Not applicable.
The structures and techniques described herein relate to thermal management and more particularly to a thermal interface.
As is known in the art, a phased array antenna includes a plurality of antenna elements spaced apart from each other by known distances. Each of the antenna elements are typically coupled through a plurality of phase shifter circuits, amplifier circuits and/or other circuits to either or both of a transmitter or receiver. In some cases, the phase shifter, amplifier circuits and other circuits (e.g. mixer circuits) are provided in a so-called transmit/receive (T/R) module and are considered to be part of the transmitter and/or receiver.
The phase shifters, amplifier and other radio frequency (RF) circuits (e.g. T/R modules) are often powered by an external power supply (e.g. a DC power supply). Such circuits are referred to as “active circuits” or “active components.” Accordingly, phased array antennas which include active circuits are often referred to as “active phased arrays.”
Active circuits dissipate power in the form of heat. Thus, it is necessary to cool active phased arrays so that the active circuits operate within a desired temperature range.
In active phased arrays having T/R channels which use relatively little power (e.g. less than about two Watts (W) average RF power), individual finned heat-sinks (or “hat-sinks”) are sometimes attached to each active circuit in the channels. That is, each active circuit has an individual heat sink attached thereto. Although this approach may satisfy the cooling requirements for the active phased array, this approach to thermal management is expensive since the cost of disposing an individual “hat-sink” on an active circuit can be on the same order as the cost of the active circuit itself.
In relatively high power per T/R channel applications, it is often necessary to use a liquid cooling approach to maintain active circuits in their normal operating temperature range. Although the liquid cooling approach is effective to maintain active circuits at temperatures at or below maximum allowed operating temperatures, liquid cooling has very high life cycle costs. For example, liquid cooling requires the use of a manifold through which the liquid circulates. Such liquid filled manifolds add a tremendous amount of weight and complexity to a radar system which increases the radar system recurring cost and also increases the transportation costs and maintenance costs over the operational life of the active phased array.
The mechanical/thermal interfaces between the heat generating devices (e.g. the active circuits) and heat sinking devices determines, at least in part, the cooling effectiveness of heat sinking devices.
Some RF systems, including active phased arrays, utilize so-called flip-chip mounted circuits. One technique commonly used to remove heat from flip-chip mounted circuits (or more simply, “flip-chips”) is to dispose a gap-pad between the exposed surface of the flip-chip and a surface of a heat sink. In this configuration, the gap-pad needs to be compliant in compression and shear to compensate for coplanarity tolerances from chip-to-chip and in-plane movement due to coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch between the flip-chip, circuit board and heatsink as well as vibration between the circuit board on which the flip-chip circuit is mounted and the heatsink. The gap-pad technique can result in a thermal path having poor bulk thermal conductivity. Furthermore, the gap-pad approach results in thermal junctions on each surface of the gap pad (i.e. one thermal junction between the gap-pad and the chip and one thermal junction between the gap-pad and the heatsink). Such thermal junctions would not exist if the heatsink were directly mounted to the flip-chip. Furthermore, the thermal resistance at these junctions is relatively high compared with the thermal resistance which would result if the heatsink were directly mounted to the flip-chip.
It would, therefore, be desirable to provide a reliable, efficient and cost effective system and technique for cooling RF systems including active phased arrays which operate over a wide range of RF output power levels.
In accordance with the concepts and techniques described herein, it has been recognized that in an active panel array it is possible to provide a dielectric panel (or more simply a “panel”) having an array of antenna elements disposed on one surface and having a plurality of active circuits disposed on a second opposing surface of the panel. In preferred embodiments, the active circuits are flip-chip mounted to the panel surface. Such panels are typically provided by bonding together multiple circuit boards. In applications in which the panel is relatively large, the panel has a flatness tolerance which must be taken into account when mounting a heat sink to the flip-chip mounted circuits.
To compensate for such flatness tolerance, a gap-pad can be utilized between the flip-chip mounted circuit and the heat sink. The RF power level achievable using such a cooling method is limited due to relatively high temperature rises which occur through thermal interfaces between the gap-pad and the flip-chip and the gap-pad and the heatsink, as well as through the bulk of the gap-pad material.
