This invention relates generally to groundwater and subsurface soil remediation.
There is a well recognized need for removal of subsurface contaminants that exist in aquifers and surrounding soils. Such contaminants can include various man-made volatile hydrocarbons including chlorinated hydrocarbons, e.g., volatile organic compounds such as chlorinated olefins including tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, c is 1,2-dichloroethane and vinyl chloride. Other compounds include aromatic or polyaromatic ring compounds such as benzene, toluene, methylbenzene, xylenes, naphthalene, and propellents or explosives such as nitro anilines trinitrotoluene, and so forth. The groups of compounds are characterized by aromatic ring structures also include alkyl substituted aromatic hydrocarbons.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a method of treating a site includes sparging the site with an air/ozone gas stream delivered with a hydroperoxide, which is a substantial byproduct of a reaction of a contaminant present in the aquifer or soil formation with the ozone.
The air/ozone gas stream is delivered through a microporous diffuser that delivers the air/ozone gas in microbubbles. In some embodiments, the hydroperoxide is selected from the group consisting of formic peracid, hydroxymethyl hydroperoxide, 1-hydroxylethyl hydroperoxide, and chloroformic peracid or their derivatives. The hydroperoxide is selected based on the type of contaminant present in the site. The hydroperoxide is delivered as a surface layer over microfine bubbles including the air/ozone gas. Sparging introduces air including the oxidizing gas into the microporous diffuser. The microporous diffuser also introduces promoters or nutrients such as catalyst agents including iron containing compounds such as iron silicates or palladium containing compounds such as palladized carbon and platinum or platinum containing compounds.
According to an additional aspect of the invention, an apparatus for treating subsurface water includes a well having a casing with an inlet screen and outlet screen to promote recirculation of water into the casing and through surrounding ground area and at least one microporous diffuser disposed in the injection well that allows delivery of a pair of fluids with one of the fluids forming a coating over the other of the fluids. The apparatus also includes an ozone generator, an air compressor and compressor/pump control mechanism to deliver ozone (O3) from the ozone generator to the microporous diffuser, and a source of the liquid hydroperoxides selected from the group consisting of formic peracid, hydroxymethyl hydroperoxide, 1-hydroxylethyl hydroperoxide, and chloroformic peracid or their derivatives. The apparatus includes a pump to deliver the selected liquid hydroperoxide to the microporous diffuser.
One or more of the following advantages may be provided by one or more aspects of the invention.
The hydroperoxides promote decomposition of chlorinated olefins by forming a secondary liquid-phase reactive interface to the contaminants such as volatile chlorinated olefins and volatile hydrocarbons including chlorinated hydrocarbons, chlorinated olefins such as tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, c is 1,2-dichloroethane and vinyl chloride and other compounds e.g., aromatic ring compounds, propellants, explosives, and so forth that are found as contaminants compounds as the contaminants enter the gaseous phase within the bubbles.
Promoters or nutrients are introduced with the hydroperoxides. The hydroperoxides are produced by reactions that decompose the contaminants. In the presence of the hydroperoxides, the promoters or nutrients can combine with the hydroperoxides and promote and accelerate the decomposition reactions. Further, when treating contaminants that have large number of double bonded carbon atoms or which are present in super-saturated conditions the addition of the hydroperoxides promotes rapid and efficient Criegee reactions of the contaminants.
Referring to
Referring to
In an embodiment, packer material 115 may be constructed of a high density polyethylene (HDPE) material. Material 115 may form an inner wall and an outer wall. Material 115 may be constructed to form closed compartment 117 and may be generally shaped like a mesh bag or “sock” which may be sealed at both ends. Packer 17 may be constructed to form internal space 113, an aperture for the insertion of the gas and liquid lines as illustrated in
Compartment 117 may be filled with material such as pellets 114 that expand upon contact with water. In an embodiment pellets 114 may be bentonite pellets. It is to be appreciated that pellets 114 are not limited to any shape or type of material. Pellets 114 may be of various sizes and shapes may be placed inside compartment 117. In a preferred embodiment pellets 114 are ¼ inch bentonite pellets.
Turning to
Packer 17 may have plug 116. Plug 116 may be constructed of any material. In a preferred embodiment, plug 116 is constructed of Teflon or silicon. Plug 116 may be placed inside the distal end of compartment 117. Plug 116 may function like a washer or stopper, to lessen pitting by microbubbles and bentonite spread into well screen regions. Plug 116 may be constructed to be generally circular in shape, comprising a generally circular aperture to allow the air and liquid lines, as illustrated in
Arrangement 10 also includes treatment control system 30 including air compressor 32, e.g., pump that feeds a mixture of air/ozone into microporous diffusers 50, 70. Air compressor 32 delivers air mixed with ozone (O3) that is produced from ozone generator 36 into the microporous diffusers. The mixture of air/ozone affects substantial removal of contaminants such as various man-made volatile hydrocarbons including chlorinated hydrocarbons, chlorinated olefins such as tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, c is 1,2-dichloroethane and vinyl chloride and other compounds e.g., aromatic ring compounds, propellants, explosives, and so forth that are found as contaminants.
