Patent Grant
11238973
The present application is a Continuation application which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/126,726, filed on Sep. 16, 2016, which is a U.S. National Stage Application filed under 35 U.S.C. § 371(a) of International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/070547, filed Dec. 16, 2014, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/972,826, filed Mar. 31, 2014, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
This disclosure generally relates to the detection of the presence or absence of objects tagged with transponders, which may, for example, allow the detection of retained medical supplies during medical procedures.
It is often useful or important to be able to determine the presence or absence of an object.
For example, it is important to determine whether objects associated with surgery are present in a patient's body before completion of the surgery. Such objects may take a variety of forms. For example, the objects may take the form of instruments, for instance scalpels, scissors, forceps, hemostats, and/or clamps. Also for example, the objects may take the form of related accessories and/or disposable objects, for instance surgical sponges, gauzes, and/or pads. Failure to locate an object before closing the patient may require additional surgery, and in some instances may have serious adverse medical consequences.
Some hospitals have instituted procedures which include checklists or requiring multiple counts to be performed to track the use and return of objects during surgery. Such a manual approach is inefficient, requiring the time of highly trained personnel, and is prone to error.
Another approach employs transponders and a wireless interrogation and detection system. Such an approach employs wireless transponders which are attached to various objects used during surgery. The interrogation and detection system includes a transmitter that emits pulsed wideband wireless signals (e.g., radio or microwave frequency) and a detector for detecting wireless signals returned by the transponders in response to the emitted pulsed wideband signals. Such an automated system may advantageously increase accuracy while reducing the amount of time required of highly trained and highly compensated personnel. Examples of such an approach are discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,026,818, issued Feb. 22, 2000, and U.S. Patent Publication No. U.S. 2004/0250819, published Dec. 16, 2004.
Commercial implementation of such an automated system requires that the overall system be cost competitive and highly accurate. In particular, false negatives must be avoided to ensure that objects are not mistakenly left in the patient. Some facilities may wish to install a single interrogation and detection system in each surgery theater, while other facilities may move an interrogation and detection system between multiple surgical theaters. In either case, the overall system will require a large number of transponders, since at least one transponder is carried, attached or otherwise coupled to each object which may or will be used in surgery. Consequently, the transponders must be inexpensive. However, inexpensive transponders typically have a relatively large variation in the frequency of signals they emit, making it difficult to accurately detect the signals returned by the transponders. This may be particularly difficult in some environments which are noisy with respect to the particular resonant frequencies of the transponders. Consequently, a new approach to detection of the presence and absence of transponder that facilitates the use of inexpensive transponders is highly desirable.
A transponder detection device to detect surgical objects in a work area, the surgical objects marked by respective resonant tag elements that produce return signals in response to energization may be summarized as including: a hand-held probe which includes: a substantially spherically shaped coil form that includes three coil support channels, each of the three coil support channels defines an outer coil support surface; a first antenna element which includes a first electrical wire wound around the outer coil support surface of a first one of the three coil support channels, the first antenna element arranged to transmit and receive signals generally in a first coordinate direction; a second antenna element which includes a second electrical wire wound around the outer coil support surface of a second one of the three coil support channels over the first electrical wire, the second antenna element arranged to transmit and receive signals generally in a second coordinate direction orthogonal to the first coordinate direction; a third antenna element which includes a third electrical wire wound around the outer coil support surface of a third one of the three coil support channels over the first electrical wire and the second electrical wire, the third antenna element arranged to transmit and receive signals generally in a third coordinate direction orthogonal to the first coordinate direction and the second coordinate direction; a processor operatively coupled to the first antenna element, the second antenna element, and the third antenna element; and a nontransitory processor-readable medium communicatively coupled to the processor and that stores at least one of instructions or data executable by the processor, which cause the processor to: control each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to emit wideband interrogation signals; receive any of the return signals from any of the resonant tag elements; and determine from a receipt of any of the return signals whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area.
Each of the three coil support channels may be shaped as a spherical zone of a virtual sphere. Each of the three coil support channels may be shaped as a spherical zone of a virtual sphere centered on a great circle of the virtual sphere. The three coil support channels may be shaped as a spherical zones of the substantially spherically shaped coil form centered on respective orthogonal great circles of the coil form. The hand-held probe may further include: a housing that includes a cavity sized and shaped to receive the coil form therein. The transponder detection device may further include: a light source coupled to the housing that provides a visual indication of at least a status of the transponder detection device. The cavity of the housing may be defined by a substantially spherical body portion, and the housing may further include a handle portion coupled to the body portion. The handle portion may include a handle portion cavity, and the hand-held probe may further include: a circuit board disposed within the handle portion cavity and electrically coupled to the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element. The transponder detection device may further include: a cable coupled to the handle portion and electrically coupled to the circuit board to couple the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to the first electronic circuit and the second electronic circuit. The processor: may control each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to emit wideband interrogation signals in time-wise succession during a transmit portion of respective transmit and receive cycles, and may control each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to not emit wideband interrogation signals during a receive portion of respective transmit and receive cycles. The processor may receive any of the return signals from any of the resonant tag elements during the receive portion of respective transmit and receive cycles. The processor: may filter the any received return signals from noise to determine whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area. The processor may further: receive a selection of at least one of a dynamic scan mode and a static scan mode; in response to receiving a selection of the static scan mode, control each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to emit wideband interrogation signals according to a static instrument scan cycle having a static instrument scan cycle duration; and in response to receiving a selection of the dynamic scan mode, control each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to emit wideband interrogation signals according to a dynamic instrument scan cycle having a dynamic instrument scan cycle duration that is less than the static instrument scan cycle duration. In response to receiving a selection of the static scan mode, the processor may control each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to emit wideband interrogation signals centered on a first frequency, and may further control each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to emit wideband interrogation signals centered on a second frequency, the second frequency different from the first frequency. The static instrument scan cycle duration may be less than fifteen (15) seconds and the dynamic instrument scan cycle duration may be less than five (5) seconds. The processor may further: determine from a receipt of any of the return signals whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area based at least in part on a frequency of the return signals received being within a defined frequency range. The defined frequency range may include the frequency range of about 137 kHz to about 160 kHz. The processor may further: determine whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area based at least in part on a Q value of the return signals received. The processor may further: determine whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area based at least in part on a Q value of the return signals received being at least equal to a threshold Q value. The threshold Q value may be 35. The process may further: determine whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area based at least in part on a signal detection threshold. The processor may further: receive electromagnetic signals during a noise detection portion; determine a noise value indicative of a noise level that corresponds to a number of measurements of the electromagnetic signals received during the noise detection portion; adjust a signal detection threshold based at least in part on the determined noise value; and determine whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area based at least in part on a number of measurements of the return signals received and the adjusted signal detection threshold. The processor may further: compare a maximum value of a plurality of matched filter outputs with the adjusted signal detection threshold. The processor may further: adjust the signal detection threshold to be approximately twice the determined noise value. The processor may further: determine if an output of at least one matched filter during the noise detection portion exceeds a noise fault threshold indicative of a noise fault. The wideband interrogation signals may be centered in at least one of a 136 kHz band, a 139 kHz band, a 142 kHz band, a 145 kHz band, a 148 kHz band, a 151 kHz band or a 154 kHz band.
A method to detect surgical objects in a work area, the surgical objects marked by respective resonant tag elements that produce return signals in response to energization may be summarized as including: providing a transponder detection device that includes a hand-held probe that includes a substantially spherically shaped coil form that includes three coil support channels, each of the three coil support channels defines an outer coil support surface, a first antenna element which includes a first electrical wire wound around the outer coil support surface of a first one of the three coil support channels, the first antenna element arranged to transmit and receive signals generally in a first coordinate direction, a second antenna element which includes a second electrical wire wound around the outer coil support surface of a second one of the three coil support channels over the first electrical wire, the second antenna element arranged to transmit and receive signals generally in a second coordinate direction orthogonal to the first coordinate direction, and a third antenna element which includes a third electrical wire wound around the outer coil support surface of a third one of the three coil support channels over the first electrical wire and the second electrical wire, the third antenna element arranged to transmit and receive signals generally in a third coordinate direction orthogonal to the first coordinate direction and the second coordinate direction; emitting wideband interrogation signals via the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element; receiving any of the return signals from any of the resonant tag elements via at least one of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element; and determining from a receipt of any of the return signals whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area.
