This invention relates to plates (referred to herein as “heave” plates or “damping” plates) attached to the submerged end of a spar (or column), where the plates are shaped to increase the effective mass of the spar and to affect the phase relationship of vertical motion of the spar.
There are many applications where it is desirable to control the (up down) movement of an element placed in a body of water and subjected to the forces of the waves.
For example, in the case of wave energy converters (WECs), the system includes a buoy having a relatively flat float (hereinafter the “float”) and an elongated float (hereinafter the “spar”) which, when placed in a body of water, can move relative to each other in response to the motion of the waves. The WEC includes a power take off device (PTO) responsive to the relative motion between the spar and the float for producing suitable forms of energy, mechanical and/or electrical. In the case of the WEC, to improve the efficiency of power production, it is desired that the flat float move up and down generally in phase with the waves in the body of water in which the WEC is placed. However, it is desired that the spar move out of phase with respect to the waves and the float. This may be effectuated by attaching a heave (damping) plate to the submerged portion of the spar.
The heave plate is disposed in a plane which is generally transverse (perpendicular) to the up or down direction of motion of the spar for increasing the effective mass of the spar. A plate so attached affects the dynamic behavior of the spar by increasing the effective mass and the viscous drag in the heave (vertical) direction. In general, the benefit of attaching one, or more, heave plates is to allow for a shorter vertical spar that will still have a heave natural period outside of the prevailing wave period for the operating conditions (so that the spar will not respond to the prevailing wave conditions) and to increase the viscous damping of the spar in order to decrease near-resonance responses. The heave plates that have been employed in the past include thin square, circular, or rectangular plates that are either solid or have holes punched in them.
The added mass that the heave plates contribute is due to the fact that the acceleration or deceleration of the plate requires movement of some volume of fluid around the plate as it moves. The volume of fluid that the plate will move is proportional to the equivalent volume of the plate times some (experimentally determined) factor.
The equivalent volume of the plate depends upon the geometry of the plate, however the general rule is that the equivalent volume is the area of the plate multiplied by a linear dimension of the plate; e.g., the radius of a circular plate, the side length of a square plate; the width of a rectangular plate, etc. By way of example, the equivalent volume of a square plate of width and length d is a cube (d3), that of a circular plate of radius r is a sphere (4/3πr3), and that of a rectangular plate of length L and width d is a cuboid (3-D rectangle) by using the shorter dimension, d, as the 3rd multiplier (Ld2). In general heave plates are made thin to save on cost and weight; however a heave plate may be made to have an appreciable thickness to provide needed structural strength, or to use as a buoyancy chamber. If the heave plate is made thick, then the added mass may be modeled in a similar fashion to that described above. Also, although not discussed, the volume of fluid moved is also a function of the frequency with which the plate is moving.
The accelerated flow inertia force caused by the heave plate is the added mass of the system (the density of water times the equivalent volume times the experimental factor) times the acceleration of the system, or:
FInterial=(CmVequivalentρ)a=AddedMass*a, Equation 1
where Cm is the experimentally determined factor Vequivalent is the equivalent volume defined above, p is the density of water, and a is the acceleration. Note that the added mass term, with units of mass, is the combination of the variable inside of the parenthesis.
In general, heave plates are placed between one length scale (d if a square or rectangle, r if a circle) below the surface of the water and one length scale above the ocean floor so that the full equivalent volume of fluid may be captured. For optimal heave plate operation, the heave plate is placed with as deep a draft as possible in order to reduce the effect of wave exciting forces.
It is advantageous to use heave plates to increase the effective mass (or hydrodynamic inertia) of a spar and to move the natural period of the spar outside of prevailing wave conditions. As shown in
The use of heave plates provides the advantages discussed above. However, in accordance with the prior art, the only known way to increase the effective mass of a spar via the use of heave (damping) plates (in order to increase the heave natural resonance period of the spar) is to increase the length scale (d, r, or L as mentioned above) of the heave plates (which is equivalent to increasing the surface area of the heave plates) or to increase the number of plates present. An increase in length scale can be hard to achieve when considerations of harbor depth, structural strength along the dimension of increase, and weight of the plate are taken into account. An increase in the number of plates requires the use of a longer supporting spar structure.
Thus, although the use of known heave plates presents significant advantages, it is desirable to further increase the effective mass of a spar-like structure without increasing the size of the spar and/or the length scale of the heave plate.
Applicants' invention resides, in part, in the recognition that a vertical extension (“lip”) may be formed above and below and about the top and bottom surfaces of a heave plate attached to a spar to increase the effective mass of the spar to which the heave plate is attached.
Thus, in systems embodying the invention, a damping (or “heave”) plate is attached to the submerged end of a spar like element floating in a body of water, where the spar tends to move up and down vertically. The damping plate, which extends generally in a horizontal plane, has a pair of oppositely facing surfaces extending transversely to the up and down motion of the spar. Vertically extending structures are mounted on the oppositely facing surfaces to increase the mass of water pushed during movement of the damping plate through the water.
When disposed in a body of water, the vertically extending structures, formed along the top and bottom surfaces of the damping (“heave”) plate attached to a spar, cause an increase in the effective mass, or hydrodynamic inertia, of the damping (heave) plate. The increase in effective mass is a function of the volume enclosed by the surface area of the plate and the height of the vertical structures enclosing the damping plate.
In general, heave plates with attached vertical structures may be placed between one length scale plus the vertical extent (d if a square or rectangle, r if a circle, plus the height of the “lip”) below the surface of the water and one length scale plus the vertical extent above the ocean floor so that the full equivalent volume of fluid may be captured. However, for optimal heave plate operation with attached vertical structures, the heave plate will generally be placed with as deep of a draft as possible in order to reduce the effect of wave exciting forces.
This invention can be applied to any system that has an oscillating component in heave (perpendicular to the sea floor) where it is desired to increase the hydrodynamic inertia of the system in order to cause a larger natural resonance period in heave.
The invention is applicable for use in wave energy converters (WECs) which include a float and a spar which, when placed in a body of water, can move relative to each other in response to the motion of the waves. The WEC may be of the type described and claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,140,180 assigned to the assignee of the present application and whose teachings are incorporated herein by reference. Although it should be understood that the invention is applicable to any apparatus having a spar to which a heave plate is attached to control the movement of the spar. This application also incorporates the teachings, as though fully set forth herein, of a patent application Ser. No. 11/796,852 titled Improved Wave Energy Converter (WEC) with Heave Plates being filed simultaneously with this application and assigned to the same assignee as this application.
The WECs include a power take off device (PTO) responsive to the relative motion between the spar and the float for producing suitable forms of energy, mechanical and/or electrical. The float is intended to move in phase with the waves and the spar is an elongated float which is intended to move out of phase relative to the waves and float. A heave plate with “lips” may be attached to the spar to increase the effective mass of the spar and increase the power conversion efficiency of the system.
This invention is also applicable, but not limited, to offshore platforms such as, for example, truss spar oil platforms, and cell spar oil platforms. In these applications, spar-like structures are used to stabilize very large floating off-shore oil platforms and to dampen their motion, particularly in the up and down direction.
Heave plates with vertical structures formed along the top and bottom surfaces of the heave plate may be attached to the spar-like structures to increase the effective mass of the spar-like structure without the need to increase the size of the spar and/or the length scale of the heave plate.
The heave plates may take any suitable shape (e.g., circular, elliptical, rectangular) best suited for the system in which it is being used.
The shape of the vertical structures formed on and around the damping plates may take many different forms, which include, but are not limited to: a cube structure, a straight thin structure, a cuboid structure (rectangular cross section), straight thin pieces arranged at an angle from the plate (so that there is a vertical extent), etc.
The vertical structures may be formed so as to be symmetrically disposed above and below the opposing surfaces of the damping plate. However, the vertical structures extending on one surface need not be the same as those on the opposite surface.
In the accompanying drawings, which are generally not drawn to scale, like reference characters denote like components; and
Referring to
For the example of
where: D is the diameter of the plate and h is the total lip height. Equation 2 indicates that the entrained water volume for a circular plate with vertical structures S1, S2 is that of a sphere of water created by the movement of a plain plate (i.e. without vertical structures) plus that of a cylinder of water being formed by the area of the plate and the height of the vertical structures (lips). As noted in connection with equation 1, above, an experimentally determined factor multiplied by the above value along with the density of water provides an added mass value.
To move an equivalent volume of water when the lip height is zero (as in the prior art) the diameter of a circular plate would have to increase by
in order to obtain the same added mass as the plate augmented with vertical members.
The height (e.g., h/2) of the vertical structures may be varied over a wide range. Some of the considerations that must be taken into account when determining the optimal lip height include (but are not limited to): (a) the interaction area of vertical members when oscillating surge or sway (objects in the ocean not only move up and down but are also subjected to a transverse force because the water particles in waves move in an elliptical fashion, thus yielding a forces in the “x” direction (surge) and the “y” direction (sway)), (b) interaction area of vertical members with current; that is, there may be sub-surface current(s) transverse to the lip height which would tend to push the structure in an undesired and/or uncontrolled manner, and (c) weight of system.
Thus, depending on the various factors, the ratio of the height of the vertical structures to the length scale of the heave plate, (h/D), may generally vary between 0.01 and 1.