Another technique which can be used is to couple a thermal strap between each active circuit and the heatsink. The thermal strap technique is often used for individual flip-chips because thermal straps generally cannot compensate for 3-dimensional Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) mismatch.
In accordance with the concepts, structures and techniques described herein, a thermal interface includes a frame having a plurality of elevated regions and a plurality of mechanical tolerance circuits which couple the plurality of elevated regions to the frame. The thermal interface is configured to be disposed between an array of heat generating elements and a heat sink with each of the plurality of elevated regions thermally coupled to a corresponding one or more of the array of heat generating elements. In one embodiment, the thermal interface is disposed between a printed wiring board having a plurality of flip-chip circuit components disposed on an external surface thereof and a heat sink disposed over the flip-chip circuit components.
The mechanical tolerance circuit portions of the thermal interface allow the thermal interface to be mechanically coupled to both the flip-chip and the heatsink using a coupling having a low thermal resistance (e.g. a solder joint, thermally conductive epoxies, thermal grease, phase change compounds or the like). The thermal interface thus significantly improves the heat transfer between the flip-chip and the heatsink because the thermal interface allows use of a connection (e.g. direct solder attachment) having a thermal resistance which is on the order of the thermal resistance which would result if the heatsink were directly coupled to the flip-chip. A reason a direct solder attachment can be used is because three-dimensional tolerance compensation is accomplished via the mechanical tolerance circuit portions of the thermal interface. In a preferred embodiment, the mechanical tolerance circuit portions are provided as strain relieving bends formed in the thermal interface. Also, the thermal interface can be provided from a high thermal conductivity ductile material, e.g. copper, so the temperature rise through the bulk of the material may be significantly less than the temperature rise through a gap-pad, for example.
In the thermal gap-pad technique, the gap-pad is used to compensate for variations in spacing between a heatsink surface and a heat generating device. Thus, different thicknesses at the thermal interface exist. That is, due to variations in flatness and thickness of a heat sink and circuit components, the gap-pad portion located at one circuit component (e.g. one chip) is typically compressed to a different thickness than the gap-pad portion located at another circuit component. As a result of such variations in thicknesses, the junction temperature at the flip-chips varies from one location to another. Such variations in thickness result in temperatures gradients across the array of active circuits.
When the active circuits and gap pad are used as part of a phased array antenna, the phased array antenna has temperature gradients and such temperature gradients adversely affect the performance of the phased array. When a phased array is used as part of a radar system (e.g. a phased array radar system), the radar system preferably takes into account the effects of the temperature gradients. Thus, temperature gradients can be a problem to solve in a phased array radar.
With the thermal interface approach described herein, however, the conduction distance from each circuit component (e.g. each flip-chip) to the heatsink is identical from one chip to another. Thus, the thermal interface provides a more uniform temperature distribution among circuit components (e.g. flip-chips) mounted on a panel, for example.
In one embodiment, the thermal interface is configured for operation with a radio frequency (RF) panel array. RF panel arrays require new and innovative cooling solutions because their thermal requirements are unique compared with existing thermal requirements encountered in conventional phased arrays.
In conventional phased arrays, processors are typically cooled one chip at a time. Thus, multiple processors on a circuit card require multiple gap-pads or many thermal straps because neither one (i.e. neither a gap-pad nor a thermal strap) can compensate for the three-dimensional aspects of an array of chips, such as those found in panel array applications.
The thermal interface described herein not only compensates for tolerance stackup and dynamic strain due to coefficient of thermal expansion mismatch, but also provides a superior thermal path resulting in lower junction temperatures at chip and heatsink interfaces as well as higher performance and reliability.
The foregoing features of this invention, as well as the invention itself, may be more fully understood from the following description of the drawings in which:
It should be understood that in an effort to promote clarity in the drawings and the text, the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead is generally placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
Before describing the various embodiments of the invention, some introductory concepts and terminology are explained.
Described herein is a structure which acts as a mechanical and thermal interface between a heat generating device (e.g. a heat generating radio frequency circuit) and a heat sink. The interface compensates for mechanical tolerances in three dimensions. The interface is also sometimes referred to herein as a “thermal interface,” a “thermal cushion,” or a “heat sink interface.”