Emitting wideband interrogation signals via the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element may include, for each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element, emitting a first wideband interrogation signal centered at a first frequency and emitting a second wideband interrogation signal centered at a second frequency, the second frequency different from the first frequency. The method may further include: controlling each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to emit wideband interrogation signals in time-wise succession during a transmit portion of respective transmit and receive cycles and controlling each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to not emit wideband interrogation signals during a receive portion of respective transmit and receive cycles. The method may further include: filtering the any received return signals from noise to determine whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area. The method may further include: controlling each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to emit wideband interrogation signals according to a static instrument scan cycle having a static instrument scan cycle duration; and controlling each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to emit wideband interrogation signals according to a dynamic instrument scan cycle having a dynamic instrument scan cycle duration that is less than the static instrument scan cycle duration. The transponder detection device may include a user interface, the method further including: receiving a selection of at least one of the dynamic instrument scan cycle and the static instrument scan cycle via the user interface. The method may further include: in response to receiving a selection of the static instrument scan cycle, controlling each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to emit wideband interrogation signals centered on a first frequency; and controlling each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to emit wideband interrogation signals centered on a second frequency, the second frequency different from the first frequency. The static instrument scan cycle duration may be less than fifteen (15) seconds and the dynamic instrument scan cycle duration may be less than five (5) seconds. The method may further include: determining from a receipt of any of the return signals whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area based at least in part on a frequency of the return signals received being within a defined frequency range. The method may further include: determining whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area based at least in part on a Q value of the return signals received. The method may further include: determining whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area based at least in part on a Q value of the return signals received being at least equal to a threshold Q value. The method may further include: determining whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area based at least in part on a signal detection threshold. The method may further include: receiving electromagnetic signals during a noise detection portion; determining a noise value indicative of a noise level that corresponds to a number of measurements of the electromagnetic signals received during the noise detection portion; adjusting a signal detection threshold based at least in part on the determined noise value; and determining whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area based at least in part on a number of measurements of the return signals received and the adjusted signal detection threshold. The method may further include: comparing a maximum value of a plurality of matched filter outputs with the adjusted signal detection threshold. The method may further include: adjusting the signal detection threshold to be approximately twice the determined noise value. The method may further include: determining if an output of at least one matched filter during the noise detection portion exceeds a noise fault threshold indicative of a noise fault.
A method of operating a transponder detection device that includes a processor, at least one nontransitory processor-readable medium communicatively coupled to the processor and which stores at least one of instructions or data executable by the at least one processor, and a hand-held probe that includes a first antenna element, a second antenna element, and a third antenna element, the first, second, and third antenna elements arranged orthogonal to each other, the first, second, and third antenna elements operatively coupled to the processor may be summarized as including: receiving a selection of at least one of a static scan mode and a dynamic scan mode; in response to receiving a selection of the static scan mode, controlling each of the first, second, and third antenna elements to emit wideband interrogation signals according to a static instrument scan cycle having a static instrument scan cycle duration; and in response to receiving a selection of the static scan mode, controlling each of the first, second, and third antenna elements to emit wideband interrogation signals according to a dynamic instrument scan cycle having a dynamic instrument scan cycle duration that is less than the static instrument scan cycle duration.
A transponder detection device may be summarized as including: a coil form that includes three coil support channels, each of the coil support channels curved about a respective primary axis and curved about a respective secondary axis orthogonal to the respective primary axis, the primary axes orthogonal to one another.
The transponder detection device may further include: a first antenna element which includes a first electrical wire wound around a first one of the three coil support channels; a second antenna element which includes a second electrical wire wound around a second one of the three coil support channels over the first electrical wire; and a third antenna element which includes a third electrical wire wound around a third one of the three coil support channels over the first electrical wire and the second electrical wire. The transponder detection device may further include: a processor operatively coupled to the first antenna element, the second antenna element, and the third antenna element; and a nontransitory processor-readable medium communicatively coupled to the processor and that stores at least one of instructions or data executable by the processor, which cause the processor to: control each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to emit wideband interrogation signals; receive return signals from one or more resonant tag elements; and determine from a receipt of any of the return signals whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area. Curvatures of the three coil support channels about the respective primary axes may be equal to one another and equal to curvatures of the coil support channels about the respective secondary axes.
A transponder detection device may be summarized as including: a coil form including: a first coil support channel curved about a primary axis defined by a first axis and curved about a secondary axis defined by a second axis orthogonal to the first axis; a second coil support channel curved about a primary axis defined by third axis and curved about a secondary axis defined by the first axis, the third axis orthogonal to the first axis and the second axis; and a third coil support channel curved about a primary axis defined by the second axis and curved about a secondary axis defined by the first axis.
Curvatures of the first, second, and third coil support channels about the respective primary axes may be equal to one another and equal to curvatures of the first, second, and third coil support channels about the respective secondary axes. The transponder detection device may further include: a first antenna element including a first electrical wire wound around the first coil support channel; a second antenna element including a second electrical wire wound around the second coil support channel over the first electrical wire; and a third antenna element including a third electrical wire wound around the third coil support channel over the first electrical wire and the second electrical wire. The transponder detection device may further include: a processor operatively coupled to the first antenna element, the second antenna element, and the third antenna element; and a nontransitory processor-readable medium communicatively coupled to the processor and that stores at least one of instructions or data executable by the processor, which cause the processor to: control each of the first antenna element, the second antenna element and the third antenna element to emit wideband interrogation signals; receive return signals from one or more resonant tag elements; and determine from a receipt of any of the return signals whether any of the resonant tag elements are present in the work area.
In the drawings, identical reference numbers identify similar elements or acts. The sizes and relative positions of elements in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. For example, the shapes of various elements and angles are not drawn to scale, and some of these elements are arbitrarily enlarged and positioned to improve drawing legibility. Further, the particular shapes of the elements as drawn, are not intended to convey any information regarding the actual shape of the particular elements, and have been solely selected for ease of recognition in the drawings.
In the following description, certain specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of various disclosed embodiments. However, one skilled in the relevant art will recognize that embodiments may be practiced without one or more of these specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures associated with transmitters, receivers, or transceivers have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring descriptions of the embodiments.
Unless the context requires otherwise, throughout the specification and claims which follow, the word “comprise” and variations thereof, such as, “comprises” and “comprising” are to be construed in an open, inclusive sense, that is as “including, but not limited to.”
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. It should also be noted that the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
The headings and Abstract of the Disclosure provided herein are for convenience only and do not interpret the scope or meaning of the embodiments.
The object 106 may take a variety of forms, for example instruments, accessories and/or disposable objects useful in performing surgical procedures. For instance, the object 106 may take the form of scalpels, scissors, forceps, hemostats, and/or clamps. Also for example, the objects 106 may take the form of surgical sponges, gauze and/or padding. The object 106 is tagged, carrying, attached or otherwise coupled to a transponder 116. Embodiments of the interrogation and detection system 104 disclosed herein are particularly suited to operate with transponders 116 which are not accurately tuned to a chosen or selected resonant frequency. Consequently, the transponders 116 do not require high manufacturing tolerances or expensive materials, and thus may be inexpensive to manufacture.
In use, the medical provider 102 may position the probe 112 proximate the patient 108 in a fixed or static position to detect the presence or absence of the transponder 116 and hence an object 106. The medical provider 102 may in some embodiments dynamically move the probe 112 along and/or across the body of the patient 108 or may move the probe near other areas, such as a near a trash can or drape bag in a surgery room. In some embodiments, the probe 112 may be sized to fit at least partially in a body cavity 118 of the patient 108.
The transponder 116a includes a miniature ferrite rod 230 with a conductive coil 232 wrapped about an exterior surface thereof to form an inductor (L), and a capacitor (C) 234 coupled to the conductive coil 232 to form a series LC circuit. The conductive coil 232 may, for example, take the form of a spiral wound conductive wire with an electrically insulative sheath or sleeve. The transponder 116a may include an encapsulant 236 that encapsulates the ferrite rod 230, conductive coil 232, and capacitor 234. The encapsulant 236 may be a bio-inert plastic that protects the ferrite rod 230, conductive coil 232 and/or capacitor 234 from pressure and/or from fluids, for example bodily fluids.
In some embodiments, the ferrite rod 230 may include a passage 238 sized to receive a physical coupler, for example a bonding tie or string 240. The bonding tie or string 240 may take the form of an elastomeric x-ray opaque flexible elongated member, that may be used to attach the transponder 116a to various types of objects 106, for example surgical sponges. The transponder 116a may have a length of about 8 millimeters and a diameter of about 2 millimeters. Employing such small dimensions ensures that the transponder 116a does not impede deformation of objects 106 such as sponges. The transponder 116a may include an optional diode (not shown), to protect against over-voltage occurrences caused by other electronic instruments.
The transponder 116b includes a single loop of conductive material 242, for example a loop of conductive wire forming an inductor (L), coupled in series to a capacitor 244 (C) to form an LC series circuit. The loop of conductive material 242 and capacitor 244 may be encapsulated in an elastomeric coating or sleeve 246. The dimensions of the transponder 116b may be similar to the dimensions of the transponder 116a. In some embodiments, the dimensions of the transponder 116b are greater than the dimensions of the transponder 116a. The transponder 116b is highly flexible, and thus may provide its own thread-like or string-like attachment to various types of objects 106.
