The present invention relates generally to heat pipes. More specifically the invention pertains to a heat pipe having a fluid charge particularly specific to provide regulation of temperature and pressure and a hydrophobic coating to increase the heat-up rate of the heat pipe.
Heat pipes are efficient heat transport devices. Their origin likely dates back to the 1940's as evidenced by U.S. Pat. No. 2,350,348. A heat pipe generally comprises a sealed container, such as a pipe with end caps, a wick structure, and an amount of working fluid.
The heat pipe process described above is well known, and is further detailed in Heat Pipe Science and Technology by Amir Faghri and published by Taylor & Francis Publishers (1995).
Conventionally, the “working fluid” is selected based upon the temperature range of intended application. The art generally recognizes that the useful temperature range for a given working fluid ranges generally from the temperature at which the working fluid exhibits a saturation pressure greater than 0.1 Atm, up to about 20 Atm. This generally allows containment of the fluid and its vapor without excessive pressure in the heat pipe container. For example, water exhibits a useful working fluid temperature range from about 300° K to about 550° K. A table of conventional working fluids and their suitable temperature ranges may be found in Heat Pipe Science and Technology, Amir Faghri, Taylor & Francis (1995).
Conventional heat pipes contain an ample charge of the working fluid so that the liquid never fully vaporizes in the temperature range in which the heat pipe is intended for operation. In contrast, the heat pipe of the present invention contains a specified volume of working fluid that results in at least three advantages, self-regulation of temperature, pressure management, and enhanced safety.
The heat-up rate of the heat pipe can be accelerated by increasing the fluid charge to the heat pipe. This approach, however, may impair or defeat the controlled charge temperature self-regulation. This invention overcomes that shortcoming by providing a coating of hydrophobic material on an inside wall of the heat pipe to effectively increase the fluid inventory that is available for re-boiling, without adding to the overall fluid charge to the heat pipe.
The present invention pertains to a heat pipe having a specified mass of working fluid determined in relation to the interior volume of the heat pipe, a hydrophobic coating of at least a portion of the interior of the heat pipe, a target temperature, and the thermal design characteristics and the specific configuration of the heat pipe to provide automatic temperature regulation and pressure management.
The present invention may be understood by reference to the heat pipe configuration illustrated in
The volume of the heat pipe (interior) is determined by conventional means, and is here referred to as V. The user then identifies a target temperature TT that is intended to be the self-regulating temperature of the object(s) being heated by the heat pipe, and selects a working fluid that is known to be operable in the temperature range of interest.
Referring to
Conventionally, the hydrophobic materials may coat the interior of the heat pipe, may comprise an integral part of the heat pipe, or may otherwise constitute the surface of the interior of the heat pipe by conventional means. The hydrophobic coating serves to reduce the amount of the working fluid resident on the interior wall(s) of the condenser region (22) and adiabatic region (23). This configuration returns the working fluid more quickly from the condenser region to the evaporator region, thereby increasing the charge fluid resident in the evaporator region for faster heating and re-heating.
The total fluid charged to the heat pipe for self regulation of temperature TT is determined as follows:
A. A no heat load mass is calculated as Mwf=Dwf@TT×V where Mwf is the mass of the working fluid and Dwf is density of its saturated vapor at TT; and
B. An additional amount of working fluid is added such that the following conditions are met:
An additional condition may be satisfied for determining the total working fluid mass of the present invention. At a condition of maximum heat load to the condenser, a gas bubble (as defined hereinafter) of superheated gas of the working fluid, initiates in the evaporator region.
In a heat pipe, heat is transferred from a heat source to the heat transfer recipient. This is achieved by evaporating and boiling the working fluid in the evaporator region using heat from the heat source. The vapors generated by boiling are driven to the condenser region where the vapors condense and transfer their latent heat to the heat recipient. The condensate flows back to the evaporator region where they boil-off again, thus providing transfer of heat from the evaporator region to the condenser region.
Referring to
In any specific heat pipe application of the present invention, the heat demand of the heat recipient (25) may vary over a range. For example, the heat recipient may be a hydrocarbon process flow stream which needs to be maintained at a temperature of about TT. The heat demand to maintain its temperature at about TT will vary as the flow rate of this stream varies. Likewise, the temperature of the heat source may also vary in a range above about TT.
The quantity of the fluid charge in the heat pipe of the present invention is such that the gas bubble size adjusts in response to the varying heat demand and the heat source temperature, such that a near constant temperature TT is achieved at the heat recipient.
For example, when the heat source temperature is just above TT and there is heat demand by the heat recipient (25), only a very small gas bubble forms in the lower end of the evaporator region (24). The evaporator is essentially unimpeded and can accept the necessary amount of heat from the heat source (21) and transmit this heat to the working fluid to meet the heat demand of the heat recipient (25).
When the heat demand by the heat recipient drops, the amount of condensate that is returned to the evaporator region will also drop. This will cause the gas bubble initiated in the evaporator section to expand and impede the transfer of heat to the working fluid. The less the heat demand by the heat recipient the less condensate will be returned to the evaporator and increase the size of the bubble. The heat transfer from the heat source to the working fluid will be adequately impeded by the gas bubble to equal the heat demand by the heat recipient at temperature TT.
The same principle of impeding the heat transfer to the working fluid by a self adjusting gas bubble applies when the heat source (21) temperature fluctuates substantially above TT. The gas bubble will expand to adequately impede heat transfer to the evaporator section so as not to overheat the heat recipient above TT. If concurrently the heat demand by the heat recipient goes down, the condensate return will be reduced further and the bubble will further expand to further impede heat transfer to the evaporator.
The following table provides a summary of how the gas bubble adjusts in size so that the heat transfer to the working fluid approximately equals the heat demand by the heat recipient to maintain its temperature at approximately TT.
In addition to self-regulation of temperature, the heat pipe of the present invention provides effective pressure management. In a conventional heat pipe with an ample fluid charge, the vapor and liquid are essentially at boiling equilibrium and the pressure is essentially the vapor pressure of the fluid. Since the vapor pressure generally increases almost exponentially with temperature, the pressure inside the conventional heat pipe increases super linearly when heat is supplied from the heat source to increase the heat pipe temperature. In contrast, pressure in the present invention increases exponentially or super linearly only till the temperature TT is achieved in the evaporator region of the heat pipe. Above TT, there is substantially no liquid and the vapor in the evaporator region is below its vapor pressure. Since the pressure of super heated vapor bubble will generally increase about linearly with the absolute temperature and not increase exponentially, the pressure rise in the heat pipe can be more easily managed. Essentially, the pressure buildup is moderated above temperature TT because liquid is not available to generate additional vapors. This temperature pressure relationship is graphically illustrated in
The problem with the limited working fluid charge heat pipe is the potential for unavailability of working fluid in the evaporator section of the heat pipe when heat transfer is actually needed. This is due to the time lag of transporting the condensed working fluid from the condenser region back to the evaporator region. The hydrophobic coating of the interior of the heat pipe substantially reduces the delay in transporting the working fluid back to the evaporator region.
The following exemplifies specific embodiments of the present invention.
A design analysis was done for a heat pipe configured as illustrated in
However, with the controlled charge, there is no liquid carbon dioxide inside the evaporator region of the heat pipe at temperature exceeding about −3.2° C. Even if the heat pipe heats up above −3.2° C. due to some extraneous heat, the pressure will increase only modestly, and only linearly with absolute temperature. This modest increase in pressure due to hypothetical extraneous heat is shown by the broken line in
In a second example of the present invention, heat was extracted from a hot gas stream whose temperature varied over a large range from 300 to 600° C. It was desired to heat a hydrocarbon stream using this heat. In this case the temperature of the hydrocarbon stream was regulated at about 240° C.
A heat pipe with an internal volume of 251 cc was built. A finned heat exchanger was used to transfer heat from a hot gas stream to the evaporator section of the heat pipe. Similarly, a condenser was built to transfer heat to a hydrocarbon stream with the aim of heating the hydrocarbon stream to a regulated temperature of about 240° C. Water was selected as the working fluid for this heat pipe application. The heat pipe was evacuated of all gases and then first charged with about 4.1 grams of water. This 4.1 grams of water was calculated by multiplying the heat pipe volume (=251 cc) by the density of saturated water vapor (steam) at 240° C. (=0.016 g/cc). An additional amount of water was added to compensate for the shuttling-water between the evaporator and the condenser, and the water retained inside the wick as described earlier. This heat pipe, using a controlled-fluid charge was then found to regulate the temperature of the hydrocarbon stream at about 240° C. when the temperature of the hot gas stream varied over the large range mentioned above. Thus, by using a prescribed quantity of fluid charge a substantially constant temperature of the hydrocarbon stream was obtained.
The evacuated heat pipe tube described was charged with 3 g of distilled water and 0.05 g of Argon. This amount of water was chosen to maintain operating temperatures of <200° C. with variable heat inputs and fuel loads. The corresponding steam density at 2000° C. is 0.0076 g/cc.
The heat pipe was mounted at a variety of tube angles from 5 to 45 degrees for testing, with the heated evaporator section at the low position. The heat pipe tube and fuel heat exchanger were insulated.
The heat pipe described by
Hot nitrogen flowing at about 7.8 g/s and 375° C. was used as the heat source to heat the gasoline to a nearly constant temperature of approximately 160° C., with a variation of less than 10° C. with the fuel flow varying from 0.5 to 2 g/s.
Temperatures along the length of the heat pipe tube were measured at positions noted in
With no fuel load, temperatures increased slightly, but remained less than 200° C. with the minimal load resulting from heat losses along the length of the heat pipe. The result indicates that fuel rates lower than 0.5 g/s can be used.
The temperature profile of the device is illustrated for four fuel rates which correlate to four heat demand rates, illustrating the temperature regulating characteristics of the heat pipe with a specified mass of working fluid.
The heat pipe illustrated in
Boiling and evaporation in the evaporator section (4), and convection of the generated vapor to the condenser section (51) is the dominant mechanism of heat transport in heat pipes. A shortcoming of the limited working fluid charge heat pipe is slowed temperature response. The slow response of the heat pipe, when using a limited fluid charge, can result from an inadequate fluid being available for boiling in the evaporator section of the heat pipe. This potential problem is exacerbated as the temperature rises, when more and more of the fluid gets boiled off, and a lesser amount of the working fluid remains available for boiling . . . thereby reducing the boiling rate further. Additionally, the condensate produced in the condenser clings to the heat pipe wall as droplets or liquid films which may travel down slowly to the evaporator. If the fluid inventory on the heat pipe wall could be instantly made available for reboiling more rapidly, the rate of heat up will increase. The hydrophobic coating of the present invention reduces the liquid clinging to the wall and reduces the transit time of the working fluid to the evaporator section of the heat pipe. This reduction in the liquid inventory on the wall increases the liquid inventory in the evaporator section. This in turn increases the boil-off rate and accelerates the heat pipe response.
The faster heat pipe response with a hydrophobic coating is depicted in
Without a hydrophobic coating, the working fluid was found to condense on the wall during cool down to the ambient temperature. This condensed fluid formed small droplets which adhered to the wall and failed to flow down to the evaporator section. Since there was no working fluid available in the evaporator during for boil-off, this heat pipe without a hydrophobic coating took a relatively long time to start. It took about 11.5 minutes for the heat to conduct from the lower section of the evaporator to the droplets on the wall before these droplets could boil-off and the heat pipe could start.
In contrast, with the hydrophobic coating, the droplets failed to adhere to the wall during the heat pipe cool down to the ambient temperatures. This resulted in the availability of a liquid working fluid in the evaporator section. Upon restart, the heat pipe responded in a relatively shorter period of only 4.0 minutes.