1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the systems and methods for reducing vehicle collisions with deer as well as other roadway hazards.
2. Background Art
Most systems which are intended to minimize deer automobile collisions tend to try to scare the deer from the roadway or to warn drivers of areas in which deer frequently are present.
Deer warning signs with and without flashing warning lights have been the principal method of warning motorists of the potential presence of deer. These signs are often ignored by motorists. These “deer crossing” signs do not indicate that deer are actually present only that deer have been known to frequent that particular stretch of roadway.
So called “deer whistles” are mounted to vehicles to produce a sound that is claimed to scare deer off the roadway when a vehicle is in motion. Some studies claim that this device is ineffective. Further, devices like this or of similar design can in fact scare animals close to the road to dart the wrong way, and out into traffic rather than away.
Other sound making inventions are placed on the sides of roadways to produce sounds that report scare deer such as the sound of an animal being attached by a predator. These devices are off until a headlight of an approaching vehicle is detected and then the emit sound and light to scare the deer off the roadway. The cost of this system is approximately $10,500 per mile.
The Strieter-Lites system came out in the mid 1990s and collects light from the headlights of an approaching vehicle. The light is bounced back and forth across the road way and is reflected by red colored reflectors. A deer attempting to cross the road way sees the red reflected light across the other side of the road. This system runs around $25,000.00 to $30,000 a mile. Aligning the reflectors is critical. This system requires no power supply.
Inventions that utilize sound or sound in combination with light systems to scare deer away from a roadway may suffer from the deer becoming desensitized with the sound and lights. The deer may become familiar with the sounds and lights and cease to be afraid of those systems.
Some states are now experimenting with systems that detect motion and alert motorists by flashing lights. The cost per mile of these systems often exceeds $30,000 per mile. These “animal detection” systems are sometimes used in conjunction with fencing that funnels the deer population into a single crossing point outfitted with motion sensors and flashing lights.
One system developed by Sensor Technologies and Systems (STS) in Scottsdale, Ariz. uses transmitter and microware radio signals in their product. When a large animal crosses a signal's beam, beacons flash on top of signs to warn motorists they could encounter wildlife.
Roadside mounted systems for scaring deer off the roadway are expensive, require maintenance, and may prove to be ineffective.
The vehicle mounted “deer whistle” for scaring deer is inexpensive but may not be effective according to several experts and studies.
The hazard warning apparatus is provided for use in motor vehicles enabling a driver observing a road hazard to warn other drivers approaching the hazard. One embodiment of the invention of the hazard warning apparatus is provided for use in a motor vehicle having at least one light forming a hazard warning signal mounted on the body associated of the vehicle in a forward facing direction in order to warn oncoming traffic when illuminated. A power supply circuit provides an intermittently pulsed power signal to the at least one light for a limited period of time in response to an input signal and then automatically turns off. An input switch is located proximate the driver which when engaged, communicates with the power supply causing the array of lights to be intermittently pulsed. In the one preferred embodiment of the invention, the at least one light is an array of lights are formed in the shape of a caution triangle and emit amber colored light. The invention can be either mounted on an inexpensive disposable placard provided with batteries; or alternatively, integrally formed into traditional vehicle components such as inside or outside rearview mirrors.
In one embodiment, the hazard warning apparatus is further provided with a transceiver and an in-vehicle driver warning indicator. When the vehicle driver sees a roadway hazard and activates the warning device, the transceiver emits a local area warning signal. Cars in the local area receiving a local area warning signal activate the in vehicle driver warning indicator to warn the driver of a potential approaching hazard. The wireless hazard signal may be directly transmitted to other vehicles in the immediate vicinity or alternatively, the wireless hazard signal may be indirectly transmitted to vehicles via a GPS enabled cell phone within the vehicle. In this GPS enabled cell phone embodiment, the cell phone upon receipt of the hazard signal from the warning device in the vehicle, transmits a message to a wireless service provider, who, in turn, broadcasts a hazard warning signal to other wireless enabled vehicles operating in the vicinity of the reported hazard.
By providing a transmitter in the hazard warning apparatus, one is able to add a rearward facing auxiliary hazard warning light which is activated automatically when the main hazard warning system is activated by the driver.