Treatment system 10 also includes a delivery mechanism e.g., second pump 38 or other feed arrangement that supplies a liquid decontamination agent such as hydrogen peroxide or other hydroperoxides into microporous diffuser 50, 70. The hydrogen peroxide or other hydroperoxides are provided via source 40. Also supplied to the microporous diffusers are promoters or nutrients, as well as catalyst agents 42 including iron containing compounds such as iron silicates, ferrous iron, acetic acid, or palladium containing compounds such as palladized carbon or other transition metals in acid solution. In addition, other materials such as platinum may alternatively be used. The promoters or nutrients are introduced with the hydroperoxides. The hydroperoxides are produced by reactions that decompose the contaminants. In the presence of the hydroperoxides, the promoters or nutrients can combine with the hydroperoxides and promote and accelerate the decomposition reactions.
Referring to
Arrangement 10′ also includes treatment control system 30′ generally similar to system 30′ (
Treatment system 10 or system 10′ makes use of a gas-gas reaction of contaminant vapors with ozone, as will be described below, supplemented by a liquid phase reaction provided by a flow of hydrogen peroxide and preferable other hydroperoxides, described below. The ozone is trapped inside of micro bubbles produced from the air/ozone escaping microporous diffusers 50, 70 and being trapped in water from the aquifer. On the other hand, hydrogen peroxide or other hydroperoxides provide a thin film coating over the outer surfaces of the bubbles.
The hydroperoxides promote decomposition of chlorinated olefins by forming a secondary liquid-phase reactive interface to the contaminants such as volatile chlorinate olefins and volatile hydrocarbons including chlorinated hydrocarbons, chlorinated olefins such as tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, c is 1,2-dichloroethane and vinyl chloride and other compounds e.g., aromatic ring compounds, propellants, explosives, and so forth that are found as contaminants compounds as the contaminants enter the gaseous phase within the bubbles. Suitable hydroperoxides can be as these listed in Table 1.
These hydroperoxides or derivatives thereof react at different rates with the olefins, as shown for the Allen's Reaction Rate Constants in Table 1. The presence of the hydroperoxides as a coating over the gas bubbles contact contaminants such as compounds containing aromatic rings to break the rings into fragments that partition from liquid to gas phase bringing them more rapidly into contact with the gaseous ozone within the microfine bubbles. The presence of iron of a transition metal e.g., nickel or tin, or platinum or palladium solution can assist the reaction by becoming electron donors or act as catalyst agents.
In general, the hydroperoxides are intermediary compounds that are produced from a reaction of ozone with particular olefins. Thus, for other olefins the appropriate hydroperoxide would be the intermediary hydroperoxide that results from the reaction of the olefin with ozone.
The use of hydroperoxides and transition metals such as, iron, palladiuim, platinum, nickel and tin promote hydroxyl radical (OH.) formation at the reactive interface of the microbubble coating region. The formation of hydroxyl radicals further leads to the generation of additional free radicals resulting in Criegee-like degradation of non-halogenated double-bond structures such as aromatics and non-double bond compounds of ether such as MtBE. Certain organics may be decomposed more rapidly by OH• than by O3.
While ozone in high concentration is recognized as an agent for rapid decomposition of semi-volatile or poorly volatile polyaromatic ring compounds in soil, the combination of a slowly reacting hydroperoxides and ozone provides improved efficiency of delivery and reaction. This results since the gaseous partitioning pulls compounds through the hydroperoxide interface reducing extraneous secondary reactions that occur with soil components as observed when hydrogen peroxide is injected as a solution into fractured soil formations, as in so called Fenton's agent reactions.
As mentioned above, these hydroperoxides, formic peracid, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxymethyl hydroperoxide, 1-hydroxymethyl hydroperoxide, and chloroformic peracid, are intermediary products in reactions involving chlorinated olefins and ozone. As by-products of reactions of the chlorinated olefins with ozone the presence of the hydroperoxides as a coating on the bubbles serves to mitigate other competing reactions that can occur when the chlorinated olefins double bonded carbon atoms are attacked by the ozone as the chlorinated olefins enter the bubbles.
