preferably composed of a blend of ionomers, preferably comprising at least two high acid (greater than 18 weight percent) ionomers neutralized with sodium, zinc, or other metal ions. The blend of ionomers also preferably includes a masterbatch. The material of the outer mantle layer preferably has a Shore D plaque hardness ranging preferably from 55 to 75, more preferably from 65 to 71, and most preferably approximately 67. The thickness of the outer mantle layer preferably ranges from 0.025 inch to 0.040 inch, and is more preferably approximately 0.030 inch. The mass of the entire insert including the core, the inner mantle layer and the outer mantle layer preferably ranges from 38 grams to 43 grams, more preferably from 39 to 41 grams, and is most preferably approximately 41 grams.
In an alternative embodiment, the inner mantle layer is preferably composed of a blend of ionomers, preferably comprising at least two high acid (greater than 18 weight percent) ionomers neutralized with sodium, zinc, or other metal ions. The blend of ionomers also preferably includes a masterbatch. In this embodiment, the material of the inner mantle layer has a Shore D plaque hardness ranging preferably from 55 to 75, more preferably from 65 to 71, and most preferably approximately 67. The thickness of the outer mantle layer preferably ranges from 0.025 inch to 0.040 inch, and is more preferably approximately 0.030 inch. Also in this embodiment, the outer mantle layer 14b is composed of a blend of ionomers, preferably comprising a terpolymer and at least two high acid (greater than 18 weight percent) ionomers neutralized with sodium, zinc, magnesium, or other metal ions. In this embodiment, the material for the outer mantle layer 14b preferably has a Shore D plaque hardness ranging preferably from 35 to 77, more preferably from 36 to 44, a most preferably approximately 40. The thickness of the outer mantle layer preferably ranges from 0.025 inch to 0.100 inch, and more preferably ranges from 0.070 inch to 0.090 inch.
In yet another embodiment wherein the inner mantle layer is thicker than the outer mantle layer and the outer mantle layer is harder than the inner mantle layer, the inner mantle layer is composed of a blend of ionomers, preferably comprising a terpolymer and at least two high acid (greater than 18 weight percent) ionomers neutralized with sodium, zinc, magnesium, or other metal ions. In this embodiment, the material for the inner mantle layer has a Shore D plaque hardness ranging preferably from 30 to 77, more preferably from 30 to 50, and most preferably approximately 40. In this embodiment, the material for the outer mantle layer has a Shore D plaque hardness ranging preferably from 40 to 77, more preferably from 50 to 71, and most preferably approximately 67. In this embodiment, the thickness of the inner mantle layer preferably ranges from 0.030 inch to 0.090 inch, and the thickness of the outer mantle layer ranges from 0.025 inch to 0.070 inch.
Preferably the inner core has a diameter ranging from 0.75 inch to 1.20 inches, more preferably from 0.85 inch to 1.05 inch, and most preferably approximately 0.95 inch. Preferably the inner core 12a has a Shore D hardness ranging from 20 to 50, more preferably from 25 to 40, and most preferably approximately 35. Preferably the inner core is formed from a polybutadiene, zinc diacrylate, zinc oxide, zinc stearate, a peptizer and peroxide. Preferably the inner core has a mass ranging from 5 grams to 15 grams, 7 grams to 10 grams and most preferably approximately 8 grams.
Preferably the outer core has a diameter ranging from 1.25 inch to 1.55 inches, more preferably from 1.40 inch to 1.5 inch, and most preferably approximately 1.5 inch. Preferably the inner core has a Shore D surface hardness ranging from 40 to 65, more preferably from 50 to 60, and most preferably approximately 56. Preferably the inner core is formed from a polybutadiene, zinc diacrylate, zinc oxide, zinc stearate, a peptizer and peroxide. Preferably the combined inner core and outer core have a mass ranging from 25 grams to 35 grams, 30 grams to 34 grams and most preferably approximately 32 grams.
Preferably the inner core has a deflection of at least 0.230 inch under a load of 220 pounds, and the core has a deflection of at least 0.080 inch under a load of 200 pounds. As shown in
In an alternative embodiment of the golf ball shown in
In one embodiment, the golf ball comprises a core, a mantle layer and a cover layer. The core comprises an inner core sphere, an intermediate core layer and an outer core layer. The inner core sphere comprises a polybutadiene material and has a diameter ranging from 0.875 inch to 1.4 inches. The intermediate core layer is composed of a highly neutralized ionomer and has a Shore D hardness less than 40. The outer core layer is composed of a highly neutralized ionomer and has a Shore D hardness less than 45. A thickness of the intermediate core layer is greater than a thickness of the outer core layer. The mantle layer is disposed over the core, comprises an ionomer material and has a Shore D hardness greater than 55. The cover layer is disposed over the mantle layer comprises a sprayed polyurea with a thickness ranging from 0.010 inch to 0.040 inch. The golf ball has a diameter of at least 1.68 inches. The mantle layer is harder than the outer core layer, the outer core layer is harder than the intermediate core layer, the intermediate core layer is harder than the inner core sphere, and the cover layer is softer than the mantle layer.
In another embodiment, shown in
In a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the golf ball preferably has an aerodynamic pattern such as disclosed in Simonds et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,419,443 for a Low Volume Cover For A Golf Ball, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Alternatively, the golf ball has an aerodynamic pattern such as disclosed in Simonds et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,338,392 for An Aerodynamic Surface Geometry For A Golf Ball, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Various aspects of the present invention golf balls have been described in terms of certain tests or measuring procedures. These are described in greater detail as follows.
As used herein, “Shore D hardness” of the golf ball layers is measured generally in accordance with ASTM D-2240 type D, except the measurements may be made on the curved surface of a component of the golf ball, rather than on a plaque. If measured on the ball, the measurement will indicate that the measurement was made on the ball. In referring to a hardness of a material of a layer of the golf ball, the measurement will be made on a plaque in accordance with ASTM D-2240. Furthermore, the Shore D hardness of the cover is measured while the cover remains over the mantles and cores. When a hardness measurement is made on the golf ball, the Shore D hardness is preferably measured at a land area of the cover.
As used herein, “Shore A hardness” of a cover is measured generally in accordance with ASTM D-2240 type A, except the measurements may be made on the curved surface of a component of the golf ball, rather than on a plaque. If measured on the ball, the measurement will indicate that the measurement was made on the ball. In referring to a hardness of a material of a layer of the golf ball, the measurement will be made on a plaque in accordance with ASTM D-2240. Furthermore, the Shore A hardness of the cover is measured while the cover remains over the mantles and cores. When a hardness measurement is made on the golf ball, Shore A hardness is preferably measured at a land area of the cover
The resilience or coefficient of restitution (COR) of a golf ball is the constant “e,” which is the ratio of the relative velocity of an elastic sphere after direct impact to that before impact. As a result, the COR (“e”) can vary from 0 to 1, with 1 being equivalent to a perfectly or completely elastic collision and 0 being equivalent to a perfectly or completely inelastic collision.
COR, along with additional factors such as club head speed, club head mass, ball weight, ball size and density, spin rate, angle of trajectory and surface configuration as well as environmental conditions (e.g. temperature, moisture, atmospheric pressure, wind, etc.) generally determine the distance a ball will travel when hit. Along this line, the distance a golf ball will travel under controlled environmental conditions is a function of the speed and mass of the club and size, density and resilience (COR) of the ball and other factors. The initial velocity of the club, the mass of the club and the angle of the ball's departure are essentially provided by the golfer upon striking. Since club head speed, club head mass, the angle of trajectory and environmental conditions are not determinants controllable by golf ball producers and the ball size and weight are set by the U.S.G.A., these are not factors of concern among golf ball manufacturers. The factors or determinants of interest with respect to improved distance are generally the COR and the surface configuration of the ball.
The coefficient of restitution is the ratio of the outgoing velocity to the incoming velocity. In the examples of this application, the coefficient of restitution of a golf ball was measured by propelling a ball horizontally at a speed of 125+/−5 feet per second (fps) and corrected to 125 fps against a generally vertical, hard, flat steel plate and measuring the ball's incoming and outgoing velocity electronically. Speeds were measured with a pair of ballistic screens, which provide a timing pulse when an object passes through them. The screens were separated by 36 inches and are located 25.25 inches and 61.25 inches from the rebound wall. The ball speed was measured by timing the pulses from screen 1 to screen 2 on the way into the rebound wall (as the average speed of the ball over 36 inches), and then the exit speed was timed from screen 2 to screen 1 over the same distance. The rebound wall was tilted 2 degrees from a vertical plane to allow the ball to rebound slightly downward in order to miss the edge of the cannon that fired it. The rebound wall is solid steel.
As indicated above, the incoming speed should be 125±5 fps but corrected to 125 fps. The correlation between COR and forward or incoming speed has been studied and a correction has been made over the ±5 fps range so that the COR is reported as if the ball had an incoming speed of exactly 125.0 fps.
The measurements for deflection, compression, hardness, and the like are preferably performed on a finished golf ball as opposed to performing the measurement on each layer during manufacturing.
Preferably, in a five layer golf ball comprising an inner core, an outer core, an inner mantle layer, an outer mantle layer and a cover, the hardness/compression of layers involve an inner core with the greatest deflection (lowest hardness), an outer core (combined with the inner core) with a deflection less than the inner core, an inner mantle layer with a hardness less than the hardness of the combined outer core and inner core, an outer mantle layer with the hardness layer of the golf ball, and a cover with a hardness less than the hardness of the outer mantle layer. These measurements are preferably made on a finished golf ball that has been torn down for the measurements.