The hazard warning system of the present invention can be implemented in a number of different forms. In
In operation, when a driver of a vehicle sees a roadway hazard such as a deer at the side of the road or other hazards, such as a fallen tree, a rock or a patch of ice, the driver of the vehicle can engage the on-switch 36 causing the lights to intermittently flash for a period of time. The flashing lights are not intended to scare away the deer, but rather, to warn oncoming drivers that they are approaching a hazard and to use caution. In the preferred embodiment illustrated, a standard caution triangle is formed by the array of lights, however, other hazard symbols can be used or even an outline of a deer, however, a triangle universal hazard symbol is preferred using an amber color light. While an array of lights is preferred it is possible to utilize a single high power light source.
By limiting the total duration of the flashing light to one-half to two minutes and preferably, about one minute, false warnings of hazards can be minimized. People familiar with the hazard warning apparatus will know that within a minute of travel time, they will be approaching a potential hazard.
The device is intended to present a hazard message to other motorists in an unambiguous manner so that they will be warned that they are approaching a hazard even if they are unfamiliar with the present invention. The hazard signal of the present invention is unlikely to be confused with other types of warning techniques commonly implemented by those driving at night, such as: flashing vehicle headlights which usually indicates to other drivers that their headlights are off, their high beams are on, or that a trailing motorist wishes to pass, turning on the vehicle's hazard warning lights is typically done to convey that the vehicle is disabled, is being towed, or is being driven at a reduced speed, or tapping one's brake lights is a common warning to trailing drivers to slow down and that a hazard is ahead. There are several types of auxiliary warning lights used by specialty vehicles such as flashing red or blue lights used by police and emergency vehicles and a rotating amber beacon typically used by trucks towing a wide low or plowing snow. It is intended that the present hazard warning indicator provide a unique and unambiguous signal to other drivers in the vicinity that a hazard is ahead unlike other commonly used warning lights.
While the present embodiments of the device are intended primarily for use in low light situations, such as night driving or driving at dusk or early morning, alternative embodiments of the invention can be developed for use in daytime situations by simply using brighter lights during daytime mode of operation. Lights can be provided by a number of different sources such as light emitting diodes (LEDs), OLEDs, incandescent lamps, vacuum florescent lamps, electroluminescent devices, high energy discharge lights or the like. In the preferred embodiment, LEDs are utilized because of their low cost, high light output, low energy usage and total light dispersion pattern characteristics. In the preferred embodiment, the hazard warning lights are flashed which reduce power consumption and makes the light more conspicuous. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the hazard warning lights are pulsed on an off at a 15%-25% on duty cycle and most preferably, at a duty cycle of about 20%. The frequency of the light flashes are preferably in the range of 0.5 to 2 hertz and most preferably, about 1 hertz.
Due to the relatively infrequent expected use of the hazard warning system and the low power usage by the LED light array, it is possible to power placard type hazard warning system 22 with small button type batteries 38 at the location indicated in
It is desirable to keep a placard type hazard warning system as light weight as possible so that it does not become a potential projectile in an automobile crash which could injure the occupants of the vehicle. Accordingly, the placard type hazard warning system 22 illustrated in
As illustrated in
The placard body 30 is preferably printed using conventional printing techniques to provide instructions and other graphics on the front and rear exposed faces of the front and back panels 42 and 44. In addition to graphics, the body in the preferred embodiment is imprinted with a conductive ink which acts as a ground plane minimizing electronic interference as well as a UV protective coating to protect the graphics from degradation due to sunlight.
In
The input terminal 64 of the microprocessor 60 is connected to the output of one of the batteries, battery 38, via a diode pair 66 limiting the no load power to 3 volts. Diode 66 in conjunction with capacitor 68 insures an adequate voltage supply to the microprocessor as the battery voltage drops as current is drawn during a life flash event. Preferably, the power to the input terminal 64 of microprocessor 60 stays above 1.8 volts. During the flash event, the voltage across a single battery cell may drop below 1.8 volts. During this intermittent time, energy is stored in capacitor 68 coupled is discharged while diode 66 prevents the reverse flow of current. This circuit design feature maintains adequate power of the microprocessor during maximum current draw periods. The other capacitors and resistors in the circuit form conventional RC filters to eliminate noise and electrostatic interference.