The coating on the bubbles provided by microporous diffusers 50, 70 can be consider to be a gas-liquid-emulsion since the micro bubbles are dispersed gases with film coatings. Rather than a foam, the material co-exists in liquid water and does not necessarily rise to the top surface. Moreover, the hydroperoxide coating is not technically in solution with the gas. A solution would have the ozone gas and hydroperoxide liquid dispersed homogeneously without chemical change. In this arrangement, the coating on the bubbles exist separate from the gas inside the bubbles.
Referring now to
A proximate end of cylindrical member 60 is coupled to a first inlet port provided from first inlet cap 52 and proximate ends of the plurality of cylindrical members 58 are coupled to second inlet ports generally denoted as 52b. At the opposite end of microporous diffuser 50 is end cap 54 that covers distal ends of cylindrical members 56 and 58. Here distal ends of the plurality of cylindrical members are sealed by separate caps 59 but could be terminated by a common end cap as end cap 54. End cap 54, in conjunction with cap 52, seals ends of microporous diffuser 50.
Cylindrical members 56, 58 and 60 are cylindrical in shape and have a plurality of microporous openings constructed through sidewalls 56a, 58a and 60a, respectively thereof, having pore sizes matched to a porosity characteristic of the surrounding formation to produce a pore size effective for inducing gas-gas reactions in bubbles that emanate from the microporous diffusers into the surrounding soil formations and/or aquifer. The sidewalls can have pore diameters in a range of 1-200 microns, preferably 1 to 50 microns or more preferably 5 to 20 microns.
The combination of the inlet cap and the end cap seals microporous diffuser 50 permitting liquid and gas to escape by the porous construction of sidewalls of the microporous diffusers. The microporous diffuser can be filled with a microporous material such as microbeads having mesh sizes from 20 to 200 mesh, or sand pack, or porous hydrophilic plastic to allow introducing a liquid into the porous spaces. In this arrangement, the liquid is one of the aforementioned hydroperoxides, formic peracid, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxymethyl hydroperoxide, 1-hydroxymethyl hydroperoxide, and chloroformic peracid or derivatives, and so forth.
Referring now to
Sidewalls of each of the cylindrical members can have a pore diameter in the range of 1 to 200 microns. Depending on soil conditions various ranges can be used exemplary ranges are 50 to 200 microns for very coarse gravel-like soils, 1 to 50 microns for sandy-type soils or 1-5 to 20 microns for more silty type soils. A proximate end of the cylindrical member is coupled to inlet port 72a that is fed an air-ozone mixture from pump 36. The microporous diffuser also includes end cap 74 which secures distal ends of cylinder 76, 78. The combination of inlet cap 72 and end cap 78 seals the microporous diffuser permitting liquid and gas to escape by the porous combination of construction of the sidewalls of the microporous diffusers. Also in this arrangement, the liquid is one of the aforementioned hydroperoxides, e.g., formic peracid, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxymethyl hydroperoxide, 1-hydroxymethyl hydroperoxide, and chloroformic peracid, etc.
Thus, when using microporous diffusers 50 or 70 in the arrangement of
The Criegee reaction of ozone in a water gas mixture is promoted by the microbubble emulsion. The hydroperoxide compounds and ozone produce reactions during the process of water to gas partitioning with volatile organic compounds or absorbed liquid/water to gas partitioning with semi-volatile organic compounds. The breakdown of chlorinated or halogenated solvents in an aqueous solution by Criegee decomposition involving ozone yields various hydroperoxide products such as those set forth in Table 1. To promote higher concentration of volatile organic and semi-volatile organic destruction, the organic hydroperoxides are injected with the laminated microporous diffusers 50, 70 as a coating for the microporous emulsions. The injection which occurs under pressure produces an aerosol in system 10 where water is reduced to particles of micron size. Therefore to practice the methods described below, any system that can produce an aerosol of the hydroperoxide coated bubbles may be used.
The peroxide acid solution becomes a coating of a microsize bubble occupying a fifth or less of the volume of the gas injected. It is believed that at this point, the coating is not in solution with the water or ozone. As used a solution can be considered as a gas, liquid or solid dispersed homogeneously in a gas, liquid or solid without chemical change. Rather, the hydroperoxide/water/ozone is a gas-liquid emulsion as referred to above. Attaching to the surface of a semi-volatile compound such as an olefin e.g., nitroaniline or nitrotoluene or polyaromatic ring compounds the coating reacts with the aromatic rings of such compounds to break the rings into fragments that partition from a liquid to gas phase bringing them even more rapidly into contact with the gaseous ozone content.