The thermal interface is described herein in the context of an “active panel array” antenna. It should be appreciated, however, that the thermal interface and concepts described herein, may also be used with other heat generating devices and is not limited to use with active panel array antennas. Rather, the thermal interface and concepts can be used with any radio frequency (RF) circuit which utilizes a heat sink. The thermal interface may also find application with other types of circuits (e.g. non-RF circuits) which utilize a heat sink. In particular, the thermal interface structure and concept described herein can be used in any application in which mechanical or other tolerances of a heat generating structure and a heat sink promote use of an interface structure having low thermal resistance therebetween.
A “panel array antenna” (or “panel array” or more simply “panel”) to be described herein refers to a multilayer printed wiring board (PWB) which includes an array of antenna elements (or more simply “radiating elements” or “radiators”), as well as RF, logic and DC distribution circuits in one highly integrated PWB. A panel is also sometimes referred to herein as a tile array (or more simply, a “tile”). A panel array antenna may be provided from a single panel or from a plurality of panels. In the case where an array antenna is provided from a plurality of panels, a single one of the plurality of panels is sometimes referred to herein as a “panel sub-array” (or a “tile sub-array”).
A heat sink interface may be disposed over a single panel, multiple panels or over portions of one or more panels. Thus, the heat sink interface may be provided having a size and shape selected in accordance with the needs of the particular application in which it is being used.
Reference is also sometimes made herein to an array antenna having a particular number of panels or a particular number of heat sink interfaces. It should of course, be appreciated that an array antenna may be comprised of any number of panels and heat sink interfaces and that one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate how to select the particular number of panels and heat sink interfaces to use in any particular application.
It should also be noted that reference is sometimes made herein to a panel or an array antenna having a particular array shape and/or physical size or a particular number of antenna elements and one or more heat sink interfaces having a particular shape and/or physical size. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the heat sink interfaces described herein are applicable to various sizes and shapes of panels or other structures and that any number of heat sink interfaces may be used in a given application.
Thus, although the description provided hereinbelow describes a thermal interface and related concepts in the context of an array antenna having a substantially square or rectangular shape, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the concepts equally apply to other sizes and shapes of antennas or other circuits having a variety of different sizes and shapes.
Applications of at least some embodiments of the thermal interface described herein include, but are not limited to, radar, electronic warfare (EW) and communication systems for a wide variety of applications including ship based, airborne, missile and satellite applications. It should thus be appreciated that the thermal interface described herein can be used as part of a radar system or a communications system.
As will also be explained further herein, at least some embodiments of the invention are applicable, but not limited to, commercial, military, airborne, shipborne, communications, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and/or commercial wireless applications.
The panel to be described hereinbelow can also utilize embedded circulators; a slot-coupled, polarized egg-crate radiator; a single integrated monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC); and a passive radio frequency (RF) circuit architecture. For example, as described further herein, technology described in the following commonly assigned United States patents can be used in whole or in part and/or adapted to be used with at least some embodiments of the panel (aka tile subarrays) described herein: U.S. Pat. No. 6,611,180, entitled “Embedded Planar Circulator”; U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,787, entitled “Slot Coupled, Polarized, Egg-Crate Radiator”; and/or U.S. Pat. No. 6,731,189, entitled “Multilayer stripline radio frequency circuits and interconnection methods.” Each of the above patents is hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Referring now to
In one embodiment, panel 12 is provided from a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) multilayer PWB comprised of a plurality of individual circuit boards bonded or otherwise joined together to provide the multilayer PWB. Panel 12 has a thickness T and is generally planar and has a plurality of antenna elements, generally denoted 18 disposed to radiate through a first surface 12a thereof. Antenna elements 18 are shown in phantom since they are provided on a circuit board layer which is located below the circuit board layer which corresponds to surface 12a.
The multilayer PWB which comprises panel 12 includes RF, power and logic circuits and in a preferred embodiment is provided from a single lamination and single drill and plate operations. The single lamination and single drill and plate operations result in a low-cost, low profile (i.e. thin) panel. Thus the PWB from which panel 12 is provided is a low cost mixed signal PWB.