The transponder 116c includes a dumbbell-shaped ferrite rod 248 having broad end portions 248a, 248b, and a narrow intermediate portion 248c which is wrapped by a conductive coil 250. The broad end portions 248a, 248b contain the conductive coils 250. Such a design may provide stronger and/or more reliable signal emission than transponders 116a, 116b fashioned with cylindrical ferrite rods. The transponder 116c may optionally include an encapsulant 252. Further details regarding the transponder 116c may be found in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/811,376 filed Jun. 6, 2006. In some embodiments, the transponder 116c may be formed as a fusiform-shaped object, with truncated ends. The fusiform shape may be advantageous over cylindrical shaped transponders 116a, 116b in reducing the likelihood of close parallel alignment of the transponders 116a, 116b, which may produce transponder-to-transponder interaction and interference.
The transponder 116d includes a ferrite core 253, inductor (L) 254, and capacitor (C) 255 electrically coupled to the inductor 254 to form an LC series circuit. The transponder 116d also includes a capsule 256 with a cavity 257 open at one end to receive the ferrite core 253, inductor 254 and capacitor 255, as well as a lid 258 to close the open end of the capsule 256.
The ferrite core 253 may, for example, take the form of a soft ferrite drum, and may, for example, be formed of Nickel Zinc. Suitable ferrite cores 253 may be commercially available from TAK FERRITE as part no. L8A DR3X9 B=1.8 F=6 or from HUAH YOW under part no. 10R030090-77S. The drum may have a pair of larger diameter end portions 253a, 253b, with a smaller diameter intermediate portion 253c therebetween.
The inductor 254 may take the form of magnet wire wrapped around the intermediate portion 253c of the ferrite core 253. The magnet wire may, for example, have a dimension of approximately 41 American Wire Gauge (AWG), although some embodiments may employ wires or conductors of larger or small gauges. Suitable inductors 254 may be commercially available from ELEKTISOLA under part no. PN-155 or from ROSEN under part no. 2UEW-F. The inductor may, for example, include approximately 432 turns, over approximately 6.5 layers, although some embodiments may include a greater or lesser number of turns and/or layers. The transponder 116d may include tape and/or epoxy enveloping the inductor 254. Suitable tape may be commercially available from 3M under part nos. 1298, 1350-1 or PLEO 1P801, while suitable epoxy may be commercially available from LOCKTITE under part no. 3211.
The capacitor 255 may, for example, take the form of a ceramic capacitor. The capacitor 255 may, for example, have a capacitance of 470 PF, 100V, with a Quality factor of Q>2200 @ 1 MHz. Suitable capacitors 255 may be commercially available from SANJV DIELECTRIC under part no. 0805NPO471J101 or from FENG HUA under part no. 0805CG471J101NT.
The capsule 256 and lid 258 may, for example, be formed of a polypropylene. Suitable capsules 256 and lids 258 may be commercially available from WEITHE ELECTRON (HK) COMPANY, under part specification CASE 4.3×12.6. The combination of the capsule 256 and lid 258 may, for example, have a length of approximately 12.8 mm and a diameter of 4.4 mm. Circuit bonds may, for example, employ UNITED RESINS CORP. part no. 63001500 CIRCUIT BOND LV, while solder may take the form of a lead free 96.5% Ag/3% Sn/0.5 Cu solder.
The transponders 116 may be attached to hemostats, scissors, certain forms of forceps, and the like. In some embodiments, the transponders 116 may be coupled to the object 106 by way of a clamp or holder. In some embodiments, the transponders 116 may be retained within a cavity of the holder. In some embodiments, the holder may be fashioned of a durable deformable material, such as surgical grade polymer, which may be deformed to clamp securely onto the finger or thumbhole of an instrument. In other embodiments, the transponders 116 may be attached to objects 106 by way of pouches fashioned of sheet material (e.g., surgical fabric) surrounding the transponder 116. The transponder 116 is retained within the pouch, and in some embodiments the pouch may be sewn or otherwise sealed. Sealing may be done with adhesive, hot glue, clamping, grommeting, or the like.
As shown in
The body portion 302 may define a cavity 316 (
As shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, the probe 112 may include one or more user interface devices, for example one or more visual indicators 314 (
In the illustrated embodiment, the printed circuit board includes the light emitting diode 332 (
As shown in
As shown in
The curvatures of the length L and the width W of each of the outer coil support surfaces 318a-c are equal to each other. For example, the length L of the outer coil surface 318a at its center may be defined by a circle in the XY plane having a curvature radius RL-318a (
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
By providing three mutually orthogonal coils 306a-c within the spherical body portion 302 of the probe 112, the likelihood of detecting a transponder at a given distance is improved. This is illustrated with reference to
By utilizing three mutually orthogonal coils 306a-c as opposed to a single planar coil, it is possible to ensure that the angle θ of rotation of the transponder coil 254 will always be less than 45 degrees with respect to at least one of the orthogonal coils 306a-c. At an angle θ of rotation of 45 degrees (i.e., “worst case” orientation), the magnetic coupling is approximately 71% of the maximum or optimum magnetic coupling (i.e., cosine 45 degrees=0.707). Thus, the use of three orthogonal coils 306a-c ensures that the magnetic coupling between the transponder coil 254 and at least one of the coils 306a-c of the probe 112 will always be at least 71% of the maximum coupling orientation. Accordingly, given the same transmit energy, transponders 116 may be detected at a greater distance using the three orthogonal coils 306a-c as compared to using a single planar coil. Additionally or alternatively, the probe 112 may transmit signals at lower energy levels to achieve a similar read range as a single planar coil transmitting at a higher energy level.
The control system 500 includes a field programmable gate array (FPGA) board 502, analog board 504 and display board 506, communicatively coupled to one another.
The FPGA board includes an FPGA 508, configuration jumpers 510, RS-232 drivers 512, oscillator 514, random access memory (RAM) 516, flash memory 518, and voltage monitoring (VMON) analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 520. The FPGA 508 may take the form of a Xilinx Spartan3 FPGA, which runs FPGA and application software. As explained below, on power up, the FPGA reads the configuration information and application software program from the flash memory 518.
The configuration jumpers 510 are used to select the application software configuration.
The RS-232 drivers 512 are used to allow the application software to communicate using serial RS-232 data for factory test and diagnostics.
The oscillator 514 sets the clock frequency for the operation of the FPGA 508. The oscillator 514 may, for example, take the form of 40 MHz oscillator, although other frequencies are possible.
The RAM 516 is connected to the FPGA 508 and is available for use by the application software. The application software uses this memory space for storage of both the executable program and program data. The RAM 516 may, for example, have a capacity of 1 MB.
The flash memory 518 contains both the FPGA configuration data and the binary application program. On power up the FPGA 508 reads the flash memory to configure the FPGA 508 and to copy the application program binary data from the flash memory 518 to the RAM 516.
The voltage monitor ADC 520 is connected to the FPGA 508 and controlled by the application software to monitor a power supply and regulated voltage forms in controller electronics.
The analog board 504 includes transmit control circuits 522, capacitor selection circuits 524, probe detection circuit 526, signal ADC 528, audible beeper 430 and self-test signal 532.
The transmit control circuits 522 on the analog board 504 are controlled by signals from the FPGA 508 to generate a transmit waveform.
Optional capacitor selection circuits 524 on the analog board 504 are controlled by the signals from the FPGA 508 to tune the drive circuit to match an inductance of the antenna 306.
The probe detection circuit 526 detects when a probe 112 is connected to the controller 110. The output of the probe detection circuit 526 drives a signal denominated as the LOOP_LEVEL_OUT signal, which is an input to the FPGA 508.
The signal ADC 528 is used as a receiver to sample the signals received at the antenna 306 from the transponders 116 (
The audible speaker or beeper 430 can be controlled by the FPGA 508 to emit sounds to indicate various states, modes or operating conditions to the medical provider 102 (
The FPGA 508 can cause the generation of the self-test signal 532 on the analog board 504 at the signal ADC 528. Self-testing may be performed at start up, and/or at other times, for example periodically or in response to the occurrence of certain conditions or exceptions.
The display board 506 includes user interface elements, for example a number of light emitting diodes (LEDs) 434. The FPGA board 502 can control the LEDs 434 on the display board 506. The display board 506 also includes a user selectable activation switch, denominated as front panel button 436. The front panel button 436 is connected to the display board 506 which allow the FPGA 508 to monitor when the front panel button 436 is activated (e.g., pressed).
The software may include application software 602 that is responsible for operating the controller 110 (
The boot loader 604 is automatically loaded when the FPGA 508 is configured, and starts execution after a processor core 606 is reset. The boot loader 604 is responsible for transferring the application software 602 from the flash memory 518 to the external RAM 516.
The processor platform 608 is configured into the FPGA 508 (
The processor core 606 may take the form of a soft processor core supplied by XILINX under the name MICROBLAZE, that implements a 32-bit processor including memory cashes and a floating point unit. A soft core processor is one that is implemented by interconnected FPGA logic cells instead of by a traditional processor logic. The processor core 606 is connected to the internal FPGA peripherals 610a-610n using a 32-bit processor bus 611 called the On-Chip Peripheral Bus. The XILINX supplied peripherals for the MICROBLAZE processor core 606 include external memory interfaces, timers, and general purpose I/O.
The custom logic 612 to create the transmit signals, sample the ADC 128, and accumulate the transponder return signals is designed as a peripheral to the processor core 606. The custom logic 612 is the part of the design of the FPGA 508.
In some embodiments, a detection cycle that employs an approach that optimizes signal to noise ratio (SNR) by a receiver portion may be implemented. Such may, for example, advantageously increase range or increase sensitivity at a given range. One embodiment is optimized based on having an overall detection cycle that performs well for transponders with resonant frequencies from approximately 136 kHz to approximately 154 kHz.
The application software 602 (
During the noise detection portion, which may, for example be a first measurement portion of each detection cycle, ambient or background noise is measured or sampled, providing a value indicative of a level of ambient or background noise for the particular environment. The noise measurements or are taken or captured at a time sufficiently after excitement of the transponders 116 by the interrogation signal emitted by the transmitter such that the transponders 116 are substantially not resonating or responding to any previous excitation by interrogation signals. In particular, a number N of measurements or samples are taken during the noise detection or first measurement portion.
During the signal measurement portion, which may, for example take the form of the second measurement portion of each detection cycle, responses by transponders 116 are measured or sampled. The response measurements or samples are taken with the transmitter transmitting or at a time sufficiently close to excitement of the transponders 116 by the interrogation signal emitted by the transmitter such that the transponders 116 are still substantially resonating or responding to the interrogation signal. In particular, a number M of measurements or samples are taken during the interrogation or second measurement portion.
While the signal measurement portion may be one contiguous or continuous portion, in some embodiments the signal measurement portion may take the form of two or more separate portions or intervals. Each of the portions may employ the same transmit frequency band, for example centered around 145 kHz. Other center channels or frequencies may for example be 136 kHz, 139 kHz, 142 kHz, 145 kHz, 148 kHz, 151 kHz and/or 154 kHz, or any other frequency suitable for exciting the transponder to resonate. Some embodiments may employ frequency hopping, for example transmitting a different center channel or frequency for each of a plurality of signal measurement portions of each detection cycle. Such is discussed further in U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/892,208, filed Feb. 28, 2007 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,957) and U.S. non-provisional application Ser. No. 11/743,104, filed May 1, 2007 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,696,877).
The gap portion may provide time for the response of the transponders 116 to the interrogation signal to decay sufficiently to allow measurement of noise.
Some embodiments may arrange the gap, the noise detection portion and/or the signal measurement portion, or parts thereof, in a different order.
In one embodiment, the time to accumulate the noise sample or value indicative of a noise level may, for example, be approximately 37 milliseconds, and the time to accumulate the transponder signal measurement approximately 228 milliseconds. Along with a gap of approximately 10 milliseconds between the signal and noise portions, the time for a single detection cycle would be approximately 275 milliseconds. As noted above, the transmitter is OFF during the noise measurement portion of each detection cycle to allow the receiver to measure ambient noise, and the signal detection portion is taken with the transmitter transmitting a wideband interrogation signal about the particular center channel or frequency.
The noise samples collected by the receiver may be accumulated and a highest one or more of multiple samples or measurements over one or more detection cycles selected or used to prevent unwarranted fluctuations. The response signals from the transponder 116 may be accumulated and/or averaged or integrated over one detection cycle or over multiple detection cycles.
The number N of noise measurements or samples and/or the number M of response signal measurements or samples may be selected to achieve a desired ratio of N to M, in order to achieve or maintain a desired signal to noise ratio. For example, obtaining 200 noise measurements or samples and 800 response measurements or samples each detection cycle results in an SNR of approximately 2 (e.g., the square root of the 800 divided by 200). While an SNR as low as 1.1:1 may be sufficient in some embodiments, an SNR approaching 2:1 ensures sufficient differentiation to eliminate or reduce the possibility of false positives to an acceptable level for the particular applications envisioned herein. Any known hardware and software accumulators, summer, integrators and/or other hardware or software may be suitable.
The accumulated or integrated received signal may be matched filtered with both in-phase and quadrature reference signals to determine the signal magnitude. The received receive signal is matched filtered with a plurality of reference signals, for example with the seven reference signals, for instance as shown in Table 1 below. Some embodiments may employ matched filtering before accumulating or integrating the received signal.
The maximum value for the matched filters (e.g., seven matched filters) with active transmit may be compared with an adjusted detection threshold. If the maximum value is greater than the detection threshold, then a response signal from a transponder 116 may be considered as having been detected, and appropriate action is taken, such as discussed below with reference to
The noise filtering processes the measured or sampled noise values for each detection cycle to determine a stable noise floor value. The output of the noise filter may, for example, be the maximum of either the current noise measurement or a decayed value of the previous noise floor.
The output of the noise filter may be an estimate of the current noise floor level after selecting the highest of a plurality (e.g., 6) of noise measurements or samples. The filtered noise floor may advantageously include samples collected, captured or measured both before and after a given signal sample is collected, captured or measured. Thus, for any sample of a given detection cycle the noise floor may include noise samples from the given detection cycle, as well as a next successive detection cycle. The filtered noise floor may additionally, or alternatively, include noise samples from one or more successively preceding detection cycles, as well as one or more successfully succeeding detection cycles.
In response to detecting a disconnect of power, the interrogation and detection system 104 enters a Power OFF mode at 702. For example, the Power OFF mode 702 may be entered when the controller 110 (
In response to detecting an application of power, the interrogation and detection system 104 enters a Power-Up mode 704. The Power UP mode 704 may, for example, in response to the application of power to the controller 110 and turning ON the switch on the back of the controller. In the Power-Up mode 704, a Power LED 434a may be turned ON or illuminated, and may remain ON or illuminated as long as the power is applied and the switch is in the ON state. In response to entering the Power UP mode 704, the software 200 will perform software initialization, built in tests, and an audio/visual test.
If a fault is detected, the software 200 progresses to a System Fault Mode 706. If no faults are detected, the software 200 may turn a System Ready LED green, and enter a Probe Detection Mode 708.
In the System Fault Mode 706, the software 200 may cause an indication of the detection of a system fault by blinking a System Ready LED 434b yellow, and/or issuing a sequence of rapid beeps or other sounds. The corrective action for the System Fault Mode 706 is to cycle power to reinitiate the Power Up mode 704. Continued failure indicates a failed controller 110.
In the Probe Detection Mode 708, the software 200 checks for a probe 112 connected to the controller 110. The Probe Detection Mode 708 may be indicated by turning the System Ready LED 434b green and turning the Probe Ready LED 434c OFF. If no probe 112 is detected, the software 200 remains in the Probe Detection Mode. If a probe 112 is detected, the software 200 progresses to the Probe Initialization Mode 710.
At the start of the Probe Initialization Mode 710, after the detection of a probe 112, the software 200 may turn the Probe Ready LED 434c yellow and check for the presence of a fuse in the probe 112. If a fuse is found, the software 200 may attempt to blow the fuse and verify that the fuse was correctly blown. After the fuse is blown the software 200 may verify that probe 112 is operating within tolerances. The software 200 may indicate that the probe 112 is ready by turning the Probe Ready LED 434c green. The software 200 may also start a timer which will allow the probe 112 to be disconnected and reconnected to the controller for a period to time (e.g., 5 hours) after the fuse is blown.
The controller 110 may determine the adjustments or fine tuning to be made about the center frequencies or channels during Probe Initialization Mode 710. In particular, the controller 110 may determine the particular frequency in each of the frequency bands that elicits the response with the highest voltage. The controller may determine such by varying the capacitance of the LC circuit using the switched capacitors C33-C36 during the Probe Initialization Mode 710. The particular combination of switched capacitors C33-C36 which achieved the response with the highest voltage may then be automatically employed during a Scan Mode 714 (discussed below) to adjust or fine tune about the center frequency or channel in each broad band of transmission. Other approaches to determining the fine tuning may be employed.
If the software 200 does not successfully complete the Probe Initialization Mode 710, the software 200 enters an Invalid Probe Mode 712. If the software 200 successfully completes the Probe Initialization Mode 710, the software 200 progresses to the Scan Mode 714 to automatically start scanning.
In the Invalid Probe Mode 712, the software 200 may blink the Probe Ready LED 434c yellow and issues a slow beep pattern.
The Invalid Probe Mode may be entered in response to any of the following conditions: The probe 112 connected to the controller 110 is out of tolerance.
The controller 110 is unable to blow the fuse in the probe 112.