Referring to
Once the equipment has been established on a site, process 100 initiates 106 a flow of air and ozone (O3) through microporous diffusers 50, 70. In response, the process 100 produces microbubbles of appropriate size determine in accordance with the porosity characteristics of the microporous diffusers that attempt to match that of the surrounding soil formation. As described above, generally this porosity characteristic is in a range of 5 to 200 microns. Other ranges may be used however. The flow of air and ozone continues through the microporous diffusers 50, 70 and produces a dispersed pattern of microfine bubbles through the treatment area. During process 100, the wells are monitored 108 to determine when a microfine bubble pattern of appropriate dispersion through the treatment zone has been established. Bubble dispersion can be determined by dissolved oxygen distribution, oxidative reduction potential measurements, or by direct measurement of micro-bubbles (bubble counters). Once this pattern has been established the process initiates 110 a flow of a suitable hydroperoxide(s) selected in accordance with the contaminant(s) being treated. The hydroperoxides are in the form of liquid that is provided in the outer portions of microporous diffusers 50, 70. Initiation 110 of the flow of hydroperoxides allows the hydroperoxides to coat the microbubbles as they emerge from the center of microporous diffusers 50, 70 producing the abovementioned hydroperoxide bubble emulsion. The process periodically samples 112 groundwater to determine the cleanup status of the site. Once contaminants in the groundwater have reached a certain level, process 100 can be terminated. Alternatively, the process can be used as a fence to continually and indefinitely pump air-ozone and a suitable hydroperoxide into a portion of a contaminated site to contain a migrating plume of contaminants from reaching a critical area such as residential wells, aquifers and so forth.
Typical conditions for the air/ozone flow are as follows:
The percent concentration of hydroperoxide in water is typically in a range of (2-20) percent although other concentrations can be used. The flow is adjusted to the total mass of the contaminants in the soil and water. If high concentrations (greater than 50,000 parts per billion in water or 500 mg/kg in soil) of the contaminants are present sufficient hydroperoxides should be added in insure efficient decomposition by the Criegee reaction mechanism. Preferably this would occur in the presence of an accelerant (e.g., transition metals iron, nickel or zinc, and/or catalysts palladium or platinum).
Further, when treating contaminants that have large number of double bonded carbon atoms or which are present in super-saturated concentrations e.g., (greater than 200,000 parts per billion in water or 5000 mg/kg in soil) the addition of the hydroperoxides is highly desirable to promote rapid and efficient Criegee reactions on the site. This is because, the mole volume or ratio of moles of the contaminant to moles of ozone becomes high in the presence large number of double bonded carbon atoms or high concentrations, while the concentration of the ozone is limited to that which can be suitable injected taking into consideration generation capacity, stress on the apparatus, site conditions and desire to maintain a Criegee mechanism.
Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/409,892 filed Apr. 24, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,666,313 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/602,256, filed Jun. 23, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,033,492, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/610,830, filed Jul. 6, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,582,611. Each of these patents and applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1920719 | Stich | Aug 1933 | A |
2517525 | Cummings | Aug 1950 | A |
2845185 | Winderweedle, Jr. | Jul 1958 | A |
2946446 | Herbert | Jul 1960 | A |
3027009 | Price | Mar 1962 | A |
3206178 | Lamb | Sep 1965 | A |
3219520 | Box | Nov 1965 | A |
3276994 | Andrews | Oct 1966 | A |
3441216 | Good | Apr 1969 | A |
3545731 | McManus | Dec 1970 | A |
3570218 | Finney | Mar 1971 | A |
3669276 | Woods | Jun 1972 | A |
3670817 | Saucier | Jun 1972 | A |
3708206 | Hard et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3808123 | Neel | Apr 1974 | A |
3814394 | Murray | Jun 1974 | A |
3823776 | Holmes | Jul 1974 | A |
3997447 | Breton et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4007118 | Ciambrone | Feb 1977 | A |
4021347 | Teller et al. | May 1977 | A |
4048072 | McCullough | Sep 1977 | A |
4049552 | Arff | Sep 1977 | A |
4064163 | Drach et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4118447 | Richter | Oct 1978 | A |
4178239 | Lowther | Dec 1979 | A |
4203837 | Hoge et al. | May 1980 | A |
4268283 | Roberts | May 1981 | A |
4298467 | Gartner et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4310057 | Brame | Jan 1982 | A |
4351810 | Martinez et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4360234 | Hsueh et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4614596 | Wyness | Sep 1986 | A |
4622139 | Brown | Nov 1986 | A |
4639314 | Tyer | Jan 1987 | A |
4684479 | D'Arrigo | Aug 1987 | A |
4695447 | Shultz | Sep 1987 | A |
4696739 | Pedneault | Sep 1987 | A |
4730672 | Payne | Mar 1988 | A |
4780215 | Carlson | Oct 1988 | A |
4804050 | Kerfoot | Feb 1989 | A |
4832122 | Corey et al. | May 1989 | A |
4837153 | Laurenson, Jr. | Jun 1989 | A |
4838434 | Miller et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4844795 | Halwani | Jul 1989 | A |
4849114 | Zeff et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4883589 | Konon | Nov 1989 | A |
4941957 | Zeff et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4943305 | Bernhardt | Jul 1990 | A |
4960706 | Bliem et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4966717 | Kern | Oct 1990 | A |
4971731 | Zipperian | Nov 1990 | A |
5006250 | Roberts | Apr 1991 | A |
5025113 | Sanderson et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5078921 | Zipperian | Jan 1992 | A |
5080805 | Houser | Jan 1992 | A |
5116163 | Bernhardt | May 1992 | A |
5120442 | Kull et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5122165 | Wang | Jun 1992 | A |
5126111 | Al-Ekabi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5133906 | Louis | Jul 1992 | A |
5160655 | Donker et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167806 | Wang et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178491 | Graves et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5178755 | Lacrosse | Jan 1993 | A |
5180503 | Gorelick et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5205927 | Wickramanayake | Apr 1993 | A |
5215680 | D'Arrigo | Jun 1993 | A |
5221159 | Billings et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5227184 | Hurst | Jul 1993 | A |
5238437 | Vowles et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5246309 | Hobby | Sep 1993 | A |
5248395 | Rastelli et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5254253 | Behmann | Oct 1993 | A |
5259962 | Later | Nov 1993 | A |
5269943 | Wickramanayake | Dec 1993 | A |
5277518 | Billings et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5302286 | Semprini et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5332333 | Bentley | Jul 1994 | A |
5348664 | Kim et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5362400 | Martinell | Nov 1994 | A |
5364537 | Paillard | Nov 1994 | A |
5375539 | Rippberger | Dec 1994 | A |
5389267 | Gorelick et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5398757 | Corte et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
RE34890 | Sacre | Apr 1995 | E |
5402848 | Kelly | Apr 1995 | A |
5403476 | Bernhardt | Apr 1995 | A |
5406950 | Brandenburger et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5425598 | Pennington | Jun 1995 | A |
5427693 | Mausgrover et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430228 | Ciambrone et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5431286 | Xu et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5451320 | Wang et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5464309 | Mancini et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5472294 | Billings et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5480549 | Looney et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5482630 | Lee et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5520483 | Vigneri | May 1996 | A |
5525008 | Wilson | Jun 1996 | A |
5545330 | Ehrlich | Aug 1996 | A |
5560737 | Schuring et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5588490 | Suthersan et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5609798 | Liu et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615974 | Land et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620593 | Stagner | Apr 1997 | A |
5622450 | Grant et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624635 | Pryor | Apr 1997 | A |
5663475 | Elgal | Sep 1997 | A |
5664628 | Koehler et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5667690 | Doddema et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5667733 | Waldron, Sr. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676823 | McKay et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5698092 | Chen | Dec 1997 | A |
5741427 | Watts et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5827485 | Libal et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833388 | Edwards et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851407 | Bowman et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855775 | Kerfoot | Jan 1999 | A |
5860598 | Cruz | Jan 1999 | A |
5879108 | Haddad | Mar 1999 | A |
5925257 | Albelda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5954452 | Goldstein | Sep 1999 | A |
5967230 | Cooper et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975800 | Edwards et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007274 | Suthersan | Dec 1999 | A |
6017449 | Eriksson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6083403 | Tang et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6083407 | Kerfoot | Jul 2000 | A |
6086769 | Kilambi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6136186 | Gonzalez-Martin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139755 | Marte et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149819 | Martin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6210955 | Hayes | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214240 | Yasunaga et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217767 | Clark | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221002 | James | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6254310 | Suthersan | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283674 | Suthersan | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6284143 | Kerfoot | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306296 | Kerfoot | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312605 | Kerfoot | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6352387 | Briggs et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6357670 | Ganan-Calvo | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6364162 | Johnson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391259 | Malkin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6403034 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428694 | Brown | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436285 | Kerfoot | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447676 | Kerfoot | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6488850 | Perriello | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6533499 | Breeding | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6582611 | Kerfoot | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6596161 | Kerfoot | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596177 | Sherman | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6623211 | Kukor et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6645450 | Stoltz et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6733207 | Liebert, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736379 | Wegner et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745815 | Senyard | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6773609 | Hashizume | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6780329 | Kerfoot | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787038 | Brusseau et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805798 | Kerfoot | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818136 | Marek | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6827861 | Kerfoot | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6866781 | Schindler | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872318 | Kerfoot | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6913251 | Kerfoot | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921477 | Wilhelm | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6984329 | Kerfoot | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7022241 | Kerfoot | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033492 | Kerfoot | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7131638 | Kerfoot | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7156984 | Kerfoot | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7208090 | Applegate et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7264419 | Bowman et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7264747 | Kerfoot | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7300039 | Kerfoot | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7442313 | Kerfoot | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7537706 | Kerfoot | May 2009 | B2 |
7547388 | Kerfoot | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20020029493 | Baek | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020109247 | Jager et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030029792 | Kerfoot | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030222359 | Jager | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040045911 | Kerfoot | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050067356 | Bowman et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060243668 | Miller et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3805200 | Sep 1998 | DE |
0402158 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0546335 | Jun 1993 | EP |
2005655 | Apr 1979 | GB |
2185901 | Aug 1987 | GB |
1-304838 | Dec 1989 | JP |
3267196 | Nov 1991 | JP |
4-171036 | Jun 1992 | JP |
6-023378 | Jan 1994 | JP |
407178391 | Jul 1995 | JP |
40931314 | Dec 1997 | JP |
WO 9821152 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9954258 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO9956894 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO0235908 | May 2001 | WO |
WO0226640 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 2005063367 | Jul 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-11711-GAO, Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc.'s Supplemental Response to Plaintiff's Interrogatory Three, Jun. 25, 2009, 36 pages. |
Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-11711-GAO, Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc.'s Supplemental Response to Plaintiff's Interrogatories Three and Four, Jul. 6, 2009, 164 pages. |
ThinkVillage-Kerfoot LLC v. Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc., Complaint for Patent Infringement, US District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Oct. 7, 2008, 5 pages. |
ThinkVillage-Kerfoot LLC v. Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc., Answer and Counterclaims, Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-11711-GAO, Dec. 5, 2008, 7 pages. |
ThinkVillage-Kerfoot LLC v. Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc., Amended Answer and Counterclaims, Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-11711-GAO, Dec. 15, 2008, 7 pages. |
ThinkVillage-Kerfoot LLC v. Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc., Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc.'s Amended Counterclaims, Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-11711-GAO, Dec. 30, 2008, 5 pages. |
Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-11711-GAO, Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc.'s Objections and Responses to Plaintiff's Requests for Production of Documents and Things, Mar. 4, 2009, 54 pages. |
Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-11711-GAO, Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc.'s Objections and Answers to Plaintiffs Interrogatories, Mar. 4, 2009, 10 pages. |
Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-11711-GAO, ThinkVillage-Kerfoot, LLC's Responses to Defendant's Interrogatories (Nos. 1-11) Apr. 9, 2009, 12 pages. |
Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-11711-GAO, ThinkVillage-Kerfoot, LLC's Objections and Responses to Defendant's First Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 1-98) Apr. 9, 2009, 37 pages. |
Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-11711-GAO, ThinkVillage-Kerfoot, LLC's Supplemental Responses to Defendant's Interrogatories (Nos. 7 and 8) Jun. 2, 2009, 9 pages. |
PCT/US04/43634 International Search Report mailed May 18, 2005, 1 page. |
PCT/US04/43634 International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Jun. 26, 2006, 5 pages. |
Makarov , A. M. & Sorokin, S.S., “Heat Exchange of a Bubble Coated with a Liquid Film on the Rear Surface,” Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, vol. 30, No. 2, 1994, pp. 78-81. |
Abstract JP 6-238260, Aug. 30, 1994, Karuto. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/470,167 (U.S. 6,436,285). |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/860,659. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,111. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/993,152. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/223,166 (U.S. 6,596,161). |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/354,584. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/365,027. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/602,256. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/745,939. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/794,994. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/895,015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/910,441. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/916,863. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/963,361. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/963,353. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,960. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,452. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,871. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,871, Response to Office Action filed Dec. 16, 2008, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,871, Office Action mailed Mar. 18, 2009, 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,871 Response to Office Action filed Jun. 18, 2009, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/146,722. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/272,446. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/272,446 Supplemental Notice of Allowance May 1, 2009, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/328,475. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/485,080. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/485,080, Response to Office Action filed May 8, 2009, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,413. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,413 Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 10, 2009, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/594,019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/177,467. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/254,359, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 1, 2009, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/259,051, Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2009, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/259,051, Response to Office Action filed Jun. 23, 2009, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/272,462, Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 2, 2009, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/272,462, Response to Restriction Requirement filed Jul. 2, 2009, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/485,080, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 9, 2009, 4 pages. |
PCT/US05/25478, International Search Report & Written Opinion, mailed Feb. 15, 2006, 4 pages. |
PCT/US05/25478, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Jan. 23, 2007, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/177,467 Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 2, 2009, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/259,051 Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 24, 2009, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/485,223 Response to Office Action filed Mar. 11, 2009, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/485,223 Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2008, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/485,223. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,871 Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 9, 2009, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/272,462 Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 21, 2009, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/254,359, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 6, 2009, 4 pages. |
Canadian Application No. 2,441,259 Office Action dated Oct. 14, 2009, 7 pages. |
Advanced Oxidation Processes for Treating Groundwater Contaminated with TCE and PCE, Aieta AXXX et al., 1988, Pilot-Scale Evaluations., Journal of American Water Works Association, JAWWAS, vol. 80, pp. 64-72. |
Echegaray, D.F. et al, “Biologically Resistant Contaminants, Primary Treatment with Ozone”, Water Science and Technology, A Journal of the International Association on Water Quality, vol. 29, No. 8, 1994, pp. 257-261. |
Alternate Technologies for Wastewater Treatment, J. Hauck wt al.. Polluting Engineering, May 1990, pp. 81-84. |
Analysis of Selected Enhancements for Soil Vapor Extraction, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Sep. 1997, pp. 1-5 to 7-39. |
Aquifier Remediation Wells, EPA, vol. 16, Sep. 1999, pp. 1-80. |
Chemical Degradation of Aldicarb in Water Using Ozone, F.J. Beltran et al., Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 1995, pp. 272-278. |
Clare Water Supply, EPA, http://www.eoa.gov/region5/s11ocrfund/nnl/michillan/MID980002273.htm, pp. 1-3, date unknown. |
Leonard, B., Cleaning up, Forbes, Jun. 1, 1987, pp. 52-53. |
Completed North American Innovative remediation Technology Demonstration Projects, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Aug. 12, 1996, pp. 1-35. |
Design of a Packed Bed Ozonation Reactor for Removal of Contaminants from Water, Billing, Dissertation Abstracts International, vol. 57, No. 10, Apr. 1997, pp. 6398-B. |
Effect of Organic Substances on Mass Transfer in Bubble Aeration, M. Gurol et al., Journal WPCF, vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 235-240. |
Environmental Management:, DON Environmental Restoration Plan for Fiscal years 1997-2001, Sep. 30, 1996, pp. 4-1 to 4-8. |
Factors Controlling the Removal of Organic Pollutants in an Ozone Reactor, M.D. Gurol, AWWA 1984 Annual Conference, Dallas, TX, Jun. 10-14, 1984, pp. 2-21. |
Field Applications of In Situ Remediation Technologies: Chemical Oxidation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Sep. 1998, pp. 1-31. |
Gas Partitioning of Dissolved Volatile Organic Compounds in the Vadose Zone: Principles, ABBB Temperature Effects and Literature Review, J.W. Washington, Groundwater, vol. 34, No. 4, Jul.-Aug. 1996, pp. 709-718. |
Ground Water Issue, H.H. Russell et al., u.s. Environmental Protection Agency, Jan. 1992, pp. 1-10. |
Ground Water, Surface Water. and Leachate, http://www.frtr.gov/mlltrix2/section 4/4-30.html, Jul. 22, 2003, pp. 1-4. |
How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup Technologies for Underground Storage Tank Sites, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, May 1995, 37 pages. |
In Situ Air Sparging System, Tech Data Sheet. Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, Mar. 1997, pp. 1-4. |
In Situ Chemical Oxidation for Remediation of Contaminated Soil and Ground Water, EPA, Sep. 2000, Issue No. 37; pp. 1-6. |
Yin, Y, PhD, In Situ Chemical Treatment, Technology Evaluation Report, GWRTAC, Jul. 1999, pp. 1-74. |
J. Dablow et al, In Situ Ozonation to Remediate Recalcitrant Organic Contamination, IT Corporation, .pp. 1-2, date unknown. |
In Situ Remediation with Chemical Oxidizers: Ozone, Peroxide and Permanganate, Environmental Bio-systems, Inc., pp. 1-5, date unknown. |
R. Schaffner Jr., et al., In-Situ Air Sparging Without Inorganic Nutrient Amendment: An Effective Bioremediation Strategy for Treating Petroleum-Contaminated Groundwater Systems http://www.bioremediationgroup.org/BioReferences/Tier—1—Papers/insitu.htm, Jul. 30, 203, pp. 1-14. |