In the normal state with switch 36 in the open or off position. When the circuit is inactive for a period of time the microprocessor goes into a sleeper mode in which there is an extremely low current draw. When the driver engages switch 36, the switch is momentarily closed sending an “on” signal to the microprocessor input port 70. The microprocessor then begins its programmed cycle intermittently providing an output signal at port 62 which drives the gate of FET 58. Output signal 62 intermittently pulses at a 15% to 25% duty cycle and preferably, 20% duty cycle at a frequency of 0.5 to 2 hertz and preferably, 1 hertz. Pulses continue for 0.5 to 2 minutes or preferably, about 1 minute, whereupon , the microprocessor output ceases and after a period of time resumes the sleep or power saving mode. Any number of microprocessors are suitable for this circuit. In this preferred embodiment, a microprocessor from Microchip was used. This microprocessor is preprogrammed prior to being mounted to a thin, flexible PC board.
Preferably, lights 34 are LEDs having a limited light dispersion pattern. Ideally, the light dispersion pattern will be sufficiently narrowly focused to provide an intense light signal to oncoming traffic, but, be sufficiently wide so that the LEDs remain in view until just prior to the vehicles in adjacent lanes are passing one another in opposite directions. Preferably, the total included angle of the dispersed light will vary from centerline 15° to 40° and most preferably, 25° to 35°. In the embodiment illustrated, the LEDs have a light dispersion angle of about 30° and provides a good compromise between light intensity at a distance and the proximity between adjacent vehicles in different lanes which the primary beam of the light is no longer in view. A narrow dispersion angle also reduces the reflection of light of the windshield back at the driver. Of course, even at a near 90° angle the LEDs will be illuminated at some very low light level due to inherent light scatter. The light dispersion angle refers to the primary beam of the light, This angle is commonly reported by LED manufactures.
The circuit of
Mirror 74 is further provided with a hazard “on” switch 78 in an orientation which can be easily activated by the driver of the vehicle. The hazard warning light in the
In a simple form of the present invention, this wireless hazard warning signal can be detected by other vehicles in the vicinity having like constructed hazard warning system. When a vehicle that has a warning system detects a wireless hazard signal broadcast by another vehicle, the microprocessor and transceiver 88 will provide an output to the gate of FET 94 which connects in-vehicle driver warning light 96 to providing a visual indication of a potential hazard in the area to the driver. (FET 84 which controls light array 82 is not activated.) It should be appreciated the multiple hazard switches can be provided which would broadcast a different wireless signals in order to be able to specifically identify two or more different hazards such a general warning of deer spotted in the area verses a prepare to emergency stop the roadway is closed.
The driver warning light 96 is preferably mounted on the placard on the side the faces the driver. The warning may be also communicated to the driver with an audible alarm. Drivers receiving the alarm could be trailing the vehicle issuing the hazard warning or be on a side road out of direct line of sight of the hazard warning light, yet, they would have the benefit of the hazard warning. Since the in vehicle warning light will be proximate the driver, a very low power light and/or an audible alarm could be used. The in vehicle warning alarm light 96 may or may not flash depending upon the preference of the system designer, nor does the in vehicle warning alarm need to operate before. Since the in vehicle driver alarm could be relatively unobtrusive and utilize very little power, the duration of the in vehicle warning light is not an issue in system design.
By having a centralized hazard warning system provider, the system can become very intelligent. For example, a hazard is detected on a Northbound lane of a divided expressway, only drivers that are Northbound approaching the hazard need to be warned. Southbound traffic or traffic on adjacent streets need not be warned of the hazard. Similarly, the duration that the hazard is active can be greatly extended since only those people approaching the hazard need be notified. With a centralized hazard warning, it is also possible to notify local police or a GPS based route planning systems of the hazard in a very timely manner.
While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/200,458 filed Dec. 1, 2008, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61200458 | Dec 2008 | US |