All active and passive electronics, generally denoted 20 (
It should be appreciated that in one embodiment, components 20 are provided as surface mount components and that a metal cover (not shown) is bonded over components 20 and an environmental conformal coating is then applied. One or more “flex” circuits 22 (
Heat sink 14 comprises a base portion 24 having a first surface corresponding to surface 14a of heat sink 14 and a second opposing surface having a plurality of heat spreading elements 28 projecting therefrom. In the exemplary embodiment shown in
Thermal interface 16 has a plurality of raised surfaces 30 with each of the raised surfaces disposed to contact surfaces of corresponding ones of electronics 20. Although each surface 30 is here shown to contact only a single component 20, in some embodiments it may be preferable to provide one or more of surfaces 30 having a size and shape such that they contact more than one component 20.
A second surface 32 of interface 16 is disposed to contact surface 14a of heat sink 14. Thermal interface 16 may be provided from a thermally conductive material (e.g. a thermally conductivity ductile material such as copper, for example) or may be provided from a non-thermally conductive material and have a thermally conductive coating disposed thereover. In either case, interface 16 provides a thermally conductive path between electronics 20 and heat sink surface 14a. Thus, surface 14a of heat sink 14 is thermally coupled to heat generating devices (e.g. electronics 20) on surface 12b of panel 12.
In a preferred embodiment, a bond exists between heat sink surface 14a and surface 32 of thermal interface 16. Thus, surface 14a of heat sink 14 is disposed over and configured to be in thermal contact with surface 32 of interface 16.
Also in a preferred embodiment, thermal interface sections 30 are directly bonded to electronics 20 (
Practical multilayer PWBs (and in particular, multilayer PWBs provided from multiple circuit boards) have flatness tolerances which make it difficult to achieve good thermal contact between multiple circuits (e.g. components 20) disposed on the PWB and a heat sink (e.g. heat sink 14) Thus, referring to
Thus, thermal interface 16 is configured to be disposed between an array of heat generating elements (e.g. elements 20) and a heat sink (e.g. heat sink 14) with each of the plurality of elevated regions 30 thermally coupled to a corresponding one or more of the array of heat generating elements. In one embodiment, the thermal interface promotes transfer of heat from a printed wiring board having a plurality of flip-chip circuit components disposed on an external surface thereof and a heat sink disposed over the flip-chip mounted circuit components.
The mechanical tolerance circuit portions 36 (
Also, as mentioned above, the thermal interface can be made from high thermal conductivity ductile material (e.g. copper) or a ductile material having a thermally conductive coating disposed thereon. Thus, the temperature rise through the bulk of the thermal interface material may be significantly less than the temperature rise through a gap-pad (i.e. the differential of the temperature at the first interface where the chip and the gap-pad/thermal interface material meet and the temperature at the second interface where the heatsink and the gap-pad/thermal interface material meet).
Furthermore, thermal interface 16 controls temperature gradients among active circuits. This is typically a difficult and important problem to solve in phased array radar applications, for example, since temperature gradients can directly affect the operation of the radar. Also, it is relatively time consuming to compensate for such temperature gradients in a phased array radar.
Although a prior art thermal gap-pad can be used to compensate for various thicknesses at the thermal interface, since one pad portion gets compressed to a different thickness than a pad portion at another chip, the junction temperature varies from one to another.
With the thermal interface approach, however, the conduction distance as measured from the chip to the heatsink is identical from one chip to another and thus provides a more uniform temperature distribution.
Furthermore, the use of a solder connection or other low-thermal resistance connection between the heat generating circuits and the thermal interface and the thermal interface and the heat sink reduces the thermal resistance between heat generating circuits and the heat sink. By reducing the thermal resistance between the heat sink and the heat generating circuits, the heat is removed from the circuits more efficiently than with prior art gap-pad approaches. Thus, the panel-interface-heat sink arrangement described herein efficiently transfers heat (i.e. thermal energy) from an active panel (and in particular from active circuits mounted on the active panel) to the heat sink.
Furthermore, thermal interface 16 allows a single heat sink to cool multiple flip-chip mounted circuits (vs. the prior art use of multiple, individual “hat sinks”). Thus, the cost (both part cost and assembly costs) of cooling a panel array or other circuit is reduced since it is not necessary to mount individual heat sinks on each heat generating circuit.