Preferably the inner mantle layer is thicker than the outer mantle layer or the cover layer. The dual core and dual mantle golf ball creates an optimized velocity-initial velocity ratio (Vi/IV), and allows for spin manipulation. The dual core provides for increased core compression differential resulting in a high spin for short game shots and a low spin for driver shots. A discussion of the USGA initial velocity test is disclosed in Yagley et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,595,872 for a Golf Ball With High Coefficient Of Restitution, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Another example is Bartels et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,648,775 for a Golf Ball With High Coefficient Of Restitution, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Alternatively, the cover 16 is composed of a thermoplastic polyurethane/polyurea material. One example is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,367,903 for a Golf Ball, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Another example is Melanson, U.S. Pat. No. 7,641,841, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Another example is Melanson et al, U.S. Pat. No. 7,842,211, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Another example is Matroni et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,867,111, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Another example is Dewanjee et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,785,522, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Bartels, U.S. Pat. No. 9,278,260, for a Low Compression Three-Piece Golf Ball With An Aerodynamic Drag Rise At High Speeds, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Chavan et al, U.S. Pat. No. 9,789,366, for a Graphene Core For A Golf Ball, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Chavan et al, U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/039,959, for a Graphene Core For A Golf Ball, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Chavan et al, U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/058,741, for a Carbon Nanotubes Reinforced Dual Core A Golf Ball, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Simonds et al., U.S. Pat. No. 9,707,454 for a Limited Flight Golf Ball With Embedded RFID Chip is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Simonds et al., U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/252,117 for a Graphene Core Golf Ball With An Integrated Circuit is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Balardeta et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,355,869 for a Golf GPS Device is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Raposo, U.S. Pat. No. 8,992,346 for a Method And System For Swing Analysis is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Balardeta et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,845,459 for a Method And System For Shot Tracking is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Raposo, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/157,998, filed on Oct. 11, 2018, for a Smart Golf Ball, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
From the foregoing it is believed that those skilled in the pertinent art will recognize the meritorious advancement of this invention and will readily understand that while the present invention has been described in association with a preferred embodiment thereof, and other embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings, numerous changes, modifications and substitutions of equivalents may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention which is intended to be unlimited by the foregoing except as may appear in the following appended claims. Therefore, the embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined in the following appended claims.
The Present Application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/697,584, filed on Jul. 13, 2018, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3351347 | Smith | Nov 1967 | A |
5112055 | Barnhill | May 1992 | A |
5447314 | Yamazaki et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5820484 | Terry | Oct 1998 | A |
5965669 | Cavallaro et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6042487 | Schrimmer | Mar 2000 | A |
6245859 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6440012 | Nesbitt | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450898 | Nesbitt | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6525139 | Takesue | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6692380 | Sullivan | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6712487 | Liou | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6780126 | Ladd | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6806347 | Hogge | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6852043 | Sullivan | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855073 | Keller | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6916254 | Ladd | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7014575 | Sullivan | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7059974 | Golliffe et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7115049 | Sullivan | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7306528 | Jordan | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7367903 | Matroni et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7614959 | Gentile | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7641841 | Melanson | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7691009 | Savarese | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7785522 | Dewanjee et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8355869 | Balardeta et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8540583 | Leech | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8747241 | Molinari | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8764588 | Gill | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8845459 | Balardeta et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8972102 | Reindl | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8974266 | Liao | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8974318 | Ogg et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8992346 | Raposo | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9278260 | Bartels | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9498680 | Luciano, Jr. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9522306 | Ganson | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9597567 | Tran | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9682305 | Kim | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9694247 | Nurnberg | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9707454 | Simonds et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9789366 | Chavan et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
10204456 | Kudirka | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10232225 | Oberc | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10252117 | Simonds | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10315077 | Komatsu | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10428216 | Sullivan | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10493329 | Luciano, Jr. | Dec 2019 | B1 |
20020022537 | Nesbitt et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030096664 | Jordan | May 2003 | A1 |
20050227792 | McCreary | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233815 | McCreary | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060105857 | Stark | May 2006 | A1 |
20070015605 | Kim et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070173349 | Eng | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20090197704 | Sullivan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090280921 | Rankin | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100081517 | Sullivan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110081988 | Comeau et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20130196787 | Luciano | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130203518 | Hatton et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20150072811 | Jolliffe et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150094168 | Unger, Sr. et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150105173 | Thurman et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150335946 | Crowder et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160279482 | DuFaux et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20180021630 | Monnin et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180161640 | Lin et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180214758 | Mosher | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180236303 | Mathar et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180272221 | Sundararajan et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190036360 | Zilles | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1176171 | Jan 2002 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/785,163, dated Jun. 26, 2018. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/157,998, dated Jul. 18, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62697584 | Jul 2018 | US |