The probe 112 does not have a fuse and more than the set time period has past (e.g., 5 hours) since a fuse was blown.
The probe 112 does not have a fuse and the controller 110 has been restarted.
The probe 112 has been connected to the controller for more than the set time period (e.g., 5 hours).
The probe 112 is detuned due to close proximity to metal.
The corrective action for the Invalid Probe Mode 712 is to remove the invalid probe 112 and attach a new probe 112 to the controller 110 that contains a fuse or to reconnect the probe 112 while holding it in the air at least 2 feet away from large metallic objects.
The software 200 enters the Scan Mode 714 when the probe 112 is ready and the operator presses a Start/Stop button. The software 200 may issue a short three beep pattern via the speaker or beeper 130 when entering the Scan Mode 714 to identify the entry to the user.
In the Scan Mode 714, the software 200 may continuously or periodically perform the following functions.
Look for response signals from transponders 116
Monitor the Noise Level
Insure the probe 112 is connected and operating correctly
Blink the LED's in a circular pattern
When the operator or user pushes the Start/Stop button or the a scan maximum time interval (e.g., 4 minute) has been reached, the software 200 may issue a short three beep pattern and return to the Probe Ready Mode 716.
When an appropriate response signal from a transponder 116 is detected while in Scan Mode 714, the software 200 may turn ON an amber DETECT LEDs 434d and/or provide an audible alarm. The alarm may, for example, beep a continuous solid tone as long as the transponder is detected, with a minimum of beep duration of, for instance 0.5 second.
If the software 200 detects the probe 112 is disconnected while in the Scan Mode 714, the software 200 enters the Scan Fault Mode 720. In the Scan Fault Mode 720, the software 200 may issue a sequence of rapid beeps and blink ON and OFF the amber DETECT LEDs 434d. The Scan Fault Mode 720 can be cleared by pushing the Start/Stop button. The software 200 will automatically clear the Scan Fault Mode 720 after 10 beeps.
While in the Scan Mode 714, if excess noise or loss of transmit signal is detected, the software 200 will progress to the Environment Error Mode 722. In the Environment Error Mode 722, the software 200 may issue or produce an appropriate indication. For example, the software 200 may cause the production of a sequence of slow beeps and the blinking ON and OFF the green circle LEDs 434e. The corrective action for the Environment Error Mode 722 is to reposition the probe 112 away from large metal objects or sources of electrical interference. The software 200 will automatically stop the scan if the environment error condition lasts for more than a set time or number of beeps (e.g., 5 beeps).
During each of a plurality of detection cycles, the interrogation and detection system performs a number of acts 802-814. At 802, the interrogation and detection system receives electromagnetic signals, for example unmodulated electromagnetic signals, during a noise detection portion of the detection cycle. The below descriptions will be presented in terms of unmodulated electromagnetic signals due to the unique technical advantages realized by a system that employs simple resonant transponders without any on-board memory or storage, and from which information cannot be read from or written to. However, some embodiments may employ readable and/or writable transponders, for instance radio frequency identification (RFID) transponders or tags, which respond with a modulated electromagnetic signal that encodes information in the modulation. The various techniques described herein are applicable to such transponders and modulated electromagnetic signals.
At 804, the interrogation and detection system determines a noise value indicative of a noise level that corresponds to a highest one of a number N of samples or measurements of the unmodulated electromagnetic signals received during the noise detection portion of the detection cycle, where the number N is greater than one. At 806, the interrogation and detection system adjusts a signal detection threshold based at least in part on the determined noise value of at least one of the detection cycles.
At 808, the interrogation and detection system emits at least one electromagnetic interrogation signal during a transmit portion of the detection cycle. At 810, the interrogation and detection system receives unmodulated electromagnetic signals during a receive response portion of the detection cycle that follows the transmit portion of the detection cycle.
At 812, the interrogation and detection system determines the presence or absence of a transponder based at least in part on a number M of samples or measurements of the unmodulated electromagnetic signals received during the detection cycle and the adjusted signal detection threshold, where the number M is greater than one. A ratio of N:M may be at least equal to 4. N may be equal to about 200 and M may be equal to about 800.
The interrogation and detection system may determine a noise value indicative of a noise level based at least in part on the unmodulated electromagnetic signals received during the noise detection portion of the detection cycle by setting the noise value based on the highest one of six samples or measurements of the unmodulated electromagnetic signal received during the noise detection portion of the detection cycle.
The interrogation and detection system may adjust the signal detection threshold by adjusting the signal detection threshold based at least in part on a first number of determined noise values indicative of a noise level during at least one noise detection portion that occurred before the receive response portion of a first one of the detection cycles and a second number of determined noise values indicative of a noise level during at least one noise detection portion that occurred after the receive response portion of the first one of the detection cycles.
The interrogation and detection system may adjust the signal detection threshold based at least in part on the determined noise value of at least one of the detection cycles by adjusting the signal detection threshold to be approximately twice an average of at least one of the first and the second number of determined noise values.
The interrogation and detection system may adjust the signal detection threshold based at least in part on the determined noise value of at least one of the detection cycles by adjusting the signal detection threshold to be approximately twice a greatest one of at least one of the first and the second number of determined noise values.
The interrogation and detection system may determine the presence or absence of a transponder by comparing a maximum value of a plurality of matched filter outputs with the adjusted signal threshold.
The interrogation and detection system may adjust the signal detection threshold based at least in part on the determined noise value of at least one of the detection cycles by adjusting the signal detection threshold to be approximately twice the determined noise value.
The interrogation and detection system may adjust the signal detection threshold based at least in part on the determined noise value of at least one of the detection cycles includes adjusting the signal detection threshold to be the large of approximately twice the determined noise value or a defined threshold value. The defined threshold value may for example be approximately 0.5 mV.
In some embodiments, the interrogation and detection system determines if an output of at least one matched filter during the noise detection portion of the detection cycle exceeds a noise fault threshold indicative of a noise fault.
In some embodiments, the interrogation and detection system determines if the output of the at least one matched filter during the noise detection portion of the detection cycle exceeds the noise fault threshold for a defined period of time. The interrogation and detection system may terminates the detection cycle in response to the output of the at least one matched filter exceeding the noise fault threshold for the defined period of time.
The interrogation and detection system may convert the received signal(s) from the time domain to the frequency domain spectrum. The interrogation and detection system may, for example, perform a Fourier transform, for instance a fast Fourier transform such as a 256 point fast Fourier transform. Suitable algorithms and/or sets of software code for performing such are available or can be written.
The interrogation and detection system may search the frequency domain spectrum to determine the object with the strongest resonance in a defined frequency band. For example, the interrogation and detection system may search the frequency domain spectrum from about 120 kHz to about 175 kHz. An amplitude of the resonant object may be computed as the sum of the resonant power plus and minus 2 fast Fourier transform bins from the peak resonance frequency. This approach may provide a more accurate measurement of power than simply using the peak value. The frequency of the resonant object may be computed using an interpolation approach. This approach may provide a more accurate determination of resonant frequency than simply using the fast Fourier bin number.
The interrogation and detection system may determine the presence or absence of a transponder based at least in part on a frequency of the unmodulated electromagnetic signals received during the detection cycle being within a defined frequency range. The defined frequency range may extend from about 137 kHz to about 160 kHz.
The interrogation and detection system may determine a Q value (i.e., Quality factor) of the resonant object from a signal decay slope for the received unmodulated electromagnetic signal(s) returned by the resonant object. The interrogation and detection system may, for example, use multiple windows, for instance five (5) window positions may provide suitable results.
The interrogation and detection system may determine the presence or absence of a transponder based at least in part on a Q value of the unmodulated electromagnetic signal(s) received during the detection cycle. The interrogation and detection system may preferably employ the Q value determination in conjunction with determination based on the frequency and on the determination based on the adjusted signal detection threshold.
In some embodiments, the interrogation and detection system determines the presence or absence of a transponder is based at least in part on a Q value of the unmodulated electromagnetic signals received during the detection cycle being at least equal to a threshold Q value. The threshold Q value may be 35, for example. The interrogation and detection system may preferably employ the Q value determination in conjunction with determination based on the frequency and on the determination based on the adjusted signal detection threshold.
Consequently, tag detection may advantageously be based on the received unmodulated electromagnetic signal(s) satisfying all three conditions: 1) measured amplitude is above a threshold, which may be an adjustable threshold, 2) measured frequency is between a lower limit and an upper limit, and 3) measured Q value is above a minimum Q threshold. Interference, for example from RFID tags or EKG cables, are rejected when any of the following three conditions are satisfied: a) measured frequency is below the lower frequency limit, b) measured frequency is above the upper frequency limit, or c) measured Q value is below the threshold Q value. Such may provide significantly superior results over previous approaches, preventing false positives which could otherwise cause a patient to remain open for longer period of time during surgery and tie up hospital personnel and resources.