As mentioned above, in one embodiment, the flip-chip circuits are provided as monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMICs) and the heat sink heat spreading elements are provided as fins or pins. In other embodiments, liquid cooled heatsinks (e.g. brazements, etc.) may be used.
In one embodiment, the heat sink may be provided as an aluminum finned heat sink having a mechanical interface between a surface thereof and a plurality of flip-chip MMICs disposed on a surface of the panel.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Interface 54 is provided having a pair of generally S-shaped legs or paths which lead from heat sink 58 to device 52. The S-shaped paths allow relative movement between heat sink 58 and device 52 in multiple directions. Thus, S-shaped paths act as mechanical tolerance circuits which accommodate mechanical tolerances which occur in the manufacture and/or assembly of the PWB 50, device 52, and heat sink 58.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In general the larger the number of bends in the interface leg (e.g. mechanical tolerance circuits 36 or strain relieved sections 40), the larger the tolerances which can be accommodated or the lower the force required to accommodate the tolerance. One of ordinary skill in the art would know how to configure the bends for a desired application.
Referring now to
Interface 84 is provided having a single S-shaped leg or path which leads from heat sink 88 to device 82. The S-shaped path allows relative movement between heat sink 88 and device 82 in multiple directions. Thus, the single S-shaped path acts as a tolerance circuit which accommodates tolerances which occur in the manufacture and/or assembly of the PWB 80, device 82, and heat sink 88.
Referring now to
All publications and references cited herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
In the figures of this application, in some instances, a plurality of elements may be shown as illustrative of a particular element, and a single element may be shown as illustrative of a plurality of a particular elements. Showing a plurality of a particular element is not intended to imply that a system or method implemented in accordance with the invention must comprise more than one of that element or step, nor is it intended by illustrating a single element that the invention is limited to embodiments having only a single one of that respective element. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the numbers of a particular element shown in a drawing can, in at least some instances, be selected to accommodate the particular user needs.
It is intended that the particular combinations of elements and features in the above-detailed embodiments be considered exemplary only; the interchanging and substitution of these teachings with other teachings in this and the incorporated-by-reference patents and applications are also expressly contemplated. As those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize, variations, modifications, and other implementations of what is described herein can occur to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the concepts as described and claimed herein. Thus, the foregoing description is by way of example only and is not intended to be and should not be construed in any way to be limiting.
Further, in describing the invention and in illustrating embodiments of the concepts in the figures, specific terminology, numbers, dimensions, materials, etc., are used for the sake of clarity. However the concepts are not limited to the specific terms, numbers, dimensions, materials, etc. so selected, and each specific term, number, dimension, material, etc., at least includes all technical and functional equivalents that operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose. Use of a given word, phrase, number, dimension, material, language terminology, product brand, etc. is intended to include all grammatical, literal, scientific, technical, and functional equivalents. The terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and not limitation.
Having described the preferred embodiments of the concepts sought to be protected, it will now become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating the concepts may be used. Moreover, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the embodiments of the invention described herein can be modified to accommodate and/or comply with changes and improvements in the applicable technology and standards referred to herein. For example, the technology can be implemented in many other, different, forms, and in many different environments, and the technology disclosed herein can be used in combination with other technologies. Variations, modifications, and other implementations of what is described herein can occur to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and the scope of the concepts as described and claimed. It is felt, therefore, that the scope of protection should not be limited to or by the disclosed embodiments, but rather, should be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2711382 | Smith-Johannsen | Jun 1955 | A |
3091743 | Wilkinson | May 1963 | A |
3665480 | Fassett | May 1972 | A |
3883834 | Osteen | May 1975 | A |
4442450 | Lipschutz et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4489363 | Goldberg | Dec 1984 | A |
4527165 | deRonde | Jul 1985 | A |
4612601 | Watari | Sep 1986 | A |
4654754 | Daszkowski | Mar 1987 | A |
4698663 | Sugimoto et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4706094 | Kubick | Nov 1987 | A |
4751513 | Daryoush et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4770242 | Daikoku et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4835658 | Bonnefoy | May 1989 | A |
4964458 | Flint et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5005019 | Zaghloul et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5022462 | Flint et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5055852 | Dusseux et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5099254 | Tsukii et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5159531 | Horvath et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5168348 | Chu et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5184211 | Fox | Feb 1993 | A |
