This application is directed, in general, to a heating device and, more specifically, to a heat exchanging, wood stove fire box top.
Wood burning stoves have become commonplace in today's building trades for both residential and commercial applications, whether for providing heat or for value enhancement. Where a more massive fireplace is not desired or feasible, wood stoves are a highly desirable option. Stoves are often preferred over open fireplaces because many wood stoves have the capability to heat large spaces efficiently from a center-room location. Most of these stoves are able to burn for extended periods of time, such as over night, without refueling or reloading, further enhancing the preference over conventional masonry fireplaces. The fact that the stove fully contains the fire while providing heat in a full circle around the stove makes the wood stove highly desirable. In general, wood stoves are much less expensive than a comparable masonry fireplace. However, these stoves have seen little effort directed toward improving the efficiency of heat transfer into the room.
One aspect provides a heating device comprising a firebox having a hearth therein and first and second heat exchange chambers, and a heat exchanging plate having a first surface and a second opposing surface. The heat exchanging plate is suspended above the hearth, such that the first surface is located between the hearth and the second surface. The heat exchanging plate has lower protrusions extending from the first surface and into the first heat exchange chamber, and upper protrusions extending from the second surface and into the second heat exchange chamber.
In a further aspect, a method of manufacturing a heating device is provided comprising forming a firebox having a hearth therein and first and second heat exchange chambers, and suspending a heat exchanging plate above the hearth. The heat exchanging plate has a first surface and a second opposing surface, such that the first surface is located between the hearth and the second surface. The heat exchanging plate has lower protrusions extending from the first surface and into the first heat exchange chamber and upper protrusions extending from the second surface and into the second heat exchange chamber.
Reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The principles described in this discussion directed to a heating device, while described with reference to a wood burning stove, are equally applicable to other heating devices, e.g., fireplace inserts, etc.
Referring initially to
In one embodiment, the plurality of upper protrusions 121 and corresponding polar opposite lower protrusions 111 may be arrayed in upper arcs 122a-122i and lower arcs 112a-112h, respectively, around the flue aperture 130. However, it should be noted that other embodiments provide that the protrusions may be arranged in straight line or off-set formations. The upper and lower arcs 122a-122i and 112a-112h, respectively, are not necessarily concentric to the flue aperture 130. In one embodiment, the upper and lower arcs 122a-122i and 112a-112h are concentric to a point 170. Positioning of the flow diverter 140 may require that certain of the lower protrusions 111 be foregone, i.e., construction or forming of the flow diverter 140 prevents forming of certain of the lower protrusions 111. The flow diverter 140, in one aspect, may comprise a first wishbone-shaped forward diverter 141 and a second arcuate rear diverter 142. The first wishbone-shaped forward diverter 141 and second arcuate rear diverter 142 may be separated by first and second gaps 145, 146, respectively.
In one embodiment, the heat exchanging plate 100 including the plurality of lower and upper protrusions 111, 121, respectively, the flue aperture 130, and the flow diverter 140, may be simultaneously formed of cast iron by traditional methods. The height and geometric configurations of the protrusions 111, 121, may vary. For example, in one embodiment, the heights of the protrusions may gradually increase from one region of the heat exchanging plate 100 to another region of the heat exchanging plate 100. In another example, the upper protrusions 121 within the first region 161 may be substantially equal in height above the second surface 120 as the lower protrusions 111 are in height below the first surface 110. In one aspect of this embodiment, the lower protrusions may be 1.3 inches in height while the upper protrusions 121 within the first region 161 may be 1.5 inches in height. Conversely, the upper protrusions 121 within the second region 162 may be substantially shorter in height above the second surface 120 than the lower protrusions 111 are in height below the first surface 110. For example, in one embodiment, the upper protrusions within the second region 162 may be 0.375 inches in height.
Cross sections of airfoils referenced in this description are taken parallel to the surface 110 or 120 of the heat exchanging plate 100.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The heat exchanging plate 100 may be coupled to the stove cabinet 310 and the firebox 320 with mechanical fasteners 370 through coupling apertures 150. In one embodiment, the flue baffle plate assembly 340 may be a ceramic plate; however, other heat retaining materials, such as metal and alloys thereof may be used. In a preferred embodiment, the flue baffle plate assembly 340 may comprise first and second ceramic plates 341, 342, respectively. The first heat exchange chamber 391 is bounded from below by the flue baffle plate assembly 340 and from above by the first surface 110 of the heat exchanging plate 100. The second heat exchange chamber 392 is bounded from below by the second surface 120 of the heat exchanging plate 100 and from above by a stove cabinet top 311. The first heat exchange chamber 391 is bounded also by the side walls (not shown) of the firebox 320. The second heat exchange chamber 392 is, in a like manner, bounded by the side walls (not shown) of the cabinet 310. In a preferred embodiment, the stove cabinet top 311 has a first section 312 and a second section 313 at different heights above the heat exchanging plate 100 to accommodate the different heights of upper protrusions 121 in the first and second heat exchanging plate regions 161, 162, respectively.
In general operation, the stove 300 houses a fire 380 on the hearth 330. The fire 380 generates heated combustion products 385 that circulate via pathway 387 through the first heat exchange chamber 391 and out the flue 390. Ambient air is drawn in through the fan 360, forced through a duct 365 into the second heat exchange chamber 392, across protrusions 121 and out the front of the stove cabinet 310 as two conditioned airflows 367a, 367b, collectively 367.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
For comparative testing, a conventional steel firebox top was provided of 0.25″ thick, hot rolled steel. The steel firebox top was intended as the baseline of conventional design to be compared to the heat exchanging design of the present disclosure. A cast iron prototype of the heat exchanging plate 100 was formed to provide comparative data on the new design.
Three test runs of the conventional steel firebox top without protrusions were accomplished and the temperature results are shown as follows:
Four test runs of the cast iron heat exchanging plate 100 were made with the temperature results as shown:
These temperatures can be converted to approximate
BTUs into the conditioned space with the formula: BTU/hr=CFM*ΔT*1.08. For the cast iron heat exchanging plate of the present discussion, the average temperature increase in the heated air over the ambient air is: ΔT=47.5° F. For the conventional steel firebox top, the average temperature increase in the heated air over the ambient air is: ΔT=31° F. The heat output results are:
Heat output may be compared to that of the conventional stove top by dividing the heat (BTU/hr) increase of 875 BTU/hr by the conventional steel firebox top output of 1690 BTU/hr. The result is a heat output increase of 52.3%. Thus, the cast iron heat exchanger significantly improved heated air output by more than a 50% increase over a conventional steel firebox top design.
Stove efficiency can be expressed as:
Efficiency=(100−T.A.R.)−[(0.343/CO2m+0.009)*ΔT]
where T.A.R. is Theoretical Air Requirement which for propane gas, the fuel used, equals 23.86. CO2m is measured CO2, ΔT is the flue loss temperature, i.e., flue temperature minus room temperature in ° C. and the ° F. to ° C. conversion is:
° C.=5/9*(° F.−32).
Thus efficiency results for the cast iron heat exchanging plate vs. steel firebox top are shown in
The average efficiency of the heat exchanging plate is 47.1% vs. the average efficiency of the steel firebox top being 43.3%. Thus, the efficiency improvement is (47.1%−43.3%)/43.3%=8.8% improvement.
Thus, a wood stove, as an example of a heating device, comprising a heat exchanging plate defining the boundary between the combustion products and conditioned/circulating room air has been described. The heat exchanging plate comprises aerodynamic protrusions on lower and upper surfaces thereof to better transfer heat from the combustion products to the heat exchanging plate in the first heat exchange chamber, thence through the heat exchanging plate and to the circulating room air in the second heat exchange chamber.
For the purposes of this discussion, use of the terms “providing” and “forming,” etc., includes: manufacture, subcontracting, purchase, etc. Those skilled in the art to which this application relates will appreciate that other and further additions, deletions, substitutions and modifications may be made to the described embodiments.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/446,396, filed by Joseph A. Benedetti on Feb. 24, 2011, entitled “INTEGRATED HEAT EXCHANGING WOOD STOVE FIRE BOX TOP,” commonly assigned with this application and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61446396 | Feb 2011 | US |