In the example above the vertical members were assumed to be placed symmetrically above and below the plate resulting in like responses for up and down movement. However, the vertical structures (members) or the heave plate itself, may be designed to provide a different response when being lifted (raised) as compared to when it is being driven down (lowered). This may be achieved by making the vertical structures above the heave plate different than those formed below the heave plate. Alternatively, the heave plate may be shaped so that there is vertical extent preferential to one direction. For example, in a floating system that comes close to the sea floor in storm conditions, a longer vertical extent towards the sea floor is used so that as the floating body moves towards the sea floor the added mass and drag are greater hence helping to impede the motion.
As already noted the heave plate provides drag (resistance) and added mass characteristics (inertia) important in the operation of the WEC. Hence, while the float is designed to respond to the higher frequency motion of the waves, the heave plate gives the spar characteristics to respond to much lower frequency (longer period) wave motions and thus increases the differential in the relative motion between the spar and float.
In
The use of a submerged heave plate on a WEC presents a challenge to/in the structural design. The shape of the heave plate form is essentially a large radius cantilevered platter (if the spar is centrally located), with a very large mass spread over its entire area, resulting in a very large moment at the attachment point to the spar and which will translate through the lower spar up to the upper spar.
A series of rods, cables, beams, or pipes shown in
Using a heave plate on a WEC (attaching a heave plate to a spar as shown and taught herein) results in increased power conversion efficiency for the WEC. For a model WEC with a centrally oriented cylindrical spar of, for example, a diameter of 1.75 m and draft of 25 m the heave natural resonance period of the spar is 10.5 sec. Hence, if an 11 sec wave is run past the spar that does not have a heave plate or a heave plate with “lips”, the spar will respond to this wave practically in phase with the wave. Hence if a float were attached to the plain spar, then both objects would be moving practically in phase with the wave and in phase with each other, hence producing little to no relative motion and hence little to no power.
In sharp contrast, if a flat, circular heave plate of diameter 10 m is added to the spar, a heave natural resonance period of 31.7 sec is achieved. In addition, if vertical lip's are then added above and below the heave plate, each of height 0.8 m, then the heave natural resonance period is further increased to 34.7 sec. The larger the heave natural resonance period, the longer it will take for the object (spar, spar with heave plate, spar with heave plate with lips) to respond to the wave (hence the greater the phase lag between the object and the wave). Thus, if a float, that is designed to move practically in phase with the waves, is attached to a spar with a large heave natural resonance period the relative motion between the two can be dramatically increased. This results in a significant increase in power production by the PTO.
The use of heave plates with other floating objects, particularly oil platforms, is now discussed.
The addition of vertical structures (lips) to the heave plate used in WECs to control the up down movement of the spar provides the advantages discussed above. Applicants recognized that forming a heave plate with lips is also applicable for applications where the heave plate is attached to the submerged portion of a spar which is fixedly attached to a platform, where the heave plates are used to increase the mass of the spar and ensure that the spar and the platform to which it is attached have limited up down motion.
As noted above,
The stability of the platforms is improved by the addition of lips to the heave plates as shown in
In
The lips can have different shapes as shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to the configuration shown in
Referring to
Referring to
It should be appreciated that, as shown herein, the invention includes a damping plate attached to the submerged end of a spar-like element floating in a liquid. This makes the invention also applicable in industrial mixing applications. The spar like element may be driven up and down by an externally applied force. The damping plate has a pair of oppositely facing surfaces extending transversely to the vertical direction of the movement of the spar-like element and the vertical structures are mounted on the oppositely facing surfaces for increasing the effective mass of liquid pushed during movement of the damping plate through the liquid.
This invention claims priority from provisional application Ser. No. 60/796,388 filed May 1, 2006 for Wave Energy Converter (WEC) with Heave Plates whose contents are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3167793 | Keats | Feb 1965 | A |
3191388 | Ludwig | Jun 1965 | A |
4277690 | Noren | Jul 1981 | A |
4447740 | Heck | May 1984 | A |
5471098 | Asay | Nov 1995 | A |
5609442 | Horton | Mar 1997 | A |
5722797 | Horton, III | Mar 1998 | A |
5842838 | Berg | Dec 1998 | A |
6102625 | Olsen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6731018 | Grinsted et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6772592 | Gerber et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6831374 | Seki | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6849963 | Grinsted et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6933623 | Carroll et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7033115 | Huang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7140180 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7141888 | Sabol et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7199481 | Hirsch | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7264420 | Chang | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7323790 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20010000718 | Blevins et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20030206772 | Horne et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040028479 | Horton, III | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040061338 | Woodbridge | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040141812 | Busso | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040163389 | Gerber et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040190999 | Wybro et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040208707 | Huang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040253059 | Horton, III | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258484 | Haun | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050099010 | Hirsch | May 2005 | A1 |
20050237775 | Sabol et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050281624 | Basak et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060120809 | Ingram et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060191461 | Chow | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070046027 | Stewart et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070059105 | Chang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080014024 | Lokken et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080309088 | Agamloh et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070286683 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60796388 | May 2006 | US |