5270902 | Bellar et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5276455 | Fitzsimmons et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5345107 | Daikoku et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5398010 | Klebe | Mar 1995 | A |
5400040 | Lane et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404148 | Zwarts | Apr 1995 | A |
5438477 | Pasch | Aug 1995 | A |
5451969 | Toth et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459474 | Mattioli et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5488380 | Harvey et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5493305 | Wooldridge et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5548090 | Harris | Aug 1996 | A |
5563613 | Schroeder et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5592363 | Atarashi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5646826 | Katchmar | Jul 1997 | A |
5650914 | DiStefano et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5675345 | Pozgay et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5724048 | Remondiere | Mar 1998 | A |
5786792 | Bellus et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796582 | Katchmar | Aug 1998 | A |
5854607 | Kinghorn | Dec 1998 | A |
5896269 | Autry | Apr 1999 | A |
5907304 | Wilson et al. | May 1999 | A |
6011507 | Curran et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6037658 | Brodsky et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037903 | Lange et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061027 | Legay et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078289 | Manoogian et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6087988 | Pozgay | Jul 2000 | A |
6091373 | Raguenet | Jul 2000 | A |
6104343 | Brookner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6127985 | Guler | Oct 2000 | A |
6131646 | Kelley | Oct 2000 | A |
6166705 | Mast et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6181280 | Kadambi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184832 | Geyh et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208316 | Cahill | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211824 | Holden et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218214 | Panchou et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222493 | Caille et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225695 | Chia et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6297775 | Haws et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6367541 | McCullough | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6388620 | Bhattacharyya | May 2002 | B1 |
6392890 | Katchmar | May 2002 | B1 |
6424313 | Navarro et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6480167 | Matthews | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483705 | Snyder et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6496373 | Chung | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6580402 | Navarro et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6611180 | Puzella et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6621470 | Boeringer et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624787 | Puzella et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6661376 | Maceo et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670930 | Navarro | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6686885 | Barkdoll et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6703976 | Jacomb-Hood et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6731189 | Puzella et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6756684 | Huang | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6774482 | Colgan et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6830960 | Alcoe et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6856210 | Zhu et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6900765 | Navarro et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6922272 | de Groot et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6942025 | Nair et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943330 | Ring | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6961248 | Vincent et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6995322 | Chan et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7030712 | Brunette et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042729 | Dias et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7061446 | Short, Jr. et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7077858 | Fletcher et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7129908 | Edward et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7132990 | Stenger et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7180745 | Mandel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187342 | Heisen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200006 | Farrow et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7348932 | Puzella et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7361985 | Yuan et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7394659 | Colgan et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7417598 | Navarro et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7443354 | Navarro et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444737 | Worl | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7489283 | Ingram et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7508338 | Pluymers et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7518066 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7597534 | Hopkins | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7748440 | Michel et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20020051342 | Kanada | May 2002 | A1 |
20050110681 | Londre | May 2005 | A1 |
20050151215 | Hauhe et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060268518 | Edward et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070044422 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070047209 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070152882 | Hash et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070159799 | Dando et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177367 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070230133 | Michel et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080074324 | Puzella et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080106467 | Navarro et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080106482 | Cherrette et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080150832 | Ingram et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080316139 | Blaser et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 481 417 | Apr 1992 | EP |