Beltran-Heredia, Kinetics of the Bentazone Herbicide Ozonation, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, vol. A31, No. 3, 1996, pp. 519-537. |
Beltran,. Modelling Industrial Wastewater Ozonation in Bubble Contactors, Ozone Science & Engineering, vol. 17, 1995, pp. 355-378. |
Beltran. Modelling Industrial Wastewater Ozonation in Bubble Contactors, Ozone Science & Engineering, vol. 17, 1995, pp. 379-398. |
Newark Brownfield Site to Increase Student Housing, Environmental Alliance Monitor, http://www.envalliance.com/monitor&pubs/1998fall.htm, 1998, pp. 1-8. |
“RCC RemedOzone Mobile Remediation System”, RCC, 2 pages, date unknown. |
Santa Barbara I Manufactured Gas Plant Site, California EPA, Jan. 2002, pp. 1-6. |
P.V. Shanbhag, et al., Single-phase Membrane Ozonation of Hazardous Organic Compounds ill Aqueous Streams. Journal of Hazardous Materials 41, 1995, pp. 95-104. |
Strategies to Protect Your Water Supply from MTBE, Komex Industries, http://www.komex.com/industries/remediation.htm, 2002, pp. 1-8. |
Technology Status Review in Situ Oxidation, Environmental Security technology Certification Program, Nov. 1999, pp. 1-42. |
The Ultrox System: USEPA Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation Technology, Applications Analysis Report, EPN540/A5-89/012, Sep. 1990. |
P. Dowideit et al, Reaction of Ozone With Ethene and Its Methyl-and Chlorine-Substituted Derivatives in Aqueous Solution, Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 1112-1999. |
K.K. Wiegner, Toxins, toxins everywhere, Forbes, Jul. 22, 1991, pp. 298. |
Bellamy, W.D et al., Treatment of VOC-Contaminated Groundwater by Hydrogen Peroxide and Ozone Oxidation, Res. J. Water Pollution Control Fed. 63, 120., 1991. |
Typical Applications of Ozone, ARCE Systems, Inc., http://www.arcesystems.com/products/ozone/applications.htm, Feb. 2000, pp. 1-2. |
Wheeler, K.P et al., Who's Afraid of MTBE?, http://www.rccnet.com/Wheels.htm, Jul. 2000, pp. 1-5. |
Yuma Pilot-Testing Ozone Sparging, Stripping, Pasha Publications, Defense Cleanup, Nov. 8, 1996, pp. 5-6. |
Transfer Rate of Ozone Across the Gas-Water Interface, S. Okouchi et al., The Chemical Society of Japan, No. 2, 1989, pp. 282-287. |
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,351,257, Office Action dated May 1, 2009, 4 pages. |
Substantive examination report Application No. 01305133.9, Jul. 16, 2003. |
Further Substantive examination report Application No. 01305133.9, Sep. 13, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,048 Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2010 , 18 pages. |
Wilkins (ed.) et al. “Workshop on Monitoring Oxidation-Reduction Processes for Ground-water Restoration,” EPA, (2000), 148 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/409,892, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 1, 2009, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/409,892. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,048, Response to Office Action filed Jan. 7, 2011, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,048, Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2011, 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/847,931, Office Action mailed Feb. 9, 2011, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,048, Response to Office Action filed Apr. 13, 2010, 20 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,048, Office Action mailed Jul. 12, 2010, 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,048, Response to Office Action filed May 31, 2011, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,048, Advisory Action mailed Jun. 27, 2011, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/847,931 Response to Office Action filed Aug. 22, 2011, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/847,931 Office Action mailed Jun. 20, 2011, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/847,931 Response to Office Action filed Apr. 25, 2011, 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12,483,048 Response to Office Action filed Sep. 30, 2011, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,048, Response to Office Action filed Sep. 10, 2010, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,048, Office Action mailed Oct. 7, 2010, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/847,931 Notice of allowance mailed Oct. 14, 2011, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12,483,048 Office Action mailed Oct. 12, 2011, 22 pages. |
European Application No. 05793889.6 Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 15, 2011, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,662, Office Action mailed Nov. 10, 2011, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12,483,048 Response to Office Action filed Jan. 12, 2012, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12,483,048 Office Action Mailed Jan. 30, 2012, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,662 Response to Office Action filed Mar. 12, 2012, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,662 Office Action Mailed Apr. 6, 2012, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/847,931 Notice of allowance mailed Feb. 15, 2012, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,048, Advisory Action mailed Apr. 13, 2012, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,048, Response to Final Rejection filed Mar. 30, 2012, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/631,596 Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 5, 2012, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,048 Response to Final Office Action filed Jul. 30, 2012, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,048 Office Action mailed Nov. 28, 2012, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,662 Response to Office Action filed Aug. 6, 2012, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,662 Office Action Mailed Jan. 24, 2013, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100116725 A1 | May 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09610830 | Jul 2000 | US |
Child | 10602256 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10602256 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 11409892 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11409892 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 12688816 | US |