The transponder response signal 902 may, for example, be a nominal periodic signal centered around a particular frequency (e.g., 136 kHz, 145 kHz, 154 kHz, etc.). The noise signal 904 may be emitted from an electronic medical device located proximate to the interrogation and detection system 104 (
To accomplish this, in some embodiments the scanning process for each antenna 306 (
A subsample scan cycle delay period 1010f of the interrogation cycle 1010 has a unique duration for interrogation cycles associated with a particular one of the NSS subsample scan cycles. Interrogation cycles associated with different ones of the NSS subsample scan cycles may have subsample scan cycle delay periods 1010f having differing durations. In some embodiments, the subsample scan cycle delay period 1010f associated with respective ones of the NSS subsample scan cycles may be approximately a fraction of the period (T) of the expected transponder response signal 902 (
(0/NSS)*T for interrogation cycles of subsample scan cycle 1;
(1/NSS)*T for interrogation cycles of subsample scan cycle 2;
(2/NSS)*T for interrogation cycles of subsample scan cycle 3;
. . . .
((NSS−1)/NSS)*T for interrogation cycles of subsample scan cycle NSS.
Thus, the period (T) of the expected transponder response signal is divided into NSS start times, with each of the NSS subsample scan cycles being associated with a different one of the start times.
The instrument scan cycle 1102 includes a number NCOILS of coil scan cycles 1104, one coil scan cycle for each of NCOILS present in the interrogation and detection system 104. For example, the system 104 may include three antenna coils (NCOILS=3), mutually orthogonal to each other, such that each instrument scan cycle 1102 includes three coil scan cycles 1104. In some embodiments the system 104 may include six antenna coils (NCOILS=6), or a greater or fewer number of antenna coils. In some embodiments, the system 104 includes a single coil (NCOILS=1), such that only a single coil scan cycle 1104 is performed during each instrument scan cycle 1102.
In the illustrated embodiment, the subsample scan cycle delay periods 1010f are evenly spaced across the duration of the period (T) of the expected transponder response signal. For example, for a transponder response signal expected to have a center frequency of about 145 kHz, the period T is approximately 6.9 μs. Accordingly, interrogation cycles of a next successive subsample scan cycle has a subsample scan cycle delay period 1010f that is about 1/7 of the transponder response signal period T greater than interrogation cycles of a previous successive subsample scan cycle. As an example, the subsample scan cycle delay period 1010f for interrogation cycles I4-1 to I4-250 of subsample scan cycle 4 is three (3) μs and the subsample scan cycle delay period 1010f for interrogation cycles I5-1 to I5-250 of subsample scan cycle 5 is four (4) μs. By utilizing seven different subsample scan cycle delay periods 1010f spread across the duration of the period T of the expected transponder response signal, the probability of a sampling at a time of low harmonically synchronous noise and high transponder response signal is increased. In some embodiments, more or less than seven subsample scan cycles may be used.
In some embodiments, the subsample scan cycle delay periods 1010f of the interrogation cycles may be different fractions of the period (T) of the expected transponder response signal, offset by one or more periods T. For example, in some embodiments with four subsample scan cycles, interrogation cycles of a subsample scan cycle 1 may have a subsample scan cycle delay period of T (i.e., (0/4)*T+T), such that the subsample scan cycle delay period is offset by one period T relative to the example provided in Table 2. Similarly, interrogation cycles of a subsample scan cycle 2 may have a subsample scan cycle delay period of (5/4)*T (i.e., (1/4)*T+T=(5/4)*T), interrogation cycles of a subsample scan cycle 3 may have a subsample scan cycle delay period of (6/4)*T (i.e., (2/4)*T+T=(6/4)*T), and interrogation cycles of a subsample scan cycle 4 may have a subsample scan cycle delay period of (7/4)*T (i.e., (3/4)*T+T=(7/4)*T). Importantly, the subsample scan cycle delay periods for the interrogation cycles in respective subsample scan cycles are different fractions of the expected transponder response signal. Other values for the subsample scan cycle delay periods may be used to obtain samples at different start times within the period T of the expected transponder response signal.
The method starts at 1302. The method 1300 may, for example, start when an interrogation and detection system enters the Scan Mode 714 (
At 1306, the interrogation and detection system initializes a control variable SUBSAMPLE_COUNT. This control variable may be used during the method 1300 for comparison with a number of subsample scan cycles NSS to be executed by the interrogation and detection system. In the example shown in
At 1308, the interrogation and detection system initializes a control variable INTERROGATION_COUNT. This control variable may be used during the method 1300 for comparison with the number NI of interrogation cycles 1010 in each subsample scan cycle. In the example of
At 1310, the interrogation and detection system begins a first interrogation cycle (interrogation cycle 1) for a first subsample scan cycle (subsample scan cycle 1) by emitting an electromagnetic interrogation signal centered at first frequency (frequency specific sample cycle 1) during a transmit portion 1010a of the interrogation cycle (see
At 1314, the interrogation and detection system waits a subsample scan cycle delay period 1010f, which in some embodiments is a fraction of the period T of the expected transponder response signal, before starting the next interrogation cycle at 1310. The subsample scan cycle delay period may be approximately equal to ((SUBSAMPLE_COUNT−1)/NSS) times the period (T) of the expected transponder response signal, in some embodiments. Thus, for interrogation cycles associated with subsample scan cycle 1, the subsample scan cycle delay period is approximately zero seconds (i.e., (0/NSS)*T=0). For interrogation cycles associated with subsample scan cycle 2, the subsample scan cycle delay period is approximately equal to (1/NSS)*T, and so on as discussed above.
At 1316, the interrogation and detection system increments the control variable INTERROGATION_COUNT. At 1318, the interrogation and detection system compares the value of INTERROGATION_COUNT to the number of interrogation cycles NI per subsample scan cycle. The interrogation and detection system thus continues to loop through acts 1310-1314 (i.e., interrogation cycles) until all of the interrogation cycles in subsample scan cycle 1 have been executed. The number of interrogation cycles per subsample scan cycle may be any suitable value, such as 1, 100, 250, 500, 2000, etc.
Once all of the interrogation cycles for subsample scan cycle 1 have been executed (i.e., decision 1318=YES), the interrogation and detection system increments the control variable SUBSAMPLE_COUNT at 1320, and compares its value to the number of subsample scan cycles NSS at 1322. Thus, similar to the acts for subsample scan cycle 1, the interrogation and detection system executes the acts 1310-1314 for subsample scan cycle 2 to subsample scan cycle NSS to complete a total of NSS subsample scan cycles and collect NSS subsamples.
Once all of the interrogation cycles for each of the subsample scan cycles 1 to NSS have been executed (i.e., decision 1322=YES), the interrogation and detection system increments the control variable FREQUENCY_COUNT at 1324 and compares its value to the number of transmit frequencies (NFREQ) at 1326. If the number of transmit frequencies NFREQ is greater than one, the interrogation and detection system repeats the acts discussed above to perform NSS subsample scan cycles at each of the number NFREQ of transmit frequencies for a total of NFREQ frequency specific sample cycles.
The method 1300 may terminate at 1328 until started again. As discussed above, the method 1300 may repeat for one or more additional antenna coils of the interrogation and detection system. The method 1300 may continually repeat when the interrogation and detection system is in the Scan Mode. Alternatively or additionally, the method 1300 may run concurrently with other methods or processes.
The method starts at 1402. The method 1400 may, for example, start when an interrogation and detection system enters the Scan Mode 714 (
At 1406, the interrogation and detection system performs a coil scan cycle 1104 (
The method 1400 may terminate at 1412 until started again. The method 1400 may continually repeat when the interrogation and detection system is in the Scan Mode. Alternatively or additionally, the method 1400 may run concurrently with other methods or processes.
The method 1500 begins at 1502. At 1504 the interrogation and detection system may receive a scan mode selection from a user (e.g., via the console 110). In some embodiments, a graphical user interface of the console 110 may present a prompt to the user requesting a selection of a scan mode. In some embodiments, the system may automatically select a scan mode for the user. In this embodiment, the interrogation and detection system is configured to provide at least two different types of instrument scan cycles: a static scan and a dynamic scan. During a static scan, the user maintains the probe 112 in a substantially fixed position relative to the patient 108. For example, in a child delivery medical setting, the user may position the body portion 302 of the probe 112 near the top of the patient's pelvic bone when the patient is in the lithotomy position to scan for detection of objects (e.g., retained sponges). During a dynamic scan, the user may move the probe 112 to various locations to scan for detection of objects. For example, in the dynamic instrument scan cycle mode, the user may move the probe 112 near a trash can, near portions of the patient's body, near a drape bag, and/or near other areas in a medical facility to scan for objects (e.g., so that such objects may be counted).
If the user has selected a static scan (i.e., decision 1506=YES), the interrogation and detection system executes one or more static instrument scan cycles at 1508. If the user has selected a dynamic scan (i.e., decision 1510=YES), the interrogation and detection system executes one or more dynamic instrument scan cycles at 1512.
The static instrument scan cycle and the dynamic instrument scan cycle differ by the number of subsamples obtained. The time available for the dynamic instrument scan cycle is less than the time available for the static instrument cycle because, in the dynamic scan cycle mode, the user is constantly moving the probe 112 relative to a transponder that is to be detected. Thus, to provide a relatively fast scan, in some embodiments only a single frequency specific sample cycle 1108 (
In operation, the medical provider 102 may operate the interrogation and detection system in both instrument scan cycle modes after a medical procedure. For example, the user may operate the interrogation and detection system in the static scan cycle mode to first detect whether any objects are retained in the patient, and then operate the system in the dynamic scan cycle mode to detect whether any objects are located in surrounding areas (e.g., trash cans, drape bags, etc.).
As discussed above, in some embodiments the dynamic scan mode includes a single frequency specific sample cycle 1108 (
In some embodiments, the static scan mode includes two frequency specific sample cycles 1108 that each include seven subsample scan cycles 1112. Thus, the instrument scan cycle 1102 in the static mode includes sequentially performing a coil scan cycle 1104 for each of the three orthogonal coils 306a, 306b, 306c, where each coil scan cycle includes two frequency specific sample cycles 1108 that each include seven subsample scan cycles 1112.
In some embodiments, a single subsample scan cycle 1112 may have a duration of approximately 216 milliseconds. Continuing with the example discussed above, a single dynamic instrument scan cycle may have a duration of about 2.6 seconds (i.e., 216 milliseconds per subsample scan cycle, 4 subsample scan cycles per frequency specific sample scan, 1 frequency specific sample scan per coil, and 3 orthogonal coils). A single static instrument scan cycle may have a duration of approximately 9.1 seconds (i.e., 216 milliseconds per subsample scan cycle, 7 subsample scan cycles per frequency specific sample scan, 2 frequency specific sample scans per coil, and 3 orthogonal coils). The durations of the static and dynamic instrument scan cycles may be modified to suit a particular application, recognizing the tradeoff between scan time and the number of samples collected.
The method 1500 terminates at 1514 until started again. The method 1500 may start again, for example, when the user makes a selection of one of the dynamic scan cycle mode or the static scan cycle mode.
At 1602, the interrogation and detection system determines the presence or absence of a transponder based at least in part on at least one of the subsamples obtained by performing the method 1300 and/or the method 1400 discussed above (
As discussed above, the signal ADC 128 (
In some embodiments, the accumulated or integrated received signal for each subsample is matched filtered with both in-phase and quadrature reference signals to determine the signal magnitude. The received response signal may be matched filtered with a plurality of reference signals, for example with the seven reference signals, for instance as shown in Table 1 above. Some embodiments may employ matched filtering before accumulating or integrating the received signal.
For each subsample collected, the maximum value for the matched filters (e.g., seven matched filters) with active transmit may be compared with an adjusted detection threshold. If the maximum value is greater than the detection threshold for one or more subsamples, then a response signal from a transponder is considered as having been detected, and appropriate action is taken, such as discussed above with reference to
The above description of illustrated embodiments, including what is described in the Abstract, is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments to the precise forms disclosed. Although specific embodiments of and examples are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure, as will be recognized by those skilled in the relevant art. The teachings provided herein of the various embodiments can be applied to other transponders and interrogation and detection systems, not necessarily the exemplary surgical object transponders and interrogation and detection systems generally described above.
For instance, the foregoing detailed description has set forth various embodiments of the devices and/or processes via the use of block diagrams, schematics, and examples. Insofar as such block diagrams, schematics, and examples contain one or more functions and/or operations, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that each function and/or operation within such block diagrams, flowcharts, or examples can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, or virtually any combination thereof. In one embodiment, the present subject matter may be implemented via Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). However, those skilled in the art will recognize that the embodiments disclosed herein, in whole or in part, can be equivalently implemented in standard integrated circuits, as one or more computer programs running on one or more computers (e.g., as one or more programs running on one or more computer systems), as one or more programs running on one or more controllers (e.g., microcontrollers) as one or more programs running on one or more processors (e.g., microprocessors), as firmware, or as virtually any combination thereof, and that designing the circuitry and/or writing the code for the software and or firmware would be well within the skill of one of ordinary skill in the art in light of this disclosure.
In addition, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the mechanisms of taught herein are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that an illustrative embodiment applies equally regardless of the particular type of signal bearing media used to actually carry out the distribution. Examples of signal bearing media include, but are not limited to, the following: recordable type media such as floppy disks, hard disk drives, CD ROMs, digital tape, and computer memory; and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links using TDM or IP based communication links (e.g., packet links).
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/056,787, filed May 28, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/091,667, filed Aug. 25, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/811,376 filed Jun. 6, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 6,026,818, issued Feb. 22, 2000; U.S. Patent Publication No. U.S. 2004/0250819, published Dec. 16, 2004; U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/811,376, filed Jun. 6, 2006 and U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 11/743,104, filed May 1, 2007, are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety. Aspects of the embodiments can be modified, if necessary, to employ systems, circuits and concepts of the various patents, applications and publications to provide yet further embodiments.
These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3422816 | Robinson et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3587583 | Greenberg | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3717876 | Volkers et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
| 4034297 | Giorgi et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4114601 | Abels | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4193405 | Abels | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4355317 | Muzio | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4658818 | Miller, Jr. et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4681111 | Silvian | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4893118 | Lewiner et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4992675 | Conner, Jr. et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5057095 | Fabian | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5105829 | Fabian et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5107862 | Fabian et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5188126 | Fabian et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5190059 | Fabian et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5231273 | Caswell et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5235326 | Beigel et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5281941 | Bernstein | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5329944 | Fabian et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5353011 | Wheeler et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5390360 | Scop et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5446447 | Carney et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5450622 | Vandegraaf | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5482036 | Diab et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5650596 | Morris et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5664582 | Szymaitis | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5923001 | Morris et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928151 | Hossack et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6026818 | Blair et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6075797 | Thomas | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6172608 | Cole | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6201469 | Balch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6211666 | Acker | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6215437 | Schurmann et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6223137 | McCay et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6232878 | Rubin | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6270460 | McCartan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6317027 | Watkins | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6349234 | Pauly et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
| 6353406 | Lanzl et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6354493 | Mon | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6359562 | Rubin | Mar 2002 | B2 |
| 6366206 | Ishikawa et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6401722 | Krag | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6557752 | Yacoob | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6566997 | Bradin | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6588661 | Degrauwe et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6632216 | Houzego et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6633226 | Nysen | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6641039 | Southard | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6648223 | Boukhny et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6650240 | Lee et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6696954 | Chung | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6734795 | Price | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6744378 | Tyburski | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6753783 | Friedman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6777623 | Ballard | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6786405 | Wiedenhoefer | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6812824 | Goldinger et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6812842 | Dimmer | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6822570 | Dimmer et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6838990 | Dimmer | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6861954 | Levin | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6879300 | Rochelle et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6903656 | Lee | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6909366 | Marsh et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6951305 | Overhultz et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6977504 | Wright et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6998541 | Morris et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7001366 | Ballard | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7019650 | Volpi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7026924 | Degrauwe et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7026927 | Wright et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7071791 | Wilson, III | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7098793 | Chung | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7098866 | Desjeux et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7142815 | Desjeux et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7158030 | Chung | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7158754 | Anderson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7160258 | Imran et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7176798 | Dimmer et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7227469 | Varner et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7245893 | Husted et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7256695 | Hamel et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7256696 | Levin | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7268684 | Tethrake et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7299981 | Hickle et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7319396 | Homanfar et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7319397 | Chung et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7319398 | Marino | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7325723 | Desjeux | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7333013 | Berger | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7342497 | Chung et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7362228 | Nycz et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7382255 | Chung | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7397364 | Govari | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7408168 | Aufrichtig et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7420468 | Fabian et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7423535 | Chung et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7446646 | Huomo | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7464713 | Fabian et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7492257 | Tethrake et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7492261 | Cambre et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7508308 | Chung | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7513425 | Chung | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7541933 | Volpi et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7557710 | Sanchez et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7644016 | Nycz et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7696877 | Bames et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7769422 | DiSilvestro et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7795491 | Stewart et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7855656 | Maschke | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7876097 | Greim | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7898420 | Blair et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8072310 | Everhart | Dec 2011 | B1 |