1 764 863 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1 436 859 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1 978 597 | Oct 2008 | EP |
61224504 | Oct 1986 | JP |
4-122107 | Apr 1992 | JP |
06-097710 | Apr 1994 | JP |
7-212125 | Aug 1995 | JP |
2000-138525 | May 2000 | JP |
2003179429 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2005-505963 | Feb 2005 | JP |
1020010079872 | Aug 2001 | KR |
WO 9826642 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9966594 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0106821 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0120720 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0133927 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0141257 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 03003031 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03030301 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 2007136941 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007136941 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008010851 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008010851 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008036469 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“S-band Modular Integrated Panel (S-MIP) Radar;” Proposal White Paper; copyright 2007 Raytheon Company; 17 pages. |
Carter; “‘Fuzz Button’ interconnects and microwave and mm-wave frequencies;” IEEE Seminar, London, UK; Mar. 1-7, 2000; 7 pages. |
Jerinic et al.; “X-Band “Tile” Array for Mobil Radar;” internal Raytheon Company publication; Spring 2003; 4 pages. |
Puzella et al.; “Digital Subarray for Large Apertures;” slide presentation; internal Raytheon Company publication; Spring 2003; pp. 1-22. |
Puzella et al.; “Radio Frequency Interconnect Circuits and Techniques;” U.S. Appl. No. 11/558,126, filed Nov. 9, 2006; 57 pages. |
Puzella et al.; “X-Band Tile Sub-Array;” slide presentation; internal Raytheon Company publication; Spring 2003; 28 pages. |
Puzella; “Deliverable Demonstration Sub-Array;” slide presentation; internal Raytheon Company publication; Fall 2003; pp. 1-17. |
PCT International Preliminary Examination Report and Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2002/30677 dated Nov. 27, 2003; 10 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Examination Report and Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2007/074795 dated Apr. 2, 2009; 7pages. |
PCT Search Report of the ISA for PCT/US2007/074795 dated Dec. 19, 2007; 5 pages. |
PCT Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2007/074795 dated Dec. 19, 2007; 5 pages. |
Bash et al,; “Improving Heat Transfer From a Flip-Chip Package;” Technology Industry; Email Alert RSS Feed; Hewlett-Packard Journal, Aug. 1997; 3 pages. |
Marsh et al.; “5.4 Watt GaAs MESFET MMIC for Phased Array Radar Systems;” 1997 Workshop on High Performance Electron Devices for Microwave and Optoelectronic Applications, Nov. 24-25, 1997; pp. 169-174. |
Div. Application (with translation of amended claims) as filed on Dec. 1, 2008 in Korean Intellectual Property Office and assigned App. No. 10-2008-7029396. |
Decision of Rejection dated Jul. 30, 2008 from KR Pat. App. No. 10-2004-7003900. |
Notice of Trial Decision dated Mar. 23, 2010 from KR Pat. App. No. 10-2004-7003900. |
EP Search Report for 06021905.2; dated Feb. 9, 2007; 8 pages. |
European Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2005 from EP Pat. App. No. 02800372.1. |
Response to European Office Action filed Jan. 12, 2007 from EP Pat. App. No. 02800372.1. |
European Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2007 from EPO Pat. App. No. 06021905.2. |
Response to European Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2007 filed in the EPO on Aug. 11, 2008 from EP Pat. App. No. 06021905.2. |
Response to European Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2009 filed in the EPO on Nov. 19, 2009 from EP Pat. App. No. 06021905.2. |
European Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2010 from EPO Pat. App. No. 06021905.2. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 2, 2007 from EP Pat. App. No. 02800372.1. |
Korean Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2007 from KR Pat. App. No. 10-2004-7003900. |
Response to Korean Office Action filed Mar. 26, 2008 from KR Pat. App. No. 10-2004-7003900. |
Korean Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2009 from KR Pat. App. No. 10-2008-7029396. |
Korean Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2009 from KR Pat. App. No. 10-2008-7029396. |
Japanese Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2007 from JP Pat. App. No. 2003-533378. |
Japanese Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2008 from JP Pat. App. No. 2003-533378. |
Japanese Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2009 from JP Pat. App. No. 2003-533378. |
Response to Japanese Office Action filed Jul. 5, 2007 from JP App. No. 2003-533378. |
Response to Japanese Office Action filed Jun. 19, 2009 from App JP App. No. 2003-533378. |
PCT Search Report of the ISA for PCT/US2010/026861 dated Jun. 18, 2010; 6 pages. |
PCT Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2010/026861 dated Jun. 18, 2010; 5 pages. |
Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,450. |
Response to Office Action of Jun. 11, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,450 dated Sep. 21, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 3, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/482,061. |
Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,450. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the ISA for PCT/US2010/026861 dated Oct. 6, 2011. |
Response to Office Action of Dec. 1, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,450 dated Jan. 25, 2011. |
PCT Search Report of the ISA for PCT/US2010/049261 dated Feb. 7, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2010/049261 dated Feb. 7, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110075377 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |