This disclosure relates to the field of magnetic gradient field sensing, specifically a system and method thereof.
DC magnetic field measurements with femtotesla level resolution require highly sensitive magnetometers, such as Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) magnetometers. SQUIDs must be cooled to cryogenic temperatures, and the technologies involved in cooling are complex, bulky, and expensive. This has proven to be a major roadblock in the mass market commercialization of SQUID technologies for many promising remote sensing applications in both the civilian and defense sector. Recently, advances in the optically pumped magnetometer (OPM) technology, also called atomic magnetometers, optical magnetometers, or optical atomic magnetometers, have led to the development of compact magnetic OPM sensors that operate without the need for cryogenic cooling and with the same sensitivity as the SQUID magnetometers (Dang et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 151110, 2010). Because OPMs do not need cryogenic cooling to operate, the cost and complexity associated with OPMs is significantly lower and enables the operation in remote environments, where maintaining a supply of cryogenics is difficult. In addition, thanks to the small size and weight of OPMs, they provide a greater flexibility for deployment in a wide range of applications.
Optically pumped magnetometers operate on the principle that electron or proton spins of atoms precess around an external magnetic field BEarth at a distinct frequency, called the Larmor frequency ωL, which is proportional to the magnitude of the field given by ωL=γBEarth, where γ is the gyromagnetic ratio. If light passes through a spin-polarized sample of atoms, the light polarization and amplitude can get modulated at the precession frequency of the atoms.
The are two classes of OPMs for DC magnetic field measurements: scalar OPMs and zero-field OPMs. A detailed description of different types of optically-pumped magnetometers and their applications has been published before, for example in an article by Budker and Romalis (Budker, D. & Romalis, M., Nat. Phys. 3, 227, 2007). The zero-field OPMs can reach very high sensitivity when operating in a regime where decoherence due to spin-exchange collisions is suppressed (Happer, W. & Tam, A. C. Phys. Rev. A 16, 1877, 1977), also known as the spin-exchange relaxation free (SERF) regime (Allred, J. C. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 130801, 2002). Scalar sensors have reached sensitivity in the femtotesla level as well (Sheng, D. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 160802, 2013), but so far only in large laboratory settings with highly complex setups or in very large vapor cells. Zero-field OPM sensors with high sensitivities have been implemented into compact sensors, but major limitations restrict their use including: (1) To reach very high sensitivity, OPMs must operate in a very low ambient magnetic field environment, and (2) OPMs are pure magnetometers making them highly susceptible to ubiquitous magnetic noise. For these two reasons, the zero-field OPMs can be used only in a magnetically-shielded environment in which the background field is nearly zero and the background magnetic noise is very low.
A standard way to solve the problem of ambient magnetic field noise is the implementation of gradiometers, where the magnetic field in two locations is measured and subtracted. The output is then the magnetic field gradient, which means the field difference divided by the separation of the two locations, also called the baseline of the gradiometer. In SQUIDs, intrinsic gradiometers are created by use of two oppositely-wound pick-up loops in series. In OPMs, most gradiometers have been implemented by sending the same probe laser beam through two sections of the same vapor cell and subtracting the outputs, but intrinsic gradiometers have also been demonstrated in the laboratory (Wasilewski, W., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 133601, 2010), where both pump and probe lasers pass consecutively through two separate vapor cells. While this scheme has proven good performance, it requires precise tuning of the parameters in both vapor cells, which can be a tedious task.
Here we describe a new gradiometer that can reach very high sensitivities, operate in high ambient magnetic fields, and suppresses ambient magnetic noise. The disclosed device is an improvement on the prior art invention of a Free Precession magnetometer (FP). The FP magnetometer concept is commonly employed in proton magnetometers and by the low-field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) community. Very high sensitivities have been demonstrated with this approach even in small cells at room temperature (K. Jensen et al., Scientific Reports 6, 29638, 2016).
In prior art, Dehmelt in 1957 (Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. 105, 1924, 1957) demonstrated the concept that the precession frequency of atomic spins can be monitored through the transmission of light perpendicular to the axis of precession. This can be used to monitor the magnetic field at the location of the atoms, which is proportional to the precession frequency. Kukolich, 1968, (S. Kukolich, Am. J. Phys. 36, 919, 1968) extended this concept from spin ½ to spin 1 and spin 2 systems. There is a large body of prior art that uses this concept in magnetometers that are based on the free-precession of atomic electron spins in alkali atoms (C. Bowers et al., Phys. Rev. A 46, 7042, 1992; J. Skalla et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12, 772, 1995; S. Seltzer et al., Phys. Rev. A 75, 051407, 2007; C. Gemmel at al., Eur. Phys. J. D 57, 303, 2010; L. Lenci et al., J. Phys. B 45, 215401, 2012; L. Lenci et al., Phys. Rev. A 89, 043836, 2014; E. Breschi et al., Appl. Phys. B 115).
In prior art, a magnetometer has been described based on the free precession of the spins of alkali atoms in a vapor cell (U.S. Pat. No. 8,421,455 B1), where the precession was monitored through non-linear magneto-optical rotation. The free-precession magnetometer concept is commonly employed in proton magnetometers and by the low-field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) community and has been chosen in applications that require high accuracy (Z. Grujić et al., Euro. Phys. J. D 69, 135, 2015; S. Afach, Opt. Expr. 23, 22108, 2015; H.-C. Koch et al., Eur. Phys. J. D 69, 202, 2015).
In noisy ambient field environments, it is often advantageous to measure the magnetic gradient field rather than the actual magnetic field itself, since the gradient field is often much more stable and can reveal information about close sources, while suppressing noise from distant sources. Gradiometers based on optically-pumped magnetometer with baselines of several centimeters have been developed by subtracting the outputs of two optically-pumped magnetometers (U.S. Pat. No. 7,573,264 B2; Affolderbach, C. et al., Appl. Phys. B, 75, 605, 2002; S. Trojanowski and M. Ciszek, Review of Scientific Instruments 79, 104702, 2008; Johnson, C., Schwindt, P. D. D. & Weisend, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 243703, 2010; Wyllie, R., et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 57, 2619, 2012; Sheng, D., et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 031106, 2017).
The gradient field optically pumped magnetometer (GF-OPM) of the present invention, consists of two alkali vapor cells, or sets of alkali atoms contained in some manner, separated by a distance referred to as the baseline of the gradiometer. Instead of passing the pump/probe beam through just one contained locations or cells of atoms, it passes through two or both contained locations or cells consecutively. After both spin-ensembles have been pumped simultaneously, the holding field is suddenly switched off and the spins in both cells precess at their respective Larmor frequencies ωL1=γB1 and ωL2=γB2, where B1 and B2 represent the magnetic fields at the locations of the two cells, respectively. The two vapor cells modulate the probe beam at both frequencies, and a beat can be seen on the photodiode at the difference frequency Δω=γ·|B1−B2|=γ·∇B·Δ, where Δ is the baseline. The beat frequency is therefore directly proportional to the magnetic field gradient ∇B and can be extracted independently even without the knowledge of independent magnetometer outputs. The advantage of this method is that the beat note frequency depends only on the gradient field and is therefore immune to parameter drifts such as probe laser frequency or amplitude.
As such, what is described and claimed is, a gradient field optically pumped magnetometer (GF-OPM) device comprising atoms confined in at least two locations; a means to spin polarize the atoms in the at least two locations; a means to extract a beat note signal from the Larmor precession signal in the at least two locations; a means to measure the frequency or phase of the beat note signal; and a means to create a gradiometer output based on frequency or phase of the beat note signal. In another embodiment, a method for measuring a magnetic field is provided and comprises the steps of: a) spin-polarizing atoms in at least two locations; b) inducing Larmor precession in the atoms in the at least two locations; c) detecting the Larmor precession signal from the atoms in the at least two locations; d) extracting a beat note signal of the Larmor precession signal from the atoms in the at least two locations; e) measuring the frequency or phase of the beat note signal; and f) creating and output signal of the gradiometer based on the frequency or phase of the beat note signal.
Before explaining the disclosed embodiments of the present invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of the particular arrangement shown, since the invention is capable of other embodiments. Also, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.
As an example, a simple OPM gradiometer prototype was built as shown in
When the solenoid was energized, the circular part of the laser light polarized a significant fraction of the atoms through optically pumping to the F=2, mF=2 ground state. Once the optical pumping process reached an equilibrium, and the current through the solenoid 78 was cut-off in less than 1 μs. This non-adiabatic cut-off caused the rubidium atoms in each cell to start precessing about the Earth's field at their respective Larmor frequencies. The precessing spins induced an oscillating polarization rotation in the linearly-polarized part of the light. The spins in both cells precess at their respective Larmor frequencies ωL1=γB1 and ωL2=γB2, where B1 and B2 represent the magnetic fields at the locations of the two cells, respectively. The two vapor cells modulated the probe beam at both frequencies, and a beat was on the photodiode at the difference frequency Δω=γ·|B1−B2|=γ·∇B·Δ, where Δ is the baseline. The beat frequency was therefore directly proportional to the magnetic field gradient ∇B and was extracted independently, even without the knowledge of independent magnetometer outputs.
In the presence of a magnetic gradient, the two cells experienced slightly different magnetic fields 79 and 80, and therefore, the atoms precessed at slightly different frequencies. The polarimeter output produced a beat note signal with a frequency ωbeat proportional to the magnitude of the gradient field ∇B: ωbeat=γ·∇B·Δ. Here, γ was the gyromagnetic ratio and Δ is the gradiometer baseline. The signal was rectified or squared and then a low-pass filter 85 was used to remove the high-frequency oscillations corresponding to the Larmor frequencies of the atoms, leaving behind only the beat note. The phase or frequency of the beat note was measured with a counter 86, which functions as the output of the gradiometer. For gradiometer operation, only the filtered slow beat frequency must be measured. The information related to individual noisy magnetometer outputs (individual precession frequencies in two cells) has no relevance and can be discarded entirely.
The experimentally recorded precession signal from one of the cells is shown in
Although the present invention has been described with reference to the disclosed embodiments, numerous modifications and variations can be made and still the result will come within the scope of the invention. No limitation with respect to the specific embodiments disclosed herein is intended or should be inferred. Each apparatus embodiment described herein has numerous equivalents.
The following application is an application for patent under 35 USC 111 (a). This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/460,292 filed Feb. 17, 2017 of common title and inventorship. This invention was made with government support of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Contract #D16PC00195. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62460292 | Feb 2017 | US |