| 8105296 | Morris et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8111162 | Barnes | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8181860 | Fleck et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8193938 | Halberthal et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8256674 | Fleck et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8279068 | Morris et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8319612 | Borcherding | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8323189 | Tran et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8358212 | Blair | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8477076 | Nero, Jr. et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8479989 | Fleck et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8576076 | Morris et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8710957 | Blair et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8872662 | Halberthal et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8878668 | Blair et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8937575 | Ward et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8985446 | Fleck et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8994358 | McElhinny et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9041479 | Nero, Jr. et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9168104 | Dein | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9414973 | Fleck et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9672397 | Fleck et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 10339269 | Blair et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 20010030610 | Rochelle et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020011932 | Rodgers et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032435 | Levin | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020070863 | Brooking | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143320 | Levin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165587 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188259 | Hickle et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004411 | Govari et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105394 | Fabian et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040070399 | Olsson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040129279 | Fabian et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137844 | Desjeux et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040250819 | Blair et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050110640 | Chung | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131397 | Levin | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050212673 | Forster | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050249036 | Davies et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267550 | Hess et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060055537 | Jackson | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106368 | Miller et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060109086 | Amtmann | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060163350 | Melton et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187044 | Fabian et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060202827 | Volpi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235488 | Nycz et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241396 | Fabian et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241399 | Fabian | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070004994 | Sherman | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070005141 | Sherman | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070069866 | Schuessler et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070109099 | Raphaeli et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070125392 | Olson, Jr. et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070152823 | Hirahara et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070213837 | Ferreri et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070238982 | Caylor, III | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070239289 | Cambre et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265690 | Lichtenstein et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070270660 | Caylor, III et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070285249 | Blair et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080007411 | Levin | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080018432 | Volpi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080024281 | Shimura | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051746 | Shen-Gunther | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080132860 | Smith et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080231452 | Levin | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243404 | Banhegyesi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080272913 | Barnes et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080281190 | Petcavich et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080284570 | Ryoo et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080296373 | Zmood et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090008449 | Qing et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090051485 | Corry et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090121965 | Palmade | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132008 | Sniffing et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090215405 | Domokos et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090267765 | Greene et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090322485 | Barnes et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100109848 | Blair et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100179822 | Reppas | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20110063078 | Souma | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110181394 | Blair | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20130023225 | Weber | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130088354 | Thomas | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20150054625 | Blair et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150164603 | Fleck et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150272688 | Blair et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160070942 | Dor et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160157957 | Blair | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160206399 | Blair | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160210548 | Blair | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160259954 | Buhler et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20170348172 | Blair et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 716011 | Feb 2000 | AU |
| 101460096 | Jun 2009 | CN |
| 101896131 | Nov 2010 | CN |
| 2009539478 | Nov 2009 | JP |
| 8602539 | May 1986 | WO |
| 0239917 | May 2002 | WO |
| 03073934 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| 2004078039 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| 2004086997 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| 2007024348 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2007120736 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2008008449 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008024921 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| 2007146091 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2008106552 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| 2008133634 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| 2009154987 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2014176072 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report for (PCT/US2014/070547) date of completion is Mar. 24, 2015 (3 pages). |
| Barnes et al., “Design for a FET based 1 MHz, 10kV Pulse Generator,” Pulsed Power Conference, Digest of Technical Papers, Tenth IEEE International, 2:1335-1340, 1995. |
| Barnes et al., “Method, Apparatus and Article for Detection of Transponder Tagged Objects, for Example During Surgery,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/056,787, filed May 28, 2008, 60 pages. |
| Barnes et al., “Method, Apparatus and Article for Detection of Transponder Tagged Objects, for Example During Surgery,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/091,667, filed Aug. 25, 2008, 76 pages. |
| Black, “Method and Apparatus to Account for Transponder Tagged Objects During Clinical Procedures, Employing a Trocar,” U.S. Appl. No. 62/360,869, filed Jul. 11, 2016, 99 pages. |
| Black, “Method and Apparatus to Account for Transponder Tagged Objects Used During Clinical Procedures, Employing a Trocar,” U.S. Appl. No. 62/378,515, filed Aug. 23, 2016, 103 pages. |
| Blair et al., “Improved Apparatus and Method for Detecting Objects Using Tags and Wideband Detection Device,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/811,376, filed Jun. 6, 2006, 16 pages. |
| Blair et al., “Method and Apparatus to Detect Transponder Tagged Objects, for Example During Surgery,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/109,104, filed Oct. 28, 2008, 73 pages. |
| Blair et al., “Method and Apparatus to Detect Transponder Tagged Objects and to Communicate with Medical Telemetry Devices, for Example During Surgery,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/222,847, filed Jul. 2, 2009, 122 pages. |
| Blair et al., “Method and Apparatus to Detect Transponder Tagged Objects, for Example During Surgery,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/222,443, filed Jul. 1, 2009, 95 pages. |
| Blair et al., “Method and Apparatus to Detect Transponder Tagged Objects, for Example During Medical Procedures,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/242,704, filed Sep. 15, 2009, 127 pages. |
| Blair et al., “Method, Apparatus and Article for Detection of Transponder Tagged Objects, for Example During Surgery,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/892,208, filed Feb. 28, 2007, 50 pages. |
| Blair et al., “Tag and Detection Device,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/458,222, filed Mar. 27, 2003, 23 pages. |
| Blair, “Detectable Surgical Objects and Methods of Making Same,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/109,142, filed Oct. 28, 2008, 47 pages. |
| Blair, “Method and Apparatus to Account for Transponder Tagged Objects Used During Medical Procedures,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/263,726, filed Nov. 23, 2009, 78 pages. |
| Blair, “Transponder Device to Mark Implements, Such as Surgical Implements, and Method of Manufacturing and Using Same,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/086,727, filed Aug. 6, 2008, 30 pages. |
| Blair, “Transponder Device to Mark Implements, Such as Surgical Implements, and Method of Manufacturing and Using Same,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/220,452, filed Jun. 25, 2009, 46 pages. |
| Clearcount Medical Solutions, “The SmartSponge System,” Downloaded from http://clearcount.com on Oct. 20, 2009, 7 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report, dated Jul. 14, 2016, for corresponding European Application No. 16158315.8, 7 pages. |
| Haldor Advanced Technologies, “Haldor Advanced Technologies Releases a Breakthrough New Sponge Management Solution: Modular, Mobile, Wireless, and Tailored per Use-case and Requirements,” Sep. 8, 2015, retrieved fromhttp://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2015/09/06/12938762/ORLocate%205Sponge%20Sol-ution-September%202015.pdf, 2 pages. |
| Hansen et al., “Method and Apparatus to Account for Transponder Tagged Objects Used During Clinical Procedures, Employing a Shielded Receptacle,” U.S. Appl. No. 62/360,864, filed Jul. 11, 2016, 99 pages. |
| Hansen et al., “Method and Apparatus to Account for Transponder Tagged Objects Used During Clinical Procedures Employing a Shielded Receptacle With Antenna,” U.S. Appl. No. 62/360,866, filed Jul. 11, 2016, 154 pages. |
| Macario et al., “Initial Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Device for Detecting Retained Surgical Gauze Sponges Using Radiofrequency Identification Technology,” Arch Surg 141:659-662, Jul. 2006. |
| Poirier et al., “Method and Apparatus to Account for Transponder Tagged Objects Used During Clinical Procedures, for Example Including Count in and/or Count Out and Presence Detection,” U.S. Appl. No. 62/360,868, filed Jul. 11, 2016, 113 pages. |
| Poirier et al., “Method and Apparatus to Account for Transponder Tagged Objects Used During Clinical Procedures, for Example Including Count in and/or Count Out and Presence Detection,” U.S. Appl. No. 62/378,511, filed Aug. 23, 2016, 114 pages. |
| Reza et al., “RFID Transponder Collision Control Algorithm,” Wireless Pers. Commun. 59:689-711, 2011. |
| Written Opinion, dated Jan. 4, 2010, for PCT/US2009/045312, 3 pages. |
| Bacheldor, “Surgical Sponges Get Smart” RFID Journal, Jul. 26, 2006, 2 pages. |
| Blair et al., “Method and Apparatus to Detect Transponder Tagged Objects and to Communicate with Medical Telemetry Devices, for Example During Medical Procedures,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/242,699, filed Sep. 15, 2009, 158 pages. |
| Blair, “Transponder Device to Mark Implements, Such as Surgical Implements, and Method of Manufacturing and Using Same,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/224,323, filed Jul. 9, 2009, 57 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report, dated Jul. 30, 2015, for European Application No. 14176398.7, 7 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report, dated Oct. 26, 2017, for European Application No. 14888535.3-1659, 11 pages. |
| International Search Report, dated Dec. 23, 2014, for PCT/US2014/045942, 3 pages. |
| Technologies Solutions Group, “Sponge-Track,” 2013, 2 pages. |
| Written Opinion, dated Dec. 23, 2014, for PCT/US2014/045942, 7 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action, dated Jul. 30, 2018, for Chinese Application No. 201480077746.0, 24 pages, (with English Translation). |
| Australian Examination Report No. 1 corresponding to counterpart Patent Appln. AU 2014389461 dated Jan. 18, 2019. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190267137 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
